ISLAMIC INTELLIGENCE
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Israel’s False Flag Operation Against Iran
By Stephen Sniegoski,
This article in “Foreign Policy” describes
one of Israel’s recent “false flag” operations. A series of CIA memos
describes how Israeli Mossad agents posed as American spies to recruit
members of the terrorist organization Jundallah to fight their covert
war against Iran. This type of “false flag” operation was not directed
against the US, but it could provide a model to bring about a US/Iran
war. If Iranians could be made to think that the US was behind extreme
terrorist attacks in their country, this could force the Iranian
government to take belligerent action against the US that would mean
war. The Iranian government could not afford to look like a ”paper
tiger,” too weak to make any effort to defend its citizens.
One cannot absolve America’s government leaders of the
responsibility for these Israeli actions. That the US government
fails to do anything significant to stop such “false flag” operations
makes it appear that it actually supports them. And it certainly could
appear this way to the Iranians. In fact, since Israel is allegedly
America’s close ally, the US should demand that it stop any type of
terrorism against Iran, since such activity makes it appear that it has,
at the very least, America’s tacit support. And Israel’s rejection
of such a demand should have serious consequences, such as the
termination of US military collaboration.
Ofcourse, for political reasons US government leaders are too fearful to take such a step against Israel, even though allowing Israeli terrorist attacks against Iran to continue could bring the US into a war. Unfortunately, most American politicians are far more concerned about the harm that an angry Israel lobby could do to them, than the harm that an unnecessary war could do to the United States and the rest of the world.
Interesting comments about this article are made at the Mondoweiss
website, especially those that relate to the power of the Israel lobby: http://mondoweiss.net/2012/01/bombshell-israeli-intelligence-posed-as-cia-to -recruit-terror-group-for-covert-war-on-iran.html
False Flag
A series of CIA memos describes how Israeli Mossad agents posed as American spies to recruit members of the terrorist organization Jundallah to fight their covert war against Iran.
by Mark Perry
Buried deep in the archives of America’s intelligence services are a
series of memos, written during the last years of President George W.
Bush’s administration, that describe how Israeli Mossad officers
recruited operatives belonging to the terrorist group Jundallah by
passing themselves off as American agents. According to two U.S.
intelligence officials, the Israelis, flush with American dollars and
toting U.S. passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah
operatives — what is commonly referred to as a “false flag” operation.
The memos, as described by the sources, one of whom has read them and
another who is intimately familiar with the case, investigated and
debunked reports from 2007 and 2008 accusing the CIA, at the direction
of the White House, of covertly supporting Jundallah — a Pakistan-based
Sunni extremist organization. Jundallah, according to the U.S. government and published reports, is responsible for assassinating Iranian government officials and killing Iranian women and children.
But while the memos show that the United States had barred even the
most incidental contact with Jundallah, according to both intelligence
officers, the same was not true for Israel’s Mossad. The memos also
detail CIA field reports saying that Israel’s recruiting activities
occurred under the nose of U.S. intelligence officers, most notably in
London, the capital of one of Israel’s ostensible allies, where Mossad
officers posing as CIA operatives met with Jundallah officials.
The officials did not know whether the Israeli program to recruit and
use Jundallah is ongoing. Nevertheless, they were stunned by the
brazenness of the Mossad’s efforts.
“It’s amazing what the Israelis thought they could get away with,”
the intelligence officer said. “Their recruitment activities were nearly
in the open. They apparently didn’t give a damn what we thought.”
Interviews with six currently serving or recently retired intelligence officers over the last 18 months have helped to fill in the blanks of the Israeli false-flag operation. In addition to the two currently serving U.S. intelligence officers, the existence of the Israeli false-flag operation was confirmed to me by four retired intelligence officers who have served in the CIA or have monitored Israeli intelligence operations from senior positions inside the U.S. government.
The CIA and the White House were both asked for comment on this
story. By the time this story went to press, they had not responded. The
Israeli intelligence services — the Mossad — were also contacted, in
writing and by telephone, but failed to respond. As a policy, Israel
does not confirm or deny its involvement in intelligence operations.
There is no denying that there is a covert, bloody, and ongoing
campaign aimed at stopping Iran’s nuclear program, though no evidence
has emerged connecting recent acts of sabotage and killings inside Iran
to Jundallah. Many reports have cited Israel as the architect of this
covert campaign, which claimed its latest victim on Jan. 11 when a
motorcyclist in Tehran slipped
a magnetic explosive device under the car of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, a
young Iranian nuclear scientist. The explosion killed Roshan, making him
the fourth scientist assassinated in the past two years. The United
States adamantly denies it is behind these killings.
According to one retired CIA officer, information about the
false-flag operation was reported up the U.S. intelligence chain of
command. It reached CIA Director of Operations Stephen Kappes, his
deputy Michael Sulick, and the head of the Counterintelligence Center.
All three of these officials are now retired. The Counterintelligence
Center, according to its website, is tasked with investigating “threats posed by foreign intelligence services.”
The report then made its way to the White House, according to the
currently serving U.S. intelligence officer. The officer said that Bush
“went absolutely ballistic” when briefed on its contents.
“The report sparked White House concerns that Israel’s program was
putting Americans at risk,” the intelligence officer told me. “There’s
no question that the U.S. has cooperated with Israel in
intelligence-gathering operations against the Iranians, but this was
different. No matter what anyone thinks, we’re not in the business of
assassinating Iranian officials or killing Iranian civilians.”
Israel’s relationship with Jundallah continued to roil the Bush
administration until the day it left office, this same intelligence
officer noted. Israel’s activities jeopardized the administration’s
fragile relationship with Pakistan, which was coming under intense
pressure from Iran to crack down on Jundallah. It also undermined U.S.
claims that it would never fight terror with terror, and invited attacks
in kind on U.S. personnel.
“It’s easy to understand why Bush was so angry,” a former
intelligence officer said. “After all, it’s hard to engage with a
foreign government if they’re convinced you’re killing their people.
Once you start doing that, they feel they can do the same.”
A senior administration official vowed to “take the gloves off” with
Israel, according to a U.S. intelligence officer. But the United States
did nothing — a result that the officer attributed to “political and
bureaucratic inertia.”
“In the end,” the officer noted, “it was just easier to do nothing
than to, you know, rock the boat.” Even so, at least for a short time,
this same officer noted, the Mossad operation sparked a divisive debate
among Bush’s national security team, pitting those who wondered “just
whose side these guys [in Israel] are on” against those who argued that
“the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
The debate over Jundallah was resolved only after Bush left office
when, within his first weeks as president, Barack Obama drastically
scaled back joint U.S.-Israel intelligence programs targeting Iran,
according to multiple serving and retired officers.
The decision was controversial inside the CIA, where officials were
forced to shut down “some key intelligence-gathering operations,” a
recently retired CIA officer confirmed. This action was followed in
November 2010 by the State Department’s addition
of Jundallah to its list of foreign terrorist organizations — a
decision that one former CIA officer called “an absolute no-brainer.”
Since Obama’s initial order, U.S. intelligence services have received
clearance to cooperate with Israel on a number of classified
intelligence-gathering operations focused on Iran’s nuclear program,
according to a currently serving officer. These operations are highly
technical in nature and do not involve covert actions targeting Iran’s
infrastructure or political or military leadership.
“We don’t do bang and boom,” a recently retired intelligence officer said. “And we don’t do political assassinations.”
Israel regularly proposes conducting covert operations targeting
Iranians, but is just as regularly shut down, according to retired and
current intelligence officers. “They come into the room and spread out
their plans, and we just shake our heads,” one highly placed
intelligence source said, “and we say to them — ‘Don’t even go there.
The answer is no.’”
Unlike the Mujahedin-e Khalq, the controversial exiled Iranian
terrorist group that seeks the overthrow of the Tehran regime and is
supported by former leading U.S. policymakers, Jundallah is relatively
unknown — but just as violent. In May 2009, a Jundallah suicide bomber
blew himself up inside a mosque in Zahedan, the capital of Iran’s
southeastern Sistan-Baluchistan province bordering Pakistan, during a
Shiite religious festival. The bombing killed 25 Iranians and wounded
scores of others.
The attack enraged Tehran, which traced the perpetrators to a cell operating in Pakistan. The Iranian government notified
the Pakistanis of the Jundallah threat and urged them to break up the
movement’s bases along the Iranian-Pakistani border. The Pakistanis
reacted sluggishly in the border areas, feeding Tehran’s suspicions that
Jundallah was protected by Pakistan’s intelligence services.
The 2009 attack was just one in a long line of terrorist attacks attributed to the organization. In August 2007, Jundallah kidnapped 21 Iranian truck drivers. In December 2008, it captured and executed
16 Iranian border guards — the gruesome killings were filmed, in a
stark echo of the decapitation of American businessman Nick Berg in Iraq
at the hands of al Qaeda’s Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. In July 2010,
Jundallah conducted
a twin suicide bombing in Zahedan outside a mosque, killing dozens of
people, including members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
The State Department aggressively denies that the U.S. government had
or has any ties to Jundallah. “We have repeatedly stated, and reiterate
again that the United States has not provided support to Jundallah,” a spokesman wrote in an email to the Wall Street Journal, following
Jundallah’s designation as a terrorist organization. “The United States
does not sponsor any form of terrorism. We will continue to work with
the international community to curtail support for terrorist
organizations and prevent violence against innocent civilians. We have
also encouraged other governments to take comparable actions against
Jundallah.”
A spate of stories in 2007 and 2008, including a report by ABC News and a New Yorker article,
suggested that the United States was offering covert support to
Jundallah. The issue has now returned to the spotlight with the string
of assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and has outraged serving
and retired intelligence officers who fear that Israeli operations are
endangering American lives.
“This certainly isn’t the first time this has happened, though it’s
the worst case I’ve heard of,” former Centcom chief and retired Gen. Joe
Hoar said of the Israeli operation upon being informed of it. “But
while false-flag operations are hardly new, they’re extremely dangerous.
You’re basically using your friendship with an ally for your own
purposes. Israel is playing with fire. It gets us involved in their
covert war, whether we want to be involved or not.”
The Israeli operation left a number of recently retired CIA officers
sputtering in frustration. “It’s going to be pretty hard for the U.S. to
distance itself from an Israeli attack on Iran with this kind of thing
going on,” one of them told me.
Jundallah head Abdolmalek Rigi was captured
by Iran in February 2010. Although initial reports claimed that he was
captured by the Iranians after taking a flight from Dubai to Kyrgyzstan,
a retired intelligence officer with knowledge of the incident told me
that Rigi was detained by Pakistani intelligence officers in Pakistan.
The officer said that Rigi was turned over to the Iranians after the
Pakistani government informed the United States that it planned to do
so. The United States, this officer said, did not raise objections to
the Pakistani decision.
Iran, meanwhile, has consistently claimed that Rigi was snatched from
under the eyes of the CIA, which it alleges supported him. “It doesn’t
matter,” the former intelligence officer said of Iran’s charges. “It
doesn’t matter what they say. They know the truth.”
Rigi was interrogated, tried, and convicted by the Iranians and hanged on June 20, 2010. Prior to his execution, Rigi claimed
in an interview with Iranian media — which has to be assumed was under
duress — that he had doubts about U.S. sponsorship of Jundallah. He
recounted an alleged meeting with “NATO officials” in Morocco in 2007
that raised his suspicions. “When we thought about it we came to the
conclusion that they are either Americans acting under NATO cover or
Israelis,” he said.
While many of the details of Israel’s involvement with Jundallah are
now known, many others still remain a mystery — and are likely to remain
so. The CIA memos of the incident have been “blue bordered,” meaning
that they were circulated to senior levels of the broader U.S.
intelligence community as well as senior State Department officials.
What has become crystal clear, however, is the level of anger among
senior intelligence officials about Israel’s actions. “This was stupid
and dangerous,” the intelligence official who first told me about the
operation said. “Israel is supposed to be working with us, not against
us. If they want to shed blood, it would help a lot if it was their
blood and not ours. You know, they’re supposed to be a strategic asset.
Well, guess what? There are a lot of people now, important people, who
just don’t think that’s true.”
Mark Perry is a military and political analyst and author of eight books, including Partners In Command, George Marshall and Dwight Eisenhower in War and Peace, and the recently released Talking To Terrorists.
Prof. Stephen J. Sniegoski, Ph.D. earned his
doctorate in American history,with a focus on American foreign policy,
at the University of Maryland. His focus on the neoconservative
involvement in American foreign policy antedates September 11, 2001. His
first major work on the subject, “The War on Iraq: Conceived in Israel”
was published February 10, 2003, more than a month before the American
attack. He is the author of “The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel”. Read more articles by Stephen J. Sniegoski at: http://home.comcast.net/~transparentcabal/
Also see:
Editing: Debbie Menon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/14/israels-false-flag-operation-against-iran/
Saturday, January 14, 2012
IRAN: US/Israeli “False Flag” Attack May Be Underway
by Jim Fetzer and Joshua Blakeney
Several warnings of an imminent “false flag” attack by the
Israeli-influenced United States on one of its own warships, which will
be attributed to Iran, have been reported by several reliable sources.
In recent years “false-flag” terrorism has been utilized multiple times
by US and Israeli political actors to provide pretexts for otherwise
unjustifiable, anti-Islamic military excursions. The plan is to justify
an all-out assault on Iran based upon a new fabricated “Pearl Harbor”.
Israel is the primary motivator behind the attempts to destabilize
Iran. US traditional foreign policy was one of attempting to foster
stability in the Middle East for oil markets. The Zionist impulse,
conversely, is to destabilize all potential regional hegemons and carve
the Middle East up into ethno-religious statelets. Thus, since the
fraudulent events of 9/11, we’ve seen a policy of Middle East
disintegration being pursued by Israeli-influenced American politicians.
Indeed, recently released CIA memos reveal that Mossad agents have been posing as CIA agents and conscripting anti-Iranian terrorists.
Former Israeli intelligence officer, Avi Perry, startlingly wrote in a January 9th Jerusalem Post article of a forthcoming “ ‘Pearl Harbor’ scenario,
in which Iran [will] launch…a “surprise” attack on the US navy,” giving
the US “the perfect rationalization to finish them [Iran] off.”
Tellingly, Perry chose to put the word “surprise” in quotation marks. Is
Perry telling us something?
Perry asserts: “[an] Iranian attack on an American military vessel
will serve as a justification and a pretext for a retaliatory move by
the US military against the Iranian regime.” However, Perry identifies
“a US aircraft carrier” as the likely target of this imagined Iranian
attack.
We beg to differ. There are major indications that the vessel of choice is to be the USS Vincennes. The fourth USS Vincennes
(CG-49) is a US Navy Ticonderoga class Aegis guided missile cruiser. On
July 3, 1988, the ship shot down Iran Air Flight 655 over the Persian
Gulf, killing all 290 civilian passengers on board, including 38
non-Iranians and 66 children.
This would be an ideal vessel for the staged provocation as it could
be easily sold to the world as having been Iranian retribution for the
1988 downing of Flight 655. That way the evident lack of motive for Iran
to provoke the US and Israeli military titans will be replaced by a
perceived “motive.” No one will stop to ask themselves why Iran would
thereby invite its own national annihilation.
If we were to believe the Wikipedia version of history, the Vincennes has already been scrapped. The Wikipedia article for the Vincennes states, “The Vincennes
was completely scrapped by 23 November 2011.” If that were true it
could not be used as the target of this “false-flag” attack. Yet we have
photographic and testimonial evidence suggesting otherwise.
A reliable source interviewed by one of us has brought us up to speed on the latest developments:
“We now know what that INACTIVE Ticonderoga class AEGIS missile
cruiser got towed out of here under cover of darkness for. It’ll likely
be the sacrificial lamb that starts the war with Iran….
“Why else would they move it when all the rest sit at a buoy here for months before they finally leave to be sunk?
“I told this to a former 9/11 Truth person back when that ship
got moved that it was likely to be used for a FALSE FLAG attack. Well,
we’ll soon see if I was right about this one.”
Since the ship left Puget Sound in the dead of night about two months
ago, it’s most probable location today is at the 5th Fleet Headquarters
in Bahrain for safe keeping until the time comes for its deployment.
The ship would have been refurbished and repainted and provided with
remote control capabilities.
“That is the only location in the region outside of Haifa Harbor
where she could probably be at least partially concealed by cocooning
the superstructure to make it less obvious who she is. Meanwhile, the US
Navy is compiling a list of casualties based upon deceased sailors,
very much as was the case on 9/11,” we were advised.
Former Israeli false-flag attacks, such as on the USS Liberty in 1967, and the Argentine attacks in 1992 and in 1994,
demonstrate Israel’s willingness to attack US targets, on the one hand,
and its own people, on the other. It’s highly probable that, having
shipped the Vincennes into an acceptable location, that the
Mossad, which has also been implicated in the events of 9/11, would do
the rest of the dirty work. Or the United States, which has become
Israel’s lackey, might blow up one of its own ships, which would be a
literal and a figurative sign of how low the US has sunk.
“As a Marine Corps officer, I swore an oath to preserve, protect
and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies,
foreign and domestic”, Jim Fetzer observes. “Neither I nor any
other officer I know ever swore allegiance to the State of Israel. Our
leaders are not only betraying our own Constitution but have turned our
nation into a servant of an unworthy, brutal and tyrannical master, who
couldn’t care less about the best interests of American citizens–and our
own leaders not only permit this to happen but actually promote it.”
In light of recent “deep political events”
in Iran, including the recent murder of Iranian nuclear physicist
Professor Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, it would not be surprising if the US
and Israel were to raise the ante by implementing a fraudulent trigger
incident, which may very well ignite World War III.
Because of the pervasiveness of US-Israeli deceptions, an increasing
number of public intellectuals are awakening to the prospect of these
fraudulent events BEFORE THEY HAPPEN,
as appears to be the case with this initiative. We can’t be certain
about all of this, because we are on the outside, looking in. Perhaps
the USS Vincennes actually has been scrapped. But on this point the world can rest assured: they haven’t scrapped the plan!
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is
McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth and
the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
Joshua Blakeney is a graduate student at the University of Lethbridge, member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Staff Writer at Veterans Today.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/14/iran-usisraeli-false-flag-attack-may-be-underway/
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1064852.html
ReplyDeletePublished 09:39 17.02.09
Latest update 18:17 17.02.09
HAARETZ.com
Is Israel assassinating Iran nuclear scientists?
Daily Telegraph: Israel using hitmen, double agents to disrupt project as alternative to military strike.
By Yossi Melman
Tags: Iran Israel news
Israel is assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists as part of a covert war against the Islamic Republic's illicit weapons program, the Daily Telegraph on Tuesday quoted Western intelligence analysts as saying.
The British daily said Israel's Mossad espionage agency was rumored to be behind the death of Ardeshire Hassanpour, a top nuclear scientist at Iran's Isfahan uranium plant, who died in mysterious circumstances from reported "gas poisoning" in 2007.
Other recent deaths of important figures in the procurement and enrichment process in Iran and Europe have been the result of Israeli "hits", intended to deprive Tehran of key technical skills at the head of the program, according to the analysts.
The Telegraph also quoted United States intelligence sources as saying Israel is using sabotage, front companies and double agents to disrupt the regime's illicit weapons project as an alternative to direct military strikes.
Nevertheless, it should be noted that Israel has been carrying out similar covert activities for about a decade, ever since Iran was first suspected of seeking nuclear weapons. The U.S. journalist James Risen has written recently that the CIA and the Mossad have planned together a number of sabotage operations against the Iranian program, including damaging power lines to nuclear sites in order to cause harm to computer systems and equipment.
The Telegraph also quoted Israeli officials as privately acknowledging the new U.S. administration is unlikely to sanction an air attack on Iran's nuclear installations and that President Barack Obama's offer to extend a hand of peace to Tehran puts any direct military action beyond reach for now.
As such, the reported goal of Israel's covert campaign is to delay or interrupt the Iranian research program, without engaging in a direct confrontation that could lead to a wider war.
"Disruption is designed to slow progress on the program, done in such a way that they don't realize what's happening. You are never going to stop it," a former CIA officer on Iran was quoted as saying.
"The goal is delay, delay, delay until you can come up with some other solution or approach," he added. "We certainly don't want the current Iranian government to have those weapons. It's a good policy, short of taking them out militarily, which probably carries unacceptable risks."
Reva Bhalla, a senior analyst with Stratfor, the U.S. private intelligence company with strong government security connections, was quoted by the paper as saying the strategy was to take out key people.
"With co-operation from the United States, Israeli covert operations have focused both on eliminating key human assets involved in the nuclear programme and in sabotaging the Iranian nuclear supply chain," she was quoted as saying.
"As US-Israeli relations are bound to come under strain over the Obama administration's outreach to Iran, and as the political atmosphere grows in complexity, an intensification of Israeli covert activity against Iran is likely to result."
MY OBSERVATION
In January 2012, CIA-MOSSAD is still assassinating Irannian scientists and Iran does not seem to have done much to protect those scientists.
BAFS
17 January 2012