OY VEY! SHALOM!
WAS THEIR FOOD NOT KOSHER? (BAFS)
 |
WHY WERE SO MANY 'HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS' SO WELL-FED?
By Mike King
|
AND THEIR FOOD WAS ALWAYS KOSHER! (BAFS)
We have all seen those gruesome images of emaciated
concentration camp inmates described as 'Holocaust TM survivors'.
Some of these images
were indeed those of victims of various diseases known to have
existed in the camps --especially toward the end of the war
as conditions deteriorated. Some others are straight-up fakes;
and others may even have been images of Germans who were placed in the camps and starved after the war's end. Who
can say for sure which photos represent which situation?
But
one thing we can say with absolute certainty is that there are numerous
images, from numerous internment camps,
which reveal happy and healthy inmates at the time of
liberation. Indeed, a few of them look downright chubby! In addition
to the over-abundance of other evidence to refute the Holohoax,
these images add a final finishing touch - a death blow to
the fairy tale of "extermination camps". It simply defies all logic and reason to suggest that the Germans
would fatten inmates who were destined for "zee gass chambers".
The
fact that so many inmates "survived" is more than enough evidence to
debunk
the Holohoax -- but the added fact that they were well fed and
sheltered, even toward the very end, makes the tale laughable.
The following collection of liberation photos speaks for
itself. Note the healthy bodies and some of the happy faces. Of course,
we would expect the liberated inmates of a detention camp to smile -- but not the traumatized inmates of an "extermination
camp" where mass murder and torture were said to have occurred on a daily basis. No sir. Those joyous smiles are out
of place, as are the waistlines!
LIBERATION OF AUSCHWITZ
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
LIBERATION OF DACHAU
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
LIBERATION OF BERGEN BELSEN
 |
 |
 |
LIBERATION OF BUCHENWALD
 |
 |
 |
There are plenty more
images of newly liberated
prisoners who were obviously well-fed -- even after the German
guards had fled the camps in advance of the Allied advance.
How good of these ruthless 'exterminators' to have fed their
intended victims so well -- right up until the very end. Heck
-- they even took good care of the pregnant Jewish moms!
Add another nail to the coffin of 'The Holohoax!'
It's time
for the Holohoaxers to raise the White Flag of surrender!
RELATED: HOLOHOAX 'SCHOLAR' PUTS FOOT IN MOUTH (here)
Pr Roger Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce,
Pr Robert Faurisson et Michael Hoffman II
Victor Thorn
DEANNA SPINGOLA
 |
The
Holocaust Hoax Exposed: Debunking the 20th Century’s Biggest Lie: Victor Thorn does it again with a tremendous
exposé of one of the most incredible hoaxes ever pulled off—the holocaust myth. He
documents a pack of lies, unmasking the “Anne Frank” scam, the
“Six Million Jews” fairy tale, and the “gas chambers”
myth. Were German prisoners tortured at Nuremberg and forced to sign false confessions? Was the
holocaust hox a scheme to gain a homeland and trillions in reparations for the Jews?
Thoroughly documented facts and evidence.
186 pages •
Victor Thorn • $20.00
| Three ways to order: Order online now or, if you prefer, phone us toll-free at 1-800-234-9673 (Monday-Friday, 8-5 CST), or simply send check or money order to: Power of Prophecy 1708 Patterson Rd. Austin, TX 78733 [Please include 10% for domestic shipping and handling ($5.00 Minimum) or 30% for international shipping and handling ($15.00 Minimum)] |
 |
The Ruling Elite:
A Study in Imperialism, Genocide, and Emancipation: Deanna Spingola explores real history. Was the
Civil War fought to end slavery—or was it a brutal invasion of one coutry by antoher in a bid
to set up a tyrannical regime over the United States? Was Abraham Lincoln a closet Marxist? Is
America an imperialist nation responsible for one bloody war after another, on behalf of rich
elitists and corporations? Is the CIA a criminal operation? Were native American Indians murdered
for their lands, gold, and other resources? A Shocking report!
684 pages •
Deanna Spingola • $35.00
| Three ways to order: Order online now or, if you prefer, phone us toll-free at 1-800-234-9673 (Monday-Friday, 8-5 CST), or simply send check or money order to: Power of Prophecy 1708 Patterson Rd. Austin, TX 78733 [Please include 10% for domestic shipping and handling ($5.00 Minimum) or 30% for international shipping and handling ($15.00 Minimum)] |
#1 05-03-2010 18:52:04
Roger Polacco de Ménasce
Roger Dommergue - Entretien avec le professeur
Origine du film : France
Acteurs : Roger Dommergue
Durée : 43 minutes
Date de sortie : 2009
Langue : Français
Sous-titres : English
Acteurs : Roger Dommergue
Durée : 43 minutes
Date de sortie : 2009
Langue : Français
Sous-titres : English
Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce, né en 1923, est un essayiste français. Il a produit plusieurs ouvrages ainsi que des essais sur la médecine naturelle. Lors de la Seconde Guerre Mondiale, il a combattu dans l'armée de l'air des Forces françaises libres. Il est titulaire d'un doctorat en psychopathologie.
Fils d'un non-juif et d'une juive convertie au christianisme (selon son autobiographie), il n'est donc pas circoncis. Il a néanmoins été élevé durant la majeure partie de son enfance par sa grand mére maternelle, juive, mais a totalement rejeté le judaïsme, tout comme le christianisme d'ailleurs (qu'il définit comme une religion juive). Après avoir été franc-maçon, il se revendique maintenant comme libre penseur et agnostique.
Écrits et théories
Le premier ouvrage de Roger Dommergue, J'ai mal de la terre, est largement autobiographique. Ayant été élevé par sa grand-mère Charlotte de Menasce, il raconte son enfance dans cette famille juive illustre, et les raisons qui l'ont poussé à sa prise de conscience, notamment sur ce qu'il pense être les conséquences hormonales de la circoncision au 8e jour. Il a ensuite précisé cette théorie dans Dossiers secrets du XXIe siècle. Il y revient entre autres sur les raisons officielles et sur celles non-dites de la circoncision, ainsi que sur son historique dans le monde ancien par exemple en Egypte, pour appuyer sa théorie.
Il est un défenseur et praticien de la médecine naturelle sur laquelle il a rédigé de nombreux essais ainsi que quelques ouvrages. Il a créé à Châteauroux l'Institut Dr Alexis Carrel, association visant à la diffusion de la médecine naturopathe.
Il a également produit plusieurs écrits révisionnistes (notamment Auschwitz, le silence de Heidegger) apres s'être intéressé à la question et avoir longuement correspondu avec le Professeur Robert Faurisson.
La circoncision au 8e jour
Roger Dommergue considère que les juifs sont des malades glandulaires victimes de la pratique rituelle de la circoncision au 8e jour, leur octroyant une psychologie particulière qui serait la cause majeure de diverses tragédies vécues par cette communauté. Il s'inspire des travaux du Docteur Jean Gautier qui a postulé l'antériorité fonctionnelle du système hormonal sur le système nerveux[4], et affirme que la circoncision au 8e jour perturbe la première puberté pendant laquelle le système hormonal du nouveau-né se construit. Cette opération atrophierait selon lui la glande génitale interne, causant une hypertrophie de la thyroïde, de l'hypophyse ou parfois des glandes surrénales et ayant de lourdes conséquences psychologiques. Il a tenté d'attirer, sans succès, l'attention de certains membres éminents de la communauté juive sur sa théorie, et appelle à supprimer radicalement la pratique de la circoncision au 8e jour.
Fils d'un non-juif et d'une juive convertie au christianisme (selon son autobiographie), il n'est donc pas circoncis. Il a néanmoins été élevé durant la majeure partie de son enfance par sa grand mére maternelle, juive, mais a totalement rejeté le judaïsme, tout comme le christianisme d'ailleurs (qu'il définit comme une religion juive). Après avoir été franc-maçon, il se revendique maintenant comme libre penseur et agnostique.
Écrits et théories
Le premier ouvrage de Roger Dommergue, J'ai mal de la terre, est largement autobiographique. Ayant été élevé par sa grand-mère Charlotte de Menasce, il raconte son enfance dans cette famille juive illustre, et les raisons qui l'ont poussé à sa prise de conscience, notamment sur ce qu'il pense être les conséquences hormonales de la circoncision au 8e jour. Il a ensuite précisé cette théorie dans Dossiers secrets du XXIe siècle. Il y revient entre autres sur les raisons officielles et sur celles non-dites de la circoncision, ainsi que sur son historique dans le monde ancien par exemple en Egypte, pour appuyer sa théorie.
Il est un défenseur et praticien de la médecine naturelle sur laquelle il a rédigé de nombreux essais ainsi que quelques ouvrages. Il a créé à Châteauroux l'Institut Dr Alexis Carrel, association visant à la diffusion de la médecine naturopathe.
Il a également produit plusieurs écrits révisionnistes (notamment Auschwitz, le silence de Heidegger) apres s'être intéressé à la question et avoir longuement correspondu avec le Professeur Robert Faurisson.
La circoncision au 8e jour
Roger Dommergue considère que les juifs sont des malades glandulaires victimes de la pratique rituelle de la circoncision au 8e jour, leur octroyant une psychologie particulière qui serait la cause majeure de diverses tragédies vécues par cette communauté. Il s'inspire des travaux du Docteur Jean Gautier qui a postulé l'antériorité fonctionnelle du système hormonal sur le système nerveux[4], et affirme que la circoncision au 8e jour perturbe la première puberté pendant laquelle le système hormonal du nouveau-né se construit. Cette opération atrophierait selon lui la glande génitale interne, causant une hypertrophie de la thyroïde, de l'hypophyse ou parfois des glandes surrénales et ayant de lourdes conséquences psychologiques. Il a tenté d'attirer, sans succès, l'attention de certains membres éminents de la communauté juive sur sa théorie, et appelle à supprimer radicalement la pratique de la circoncision au 8e jour.
Original :
http://www.miroriii.com/fichier/88/2217 … r-avi.html
Original with English subtitle :
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=5K4NZES4
http://www.miroriii.com/fichier/88/2217 … r-avi.html
Original with English subtitle :
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=5K4NZES4
AUDIOS
E-BOOKS
Dernière modification par SigelVictoria (05-03-2010 18:53:05)
Ce n'est pas le volume de connaissance qui importe, mais comment on l'utilise...
Roger Polacco de Ménasce
Roger Polacco de Ménasce (Roger Dommergue) est un Juif contemporain en désaccord avec la judéopathie mondialiste totalitaire.
Dans cette synthèse magistrale (livre Vérité et synthèse), basée sur une énorme et rare documentation, l'auteur aborde la " Question juive " en citant ce que des Juifs importants affirmèrent à ce propos, et en confrontant ces déclarations avec celles que des non-Juifs célèbres exprimèrent sur le même sujet.
Ce livre est certes un réquisitoire sans concession de la sempiternelle " Question juive ", mais il dépasse la critique stérile pour proposer une solution digne et naturelle.
Biographie de l'auteur
Lors de la Seconde Guerre Mondiale, il a combattu dans l'armée de l'air des Forces françaises libres. Il est titulaire d'un doctorat en psychopathologie.
Fils d'un non-juif et d'une juive convertie au christianisme (selon son autobiographie), il n'est donc pas circoncis. Il a néanmoins été élevé durant la majeure partie de son enfance par sa grand-mère maternelle, juive, mais a totalement rejeté le judaïsme, tout comme le christianisme d'ailleurs (qu'il définit comme une religion juive).
Après avoir été franc-maçon, il se revendique maintenant comme libre penseur et agnostique.
Dans cette synthèse magistrale (livre Vérité et synthèse), basée sur une énorme et rare documentation, l'auteur aborde la " Question juive " en citant ce que des Juifs importants affirmèrent à ce propos, et en confrontant ces déclarations avec celles que des non-Juifs célèbres exprimèrent sur le même sujet.
Ce livre est certes un réquisitoire sans concession de la sempiternelle " Question juive ", mais il dépasse la critique stérile pour proposer une solution digne et naturelle.
Biographie de l'auteur
Lors de la Seconde Guerre Mondiale, il a combattu dans l'armée de l'air des Forces françaises libres. Il est titulaire d'un doctorat en psychopathologie.
Fils d'un non-juif et d'une juive convertie au christianisme (selon son autobiographie), il n'est donc pas circoncis. Il a néanmoins été élevé durant la majeure partie de son enfance par sa grand-mère maternelle, juive, mais a totalement rejeté le judaïsme, tout comme le christianisme d'ailleurs (qu'il définit comme une religion juive).
Après avoir été franc-maçon, il se revendique maintenant comme libre penseur et agnostique.
Roger Dommergue considère que les juifs sont des malades glandulaires victimes de la pratique rituelle de la circoncision au 8e jour, leur octroyant une psychologie particulière qui serait la cause majeure de diverses tragédies vécues par cette communauté.
Il s'inspire des travaux du Docteur Jean Gautier qui a postulé l'antériorité fonctionnelle du système hormonal sur le système nerveux, et affirme que la circoncision au 8e jour perturbe la première puberté pendant laquelle le système hormonal du nouveau-né se construit.
Cette opération atrophierait selon lui la glande génitale interne, causant une hypertrophie de la thyroïde, de l'hypophyse ou parfois des glandes surrénales et ayant de lourdes conséquences psychologiques.
Il a tenté d'attirer, sans succès, l'attention de certains membres éminents de la communauté juive sur sa théorie, et appelle à supprimer radicalement la pratique de la circoncision au 8e jour.
Il s'inspire des travaux du Docteur Jean Gautier qui a postulé l'antériorité fonctionnelle du système hormonal sur le système nerveux, et affirme que la circoncision au 8e jour perturbe la première puberté pendant laquelle le système hormonal du nouveau-né se construit.
Cette opération atrophierait selon lui la glande génitale interne, causant une hypertrophie de la thyroïde, de l'hypophyse ou parfois des glandes surrénales et ayant de lourdes conséquences psychologiques.
Il a tenté d'attirer, sans succès, l'attention de certains membres éminents de la communauté juive sur sa théorie, et appelle à supprimer radicalement la pratique de la circoncision au 8e jour.
Vérité et synthèse : la fin des impostures
Dossiers secrets du XXIème siècle
Livre disponible aux Editions de Cassandra
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=TIR9TGSL
Histoire divers : Documents révisionnistes
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=OJ7IP7DM
J'ai mal de la Terre
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=2NMIHXNT
Dossiers secrets du XXIème siècle
Livre disponible aux Editions de Cassandra
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=TIR9TGSL
Histoire divers : Documents révisionnistes
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=OJ7IP7DM
J'ai mal de la Terre
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=2NMIHXNT
Le martyr et l'holocauste des nègres par les juifs trafiquants esclavagistes
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=C27I61XB
Le martyre et l'holocauste des nègres par les juifs trafiquants esclavagistes.
Par Roger Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce un Juif en désaccord absolu avec la judéopathie mondialiste totalitaire.
Quand la communauté noire internationale va-t-elle demander des réparations à la communauté juive pour l'immense préjudice que lui a causé le commerce juif des esclaves?
Quand dressera-t-on un monument commémoratif de ce crime de lèse-humanité à ne jamais oublier?
Parmi ceux qui accompagnaient Christophe Colomb à son arrivée en Amérique, il y avait cinq juifs:
Luis de Torres, Marco, Bernal, Alonzo de la Calle, Gabriel Sanchez.
Ils persuadèrent Colomb de capturer 500 Indiens et de les vendre comme esclaves à Séville en Espagne.
Les juifs furent chassés d'Espagne en 1492 et du Portugal en 1497. Ils s'installèrent aux Pays-Bas où ils fondèrent «la Compagnie hollandaise des Indes Occidentales» (c'est à dire l'Amérique).
En 1654, Jacob Barsimson fut le premier juif à émigrer de Hollande vers New Amsterdam (New York).
De nombreux juifs le suivirent, s'établissant sur la côte et commerçant avec les autochtones. Le premier à exercer ainsi ce métier fut Layman Lévi qui échangeait des pacotilles venues de Hollande contre de précieuses fourrures.
Les juifs Nicholas Lowe et Joseph Simon prirent alors part à ce fructueux commerce. Lowe eut l'idée de vendre du rhum aux Indiens sans méfiance. En un rien de temps la ville portuaire de Newport comptait 22 distilleries. Toutes appartenaient à des juifs.
L'intoxication alcoolique des Indiens et les massacres perpétrés en état d'ivresse sur les premiers colons européens sont dus à cette initiative juive. Newport, qu'on appela longtemps «Newport juif», devint un centre mondial du trafic d'esclaves avec l'Afrique.
Les bateaux partaient de Newport vers l'Afrique Occidentale pour y capturer leur cargaison humaine noire. 128 bateaux qui débarquaient des esclaves à Charleston appartenaient à des Juifs de Newport et de Charleston. La traite des esclaves était un monopole juif.
Le juif Aaron Lopez joua un rôle très important dans ce monstrueux commerce de 1726 à 1774, il contrôla personnellement 50% de la traite de ces êtres humains dans toutes les colonies américaines.
En 1717 la première loge maçonnique fut fondée: 90% des membres en étaient juifs. Vingt ans plus tard la loge maçonnique King David fut fondée. Elle était entièrement juive;
Accompagnons le bateau «Abigaïl» du juif Aaron Lopez jusqu'en Afrique Occidentale. En mai 1752, il fut chargé de 34.000 litres de rhum, d'une énorme quantité de fers à mettre aux mains et aux pieds des Noirs qui seraient ramenés comme esclaves.
Il y avait aussi pistolets, poudre, sabres, et une abondante camelote, comme fond de «commerce». Le capitaine Freedman était un juif.
Trois mois plus tard ils abordaient la terre d'Afrique où de nombreux agents d'établissements juifs, travaillaient pour le compte des trafiquants d'esclaves, étaient sur place. Les choses se passèrent comme avec les Indiens: les chefs des tribus noirs étaient saoulés au rhum et vendaient or, ivoire et membres de la tribu.
Souvent on menait les tribus noires à travers forêts et steppes jusqu'à la côte. Le trajet durait des semaines et beaucoup succombaient.
Les cravaches empêchaient les colonnes d'esclaves de s'arrêter. On abandonnait à une mort affreuse ceux qui ne pouvaient suivre.
Des ossements jonchaient les pistes. Arrivés à la côte, ils étaient laissés dans leurs fers, inspectés comme du bétail, et gardés par des chiens féroces.
On leur rasait le crâne et on les marquait au fer rouge, ce qui permettait de reconnaître les fugitifs.
Pères, enfants, femmes étaient séparés et de désespoir certains se noyaient en se jetant à la mer. Un voyage sans espace de trois mois était atroce.
Manque de place, scènes de folie pour
2
quelques centimètres carrés, matière fécale, fouets pour faire régner le calme. Les femmes étaient violées par l'équipage. Les nombreux morts étaient jetés par-dessus bord.
Historiens et statisticiens évaluent à 9 millions le nombre des victimes de cette horreur juive banalisée. Véritable holocauste celui-là.
11 millions ont dû survivre débarqués dans les ports américains où ils furent vendus dans de véritables marchés à bestiaux. Les bénéfices furent considérables: par exemple le voilier «la Fortuna» revint en Amérique avec 217 Noirs payés 4300 dollars et revendus 41.438 dollars.
Dans le nord des États-Unis le trafic d'esclaves était interdit. Les juifs Sandifortd Lay, Woolman, Solomon et Benezet oeuvrèrent afin qu'il devînt légal.
L'institut Carnégie de Washington possède de nombreux documents qui prouvent de façon radicale que le vaste trafic d'esclaves fut un monopole juif, sur lequel les non-juifs n'avaient aucune participation. [...]
Parmi les habitants de Newport et de Charleston nous relevons plus de cent noms juifs participant au trafic d'esclaves et à l'exploitation des distilleries, depuis Isaac Gomez à Abraham All, en passant par Felix de Souza et Aaron Lopez connus comme les rois du trafic d'esclaves...
Dans un article publié peu avant la guerre des six jours, le Professeur Shahak nous a montré que le trafic d'esclaves entre l'Europe et l'Orient, était entièrement entre les mains des juifs, autre «petit détail ...» Tous les Juifs connaissaient cet horrible trafic, ce crime monstrueux.
Pourquoi les rabbins n'ont-ils pas déféré les auteurs devant un tribunal? Pourquoi les honnêtes petits juifs n'ont-ils pas opposé une âpre résistance à ce génocide authentique, lui, et qui ne souffre pas de contradictions arithmético-techniques [comme au sujet de la révision à la basse – 10 x moins ! - du nombre des Juifs morts durant la Deuxième Guerre mondiale et l’impossibilité technique des gazages massifs d’êtres humains avec du Ziklon B !] ?
Aujourd'hui encore l'immense majorité des Noirs aux U.S.A ont le statut social d'assisté. Or cette misère de la masse noire est due aux trafiquants juifs d'esclaves de l'époque.
Les descendants des trafiquants juifs sont-ils coupables, comme on veut que les Allemands le soient d'un holocauste plus que remis en question?
Qu'en pense Bronfman, roi de l'alcool et chantre milliardaire d'un holocauste de 6 millions de juifs, alors que l'American Jewish year book, fixe à 3.300.000 le nombre de juifs présents en 1941 en Europe occupée?
Qu'ont fait les juifs en matière de réparations envers la population noire alors que l'Allemagne aura versé en 2030, la somme de 119 milliards 790 millions de marks (Multiplier par 3 pour avoir l'équivalent en francs) !!!
Que vont faire les Juifs pour entretenir la mémoire et le sentiment de culpabilité juive envers les Noirs?
Ce génocide va-t-il être rappelé sans cesse dans les médias?
Les politiciens juifs vont-ils sans cesse demander pardon aux Noirs?
Va-t-on conduire les enfants juifs sur les lieux du crime ou à des expositions?
Vont-ils faire en sorte que cet horrible génocide ne tombe jamais dans l'oubli?
Actuellement des êtres humains en provenance d'Asie, d'Amérique Latine et d'Afrique sont l'objet de trafics menés par des juifs.
Que vont faire les juifs à leur égard?
Et les Palestiniens?
Qui en dehors du professeur Shahak, va s'élever contre le martyre et l'injustice qui leur est imposé?
Où sera le monument commémoratif et quelles réparations les juifs vont-il accorder aux Russes pour ceux massacrés dans des Goulags par un régime entièrement juifs par ses idéologues, ses financiers, ses politiciens, ses administrateurs et ses bourreaux carcéraux et concentrationnaires, ou réduits à des famines volontairement agencées comme en Ukraine où il y eut six millions de morts?
Les juifs vont-ils demander pardon pour l'outrecuidance de leurs livres saints racistissimes: «Le peuple de Yahwé est le peuple distingué parmi tous les peuples.
- Israël est le peuple élu entre toutes les nations
- Le Seigneur t'a choisi pour être son peuple à lui parmi tous les peuples de la terre
- Tous les peuples que le Seigneur ton Dieu te livre, tu les dévoreras et les regarderas sans pitié
- De tes fils tu feras des princes par toute la terre - Yahwé a mis Israël à la tête de toutes les nations
3
- Le Seigneur ton Dieu exterminera les peuples chez qui tu te rends pour les déposséder de leur territoire
- Les Dieux des autres peuples sont des fantômes, des idoles et des démons.
- Aux serviteurs des idoles il faut faire une guerre d'extermination.»
Y a-t-il une phrase analogue de ce type mystico-mégalo-paranoïaco-raciste dans tout Mein Kampf? Non! Absolument pas. 30 décembre 2004 Autres sources et travaux: Who brought the slaves to America?-(Liberty Bell, decembre 1976).
Elisabeth Donnan: Documents illustrative of the History of the slave trade to America. Malcom Cowley: Adventures of an African slave. (1928).
Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein: The Story of the Jews in Newport. (Carnegie Institute of Technology-Pittsburgh).
The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews publié en 1991 par The Nation of Islam, PO Box 551, Boston MA 02119, USA. .
Auteur : Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger
Ouvrage : Dossiers secrets du XXIème siècle Vérité et synthèse La fin des impostures
Année : 19**
Lien de téléchargement : Dommergue_Polacco_de_Menasce_Roger_-_Dossiers_secrets_du_XXIeme_siecle.zip
"C'est dans la nuit des temps que l'homme a commencé à s'égarer" Lao-Tseu. "La vérité à ce niveau, ce n'est même plus de l’héroïsme, c'est une grandiose folie: vous êtes le plus marginal des marginaux", Docteur... "Cette main est celle du type humain le plus achevé au niveau de l'intelligence pure. Celui qui en est doté sera contraint au suicide ou à la folie s'il ne jouit pas d'une situation sociale suffisante ou d'une fortune personnelle, de fait de la brutalité et de la dureté de la vie. Si l'homme à la main psychique parvient à sur-vivivre il communiquera à une petite chapelle d'initiés intelligents des connaissances que l'inspiration lui aura dictées". "Le dandy,quand il ne se tue pas ou ne devient pas fou, fait carrière et pose pour la postérité" Albert Camus (L'homme révolté) "J'ai déversé sur toi toutes les forces du mal afin que tu connaisses la maternité de Dieu". " Je crois que je comprends bien vos difficultés. je souhaite que vous puissiez les dépasser sans les oublier" ( Albert Camus - lettre à l'auteur) " L'homme qu i a contact avec le surnaturel est par essence ROI.car il est la présence dans l a société sous forme d'infiniment petit d'un ORDRE TRANSCENDANT AU SOCIAL". ( Simone Weil ) ...
3028 lectures
http://www.youtube.com/user/rogerdommergue
Michael Anthony Hoffman II, (born 1954, New York), is an American historian and writer. Hoffman has been characterised [1]as a conspiracy theorist and Holocaust denier; he has questioned the accuracy and legitimacy of the latter term.
Hoffman is the managing editor of the newsletter Revisionist History, and describes himself as a "heretical writer." He is little known to mainstream audiences, but has produced many books and articles.
Hoffman also argues that the gnosis of this ruling cabal are slowly being revealed through movies such as They Live and The Matrix and other forms of symbolic and subliminal communication which Hoffman terms twilight language.[3]
Hoffman also contends that the British Empire might have achieved its power via a pact John Dee made with Kabbalistic Judaism [5]. He has characterized Jews as "Khazars" and "Edomite parasites" and Ashkenazi (Central and Eastern European Jews) as "Ash-ken-nazi". [6]
Hoffman differs from other Holocaust deniers in believing that Hitler did indeed have as a goal, at least philosophically, the extermination (ausrottung) of the Jewish people, but Hoffman also argues that the primary means of extermination -- the execution gas chambers of Auschwitz -- have not been scientifically proved to have existed or been operable, and that "eyewitness" testimony failed under cross-examination at the 1985 "Great Holocaust Trial" of Ernst Zündel in Toronto.
Hoffman points to German eyewitnesses such as Thies Christophersen who maintained there were no execution gas chambers in Auschwitz. Hoffman has been influenced by the research of Charles D. Provan, Carlo Mattogno, Germar Rudolf [8] and Brian Renk.
Hoffman rejects the label "Holocaust denier," and argues[9] that the label is applied unfairly, and with an emotional rather than empirical basis, to those who research controversial issues related to WWII and Judaism -- according to Hoffman, applying the same partisan logic, those who doubt the Roman Catholic dogma of the Immaculate Conception would be stigmatized by journalists and academics as "Immaculate Conception deniers."
by Jonathan Azaziah
Prelude: In the wake of my two-part deconstruction of “mask of Zion” wearer Uri Avnery and the grave intellectual and ideological problems within the International Palestine Solidarity Movement, I was accused of “anti-Semitism” by a well-known voice within the blogosphere who rushed to Avnery’s defense. While this person’s reply to my vastly-documented work did not warrant such a response, I diligently composed this series to demolish and banish any similar accusations that are sure to arise in the future. In this first part, we delve into the true nature and wider historical context of Zionism, what it means to be a “Jewish Israeli” and the always-controversial realm of Holocaust® revisionism....
Like the moon rising upon the completion of sunset, it can be described as nothing other than inevitable that as soon as one raises one’s voice above a whisper in regards to the twisted, cancerous and supremacist ideology that guides the usurping Zionist entity occupying Palestine and the far-reaching global Jewish-Zionist Lobby that protects it from even the slightest criticism, one will be hysterically demonized, slandered, libeled, smeared and browbeaten with the label of “anti-Semitism.” If one criticizes any person of Jewish origin who expresses ‘support’ for Palestine but who also harbors blatant Zionist sympathies and actively attempts to impose this Zionism on others to delay, deflect and outright silence discussion on key matters relevant to full Palestinian liberation, one will once again face the same hysteria reignited like a supremacist conflagration and receive the chastisement of “anti-Semitism.” This inevitable calumny has now found its way to my person.
On February 2nd, 2012, I completed and published a two-part series deconstructing and exposing the ‘Israeli’ activist for ‘peace,’ Uri Avnery (real name: Helmut Ostermann), a highly-regarded figure in the Palestine Solidarity Movement. The first part secondarily dealt with Avnery’s expertly-masked supremacism and chiefly, his elephantine lies against Islamic Resistance movements, which were smashed to pieces as perversions of history (1). The second, more controversial part of the series examined and documented Avnery’s support for the Zionist entity’s current top stooge in the United States, President Barack Obama, as well as his glowing approval for NATO’s genocidal aggression against Libya and his obscene call for more genocide in Syria. It also delved deeply into the reasons behind the degeneration of the Solidarity Movement and the relation of persons like Avnery to this deterioration (2). For this, I was vitriolically accused of “anti-Semitism” by one Steve Amsel, operator of the website ‘Desert Peace,’ in a short, slanderous op-ed that he penned entitled, “In Defense Of Uri Avnery (3).”
In his piece, Amsel did not refute a single point of
either part of the series, showing that his allegiance is not to the
truth of the matter but to the protection of tribal interests. Throwing
scholarship and academic debate to the wayside, he instead chose to
engage in an irrational, distorted and ad hominem tirade against my
character due to him being rather perturbed with the fact that Uri
Avnery’s murderous past and overt adherence to Zionism were brutally and
unforgivingly exposed in my series. Amsel writes, “The lies, the quotes
out of context by Avnery found throughout the essay do the same
{“discredit the entire pro Palestinian Movement”},” and also, “I am
afraid that Azaziah falls into the trap set by the Zionists themselves
in attempting to discredit Avnery simply because he is a Jewish
Israeli.” How woeful and obscene. The luminously obvious reason as to
why Amsel couldn’t display examples of lies or misquotes is because such
examples don’t exist; except maybe in Amsel’s dreams. There wasn’t a
single “lie” uttered about Avnery throughout the piece, nor was there a
single quote taken out of context; every Avnery quote and every Avnery
position were taken directly from his own writings.
The idea of falling “into the trap set by the Zionists themselves” by unveiling the true face of a Zionist only could have originated in a purgatorial, Orwellian realm located between the laughable and the demented. I would sincerely like someone to explain to me, preferably in the most vivid way possible, how exposing Zionists... benefits Zionists. This asininity will be revisited in the conclusion. The title “Jewish Israeli” is one that deserves a brief but thorough examination; what does it mean, really, to be a “Jewish Israeli?”
Since “Israeli” is a fabricated identity, one based on the theft of Palestinian food like falafel, hummus, olive oil and maftoul as well as Palestinian folklore and culture (4), and “Israel” is a fabricated entity, one based on 131 years of illegal, immoral Jewish colonization of Palestine and the destruction of more than 500 Palestinian villages during the (still-ongoing) Nakba (5), to be a “Jewish Israeli” is to be a colonizer and a destroyer of Palestine. To be a “Jewish Israeli” is to have racial and colonial privileges over the indigenous Palestinian people; at least 30 racist, supremacist laws within “Israel” solidify and uphold these privileges (6). Several of these laws represent a system in which all persons of Jewish heritage on the planet have the “right” to become “Israeli” while all Palestinians, refugees and current inhabitants of Palestine, are systematically denied the most basic human rights (7). To be a “Jewish Israeli” is to serve in the Zionist occupation army and massacre Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese, Egyptians, et al. The essence of the “Jewish Israeli” identity is the identity of an oppressor, of a murderer, and irregardless of whatever ‘mask of Zion’ that Zionists attempt to place on it, this is all that it is.
Despite this irrefutableness and the undeniable fact
that Uri Avnery embodies these oppressive qualities to the letter, I did
not “attack” or “discredit” him “simply because he is a Jewish Israeli”
and this suggestion is particularly intellectually infantile. I
“attacked” and “discredited” Avnery because he scripted the most egregious fallacies against the Islamic Resistance movements of the region (1). I “attacked” and “discredited” Avnery because he
jovially and fully supported the Zionist-engineered annihilation of
Libya at the hands of NATO and wants to see the same carnage repeated in
Syria (8). I “attacked” and “discredited” Avnery because he murdered Palestinian women and children during his admitted stint as an Irgun terrorist (9). I “attacked” and “discredited” Avnery because he admittedly partook in the ethnic cleansing of Palestine as an occupation terrorist of the Givati Brigades (10).
Persons like Avnery, excuse me, terrorists like Avnery, have no
business with the International Palestine Solidarity Movement; the only
business that they truly have is with the four walls of the prison cell
that they should be thrown in for violating humanity in the most
malevolent manner imaginable.
Amsel also brazenly demands, “After a long lifetime in the struggle, both as an activist and a pro Palestinian voice in the Israeli Knesset, Avnery deserves honour, not discredit.” What “struggle” did Uri Avnery participate in? The Zionists’ “struggle” to butcher, rape, pillage, ethnically cleanse, murder and demolish their way to a “state” built upon the bodies of the aboriginals? What a monstrous insult to the Palestinian people who have been waging a real struggle against Zionism since the first criminal Jewish colonists arrived in their homeland in 1881 (5).
If one wants to see what the veritable definition of what struggle is, look no further than Palestinian activist and political prisoner Khader Adnan, who remarkably and courageously went on hunger strike for 66 days, beginning on December 18th, 2011, one day after Zionist occupation authorities kidnaped
him from his Jenin home at 3:30 a.m. then locked him away in
‘administrative detention,’ the Orwellian “Israeli” phrase for illegal
imprisonment without charge (11). There is no Zionist, including
Avnery, that could ever walk a millisecond in Khader Adnan’s shoes;
bravery is a characteristic that is incompatible with their way of
thinking. Avnery is to struggle what Jewish pornography kingpin Al
Goldstein is to decency or what twisted Zionist
war criminal Henry Kissinger, developer of the National Security Study
Memo (NSSM 2000) to weaponize food and depopulate the “Lesser Developed
Countries {read: Arabs, Africans, Asians; read further: goyim} (12),” is to humanity.
And “pro Palestinian?” How does bombing and ethnically cleansing Palestinians make one “pro Palestinian?” How does recognizing the entity that usurped Palestinians of their land and giving them a demilitarized ghetto-prison “state” for a consolation prize make one “pro Palestinian?” More Zionist newspeak; more Zionist doublethink. It is astonishing that Amsel would suggest that a terrorist and killer of Palestinians deserves “honor.” Would he suggest that Sharon and Peres, Barak and Olmert also deserve “honor?” It is equally astonishing that he invokes the “Israeli” Knesset as if it were an institution of justice, human rights and dignity, and serving in this institution leads to one embodying these qualities. It is nothing of the sort. The Knesset represents the institutionalized racism of Zionism, it is the structural personification of the Zionist occupation. It is the entity that passed the Orwellian “Boycott Bill,” which punishes any ‘citizen’ of “Israel” who boycotts the Zionist regime (13). And it is the entity that passed the “Nakba Law,” which criminalizes the remembrance and exposé of the Zionist regime’s ethnic cleansing of Palestine (14).
The exceptionally limited number of Palestinians who serve in the Knesset are routinely incited against, illegally arrested, groundlessly prosecuted and subjected to the most degrading anti-Arab racism (15). But this is Zionism that we are discussing here, and with it inherently comes maniacal violence. MK Talab al-Sana, chief of the Arab Democratic Party in “Israel,” has been threatened with death by letter (16). MK Ahmed Tibi has been threatened with death via Facebook (17). Survivor of the Freedom Flotilla Massacre, the gallant and eloquent MK Haneen Zoabi, has been threatened with death so many times (well over 50) that she told her secretary to stop informing her of it (18). “Israel” is not a normal “state,” and thus, its “state” institutions should not be treated with normalcy. The Knesset is an organ of Zionist oppression and it has absolutely no authority, legitimacy or jurisdiction over any part of Palestine. It, like the “Israeli” entity and identity, is a projection of the psychosis known as Jewish supremacism and it, like the “Israeli” entity and identity, must be boycotted, dismantled and abolished. Permanently.
To close his slanderous invective, Amsel presents a piece of Avnery’s entitled, “Reluctant Prophet,” to, evidently, show “what type of man he {Avnery} is through his description of another great Jewish (Israeli) person.” But of course! One “Israeli” praising another “Israeli,” occupier patting occupier on the back, all in the name of solidarity with Palestine, yes? The “Jewish Israeli person” in question is none other than Yeshayahu Leibowitz, the famed “Israeli” scholar and thinker who former “Israeli” President, Air Force Commander, Defense Minister and Irgun terrorist Ezar Weizman described as, “one of the greatest figures in the life of the Jewish people and the State of Israel in recent generations,” and also, “a spiritual conscience for many in Israel.” Leibowitz was a devout Orthodox Jew and arch Zionist who repeated lies about Hamas quite similar to those repeated by Avnery in his now-disgraced “Shukran, Israel” piece. Leibowitz famously stated after al-Naksa that, “The occupation of the territories would turn Israel into an agent of repression, whose citizens would be employed in growing numbers to police the Palestinians (19).” This is typical of the delusion that is Zionist romanticism.
Zionist romantics like Avnery and Leibowitz would like
the world to believe that there is dichotomy between the right and left
wings of Zionism, that there is a more benevolent, universalist,
innocent Zionism on the “left” side of the aisle. They would like to
dupe the world into thinking that the Zionist “left” transcends racism
and militarism, that the Zionist “left” is intent on establishing
“peace.” Most contemptibly, they would also like to fool the world into
accepting the Zionist occupation of Palestine as an “obstacle” that has
only existed since 1967. These are lies; grotesque, misleading and
unconstructive. Zionism has no right wing and it has no left wing, this
is a distraction birthed by the Zionist media to humanize it and hide
the animalistic atrocities it has committed against the indigenous.
Zionism was, is and always will be a project of supremacist terror and
plunder. This project is now a global empire of criminality and it all
began with the theft of Palestine. Whatever petty political squabbles
may occur between Jewish usurpers in “Israel,” all Zionist parties are
committed to the same goal: destruction of the Arab peoples for the sake
of creating ‘Greater Israel.’
Lest we forget, just so there isn’t an ounce of discrepancy on this matter of the intrinsical evil of Zionism, al-Nakba, the Qibya massacre, the Kafr Qassim massacre, Mossad’s assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy, al-Naksa, the murderous assault on the USS Liberty, further Zionist expansion into the occupied West Bank, al-Quds and Syria’s al-Jaulan, the implementation of the Law of Return as a “come to Palestine and steal some aboriginal land because you’re chosen” card for World Jewry and lastly, genocidal Operation Cast Lead, were all carried out by “left-wing” Zionist entity leaders. Khalas with this insulting false dichotomy and khalas with the recognition of any person as a credible source who attempts to preserve it. Amsel wrote that we would uncover what kind of person Avnery is through his gleaming depiction of Leibowitz in “Reluctant Prophet,” and indeed we do: he is a Zionist, a hardcore, self-deluding Zionist, whose concern with “peace” only translates to the racist preservation of the usurping Zionist entity, just like Leibowitz before him.
On The Holocaust®: Countering and Shattering The “Jewish Suffering” Vertex
Prior to introducing the rubbish about Leibowitz, Amsel quoted a caption from the second part of my Avnery series dealing with the ‘holocaust’; the caption reads, “The Palestine Solidarity Movement is so busy paying its respects to the propaganda-ridden “chosen” holocaust, it is failing to adequately fight for Palestine.” Seemingly incapable of responding without hysteria, Amsel subsequently commented, “The above is a lie to discredit those Jews involved in the struggle. Nothing but pure, unadulterated anti-Semitism.” Odd. I did not mention “Jews” in the caption, but Amsel did, for the transparently perceptible reason of adding fuel to the “anti-Semitism” fire that he sought to burn me with.
No matter, a tidal wave of truth will douse the defamatory flames. Again, there was no examination of my remark, let alone a refutation. By no means was it a “lie” on any level and by no means was it an attempt to discredit anyone, Jewish or otherwise. It was an undoubtedly harsh but nevertheless accurate statement to wake up the Solidarity Movement from its Zionist-induced slumber. There are none so blind as those who choose their blindness, cherishing it as if it were a heavenly gift.
Thinker and activist Dr. Francis Clark-Lowes, along with esteemed activist and revisionist Paul Eisen before him, characterize the very essence of the caption. Both of these brilliant and fearless men have been expelled from a vital wing of the UK Palestine Solidarity Campaign for alleged ‘Holocaust® Denial’ and ‘anti-Semitism.’ Paul Eisen was ruthlessly targeted for having the spine to speak on Holocaust® revisionism and his beautiful, important website, Deir Yassin Remembered, a commemoration of the ungodly Zionist massacre of at least 112 Palestinian men, women and children on April 9th, 1948, is now defunct as a result of this cruel and dastardly character assault. This particular branch has been conquered by Jewish supremacists masquerading as “anti-Zionists” and it has become obsessed with ‘Holocaust® Denial’ and ‘anti-Semitism.’ It has even entered into a shadowy, unspoken alliance with toxic Zionist outlets like Engage, Harry’s Place and the Jewish Chronicle to fight its newfound obsessions (20).
Additionally, it has installed a precondition into its framework called “anti-racism,” an Orwellian phrase for “anything critical of Jewish-Zionist power will not be tolerated;” and it is doing everything that it can to deflect attention away from Zionism and Jewish supremacism, passing out leaflets and organizing forums that repeat the tiresome slogan of “Israel” being a settler-colonial apartheid state, insisting that “Israel” is an American client regime and even going as far as saying that Zionism has “non-Jewish origins (21),” one of the most astronomical assertions that I have ever come across. “Israel” is far worse and far more powerful than any “settler-colonial apartheid state” and this description at its root is deceptive and deflective (22). “Israel” absolutely is not another mere US client regime, as ‘American imperialism’ has no place in the Zionist entity (23) and its fifth column lobbying apparatus exercises immense power over the American government, as evidenced just recently with its coverup of the heavy, domineering Zionist hand in the butchering of Iraq and the push for more butchery in the Islamic Republic of Iran (24).
And as if this wasn’t painfully obvious enough already,
the origins of Zionism are entirely Jewish, birthed in the mental womb
of a hideous supremacist largely forgotten by history. Long before
Herzl, there was Moses Hess, or more aptly, Rebbe Moses Hess, a
fanatical Talmudist who placed the self-anointed racist rabbinical
‘sages’ on a higher station than prophets and who deemed the Jewish
people possessors of a collective, legislative genius that will bring
forth their resurgence in the land that they call “Israel.” Rabbi Hess went as far as deeming the Jewish people their own ‘God (25).’
Beyond his rabbinic hatred of goyim in general, Hess had a particular rabid, racist dislike for the German people and his landmark book, “Rome and Jerusalem: the Last National Question,” penned in 1862, is filled with venomous rhetoric against Europeans and serves as a call to Jews to recognize their inherent superiority over all other peoples on earth and thus, “the new Jewish state would be a light to the nations showing them how to live in socialist harmony.” This written pronunciamento of Talmudism is the godfather work of Zionism. Why do “leftists” ignore Rebbe Hess? Because he is also the true founder of Communism (and its manifesto), their ideology’s backbone. Hess was the mentor of none other than Karl Marx, who referred to Hess as the “communist rabbi (26).” Leftists, most specifically those of Jewish heritage who put their tribal interests before everything, would rather dwell in delusion because they don’t want their political dogma tainted. But facts are facts; their dogma is forever linked to Zionism, a byproduct of Jewish supremacism.
If the nature of the Zionist entity is skewed, the root of its power is downplayed and its origins are designedly lied about, how can it be combated? How can the Solidarity Movement triumph, how can full freedom for Palestine be attained, when something is rotten at the core? In light of the facts presented here, especially the persecutions of Dr. Francis Clark-Lowes and Paul Eisen, is the caption sited by Amsel not vindicated? Is it not validated? Is its representation of truth not etched in even bolder ink?
Eisen and Clark-Lowes care deeply about Palestine, why should their (correct) opinions about World War II’s history disqualify them in any way from showing solidarity with the suffering Palestinian people? Why is a Palestine Solidarity organization dedicating so much of its time to ‘fighting’ the slippery, vague and idolatrous constructs of ‘anti-Semitism’ and ‘Holocaust® Denial’ while the Zionist occupation of Palestine rages on without mercy? And more importantly, why is a Palestine Solidarity organization allying itself with and behaving like the very Zionist outfits that incessantly berate and slander the Palestinian people and cause on a daily basis? And the answer is, because Jewish sensitivities regarding what took place during World War II and the irreconcilable need to maintain the uniqueness of Jewish suffering (as well as victimhood) and the racist notion that Jewish persecution at the hands of non-Jews just because they are Jewish is an inevitable occurrence have utterly crippled any rational debate or discussion on these issues (2).
Even referring to Zionists or “Israelis” as “Nazis” or
calling the usurping entity itself a “Nazi state” are exaltations of the
supremacist idea that Jews have suffered more than anyone else on earth
and they deserve more sympathy than all other people, even when Jews do
awful things to other (non-chosen) peoples. Despite some Zionist
shrieking here and there, these false comparisons are quietly encouraged
because it takes the weight off of Zionism and the Jewish supremacists
upholding it.
It is a subtle but very effective method of disseminating Zionist propaganda. By equating to Zionism to Nazism or “Israelis” to Nazis, you are unequivocally saying that “Israel” is like the Nazi regime but there is nothing worse than the Nazi regime and no matter who suffers at the ironfisted hands of “Israel,” nothing can or will ever compare to the suffering of those who lived under Nazism, especially Jews. You are upholding the Zionist myth that the Nazis were the most evil persons to ever walk the planet and nothing that “Israel” does, no matter how savage, no matter how bloody, will ever trump this “ultimate Nazi evil.” Zionists, because of their Jewishness, because of their victimhood, will always be given the benefit of the doubt when their crimes are judged. “Look at what was done to them during the Holocaust®,” how many times has this atrocious fantasy been repeated as indisputable fact?
How many times have we said “Al-Nakba,” and we have been countered with, “but what about the ‘death’ camps...” How many times have we said, “Al-Naksa,” and we have been countered with, “but what about the human soap...” How many times have we said, “Sabra and Shatila, Qana, Marwaheen, Jenin, al-Khisas, al-Aqsa, al-Ibrahimi Mosque, Dahmash Mosque, Dueima, Lebanon ‘06, Cast Lead, countless other massacres, the torture, the dungeons, the administrative detention, the ethnic cleansing, the home demolitions, 64 years of illegal occupation,” and we have been countered with, “all of ‘that’ is horrible, sure, but what about the gas chambers...”
By capitulating to this supremacism, in which Jewish suffering always has primacy, the Palestine Solidarity Movement is helping maintain the status quo; by establishing preconditions to join a group meant to display solidarity with Palestine, but these preconditions protect Zionists and water down their crimes in the name of “fighting anti-Semitism and Holocaust® Denial,” the Palestine Solidarity Movement is operating as yet another Zionist fifth column, just like the ADL, which has a long record of spying for the Zionist entity (27), the Zionist Organization of America or AIPAC. The only difference is, its ‘mask of Zion’ is a much better cover than the others. It must change the path it is on.
Why would it be mandatory to pay one’s allegiance to the
holocaust unless it was to pay homage to Jewish suffering, even if the
one paying said allegiance is a Palestinian, Lebanese or Syrian whose
life has been destroyed under the very guise of “Jewish suffering”? Why
would such a ludicrous oath be needed unless it was to engrave in stone
this narrative that has been eating at the world for more than six
decades now, even in a place (the Solidarity Movement) where historical
iconoclasm is so desperately needed? Does anyone not ask themselves why
men have done hard time in prison for questioning a historical event? Or
why do laws even exist to stop this event from being investigated or
criticized?
If anything, investigating all narratives used by international Zionism to deepen its stranglehold over Palestine should be the prerequisite for joining a solidarity campaign, especially the Holocaust®, which “Israel” and its worldwide Jewish-Zionist network of sayanim have used as a weapon since its criminal founding to extort and influence Western governments, stifle international debate on “Israel”, infect the historical record with falsities, corrupt Western educational discourse and build Zionist fortunes. Dr. Alfred Lilienthal, the invaluable Jewish anti-Zionist pioneer, called it “Holocaustomania (28).”
Let this next statement ring from pillar to post in the Solidarity Movement, from western hemisphere to eastern hemisphere, in the hearts of the religious and the non-religious and in the minds of all persons from all political persuasions: National Socialism is dead and has been so for nearly seven decades; it was decapitated at the behest of international Zionism by the crippling military might of the Allied Powers. Adolf Hitler is dead too and he is not coming back; ever. Nazism is not the beast devouring our world today and Hitler isn’t the figurehead of the beast.
These two things are apparitions; they are boogeymen kept alive and perpetually invoked by the real “powers that be” to deter investigation into their criminal intrigues; nothing more. Zionism and Jewish supremacism are the interlocked demons eating away at the heart of our earth at the present moment, they are the forces behind the vast majority of the world’s problems and they are certainly, without a doubt, the driving force behind every major war of the last century, as correctly noted by the eloquent President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (29).
With that said, no, Nazism wasn’t the most evil ideology to have ever been spawned and no, Hitler wasn’t the most evil man to have ever lived; not even close. Jewish supremacism on the other hand, which destroyed Nazism and Germany itself in the process, is the most evil ideology to have ever been spawned and the persons who adhere to this belief system of “chosen-ness” are the most insidious group that humanity has ever known. The blood of hundreds of millions of innocents as a result of the major wars they have engineered are the genocidal proof.
Comparing this two-headed malevolent behemoth with
Nazism is not only fallacious and an insult to the historical record, it
is a service to the Zionist entity and its powerful worldwide lobbying
networks. The Zionist Power Configuration appreciates nothing more than
pathetic excuses for investigators, who have been so brainwashed beyond
repair with Zionist propaganda regarding WWII that they look inside
every nook and cranny for Nazi elites that don’t exist, while the very
real Jewish supremacist elites (that do exist) own and thoroughly dominate the media with Zionist hasbara (30), nefariously police the Internet (31), despicably promote and distribute pornography (32), pump ecstasy pills and other narcotics into streets across the globe in a “virtual monopoly” (33), successfully lobby the US Congress to implement racist, Talmudic law in America (34), and, last but not least, vigorously work around the clock to eviscerate beyond recognition the Muslim nations of Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Palestine itself (35), Pakistan and Kashmir (36).
And what of National Socialist Germany? Ernst Zündel, the steadfast fighter for truth, hero of history and revisionist giant, who has been dragged through the mud over the years by the Jewish community and Zionist media, imprisoned for “thought crime,” had his home burnt to the ground, targeted for murder by Jewish zealots and had his reputation completely destroyed, opined that National Socialism should be judged for defending Germany as well as the crimes it committed, for its achievements and failures, but nothing more, nothing less and certainly not for fanciful exaggerations (37).
Zündel rightfully believes that the collective memory of the world regarding Nazi Germany is one replete with everybody’s perception of that time period except that of Germans, and this is because the Zionists have ensured that the global forum be this way to protect their tribal interests and international agenda. Aforementioned Jewish Holocaust® revisionist Paul Eisen succinctly notes that there are three distinct, foundational principles to revisionism. Firstly, there never was an official plan on the part of Hitler or any other part of the Nazi regime to systematically and physically eliminate every Jew in Europe. Secondly, homicidal gas-chambers never existed. And thirdly, the numbers of Jewish victims have been exaggerated (37).
Even Holocaust® “expert” Raul Hilberg, the world’s
premier “authority” on the topic, admitted under oath in the kangaroo
court of the first Zündel trial in 1985 that there was no planned
genocide against the Jews of Germany, there was no Nazi blueprint for
mass extermination, no central planning of systematic killing by any
agency of National Socialism and no budget designated specifically for the destruction of European Jewry (37). Does this make Hilberg, a staunch Zionist, a self-described “defiantly strong Jew” and a Jewish supremacist who believed that, “The Jews are the conscience of the world. They are the father figures, stern, critical, and forbidding (38),” anti-Semitic and a ‘denier of the Holocaust®’?
For the sake of truth, it must be said: the “annihilation of the Jews” narrative that has been relentlessly pumped into the consciousness of humanity since the rise of National Socialism is a farce. A hardcore dose of wartime propaganda that began in the spring of 1942 with hasbara cooked up by Jewish and Zionist agencies and then disseminated throughout the Jewish press. These unconfirmed and uncorroborated sensationalist reports about Jews being steamed to death, suffocated to death, pressed to death, electrocuted to death and gassed to death were then picked up by Zionist media apparatuses in both Britain and America, including the BBC and the New York Times, and were repeated as factual happenings. Not a single one of these reports were rooted in factuality; not one. In reality, hundreds of thousands of people, many of them Jews, died in the Nazi work-prison camp system from exhaustion, malnutrition and the typhus epidemic because the Hitler government failed to provide them the proper food and medicine. But this wasn’t deliberate. It was due to the sadistic 6-year blockade and the barbaric, deranged and cruel saturation bombing campaign carried out against Germany by the Allies, chiefly the Zionist-occupied United States (37).
Nothing defines the holocaust quite like the “homicidal gas chambers,” and no place embodies the “homicidal gas chambers” quite like Auschwitz, National Socialism’s most infamous camp complex. According to popular opinion, 4 million victims, mostly Jews, died in the Auschwitz “extermination” camp. But this, like most other facets of the Holocaust® religion narrative, is false, so false that even preeminent “Israeli” holocaust ‘historian’ Yehuda Bauer has admitted that it is a “deliberate myth.” The Zionist entity’s Holocaust® center and Poland’s Auschwitz State Museum have both reduced the Auschwitz death toll down to 1 million Jewish and Gentile victims but several other prominent historians put the number lower, as low as 500,000 Jewish and Gentile victims (39).
Moreover, the world famous Auschwitz “gas chamber” is a fake, every part of it. It was constructed brick by brick after World War II for propaganda reasons. It is from this point that the “homicidal gas chambers” story falls to pieces. American gas chamber expert Fred A. Leuchter, research chemist Dr. William B. Lindsey and Walter Lüftl, a prominent Austrian expert engineer who ran a huge Vienna-based engineering firm, have all proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the stories of Jews being exterminated by gassing en masse at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek and Mauthausen are untrue on every level. After thorough investigations of the camps, all three men, preeminent authorities in the field, concluded that the stories were “absurd” and “technically impossible.” To reiterate, there isn’t a lick of documentary evidence which suggests that the Nazis planned a “final solution” for Euro-Jewry or “extermination” of Euro-Jewry. This truth can be reconciled with the fact that the vast majority of Jewish inmates unable to work in the camps were left alive and cared for, contrary to the oft-repeated hasbara that those unable to work were executed by gassing. Another major Jewish ‘historian,’ History Professor of Princeton Arno Mayer, has admitted that most Jews who died in Auschwitz died of typhus (39).
While there was no German “final solution” for the Jews
of Europe, there was a Jewish “final solution” in place for the people
of Germany. The name of this “final solution” was “The Book That Hitler
Fears: Germany Must Perish,” a small volume written by a Jewish
businessman and rabid Zionist from New York City named Theodore N.
Kaufman; the first edition was published sometime between late 1940 and
early 1941 and the second edition was published later on in the latter
year. In truly disturbing fashion, and in no uncertain terms for that
matter, Kaufman blatantly advocates the mass genocidal sterilization of
the German people and the subsequent territorial breakup of Germany as a
nation-state, fractionalizing it into smaller, weaker entities. Kaufman
put this frightening plot on paper
because he genuinely believed (and wanted others, specifically
Americans, to believe) that Germans were inherently barbaric as a people
and therefore, the only way to stop their barbarism from spreading to
the four corners of the earth, was to annihilate them (40). Sick does not even begin to delineate Kaufman or his book.
And yet, to note, yes, to simply note these critical historical facts long-suppressed by the Zionist media, to merely discuss this tiny, albeit devastating and refutative package of information, is to commit the ultimate sin, is to engage in the damnable-by-imprisonment thought crime of “Holocaust® denial.” To refuse to accept fabrications, inaccuracies, falsehoods, exaggerations and outright hasbara by Zionist propagandists is to be a “Holocaust® denier.” On the other hand, to accept these lies, these pernicious lies that have been used to justify the most berserk, inhuman aggressions against the people of Palestine and others, is to be a teller of truth, devoted “activist” and “humanist.” Is madness not what this Orwellian dichotomy represents? Is the very essence of “freedom of speech” not maimed beyond recognition by this eccentric duality?
The infamous, Zionist-engineered “312 incubator babies” story that led to the beginning of the decimation of Iraq more than 20 years ago has been exposed as a grisly hoax (41), should we still accept it as fact? The repugnant stories of the now-fallen Libyan leader Muammar al-Qadhdhafi giving his military forces Viagra and ordering them to rape civilians, which were used by NATO to increase its barbarous bombing of Libya, have also been exposed as totally baseless (42), should we still accept them as examples of truth? The story of Hamas causing the initiation of Operation Cast Lead by violating the ceasefire with the Zionist entity in late 2008 has been debunked as a Zionist lie; ‘Israel’ had not only been planning the Gaza massacre for quite some time, but it broke the ceasefire on November 4th, 2008 (43), should we still parrot the hasbara? And then there is the “WMDs in Iraq” story, which was another Zionist-birthed fallacy that caused more Iraqi blood to be spilled for the usurping ‘Israeli’ regime (44), should we still cite it as veracious? The emphatic answer to these four questions of course, is “NO!” Using this as the guideline, why then should the hasbara of the Holocaust® not be rejected any less resoundingly?
It is not only socially (and professionally)
recommendable but socially (and professionally) obligatory to swallow
Holocaust® propaganda in both the mainstream and alternative spheres of
media because of the “Jewish sensitivities” sacred cow. To reporters and
journalists of both spheres, the ‘fragile feelings’ and emotional
(delusional) attachments of Zionist Jews, are seemingly much more
important than the truth of a very serious matter, with very serious
geopolitical implications. To the same reporters and journalists, the
feelings of other peoples who have been afflicted by genocide are of no
consequence at all.
The Armenian Genocide of 1915-1923 is frequently belittled, downplayed and denied. The number of martyrs total more than 1.5 million but mainstream “authorities” routinely reduce this to around 300,000, without incident, without uproar. The ADL, Zionist spy nest and Mossad’s most powerful American front organization (45), leads the charge in suppressing the history of the Armenian Genocide (46). The Ukranian Genocide of 1932-1933, known as the Holodomor, is as badly ignored as the horrors experienced by the Armenian people. More than 10 million Ukranian men, women and children were mercilessly starved to death in a manmade famine, but this martyr count too is disgracefully reduced to numbers as low as 1 or 2 million. Once more, we find the ADL leading the charge to minimize and deny this crucial historical event, with ADL head and Jewish supremacist thug Abraham Foxman once telling reps of former Ukranian President Viktor Yushchenko that, “One thing that you need to be sensitive about is not to link it {the Holodomor} with ours {the Holocaust®}. Be careful. It cannot be played as your genocide, our genocide. Because that will be counterproductive on all sides (47).”
The Iraq Genocide that began with UN Resolution 661 on August 6th, 1990 and continues to rage on to this very moment is assuredly the most denigrated of modern day atrocities. Not only is the vast scope and sheer brutality and evil of the American-British invasion excused and lessened by the previously-discussed “authorities,” so are the numbers of the martyrs and this incessant need to “decrease and downplay” is nothing short of shameful. How many different death tolls are there? 30,000? 100,000? “Tens of thousands” is a common expression. “Collateral damage in the thousands” is also typical.
Even “one million dead” has become a trivialized slogan for “leftists” who ramble on about an “imperialism” that is faceless, as if there aren’t persons behind it with an exceedingly particular ideology. In reality, according to Iraq’s Ministry of Women’s Affairs, more than 2,500,000 Iraqis have lost their lives as a result of the criminal invasion and this staggering figure only includes the martyrs of 2003-2010 (48). Moreover, according to the Iraq Ministry of Health, the crippling, unrelenting sanctions that preceded the invasion claimed well over 2,000,000 lives, including 700,000 children (49). 4.5 million Iraqis dead and the ADL refers to this crime against humanity as “democratization (50).”
And the question, as always, is “WHY?” Why are the Armenian, Ukranian and Iraqi Genocides, all of which are rooted in graphic, prolific historical fact and detail, denied, downplayed and minimized by the establishment media? Because the establishment media is the Zionist media and the Zionist media is an instrument of the Jewish supremacist agenda. The Armenian, Ukranian and Iraqi Genocides weren’t Jewish, and because of this obvious but very telling fact, they aren’t newsworthy in the eyes of the Zionist media and the stooges that it employs as “reporters.” But there is a more mischievous reason as why these specific ‘atrocity events’ are devalued, nay, covered up, by the Zionist media and it is because they are all the products of Jewish-Zionist intrigue.
The subversive and maniacal Young Turks, who perpetrated
the Armenian Genocide, were Jewish in origin who strongly believed in
the Talmudic-Kabbalistic ideology of the 17th century false Jewish
Messiah Sabbatai Zevi and his followers, whom many of them descended
from. The Young Turks, who were also deeply connected to Freemasonry, had
extraterritorial ambitions and were not content with just eliminating
the Ottoman Empire; they wanted to establish a “Jewish state” in the
heart of Mesopotamia, after ethnically cleansing the indigenous peoples
in a repeat of the Armenian Genocide (51). Their exploits were funded
by the wealthy communities of Jews and Donmè (crypto-Jews) of
Thessalonika (Salonika; Thessaloniki, then part of Turkey, now part of
Greece), as well as powerful Jewish-Zionist banking interests in Vienna
and Berlin (52).
Their flagship propaganda paper, “The Young Turk,” was managed by none other than Jewish supremacist Vladimir “Iron Wall” Jabotinsky, the genocidal spiritual godfather of the Irgun terror gang, and arms used in their massacres were provided by powerful Jewish financier of the Bolsheviks, Alexander Israel Helphand, better known as “Parvus.” Emmanuel Carasso, Jewish-Zionist founder of the Young Turks, maintained close links to and sought advice from B’nai B’rith, the institution of Jewish Freemasonry, throughout their campaign of bloodshed and militarism (53).
Without the Young Turks’ overthrow of the Ottoman Empire, there would not be a usurping Zionist entity in Palestine now; there would be no Zionist occupation. To understand that the perpetrators of the Armenian Genocide were one of the seemingly endless tentacles of international Zionism is to understand a major missing piece of the geopolitical puzzle. The Zionists were well-aware that the Ottoman Empire had to be liquidated if they were to turn Palestine into a “Jewish homeland,” hence why the Young Turks, a force almost exclusively comprised of Jews, were put into action. Today, the Zionist Power Matrix not only wants this hidden Jewish history ignored, but buried; it wants to maintain the idea that “Muslim Young Turks” massacred Armenian Christians to further the Zionist “divide and conquer” agenda.
The architect of the Holomodor was the Jewish-Bolshevik
Lazar Kagonovich, an “artist” in savagery who is said to be the real
power behind Josef Stalin. The founder and first commander of the
All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution
and Sabotage, better known as the Cheka, the animalistic internal
security apparatus of the Soviet regime, was Jewish-Bolshevik Genrikh
Yagoda, who also founded the brutal Soviet Gulag system and is
single-handedly responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million
innocents. Jewish-Bolshevik Leonid Reichman was the head of the Cheka’s
special operations department and served as its chief interrogation
officer and is responsible for the torture of tens of millions of
Russians. 39%
of all Bolshevik-Stalinist security officials were Jewish, making the
greatest mass murderers of the modern era Jews, not Germans; Bolsheviks,
not Nazis (54). The Bolshevik Revolution itself, from the onset, was
a Jewish endeavor, with close to all of the leading Bolsheviks,
including Lenin and Trotsky, possessing Jewish origins and the murder of
the imperial Romanov family being ordered and carried out by
Jewish-Bolshevik agents (55).
The Zionist media has deliberately entombed these facts because the Holocaust® narrative of “perennial Jewish victimhood” wouldn’t hold as much as weight if the world knew that Jews were nothing even remotely close to victims in Bolshevik-Stalinist Russia; they were the rulers, oppressors and tormenters, just like they are in Palestine today. The only difference is the name of the ideology. Bolshevism and Zionism are simply two heads of the same Jewish supremacist dragon.
While several top academics have documented the domineering Zionist role in the planning and execution of the destruction of Iraq, most notably Professor John J. Mearsheimer and Professor Steven Walt in their landmark work, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy,” as well as Dr. Stephen J. Sniegoski in his masterpiece, “The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel,” it has not been discussed (at all) that Mossad, the Zionist entity’s international intelligence directorate, has been the chief player in keeping the Iraqi nation in chaos by endlessly planting car bombs and attempting to foment ethno-sectarian war. Very few have spoken above a whisper that the annihilation of Iraq wasn’t just for the “protection” of the usurping ‘Israeli’ regime but for the expansion of it (56).
Anyone who has spoken out against the power of the
Zionist Lobby and its role in constructing the decimation of Iraq,
including the aforementioned scholars, has been smeared as
“anti-Semitic” by the Zionist media and any info on Mossad operations in
Iraq have been totally blacked out. The Iraqi people were sacrificed on
the altar of Zionism and this must never be revealed to the public
because it may just prevent future wars of Zionist aggression from
occurring.
And while the two said books also prominently featured the little-known truth that “neoconservativism,” the guiding ideology of the Zionist warmongers behind Iraq’s butchering, is a sole invention of Jewish intellectuals who desperately desire to preserve the existence of the Zionist entity at any cost, it did not focus on what drove these tribalists to found the ideology to begin with: “Holocaust® consciousness (57).” So these men, nearly all of whom are Jewish, just like the Bolsheviks before them, are pushing, bullying, influencing and lobbying Western governments to fight imperial wars for Jewish interests and the preservation of “Israel” in the name of the “6 million Jewish victims” of the Holocaust®.
Paul Wolfowitz, the author of the “Wolfowitz Doctrine” and the chief Zionist strategist behind Iraq’s dismemberment, stated, “That sense of what happened in Europe in World War II has shaped a lot of my views (58).” Wolfowitz’s ‘partner in crime,’ fellow arch Zionist, Iraq War planner and ‘Israeli’ spy Richard Perle, echoes this sentiment, “The defining moment of our history was certainly the Holocaust. It was destruction, a genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering. We don’t want that to happen again. When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes, we should do so, because when we fail to do so, the results are catastrophic (59).” Astounding.
When these revelations are presented in context with the earlier iconoclastic bombshells regarding the exaggerations and fabrications so intimately associated with the Holocaust®, you get the feeling that these persons are insane; not metaphorically, but literally insane. Jewish supremacist warmongers like Wolfowitz, Perle and the rest of their neoconservative tribal brethren are planning and ordering wars that are based on lies in the memory of the biggest historical lie of our time. I am legitimately asking here: does it get anymore psychotic than this? And please, allow me to ask another question... doesn’t researching the Holocaust® and debunking all of the gobbledygook that comes along with it become all that more important when the stability of our world is being threatened by madmen who believe in its manufactured uniqueness and righteousness? This is an especially important point when considering ‘Israeli’-American aggression against Iran is on the rise (60), and the “prevention of a second holocaust” is the pretext that is being invoked by the ‘left’ and ‘right’ wings of the Jewish spectrum to destroy thousands of years of Persian history.
Just recently, Chemi Shalev, in his “West of Eden” blog
for the “liberal” Zionist entity newspaper Ha’aretz, wrote a piece
entitled “The Holocaust is a good reason, not a bad excuse, for attacking Iran (61)” and neoconservative godfather and genocide-monger Charles Krauthammer, recipient of the “Guardian
of Zion” award, an “honor” given out for supporting ‘Israel’ in print
by the Zionist entity’s Bar-Ilan University’s Ingeborg Rennert Center
for Jerusalem Studies (62), recently told ultra-Zionist Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News that, “I
cannot imagine the Israelis are going to allow Iran to go nuclear and
to hold the Damocles sword over 6 million Jews all over again. Israel
was established to prevent a second Holocaust, not to invite one (63).”
Not only does this bloodthirsty trash reinforce the point made earlier that Zionism is chameleonic and it can manifest itself as “rightist” or “leftist” at will as a means of enforcing the Jewish supremacist agenda at its core, it illuminates a much more important matter: investigating the Holocaust® and exposing it for the psychological warfare that it truly represents isn’t only a must for the people of Palestine but for every truth-seeking, peace-seeking human on this planet.
In his groundbreaking book, “The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics,” brother Jihad (Gilad) Atzmon writes some monumentally important words on page 176 that encapsulate the vivid details of this section wholeheartedly, “We should also ask what purpose Holocaust denial laws serve? What is the Holocaust religion there to conceal? As long as we fail to ask questions, we will be subjected to Zionist lobbies and their plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish suffering. We will maintain our complicity in Western imperialist crimes (64).”
~ End Of Part I ~
Next: The revolutionary, fearless breakdown of international Zionism's linguistic weaponry, the examination and refutation of Jewish "chosen-ness" and the ever-stunning heights of Zionist arrogance...
Sources:
(1) The Case Of Uri Avnery I: “Shukran, Israel” Analyzed And Refuted by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(2) The Case Of Uri Avnery II: Hasbara, Supremacism And The Future Of Solidarity by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(3) In Defense Of Uri Avnery by Steve Amsel, Desert Peace
(4) Hummus And Falafel Are Already “Israeli.” Now They’re Coming For Palestine’s Olive Oil Too by Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada
(5) Resisting The Nakba by Professor Joseph Massad, Al-Ahram Weekly
(6) The Rights Of Israel by Professor Joseph Massad, Al-Jazeera English
(7) Is Israel A Democracy Or An Ethnocracy? by Ben White, The New Statesman
(8) Understanding The Opposition To NATO’s Intervention In Libya by Uri Avnery, Redress Information and Analysis
(9) Uri Avnery Interview by Jon Elmer, The Progressive
(10) 1948 Remembered By The People Who Were There by The Independent
(11) Take Action For Hunger Striking Palestinian Prisoner Khader Adnan! by Samidoun: Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network; Deal Reached To End Khader Adnan’s Detention By 17 April; 66 Day Hunger Strike Ends by Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada; Starving For Freedom: The Hunger Strike Of Khader Adnan by Ali Abunimah, Al-Jazeera English
(12) Kissinger’s 1974 Plan For Food Control Genocide by Joseph Brewda, The Executive Intelligence Review
(13) Anti-Boycott Bill Becomes Law After Passing Knesset by Lahav Harkov, The Jerusalem Post
(14) Knesset Approves Nakba Law by Elad Benari, Arutz Sheva
(15) Equality For Palestinians? Israel Won’t Have It by Ben White, The Guardian
(16) Arab MK Gets Death Threats by WAFA
(17) Israeli Arab MK Lodges Complaints After Receiving Death Threats On Facebook by Jonathan Lis and Ophir Bar-Zohar, Haaretz
(18) Arab-Israeli Parliamentarian Fights Death Threats by Mel Frykberg, Inter Press Service
(19) Obituaries: Yeshayahu Leibowitz, 91, Iconoclastic Israeli Thinker by Joel Greenberg, The New York Times
(20) As A Jew... A Letter To Sarah Colbourne by Paul Eisen
(21) From The Outside Looking In... The PSC AGM by Paul Eisen, deLIBERATION
(22) “International Zionism Is Strangling The World:” Interview With Jonathan Azaziah by Kourosh Ziabari, Mask of Zion
(23) Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth; Section – Cablegate Fraud II: Disgusting Zionist Lies by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(24) The Iraq War Cover-Up: What Did AIPAC Do And When Did It Do It? by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss
(25) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – Moses Hess And The Secret Relationship Between Judaism, Zionism And Communism, Section – Moses Hess And Judaism, Pages 862-863 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research
(26) Emancipation: Moses Hess To Theodor Herzl by Michael Goldfarb, Global Post
(27) The Anti-Defamation League: A Protector Of Civil Rights Or Silencer Of Free Speech? by American Muslims for Palestine
(28) Book Review: The Holocaust Industry: Reflections On the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering by James A. Montanye, The Independent Institute
(29) Ahmadinejad: Zionists Started Both World Wars by Yitzhak Benhorin, Ynet
(30) Stunning Jewish Success Dominates American Media by Jeffrey Blankfort, Intifada Palestine; Do Jews Dominate In American Media? And So What If We Do? by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss
(31) A Talmud Ace Tackles Thorny Issue Of Net Neutrality by Joy Resmovits, The Jewish Daily Forward
(32) Triple-Exthnics by Nathan Abrams, The Jewish Quarterly
(33) Israel Trips On Ecstasy by The Washington Times
(34) Bill Text 102nd Congress (1991-1992) H.J.RES.104.ENR by The Library of Congress
(35) Pakistan: Gateway To The Zionist Endgame by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black
(36) The Salala Massacre: NATO’s Naked Aggression Against Pakistan And The Hegemonic Israeli-Indo-American Strategy Behind It by Martin Iqbal and Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(37) The Holocaust Wars by Paul Eisen, Righteous Jews
(38) A Conscious Pariah by Nathaniel Popper, The Nation
(39) Auschwitz: Myths And Facts by Mark Weber, The Institute For Historical Review
(40) The Book That Hitler Fears: Germany Must Perish by Theodore N. Kaufman, Argyle Press; Introductory Note by Mark Weber, The Institute For Historical Review
(41) Syria Under Fire: Zionist Destabilization Hits Critical Mass; Section – Hasbara In Full Effect: Exaggerations and Fabrications by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(42) Amnesty Questions Claim That Gaddafi Ordered Rape As Weapon Of War by Patrick Cockburn, The Independent
(43) US Media Didn’t Report Israeli Ceasefire Violation by Jim Lobe and Ali Gharib, The Electronic Intifada
(44) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(45) The Ugly Truth About The ADL by The Executive Intelligence Review
(46) ADL’s Abe Foxman Disputes Criticism On Armenian Genocide Position by Armenian National Committee Of America
(47) Defamation (film) by Yoav Shamir
(48) Army Of Widows, Orphans Trail US War by Press TV
(49) Lifting The Iraq Embargo After Almost 2 Million Deaths by Dr. M. Amir Ali, Institute Of Islamic Information and Education
(50) Iraq War: Is It Good For Jews, And Israel? by Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith
(51) Young Turks, Freemasons And Jews by Elie Kedourie, Middle Eastern Studies (Vol. 7, No. 1, Jan. 1971)
(52) The Young Turks: Who Were They? by Radio Islam
(53) Palmerston Launches Young Turks To Permanently Control Middle East by Joseph Brewda, The Schiller Institute
(54) Stalin’s Jews by Sever Plocker, Ynet
(55) The Jewish Role In The Bolshevik Revolution And Russia’s Early Soviet Regime: Assessing The Grim Legacy Of Soviet Communism by Mark Weber, The Institute For Historical Review
(56) Occupied Iraq: New Year, Same Zionism by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(57) The Neoconservative Persuasion: Examining The Jewish Roots of An Intellectual Movement by Gal Beckerman, The Jewish Daily Forward
(58) The Busy Life Of Being A Lightning Rod For Bush by Eric Schmitt, The New York Times
(59) The War Party by BBC Panorama
(60) Iran Escalation: All The Elements For War Are Coming Together by Tom Burghardt, Global Research
(61) The Holocaust Is A Good Reason, Not A bad Excuse, For Attacking Iran by Chemi Shalev, Haaretz
(62) Charles Krauthammer: A Pen In Defense Of Zion by Bret Stephens, The Israel Report
(63) Krauthammer: Israel ‘Will Strike’ Iran To “Prevent A Second Holocaust” by The Daily Caller
(64) The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics; Chapter 21 – Truth, History And Integrity, Page 176 by Gilad Atzmon, Zero Books
Submitted by Abdul Alhazred on Fri, 2008-05-09 19:58
By
Allan Hall
|
Some
German Jews escaped the Holocaust by fleeing the country, others hid and
some battled to stay alive long enough to be freed from the Nazi death
camps.
But Ernst Hess owed his survival to the personal intervention of Adolf Hitler.
The Fuhrer ordered his SS thugs to leave the Jewish judge alone because Hess had been his commanding officer during the First World War.
Hitler looked back on his time on the Western Front with great pride and fondness so, while some six million Jews perished in the Holocaust set in motion by Hitler, Hess was allowed to live on the Fuhrer's whim.
His remarkable story was told by his daughter Ursula, 86, after a newspaper unearthed the letter sent on the orders of Hitler insisting that Hess was not to be 'persecuted or deported'.
A file kept by the Dusseldorf Gestapo on him includes the letter from the head of the Gestapo and the SS, Heinrich Himmler, dated August 27, 1940, saying Hess must receive 'relief and protection as per the Fuhrer's wishes'.
Himmler made a point of informing all relevant authorities and officials that the judge was 'not to be inopportuned in any way whatsoever'.
Ironically, Hess told his daughter that he and his old comrades from the trenches hardly remembered Hitler – by then a well-known figure in German politics – when they met at reunions in the 1920s and 30s.
He told her that the future dictator rarely spoke and had few friends among the troops.
Historians have in recent years poured scorn on the Nazi myth of the heroic Corporal Hitler running messages from one frontline trench to another.
In fact, other soldiers regarded him as a 'rear area pig', taking his messages between HQs a few miles behind the front.
Ernst Moritz Hess, born in 1890, had joined the 2nd Royal Bavarian Reserve Infantry as an officer at the beginning of the First World War, the same regiment that Austrian-born Hitler volunteered for.
Both men were deployed to the Flanders front in autumn 1914, serving in what was known as the List Regiment until 1918.
Hess was seriously wounded in October of 1914 and again two years later in October 1916. In the summer of that year, the highly decorated officer had temporarily been Hitler's company commander.
Although baptised a protestant, his mother was Jewish and the Nuremberg Race Laws of 1935, introduced by the Nazis, classified him as a 'full blooded Jew'.
Hess was forced by the laws to quit
his post as a judge in 1936. His family saw him being beaten up outside
his house by Nazi thugs the same year.
He had petitioned Hitler in June of 1936 asking for an exception to be made for him and his daughter under the race laws.
In his letter Hess said: 'For us, it is a kind of spiritual death to now be branded as Jews and exposed to general contempt.'
Hess ended up as a slave labourer, building barracks. This time he escaped extermination because of his 'privileged miscegenated marriage' to Margarete Hess, a Protestant.
His sister Berta was gassed at Auschwitz, wrongly believing that the protection afforded to her brother extended to her.
Hess died in Frankfurt after a successful career in post-war West Germany on September 14, 1983.
Hess moved his family to Bolzano, Italy in October 1937, but was forced to return in 1939. Hoping that his connections to Hitler would keep him safe, he moved his family to a remote Bavarian village in mid-1940.
A copy of the letter Himmler sent to the Gestapo in Dusseldorf was given to him. But in late June 1941, Hess was summoned to appear before the SS in Munich.
When he submitted his letter of protection it was taken from him and he was told it had been revoked in May of 1941, and that he was now 'a Jew like any other'.
Quand la communauté noire internationale va-t-elle demander des réparations à la communauté juive pour l'immense préjudice que lui a causé le commerce juif des esclaves?
Quand dressera-t-on un monument commémoratif de ce crime de lèse-humanité à ne jamais oublier?
Parmi ceux qui accompagnaient Christophe Colomb à son arrivée en Amérique, il y avait cinq juifs:
Luis de Torres, Marco, Bernal, Alonzo de la Calle, Gabriel Sanchez.
Ils persuadèrent Colomb de capturer 500 Indiens et de les vendre comme esclaves à Séville en Espagne.
Les juifs furent chassés d'Espagne en 1492 et du Portugal en 1497. Ils s'installèrent aux Pays-Bas où ils fondèrent «la Compagnie hollandaise des Indes Occidentales» (c'est à dire l'Amérique).
En 1654, Jacob Barsimson fut le premier juif à émigrer de Hollande vers New Amsterdam (New York).
De nombreux juifs le suivirent, s'établissant sur la côte et commerçant avec les autochtones. Le premier à exercer ainsi ce métier fut Layman Lévi qui échangeait des pacotilles venues de Hollande contre de précieuses fourrures.
Les juifs Nicholas Lowe et Joseph Simon prirent alors part à ce fructueux commerce. Lowe eut l'idée de vendre du rhum aux Indiens sans méfiance. En un rien de temps la ville portuaire de Newport comptait 22 distilleries. Toutes appartenaient à des juifs.
L'intoxication alcoolique des Indiens et les massacres perpétrés en état d'ivresse sur les premiers colons européens sont dus à cette initiative juive. Newport, qu'on appela longtemps «Newport juif», devint un centre mondial du trafic d'esclaves avec l'Afrique.
Les bateaux partaient de Newport vers l'Afrique Occidentale pour y capturer leur cargaison humaine noire. 128 bateaux qui débarquaient des esclaves à Charleston appartenaient à des Juifs de Newport et de Charleston. La traite des esclaves était un monopole juif.
Le juif Aaron Lopez joua un rôle très important dans ce monstrueux commerce de 1726 à 1774, il contrôla personnellement 50% de la traite de ces êtres humains dans toutes les colonies américaines.
En 1717 la première loge maçonnique fut fondée: 90% des membres en étaient juifs. Vingt ans plus tard la loge maçonnique King David fut fondée. Elle était entièrement juive;
Accompagnons le bateau «Abigaïl» du juif Aaron Lopez jusqu'en Afrique Occidentale. En mai 1752, il fut chargé de 34.000 litres de rhum, d'une énorme quantité de fers à mettre aux mains et aux pieds des Noirs qui seraient ramenés comme esclaves.
Il y avait aussi pistolets, poudre, sabres, et une abondante camelote, comme fond de «commerce». Le capitaine Freedman était un juif.
Trois mois plus tard ils abordaient la terre d'Afrique où de nombreux agents d'établissements juifs, travaillaient pour le compte des trafiquants d'esclaves, étaient sur place. Les choses se passèrent comme avec les Indiens: les chefs des tribus noirs étaient saoulés au rhum et vendaient or, ivoire et membres de la tribu.
Souvent on menait les tribus noires à travers forêts et steppes jusqu'à la côte. Le trajet durait des semaines et beaucoup succombaient.
Les cravaches empêchaient les colonnes d'esclaves de s'arrêter. On abandonnait à une mort affreuse ceux qui ne pouvaient suivre.
Des ossements jonchaient les pistes. Arrivés à la côte, ils étaient laissés dans leurs fers, inspectés comme du bétail, et gardés par des chiens féroces.
On leur rasait le crâne et on les marquait au fer rouge, ce qui permettait de reconnaître les fugitifs.
Pères, enfants, femmes étaient séparés et de désespoir certains se noyaient en se jetant à la mer. Un voyage sans espace de trois mois était atroce.
Manque de place, scènes de folie pour
2
quelques centimètres carrés, matière fécale, fouets pour faire régner le calme. Les femmes étaient violées par l'équipage. Les nombreux morts étaient jetés par-dessus bord.
Historiens et statisticiens évaluent à 9 millions le nombre des victimes de cette horreur juive banalisée. Véritable holocauste celui-là.
11 millions ont dû survivre débarqués dans les ports américains où ils furent vendus dans de véritables marchés à bestiaux. Les bénéfices furent considérables: par exemple le voilier «la Fortuna» revint en Amérique avec 217 Noirs payés 4300 dollars et revendus 41.438 dollars.
Dans le nord des États-Unis le trafic d'esclaves était interdit. Les juifs Sandifortd Lay, Woolman, Solomon et Benezet oeuvrèrent afin qu'il devînt légal.
L'institut Carnégie de Washington possède de nombreux documents qui prouvent de façon radicale que le vaste trafic d'esclaves fut un monopole juif, sur lequel les non-juifs n'avaient aucune participation. [...]
Parmi les habitants de Newport et de Charleston nous relevons plus de cent noms juifs participant au trafic d'esclaves et à l'exploitation des distilleries, depuis Isaac Gomez à Abraham All, en passant par Felix de Souza et Aaron Lopez connus comme les rois du trafic d'esclaves...
Dans un article publié peu avant la guerre des six jours, le Professeur Shahak nous a montré que le trafic d'esclaves entre l'Europe et l'Orient, était entièrement entre les mains des juifs, autre «petit détail ...» Tous les Juifs connaissaient cet horrible trafic, ce crime monstrueux.
Pourquoi les rabbins n'ont-ils pas déféré les auteurs devant un tribunal? Pourquoi les honnêtes petits juifs n'ont-ils pas opposé une âpre résistance à ce génocide authentique, lui, et qui ne souffre pas de contradictions arithmético-techniques [comme au sujet de la révision à la basse – 10 x moins ! - du nombre des Juifs morts durant la Deuxième Guerre mondiale et l’impossibilité technique des gazages massifs d’êtres humains avec du Ziklon B !] ?
Aujourd'hui encore l'immense majorité des Noirs aux U.S.A ont le statut social d'assisté. Or cette misère de la masse noire est due aux trafiquants juifs d'esclaves de l'époque.
Les descendants des trafiquants juifs sont-ils coupables, comme on veut que les Allemands le soient d'un holocauste plus que remis en question?
Qu'en pense Bronfman, roi de l'alcool et chantre milliardaire d'un holocauste de 6 millions de juifs, alors que l'American Jewish year book, fixe à 3.300.000 le nombre de juifs présents en 1941 en Europe occupée?
Qu'ont fait les juifs en matière de réparations envers la population noire alors que l'Allemagne aura versé en 2030, la somme de 119 milliards 790 millions de marks (Multiplier par 3 pour avoir l'équivalent en francs) !!!
Que vont faire les Juifs pour entretenir la mémoire et le sentiment de culpabilité juive envers les Noirs?
Ce génocide va-t-il être rappelé sans cesse dans les médias?
Les politiciens juifs vont-ils sans cesse demander pardon aux Noirs?
Va-t-on conduire les enfants juifs sur les lieux du crime ou à des expositions?
Vont-ils faire en sorte que cet horrible génocide ne tombe jamais dans l'oubli?
Actuellement des êtres humains en provenance d'Asie, d'Amérique Latine et d'Afrique sont l'objet de trafics menés par des juifs.
Que vont faire les juifs à leur égard?
Et les Palestiniens?
Qui en dehors du professeur Shahak, va s'élever contre le martyre et l'injustice qui leur est imposé?
Où sera le monument commémoratif et quelles réparations les juifs vont-il accorder aux Russes pour ceux massacrés dans des Goulags par un régime entièrement juifs par ses idéologues, ses financiers, ses politiciens, ses administrateurs et ses bourreaux carcéraux et concentrationnaires, ou réduits à des famines volontairement agencées comme en Ukraine où il y eut six millions de morts?
Les juifs vont-ils demander pardon pour l'outrecuidance de leurs livres saints racistissimes: «Le peuple de Yahwé est le peuple distingué parmi tous les peuples.
- Israël est le peuple élu entre toutes les nations
- Le Seigneur t'a choisi pour être son peuple à lui parmi tous les peuples de la terre
- Tous les peuples que le Seigneur ton Dieu te livre, tu les dévoreras et les regarderas sans pitié
- De tes fils tu feras des princes par toute la terre - Yahwé a mis Israël à la tête de toutes les nations
3
- Le Seigneur ton Dieu exterminera les peuples chez qui tu te rends pour les déposséder de leur territoire
- Les Dieux des autres peuples sont des fantômes, des idoles et des démons.
- Aux serviteurs des idoles il faut faire une guerre d'extermination.»
Y a-t-il une phrase analogue de ce type mystico-mégalo-paranoïaco-raciste dans tout Mein Kampf? Non! Absolument pas. 30 décembre 2004 Autres sources et travaux: Who brought the slaves to America?-(Liberty Bell, decembre 1976).
Elisabeth Donnan: Documents illustrative of the History of the slave trade to America. Malcom Cowley: Adventures of an African slave. (1928).
Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein: The Story of the Jews in Newport. (Carnegie Institute of Technology-Pittsburgh).
The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews publié en 1991 par The Nation of Islam, PO Box 551, Boston MA 02119, USA. .
Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger - Dossiers secrets du XXIème siècle
vendredi 10 février 2012.
Lien permanent
D › Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger
Auteur : Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger
Ouvrage : Dossiers secrets du XXIème siècle Vérité et synthèse La fin des impostures
Année : 19**
Lien de téléchargement : Dommergue_Polacco_de_Menasce_Roger_-_Dossiers_secrets_du_XXIeme_siecle.zip
"C'est dans la nuit des temps que l'homme a commencé à s'égarer" Lao-Tseu. "La vérité à ce niveau, ce n'est même plus de l’héroïsme, c'est une grandiose folie: vous êtes le plus marginal des marginaux", Docteur... "Cette main est celle du type humain le plus achevé au niveau de l'intelligence pure. Celui qui en est doté sera contraint au suicide ou à la folie s'il ne jouit pas d'une situation sociale suffisante ou d'une fortune personnelle, de fait de la brutalité et de la dureté de la vie. Si l'homme à la main psychique parvient à sur-vivivre il communiquera à une petite chapelle d'initiés intelligents des connaissances que l'inspiration lui aura dictées". "Le dandy,quand il ne se tue pas ou ne devient pas fou, fait carrière et pose pour la postérité" Albert Camus (L'homme révolté) "J'ai déversé sur toi toutes les forces du mal afin que tu connaisses la maternité de Dieu". " Je crois que je comprends bien vos difficultés. je souhaite que vous puissiez les dépasser sans les oublier" ( Albert Camus - lettre à l'auteur) " L'homme qu i a contact avec le surnaturel est par essence ROI.car il est la présence dans l a société sous forme d'infiniment petit d'un ORDRE TRANSCENDANT AU SOCIAL". ( Simone Weil ) ...
- Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger - Le martyre et l'holocauste des nègres par les juifs trafiquants esclavagistes
- Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger - La fin du judéo cartésianisme
- Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger - Dossiers secrets du XXIème siècle
- Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger - Auschwitz : Le silence de Heidegger
- Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger - Ce que des Juifs importants ont affirmé au sujet des Juifs Ce que des Goyim célèbres ont confirmé
- Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce Roger - Comment méditer l'athéisme et la réincarnation ?
Ouvrages similaires :
- Mathieu Olivier - Comment peut-on être provocateur ?
- Verbeke Herbert - Reynouard Vincent - L'expertise de Richard Krege Le mythe de l'Holocauste est définitivement mort
- Brigneau François - Mais qui est donc le professeur Faurisson ?
- Theil Georges - Un cas d'insoumission Comment on devient révisionniste
- Reynouard Vincent - Berclaz René-Louis - D'Oradour-sur-Glane à Berne Contre la censure, les mensonges & le racket international
- Faurisson Robert - Céline devant le mensonge du siècle et Notes céliniennes
- Faurisson Robert - Chronique sèche de l'épuration
- Faurisson Robert - Ecrits révisionnistes - IV - 1993 à 1998
- Faurisson Robert - Ecrits révisionnistes - III - 1990 à 1992
- Faurisson Robert - Ecrits révisionnistes - II - 1984 à 1989
- Faurisson Robert - Ecrits révisionnistes - I - 1974 à 1983
- Leloup C. - Souvenirs de l'occupation et de la libération de la Belgique
- Verbeke Herbert - Génocide contre qui ? Par... qui ?
- Colloque La lutte contre le négationnisme
- Thion Serge - Une allumette sur la banquise
- Thion Serge - Vérité historique ou vérité politique ?
- A propos du livre Une technique du mal Le Nazisme
- Leuchter Frederick A. - Le Rapport Leuchter
- Garaudy Roger - L'Avenir : mode d'emploi
- Faurisson Robert - A propos de l'arrêt Touvier L'affaire des Juifs bruns
- Faurisson Robert - Le défi d'un Humoriste juif
- Garaudy Roger - Les mythes fondateurs de la politique israélienne
- Garaudy Roger - Le procés du Sionisme israélien
- Faurisson Robert - En confidence Entretien avec l'inconnue
- Faurisson Robert - Les victoires du révisionnisme
- Reynouard Vincent - Le massacre d'Oradour
S'abonner
Robert Faurisson
Websites of Interest
- Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
- Bradley Smith's Blog
- L'Association des Anciens Amateurs de Récits de Guerres et d'Holocaustes
- Adelaide Institute
- One Third Of the Holocaust
- Michèle Renouf
- Ernst Zündel
- Comite de soutien à Vincent Reynouard
- Dernières nouvelles de la scène révisionniste
ROGER DOMMERGUE, ERNST ZUNDEL AND MICHAEL HOFFMAN
Jewish Scholar Professor Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce
Playlists
Playlists
3 videos
|
Roger Dommergue - Zundel 3 Videos
Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce - Zundel
|
4 videos
|
Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce 4 Videos
Entretien avec le professeur
Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce |
Michael A. Hoffman II explained
| Michael Anthony Hoffman II | |
| Birth Date: | 1954 |
| Birth Place: | New York |
| Occupation: | novelist, revisionist historian |
| Genre: | History |
| Website: | http://www.revisionisthistory.org |
Hoffman is the managing editor of the newsletter Revisionist History, and describes himself as a "heretical writer." He is little known to mainstream audiences, but has produced many books and articles.
Education and employment
He was educated at the State University of New York at Oswego. He is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and is the author of several books and articles (including for the UK-based magazine Fortean Times). Hoffman moved from New York to Idaho in 1996. Hoffman now writes mainly on World War II revisionism, current affairs, and the occult roots of freemasonry.Views on cryptocracy
Hoffman's self-described vocation is "researching the occult cryptocracy's orchestration of American history." He believes that this cryptocracy runs American history, controlling culture and thought via ritualistic psychodramas and killing sprees. A detailed explanation of this hypothesis is found in Hoffman's Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare. Examples of such "psychodramas," in Hoffman's view, include Route 66 (which connects various centers of Satanic importance), and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, in which Hoffman sees ritualistic elements.[2].Hoffman also argues that the gnosis of this ruling cabal are slowly being revealed through movies such as They Live and The Matrix and other forms of symbolic and subliminal communication which Hoffman terms twilight language.[3]
Views on Jews and Judaism
In his book Judaism's Strange Gods (2000) Hoffman argues that modern-day Jewish Orthodoxy has little to no relation to the Tanakh (the Jewish sacred texts that also form the basis of the Christian Old Testament), but on the Talmud and the Mishnah. Hoffman cites[4] the Karaites, a Jewish sect who reject the Talmud, as "a group which, historically, has been most hated and severely persecuted by orthodox Jewish rabbinate."Hoffman also contends that the British Empire might have achieved its power via a pact John Dee made with Kabbalistic Judaism [5]. He has characterized Jews as "Khazars" and "Edomite parasites" and Ashkenazi (Central and Eastern European Jews) as "Ash-ken-nazi". [6]
Views on the Holocaust
Hoffman doubts that execution gas chambers existed in the Nazi camp Auschwitz-Birkenau, and claims that the term "Holocaust" is Orwellian Newspeak [7] imposed beginning circa 1978 in order to confuse and distract from debates about the numbers of Jewish deaths that can be attributed to Nazis. Hoffman doubts that six million Jews were killed by the Nazis and asserts that most of the Jewish deaths in WWII were from typhus, malnutrition and shootings perpetrated by some units of the SS on the Eastern front.Hoffman differs from other Holocaust deniers in believing that Hitler did indeed have as a goal, at least philosophically, the extermination (ausrottung) of the Jewish people, but Hoffman also argues that the primary means of extermination -- the execution gas chambers of Auschwitz -- have not been scientifically proved to have existed or been operable, and that "eyewitness" testimony failed under cross-examination at the 1985 "Great Holocaust Trial" of Ernst Zündel in Toronto.
Hoffman points to German eyewitnesses such as Thies Christophersen who maintained there were no execution gas chambers in Auschwitz. Hoffman has been influenced by the research of Charles D. Provan, Carlo Mattogno, Germar Rudolf [8] and Brian Renk.
Hoffman rejects the label "Holocaust denier," and argues[9] that the label is applied unfairly, and with an emotional rather than empirical basis, to those who research controversial issues related to WWII and Judaism -- according to Hoffman, applying the same partisan logic, those who doubt the Roman Catholic dogma of the Immaculate Conception would be stigmatized by journalists and academics as "Immaculate Conception deniers."
Views of Slavery
Another of Hoffman's subjects of study is indentured servitude and slavery in America; he contends that a widespread history of white slavery has been overlooked by most historians. In his book They Were White and They Were Slaves, Hoffman attempts to demonstrate a social structure situating poor whites as holding the lowest post in colonial and post-colonial America, even to the point of citing a quote from Eugene D. Genovese in "Toward a New View of America" (pp. 79, 81-82, 84, 90-91), in which a former black slave in South Carolina, Ella Kelly, refers to the poor whites as the bottom rung, black slaves occupying the middle, and the white planters as the ruling stratum.Notes and References
- Michael Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America, University of California Press:2003
- http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=74 Hoffman, Michael A. King Kill 33
- Gardell, 99
- http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html Hoffman, Michael A. "The Truth About the Talmud"
- http://ftp.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/h/ftp.py?people/h/hoffman.michael/british-pact-with-devil Shofar FTP Archive File: people/h/hoffman.michael/british-pact-with-devil; URL accessed February 14, 2007
- http://ftp.nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hoffman-michael/in-his-words-9410.html In His WordsThe Mouth and Mind of Michael Hoffman II, October 1994
- http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p467_Hoffman.html Hoffman, Michael A. "The Psychology and Epistemology of 'Holocaust' Newspeak"
- http://www.vho.org/dl/ENG/trr.pdf Rudolph, Germar "The Rudolph Report: Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the 'Gas Chambers' at Auschwitz"
- http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p467_Hoffman.html Hoffman, Michael A. "The Psychology and Epistemology of 'Holocaust' Newspeak"
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
The Accusation Of “Anti-Semitism” I: Zionism, “Jewish Israelis” And Revisionism
 |
| Anyone who demands the full liberation of Palestine and nothing less, and who has no fear of criticizing "Jewish voices for peace" that are really just Zionist shields, will immediately be stamped with the "anti-Semitism" label. |
Prelude: In the wake of my two-part deconstruction of “mask of Zion” wearer Uri Avnery and the grave intellectual and ideological problems within the International Palestine Solidarity Movement, I was accused of “anti-Semitism” by a well-known voice within the blogosphere who rushed to Avnery’s defense. While this person’s reply to my vastly-documented work did not warrant such a response, I diligently composed this series to demolish and banish any similar accusations that are sure to arise in the future. In this first part, we delve into the true nature and wider historical context of Zionism, what it means to be a “Jewish Israeli” and the always-controversial realm of Holocaust® revisionism....
Like the moon rising upon the completion of sunset, it can be described as nothing other than inevitable that as soon as one raises one’s voice above a whisper in regards to the twisted, cancerous and supremacist ideology that guides the usurping Zionist entity occupying Palestine and the far-reaching global Jewish-Zionist Lobby that protects it from even the slightest criticism, one will be hysterically demonized, slandered, libeled, smeared and browbeaten with the label of “anti-Semitism.” If one criticizes any person of Jewish origin who expresses ‘support’ for Palestine but who also harbors blatant Zionist sympathies and actively attempts to impose this Zionism on others to delay, deflect and outright silence discussion on key matters relevant to full Palestinian liberation, one will once again face the same hysteria reignited like a supremacist conflagration and receive the chastisement of “anti-Semitism.” This inevitable calumny has now found its way to my person.
On February 2nd, 2012, I completed and published a two-part series deconstructing and exposing the ‘Israeli’ activist for ‘peace,’ Uri Avnery (real name: Helmut Ostermann), a highly-regarded figure in the Palestine Solidarity Movement. The first part secondarily dealt with Avnery’s expertly-masked supremacism and chiefly, his elephantine lies against Islamic Resistance movements, which were smashed to pieces as perversions of history (1). The second, more controversial part of the series examined and documented Avnery’s support for the Zionist entity’s current top stooge in the United States, President Barack Obama, as well as his glowing approval for NATO’s genocidal aggression against Libya and his obscene call for more genocide in Syria. It also delved deeply into the reasons behind the degeneration of the Solidarity Movement and the relation of persons like Avnery to this deterioration (2). For this, I was vitriolically accused of “anti-Semitism” by one Steve Amsel, operator of the website ‘Desert Peace,’ in a short, slanderous op-ed that he penned entitled, “In Defense Of Uri Avnery (3).”
 |
| Zionists do not work well with facts; they are much more comfortable with ad hominem distortions. |
The idea of falling “into the trap set by the Zionists themselves” by unveiling the true face of a Zionist only could have originated in a purgatorial, Orwellian realm located between the laughable and the demented. I would sincerely like someone to explain to me, preferably in the most vivid way possible, how exposing Zionists... benefits Zionists. This asininity will be revisited in the conclusion. The title “Jewish Israeli” is one that deserves a brief but thorough examination; what does it mean, really, to be a “Jewish Israeli?”
Since “Israeli” is a fabricated identity, one based on the theft of Palestinian food like falafel, hummus, olive oil and maftoul as well as Palestinian folklore and culture (4), and “Israel” is a fabricated entity, one based on 131 years of illegal, immoral Jewish colonization of Palestine and the destruction of more than 500 Palestinian villages during the (still-ongoing) Nakba (5), to be a “Jewish Israeli” is to be a colonizer and a destroyer of Palestine. To be a “Jewish Israeli” is to have racial and colonial privileges over the indigenous Palestinian people; at least 30 racist, supremacist laws within “Israel” solidify and uphold these privileges (6). Several of these laws represent a system in which all persons of Jewish heritage on the planet have the “right” to become “Israeli” while all Palestinians, refugees and current inhabitants of Palestine, are systematically denied the most basic human rights (7). To be a “Jewish Israeli” is to serve in the Zionist occupation army and massacre Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese, Egyptians, et al. The essence of the “Jewish Israeli” identity is the identity of an oppressor, of a murderer, and irregardless of whatever ‘mask of Zion’ that Zionists attempt to place on it, this is all that it is.
 |
| Uri Avnery partook in the (ongoing) ethnic cleansing of Palestine as a member of the terrorist Givati Brigades. |
Amsel also brazenly demands, “After a long lifetime in the struggle, both as an activist and a pro Palestinian voice in the Israeli Knesset, Avnery deserves honour, not discredit.” What “struggle” did Uri Avnery participate in? The Zionists’ “struggle” to butcher, rape, pillage, ethnically cleanse, murder and demolish their way to a “state” built upon the bodies of the aboriginals? What a monstrous insult to the Palestinian people who have been waging a real struggle against Zionism since the first criminal Jewish colonists arrived in their homeland in 1881 (5).
 |
| Palestinian hunger striker and hero Khader Adnan; Uri Avnery and other likeminded Jewish supremacists could never even dream of his courage. |
And “pro Palestinian?” How does bombing and ethnically cleansing Palestinians make one “pro Palestinian?” How does recognizing the entity that usurped Palestinians of their land and giving them a demilitarized ghetto-prison “state” for a consolation prize make one “pro Palestinian?” More Zionist newspeak; more Zionist doublethink. It is astonishing that Amsel would suggest that a terrorist and killer of Palestinians deserves “honor.” Would he suggest that Sharon and Peres, Barak and Olmert also deserve “honor?” It is equally astonishing that he invokes the “Israeli” Knesset as if it were an institution of justice, human rights and dignity, and serving in this institution leads to one embodying these qualities. It is nothing of the sort. The Knesset represents the institutionalized racism of Zionism, it is the structural personification of the Zionist occupation. It is the entity that passed the Orwellian “Boycott Bill,” which punishes any ‘citizen’ of “Israel” who boycotts the Zionist regime (13). And it is the entity that passed the “Nakba Law,” which criminalizes the remembrance and exposé of the Zionist regime’s ethnic cleansing of Palestine (14).
The exceptionally limited number of Palestinians who serve in the Knesset are routinely incited against, illegally arrested, groundlessly prosecuted and subjected to the most degrading anti-Arab racism (15). But this is Zionism that we are discussing here, and with it inherently comes maniacal violence. MK Talab al-Sana, chief of the Arab Democratic Party in “Israel,” has been threatened with death by letter (16). MK Ahmed Tibi has been threatened with death via Facebook (17). Survivor of the Freedom Flotilla Massacre, the gallant and eloquent MK Haneen Zoabi, has been threatened with death so many times (well over 50) that she told her secretary to stop informing her of it (18). “Israel” is not a normal “state,” and thus, its “state” institutions should not be treated with normalcy. The Knesset is an organ of Zionist oppression and it has absolutely no authority, legitimacy or jurisdiction over any part of Palestine. It, like the “Israeli” entity and identity, is a projection of the psychosis known as Jewish supremacism and it, like the “Israeli” entity and identity, must be boycotted, dismantled and abolished. Permanently.
To close his slanderous invective, Amsel presents a piece of Avnery’s entitled, “Reluctant Prophet,” to, evidently, show “what type of man he {Avnery} is through his description of another great Jewish (Israeli) person.” But of course! One “Israeli” praising another “Israeli,” occupier patting occupier on the back, all in the name of solidarity with Palestine, yes? The “Jewish Israeli person” in question is none other than Yeshayahu Leibowitz, the famed “Israeli” scholar and thinker who former “Israeli” President, Air Force Commander, Defense Minister and Irgun terrorist Ezar Weizman described as, “one of the greatest figures in the life of the Jewish people and the State of Israel in recent generations,” and also, “a spiritual conscience for many in Israel.” Leibowitz was a devout Orthodox Jew and arch Zionist who repeated lies about Hamas quite similar to those repeated by Avnery in his now-disgraced “Shukran, Israel” piece. Leibowitz famously stated after al-Naksa that, “The occupation of the territories would turn Israel into an agent of repression, whose citizens would be employed in growing numbers to police the Palestinians (19).” This is typical of the delusion that is Zionist romanticism.
 |
| Zionism is a supremacist force of destruction and manifests itself as "rightist" or "leftist" at will to further its agenda. |
Lest we forget, just so there isn’t an ounce of discrepancy on this matter of the intrinsical evil of Zionism, al-Nakba, the Qibya massacre, the Kafr Qassim massacre, Mossad’s assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy, al-Naksa, the murderous assault on the USS Liberty, further Zionist expansion into the occupied West Bank, al-Quds and Syria’s al-Jaulan, the implementation of the Law of Return as a “come to Palestine and steal some aboriginal land because you’re chosen” card for World Jewry and lastly, genocidal Operation Cast Lead, were all carried out by “left-wing” Zionist entity leaders. Khalas with this insulting false dichotomy and khalas with the recognition of any person as a credible source who attempts to preserve it. Amsel wrote that we would uncover what kind of person Avnery is through his gleaming depiction of Leibowitz in “Reluctant Prophet,” and indeed we do: he is a Zionist, a hardcore, self-deluding Zionist, whose concern with “peace” only translates to the racist preservation of the usurping Zionist entity, just like Leibowitz before him.
 |
| Questioning "The Holocaust®" in any capacity can get you imprisoned alongside hardened convicts for the criminal action of "thought crime." |
Prior to introducing the rubbish about Leibowitz, Amsel quoted a caption from the second part of my Avnery series dealing with the ‘holocaust’; the caption reads, “The Palestine Solidarity Movement is so busy paying its respects to the propaganda-ridden “chosen” holocaust, it is failing to adequately fight for Palestine.” Seemingly incapable of responding without hysteria, Amsel subsequently commented, “The above is a lie to discredit those Jews involved in the struggle. Nothing but pure, unadulterated anti-Semitism.” Odd. I did not mention “Jews” in the caption, but Amsel did, for the transparently perceptible reason of adding fuel to the “anti-Semitism” fire that he sought to burn me with.
No matter, a tidal wave of truth will douse the defamatory flames. Again, there was no examination of my remark, let alone a refutation. By no means was it a “lie” on any level and by no means was it an attempt to discredit anyone, Jewish or otherwise. It was an undoubtedly harsh but nevertheless accurate statement to wake up the Solidarity Movement from its Zionist-induced slumber. There are none so blind as those who choose their blindness, cherishing it as if it were a heavenly gift.
Thinker and activist Dr. Francis Clark-Lowes, along with esteemed activist and revisionist Paul Eisen before him, characterize the very essence of the caption. Both of these brilliant and fearless men have been expelled from a vital wing of the UK Palestine Solidarity Campaign for alleged ‘Holocaust® Denial’ and ‘anti-Semitism.’ Paul Eisen was ruthlessly targeted for having the spine to speak on Holocaust® revisionism and his beautiful, important website, Deir Yassin Remembered, a commemoration of the ungodly Zionist massacre of at least 112 Palestinian men, women and children on April 9th, 1948, is now defunct as a result of this cruel and dastardly character assault. This particular branch has been conquered by Jewish supremacists masquerading as “anti-Zionists” and it has become obsessed with ‘Holocaust® Denial’ and ‘anti-Semitism.’ It has even entered into a shadowy, unspoken alliance with toxic Zionist outlets like Engage, Harry’s Place and the Jewish Chronicle to fight its newfound obsessions (20).
Additionally, it has installed a precondition into its framework called “anti-racism,” an Orwellian phrase for “anything critical of Jewish-Zionist power will not be tolerated;” and it is doing everything that it can to deflect attention away from Zionism and Jewish supremacism, passing out leaflets and organizing forums that repeat the tiresome slogan of “Israel” being a settler-colonial apartheid state, insisting that “Israel” is an American client regime and even going as far as saying that Zionism has “non-Jewish origins (21),” one of the most astronomical assertions that I have ever come across. “Israel” is far worse and far more powerful than any “settler-colonial apartheid state” and this description at its root is deceptive and deflective (22). “Israel” absolutely is not another mere US client regime, as ‘American imperialism’ has no place in the Zionist entity (23) and its fifth column lobbying apparatus exercises immense power over the American government, as evidenced just recently with its coverup of the heavy, domineering Zionist hand in the butchering of Iraq and the push for more butchery in the Islamic Republic of Iran (24).
 |
| Rabbi Moses Hess: the REAL godfather of Zionism, the little-known creator of Communism and a hardcore Jewish supremacist. |
Beyond his rabbinic hatred of goyim in general, Hess had a particular rabid, racist dislike for the German people and his landmark book, “Rome and Jerusalem: the Last National Question,” penned in 1862, is filled with venomous rhetoric against Europeans and serves as a call to Jews to recognize their inherent superiority over all other peoples on earth and thus, “the new Jewish state would be a light to the nations showing them how to live in socialist harmony.” This written pronunciamento of Talmudism is the godfather work of Zionism. Why do “leftists” ignore Rebbe Hess? Because he is also the true founder of Communism (and its manifesto), their ideology’s backbone. Hess was the mentor of none other than Karl Marx, who referred to Hess as the “communist rabbi (26).” Leftists, most specifically those of Jewish heritage who put their tribal interests before everything, would rather dwell in delusion because they don’t want their political dogma tainted. But facts are facts; their dogma is forever linked to Zionism, a byproduct of Jewish supremacism.
If the nature of the Zionist entity is skewed, the root of its power is downplayed and its origins are designedly lied about, how can it be combated? How can the Solidarity Movement triumph, how can full freedom for Palestine be attained, when something is rotten at the core? In light of the facts presented here, especially the persecutions of Dr. Francis Clark-Lowes and Paul Eisen, is the caption sited by Amsel not vindicated? Is it not validated? Is its representation of truth not etched in even bolder ink?
Eisen and Clark-Lowes care deeply about Palestine, why should their (correct) opinions about World War II’s history disqualify them in any way from showing solidarity with the suffering Palestinian people? Why is a Palestine Solidarity organization dedicating so much of its time to ‘fighting’ the slippery, vague and idolatrous constructs of ‘anti-Semitism’ and ‘Holocaust® Denial’ while the Zionist occupation of Palestine rages on without mercy? And more importantly, why is a Palestine Solidarity organization allying itself with and behaving like the very Zionist outfits that incessantly berate and slander the Palestinian people and cause on a daily basis? And the answer is, because Jewish sensitivities regarding what took place during World War II and the irreconcilable need to maintain the uniqueness of Jewish suffering (as well as victimhood) and the racist notion that Jewish persecution at the hands of non-Jews just because they are Jewish is an inevitable occurrence have utterly crippled any rational debate or discussion on these issues (2).
 |
| Nazism doesn't even come close to the evil of Zionism. Comparing the two only benefits the Jewish supremacist agenda. |
It is a subtle but very effective method of disseminating Zionist propaganda. By equating to Zionism to Nazism or “Israelis” to Nazis, you are unequivocally saying that “Israel” is like the Nazi regime but there is nothing worse than the Nazi regime and no matter who suffers at the ironfisted hands of “Israel,” nothing can or will ever compare to the suffering of those who lived under Nazism, especially Jews. You are upholding the Zionist myth that the Nazis were the most evil persons to ever walk the planet and nothing that “Israel” does, no matter how savage, no matter how bloody, will ever trump this “ultimate Nazi evil.” Zionists, because of their Jewishness, because of their victimhood, will always be given the benefit of the doubt when their crimes are judged. “Look at what was done to them during the Holocaust®,” how many times has this atrocious fantasy been repeated as indisputable fact?
How many times have we said “Al-Nakba,” and we have been countered with, “but what about the ‘death’ camps...” How many times have we said, “Al-Naksa,” and we have been countered with, “but what about the human soap...” How many times have we said, “Sabra and Shatila, Qana, Marwaheen, Jenin, al-Khisas, al-Aqsa, al-Ibrahimi Mosque, Dahmash Mosque, Dueima, Lebanon ‘06, Cast Lead, countless other massacres, the torture, the dungeons, the administrative detention, the ethnic cleansing, the home demolitions, 64 years of illegal occupation,” and we have been countered with, “all of ‘that’ is horrible, sure, but what about the gas chambers...”
By capitulating to this supremacism, in which Jewish suffering always has primacy, the Palestine Solidarity Movement is helping maintain the status quo; by establishing preconditions to join a group meant to display solidarity with Palestine, but these preconditions protect Zionists and water down their crimes in the name of “fighting anti-Semitism and Holocaust® Denial,” the Palestine Solidarity Movement is operating as yet another Zionist fifth column, just like the ADL, which has a long record of spying for the Zionist entity (27), the Zionist Organization of America or AIPAC. The only difference is, its ‘mask of Zion’ is a much better cover than the others. It must change the path it is on.
 |
| The Zionist Power Configuration has turned "The Holocaust®" into an extortion racket that generates money for the global protection of the Zionist entity. |
If anything, investigating all narratives used by international Zionism to deepen its stranglehold over Palestine should be the prerequisite for joining a solidarity campaign, especially the Holocaust®, which “Israel” and its worldwide Jewish-Zionist network of sayanim have used as a weapon since its criminal founding to extort and influence Western governments, stifle international debate on “Israel”, infect the historical record with falsities, corrupt Western educational discourse and build Zionist fortunes. Dr. Alfred Lilienthal, the invaluable Jewish anti-Zionist pioneer, called it “Holocaustomania (28).”
Let this next statement ring from pillar to post in the Solidarity Movement, from western hemisphere to eastern hemisphere, in the hearts of the religious and the non-religious and in the minds of all persons from all political persuasions: National Socialism is dead and has been so for nearly seven decades; it was decapitated at the behest of international Zionism by the crippling military might of the Allied Powers. Adolf Hitler is dead too and he is not coming back; ever. Nazism is not the beast devouring our world today and Hitler isn’t the figurehead of the beast.
These two things are apparitions; they are boogeymen kept alive and perpetually invoked by the real “powers that be” to deter investigation into their criminal intrigues; nothing more. Zionism and Jewish supremacism are the interlocked demons eating away at the heart of our earth at the present moment, they are the forces behind the vast majority of the world’s problems and they are certainly, without a doubt, the driving force behind every major war of the last century, as correctly noted by the eloquent President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (29).
With that said, no, Nazism wasn’t the most evil ideology to have ever been spawned and no, Hitler wasn’t the most evil man to have ever lived; not even close. Jewish supremacism on the other hand, which destroyed Nazism and Germany itself in the process, is the most evil ideology to have ever been spawned and the persons who adhere to this belief system of “chosen-ness” are the most insidious group that humanity has ever known. The blood of hundreds of millions of innocents as a result of the major wars they have engineered are the genocidal proof.
 |
| Citizens of the world are afraid to criticize the crimes of Zionist Jewry because they don't want their name blackened with "anti-Semitism." |
And what of National Socialist Germany? Ernst Zündel, the steadfast fighter for truth, hero of history and revisionist giant, who has been dragged through the mud over the years by the Jewish community and Zionist media, imprisoned for “thought crime,” had his home burnt to the ground, targeted for murder by Jewish zealots and had his reputation completely destroyed, opined that National Socialism should be judged for defending Germany as well as the crimes it committed, for its achievements and failures, but nothing more, nothing less and certainly not for fanciful exaggerations (37).
Zündel rightfully believes that the collective memory of the world regarding Nazi Germany is one replete with everybody’s perception of that time period except that of Germans, and this is because the Zionists have ensured that the global forum be this way to protect their tribal interests and international agenda. Aforementioned Jewish Holocaust® revisionist Paul Eisen succinctly notes that there are three distinct, foundational principles to revisionism. Firstly, there never was an official plan on the part of Hitler or any other part of the Nazi regime to systematically and physically eliminate every Jew in Europe. Secondly, homicidal gas-chambers never existed. And thirdly, the numbers of Jewish victims have been exaggerated (37).
 |
| Children of "the West" are constantly bombarded with "Holocaust®" stories but none of them are rooted in anything even resembling fact. |
For the sake of truth, it must be said: the “annihilation of the Jews” narrative that has been relentlessly pumped into the consciousness of humanity since the rise of National Socialism is a farce. A hardcore dose of wartime propaganda that began in the spring of 1942 with hasbara cooked up by Jewish and Zionist agencies and then disseminated throughout the Jewish press. These unconfirmed and uncorroborated sensationalist reports about Jews being steamed to death, suffocated to death, pressed to death, electrocuted to death and gassed to death were then picked up by Zionist media apparatuses in both Britain and America, including the BBC and the New York Times, and were repeated as factual happenings. Not a single one of these reports were rooted in factuality; not one. In reality, hundreds of thousands of people, many of them Jews, died in the Nazi work-prison camp system from exhaustion, malnutrition and the typhus epidemic because the Hitler government failed to provide them the proper food and medicine. But this wasn’t deliberate. It was due to the sadistic 6-year blockade and the barbaric, deranged and cruel saturation bombing campaign carried out against Germany by the Allies, chiefly the Zionist-occupied United States (37).
Nothing defines the holocaust quite like the “homicidal gas chambers,” and no place embodies the “homicidal gas chambers” quite like Auschwitz, National Socialism’s most infamous camp complex. According to popular opinion, 4 million victims, mostly Jews, died in the Auschwitz “extermination” camp. But this, like most other facets of the Holocaust® religion narrative, is false, so false that even preeminent “Israeli” holocaust ‘historian’ Yehuda Bauer has admitted that it is a “deliberate myth.” The Zionist entity’s Holocaust® center and Poland’s Auschwitz State Museum have both reduced the Auschwitz death toll down to 1 million Jewish and Gentile victims but several other prominent historians put the number lower, as low as 500,000 Jewish and Gentile victims (39).
Moreover, the world famous Auschwitz “gas chamber” is a fake, every part of it. It was constructed brick by brick after World War II for propaganda reasons. It is from this point that the “homicidal gas chambers” story falls to pieces. American gas chamber expert Fred A. Leuchter, research chemist Dr. William B. Lindsey and Walter Lüftl, a prominent Austrian expert engineer who ran a huge Vienna-based engineering firm, have all proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the stories of Jews being exterminated by gassing en masse at Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek and Mauthausen are untrue on every level. After thorough investigations of the camps, all three men, preeminent authorities in the field, concluded that the stories were “absurd” and “technically impossible.” To reiterate, there isn’t a lick of documentary evidence which suggests that the Nazis planned a “final solution” for Euro-Jewry or “extermination” of Euro-Jewry. This truth can be reconciled with the fact that the vast majority of Jewish inmates unable to work in the camps were left alive and cared for, contrary to the oft-repeated hasbara that those unable to work were executed by gassing. Another major Jewish ‘historian,’ History Professor of Princeton Arno Mayer, has admitted that most Jews who died in Auschwitz died of typhus (39).
 |
| Wealthy Zionist fanatic Theodore Kaufman and his book of genocide, "Germany Must Perish." |
And yet, to note, yes, to simply note these critical historical facts long-suppressed by the Zionist media, to merely discuss this tiny, albeit devastating and refutative package of information, is to commit the ultimate sin, is to engage in the damnable-by-imprisonment thought crime of “Holocaust® denial.” To refuse to accept fabrications, inaccuracies, falsehoods, exaggerations and outright hasbara by Zionist propagandists is to be a “Holocaust® denier.” On the other hand, to accept these lies, these pernicious lies that have been used to justify the most berserk, inhuman aggressions against the people of Palestine and others, is to be a teller of truth, devoted “activist” and “humanist.” Is madness not what this Orwellian dichotomy represents? Is the very essence of “freedom of speech” not maimed beyond recognition by this eccentric duality?
The infamous, Zionist-engineered “312 incubator babies” story that led to the beginning of the decimation of Iraq more than 20 years ago has been exposed as a grisly hoax (41), should we still accept it as fact? The repugnant stories of the now-fallen Libyan leader Muammar al-Qadhdhafi giving his military forces Viagra and ordering them to rape civilians, which were used by NATO to increase its barbarous bombing of Libya, have also been exposed as totally baseless (42), should we still accept them as examples of truth? The story of Hamas causing the initiation of Operation Cast Lead by violating the ceasefire with the Zionist entity in late 2008 has been debunked as a Zionist lie; ‘Israel’ had not only been planning the Gaza massacre for quite some time, but it broke the ceasefire on November 4th, 2008 (43), should we still parrot the hasbara? And then there is the “WMDs in Iraq” story, which was another Zionist-birthed fallacy that caused more Iraqi blood to be spilled for the usurping ‘Israeli’ regime (44), should we still cite it as veracious? The emphatic answer to these four questions of course, is “NO!” Using this as the guideline, why then should the hasbara of the Holocaust® not be rejected any less resoundingly?
 |
| The Zionist entity fills the collective mind of the globe with lies and it is a professional obligation of mainstream "journalists" to accept these lies as truths. |
The Armenian Genocide of 1915-1923 is frequently belittled, downplayed and denied. The number of martyrs total more than 1.5 million but mainstream “authorities” routinely reduce this to around 300,000, without incident, without uproar. The ADL, Zionist spy nest and Mossad’s most powerful American front organization (45), leads the charge in suppressing the history of the Armenian Genocide (46). The Ukranian Genocide of 1932-1933, known as the Holodomor, is as badly ignored as the horrors experienced by the Armenian people. More than 10 million Ukranian men, women and children were mercilessly starved to death in a manmade famine, but this martyr count too is disgracefully reduced to numbers as low as 1 or 2 million. Once more, we find the ADL leading the charge to minimize and deny this crucial historical event, with ADL head and Jewish supremacist thug Abraham Foxman once telling reps of former Ukranian President Viktor Yushchenko that, “One thing that you need to be sensitive about is not to link it {the Holodomor} with ours {the Holocaust®}. Be careful. It cannot be played as your genocide, our genocide. Because that will be counterproductive on all sides (47).”
The Iraq Genocide that began with UN Resolution 661 on August 6th, 1990 and continues to rage on to this very moment is assuredly the most denigrated of modern day atrocities. Not only is the vast scope and sheer brutality and evil of the American-British invasion excused and lessened by the previously-discussed “authorities,” so are the numbers of the martyrs and this incessant need to “decrease and downplay” is nothing short of shameful. How many different death tolls are there? 30,000? 100,000? “Tens of thousands” is a common expression. “Collateral damage in the thousands” is also typical.
Even “one million dead” has become a trivialized slogan for “leftists” who ramble on about an “imperialism” that is faceless, as if there aren’t persons behind it with an exceedingly particular ideology. In reality, according to Iraq’s Ministry of Women’s Affairs, more than 2,500,000 Iraqis have lost their lives as a result of the criminal invasion and this staggering figure only includes the martyrs of 2003-2010 (48). Moreover, according to the Iraq Ministry of Health, the crippling, unrelenting sanctions that preceded the invasion claimed well over 2,000,000 lives, including 700,000 children (49). 4.5 million Iraqis dead and the ADL refers to this crime against humanity as “democratization (50).”
And the question, as always, is “WHY?” Why are the Armenian, Ukranian and Iraqi Genocides, all of which are rooted in graphic, prolific historical fact and detail, denied, downplayed and minimized by the establishment media? Because the establishment media is the Zionist media and the Zionist media is an instrument of the Jewish supremacist agenda. The Armenian, Ukranian and Iraqi Genocides weren’t Jewish, and because of this obvious but very telling fact, they aren’t newsworthy in the eyes of the Zionist media and the stooges that it employs as “reporters.” But there is a more mischievous reason as why these specific ‘atrocity events’ are devalued, nay, covered up, by the Zionist media and it is because they are all the products of Jewish-Zionist intrigue.
 |
| The ungodly Armenian Genocide was a crime against humanity carried out by the agents of Jewish-Zionist intrigue. |
Their flagship propaganda paper, “The Young Turk,” was managed by none other than Jewish supremacist Vladimir “Iron Wall” Jabotinsky, the genocidal spiritual godfather of the Irgun terror gang, and arms used in their massacres were provided by powerful Jewish financier of the Bolsheviks, Alexander Israel Helphand, better known as “Parvus.” Emmanuel Carasso, Jewish-Zionist founder of the Young Turks, maintained close links to and sought advice from B’nai B’rith, the institution of Jewish Freemasonry, throughout their campaign of bloodshed and militarism (53).
Without the Young Turks’ overthrow of the Ottoman Empire, there would not be a usurping Zionist entity in Palestine now; there would be no Zionist occupation. To understand that the perpetrators of the Armenian Genocide were one of the seemingly endless tentacles of international Zionism is to understand a major missing piece of the geopolitical puzzle. The Zionists were well-aware that the Ottoman Empire had to be liquidated if they were to turn Palestine into a “Jewish homeland,” hence why the Young Turks, a force almost exclusively comprised of Jews, were put into action. Today, the Zionist Power Matrix not only wants this hidden Jewish history ignored, but buried; it wants to maintain the idea that “Muslim Young Turks” massacred Armenian Christians to further the Zionist “divide and conquer” agenda.
 |
| The savage reign of the Bolsheviks was a Jewish endeavor; this devastating fact of history has been forgotten by the world thanks to the Zionist propaganda machine. |
The Zionist media has deliberately entombed these facts because the Holocaust® narrative of “perennial Jewish victimhood” wouldn’t hold as much as weight if the world knew that Jews were nothing even remotely close to victims in Bolshevik-Stalinist Russia; they were the rulers, oppressors and tormenters, just like they are in Palestine today. The only difference is the name of the ideology. Bolshevism and Zionism are simply two heads of the same Jewish supremacist dragon.
While several top academics have documented the domineering Zionist role in the planning and execution of the destruction of Iraq, most notably Professor John J. Mearsheimer and Professor Steven Walt in their landmark work, “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy,” as well as Dr. Stephen J. Sniegoski in his masterpiece, “The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel,” it has not been discussed (at all) that Mossad, the Zionist entity’s international intelligence directorate, has been the chief player in keeping the Iraqi nation in chaos by endlessly planting car bombs and attempting to foment ethno-sectarian war. Very few have spoken above a whisper that the annihilation of Iraq wasn’t just for the “protection” of the usurping ‘Israeli’ regime but for the expansion of it (56).
 |
| Speaking out against the mighty Zionist Lobby is not just forbidden, it is "anti-Semitic." |
And while the two said books also prominently featured the little-known truth that “neoconservativism,” the guiding ideology of the Zionist warmongers behind Iraq’s butchering, is a sole invention of Jewish intellectuals who desperately desire to preserve the existence of the Zionist entity at any cost, it did not focus on what drove these tribalists to found the ideology to begin with: “Holocaust® consciousness (57).” So these men, nearly all of whom are Jewish, just like the Bolsheviks before them, are pushing, bullying, influencing and lobbying Western governments to fight imperial wars for Jewish interests and the preservation of “Israel” in the name of the “6 million Jewish victims” of the Holocaust®.
Paul Wolfowitz, the author of the “Wolfowitz Doctrine” and the chief Zionist strategist behind Iraq’s dismemberment, stated, “That sense of what happened in Europe in World War II has shaped a lot of my views (58).” Wolfowitz’s ‘partner in crime,’ fellow arch Zionist, Iraq War planner and ‘Israeli’ spy Richard Perle, echoes this sentiment, “The defining moment of our history was certainly the Holocaust. It was destruction, a genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering. We don’t want that to happen again. When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes, we should do so, because when we fail to do so, the results are catastrophic (59).” Astounding.
When these revelations are presented in context with the earlier iconoclastic bombshells regarding the exaggerations and fabrications so intimately associated with the Holocaust®, you get the feeling that these persons are insane; not metaphorically, but literally insane. Jewish supremacist warmongers like Wolfowitz, Perle and the rest of their neoconservative tribal brethren are planning and ordering wars that are based on lies in the memory of the biggest historical lie of our time. I am legitimately asking here: does it get anymore psychotic than this? And please, allow me to ask another question... doesn’t researching the Holocaust® and debunking all of the gobbledygook that comes along with it become all that more important when the stability of our world is being threatened by madmen who believe in its manufactured uniqueness and righteousness? This is an especially important point when considering ‘Israeli’-American aggression against Iran is on the rise (60), and the “prevention of a second holocaust” is the pretext that is being invoked by the ‘left’ and ‘right’ wings of the Jewish spectrum to destroy thousands of years of Persian history.
 |
| The Zionists are invoking "The Holocaust®" as a pretext to destroy the Islamic Republic of Iran. |
Not only does this bloodthirsty trash reinforce the point made earlier that Zionism is chameleonic and it can manifest itself as “rightist” or “leftist” at will as a means of enforcing the Jewish supremacist agenda at its core, it illuminates a much more important matter: investigating the Holocaust® and exposing it for the psychological warfare that it truly represents isn’t only a must for the people of Palestine but for every truth-seeking, peace-seeking human on this planet.
In his groundbreaking book, “The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics,” brother Jihad (Gilad) Atzmon writes some monumentally important words on page 176 that encapsulate the vivid details of this section wholeheartedly, “We should also ask what purpose Holocaust denial laws serve? What is the Holocaust religion there to conceal? As long as we fail to ask questions, we will be subjected to Zionist lobbies and their plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish suffering. We will maintain our complicity in Western imperialist crimes (64).”
~ End Of Part I ~
Next: The revolutionary, fearless breakdown of international Zionism's linguistic weaponry, the examination and refutation of Jewish "chosen-ness" and the ever-stunning heights of Zionist arrogance...
Sources:
(1) The Case Of Uri Avnery I: “Shukran, Israel” Analyzed And Refuted by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(2) The Case Of Uri Avnery II: Hasbara, Supremacism And The Future Of Solidarity by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(3) In Defense Of Uri Avnery by Steve Amsel, Desert Peace
(4) Hummus And Falafel Are Already “Israeli.” Now They’re Coming For Palestine’s Olive Oil Too by Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada
(5) Resisting The Nakba by Professor Joseph Massad, Al-Ahram Weekly
(6) The Rights Of Israel by Professor Joseph Massad, Al-Jazeera English
(7) Is Israel A Democracy Or An Ethnocracy? by Ben White, The New Statesman
(8) Understanding The Opposition To NATO’s Intervention In Libya by Uri Avnery, Redress Information and Analysis
(9) Uri Avnery Interview by Jon Elmer, The Progressive
(10) 1948 Remembered By The People Who Were There by The Independent
(11) Take Action For Hunger Striking Palestinian Prisoner Khader Adnan! by Samidoun: Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network; Deal Reached To End Khader Adnan’s Detention By 17 April; 66 Day Hunger Strike Ends by Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada; Starving For Freedom: The Hunger Strike Of Khader Adnan by Ali Abunimah, Al-Jazeera English
(12) Kissinger’s 1974 Plan For Food Control Genocide by Joseph Brewda, The Executive Intelligence Review
(13) Anti-Boycott Bill Becomes Law After Passing Knesset by Lahav Harkov, The Jerusalem Post
(14) Knesset Approves Nakba Law by Elad Benari, Arutz Sheva
(15) Equality For Palestinians? Israel Won’t Have It by Ben White, The Guardian
(16) Arab MK Gets Death Threats by WAFA
(17) Israeli Arab MK Lodges Complaints After Receiving Death Threats On Facebook by Jonathan Lis and Ophir Bar-Zohar, Haaretz
(18) Arab-Israeli Parliamentarian Fights Death Threats by Mel Frykberg, Inter Press Service
(19) Obituaries: Yeshayahu Leibowitz, 91, Iconoclastic Israeli Thinker by Joel Greenberg, The New York Times
(20) As A Jew... A Letter To Sarah Colbourne by Paul Eisen
(21) From The Outside Looking In... The PSC AGM by Paul Eisen, deLIBERATION
(22) “International Zionism Is Strangling The World:” Interview With Jonathan Azaziah by Kourosh Ziabari, Mask of Zion
(23) Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth; Section – Cablegate Fraud II: Disgusting Zionist Lies by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(24) The Iraq War Cover-Up: What Did AIPAC Do And When Did It Do It? by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss
(25) Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti-Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition And Deceit; Chapter – Moses Hess And The Secret Relationship Between Judaism, Zionism And Communism, Section – Moses Hess And Judaism, Pages 862-863 by Professor Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research
(26) Emancipation: Moses Hess To Theodor Herzl by Michael Goldfarb, Global Post
(27) The Anti-Defamation League: A Protector Of Civil Rights Or Silencer Of Free Speech? by American Muslims for Palestine
(28) Book Review: The Holocaust Industry: Reflections On the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering by James A. Montanye, The Independent Institute
(29) Ahmadinejad: Zionists Started Both World Wars by Yitzhak Benhorin, Ynet
(30) Stunning Jewish Success Dominates American Media by Jeffrey Blankfort, Intifada Palestine; Do Jews Dominate In American Media? And So What If We Do? by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss
(31) A Talmud Ace Tackles Thorny Issue Of Net Neutrality by Joy Resmovits, The Jewish Daily Forward
(32) Triple-Exthnics by Nathan Abrams, The Jewish Quarterly
(33) Israel Trips On Ecstasy by The Washington Times
(34) Bill Text 102nd Congress (1991-1992) H.J.RES.104.ENR by The Library of Congress
(35) Pakistan: Gateway To The Zionist Endgame by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black
(36) The Salala Massacre: NATO’s Naked Aggression Against Pakistan And The Hegemonic Israeli-Indo-American Strategy Behind It by Martin Iqbal and Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(37) The Holocaust Wars by Paul Eisen, Righteous Jews
(38) A Conscious Pariah by Nathaniel Popper, The Nation
(39) Auschwitz: Myths And Facts by Mark Weber, The Institute For Historical Review
(40) The Book That Hitler Fears: Germany Must Perish by Theodore N. Kaufman, Argyle Press; Introductory Note by Mark Weber, The Institute For Historical Review
(41) Syria Under Fire: Zionist Destabilization Hits Critical Mass; Section – Hasbara In Full Effect: Exaggerations and Fabrications by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(42) Amnesty Questions Claim That Gaddafi Ordered Rape As Weapon Of War by Patrick Cockburn, The Independent
(43) US Media Didn’t Report Israeli Ceasefire Violation by Jim Lobe and Ali Gharib, The Electronic Intifada
(44) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(45) The Ugly Truth About The ADL by The Executive Intelligence Review
(46) ADL’s Abe Foxman Disputes Criticism On Armenian Genocide Position by Armenian National Committee Of America
(47) Defamation (film) by Yoav Shamir
(48) Army Of Widows, Orphans Trail US War by Press TV
(49) Lifting The Iraq Embargo After Almost 2 Million Deaths by Dr. M. Amir Ali, Institute Of Islamic Information and Education
(50) Iraq War: Is It Good For Jews, And Israel? by Abraham Foxman, Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith
(51) Young Turks, Freemasons And Jews by Elie Kedourie, Middle Eastern Studies (Vol. 7, No. 1, Jan. 1971)
(52) The Young Turks: Who Were They? by Radio Islam
(53) Palmerston Launches Young Turks To Permanently Control Middle East by Joseph Brewda, The Schiller Institute
(54) Stalin’s Jews by Sever Plocker, Ynet
(55) The Jewish Role In The Bolshevik Revolution And Russia’s Early Soviet Regime: Assessing The Grim Legacy Of Soviet Communism by Mark Weber, The Institute For Historical Review
(56) Occupied Iraq: New Year, Same Zionism by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(57) The Neoconservative Persuasion: Examining The Jewish Roots of An Intellectual Movement by Gal Beckerman, The Jewish Daily Forward
(58) The Busy Life Of Being A Lightning Rod For Bush by Eric Schmitt, The New York Times
(59) The War Party by BBC Panorama
(60) Iran Escalation: All The Elements For War Are Coming Together by Tom Burghardt, Global Research
(61) The Holocaust Is A Good Reason, Not A bad Excuse, For Attacking Iran by Chemi Shalev, Haaretz
(62) Charles Krauthammer: A Pen In Defense Of Zion by Bret Stephens, The Israel Report
(63) Krauthammer: Israel ‘Will Strike’ Iran To “Prevent A Second Holocaust” by The Daily Caller
(64) The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics; Chapter 21 – Truth, History And Integrity, Page 176 by Gilad Atzmon, Zero Books
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
FAIR USE NOTICE
All articles, poetry and lyrics are the copywritten property of Jonathan Azaziah. Websites and individuals can post the written works of Jonathan Azaziah as long as they provide the name of Jonathan Azaziah and a link to www.maskofzion.com.
This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Reading the articles posted on this blog represents such a request for information.
Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Common Dreams and Informationclearinghouse.
ISLAMIC INTELLIGENCE
Friday, March 02, 2012
Me voici poursuivi par la LICRA pour "contestation de crimes contre l"humanité".
COMMUNIQUÉ DE PAUL-ÉRIC BLANRUE!
Le 1er mars 2012, au lendemain du retocage par le Conseil constitutionnel de la loi réprimant la contestation du génocide arménien, j'ai été convoqué dans les locaux de la Police judiciaire de Paris.
...
Au moment même où la liberté de recherche est reconnue par l'institution française dont l'une des fonctions est de veiller à la constitutionnalité des lois, je suis poursuivi par la LICRA (Ligue contre le racisme et l'antisémitisme) pour "contestation de crimes contre l'humanité" au sujet du documentaire "Un Homme" consacré au professeur Robert Faurisson.
J'ai refusé de répondre aux questions du Gardien de la paix chargé de mon audition.
Le titre de l'éditorial du Monde de ce jour (n° 20 874) est : "Le Parlement n'est pas un tribunal de l'Histoire". Dans sa chronique, Pierre Assouline écrit qu'il "serait temps de reconsidérer la question des lois mémorielles (toutes, sans exception)."
La loi Gayssot du 13 juillet 1990 en vertu de laquelle je suis poursuivi est une aberration par rapport aux principes de notre Droit. La loi n’a pas à intervenir dans la définition de la vérité historique. Dans un État libre, cette fonction est celle des historiens et des citoyens.
Ayant lancé en août 2010 une pétition contre la loi Gayssot soutenue par l'intellectuel Noam Chomsky et signée par plus de 3 000 personnes, je réclame à nouveau l’abrogation de cette loi inique condamnant à de lourdes amendes et à de la prison ferme les citoyens qui ne se plient pas à un dogme historique qui s'est transformé en religion.
J'appelle les esprits libres à se révolter contre cette infamie et à me soutenir dans le combat que j'ai entrepris pour la liberté de recherche.
Paul-Éric Blanrue, 1er mars 2012.
HTTP://blanrue.blogspot.com/2012/03/blanrue-poursuivi-par-la-licra-pour.html
Salut à tous !
Le 1er mars 2012, au lendemain du retocage par le Conseil constitutionnel de la loi réprimant la contestation du génocide arménien, j'ai été convoqué dans les locaux de la Police judiciaire de Paris.
...
Au moment même où la liberté de recherche est reconnue par l'institution française dont l'une des fonctions est de veiller à la constitutionnalité des lois, je suis poursuivi par la LICRA (Ligue contre le racisme et l'antisémitisme) pour "contestation de crimes contre l'humanité" au sujet du documentaire "Un Homme" consacré au professeur Robert Faurisson.
J'ai refusé de répondre aux questions du Gardien de la paix chargé de mon audition.
Le titre de l'éditorial du Monde de ce jour (n° 20 874) est : "Le Parlement n'est pas un tribunal de l'Histoire". Dans sa chronique, Pierre Assouline écrit qu'il "serait temps de reconsidérer la question des lois mémorielles (toutes, sans exception)."
La loi Gayssot du 13 juillet 1990 en vertu de laquelle je suis poursuivi est une aberration par rapport aux principes de notre Droit. La loi n’a pas à intervenir dans la définition de la vérité historique. Dans un État libre, cette fonction est celle des historiens et des citoyens.
Ayant lancé en août 2010 une pétition contre la loi Gayssot soutenue par l'intellectuel Noam Chomsky et signée par plus de 3 000 personnes, je réclame à nouveau l’abrogation de cette loi inique condamnant à de lourdes amendes et à de la prison ferme les citoyens qui ne se plient pas à un dogme historique qui s'est transformé en religion.
J'appelle les esprits libres à se révolter contre cette infamie et à me soutenir dans le combat que j'ai entrepris pour la liberté de recherche.
Paul-Éric Blanrue, 1er mars 2012.
HTTP://blanrue.blogspot.com/2012/03/blanrue-poursuivi-par-la-licra-pour.html
Salut à tous !
How Hitler defied the bankers
Many people take joy in saying Wall Street and Jewish bankers "financed Hitler." There is plenty of documented evidence that Wall Street and Jewish bankers did indeed help finance Hitler at first, partly because it allowed the bankers to get rich (as I will describe below) and partly in order to control Stalin. However, when Germany broke free from the bankers, the bankers declared a world war against Germany.
When we look at all the
facts, the charge that "Jews financed Hitler" becomes irrelevant. Los
Angeles Attorney Ellen Brown discusses this topic in her book Web Of Debt…
When Hitler came to
power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty of Versailles had
imposed crushing reparations on the German people, demanding that
Germans repay every nation’s costs of the war. These costs totaled three
times the value of all the property in Germany.
Private currency
speculators caused the German mark to plummet, precipitating one of the
worst runaway inflations in modern times. A wheelbarrow full of 100
billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national
treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms were lost to speculators
and to private (Jewish controlled) banks. Germans lived in hovels. They
were starving.
Nothing like this had
ever happened before - the total destruction of the national currency,
plus the wiping out of people's savings and businesses. On top of this came a global depression. Germany
had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international
(mainly Jewish) bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to
power. At that point the German government thwarted the international
banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by
declaring a global boycott against Germany.
Hitler began a national
credit program by devising a plan of public works that included flood
control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and
construction of new roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. All
these were paid for with money that no longer came from the private
international bankers.
The projected cost of
these various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national
currency. To pay for this, the German government (not the international
bankers) issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates.
In this way the National Socialists put millions of people to work, and
paid them with Treasury Certificates.
Under the National
Socialists, Germany’s money wasn't backed by gold (which was owned by
the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and
materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, "For every mark
issued, we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done, or
goods produced." The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers
spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more
jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the
crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.
Within two years, the
unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet.
It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a
time when millions of people in the United States and other Western
countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.
Germany even managed to
restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of
foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by
Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging
equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter
system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished,
since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits. (Venezuela
does the same thing today when it trades oil for commodities, plus
medical help, and so on. Hence the bankers are trying to squeeze
Venezuela.)
Germany's economic
freedom was short-lived; but it left several monuments, including the
famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive superhighway.
Hjalmar Schacht, a Rothschild agent who was temporarily head of the German central bank, summed
it up thus… An American banker had commented, "Dr. Schacht, you should
come to America. We've lots of money and that's real banking." Schacht
replied, "You should come to Berlin. We don't have money. That's real
banking."
(Schact, the Rothschild
agent, actually supported the private international bankers against
Germany, and was rewarded by having all charges against him dropped at
the Nuremberg trials.)
This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with the German people. Germany
was rescued from English economic theory, which says that all currency
must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive
banking cartel -- such as the Federal Reserve, or the Central Bank of
Europe -- rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the
people.
Canadian researcher Dr.
Henry Makow (who is Jewish himself) says the main reason why the
bankers arranged for a world war against Germany was that Hitler
sidestepped the bankers by creating his own money, thereby freeing the
German people. Worse, this freedom and prosperity threatened to spread
to other nations. Hitler had to be stopped!
Makow quotes from the
1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet
Bolsevism and a Trotsky intimate. Rakovsky was tried in show trials in
the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky, Hitler was at first funded by the international bankers, through the bankers’ agent Hjalmar Schacht. The
bankers financed Hitler in order to control Stalin, who had usurped
power from their agent Trotsky. Then Hitler became an even bigger threat
than Stalin when Hitler started printing his own money.
(Stalin came to power in 1922, which was eleven years before Hitler came to power.)
Rakovsky said:
“Hitler took over the
privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also
financial ones. He took over the machinery of falsification and put it
to work for the benefit of the people. Can you possibly imagine what
would have come if this had infected a number of other states?” (Henry
Makow, "Hitler Did Not Want War," www.savethemales.com March 21, 2004).
Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany's remarkable transformation:
“The Nazis came to
power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with
ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign
investment or credit. Through an independent monetary
policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program,
the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of
overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four
years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C. K. Liu, "Nazism
and the German Economic Miracle," Asia Times (May 24, 2005).
In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:
“Germany issued
debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for
Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five
years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to
1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and
Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back
under the heel of the Bankers.”
These facts do not appear in any textbooks today, since Jews own most publishing companies. What does
appear is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the
Weimar Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today’s
textbooks use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite
the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes
wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from
private cartels.
In reality, the Weimar
financial crisis began with the impossible reparations payments imposed
at the Treaty of Versailles. Hjalmar Schacht – the Rothschild agent who
was currency commissioner for the Republic -- opposed letting the German
government print its own money…
“The Treaty of Versailles is a model of ingenious measures for the economic destruction of Germany. Germany
could not find any way of holding its head above the water, other than
by the inflationary expedient of printing bank notes.”
Schact echoes the
textbook lie that Weimar inflation was caused when the German
government printed its own money. However, in his 1967 book The Magic of Money, Schact let the cat out of the bag by revealing that it was the PRIVATELY-OWNED Reichsbank, not the German government, that was pumping new currency into the economy. Thus, the PRIVATE BANK caused the Weimar hyper-inflation.
Like the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Reichsbank was overseen by
appointed government officials, but was operated for private gain. What
drove the wartime inflation into hyperinflation was speculation by
foreign investors, who sold the mark short, betting on its decreasing
value. In the manipulative device known as the short sale, speculators
borrow something they don't own, sell it, and then "cover" by buying it
back at the lower price.
Speculation in the German mark was made possible because the PRIVATELY OWNED Reichsbank
(not yet under Nazi control) made massive amounts of currency available
for borrowing. This currency, like U.S. currency today, was created
with accounting entries on the bank's books. Then the funny-money was
lent at compound interest. When the Reichsbank could not keep up with
the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to
create marks out of nothing, and to lend them at interest. The result
was runaway debt and inflation.
Thus, according to
Schacht himself, the German government did not cause the Weimar
hyperinflation. On the contrary, the government (under the National
Socialists) got hyperinflation under control. The National Socialists
put the Reichsbank under strict government regulation, and took prompt
corrective measures to eliminate foreign speculation. One of those
measures was to eliminate easy access to funny-money loans from private
banks. Then Hitler got Germany back on its feet by having the public
government issue Treasury Certificates.
Schacht , the
Rotchschild agent, disapproved of this government fiat money, and wound
up getting fired as head of the Reichsbank when he refused to issue it.
Nonetheless, he acknowledged in his later memoirs that allowing the
government to issue the money it needed did not produce the price
inflation predicted by classical economic theory, which says that
currency must be borrowed from private cartels.
What causes
hyper-inflation is uncontrolled speculation. When speculation is coupled
with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is disaster. On
the other hand, when a government issues currency in carefully measured
ways, it causes supply and demand to increase together, leaving prices
unaffected. Hence there is no inflation, no debt, no unemployment, and
no need for income taxes.
Naturally this
terrifies the bankers, since it eliminates their powers. It also
terrifies Jews, since their control of banking allows them to buy the
media, the government, and everything else.
Therefore, to those who delight in saying “Jews financed Hitler,” I ask that they please look at all the facts.
Submitted by Abdul Alhazred on Fri, 2008-05-09 19:58
- Abdul Alhazred's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 3117 reads
-
Tuesday, July 03, 2012
European Union defines criminal anti-semitism
From the European Union:
Working Definition of Antisemitism
http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf
"The purpose of this document is to provide a practical guide for
identifying incidents, collecting data, and supporting the
implementation and enforcement of legislation dealing with
antisemitism."
Working definition: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which
may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical
manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish
individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions
and religious facilities.”
In addition, such manifestations could also target the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews
with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews
for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual
forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative
character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into
account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the
name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such
as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for
acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during
World War II (the Holocaust).
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own
nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard
to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could
include:
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by
claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g.,
claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or
Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
materials in some countries).
***
The single Jew that Hitler wanted to save: Astonishing letter
reveals how Führer ordered Gestapo to leave his WW1 commander alone
- Ernst Hess commanded Adolf Hitler's unit during the First World War
- Baptised a Protestant, he had a Jewish mother and was thus regarded a 'full-blooded Jew' by Nazi race laws
- Although
finally thrown in concentration camp in 1941, he survived the war to
become president of the German Federal Railways Authority
By
Allan Hall
Tuesday, July 03, 2012
European Union defines criminal anti-semitism
From the European Union:
Working Definition of Antisemitism
http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf
"The purpose of this document is to provide a practical guide for
identifying incidents, collecting data, and supporting the
implementation and enforcement of legislation dealing with
antisemitism."
Working definition: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
In addition, such manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).
***
The single Jew that Hitler wanted to save: Astonishing letter reveals how Führer ordered Gestapo to leave his WW1 commander alone
|
Ernst Hess, Adolf Hitler's company commander in
WWI, who was, despite his Jewish roots, spared from the genocide
unleashed by the Nazis
But Ernst Hess owed his survival to the personal intervention of Adolf Hitler.
The Fuhrer ordered his SS thugs to leave the Jewish judge alone because Hess had been his commanding officer during the First World War.
Hitler looked back on his time on the Western Front with great pride and fondness so, while some six million Jews perished in the Holocaust set in motion by Hitler, Hess was allowed to live on the Fuhrer's whim.
His remarkable story was told by his daughter Ursula, 86, after a newspaper unearthed the letter sent on the orders of Hitler insisting that Hess was not to be 'persecuted or deported'.
A file kept by the Dusseldorf Gestapo on him includes the letter from the head of the Gestapo and the SS, Heinrich Himmler, dated August 27, 1940, saying Hess must receive 'relief and protection as per the Fuhrer's wishes'.
Himmler made a point of informing all relevant authorities and officials that the judge was 'not to be inopportuned in any way whatsoever'.
Ironically, Hess told his daughter that he and his old comrades from the trenches hardly remembered Hitler – by then a well-known figure in German politics – when they met at reunions in the 1920s and 30s.
He told her that the future dictator rarely spoke and had few friends among the troops.
Historians have in recent years poured scorn on the Nazi myth of the heroic Corporal Hitler running messages from one frontline trench to another.
In fact, other soldiers regarded him as a 'rear area pig', taking his messages between HQs a few miles behind the front.
Ernst Moritz Hess, born in 1890, had joined the 2nd Royal Bavarian Reserve Infantry as an officer at the beginning of the First World War, the same regiment that Austrian-born Hitler volunteered for.
Both men were deployed to the Flanders front in autumn 1914, serving in what was known as the List Regiment until 1918.
Hess was seriously wounded in October of 1914 and again two years later in October 1916. In the summer of that year, the highly decorated officer had temporarily been Hitler's company commander.
Although baptised a protestant, his mother was Jewish and the Nuremberg Race Laws of 1935, introduced by the Nazis, classified him as a 'full blooded Jew'.
Hess, standing far right, with his unit during the Great War
Hitler (pictured far right) and Hess were both
deployed to the Flanders front in the fall of 1914, serving in what was
known as the 'List Regiment' until 1918
The letter which was sent by Heinrich Himmler,
reichsführer of the SS and overlord of the death camps, dated 27 August
1940, granting Hess 'relief and protection as per the Führer's wishes'
Hess with his wife Margarethe and daughter Ursula in the early Thirties
Hitler pictured in 1934. He remembered his time in the army fondly and was proud of his service in the war
He had petitioned Hitler in June of 1936 asking for an exception to be made for him and his daughter under the race laws.
In his letter Hess said: 'For us, it is a kind of spiritual death to now be branded as Jews and exposed to general contempt.'
Hess ended up as a slave labourer, building barracks. This time he escaped extermination because of his 'privileged miscegenated marriage' to Margarete Hess, a Protestant.
His sister Berta was gassed at Auschwitz, wrongly believing that the protection afforded to her brother extended to her.
Hess died in Frankfurt after a successful career in post-war West Germany on September 14, 1983.
Hess moved his family to Bolzano, Italy in October 1937, but was forced to return in 1939. Hoping that his connections to Hitler would keep him safe, he moved his family to a remote Bavarian village in mid-1940.
A copy of the letter Himmler sent to the Gestapo in Dusseldorf was given to him. But in late June 1941, Hess was summoned to appear before the SS in Munich.
When he submitted his letter of protection it was taken from him and he was told it had been revoked in May of 1941, and that he was now 'a Jew like any other'.
et la journée commence bien après tout 
The Holocaust Hoax Exposed: Debunking the 20th Century’s Biggest Lie
A MUST READ!
ReplyDeleteLe martyr et l'holocauste des nègres par les juifs trafiquants esclavagistes
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=C27I61XB
Les Juifs holocaustiques et leur religion de merde, signée par eux-mêmes et leurs sympathisants!
ReplyDeleteEt tout cela est bien légal ! Pauvre France !