EUROPEAN
RACISTS WANT TO SEE EUROPEAN MUSLIMS DEPORTED, BUT PROMOTE JEWISH INVASION OF OCCUPIED
PALESTINE!
Thurs 01/08/2015 False Flag Weekly News
Removed by Youtube?
Alain Soral réagit sur l'affaire Charlie Hebdo
MILTON WILLIAM COOPER is part Native American and his wife is Chinese. For this reason racists of all kinds including the JUDAIC SUPREMACISTS wanted him dead.
Christian Identity Part 1: Its British And Venetian Origins
Christian Identity Part 2: Modern Day Implications
- ZIONIST LOBBY
- ROTHSCHILD (LIBÉRATION) AND JEWISH BACKED, RACIST, BLASPHEMOUS, HATE-MONGERING, SATYRICAL & PORNOGRAPHIC CHARLIE HEBDO - FORMER HARA-KIRI PORN!!!
-
Published on 7 May 2014
THE JEWISH GAS CHAMBER HOAX is a Revisionist documentary which provides revelatory evidence debunking the greatest hoax in human history -
"The Holocaust" -- the fraudulent claim that six million Jews were murdered by Germans, mostly in "Gas Chambers disguised as Shower Rooms."
Never before seen evidence helps prove that Treblinka was a transit camp, far from the "Pure Extermination Camp" myth currently promoted by the Holocaust religion.
In never before seen footage, Jews themselves who were transited through Treblinka describe the process of being transferred from Treblinka to other camps, along with hundreds and thousands of other men women and children. Documentation is presented which affirms that Treblinka was no top secret "pure extermination center", but a simple transit camp where many Jews took real showers in order to keep them alive.
The absurdity of diesel gassings, non-existent mass graves, forced confessions, and more are covered in THE JEWISH GAS CHAMBER HOAX, a new documentary from the filmmaker of THE LAST DAYS OF THE BIG LIE.
www.gaschamberhoax.com
Adolf Hitler
founded Israel 1933
(Jewish author Edwin Black’s “The Haavara (Transfer)
Agreement”)
I am not an immigrant and I have nowhere to go as the
homeland of my ancestors was invaded, occupied, their people and families mass
murdered, and enslaved. I was born in
one of those slave colonies of the Western imperialists and racists and it is
still controlled by the descendants of those same slave masters. Many immigrants in (Western) Europe have no
country to return to as their children and grand children are all born in
Europe, and their own homelands are being constantly bombed, occupied and their
people and loved ones live in slavery to this very day.
WHY EUROPEANS,
REGIMES AND PEOPLE IN GENERAL, HATE IMMIGRATION, MEANING MORE SPECIFICALLY THAT
OF MUSLIMS?
The main reason that jumps to my mind is that of “racism” (a
term with so many meanings, even opposing ones), the eternal White racism
against all non Whites. Yet, White
racism was also seen against inferior Whites, that of the Superior royalties,
the Church, the rich and the aristocrats, that is the ruling the Élite against
the masses of inferior White people. But,
as politics keep changing, so does the meaning of the term racism, and Christian
racism was soon to be replaced by Judeo-Christian racism. What is such a Judeo Christian? Judeo-Christians are decadent Jews and
decadent Christians, usurious Bank gangsters and their mass murdering armies.
One example of racism is that of the fanatical and extremist
French State religion called laïcité, the
separation of the decadent Catholic Church from the Socialist-Communist State whereby
the Church was forced to surrender to the dictates of the Godless State 9Socialism
and Communism) and this caused the death of the anti-Socialist and
anti-Communist Church, which now existed only under a binding legal contract
with the Socialist-Communist (Atheist) State.
Jews have a similar contract with the Godless State, but not Muslims as
Islam has no priesthood and no legal body to represent them and surrender to no
other than God. The only legal body that
can ever represent Muslims is and will forever remain a Caliphate that obeys
only God. Those Algerians (traitors) who
collaborated with the French colonial regime in Algeria against the Commandment
of God (See Holy Qur’ân) were rewarded by the French Satanic Judeo-Christian
regime by being left to die after they had struck a deal with the Algerian Resistance
(forming the new Colonial government!) and those who were allowed to IMMIGRATE
to France were given French citizenship, but parked in Concentration Camps and
treated as second class citizens!
I lived for 13 years
in France where anti Arab, anti Muslim and anti Islamic racism was prevalent at
all levels of the government and its institutions including its corporate
media, cinema, press, television, and even Academia, and all Muslims were
second class citizens with very few rights.
For thirteen years I had to suffer the daily bashing of Muslims and the
vilification of Islam until one day a few Muslims were granted by Freemason
President François Mitterrand as a “privilege” the right to speak about “French
Islam” for half an hour every week on French television, but only under the
strict control of Freemason Satanist Dalil Boubakeur (a non Muslim obviously),
Atheist Pr Arkoun, and a few Muslim collaborators like, for example, Abdel Haq
Guiderdoni.
The ruling Jewish and laïque (secular racist) controlled
Socialist-Communist regimes invited Muslim and non Muslim immigrants alike
because they needed slave (obviously cheap) labour that was plentiful in
Western occupied or controlled and plundered countries like Algeria, Morocco,
Tunisia, Senegal, Ivory Coast, or from poverty stricken Spain and Portugal. Those coming from Eastern European countries
and from the EEU joined the ruling classes, businesses, academia, spoken and
written press, and cinema and music industry. The immigration was CONTROLLED!
They then imposed a State sponsored programme of
integration-assimilation, destined mainly for North Africans via cultural
terrorism, but the First Native French masses, like other world masses, are so
stupid that they participated in the programme without understanding what was
really at stake. What was to happen did
happen. Bank gangsters that kept
plundering the economy blamed it on UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION! And who are those uncontrolled
immigrants? Muslims, Arabs and Islam! Now, the same racist governments are
terrorising the citizens by promoting lies after lies and saying that Muslims
and Islam are taking over Europe and destroying their Judeo-Christian
civilisation and causing their economy to fail when the truth is that their
economy has always been successful for the benefit of the Élite and always
against the working class. There is of
course a major problem in France and it is the lack of spirituality and the
evil of savage capitalism under a totalitarian corporate regime called democracy. Unless a REVOLUTION will bring back France to
its spiritual Christian consciousness and get rid of Corporate democracy, the
usurious bank gangsters will always win.
France knew that it could not completely destroy the
biological and cultural heritage and identity of foreign Muslims, and in the mean
time millions of them were born on French soil, and many thousands of French
First Natives have embraced Islam with no “Islamic Sword” at their throats! And because millions of Muslims are French
they play a great role in changing the way of life of non Muslim French, and
French Judeo-Christian racism cannot accept that. And, with the terrorist entity known as Eretz
Israel and US American politics having taken control of French politics and
government now under the control of Jewish Freemasonic Lodges (US ADL of B’nai
B’rith and AIPAC, and French Crif, Licra and JDL – an all out war is being
waged not only against Muslim countries abroad but all with European and French
Muslims at home. Despite being
controlled by Secular (laïcité raciste et intolérante) White, Mixed, Jewish,
Christian and Secular Supremacists, the Islam kept imprisoned in the hearts and
minds of Muslims for so long has re-emerged although many Muslims have
completely lost their identity, culture and religion, including in
neo-colonised Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco and other occupied Muslim countries.
France and Europe will accept prostitution, drugs (alcohol,
cigarettes, etc.), pornography, incest, homosexual ‘marriages’ , the adoption
by homosexuals of our children, gambling, wars of conquest, abortion, a man or
woman having hundreds of sexual partners, but would ban all Islamic way of life
including the right to freely practice their religion, except for some useless rituals. Even the fact that Muslim are having children
on European soil is being vilified. Yet,
the mathematics doed not add up. They
accuse Muslims of being too “prolific” when they were some six million back in
the eighties according to Charles Pasqua.
Yet, more than thirty years later the same accusations is being levelled
against them, and guess what? Muslims
are said to number today ONLY FIVE MILLION IN FRANCE??? What the Judeo-Christian Freemasonic racists also
know is that genuine Muslims will never integrate-assimilate in any oppressive
(or not) society. Islam is to lead and
never to be led. So, they came up with The Real Final Solution for all European
Muslim so-called IMMIGRANTS: DEPORTATION!
Germany DEPORTED some half a million Turkish immigrants because of
racism as they did not want their Germanity to be soiled by those filthy
Turks! France wants to do the same
today! And in order to achieve that goal
the corporate media is terrorising the French First Natives (de souche) brainwashing them about a supposedly
Islamic Invasion not only of France, but of Europe, Australia, Canada, etc. via
an “UNCONTROLED (MUSLIM) IMMIGRATION”!
While it is true that we see only “house negroes” in the
media and in politics, more and more French citizens who have kept their
identities or developed new ones thanks to intermarriage or being born in
France would not bow down to the dictates of a racist and intolerant State. The case of French-Cameroun comedian
Dieudonné M’bala M’bala is one of the most famous examples of a mixture of both
biological traits and mind. The White
European Racist who claims for himself a monopoly of biological ‘whiteness’
remains supreme no matter how much some of them would mix their blood with
so-called non-Whites! How many Black women have the European
aristocracy or royalty married in the past century? Half a million or so Whites freely mixing
with the non White population of France is causing unnecessary alarm because
the French are unable to get rid of their racist past! Islam has got rid of it more than 1400 years
ago despite of the fact that we do have good and bad Muslims globally.
The European racists cannot control biology, culture and religion by oppression. Until the end of time there will always be what can be termed as Arab, Black, Asian, African, Islamic and Muslim sensitivities and realities. I am one such other sensitivity and reality that racists hate because in my mind and writings I have already changed European civilisation as did our Muslim and other predecessors when they were free and far more advanced than Europeans. But, no, European racists would have it only their way and refuse to understand or admit that genuine Muslims will share part of their civilisation values, but will never integrate-assimilate into their system of governance or accept their immoral way of life, NEVER! And they know that!
The European racists cannot control biology, culture and religion by oppression. Until the end of time there will always be what can be termed as Arab, Black, Asian, African, Islamic and Muslim sensitivities and realities. I am one such other sensitivity and reality that racists hate because in my mind and writings I have already changed European civilisation as did our Muslim and other predecessors when they were free and far more advanced than Europeans. But, no, European racists would have it only their way and refuse to understand or admit that genuine Muslims will share part of their civilisation values, but will never integrate-assimilate into their system of governance or accept their immoral way of life, NEVER! And they know that!
It has been recorded according to one source (La Documentation
catholique, 22 nov 1924, dossier intitulé : Statistique démographiques, col
1021 quoted by Vincent Reynouard : Plaidoyer
pour le racisme) that at the beginning of the 1920s, there were
some 2,3 million foreigners living in France. Out of them, only a few
integrated after being granted French citizenship: 10,887 in 1921, 17,441 in
1922, and 20,308 in 1923, that is, less than 1%. But, this would not apply to Muslims who were
regarded as INFERIORS and barred from French citizenship. The Jewish Décret Crémieux granted French
citizenship only to Jews living in the French colonies (occupied territory) like
Algeria.
It is a lie to say that, for example, Muslim immigrants came
to France, leaving their loved ones and way of life behind, in order to GET
RICH! This has been the kind of racist and
Satanic propaganda sold out to the gullible French masses for over a century! The truth is that the Muslim homelands were
invaded, occupied, enslaved, and their families mercilessly slaughtered like
cattle, and many were just fleeing colonial oppression.
If France (or Europe) is devoid of spirituality, why should Muslim
immigrants not have the right to stick to their ancestral spirituality that
only Islam can provide them? But, the
racists argue that Europe is being threatened in its identity when the truth is
that Europe itself has lost its identity.
But, what really makes “European identity” or way of life?
Genocidal wars, land
theft, savage capitalism, deceit, theft, homosexuality, prostitution,
pornography, paedophilia, incest, public and mediatised indecency, atheism, drugs
(alcohol, cigarettes, etc.), GM ‘food’, vaccines, abortion, homosexual
marriage, hypocritical monogamy (monogyny), chemtrails, mercury, aspartame,
fluoride, weapons of mass destruction, lottery, gambling, usury, abortion,
racism, “animal rights”, “human rights”, the UNO dictatorship, Zionism, racism,
corporate democracy, imposed belief in macro evolution, belief in the Six
Million Jewish Holocaust dogma (Shoah), vilification of Arabs, the Arabic
language, Muslims and Islam, hard rock, rap, Satanic music, violence, rape,
...???
Is this how we define European identity? As for the other positive European values non
Europeans are acquiring and sharing them more and more, but this MUST NOT BE
IMPOSED BY THE STATE!
Sharing other civilisation values and adding to our identity
does not mean LOSING our identity unless there is a law that imposes a static
identity on the citizens like that of laïcité. When some write about European civilisation
as the only way for the entire of humankind, they make a colossal mistake. Even Islam that claims to be the best and most
perfected form of the natural religion for Humankind and Jinnkind staes explicitly that there is and should not
be any coercion in matters of religion.
Humans are totally free to embrace Islam or not. Here is one example of the superiority of
Islam over what is termed “Western civilisation” which the military superpowers
have tried to impose on the entire of human kind for millennia and are still
advocating today despite its records of mass exterminations, civilisation
destructions of INFERIOR nations, and the impossible to fathom human sufferings.
There is nothing wrong in trying to protect the ‘purity’ of any
human ethnic group, but not through racist and discriminatory tactics or
policies. European Jewish leadership is boasting
that it is leading the world in pluriculturalism and in the mixing of “races”
while at the same protecting their own ethnic “purity” and supporting a racist
entity like Israel . Even the Catholic
Church was in 1931 (as quoted in The Catholic
Documentation of 21 March 1931, col.760) allowing Catholics to collaborate
with the German National Socialists who were campaigning for the purity of a
German Ethnic Nation. Of course, as long
as this does not interfere with the Catholic FAITH and MORALS! Many National Socialists were Christians and
also Zionists!
But, on 24 March 1933, the Jews (JUDEA) declared WAR ON
GERMANY!
On 13 April 1933, the German Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen
and envoy of Herr Adolf Hitler received the Holy Communion from the hand of Pope
Pius XI himself. (The
Catholic Documentaion of 7 Octobre
1933, col.468-9,note 3).
On 20 July 1933, the Vatican and Germany signed the Concordat and a radio broadcast sermon congratulated the Führer for its great German Popular Movement, praising Hitler for his awareness of his responsibility before God, and his sincere will to better the destiny of the German people. (Ibid.., col.494)
On 20 July 1933, the Vatican and Germany signed the Concordat and a radio broadcast sermon congratulated the Führer for its great German Popular Movement, praising Hitler for his awareness of his responsibility before God, and his sincere will to better the destiny of the German people. (Ibid.., col.494)
After the March 1933 Jewish Declaration of War against
Germany, in April-June the National Socialist government was blackmailed into
carrying out a series of talks that lasted for three months with the Zionist Federation of
Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of
the Jewish
Agency), and with Great Britain of course.
And on 25 August 1933, the Germans and the Jews signed the Haavara Agreement allowing German Jews
to immigrate to occupied Palestine taking away their assets. Thus the Germans would preserve their “purity”
and “racial and cultural identity” on German soil and Jews would do the same,
not on Jewish soil but on stolen Palestinian land, through mass murder, racism
and ethnic cleansing.
While the West is permanently occupying Muslim lands and mass murdering millions
of men, women, children and babies, bombing all their infrastructures driving
them crazy, and destroying their cultures, identities, and civilisation, they
are at the same time campaigning against “UNCONTROLLED IMMIGRATION” meaning more specifically that of Muslims! But, they have the right to invade, bomb and occupy
all Muslim lands and defend the right of European Jews who already occupy and
control Europe to immigrate to occupied Palestine!
I do not know if I need to laugh or lament!
But, I chose RESISTANCE and REVOLUTION
instead!
BAFS
Wednesday 7 January 2015
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
DJsNorthWest youtube
http://www.youtube.com/user/DJsNorthWest
Join my facebook page - https://www.facebook.com/Truthtube451
Achtung! Youtube fast at work suppressing videos that proves yesterday's MOSSAD PARIS ATTACKS as a FALSE FLAG!
truthjihad.com blog
NoLiesRadio produce Allan Rees writes:
https://plus.google.com/+HuffPostUK/posts/HgDXoao79kT
Labels:
breivik,
charlie hebdo,
false flag,
inside job,
Israel,
Mossad,
Palestine,
paris,
terrorism,
Zionism
***
Je suis Der Sturmer ?
Par Norman G. Finkelstein
Article original : http://normanfinkelstein.com/2015/01/13/ich-bin-der-sturmer/
Lundi 12 janvier 2015
La publication nazie Der Sturmer, éditée par Julius Streicher, était connue pour ses caricatures antisémites obscènes.
Article original : http://normanfinkelstein.com/2015/01/12/sorry-charlie%E2%80%8B/
Lundi 12 janvier 2015
Article original : http://normanfinkelstein.com/2015/01/10/je-suisgaza/
[Après un périple extrêmement ardu, un groupe d'enfants de Gaza a pu réaliser son rêve et se présenter sur la scène de l'émission populaire Arabs Got Talent, bouleversant d'émotion jury et télespectateurs (voir cet article détaillé).]
Vidéo postée par N. Finkelstein
(Traduction : Sayed 7asan)
Source: Sayed Hasan
So the notion that this is a conspiracy source, absolutely this [yes]. It was done to inflame the Islamic world so as to further propagandize the West into making war against the Middle Eastern countries."
Anti-US demonstrations, which began on September 11 over the anti-Islam film, have been held across the Muslim world, with protesters storming US embassies and torching US flags.
Over a dozen people have already been killed in protests since the release of the film.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Mark Glenn, from the Crescent and Cross Solidarity Movement, to further discuss the issue. What follows is an approximate transcription of the interview.
Press TV: Mr. Glenn, protests are gaining momentum around the world and more and more people are coming to this belief that this move, this insulting movie, was more likely to be a deliberate act of conspiracy.
Glenn: Yes, I think that is exactly what it was and I think that the people responsible for putting this together, their reasons for doing it are self-evident. They want the world to witness these uprisings and these protests taking place as a means of defaming Islam and painting the Muslims as violent, irrational people.
You know (blipped) … is saying this that the Christian in the West because it is not my religion that has been attacked in this per se but when I would counsel those in these, [all I want to do] is to take a step back and to understand that what they are doing by participating in these things is that they are giving their enemies all of the ammunition that they need in order to take Islam as a violent, irrational religion followed by violent irrational people and all of this being on a course in order to justify the military brutality that has taken place in the past, that is taking place now and will take place in the future if these evil doers are given a free hand to do it.
Press TV: So what you are saying is that actually this was a conspiracy for Muslims to play in the hands of their enemies. Well, there are questions also surrounding the timing of the insulting movie, its coincidence with 9/11 and the US elections is also a month to go there.
Glenn: Yes, absolutely. You know, in 11 years since 9/11, there have been no terrorist attacks in the United States. And so the American people are beginning to ask questions: Why are we still at war? Why are young people so being set off to fight in these theatres such as Iraq and Afghanistan? You know, Osama bin Laden is dead; there have been no terrorist attacks; we are going bankrupt fighting these wars. Perhaps it is time to bring our troops home and to go back to peace and prosperity.
I think that this entire debacle that is taking place that the main bull’s-eye in this thing, I mean the big agenda here that is being pushed is to prepare the mind of the American people so that they will sign on to increase military adventures against Iran.
AHK/MSK/JR
THE UGLY TRUTH (MARK GLENN)
I, you, we and all of us are pursuing truth and happiness for human beings, which is unfortunately a victim of world powers.
This is a historical opportunity to undermine all inhuman relations and put an end to prejudices, which have questioned the truths and separates them, to build a new beautiful world based on love, justice and beauty.
This is a historical and certainly achievable objective. It only needs our hands, minds and hearts to join each other.
I pray Great God to bless you, who love humanity and wish success for all. I hope to meet you in a better future.
Motive for the attack: The newspaper has attracted worldwide attention for its scurrilous depictions of the prophet Muhammad.
The attacks now appear to have ended after 72 hours of carnage. A total of twenty people were killed at four locations between 7 and 9 January, including the three suspects. At least twenty-one others were injured, some critically. The attacks are the deadliest act of terrorism in France for fifty-four years.
The remaining staff of Charlie Hebdo announced that publication was to continue as usual, with plans for a print run of one million copies for the next week’s issue, rather than its typical 60,000. (See here)
To many observers, the Charlie Hebdo shootings would appear to have all the hallmarks of a false flag attack. There are many unanswered questions. Even as we write, events on the ground are changing.
Watch this spot for further developments.
There were other people, perhaps millions of them all over the world, who thought just like me.
Like the Saker, I too am not a Muslim. I am a Roman Catholic Christian. I also believe firmly in freedom of speech. “Feel free to say whatever you want,” I like to advise. “Have total freedom to say what you want. But be prepared to accept the consequences of free speech.”
If you wish to spit in Islam’s face, do so—at your peril.
If you wish to insult the Prophet Mohammed, or Jesus Christ, or the Buddha, or anyone else for that matter, feel free to do so—and take the consequences of your folly.
Spit and be spat upon. Kill with vicious words and be killed by guns. Hate your neighbor and expect to be hated in return.
Assuming this terrorist act was done by Muslims—something, incidentally, we have no right to assume right now—how many Muslims deserve to be arrested and tortured? The answer is three Muslims, at the very most, assuming you believe in torture like the Americans and Israelis.
How many Muslims had nothing to do with this act and are absolutely innocent? I will tell you: 1.6 billion Muslims minus three.
That’s a lot of innocent Muslims.
This I will say: if you keep goading people to a pitch of frenzy by ridiculing their religion and insulting their honor, sooner or later you will get your teeth smashed in. And deservedly so. Among the French cartoonists killed in Paris recently, I learn that one was a Jew and all the rest were devout Zionists blowing the trumpet for Israel. That’s interesting.
Let’s observe a minute’s silence and shed a few (hopefully genuine) tears for these “heroes” of free speech. After all, they didn’t deserve to be killed just for spitting in people’s faces for a living and smirking contemptuously, “Hey, this is freedom of speech! Aren’t we brave!”
Insulting the prophet Mohammed in the name of free speech appeared to be their constant delight. For which they were paid, and paid quite generously, by those who have a vested interest in whipping up Islamophobia.
Mocking Christianity was also part of their agenda, much to the delight of international Jewry, their principal paymasters, who offered them both moral and financial support in their “satirical” undertakings — “hate speech” when used against Jews. but “satire” and “courageous free speech” when directed at Muslims and Christians, the Jews’ most hated enemies.
They would have loved her for saying, “I hope the Jews DID kill Christ! I’d fucking do it again—in a second!”
Maybe insulting the prophet Mohammed will soon be made compulsory in order to drive all Muslims crazy. And then, when they have predictably reacted with rage to our constant provocations, we will have the perfect excuse we need to pull their beards, knock off their turbans, trample on their Qur’ans, obliterate Syria and Iran, grab hold of Middle Eastern oil, and, finally, allow our favorite country, Israel, to expand its borders from the Nile to the Euphrates.
Note one thing, my friends: this freedom of speech, which is so very precious and of which we make such a fetish, does not include freedom to criticize Israel or question the Holocaust.
You may mock Jesus Christ
as much as you want, but you must not mock Anne Frank. Poke fun at
Christ carrying his Cross—no problem!—but don’t dare to breathe a word
about Anne Frank’s sacred ball point pen!
The French cartoonists who died recently (God rest their souls) never satirized Auschwitz. They would never have dared to expose “The Diary of Anne Frank” (see cartoon opposite) as a fake, by pointing out that much of it had been written with a ballpoint pen, invented only in 1951, whereas Anne Frank had died in Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and so couldn’t possibly have written the entire book herself.
Nor did these courageous French “martyrs for free speech” ever have the guts to criticize the war crimes of Israel. Oh no, they thought the Israelis were doing a fine job slaughtering women and children in Gaza like flies—like this Palestinian child here, her face half blown off by an Israeli sniper.
These cowardly cartoonists kept all their scorn for the prophet Mohammed and the Lord Jesus Christ, much to the delight of the Jews whose dirty work they did so well and whose contemptible mercenaries they remained to their last dying breath.
Terrorist, die! We’ll rip your fucking heart out! We’ll torture you to death!
So much for free speech, my friends. Free speech for them. For the rest of us, silence.
Terror experts including the New York Times are all asking the same question: What can possibly explain the intelligence gaps revealed by the Charlie Hebdo shooting?
The Times puts it this way: “How did several jihadists — and possibly a larger cell of co-conspirators — manage to evade surveillance and execute a bold attack despite being well known to the country’s police and intelligence services?”
The obvious answer: When it comes to terrorism, there are huge, gaping holes in our intelligence.
French terror expert Gaston Grenouille explains: “How about (the claim by French police) that a highly-professional special-forces-type terrorist would just accidentally ‘forget’ his ID card in an abandoned getaway car? Anyone who believes that must have a rather large gap where their intelligence is supposed to be.”
“We’re not just talking ‘intelligence gap’,” adds Parisian intelligence analyst Dagobert DeMerdeur. “We’re talking about an intelligence chasm – a yawning void the size of the Grand Canyon between people’s ears. The depth, breadth, and utter vacuity of this ‘intelligence black hole’ is simply astonishing.”
Experts have also cited a notable intelligence gap separating those who know that 9/11 and other alleged Islamic terror attacks are inside jobs from those who have not yet figured it out. According to Michael Mensa of Mensa Standardized Testing and Pizza Delivery, IQ tests reveal an intelligence gap of roughly 60 points between the two groups.
Various hypotheses may explain the intelligence gap between skeptics and sheeple. According to Mensa these include:
*Sheeple eat 550% more GMO food than skeptics, and the nanotoxins may be destroying their brains.
*Skeptics avoid watching Fox News, which has been shown to emit pulsed bursts of frontal-lobe-disabling gamma radiation.
*Conspiracy theorizing has been shown to exercise key parts of the brain involved in cognition, including the neural circuits responsible for dot-connecting, inference-drawing, visualization, logic, and seeing what is right there in front of ones face.
As the audacity and obviousness of false flag terror stunts increases, experts say, the intelligence gap will continue to widen. If current trends continue, sheeple and skeptics may one day evolve into entirely different species.
“Can
you imagine being married to a sheeple and having little half-sheeple
children?” asks Kurvil McGurgle of the Institute of Applied Evolutionary
Speculation. “The frisson of horror you undoubtedly felt when I asked
you this question provides evidence that what we are seeing is the early
stages of a new form of evolutionary divergence that will eventually
leave non-‘conspiracy-theorists’ somewhere between the Neanderthal and
the Dodo.”
Already in France, people who believe the official story of the Charlie Hebdo shootings are dying off as they wander across heavily-trafficked freeways, drown in their own toilets, and otherwise display a lack of ability to survive, much less breed. “At this rate, the ‘intelligence gap’ problem will solve itself in approximately 30 years,” McGurgle estimates. “The downside is that we may be in for several dozen more false flags, each more obvious than the last. But as the sheeple cluelessly wander off the edge of their evolutionary dead-end, we have reason to hope that they will leave a better world for our grandchildren.”
Call them sheeple. Lemmings. Zombies. New World Order mind control slaves.
It’s a dirty job, but somebody’s gotta do it.
For several years, I was fortunate to spend Ramadan in Mecca and Medina and to celebrate Eid in Dammam and Al-Ahsa in eastern (Occupied) Arabia. I came to know that latter city and its notable families well, and they had grown so accustomed to my celebrating Eid with them that some joked that if I didn’t come for Eid, they would keep fasting thinking my absence must mean Ramadan had not ended yet.
I spent so many Eids in Dammam and Al-Ahsa because it meant I could be with the Islamic scholar and world-class city planner, Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi, whom I was introduced to about twenty years ago by a mutual Irish friend, Muhammad Abdal Bari. That introduction took place when Muhammad, whom I knew from my earliest days as a convert to Islam in Great Britain, had moved to Portland, Oregon, where Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi was completing his Ph.D. in city planning at Oregon State University. (Portland is a testimony to excellent city planning, and the university boasts one of the best programs in the world.) When Muhammad visited me in the Bay Area, he told me about an “amazing Saudi” whom he insisted I should meet. He also told Shaykh Abdullah about his American convert friend and said that he should meet me.
Eventually, Shaykh Abdullah visited the Bay Area, and we met at the home of a Syrian friend, Basil Dayyani. We had a memorable Syrian breakfast among friends who all emanated love and respect for one another. I will always be grateful that Muhammad insisted that I meet Shaykh Abdullah: Our encounter was for me the beginning of a deeply spiritual love for a man whose character and comportment have affected me profoundly over the years.
Shaykh Abdullah hails from a noble family whose lineage traces back to ‘Aqil bin Abi Talib, a cousin of the Prophet, God’s peace and blessings upon him, and the brother of Sayyidina ‘Ali, the Prophet’s son-in-law as well as cousin. Shaykh Abdullah is a product of the school of the late Shaykh Ahmad Dughan, the Eastern sun of Arabia, who revived the traditional sciences in Al-Ahsa and had a lasting influence on the character of many of its residents. He was well over ninety years of age when he passed away earlier this year, leaving behind three sons, each one a scholar. He also trained countless other scholars, including Shaykh Abdullah, who have spread all over the world.
Shaykh Abdullah had studied several sciences with Shaykh Ahmad Dughan, including Shafi’i jurisprudence. He mastered the science of inheritance laws under Shaykh Ahmad’s tutelage, as Shaykh Ahmad especially emphasized this subject because it is the first of the Shariah sciences to be lost according to a hadith. Shaykh Abdullah also memorized the Qur’an and studied Arabic, hadith, Qur’anic exegesis, Prophetic biography, and the other traditional sciences. Instead of assuming the life of a traditional scholar, he set out to master Western knowledge, as he felt too many traditional scholars were ignorant of the age in which they lived. He excelled in science and math and pursued higher studies in architecture and city planning, which led to his studies in Portland.
It speaks to his humility that most of his colleagues are unaware of his competence in the sacred sciences as well as his expertise in Prophetic biography, Qur’an, and Shafi’i jurisprudence. They know only of his Western education and think of him as a city planner and college administrator since he works at the University of Dammam. I was once with a Sudanese professor in West Africa, and upon hearing that he taught in Dammam, I asked if he knew Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi. When he replied that he did, I said his university was fortunate to have such a learned Muslim scholar. He shook his head in confusion and asked if we were referring to the same person, as he had no idea that in addition to his Western education, Shaykh Abdullah was a master of Islamic scholarship.
Over the years, Shaykh Abdullah has taught at Deen Intensives and other programs. His modesty, genuine humility, and impeccable prophetic character always made him a favorite teacher amongst the students. At closing sessions, when he made his final remarks and bid farewell, rarely a dry eye was left in the audience. We taught programs together in the U.S., Canada, Spain, Turkey, England, and, most memorably, in Medina and Mecca. In all the time I spent with him, I never once saw him lose his temper, speak unkindly, or mistreat anyone. He was always positive and made people love the religion simply because of the character he embodied.
An anecdote that reveals his endearing nature was related to me by Muhammad Abdal Bari, who first introduced me to Shaykh Abdullah: When he lived in Portland, Shaykh Abdullah led night prayers at a masjid during Ramadan, and after prayers, at around nine-thirty, he visited a nearby coffee shop with friends. He established a wonderful rapport with the young baristas there. One night, the prayer went on longer than usual, and afterward his friends noted that it was too late to make their usual stop, as the coffee shop would be closed. Shaykh Abdullah, however, decided to stop by anyway to see if the workers were still there. When the group arrived, they found that the employees had kept the shop open after closing time, waiting for Shaykh Abdullah, hoping he would come by as was his wont.
When I spent Ramadan with him in Mecca and Medina, I noticed that Shaykh Abdullah devoted his time entirely to Qur’anic recitation and completed the recitation of the Qur’an several times during the month. He explained that Ramadan was his opportunity to make up for any neglect he had toward the Book of God during the rest of the year. We also had many wondrous adventures meeting people who loved God and the Prophet, God’s peace and blessings upon him. We visited great scholars, most of who have now passed on, and read sacred texts with them to gain their blessing.
During this time, I came to know Shaykh Ahmad Jabir Jibran, a man very similar to Shaykh Abdullah in his piety and humility. In Al-Ahsa, Shaykh Abdullah and I were invited to many different homes. Each home was emblematic of the entire culture: hospitality, warmth, deep piety, and family informed every gathering. During those years, I came to know and love the entire community, especially the families that make up what are called in Arabia al-‘ayan (the notables). These families have excelled in learning and contributed the most to society. They have long-standing kinship ties, and although they generally marry within the clan, it is not unusual for them to marry from other notable clans. I was always the immediate guest of the Al-Kadi clan, but the Al-Dughan clan also showed immense hospitality to me during my stays.
I also felt a special connection to the al-Mubarak clan. One of their notable scholars, Shaykh Ahmad al-Mubarak, had moved decades ago to the U.A.E. to serve as the religious head of their court system. He welcomed me to the Emirates when I was a young student, and he allowed me to sit with the many great scholars he hosted throughout the year. The Al-Mubarak clan is the largest remaining Maliki family in (Occupied) Arabia. Though the majority of the peninsula followed the Maliki school for centuries, the traditional four schools began to die off due to the spread of Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab’s reform movement, and now a loosely affiliated form of Hanbalism permeates the peninsula.
Postscript on Charlie Hebdo
An intriguing aspect of Muslim culture is that murders are rarely committed over wealth. While there may be theft in Muslim countries, theft that involves murder is almost unheard of. The idea of killing someone over something as ephemeral as a car or money or a cell phone is a rarity (except perhaps in war-torn countries where all civil society has broken down). Murder in Muslim societies tends to be motivated by political issues but more often by a misguided sense of honor. This was the case earlier this month in France, where clearly deluded and uneducated men from the ghettos of Paris, after rediscovering their faith, felt compelled to take their misperception of Islamic law into their own hands in order to “uphold the honor” of their prophet who, they believed, was being denigrated by the cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo. * Without a doubt, such murders are criminal and wrong, but they can be rationally understood within the context of a society that holds the sanctity of prophets, those men of God, above all else.
In classical Muslim law, any willful and knowing denigration of a prophet is a capital offense. Blasphemy laws have always been the prerogative of the government, implemented only after trial and sentencing, and limited to Muslim lands where it was understood that this law was applicable. Historically, however, Muslim rulers were loathe to execute these laws without attempting to find excuses for the accused. In the case of the “Martyrs of Cordoba,” for example, when fanatical Christians, distraught at Christian conversion to Islam, attempted to revive Christian zeal by entering into mosques and denigrating the Prophet, the Muslim rulers, troubled by the deaths of their Christian subjects, used the ruling of insanity to exempt them from the offense. Such pre-modern laws, while also found in Christianity and Judaism, are no longer considered valid in the West due to a long and complicated process of secularization that has not occurred to the same degree or even in the same fashion in the Muslim world. Hence, many Muslims still feel strongly about the sanctity of all the prophets but specifically of the Prophet Muhammad, God’s peace and blessings upon him, and while the vast majority of Muslims would not think of killing anyone for doing so, they will not find it hard to understand why some would. The prophets, such as Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, and their lives and what they stood for represent the Muslim world’s highest values.
What then, in the West, do we hold above all else? It seems wealth has now become the highest value, and murders are often attempts to take that away from another. People kill others to take their money, their cars, their cellphones, or their drugs. Some even engage in meaningless violence, simply going into a public place and killing innocent people, not for any misguided political sensibilities, nor for wealth, but simply because they feel an urge to do so (perhaps acting out Grand Theft Auto or some other pathologically violent video game in order to experience the thrill of the real deal). Undeniably, like the West, the Muslim world also has mentally disturbed people, but they don’t go into schools and kill little children for the thrill of it. In fact, the horrific assault last December on the school in Pakistan was done in classic Jahili retaliation for murders of their own youth. There was a method to that madness, as they did not indiscriminately kill anyone in sight but spared the young children and targeted only those who had passed the age of puberty, as they were considered adults. While it was a brutal assault, it had a type of misguided rationality that can be understood in the context of vengeful tribal cultures in a way that Western school shootings cannot, irrespective of their context.
While the “whole” world is mourning the cartoonists who made their livelihoods as equal opportunity denigrators, perceiving this as an attack on freedom of expression, there is an aspect of this that is disturbing. The West displayed no moral outrage over the countless lives of innocent and honorable people whose only crime was being at home when a drone, intentionally or not, bombed them out of existence. No one is shedding tears over the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, Afghans, Palestinians, and many others in the Muslim world who were killed due to Western misadventures in the region. The Brookings Institution has noted that for every drone strike that has occurred, ten or so civilians have died. More people, many of them civilians, have been killed by U.S. drone strikes than were killed on 9-11. Take a look at the Wikipedia page that lists the drone strikes on Pakistan alone since 2004; and keep in mind that drone strikes are also waged against people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Algeria, Iran, Libya, and Somalia.
The murders of Charlie Hebdo’s staff were a crime; they were wrong, plain and simple. But lest we forget, the people at Charlie Hebdo knew exactly what they were doing. They acted much like Steve Irwin, the Australian crocodile hunter, who went around poking wild animals only to provoke a response from them. Eventually, he decided that the countless land and river animals were not enough and chose to dive into the vast ocean in search of sea creatures to provoke until a stingray, in apparent solidarity with its fellow land and sea creatures suffering at the hands of humans like Irwin, poked back and killed him. But, like the Charlie Hebdo staff, Irwin well knew the risks he was facing when provoking these wild animals and fell victim to the consequences. The editor of Charlie Hebdo knew the game he was playing and enlisted a guard to protect his staff given the many death threats they had received. He was cognizant of the real dangers of provoking those he deemed open game and sport for the paper’s “satire.”
Today, much of the Western world expresses its moral outrage in solidarity over the murder of twelve people who knew the risks of provoking angry extremists yet argued, “These people want to frighten us into respecting their religion; therefore we will not be frightened”; and so they continued to poke fun at that which Muslims hold most sacred. This was not done in the long-standing Western tradition of satire, which takes aim at the powerful to empower the powerless; these cartoonists engaged in mockery for the sake of mockery and had no higher purpose. They suffered the fate of a man who gratuitously calls another man’s mother a whore and is surprised when that man stabs him. Pope Francis said it well: If a close friend “says a swear word against my mother, then a punch awaits him,” he explained. “One cannot provoke; one cannot insult other people’s faith; one cannot make fun of faith.” This is a man who believes in “turning the other cheek,” yet true to his Argentinian roots, he displays classic Latin attitude toward the dishonoring of one’s mother. For Muslims, the Prophet reminded us, “None of you truly believes until I am more beloved to him than his own parents.” Hence, to slander our Prophet is a greater injury than an attack on our mothers. If the Pope will punch someone, even his close friend, should he insult his mother, then what are we to expect from uneducated and volatile street urchins ** with the same sense of honor?
Retaliatory murders for honor or otherwise are clearly wrong under Islamic law, or any other reasonable system of law, as they should be. But even the cofounder of Charlie Hebdo, Henri Roussel, blamed the editor for knowingly endangering the lives of his employees. “What made him feel the need to drag the team into overdoing it?” Roussel wrote in Nouvel Observateur. “He shouldn’t have done it, but Charb did it again a year later, in September 2012.” Roussel continued, “I believe that we [were] fools who took an unnecessary risk…. We think we are invulnerable. For years, decades even, it was a provocation, and then one day the provocation turns against us.” Addressing the slain editor, whom he referred to as a “blockhead,” Roussel said, “I really hold it against you.”
Just for a moment, let us imagine that this incident had been about twelve murdered black Nigerian cartoonists instead of white French ones: would world leaders have descended on Lagos to march lock-armed with President Goodluck Jonathan in solidarity? Can we imagine Netanyahu heading to the West Bank to hold hands with Abbas in solidarity for the dozens of Palestinian journalists who, in clear crimes against free speech, were targeted by Israeli forces for simply being witnesses to atrocities and reporting to the world about them? No, there will be no demonstrations or gathering of world leaders held for the untold numbers of innocent civilians, including women and children, who, without any provocation, have borne the brunt of bombings, drone strikes, and other nefarious means of modern warfare. It is at times like these when it seems as though we live in a cartoon world where millions are shedding tears or displaying moral outrage for twelve white people who, without denial, were brutally murdered, while too many of those same eyes remain blind and dry to the countless deaths and suffering of the world’s Muslims.
* Absolutely wrong!
** These young men were only "SUSPECTS" and not proven guilty of any crime!
Sky News – 3 minutes 53 seconds ago [Wed 7 January 2015]
Two brothers and a third man have been identified as suspects behind the attack on the Charlie Hebdo headquarters in Paris.
The men have been named as French nationals Said Kouachi and Cherif Kouachi, in their early 30s, along with 18-year-old Hamyd Mourad.
Police officials have said the suspects are linked to a Yemeni terror network.
Follow live updates here
Cherif Kouachi was reportedly convicted in 2008 of terrorism charges for helping channel fighters to Iraq's insurgency. He was jailed for 18 months.
Three masked gunmen stormed the offices of Charlie Hebdo, which has previously been targeted over its portrayal of the Prophet Mohammed.
They were armed with Kalashnikov rifles and a rocket-propelled grenade during the attack on Wednesday morning.
A major manhunt was launched after the men fled the scene in a black Citroen, which was later found abandoned in north-eastern Paris.
They then hijacked a white Renault Clio and drove off in the direction of the Porte de Pantin - one of the main routes out of the French capital.
The attackers called out their victims by name before opening fire during a morning editorial meeting.
They were let inside the Charlie Hebdo building by a female employee who was threatened at gunpoint along with her daughter and forced to punch in a security code to allow them inside.
The editor and a cartoonist for the newspaper, who went by the pen names Charb and Cabu , were among those killed.
Radio France chief executive Mathieu Gilet announced revealed that contributor Bernard Maris was also killed.
Two police officers were among the dead, including one assigned as Charb's bodyguard after he had received death threats and another who was shot in the head as he lay wounded on the ground outside the offices.
French President Francois Hollande has declared a national day of mourning on Thursday.
In a televised address on Wednesday he said: "We have to respond according to the crime, first of all by finding the authors of this infamy and we have to ensure that they are arrested, judged... and punished very severely.
"We must also protect all public buildings... security forces will be deployed everywhere where there could be a threat.
Our best weapon is our unity, the unity of all our citizens, nothing can divide us, nothing must separate us. Freedom will always be stronger than barbarism."
Hassen Chalghoumi, imam of Drancy mosque in the Paris suburb of Seine-Saint-Denis, said: "These are criminals, barbarians. They have sold their soul to hell. This is not freedom.
"This is not Islam and I hope the French will come out united at the end of this."
An extra 3,000 police officers have been deployed on the streets in a massive security operation, according to reports, as the security threat level in France was raised to the highest level.
Tens of thousands of people have staged silent protests in France and across the world in solidarity for the victims of the attack.
Social media users have used the hashtag #jesuischarlie to show solidarity for the victims of the shooting, with the Charlie Hebdo website also using the image as its masthead.
The shooting is one of the worst terror attacks in France in decades.
In 1995, a bomb on a commuter train blamed on Algerian extremists killed eight people at the Saint Michel metro station in Paris.
MOSSAD USING ISLAM TO NEUTRALISE DISSIDENT ALAIN SORAL AND DIEUDONNÉ!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
truthjihad.com blog
"The best jihad is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant."
MOSSAD USING ISLAM TO NEUTRALISE DISSIDENT ALAIN SORAL AND DIEUDONNÉ!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
JEHOVA HU AKBAR!
PARIS SHOOTING: Several Clues To This Being Another STAGED FALSE FLAG EVENT
Published on 7 Jan 2015
There are already certain aspects of this story that make me feel it is worthy of further investigation.
1.
If this is in central Paris, one of Europes busiest capitol cities, why
then from footage shot from a rooftop is there NO OTHER VEHICLES
DRIVING ON ANY OF THE STREETS?
2. Why did the attackers feel confident enough of thier getaway that they didnt even speed off from the scene?
3.
Why was it security forces were happy for the french President to go
the scene so soon after the incident when we are being told the
whereabout of the attackers is unknown?
4. After recent attacks
with vehicles on pedestrians in the run up to xmas, why did the police
send officers on bikes to a location already know to be a target for
islamic extremists?
Just some of the questions that need answering in my opinion.
Is this fake or real? it would be ridiculous of me to say either way, or to dismiss anything at this time.
Kev Baker Show
Kev
Baker has been on the front lines since 2009. Hailing from Glasgow,
Scotland, Kev was recently featured in VICE magazine as a front-line
consultant and expert on activist groups in the United Kingdom. You can
listen to Kev Baker on AM/FM in Colorado, Oregan, California, Sydney and
London or tune into any of the TFR internet streams or listening
options.
Kev Baker has set his mark as a professional broadcaster
by featuring cutting edge analysis, current events and breaking news.
However he does not stop there! Together with his co-hosts Johnny
Whistles and Martin Hardy, Kev is joined by a great panel of expert
researchers and whistleblowers in the field of space technology,
metaphysics, human origins, black operations and international
terrorism.
Seeking the answers to age old questions and
dechipering the world around you painted by the mainstream media.. this
is the Kev Baker Show!
And remember...
WHERVER YOU ARE .... MAKE IT T.F.R.
Show Archives -- www.truthfrequencyradio.com/kevbaker
FACEBOOK -- www.facebook.com/truthtube451
Twitter www.twitter.com/TruthTube451
Youtube www.youtube.com/truthtube451
DJsNorthWest youtube
http://www.youtube.com/user/DJsNorthWest
Join my facebook page - https://www.facebook.com/Truthtube451
Thursday, 8 January 2015
YOUTUBE FAST BLOCKING OR SUPPRESSING VIDEOS PROVING PARIS ATTACKS A MOSSAD FALSE FLAG!
Thurs 01/08/2015 False Flag Weekly News
- FROM HOLOCAUST "DENIERS" TO CHARLIE HEBDO "DENIERS"!!!THOSE WHO ARE "NOT CHARLIE HEBDO" MUST BE HOUNDED, JAILED, INDOCTRINATED...!!!
Charlie Hebdo - The Hidden Agenda Exposed
Published on 17 Jan 2015We don't have to speculate as to how this event is going to be used. It has already started. Sources, transcript and download links: http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charl...
Follow us on Facebook: http://facebook.com/StormCloudsGathering
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/SCGupdates
Donate: http://StormCloudsGathering.com/donate
Get weekly email updates: http://scgnews.com/scgnews_updates
TOTAL HOAX BUSTED, DESTROYED, BLOWN APART...!app=desktop
Paris Hoax Shooting Blown Wide Open blood added later in wrong place
100% debunked as Fake
- ROTHSCHILD AND JEWISH BACKED,
- RACIST, BLASPHEMOUS, HATE-MONGERING, SATYRICAL & PORNOGRAPHIC CHARLIE HEBDO - FORMER HARA-KIRI PORN!!!
News Feed
I
posted this piece yesterday, but it was mysteriously taken down
overnight; VT appears to have been hacked. So I had to re-post from a
back-up. Sorry to all the people whose comments were erased. This must
be an important story if the bad guys have to hack VT to try to stop it
as it goes viral.
By
Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor False Flag Weekly News just
finished a special report on the Charlie Hebdo spectacular in Paris:
Also check out the links to the stories we covered. I also did a special
radio show on Charlie Hebdo, including a verbal battle with neocon
propagandist Patrick Po…
www.veteranstoday.com
Kate Bates likes RT.
Sir
Malcolm Rifkind has requested data from the US to learn the extent of
British intelligence’s involvement in the CIA’s torture program. The UK
government’s...
rt.com
News Feed
I
posted this piece yesterday, but it was mysteriously taken down
overnight; VT appears to have been hacked. So I had to re-post from a
back-up. Sorry to all the people whose comments were erased. This must
be an important story if the bad guys have to hack VT to try to stop it
as it goes viral.
By
Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor False Flag Weekly News just
finished a special report on the Charlie Hebdo spectacular in Paris:
Also check out the links to the stories we covered. I also did a special
radio show on Charlie Hebdo, including a verbal battle with neocon
propagandist Patrick Po…
www.veteranstoday.com
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Paris "Charlie Hebdo" attack": another Zionist false flag?
Just one month ago, France set off a stampede when its lower house voted
to recognize Palestine. Now Palestine is in the International Criminal
Court, poised to take down Israel for genocide.
Suddenly "Islamic terror strikes France." Is Paris being punished for its pro-Palestine vote?
In late 2013, Malaysia's Kuala Lumpur Tribunal found Israel guilty of
genocide. A few months later, Malaysian planes started falling out of
the sky.
In 2011, Norway's Labor Party's youth wing was poised to impose a
complete blockade on Israel. Suddenly the entire leadership of the
Party's youth wing was slaughtered in a professional operation falsely
attributed to a lone nut, Anders Breivik.
NoLiesRadio produce Allan Rees writes:
https://plus.google.com/+HuffPostUK/posts/HgDXoao79kT
They had a camera well placed beforehand to film the attack.
They spoke perfect French
Killed with military precision.
Dressed in military style.
Killed from a target list.
Got away clean.
French President shows up afterwards and then convenes emergency meeting on what measures to enact.
Multiple shooters.
Could this be false flag from French Intel Agency?
So far, it walks like one, it talks like one, and it perpetuates the 9/11 false-flag narrative about "radical Islam" like one.
So I'm calling it a false flag until proven otherwise.
PS: Running updates:
Zionists are already trying to use this event to stop the surging Alain Soral / Dieudonné movement: http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Tuerie-a-Charlie-Hebdo-Frederic-Haziza-accuse-Alain-Soral-et-Dieudonne-30100.html
Terrorist dropped his ID at the scene of the crime?! Give me a break!!!!!!
https://twitter.com/AndreyPanevin/status/552948198919004161
Zionist propaganda rolled out on cue
http://www.jns.org/latest-articles/2015/1/7/paris-attack-shows-frances-appeasement-of-palestinians-and-islamists-failed#.VK3UlFecpsh=
PS: Running updates:
Zionists are already trying to use this event to stop the surging Alain Soral / Dieudonné movement: http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Tuerie-a-Charlie-Hebdo-Frederic-Haziza-accuse-Alain-Soral-et-Dieudonne-30100.html
Terrorist dropped his ID at the scene of the crime?! Give me a break!!!!!!
https://twitter.com/AndreyPanevin/status/552948198919004161
Zionist propaganda rolled out on cue
http://www.jns.org/latest-articles/2015/1/7/paris-attack-shows-frances-appeasement-of-palestinians-and-islamists-failed#.VK3UlFecpsh=
Mossad attacks Paris?
THERE WE GO AGAIN!
Planted ID card exposes Paris false flag
Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:38AM
Police investigators search for evidence during an operation in the eastern French city of Reims, January 8, 2015.
French Interior Minister Bernard
Cazeneuve says the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo would never
have been caught had they not made one fatal mistake: They conveniently
left an ID card in their abandoned getaway car.
Since when did criminals leave their identification cards in abandoned getaway cars?
An ordinary citizen, taking no precautions, might accidentally leave a wallet or purse in their parked car. I have driven automobiles approximately 50,000 times in my life, and I think my wallet might have slipped out of my pocket and fallen into the crack between the driver’s seat and the door...once.
What are the odds that skilled terrorists who have just carried out an ultra-professional special-forces style attack will accidentally leave their ID card in the abandoned getaway car? Answer: Effectively zero.
So why are police reporting an event that cannot have happened?
Assuming that French police really did find “terror suspect” Said Kouachi’s ID card in an abandoned getaway car, that ID card must have been planted by someone wishing to incriminate Kouachi. Even the legendary French idiot detective, Inspector Clouseau, could not fail to make this thunderingly obvious inference.
The discovery of Kouachi’s ID does not implicate him; it exonerates him. It shows that he is an innocent patsy who is being framed by the real perpetrators of the attack.
Police and intelligence agencies routinely plant evidence to support false narratives, convict innocent people, and exonerate themselves. American police who kill unarmed citizens often plant a gun on the corpses to support their claims of having killed in self-defense. Such throw-down guns, which the police call “ham sandwiches,” are kept in police locker rooms and carried in police cars in case they are needed.
Likewise, throw-down ID cards and other “incriminating” documents are routinely used by the military, intelligence, and special forces professionals who orchestrate false flag operations. Consider the ludicrously-obvious planted evidence used in the mother of all false-flag operations: the September 11th, 2001 inside job.
Intelligence agents planted not just one, but two “magic suitcases” designed to incriminate Mohamed Atta, the innocent patsy framed for the crimes of September 11th. According to Der Spiegel’s book Inside 9/11: What Really Happened, the first Atta suitcase was handed to German police by a self-described “good Samaritan burglar.” The so-called burglar claimed to have stolen Atta’s suitcase during the course of a burglary and discovered terrorism-related information in it. As an honorable citizen, this kind-hearted burglar felt compelled by his conscience to deliver the suitcase to the authorities.
According to Der Spiegel, the German police, not being fools, knew that the self-styled burglar was not really a burglar at all, but an intelligence agent planting fake evidence against Atta. Der Spiegel quotes German police as saying: “The only question is, which intelligence agency was he working for?” (“CIA and Mossad,” answered former German Intelligence Minister Andreas Von Bülow in his book The CIA and September 11th.)
Despite its absurd origins, this suitcase full of fabricated documents provides virtually the only purported evidence supporting the official story of Atta’s supposed terrorism-related activities in Germany. Aside from the good Samaritan burglar’s suitcase, it seems that the original Egyptian Atta – the one in Germany – was a gentle, shy, sensitive, soft-spoken architecture student with no connections to terrorism of any kind. Yet the “Atta” who made a spectacle of himself in Florida before 9/11, staging memorable public scenes while all but wearing an “I am an al-Qaeda terrorist” sign around his neck, was a coarse, obscene, violent loudmouthed braggart who dated strippers, disemboweled kittens, and spoke fluent Hebrew.
The Hebrew-speaking Atta’s second and better-known “magic suitcase” was the one he allegedly checked in on his early morning flight from Portland, Maine to Boston on September 11th, 2001. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the suitcase was miraculously preserved and delivered to the authorities when it somehow failed to make the transfer from Atta’s Portland-to-Boston commuter flight onto Flight 11, which Atta supposedly piloted into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Had the suitcase been transferred as it should have been, we are told, it would have been destroyed in a fireball at the World Trade Center.
This magic suitcase provided the only evidence allowing authorities to identify the alleged 19 hijackers within 24 hours of the event. (None of the 9/11 passenger lists contained any Arab names; no airline employees remember having ticketed or boarded any of the alleged hijackers; and none of the hundreds of security cameras at Boston’s Logan Airport, Washington D.C.’s Dulles Airport, or Newark Airport took a single authenticated frame of any of the 19 Arabs blamed for 9/11.)
This suitcase not only contained a list of the 19 patsies, but also Atta’s supposed last will and testament. (Why would a suicide hijacker check his will onto a doomed plane?) Britain’s dean of Middle East journalism Robert Fisk has ridiculed Atta’s alleged will, pointing out that it begins with a botched bismillah: “In the name of God, myself, and my family...” No Muslim would ever write such a thing. As Fisk suggests, the document purporting to be Atta’s will must have been forged by an incompetent intelligence agent. The suitcase was obviously planted.
And that is not just Robert Fisk’s opinion. Seymour Hersh, the dean of American investigative journalism, quotes a senior US intelligence source as saying, with regard to Atta’s magic suitcase: “Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase.”
Atta’s two magic suitcases are not the only examples of clumsily-planted 9/11 evidence. Another is the “magic passport” of alleged 9/11 hijacker Satam al-Suqami. That passport, looking as pristine as the “magic bullet” of the JFK assassination, was allegedly discovered by an anonymous individual, with no chain of custody, near the two flat spots of smoking ground where two 110-story towers somehow exploded into very fine dust.
But Atta’s magic suitcases, the magic passport, beside the most pathetically-planted 9/11 item of them all: The “Fatty Bin Laden confession video” supposedly discovered in December 2001 by an anonymous US soldier in Jalalabad, and delivered with no chain of possession to be brandished by the Bush Administration as supposed proof of Bin Laden’s guilt.
Professor Bruce Lawrence, a respected expert on Bin Laden, has categorically stated of this video: “It’s bogus!” Lawrence adds that his many acquaintances in the US intelligence community’s Bin Laden units know that the video is bogus – but are afraid to say so in public, because they are afraid of the implications of Bin Laden’s innocence.
These and other examples show that the intelligence agents who orchestrate false-flag terror spectacles often do not even bother to disguise the blatantly-fabricated nature of the planted evidence used to implicate patsies.
So we should not be terribly surprised when the French police tell us – with a straight face – that a highly professional fleeing terrorist would leave his ID card in an abandoned getaway car.
KB/MKA
Since when did criminals leave their identification cards in abandoned getaway cars?
An ordinary citizen, taking no precautions, might accidentally leave a wallet or purse in their parked car. I have driven automobiles approximately 50,000 times in my life, and I think my wallet might have slipped out of my pocket and fallen into the crack between the driver’s seat and the door...once.
What are the odds that skilled terrorists who have just carried out an ultra-professional special-forces style attack will accidentally leave their ID card in the abandoned getaway car? Answer: Effectively zero.
So why are police reporting an event that cannot have happened?
Assuming that French police really did find “terror suspect” Said Kouachi’s ID card in an abandoned getaway car, that ID card must have been planted by someone wishing to incriminate Kouachi. Even the legendary French idiot detective, Inspector Clouseau, could not fail to make this thunderingly obvious inference.
The discovery of Kouachi’s ID does not implicate him; it exonerates him. It shows that he is an innocent patsy who is being framed by the real perpetrators of the attack.
Police and intelligence agencies routinely plant evidence to support false narratives, convict innocent people, and exonerate themselves. American police who kill unarmed citizens often plant a gun on the corpses to support their claims of having killed in self-defense. Such throw-down guns, which the police call “ham sandwiches,” are kept in police locker rooms and carried in police cars in case they are needed.
Likewise, throw-down ID cards and other “incriminating” documents are routinely used by the military, intelligence, and special forces professionals who orchestrate false flag operations. Consider the ludicrously-obvious planted evidence used in the mother of all false-flag operations: the September 11th, 2001 inside job.
Intelligence agents planted not just one, but two “magic suitcases” designed to incriminate Mohamed Atta, the innocent patsy framed for the crimes of September 11th. According to Der Spiegel’s book Inside 9/11: What Really Happened, the first Atta suitcase was handed to German police by a self-described “good Samaritan burglar.” The so-called burglar claimed to have stolen Atta’s suitcase during the course of a burglary and discovered terrorism-related information in it. As an honorable citizen, this kind-hearted burglar felt compelled by his conscience to deliver the suitcase to the authorities.
According to Der Spiegel, the German police, not being fools, knew that the self-styled burglar was not really a burglar at all, but an intelligence agent planting fake evidence against Atta. Der Spiegel quotes German police as saying: “The only question is, which intelligence agency was he working for?” (“CIA and Mossad,” answered former German Intelligence Minister Andreas Von Bülow in his book The CIA and September 11th.)
Despite its absurd origins, this suitcase full of fabricated documents provides virtually the only purported evidence supporting the official story of Atta’s supposed terrorism-related activities in Germany. Aside from the good Samaritan burglar’s suitcase, it seems that the original Egyptian Atta – the one in Germany – was a gentle, shy, sensitive, soft-spoken architecture student with no connections to terrorism of any kind. Yet the “Atta” who made a spectacle of himself in Florida before 9/11, staging memorable public scenes while all but wearing an “I am an al-Qaeda terrorist” sign around his neck, was a coarse, obscene, violent loudmouthed braggart who dated strippers, disemboweled kittens, and spoke fluent Hebrew.
The Hebrew-speaking Atta’s second and better-known “magic suitcase” was the one he allegedly checked in on his early morning flight from Portland, Maine to Boston on September 11th, 2001. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the suitcase was miraculously preserved and delivered to the authorities when it somehow failed to make the transfer from Atta’s Portland-to-Boston commuter flight onto Flight 11, which Atta supposedly piloted into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Had the suitcase been transferred as it should have been, we are told, it would have been destroyed in a fireball at the World Trade Center.
This magic suitcase provided the only evidence allowing authorities to identify the alleged 19 hijackers within 24 hours of the event. (None of the 9/11 passenger lists contained any Arab names; no airline employees remember having ticketed or boarded any of the alleged hijackers; and none of the hundreds of security cameras at Boston’s Logan Airport, Washington D.C.’s Dulles Airport, or Newark Airport took a single authenticated frame of any of the 19 Arabs blamed for 9/11.)
This suitcase not only contained a list of the 19 patsies, but also Atta’s supposed last will and testament. (Why would a suicide hijacker check his will onto a doomed plane?) Britain’s dean of Middle East journalism Robert Fisk has ridiculed Atta’s alleged will, pointing out that it begins with a botched bismillah: “In the name of God, myself, and my family...” No Muslim would ever write such a thing. As Fisk suggests, the document purporting to be Atta’s will must have been forged by an incompetent intelligence agent. The suitcase was obviously planted.
And that is not just Robert Fisk’s opinion. Seymour Hersh, the dean of American investigative journalism, quotes a senior US intelligence source as saying, with regard to Atta’s magic suitcase: “Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase.”
Atta’s two magic suitcases are not the only examples of clumsily-planted 9/11 evidence. Another is the “magic passport” of alleged 9/11 hijacker Satam al-Suqami. That passport, looking as pristine as the “magic bullet” of the JFK assassination, was allegedly discovered by an anonymous individual, with no chain of custody, near the two flat spots of smoking ground where two 110-story towers somehow exploded into very fine dust.
But Atta’s magic suitcases, the magic passport, beside the most pathetically-planted 9/11 item of them all: The “Fatty Bin Laden confession video” supposedly discovered in December 2001 by an anonymous US soldier in Jalalabad, and delivered with no chain of possession to be brandished by the Bush Administration as supposed proof of Bin Laden’s guilt.
Professor Bruce Lawrence, a respected expert on Bin Laden, has categorically stated of this video: “It’s bogus!” Lawrence adds that his many acquaintances in the US intelligence community’s Bin Laden units know that the video is bogus – but are afraid to say so in public, because they are afraid of the implications of Bin Laden’s innocence.
These and other examples show that the intelligence agents who orchestrate false-flag terror spectacles often do not even bother to disguise the blatantly-fabricated nature of the planted evidence used to implicate patsies.
So we should not be terribly surprised when the French police tell us – with a straight face – that a highly professional fleeing terrorist would leave his ID card in an abandoned getaway car.
KB/MKA
L'EUROPE
FÉDÉRALE US-NAZIE ENFIN UNE RÉALITÉ!
Ces scandaleuses infos retirées des livres scolaires car trop gênantes. A partager partout !
Published on 9 Mar 2014
L'UPR
est après seulement 7 ans d'existence, l'un des plus gros partis
politique de France. Si vous n'en avez toujours pas entendu parler,
c'est normal; nos idées dérangent tellement que les médias n'osent pas
nous présenter.
Nous sommes déjà plusieurs milliers d'adhérents et sympathisants qui avons décidé de dire NON à la dictature euro-atlantiste qui nous entraîne vers la misère et des guerres permanentes qui ont déjà tué plusieurs millions d'innocents.
Parce-que l'heure est grave, nous ne pouvons plus nous permettre de nous chamailler pour des futilités. Nous devons mettre de côté nos différences dans le seul objectif de sauver la France d'une disparition pur et simple.
Que vous soyez de droite, de gauche ou apolitique rejoignez la résistance et rentrez dans l'histoire.
L'union du peuple français pour sortir de l'UE, de l'euro et de l'OTAN.
Site de l'UPR: http://goo.gl/JhQB9n
Compte Youtube de l'UPR: http://goo.gl/0hvpID
Visionnez les EXCELLENTES conférence de François Asselineau: http://goo.gl/8SEFjU
Merci à la chaîne de GERONIMO Guu ji ya pour cette vidéo :
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjY0n...
(Ceci n'est pas le compte officiel de l'UPR mais celui d'un sympathisant.)
Nous sommes déjà plusieurs milliers d'adhérents et sympathisants qui avons décidé de dire NON à la dictature euro-atlantiste qui nous entraîne vers la misère et des guerres permanentes qui ont déjà tué plusieurs millions d'innocents.
Parce-que l'heure est grave, nous ne pouvons plus nous permettre de nous chamailler pour des futilités. Nous devons mettre de côté nos différences dans le seul objectif de sauver la France d'une disparition pur et simple.
Que vous soyez de droite, de gauche ou apolitique rejoignez la résistance et rentrez dans l'histoire.
L'union du peuple français pour sortir de l'UE, de l'euro et de l'OTAN.
Site de l'UPR: http://goo.gl/JhQB9n
Compte Youtube de l'UPR: http://goo.gl/0hvpID
Visionnez les EXCELLENTES conférence de François Asselineau: http://goo.gl/8SEFjU
Merci à la chaîne de GERONIMO Guu ji ya pour cette vidéo :
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjY0n...
(Ceci n'est pas le compte officiel de l'UPR mais celui d'un sympathisant.)
Norman Finkelstein réagit à l’affaire Charlie Hebdo : « Je suis…Gaza »
Dans les trois « posts » réunis ci-dessous, Norman G.
Finkelstein, historien et politologue américain, référence
internationale sur le conflit israélo-palestinien, réagit à l’affaire
« Charlie Hebdo » de manière brève mais éloquente.
Juif, enfant de rescapés du ghetto de Varsovie et d’Auschwitz, le reste de sa famille ayant disparu dans les camps nazis, Norman Finkelstein avait déjà dénoncé l’incroyable arriération de la France en ce qui concerne l’éveil politique et la liberté d’expression, notamment la liberticide loi Gayssot (cf. cet extrait vidéo comportant le fameux « Que dire d’un pays qui considère BHL comme un philosophe ?! »).
L’engagement de Norman Finkelstein pour la cause palestinienne lui a coûté son métier et sa vocation. Parce qu’il avait minutieusement démonté un ouvrage pro-israélien d’Alan Dershowitz, un BHL américain qu’il révéla comme une imposture, Norman Finkelstein fut victime d’une cabale orchestrée par ledit Dershowitz, suite à laquelle il perdit son poste d’enseignant à l’Université De Paul de Chicago. Depuis, malgré son parcours universitaire exceptionnel (Doctorat à Princeton, Professeur dans plusieurs Universités américaines, auteur et conférencier de renommée internationale), il n’a pas pu retrouver de poste.
Juif, enfant de rescapés du ghetto de Varsovie et d’Auschwitz, le reste de sa famille ayant disparu dans les camps nazis, Norman Finkelstein avait déjà dénoncé l’incroyable arriération de la France en ce qui concerne l’éveil politique et la liberté d’expression, notamment la liberticide loi Gayssot (cf. cet extrait vidéo comportant le fameux « Que dire d’un pays qui considère BHL comme un philosophe ?! »).
L’engagement de Norman Finkelstein pour la cause palestinienne lui a coûté son métier et sa vocation. Parce qu’il avait minutieusement démonté un ouvrage pro-israélien d’Alan Dershowitz, un BHL américain qu’il révéla comme une imposture, Norman Finkelstein fut victime d’une cabale orchestrée par ledit Dershowitz, suite à laquelle il perdit son poste d’enseignant à l’Université De Paul de Chicago. Depuis, malgré son parcours universitaire exceptionnel (Doctorat à Princeton, Professeur dans plusieurs Universités américaines, auteur et conférencier de renommée internationale), il n’a pas pu retrouver de poste.
***
Je suis Der Sturmer ?
Par Norman G. Finkelstein
Article original : http://normanfinkelstein.com/2015/01/13/ich-bin-der-sturmer/
Lundi 12 janvier 2015
La publication nazie Der Sturmer, éditée par Julius Streicher, était connue pour ses caricatures antisémites obscènes.
Imaginez qu’une paire de frères juifs, éperdus de douleur face à la
mort et à la destruction qui s’étaient abattues sur le peuple juif,
aient fait irruption dans les bureaux du journal et assassiné des
membres de son personnel.
Elèverions-nous au rang de martyrs et de héros ceux qui ont choisi de se moquer des croyances profondément ancrées dans les consciences d’un peuple souffrant et méprisé ; de dégrader, rabaisser, insulter et humilier les Juifs à l’heure de leur épreuve, alors que le monde qu’ils avaient connu se désintégrait tout autour d’eux ?
Imaginez qu’un million de Berlinois se soient mobilisés pour pleurer les pornographes politiques.
Applaudirions-nous à cette manifestation de solidarité ?
Streicher a été condamné à mort durant le procès de Nuremberg.
Il n’est pas rapporté que beaucoup de personnes dans notre Occident éclairé aient versé des larmes.
***
Désolé, Charlie
Par Norman G. FinkelsteinElèverions-nous au rang de martyrs et de héros ceux qui ont choisi de se moquer des croyances profondément ancrées dans les consciences d’un peuple souffrant et méprisé ; de dégrader, rabaisser, insulter et humilier les Juifs à l’heure de leur épreuve, alors que le monde qu’ils avaient connu se désintégrait tout autour d’eux ?
Imaginez qu’un million de Berlinois se soient mobilisés pour pleurer les pornographes politiques.
Applaudirions-nous à cette manifestation de solidarité ?
Streicher a été condamné à mort durant le procès de Nuremberg.
Il n’est pas rapporté que beaucoup de personnes dans notre Occident éclairé aient versé des larmes.
***
Désolé, Charlie
Article original : http://normanfinkelstein.com/2015/01/12/sorry-charlie%E2%80%8B/
Lundi 12 janvier 2015
Après le massacre de 1000 musulmans par le dictateur égyptien Sissi
en un seul jour, le journal Charlie Hebdo a publié ce titre (image de
gauche) : « Le Coran c’est de la m*** : Ca n’arrête pas les balles ».
Est-ce que l’image de droite, sur laquelle on peut lire « Charlie Hebdo, c’est de la m*** : Ca n’arrête pas les balles » est inclus dans la liberté d’expression, ou est-ce considéré comme un propos offensant par le monde « épris de liberté » ?
***
Je suis… Gaza
Norman G. Finkelstein | 10 janvier 2015Est-ce que l’image de droite, sur laquelle on peut lire « Charlie Hebdo, c’est de la m*** : Ca n’arrête pas les balles » est inclus dans la liberté d’expression, ou est-ce considéré comme un propos offensant par le monde « épris de liberté » ?
***
Je suis… Gaza
Article original : http://normanfinkelstein.com/2015/01/10/je-suisgaza/
[Après un périple extrêmement ardu, un groupe d'enfants de Gaza a pu réaliser son rêve et se présenter sur la scène de l'émission populaire Arabs Got Talent, bouleversant d'émotion jury et télespectateurs (voir cet article détaillé).]
Vidéo postée par N. Finkelstein
(Traduction : Sayed 7asan)
Source: Sayed Hasan
Suivez-nous
S'inscrire à notre lettre d'information.Wednesday, 19 September 2012
BROTHER MARK GLENN'S ADVICE ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE
BROTHER MARK GLENN’S ADVICE
ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE
Anti-Islam movie, West’s conspiracy against Muslim world:
Analyst
Wed Sep 19, 2012 5:15PM GMT
Interview with Mark Glenn, from the Crescent and Cross
Solidarity Movement
So the notion that this is a conspiracy source, absolutely this [yes]. It was done to inflame the Islamic world so as to further propagandize the West into making war against the Middle Eastern countries."
Outrage and anti-US sentiment are growing across the Muslim
world over the controversial movie that insults Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).
Anti-US demonstrations, which began on September 11 over the anti-Islam film, have been held across the Muslim world, with protesters storming US embassies and torching US flags.
Over a dozen people have already been killed in protests since the release of the film.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Mark Glenn, from the Crescent and Cross Solidarity Movement, to further discuss the issue. What follows is an approximate transcription of the interview.
Press TV: Mr. Glenn, protests are gaining momentum around the world and more and more people are coming to this belief that this move, this insulting movie, was more likely to be a deliberate act of conspiracy.
Glenn: Yes, I think that is exactly what it was and I think that the people responsible for putting this together, their reasons for doing it are self-evident. They want the world to witness these uprisings and these protests taking place as a means of defaming Islam and painting the Muslims as violent, irrational people.
You know (blipped) … is saying this that the Christian in the West because it is not my religion that has been attacked in this per se but when I would counsel those in these, [all I want to do] is to take a step back and to understand that what they are doing by participating in these things is that they are giving their enemies all of the ammunition that they need in order to take Islam as a violent, irrational religion followed by violent irrational people and all of this being on a course in order to justify the military brutality that has taken place in the past, that is taking place now and will take place in the future if these evil doers are given a free hand to do it.
So the notion that this is a conspiracy source, absolutely
this [yes]. It was done to inflame the Islamic world so as to further
propagandize the West into making war against the Middle Eastern countries.
Press TV: So what you are saying is that actually this was a conspiracy for Muslims to play in the hands of their enemies. Well, there are questions also surrounding the timing of the insulting movie, its coincidence with 9/11 and the US elections is also a month to go there.
Glenn: Yes, absolutely. You know, in 11 years since 9/11, there have been no terrorist attacks in the United States. And so the American people are beginning to ask questions: Why are we still at war? Why are young people so being set off to fight in these theatres such as Iraq and Afghanistan? You know, Osama bin Laden is dead; there have been no terrorist attacks; we are going bankrupt fighting these wars. Perhaps it is time to bring our troops home and to go back to peace and prosperity.
And so these organized pro-war interests, Zionist interest, organized
Jewish interest-- whatever you want to call them-- they have to from
time to time remind the American people why they are going bankrupt fighting
these wars and why they should continue to go bankrupt fighting these wars and
so that is exactly what this entire stunt in making this movie was all about,
was to bring the American people back to the morning of 9/11 of 2001 and also
in order to set
the stage for further military action, unfortunately, against your own country
of Iran.
I think that this entire debacle that is taking place that the main bull’s-eye in this thing, I mean the big agenda here that is being pushed is to prepare the mind of the American people so that they will sign on to increase military adventures against Iran.
AHK/MSK/JR
P.S. Many lives were lost uselessly after Jewish
sponsored renegade Salman Rushdie released his SATANIC VERSES attacking
Muhammad and Muslims and blaspheming Islam!
For outraging Muslims around the world and causing the deaths of many,
Salman Rushdie was knighted by the Freemasonic and Druidic German Squatter
Queen of B’rit’ain! B’rit in “Hebrew”
means Covenant or Contract and the B’rit’ish monarchs retrace their roots to
King David, the Lion of Judah and the Jewish Qabbalah. (BAFS)
THE UGLY TRUTH (MARK GLENN)
“As The War Drums Beat”
Merlin Miller, President–Americana Pictures
I contemplate my recent trip to
the Islamic Republic of Iran and ask myself who wants war between
America and Iran. I quickly surmise that it is not the American people,
nor the Iranian people, but globalists (international bankers and their
multinational beneficiaries). They control Israel, the American media
and most of our politicians…and by extension our foreign policy.
My journey to this exotic and
little understood land began with an invitation to “New Horizon – The
First International Independent Filmmakers Festival”. It was a
conference and festival held in Tehran from September 2nd through
September 7th. Filmmakers and intellectuals from around the world
attended. It was one of the most stimulating experiences that I have
ever had and an effective bridge between diverse cultures and
perspectives – with the purpose of promoting truth, justice, liberty,
and peace.
This initiative was undertaken,
not by America or other world leaders, but by a country unfairly
besieged with sanctions and threats of war. My observations were in
stark contrast to the perceptions of most Americans. What I experienced
was a devout country with a love of God, family, and nation – and an
uncompromising respect for the noblest of human endeavors.
As I write this, a giant,
beautiful book, Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, lies next to me. Khayyam’s
wonderful poems have survived the test of time and are a testament to
the normally peaceful spirit of the Persian people. This treasure was
given to me by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Inside its back cover, he
inscribed the following for me (transcribed from Farsi):
In the name of God who loves human beings.
My dear brother:
I, you, we and all of us are pursuing truth and happiness for human beings, which is unfortunately a victim of world powers.
This is a historical opportunity to undermine all inhuman relations and put an end to prejudices, which have questioned the truths and separates them, to build a new beautiful world based on love, justice and beauty.
This is a historical and certainly achievable objective. It only needs our hands, minds and hearts to join each other.
I pray Great God to bless you, who love humanity and wish success for all. I hope to meet you in a better future.
(signed)
M. Ahmadinejad
September 8, 2012
M. Ahmadinejad
September 8, 2012
I found President Ahmadinejad to
be a humble man with a firm handshake and intense, intelligent eyes.
Despite his courteous and dignified bearing, he has been regularly
berated, and routinely misrepresented, by a controlled western media. Is
their demonization justified, or has he been targeted as the lone
political figure standing against Zionist powers? This is my attempt to
represent truths, such that the world might have a better understanding
of Iran, its people, and its leadership.
The Iranian people are similar to
Europeans in appearance…a beautiful people, poised and kind. Their
women wear clothing which modestly cover them, but in elegant fashion
and with serene faces that are usually exposed. They return smiles and
are not treated as second class citizens, as we have been conditioned to
believe. In fact, they outnumber men in higher education enrollments.
There is no profanity and women are safe on any Tehran street – at any
time of day or night. The influences of western civilization have not
been totally removed, but the Iranians resist the decadence of
cultural-Marxism. I attribute this largely to their faith and love of
family. I was surprised to discover that the Islamic faith actually
honors Jesus and Christianity. However, through Zionist media control,
policy dictates, and other manipulations, the Christian world is
incessantly convinced that Muslims should be our enemies and that we
should be theirs.
Muslims look with jaundiced eye
upon the outrageous media lies and perpetual assaults on their faith and
culture. Hollywood’s promotion of twisted films can provoke extremist
reactions, and we are then led to believe that Muslims are all radicals.
We never question the bizarre promotion of these divisive, Zionist
inspired productions, or the actions of multinational interests in the
internal affairs of sovereign Islamic nations. Were we to look honestly
at the many false portrayals, we would see remarkable similarities to
how our Christian communities have also been assaulted – increasingly
with contempt and disrespect by these same Zionist and Cultural Marxist
propagandists. They seek a globalist new world order – devoid of the
diversity and freedoms associated with independent nation states.
As I wandered from the festival
grounds to meet people on the streets, I found them to be most helpful
and without animosity – despite my obvious American nationality. I
enjoyed their exotic food and came to appreciate the craftsmanship of
their products. The only negative sensation that I had was in witnessing
the mad house traffic situation in Tehran. A city of 15 million, it has
grown faster that it’s infrastructure. Despite this, the city is
thriving with new construction and beautiful parks and monuments – which
reflect a noble and accomplished people. The Iranians seemingly love
Americans, but are rightly concerned and critical of our irrational and
invasive government policies. The common response seems to be “why would
your country want to attack us?”
The current condemnation of Iran
is supposedly due to the possibility that they may develop nuclear
weapons. We should all work for a world free from nuclear threat, but
the sovereignty of nations must also be respected. Iran is signatory to
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and has opened their facilities for
inspection, declaring their interest is for energy development only. No
evidence to the contrary has been shown, and Iran’s Supreme Leader, the
Ayatollah Khamenei condemns nuclear weaponry – actually declaring a
“Fatwa” against them – as it is contrary to their nation’s faith.
However, Israel, their chief accuser (and architect behind the campaign
to falsely accuse Iraq of possessing “weapons of mass destruction”), is
believed to possess over 300 nuclear weapons. Israel is not signatory to
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and has no intention of sharing
information or opening their facilities for inspection – yet America
continues to march to their fanatical war drums against others. Why is
there no pressure on Israel to meet the same standards and why are we
imposing “sanctions” against a nation that has done us no wrong? It is a
preliminary act of war, and only imposed because Israeli lobbies demand
it of our lap-dog politicians, who incredibly serve Zionist interests
rather than the American people.
Iran is a strategic rival for
regional hegemony in the resource rich middle-east and has stood strong
for Islamic unity. They also courageously and most justifiably call for
an end to the Palestinian occupation – the ruthless suppression of an
enslaved people, largely funded by America. There is no greater
injustice than that being perpetrated against the Palestinian people.
World condemnation, through the United Nations is consistently blocked
by U.S. actions on the Security Council. As a result, the Non Aligned
Nations Movement (NAM) is growing as an alternative to the UN. Its
recent success is not generally reported in Western media, but 120
nations came together in Tehran the week before the New Horizon Film
Festival – in unity and in opposition to the evils of the Israeli
occupation of Palestine. The Secretary General of the United Nations
even attended, as well as observers from Russia and China. The
Palestinian occupation and Israeli aggressions (including “false flag”
operations against other nations) are at the root of the discontents for
Zionism.
As President Ahmadinejad gave me
copy of Khayyam’s works, I gave him copy of my western motion picture,
“Jericho”, and my political book, “Our Vision for America”. When I asked
him what messages I might convey to the American people, he indicated
“truths” and “Iran’s desire for peace”. Through lies and evil acts,
Globalists and Zionists falsely portray Iran, as they seek conflict
between nations. I later told him that our State Department should be
meeting with Iran’s leaders and not depending on the initiatives of
private citizens, like me. However, I hope that he and the Iranian
people take hope in the prospect that many patriotic Americans are
awakening to the evils that have consumed us, even while our politicians
continue to betray the otherwise good spirit and traditions of the
American people. Growing numbers seek answers that might save America
and truly promote world peace.
Americans do not want war, and
are beginning to realize that our politicians, of both major parties,
initiate these actions against the wishes of the American people – and
in accord with the intrigues of international bankers and their Zionist
agents. It is time we stopped them by creating alternatives in politics,
and in media. Iran sees the need and is taking appropriate initiatives,
and so should America.
I went to Iran to promote the
prospects for producing “False Flag”, a critically important motion
picture. I returned to America more committed than ever to produce this
political thriller and, through commercial entertainment, help awaken a
sleeping America. Vital truths must be revealed so that new evils are
not perpetrated against the people of America and Iran, with destructive
effects resonating throughout the world. I also return committed to
building a viable third party, which will represent traditional working
class Americans, rather than perpetuating a corrupt two party system,
which serves special global interests. God willing, my answer to the
courageous efforts of President Ahmadinejad is “I also hope to meet you
in a better future”.
Merlin Miller is a West Point
graduate, US Army veteran, engineer, writer, filmmaker
(www.Americana-Pictures.com) and 2012 Presidential candidate
(www.MerlinMiller2012.com)
Like this:
You and one other blogger like this.
-
Nothing could incite more anti-semitism than an unprovoked attack by isreal on Iran that drags the US into war! Netanyahu’s name will be equated as a 21′st century Hitler!
I hope the Isreali people do something to rein him in before Isreal is destroyed….forever! -
#2 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on September 20, 2012 - 2:03 amYour comment is awaiting moderation.Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei condemns nuclear weaponry – actually declaring a “Fatwa” against them – as it is contrary to their nation’s faith.
This is one truth that has always been kept away from the public: THAT ISLAM FORBIDS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!
Beautiful article and a rare gem!
BAFS
-
#6 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on September 20, 2012 - 12:33 pmIOANNES PAULUS PP. II
VERITATIS SPLENDOR
1993
CHAPTER I – “TEACHER, WHAT GOOD MUST I DO…? ” (Mt 19:16)
– Christ and the answer to the question about morality
“Someone came to him…” (Mt 19:16)
6. The dialogue of Jesus with the rich young man, related in the nineteenth chapter of Saint Matthew’s Gospel, can serve as a useful guide for listening once more in a lively and direct way to his moral teaching: “Then someone came to him and said, ‘Teacher, what good must I do to have eternal life?’ And he said to him, ‘Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments. ‘He said to him, ‘Which ones?’ And Jesus said,
‘You shall not murder;
You shall not commit adultery;
You shall not steal;
You shall not bear false witness;
Honour your father and mother; also,
You shall love your neighbour as yourself.’
The young man said to him, ‘I have kept all these; what do I still lack?’ Jesus said to him,
‘If you wish to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me’ ”
(Mt 19:16-21).13
BAFS:
Note that in the very First Commandment (God’s, not Jesus’s!) the Pope has changed the word KILL into that of MURDER, which is the correct translation as made by the “Hebrews” or today’s JEWS. For nearly 2,000 years Rome had preached the wrong religion.
Now, Catholics are allowed TO KILL, but not MURDER! So, KILLING Arabs, Muslims, Palestinians and other defenceless nations on earth amounts just to KILLING which is no more stressed as before!
This position of Rome is in contradiction with Saint Paul’s teachings who got rid of the Mosaic Law, nailing it to the Cross! And, by that one magical stroke, the Pope has also got rid of the doctrine of TURN THE OTHER CHEEK, which was a fallacy anyway!
Until Christians do not start thinking BY THEMSELVES and not stop listening blindly to Churches and Popes, they will never be obeying God’s Commandments!
Thank God, in Islam, we do not need Churches or Popes to tell humankind what to believe or not and what to do or not.
But, after Council Vatican II, Rome and the Churches worldwide sold out to Zionism and the International Jewish Mafia!
BAFS
20 September 2012 -
#7 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on September 20, 2012 - 3:39 pm#6 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on September 20, 2012 – 12:33 pm
“Thank God, in Islam, we do not need Churches or Popes to tell humankind what to believe or not and what to do or not.”
SATAN: But, can’t you see, you fool, that even when Muslims know EXACTLY what to believe and what to do, they still believe in and do the wrong things, EXACTLY the way I want things to be done! I have got them all EXACTLY where I want, those stupid Godly Christians and Godly Muslims, those hypocrites and money-loving fake Believers, those cowards and treacherous Paradise lovers?
BAFS: Unfortunately, I do see what you mean, O Master of this wretched world! But, let’s see what your adversary God has in store for His own Creation, the Good, the Evil and the Ugly! Isn’t it strange that you the Devil should obey God faithfully by doing the maximum of evil on earth and mislead His creation whereas Believers in God would disobey Him to such an extent that they now face total annihilation?
SATAN: So, tell me, you Earthling, WHO IS THE BEST OF PLANNERS, God or Me! Who is greater, God or me?
BAFS: Are you serious, O Master of this world? Do you want me to blaspheme? But, as you say, they well deserve their fate, don’t they? All our good and saintly people are being murdered one by one and we keep drinking Coca-Cola, watching television, football, and sing to the tune of the Kosher Nostra! Whole nations of nice people that were never contaminated by the diabolical West have now completey disapperared.
SATAN: This is nothing, just wait and see!
BAFS: Well, I will wait no more as my time is almost up and I leave it to our progeny if there will be any left with good health, a free mind and humanity in their heart.
BAFS
Thursday 20th of September 2012
Actress in anti-Muslim movie sues for its removal online; sues filmmaker for fraud
LOS ANGELES, Calif. - An actress who appears in the anti-Muslim film that has sparked riots in the Middle East is suing the filmmaker for fraud and slander and suing Google to try to get the movie’s trailer removed online.Cindy Lee Garcia’s lawsuit filed Wednesday in Los Angeles claims the actress was duped by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the man behind “Innocence of Muslims” who has been forced into hiding since its 14-minute trailer rose to prominence last week. She was unaware of the film’s anti-Muslim content and said the pages of the script she received had no mention of the prophet Muhammad, according to her complaint.The lawsuit states Garcia responded to an ad and thought she was appearing in an ancient Egyptian adventure film, which was altered to give it an anti-Islamic message.“The film is vile and reprehensible,” Garcia’s attorney, M. Cris Armenta, wrote in the document.“This lawsuit is not an attack on the First Amendment nor on the right of Americans to say what they think, but does request that the offending content be removed from the Internet,” the complaint states. Garcia’s attorneys plan to seek an injunction against the film Thursday in a Los Angeles court.Garcia has received death threats since the trailer began drawing attention, and her suit states she no longer is able to visit her grandchildren as a result. It has also harmed her reputation and caused “shame, mortification, and hurt feelings,” the suit states.An email sent to Google seeking comment was not immediately returned. The search giant owns YouTube and has blocked users in Saudi Arabia, Libya and Egypt from viewing the “Innocence of Muslims” trailer. It has also blocked the video from being viewed in Indonesia and India because it violates laws in those countries.A man who answered the phone at the law offices of Steven Seiden, who represents Nakoula on any criminal repercussions he may face, declined comment. He said Seiden does not represent Nakoula, who is on probation for a bank fraud case in which he opened 600 fraudulent credit accounts, in civil matters.According to the terms of his probation, Nakoula was allowed to only access websites with the permission of probation officials and for work purposes. It is unclear who uploaded the film to the site.The lawsuit also names Sam Bacile, an alias that Nakoula gave to The Associated Press after the trailer was linked to protests that have since killed at least 30 people in seven countries, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.Like this:
You like this.CHARLIE HEBDOFORMER HARA-KIRI HEBDO
“Charlie Hebdo” is a weekly French satirical pornographic magazine for perverts and popular atheist consumption, sold freely in all newspaper outlets and within easy reach of teenagers.It is said to be “satirical” magazine only because France is ruled by the Devil himself, the morally bankrupt Judeo-Christian, Judeo-Protestant, and Laïque (Secular) Marxist left, and Israelist Jews like Laurent Fabius (former Prime Minister of Zionist France who is now drumming for war against Iran!) and Nicolas Sarkozy (former Knesset puppet President of Zionist France who too wants war with all Arabs and all Muslims worldwide).The same Israelist Jew Laurent Fabius teamed up with Communist Gayssot and passed Fabius-Gayssot Law outlawing any criticism of the Holocaust (or of Israel), but is in favour of “freedom of speech” when Islam, Muslims and Arabs are demonised and the French populace is incited to hatred and violence against Muslims in France and worldwide! Or when the Pope and Catholics are demonised.“Charlie Hebdo” is a weekly satirical pornographic magazine even if most depictions are cartoon like. Literature deemed as pornographic does not have to be illustrated with real photographs of male and female prostitutes or whores to de described as pornographic! “Charlie Hebdo” started as Hara-Kiri (a satirical porn magazine, which was banned), then Hara-Kiri Hebdo Weekly which was banned again.In one of the Hara-Kiri issues, on the cover John Paul II was shown (having sex?) with naked or half naked nuns, but I cannot confirm the details of the cover depiction.However, I still have a copy of Hara-Kiri Hebdo which I purchased for 10 francs (£1 then in English money) in Gare-du-Nord during one of my travels (sold to any Tom, Dick and Harry!), Hara-Kiri Hebdo, Wednesday, Number 3 released at the time of the European orchestrated mass rape of Muslim women and girls in Bosnia Herzegovina in the nineties. The European Union was then led by British Prime Minister John Major and the Europeans were behind the ethnic cleansing of Muslims in the Balkans at the behest of Israel and the US.On the cover of that Hara-Kiri issue we see some 20 cartoons of naked women being raped and with sperm all over their body, front and back, and the title: “SERBS MORE POWERFUL THAN PATRICK BRUEL! Patrick Bruel is a French Jewish Supremacist!The cover depicts a Cartoon Serb Soldier with a huge naked male organ shouting:“Send me more sperm. My balls are empty!”And, the raped Muslim women coming and screaming:“more…continue, please…more…more…oh yes, more…yea…oh yea…yes, yes more…yes, continue, please…for heaven’s sake, put it in again…”
On page 3 of the same issue, we see the photographs of the editor of Hara-Kiri Georges Bernier aka “Professor Shoron” and of three naked women holding their legs up and showing their genitals wide open with a caption saying they were “authentic” Bosnian women with banners attached to their legs saying:- We demand courting before the act
- Our body is not a motorway
- Down with penetrations by surprise
This is the type of filth that Jewish Zionist France enjoys with the blessings of the Catholic Church and the Vatican and of the entire West!Now, you must have a clear idea of what “Charlie Hebdo” really is!As for the demonstrations of outrage in public with the burning of flags, I am totally against, but it is impossible to prevent some more vulnerable people (like in all countries, Muslims or not) from feeling so outraged as to commit some irrational acts. Anyway, it is not because of such public demonstrations of anger that make the West go and bomb Muslim countries and plunder their wealth!
Bon appétit with the French Jewish Marxist porn!BAFS
P.S. THIS IS WESTERN CIVILISATION!
Photo by Yasuyoshi Chiba/AFP/File Mon, Oct 1, 2012
Competitors in Brazil's Miss Bum Bum pageant wait to record a TV program in Osasco, a surburb of Sao Paulo, on September 24. Brazil's upcoming municipal elections are being overshadowed by the online contest, which seeks to find the cutest female behind
New French cartoons inflame prophet film tensions
France stepped up security Wednesday at its embassies across the Muslim world after a French satirical weekly revived a formula that it has already used to capture attention: Publishing crude, lewd caricatures of Islam’s Prophet Muhammad.Wednesday’s issue of the provocative satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, whose offices were firebombed last year, raised concerns that France could face violent protests like the ones targeting theUnited States over an amateur video produced in California that have left at least 30 people dead.The drawings, some of which depicted Muhammad naked and in demeaning or pornographic poses, were met with a swift rebuke by the French government, which warned the magazine could be inflaming tensions, even as it reiterated France’s free speech protections.The principle of freedom of expression “must not be infringed,”Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said, speaking on France Interradio.But he added: “Is it pertinent, intelligent, in this context to pour oil on the fire? The answer is no.”Anger over the film “Innocence of Muslims” has fueled violent protests from Asia to Africa. In the Lebanese port city of Tyre, tens of thousands of people marched in the streets Wednesday, chanting “Oh, America, you are God’s enemy!”Worried France might be targeted, the government ordered its embassies, cultural centers, schools and other official sites to close on Friday — the Muslim holy day — in 20 countries. It also immediately shut down its embassy and the French school in Tunisia, the site of deadly protests at theU.S. Embassy last week.The French Foreign Ministry issued a travel warning urging French citizens in the Muslim world to exercise “the greatest vigilance,” avoiding public gatherings and “sensitive buildings.”The controversy could prove tricky for France, which has struggled to integrate its Muslim population, Western Europe’s largest. Many Muslims believe the Prophet Muhammad should not be depicted at all — even in a flattering way — because it might encourage idolatry.Violence provoked by the anti-Islam video, which portrays the prophet as a fraud, womanizer and child molester, began with a Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, then quickly spread toLibya, where an attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi left the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans dead.In Washington, White House spokesman Jay Carney said the Obama administration believed the French magazine images “will be deeply offensive to many and have the potential to be inflammatory.”“We don’t question the right of something like this to be published,” he said, pointing to the U.S. Constitution’s protections of free expression. “We just question the judgment behind the decision to publish it.”In a statement, Arab League chief Nabil Elarabi called the cartoons “provocative and disgraceful” and said their publication added complexity to an already inflamed situation. He said the drawings arose from ignorance of “true Islam and its holy prophet.”A lawsuit was filed against Charlie Hebdo hours after the issue hit newsstands, the Paris prosecutor’s office said, though it would not say who filed it. The magazine also said its website had been hacked.Riot police took up positions outside the magazine’s offices, which were firebombed last year after it released an edition that mocked radical Islam.Chief editor Stephane Charbonnier, who publishes under the pen name “Charb” and has been under police protection for a year, defended the cartoons.“Muhammad isn’t sacred to me,” he told The Associated Press. “I don’t blame Muslims for not laughing at our drawings. I live under French law. I don’t live under Quranic law.”He said he had no regrets and felt no responsibility for any violence.“I’m not the one going into the streets with stones and Kalashnikovs,” he said. “We’ve had 1,000 issues and only three problems, all after front pages about radical Islam.”The cartoonist, who goes by the name Luz, also was defiant.“We treat the news like journalists. Some use cameras, some use computers. For us, it’s a paper and pencil,” he said. “A pencil is not a weapon. It’s just a means of expression.”A small-circulation weekly, Charlie Hebdo often draws attention for ridiculing sensitivity about the Prophet Muhammad. It was acquitted in 2008 by a Paris appeals court of “publicly abusing a group of people because of their religion” following a complaint by Muslim associations.The magazine has staked out a sub-genre in France’s varied media universe with its cartoons. Little is sacred, and Wednesday’s issue also featured caricatures of people as varied as Clint Eastwood, an unnamed Roman Catholic cardinal who looked a bit like Pope John Paul II and French President Francois Hollande, a staple.At the demonstration in Lebanon, Nabil Kaouk, deputy chief of Hezbollah’s Executive Council, warned the United States and France not to anger Muslims.“Be careful of the anger of our nation that is ready to defend the prophet,” he said. “Our hearts are wounded and our chests are full of anger.”Nasser Dheini, a 40-year-old farmer, said instead of boosting security at its embassies, France should close down the offending magazine.“Freedom of opinion should not be by insulting religions,” said Dheini, carrying his 4-year-old son Sajed.Outside the magazine’s Paris offices, a passer-by wearing a traditional Muslim tunic said he was neither surprised nor shocked by the cartoons. He criticized France’s decision to close embassies and schools for fear of protests by extremists.“It gives legitimacy to movements that don’t have any,” said Hatim Essoufaly, who was walking his toddler in a stroller.
THE UGLY TRUTH (MARK GLENN)
Egypt Issues Arrest Warrants for Terry Jones and Anti-Islam Filmmaker
On Tuesday, Egypt’s general prosecutor issued eight arrest warrants for anti-Muslim U.S. pastor Terry Jones, producerNakoula Basseley Nakoula and six other Coptic Christiansassociated with the incendiary film Innocence of Muslims, the The prosecutor’s office says the seven men and one woman could face the death penalty and are charged with “harming national unity, insulting and publicly attacking Islam and spreading false information.” It’s not clear where the other Coptic Christians live (an names them as Adel Riad, Morris Sadek, Nabil Bissada, Esmat Zaklama, Elia Bassily, Ihab Yaacoub and Jack Atallah) but the prosecutor says they are outside of Egypt at the moment. Meanwhile Jones and Nakoula live in the free lands of Florida and California, respectively, where it’s not a crime to make or promote a movie that depicts the prophet Muhammad as an effete homosexual.RELATED:However, that doesn’t mean their security situation isn’t a major legal headache for U.S. officials. As the U.S. is in a tricky position. “If the government were to overtly protect Nakoula, it could be seen by some as tacit approval of the film, and further enflame protests. Leaving him to fend for himself could have deadly consequences. There are examples of violence against others who have written or spoken against Muhammad.” So far, the government has offered some assistance, in the form of Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies escorting Nakoula to a meeting with probation officials in the dead of night.RELATED:One would assume the U.S. would reject any Egyptian extradition request on First Amendment grounds, which could inflame Egyptian sentiment further. As Lawrence Rosenthal, a professor at Chapman University’s School of Law, . ‘‘The thing that makes this particularly difficult for the United States is that … we treat what most of us would refer to as hate speech as constitutionally protected speech and Americans don’t appreciate, I think, how unusual this position seems in the rest of the world.” You can say that again.Like this:
You like this- THOSE FOOLISH MUSLIMS!
Anti-Islam Film: Seventeen Killed in Pakistan
Sky News – 8 minutes ago
View PhotoAnti-Islam Film: Seventeen Killed in Pakistan
Pakistani officials said 17 people have been killed in protests against an anti-Islam film - including a dozen in Karachi.The fatalities came as demonstrations swept across the world on Friday over a US made film denigrating the Prophet Mohammed. At least 47 people have died overall in violence linked to the movie, including the US ambassador to Libya.
:: Pakistan
Tens of thousands protested around the country after the government encouraged peaceful protests and declared a national holiday - "Love for the Prophet Day".
But demonstrations turned violent as police and protesters clashed in several Pakistani cities – including Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad. Five people were killed in Peshawar and 12 in Karachi.
One of the dead was identified as Mohammad Amir, a driver for a Pakistani television station, who was killed after police opened fire on rioters torching a cinema in Peshawar.
The United States has paid for adverts on Pakistani television which show US President Barack Obama and US Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton denouncing the film.
But the president has also suggested Islamist extremists are manipulating the protests for their own ends.
"What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage of the video was used as an excuse by extremists to see if they could directly harm US interests," he said.
:: France
Meanwhile, security has been tightened in France after a satirical magazine published drawings featuring the Prophet Mohammed naked.
French authorities declared street protests had been banned and interior minister Manuel Valls said there would be a crackdown if the ban was challenged.
"There will be strictly no exceptions. Demonstrations will be banned and broken up," he said.
Charlie Hebdo magazine has said the cartoons were merely designed to satirise the international furore over the film, and the pictures have yet to cause public disorder in France.
But French embassies, schools and cultural centres have been shut in 20 Muslim countries, on orders from French authorities, and the magazine's offices have been put under police guard.
Mohammed Moussaoui, leader of the French Muslim Council, described both the film and the cartoons as "acts of aggression". But he appealed to French Muslims not to take to the streets to protest.
:: Germany
Several hundred people gathered in the city of Freiburg in southwest of Germany to protest the film. Police banned inflammatory slogans.
Some carried banners saying: "The dignity of the Prophet Muhammad is our dignity."
The Interior Ministry postponed a poster campaign aimed at countering radical Islam among young people due to tensions caused by the US-made video.
Posters for the campaign - in German, Turkish and Arabic - were meant to go on display in German cities with large immigrant populations on Friday, but are being withheld because of the changed security situation.
:: Iraq
About 3,000 people, mostly followers of Iranian-backed Shiite Muslim groups, protested against the film and French cartoons in Basra.
Demonstrators carried Iraqi flags and posters of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, chanting "death to America" and "no to America."
:: United Kingdom
Some 100 people gathered near the Bullring in Birmingham on Friday afternoon, although the motive of the protest is unclear. No violence has been reported.
:: Bangladesh
About 10,000 Bangladeshis took to the streets of Dhaka, outside the country's National Mosque, shouting slogans and carrying placards.
A mock coffin of President Obama was burnt and a mock execution was held of the creator of the film Innocence Of Muslims.
The protesters also set fire to a French flag as they carried placards stating "Obama, you are a cheater!" and "Protest the disgrace of Prophet Muhammed!"
About 90% of Bangladesh's 153 million people are Muslims.
:: Sri Lanka
In the Sri Lankan capital Colombo, up to 2,000 Muslims were reported to have burnt effigies of Mr Obama
One of the protest organisers, Mujibur Rahman, said Muslims in Sri Lanka "have come to the streets today to join with Muslims all over the world" to protest against the film's insults to Islam and Prophet Mohammed.
He threatened to continue protests if the "US fails to ban this film and arrest its creators".
:: North Africa
Tunisian authorities banned all demonstrations on Friday and in the Libyan city of Benghazi, where US ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed last week, but protests were being planned.
Lebanese Muslims, Sunnis and Shiites took part in protests in the southern port city of Sidon, where Sunni clerics called "a day of rage" against insults to the Prophet Mohammed but urged followers to contain their anger to inside the mosques.
:: Lebanon
Thousands gathered in the Bekaa valley for the latest in a series of protest rallies organised by the Shiite militant group Hezbollah. Protesters carried the yellow Hezbollah flag.
:: Malaysia
About 3,000 Muslims marched on the US embassy, burning an American flag topped with the Jewish Star of David.
Although there was no violence, angry demonstrators declared their willingness to sacrifice their lives to defend the honour of the Prophet Mohammed and warned "there will be consequences" over the film.
"We will not allow the prophet to be insulted. We are willing to sacrifice our lives and property," said Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, an official with the opposition Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party, which spearheaded the march.
:: Indonesia
Indonesians staged anti-French and anti-American protests in the capital Jakarta. Protesters gathered outside US and French embassies, which were closed on the Muslim holy day amid fears of violence.
Demonstrators targeted American fast food outlets, and there were minor scuffles with police.
In Medan, North Sumatra province, dozens of protesters from the hardline Islamic Defenders Front burnt an American flag outside the US consulate.
:: Afganistan
About 900 people have gathered for a protest against the film in the capital, Kabul, chanting "death to America" and burning an effigy of President Barack Obama and an American flag.
A few hundred demonstrators also protested inside a mosque in the eastern city of Ghazni. The protests were peaceful.@YahooNewsUK on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook-
#10 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on September 21, 2012 - 9:23 pm#9 by MJ on September 21, 2012 – 1:28 pm“Basheer so true, this along with the firing of the generals are good moves by Egypt.”DEAR MJSalaamThanks for the observation.As you know I have been spending quite some time interviewing and speaking to Satan himself, and I enjoy doing it, but this woman is worse than Satan. Miss Leigh Sales has hate written on her face and every word she utters is full of lies, hate, disinformation and venom.Of course, Brother Mustafa is not a “preacher of hate”, and Miss Leigh knows this very well as she has gone through the ‘pain’ to find out whether he was preaching hate or not. Strangely enough, she should have known this was not true, but by some kind of (Jewish) miracle all she found was one fake website, most probably set up by MOSSAD, Jews or Zionists, with totally fabricated statements that Brother Mustafa confirms are not from Hizb ut Tahrir, and which she almost defiantly ‘handed over’ to him as HER evidence. And, she really did not seem concerned in the least that she was wrong, or caught up using disinformation live, when Brother Mustafa said “this does not look like our website”. Her main concern was exclusively about Jews and Israel.“ERADICATING ISRAEL AND PURIFYING THE EARTH OF JEWISH FILTHS”. That is certainly hateful, isn’t it?This is all she could come up with as evidence, a fake website! She does not give a damn about Muslims, about their suffering, about them being exterminated by the millions, starved, persecuted, exiled, tortured, demonised, and raped, and so on.“DO YOU THIK THAT JEWS SHOULD BE ERADICATED?” This is all she is interested in, and she even condones the slaughter the West and the Jews (like Bernard Henri Lévi, Nicolas Sarkozy, Laurent Fabius…) carried out in Libya because she argues Colonel Ghaddafi committed the capital crime of “not doing a great job for its citizens”!On the good side, Brother Mustafa managed to say without being interrupted (which shows that Miss Leigh is not that vicious!) what Hizb ut Tahrir and I have been saying for decades now, that WE NEED TO ESTABALISH A KHILAAFAH AND SHARI’A LAW IN OUR OWN MUSLIM LANDS!Miss Leigh proves that she is just another stooge for Israel and the Jews or Jewish interest by trying to insinuate that Br Mustafa was condoning the killing of the US ambassador. Her logic stinks.After admitting that she heard Br Mustafa say on a Youtube video: “American ambassadors should not be in Muslim countries. They should leave and go home.”, which he confirms, she asks Br Mustafa if he was saying THEREFORE THAT THE US AMBASSADOR WAS ASKING FOR IT BECAUSE HE WAS THERE, which, of course, he was not saying!Lastly, our brave Miss Leigh seemed so concerned about a child carrying a sign saying:“BEHEAD ALL THOSE WHO INSULT PROPHET MUHAMMAD!”But, she shows no concern at all about all the Muslims that the West is beheading, bombing, killing, holocausting, on a daily basis.But, I bet if Brother Mustafa would explain himself and Hizb ut Tahrir policy independently, no mainstream media would air it at all, including her.Yet, on the whole, we have to give the she-devil her due, as she allowed Brother Mustapha to say what he wanted to say and toned down her aggressiveness near the end. So, she is not that bad after all, and may even make a good Muslimah, insha’Allah!I am glad to see our Brother Mustafa keeping his calm. I would not have been able to. But, my initial remark (which I have removed) was that our Brother Mustafa was a blooming idiot for exposing himself and Muslims to ridicule like our Br Dr Tariq Ramadan does so often. This nonsense about “peaceful protest” by calling for street picnics where the innocent gets injured and even killed should stop! Sixteen got killed today FOR NOTHING in Pakistan!Why not PEACEFUL BOYCOTT INSTEAD?I went shopping to buy wholemeal sliced bread several times, but each time I found it had E471 in its ingredients, which is en anzyme obtained either from pork (cheaper to make) or beef. So, I did not buy it. Out of all the drinks they sell in the shops, I buy only juices pressed from fruits and with no artificial junk like aspartame. I try to avoid meat as much as possible because meat is a killer and eat as ‘natural’ as possible although I have not far to go in life. My grand daughters want me to live longer and I pray to God to give me health to be able to take care of them as long as possible! I do not waste food or money and do not buy junk like most City Muslims do! So, protesting is picnic (in my view) while boycotting hurts the usurious Jews and the war mongers EXACTLY where it should! Now, it is useless to protest when we support Muslim governments that are members of the Zionist United Nations Dictatorship! We will not be able to establish the Khilaafah as long as we bow down to UN dictates!Without the Khilaafah, Islam will remain in the gutter and Muslims will continue to be exterminated!Thanks again.Salaam.Basheer
-
#11 by MJ on September 22, 2012 - 2:47 amThe Egyptian masses are genuine but I am not into reading the hearts of people.
Blasphemy or freedom of speech
Posted by on September 26, 2012
Islamophobia is modern day racism. Insulting someone and calling it freedom of speech. Like the CNN, whose ignorant recent poll was no different than if they were to ask the Jews about the Holocaust or the Africans about Slavery. If there are laws in place to protect people from anti-Semitism, racism and homophobia, then why is Islamophobia accepted?The sacrilegious film “Innocence of Muslims” that mocked Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) and Islam has profoundly hurt the sensitivities of Muslims and sparked violent protests all over the world. It has renewed the debate about sanctity of religion and controversial approaches towards freedom of speech. What is freedom of speech and expression? Does it allow humiliation of any divine religion, its prophet, its faith, and values that are perceived sacred by the followers of that religion? If it does allow all such things then why freedom of expression has always been used against Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)? These are a few questions frequently raised by Muslims across the world.Muslims have been protesting against the movie, at some places protests are staged in a peaceful way while in most states these have turned violent, such as the killing of American diplomats in Libya and the burning of public and private property and loss of innocent lives in Pakistan. This is not the first time when blasphemous act has been committed against Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), there has been a chain of events, at first books were written to defame the Prophat Muhammad (PBUH), then caricatures were drawn in Denmark and other European newspapers and now a malicious attempt has been made to produce a sacrilegious movie. This movie has followed by publication of caricatures of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in the Frenchmagazine Charlie Hebdo that have added fuel to anti-Western sentiments in Muslims.In the post 9/11 era the wrong image of Islam has been portrayed in the Western societies and it is considered as a threat to Western civilization. New terminologies are being introduced that are being associated with Islam such as radicalization, extremism, fundamentalism, Islamic terrorism and Islamophobia. People like Sam Bacile are representing the so-called Islamophobia, the filmmaker has deliberated focused on fermenting violence. Filmmakers should have anticipated that it will create unrest and violence in Muslim societies because for the Muslims, love for Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) has been considered as part of the faith. Veneration of all prophets of Allah is a fundamental principle of faith in Islam. If we see what has been the reaction of Muslim states it becomes obvious that Muslim masses are protesting against blasphemy of their religion but their leaders are silent. They have not raised a collective voice. Unfortunately, there is lack of will on the part of Muslim leaders to project a common cause.Criminalizing the defamation of religion has been on the agenda of OIC for some time but it could not get support from the western liberal democracies. At present, Turkey is heading the OIC, but it is not yet clear that organization has consulted with its members to bring a resolution to ban blasphemy. OIC member states must get agreed on a common agenda that UN should declare blasphemy as a criminal offence and should present their case from a unitary platform so that it could have a forceful effect. If denial of holocaust has been prohibited by law in majority of Western states to respect the sensitivities of 13 million Jewish population then why indifferent laws and practices against over 1.5 billion Muslim population?It is our right to protest against such attacks on our religion but the protest should be staged in a peaceful manner. Our Prophet (PBUH) stood for peace in his whole life. If we resort to violent means and destruction of our own property then we may not be able to highlight the noble cause to which each one of us is duty bound to raise our voice. Western notion of freedom of speech and expression can not be accepted in its current form. There should be a clear distinction between what constitutes free speech and what will be considered as hate speech against any religion. Turkish Prime Minister has rightly said that free speech comes with boundaries, “Freedom of thought and belief ends where the freedom of thought and belief of others starts”.UN Secretary General Ban ki-Moon referring to anti-Islam movie has also made it clear that the right of freedom of expression to provoke or humiliate some others’ values and beliefs can not be protected, it can only be guaranteed and protected as a fundamental right when it is used for common justice, and common purpose. To promote interfaith harmony, it is the duty of Western governments to take this issue seriously and to come up with some proposals that could address the discriminatory law of freedom of expression and could differentiate between freedom of speech and blasphemy.Insults, incitement and Islam
Across the Muslim World there is rightly outrage and hurt at the latest calculated attack on Islam, in the form of the film trailer Innocence of Muslims. All who hold human rights and moral decency close to their heart share their indignation.Freedom of speech is a basic human right, protected under Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which states 1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference. And 2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression. Rights enshrined in law that are nevertheless denied to many, rights supposedly honoured in democratic countries.Expressions of free speech that are little more than propaganda, that consciously incite hatred and spark acts of violence are rightly restricted under the very law that protects our freedom of expression. Article 20, paragraph 2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.Innocence of MuslimsThe deliberately amateurish film with no real narrative portrays the Prophet Mohammed as a violent and lascivious fool. It is cheaply made, poorly acted and directed, and as a piece of filmmaking it is to be dismissed out of hand, but as The Guardian 17/09/2012 put it “the really sinister thing is that all this ham-fistedness and crassness is an important sense deliberate. It has to look like propaganda for the provocation to be effective.” The actors claim they did not know what the film was about, or it’s purpose and some speak of suing the producers. The BBC reports, “One actress featured in the film said she had no idea it would be used for anti-Islamic propaganda and condemned it.” Offensive dialogue that insults Islam and the Prophet Mohammed has been crudely added after filming.The trailer was written and produced in the USA by Nakoula Basseley, a Coptic (Egyptian) Christian living in California, who drafted much of the script whilst serving a prison sentence for fraud. And directed, according to Gawker “by a 65-year-old schlock director named Alan Roberts …. He’s the creative vision behind soft-core porn classics like The Happy Hooker Goes Hollywood.” Whether a full film version exists is speculation, the trailer however has done its toxic, destructive work.Basseley says his wife’s family paid for the film, but it is still unclear how it was funded or what the cost was. Whatever the amount, it is hard to justify any expense at all on a film rooted in such prejudice and hatred, which serves no purpose other than to hurt and insult Muslims throughout the World, reinforce negative stereotypes, incite violence and fuel division. The film is as The Guardian 17/09/2012 state “a bigoted piece of poison calculated to inflame the Muslim world… it might be risible were it not for the ugly Islamophobia which it promotes and whose effects are now being seen around the world.”Intended furyThe film has unsurprisingly prompted widespread protests throughout the World. On the 11th September In Cairo protesters scaled the walls of the embassy, pulled down the US flag and called for the expulsion of the US ambassador to Cairo. In Libya the U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other American staff members were killed in the American embassy in what appears to have been an unrelated pre-planned military style attack, as The Observer 16/09/2012 comments “The murder of US diplomats was not carried out spontaneously, but by a jihadist militia that wanted to kill Americans on the 9/11 anniversary.”Protests directly triggered by the offensive, degrading film, have since taken place in countries with large Muslim populations, sadly causing as the BBC 14/09/2012 reports more loss of life. “Three people were killed when the US embassy in Khartoum was attacked, Sudanese state radio said. In Tunisia, two people were killed after crowds breached the US embassy compound in Tunis. There was one death in Egypt and one in Lebanon.” In Yemen hundreds of students demonstrated in the capital Sanaa and demanded the US ambassador be expelled, thousands waved flags on the streets of Beirut and chanted “America hear us – don’t insult our Prophet.” The Guardian 17/09/2012 reports that Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah has “called for new demonstrations to express outrage at a film that denigrates Islam and the prophet Muhammad. “Prophet of God, we offer ourselves, our blood and our kin for the sake of your dignity and honour,” Nasrallah told supporters who chanted “death to Israel” and “death to America” at a rally in the southern Shia suburbs of Beirut.”The Philippines Indonesia, usually calm Qatar, Afghanistan, London, Kashmir, all have witnessed demonstrations and in Pakistan access to You tube has been blocked by the government, the Prime Minister, rightly describing the film as “”blasphemous.” Such is the deep-seated feeling amongst the people of the Muslim community. An open wound has been deliberately inflamed and the people cry out in anger and frustration.Free speech or incitementThe film and the reaction to it, has prompted much to be written and spoken about unrestricted free speech and the dangers of censorship. Writing in The Observer Nick Cohen argues that, “Nothing, however vile, justifies censorship. Even in the hardest of cases such as this anti-Islamic film, the old arguments against censorship remain the best.” The observation of basic human rights is the foundation for any democratic society and free speech is a fundamental requirement. Where it is absent totalitarian control of one kind of another becomes possible, perhaps inevitable.There are though many methods of control and restriction of freedoms, both crude and subtle. Is for example the manufacturing of consent, a form of sociological coercion commonplace in America (and elsewhere) compatible with freedom and/or democratic principles of independent thinking and participation. Noam Chomsky, “the anti-democratic thrust of opinion in what are called democratic societies is really ferocious, and for good reason. Because the freer the society gets, the more dangerous the great beast becomes and the more you have to be careful to cage it somehow.” The ‘Great Beast’ is of course us – the 99%.The making and distribution of this film is not an expression of freedom of any kind, it contributes nothing of value to the political environment or social discourse and has no artistic merit. The Anna Lindh Foundation reinforces this view in their statement made on 16/09/12, asserting “Innocence of Muslims is an inflammatory pamphlet, the distribution of which – on the anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11th – cannot be abridged to a manifestation of freedom of expression.”International law, acting as a guide and aid to clarity of thinking, states there are limits to free speech. Where such expression is clearly based on racial or religious hatred and incites violence, then it is illegal and the perpetrators subject to prosecution. For where the law is infringed consequences follow – something Israel should be made aware of. What is crucial is the motive. If something is spoken, written, painted, drawn, filmed etc. with the premeditated intention of causing offense, because it is rooted in hatred of one kind or another it is outside the law.Freedom of expression is indeed a fundamental human right, but it does not stand alone, or above other related rights, such as human dignity and mutual respect. All need to coexist and indeed all are indivisible.Unless the filmmakers of Innocence of Muslims are completely naïve or plain stupid, they would have known that producing a film in which the Prophet Mohammed is portrayed, as a violent, promiscuous simpleton would inevitably cause offense and would probably result in violent demonstrations. Therefore the film breaches international guidelines on free speech, and should be banned, its makers charged and prosecuted. Al Jazeera 14/09/2012 quote the filmmaker Danny Schechter, whose view on the film is clear: “It is very political from beginning to end. It’s not about free expression; it’s about propaganda. The film is incitement – it’s not information, it’s not filmmaking and it’s really intended as a technique of war-making.”What good can possibly come from continuing to allow such a distasteful film to be circulated? It serves no purpose other than to provoke further potential violence. Enabling Muslims to be marginalized and demonized once more, constructing some perverse justification for continued American and Israeli intimidation, aggression and the spreading of paranoia. Allowing this film to be shown or not has little to do with censorship and/or free speech, and to reduce this issue to such notions is a convenient, distraction, fabricated in order to avoid discussing the filmmakers intention and the underlying causes of Islamists hurt and anger, which arise largely out of American foreign policy.Simmering resentment “the safeguard of justice”Opinion amongst large numbers of Islamists throughout the Muslim World towards America is overwhelmingly negative. The Pew Research Center found in a recent survey that “There remains a widespread perception that the U.S. acts unilaterally and does not consider the interests of other countries. In predominantly Muslim nations, American anti-terrorism efforts are still widely unpopular.” In fact according to the Pew report only 15% of Muslims have confidence in President Obama, approve of his foreign policies and hold favorable views of America in general. Pew state, “In a number of strategically important Muslim nations, America’s image has not improved during the Obama presidency.” In fact it has deteriorated, as US policies throughout the region continue to cause consternation amongst large numbers of Muslims, (and of course more widely).American support for Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine, which violates a host of international and indeed national laws and contravenes numerous UN resolutions, is perhaps top of the list. Followed by the Iraq war US involvement in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Yemen, long running proxy wars in Somalia, and US support for what the BBC call ‘friendly dictators’. Add confinement without trial, abuse and torture in Guantanamo and Bagram prisons, the burning of the Qur’an by US soldiers in Afghanistan and Florida Pastor Terry Jones and disrespecting the dead bodies of Afghans. The list is indeed long and damning, and so it goes on.The recent demonstrations were simply sparked by the film Innocence of Muslims; it was of course not the root cause of the protests. As the BBC 15/09/2012 state “we are witnessing profound anti-Americanism, dormant for much of last year, fused with religious extremism – with the controversial Innocence of Muslims film merely a trigger.” Of course extremists were involved they never miss an opportunity, their violent actions distorting the events feeding prejudice and creating a convenient diversion from the issues.US ideals of peace justifying conflictAll violence is to be condemned and the attacks that caused deaths and injuries resulting from these protests are no exception, they should not be allowed to take centre stage though, and it must be stated that the vast majority of actions undertaken have been peaceful and without incident. The Anna Lindh Foundation (ALF) says in relation to the protests that “the vast majority of Muslim public opinion has expressed its anger to the release of the film peacefully and individually, and the Arab governments of the region have reiterated their commitment with cultural inclusiveness while condemning the attacks to diplomatic delegations.”To speak with solemnity and shock, calling for justice against the perpetrators of violence as US officials have, is expected and indeed right, albeit hypocritical and reactionary. In order to create peace however it is necessary to remove the causes of conflict, in this case those causes are complex and not confined to one poorly made deeply offensive film. Offensive let us add, not just to Muslims, who are understandably enraged, but to all right minded men and women respectful and tolerant of others beliefs and cultures.American foreign policy is seen by many to be that which seeks to extend the influence and maximize the power of America, safeguard their interests at the expense of others and the natural environment and support criminality – Israel comes to mind. Such distasteful American foreign policies go back decades, as Noam Chomsky states in The Guardian “Even in the 1950s, President Eisenhower was concerned about what he called a campaign of hatred of the US in the Arab world, because of the perception on the Arab street that it supported harsh and oppressive regimes to take their oil.” A perception proved to be correct.Ideologically driven, rooted in a desire to export worldwide an American version, or vision, of democracy, which they claim to be the highest ideal for all. The attitude is that when all follow America’s lead on matters relating to economics, politics, religion and social affairs, peace will inevitably follow, and not until. With this doctrine in mind America has sought to dominate the world, repeatedly making war in the name of peace.Peace though is beyond ideology. For peace to envelop our world as men ad women everywhere hope, there must be tolerance, cooperation and understanding of others, not ideological imposition – of any kind. The equitable sharing of natural resources, of knowledge, ideas and experience will create justice. Dissipating mistrust and resentment leading to peace and a natural movement towards unity that encourages the greatest possible diversity enriching the lives of us all.Occidental double standards
The recent outrage by the Muslim Ummah protesting against a low budget blasphemous movie produced in theUSAand the West’s condemnation of the remonstration of the Islamists depict occidental double standards.The US State Department assures the Muslims that the sacrilegious film was not sponsored by it. The US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, during her meeting with her Pakistani counterpart Hina Rabbani Khar, made it clear that the protests that had turned violent and, sadly, resulted in loss of life, cannot be tolerated. She admitted that there is provocation, and theUShad made clear that it does not in any way support provocation. She reiterated that theUSadministration found the video, which is at the core of this series of events, offensive, disgusting and reprehensible.Unfortunately, the West displays double standards in its dealing. Terry Jones, a small time pastor of Dove World Outreach Centre, a small nondenominational Christian church inGainesville,Florida, had his 10 minutes of fame when he burnt copies of the Holy Quràn. His despicable act was condemned, but no legal action was taken against him. The Danish caricatures ridiculing Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) were in bad taste and violently protested by the Muslim Ummah, but no legal action was taken against the cartoonist, who caused mental agony to billions of Muslims all over the globe. Salman Rushdie, the author of Satanic Verses, was revered by the West although his blasphemous book was reviled by the Muslims all over the globe. Now similar revulsion has been caused by the profane film, which would have gone unnoticed if the producer had not taken pains to translate it in Arabic and post it on YouTube.The sad aspect is that all these heinous acts causing mental anguish to Muslims for defaming their beloved Prophet (PBUH) are brushed aside by the West under the ‘Freedom of Speech Act’.It is, indeed, doublespeak when the punishment for the denial of Holocaust ranges to imprisonment of one up to 10 years in a number of Western countries. Nudity is permissible but in some Western countries, Muslim women covering their heads with scarves can be punished or sacked from their jobs or expelled from educational institutions. InDenmark, the construction of magnificent palaces, citadels and mansions is permissible, but the domes of mosques are prohibited. Smoking at public places is prohibited as it is injurious to health, but the onslaught of venomous comments against a religious entity is permissible under freedom of speech. InGermany, Hitler’s Mein Kampf is banned, but books preaching hate and odium against Islam are tolerable. It is high time that the Occident reviews its laws against blasphemy and the reviling of other religions.On the other hand, Muslims, and especially Pakistanis, need to rein in our anger.September 21, 2012, was declared as the day of ‘Love for the Holy Prophet (PBUH)’, but it turned into a day of expressing extreme hatred, violence and aggression. The same Holy Prophet (PBUH), whom we revere and whose Sunnah (teaching and practices) we are ordained to follow, were conveniently forgotten. The Prophet (PBUH) was a paragon of love and virtue. He decried violent behaviour and forgave even those who caused him physical harm.Against this backdrop, Pakistanis, who attacked and burned a church, cinema houses, looted ATMs, torched cars and petrol pumps, only caused damage to their own country. They lost an ideal opportunity to display to the world that their sentiments had been hurt. By giving vent to their emotions through violent acts, they only revealed their barbaric nature and brought Islam a bad name. No wonder, an Indian student has taunted that India does not need to build Pakistan-specific Agni and Prithvi missiles —- “just produce a blasphemous movie, post it on YouTube and in retaliation, Pakistanis will destroy their own country.”Brazil moves against Google over videos
A Brazilian court has ordered YouTube to remove an anti-Islam video that prompted violent protests across the Muslim world, while an elections court has ordered the arrest of a Google executive after the popular video-sharing service failed to remove a video attacking a mayoral candidate.Tuesday’s decision by a state court in Sao Paulo, home to a large Middle Eastern immigrant community, came just hours after Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff criticised “Islamophobia” in Western countries in a speech at the UN.In a statement, the court said Judge Gilson Delgado Miranda gave the video-sharing site ten days to remove videos of the film, “Innocence of Muslims”.After that, it will face fines of $5,000 a day for every day the clips remain accessible in Brazil.The case against the controversial film was brought by a Brazilian Muslim group, the National Islamic Union, against Google Inc, the owner of YouTube, for posting on the internet a film it said was offensive and a violation of the constitutional right to freedom of religion.Miranda said the case juxtaposed freedom of expression and the need to protect individuals or groups of people from action that might incite religious discrimination.Miranda concluded that banning something illegal should not “offend” freedom of thought and expression, according to the ruling posted online by Estado de S. Paulo newspaper.It was not the only Brazilian court ruling against Google on Tuesday. Earlier, an elections court ordered the arrest of Google’s most senior executive in Brazil after the company failed to take down YouTube videos attacking a local mayoral candidate.Google is appealing the order, which follows a similar decision by another Brazilian election judge. In that case, a judge found another senior executive responsible for violating local election law. That decision was overturned last week.The legal challenges underline broader questions about Google’s responsibility for content uploaded by third parties to its websites.Fifteen people were killed in Pakistan during demonstrations over the video on Friday.People involved in the film, an amateurish 13-minute clip of which was posted on YouTube, have said it was made by a 55-year-old California man, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.Muslim leaders condemn Islamophobia at UN General Assembly
Muslim leaders have called on the Western countries to stop spreading Islamophobia and blasphemy in their communities, challenging US President Barack Obama’s defense of freedom of expression.In his address to the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, Obama condemned the “violence and intolerance” which has erupted across the world over a blasphemous anti-Islam film produced in the United States.He also stated that the removal of such sacrilegious videos or offensive publications from the Internet would be a violation of the US constitution, which “protects the right to practice free speech.”Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono challenged Obama’s speech, saying the insulting movie was another example of religious defamation.Yudhoyono stressed that freedom of expression is “not absolute” as according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights “everyone must observe morality and public order.”
He also called for the establishment of an international “instrument to effectively prevent incitement to hostility or violence based on religions or beliefs.”In addition to Yudhoyono, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari asked the UN to take actions against the “incitement of hate” against Muslims.“Although we can never condone violence, the international community must not become silent observers and should criminalize such acts that destroy the peace of the world and endanger world security by misusing freedom of expression,” Zardari said during his speech at the General Assembly.Meanwhile, Afghan President Hamid Karzai denounced the anti-Islam movie and said, “The menace of Islamophobia is a worrying phenomenon that threatens peace and co-existence.”The Muslim world has been boiling with anti-Western sentiments over a blasphemous film named Innocence of Muslims, which insults Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).Muslim protesters across the globe demand the US government apologize to the Muslims and punish those behind the blasphemous act.
Freedom of Speech - Double Standards?
Dr Amjid Muhammad
Last Updated on Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:30 Please help us run Islam21c and its' projects for the next 12 months. Donate to our Just Giving page.In other words there is a fine balance between the freedom of speech and the freedom to offend. Freedom of speech is curtailed if it dishonours unjustifiably or if it can cause harm to the wider public. The Muslim would argue that the west, when it applies this principle to Islam, does so with an element of prejudice. It fails to consider the unjustifiable attack on the reputation of the Prophet Muhammad, or the public disorder that such expressions can lead to. In a world which is increasingly resembling a global village, the later must surely come into consideration.
Sources: www.islam21c.comEmbassies are razed, diplomats are lynched, protesters have marched with unbridled aggression from east to west. The Islamic world and the West once again finds itself at loggerheads arising from two conflicting principles, the right of 'freedom of speech' against the right to 'defend one's honour'. What ensues is a repetitive discourse occurs between the two.
The argument a Liberal-Secular puts forward is that he can say what he wants without the Muslim having the right to be offended. He will then further propose that Muslims should be mature enough to handle such insults. The Muslims would argue that it is well understood that the freedom of speech is not absolute. Exceptions have always been made against blasphemy. Why then, the Muslim would argue, that these exceptions do not apply when Islam or its Prophet are in question?
The right to freedom of expression has been articulated both in the UN’s Universal declaration of Humans Rights as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), however it is well understood that this concept is not absolute. The ICCPR states that restrictions are imposed to "respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "for the protection of national security or of public order...". Even within the United States, the most liberal in terms of freedom of expression due to its Constitution's First amendment, defamation and censorship laws exist.
In other words there is a fine balance between the freedom of speech and the freedom to offend. Freedom of speech is curtailed if it dishonours unjustifiably or if it can cause harm to the wider public. The Muslim would argue that the west, when it applies this principle to Islam, does so with an element of prejudice. It fails to consider the unjustifiable attack on the reputation of the Prophet Muhammad, or the public disorder that such expressions can lead to. In a world which is increasingly resembling a global village, the later must surely come into consideration.
There are many examples which highlight the inconsistency in which the freedom of speech is applied in the west, which implies an underlying prejudice against Islam and Muslims.
The Holocaust perpetrated against the Jews is a dark page in human history. Muslims sympathize with the many innocent lives that were lost during the Nazi era. Nevertheless Holocaust deniers do exist. These Holocaust deniers are not given the freedom to express themselves across 17 European nations in which it is considered a crime. The EU further advocates an optional maximum term of three years in jail to all member nations for denying or grossly trivialising crimes such as the Holocaust. The Muslim will ask why is the balance here towards suppression and not expression? What makes denial of the holocaust a crime while insulting a Prophet of God is not?
Staying in Europe, in 2007 a Swiss court convicted Doğu Perinçek, a Turkish politician, of racial discrimination because he denied the Armenian Genocide. In his defence he argued that he had a right to freedom of expression and added, "I have not denied genocide because there was no genocide". It is a crime in Switzerland to deny the Armenian Genocide and this was also the case in France until recently. Muslims see only duplicity in this.
We just have to look at events over the last week to further strengthen the case of prejudice against Muslims.In the UK, an advert showing a pregnant nun having ice-cream was banned because according to The Advertising Standards Authority, “it mocked Roman Catholic beliefs”. The Muslim will ask why its ok to mock Islamic beliefs but not Roman Catholic ones?
Again in the UK, a Muslim teenager was charged with “sending a grossly offensive communication”. The teenager posted on facebook, “all soldiers should die and go to hell" two days after 6 British soldiers were killed in Afghanistan. The judged ruled that the comments were "derogatory, disrespectful and inflammatory" and understandably so. The Muslim however will ask why "derogatory, disrespectful and inflammatory" comments against Islam go punished while a Muslim is punished when Western sentiments are offended?
The French take the cake though. In the country where the cartoons demeaning the Prophet are considered acceptable, protesting against these cartoons is not. Interior Minister Manuel Valls said, "There will be strictly no exceptions. Demonstrations will be banned and broken up”. We are not even allowed to express our objections via peaceful and recognized democratic avenues?
Even in Australia, Senator Cory Bernardi was forced to resign as Tony Abbot’s personal parliamentary secretary because of his perceived homophobic comments; but when he called for banning the burqah or an end to multiculturalism, his leader or party did not see the need to censure him.
It seems, at least from a Muslims point of view, that if a value in question is closer to Western culture, the balance between the freedom of speech and its curtailment shifts towards the latter while in the case of an Islamic value such as the honour of the Prophet Muhammad, the opposite holds true. This inconsistent and perhaps even biased application of this value only compounds the hurt Muslims feel when Islam or any of its symbols are demeaned. This perspective towards understanding the reaction of Muslims towards recent events has long been overlooked.
Virtuous speech is not speech itself, but the impact it has on oneself and others. This is why freedom of speech has its boundaries defined in law. Perhaps it’s time for the West to be equal in its interpretation of this principle and to legislate against mocking Islam and its Prophet, at least for the sake of a more harmonious global village.
Islam21c requests all the readers of this article, and others, to share it on your facebook, twitter, and other platforms to further spread our efforts.
West wages all-out war against divine religions, spiritual values: ActivistMon Sep 24, 2012 7:27PM GMT2
Interview with Mr. Manfred Petritsch, finance expert and international activistWell, I think they are trying to… We have to see this as a general picture of a war against spirituality. That means, they are not particularly attacking Islam, but they are attacking spirituality as a whole."
So what they are doing now is shifting the focus, after they have finished off Christianity, they are now attacking Islam. But the whole war is against spirituality as a whole."A blasphemous anti-Islam film from the US followed up with insulting cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) from France shows a Western attack on Islam.
This last week in yet another anti-Muslim move, a French magazine published a caricature of the prophet of Islam (PBUH), sparking more outrage in the Muslim world and with no stoppage or condemnation by France or any other Western governments.
Press TV has interviewed Mr. Manfred Petritsch, an international activist and prominent finance expert. What follows is an approximate transcript of the interview.
Press TV: 1.3 billion people… Muslims. And we have this new wave of attack on Islam. These people, these Western countries, the Western people, those who are attacking Islam - Who are these people and why is it they are doing so?
Petritsch Well, I think they are trying to… We have to see this as a general picture of a war against spirituality. That means, they are not particularly attacking Islam, but they are attacking spirituality as a whole.
The attack against Christianity has been happening already since a long time and Christianity is more or less destroyed.
So what they are doing now is shifting the focus, after they have finished off Christianity, they are now attacking Islam. But the whole war is against spirituality as a whole.
You see, these blasphemous attacks are happening against Christianity all the time, but nobody is doing anything anymore because society and also the people who represent the Christian church are not putting up a fight anymore. They have lost and now they are shifting focus to Islam to also try to destroy their spirituality.
Press TV: We saw in the United States the blasphemous film that sparked tensions and protests all across the world. The US Ambassador to Libya was killed; more than 40 people across the world were killed in those protests.
And right in the midst of all these protests and tensions, France allows a person, a magazine, a publisher to print another set of blasphemous material, this time cartoons insulting the prophet of Islam. And yet the French authorities did not do anything to stop that although they knew that it might create further tension in the world - they didn’t stop that.
At the same time, they stopped the French magazine that published nude pictures of the British princess. So, what is going on here? Why is this happening, why the disparity?
Petritsch Well, this shows you exactly the double standard the West operates in many ways. So if it is against what they want then they of course stop it, like the photos of the princess, which is of course, wrong to invade her personal life.
But how can the insult of a whole religion be less important than the personal feelings of one person?
So, on the one hand the same government or the same system in France closes down a magazine because of nude pictures, but on the other hand allows insulting cartoons against a whole religion. And this shows how the West always uses double standards, in many ways… This exposes it, that what they are doing is a lie.
Press TV: Do you think the attacks will continue - the attacks on Islam?
Petritsch As I said before we are talking about a war against spirituality… You see, a lot of people believe that the cause for all this protest is the film. But I think it’s not the film, the film was just the ignition point.
There was a whole explosive mixture existing because of the American foreign policy or the foreign policy of the West as a whole against all Islamic countries; against the war they are fighting; against this double standard they are doing; against the killer drones, which are killing hundreds of civilians.
And all this explosive mixture was there and now the film came along and was the ignition point. So I think the people are not protesting specially against the film, they are protesting against the whole attitude of the West towards the Islamic countries.
Press TV: The issue of human rights particularly the issue of European countries talk more often than not about the issue of human rights in terms of, they want those countries that they say violate human rights to be brought to justice and they themselves say that they are the biggest advocates of human rights in the world.
A lot of people say that the sanctions against Iran that primarily affect ordinary people in the country; they say these sanctions are in essence in violation of human rights of the Iranian people. What do you think?
Petritsch Absolutely. Anybody who reads the Charter of the United Nations sees that sanctions must not cover, for instance, medical supplies or food and things like that. That means anything that touches the basic human rights of people you cannot sanction, right?
But they are doing it, so they are violating not only their own laws, but also the laws of the United Nations. But who is there to take them to court? That is a big problem, you know.
Press TV: You come from Switzerland. Switzerland is part of the countries that are imposing sanctions against Iran. Is that something legal in terms of the Swiss Constitution, the Swiss internal laws?
Petritsch: No. The Swiss government is acting illegally because Switzerland and the spirit of Switzerland, is based on neutrality. That’s what Switzerland is all about. And it’s about humanitarian aid. That’s also why the Red Cross has its headquarters there, and UNICEF and all these humanitarian organizations.
So what the Swiss government is doing by blindly following the sanctions of the United States and of the EU is, in my opinion, definitely breaking the laws and the spirit of Switzerland.
That is not correct because they’re taking sides, and Switzerland does not take sides -- it always helps, normally, people who are suffering. And I know that the Iranian people are suffering because of these sanctions.
Press TV: How does Switzerland explain, justify the sanctions against Iran?
Petritsch: The Swiss Foreign Ministry and the government say that they cannot step out of line, out of this NATO policy. They cannot be something different because otherwise they will suffer themselves.
But I think that the Swiss politicians should have enough backbone to say to the EU and NATO countries ‘you can do what you want, but we have our own policies’.
Press TV: Switzerland is not taking independent policies?
Petritsch: No. That is a big problem that a lot of people see, that more and more, Switzerland is losing its independence, its own free decision-making, its neutrality. This has a couple of reasons:
First, the reason is that we are, in Switzerland, under huge pressure from the outside because we are surrounded by NATO countries and by EU countries. So you can imagine being a small island in this sea, we are under huge pressure - just like Iran.
They don’t like independent countries. They don’t like countries that don’t follow their policies. So this is a huge pressure. The problem is that our government is collapsing to these pressures and they shouldn’t do that.
Press TV: Let’s talk about a different topic, the issue of terrorism in the world. Militants, insurgency, a lot of al-Qaeda fighters, al-Qaeda insurgents who have been fighting American and NATO forces in the past 11, 12 years, these people are now fighting in Syria against the Syrian government.
When they fight in Afghanistan, they are called insurgents, they are called terrorists. When they fight in Syria, they are called freedom fighters. How does that sit in terms of double standards in the way that the West is looking at these people, the same people, but different titles when it comes to different countries?
Petritsch: Well, here we have again the proof that the West works with double standards. So for the West, there is good terrorism and bad terrorism.
Good terrorism is the terrorism, which works against their enemies, and they use it. Bad terrorism is the one, which works against themselves.
Turkey is a very good example. Turkey allows bases for al-Qaeda terrorists, training camps where they’re supplied with weapons, and then sent to Syria to cause terror. But at the same time, the government fights terror, which comes from the outside, from Iraq, from the PKK.
Here we have a perfect example of how on the one hand they support terrorism when it is to their own good; and on the other hand, they fight it when it is against them. This shows how the West always uses double standards in many ways.
Press TV: Is there anything else that you wanted to discuss?
Petritsch: I would like to say to your viewers that Iran has many friends in the West who are realizing more and more that the way Iran is treated is wrong. Also, that there is a completely wrong picture about Iran out there.
The reason is that the Western media purposely is showing the wrong picture about how the Iranians are, what they think, what they want.
I hope that with more and more information, we can open up the minds of the people more so that they understand that what their governments are doing is wrong against Iran.
We are fighting here an information war. The question is, who will win this information war? We are up against a huge enemy with endless resources, who control all the media and therefore they can show this wrong picture. The question is can we counter that?
SC/GMA/JR
-
LASHA DARKMOON
The Paris Massacre: they had it coming
Update
On 7 January 2015, at about 11:30 am, two masked gunmen forced their way into the offices of the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris, France. They killed twelve people, including the editor Stéphane “Charb” Charbonnier, seven other Charlie Hebdo employees, and two National Police officers, and wounded eleven others.Motive for the attack: The newspaper has attracted worldwide attention for its scurrilous depictions of the prophet Muhammad.
The attacks now appear to have ended after 72 hours of carnage. A total of twenty people were killed at four locations between 7 and 9 January, including the three suspects. At least twenty-one others were injured, some critically. The attacks are the deadliest act of terrorism in France for fifty-four years.
The remaining staff of Charlie Hebdo announced that publication was to continue as usual, with plans for a print run of one million copies for the next week’s issue, rather than its typical 60,000. (See here)
To many observers, the Charlie Hebdo shootings would appear to have all the hallmarks of a false flag attack. There are many unanswered questions. Even as we write, events on the ground are changing.
Watch this spot for further developments.
§
“Okay, let’s be clear. I am not Muslim. I oppose terrorism. I don’t even support the death penalty. I oppose violence as a means to make a political or ethical point. I fully support freedom of speech, including critical speech and humor.When I read those words in an article called I am NOT Charlie, by an author who calls himself “the Saker”, I gave a sigh of relief. Why? Because it turns out I wasn’t the only one to have entertained such dangerous thoughts that could get me put away as a potential Al Qaeda sympathizer.
But this morning I am most definitely NOT Charlie.
In fact, I am disgusted and nauseated by the sick display of collective hypocrisy about the murders in France. Here is why: The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming!”
There were other people, perhaps millions of them all over the world, who thought just like me.
Like the Saker, I too am not a Muslim. I am a Roman Catholic Christian. I also believe firmly in freedom of speech. “Feel free to say whatever you want,” I like to advise. “Have total freedom to say what you want. But be prepared to accept the consequences of free speech.”
If you wish to spit in Islam’s face, do so—at your peril.
If you wish to insult the Prophet Mohammed, or Jesus Christ, or the Buddha, or anyone else for that matter, feel free to do so—and take the consequences of your folly.
Spit and be spat upon. Kill with vicious words and be killed by guns. Hate your neighbor and expect to be hated in return.
§
It is the morning of Thursday, 8 January.
I am confronted by a shelf of newspapers in
a busy department store. This is in London, England, one of the three
capitals of the Empire of Evil, the other two being Washington and Tel
Aviv.
I hear the murmurs of people around me.
They are outraged. Their cheeks are flushed, their hands are bunched
into fists. Their eyes are red with rage and their lips are quivering.
They want to kill someone. Who? You guessed it: they want to kill 1.6 billion Muslims!
Here are the newspaper headlines that are whipping us all into a froth of hysteria:
“Attack on Freedom” — The Times.“War on Freedom” — The Daily Telegraph.“An Assault on Democracy” — The Guardian.“NON! A policeman is murdered in cold blood for defending free speech. This evil in the name of Islam MUST STOP!” — The Sun, owned by Rupert Murdoch, the man who introduced topless titillation to Britain in the form of sleazy page-three girls. I turn to page 3 to check if the usual luscious lady, flashing her tits, is still there. She isn’t. The poor darling has been banished to page 9 to make room on page 3 for a dose of screaming hysterics and concentrated Islamophobia.“Massacred in minutes—Britain on red alert as jihadis shoot 12 dead in Paris.” — The Daily Express, owned by Jewish tycoon Richard Desmond who made his fortune selling porn magazines and who dined at Downing Streets on more than one occasion with Britain’s war criminal Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Whew, no wonder the seething crowds around me are baying for Muslim blood! “Kill the bastards! Wipe out the dirty ragheads! Fuck the Palestinians! Let’s bomb Iran!” Ah, words of music to the Zionist press which have done their job only too well!
And here was this man, “the Saker”, saying
that the French cartoonists who had been killed in the Paris Massacre
had been asking for it.
“The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming!” he has the nerve to say. “I am NOT Charlie!”
Wow, what a lunatic! If he’d said that in
front of these frothing maniacs, queuing up to buy their newspapers and
seething with anger over Muslims, they would have torn him apart. I
bought six papers, composing my face into a mask of icy indifference, as
if I too wanted to knock off the nearest turban and dance with delirium
over a mound of Qur’ans.
This is how one survives in a police state: by pretending that one’s indoctrination by the state has been successful.
I am a zombie . . . please don’t kill me!
§
The Saker writes: “Check out the caricature which one of the folks who got murdered yesterday had just posted. The text reads: “Still no terrorist attacks in France — Wait, we have until the end of January to send you our best wishes!”
“There is an expression in Russian: spitting in somebody’s soul,” the Saker continues. “It fully applies here. Muslims worldwide need to be unambiguously clear about that. They take blasphemy very, very seriously, as they do the name of the Prophet and the Quran.If you want to really offend a Muslim, ridicule his Prophet or his Holy Book. That is not a secret at all. And when Charlie Hebdo published their caricatures of the Prophet and when they ridiculed him in a deliberately rude and provocative manner, they knew what they were doing: they were very deliberately and deeply offending 1.6 billion Muslims all over the world.
Oh, and did I mention that in Islam blasphemy is a crime punishable by death?
Well, it turns out that of 1.6 billion Muslims exactly three decided to take justice into their own hands and kill the blasphemous Frenchmen, deliberately blaspheming — one a Jew and the rest all nice little Zionists on the payroll of international Jewry. (Phrase in italics added by Lasha Darkmoon).
You don’t have to be Muslim or to approve of the death penalty for blasphemy to realize that this was inevitable and that this has nothing to do with Islam as a religion. Offend any group as large as 1.6 billion people and sooner or later you will find 2-3 people — call them “fanatics” if you will — who will resort to violence to make you pay for it.
This is a statistical inevitability. (See here)
THE AMERICAN EMPIRE’S NEW FREEDOM FIGHTER
“What is going on here?” the Saker asks rhetorically. He thinks the Paris massacre is the French government’s version of 9/11. It gives them the pretext they need to intimidate and torture France’s 4.7 million Muslims and confiscate their Qur’ans.Assuming this terrorist act was done by Muslims—something, incidentally, we have no right to assume right now—how many Muslims deserve to be arrested and tortured? The answer is three Muslims, at the very most, assuming you believe in torture like the Americans and Israelis.
How many Muslims had nothing to do with this act and are absolutely innocent? I will tell you: 1.6 billion Muslims minus three.
That’s a lot of innocent Muslims.
“I am disgusted beyond words,” the Saker concludes, “[with these people] who made their money spitting in the souls of billions of people and then dared them to do something about it.
And I am under no illusion whatsoever about the fact that cui bono clearly indicates that the French regime either organized it all, or let it happen, or, at the very least, intends to make capital out of it.
But most of all I am disgusted with all those who play along and studiously avoid asking the right questions about all this. I guess they really are “Charlies”, all of them.
I am not.
§
I fully agree with everything the Saker has said. At the risk of getting myself hated for exercising my freedom of speech, I would like to add a few points to the Saker’s courageous analysis. He is much to be commended for refusing to shed crocodile tears for this bunch of impudent scoundrels who made a living out of mocking 1.6 billion people and trampling on their most cherished values.This I will say: if you keep goading people to a pitch of frenzy by ridiculing their religion and insulting their honor, sooner or later you will get your teeth smashed in. And deservedly so. Among the French cartoonists killed in Paris recently, I learn that one was a Jew and all the rest were devout Zionists blowing the trumpet for Israel. That’s interesting.
Let’s observe a minute’s silence and shed a few (hopefully genuine) tears for these “heroes” of free speech. After all, they didn’t deserve to be killed just for spitting in people’s faces for a living and smirking contemptuously, “Hey, this is freedom of speech! Aren’t we brave!”
Insulting the prophet Mohammed in the name of free speech appeared to be their constant delight. For which they were paid, and paid quite generously, by those who have a vested interest in whipping up Islamophobia.
Mocking Christianity was also part of their agenda, much to the delight of international Jewry, their principal paymasters, who offered them both moral and financial support in their “satirical” undertakings — “hate speech” when used against Jews. but “satire” and “courageous free speech” when directed at Muslims and Christians, the Jews’ most hated enemies.
A correspondent Greg Bacon writes: “Hedbo’s cartoons make me vomit, especially the one showing Jesus Christ sodomizing God the Father and the Holy Ghost sodomizing Jesus Christ. That’s not comedy, it’s vulgar, obscene porn. I’m not into religion, but that’s disgusting.”The Jewish comedienne Sarah Silverman, the nice young lady who likes humping dogs and licking their anuses in various video skits—see here—and who gets many a cheap laugh by insulting Christianity in America, would have been a great hit with these satirical French journalists.
He forgets to mention the obvious: that all this is a direct and vicious attack on Christianity by an organization financed by Jews.
They would have loved her for saying, “I hope the Jews DID kill Christ! I’d fucking do it again—in a second!”
Sarah Silverman, exercising her right of “free speech.”
Freedom of speech is indeed precious.Ask yourself: would a Christian comedian be allowed to mock the Holocaust in the same way? Sarah, thank your lucky stars that Christian jihadists haven’t blown your brains out! No chance of that ever happening, I guess, since Christians believe in turning the right cheek when the Jew strikes the left one. Christianity has its uses, it seems. It keeps Christians docile and submissive and makes them only too happy to acquire virtue by being kicked around.
Maybe insulting the prophet Mohammed will soon be made compulsory in order to drive all Muslims crazy. And then, when they have predictably reacted with rage to our constant provocations, we will have the perfect excuse we need to pull their beards, knock off their turbans, trample on their Qur’ans, obliterate Syria and Iran, grab hold of Middle Eastern oil, and, finally, allow our favorite country, Israel, to expand its borders from the Nile to the Euphrates.
Note one thing, my friends: this freedom of speech, which is so very precious and of which we make such a fetish, does not include freedom to criticize Israel or question the Holocaust.
Make one satirical comment about Auschwitz, or express doubts about six million Jews dying in gas ovens, and you will end up behind bars in 16 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Switzerland, and Romania.
You may mock Jesus Christ
as much as you want, but you must not mock Anne Frank. Poke fun at
Christ carrying his Cross—no problem!—but don’t dare to breathe a word
about Anne Frank’s sacred ball point pen!The French cartoonists who died recently (God rest their souls) never satirized Auschwitz. They would never have dared to expose “The Diary of Anne Frank” (see cartoon opposite) as a fake, by pointing out that much of it had been written with a ballpoint pen, invented only in 1951, whereas Anne Frank had died in Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and so couldn’t possibly have written the entire book herself.
Nor did these courageous French “martyrs for free speech” ever have the guts to criticize the war crimes of Israel. Oh no, they thought the Israelis were doing a fine job slaughtering women and children in Gaza like flies—like this Palestinian child here, her face half blown off by an Israeli sniper.
These cowardly cartoonists kept all their scorn for the prophet Mohammed and the Lord Jesus Christ, much to the delight of the Jews whose dirty work they did so well and whose contemptible mercenaries they remained to their last dying breath.
Yes, they had it coming! They were asking for it! For blowback. For their just deserts. For the iron law of karma to take effect. — “The wheel has come full circle, I am here!”But shush! be quiet! don’t say it out too loud! Or you will suddenly learn the bitter truth: that only those who wear the iron boot have the right to free speech: to mock you and trample on all you hold dear, and that if you try and avenge your honor and smash the dirty bastards back in the teeth—heaven help you!
Terrorist, die! We’ll rip your fucking heart out! We’ll torture you to death!
So much for free speech, my friends. Free speech for them. For the rest of us, silence.
Like this? Share it now.
55 thoughts on “The Paris Massacre: they had
I am NOT Charlie
By The Saker
January 08, 2015 "ICH" - Okay, let's be clear. I am not Muslim. I oppose terrorism. I don't even support the death penalty. I loathe Takfirism. I oppose violence as a means to make a political or ethical point. I fully support freedom of speech, including critical speech and humor.
But this morning I am most definitely NOT Charlie.
In fact, I am disgusted and nauseated by the sick display of collective hypocrisy about the murders in France. Here is why:
Charlie Hebdo for the Darwin Awards
The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming. Here is what I wrote about them in September 2012 when they published their famous caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed: Worthy of the Darwin Awards, if you ask me. Excellent, the “gene pool” of the French “caviar-Left” badly needs some cleaning". Today I fully stand by my words.
Let me ask you this: what
would be the point of, say, taking a nap on
train tracks? You don't have to "agree"
with the train which will run you over, but
it still will, won't it? What about taking
a nap on train tracks specifically to make a
point? To prove that the train is bad? To
dare it? To make fun of it? Would that not
be the height of stupidity? And yet, that
is *exactly* what Charlie Hebdo did. I
would even argue that that his how Charlie
Hebdo made it's money, daring the "Muslim
train" to run them over. You think I am
exaggerating? Check out the caricature
which one of the folks who got murdered
yesterday had just posted. The text reads:
"Still no terrorist attacks in France -
Wait, we have until the end of January to
send you are best wishes". The crazy
person shown in the drawing is packing a
Kalashnikov and wearing an Afghan "Pakol"
- the typical "crazy Muslim" in Charlie
Hebdo's world. Talk about a stupid dare...
"Spitting in people's souls"
There is an expression in Russian: spitting in somebody's soul. It fully applies here. Muslims worldwide have be unambiguously clear about that. They take blasphemy very, very seriously, as they do the name of the Prophet and the Quran. If you want to really offend a Muslim, ridicule his Prophet or his Holy Book. That is not a secret at all. And when Charlie Hebdo published their caricatures of the Prophet and when they ridiculed him the a deliberately rude and provocative manner, they knew what they were doing: they were very deliberately deeply offending 1.6 billion Muslims world wide. Oh, and did I mention that in Islam blasphemy is a crime punishable by death? Well, it turns out that of 1.6 billion Muslims exactly three decided to take justice in their own hands and kill the very deliberately blaspheming Frenchmen. You don't have to be Muslim or to approve of the death penalty for blasphemy to realize that this was inevitable and that this has nothing to do with Islam as a religion. Offend any group as large as 1.6 billion and sooner or later you will find 1-5 folks willing to use violence to make you pay for it. This is a statistical inevitability.
Are some victims more equal then others?
So 12 deliberately "soul spitting blasphemers" were murdered and all of France is in deep mourning. The media worldwide does such a good job presenting it all as a planetary disaster that many thousands people worldwide say "I am Charlie", sob, light candles and take a "courageous" stance for freedom of speech.
Crocodile tears if you ask me.
The fact is that the
AngloZionists have carefully and lovingly
nurtured, organized, armed, financed,
trained, equipped and even directed the
Takfiri crazies for decades. From the war
in Afghanistan to Syria today these
murderous psychopaths have been the
foot-soldiers of the AngloZionist Empire for
decades. But, apparently, nobody cares
about their victims in Afghanistan, in
Bosnia, in Chechnia, in Kosovo, in Libya, in
Kurdistan, in Iraq or elsewhere. There
these liver-eating murderers are "freedom
fighters" who get full support. Including
from the very same media which today is in
mourning over Charlie Hebdo. Apparently, in
the western ethos some victims are
more equal then others.
And when is the last time somebody in Europe shed a single tear over the daily murders of innocent people in the Donbass whose murder is paid for and directly directed by the western regimes?
How stupid do they think we are?
And then this. Even a drooling idiot knew that Charlie Hebdo was THE prime target for that kind of attack. And I promise you that French cops are not drooling idiots. Yet, for some reason, they were nowhere to be seen that day. Only a van with two (or one?) cop was parked nearby (hardly an anti-terrorist protection detail) and one poor cop was shot and then executed with an AK shot to the head while he was begging for mercy. Is this the best the French state can do?
Hardly.
So what is going on here? I will tell you what - the EU 1%ers are now capitalizing on these murders to crack down on their own population. Sarkozy already met Hollande and they both agreed that new levels of firmness and vigilance need to be implemented. Does that not reek of a French 9/11?
So no, I am most definitely NOT Charlie this morning and I am disgusted beyond words with the obscene display of doubleplusgoodthinking "solidarity" for a group of "caviar-lefties" who made their money spitting in the souls of billions of people and then dared them to do something about it. And I am under no illusion whatsoever about the fact that cui bono clearly indicates that the French regime either organized it all, or let it happen or, at the very least, makes maximal political use of it all.
But most of all, I am disgusted with all those who play along and studiously avoid asking the right questions about all this. I guess they really are "Charlies" all of them.
I am not.
The Saker blogs at http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.com
By The Saker
January 08, 2015 "ICH" - Okay, let's be clear. I am not Muslim. I oppose terrorism. I don't even support the death penalty. I loathe Takfirism. I oppose violence as a means to make a political or ethical point. I fully support freedom of speech, including critical speech and humor.
But this morning I am most definitely NOT Charlie.
In fact, I am disgusted and nauseated by the sick display of collective hypocrisy about the murders in France. Here is why:
Charlie Hebdo for the Darwin Awards
The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming. Here is what I wrote about them in September 2012 when they published their famous caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed: Worthy of the Darwin Awards, if you ask me. Excellent, the “gene pool” of the French “caviar-Left” badly needs some cleaning". Today I fully stand by my words.
 |
| Just a stupid dare? |
"Spitting in people's souls"
There is an expression in Russian: spitting in somebody's soul. It fully applies here. Muslims worldwide have be unambiguously clear about that. They take blasphemy very, very seriously, as they do the name of the Prophet and the Quran. If you want to really offend a Muslim, ridicule his Prophet or his Holy Book. That is not a secret at all. And when Charlie Hebdo published their caricatures of the Prophet and when they ridiculed him the a deliberately rude and provocative manner, they knew what they were doing: they were very deliberately deeply offending 1.6 billion Muslims world wide. Oh, and did I mention that in Islam blasphemy is a crime punishable by death? Well, it turns out that of 1.6 billion Muslims exactly three decided to take justice in their own hands and kill the very deliberately blaspheming Frenchmen. You don't have to be Muslim or to approve of the death penalty for blasphemy to realize that this was inevitable and that this has nothing to do with Islam as a religion. Offend any group as large as 1.6 billion and sooner or later you will find 1-5 folks willing to use violence to make you pay for it. This is a statistical inevitability.
Are some victims more equal then others?
So 12 deliberately "soul spitting blasphemers" were murdered and all of France is in deep mourning. The media worldwide does such a good job presenting it all as a planetary disaster that many thousands people worldwide say "I am Charlie", sob, light candles and take a "courageous" stance for freedom of speech.
Crocodile tears if you ask me.
 |
| The Empire's freedom fighter |
And when is the last time somebody in Europe shed a single tear over the daily murders of innocent people in the Donbass whose murder is paid for and directly directed by the western regimes?
How stupid do they think we are?
And then this. Even a drooling idiot knew that Charlie Hebdo was THE prime target for that kind of attack. And I promise you that French cops are not drooling idiots. Yet, for some reason, they were nowhere to be seen that day. Only a van with two (or one?) cop was parked nearby (hardly an anti-terrorist protection detail) and one poor cop was shot and then executed with an AK shot to the head while he was begging for mercy. Is this the best the French state can do?
Hardly.
So what is going on here? I will tell you what - the EU 1%ers are now capitalizing on these murders to crack down on their own population. Sarkozy already met Hollande and they both agreed that new levels of firmness and vigilance need to be implemented. Does that not reek of a French 9/11?
So no, I am most definitely NOT Charlie this morning and I am disgusted beyond words with the obscene display of doubleplusgoodthinking "solidarity" for a group of "caviar-lefties" who made their money spitting in the souls of billions of people and then dared them to do something about it. And I am under no illusion whatsoever about the fact that cui bono clearly indicates that the French regime either organized it all, or let it happen or, at the very least, makes maximal political use of it all.
But most of all, I am disgusted with all those who play along and studiously avoid asking the right questions about all this. I guess they really are "Charlies" all of them.
I am not.
The Saker blogs at http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.com
Click for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note-
Translation may take a
moment to load.
What's your response?
-
Scroll down to add / read comments
Intelligence gaps cited in Paris attacks
And the gaps are getting wider...
by Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
“Intelligence gap” widens.
The Times puts it this way: “How did several jihadists — and possibly a larger cell of co-conspirators — manage to evade surveillance and execute a bold attack despite being well known to the country’s police and intelligence services?”
The obvious answer: When it comes to terrorism, there are huge, gaping holes in our intelligence.
French terror expert Gaston Grenouille explains: “How about (the claim by French police) that a highly-professional special-forces-type terrorist would just accidentally ‘forget’ his ID card in an abandoned getaway car? Anyone who believes that must have a rather large gap where their intelligence is supposed to be.”
“We’re not just talking ‘intelligence gap’,” adds Parisian intelligence analyst Dagobert DeMerdeur. “We’re talking about an intelligence chasm – a yawning void the size of the Grand Canyon between people’s ears. The depth, breadth, and utter vacuity of this ‘intelligence black hole’ is simply astonishing.”
Experts have also cited a notable intelligence gap separating those who know that 9/11 and other alleged Islamic terror attacks are inside jobs from those who have not yet figured it out. According to Michael Mensa of Mensa Standardized Testing and Pizza Delivery, IQ tests reveal an intelligence gap of roughly 60 points between the two groups.
Various hypotheses may explain the intelligence gap between skeptics and sheeple. According to Mensa these include:
*Sheeple eat 550% more GMO food than skeptics, and the nanotoxins may be destroying their brains.
*Skeptics avoid watching Fox News, which has been shown to emit pulsed bursts of frontal-lobe-disabling gamma radiation.
*Conspiracy theorizing has been shown to exercise key parts of the brain involved in cognition, including the neural circuits responsible for dot-connecting, inference-drawing, visualization, logic, and seeing what is right there in front of ones face.
As the audacity and obviousness of false flag terror stunts increases, experts say, the intelligence gap will continue to widen. If current trends continue, sheeple and skeptics may one day evolve into entirely different species.
“Can
you imagine being married to a sheeple and having little half-sheeple
children?” asks Kurvil McGurgle of the Institute of Applied Evolutionary
Speculation. “The frisson of horror you undoubtedly felt when I asked
you this question provides evidence that what we are seeing is the early
stages of a new form of evolutionary divergence that will eventually
leave non-‘conspiracy-theorists’ somewhere between the Neanderthal and
the Dodo.”Already in France, people who believe the official story of the Charlie Hebdo shootings are dying off as they wander across heavily-trafficked freeways, drown in their own toilets, and otherwise display a lack of ability to survive, much less breed. “At this rate, the ‘intelligence gap’ problem will solve itself in approximately 30 years,” McGurgle estimates. “The downside is that we may be in for several dozen more false flags, each more obvious than the last. But as the sheeple cluelessly wander off the edge of their evolutionary dead-end, we have reason to hope that they will leave a better world for our grandchildren.”
“Je suis brainwashed”
Million morons march for big lies & genocide
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
Call them sheeple. Lemmings. Zombies. New World Order mind control slaves.
Whatever you call them, the drooling dimwits chanting “we are
Charlie” are the all-time greatest argument for Rockefeller-style
eugenic euthanasia. (Which, incidentally, should start with the
Rockefellers.)
And don’t get me started on those “world leaders” who led the le défilé des idiots.
These scumbag-psychopath “leaders” are the worst terrorists on earth.
Take Netanyahu – please! Where are the black ski mask guys with AK-47s
when we need them? Somebody call in a drone strike!
But seriously, folks, it isn’t easy being a three-digit-IQ Muslim in a
world full of one-digit-IQ infidels. Frankly, I’m getting tired of
trying to explain things to people who should know better…a category
that includes pretty much everybody who isn’t too stupid to live.
It’s a dirty job, but somebody’s gotta do it.
First, this Charlie Hebdo thing (dramatic drum roll) is the most
obvious freakin’ false flag imaginable. If inside jobs were hamburgers,
this one would come with “the works” – throw-down ID in an abandoned getaway car, Police Commissioner conveniently suicided, intel-cutout patsies murdered, blatantly fake “terrorist kills cop” propaganda video…it doesn’t get any better (or should I say worse) than this.
Listen to Gordon Duff explain the ballistic evidence that proves Charley Hebdo was a false flag
But just because it was a false flag doesn’t mean that Muslims are
always going to put up with obscene, blasphemous attacks on their
Prophet. If you publish garbage like Charlie did, you are asking to get
hurt…just like if I were to publish an obscene drawing of your mother or
daughter or sister, only more so…MUCH more so. If you publish an
obscene attack on my mother or sister or wife or daughter (assuming I
had a daughter) I am going to be very, very angry with you…and you
had best hope that I manage to control my anger…and, more pertinently,
choose not to serve you a dish of cold revenge some day, perhaps years
from now when you least expect it.
You will be facing the same situation – except a whole lot more
grievous – if you obscenely insult my Prophet. A whole lot of us Muslims
are just that way.
We’ll struggle all-out to control ourselves. Maybe 99% of us, or even
99.9%, will succeed. But if one day somebody loses it and goes off on
you, you shouldn’t pretend to be surprised.
Maybe you don’t hold anything sacred, not even your
womenfolk’s honor. Or maybe there are certain “fighting words” that
you’d feel compelled to avenge. Maybe I could walk up to you in a bar
and start talking trash about your female family members and you’d turn
the other cheek. Then again, maybe you wouldn’t. If I tried that, and
got my ass kicked, or even got my ass shot, would you organize a million
moron march in my memory? The thought of a million morons marching down
the Champs Elysées carrying signs reading “Je suis Kevin”…c’est trop délicieux.
So yes, many Muslims will grow very, very angry if you cross the line
in obscenely attacking their prophet. That is a well-known
fact…background knowledge for the psy-op specialists tasked with staging
murderous PR stunts to keep the clash-of-civilizations a-clashing.
And that’s how this false flag was arranged: Find some creep
cartoonists who are practically begging for Muslims to come after
them…and then dress up your blue-eyed (!) Special Forces guys in ski
masks and stage a professional slaughter.
Next, whip out the genocide propagandists and useful idiots.
I have seen more out-and-out lies in the Charlie Hebdo propaganda
stories than even I imagined the MSM could be capable of. A few examples
from my favorite Mossadnik rag will suffice.
The Huffington Post published a gargantuan genocidal big lie story: These Are The Charlie Hebdo Cartoons That Terrorists Thought Were Worth Killing Over.
But that’s a lie. This story features only relatively inoffensive
Charlie Hebdo cartoons. It leaves the really sick, obscene stuff out.
People who read this mendacious Huffington Post piece, and who don’t
understand that it was a false flag, are going to think that the Charlie
Hebdo creeps were – as so many “house Muslims” disgustingly intone –
“innocent.” Bullshit. They were vicious, evil,
blasphemous pornographers pumping out genocide propaganda. And rather
than being murdered by blue-eyed Special Forces officers dressed up as
Wahhabis, they should have been tried, condemned, and hanged, whether
for genocide propaganda in a secular courtroom, or for blasphemy in an
Islamic one. (The genocide I am referring to, of course, is the
9/11-false-flag-triggered War on Islam, which has killed more than one
million Muslims, ruined the lives of tens of millions, and aims at
eradicating Islam in part by targeting its sacred symbols for
blasphemous, pornographic annihilation.)
HuffPost, a well-known Zionist mouthpiece, also published another
Goebbels-style propaganda lie, this time by an author with a Muslim
name. I am referring to Fathima Imra Nazeer’s sickening To Prevent Another Charlie Hebdo, Reconsider the Example of Muhammed. This airhead (or Mossad operative using an Islamic pen name) begins by invoking the “good Muslim vs. bad Muslim” dichotomy:
“Many Muslims are rightfully outraged by the attack on Charlie Hebdo way
more than they would ever be offended by some caricature of Muhammed.
Unfortunately, there are some Muslims who are quick to justify this atrocity as well.”
The “good Muslims” she cites are the pathetic, Guantanamo-terrorized house Muslims
who are complicit in their own genocide; while her “bad Muslim” is the
illiterate idiot Anjum Chaudary, London’s walking, talking advertisement
for Islamophobia. This is a classic false dichotomy, like Bush’s
“either you’re with us, or you’re with the terrorists.” And like Bush’s
line, it was designed by Zionist psy-op specialists as part of the
ongoing effort to delegitimize self-defense-while-Muslim.
Nazeer then slanders the Qur’an, saying: “The Quran encourages the killing of ‘those who spread mischief’ against Allah and Muhammed.” That’s a big lie. If you follow her link, you’ll find it goes to a passage that might be roughly translated as:
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against God and
His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but
that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off
from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for
them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great
punishment,
“Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.”
The passage – which was revealed in, and refers to, the context of a
desperate defensive war – says nothing about “spreading mischief against
Allah and Muhammad.” Instead, it clearly states that to merit capital
punishment, the war criminal must be guilty of all of the following:
*Waging war against God.
*Waging war against God’s messenger.
*Striving to cause corruption. (The Arabic word fasad indicates a very strong, extreme form of corruption; the word mischief,
which connotes the naughty tricks of children, is light-years away from
the correct meaning. In other words, the war criminal must be working
really, really hard to do really, really terrible things.)
Only a very uncharitable mufti would say that Nazeer, by viciously
slandering the Qur’an and the Prophet in her lying article, was guilty
of all of the three parts of this crime. If I were called for Islamic
jury duty, I would vote to let her off with a reprimand. It could be
that she has psychological problems, or perhaps her grotesque
mistranslation is an innocent mistake.
I’m joking, of course. There is no such thing as Islamic jury duty, and if there were, I would find a way to get out of it.
But the Qur’anic passage Nazeer mistranslates is revealing. It
suggests that in a desperate, defensive war to defend a community
founded on the sacred, the worst crimes merit the harshest
punishments…but that repentance and mercy are better than punishment.
Which, like everything else in the Qur’an, displays its profound
understanding of human nature. Any community founded on the sacred – and
all communities are, one way or another – will fight to defend itself
and what it holds sacred…and the more desperate the struggle, the more
powerful and nastier the enemies, the more harshly will attempts at
order-restoring justice be meted out. To take one historical example,
when the US was collapsing from the Great Depression, it began executing
people in far greater numbers than ever before or since. A decade
later, the desperation felt by all the belligerent parties during World
War II led to their committing unprecedented atrocities.
Since the Western powers-that-be have forced the ludicrous official
story of 9/11 down our throats – a story that 80% of Muslims worldwide
know is a lie – we Muslims feel, rightly or wrongly, that we are in
desperate straits. Over a million have been murdered for this lie. Tens
of thousands have been tortured. Our religion is under genocidal attack.
But we must not fight back by stupidly lashing out…and providing our enemies with the propaganda ammunition they seek.
There is a famous “Muslim anger management” story:
“Caliph Ali was once fighting in a war imposed on Muslims,
and the chief of the Unbelievers confronted him. During the fight, the
Ali was able to overcome his enemy, who fell on the ground and Ali was
about to kill him. The enemy, knowing his fate, had no hope so he spit
on the face of Ali. Ali immediately got up and left him alone. The man
came running to him and asked, ‘You had a chance to kill me since I am a
Polytheist; how come you didn’t use your sword?’ Ali said, ‘I have no
personal animosity toward you. I was fighting you on behalf of God. If I
had killed you after you spat on my face, then it would have become my
personal revenge which I do not wish to take.’ That Unbeliever chief
became a Muslim immediately.”
If you insult my Prophet (or female family member) and I strike you
out of anger, that is a failure on my part. A natural failure, one that
we might hope and pray will not be judged too severely by the only Judge
who counts; but a failure nonetheless.
The greater jihad is the struggle for self-control, the struggle to
be a better person. The lesser jihad is the struggle to defend the
community…whether by force of arms, or by waging “the best jihad…(which) is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant.”
Obviously we need a whole lot of both varieties these days.
HOW EVEN IN OCCUPIED ARABIA (CIA-ISRAEL SAUDIA) MUSLIMS SET THE BEST OF ISLAMIC EXAMPLES
On the Passing of Abdullah Abdullatif Alkadi and a Postscript on Charlie Hebdo
N.B. (The
deceased, Abdullah Abdullatif Alkadi (who happened to share a similar
name as my close friend, Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi), was a 23-year-old who
had just earned a degree in electrical engineering and was selling his
car before returning to his family, when a depraved and greedy man
decided to murder him and abscond with the car.)
by Hamza Yusuf on January 19, 2015
by Hamza Yusuf on January 19, 2015
For several years, I was fortunate to spend Ramadan in Mecca and Medina and to celebrate Eid in Dammam and Al-Ahsa in eastern (Occupied) Arabia. I came to know that latter city and its notable families well, and they had grown so accustomed to my celebrating Eid with them that some joked that if I didn’t come for Eid, they would keep fasting thinking my absence must mean Ramadan had not ended yet.
I spent so many Eids in Dammam and Al-Ahsa because it meant I could be with the Islamic scholar and world-class city planner, Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi, whom I was introduced to about twenty years ago by a mutual Irish friend, Muhammad Abdal Bari. That introduction took place when Muhammad, whom I knew from my earliest days as a convert to Islam in Great Britain, had moved to Portland, Oregon, where Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi was completing his Ph.D. in city planning at Oregon State University. (Portland is a testimony to excellent city planning, and the university boasts one of the best programs in the world.) When Muhammad visited me in the Bay Area, he told me about an “amazing Saudi” whom he insisted I should meet. He also told Shaykh Abdullah about his American convert friend and said that he should meet me.
Eventually, Shaykh Abdullah visited the Bay Area, and we met at the home of a Syrian friend, Basil Dayyani. We had a memorable Syrian breakfast among friends who all emanated love and respect for one another. I will always be grateful that Muhammad insisted that I meet Shaykh Abdullah: Our encounter was for me the beginning of a deeply spiritual love for a man whose character and comportment have affected me profoundly over the years.
Shaykh Abdullah hails from a noble family whose lineage traces back to ‘Aqil bin Abi Talib, a cousin of the Prophet, God’s peace and blessings upon him, and the brother of Sayyidina ‘Ali, the Prophet’s son-in-law as well as cousin. Shaykh Abdullah is a product of the school of the late Shaykh Ahmad Dughan, the Eastern sun of Arabia, who revived the traditional sciences in Al-Ahsa and had a lasting influence on the character of many of its residents. He was well over ninety years of age when he passed away earlier this year, leaving behind three sons, each one a scholar. He also trained countless other scholars, including Shaykh Abdullah, who have spread all over the world.
Shaykh Abdullah had studied several sciences with Shaykh Ahmad Dughan, including Shafi’i jurisprudence. He mastered the science of inheritance laws under Shaykh Ahmad’s tutelage, as Shaykh Ahmad especially emphasized this subject because it is the first of the Shariah sciences to be lost according to a hadith. Shaykh Abdullah also memorized the Qur’an and studied Arabic, hadith, Qur’anic exegesis, Prophetic biography, and the other traditional sciences. Instead of assuming the life of a traditional scholar, he set out to master Western knowledge, as he felt too many traditional scholars were ignorant of the age in which they lived. He excelled in science and math and pursued higher studies in architecture and city planning, which led to his studies in Portland.
It speaks to his humility that most of his colleagues are unaware of his competence in the sacred sciences as well as his expertise in Prophetic biography, Qur’an, and Shafi’i jurisprudence. They know only of his Western education and think of him as a city planner and college administrator since he works at the University of Dammam. I was once with a Sudanese professor in West Africa, and upon hearing that he taught in Dammam, I asked if he knew Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi. When he replied that he did, I said his university was fortunate to have such a learned Muslim scholar. He shook his head in confusion and asked if we were referring to the same person, as he had no idea that in addition to his Western education, Shaykh Abdullah was a master of Islamic scholarship.
Over the years, Shaykh Abdullah has taught at Deen Intensives and other programs. His modesty, genuine humility, and impeccable prophetic character always made him a favorite teacher amongst the students. At closing sessions, when he made his final remarks and bid farewell, rarely a dry eye was left in the audience. We taught programs together in the U.S., Canada, Spain, Turkey, England, and, most memorably, in Medina and Mecca. In all the time I spent with him, I never once saw him lose his temper, speak unkindly, or mistreat anyone. He was always positive and made people love the religion simply because of the character he embodied.
An anecdote that reveals his endearing nature was related to me by Muhammad Abdal Bari, who first introduced me to Shaykh Abdullah: When he lived in Portland, Shaykh Abdullah led night prayers at a masjid during Ramadan, and after prayers, at around nine-thirty, he visited a nearby coffee shop with friends. He established a wonderful rapport with the young baristas there. One night, the prayer went on longer than usual, and afterward his friends noted that it was too late to make their usual stop, as the coffee shop would be closed. Shaykh Abdullah, however, decided to stop by anyway to see if the workers were still there. When the group arrived, they found that the employees had kept the shop open after closing time, waiting for Shaykh Abdullah, hoping he would come by as was his wont.
When I spent Ramadan with him in Mecca and Medina, I noticed that Shaykh Abdullah devoted his time entirely to Qur’anic recitation and completed the recitation of the Qur’an several times during the month. He explained that Ramadan was his opportunity to make up for any neglect he had toward the Book of God during the rest of the year. We also had many wondrous adventures meeting people who loved God and the Prophet, God’s peace and blessings upon him. We visited great scholars, most of who have now passed on, and read sacred texts with them to gain their blessing.
During this time, I came to know Shaykh Ahmad Jabir Jibran, a man very similar to Shaykh Abdullah in his piety and humility. In Al-Ahsa, Shaykh Abdullah and I were invited to many different homes. Each home was emblematic of the entire culture: hospitality, warmth, deep piety, and family informed every gathering. During those years, I came to know and love the entire community, especially the families that make up what are called in Arabia al-‘ayan (the notables). These families have excelled in learning and contributed the most to society. They have long-standing kinship ties, and although they generally marry within the clan, it is not unusual for them to marry from other notable clans. I was always the immediate guest of the Al-Kadi clan, but the Al-Dughan clan also showed immense hospitality to me during my stays.
I also felt a special connection to the al-Mubarak clan. One of their notable scholars, Shaykh Ahmad al-Mubarak, had moved decades ago to the U.A.E. to serve as the religious head of their court system. He welcomed me to the Emirates when I was a young student, and he allowed me to sit with the many great scholars he hosted throughout the year. The Al-Mubarak clan is the largest remaining Maliki family in (Occupied) Arabia. Though the majority of the peninsula followed the Maliki school for centuries, the traditional four schools began to die off due to the spread of Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab’s reform movement, and now a loosely affiliated form of Hanbalism permeates the peninsula.
Given my close
relationship with the city and its families, I felt immense pain upon
learning that one of their sons was recently murdered here in my home
state of California. The murdered young man was the son of someone who
had welcomed me in his home and the cousin of my dear and beloved
friend, Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi. Usually when I call to speak with Shaykh
Abdullah, his voice is filled with joy and enthusiasm, so when I called
to offer my condolences and prayers for his cousin, I was even more
grief-stricken to hear the sadness in his voice. He simply said, “Qaddara Allah ma sha’” (God enables what He wills).
Violence permeates our world. We read of suicide bombings, military sorties, murders, and mayhem on a daily basis. The recent massacre in Gaza left many of us sleepless, knowing that bombs paid for by U.S. tax dollars were dropping on innocent women and children. But when violence is personal, when it hits home, it strikes us in our hearts in ways disembodied violence never can. In his book, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith, the Scottish moralist, points out that when we read of great loss of life in a distant place, we are troubled, yet we carry on; however, if we find out that our little finger will be amputated tomorrow, we cannot sleep out of worry. Though he finds this paradoxical, he also sees redemption in that many a man would willingly lose his finger in order to save millions that he does not even know.
I would give my right hand to see my friend’s cousin restored to life, and it pains me greatly that his life was stolen while he was studying in my country as a guest from a place that showed me such immense generosity and hospitality. The deceased, Abdullah Abdullatif Alkadi (who happened to share a similar name as my close friend, Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi), was a 23-year-old who had just earned a degree in electrical engineering and was selling his car before returning to his family, when a depraved and greedy man decided to murder him and abscond with the car. So many Westerners view Muslims as violent, but I know that someone who grew up in Al-Ahsa, (Occupied) Arabia, would never have even heard of a murder in his town or have thought to take precautions against such a possibility. In a relatively recent book, Are Muslims Distinctive?: A Look at the Evidence, M. Steven Fish, a social scientist and professor at U.C. Berkeley who studied Muslim societies to see, among other things, if they were more prone to violence than other societies, reported that the evidence clearly shows that murder rates are far lower in Muslim societies than in other societies.
Another aspect of this tragedy that impacted me was the young man’s tweets: they were mostly prayers for various people and words of advice. In an age when so many youth are tweeting inane comments, he was tweeting prayers for his family, friends, and others and sharing words of wisdom. In one of his tweets, he asked God not to deprive him of being reunited with his father.
May
God shower him in His grace and grant him a martyr’s death. May God
ease the pain of his family, the Alkadi family that I love so much: a
humble, pious, and learned group of descendants of ‘Aqil bin Abi Talib
Al-Qurayshi. I am sure the whole town of Al-Ahsa was devastated by the
tragic news and undoubtedly spent the following days visiting the
murdered young man’s family. Life there will eventually return to
normal, as this tragedy becomes a memory, but for a time the people in
Al-Ahsa will grieve collectively for their loss. Meanwhile, in America,
the dehumanization of Arabs and Muslims is on the rise, fueled by many
in the media who openly broadcast the notion that Muslim lives do not
matter. Our military operations have killed hundreds of thousands of
them and left many of their countries in total chaos. Yet our pundits
focus only on the “violent and savage jihadi Muslims” and will never see
the grace, hospitality, and beauty of a little town in eastern Arabia
now grieving from the violence against one of their own. But God is
generous and takes care of His own, sometimes with majesty, mystery, and
pain: the 23-year-old Abdullah Alkadi’s prayer was answered; he was
returned to his homeland and reunited with his father who, surrounded by
mourning friends, family, and loved ones, buried his newly graduated
son in the Prophet’s city, Medina, with ten thousand of the Prophet’s
companions as his neighbors, on October 25th, 2014, after the dawn (fajr) prayer was offered. He will rest there until we all see the day of true retribution, reward, and restoration.
Some of Abdullah Alkadi’s Tweets (translated from his original Arabic):
Violence permeates our world. We read of suicide bombings, military sorties, murders, and mayhem on a daily basis. The recent massacre in Gaza left many of us sleepless, knowing that bombs paid for by U.S. tax dollars were dropping on innocent women and children. But when violence is personal, when it hits home, it strikes us in our hearts in ways disembodied violence never can. In his book, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith, the Scottish moralist, points out that when we read of great loss of life in a distant place, we are troubled, yet we carry on; however, if we find out that our little finger will be amputated tomorrow, we cannot sleep out of worry. Though he finds this paradoxical, he also sees redemption in that many a man would willingly lose his finger in order to save millions that he does not even know.
I would give my right hand to see my friend’s cousin restored to life, and it pains me greatly that his life was stolen while he was studying in my country as a guest from a place that showed me such immense generosity and hospitality. The deceased, Abdullah Abdullatif Alkadi (who happened to share a similar name as my close friend, Shaykh Abdullah Alkadi), was a 23-year-old who had just earned a degree in electrical engineering and was selling his car before returning to his family, when a depraved and greedy man decided to murder him and abscond with the car. So many Westerners view Muslims as violent, but I know that someone who grew up in Al-Ahsa, (Occupied) Arabia, would never have even heard of a murder in his town or have thought to take precautions against such a possibility. In a relatively recent book, Are Muslims Distinctive?: A Look at the Evidence, M. Steven Fish, a social scientist and professor at U.C. Berkeley who studied Muslim societies to see, among other things, if they were more prone to violence than other societies, reported that the evidence clearly shows that murder rates are far lower in Muslim societies than in other societies.
Another aspect of this tragedy that impacted me was the young man’s tweets: they were mostly prayers for various people and words of advice. In an age when so many youth are tweeting inane comments, he was tweeting prayers for his family, friends, and others and sharing words of wisdom. In one of his tweets, he asked God not to deprive him of being reunited with his father.
May
God shower him in His grace and grant him a martyr’s death. May God
ease the pain of his family, the Alkadi family that I love so much: a
humble, pious, and learned group of descendants of ‘Aqil bin Abi Talib
Al-Qurayshi. I am sure the whole town of Al-Ahsa was devastated by the
tragic news and undoubtedly spent the following days visiting the
murdered young man’s family. Life there will eventually return to
normal, as this tragedy becomes a memory, but for a time the people in
Al-Ahsa will grieve collectively for their loss. Meanwhile, in America,
the dehumanization of Arabs and Muslims is on the rise, fueled by many
in the media who openly broadcast the notion that Muslim lives do not
matter. Our military operations have killed hundreds of thousands of
them and left many of their countries in total chaos. Yet our pundits
focus only on the “violent and savage jihadi Muslims” and will never see
the grace, hospitality, and beauty of a little town in eastern Arabia
now grieving from the violence against one of their own. But God is
generous and takes care of His own, sometimes with majesty, mystery, and
pain: the 23-year-old Abdullah Alkadi’s prayer was answered; he was
returned to his homeland and reunited with his father who, surrounded by
mourning friends, family, and loved ones, buried his newly graduated
son in the Prophet’s city, Medina, with ten thousand of the Prophet’s
companions as his neighbors, on October 25th, 2014, after the dawn (fajr) prayer was offered. He will rest there until we all see the day of true retribution, reward, and restoration.Some of Abdullah Alkadi’s Tweets (translated from his original Arabic):
O
God, make me happy more than I have been in pain, and in more ease than
I have been in difficulty, and don’t disappoint my hopes, for You
suffice me and are a Beautiful Support.
6:38 PM - 14 Sep 2014 (his final tweet)
O
Lord, whenever my dad and mom raise their hands to You, spread your
treasures for them and make them happy and lengthen their lives –
because I have no life without them.
Be
loving to your parents, supportive to your brother, a help to your
sister, faithful to your friend, and beautiful to your neighbor – this
life is perishing, and we are all journeying.
Read More TweetsPostscript on Charlie Hebdo
An intriguing aspect of Muslim culture is that murders are rarely committed over wealth. While there may be theft in Muslim countries, theft that involves murder is almost unheard of. The idea of killing someone over something as ephemeral as a car or money or a cell phone is a rarity (except perhaps in war-torn countries where all civil society has broken down). Murder in Muslim societies tends to be motivated by political issues but more often by a misguided sense of honor. This was the case earlier this month in France, where clearly deluded and uneducated men from the ghettos of Paris, after rediscovering their faith, felt compelled to take their misperception of Islamic law into their own hands in order to “uphold the honor” of their prophet who, they believed, was being denigrated by the cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo. * Without a doubt, such murders are criminal and wrong, but they can be rationally understood within the context of a society that holds the sanctity of prophets, those men of God, above all else.
In classical Muslim law, any willful and knowing denigration of a prophet is a capital offense. Blasphemy laws have always been the prerogative of the government, implemented only after trial and sentencing, and limited to Muslim lands where it was understood that this law was applicable. Historically, however, Muslim rulers were loathe to execute these laws without attempting to find excuses for the accused. In the case of the “Martyrs of Cordoba,” for example, when fanatical Christians, distraught at Christian conversion to Islam, attempted to revive Christian zeal by entering into mosques and denigrating the Prophet, the Muslim rulers, troubled by the deaths of their Christian subjects, used the ruling of insanity to exempt them from the offense. Such pre-modern laws, while also found in Christianity and Judaism, are no longer considered valid in the West due to a long and complicated process of secularization that has not occurred to the same degree or even in the same fashion in the Muslim world. Hence, many Muslims still feel strongly about the sanctity of all the prophets but specifically of the Prophet Muhammad, God’s peace and blessings upon him, and while the vast majority of Muslims would not think of killing anyone for doing so, they will not find it hard to understand why some would. The prophets, such as Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, and their lives and what they stood for represent the Muslim world’s highest values.
What then, in the West, do we hold above all else? It seems wealth has now become the highest value, and murders are often attempts to take that away from another. People kill others to take their money, their cars, their cellphones, or their drugs. Some even engage in meaningless violence, simply going into a public place and killing innocent people, not for any misguided political sensibilities, nor for wealth, but simply because they feel an urge to do so (perhaps acting out Grand Theft Auto or some other pathologically violent video game in order to experience the thrill of the real deal). Undeniably, like the West, the Muslim world also has mentally disturbed people, but they don’t go into schools and kill little children for the thrill of it. In fact, the horrific assault last December on the school in Pakistan was done in classic Jahili retaliation for murders of their own youth. There was a method to that madness, as they did not indiscriminately kill anyone in sight but spared the young children and targeted only those who had passed the age of puberty, as they were considered adults. While it was a brutal assault, it had a type of misguided rationality that can be understood in the context of vengeful tribal cultures in a way that Western school shootings cannot, irrespective of their context.
While the “whole” world is mourning the cartoonists who made their livelihoods as equal opportunity denigrators, perceiving this as an attack on freedom of expression, there is an aspect of this that is disturbing. The West displayed no moral outrage over the countless lives of innocent and honorable people whose only crime was being at home when a drone, intentionally or not, bombed them out of existence. No one is shedding tears over the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, Afghans, Palestinians, and many others in the Muslim world who were killed due to Western misadventures in the region. The Brookings Institution has noted that for every drone strike that has occurred, ten or so civilians have died. More people, many of them civilians, have been killed by U.S. drone strikes than were killed on 9-11. Take a look at the Wikipedia page that lists the drone strikes on Pakistan alone since 2004; and keep in mind that drone strikes are also waged against people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Algeria, Iran, Libya, and Somalia.
The murders of Charlie Hebdo’s staff were a crime; they were wrong, plain and simple. But lest we forget, the people at Charlie Hebdo knew exactly what they were doing. They acted much like Steve Irwin, the Australian crocodile hunter, who went around poking wild animals only to provoke a response from them. Eventually, he decided that the countless land and river animals were not enough and chose to dive into the vast ocean in search of sea creatures to provoke until a stingray, in apparent solidarity with its fellow land and sea creatures suffering at the hands of humans like Irwin, poked back and killed him. But, like the Charlie Hebdo staff, Irwin well knew the risks he was facing when provoking these wild animals and fell victim to the consequences. The editor of Charlie Hebdo knew the game he was playing and enlisted a guard to protect his staff given the many death threats they had received. He was cognizant of the real dangers of provoking those he deemed open game and sport for the paper’s “satire.”
Today, much of the Western world expresses its moral outrage in solidarity over the murder of twelve people who knew the risks of provoking angry extremists yet argued, “These people want to frighten us into respecting their religion; therefore we will not be frightened”; and so they continued to poke fun at that which Muslims hold most sacred. This was not done in the long-standing Western tradition of satire, which takes aim at the powerful to empower the powerless; these cartoonists engaged in mockery for the sake of mockery and had no higher purpose. They suffered the fate of a man who gratuitously calls another man’s mother a whore and is surprised when that man stabs him. Pope Francis said it well: If a close friend “says a swear word against my mother, then a punch awaits him,” he explained. “One cannot provoke; one cannot insult other people’s faith; one cannot make fun of faith.” This is a man who believes in “turning the other cheek,” yet true to his Argentinian roots, he displays classic Latin attitude toward the dishonoring of one’s mother. For Muslims, the Prophet reminded us, “None of you truly believes until I am more beloved to him than his own parents.” Hence, to slander our Prophet is a greater injury than an attack on our mothers. If the Pope will punch someone, even his close friend, should he insult his mother, then what are we to expect from uneducated and volatile street urchins ** with the same sense of honor?
Retaliatory murders for honor or otherwise are clearly wrong under Islamic law, or any other reasonable system of law, as they should be. But even the cofounder of Charlie Hebdo, Henri Roussel, blamed the editor for knowingly endangering the lives of his employees. “What made him feel the need to drag the team into overdoing it?” Roussel wrote in Nouvel Observateur. “He shouldn’t have done it, but Charb did it again a year later, in September 2012.” Roussel continued, “I believe that we [were] fools who took an unnecessary risk…. We think we are invulnerable. For years, decades even, it was a provocation, and then one day the provocation turns against us.” Addressing the slain editor, whom he referred to as a “blockhead,” Roussel said, “I really hold it against you.”
Just for a moment, let us imagine that this incident had been about twelve murdered black Nigerian cartoonists instead of white French ones: would world leaders have descended on Lagos to march lock-armed with President Goodluck Jonathan in solidarity? Can we imagine Netanyahu heading to the West Bank to hold hands with Abbas in solidarity for the dozens of Palestinian journalists who, in clear crimes against free speech, were targeted by Israeli forces for simply being witnesses to atrocities and reporting to the world about them? No, there will be no demonstrations or gathering of world leaders held for the untold numbers of innocent civilians, including women and children, who, without any provocation, have borne the brunt of bombings, drone strikes, and other nefarious means of modern warfare. It is at times like these when it seems as though we live in a cartoon world where millions are shedding tears or displaying moral outrage for twelve white people who, without denial, were brutally murdered, while too many of those same eyes remain blind and dry to the countless deaths and suffering of the world’s Muslims.
* Absolutely wrong!
** These young men were only "SUSPECTS" and not proven guilty of any crime!
Paris Attack: Terror Raid Under Way In Reims
Sky News – 3 minutes 53 seconds ago [Wed 7 January 2015]
View PhotoParis Attack: Terror Raid Under Way In Reims
An
anti-terror raid has been launched in north-eastern France after 12
people were killed during a gun attack on a newspaper office, according
to reports.
AFP news agency reported that France's elite anti-terrorist unit had begun the raid in Reims on Wednesday night.Two brothers and a third man have been identified as suspects behind the attack on the Charlie Hebdo headquarters in Paris.
The men have been named as French nationals Said Kouachi and Cherif Kouachi, in their early 30s, along with 18-year-old Hamyd Mourad.
Police officials have said the suspects are linked to a Yemeni terror network.
Follow live updates here
Cherif Kouachi was reportedly convicted in 2008 of terrorism charges for helping channel fighters to Iraq's insurgency. He was jailed for 18 months.
Three masked gunmen stormed the offices of Charlie Hebdo, which has previously been targeted over its portrayal of the Prophet Mohammed.
They were armed with Kalashnikov rifles and a rocket-propelled grenade during the attack on Wednesday morning.
A major manhunt was launched after the men fled the scene in a black Citroen, which was later found abandoned in north-eastern Paris.
They then hijacked a white Renault Clio and drove off in the direction of the Porte de Pantin - one of the main routes out of the French capital.
The attackers called out their victims by name before opening fire during a morning editorial meeting.
They were let inside the Charlie Hebdo building by a female employee who was threatened at gunpoint along with her daughter and forced to punch in a security code to allow them inside.
The editor and a cartoonist for the newspaper, who went by the pen names Charb and Cabu , were among those killed.
Radio France chief executive Mathieu Gilet announced revealed that contributor Bernard Maris was also killed.
Two police officers were among the dead, including one assigned as Charb's bodyguard after he had received death threats and another who was shot in the head as he lay wounded on the ground outside the offices.
French President Francois Hollande has declared a national day of mourning on Thursday.
In a televised address on Wednesday he said: "We have to respond according to the crime, first of all by finding the authors of this infamy and we have to ensure that they are arrested, judged... and punished very severely.
"We must also protect all public buildings... security forces will be deployed everywhere where there could be a threat.
Our best weapon is our unity, the unity of all our citizens, nothing can divide us, nothing must separate us. Freedom will always be stronger than barbarism."
Hassen Chalghoumi, imam of Drancy mosque in the Paris suburb of Seine-Saint-Denis, said: "These are criminals, barbarians. They have sold their soul to hell. This is not freedom.
"This is not Islam and I hope the French will come out united at the end of this."
An extra 3,000 police officers have been deployed on the streets in a massive security operation, according to reports, as the security threat level in France was raised to the highest level.
Tens of thousands of people have staged silent protests in France and across the world in solidarity for the victims of the attack.
Social media users have used the hashtag #jesuischarlie to show solidarity for the victims of the shooting, with the Charlie Hebdo website also using the image as its masthead.
The shooting is one of the worst terror attacks in France in decades.
In 1995, a bomb on a commuter train blamed on Algerian extremists killed eight people at the Saint Michel metro station in Paris.
Mohamed Merah, an al Qaeda-inspired gunman, killed seven people in
Toulouse in 2012, including three French soldiers and three children.
Pictured: Two brothers who 'trained in Yemen as assassins' and a homeless teenager identified by police as suspects in Paris magazine massacre that left 12 dead
- Masked gunmen storm Paris headquarters with AK-47s shouting 'Allahu akbar!' and 'the Prophet has been avenged'
- Stalked building asking for people's names before killing the editor, three cartoonists and the deputy chief editor
- Editor Stephane Charbonnier had famously shrugged off threats, saying: 'I'd rather die standing than live kneeling'
- Horrific footage shows a police officer begging for his life before being shot in the head at point-blank range
- Cartoonist Corrine Rey told how she cowered with her young daughter as she watched two colleagues gunned down
- Killers fled in stolen car across eastern Paris after a 'mass shoot-out' with police officers and remain on the loose
- Militants believed to be from Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula which was behind plane bomb plots in US and UK
- Three suspects said to be all French citizens - a homeless teenage man aged 18, and two brothers aged 32 and 34
- Newspaper had earlier posted a picture of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on its Twitter account
- Publication's offices were firebombed in 2011 for publishing satirical cartoon of Prophet Mohammed
- White House had previously criticised Charlie Hebdo in 2012 for publishing its religiously sensitive cartoons
Two
brothers were tonight named as being among the three suspects involved
in a deadly terrorist attack on an anti-Islamist newspaper in France.
Said
Kouachi, 34, and Cherif Kouachi, 32, were identified along with Hamyd
Mourad, 18, with all three from the Paris commuter town of
Gennevilliers.
At
least 100,000 people gathered across France tonight to back the Charlie
Hebdo publication, as a huge manhunt was launched to find the
attackers.
The
suspected Al Qaeda militants massacred 12 people in Paris today - and
among those slaughtered was a police officer as he begged for mercy.
Tonight,
thousands of people went to Republique Square near the scene to honour
the victims, holding signs reading 'Je suis Charlie' - 'I am Charlie'.
Scroll down for videos and audio
Suspects:
The three men were named as Said Kouachi (left), 34, his brother Cherif
Kouachi (right), 32, and Hamyd Mourad, 18, of Gennevilliers
Brutal execution: A police officer
pleads for mercy on the pavement in Paris before being shot in the head
by masked gunmen during an attack on the headquarters of the French
satirical publication Charlie Hebdo, a notoriously anti-Islamic
publication
Gunned down in cold blood: Horrific
footage shows the injured police officer slumped on the pavement as two
of the gunmen approach. In a desperate plea for his life, the officer
slowly raises his hand towards one of the attackers, who callously
shoots him at point-blank range
'Massacre': The gunmen are seen
brandishing Kalashnikovs as they move in on the injured police officer
from their vehicle outside the office
Vigil: People gather around candles
and pens at the Place de la Republique in Paris in support of the
victims after the terrorist attack
The three suspects were tonight said by Metronews to be all French citizens - a homeless teenage man, and two brothers in their thirties.
There were disputed claims that the three men had been arrested 100 miles away in Reims, following a report by Libération. This could not be verified.
Cherif
Kouachi was convicted in 2008 of terrorism charges for helping funnel
fighters to Iraq's insurgency and sentenced to 18 months in prison.
Clad
all in black with hoods and speaking French, the militants forced one
of the cartoonists - at the office with her young daughter - to open the
door.
-
'I prefer to die than live like a rat': Bravery of slain...
Crowds gather in central Paris in solidarity with murdered...
Standing together in defiance, thousands gather across...
Merkel and Cameron given extraordinary joint terror briefing...
#JeSuisCharlie sweeps Twitter as Internet users rush to show...
Soldiers on the streets: Military is brought in to protect...
-
Obama condemns 'cowardly evil' attack on French newspaper...
Charlie Hebdo cartoonist reveals terrorists threatened to...
Were they militarily trained? Terrifying footage shows how...
'Very little seems funny today': Private Eye editor Ian...
Share this article
15k shares
Witnesses
said the gunmen shouted 'we are from the Al Qaeda in Yemen', and
'Allahu akbar!' - Arabic for 'God is great' - as they stalked the
building.
They were also said to have yelled 'the Prophet has been avenged', during what was France's deadliest post-war terrorist attack.
The attackers headed straight for the paper's editor and cartoonist, Stephane Charbonnier, killing him and his police bodyguard.
The
security had been recruited to protect him after extremists firebombed
the offices in 2011 over a satirical cartoon about the Prophet
Mohammed.
People gather in Toulouse tonight to
show their solidarity for the victims of the attack by gunmen on the
offices of the satirical publication
Elsewhere: People gather at the Place
Royale in Nantes to show their solidarity for the victims of the attack
on the offices of the satirical weekly
Standing together: People hold up pens
and posters reading 'I am Charlie' in French as they take part in a
vigil in Trafalgar Square, London
People gather near candles lit to
commemorate the victims of the deadly attack on the Charlie Hebdo
offices, in Lyon, central France
'Not afraid': People gather to pay
their respects for the victims of the terror attack against the
satirical newspaper, in Paris tonight
A
year later, Mr Charbonnier famously dismissed threats against his life,
declaring: 'I would rather die standing than live kneeling.'
The
militants also killed three other renowned cartoonists – men who had
regularly satirised Islam – and the newspaper's deputy chief editor.
Despite a shoot-out with armed officers, the gunmen escaped in a hijacked car and remained on the loose this evening.
This left the French capital in virtual lockdown as police and soldiers flooded the streets to join the search.
President Barack Obama offered U.S. help in pursuing the gunmen, saying they had attacked freedom of expression.
But it also emerged that the White House had previously criticised Charlie Hebdo in 2012 over its Prophet Mohammed cartoon.
At the time it had said that the images would be 'deeply offensive to many and have the potential to be inflammatory'.
Emergency: Police officers and
firefighters gather in front of the offices of Charlie Hebdo in Paris
today after gunmen stormed the building
Critical: Firefighters carry an
injured man on a stretcher in front of the offices of French satirical
paper Charlie Hebdo after the shooting
Faces of the victims: Among the
journalists killed were (l to r) Charlie Hebdo's deputy chief editor
Bernard Maris and cartoonists Georges Wolinski, Jean Cabut, aka Cabu,
Stephane Charbonnier, who is also editor-in-chief, and Bernard Verlhac,
also known as Tignous
Meanwhile,
horrific footage emerged showing an injured police officer slumped on
the pavement as two gunmen approached him outside the office.
In
an apparent desperate plea for life, the officer is seen slowly raising
his hand towards an attacker, who shoots him in the head at point-blank
range.
Despite
a fierce firefight with police, the men got away in a hijacked car,
and, within an hour of the atrocity, appeared to have vanished without
trace.
France
raised its security alert to the highest level and reinforced
protective measures at houses of worship, stores, media offices and
transportation.
President
Francois Hollande called the bloodbath a 'barbaric attack against
France and against journalists' and vowed to hunt down those
responsible.
Jacques Myard, French MP with opposition party UMP (Union for a Popular Movement), said: 'We knew something would happen.
'The (security) services used to say to us it's not if but when and where. We know that we are at war.
'The Western nations - like Britain, France, Germany - we are at war.'
The Queen today sent her 'sincere condolences to the families of those who have been killed' in the attack.
And Prime Minister David Cameron described the murders as 'sickening'.
Tonight: French forensic experts and
police officers examine evidence outside the French satirical newspaper
Charlie Hebdo's office, in Paris
At large: The gunmen are seen near the
offices of the French newspaper Charlie Hebdo before fleeing in a car.
They remain on the loose
Forensic experts examine the car
believed to have been used as the escape vehicle by gunmen who attacked
the Charlie Hebdo office
Twitter
users responded to the Charlie Hebdo massacre with an outpouring of
solidarity using the hashtag #jesuischarlie, which is trending online.
By
4.15pm, nearly five hours after the attack, it had already been tweeted
more than 250,000 times, according to one social analytics website.
Guy
Verhofstadt, the President of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats
for Europe tweeted: 'A tragic day for the freedom of speech
#jesuischarlie.'
Marches have also been organised through Paris and London in support of journalistic freedom.
As well as the AK47 assault rifles, there were also reports of a rocket-propelled grenade being used in the attack.
It
took place during the publication's weekly editorial meeting at around
12pm (11am GMT), meaning all the journalists would have been present.
A
young mother and cartoonist, known as 'Coco', who survived the massacre
told how she had let the suspected Al Qaeda killers into the office.
Corrine
Rey said she had returned from picking up her daughter from a nursery
when she was confronted by two armed men wearing balaclavas.
'I
had gone to pick up my daughter at day care, arriving in front of the
building, where two masked and armed men brutally threatened us,' said
Ms Rey.
'They
said they wanted to go up to the offices, so I tapped in the code,'
said Ms Rey, referring to the digi-code security system on the
interphone.
A police photographer (partially
hidden) works with investigators as they examine the impacts from
machine gun fire on a police vehicle
Life-threatening: An injured person is evacuated outside the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo's office
Ms Rey and her daughter hid under a desk, from where they saw two other cartoonists being executed.
'They shot Wolinski and Cabu,' she said. 'It lasted five minutes. I had taken refuge under a desk.'
Ms Rey said the men 'spoke French perfectly' and 'claimed they were 'Al Qaeda terrorists'.
Gunmen reportedly told another witness: 'You say to the media, it was Al Qaeda in Yemen.'
A
police source told the Liberation newspaper the gunmen were asking for
the Mr Charbonnier by name, shouting: 'Where is Charb? Where is Charb?'
The source added: 'They killed him then sprayed everyone else.'
Mr
Charbonnier was included in a 2013 'Wanted Dead or Alive for Crimes
Against Islam' article published by Al Qaeda propaganda magazine
Inspire.
The
latest tweet published by the newspaper's official Twitter account
earlier in the day featured a cartoon of Abu Baghdadi, the leader of
Islamic State.
In it, he wishes everyone 'good health'. Cartoonists Cabu, Tignous and Wolinski were all also reported dead.
Radio
France chief executive Mathieu Gilet later announced on Twitter that a
contributor, Bernard Maris, was another of the victims.
Shell-shocked: A woman cries outside
the office. Witnesses reported hearing loud gunfire and at least one
explosion during the attack
Trail of destruction: Police inspect
the damage after a collision between police cars at the scene during a
firefight with Islamic militants
Meanwhile,
there were reports of a car explosion outside a synagogue in Sarcelles,
in northern Paris, just hours after the Charlie Hebdo attack.
The
blast, at about 1.30pm GMT, is not thought to be connected to the
massacre, according to Paris Metro which quoted the mayor of Sarcelles.
Florence
Pouvil, a saleswoman at Lunas France on Rue Nicolas Appert, opposite
the Charlie Hebdo offices, spoke of her shock at the attack.
She
told MailOnline: 'I saw two people with big guns, like Kalashnikovs
outside our office and then we heard firing. We were very confused.
'There were two guys who came out of the building and shot everywhere. We hid on the floor, we were terrified.
'They came from the building opposite with big guns. It has a bunch of different companies inside.
'Some of our co-workers work there so we were frightened for them. They weren't just firing inside the Charlie Hebdo offices.
'They were firing in the street too. We feared for our lives so we hid under our desks so they wouldn't see us.
'Both men were dressed in black from head to toe and their faces were covered so I didn't see them.
'They were wearing military clothes, it wasn't common clothing, like they were soldiers.'
Benoit Bringer, a journalist with
Agence Premiere Ligne, told the iTele network he saw several masked men
armed with machine guns
Carnage: A police official, Luc
Poignant, said he was aware of one journalist dead and several injured,
including three police officers
The
New York Times reported that a journalist at the Charlie Hebdo office,
who asked not to be named, texted a friend after the attack to say: 'I'm
alive.
'There is death all around me. Yes, I am there. The jihadists spared me.'
Another
witness, Gilles Boulanger, who works in the same building, told Itele:
'A neighbour called to warn me that there were armed men in the building
and that we had to shut all the doors.
'And several minutes later, there were several shots heard in the building from automatic weapons firing in all directions.
'So
then we looked out of the window and saw the shooting was on Boulevard
Richard-Lenoir, with the police. It was really upsetting. You'd think it
was a war zone.'
French
journalist, Stefan De Vries, told Sky News: 'There was protection at
the door but they killed the police officers, they executed them and
they started shooting in the offices.'
An
unnamed eyewitness told the BBC World Service: 'When I arrived at the
scene it was quite disturbing as you can imagine. There were several
corpses on the floor.
'We
saw the number of casualties was very high, so we just tried to help as
we could - there were a lot of people down on the floor and there was
blood everywhere.
'I'm
very traumatised by this attack and everything and now we're in
psychological hell where we're being attended to by professionals.'
Terror: In footage filmed from a rooftop, people are seen running for cover as the gunmen rampage through the building
A picture posted on Twitter appearing to show people taking refuge on the roof of the Charlie Hebdo office
Benoit
Bringer, a journalist at the scene who works next door, took refuge on
the roof of the building, which is in the 11th arrondissement of Paris.
He
said: 'There were very many people in the building. We evacuated via
the roof just next to the office. After around ten minutes we saw two
heavily armed, masked men in the street'.
Another
witness said: 'There was a loud gunfire and at least one explosion.
When police arrived there was a mass shoot-out. The men got away by car,
stealing a car.'
A police official, Luc Poignant, said: 'It's carnage.'
After
the shooting, hundreds of comments were posted on the Charlie Hebdo
Twitter page, with one user, David Rault, writing: 'A sad day for
freedom of expression.'
Charlie Hebdo's editor-in-chief Gerard Biard escaped the massacre because he was in London.
He
told France Inter: 'I am shocked that people can have attacked a
newspaper in France, a secular republic. I don't understand it.
'I don't understand how people can attack a newspaper with heavy weapons. A newspaper is not a weapon of war.'
Targeted: A picture posted on Twitter reportedly showing bullets in one of the windows of the Charlie Hebdo offices
High alert: French soldiers patrol at
the Eiffel Tower after the Charlie Hebdo shooting as the militants are
hunted across the city
Mr
Biard said he did not believe the attack was linked to the newspaper's
latest front page, which featured novelist Michel Houellebecq, who has
previously sparked controversy with comments about Islam.
And
he said the newspaper had not received threats of violence: 'Not to my
knowledge, and I don't think anyone had received them as individuals,
because they would have talked about it. There was no particular tension
at the moment.'
A
visibly shocked French President François Hollande, speaking live near
the scene of the shooting, said: 'France is today in shock, in front of a
terrorist attack.
'This newspaper was threatened several rimes in the past and we need to show we are a united country.
'We have to be firm, and we have to be stand strong with the international community in the coming days and weeks.
'We are at a very difficult moment following several terrorist attacks. We are threated because we are a country of freedom
'We will punish the attackers. We will look for the people responsible.'
Today, Mr Cameron said: 'We stand with the French people in the fight against terror and defending the freedom of the press.'
US
President Barack Obama has condemned the 'horrific shooting', offering
to provide any assistance needed 'to help bring these terrorists to
justice'.
And United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said: 'It was a horrendous, unjustifiable and cold-blooded crime.
'It was also a direct assault on a cornerstone of democracy, on the media and on freedom of expression.'
The
British Foreign Office immediately updated is advice for travellers
heading to Pairs, warning: 'There is a high threat from terrorism.'
Defiant: Stephane
Charbonnier, known by his pen name Charb, was editor of Charlie Hebdo,
and gunned down by men with assault weapons
Mr Charbonnier
was named as one of nine men the extreme Islamist group were targetting
(pictured centre right). Their photographs were printed alongside the
caption 'a bullet a day keeps the infidel away'
Tragic: Cartoonist Georges Wolinski was named by officials as one of those shot dead at the offices of Charlie Hebdo
Lead
cartoonist Jean 'Cabu' Cabut (left) was among the 12 massacred by
terrorists in Paris today, along with Bernard 'Tignous' Verlhac (right)
Radio France
chief executive Mathieu Gilet announced on Twitter that a contributor,
Bernard Maris (above right) was another of the victims
It added: 'If you're in Paris or the Ile de France area take extra care and follow advice of French authorities.'
Luce
Lapin and Laurent Leger, who have both worked at Charlie Hebdo, were
using Twitter hours before the attack, with the most recent tweet posted
by Lapin praising cartoonist Cabu.
It read: 'Cabu, a great man! And honest, he doesn't eat foie gras.'
While Leger's made a political point about taxes.
It
said: 'Macron [French ministry of economy] wants more billionaires in
France, the same that use tricks for not paying ISF [solidarity tax on
wealth].'
Mohammed
Moussaoui, president of the Union of French mosques, condemned the
'hateful act,' and urged Muslims and Christians 'to intensify their
actions to give more strength to this dialogue to make a united front
against extremism'.
It
is believed to be the deadliest attack in France since 1961, when
right-wingers who wanted to keep Algeria French bombed a train, killing
28 people.
The
number of attackers was initially reported to be two, but the French
Interior Minister later said security services were hunting three
'criminals'.
Bernard Cazeneuve added that Paris had been placed on the highest alert.
Security
expert Professor Anthony Glees, from the University of Buckingham,
said: ‘The French have signally failed to keep their country safe.’
He
told MailOnline: ‘We in the great western democracies could now be on
the verge of a sustained series of Al-Qaeda-IS attacks, generated by the
hold that Islamists have in many places in the world, not least the IS
state itself.
‘We cannot appease this movement - we have to win the security war against it and contain it, otherwise big trouble lies ahead.
Location:
Officers were involved in a gunfight with the men, who escaped in a
hijacked car and sped away from the office towards east Paris
'We have to be stand strong with the
international community': A visibly shocked French President François
Hollande arrives at the scene, where he promised to bring those
responsible to justice
‘We need more and better intelligence-led activity at home and we need to defeat the IS state abroad.
‘It's not surprising that so many people in Europe are demonstrating against what they see as the Islamisation of Europe.
‘However,
their target should not be the vast majority of European Muslims who
want nothing to do with Islamism, but the political movement it has
produced.
‘This isn't about religion or faith communities, it's about revolutionary politics and violence and only force can overcome it.’
The
offices of the same newspaper were burnt down in a petrol attack in
2011 after running a magazine cover of the Prophet Mohammed as a cartoon
character.
At the time, the editor-in-chief, Stephane Charbonnier, said Islam could not be excluded from freedom of the press.
He
said: 'If we can poke fun at everything in France, if we can talk about
anything in France apart from Islam or the consequences of Islamism,
that is annoying.'
Mr
Charbonnier, also known as Charb, said he did not see the attack on the
newspaper as the work of French Muslims, but of what he called 'idiot
extremists'.
The cover showed Mohammed saying: '100 lashes if you are not dying of laughter'.
This
week's Charlie Hebdo also featured the author Houellebecq, whose new
novel imagines Muslims taking over the French government in 2022.
Inside,
there was an editorial, attributed to the Prophet Muhammad, and more
cartoons - one showing the Prophet with a clown's red nose.
Depiction of the Prophet is strictly prohibited in Islam, but the newspaper denied it was trying to be provocative.
A
firebomb attack gutted the headquarters of Charlie Hebdo in November
2011 after it put an image of the Prophet Mohammed on its cover.
Rabbi Rick Wiles: “Islam Must Be Eliminated From The Face Of The Earth…”
ReplyDelete