Wednesday, January 28, 2015
"Israelis have a license to kill Arabs. They can “Auschwitz” them as much as they like..."
Hoffman's Judaism Slideshow PREVIEW
An Auschwitz for Arabs
By Michael Hoffman
www.revisionisthistory.org
The
Auschwitz bandwagon has rolled onto our television and Internet screens
and newspaper front pages once again. It never actually leaves, so
perhaps it is more accurate to say that this week it is more present
than usual.
You don’t believe we’re ruled by halacha
(Talmudic law)? In that case, how is it that whatever befalls The Holy
People of Counterfeit “Israel” is branded the supreme evil of the
cosmos, and whatever happens to the eternally skimmed (we the goyim), counts for slightly less than nothing?
Take for example the hideously evil El Khiam concentration camp operated by the Israelis through their south Lebanon proxy army, the SLA.
You
never heard of it, correct? Why is that? It was a torture camp; a death
camp paid for in part with American taxpayer money. But you know
nothing of it. Israeli allies under Israeli direction killed and
tortured the Lebanese in that El Khiam concentration camp. All of the victims were goyim, not Holy People. Now do you understand why El Khiam is unsung and unknown?
El Khiam
was liberated by Hezbollah, the people Americans are taught to hate
because they are the only formidable armed resistance against Israeli
conquest and land theft in the Middle East. Unlike Sunni Saudi Arabia
which is allied with the Israelis, Shiite Hezbollah has not cut a deal
with the US or the Israelis. This is why Assad in Syria and the
government of Iran are attacked and sanctioned -- they are the
principal, and practically the only significant allies of Hezbollah.
“Saudi
Arabian interests and Israel are almost parallel,” says Saudi Prince
Alwaleed bin Talal. “He notes the startling alliance of Saudi Arabia and
the Jewish state.” (Wall Street Journal, November 23, 2013, p. A11).
“...the
kingdom now supports Islamist rebels in Syria who often fight alongside
Qaeda groups like the Nusra Front. The Saudis say they have little
choice...they believe they must now back whoever can help them defeat
Mr. Assad’s forces and his Iranian allies.” (New York Times, January 5, 2014, p. A10).
Saudi Arabia, which maintains a compact with its clerics who furnish the murderous Wahhabist-Salafist theology
which drives ISIS and al-Qaeda, is our precious “ally,” while
Hezbollah, Iran and Assad’s Syria we are taught to hate, sanction and
prepare to do war with.
Today, Jan. 28, in retaliation for the Israeli attack
(although the mainstream media will not patently report it as
retaliation), Hezbollah struck an Israeli convoy, with the difference
being that whereas the US media published almost no photos of the
Israeli attack nine days ago, today graphic and grisly photos of the
wounded Israelis and the wreckage of their vehicles are plastered all
over the US media.
To
summarize, the Israelis launched an unprovoked bombing raid on Syria,
killing Hezbollah personnel and an Iranian general. When representatives
of those victims fight back, we have the situation today, as decreed by
“our” media: “Hezbollah launches attack on Israel.”
One
envisions the shaking heads and indignation of all of those millions of
Fox News habitués and “American Sniper” movie viewers, who are
thinking, “Those damned Arabs are at it again! Go Israel!”
With
an Israeli national election weeks away, Prime Minister Binyamin
Netanyahu was anxious to initiate a tit-for-tat exchange with Hezbollah
which he knew the US media would suggest was “an act of Arab terror,”
which in turn provides Netanyahu the opportunity to gain more popularity
with the generally bloodthirsty Israeli electorate by sparking a war
with Lebanon and Syria.
All this might very well precipitate another genocidal Israeli “lawn mowing” of Lebanese civilians (last witnessed in 2006),
and the opportunity to further assist the al-Qaeda connected Nusra
front in Syria in finally crushing the Syrian-Christian population’s
ally, Assad, and instituting Nusra’s Sharia law in Syria, which Right
wing Republicans claim to oppose in the US but support in Syria -- by
means of their Israeli-approved goal of overthrowing Assad.
According
to a statement on his Facebook page, Russian-Judaic Avigdor Lieberman,
the Israeli foreign minister, stated that “Israel” should respond to
Hezbollah’s retaliation, “in a very harsh and disproportionate manner.”
We’ll
wager that Lieberman’s advocacy of a “disproportionate” attack is a
reference to his goal of another massacre of Lebanese. Lieberman’s
political ally, Ayelet Shaked, a member of the Israeli Knesset
(parliament), spelled it out: “bombing a civilian population is
justified when civilians give shelter to evil” (Jewish Daily Forward, Jan. 26, 2015).
“Evil” in this context signifies any goy who raises his head against Israeli occupation and mass murder.
Israelis
have a license to kill Arabs. They can “Auschwitz” them as much as they
like, on this, the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.
Michael Hoffman’s counter-intelligence briefings are made by possible by donations from readers. Please donate now to ensure the continuation of this vital public service. Thank you.
Copyright©2015 by Independent History and Research
All Rights Reserved
_________________
JANUARY 27, 2015
The Elephant in the Room
The Origin of Modern Terror and Crumbling Western Values
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Do
you ever solve problems by ignoring them? Most of us would say that is
not possible, yet that is precisely what western governments do in their
efforts to counteract what is called “Islamic terror.” Yes, there are
vast and costly efforts to suppress the symptoms of what western
governments regard as a modern plague, including killing many people
presumed to be infected with it, fomenting rebellion and destruction in
places presumed to be prone to it, secretly returning to barbaric
practices such as torture, things we thought had been left behind
centuries ago, to fight it, and violating rights of their own citizens
we thought were as firmly established as the need for food and shelter.
Governments ignore, in all these destructive efforts, what in private
they know very well is the origin of the problem.
Have
Islamic radicals always existed? Yes, we have records through the
history of British and French empire-building of strange and fearsome
groups. It appears every large religion has a spectrum of believers,
always including at one end of the spectrum extreme fundamentalists.
They are not a new phenomenon anywhere, so why has one group of them, in
the sands of the Middle East, become part of our everyday awareness?
It
is also nothing new that young men become hot-blooded and disturbed
over what they regard as attacks upon their kind. Western society’s
record of crusades, religious wars, colonial wars, and revolts, a total
likely having no equal in the histories of the world’s peoples, offers
countless examples of young men being angered by this or that
circumstance and joining up or running off to fight.
George
Bush told us today’s terrorists hate our freedom and democratic values,
but like virtually every utterance of George Bush, that one was
fatuous, explaining nothing. Nevertheless, his is the explanation
pounded into public consciousness because governments and the corporate
press never stop repeating versions of it, the Charlie Hebdo affair and
its theatrical posturing over free speech being only the latest.
Theatrical? Yes, when we know perfectly well that most of those who
marched at the front of the parade in Paris are anything but friends of
free speech.
All
backward peoples are uncomfortable with certain western values, that
being the nature of backwardness, and backwardness is a defining
characteristic of all fundamentalist religious groups – Hasidic or
ultra-Orthodox Jews, Mennonites, Roman Catholic Cardinals, cloistered
nuns, Sikhs, and many others – who typically choose modes of dress,
rules to obey, and even foods to eat having little or no relationship
with the contemporary world and science. Of course, that is their right
so long as they are peaceful and law-abiding.
Any
fundamentalist group, pushed by more powerful people from outside their
community, is entirely capable of, and even prone to, violence, and all
human beings are capable of violence when faced with abuse and
injustice. Centuries of religious wars and terrors in Europe about such
matters as how the Mass is celebrated prove the proposition and should
be held as a warning, but they are forgotten by most, if they were ever
known. The tendency towards violence continues today amongst many
fundamentalist faiths. In so relatively small and seemingly homogeneous a
society as Israel, there are regular attacks from ultra-Orthodox Jews
against the country’s worldly citizens or against fair-minded rules
about such pedestrian matters as women riding buses or walking on a
street. The attacks become quite violent – punching, spitting, burning
down homes, and killing sometimes – and all go against what we call
western values, but because the scale is fairly small, and our press
also has a constant protective bias concerning all things Israeli, these
events rarely make our mainline news. They must be found on the
Internet.
It
took Western Europe literally centuries to leave behind such recurrent
and violent themes as witches and the need to burn them alive, the Evil
Eye, casting out demons, execution for differences of belief, and
countless other stupidities which characterized whole societies and
destroyed lives. And if you want to go still further back, go to the Old
Testament, a collection of ancient writing packed with violence,
superstition, prejudice, and just plain ignorance, which Christians and
others even today regard as containing important truths for contemporary
life. Human progress, at least in some matters, takes a very long time
indeed.
Our
world has more backward people than most of us can imagine. The news
does not feature their extremes and savageries because it serves no
political purpose. In Africa, for example, we find practices and beliefs
utterly repellent to modern minds: the practice of senior village men
raping young girls as an accepted right, the genital mutilation of 3
million girls annually (an African, not an Islamic, practice), the
hunting down and butchering such “strange” people as albinos, their
parts to be eaten as medicine, and many others. In India, a country well
on its way to becoming modern yet one with a huge backward population,
we have practices such as marrying off mere girls to old men rich enough
to pay dowries to poor parents. At one stroke this enriches the parents
and relieves them of the burden of a child, a female child too, always
viewed less favorably. The practice generates a large population of
widows when the old husbands of girls married at, say, twelve die. These
women are then condemned to entire lives as widows, never allowed to
remarry, required to dress and eat in certain ways, and basically
shunned to live in squalid equivalents of old folks homes., living
entirely meaningless lives. India also has the practice of “bride
burning” where new brides who are deemed unacceptable for various
reasons become the prey of the groom’s family, literally being burned
alive. There are many other barbarities in that society too, including
“honor killing” and young women who are made inmates in certain temples
to serve as glorified prostitutes.
Our
press assiduously avoids much of the world’s horrors as it focuses on
“Islamic extremism,” and politics are the only explanation for the bias.
The press theme of Islamic terror and indeed real incidents of terror
grow from a reality always taken for granted, never debated, and
certainly never criticised: the elephant in the room, as it were, is
Israel’s illegal and agonizingly long occupation of the Palestinians.
It
may be not be important to our press and governments that Israel holds
millions as prisoners, crippling the lives of generation after
generation, or that Israel periodically strikes out in every direction –
Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank – causing the deaths of many
thousands, or that Israel is seen to bulldoze people’s homes and sacred
monuments with complete impunity, but it very much matters to many
millions of Muslims in the world, and some of them, fundamentalist men,
strike out against it just as young men everywhere have sometimes struck
out against keenly-felt hurts and injustice.
In
western countries, under the hard influence of America, a country in
turn under the hard influence of the world’s best organized and financed
lobby, the Israel Lobby, we have come to regard Israel’s behavior as
normal, but it is, of course, not normal, not in any detail. What is
normal about holding several million people prisoner for half a century?
What is normal about bulldozing homes and literally stealing the land
upon which they stood? What is normal about declaring an honestly
elected government as criminal and treating its people as though they
were criminals? What is normal about limiting people’s opportunity to
earn a living or to import some of the needs of life? What is normal
about killing nearly a thousand children, as Israel has done just in
Gaza, since 2008?
Pretending
that Israel’s behavior is not the major cause of that screams from our
headlines and news broadcasts has reached absurd levels. America has
only vastly compounded the problem of Israel’s organized abuse of a
people: it and its silent partners have destroyed Iraq, destroyed Libya,
are working hard to destroy Syria, have seen to it that Egypt’s tens of
millions again live under absolute government, ignore countless
inequities and barbarities in secretly-helpful countries like Saudi
Arabia, and carry out extra-judicial killings through much of the
region. All of it is carried out on Israel’s behalf and with Israel’s
cooperation. Can any reasonable person not see that this vast factory of
death also manufactures countless grievances and vendettas? The
stupidity is on a colossal scale, rooted in the notion that you can kill
your way out of the terrible consequences of terrible policies.
In
America, paid political shills (Newt Gingrich was one) have campaigned
about there being no such thing as a Palestinian. Others (Dick Armey was
one) have said that millions of Palestinians should be removed, all
their land left conveniently to Israel. That last is an odd thing to
say, isn’t it, considering there are supposed to be no such thing as
Palestinians? And just what country would take millions of
“non-existent” Palestinians? Obviously no politician with even pretence
of integrity would say such things, and how can intelligent and
successful people like America’s Jews take satisfaction in hearing
politicians reciting such embarrassing scripts? But this is a good
measure of the way intelligence and sound thinking are scorned in
American politics. How can you achieve anything worth achieving without
intelligence and sound thinking? You cannot, but that doesn’t stop
American Presidents and Secretaries of State from carrying on the
world’s longest-running dumb show, something called the “peace process.”
The sombre, moose-like figure of John Kerry is photographed playacting
at statesmanship while American-supplied arms just keep killing
thousands of innocent people.
John Chuckman lives in Canada.Israel, the psychopathic nation
Is Zionism a collective personality disorder?
By Dr. Laurent Guyénot, translated and introduced by Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
Can a nation be a psychopath?
According to one expert on political psychopathy, Andrzej Lobaczewski, the answer is yes. Whole nations, even international political movements, can exhibit behavior that parallels that of psychopathic individuals.Lobaczewski, a Polish psychiatrist, diagnosed psychopathic symptoms among the Communist-era leadership. He argued that individuals with personality disorders, especially psychopathy, tend to gravitate to positions of power, which can set off a contagion in which the entire regime takes on psychopathic characteristics.
In a brand-new article, translated and published here for the first time, Laurent Guyénot argues that Israel (and the international Zionist movement surrounding and empowering it) is a textbook case of political psychopathy. Naturally the Zio-psychopaths, who always have to be 100% right and cannot accept the slightest bit of criticism, will not respond well to this article. Their reaction will offer yet another item of evidence that Dr. Guyénot’s thesis is correct.
Laurent Guyénot is an Engineer (National School of Advanced Technology, 1982) and medievalist (PhD in Medieval Studies at Paris IV-Sorbonne, 2009). He has authored numerous books; the latest is JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State. My recent interview with him on the Charlie Hebdo affair is archived here.
-KB
ISRAEL, THE PSYCHOPATHIC NATION
by Laurent Guyenot
“Judeophobia is a psychosis. As a psychosis, it is hereditary and as a disease transmitted for two thousand years, it is incurable.” (Leo Pinsker, Auto-Emancipation, 1882)
Jewishness is a notoriously ambivalent notion. On the one hand, Judaism is a religion; on the other, Jews are a people, an ethnic group or race. It all depends on the circumstances. But in both cases, Jewishness may legitimately be subjected to psychological analysis. If Judaism is a religion, we may turn to Freud, who addressed the relationship between religion and neurosis in three books: Totem and Taboo, Civilization and Its Discontents and The Future of an Illusion, in which he calls “religion” (referring mainly to Catholicism) a “universal obsessional neurosis of humanity.” If, conversely, the Jews are a people, then we can base our analysis on common sense, which admits that every people has a national character forged by history – or a collective memory, which is to say, its own representation of its history. Concerning the character of the Jewish nation, there is no shortage of opinions from Jewish intellectuals.
The
hypothesis presented in this paper can be summarized as follows: The
Jewish nation, as a state, but also as an organized world community,
acts collectively towards other nations and other human communities in
the way a psychopath acts towards his fellow men. I will first describe
psychopathy as a cognitive and behavioral structure and show how the
ideology and methods of the chosen people are related to it. It goes
without saying that I do not intend to imply that “the Jews” are
psychopaths, but instead that they are the first victims of a mental
straitjacket imposed by their elites, who through veritable intellectual
terrorism, make of them, to the extent that they comply, the
instruments of the collective psychopathy of Israel.What is a psychopath?
Psychopathy is a syndrome of traits classified among the personality disorders. Canadian psychologist Robert Hare (1) in the wake of Hervey Cleckley’s The Mask of Sanity (1941), has defined its diagnostic criteria on the basis of a cognitive model that is now widely adopted, though some behaviorally-oriented psychiatrists prefer the term sociopathy. In an effort to get everyone to agree, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual on Mental Disorders, the American psychiatric bible, suggested antisocial personality disorder; but the term psychopathy is still in use.
The
most striking traits of the psychopath are lack of empathy and
conscience. Other traits are common to narcissism: psychopaths have a
grand vision of their own importance. In their minds, everything is owed
to them because they are exceptional. They are never wrong, and
failures are always the fault of others. They often show megalomania,
but some learn to hide their arrogance under false modesty. If the
psychopath pretends to rise to the universal level, it is because he
confuses it with his personal interests, and the truth with his own
opinions. However, the psychopath is distinguished from the simple
narcissist by his appetite for power, which makes him much more
destructive. Moreover, his capacity for harm is not inhibited by any
scruples or remorse: he is incapable of feeling guilt. Although he
imagines himself a hero, and in some cases looks like a hero, the
psychopath is, on the human spectrum, the polar opposite of the hero who
sacrifices himself for his community; he will not hesitate to sacrifice
the people around him, and when he knows he is lost, he consoles
himself by causing as many people as possible to fall.
Basically,
the psychopath perceives others as objects. He has a mechanical view of
people and human relationships (and, in some way, of himself as well).
Although devoid of conscience, he often has a keen perception of the
law, which he, as a mechanic of the social engine, overestimates. He has
not internalized moral law and in this sense is not socialized, but he
has mastered the rules of the game and cheats without qualms if he can.
For the same reason, the psychopath almost always develops an immoderate
taste for money; he idealizes it as the epitome of power, the very
essence of the social; he thinks that people can be bought and sold like
things, and life often proves him right.The diagnostic criteria for psychopathy also include pathological lying, deception (cunning) and manipulative behavior. The psychopath feels only very superficial emotions and has no real feelings for anyone; but he has developed a great ability to deceive. He can be charming to the point of being charismatic. He typically shows highly-developed verbal intelligence and lies with disconcerting aplomb. He is unable to empathize, but learns to simulate it, sometimes with a tendency to histrionics (Latin histrio, “theater actor”). The psychoanalyst Helène Deutsche makes this trait the mark of “as-if personalities” endowed with purely mimetic “pseudo-emotions,” devoid of inner experience, “a little like an actor with good technique, but not animated by any actual life.” (2) But the psychopath is more than that: he is a manipulator. It is through his extraordinary ability to feign, trick, trap, and capture that the psychopath draws his power. Although he himself is immunized against guilt, he becomes a master in the art of using guilt to dominate others.
In
any situation, the psychopath projects a persona, which can vary
according to circumstances. The opinions he wears in public are all
disguises that he tailors to his own advantage. However, lying is so
deeply embedded in his nature that the question of his “sincerity” is
almost irrelevant: the psychopath can beat a lie detector. The truth has
no value in his eyes, or merges with the version of events that suits
him. The psychopath is unable to put himself in the place of others, and
thus to view himself critically. Confident in any circumstance of being
right and innocent (and superior), he considers the resentment of his
victims as irrational and pointless.Although those close to the psychopath – at least those who learn the hard way his true nature – can judge him raving mad, the psychopath is not “sick” because he does not “suffer.” He is innocent of neurosis, and never requests psychiatric care (except as a strategic calculation). He is not psychotic, and cannot be regarded as maladapted to social life. On the contrary, he is, in a certain sense, over-adjusted. That is why the real mystery, from a Darwinian point of view, is not the existence of psychopaths, but their low proportion in the population.
Jewishness and selective empathy
The most optimistic low-end estimate of the proportion of psychopaths in the Western population is 1%. This 1% should not be confused with the famous 1% who own half the world’s wealth; but a study of senior executives of large companies, published under the title Snakes in Suits, shows that psychopathic traits are widespread among them (3). This is not surprising; modern society values psychopathic traits and favors the upward mobility of psychopaths.
The fact that Jews today are disproportionately represented among the elite (they form half of billionaires in the United States, while representing only 2.4% of the population) (4) does not allow us to conclude that psychopathy is more prevalent among the chosen people. In a way, quite the opposite is the case: Jews demonstrate among themselves an extraordinary capacity for empathy, or at least familiarity that breeds exceptional solidarity to the point of self-sacrifice. But the selective nature of this empathy suggests that it is addressed less to the humanity of others than to their Jewishness. In Nomads. Essay on the Jewish Soul (1929) we learn what transpires when two Jews meet. “We have never met before, but I instantly know him. One look, one phrase, and I know where he grew up, how he grew up, where he got his drive and his sense of humor. He is New York. He is Jewish. He looks like my uncle Louis, his voice is my uncle Sam. I feel we’ve been together at countless weddings, bar mitzvahs, and funerals. I know his genetic structure. I’m certain that within the last five hundred years—perhaps even more recently—we shared the same ancestor.” (5)
This is a comment from Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor, about his meeting with Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Council of the Federal Reserve, two very influential Americans, about whom we would like to believe that such familiarity does not affect their judgment of the nation’s interest. Kadmi Isaac Cohen described Judaism as “the spiritualized deification of the race […]. Thus the divinity in Judaism is contained in the exaltation of the entity represented by the race.” (6) It is as if the Jews felt united by a collective or ethnic soul, which occupies more or less of their individual soul according to individuals and circumstances.
IDF slogan: “1 shot 2 kills”
Jewish ethnocentrism
In contrast to the empathy it shows for itself, the Jewish community as a whole, to the extent it submits to its representative elites, tends to behave towards the mass of Gentiles in a psychopathic rather than empathic manner. This is why a goy observer, Werner Sombart, despite his reputation as a Semitophile, highlights features of Jewish collective psychology that are similar to psychopathic tendencies including a temperament that is “coldly utilitarian” and “calculating,” alongside a propensity to mimicry, combined with a mechanical conception of human relations. (9) The founder of sociology Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), very critical of his Jewish community, noticed among Jewish intellectuals a pragmatic and self-interested notion of truth, which can be compared with that of the psychopath: “The Jew . . . seeks to learn not in order to replace his collective prejudices by reflective thought, but merely to be better armed for the struggle. . . . [H]e superimposes this intellectual life upon his habitual routine with no effect of the former upon the latter”. (10) Many Jewish historians, for example, seem to value History less as a pursuit of truth than as a means of power.
The
hypothesis of a form of “collective psychopathy” with narcissistic
tendencies makes it possible to deconstruct the universalism in which
Judaism is draped. At the first level, Jewish universalism is a fable
intended to obfuscate reality and confuse the goy. But it is not only
this, as it also appears in the literature internal to the Jewish
community, where it amounts to an expression of limitless ethnic
narcissism. The Jewish people are “the seed that is germinating the
humanity of the future” (Jacob Kaplan, Chief Rabbi of France); “the
living ladder that meets the sky” (Emmanuel Levinas); “Israel equals
humanity” (Levinas) (11); “The Jew is closer to humanity than any
other,” so that “the enemy of the Jews is the enemy of humanity” and
therefore killing Jews is “murdering all mankind” (Elie Wiesel) (12).
Worse, “Hitting a Jew is hitting God Himself,” according to Cardinal
Aron Jean-Marie Lustiger (13), taken almost verbatim from the Talmud
(Sanhedrin 58b: “Hitting a Jew is like slapping the face of God himself
“). This is why the strange notion of “crimes against humanity” was
created specifically in 1945 at the Nuremburg Trials to describe the
massacre of Jews, while the term “genocide” was coined for the same
purpose by Raphael Lemkin in 1944. These terms having since been
generalized to other victims of history, the copyrighted term Holocaust
was coined — hard to beat.This equation between Jewishness and humanity, which is the height of ethnocentrism, is the real meaning of Judaism’s claim to embody humanism. Though Israelis are “the most separatist people in the world” according to Nahum Goldman (former president of the World Jewish Organization and founder of the World Jewish Congress), he adds: “The Israelis have the great weakness of thinking that the whole world revolves around them .” (14) So there is not necessarily a contradiction in their minds between universalist discourse and the practice of tribalism. If the Jew is the essence of humanity, what is good for the Jews is good for humanity, on principle. And although fundamentally racist, Jewishness cannot see itself as such: “Judaic ethics […] by definition deny racism. A Jew cannot be racist.” (Elie Wiesel) (15). This does not prevent the same Elie Wiesel from stating that “Jewish history describes an ongoing conflict between us and the others. Since Abraham, we are on one side and the whole world is on the other.” (16)
It has often been
said that Jews have an ethnocentric conception of universal history,
which has no meaning in their eyes except in relation to the Jewish
people. Josef Kastein acknowledges this in his book History and Destiny of the Jews
(1936): “Because it accepted the idea of the chosen people and
salvation, the Jewish world was Judeocentric, and Jews could interpret
everything that happened according to a single point of view, with
themselves as the center.” (17) Joshua Jehouda illustrates this
perfectly in Antisemitism, Mirror of the World: “He who plumbs
the depths of universal history, to gain an overall vision, finds that
from ancient times until today two opposing currents are fighting over
history, penetrating and shaping it constantly: the messianic current
and the anti-Semitic current […] Because messianism and anti-Semitism
are the two opposite poles of the journey of humanity.” (18)
In
his megalomania, the psychopath is convinced that when he uses others,
it is for their own good. Similarly, according to rabbinical logic, it
is to enlighten humanity that the Jewish community must preserve itself,
prosper, and eventually dominate humanity: “Judaism considers only the
salvation of the house of Israel, which alone will permit the salvation
of the seventy nations of the universe” (Rabi, Anatomy of French Judaism,
1962) (19). This is where the double ethno-religious nature of Judaism
helps streamline the paradox that the Jews should remain a separate
people in order to spread their universal religion. Such Jewish
intellectuals as Felix Adler (1851-1933) have defended the paradoxical
idea that the Jewish people must remain ethnically united to accomplish
their mission: To spread the universalism that will dissolve ethnicity
from the rest of humanity. Only when the mission is completed will the
Jewish people disappear. In this way has the most ethnically oriented
community manages to impersonate the champions of universalism. (20)
Thus when Martin Buber called for a state for the Jews, it was so they
could serve humanity. For it is only by fulfilling his messianic dream
of a national home, he said, that the Jewish religion can lead humanity
towards the messianic age. (21) This argument, developed by Reform
Judaism, is intended primarily for goyim but also for “soft” Jews, in
order to convince them that their commitment in favor of the group is a
service to humanity.The Innocent Victim
The
psychopath is unable to see the other person’s point of view, and
criticism strikes him as irrational aggression. This is the reaction of
the Jewish elites to criticism: To them it can be nothing other than the
expression of visceral anti-Semitism, an atavistic goyish disease.
“Judeophobia is a psychosis,” wrote Leo Pinsker, a founding father of
Zionism, “a hereditary demonic madness,” “a congenital perversion of
human mentality,” “passed down for two thousand years,” “incurable.”
(22)The psychopath does not know the feeling of guilt; he constantly plays innocent. Those who get in his way, or even cast a shadow over his path, are solely responsible for their own destruction. Their accusations are baseless fabrications, their anger an irrational hatred. “One thing that Judaism has which other spiritualities lack is innocence,” explains André Neher, one of the leaders of “the Jewish school of thought of Paris” (with Emmanuel Levinas and Leon Ashkenazi). “We are innocent, and we feel even more deeply that we are innocent when we are accused. […] It is this innocence that we must be aware of at present, and that we must never deny, never, in any circumstance.” (23) And it works: “You will understand nothing of anti-Semitism,” wrote Jean-Paul Sartre, “if you fail to remember that the Jew, that object of so much hatred, is perfectly innocent, nay harmless.” (Anti-Semite and Jew, 1946). The Jewish question is thus reduced to the question of anti-Semitism, which, thanks to the mythology of the Holocaust, is elevated to the status of metaphysical Evil. “The hatred of the Jews is the enigma of enigmas …” (André Glucksmann, Hate Speech, 2004) (24). It is a necessary enigma, without which the Jewish people could dissolve. Towards the end of his life, the Jewish writer Ilya Ehrenburg repeated that he would consider himself a Jew “as long as there was a single anti-Semite left on earth.” (25) Persecution is the central theme of the Passover holiday, Hanukkah, Purim and Yom Kippur, and Jewish history as taught to Jewish children, according to Michael Walzer, is one long tale of exile and persecution – Holocaust history read backwards. (26) According to historian Zygmunt Bauman, Israel uses the Holocaust “as the certificate of its political legitimacy, as a safe-conduct pass for its past and future policies, and, above all, as advance payment for the injustices it might itself commit.” (27)
Israel, Psychopath State
The State of Israel is now in the international scene what the psychopath is in a human community. With regard to the Palestinians, “Israeli Jews’ consciousness is characterized by a sense of victimization, a siege mentality, blind patriotism, belligerence, self-righteousness, dehumanization of the Palestinians, and insensitivity to their suffering,” in the words of journalist Akiva Eldar (“Operation Cast Lead against Gaza in 2008-2009″). (28) As noted by the Deputy Director of Military Intelligence Yehoshafat Harkabi: “Dazzled by its self-righteousness, Israel cannot see the case of the other side. Self-righteousness encourages nations no less than individuals to absolve themselves of every failing and shake off the guilt of every mishap. When everyone is guilty except them, the very possibility of self-criticism and self-improvement vanishes…” (29) The Israeli journalist Gideon Levy wrote in Haaretz in 2010 that “Only psychiatrists can explain Israel’s behavior.” However, the diagnosis he offers, including “paranoia, schizophrenia and megalomania,” (30) is in my opinion insufficient. It must take into account Israel’s extraordinary manipulative capacity on the world stage via corruption and propaganda, that is to say, the Bank and the Press.
Israel’s
relationship to the United States is that of a typical psychopath to an
influential and impressionable man he has decided to use to accomplish
his misdeeds. The golden rule of manipulation formulated by Colonel
Mandell House (who was the intermediary between the Zionist network and
President Woodrow Wilson) applies generally to Israel’s manipulation of
the United States: “With the President […] it was invariably my
intention to always to make him believe that ideas he derived from me
were his own.” (31) Indeed, Israel has managed to lead America into a
Middle East policy that only serves Israeli interests, by pretending to
the American people that it serves their interests. The psychopath tries
to interfere in all the human relationships of his prey, so as to
prevent any alliance that could allow him to be unmasked. Isolate and
divide-and-rule are the essence of this strategy. This is exactly what
Israel and its neoconservative moles have done, by trying to split the
United States from its historic allies in the Middle East, with the aim
of one day remaining the only ally of the United States in the area; the
demonization of all heads of state in the Arab world is part of this
strategy.The power of the Zionist manipulation of the United States, based on quasi-total control of the mainstream media alongside large-scale psychological operations such as September 11th, is truly bewildering. But it becomes understandable in light of the cognitive mechanisms of psychopathy. It even becomes predictable to some extent, if we keep in mind that the psychopath has no ability to question, no limits to his appetite for power, and no remorse about leading humanity into ruin to save his skin. Nothing better illustrates the psychopathic nature of Zionism than the apocalyptic nuclear blackmail Israel perpetually exercises over the West under the name “the Samson Option.” In 1974 Golda Meir summed it up as “Israel’s willingness in a doomsday situation to take the region down with it” (32) in the event of looming defeat.
And remember: there is no limit to the psychopath’s thirst for power, because he does not seeks power for the comfort it can bring him, but instead loves power for the sake of power.
Conclusion
By drawing a parallel between psychopathy as a personality disorder and the attitude of Israel, I do not mean, of course, the Jews in general. They are the first to be manipulated by their elites, and they are part of this collective psychopathy only to the extent of their submission to those elites. Jewishness, do not forget, is whatever idea the Jews make of it; and the idea the Jews make of it is, almost entirely, the one imposed on them by their elites.
What
is at issue is the prevailing ideology of Israel, and (more discreetly)
of the organized Jewish community. Dominant discourse is always shaped
by the elite. Sometimes a strong current of popular thought emerges to
challenge the dominant way of thinking, but nothing of this kind is yet
observable in the Jewish community; it is overwhelmingly docile to its
elite, which currently dominates the media and the entertainment
industry and therefore enjoys considerable mind-control powers. Their
ruse is to maintain in the Jews an absolute conviction of the immaculate
innocence of their people, and simultaneously to inculcate a paranoid
fear of anti-Semitism, this “disease transmitted for two thousand years,
incurable.” (Leon Pinsker) (33)In The Corporation: the Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power (Free Press, 2005), Joel Bakan noted that those “legal persons” that are large companies behave like psychopaths, insensitive to the suffering of those they crush in their pursuit of profit: “Corporate behavior is very similar to that of a psychopath.” That company culture, which involves every employee to one degree or another, is driven by its ruling elite. The Enron case has shown the world the tremendous damage that can be done by a company run by people of high intelligence and perverse ideology. (34) My analysis here of the Jewish community is based on exactly the same reasoning. Like it or not, the character of a nation is as much determined by its legitimate leaders than the reverse. Until proven otherwise Benjamin Netanyahu is as much Israel as Vladimir Putin is Russia.
Ledeen is indeed a “terrorism expert” – he is said to be an Operation Gladio wet work operative
This article is in no way anti-Semitic; it is a severe criticism of “Jewishness” as a system of thought, a representation of the world and the self. We are critiquing an idea by exposing its dangerous irrationality, nothing more. Even if it is as old as the world, an idea still deserves critique. Since the first victims of a toxic idea are the men and women it inhabits, they are likewise the first we would help liberate. This article is basically a fraternal message to all Jews: Jews of all countries, disunite! Break away from your elites and their pathological ideology! Rejoin humanity!
Likewise,
not all elites deserve to be put in the same bag. Many are the Zionist
leaders who have had the courage to confront the monster they created,
and to try to undo the damage. Moshe Sharett, Foreign Minister from 1948
to 1956 and Prime Minister from 1954 to 1955, advocated a moderate
Zionism respectful of international rules, in contrast to the methods of
Ben Gurion, Pinhas Levon, Moshe Dayan and Shimon Peres, the clan
determined “to set the Middle East on fire,” “to frighten the West into
supporting Israel’s aims,” by raising “terrorism to the level of a
sacred principle” according to Sharett (36). The Zionist leader Nahum
Goldman, quoted above, was in favor of a genuine dialogue with the Arabs
and was deeply disillusioned by the attitude of Ben Gurion, whom he
described as “organically incapable of compromise” and blinded by
self-righteousness. After 1967 he became an outspoken critic of illegal
occupation of Palestinian territories. During the government of Begin,
he advised President Carter to “break the back” of the Zionist lobby
that he had long headed, which he believed had become a “negative
factor” afflicting American foreign policy. (37)
Why
have men like Sharett and Goldman never managed to overcome the
psychopathic ideological power machine of Zionism? Could it be because
it – like Jewishness itself – is rooted deeply in the Bible? In the
final analysis does not the Zionist manipulation go back to the creation
by those ancient priests, the Levites, of a tribal god by the name of
Yahweh, who usurped the title of the Creator of the Universe and Father
of Humanity? Ultimately, is not Zionism the logical outcome of Yahwism?
This is a question that I will reserve for another article.1) Robert Hare, Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us, The Guilford Press, 1993.
2) Helene Deutsche, Les «comme si» et autres textes, 1933-1970 (1992), Seuil, 2007, p. 55, cited in Roland Gori, La Fabrique des Imposteurs, Le Lien qui Libère, 2013, p. 232.
3) Paul Babiak et Robert Hare, Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work, HarperCollins, 2007. Theme expressed in documentary film I am Fishead (2011) : www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXFmo6WipNk
4) Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, University of Chicago Press, 1993 ; J.J. Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, Basic Books, 1997.
5) Robert Reich, Locked in the Cabinet, Scribner, 1997, cited in Kevin MacDonald, Culture of Critique: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Praeger 1998, kindle edition 2013, e. 9222-27.
6) Cited in André Pichot, Aux origines des théories raciales, de la Bible à Darwin, Flammarion, 2008, p. 418-419.
7) www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Alain-Soral-commentaires-de-l-actualite-et-conseils-de-lecture-25711.html, à 15:12.
8) Cité dans Hervé Ryssen, Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 183.
9) Werner Sombart, Les Juifs et la vie économique (1902), KontreKulture, 2012, p. 482 et 158.
10) Cited in Kevin MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, Praeger, 1998, édition kindle 2013, e. 5403-10.
11) Cited in Hervé Ryssen, La Guerre eschatologique, Éditions Baskerville, 2013, p. 23-24 et Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 184-189.
12) Cited in Roger Garaudy, Le Procès du sionisme, 1998, p. 17 et dans Hervé Ryssen, Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 184-189.
13) Jean-Marie Lustiger, La Promesse, Parole et Silence, 2002.
14) Nahum Goldman, The Jewish Paradox, Fred Jordan Book, 1978, p. 8 et 56-57.
15) Cited in Hervé Ryssen, Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 191.
16) Hervé Ryssen, La Guerre eschatologique, Éditions Baskerville, 2013, p. 25.
17) Josef Kastein, History and destiny of the Jews, Garden City publishing, 1936, cited in Douglas Reed, La Controverse de Sion (1956), Kontre Kulture, 2012, p. 163.
18) Josué Jehouda, L’Antisémitisme, miroir du monde, Éditions Synthesis, 1958, p.185, cited in Léon de Poncins, Les Juifs et le Concile Vatican II, Kontre Kulture, 2014, p. 173.
19) Cited in Martin Peltier, L’Antichristianisme juif. L’enseignement de la haine, Diffusion Internationale Édition, 2014, p. 250-252.
20) Kevin MacDonald, Culture of Critique, Praeger, 1998, Kindle edition 2013, e. 9983-10008 ; see also Separation and Its Discontents, Praeger, 1998, Kindle edition 2013, ch. 7.
21) Cited in Kevin MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents, Praeger 1998, Kindle edition 2013, e. 5485-91.
22) Léon Pinsker, Autoémancipation, Lettre d’un juif russe à ses frères (1882), Éditions Mille et Une Nuits, 2006, p. 17 et 21.
23) Cited in Hervé Ryssen, Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 319.
24) Cited in Hervé Ryssen, Psychanalyse du judaïsme, Éditions Baskerville, 2006, p. 205.
25) Kevin MacDonald, Culture of Critique, Kindle 2013, e. 3176-78.
26) Michael Walzer, “Toward a New Realization of Jewishness,” Congress Monthly n° 61, 1994, p.4, cited in MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents, Kindle 2013, e. 4675-86.
27) Kevin MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents, Kindle 2013, e. 4674-86.
28) Cited in Max Blumenthal, Goliath: Life and Loathing in Greater Israel, Nation Books, 2013, p. 16.
29) Alan Hart, Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Volume 2: David Becomes Goliath, p. 42-49.
30) Gideon Levy, “Only psychiatrists can explain Israel’s behavior,” Haaretz, January 10, 2010, www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/only-psychiatrists-can-explain-israel-s-behavior-1.261115
31) Arthur Howden Smith, The Real Colonel House (1918), Bibliographical Center for Research, 2010, citd in Aline de Diéguez, Aux Sources du chaos mondial actuel, on line at: http://aline.dedieguez.pagesperso-orange.fr/mariali/chaos/house.html.
32) Alan Hart, Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, vol. 2: David Becomes Goliath, Clarity Press, 2009, p. 194.
33) Léon Pinsker, Auto-émancipation, 1882, cited in Jean Daniel, La Prison juive, Odile Jacob, 2005, p. 133.
34) See the documentary The Smartest Guy in the Room (2005), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxzLX_C9Z74
35) Michael Ledeen, “What Machiavelli (A Secret Jew?) Learned from Moses,” Jewish World Review, 7 juin 1999, www.jewishworldreview.com/0699/machiavelli1.asp
36) Livia Rokach, Israel’s Sacred Terrorism: A Study Based on Moshe Sharett’s Personal Diary and Other Documents, Association of Arab-American University Graduates, 1986, p. 42-49.
37) Alan Hart, Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Volume 2: David Becomes Goliath, p. 42-49.
Kevin Barrett
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.
Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.
Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.
Published on 7 May 2014
THE
JEWISH GAS CHAMBER HOAX is a Revisionist documentary which provides
revelatory evidence debunking the greatest hoax in human history -
"The Holocaust" -- the fraudulent claim that six million Jews were murdered by Germans, mostly in "Gas Chambers disguised as Shower Rooms."
Never before seen evidence helps prove that Treblinka was a transit camp, far from the "Pure Extermination Camp" myth currently promoted by the Holocaust religion.
In never before seen footage, Jews themselves who were transited through Treblinka describe the process of being transferred from Treblinka to other camps, along with hundreds and thousands of other men women and children. Documentation is presented which affirms that Treblinka was no top secret "pure extermination center", but a simple transit camp where many Jews took real showers in order to keep them alive.
The absurdity of diesel gassings, non-existent mass graves, forced confessions, and more are covered in THE JEWISH GAS CHAMBER HOAX, a new documentary from the filmmaker of THE LAST DAYS OF THE BIG LIE.
www.gaschamberhoax.com
"The Holocaust" -- the fraudulent claim that six million Jews were murdered by Germans, mostly in "Gas Chambers disguised as Shower Rooms."
Never before seen evidence helps prove that Treblinka was a transit camp, far from the "Pure Extermination Camp" myth currently promoted by the Holocaust religion.
In never before seen footage, Jews themselves who were transited through Treblinka describe the process of being transferred from Treblinka to other camps, along with hundreds and thousands of other men women and children. Documentation is presented which affirms that Treblinka was no top secret "pure extermination center", but a simple transit camp where many Jews took real showers in order to keep them alive.
The absurdity of diesel gassings, non-existent mass graves, forced confessions, and more are covered in THE JEWISH GAS CHAMBER HOAX, a new documentary from the filmmaker of THE LAST DAYS OF THE BIG LIE.
www.gaschamberhoax.com
No comments:
Post a Comment