Thurs 01/08/2015 False Flag Weekly News
TOTAL HOAX BUSTED, DESTROYED, BLOWN APART...!app=desktop
Paris Hoax Shooting Blown Wide Open blood added later in wrong place
100% debunked as Fake
- ZIONIST LOBBY'S WAR AGAINST ARABS, ISLAM, MUSLIMS AND REVISIONISM!!!!!!!
- ROTHSCHILD (LIBÉRATION) AND JEWISH BACKED,
- RACIST, BLASPHEMOUS, HATE-MONGERING, SATYRICAL & PORNOGRAPHIC CHARLIE HEBDO - FORMER HARA-KIRI PORN!!!
- ROTSCHILD'S WAY OF BOOSTING SALES OF A BANKRUPT PORN MAGAZINE
- FROM HOLOCAUST "DENIERS" TO CHARLIE HEBDO "DENIERS"!!!THOSE WHO ARE "NOT CHARLIE HEBDO" MUST BE HOUNDED, JAILED, INDOCTRINATED...!!!
Charlie Hebdo - The Hidden Agenda Exposed
Published on 17 Jan 2015We don't have to speculate as to how this event is going to be used. It has already started. Sources, transcript and download links: http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charl...
Follow us on Facebook: http://facebook.com/StormCloudsGathering
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/SCGupdates
Donate: http://StormCloudsGathering.com/donate
Get weekly email updates: http://scgnews.com/scgnews_updates - "The remaining staff of Charlie Hebdo announced that publication was to continue as usual, with plans for a print run of one million copies for the next week’s issue, rather than its typical 60,000. (See here)"
- THE MOSSAD TERRORISTS CONVENIENTLY FORGOT TO SMASH THE PRESS RESPONSIBLE FOR PRINTING THE CARTOONS???????
News Feed
I
posted this piece yesterday, but it was mysteriously taken down
overnight; VT appears to have been hacked. So I had to re-post from a
back-up. Sorry to all the people whose comments were erased. This must
be an important story if the bad guys have to hack VT to try to stop it
as it goes viral.
By
Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor False Flag Weekly News just
finished a special report on the Charlie Hebdo spectacular in Paris:
Also check out the links to the stories we covered. I also did a special
radio show on Charlie Hebdo, including a verbal battle with neocon
propagandist Patrick Po…
www.veteranstoday.com
Kate Bates likes RT.
Sir
Malcolm Rifkind has requested data from the US to learn the extent of
British intelligence’s involvement in the CIA’s torture program. The UK
government’s...
rt.com
News Feed
I
posted this piece yesterday, but it was mysteriously taken down
overnight; VT appears to have been hacked. So I had to re-post from a
back-up. Sorry to all the people whose comments were erased. This must
be an important story if the bad guys have to hack VT to try to stop it
as it goes viral.
By
Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor False Flag Weekly News just
finished a special report on the Charlie Hebdo spectacular in Paris:
Also check out the links to the stories we covered. I also did a special
radio show on Charlie Hebdo, including a verbal battle with neocon
propagandist Patrick Po…
www.veteranstoday.com
truthjihad.com blog
NoLiesRadio produce Allan Rees writes:
https://plus.google.com/+HuffPostUK/posts/HgDXoao79kT
Press TV: So what you are saying is that actually this was a conspiracy for Muslims to play in the hands of their enemies. Well, there are questions also surrounding the timing of the insulting movie, its coincidence with 9/11 and the US elections is also a month to go there.
Glenn: Yes, absolutely. You know, in 11 years since 9/11, there have been no terrorist attacks in the United States. And so the American people are beginning to ask questions: Why are we still at war? Why are young people so being set off to fight in these theatres such as Iraq and Afghanistan? You know, Osama bin Laden is dead; there have been no terrorist attacks; we are going bankrupt fighting these wars. Perhaps it is time to bring our troops home and to go back to peace and prosperity.
I think that this entire debacle that is taking place that the main bull’s-eye in this thing, I mean the big agenda here that is being pushed is to prepare the mind of the American people so that they will sign on to increase military adventures against Iran.
AHK/MSK/JR
THE UGLY TRUTH (MARK GLENN)
I, you, we and all of us are pursuing truth and happiness for human beings, which is unfortunately a victim of world powers.
This is a historical opportunity to undermine all inhuman relations and put an end to prejudices, which have questioned the truths and separates them, to build a new beautiful world based on love, justice and beauty.
This is a historical and certainly achievable objective. It only needs our hands, minds and hearts to join each other.
I pray Great God to bless you, who love humanity and wish success for all. I hope to meet you in a better future.
By Sam Kiley, Foreign Affairs Editor | Sky News – 1 hour 6 minutes ago
Motive for the attack: The newspaper has attracted worldwide attention for its scurrilous depictions of the prophet Muhammad.
The attacks now appear to have ended after 72 hours of carnage. A total of twenty people were killed at four locations between 7 and 9 January, including the three suspects. At least twenty-one others were injured, some critically. The attacks are the deadliest act of terrorism in France for fifty-four years.
The remaining staff of Charlie Hebdo announced that publication was to continue as usual, with plans for a print run of one million copies for the next week’s issue, rather than its typical 60,000. (See here)
To many observers, the Charlie Hebdo shootings would appear to have all the hallmarks of a false flag attack. There are many unanswered questions. Even as we write, events on the ground are changing.
Watch this spot for further developments.
There were other people, perhaps millions of them all over the world, who thought just like me.
Like the Saker, I too am not a Muslim. I am a Roman Catholic Christian. I also believe firmly in freedom of speech. “Feel free to say whatever you want,” I like to advise. “Have total freedom to say what you want. But be prepared to accept the consequences of free speech.”
If you wish to spit in Islam’s face, do so—at your peril.
If you wish to insult the Prophet Mohammed, or Jesus Christ, or the Buddha, or anyone else for that matter, feel free to do so—and take the consequences of your folly.
Spit and be spat upon. Kill with vicious words and be killed by guns. Hate your neighbor and expect to be hated in return.
Assuming this terrorist act was done by Muslims—something, incidentally, we have no right to assume right now—how many Muslims deserve to be arrested and tortured? The answer is three Muslims, at the very most, assuming you believe in torture like the Americans and Israelis.
How many Muslims had nothing to do with this act and are absolutely innocent? I will tell you: 1.6 billion Muslims minus three.
That’s a lot of innocent Muslims.
This I will say: if you keep goading people to a pitch of frenzy by ridiculing their religion and insulting their honor, sooner or later you will get your teeth smashed in. And deservedly so. Among the French cartoonists killed in Paris recently, I learn that one was a Jew and all the rest were devout Zionists blowing the trumpet for Israel. That’s interesting.
Let’s observe a minute’s silence and shed a few (hopefully genuine) tears for these “heroes” of free speech. After all, they didn’t deserve to be killed just for spitting in people’s faces for a living and smirking contemptuously, “Hey, this is freedom of speech! Aren’t we brave!”
Insulting the prophet Mohammed in the name of free speech appeared to be their constant delight. For which they were paid, and paid quite generously, by those who have a vested interest in whipping up Islamophobia.
Mocking Christianity was also part of their agenda, much to the delight of international Jewry, their principal paymasters, who offered them both moral and financial support in their “satirical” undertakings — “hate speech” when used against Jews. but “satire” and “courageous free speech” when directed at Muslims and Christians, the Jews’ most hated enemies.
They would have loved her for saying, “I hope the Jews DID kill Christ! I’d fucking do it again—in a second!”
Maybe insulting the prophet Mohammed will soon be made compulsory in order to drive all Muslims crazy. And then, when they have predictably reacted with rage to our constant provocations, we will have the perfect excuse we need to pull their beards, knock off their turbans, trample on their Qur’ans, obliterate Syria and Iran, grab hold of Middle Eastern oil, and, finally, allow our favorite country, Israel, to expand its borders from the Nile to the Euphrates.
Note one thing, my friends: this freedom of speech, which is so very precious and of which we make such a fetish, does not include freedom to criticize Israel or question the Holocaust.
You may mock Jesus Christ
as much as you want, but you must not mock Anne Frank. Poke fun at
Christ carrying his Cross—no problem!—but don’t dare to breathe a word
about Anne Frank’s sacred ball point pen!
The French cartoonists who died recently (God rest their souls) never satirized Auschwitz. They would never have dared to expose “The Diary of Anne Frank” (see cartoon opposite) as a fake, by pointing out that much of it had been written with a ballpoint pen, invented only in 1951, whereas Anne Frank had died in Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and so couldn’t possibly have written the entire book herself.
Nor did these courageous French “martyrs for free speech” ever have the guts to criticize the war crimes of Israel. Oh no, they thought the Israelis were doing a fine job slaughtering women and children in Gaza like flies—like this Palestinian child here, her face half blown off by an Israeli sniper.
These cowardly cartoonists kept all their scorn for the prophet Mohammed and the Lord Jesus Christ, much to the delight of the Jews whose dirty work they did so well and whose contemptible mercenaries they remained to their last dying breath.
Terrorist, die! We’ll rip your fucking heart out! We’ll torture you to death!
So much for free speech, my friends. Free speech for them. For the rest of us, silence.
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Paris "Charlie Hebdo" attack": another Zionist false flag?
Just one month ago, France set off a stampede when its lower house voted
to recognize Palestine. Now Palestine is in the International Criminal
Court, poised to take down Israel for genocide.
Suddenly "Islamic terror strikes France." Is Paris being punished for its pro-Palestine vote?
In late 2013, Malaysia's Kuala Lumpur Tribunal found Israel guilty of
genocide. A few months later, Malaysian planes started falling out of
the sky.
In 2011, Norway's Labor Party's youth wing was poised to impose a
complete blockade on Israel. Suddenly the entire leadership of the
Party's youth wing was slaughtered in a professional operation falsely
attributed to a lone nut, Anders Breivik.
NoLiesRadio produce Allan Rees writes:
https://plus.google.com/+HuffPostUK/posts/HgDXoao79kT
They had a camera well placed beforehand to film the attack.
They spoke perfect French
Killed with military precision.
Dressed in military style.
Killed from a target list.
Got away clean.
French President shows up afterwards and then convenes emergency meeting on what measures to enact.
Multiple shooters.
Could this be false flag from French Intel Agency?*
So far, it walks like one, it talks like one, and it perpetuates the 9/11 false-flag narrative about "radical Islam" like one.
So I'm calling it a false flag until proven otherwise.
* OF COURSE IT IS!!!
* OF COURSE IT IS!!!
PS: Running updates:
Zionists are already trying to use this event to stop the surging Alain Soral / Dieudonné movement: http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Tuerie-a-Charlie-Hebdo-Frederic-Haziza-accuse-Alain-Soral-et-Dieudonne-30100.html
Terrorist dropped his ID at the scene of the crime?! Give me a break!!!!!!
Zionist propaganda rolled out on cue
Mossad attacks Paris?
Labels:
breivik,
charlie hebdo,
false flag,
inside job,
Israel,
Mossad,
Palestine,
paris,
terrorism,
Zionism
THERE WE GO AGAIN!
Planted ID card exposes Paris false flag
Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:38AM
Police investigators search for evidence during an operation in the eastern French city of Reims, January 8, 2015.
French Interior Minister Bernard
Cazeneuve says the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo would never
have been caught had they not made one fatal mistake: They conveniently
left an ID card in their abandoned getaway car.
KB/MKA
Since when did criminals leave their identification cards in abandoned getaway cars?
An
ordinary citizen, taking no precautions, might accidentally leave a
wallet or purse in their parked car. I have driven automobiles
approximately 50,000 times in my life, and I think my wallet might have
slipped out of my pocket and fallen into the crack between the driver’s
seat and the door...once.
What are the odds that skilled
terrorists who have just carried out an ultra-professional
special-forces style attack will accidentally leave their ID card in the
abandoned getaway car? Answer: Effectively zero.
So why are police reporting an event that cannot have happened?
Assuming
that French police really did find “terror suspect” Said Kouachi’s ID
card in an abandoned getaway car, that ID card must have been planted by
someone wishing to incriminate Kouachi. Even the legendary French idiot
detective, Inspector Clouseau, could not fail to make this thunderingly
obvious inference.
The discovery of Kouachi’s ID does not
implicate him; it exonerates him. It shows that he is an innocent patsy
who is being framed by the real perpetrators of the attack.
Police
and intelligence agencies routinely plant evidence to support false
narratives, convict innocent people, and exonerate themselves. American
police who kill unarmed citizens often plant a gun on the corpses to
support their claims of having killed in self-defense. Such throw-down
guns, which the police call “ham sandwiches,” are kept in police locker
rooms and carried in police cars in case they are needed.
Likewise,
throw-down ID cards and other “incriminating” documents are routinely
used by the military, intelligence, and special forces professionals who
orchestrate false flag operations. Consider the ludicrously-obvious
planted evidence used in the mother of all false-flag operations: the
September 11th, 2001 inside job.
Intelligence agents planted not
just one, but two “magic suitcases” designed to incriminate Mohamed
Atta, the innocent patsy framed for the crimes of September 11th.
According to Der Spiegel’s book Inside 9/11: What Really Happened, the
first Atta suitcase was handed to German police by a self-described
“good Samaritan burglar.” The so-called burglar claimed to have stolen
Atta’s suitcase during the course of a burglary and discovered
terrorism-related information in it. As an honorable citizen, this
kind-hearted burglar felt compelled by his conscience to deliver the
suitcase to the authorities.
According to Der Spiegel, the German
police, not being fools, knew that the self-styled burglar was not
really a burglar at all, but an intelligence agent planting fake
evidence against Atta. Der Spiegel quotes German police as saying: “The
only question is, which intelligence agency was he working for?” (“CIA
and Mossad,” answered former German Intelligence Minister Andreas Von
Bülow in his book The CIA and September 11th.)
Despite its absurd
origins, this suitcase full of fabricated documents provides virtually
the only purported evidence supporting the official story of Atta’s
supposed terrorism-related activities in Germany. Aside from the good
Samaritan burglar’s suitcase, it seems that the original Egyptian Atta –
the one in Germany – was a gentle, shy, sensitive, soft-spoken
architecture student with no connections to terrorism of any kind. Yet
the “Atta” who made a spectacle of himself in Florida before 9/11,
staging memorable public scenes while all but wearing an “I am an
al-Qaeda terrorist” sign around his neck, was a coarse, obscene, violent
loudmouthed braggart who dated strippers, disemboweled kittens, and
spoke fluent Hebrew.
The Hebrew-speaking Atta’s second and
better-known “magic suitcase” was the one he allegedly checked in on his
early morning flight from Portland, Maine to Boston on September 11th,
2001. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the suitcase was
miraculously preserved and delivered to the authorities when it somehow
failed to make the transfer from Atta’s Portland-to-Boston commuter
flight onto Flight 11, which Atta supposedly piloted into the North
Tower of the World Trade Center. Had the suitcase been transferred as it
should have been, we are told, it would have been destroyed in a
fireball at the World Trade Center.
This magic suitcase provided
the only evidence allowing authorities to identify the alleged 19
hijackers within 24 hours of the event. (None of the 9/11 passenger
lists contained any Arab names; no airline employees remember having
ticketed or boarded any of the alleged hijackers; and none of the
hundreds of security cameras at Boston’s Logan Airport, Washington
D.C.’s Dulles Airport, or Newark Airport took a single authenticated
frame of any of the 19 Arabs blamed for 9/11.)
This suitcase not
only contained a list of the 19 patsies, but also Atta’s supposed last
will and testament. (Why would a suicide hijacker check his will onto a
doomed plane?) Britain’s dean of Middle East journalism Robert Fisk has
ridiculed Atta’s alleged will, pointing out that it begins with a
botched bismillah: “In the name of God, myself, and my family...” No
Muslim would ever write such a thing. As Fisk suggests, the document
purporting to be Atta’s will must have been forged by an incompetent
intelligence agent. The suitcase was obviously planted.
And that
is not just Robert Fisk’s opinion. Seymour Hersh, the dean of American
investigative journalism, quotes a senior US intelligence source as
saying, with regard to Atta’s magic suitcase: “Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase.”
Atta’s
two magic suitcases are not the only examples of clumsily-planted 9/11
evidence. Another is the “magic passport” of alleged 9/11 hijacker Satam
al-Suqami. That passport, looking as pristine as the “magic bullet” of
the JFK assassination, was allegedly discovered by an anonymous
individual, with no chain of custody, near the two flat spots of smoking
ground where two 110-story towers somehow exploded into very fine dust.
But
Atta’s magic suitcases, the magic passport, beside the most
pathetically-planted 9/11 item of them all: The “Fatty Bin Laden
confession video” supposedly discovered in December 2001 by an anonymous
US soldier in Jalalabad, and delivered with no chain of possession to
be brandished by the Bush Administration as supposed proof of Bin
Laden’s guilt.
Professor Bruce Lawrence, a respected expert on Bin
Laden, has categorically stated of this video: “It’s bogus!” Lawrence
adds that his many acquaintances in the US intelligence community’s Bin
Laden units know that the video is bogus – but are afraid to say so in
public, because they are afraid of the implications of Bin Laden’s
innocence.
These and other examples show that the intelligence
agents who orchestrate false-flag terror spectacles often do not even
bother to disguise the blatantly-fabricated nature of the planted
evidence used to implicate patsies.
So we should not be terribly
surprised when the French police tell us – with a straight face – that a
highly professional fleeing terrorist would leave his ID card in an
abandoned getaway car.
Wednesday, 19 September 2012
BROTHER MARK GLENN'S ADVICE ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE
BROTHER MARK GLENN’S ADVICE
ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE
Anti-Islam movie, West’s conspiracy against Muslim world:
Analyst
Wed Sep 19, 2012 5:15PM GMT
Interview with Mark Glenn, from the Crescent and Cross
Solidarity Movement
So the notion that this is a conspiracy source, absolutely this [yes]. It
was done to inflame the Islamic world so as to further propagandize the West
into making war against the Middle Eastern countries."
Outrage and anti-US sentiment are growing across the Muslim
world over the controversial movie that insults Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).
Anti-US demonstrations, which began on September 11 over the anti-Islam film,
have been held across the Muslim world, with protesters storming US embassies
and torching US flags.
Over a dozen people
have already been killed in protests since the release of the film.
Press TV has conducted an interview with Mark Glenn, from the Crescent and Cross Solidarity Movement,
to further discuss the issue. What follows is an approximate transcription of
the interview.
Press TV: Mr. Glenn, protests are gaining
momentum around the world and more and more people are coming to this belief
that this move, this insulting movie, was more likely to be a deliberate act of
conspiracy.
Glenn: Yes, I think that is exactly what it was and I think that the
people responsible for putting this together, their reasons for doing it are
self-evident. They want the world to witness these uprisings and these protests
taking place as a means of defaming Islam and painting the Muslims as violent,
irrational people.
You know (blipped) … is saying this
that the Christian in the West because it is not my religion that has been
attacked in this per se but when I would counsel those in these, [all I want to
do] is to take
a step back and to understand that what they are doing by participating in
these things is that they are giving their enemies all of the ammunition that
they need in order to take Islam as a violent, irrational religion followed by
violent irrational people and all of this being on a course in order
to justify the
military brutality that has taken place in the past, that is taking place now
and will take place in the future if these evil doers are given a
free hand to do it.
So the notion that this is a conspiracy source, absolutely
this [yes]. It was done to inflame the Islamic world so as to further
propagandize the West into making war against the Middle Eastern countries.
Press TV: So what you are saying is that actually this was a conspiracy for Muslims to play in the hands of their enemies. Well, there are questions also surrounding the timing of the insulting movie, its coincidence with 9/11 and the US elections is also a month to go there.
Glenn: Yes, absolutely. You know, in 11 years since 9/11, there have been no terrorist attacks in the United States. And so the American people are beginning to ask questions: Why are we still at war? Why are young people so being set off to fight in these theatres such as Iraq and Afghanistan? You know, Osama bin Laden is dead; there have been no terrorist attacks; we are going bankrupt fighting these wars. Perhaps it is time to bring our troops home and to go back to peace and prosperity.
And so these organized pro-war interests, Zionist interest, organized
Jewish interest-- whatever you want to call them-- they have to from
time to time remind the American people why they are going bankrupt fighting
these wars and why they should continue to go bankrupt fighting these wars and
so that is exactly what this entire stunt in making this movie was all about,
was to bring the American people back to the morning of 9/11 of 2001 and also
in order to set
the stage for further military action, unfortunately, against your own country
of Iran.
I think that this entire debacle that is taking place that the main bull’s-eye in this thing, I mean the big agenda here that is being pushed is to prepare the mind of the American people so that they will sign on to increase military adventures against Iran.
AHK/MSK/JR
P.S. Many lives were lost uselessly after Jewish
sponsored renegade Salman Rushdie released his SATANIC VERSES attacking
Muhammad and Muslims and blaspheming Islam!
For outraging Muslims around the world and causing the deaths of many,
Salman Rushdie was knighted by the Freemasonic and Druidic German Squatter
Queen of B’rit’ain! B’rit in “Hebrew”
means Covenant or Contract and the B’rit’ish monarchs retrace their roots to
King David, the Lion of Judah and the Jewish Qabbalah. (BAFS)
THE UGLY TRUTH (MARK GLENN)
“As The War Drums Beat”
Merlin Miller, President–Americana Pictures
I contemplate my recent trip to
the Islamic Republic of Iran and ask myself who wants war between
America and Iran. I quickly surmise that it is not the American people,
nor the Iranian people, but globalists (international bankers and their
multinational beneficiaries). They control Israel, the American media
and most of our politicians…and by extension our foreign policy.
My journey to this exotic and
little understood land began with an invitation to “New Horizon – The
First International Independent Filmmakers Festival”. It was a
conference and festival held in Tehran from September 2nd through
September 7th. Filmmakers and intellectuals from around the world
attended. It was one of the most stimulating experiences that I have
ever had and an effective bridge between diverse cultures and
perspectives – with the purpose of promoting truth, justice, liberty,
and peace.
This initiative was undertaken,
not by America or other world leaders, but by a country unfairly
besieged with sanctions and threats of war. My observations were in
stark contrast to the perceptions of most Americans. What I experienced
was a devout country with a love of God, family, and nation – and an
uncompromising respect for the noblest of human endeavors.
As I write this, a giant,
beautiful book, Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, lies next to me. Khayyam’s
wonderful poems have survived the test of time and are a testament to
the normally peaceful spirit of the Persian people. This treasure was
given to me by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Inside its back cover, he
inscribed the following for me (transcribed from Farsi):
In the name of God who loves human beings.
My dear brother:
I, you, we and all of us are pursuing truth and happiness for human beings, which is unfortunately a victim of world powers.
This is a historical opportunity to undermine all inhuman relations and put an end to prejudices, which have questioned the truths and separates them, to build a new beautiful world based on love, justice and beauty.
This is a historical and certainly achievable objective. It only needs our hands, minds and hearts to join each other.
I pray Great God to bless you, who love humanity and wish success for all. I hope to meet you in a better future.
(signed)
M. Ahmadinejad
September 8, 2012
M. Ahmadinejad
September 8, 2012
I found President Ahmadinejad to
be a humble man with a firm handshake and intense, intelligent eyes.
Despite his courteous and dignified bearing, he has been regularly
berated, and routinely misrepresented, by a controlled western media. Is
their demonization justified, or has he been targeted as the lone
political figure standing against Zionist powers? This is my attempt to
represent truths, such that the world might have a better understanding
of Iran, its people, and its leadership.
The Iranian people are similar to
Europeans in appearance…a beautiful people, poised and kind. Their
women wear clothing which modestly cover them, but in elegant fashion
and with serene faces that are usually exposed. They return smiles and
are not treated as second class citizens, as we have been conditioned to
believe. In fact, they outnumber men in higher education enrollments.
There is no profanity and women are safe on any Tehran street – at any
time of day or night. The influences of western civilization have not
been totally removed, but the Iranians resist the decadence of
cultural-Marxism. I attribute this largely to their faith and love of
family. I was surprised to discover that the Islamic faith actually
honors Jesus and Christianity. However, through Zionist media control,
policy dictates, and other manipulations, the Christian world is
incessantly convinced that Muslims should be our enemies and that we
should be theirs.
Muslims look with jaundiced eye
upon the outrageous media lies and perpetual assaults on their faith and
culture. Hollywood’s promotion of twisted films can provoke extremist
reactions, and we are then led to believe that Muslims are all radicals.
We never question the bizarre promotion of these divisive, Zionist
inspired productions, or the actions of multinational interests in the
internal affairs of sovereign Islamic nations. Were we to look honestly
at the many false portrayals, we would see remarkable similarities to
how our Christian communities have also been assaulted – increasingly
with contempt and disrespect by these same Zionist and Cultural Marxist
propagandists. They seek a globalist new world order – devoid of the
diversity and freedoms associated with independent nation states.
As I wandered from the festival
grounds to meet people on the streets, I found them to be most helpful
and without animosity – despite my obvious American nationality. I
enjoyed their exotic food and came to appreciate the craftsmanship of
their products. The only negative sensation that I had was in witnessing
the mad house traffic situation in Tehran. A city of 15 million, it has
grown faster that it’s infrastructure. Despite this, the city is
thriving with new construction and beautiful parks and monuments – which
reflect a noble and accomplished people. The Iranians seemingly love
Americans, but are rightly concerned and critical of our irrational and
invasive government policies. The common response seems to be “why would
your country want to attack us?”
The current condemnation of Iran
is supposedly due to the possibility that they may develop nuclear
weapons. We should all work for a world free from nuclear threat, but
the sovereignty of nations must also be respected. Iran is signatory to
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and has opened their facilities for
inspection, declaring their interest is for energy development only. No
evidence to the contrary has been shown, and Iran’s Supreme Leader, the
Ayatollah Khamenei condemns nuclear weaponry – actually declaring a
“Fatwa” against them – as it is contrary to their nation’s faith.
However, Israel, their chief accuser (and architect behind the campaign
to falsely accuse Iraq of possessing “weapons of mass destruction”), is
believed to possess over 300 nuclear weapons. Israel is not signatory to
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and has no intention of sharing
information or opening their facilities for inspection – yet America
continues to march to their fanatical war drums against others. Why is
there no pressure on Israel to meet the same standards and why are we
imposing “sanctions” against a nation that has done us no wrong? It is a
preliminary act of war, and only imposed because Israeli lobbies demand
it of our lap-dog politicians, who incredibly serve Zionist interests
rather than the American people.
Iran is a strategic rival for
regional hegemony in the resource rich middle-east and has stood strong
for Islamic unity. They also courageously and most justifiably call for
an end to the Palestinian occupation – the ruthless suppression of an
enslaved people, largely funded by America. There is no greater
injustice than that being perpetrated against the Palestinian people.
World condemnation, through the United Nations is consistently blocked
by U.S. actions on the Security Council. As a result, the Non Aligned
Nations Movement (NAM) is growing as an alternative to the UN. Its
recent success is not generally reported in Western media, but 120
nations came together in Tehran the week before the New Horizon Film
Festival – in unity and in opposition to the evils of the Israeli
occupation of Palestine. The Secretary General of the United Nations
even attended, as well as observers from Russia and China. The
Palestinian occupation and Israeli aggressions (including “false flag”
operations against other nations) are at the root of the discontents for
Zionism.
As President Ahmadinejad gave me
copy of Khayyam’s works, I gave him copy of my western motion picture,
“Jericho”, and my political book, “Our Vision for America”. When I asked
him what messages I might convey to the American people, he indicated
“truths” and “Iran’s desire for peace”. Through lies and evil acts,
Globalists and Zionists falsely portray Iran, as they seek conflict
between nations. I later told him that our State Department should be
meeting with Iran’s leaders and not depending on the initiatives of
private citizens, like me. However, I hope that he and the Iranian
people take hope in the prospect that many patriotic Americans are
awakening to the evils that have consumed us, even while our politicians
continue to betray the otherwise good spirit and traditions of the
American people. Growing numbers seek answers that might save America
and truly promote world peace.
Americans do not want war, and
are beginning to realize that our politicians, of both major parties,
initiate these actions against the wishes of the American people – and
in accord with the intrigues of international bankers and their Zionist
agents. It is time we stopped them by creating alternatives in politics,
and in media. Iran sees the need and is taking appropriate initiatives,
and so should America.
I went to Iran to promote the
prospects for producing “False Flag”, a critically important motion
picture. I returned to America more committed than ever to produce this
political thriller and, through commercial entertainment, help awaken a
sleeping America. Vital truths must be revealed so that new evils are
not perpetrated against the people of America and Iran, with destructive
effects resonating throughout the world. I also return committed to
building a viable third party, which will represent traditional working
class Americans, rather than perpetuating a corrupt two party system,
which serves special global interests. God willing, my answer to the
courageous efforts of President Ahmadinejad is “I also hope to meet you
in a better future”.
Merlin Miller is a West Point
graduate, US Army veteran, engineer, writer, filmmaker
(www.Americana-Pictures.com) and 2012 Presidential candidate
(www.MerlinMiller2012.com)
Like this:
You and one other blogger like this.
MORE SHIT TO DISTRACT US FROM THE REAL ISSUES AND TO TERRORISE THE GULLIBLE MASSES!!!
Al Qaeda 'Plotting New Massacre' In Britain
By Sam Kiley, Foreign Affairs Editor | Sky News – 1 hour 6 minutes ago
View PhotoAl Qaeda 'Plotting New Massacre' In Britain
Al Qaeda is plotting to massacre huge numbers of civilians in Britain and other western countries, the head of Mi5 has warned. (???)
Andrew Parker, director general of the security service, told a select
group mostly from the Royal United Services Institute at his London
headquarters that while the so-called Islamic State is the newest threat
to the West and that self-started lone wolf plots are hard to foil, al
Qaeda still has ambitions for something more spectacular.
He said: "We know that terrorists based in Syria
harbour... ambitions towards the UK - trying to direct attacks against
our country, and exhorting extremists here to act independently."
But this was in addition to newly identified plans from al Qaeda to revisit their traditional style of operations.
He said: "…we still face more complex and ambitious plots that follow
the now sadly well-established approach of al Qaeda and its imitators:
attempts to cause large scale loss of life, often by attacking transport
systems or iconic targets.
"We know, for example, that a group of core al Qaeda terrorists in Syria is planning mass casualty attacks against the West."
Al Qaeda experts are known to have moved from Pakistan to Syria, where
they may be able to draw on British volunteers to conduct attacks in the
UK. Their mission is entirely focussed on plots against the West.
They are known to be led by Muhsin al Fadhli, an expert bomb maker
wanted by the FBI who has a $7m price on his head. He moved to Syria two
years ago and was unsuccessfully targeted in a coalition air strike
last year.
It is also known that British citizens are in the ranks of al Qaeda in Syria and could be used in a major atrocity back home.
The domestic spy chief spoke hours after UK's COBRA committee ordered a boost to national security.
Home Secretary Theresa May said: "Following the attacks we took the
precautionary step yesterday of increasing security at the French-UK
border.
"The UK threat level, which is set by the independent Joint Terrorism
Advisory Centre, remains at severe; that means a terrorist attack is
highly likely and the public should remain vigilant.
"This morning I chaired COBRA to consider Britain's response to the attacks and our own preparedness to a similar attack."
Extra police have already been deployed at British ports and stations serving the Eurostar.
Lone wolf plots aimed at the police and military have surged over the
last year and these have combined with the Paris killings to cause
unease among officers.
"It's a huge worry for us," said Sir Peter Fahy, chief constable of Greater Manchester Police.
"There is a particular increased threat to police officers at the
moment and there have been a number of attacks foiled in differed parts
of the country, but I can tell you that our officers are very concerned
about it… they see what happened in France, and clearly we are an
unarmed police force but it is the nature of that threat which is
worrying but despite that our officers go out there and do their duty."
Such concerns from front line police reflect similar fears in the
intelligence community. Put simply - the world is getting more
dangerous.
"Al Qaeda is plotting to massacre huge numbers of civilians in Britain and other western countries"???????
The Paris Massacre: they had it coming
Update
On 7 January 2015, at about 11:30 am, two masked gunmen forced their way into the offices of the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris, France. They killed twelve people, including the editor Stéphane “Charb” Charbonnier, seven other Charlie Hebdo employees, and two National Police officers, and wounded eleven others.Motive for the attack: The newspaper has attracted worldwide attention for its scurrilous depictions of the prophet Muhammad.
The attacks now appear to have ended after 72 hours of carnage. A total of twenty people were killed at four locations between 7 and 9 January, including the three suspects. At least twenty-one others were injured, some critically. The attacks are the deadliest act of terrorism in France for fifty-four years.
The remaining staff of Charlie Hebdo announced that publication was to continue as usual, with plans for a print run of one million copies for the next week’s issue, rather than its typical 60,000. (See here)
To many observers, the Charlie Hebdo shootings would appear to have all the hallmarks of a false flag attack. There are many unanswered questions. Even as we write, events on the ground are changing.
Watch this spot for further developments.
§
“Okay, let’s be clear. I am not Muslim. I oppose terrorism. I don’t even support the death penalty. I oppose violence as a means to make a political or ethical point. I fully support freedom of speech, including critical speech and humor.When I read those words in an article called I am NOT Charlie, by an author who calls himself “the Saker”, I gave a sigh of relief. Why? Because it turns out I wasn’t the only one to have entertained such dangerous thoughts that could get me put away as a potential Al Qaeda sympathizer.
But this morning I am most definitely NOT Charlie.
In fact, I am disgusted and nauseated by the sick display of collective hypocrisy about the murders in France. Here is why: The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming!”
There were other people, perhaps millions of them all over the world, who thought just like me.
Like the Saker, I too am not a Muslim. I am a Roman Catholic Christian. I also believe firmly in freedom of speech. “Feel free to say whatever you want,” I like to advise. “Have total freedom to say what you want. But be prepared to accept the consequences of free speech.”
If you wish to spit in Islam’s face, do so—at your peril.
If you wish to insult the Prophet Mohammed, or Jesus Christ, or the Buddha, or anyone else for that matter, feel free to do so—and take the consequences of your folly.
Spit and be spat upon. Kill with vicious words and be killed by guns. Hate your neighbor and expect to be hated in return.
§
It is the morning of Thursday, 8 January.
I am confronted by a shelf of newspapers in
a busy department store. This is in London, England, one of the three
capitals of the Empire of Evil, the other two being Washington and Tel
Aviv.
I hear the murmurs of people around me.
They are outraged. Their cheeks are flushed, their hands are bunched
into fists. Their eyes are red with rage and their lips are quivering.
They want to kill someone. Who? You guessed it: they want to kill 1.6 billion Muslims!
Here are the newspaper headlines that are whipping us all into a froth of hysteria:
“Attack on Freedom” — The Times.“War on Freedom” — The Daily Telegraph.“An Assault on Democracy” — The Guardian.“NON! A policeman is murdered in cold blood for defending free speech. This evil in the name of Islam MUST STOP!” — The Sun, owned by Rupert Murdoch, the man who introduced topless titillation to Britain in the form of sleazy page-three girls. I turn to page 3 to check if the usual luscious lady, flashing her tits, is still there. She isn’t. The poor darling has been banished to page 9 to make room on page 3 for a dose of screaming hysterics and concentrated Islamophobia.“Massacred in minutes—Britain on red alert as jihadis shoot 12 dead in Paris.” — The Daily Express, owned by Jewish tycoon Richard Desmond who made his fortune selling porn magazines and who dined at Downing Streets on more than one occasion with Britain’s war criminal Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Whew, no wonder the seething crowds around me are baying for Muslim blood! “Kill the bastards! Wipe out the dirty ragheads! Fuck the Palestinians! Let’s bomb Iran!” Ah, words of music to the Zionist press which have done their job only too well!
And here was this man, “the Saker”, saying
that the French cartoonists who had been killed in the Paris Massacre
had been asking for it.
“The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming!” he has the nerve to say. “I am NOT Charlie!”
Wow, what a lunatic! If he’d said that in
front of these frothing maniacs, queuing up to buy their newspapers and
seething with anger over Muslims, they would have torn him apart. I
bought six papers, composing my face into a mask of icy indifference, as
if I too wanted to knock off the nearest turban and dance with delirium
over a mound of Qur’ans.
This is how one survives in a police state: by pretending that one’s indoctrination by the state has been successful.
I am a zombie . . . please don’t kill me!
§
The Saker writes: “Check out the caricature which one of the folks who got murdered yesterday had just posted. The text reads: “Still no terrorist attacks in France — Wait, we have until the end of January to send you our best wishes!”
“There is an expression in Russian: spitting in somebody’s soul,” the Saker continues. “It fully applies here. Muslims worldwide need to be unambiguously clear about that. They take blasphemy very, very seriously, as they do the name of the Prophet and the Quran.If you want to really offend a Muslim, ridicule his Prophet or his Holy Book. That is not a secret at all. And when Charlie Hebdo published their caricatures of the Prophet and when they ridiculed him in a deliberately rude and provocative manner, they knew what they were doing: they were very deliberately and deeply offending 1.6 billion Muslims all over the world.
Oh, and did I mention that in Islam blasphemy is a crime punishable by death?
Well, it turns out that of 1.6 billion Muslims exactly three decided to take justice into their own hands and kill the blasphemous Frenchmen, deliberately blaspheming — one a Jew and the rest all nice little Zionists on the payroll of international Jewry. (Phrase in italics added by Lasha Darkmoon).
You don’t have to be Muslim or to approve of the death penalty for blasphemy to realize that this was inevitable and that this has nothing to do with Islam as a religion. Offend any group as large as 1.6 billion people and sooner or later you will find 2-3 people — call them “fanatics” if you will — who will resort to violence to make you pay for it.
This is a statistical inevitability. (See here)
THE AMERICAN EMPIRE’S NEW FREEDOM FIGHTER
“What is going on here?” the Saker asks rhetorically. He thinks the Paris massacre is the French government’s version of 9/11. It gives them the pretext they need to intimidate and torture France’s 4.7 million Muslims and confiscate their Qur’ans.Assuming this terrorist act was done by Muslims—something, incidentally, we have no right to assume right now—how many Muslims deserve to be arrested and tortured? The answer is three Muslims, at the very most, assuming you believe in torture like the Americans and Israelis.
How many Muslims had nothing to do with this act and are absolutely innocent? I will tell you: 1.6 billion Muslims minus three.
That’s a lot of innocent Muslims.
“I am disgusted beyond words,” the Saker concludes, “[with these people] who made their money spitting in the souls of billions of people and then dared them to do something about it.
And I am under no illusion whatsoever about the fact that cui bono clearly indicates that the French regime either organized it all, or let it happen, or, at the very least, intends to make capital out of it.
But most of all I am disgusted with all those who play along and studiously avoid asking the right questions about all this. I guess they really are “Charlies”, all of them.
I am not.
§
I fully agree with everything the Saker has said. At the risk of getting myself hated for exercising my freedom of speech, I would like to add a few points to the Saker’s courageous analysis. He is much to be commended for refusing to shed crocodile tears for this bunch of impudent scoundrels who made a living out of mocking 1.6 billion people and trampling on their most cherished values.This I will say: if you keep goading people to a pitch of frenzy by ridiculing their religion and insulting their honor, sooner or later you will get your teeth smashed in. And deservedly so. Among the French cartoonists killed in Paris recently, I learn that one was a Jew and all the rest were devout Zionists blowing the trumpet for Israel. That’s interesting.
Let’s observe a minute’s silence and shed a few (hopefully genuine) tears for these “heroes” of free speech. After all, they didn’t deserve to be killed just for spitting in people’s faces for a living and smirking contemptuously, “Hey, this is freedom of speech! Aren’t we brave!”
Insulting the prophet Mohammed in the name of free speech appeared to be their constant delight. For which they were paid, and paid quite generously, by those who have a vested interest in whipping up Islamophobia.
Mocking Christianity was also part of their agenda, much to the delight of international Jewry, their principal paymasters, who offered them both moral and financial support in their “satirical” undertakings — “hate speech” when used against Jews. but “satire” and “courageous free speech” when directed at Muslims and Christians, the Jews’ most hated enemies.
A correspondent Greg Bacon writes: “Hedbo’s cartoons make me vomit, especially the one showing Jesus Christ sodomizing God the Father and the Holy Ghost sodomizing Jesus Christ. That’s not comedy, it’s vulgar, obscene porn. I’m not into religion, but that’s disgusting.”The Jewish comedienne Sarah Silverman, the nice young lady who likes humping dogs and licking their anuses in various video skits—see here—and who gets many a cheap laugh by insulting Christianity in America, would have been a great hit with these satirical French journalists.
He forgets to mention the obvious: that all this is a direct and vicious attack on Christianity by an organization financed by Jews.
They would have loved her for saying, “I hope the Jews DID kill Christ! I’d fucking do it again—in a second!”
Sarah Silverman, exercising her right of “free speech.”
Freedom of speech is indeed precious.Ask yourself: would a Christian comedian be allowed to mock the Holocaust in the same way? Sarah, thank your lucky stars that Christian jihadists haven’t blown your brains out! No chance of that ever happening, I guess, since Christians believe in turning the right cheek when the Jew strikes the left one. Christianity has its uses, it seems. It keeps Christians docile and submissive and makes them only too happy to acquire virtue by being kicked around.
Maybe insulting the prophet Mohammed will soon be made compulsory in order to drive all Muslims crazy. And then, when they have predictably reacted with rage to our constant provocations, we will have the perfect excuse we need to pull their beards, knock off their turbans, trample on their Qur’ans, obliterate Syria and Iran, grab hold of Middle Eastern oil, and, finally, allow our favorite country, Israel, to expand its borders from the Nile to the Euphrates.
Note one thing, my friends: this freedom of speech, which is so very precious and of which we make such a fetish, does not include freedom to criticize Israel or question the Holocaust.
Make one satirical comment about Auschwitz, or express doubts about six million Jews dying in gas ovens, and you will end up behind bars in 16 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Switzerland, and Romania.
You may mock Jesus Christ
as much as you want, but you must not mock Anne Frank. Poke fun at
Christ carrying his Cross—no problem!—but don’t dare to breathe a word
about Anne Frank’s sacred ball point pen!The French cartoonists who died recently (God rest their souls) never satirized Auschwitz. They would never have dared to expose “The Diary of Anne Frank” (see cartoon opposite) as a fake, by pointing out that much of it had been written with a ballpoint pen, invented only in 1951, whereas Anne Frank had died in Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and so couldn’t possibly have written the entire book herself.
Nor did these courageous French “martyrs for free speech” ever have the guts to criticize the war crimes of Israel. Oh no, they thought the Israelis were doing a fine job slaughtering women and children in Gaza like flies—like this Palestinian child here, her face half blown off by an Israeli sniper.
These cowardly cartoonists kept all their scorn for the prophet Mohammed and the Lord Jesus Christ, much to the delight of the Jews whose dirty work they did so well and whose contemptible mercenaries they remained to their last dying breath.
Yes, they had it coming! They were asking for it! For blowback. For their just deserts. For the iron law of karma to take effect. — “The wheel has come full circle, I am here!”But shush! be quiet! don’t say it out too loud! Or you will suddenly learn the bitter truth: that only those who wear the iron boot have the right to free speech: to mock you and trample on all you hold dear, and that if you try and avenge your honor and smash the dirty bastards back in the teeth—heaven help you!
Terrorist, die! We’ll rip your fucking heart out! We’ll torture you to death!
So much for free speech, my friends. Free speech for them. For the rest of us, silence.
I am NOT Charlie
By The Saker
January 08, 2015 "ICH" - Okay, let's be clear. I am not Muslim. I oppose terrorism. I don't even support the death penalty. I loathe Takfirism. I oppose violence as a means to make a political or ethical point. I fully support freedom of speech, including critical speech and humor.
But this morning I am most definitely NOT Charlie.
In fact, I am disgusted and nauseated by the sick display of collective hypocrisy about the murders in France. Here is why:
Charlie Hebdo for the Darwin Awards
The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming. Here is what I wrote about them in September 2012 when they published their famous caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed: Worthy of the Darwin Awards, if you ask me. Excellent, the “gene pool” of the French “caviar-Left” badly needs some cleaning". Today I fully stand by my words.
Let me ask you this: what
would be the point of, say, taking a nap on
train tracks? You don't have to "agree"
with the train which will run you over, but
it still will, won't it? What about taking
a nap on train tracks specifically to make a
point? To prove that the train is bad? To
dare it? To make fun of it? Would that not
be the height of stupidity? And yet, that
is *exactly* what Charlie Hebdo did. I
would even argue that that his how Charlie
Hebdo made it's money, daring the "Muslim
train" to run them over. You think I am
exaggerating? Check out the caricature
which one of the folks who got murdered
yesterday had just posted. The text reads:
"Still no terrorist attacks in France -
Wait, we have until the end of January to
send you are best wishes". The crazy
person shown in the drawing is packing a
Kalashnikov and wearing an Afghan "Pakol"
- the typical "crazy Muslim" in Charlie
Hebdo's world. Talk about a stupid dare...
"Spitting in people's souls"
There is an expression in Russian: spitting in somebody's soul. It fully applies here. Muslims worldwide have be unambiguously clear about that. They take blasphemy very, very seriously, as they do the name of the Prophet and the Quran. If you want to really offend a Muslim, ridicule his Prophet or his Holy Book. That is not a secret at all. And when Charlie Hebdo published their caricatures of the Prophet and when they ridiculed him the a deliberately rude and provocative manner, they knew what they were doing: they were very deliberately deeply offending 1.6 billion Muslims world wide. Oh, and did I mention that in Islam blasphemy is a crime punishable by death? Well, it turns out that of 1.6 billion Muslims exactly three decided to take justice in their own hands and kill the very deliberately blaspheming Frenchmen. You don't have to be Muslim or to approve of the death penalty for blasphemy to realize that this was inevitable and that this has nothing to do with Islam as a religion. Offend any group as large as 1.6 billion and sooner or later you will find 1-5 folks willing to use violence to make you pay for it. This is a statistical inevitability.
Are some victims more equal then others?
So 12 deliberately "soul spitting blasphemers" were murdered and all of France is in deep mourning. The media worldwide does such a good job presenting it all as a planetary disaster that many thousands people worldwide say "I am Charlie", sob, light candles and take a "courageous" stance for freedom of speech.
Crocodile tears if you ask me.
The fact is that the
AngloZionists have carefully and lovingly
nurtured, organized, armed, financed,
trained, equipped and even directed the
Takfiri crazies for decades. From the war
in Afghanistan to Syria today these
murderous psychopaths have been the
foot-soldiers of the AngloZionist Empire for
decades. But, apparently, nobody cares
about their victims in Afghanistan, in
Bosnia, in Chechnia, in Kosovo, in Libya, in
Kurdistan, in Iraq or elsewhere. There
these liver-eating murderers are "freedom
fighters" who get full support. Including
from the very same media which today is in
mourning over Charlie Hebdo. Apparently, in
the western ethos some victims are
more equal then others.
And when is the last time somebody in Europe shed a single tear over the daily murders of innocent people in the Donbass whose murder is paid for and directly directed by the western regimes?
How stupid do they think we are?
And then this. Even a drooling idiot knew that Charlie Hebdo was THE prime target for that kind of attack. And I promise you that French cops are not drooling idiots. Yet, for some reason, they were nowhere to be seen that day. Only a van with two (or one?) cop was parked nearby (hardly an anti-terrorist protection detail) and one poor cop was shot and then executed with an AK shot to the head while he was begging for mercy. Is this the best the French state can do?
Hardly.
So what is going on here? I will tell you what - the EU 1%ers are now capitalizing on these murders to crack down on their own population. Sarkozy already met Hollande and they both agreed that new levels of firmness and vigilance need to be implemented. Does that not reek of a French 9/11?
So no, I am most definitely NOT Charlie this morning and I am disgusted beyond words with the obscene display of doubleplusgoodthinking "solidarity" for a group of "caviar-lefties" who made their money spitting in the souls of billions of people and then dared them to do something about it. And I am under no illusion whatsoever about the fact that cui bono clearly indicates that the French regime either organized it all, or let it happen or, at the very least, makes maximal political use of it all.
But most of all, I am disgusted with all those who play along and studiously avoid asking the right questions about all this. I guess they really are "Charlies" all of them.
I am not.
The Saker blogs at http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.com
By The Saker
January 08, 2015 "ICH" - Okay, let's be clear. I am not Muslim. I oppose terrorism. I don't even support the death penalty. I loathe Takfirism. I oppose violence as a means to make a political or ethical point. I fully support freedom of speech, including critical speech and humor.
But this morning I am most definitely NOT Charlie.
In fact, I am disgusted and nauseated by the sick display of collective hypocrisy about the murders in France. Here is why:
Charlie Hebdo for the Darwin Awards
The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming. Here is what I wrote about them in September 2012 when they published their famous caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed: Worthy of the Darwin Awards, if you ask me. Excellent, the “gene pool” of the French “caviar-Left” badly needs some cleaning". Today I fully stand by my words.
 |
| Just a stupid dare? |
"Spitting in people's souls"
There is an expression in Russian: spitting in somebody's soul. It fully applies here. Muslims worldwide have be unambiguously clear about that. They take blasphemy very, very seriously, as they do the name of the Prophet and the Quran. If you want to really offend a Muslim, ridicule his Prophet or his Holy Book. That is not a secret at all. And when Charlie Hebdo published their caricatures of the Prophet and when they ridiculed him the a deliberately rude and provocative manner, they knew what they were doing: they were very deliberately deeply offending 1.6 billion Muslims world wide. Oh, and did I mention that in Islam blasphemy is a crime punishable by death? Well, it turns out that of 1.6 billion Muslims exactly three decided to take justice in their own hands and kill the very deliberately blaspheming Frenchmen. You don't have to be Muslim or to approve of the death penalty for blasphemy to realize that this was inevitable and that this has nothing to do with Islam as a religion. Offend any group as large as 1.6 billion and sooner or later you will find 1-5 folks willing to use violence to make you pay for it. This is a statistical inevitability.
Are some victims more equal then others?
So 12 deliberately "soul spitting blasphemers" were murdered and all of France is in deep mourning. The media worldwide does such a good job presenting it all as a planetary disaster that many thousands people worldwide say "I am Charlie", sob, light candles and take a "courageous" stance for freedom of speech.
Crocodile tears if you ask me.
 |
| The Empire's freedom fighter |
And when is the last time somebody in Europe shed a single tear over the daily murders of innocent people in the Donbass whose murder is paid for and directly directed by the western regimes?
How stupid do they think we are?
And then this. Even a drooling idiot knew that Charlie Hebdo was THE prime target for that kind of attack. And I promise you that French cops are not drooling idiots. Yet, for some reason, they were nowhere to be seen that day. Only a van with two (or one?) cop was parked nearby (hardly an anti-terrorist protection detail) and one poor cop was shot and then executed with an AK shot to the head while he was begging for mercy. Is this the best the French state can do?
Hardly.
So what is going on here? I will tell you what - the EU 1%ers are now capitalizing on these murders to crack down on their own population. Sarkozy already met Hollande and they both agreed that new levels of firmness and vigilance need to be implemented. Does that not reek of a French 9/11?
So no, I am most definitely NOT Charlie this morning and I am disgusted beyond words with the obscene display of doubleplusgoodthinking "solidarity" for a group of "caviar-lefties" who made their money spitting in the souls of billions of people and then dared them to do something about it. And I am under no illusion whatsoever about the fact that cui bono clearly indicates that the French regime either organized it all, or let it happen or, at the very least, makes maximal political use of it all.
But most of all, I am disgusted with all those who play along and studiously avoid asking the right questions about all this. I guess they really are "Charlies" all of them.
I am not.
The Saker blogs at http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.com
Click for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note-
Translation may take a
moment to load.
What's your response?
-
Scroll down to add / read comments
Call them sheeple. Lemmings. Zombies. New World Order mind control slaves.
Whatever you call them, the drooling dimwits chanting “we are Charlie” are the all-time greatest argument for Rockefeller-style eugenic euthanasia. (Which, incidentally, should start with the Rockefellers.)
And don’t get me started on those “world leaders” who led the le défilé des idiots. These scumbag-psychopath “leaders” are the worst terrorists on earth. Take Netanyahu – please! Where are the black ski mask guys with AK-47s when we need them? Somebody call in a drone strike!
But seriously, folks, it isn’t easy being a three-digit-IQ Muslim in a world full of one-digit-IQ infidels. Frankly, I’m getting tired of trying to explain things to people who should know better…a category that includes pretty much everybody who isn’t too stupid to live.
It’s a dirty job, but somebody’s gotta do it.
First, this Charlie Hebdo thing (dramatic drum roll) is the most obvious freakin’ false flag imaginable. If inside jobs were hamburgers, this one would come with “the works” – throw-down ID in an abandoned getaway car, Police Commissioner conveniently suicided, intel-cutout patsies murdered, blatantly fake “terrorist kills cop” propaganda video…it doesn’t get any better (or should I say worse) than this.
You will be facing the same situation – except a whole lot more grievous – if you obscenely insult my Prophet. A whole lot of us Muslims are just that way.
We’ll struggle all-out to control ourselves. Maybe 99% of us, or even 99.9%, will succeed. But if one day somebody loses it and goes off on you, you shouldn’t pretend to be surprised.
Maybe you don’t hold anything sacred, not even your womenfolk’s honor. Or maybe there are certain “fighting words” that you’d feel compelled to avenge. Maybe I could walk up to you in a bar and start talking trash about your female family members and you’d turn the other cheek. Then again, maybe you wouldn’t. If I tried that, and got my ass kicked, or even got my ass shot, would you organize a million moron march in my memory? The thought of a million morons marching down the Champs Elysées carrying signs reading “Je suis Kevin”…c’est trop délicieux.
So yes, many Muslims will grow very, very angry if you cross the line in obscenely attacking their prophet. That is a well-known fact…background knowledge for the psy-op specialists tasked with staging murderous PR stunts to keep the clash-of-civilizations a-clashing.
And that’s how this false flag was arranged: Find some creep cartoonists who are practically begging for Muslims to come after them…and then dress up your blue-eyed (!) Special Forces guys in ski masks and stage a professional slaughter.
Next, whip out the genocide propagandists and useful idiots.
I have seen more out-and-out lies in the Charlie Hebdo propaganda stories than even I imagined the MSM could be capable of. A few examples from my favorite Mossadnik rag will suffice.
The Huffington Post published a gargantuan genocidal big lie story: These Are The Charlie Hebdo Cartoons That Terrorists Thought Were Worth Killing Over. But that’s a lie. This story features only relatively inoffensive Charlie Hebdo cartoons. It leaves the really sick, obscene stuff out. People who read this mendacious Huffington Post piece, and who don’t understand that it was a false flag, are going to think that the Charlie Hebdo creeps were – as so many “house Muslims” disgustingly intone – “innocent.” Bullshit. They were vicious, evil, blasphemous pornographers pumping out genocide propaganda. And rather than being murdered by blue-eyed Special Forces officers dressed up as Wahhabis, they should have been tried, condemned, and hanged, whether for genocide propaganda in a secular courtroom, or for blasphemy in an Islamic one. (The genocide I am referring to, of course, is the 9/11-false-flag-triggered War on Islam, which has killed more than one million Muslims, ruined the lives of tens of millions, and aims at eradicating Islam in part by targeting its sacred symbols for blasphemous, pornographic annihilation.)
HuffPost, a well-known Zionist mouthpiece, also published another Goebbels-style propaganda lie, this time by an author with a Muslim name. I am referring to Fathima Imra Nazeer’s sickening To Prevent Another Charlie Hebdo, Reconsider the Example of Muhammed. This airhead (or Mossad operative using an Islamic pen name) begins by invoking the “good Muslim vs. bad Muslim” dichotomy:
“Many Muslims are rightfully outraged by the attack on Charlie Hebdo way more than they would ever be offended by some caricature of Muhammed. Unfortunately, there are some Muslims who are quick to justify this atrocity as well.”
The “good Muslims” she cites are the pathetic, Guantanamo-terrorized house Muslims who are complicit in their own genocide; while her “bad Muslim” is the illiterate idiot Anjum Chaudary, London’s walking, talking advertisement for Islamophobia. This is a classic false dichotomy, like Bush’s “either you’re with us, or you’re with the terrorists.” And like Bush’s line, it was designed by Zionist psy-op specialists as part of the ongoing effort to delegitimize self-defense-while-Muslim.
Nazeer then slanders the Qur’an, saying: “The Quran encourages the killing of ‘those who spread mischief’ against Allah and Muhammed.” That’s a big lie. If you follow her link, you’ll find it goes to a passage that might be roughly translated as:
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against God and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,
“Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.”
The passage – which was revealed in, and refers to, the context of a desperate defensive war – says nothing about “spreading mischief against Allah and Muhammad.” Instead, it clearly states that to merit capital punishment, the war criminal must be guilty of all of the following:
*Waging war against God.
*Waging war against God’s messenger.
*Striving to cause corruption. (The Arabic word fasad indicates a very strong, extreme form of corruption; the word mischief, which connotes the naughty tricks of children, is light-years away from the correct meaning. In other words, the war criminal must be working really, really hard to do really, really terrible things.)
Only a very uncharitable mufti would say that Nazeer, by viciously slandering the Qur’an and the Prophet in her lying article, was guilty of all of the three parts of this crime. If I were called for Islamic jury duty, I would vote to let her off with a reprimand. It could be that she has psychological problems, or perhaps her grotesque mistranslation is an innocent mistake.
I’m joking, of course. There is no such thing as Islamic jury duty, and if there were, I would find a way to get out of it.
But the Qur’anic passage Nazeer mistranslates is revealing. It suggests that in a desperate, defensive war to defend a community founded on the sacred, the worst crimes merit the harshest punishments…but that repentance and mercy are better than punishment.
Which, like everything else in the Qur’an, displays its profound understanding of human nature. Any community founded on the sacred – and all communities are, one way or another – will fight to defend itself and what it holds sacred…and the more desperate the struggle, the more powerful and nastier the enemies, the more harshly will attempts at order-restoring justice be meted out. To take one historical example, when the US was collapsing from the Great Depression, it began executing people in far greater numbers than ever before or since. A decade later, the desperation felt by all the belligerent parties during World War II led to their committing unprecedented atrocities.
Since the Western powers-that-be have forced the ludicrous official story of 9/11 down our throats – a story that 80% of Muslims worldwide know is a lie – we Muslims feel, rightly or wrongly, that we are in desperate straits. Over a million have been murdered for this lie. Tens of thousands have been tortured. Our religion is under genocidal attack.
But we must not fight back by stupidly lashing out…and providing our enemies with the propaganda ammunition they seek.
There is a famous “Muslim anger management” story:
“Caliph Ali was once fighting in a war imposed on Muslims, and the chief of the Unbelievers confronted him. During the fight, the Ali was able to overcome his enemy, who fell on the ground and Ali was about to kill him. The enemy, knowing his fate, had no hope so he spit on the face of Ali. Ali immediately got up and left him alone. The man came running to him and asked, ‘You had a chance to kill me since I am a Polytheist; how come you didn’t use your sword?’ Ali said, ‘I have no personal animosity toward you. I was fighting you on behalf of God. If I had killed you after you spat on my face, then it would have become my personal revenge which I do not wish to take.’ That Unbeliever chief became a Muslim immediately.”
If you insult my Prophet (or female family member) and I strike you out of anger, that is a failure on my part. A natural failure, one that we might hope and pray will not be judged too severely by the only Judge who counts; but a failure nonetheless.
The greater jihad is the struggle for self-control, the struggle to be a better person. The lesser jihad is the struggle to defend the community…whether by force of arms, or by waging “the best jihad…(which) is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant.”
Obviously we need a whole lot of both varieties these days.
“Je suis brainwashed”
Million morons march for big lies & genocide
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
Call them sheeple. Lemmings. Zombies. New World Order mind control slaves.
Whatever you call them, the drooling dimwits chanting “we are Charlie” are the all-time greatest argument for Rockefeller-style eugenic euthanasia. (Which, incidentally, should start with the Rockefellers.)
And don’t get me started on those “world leaders” who led the le défilé des idiots. These scumbag-psychopath “leaders” are the worst terrorists on earth. Take Netanyahu – please! Where are the black ski mask guys with AK-47s when we need them? Somebody call in a drone strike!
But seriously, folks, it isn’t easy being a three-digit-IQ Muslim in a world full of one-digit-IQ infidels. Frankly, I’m getting tired of trying to explain things to people who should know better…a category that includes pretty much everybody who isn’t too stupid to live.
It’s a dirty job, but somebody’s gotta do it.
First, this Charlie Hebdo thing (dramatic drum roll) is the most obvious freakin’ false flag imaginable. If inside jobs were hamburgers, this one would come with “the works” – throw-down ID in an abandoned getaway car, Police Commissioner conveniently suicided, intel-cutout patsies murdered, blatantly fake “terrorist kills cop” propaganda video…it doesn’t get any better (or should I say worse) than this.
Listen to Gordon Duff explain the ballistic evidence that proves Charley Hebdo was a false flag
But just because it was a false flag doesn’t mean that Muslims are always going to put up with obscene, blasphemous attacks on their Prophet. If you publish garbage like Charlie did, you are asking to get hurt…just like if I were to publish an obscene drawing of your mother or daughter or sister, only more so…MUCH more so. If you publish an obscene attack on my mother or sister or wife or daughter (assuming I had a daughter) I am going to be very, very angry with you…and you had best hope that I manage to control my anger…and, more pertinently, choose not to serve you a dish of cold revenge some day, perhaps years from now when you least expect it.You will be facing the same situation – except a whole lot more grievous – if you obscenely insult my Prophet. A whole lot of us Muslims are just that way.
We’ll struggle all-out to control ourselves. Maybe 99% of us, or even 99.9%, will succeed. But if one day somebody loses it and goes off on you, you shouldn’t pretend to be surprised.
Maybe you don’t hold anything sacred, not even your womenfolk’s honor. Or maybe there are certain “fighting words” that you’d feel compelled to avenge. Maybe I could walk up to you in a bar and start talking trash about your female family members and you’d turn the other cheek. Then again, maybe you wouldn’t. If I tried that, and got my ass kicked, or even got my ass shot, would you organize a million moron march in my memory? The thought of a million morons marching down the Champs Elysées carrying signs reading “Je suis Kevin”…c’est trop délicieux.
So yes, many Muslims will grow very, very angry if you cross the line in obscenely attacking their prophet. That is a well-known fact…background knowledge for the psy-op specialists tasked with staging murderous PR stunts to keep the clash-of-civilizations a-clashing.
And that’s how this false flag was arranged: Find some creep cartoonists who are practically begging for Muslims to come after them…and then dress up your blue-eyed (!) Special Forces guys in ski masks and stage a professional slaughter.
Next, whip out the genocide propagandists and useful idiots.
I have seen more out-and-out lies in the Charlie Hebdo propaganda stories than even I imagined the MSM could be capable of. A few examples from my favorite Mossadnik rag will suffice.
The Huffington Post published a gargantuan genocidal big lie story: These Are The Charlie Hebdo Cartoons That Terrorists Thought Were Worth Killing Over. But that’s a lie. This story features only relatively inoffensive Charlie Hebdo cartoons. It leaves the really sick, obscene stuff out. People who read this mendacious Huffington Post piece, and who don’t understand that it was a false flag, are going to think that the Charlie Hebdo creeps were – as so many “house Muslims” disgustingly intone – “innocent.” Bullshit. They were vicious, evil, blasphemous pornographers pumping out genocide propaganda. And rather than being murdered by blue-eyed Special Forces officers dressed up as Wahhabis, they should have been tried, condemned, and hanged, whether for genocide propaganda in a secular courtroom, or for blasphemy in an Islamic one. (The genocide I am referring to, of course, is the 9/11-false-flag-triggered War on Islam, which has killed more than one million Muslims, ruined the lives of tens of millions, and aims at eradicating Islam in part by targeting its sacred symbols for blasphemous, pornographic annihilation.)
HuffPost, a well-known Zionist mouthpiece, also published another Goebbels-style propaganda lie, this time by an author with a Muslim name. I am referring to Fathima Imra Nazeer’s sickening To Prevent Another Charlie Hebdo, Reconsider the Example of Muhammed. This airhead (or Mossad operative using an Islamic pen name) begins by invoking the “good Muslim vs. bad Muslim” dichotomy:
“Many Muslims are rightfully outraged by the attack on Charlie Hebdo way more than they would ever be offended by some caricature of Muhammed. Unfortunately, there are some Muslims who are quick to justify this atrocity as well.”
The “good Muslims” she cites are the pathetic, Guantanamo-terrorized house Muslims who are complicit in their own genocide; while her “bad Muslim” is the illiterate idiot Anjum Chaudary, London’s walking, talking advertisement for Islamophobia. This is a classic false dichotomy, like Bush’s “either you’re with us, or you’re with the terrorists.” And like Bush’s line, it was designed by Zionist psy-op specialists as part of the ongoing effort to delegitimize self-defense-while-Muslim.
Nazeer then slanders the Qur’an, saying: “The Quran encourages the killing of ‘those who spread mischief’ against Allah and Muhammed.” That’s a big lie. If you follow her link, you’ll find it goes to a passage that might be roughly translated as:
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against God and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,
“Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.”
The passage – which was revealed in, and refers to, the context of a desperate defensive war – says nothing about “spreading mischief against Allah and Muhammad.” Instead, it clearly states that to merit capital punishment, the war criminal must be guilty of all of the following:
*Waging war against God.
*Waging war against God’s messenger.
*Striving to cause corruption. (The Arabic word fasad indicates a very strong, extreme form of corruption; the word mischief, which connotes the naughty tricks of children, is light-years away from the correct meaning. In other words, the war criminal must be working really, really hard to do really, really terrible things.)
Only a very uncharitable mufti would say that Nazeer, by viciously slandering the Qur’an and the Prophet in her lying article, was guilty of all of the three parts of this crime. If I were called for Islamic jury duty, I would vote to let her off with a reprimand. It could be that she has psychological problems, or perhaps her grotesque mistranslation is an innocent mistake.
I’m joking, of course. There is no such thing as Islamic jury duty, and if there were, I would find a way to get out of it.
But the Qur’anic passage Nazeer mistranslates is revealing. It suggests that in a desperate, defensive war to defend a community founded on the sacred, the worst crimes merit the harshest punishments…but that repentance and mercy are better than punishment.
Which, like everything else in the Qur’an, displays its profound understanding of human nature. Any community founded on the sacred – and all communities are, one way or another – will fight to defend itself and what it holds sacred…and the more desperate the struggle, the more powerful and nastier the enemies, the more harshly will attempts at order-restoring justice be meted out. To take one historical example, when the US was collapsing from the Great Depression, it began executing people in far greater numbers than ever before or since. A decade later, the desperation felt by all the belligerent parties during World War II led to their committing unprecedented atrocities.
Since the Western powers-that-be have forced the ludicrous official story of 9/11 down our throats – a story that 80% of Muslims worldwide know is a lie – we Muslims feel, rightly or wrongly, that we are in desperate straits. Over a million have been murdered for this lie. Tens of thousands have been tortured. Our religion is under genocidal attack.
But we must not fight back by stupidly lashing out…and providing our enemies with the propaganda ammunition they seek.
There is a famous “Muslim anger management” story:
“Caliph Ali was once fighting in a war imposed on Muslims, and the chief of the Unbelievers confronted him. During the fight, the Ali was able to overcome his enemy, who fell on the ground and Ali was about to kill him. The enemy, knowing his fate, had no hope so he spit on the face of Ali. Ali immediately got up and left him alone. The man came running to him and asked, ‘You had a chance to kill me since I am a Polytheist; how come you didn’t use your sword?’ Ali said, ‘I have no personal animosity toward you. I was fighting you on behalf of God. If I had killed you after you spat on my face, then it would have become my personal revenge which I do not wish to take.’ That Unbeliever chief became a Muslim immediately.”
If you insult my Prophet (or female family member) and I strike you out of anger, that is a failure on my part. A natural failure, one that we might hope and pray will not be judged too severely by the only Judge who counts; but a failure nonetheless.
The greater jihad is the struggle for self-control, the struggle to be a better person. The lesser jihad is the struggle to defend the community…whether by force of arms, or by waging “the best jihad…(which) is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant.”
Obviously we need a whole lot of both varieties these days.
Monday, January 19, 2015
Persecuted writer-editor Arthur Topham: "Zionists assault free speech"
Broadcast January 21st, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on NoLiesRadio.org.
For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of TruthJihad.com and go to the "Private Blog" to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air - become a subscriber today!
Canadian author-editor-publisher Arthur Topham of RadicalPress.com
has twice been persecuted – I mean, prosecuted – for saying things
Zionists don't like. Now that the dubious Charlie Hebdo incident is
rallying Zionists in support of "free speech" (pornographic blasphemy)
it's time to point out that these people are really the world's biggest
enemies of free speech. See my new article:
CNN host lynched by hasbara shills
Arthur Topham is a natural target for persecution; this guy doesn't mince words. In a recent letter to Canadian Green Party leader Elizabeth May, Arthur writes:
Now it appears that (our leaders') unwillingness to confront reality also extends to the overwhelming volume of evidence that indicates direct complicity of the Jewish state with the massive false flag event of September 11, 2001 known around the world as 9/11.
You may recall my own personal outrage and disappointment which I conveyed to you (and all the other federal leaders) when, during the insanely vicious and heinous slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza over the summer of 2014, code-named Operation Protective Edge, you and all of the other federal leaders vainly, arrogantly, and if I may stoop to the level involved, stupidly voiced your approval of this demonic act of barbarity by "standing with Israel", thus betraying not only yourselves but your parties and Canada itself as mere obeisant sock puppets of this foreign state that now holds the ignoble title and status of being the Number One criminal, rogue state on planet Earth. Whether you, or any of the other federal leaders, are unaware of this growing dichotomy between the collective consensus of Canadians that something is seriously amiss with your own blatant forms of narcissistic repudiation of what's happening in the world is difficult to imagine yet your common actions bespeak of just this sort of gaping gap between Truth and Falsehood. "
For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of TruthJihad.com and go to the "Private Blog" to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air - become a subscriber today!
CNN host lynched by hasbara shills
Arthur Topham is a natural target for persecution; this guy doesn't mince words. In a recent letter to Canadian Green Party leader Elizabeth May, Arthur writes:
Now it appears that (our leaders') unwillingness to confront reality also extends to the overwhelming volume of evidence that indicates direct complicity of the Jewish state with the massive false flag event of September 11, 2001 known around the world as 9/11.
You may recall my own personal outrage and disappointment which I conveyed to you (and all the other federal leaders) when, during the insanely vicious and heinous slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza over the summer of 2014, code-named Operation Protective Edge, you and all of the other federal leaders vainly, arrogantly, and if I may stoop to the level involved, stupidly voiced your approval of this demonic act of barbarity by "standing with Israel", thus betraying not only yourselves but your parties and Canada itself as mere obeisant sock puppets of this foreign state that now holds the ignoble title and status of being the Number One criminal, rogue state on planet Earth. Whether you, or any of the other federal leaders, are unaware of this growing dichotomy between the collective consensus of Canadians that something is seriously amiss with your own blatant forms of narcissistic repudiation of what's happening in the world is difficult to imagine yet your common actions bespeak of just this sort of gaping gap between Truth and Falsehood. "
I hope the Isreali people do something to rein him in before Isreal is destroyed….forever!
CHAPTER I – “TEACHER, WHAT GOOD MUST I DO…? ” (Mt 19:16)
– Christ and the answer to the question about morality
Actress in anti-Muslim movie sues for its removal online; sues filmmaker for fraud
Share this:
Like this:
Bon appétit with the French Jewish Marxist porn!
P.S. THIS IS WESTERN CIVILISATION!
Competitors in Brazil's Miss Bum Bum pageant wait to record a TV program in Osasco, a surburb of Sao Paulo, on September 24. Brazil's upcoming municipal elections are being overshadowed by the online contest, which seeks to find the cutest female behind
New French cartoons inflame prophet film tensions
THE UGLY TRUTH (MARK GLENN)
Egypt Issues Arrest Warrants for Terry Jones and Anti-Islam Filmmaker
Share this:
Like this:
Kevin Barrett's radio show schedule
Monday, January 12, 2015
Gordon Duff on Charlie Hebdo hoax; John Whitehead on "enslaved by technology"
For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of TruthJihad.com and go to the "Private Blog" to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air - become a subscriber today!
Fiasco France: Lie to Me Once (updated)
Excerpt:
Fiasco France: Lie to Me Once (updated)
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
The recent events in Paris, whether hateful and obnoxious leftists were shot, and few on this earth begged for it more, or police were killed by terrorists now conclusively proven to have been shooting blanks, we simply don’t care. We are sick of the comic opera of carelessly staged false flag terrorism.
We will be featuring a series of videos that demonstrate ballistic performance. You see, Americans have AK47s and cameras, the French don’t, or most of the them anyway. If they did, whoever staged this might have thought first. When we are done, we will have exposed the epic “false flag fail” of all time. (link to original Liveleak video)
(Note: Double dust cloud caused by double impact of hot gasses followed by the paper plug from the blank cartridge. Subject (victim?) unaffected by shot drops two frames later. Normally a director would call for a retake in a scene like this.)
Gordon Duff
Gordon Duff is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists.He manages the world's largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.
Gordon Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than "several" countries.He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration.Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.
Visit Gordon Duff's YouTube Channel
Anti-Islam Film: Seventeen Killed in Pakistan
:: Pakistan
Tens of thousands protested around the country after the government encouraged peaceful protests and declared a national holiday - "Love for the Prophet Day".
But demonstrations turned violent as police and protesters clashed in several Pakistani cities – including Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad. Five people were killed in Peshawar and 12 in Karachi.
One of the dead was identified as Mohammad Amir, a driver for a Pakistani television station, who was killed after police opened fire on rioters torching a cinema in Peshawar.
The United States has paid for adverts on Pakistani television which show US President Barack Obama and US Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton denouncing the film.
But the president has also suggested Islamist extremists are manipulating the protests for their own ends.
"What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage of the video was used as an excuse by extremists to see if they could directly harm US interests," he said.
:: France
Meanwhile, security has been tightened in France after a satirical magazine published drawings featuring the Prophet Mohammed naked.
French authorities declared street protests had been banned and interior minister Manuel Valls said there would be a crackdown if the ban was challenged.
"There will be strictly no exceptions. Demonstrations will be banned and broken up," he said.
Charlie Hebdo magazine has said the cartoons were merely designed to satirise the international furore over the film, and the pictures have yet to cause public disorder in France.
But French embassies, schools and cultural centres have been shut in 20 Muslim countries, on orders from French authorities, and the magazine's offices have been put under police guard.
Mohammed Moussaoui, leader of the French Muslim Council, described both the film and the cartoons as "acts of aggression". But he appealed to French Muslims not to take to the streets to protest.
:: Germany
Several hundred people gathered in the city of Freiburg in southwest of Germany to protest the film. Police banned inflammatory slogans.
Some carried banners saying: "The dignity of the Prophet Muhammad is our dignity."
The Interior Ministry postponed a poster campaign aimed at countering radical Islam among young people due to tensions caused by the US-made video.
Posters for the campaign - in German, Turkish and Arabic - were meant to go on display in German cities with large immigrant populations on Friday, but are being withheld because of the changed security situation.
:: Iraq
About 3,000 people, mostly followers of Iranian-backed Shiite Muslim groups, protested against the film and French cartoons in Basra.
Demonstrators carried Iraqi flags and posters of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, chanting "death to America" and "no to America."
:: United Kingdom
Some 100 people gathered near the Bullring in Birmingham on Friday afternoon, although the motive of the protest is unclear. No violence has been reported.
:: Bangladesh
About 10,000 Bangladeshis took to the streets of Dhaka, outside the country's National Mosque, shouting slogans and carrying placards.
A mock coffin of President Obama was burnt and a mock execution was held of the creator of the film Innocence Of Muslims.
The protesters also set fire to a French flag as they carried placards stating "Obama, you are a cheater!" and "Protest the disgrace of Prophet Muhammed!"
About 90% of Bangladesh's 153 million people are Muslims.
:: Sri Lanka
In the Sri Lankan capital Colombo, up to 2,000 Muslims were reported to have burnt effigies of Mr Obama
One of the protest organisers, Mujibur Rahman, said Muslims in Sri Lanka "have come to the streets today to join with Muslims all over the world" to protest against the film's insults to Islam and Prophet Mohammed.
He threatened to continue protests if the "US fails to ban this film and arrest its creators".
:: North Africa
Tunisian authorities banned all demonstrations on Friday and in the Libyan city of Benghazi, where US ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed last week, but protests were being planned.
Lebanese Muslims, Sunnis and Shiites took part in protests in the southern port city of Sidon, where Sunni clerics called "a day of rage" against insults to the Prophet Mohammed but urged followers to contain their anger to inside the mosques.
:: Lebanon
Thousands gathered in the Bekaa valley for the latest in a series of protest rallies organised by the Shiite militant group Hezbollah. Protesters carried the yellow Hezbollah flag.
:: Malaysia
About 3,000 Muslims marched on the US embassy, burning an American flag topped with the Jewish Star of David.
Although there was no violence, angry demonstrators declared their willingness to sacrifice their lives to defend the honour of the Prophet Mohammed and warned "there will be consequences" over the film.
"We will not allow the prophet to be insulted. We are willing to sacrifice our lives and property," said Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, an official with the opposition Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party, which spearheaded the march.
:: Indonesia
Indonesians staged anti-French and anti-American protests in the capital Jakarta. Protesters gathered outside US and French embassies, which were closed on the Muslim holy day amid fears of violence.
Demonstrators targeted American fast food outlets, and there were minor scuffles with police.
In Medan, North Sumatra province, dozens of protesters from the hardline Islamic Defenders Front burnt an American flag outside the US consulate.
:: Afganistan
About 900 people have gathered for a protest against the film in the capital, Kabul, chanting "death to America" and burning an effigy of President Barack Obama and an American flag.
A few hundred demonstrators also protested inside a mosque in the eastern city of Ghazni. The protests were peaceful.
“Basheer so true, this along with the firing of the generals are good moves by Egypt.”
DEAR MJ
Salaam
Thanks for the observation.
As you know I have been spending quite some time interviewing and speaking to Satan himself, and I enjoy doing it, but this woman is worse than Satan. Miss Leigh Sales has hate written on her face and every word she utters is full of lies, hate, disinformation and venom.
Of course, Brother Mustafa is not a “preacher of hate”, and Miss Leigh knows this very well as she has gone through the ‘pain’ to find out whether he was preaching hate or not. Strangely enough, she should have known this was not true, but by some kind of (Jewish) miracle all she found was one fake website, most probably set up by MOSSAD, Jews or Zionists, with totally fabricated statements that Brother Mustafa confirms are not from Hizb ut Tahrir, and which she almost defiantly ‘handed over’ to him as HER evidence. And, she really did not seem concerned in the least that she was wrong, or caught up using disinformation live, when Brother Mustafa said “this does not look like our website”. Her main concern was exclusively about Jews and Israel.
“ERADICATING ISRAEL AND PURIFYING THE EARTH OF JEWISH FILTHS”. That is certainly hateful, isn’t it?
This is all she could come up with as evidence, a fake website! She does not give a damn about Muslims, about their suffering, about them being exterminated by the millions, starved, persecuted, exiled, tortured, demonised, and raped, and so on.
“DO YOU THIK THAT JEWS SHOULD BE ERADICATED?” This is all she is interested in, and she even condones the slaughter the West and the Jews (like Bernard Henri Lévi, Nicolas Sarkozy, Laurent Fabius…) carried out in Libya because she argues Colonel Ghaddafi committed the capital crime of “not doing a great job for its citizens”!
On the good side, Brother Mustafa managed to say without being interrupted (which shows that Miss Leigh is not that vicious!) what Hizb ut Tahrir and I have been saying for decades now, that WE NEED TO ESTABALISH A KHILAAFAH AND SHARI’A LAW IN OUR OWN MUSLIM LANDS!
Miss Leigh proves that she is just another stooge for Israel and the Jews or Jewish interest by trying to insinuate that Br Mustafa was condoning the killing of the US ambassador. Her logic stinks.
After admitting that she heard Br Mustafa say on a Youtube video: “American ambassadors should not be in Muslim countries. They should leave and go home.”, which he confirms, she asks Br Mustafa if he was saying THEREFORE THAT THE US AMBASSADOR WAS ASKING FOR IT BECAUSE HE WAS THERE, which, of course, he was not saying!
Lastly, our brave Miss Leigh seemed so concerned about a child carrying a sign saying:
“BEHEAD ALL THOSE WHO INSULT PROPHET MUHAMMAD!”
But, she shows no concern at all about all the Muslims that the West is beheading, bombing, killing, holocausting, on a daily basis.
But, I bet if Brother Mustafa would explain himself and Hizb ut Tahrir policy independently, no mainstream media would air it at all, including her.
Yet, on the whole, we have to give the she-devil her due, as she allowed Brother Mustapha to say what he wanted to say and toned down her aggressiveness near the end. So, she is not that bad after all, and may even make a good Muslimah, insha’Allah!
I am glad to see our Brother Mustafa keeping his calm. I would not have been able to. But, my initial remark (which I have removed) was that our Brother Mustafa was a blooming idiot for exposing himself and Muslims to ridicule like our Br Dr Tariq Ramadan does so often. This nonsense about “peaceful protest” by calling for street picnics where the innocent gets injured and even killed should stop! Sixteen got killed today FOR NOTHING in Pakistan!
Why not PEACEFUL BOYCOTT INSTEAD?
I went shopping to buy wholemeal sliced bread several times, but each time I found it had E471 in its ingredients, which is en anzyme obtained either from pork (cheaper to make) or beef. So, I did not buy it. Out of all the drinks they sell in the shops, I buy only juices pressed from fruits and with no artificial junk like aspartame. I try to avoid meat as much as possible because meat is a killer and eat as ‘natural’ as possible although I have not far to go in life. My grand daughters want me to live longer and I pray to God to give me health to be able to take care of them as long as possible! I do not waste food or money and do not buy junk like most City Muslims do! So, protesting is picnic (in my view) while boycotting hurts the usurious Jews and the war mongers EXACTLY where it should! Now, it is useless to protest when we support Muslim governments that are members of the Zionist United Nations Dictatorship! We will not be able to establish the Khilaafah as long as we bow down to UN dictates!
Without the Khilaafah, Islam will remain in the gutter and Muslims will continue to be exterminated!
Thanks again.
Salaam.
Basheer
PAK DEFENCE UNIT
Blasphemy or freedom of speech
Muslims have been protesting against the movie, at some places protests are staged in a peaceful way while in most states these have turned violent, such as the killing of American diplomats in Libya and the burning of public and private property and loss of innocent lives in Pakistan. This is not the first time when blasphemous act has been committed against Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), there has been a chain of events, at first books were written to defame the Prophat Muhammad (PBUH), then caricatures were drawn in Denmark and other European newspapers and now a malicious attempt has been made to produce a sacrilegious movie. This movie has followed by publication of caricatures of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in the Frenchmagazine Charlie Hebdo that have added fuel to anti-Western sentiments in Muslims.
In the post 9/11 era the wrong image of Islam has been portrayed in the Western societies and it is considered as a threat to Western civilization. New terminologies are being introduced that are being associated with Islam such as radicalization, extremism, fundamentalism, Islamic terrorism and Islamophobia. People like Sam Bacile are representing the so-called Islamophobia, the filmmaker has deliberated focused on fermenting violence. Filmmakers should have anticipated that it will create unrest and violence in Muslim societies because for the Muslims, love for Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) has been considered as part of the faith. Veneration of all prophets of Allah is a fundamental principle of faith in Islam. If we see what has been the reaction of Muslim states it becomes obvious that Muslim masses are protesting against blasphemy of their religion but their leaders are silent. They have not raised a collective voice. Unfortunately, there is lack of will on the part of Muslim leaders to project a common cause.
Criminalizing the defamation of religion has been on the agenda of OIC for some time but it could not get support from the western liberal democracies. At present, Turkey is heading the OIC, but it is not yet clear that organization has consulted with its members to bring a resolution to ban blasphemy. OIC member states must get agreed on a common agenda that UN should declare blasphemy as a criminal offence and should present their case from a unitary platform so that it could have a forceful effect. If denial of holocaust has been prohibited by law in majority of Western states to respect the sensitivities of 13 million Jewish population then why indifferent laws and practices against over 1.5 billion Muslim population?
It is our right to protest against such attacks on our religion but the protest should be staged in a peaceful manner. Our Prophet (PBUH) stood for peace in his whole life. If we resort to violent means and destruction of our own property then we may not be able to highlight the noble cause to which each one of us is duty bound to raise our voice. Western notion of freedom of speech and expression can not be accepted in its current form. There should be a clear distinction between what constitutes free speech and what will be considered as hate speech against any religion. Turkish Prime Minister has rightly said that free speech comes with boundaries, “Freedom of thought and belief ends where the freedom of thought and belief of others starts”.
UN Secretary General Ban ki-Moon referring to anti-Islam movie has also made it clear that the right of freedom of expression to provoke or humiliate some others’ values and beliefs can not be protected, it can only be guaranteed and protected as a fundamental right when it is used for common justice, and common purpose. To promote interfaith harmony, it is the duty of Western governments to take this issue seriously and to come up with some proposals that could address the discriminatory law of freedom of expression and could differentiate between freedom of speech and blasphemy.
Insults, incitement and Islam
Across the Muslim World there is rightly outrage and hurt at the latest calculated attack on Islam, in the form of the film trailer Innocence of Muslims. All who hold human rights and moral decency close to their heart share their indignation.Freedom of speech is a basic human right, protected under Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which states 1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference. And 2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression. Rights enshrined in law that are nevertheless denied to many, rights supposedly honoured in democratic countries.
Expressions of free speech that are little more than propaganda, that consciously incite hatred and spark acts of violence are rightly restricted under the very law that protects our freedom of expression. Article 20, paragraph 2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
Innocence of Muslims
The deliberately amateurish film with no real narrative portrays the Prophet Mohammed as a violent and lascivious fool. It is cheaply made, poorly acted and directed, and as a piece of filmmaking it is to be dismissed out of hand, but as The Guardian 17/09/2012 put it “the really sinister thing is that all this ham-fistedness and crassness is an important sense deliberate. It has to look like propaganda for the provocation to be effective.” The actors claim they did not know what the film was about, or it’s purpose and some speak of suing the producers. The BBC reports, “One actress featured in the film said she had no idea it would be used for anti-Islamic propaganda and condemned it.” Offensive dialogue that insults Islam and the Prophet Mohammed has been crudely added after filming.
The trailer was written and produced in the USA by Nakoula Basseley, a Coptic (Egyptian) Christian living in California, who drafted much of the script whilst serving a prison sentence for fraud. And directed, according to Gawker “by a 65-year-old schlock director named Alan Roberts …. He’s the creative vision behind soft-core porn classics like The Happy Hooker Goes Hollywood.” Whether a full film version exists is speculation, the trailer however has done its toxic, destructive work.
Basseley says his wife’s family paid for the film, but it is still unclear how it was funded or what the cost was. Whatever the amount, it is hard to justify any expense at all on a film rooted in such prejudice and hatred, which serves no purpose other than to hurt and insult Muslims throughout the World, reinforce negative stereotypes, incite violence and fuel division. The film is as The Guardian 17/09/2012 state “a bigoted piece of poison calculated to inflame the Muslim world… it might be risible were it not for the ugly Islamophobia which it promotes and whose effects are now being seen around the world.”
Intended fury
The film has unsurprisingly prompted widespread protests throughout the World. On the 11th September In Cairo protesters scaled the walls of the embassy, pulled down the US flag and called for the expulsion of the US ambassador to Cairo. In Libya the U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other American staff members were killed in the American embassy in what appears to have been an unrelated pre-planned military style attack, as The Observer 16/09/2012 comments “The murder of US diplomats was not carried out spontaneously, but by a jihadist militia that wanted to kill Americans on the 9/11 anniversary.”
Protests directly triggered by the offensive, degrading film, have since taken place in countries with large Muslim populations, sadly causing as the BBC 14/09/2012 reports more loss of life. “Three people were killed when the US embassy in Khartoum was attacked, Sudanese state radio said. In Tunisia, two people were killed after crowds breached the US embassy compound in Tunis. There was one death in Egypt and one in Lebanon.” In Yemen hundreds of students demonstrated in the capital Sanaa and demanded the US ambassador be expelled, thousands waved flags on the streets of Beirut and chanted “America hear us – don’t insult our Prophet.” The Guardian 17/09/2012 reports that Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah has “called for new demonstrations to express outrage at a film that denigrates Islam and the prophet Muhammad. “Prophet of God, we offer ourselves, our blood and our kin for the sake of your dignity and honour,” Nasrallah told supporters who chanted “death to Israel” and “death to America” at a rally in the southern Shia suburbs of Beirut.”
The Philippines Indonesia, usually calm Qatar, Afghanistan, London, Kashmir, all have witnessed demonstrations and in Pakistan access to You tube has been blocked by the government, the Prime Minister, rightly describing the film as “”blasphemous.” Such is the deep-seated feeling amongst the people of the Muslim community. An open wound has been deliberately inflamed and the people cry out in anger and frustration.
Free speech or incitement
The film and the reaction to it, has prompted much to be written and spoken about unrestricted free speech and the dangers of censorship. Writing in The Observer Nick Cohen argues that, “Nothing, however vile, justifies censorship. Even in the hardest of cases such as this anti-Islamic film, the old arguments against censorship remain the best.” The observation of basic human rights is the foundation for any democratic society and free speech is a fundamental requirement. Where it is absent totalitarian control of one kind of another becomes possible, perhaps inevitable.
There are though many methods of control and restriction of freedoms, both crude and subtle. Is for example the manufacturing of consent, a form of sociological coercion commonplace in America (and elsewhere) compatible with freedom and/or democratic principles of independent thinking and participation. Noam Chomsky, “the anti-democratic thrust of opinion in what are called democratic societies is really ferocious, and for good reason. Because the freer the society gets, the more dangerous the great beast becomes and the more you have to be careful to cage it somehow.” The ‘Great Beast’ is of course us – the 99%.
The making and distribution of this film is not an expression of freedom of any kind, it contributes nothing of value to the political environment or social discourse and has no artistic merit. The Anna Lindh Foundation reinforces this view in their statement made on 16/09/12, asserting “Innocence of Muslims is an inflammatory pamphlet, the distribution of which – on the anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11th – cannot be abridged to a manifestation of freedom of expression.”
International law, acting as a guide and aid to clarity of thinking, states there are limits to free speech. Where such expression is clearly based on racial or religious hatred and incites violence, then it is illegal and the perpetrators subject to prosecution. For where the law is infringed consequences follow – something Israel should be made aware of. What is crucial is the motive. If something is spoken, written, painted, drawn, filmed etc. with the premeditated intention of causing offense, because it is rooted in hatred of one kind or another it is outside the law.
Freedom of expression is indeed a fundamental human right, but it does not stand alone, or above other related rights, such as human dignity and mutual respect. All need to coexist and indeed all are indivisible.
Unless the filmmakers of Innocence of Muslims are completely naïve or plain stupid, they would have known that producing a film in which the Prophet Mohammed is portrayed, as a violent, promiscuous simpleton would inevitably cause offense and would probably result in violent demonstrations. Therefore the film breaches international guidelines on free speech, and should be banned, its makers charged and prosecuted. Al Jazeera 14/09/2012 quote the filmmaker Danny Schechter, whose view on the film is clear: “It is very political from beginning to end. It’s not about free expression; it’s about propaganda. The film is incitement – it’s not information, it’s not filmmaking and it’s really intended as a technique of war-making.”
What good can possibly come from continuing to allow such a distasteful film to be circulated? It serves no purpose other than to provoke further potential violence. Enabling Muslims to be marginalized and demonized once more, constructing some perverse justification for continued American and Israeli intimidation, aggression and the spreading of paranoia. Allowing this film to be shown or not has little to do with censorship and/or free speech, and to reduce this issue to such notions is a convenient, distraction, fabricated in order to avoid discussing the filmmakers intention and the underlying causes of Islamists hurt and anger, which arise largely out of American foreign policy.
Simmering resentment “the safeguard of justice”
Opinion amongst large numbers of Islamists throughout the Muslim World towards America is overwhelmingly negative. The Pew Research Center found in a recent survey that “There remains a widespread perception that the U.S. acts unilaterally and does not consider the interests of other countries. In predominantly Muslim nations, American anti-terrorism efforts are still widely unpopular.” In fact according to the Pew report only 15% of Muslims have confidence in President Obama, approve of his foreign policies and hold favorable views of America in general. Pew state, “In a number of strategically important Muslim nations, America’s image has not improved during the Obama presidency.” In fact it has deteriorated, as US policies throughout the region continue to cause consternation amongst large numbers of Muslims, (and of course more widely).
American support for Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine, which violates a host of international and indeed national laws and contravenes numerous UN resolutions, is perhaps top of the list. Followed by the Iraq war US involvement in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Yemen, long running proxy wars in Somalia, and US support for what the BBC call ‘friendly dictators’. Add confinement without trial, abuse and torture in Guantanamo and Bagram prisons, the burning of the Qur’an by US soldiers in Afghanistan and Florida Pastor Terry Jones and disrespecting the dead bodies of Afghans. The list is indeed long and damning, and so it goes on.
The recent demonstrations were simply sparked by the film Innocence of Muslims; it was of course not the root cause of the protests. As the BBC 15/09/2012 state “we are witnessing profound anti-Americanism, dormant for much of last year, fused with religious extremism – with the controversial Innocence of Muslims film merely a trigger.” Of course extremists were involved they never miss an opportunity, their violent actions distorting the events feeding prejudice and creating a convenient diversion from the issues.
US ideals of peace justifying conflict
All violence is to be condemned and the attacks that caused deaths and injuries resulting from these protests are no exception, they should not be allowed to take centre stage though, and it must be stated that the vast majority of actions undertaken have been peaceful and without incident. The Anna Lindh Foundation (ALF) says in relation to the protests that “the vast majority of Muslim public opinion has expressed its anger to the release of the film peacefully and individually, and the Arab governments of the region have reiterated their commitment with cultural inclusiveness while condemning the attacks to diplomatic delegations.”
To speak with solemnity and shock, calling for justice against the perpetrators of violence as US officials have, is expected and indeed right, albeit hypocritical and reactionary. In order to create peace however it is necessary to remove the causes of conflict, in this case those causes are complex and not confined to one poorly made deeply offensive film. Offensive let us add, not just to Muslims, who are understandably enraged, but to all right minded men and women respectful and tolerant of others beliefs and cultures.
American foreign policy is seen by many to be that which seeks to extend the influence and maximize the power of America, safeguard their interests at the expense of others and the natural environment and support criminality – Israel comes to mind. Such distasteful American foreign policies go back decades, as Noam Chomsky states in The Guardian “Even in the 1950s, President Eisenhower was concerned about what he called a campaign of hatred of the US in the Arab world, because of the perception on the Arab street that it supported harsh and oppressive regimes to take their oil.” A perception proved to be correct.
Ideologically driven, rooted in a desire to export worldwide an American version, or vision, of democracy, which they claim to be the highest ideal for all. The attitude is that when all follow America’s lead on matters relating to economics, politics, religion and social affairs, peace will inevitably follow, and not until. With this doctrine in mind America has sought to dominate the world, repeatedly making war in the name of peace.
Peace though is beyond ideology. For peace to envelop our world as men ad women everywhere hope, there must be tolerance, cooperation and understanding of others, not ideological imposition – of any kind. The equitable sharing of natural resources, of knowledge, ideas and experience will create justice. Dissipating mistrust and resentment leading to peace and a natural movement towards unity that encourages the greatest possible diversity enriching the lives of us all.
Occidental double standards
The recent outrage by the Muslim Ummah protesting against a low budget blasphemous movie produced in theUSAand the West’s condemnation of the remonstration of the Islamists depict occidental double standards.The US State Department assures the Muslims that the sacrilegious film was not sponsored by it. The US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, during her meeting with her Pakistani counterpart Hina Rabbani Khar, made it clear that the protests that had turned violent and, sadly, resulted in loss of life, cannot be tolerated. She admitted that there is provocation, and theUShad made clear that it does not in any way support provocation. She reiterated that theUSadministration found the video, which is at the core of this series of events, offensive, disgusting and reprehensible.
Unfortunately, the West displays double standards in its dealing. Terry Jones, a small time pastor of Dove World Outreach Centre, a small nondenominational Christian church inGainesville,Florida, had his 10 minutes of fame when he burnt copies of the Holy Quràn. His despicable act was condemned, but no legal action was taken against him. The Danish caricatures ridiculing Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) were in bad taste and violently protested by the Muslim Ummah, but no legal action was taken against the cartoonist, who caused mental agony to billions of Muslims all over the globe. Salman Rushdie, the author of Satanic Verses, was revered by the West although his blasphemous book was reviled by the Muslims all over the globe. Now similar revulsion has been caused by the profane film, which would have gone unnoticed if the producer had not taken pains to translate it in Arabic and post it on YouTube.
The sad aspect is that all these heinous acts causing mental anguish to Muslims for defaming their beloved Prophet (PBUH) are brushed aside by the West under the ‘Freedom of Speech Act’.
It is, indeed, doublespeak when the punishment for the denial of Holocaust ranges to imprisonment of one up to 10 years in a number of Western countries. Nudity is permissible but in some Western countries, Muslim women covering their heads with scarves can be punished or sacked from their jobs or expelled from educational institutions. InDenmark, the construction of magnificent palaces, citadels and mansions is permissible, but the domes of mosques are prohibited. Smoking at public places is prohibited as it is injurious to health, but the onslaught of venomous comments against a religious entity is permissible under freedom of speech. InGermany, Hitler’s Mein Kampf is banned, but books preaching hate and odium against Islam are tolerable. It is high time that the Occident reviews its laws against blasphemy and the reviling of other religions.
On the other hand, Muslims, and especially Pakistanis, need to rein in our anger.September 21, 2012, was declared as the day of ‘Love for the Holy Prophet (PBUH)’, but it turned into a day of expressing extreme hatred, violence and aggression. The same Holy Prophet (PBUH), whom we revere and whose Sunnah (teaching and practices) we are ordained to follow, were conveniently forgotten. The Prophet (PBUH) was a paragon of love and virtue. He decried violent behaviour and forgave even those who caused him physical harm.
Against this backdrop, Pakistanis, who attacked and burned a church, cinema houses, looted ATMs, torched cars and petrol pumps, only caused damage to their own country. They lost an ideal opportunity to display to the world that their sentiments had been hurt. By giving vent to their emotions through violent acts, they only revealed their barbaric nature and brought Islam a bad name. No wonder, an Indian student has taunted that India does not need to build Pakistan-specific Agni and Prithvi missiles —- “just produce a blasphemous movie, post it on YouTube and in retaliation, Pakistanis will destroy their own country.”
Brazil moves against Google over videos
A Brazilian court has ordered YouTube to remove an anti-Islam video that prompted violent protests across the Muslim world, while an elections court has ordered the arrest of a Google executive after the popular video-sharing service failed to remove a video attacking a mayoral candidate.Tuesday’s decision by a state court in Sao Paulo, home to a large Middle Eastern immigrant community, came just hours after Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff criticised “Islamophobia” in Western countries in a speech at the UN.
In a statement, the court said Judge Gilson Delgado Miranda gave the video-sharing site ten days to remove videos of the film, “Innocence of Muslims”.
After that, it will face fines of $5,000 a day for every day the clips remain accessible in Brazil.
The case against the controversial film was brought by a Brazilian Muslim group, the National Islamic Union, against Google Inc, the owner of YouTube, for posting on the internet a film it said was offensive and a violation of the constitutional right to freedom of religion.
Miranda said the case juxtaposed freedom of expression and the need to protect individuals or groups of people from action that might incite religious discrimination.
Miranda concluded that banning something illegal should not “offend” freedom of thought and expression, according to the ruling posted online by Estado de S. Paulo newspaper.
It was not the only Brazilian court ruling against Google on Tuesday. Earlier, an elections court ordered the arrest of Google’s most senior executive in Brazil after the company failed to take down YouTube videos attacking a local mayoral candidate.
Google is appealing the order, which follows a similar decision by another Brazilian election judge. In that case, a judge found another senior executive responsible for violating local election law. That decision was overturned last week.
The legal challenges underline broader questions about Google’s responsibility for content uploaded by third parties to its websites.
Fifteen people were killed in Pakistan during demonstrations over the video on Friday.
People involved in the film, an amateurish 13-minute clip of which was posted on YouTube, have said it was made by a 55-year-old California man, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.
Muslim leaders condemn Islamophobia at UN General Assembly
Muslim leaders have called on the Western countries to stop spreading Islamophobia and blasphemy in their communities, challenging US President Barack Obama’s defense of freedom of expression.In his address to the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, Obama condemned the “violence and intolerance” which has erupted across the world over a blasphemous anti-Islam film produced in the United States.
He also stated that the removal of such sacrilegious videos or offensive publications from the Internet would be a violation of the US constitution, which “protects the right to practice free speech.”
Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono challenged Obama’s speech, saying the insulting movie was another example of religious defamation.
He also called for the establishment of an international “instrument to effectively prevent incitement to hostility or violence based on religions or beliefs.”
In addition to Yudhoyono, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari asked the UN to take actions against the “incitement of hate” against Muslims.
“Although we can never condone violence, the international community must not become silent observers and should criminalize such acts that destroy the peace of the world and endanger world security by misusing freedom of expression,” Zardari said during his speech at the General Assembly.
Meanwhile, Afghan President Hamid Karzai denounced the anti-Islam movie and said, “The menace of Islamophobia is a worrying phenomenon that threatens peace and co-existence.”
The Muslim world has been boiling with anti-Western sentiments over a blasphemous film named Innocence of Muslims, which insults Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).
Muslim protesters across the globe demand the US government apologize to the Muslims and punish those behind the blasphemous act.
Freedom of Speech - Double Standards?
Islam21c requests all the readers of this article, and others, to share it on your facebook, twitter, and other platforms to further spread our efforts.
So what they are doing now is shifting the focus, after they have finished off Christianity, they are now attacking Islam. But the whole war is against spirituality as a whole."
This last week in yet another anti-Muslim move, a French magazine published a caricature of the prophet of Islam (PBUH), sparking more outrage in the Muslim world and with no stoppage or condemnation by France or any other Western governments.
Press TV has interviewed Mr. Manfred Petritsch, an international activist and prominent finance expert. What follows is an approximate transcript of the interview.
Press TV: 1.3 billion people… Muslims. And we have this new wave of attack on Islam. These people, these Western countries, the Western people, those who are attacking Islam - Who are these people and why is it they are doing so?
Petritsch Well, I think they are trying to… We have to see this as a general picture of a war against spirituality. That means, they are not particularly attacking Islam, but they are attacking spirituality as a whole.
The attack against Christianity has been happening already since a long time and Christianity is more or less destroyed.
So what they are doing now is shifting the focus, after they have finished off Christianity, they are now attacking Islam. But the whole war is against spirituality as a whole.
Press TV: We saw in the United States the blasphemous film that sparked tensions and protests all across the world. The US Ambassador to Libya was killed; more than 40 people across the world were killed in those protests.
And right in the midst of all these protests and tensions, France allows a person, a magazine, a publisher to print another set of blasphemous material, this time cartoons insulting the prophet of Islam. And yet the French authorities did not do anything to stop that although they knew that it might create further tension in the world - they didn’t stop that.
At the same time, they stopped the French magazine that published nude pictures of the British princess. So, what is going on here? Why is this happening, why the disparity?
Petritsch Well, this shows you exactly the double standard the West operates in many ways. So if it is against what they want then they of course stop it, like the photos of the princess, which is of course, wrong to invade her personal life.
But how can the insult of a whole religion be less important than the personal feelings of one person?
So, on the one hand the same government or the same system in France closes down a magazine because of nude pictures, but on the other hand allows insulting cartoons against a whole religion. And this shows how the West always uses double standards, in many ways… This exposes it, that what they are doing is a lie.
Press TV: Do you think the attacks will continue - the attacks on Islam?
Petritsch As I said before we are talking about a war against spirituality… You see, a lot of people believe that the cause for all this protest is the film. But I think it’s not the film, the film was just the ignition point.
There was a whole explosive mixture existing because of the American foreign policy or the foreign policy of the West as a whole against all Islamic countries; against the war they are fighting; against this double standard they are doing; against the killer drones, which are killing hundreds of civilians.
And all this explosive mixture was there and now the film came along and was the ignition point. So I think the people are not protesting specially against the film, they are protesting against the whole attitude of the West towards the Islamic countries.
Press TV: The issue of human rights particularly the issue of European countries talk more often than not about the issue of human rights in terms of, they want those countries that they say violate human rights to be brought to justice and they themselves say that they are the biggest advocates of human rights in the world.
A lot of people say that the sanctions against Iran that primarily affect ordinary people in the country; they say these sanctions are in essence in violation of human rights of the Iranian people. What do you think?
Petritsch Absolutely. Anybody who reads the Charter of the United Nations sees that sanctions must not cover, for instance, medical supplies or food and things like that. That means anything that touches the basic human rights of people you cannot sanction, right?
But they are doing it, so they are violating not only their own laws, but also the laws of the United Nations. But who is there to take them to court? That is a big problem, you know.
Press TV: You come from Switzerland. Switzerland is part of the countries that are imposing sanctions against Iran. Is that something legal in terms of the Swiss Constitution, the Swiss internal laws?
Petritsch: No. The Swiss government is acting illegally because Switzerland and the spirit of Switzerland, is based on neutrality. That’s what Switzerland is all about. And it’s about humanitarian aid. That’s also why the Red Cross has its headquarters there, and UNICEF and all these humanitarian organizations.
So what the Swiss government is doing by blindly following the sanctions of the United States and of the EU is, in my opinion, definitely breaking the laws and the spirit of Switzerland.
That is not correct because they’re taking sides, and Switzerland does not take sides -- it always helps, normally, people who are suffering. And I know that the Iranian people are suffering because of these sanctions.
Press TV: How does Switzerland explain, justify the sanctions against Iran?
Petritsch: The Swiss Foreign Ministry and the government say that they cannot step out of line, out of this NATO policy. They cannot be something different because otherwise they will suffer themselves.
But I think that the Swiss politicians should have enough backbone to say to the EU and NATO countries ‘you can do what you want, but we have our own policies’.
Press TV: Switzerland is not taking independent policies?
Petritsch: No. That is a big problem that a lot of people see, that more and more, Switzerland is losing its independence, its own free decision-making, its neutrality. This has a couple of reasons:
First, the reason is that we are, in Switzerland, under huge pressure from the outside because we are surrounded by NATO countries and by EU countries. So you can imagine being a small island in this sea, we are under huge pressure - just like Iran.
They don’t like independent countries. They don’t like countries that don’t follow their policies. So this is a huge pressure. The problem is that our government is collapsing to these pressures and they shouldn’t do that.
Press TV: Let’s talk about a different topic, the issue of terrorism in the world. Militants, insurgency, a lot of al-Qaeda fighters, al-Qaeda insurgents who have been fighting American and NATO forces in the past 11, 12 years, these people are now fighting in Syria against the Syrian government.
When they fight in Afghanistan, they are called insurgents, they are called terrorists. When they fight in Syria, they are called freedom fighters. How does that sit in terms of double standards in the way that the West is looking at these people, the same people, but different titles when it comes to different countries?
Petritsch: Well, here we have again the proof that the West works with double standards. So for the West, there is good terrorism and bad terrorism.
Turkey is a very good example. Turkey allows bases for al-Qaeda terrorists, training camps where they’re supplied with weapons, and then sent to Syria to cause terror. But at the same time, the government fights terror, which comes from the outside, from Iraq, from the PKK.
Here we have a perfect example of how on the one hand they support terrorism when it is to their own good; and on the other hand, they fight it when it is against them. This shows how the West always uses double standards in many ways.
Press TV: Is there anything else that you wanted to discuss?
Petritsch: I would like to say to your viewers that Iran has many friends in the West who are realizing more and more that the way Iran is treated is wrong. Also, that there is a completely wrong picture about Iran out there.
The reason is that the Western media purposely is showing the wrong picture about how the Iranians are, what they think, what they want.
I hope that with more and more information, we can open up the minds of the people more so that they understand that what their governments are doing is wrong against Iran.
We are fighting here an information war. The question is, who will win this information war? We are up against a huge enemy with endless resources, who control all the media and therefore they can show this wrong picture. The question is can we counter that?
SC/GMA/JR