We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11
"A breakthrough in the study of State Crimes Against Democracy (SCADS).
Never before have truth-seekers countered with such a comprehensive
response to a likely false-flag operation so soon after it happened." -David Ray Griffin
"A necessary set of challenging responses to the Islamophobic
manipulation of the Charlie Hebdo incident, suggesting the urgent
relevance of dissent and suspicion in response to official versions of
controversial events."- Richard Falk
Available soon from Sifting and
Winnowing Books! Pre-order at the list price of $19.95 and avoid paying
postage: Send $19.95 to S&W, POB 221, Lone Rock, WI 53556. The book
will ship in early April.
Only one version of the Charlie Hebdo affair made the mainstream media:
"Muslim extremists kill cartoonists and Jews." An
officially-orchestrated response - "je suis Charlie" - followed.
But is there another side to the story?
Disturbing facts quickly emerged. Politicians, big media, the security
industry, and arms manufacturers all rushed to cash in. And freedom of
speech in France – the supposed target of the terrorists – was rolled
back by the French government. Even as millions marched for Charlie,
millions more sensed that something was very, very wrong.
In We Are Not Charlie Hebdo, twenty leading public intellectuals
refuse the invitation to identify with "Je Suis Charlie." Jews, Muslims,
Christians, Protestants, Catholics, atheists, people of the left and
right, progressives and traditionalists, people from many different
countries and ethnicities – all have united to say "we are NOT Charlie
Hebdo." Most suspect the whole affair was a false flag operation or
psy-op. (Evidence for that interpretation is presented in the book.)
Others merely dissent from the official, mythic false consensus.
If you question what governments tell you…if you doubt the mainstream
media version of events…if you are NOT Charlie Hebdo…then this book is
for you.
Contributors
Zafar Bangash, editor, Crescent Magazine
Kevin Barrett, Press TV commentator and Veterans Today editor
Barry Chamish, author and investigative journalist
John Cobb, theology professor
Oe Dammegard, author
Laurent Guyénot, author
Anthony Hall, professor of Globalization Studies
Barbara Honegger, author and journalism professor
Shaykh Imran Hosein, Islamic scholar and geopolitical analyst
Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Thaddeus Kozinski, humanities professor
Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor, Tikkun
Cynthia McKinney, six-term congresswoman and Green Party presidential candidate
John Andrew Morrow, professor of Islamic Studies
Ashahed Muhammad, editor, The Final Call
Paul Craig Roberts, former editor of the Wall Street Journal and presidential advisor
Alain Soral, philosopher-activist
Yvonne Ridley, journalist
Ibrahim Soudy, structural engineer
Webster Tarpley, historian
Andre Vltchek, journalist and filmmaker
I'm the author of Questioning the War on
Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters; Truth Jihad; A Guide to Mysterious
San Francisco; and editor of 9/11 and American Empire v.2, and have
taught Arabic, Islamic Studies, French, American Civilization and others
subjects. Widely regarded as the world's leading Muslim 9/11 truth
activist (for what that's worth) I spent 2006-2008 as the only talk show
host featured on all three leading patriot radio networks (GCN, RBN,
and WTPRN). I ran for Congress in Wisconsin's 3rd District in 2008:
http://www.barrettforcongress.us
Currently I'm working on a couple of book projects...
Great Jihaad as usual.
I hope you and your loved ones are keeping well.
Regards
Basheer
US America, Canada, Australia, Britain, France, Israel and the West
proved that their leaders and complicit masses were and still are the greatest
cannibals, terrorists, cut throats, plunderers, thieves, racists, perverts, liars
and monsters of all times
"Je me sens Charlie Coulibaly" : Dieudonné condamné à deux mois de prison avec sursis
Le
polémiste avait écrit cette phrase au soir du 11 janvier après la
marche historique contre les attentats qui ont frappé "Charlie Hebdo" et
le magasin Hyper Cacher de la porte de Vincennes.
Dieudonné au palais de justice de Paris, le 12 mars 2015. (LOIC VENANCE / AFP) Par Francetv info
Mis à jour le , publié le
Dieudonné a été condamné à deux mois de prison avec sursis, mercredi 18 mars, pour apologie d'actes de terrorisme, par le tribunal correctionnel de Paris. Le polémiste avait écrit "Je me sens Charlie Coulibaly" dans un post sur Facebook, le 11 janvier, au soir de la marche historique après les attentats de Charlie Hebdo
et de l'Hyper Cacher. Le parquet avait demandé 30 000 euros d'amende.
Le polémiste encourait jusqu'à sept ans d'emprisonnement et 10 000 euros
d'amende, car les faits présumés ont été commis en ligne.
Le 11
janvier dernier, au soir d'une grande marche citoyenne en hommage aux
victimes des attentats, le polémiste avait écrit qu'il se sentait "Charlie Coulibaly", détournant le slogan "Je suis Charlie",
en référence à l'un des trois auteurs des attaques, Amedy Coulibaly,
qui a tué une policière et quatre clients juifs de l'épicerie casher.
Ses propos avaient ensuite été retirés de sa page Facebook.
"Un malentendu énorme", selon Dieudonné
Interrogé
sur la raison pour laquelle il avait associé "Charlie" à "Coulibaly",
et non "Kouachi", du nom des auteurs de l'attaque contre Charlie Hebdo, Dieudonné avait expliqué avoir choisi Coulibaly car celui-ci a tué une policière d'origine martiniquaise "qui ressemble trait pour trait à [sa] fille."
Dans
une vidéo de plus de dix minutes, publiée sur YouTube le 25 janvier,
Dieudonné était longuement revenu sur le sens de sa formule. "Je me sens Charlie Coulibaly" n'était, selon le polémiste, qu'une "petite saillie drôlatique". Il disait déplorer un "malentendu énorme" : "Charlie Coulibaly était une formule de paix, (...) une parole de paix dans une période de guerre." Une défense maintenue au tribunal, début février.
OR THE MODERN WESTERN DOO-DOO CIVILISATION - Excrements
persistent
That US America, Canada, Australia, Britain, France, Israel and the West proved
that their leaders and complicit masses were and still are the greatest
cannibals, terrorists, cut throats, plunderers, thieves, racists, perverts, liars
and monsters of all times has been proven hundreds of times over and by Westerners
themselves, and after ransacking and plundering other countries and crucifying
thousands of freedom fighters and civilians alike (boiling, roasting and eating
some of them!) they went to war with each other killing many more millions of
innocent people as well as the slaves who died under their ruthless claws, and
those in their colonies they had forcibly drafted in their armies of assassins. Yes, those stupid and decadent Muslims (what
is left of them and their religion) and Survivors and Children of Survivors of Multiple
Holocausts are so dumb and useless that they still do not get it or are too
scared to do anything about it to stop it and not make it worse for
everybody.
But, why are Muslims, a universal nation (the Ummah of
Muhammad) destined (conditionally, like the Israelites before them) to be the
best of nations so ignorant, so lazy, and so cowardly? Today the majority of them live as if God Almighty
was not Almighty at all and instead a buffoon, the King of Buffoons, and just a
figment of their diseased imagination, and expect Him not to fulfil His
Promises, in particular to destroy the disobeying ones, the hypocrites, the
cowards, the traitors and the followers of the Ways of Satan (found in
themselves). We read before that after
so many warnings, the Existing or Non-Existing God finally punished and
destroyed the Bani Isra’il (The Children of Israel) in ancient times (although
the accounts that reached us are hardly credible) and when their corruption had
reached incredible limits and had not achieved any greatness in their
civilisation as expected or promised. Other
civilisations were greater and they were not the “Chosen Ones” although
so-called Christians claim they are the “New Chosen Ones” of a New Alliance
with the Israelite God or Jehovah!
We read that one of the Bani Isra’il, a Nazarean of very
doubtful origins and about whom we know practically nothing except later
fabrications, concoctions, myths, legends, and Roman canonised texts, inspired
some Middle Eastern people (Arabs, Palestinians, Canaanites, Samaritans,
Syrians, Lebanese, Judeans, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Abyssinians), Romans,
Greeks and other Europeans to start an improved form of Judaism. Today we call it Christianity. But, they were persecuted and mass murdered
by the millions by the Romans. Some
three hundred years later, Rome accepted a corrupt form of that Nazarean Messiah
as their State religion and made the Messiah into God Himself, three Gods in
One, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit or Ghost, and his mother into a
Goddess eventually departing thus drastically from the religion preached by the
Messiah himself who believed in and worshipped only One God he called his Father
and the Father of all humanity. But,
Rome regarded itself as of a pure White race and the Romans hated all Blacks as
well as the descendants of the Arabs, Israelites, Palestinians and other
Semitic people (all mixed races), and even their languages as well as all
Muslims and their adopted religion Islam, and so they made the Messiah White,
blond with blue eyes and a racist who did not allow inter-racial marriages just
like today the European Royals to this very day.
But, having not much to follow in their fabricated canonised
texts, they had added to them all the former Israelite texts translated into Greek
from a mixture of ancient Arabic, Phoenician, Syriac, Babylonian, Egyptian and
other dialects that was later called Hebrew. Rome was already a great Empire that had achieved
great things by imperial conquests and extreme violence, and after forcing
every conquered nation to accept their State religion they started wars among
themselves until another bloodline of the Messiah (a mixture of all races) from
Arabia arrived on the scene and attempted to return the Middle Eastern people
to the original natural religion of surrender to One God alone and to one
humankind where all racism and oppression were banned.
Yet, we also read that Muslims fought among themselves and
killed each other right at the beginning, but at the same time we also read how
Muslims enriched world civilisation and in particular Persian, Hindustani and
Christian civilisation. At one point in
history civilisation was heavily Islamic.
But, then Muslims lapsed in Kali Yug, the Dark Age just like all the
others. Who took over? Not Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Vedantists, or
Christians, but criminal and monstrous Atheists, evolved apes as many call
themselves, perverts, Old Testament Jews, Talmudists, Freemasons, Rosicrucians,
Rotarians, genocidal racists, ethnic cleansers, liars, deceivers, cheaters,
thieves, slavers, usurers, homosexuals,
prostitutes, paedophiles, gamblers, drug addicts, pornographers, abortionists, euthanasians,
Freudians, incestuous degenerates, savage capitalists, with collaborating
Christian, Hindu, Buddhist and Muslim traitors as their house “Negroes”, and with
the Totalitarian Zionist United Nations Mafia Organisation, UNO, of course!
We saw the French State and its Death Squads
(CIA-MOSSAD-DGSE-MI6) kill a few mainly pornographers and blasphemers (if they
are really dead!) and all of a sudden 40 head of States (mostly mass murderers)
united and travelled to France (as planned!) to show to the Muslim
TERRORISTS that here they were assembled all in one place and at the same time
defying them to launch their usual SUICIDE ATTACKS and BOMBINGS! Guess what happened? The Muslim TERRORISTS got so scared and so terrorised
by those pornographic and war loving entities that they did not budge a single finger,
and the 40 thieves thus assembled were able to rejoice in all security (‘grieve’)
and announcing to the world that they had won against the ISLAMIST BASTARDS and
Charlie Hebdo could now go ahead in peace and total security and print not
their usual 60,000 porn magazines, but THREE MILLION this time with more
attacks, slanders, blasphemies, and lies on Islam, Muslims, Prophet Muhammad,
while the whole Western World are being incited globally by both media and
government to more hatred and violence towards Muslims with almost absolute
Church, academic and celebrity complicity.
The MONUMENTAL FARCE is not that there is anything wrong
with Arabs, Muslims or Islam, but there is everything wrong with the masses who
believe such crap when the main target is not Islam but their own civil
liberties, money, morality, and family life.
The Celebrities as well as the
Civil Servants (State Slaves) worldwide have usually made a pact with Satan and
are not allowed to ever talk against the Devils that own them directly or
indirectly, that is, they are muzzled forever and will never utter the
slightest reproach against Jewish criminality or imorality. The few academics, journalists and celebrities
who dare resist them are almost always fired, ostracised or found dead or
suicided! We know a few hundreds of them, including a
Jewish Messiah, several US Presidents, and heads of states trying to free
themselves from their clutches! The
later Arab Prophet and Messenger is recorded to have been poisoned by one of
those “Jews”!
And, as planned, more wars will be launched, more false
flags, and always led by that terrorist and ethnic cleansing bastard entity
known as Eretz Israel or “The Jewish State of Israel” that officially trains
all the gangs of assassins of their decadent Christian Godfathers and
Godmothers ! Don’t worry France, you
have a problem with those Muslim bastards, we’ll send you our MOSSAD SWAT GANGS
and will get rid of them all as WE ARE THE SOLE DEFENDERS OF WESTERN
CIVILISATION! But, the truth is that their
MOSSADNIKS are already everywhere and at all levels of western establishment,
but the zombified masses refuse to see or cannot see that!
On the recent renewal of my French passport, the French
fonctionnaire (Zionist Slave of the Republic), my old passport was confiscated
and when I objected because I did not want MOSSAD to one day use my passport on
their many times promised French 9/11 and requested for a photographic copy of
its pages, I was denied this right, and I was literally and rudely ordered out
of the French Embassy by that bully of a ‘woman’! I have made a written complaint and I have
never received any reply to this day.
This is how the fascist State operates!
Those warmongers and perverts have never stopped calling people like me
polygamists (I married five times and am therefore only a polygynist not at all
comparable to their brothel non civilisation!), hand choppers, head beheading savages,
wife beaters and women oppressors, terrorists, backward, and why should we
therefore stop calling them The Excrements
of the Earth, the world’s greatest Holocaust
manufacturers, exterminationists, cannibals, terrorists, cut throats,
plunderers, thieves, racists, perverts, liars, anus worshippers, vagina
addicts, paedophiles, incestuous degenerates, and monsters of all times past,
present, and future if we let them as we are doing right now. Any dialogue must be on our terms and not
theirs, or else there should be no dialogue whatsoever – only TOTAL BOYCOTT and
REVOLUTION! Let us stop buying and joining in their shit
and let them eat and drink their shit themselves! But, this is too hard for those degenerate
Muslims and non Muslims alike. As far as
Hindus, Jews, Christians and Muslims are concerned, the religion(s) they are
practicing and the God(s) they are worshipping (just like the Atheists, Macro
Evolutionists and Agnostics) are bogus and literally shit and I mean it, and
this can be the reason why they feel so comfortable living in deep shit on a
daily and nightly basis! And do not
dare say that I am angry because I am not rabid mad, not yet!
Yesterday, Romans and Greeks have been depicted as the greatest
civilisations of History that count for White European imperialists, plunderers,
slave traders and racists and they did together with the highly advanced
Muslims produce the greatest civilisation of recent History. But, today the same slave masters and
genocidal racists are depicted as the most highly civilised people on earth together
with genocidal racist Jews and Talmudists who are now telling us (like mass
murderer George W. Bush did before) that usurious Jews, Talmudists, Zionists,
Racists, Freemasons, drug barons, and mass murderers like Bibi Netanyahu and
pornographers like “Charlie Hebdo” will force us at gun point to accept their Western
values and immorality and they have the Courts on their side to severely punish
any recalcitrant! What a Satanic world! But, fortunately more and more Europeans and
Westerners who love freedom, justice and morality above everything else are
rising up at great personal costs and sacrifice. The day Christians and Muslims will unite
will be a Day of Victory for the entire world but not before as on their own
they do not seem to want unity at all.
BAFS
Sovereign Freeman-on-the-land - not yet suicided!
Addressed to the French Republic of Shit (Greater Israel)
Après la censure de sa vidéo
"Je ne suis pas Charlie", Vincent Reynouard va encore plus plus loin
en démasquant l'hypocrisie de Monsieur Valls lorsqu'il évoque les poursuites
intentées contre Dieudonné pour "apologie du terrorisme". Répondant à
tous ses adversaires qui lui reprochent ses parallèles avec la deuxième guerre
mondiale, Vincent Reynouard démontrent qu'effectivement, les Alliés ont laminé
le IIIe Reich et la Japon en violant la légalité et en pratiquant le terrorisme
aussi bien à petite qu'à grande échelle... Finalement, notre monde issu de
cette "victoire" de 1945 ne fait que récolter ce qu'il a semé voilà
70 ans.
Vidéo explosive : à regarder d'urgence avant la censure.
Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusLe Président John Fitzgerald Kennedy: "Ich bin ein Berliner" - Je suis un Berlinois! 26 juin 1963 JFK pronconça ces paroles dans le but de souligner le soutien des USA aux Allemands de l'Ouest contre les Allemands de l'Est. "Lass' sie nach Berlin kommen"
- Laissez-les venir à Berlin, parlant des Allemands de l'Est qui
désiraient venir à Berlin Ouest afin de démontrer que les Capitalistes
et les Communistes pouvaient travailler ensemble.
Sur les marches de Rathaus Schöneberg, il rappela à une audience de
450,000 personnes présentes, la célèbre formule: civis romanus sum - je
suis un citoyen romain! Faisait-il ainsi
À l'époque de JFK, le monde occidental sous contrôle judéo-maçonnique
était fier de dire tout haut: Today "Ich bin ein Berliner!" Tous les
hommes (pas les femmes!) libres, peu importe où ils habitaient, furent
des citoyens de Berlin, et, comme un homme libre (croyait-il), JFK
prononça avec une grande fierté ces mots: "Ich bin ein Berliner!" alors
que les habitants de Berlin ne se disaient jamais Berlinois. Berliner
dans le jargon local voulait tout simplement dire beignet!
Theodore Chaikin "Ted" Sorensen (May 8, 1928 – October 31, 2010), de
mère juive de Russie (Annis (Chaikin) Sorensen, écrivit la plupart des
discours de JFK, y compris le plagiat du poète mystique chrétien Khalil
Gibran qui avait écrit: "Ne demandez pas ce que peut faire le pays
pour vous; demandez ce que vous pouvez faire pour votre pays!"
Il est d'usage de dire "Nous sommes tous Palestiniens", et cela ne
veut pas dire pour autant que ceux et celles qui disent ces mots font
"l'apologie du terrorisme palestinien" ou qu'ils soient des voyous, des
brigands, des gangsters, des enfoirés (Jacques Weber) comme veulent
nous le faire croire les criminels et 'philosophes' juifs, et les
sionistes de France et d'ailleurs! BAFS Samedi 4 janvier 2015
JEAN MARIE LEPEN N'EST PAS CHARLIE! TENTATIVE D'ASSASSINAT SUR SA PERSONNE!
Jean-Marie LE PEN, TENTATIVE D'ASSASSINAT ? Complot Charlie Hebdo # Dieudonné # Soral # fn
BFM TV 17/01/15 : « Tariq Ramadan, vous êtes
Charlie ? »
TARIQ RAMADAN : « ... Nous refusons d’avoir
peur.Nous refusons le meurtre ! Nous sommes pour la liberté d’expression. Et, de ce point de vue là, je n’ai aucun
problème… » ... de dire que JE SUIS CHARLIE ! (sous-entendu)
Ce sale hypocrite, escroc, et traître de
Tariq Ramadan !
Je lui ai pardonné maintes fois ses prises de
position, son habitude de toujours permettre aux racistes et aux ennemis
détracteurs de l’Islam (des Arabes et des Musulmans, y compris leurs
dignitaires religieux et combattants de la liberté) d’en rajouter
une couche de leur MISISLAMISME
(RACISME ET HAINE DE L’ISLAM) lors de leurs ‘interviews’ d'endoctrinement, mais cette fois-cil, qu’il aille bien au
diable, ce satané traître !
Last Sunday, eyebrows were raised – not just raised, but lifted right
off people’s faces to hover three feet overhead – when BBC News
apparently published a story reporting evidence that the Charlie Hebdo
shootings were a false flag attack. The story looked and felt real, with
none of the clumsy giveaways of your average hoax (think Sorcha Faal)
or the outrageous giveaways of your average parody (think Kevin Barrett).
The embedded “BBC” TV news report looked professionally produced and featured yours truly reporting for False Flag Weekly News,
also referencing my 9/11 truth movement colleague Dr. Paul Craig
Roberts. It discussed evidence that the Charlie Hebdo shootings were
fake, including the ballistics evidence presented here at VT by Gordon Duff.
Watch the latest False Flag Weekly News – the show that scared
someone into creating a fake BBC website and story…and get the links to
all the stories we covered here.
The fake BBC report presumably cited Roberts and me because our work
on the Charlie Hebdo false flag had gone viral and reached more people
than anyone else’s. My stories and reports tallied reads and views well
into the six figures, meaning the actual audience (including reposts)
was over a million – despite cyber-criminal efforts to stop it,
including a multiple hacks here at VT that removed my story from
circulation during the most critical period shortly after the event.
Roberts’ stuff also went viral; together, we reached millions of people
with the message that Charlie Hebdo was a false flag. Was the bogus BBC
report a reaction to our success?
The fake BBC story went up late Sunday and stayed up just long enough to start going viral Monday morning. (That’s Sunday the 11th a.k.a. 1/11 for all you illuminati fans out there.)
Someone with access to expertise and resources spent a
considerable amount of time and trouble to produce this high-grade hoax.
Who would do such a thing? And why?
Let’s take the Cartesian approach and break the problem down into
manageable sub-units by listing possible suspects and motives, and then
rating their plausibility.
*Suspect #1: A rogue truther. Frustrated by the
mainstream media’s failure to report evidence of false flag operations,
our rogue truther, who happens to possess the resources and expertise to
create a plausible fake BBC website and news video, acts on the slogan:
“If you don’t like the news, make some yourself.”
Plausibility rating: negligible. The operation was too professional.
Also, spreading hoaxes doesn’t help the truth movement’s credibility.
Like 9/11 from the point of view of radical anti-imperialist Muslims,
anyone smart enough to pull it off wouldn’t want to. And if the purpose
of the hoax was to publicize the suppressed truth about Charlie Hebdo,
the hoaxer would have immediately gone public, claimed credit, and
explained his or her motive.
Suspect # 2: A malicious hacker spreading viruses
just for fun. This is the hypothesis entertained and investigated by a
purported cyber-security outfit called OpenDNS.com.
But according to their investigation, it appears that no viruses or
malware were spread. So OpenDNS falls back on the theory that the hoaxer
was simply doing a trial run to find out how many people would click on
this kind of story…market research, as it were. Gosh, who would do
something like that? Which leads to the third and most plausible theory:
*Suspect #3: An anti-truth disinfo agent working for the
organization(s) that orchestrated the Charlie Hebdo attack, namely the
Gladio 2 network involving pro-Zionist elements of Western intelligence
services and their organized crime partners. These are the
folks who would be interested in doing “market research” on how fast
“conspiracy theories” spread in the wake of false flag attacks. They
might also be interested in what would happen if a major news outlet
such as BBC somehow evaded the control of the censors and reported
honestly on a false-flag event like the Charlie Hebdo shootings. This
kind of scenario, in which a fit of honesty somehow seizes people at a
big mainstream outlet, is their worst nightmare. In order to plan for
such a worst-case contingency, they would want to know how fast the
story would spread, who would be spreading it and how, and so on. With
this knowledge, they would be in a better position to keep such an event
from blowing up into a social-stability-threatening scandal.
Such a cointelpro-generated “false-flag false-flag story” would be a clear example of Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive infiltration.”
Sunstein, an ardent Zionist and former Obama Administration Information
Czar, has argued that “conspiracy theories” represent a threat to
society, and that some day the US government may have to ban them. But
since that is not yet possible (the frog being as-of-yet insufficiently
boiled) the government should “disable the purveyors of conspiracy
theories” and engage in “cognitive infiltration” of the truth movement.
The fake BBC story certainly did “cognitively infiltrate” the truth
movement. It may have allowed the Gladio B operators, using raw NSA data
provided to Israel, to see exactly who was spreading the “conspiracy
theory” and in what manner.
The phony BBC story also promoted what Sunstein calls “beneficial
cognitive diversity,” meaning that it muddied the waters. By revealing
that the “BBC story” was a hoax, Sunstein’s minions promote suspicion of
news reports presenting evidence for false-flag events.
The clear implication: By figuring out who created the BBC hoax, we can nail suspects in the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
In the same way that suspicion has fallen on the cameraman who “just
happened” to be in position to film the fake shooting of the policeman,
questions arise about the cyber-security firm OpenDNS.com, which
published a misleading, propagandistic story about the fake BBC report.
OpenDNS, which has very little public track record and looks like an
intel-agency cutout, displays “guilty demeanor” by vilifying Paul Craig
Roberts in an apparent Cass Sunstein style attempt to “disable” one of
the “purveyors of conspiracy theories” by attacking his reputation.
So…Which intelligence agency or “national interest” would likely be lurking behind the OpenDNS cut-out?
Here’s a clue: They’re trying to muddy the waters even further by (ludicrously) blaming Iran:
“One might conclude that, given the recent events
surrounding Charlie Hebdo in Paris, the posting of disinformation on the
bbc-news[.]co[.]uk site, and links to an Iranian state-sponsored news
agency corroborating the same disinformation, that this was a
State-executed, State-ordered, State-integrated, or
State-rogue-conducted activity backed by Iran.”
Now which country has a government that is always trying to smear Iran, and is even on record pushing for all-out war?
I think we have identified, in rough outline, the probable
perpetrators of the BBC Charlie Hebdo false-flag hoax…and the Charlie
Hebdo massacre itself.
False flag – converted immediately into
public shock, the perfect condition for ramming any police, military and
surveillance legislation down the people’s throat.
French
President Francois Hollande reviews troops during his visit aboard the a
French nuclear aircraft carrier on Jan. 14, 2015 off the coast of
Toulon, southern France. Anne-Christine Poujoulat/Pool/Reuters
by Peter Koenig
On 12 January the French Parliament approved with almost
unanimity – with one abstention only – the budget for France’s
continuous and enlarged involvement in the new war on Iraq, a new war
engagement led by Washington and supported by its vassals, UK, Canada,
Australia and France. Aircraft carriers and troops were immediately
mobilized, not even losing a day. Doesn’t that conspicuously smell of an
earlier preparation, just waiting for that crucial and appropriate
event, prompting parliamentary approval?
At the same time France lawmakers agreed to displayed 10,000 troops
throughout the country to protect ‘vulnerable places’; spying on
citizens, for their protection takes on new forms and formats. A direct
reaction to the attack on Charlie Hebdo on January 7 and the assault on a
kosher supermarket on January 9? – Killing 17 people in all? Is that
it?
French Ministers of the Interior and of Defense have advanced their
wish of substantially increased respective military and defense budgets,
when the 2016-2017 allocations are being discussed later this year. No
doubt they will get their way.
No doubt, this is the shock doctrine at its best. People are in awe
and shock after the assault of the satirical and Moslem insulting
Charlie Hebdo. A million and a half took to the streets in Paris this
past weekend, the largest manifestation since the liberation of Paris
after WWII in 1945. Some media report more than 6 million people
marching throughout Europe. Almost all waving signs “I am Charlie” – Solidarity or stupidity? Hard to say. Most likely just sheer ignorance.
Its ignorance that kills our democracies, our human values; public
ignorance allows leaders (sic) to wage wars, to aggress nations that
refuse to submit, to fall to their knees. Its ignorance perpetuated
daily by our mainstream media and swallowed without question,
day-in-day-out like breakfast coffee.
Neocon leaders, all over Europe, the new patsies of Washington that
we, the people, have voted into office, under shrewd but hardly
noticeable Washington-funded propaganda, through NED (National Endowment
for Democracy) and other well-endowed CIA sponsored so-called
think-tanks, meddling in local politics, sowing threats or acts of
destabilization. Europe’s new masters that a majority of the people
doesn’t really like, but who are in office anyway – these spineless
stooges constitute Europe in Brussels, the EU itself having become a
miserable colony of Washington.
So, with a populace under shock, politicians have it even
easier to get away literally with murder, with whatever they want under
the pretext of fighting the eternal enemy – the Moslem
terrorist armies, AlQada, ISIS and whatever other names they have
morphed into or morphed out from in the course of the last couple of
decades. Eternal war on eternal terrorists perpetuates evil and more
terrorism and – war budgets yielding insane profits for the war industry
throughout the western Washington-aligned world.
Under shock and awe, people will approve every aberrant and sick wish
of aggression by politicians – if being told that it is for their good
and protection. Yes, that’s what the propaganda machine has done to the
‘free-thinking’ minds of the citizens of our ever so heralded
democracies. Democracies, freedom of expression, freedom of press – mon
oeil !
The Charlie atrocities reek all over of false flag. An attack so well
and professionally carried out with cutting edge Kalashnikovs and
get-away methodology, way beyond the capacities of the Kouachi brothers,
who have no doubt criminal records, spent time with and were trained by
the very AlQada and ISIS that were created and funded by Washington and
by its European puppets – including the French, according to President
(sic) Hollande’s own admission.
Yes, the French were and are funding counter-terrorism in Iraq and
Syria, the very counter-terrorism that provides them in turn with
pretexts to bomb the two war-torn countries to even more rubble – just
for regime change, with the added benefit of oil and gas, and a constant
profit generating war machine – leaving millions of deaths behind,
mostly civilians, women and children and elderly – and other untold
millions as refugees, in miserable unsanitary camps, or fleeing across
dangerous borders to unknown destinies, to disease, hunger and death –
people the world forgets, the media stays away from – forgotten lives.
The Kouachi brother, as well as Amedy Coulibaly, the suspect in the
hostage drama of the Hyper Kosher food market in eastern Paris, whose
identities and past activities were well recorded in French police
files, were most likely pre-identified as perpetrators of the probable
pre-meditated murderous attacks that left 17 people dead within three
days of horror in Paris; attacks so well organized and carried out that
they could easily bear the stamp of French special forces, CIA, Mossad
or all three of them – because, cui bono – who benefits? – Perhaps the
Masters of all three of them?
The Kouachi brothers were identified only by a conveniently lost ID
in the get-away car, reminiscent of the intact passport of one of the
9/11 ‘terrorists’ found in the rubbles of the twin towers. Are people
really ignorant enough to believe such a farce? – All three were caught
and killed almost immediately by police. Dead men don’t talk.
And there is more – coincidentally, as reported by Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research
, the Police Commissioner, Helric Fredou, Number Two Police Officer of
the Regional Service of France’s Judicial Police in Limoges, “committed
suicide on the night of Wednesday to Thursday at the police station.”
Commissioner Helric Fredou was leading the police investigation into the
Charlie Hebdo terror attack.
Dead police commissioner Helric Fredou.
The reason given for the ‘suicide’ is ‘burn-out’ and
depression – depression when in charge of one of France’s most prominent
criminal investigations of the century? The incidence as of this day is
hardly covered by the msm.
False flag written all over the walls of Charlie Hebdo’s publishing
house. – The publisher being controversial, having received frequent
threats for its Moslem-offensive cartoons, was normally under heavy
police protection. Why was on 7 January only one police car with one
police officer parked half a block away?
False flag – converted immediately into public shock, the perfect
condition for ramming any police, military and surveillance legislation
down the people’s throat. Better, it doesn’t even have to be ‘rammed
down’, the population asks for it. They want to be protected and secure.
They want their government going to war to wipe out Moslem terrorism,
never mind how violent and how cruel they go about it, never mind the
criminal acts these governments are committing in the name of protecting
their citizenry.
Does anybody take to the streets in Europe, in the US with posters
saying “I am…. blank” … the million victims of Iraq, of Syria – of
Libya, of Afghanistan, of Yemen, of Pakistan, of Sudan, of Somalia – and
the list is almost endless. These millions of lives wiped out by
Obama’s drones and NATO count for nothing in the dulled minds of the
western civilization (sic).
The war and killing machine that feeds the propaganda machine, driven
by the six Zionist-Anglos-Saxon monster media that control 90% of the
western information system, shy not from dishing out lie after lie after
lie to indoctrinate the populace with believes that have zilch to do
with reality – but they transform our western populace into hapless
zombies.
What does it take to stop this vicious cycle and awaken consciousness?
Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is
also a former World Bank staff and worked extensively around the world
in the fields of environment and water resources. He is the author of
Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction
and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World
Bank experience around the globe.
Since 2011, VNN has operated as part of the Veterans Today Network; a group that operates over 50 plus media, information and service online sites for U.S. Military Veterans.
The views expressed herein are the views
of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN or any
other VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and
technicians. Notices
Le point de vue du capitaine Paul Barril, du GIGN, sur l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers perpétré le 9 août 1982.
« Qui sont les auteurs de la boucherie sanglante de la rue des
Rosiers ? Le terroriste Abou Nidal revendique souvent, et sans aucun
complexe, les forfaits qu’il commet. En revanche, il ne s’exprimera
jamais sur le “sujet tabou” de l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers. Plus de
treize ans après les faits, c’est le silence dans la “communauté du
renseignement”, où pourtant peu de secrets peuvent résister au temps, à
la délation et aux vantardises, voire à la trahison ou aux primes en
dollars. Les attentats arabes commis dans les années 80 ont été, un à
un, élucidés, leurs auteurs connus, ainsi que leurs commanditaires.
Tous, sauf pour la rue des Rosiers. Black-out total. Cet attentat reste
“hors normes”. Un de ses premiers effets aura été de renverser, en
faveur de l’État d’Israël et contre le “terrorisme palestinien”, le
climat violemment anti-israélien créé par les atrocités commises au
Liban par Tsahal, l’armée israélienne. Un basculement du discours
télévisuel et médiatique suivit. L’“agresseur israélien” devint la
“victime juive”. Un miracle en somme.
J’en serai moi-même surpris, à l’occasion d’une rencontre au sein de
l’ambassade israélienne à Paris, avec un vieux monsieur chauve, digne et
discret : le représentant du Mossad pour l’Europe. Les Israéliens, qui
n’ont jamais manifesté, dans le cas de l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers,
leur habituelle volonté d’appliquer la “loi du Talion”, semblaient peu
intéressés par mes informations. J’en ai gardé un profond sentiment de
malaise et de gêne.
Régis Debray, dans une note confidentielle qu’il adressa au président
de la République, en date du 20 avril 1984, confirma mes interrogations
sur cet étrange attentat de la rue des Rosiers, ainsi que la
dangerosité des Irlandais de Vincennes. Il faisait apparaître le rôle
particulièrement trouble de Bernard Jégat. En effet, écrivait-il à
François Mitterrand :
“Il a la conviction intime [Bernard Jégat], ainsi qu’un faisceau de
présomptions, que ses amis irlandais ont servi de base logistique
(voitures, passeports, contacts, armes) dans l’attentat de la rue des
Rosiers, mais il n’en a pas la preuve matérielle, là est la difficulté.
Bernard Jégat se sent aujourd’hui menacé de mort par ses anciens amis.
Il demande les moyens de déménager rapidement, un permis de port d’arme
et une orientation sur la conduite à tenir (doit-il aller ou non chez le
juge d’instruction ?). Il me remettra, dans une quinzaine de jours, un
rapport écrit détaillé sur tout ce qu’il a vu, vécu et entendu entre
1979 et 1982 dans son réseau terroriste, qu’il croyait au départ, mais à
tort, purement de soutien à la cause irlandaise.”
Sans commentaire.
Mon scepticisme sur l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers s’est aggravé
quand j’ai appris qu’Abou Nidal, alors le terroriste le plus recherché
de la planète, avait passé de longues années, en toute tranquillité,
dans une villa cossue de Koweit City. Rallié, en 1991, à la coalition
anti-irakienne durant la guerre du Golfe, il a néanmoins laissé certains
de ses hommes de main participer aux pogroms antipalestiniens qui
eurent lieu, justement au Koweit, après le triomphe des troupes
américaines.
Quoi qu’il en soit, pour le GIGN, à l’époque, c’était “l’alerte
rouge”. L’Anschluss du général israélien Sharon avait pour but déclaré
de “rendre service au monde” en envoyant Israël “extirper du Liban le
terrorisme international”. Nous étions le 6 juin 1982. L’opération “Paix
en Galilée” commençait. Deux mois plus tard, les résultats n’étaient
pas probants. En “découpant la ville au chalumeau”, selon l’expression
d’un rescapé, les blindés du “boucher de Beyrouth” parvinrent, certes, à
chasser l’OLP de Yasser Arafat de ses bases, mais pour combien de
temps, et surtout, à quel prix ? Au demeurant, aujourd’hui, Yasser
Arafat est prix Nobel de la paix, il a remis les pieds, avec ses hommes
en armes, sur une parcelle du sol de la Palestine et il a même une
représentation à Paris. »
Paul Barril, Guerres secrètes à l’Élysée, Éditions Albin Michel, 1996, pp. 38-40
Pour réfléchir sur l’affaire Charlie, il faut une perspective
historique. La comparaison s’impose avec l’affaire Merah. Les
similitudes sont trop troublantes pour être dues au hasard ; le profil
des (...)
abdel-asiemAbdelhakim El-Andaloussyabdul rahimAbdul-Azeez Abdul-HakeemAbdul-Baasit and 135 more...
Today Monday 25 January 2015 at 11:56 AM ADD THIS ONE TO YOUR HOLOCAUST FAIRY TALE COLLECTION!!!!!
Another Great Performance by Elie Wiesel
by Daniel McGowan / December 15th, 2014
On December 8, 2014 WXXI-TV’s Great Performances
presented the legendary violinist Itzhak Perlman and the renowned
cantor Yitzchak Meir Helfgot in a musical exploration of liturgical and
traditional works for both chamber orchestra and klezmer settings. To
fortify its Jewish character the program included a short discussion
between Itzhak Perlman and Elie Wiesel, arguably the foremost proponent
of the current Holocaust narrative.
Wiesel told the
incredulous Perlman that as a boy he too had studied violin. Moreover he
claimed that he took his violin to Auschwitz in June 1944; his father
suggested that since Elie was already there he might as well try out for
the Auschwitz Orchestra in hopes of earning an extra ration of bread.
But alas Elie could only play classical music, like Beethoven, and not
those evil Nazi marches, so during his interview with the head of the
Auschwitz Orchestra a vicious kapo grabbed his violin and smashed it
under foot.
As
a Jew, I was proud of Perlman’s gracious restraint in not calling
Wiesel’s remarks utter nonsense. He did not even stoop to ask Elie how
such a tall story could have been omitted from Night, his best-selling
novel, which is force fed to American students as a must-be-believed
memoir. But I am tormented. Is it not shameful of The Great Weasel to
mention the existence of an Auschwitz Orchestra? An orchestra in an
extermination camp? What next? A swimming pool? Oy, what a shanda fur di
goyim.
And if we are to accept an inmate orchestra at
Auschwitz might we not envision a Klezmer band at Ketziot, Israel’s
largest concentration camp for Palestinians in the Negev Desert; it
could be called the Ketziot Klezmer Klub and give new meaning to the
otherwise odious acronym KKK. But wait; you must not mention an
Israeli concentration camp. Forget Ketziot. Do not compare the plight of
Jews with the plight of Palestinians; such a comparison according to
Elie Wiesel is “unworthy.” Just sit back and enjoy his “great
performance.”
Daniel McGowan is a Professor Emeritus at Hobart and William Smith Colleges.
Voltaire Network
What lies behind the anti "conspiracy theorist" discourse
The State Against The Republic
by
Thierry Meyssan
At the request of President François Hollande, the French Socialist Party has published a note on the international “conspiracy theorist"
movement. His goal: to prepare new legislation prohibiting it to
express itself. In the US, the September 11, 2001 coup established a "permanent state of emergency" (Patriot Act),
launching a series of imperial wars. Gradually, the European elites
have aligned with their counterparts across the Atlantic. Everywhere,
people are worried about being abandoned by their States and they
question their institutions. Seeking to retain power, the elites are now
ready to use force to gag their opposition.
January
27, 2015, President François Hollande made "conspiracy theorists"
responsible for the crimes committed by the Nazis against the Jews of
Europe. He called for a ban on their freedom of expression.
The President of the French Republic, François Hollande, has assimilated what he calls "conspiracy theories" to Nazism and called to prevent their dissemination on the Internet and social networks.
Thus he declared, on January 27, 2015 at the Shoah Memorial:
"[Anti-Semitism] maintains conspiracy theories that spread without
limits. Conspiracy theories that have, in the past, led to the worst
"(...)" [The] answer is to realize that conspiracy theories are
disseminated through the Internet and social networks. Moreover, we must
remember that it is words that have in the past prepared extermination.
We need to act at the European level, and even internationally, so that
a legal framework can be defined, and so that Internet platforms that
manage social networks are held to account and that sanctions be imposed
for failure to enforce" [1].
Several ministers also decried what they called conspiracy theorists as so many "fermenters of hate and disintegrators of society."
Knowing that President Hollande calls "conspiracy theory" the
idea that States, whatever their regimes - including democracies - have a
spontaneous tendency to act in their own interests and not in that of
their constituents, we can conclude that he presented this confused
amalgam to justify a possible censure of his opponents.
This interpretation is confirmed by the publication of a note entitled "Conspiracy theories, current status" by the Jean-Jaurès Foundation, a Socialist Party think tank of which Mr. Holland was the first secretary. [2]
Let’s leave aside the political relations of François Hollande, the
Socialist Party, the Fondation Jean-Jaurès, its political radicalism
Observatory and the author of the note and let’s focus on its message
and its ideological content.
Definition of "conspiracy theories"
The terms "conspiracy theories" and "conspiracy theorism" have developed in France in the wake of the publication of my book on US imperialism post-September 11, titled The Big Lie [3].
At the time, we had trouble understanding what the terms meant because
they referred to American political history. In the United States, are
commonly called "conspiracy theorists" those according to whom
President Kennedy had not been assassinated by one man but by many,
forming a conspiracy (in the judicial sense). Over time, these
expressions entered in the French language and have overlapped with
memories of the 30s and the Second World War, those of the denunciation
of the "Jewish conspiracy". These are therefore now polysemous,
sometimes evoking the law of the state-Stator silence and, at other
times, European anti-Semitism.
In its note, the Jean-Jaurès Foundation gives its own definition of conspiracy theorism. It is
"an ’alternative’ narrative that claims to significantly upset the
knowledge we have of an event and therefore competes with the "version"
which is commonly accepted, stigmatized as "official"" (p. 2).
Observe that this definition does not apply solely to the delusions
of the mentally ill. Thus, Socrates, through the myth of the cave,
affirmed his challenge to the certainties of his time; Galileo with his
heliocentric theory challenged the prevailing interpretation of the Bible of his time; etc.
For my part, and since they see me as the "pope of conspiracy theorists" or rather the "heretic"
in the words of Italian philosopher Roberto Quaglia, I reaffirm my
radical political commitment, in keeping with the French republican
radicalism of Leon Bourgeois [4], of Georges Clemenceau, [5] of Alain [6] and of Jean Moulin. [7] For me, as for them, the state is a Leviathan which by nature abuses those it governs.
As a radical Republican, I am aware that the state is the enemy of the common good, of the Res Publica;
which is why I wish not to abrogate it, but to tame it. The republican
ideal is compatible with various political regimes-including monarchies,
as was enacted by the authors of the Declaration of 1789.
This opposition, which the current Socialist Party disputes, has so
shaped our history as Philippe Pétain repealed the Republic to proclaim
the "French State". Immediately after his assuming presidential office, I denounced Hollande’s Petainism [8].
Today, Mr. Hollande claims to be of the Republic to better fight it and
this inversion of values plunges the country into confusion.
Who are the "conspiracy theorists"?
The "conspiracy theorists" are thus citizens who oppose the omnipotence of the State and who wish to place it under surveillance.
The Jean-Jaurès Foundation describes them as follows:
"[It’s] a heterogeneous movement, heavily entangled with the
Holocaust denial movement, and which combines admirers of Hugo Chavez
and fans of Vladimir Putin. An underworld that consist of former
left-wing activists or extreme leftists, former "malcontents",
sovereignists, revolutionary nationalists, ultra-nationalists,
nostalgists of the Third Reich, anti-vaccination activists, supporters
of drawing straws, September 11th revisionists, anti-Zionists,
Afrocentricists, survivalists, followers of "alternative medicine",
agents of influence of the Iranian regime, Bacharists, Catholic or
Islamic fundamentalists "(p. 8).
One will note the amalgams and abuse of this description aiming to discredit those it designates.
Myths of the "conspiracy theorists"
The Jean-Jaurès Foundation continues its vilification by accusing "conspiracy theorists" of ignoring the realities of the world and naively believing hackneyed myths. Thus, they would believe in the "World Zionist plot", the "illuminati conspiracy" and the "Rothschild myth" (p. 4). And to credit these three statements, it cites an example solely on the "Rothschild myth": blogger Etienne Chouard - whose work is not simply about the Republic, but goes beyond to treat Democracy [9]
- says the Pompidou-Rothschild 1973 law is the source of the debt of
France. And the Foundation goes on to refute this assertion by quoting
an article published by Libération.
One will note here that the example of Étienne Chouard leaves one
unsatisfied about the two other cited myths. Especially, the Foundation
addresses ignorant people who have neither read the response from Mr.
Chouard to Libération [10] nor the contribution of the "conspiracy theorist", former Prime minister Michel Rocard. [11]
Indeed, in this debate, it is clear that the 1973 law allowed the
explosion of the French debt in favor of private banks, which would have
been impossible before.
The "conspirasphere"
For the Fondation Jean-Jaurès, conspiracy intellectuals would be
"essentially North Americans. Particular mention is made of
Webster Tarpley and William Engdhal (both former members of the US
political-sectarian organization led by Lyndon LaRouche), Wayne Madsen
(WayneMadsenReport.com), Kevin Barrett (VeteransToday.com) or Michel
Chossudovsky (Mondialisation.ca ). With their European counterparts,
they form a kind of International to which Thierry Meyssan, president of
Voltaire Network, tried to give concrete form in November 2005 in
Brussels, bringing together an "anti-imperialist conference" - "Axis for
Peace "- the list of participants of which reads like a who’s who of
conspiracy authors most prominent at the time" (p. 8).
First, let’s observe that the Fondation Jean-Jaurès must only read in
French and English, and have barely skimmed over the participants’
lists of Axis for Peace, to believe that the phenomenon it
describes only concerns France, Canada and the United States. In fact
it includes a very large literature in Arabic, Spanish, Persian and
Russian; languages which are also in the majority in Axis for Peace.
Let’s note also the malicious nature of the reference to "the politico-sectarian American organization led by Lyndon LaRouche."
Indeed, William Webster Tarpley and Engdhal quit this organization more
than 20 years ago. And at the time when they were members, this party
was represented in France at an extreme-left organization’s congress.
A little further on, the Jean-Jaurès Foundation does not fail to
mention the comedian Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, whose shows the State
seeks to prohibit, the sociologist Alain Soral, whose website
(EgaliteEtReconciliation.fr ) obtains audience records in France, and
Alain Benajam (facebook.com/alain.benajam), chairman of Voltaire Network
France and representative of the Novorossian Government of Donbass.
In
1989, the former head of US intelligence in Europe, Irving Brown,
revealed to reporters Roger Faligot and Rémi Kauffer that he had
recruited Jean-Christophe Cambadélis when he militated in Lambertists
Trotskyists. 25 years later, Mr. Cambadélis became First Secretary of
the French Socialist Party.
The political ideas of "conspiracy theorists"
After these appetizers, the Fondation Jean-Jaurès comes to the heart
of the debate, that of political ideas. It defines those of the
"conspiracy theorists" thus:
"the
erasure of any distinction in kind between liberal democracies and
authoritarian regimes (deemed more “totalitarian" than the worst of
totalitarianism)”;
"[Opposition to] any anti-racist legislation under the pretext of defending "freedom of expression";
"[Rejection
of] the relevance of the left-right divide, the real divide is the one
between" the system "(or" Empire "or the" oligarchy ") and those who
resist it"; (P. 8)
"the idea that Zionism is a project of world domination" (p. 9).
The Jean-Jaurès Foundation specifically targets areas of conflict,
but exaggerates to discredit its opponents. For example, no one is
opposed to all anti-racism legislation, but only and exclusively to the
Fabius-Gayssot law that punishes by imprisonment any debate about the
extermination of the Jews of Europe [12].
What is Zionism?
The Foundation then engages in a very long analysis of my works on Zionism. It disfigures them, then comments:
"Thierry Meyssan’s anti-Zionism bears no resemblance to the
criticism of a situation, that of the governments that have been able to
succeed each other at the head of the State of Israel. It does not
arise from an anti-colonialism that would be resolved by Israel’s
withdrawal from the territories occupied after the Six Day War and the
creation of a Palestinian state. It also does not proceed from an
internationalism that would hold in suspicion, in principle, any
national movement wherever it comes from, precisely because it does not
liken Zionism to a national movement. This paranoid anti-Zionism does
not pretend to fight Zionism in the diversity of its historical
expressions, but as a fantastic hydra that is the source of evil in the
world. "
In wanting to conclude this debate by giving it considerable space in
its analysis, the Jean Jaurès Foundation highlights its importance. I
indeed defend a position thus far absent in the Western political
debate [13]: The
first head of state who stated his intention to bring together Jews
from around the world in a state that would be theirs was Lord Cromwell
in the seventeenth century. His project, clearly explained, was to use
the Jewish diaspora to expand English hegemony. This project has been
defended by all successive British governments and registered by
Benjamin Disraeli in the agenda of the Berlin Conference. Theodor
Herzl himself was a disciple of Cecil Rhodes, the theorist of the
British Empire. Herzl originally proposed to create Israel in Uganda or
Argentina, not in Palestine. When he succeeded in having Jewish
activists adhere to the British project, he bought land in Palestine by
creating the Jewish Agency whose articles are a carbon copy of the
Rhodes society in Southern Africa. In
1916-17, the United Kingdom and the United States reconciled themselves
by committing together to create the state of Israel through the
Balfour Declaration in London and Wilson’s 14 points in Washington.
It is therefore perfectly absurd to claim that Herzl invented
Zionism, to separate the Zionist project from British colonialism, and
to deny that the State of Israel is a tool of the common imperial
project in London and Washington.
The position of the Parti socialiste on this subject is not innocent.
In 1936 it proposed with Léon Blum to create the state of Israel on the
territory of the Lebanon mandate [14].
However the project was quickly dismissed because of the opposition of
the French High Commissioner in Beirut, Damien de Martel de Janville.
Concluding remarks
In 2008, Professor Cass Sunstein, an adviser to President Barack
Obama and husband of the US Ambassador to the UN, had written a similar
note [15].
He wrote:
"We can easily imagine a series of possible answers.
1. The government can ban conspiracy theories.
2. The government could impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.
3. The government could engage in a contrary discourse to discredit conspiracy theories.
4. The government could initiate credible private parties to engage in a discourse against conspiracy theories.
5. The government could engage in informal communication with third parties and encourage them. "
Ultimately, the US government had decided to fund individuals, both
at home and abroad, to disrupt the forum websites of conspiracy
theorists and to create groups to contradict them.
This not having sufficed, France is called upon to take authoritarian
measures. As in the past, the French elites, of which the Socialist
Party forms the pseudo-left wing, have placed themselves under the
orders of the main military power of the time, in this case, the US.
Let’s not be naive, we are approaching an inevitable showdown. It
remains to be determined which instance, necessarily administrative,
will be in charge of censorship and what will be its criteria.
[1] « Discours de François Hollande au Mémorial de la Shoah », par François Hollande, Réseau Voltaire, 27 janvier 2015.
[2] « Conspirationnisme : un état des lieux », par Rudy Reichstadt, Observatoire des radicalités politiques, Fondation Jean-Jaurès, Parti socialiste, 24 février 2015.
[3] L’Effroyable Imposture suivi de Le Pentagate, par Thierry Meyssan, Nouvelle réédition, entièrement réactualisée et annotée, éditions Demi-Lune.
[4]
Léon Bourgeois, sculpteur français (1851-1925). Théoricien du «
solidarisme » (que les socialistes actuels confondent avec la
Fraternité). Il fut président du Parti radical, président du Conseil des
ministres, premier président de la Société des Nations et lauréat du
prix Nobel de la paix en 1920. Avec l’aide du Tsar Nicolas II, il posa
le principe des arbitrages entre États, dont la Cour internationale de
Justice des Nations unies est l’aboutissement actuel.
[5]
Georges Clemenceau (1841-1929). Il défendit les Communards face à la
droite et combattit la gauche socialiste de Jules Ferry aussi bien
contre son projet de colonisation que contre sa vision de la laïcité.
Alors que, durant la Grande Guerre, le pays semblait vaincu, il devint
président du Conseil et le conduisit jusqu’à la victoire.
[6]
Alain, philosophe français (1868-1951), co-fondateur du Comité de
vigilance des intellectuels antifascistes (CVIA). Il milita pour une
république protectrice de la liberté, strictement contrôlée par le
peuple.
[7]
Jean Moulin, haut fonctionnaire (1899-1943). Il prit le parti des
Républicains espagnols et organisa illégalement, malgré le gouvernement
socialiste neutre, un trafic d’armes pour résister aux Franquistes.
Durant l’Occupation de la France, il dirigea le Conseil national de la
Résistance, y incluant toutes les sensibilités politiques à l’exception
de celle qui s’était battue aux côtés des Franquistes. Arrêté par les
nazis, il mourut sous la torture.
[8] “France According to François Hollande”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Michele Stoddard , Voltaire Network, 4 August 2012.
[9]
La République veille à ce que le Pouvoir serve l’Intérêt général. La
Démocratie exige que le Pouvoir soit exercé par tous les citoyens.
[10] «Analyse des réflexions de Monsieur Beitone sur la prétendue rumeur d’extrême droite à propos de la loi de 1973», par Étienne Chouard, 30 décembre 2011.
[11] Émission Mediapolis
sur la radio Europe 1, le 22 décembre 2012, l’ancien Premier ministre
socialiste Michel Rocard était l’invité de Michel Field et d’Olivier
Duhamel.
[12]
De nombreux responsables politiques se sont vainement opposés à cette
loi, dont l’ancien président Jacques Chirac, et les anciens Premiers
ministres Dominique de Villepin et François Fillon.
[13] “Who is the Enemy?”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 4 August 2014.
[14] My Enemy’s Enemy: Lebanon in the Early Zionist Imagination, 1900-1948,
Laura Zittrain Eisenberg, Wayne State University Press (1994). Thèse de
doctorat vérifiée par Itamar Rabinovitch côté israélien et Kamal Salibi
côté libanais.
[15] «Conspiracy Theories», Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule, Harvard Law School, January 15, 2008.
Affaire Bourarach : mandat d’arrêt international lancé contre l’un des accusés en fuite
Dieudonné, présent cet après-midi au procès pour soutenir la veuve de Saïd Bourarach, Nathalie
Le
17 mars 2015, le procès de l’affaire concernant l’assassinat du
vigile Saïd Bourarach s’est ouvert devant la cour d’assise de la
Seine-Saint-Denis, à Bobigny.
Dans cette affaire, quatre personnes
ont été renvoyées devant la cour d’assise pour violences volontaires
ayant entraîné la mort, sans intention de la donner.
Ils risquent 15 ans de prison ferme.
Dan Lampel
Ces quatre personnes sont : Dan Lampel, Michaël Lampel, Dan Sellam et Lucien Dadoun.
Lucien Dadoun ne s’est pas présenté à ce procès à l’ouverture, le 17 mars 2015 : il est en fuite.
La présidente de la cour d’assise a donc délivré à l’encontre de Lucien Dadoun un mandat d’arrêt international. Lucien Dadoun est donc activement recherché par toutes les polices du monde.
Il sera jugé par défaut.
On en est certain, il ne se cache pas à Jérusalem-Ouest.
Lors
de son audition par la police nationale, Lucien Dadoun a fait des
déclarations. Il a écrit en bas de son procès verbal que ce qu’il a
déclaré n’est pas forcément vrai : pressions, chantage…
Lucien
Dadoun vendait des matraques électriques. Or, l’un des témoins a indiqué
à la cour d’assise que l’un des agresseurs avait une matraque
télescopique.
Une affaire louche, très louche. Qui a bien pu exercer des pressions et des menaces contre Lucien Dadoun ?
Bref,
le procès pourra difficilement établir la réalité de ce qui s’est
passé, compte tenu du fait que Lucien Dadoun n’est pas présent puisqu’il
a pris la fuite. L’absence de Lucien Dadoun peut-elle être considérée comme un aveux de culpabilité ?
La seule certitude dans cette affaire, c’est que Saïd Bourarach est bien mort.
Les accusés s’imaginent qu’ils seront acquittés.
La suite au prochain épisode. Afin d’apporter un soutien concret à la femme et aux enfants de Saïd Bourarach actuellement en extrême précarité, Dieudonné organise une représentation de son spectacle La Bête immonde le jeudi 26 mars à 22h00 au tarif exceptionnel de 19 €. L’intégralité des recettes de cette soirée sera reversée à la famille.
NOUS SOMMES SAÏD !
Marion Sigaut sur le rapport Kinsey à l'origine de la révolution sexuelle
Marion
Sigaut : "Le but de la fondation Rockefeller dans le rapport KInsey
était d'extirper à l'Amérique sa morale et son idéologie chrétienne".
PRINCE CHARLES' MANDATORY "OUR VALUES" TO UK MUSLIMS
A BRIEF encounter like no other: New York straphangers join
thousands of commuters across the globe ditching their trousers to
celebrate the 'No Pants Subway Ride'
Public transport in cities including Milan, Bucharest, Prague and Berlin were crammed with bare-legged travellers
Participants are required to dress normally on their top halves and keep a straight face as they ride
London Undergound users also took part in the 'celebration of silliness' which was founded by Improv Everywhere
Stunt began in New York in 2002, where seven people attended. Passengers are advised to take something to read
In
the face of sub-zero temperatures and freezing winds, New Yorkers braved
the cold and went bare-legged for the annual 'No Pants Subway Ride' on
Sunday.
Wearing
hats, scarves and thick coats on their top halves, boarded trains at
stations across the city - surrounded by bemused travellers.
Scantily-clad
riders also took part in places including London, Milan, Bucharest,
Berlin and Mexico City - all joined in as part of the 'celebration of
silliness'.
Scroll down for video
+66
A participant in the No Pants Subway Ride waits for a train at Astor Place subway station in New York in her underwear
+66
A woman sticks her tongue out to the camera in a New York subway train carriage crammed with bare-legged commuters
+66
Another woman, wearing a gray beanie, texts a friend as she waits for the subway train in New York
+66
+66
Three friends pose for a photo in the warm winter gear and bare legs as another woman moves to the music in New York
+66
Two bare-legged women stand and wait
for a train in New York. The first event took place in 2002 when only
seven people took part
+66
Even though there is snow on the
ground outside, one female commuter decides to bare her midriff as she
walks with a friend through a New York subway station
It
started off as a prank by comedy group Improv Everywhere in 2002,
bemusing a few embarrassed commuters, but has since grown into a global
phenomenon.
The rules of the event, which is in its 14th year, are fairly straightforward.
Underpants
must be worn and, although flashy designs are allowed, organisers
prefer those involved to look - at least from the waist-up - as though
they are going about their daily lives.
This is to increase the impact the participants have on the unaware bystanders.
In
the inaugural event ago only seven people took part, but now thousands
in major capital cities around the globe participate in what organisers
call a 'celebration of silliness'.
Uniforms
and business suits are encouraged to amplify the lower-half effect as
are props - bicycles, prams, shopping bags or a briefcase.
Participants
are also forbidden from speaking to one another and are instructed to
bring 'any activity you might normally perform on the train: newspaper,
book, sewing kit.'
+66
Another man decided to incorporate a patriotic Captain America outfit while taking part in the stunt
+66
The commuters wore an array of underwear items from floral, green briefs to plain grey and black pieces in New York
+66
A woman and man, both without pants, share a joke with a woman riding with her son who chose not to join the festivities
+66
+66
A woman
shows off her gold briefs at the top of a staircase in a New York subway
station before being confronted by an abortion activist
+66
+66
Two participants walk out of Union Square station in New York while another raises her arms to the camera
+66
Others decided it was a time to dance as they got off a train at the Union Square station in New York
A tattooed man dons a shirt and red tie on the subway in New York. The stunt takes place in around 60 cities across the globe
+66
Earlier in the ride, before finding a seat, he stood alongside a man in pink briefs as the train traveled in Manhattan
+66
One woman tried to combat the chilly weather by wearing knee-high boots on the New York subway
+66
Jessica Faustin, of Queens, New York, participates in the annual No Pants Subway Ride
+66
A group of participants, some wearing
long socks to help keep the lower half of their legs warm, wait to board
a train in New York
+66
Despite the lack of clothes, one woman
tries to keep up a fashionable appearance by wearing sunglasses and a
coat. Another man wearing checkered underwear goes for a more
conservative look
+66
A music fan listening to his headphones bravely dons a Superman t-shirt and matching briefs at 14th Street station in New York
+66
Four pairs of legs are visible above a New York subway sign directing commuters to Downtown and Brooklyn on the N,Q and R trains
+66
Forgetting that she hadn't topped up
her MetroCard, a woman approaches a self-service machine to add credit
so she can board the train
+66
She then has to go to a cashier and pay for the ticket using the remaining pennies in her purse
+66
A colorful array of patterned shoes and sneakers climb the stairs in New York after leaving the train
+66
People don matching underwear during the annual No Pants Subway Ride. On their top halves they have wrapped up with scarves
+66
For some of the participants the event
continued outside despite the sub-zero temperatures. One woman starts
to juggle outside Whole Foods in Union Square, New York
+66
One commuter wearing tiny shorts speaks to another woman as they stand in an underpass at a New York subway station
+66
Next to a subway turnstile, a woman's zebra-striped underwear is barely visible as she waits for a train in New York
+66
A pantless woman laughs as she walks down the stairs of a New York subway station in front of bewildered commuters
+66
+66
Three
friends stand arm-in-arm as they pose for a photo at a subway station in
Manhattan. Another pair talk while holding their phones
+66
A photographer takes a photo through one of the sliding doors of the subway, capturing two women taking part
+66
Two men reading books, one on a tablet, ignore a woman standing in the middle of the train who has taken off her pants
+66
A participant in the No Pants Subway Ride DC waits for a train at the Gallery Place - Chinatown station in Washington, DC
+66
+66
One man wears a sombrero during a ride on the subway in Mexico City. Another pair celebrate the worldwide prank with a kiss
+66
Participants wearing everything from Y-fronts to suspenders walk through a subway station in Mexico City
+66
A pair of lovers, one wearing a veil, embrace as they wait for a subway train in Mexico City
+66
Marriage seems to be the theme of the day in Mexico as a pair dressed in wedding attire walk along a platform
+66
A woman wearing heels and no pants
boards the train in Mexico City behind a man who had clearly not been
taking part in the stunt
+66
One man rests his hand on the back of a female companion as they wait to board the train in Mexico City
+66
Like any other work day, this man
wears a shirt, jacket and polished shoes. However he decided to leave
his pants at home. The excitement seems to have evaded the man sitting
next to him
+66
One man reads a book while his friend talks to him on the London Underground. A woman to their right seems less impressed
+66
A woman wearing a furry coat and heels clutches her handbag as she talks to another man taking part in 'No Pants Subway Ride;
+66
Passengers on the Central Line on the London Underground line up on each side of the train with bare legs, ignoring each other
+66
A woman holds
onto a rail in front of a hoard of half-naked passengers. Other
commuters take photos of the stunt at the end of the train on the London
Underground
+66
+66
A patriotic
passenger leans against a poll in the middle of a London Underground
train while another woman dons a fur coat, a scarf and heels - but no
pants
+66
In London, a man walks down the stairs inside an Underground station wearing a New York t-shirt
+66
Two commuters wear contrasting outfits while travelling on the London Underground during the international event
+66
The idea of the stunt is for people to
ride the subways how they would normally while bare-legged. Other
passengers in Berlin look on at the participants stunned
+66
A group of participants pose for a photograph, in an array of colored briefs, in central London before boarding the Underground
+66
A number of people leave a train in Berlin, Germany, during the worldwide 'celebration of silliness'
+66
A pair at Stadtmitte in Berlin point to the station signs while taking part in the stunt in Germany
+66
A woman wearing a red top, bottoms and shoes waits for a train in Prague, Czech Republic
+66
Commuters in Prague walk up the stairs after getting off the train during 'No Pants Subway Ride'
+66
A passenger informs other commuters to 'Keep Calm' while wearing a green t-shirt without any pants
+66
One man decided to leave his pants on in Bucharest, Romania, as he is surrounded by bare-legged females
+66
A female passenger in Bucharest, Romania, looks curiously to her left at the man wearing no pants on the train
+66
Participants in Milan, Italy, smile for the camera before beginning their journey on 'No Pants Subway Ride'
+66
+66
Two stylish commuters leave a Milan station while another reads a book as she waits for the train
+66
A commuter disembarks the train in Milan, Italy, as a number of bare-legged passengers prepare to board
+66
Replicating a graduation ceremony photo, participants in Milan throw their pants into the air
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Le Président John Fitzgerald Kennedy: "Ich bin ein Berliner" - Je suis un Berlinois! 26 juin 1963 JFK pronconça ces paroles dans le but de souligner le soutien des USA aux Allemands de l'Ouest contre les Allemands de l'Est. "Lass' sie nach Berlin kommen" - Laissez-les venir à Berlin, parlant des Allemands de l'Est qui désiraient venir à Berlin Ouest afin de démontrer que les Capitalistes et les Communistes pouvaient travailler ensemble. Sur les marches de Rathaus Schöneberg, il rappela à une audience de 450,000 personnes présentes, la célèbre formule: civis romanus sum - je suis un citoyen romain! Faisait-il ainsi À l'époque de JFK, le monde occidental sous contrôle judéo-maçonnique était fier de dire tout haut: Today "Ich bin ein Berliner!" Tous les hommes (pas les femmes!) libres, peu importe où ils habitaient, furent des citoyens de Berlin, et, comme un homme libre (croyait-il), JFK prononça avec une grande fierté ces mots: "Ich bin ein Berliner!" alors que les habitants de Berlin ne se disaient jamais Berlinois. Berliner dans le jargon local voulait tout simplement dire beignet! Theodore Chaikin "Ted" Sorensen (May 8, 1928 – October 31, 2010), de mère juive de Russie (Annis (Chaikin) Sorensen, écrivit la plupart des discours de JFK, y compris le plagiat du poète mystique chrétien Khalil Gibran qui avait écrit: "Ne demandez pas ce que peut faire le pays pour vous; demandez ce que vous pouvez faire pour votre pays!" Il est d'usage de dire "Nous sommes tous Palestiniens", et cela ne veut pas dire pour autant que ceux et celles qui disent ces mots font "l'apologie du terrorisme palestinien" ou qu'ils soient des voyous, des brigands, des gangsters, des enfoirés (Jacques Weber) comme veulent nous le faire croire les criminels et 'philosophes' juifs, et les sionistes de France et d'ailleurs! BAFS Samedi 4 janvier 2015
FRENCH "CIVILISATION DE MERDE"! Pour vivre ensemble il faut savoir aimer 1971 http://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.co.uk/.../to-live...
THE JEWISH FREEMASONIC WAR ON ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY GETS WORSE! http://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.co.uk/.../the...
JO NO SÓC “CHARLIE
HEBDO” BRÈTOL!
Par Francetv info
Published on 9 Dec 2014
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index18...
Dieudonné
et le terrorisme : réponse à Valls
Je ne
suis pas Charlie 
The
first head of state who stated his intention to bring together Jews
from around the world in a state that would be theirs was Lord Cromwell
in the seventeenth century. His project, clearly explained, was to use
the Jewish diaspora to expand English hegemony. This project has been
defended by all successive British governments and registered by
Benjamin Disraeli in the agenda of the Berlin Conference.
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Le Président John Fitzgerald Kennedy: "Ich bin ein Berliner" - Je suis un Berlinois! 26 juin 1963
ReplyDeleteJFK pronconça ces paroles dans le but de souligner le soutien des USA aux Allemands de l'Ouest contre les Allemands de l'Est.
"Lass' sie nach Berlin kommen" - Laissez-les venir à Berlin, parlant des Allemands de l'Est qui désiraient venir à Berlin Ouest afin de démontrer que les Capitalistes et les Communistes pouvaient travailler ensemble.
Sur les marches de Rathaus Schöneberg, il rappela à une audience de 450,000 personnes présentes, la célèbre formule: civis romanus sum - je suis un citoyen romain! Faisait-il ainsi
À l'époque de JFK, le monde occidental sous contrôle judéo-maçonnique était fier de dire tout haut: Today "Ich bin ein Berliner!" Tous les hommes (pas les femmes!) libres, peu importe où ils habitaient, furent des citoyens de Berlin, et, comme un homme libre (croyait-il), JFK prononça avec une grande fierté ces mots: "Ich bin ein Berliner!" alors que les habitants de Berlin ne se disaient jamais Berlinois. Berliner dans le jargon local voulait tout simplement dire beignet!
Theodore Chaikin "Ted" Sorensen (May 8, 1928 – October 31, 2010), de mère juive de Russie (Annis (Chaikin) Sorensen, écrivit la plupart des discours de JFK, y compris le plagiat du poète mystique chrétien Khalil Gibran qui avait écrit: "Ne demandez pas ce que peut faire le pays pour vous; demandez ce que vous pouvez faire pour votre pays!"
Il est d'usage de dire "Nous sommes tous Palestiniens", et cela ne veut pas dire pour autant que ceux et celles qui disent ces mots font "l'apologie du terrorisme palestinien" ou qu'ils soient des voyous, des brigands, des gangsters, des enfoirés (Jacques Weber) comme veulent nous le faire croire les criminels et 'philosophes' juifs, et les sionistes de France et d'ailleurs!
BAFS
Samedi 4 janvier 2015
FRENCH "CIVILISATION DE MERDE"!
Pour vivre ensemble il faut savoir aimer 1971
http://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.co.uk/.../to-live...
THE JEWISH FREEMASONIC WAR ON ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY GETS WORSE!
http://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.co.uk/.../the...
Je suis Shoarlie