Mark Dankof's America
Just another WordPress.com weblog
Reza Saidi of Iran’s Tasnim News Agency Talks to Mark Dankof on the New World Order
Mark Dankof in San Antonio, Texas.
Reza Saidi of the Tasnim News Agency of Iran interviewed Mark Dankof
on the New World Order and its implications. The Farsi language
version of this conversation published on September 28th, 2014 may be
accessed here.
Reza Saidi: Mr. Dankof is the New World Order currently experiencing a crisis and if so, what is the root of the crisis?
Mark Dankof: The New
World Order is definitely experiencing a crisis. The root of the crisis
involves what Matthias Chang has referred to as the Anglo-American-Zionist-Military Industrial Complex,
which has overextended its reach in the world by using illegitimate
military means and political/cultural subversion of individual countries
to reach three (3) ultimate goals: 1) The
establishment of a world banking system which is committed to the
Nixon-Saudi petrodollar of August of 1971 as the global reserve currency
of the planet and the only currency to be utilized for all
international oil transactions; 2) The establishment of a world
government ultimately based in Jerusalem which will have its foundations
in this global banking system, even as it is run by the appointed
agents of Zionist and Jewish power who control establishment banking,
media, and government in all of the individual nation-states globally
who have been subverted and brought into this oppressive mechanism; and
3) the achievement of Eretz Yisrael (Greater Israel) in the Middle East,
where the Zionist entity will control all of the territory between the
Nile River and the Tigris/Euphrates River with a United Jerusalem as the
seat of a Globalist Empire which oversees world banking, individual
governments, multi-national corporations, world technologies, and the
military/intelligence apparatuses of formerly sovereign nation-states. All
of this provided the foundational assumptions of World Zionism and the
United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference at Bretton Woods in
1944. The present crisis of the New World Order lies in the
fact that the United States, the chief enabler of Global Zionism and the
New World Order, has a level of national debt and overextension of
military involvements globally that is driving a national debt
approaching $18 trillion dollars, irresponsible borrowing from foreign
central banks to finance its military adventures and profligate
spending, and a monetary policy of a Federal Reserve Board which
involves the frenetic printing and distribution of American dollars
whose worth is tied to nothing else than the Nixon-Saudi petrodollar
monopoly of 1971. If that monopoly is threatened or destroyed by
effective opposition around the world, the game is over. That would be
just fine by me. All of this is on top of the erosion of the domestic
American manufacturing economy by Globalist design, and the erosion of
the moral and spiritual values of an American population by equal design
and intent.
Reza Saidi: As a main
player in the NWO, why is the US unwilling to challenge and interfere in
certain current international issues? On the other hand, if America
tries to use and benefit from the actions of their partners as proxies
in these affairs, is this the overall strategy of the US or is it an
expression of Democratic Thought?
Mark Dankof: The
answer to this is simple. The political elite which owns and runs the
United States could care less about “Democracy,” “Human Rights,” or the
autonomy of people in America and elsewhere who want no part of its
Zionist, Globalist, Totalitarian agenda. The entire method of
financing elections in America courtesy of the Citizens United and
McCutcheon decisions of the United States Supreme Court, along with
Zionist/Globalist ownership and control of Corporate Media Consortiums
and news dissemination, guarantees the election of people to office who
are owned Lock-Stock-and-Barrel by these interests. The Anti-New World
Order Left and Right in the United States understands this. But there is
nothing up to now which has proven effective in a counter political
strategy to this monolith, either in America, or in places like Syria
and Ukraine where economic and political subversion and overt military
threats are employed to destroy anyone and anything in its path.
Reza Saidi: Do you
believe that American hegemony is approaching its downfall with the
appearance of other players on the contemporary world scene, like BRICS (Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa) and if so, what factors have led to that downfall?
Mark Dankof: Yes,
the downfall of the American Empire pursuing the interest of the
Anglo-American-Zionist-Military Industrial Complex is guaranteed. I
believe the overextension of its military deployments, national debt,
eventual destruction of the Nixon-Saudi petrodollar, erosion of domestic
economic, political, and cultural infrastructure, the proliferation of
alternative media, and both domestic and international blowback against
the Anglo-American-Zionist-Military Industrial Complex make its downfall
inevitable. It is following the pathway of all previous Empires who
went into historical eclipse in world history. The BRICS
(Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa) consortium is taking the right
course of action in making economic moves designed to weaken and
marginalize the Nixon-Saudi petrodollar and its present status as the
reserve currency of the world. The problem is that its
effectiveness is also making the world a more dangerous place in the
short term. The Globalist/Zionist elite in Washington, London, and Tel
Aviv would not ultimately concede to BRICS without a fight. The
irresponsible policies of the United States, Israel, the EU, and NATO in
Ukraine suggest the Anglo-American-Zionist-Military Industrial Complex
is willing to risk a global conflict with nuclear powers (Russia,
especially) to maintain its hegemony. This risk is clearly both
immoral and quantifiably insane, which makes the
Anglo-American-Zionist-Military Industrial Complex willingness to run it
especially terrifying. I agree with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts that the
time for BRICS to achieve its goals and for war to be averted is running
out. I am not optimistic about any of this, even as I acknowledge that
only God knows the final outcome.
Reza Saidi: Have the
unilateral decision making tendencies of the US, without consideration
for international law, influenced its main competitors, Russia and
China, to take a similar stance?
Mark Dankof: Once again, the answer is clearly yes. On Press TV today,
I discussed this very thing. America’s CINCPAC (Commander in Chief
Pacific), Admiral Samuel Locklear, is publicly upset over last week’s
appearance of 6 Russian Bear Long Range Bombers near American airspace
in Alaska. I simply would ask the Admiral what else he should expect? The
United States has illegimately used NATO to bomb Kosovo, invade Libya,
and encircle Putin’s Russia in violation of promises to Russia made by
Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush in the wake of the end of the old
Soviet Union. The United States is attempting to use
Takfiri and Wahhabic Islamic extremists financed by Saudi Arabia and
abetted by Jordan and Turkey, to overthrow President Assad in Syria as a
prelude to an Israeli inspired attack on Iran. In the
Ukraine, we learn from a tapped phone conversation between United States
Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland and the American Ambassador to
Ukraine, that the American government poured $5 billion dollars into the
orchestrated campaign of neo-Nazis and Jewish-financed NGO’s in Kiev to
overthrow the legitimately elected Yanukovitch regime. Since that time,
the illegal government in Kiev has been attacking defenseless Russian
ethnics in Eastern Ukraine with high-tech military weaponry and overt
terrorism like the deliberate torching of the Trade Union Building in
Odessa to murder innocents. And Admiral Locklear is upset about
Russian bomber deployments near Alaska? As I said on Press TV today,
this is like an American baseball manager being surprised and upset when
his pitcher deliberately throws a knockdown pitch at an opposing
batter, only to discover in the next inning that one of his own players
is then targeted for retaliation. Who would fail to retaliate and signal
future retaliations when done in self-defense? The attempts of
Obama, the American Congress, and these Neo-Conservative agents on Fox
News and CNN to paint Vladimir Putin as the bad guy in all of this is
transparently ridiculous. I’m frankly surprised Mr. Putin has exercised
the restraint he has thus far in this confrontation. The people
in the American government had better get ready. Mr. Putin’s patience
is not unending. Russia has a strong military with a nuclear capability.
The Russians are a proud people. If the United States and its
Neo-Conservative, Zionist governors believe fighting Russia to be a
“cakewalk,” to quote Kenneth Adelman’s oft-quoted statements on the
ill-fated invasion of Iraq in 2003, we are witnessing a historic and frightening transition of a regime from mere criminality to the criminally insane.
Reza Saidi: Human rights
are a main principle in US popular culture. Many of America’s
international actions are undertaken with the stated intention of
establishing human rights. However, the US domestic situation is in a
state of great unrest due to extreme racial tensions brought about by
repeated instances of police brutality against people of color and
various other unfair domestic policies. Do you believe it an accurate
observation to claim that the position on human rights that the US holds
against other nations is a tool of coercion without any real intention
to establish similar rights in their own states first? Can the US
continue to use human rights to legitimize its interference in foreign
lands?
Mark Dankof: I have
already addressed the fraudulent claims of the government of the United
States to be interfering in other people’s countries in the name of
“Human Rights” and “Democracy.” The American interference in foreign
lands is at the behest of the Anglo-American-Zionist-Military Industrial
Complex. The latter is interested only in the theft of other people’s
land, natural resources, and political autonomy by means of subversion
and overt force. As for what is going on domestically in the United
States, there are certainly many provable instances of police brutality
against people of color. But I must emphasize whites in the United States who oppose the New World Order and have spoken out publicly are also targets. Since 2001, the American Department of Homeland Security, whose first chief was an Israeli citizen, have created “fusion centers” in all 50 States. These
fusion centers are blurring the historic Constitutional delineations
which separated the American military and the Federal Government of the
United States from the law enforcement functions of duly elected State
and Local governments. This is not an accident. The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith was exposed in 2008 in the State of Missouri (see the Missouri Information Action Center report) for assisting Missouri State Law Enforcement and these Department of Homeland Security fusion centers, in the development of “Profiles of ‘Potential Home-Grown [Domestic] Terrorists’.” What
did the Missouri Information Action Center, or MIAC report conclude? It
said to watch out for white men who were identifiably Christian,
opposed homosexual marriage and abortion, who opposed the New World
Order, belonged to Second Amendment (gun ownership organizations), and
voted for political candidates like Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul! This
is a most serious business, because since September 11, 2001, the
passage of the USA Patriot Acts, the Military Commissions Act of 2006,
the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and the revelations of
illegal NSA surveillance of American citizens, has moved the United
States closer to the status of a full-blown police state. And at the
behest of whom? At the behest of the Anglo-American-Zionist-Military
Industrial Complex.
Reza Saidi: How much
longer will America continue to support non-democratic Arab states?
Isn’t this policy an example of double standards? Are most of America’s
claims against their political enemies merely superficial protocols
which America is either willing to ignore in its allies or which it
violates itself inside its own borders? Do you think American hegemony
can continue with appearance of viable opposition such as BRICS? is this
time for American hegemony to be diluted and ultimately to collapse in
history?
What factors played a role in all of
this? Why has this American unilateralism and interventionism tempted
Russia and China to follow suit? How does the United States continue to
justify its methods and attitudes? How long can the United States
support absolute opponents of Democracy in the Arab world?
Mark Dankof: I believe I have largely already addressed this clearly hypocritical contradiction in public policy. The
Anglo-American-Zionist-Military Industrial Complex could care less
about non-democratic states run by dictators and thugs as long as these
thugs and dictators are doing the bidding of the
Anglo-American-Zionist-Military Industrial Complex. The American
relationship with the present regime in Saudi Arabia is only the most
obvious example of what is going on here. This can only go on
for a time. It cannot be sustained forever. There is good news for the
world in this. The death of the Anglo-American-Zionist-Military
Industrial Complex is in the interest of freedom lovers both in the
United States and elsewhere. The question of the day is whether
or not this death will be preceded by a tragic global military conflict
which could destroy the planet. This is the fear of Dr. Paul Craig Roberts. It is also my fear. Only the God of history knows the answer.
Yearbook of Experts Profile of Mark Dankof (Washington, D. C.) for Tasnim News Agency of Iran: Click here.
Mark Dankof on “America, The Beautiful: Why We’re Finished”
![Arthur Topham's Radical Press News Wire Notes Mark Dankof's "America, The Beautiful: Why We're Finished." [Canada]](http://mark1marti2.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/whywerefinished01.jpg)
Arthur Topham’s Radical Press News Wire Notes Mark Dankof’s “America, The Beautiful: Why We’re Finished.” [Canada]
Arthur Topham’s Radical Press in Canada Notes Mark Dankof’s “America, The Beautiful: Why We’re Finished.”
[I have been receiving a lot of mail from folks asking why I’ve
taken a mild leave of absence from broadcasting and writing op-ed pieces
for The Ugly Truth. I will appear from time to time, but on a more
limited basis, both with The Ugly Truth and Press TV. I’ve been
reassessing what good I’m actually doing, given the seemingly inexorable
and disastrous direction the American Empire has embarked upon, and
what seems like the absolute passivity and indifference of the American
public to their own fate in all of this, not to mention the world. In
more recent times, I’ve been working on theological articles while
preparing to resume my thesis for my last degree along with some
theological German study. I’m also job hunting to supplement my income
as I assess the future. The bottom line is this: The title of this
piece tells you what I’ve concluded about the country and the American
people. It isn’t a happy endgame. What appears below are my latest
thoughts at the present time.]
—————————————————————
Mark Dankof: America, The Beautiful: Why We’re Finished
No comments:
Post a Comment