PUTTING ASIDE THE SOLOMON AND CHRIST MYTHS, JUDEO MASONIC ZIONIST DICTATORSHIP IS TRUE !
Mt Athos Prophecies on '666'
Uploaded on 21 May 2011
France embroiled in free speech row after Islamophobic TV presenter is sacked for saying Muslims 'should be deported to prevent civil war'
- Interview with Éric Zemmour prompted outrage among French Left
- Asked if he could deport Muslims, he said: 'History is often surprising'
- He added: 'Muslims inside French people will lead us to civil war'
- Controversial author dropped from 11-year chat show stint by iTELE
Published:
08:42, 22 December 2014
|
Updated:
10:22, 22 December 2014
+3
Row: Éric Zemmour, pictured, appeared to suggest all 5million of France's Muslims should be deported
France
is engulfed in a free speech row after a TV commentator was sacked for
appearing to suggest all 5million of the country's Muslims should be
deported to prevent civil war.
The
comments by Éric Zemmour, who has previously been convicted of inciting
racial hatred, prompted outrage and led to him being dropped from an
11-year stint on a chat show.
But
many sprang to the best-selling author's defence including the
far-right National Front leader Marine Le Pen, who declared the move
'loathsome censorship'.
Mr
Zemmour's interview with Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera went
largely unnoticed on the other side of the Alps for more than a month
after it appeared in October.
It sparked a public debate, however, after the comments were picked up by former French education minister Jean-Luc Mélenchon.
Although
the original interview has been deleted from Corriere della Sera's
website, it was copied and translated several times by people on both
sides of France's political divide.
In
the interview Mr Zemmour said Muslims 'live among themselves' in
suburbs which French people have been forced to leave, according to one
of his supporters.
The interviewer then asked: 'Then what are you suggesting? To deport 5million French Muslims?'
Mr Zemmour is said to have replied: 'I know it's unrealistic, but history is often surprising.
'Who
would have thought in 1940 that a million pieds-noirs [Europeans living
in North Africa], twenty years later, would have left Algeria to return
to France?
'Or that after the war five or six million Germans would leave Central-Eastern Europe where they had lived for centuries?'
+3
'Censorship': The sacking was seized upon by French National Front leader Marine Le Pen, pictured
The
interviewer protested that Mr Zemmour was 'speaking of exoduses
triggered by immense tragedies', to which he replied: 'I think we are
heading for chaos.
'This situation of a people inside a people, of Muslims inside French people, will lead us to civil war.
'Millions of people live here in France and refuse to live in the French manner.'
Top Gear attack by Argentine thugs was like a violent...
Welsh international rugby player sparks fury after 'blacking...
Farage 'abused power' to save Ukip candidate in racism...
'You are a white lady telling me what is racist!': Whoopi...
Share this article
Share
195 shares
The
controversy sparked a Twitter campaign with the hashtag
#ZemmourDeporteMoi - Zemmour would deport me - and outrage among leading
French politicians.
France's
interior minister Bernard Cazeneuve wrote: 'I am committed to the fight
against racism & anti-Semitism to preserve the republican pact and
guarantee of our living together #Zemmour'.
Bruno
Le Roux, the leader of the Socialist Party in France's national
assembly, said Mr Zemmour's inspiration appeared to date back to
thinking from the Second World War.
+3
Tension: France is one of the few countries to ban religious veils in schools (posed by model)
'It's
time for TV shows and newspaper columns to cease harbouring such
statements,' he wrote on his blog. 'Islamophobia is racism and is not
part of the Republic.'
Others - including the journalist himself - hit back at what they described as politically-correct censorship.
On
Friday the iTELE channel, where Mr Zemmour has made a regular
appearance on a debating show since 2003, said it had cancelled the
latest episode and he would no longer appear.
The channel's director Céline Pigalle told French newspaper Le Figaro, for which Mr Zemmour is also a columnist: 'We are very careful to respect freedom of expression.'
She
said the channel had hosted the controversial journalist for more than a
decade 'so that his ideas are taken into account, contradicted and
discussed'.
But
she added: 'Now it seems that it is he who sets the rules and what we
are talking. It was less and less the feeling that we can debate.
'The dialogue has become increasingly difficult, if not impossible.'
France's
population of 5million Muslims is the largest of any country in Europe,
and France also has the largest Jewish diaspora on the continent.
Mr Zemmour's parents were Jewish Berbers who emigrated from Algeria in the 1950s.
His
book The French Suicide, which argues France's identity is being
destroyed by factors including immigration, homosexuality and feminism,
has sold more than 250,000 copies.
In
2011 he was convicted of inciting racial hatred in France after telling
a chat show most drug dealers were 'blacks and Arabs. That's a fact'.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2883275/France-embroiled-free-speech-row-Islamophobic-TV-presenter-sacked-saying-Muslims-deported-prevent-civil-war.html#ixzz3MfUpHtAl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
The touching moment a Muslim bride took a detour on her big day to lay her wedding bouquet at the shrine for Martin Place siege victims - and hundreds of stunned onlookers broke into applause
- Newlywed bride Manal Kassem visited the memorial site at Martin Place
- The Muslim woman made it a priority to make the pilgrimage to place her bridal bouquet among the other floral tributes
- The 23-year-old had been hesitant to continue with her planned photoshoot in the city after the siege, but wanted to pay her respects
- The watching crowd applauded when she lay down her bouquet
- Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard also visited the memorial site
Published:
12:41, 21 December 2014
|
Updated:
21:02, 21 December 2014
As
the memorial to the victims of the Sydney siege continues to grow, a
Muslim bride has made a pilgrimage on her wedding day to lay flowers at
Martin Place.
Adorned
in a white wedding dress, which included a traditional white hijab and
veil, newlywed Manal Kassem arrived at the memorial with her husband,
Mahmod Homaisi, to place her wedding bouquet among the tens of thousands
of other floral tributes in the square.
The
23-year-old bride had planned for her wedding photos to be taken in the
city, but had been hesitant to continue after the tragic events of
Tuesday morning which claimed the lives of three people.
Scroll down for video
+6
Newlywed Manal Kassem arrived at the
memorial with her husband, Mahmod Homaisi, to place her wedding bouquet
with the tens of thousands of other floral tributes in the square
'She
was going to cancel [the photoshoot] because she didn't want to be
judged...celebrating her wedding in a scarf while people were
terrorised,' said the couple's wedding planner Dina Kheir.
'But she made is a priority to visit the memorial site as the first pit stop,' Ms Kheir said.
A
witness said that as the couple approached, clad in their wedding gear,
the crowd that had gathered to lay their own floral tributes stared in
surprise.
Mother of children stabbed to death in their home charged...
Homesickness, training five nights a week AND a full time...
‘Look at this man’s website’: Anonymous caller ‘tipped off...
When
Ms Kassem, from Punchbowl, placed her bouquet of white roses held
together with ribbon at the memorial, the crowd erupted in applause.
'She
did it out of respect for her country, that will one day be the country
of her children and grandchildren,' said Ms Kheir.
+6
When Ms Kassem, from Punchbowl, placed
her bouquet of white roses held together with ribbon at the memorial,
the crowd erupted in applause
+6
'She did it out of respect for her country, that will one day be the country of her children and grandchildren,' said Ms Kheir
Former
Prime Minister Julia Gillard also joined the steady stream of visitors
to pay her respects to mother-of-three Katrina Dawson, 38, and Lindt
Cafe manager Tori Johnson, 34, who lost their lives in the hostage
crisis.
'Deeply moving to pay tribute to Katrina and Tori in Martin Place in Sydney today,' she tweeted on Sunday.
Ms
Gillard recently joined the board of mental health organisation
beyondblue, the same charity that Mr Johnson's family has asked funds
raised in his name to be directed.
The
family of Ms Dawson also confirmed on Saturday that the Katrina Dawson
Foundation had been registered, to honour her achievements.
Ms Dawson was described as one of the 'best and brightest barristers' at the NSW Bar before her untimely death.
+6
Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard also joined the steady stream of visitors to pay her respects to the victims
+6
Ms Gillard paused after placing her tribute and walked around the memorial site
+6
Ms Kassem placed her wedding bouquet among the tens of thousands of other floral tributes in the square
Ms Dawson's brother, Sandy Dawson, said that her tragic passing during the Martin Place siege on Tuesday would not prevent her legacy from living on.
NSW
Premier Mike Baird said that the Australian government had been in
contact with London and Boston, cities which have both housed
large-scale floral memorial sites, for advice on how to transport and
reconstitute the flowers being laid at the Martin Place memorial site.
The
Premier confirmed that the flowers would be preserved and 'clean
composted' for a future site to preserve the memory of public compassion
and support.
'The
NSW Government is in contact with authorities in London and Boston
regarding flowers, tributes notes and condolence books to ensure we are
operating on prior international best practice.'
Condolence books will be moved from the city centre to the Opera House and state parliament on Monday.
They will stay there until the end of January.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2882520/Muslim-bride-s-touching-tribute-victims-Martin-Place-siege-floral-memorial-continues-grow.html#ixzz3MfeeVGvr
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
SECULAR JUDEO-CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH ZIONIST MENDACITY!
Terrorism and the other Religions
By Juan Cole | Apr. 23, 2013 |
104
- 73
- 2445
- 5083
- 159
Contrary
to what is alleged by bigots like Bill Maher, Muslims are not more
violent than people of other religions. Murder rates in most of the
Muslim world are very low compared to the United States.
As
for political violence, people of Christian heritage in the twentieth
century polished off tens of millions of people in the two world wars
and colonial repression. This massive carnage did not occur because
European Christians are worse than or different from other human beings,
but because they were the first to industrialize war and pursue a
national model. Sometimes it is argued that they did not act in the name
of religion but of nationalism. But, really, how naive. Religion and
nationalism are closely intertwined. The British monarch is the head of
the Church of England, and that still meant something in the first half
of the twentieth century, at least. The Swedish church is a national
church. Spain? Was it really unconnected to Catholicism? Did the Church
and Francisco Franco’s feelings toward it play no role in the Civil War?
And what’s sauce for the goose: much Muslim violence is driven by forms
of modern nationalism, too.
I
don’t figure that Muslims killed more than a 2 million people or so in
political violence in the entire twentieth century, and that mainly in
the Iran-Iraq War 1980-1988 and the Soviet and post-Soviet wars in
Afghanistan, for which Europeans bear some blame.
Compare
that to the Christian European tally of, oh, lets say 100 million (16
million in WW I, 60 million in WW II– though some of those were
attributable to Buddhists in Asia– and millions more in colonial wars.)
"KILLED BY MUSLIMS" WHILE FIGHTING THE REAL MASS KILLERS!
Belgium– yes, the Belgium of strawberry beer and quaint Gravensteen castle– conquered the Congo and is estimated to have killed off half of its inhabitants over time, some 8 million people at least.
Or,
between 1916-1930 Tsarist Russian and then Soviet forces — facing the
revolt of Central Asians trying to throw off Christian (and then
Marxist), European rule — Russian forces killed an estimated 1.5 million people.
Two boys brought up in or born in one of those territories (Kyrgyzstan)
just killed 4 people and wounded others critically. That is horrible,
but no one, whether in Russia or in Europe or in North America has the
slightest idea that Central Asians were mass-murdered during WW I and
before and after, and looted of much of their wealth. Russia when it
brutally conquered and ruled the Caucasus and Central Asia was an
Eastern Orthodox, Christian empire (and seems to be reemerging as one!).
Then,
between half a million and a million Algerians died in that country’s
war of independence from France, 1954-1962, at a time when the
population was only 11 million!
I could go on and on. Everywhere you dig in European colonialism in Afro-Asia, there are bodies. Lots of bodies.
Now
that I think of it, maybe 100 million people killed by people of
European Christian heritage in the twentieth century is an
underestimate.
As
for religious terrorism, that too is universal. Admittedly, some groups
deploy terrorism as a tactic more at some times than others. Zionists
in British Mandate Palestine were active terrorists in the 1940s, from a
British point of view, and in the period 1965-1980, the FBI considered
the Jewish Defense League among the most active US terrorist groups.
(Members at one point plotted to assassinate Rep. Dareell Issa (R-CA)
because of his Lebanese heritage.) Now that Jewish nationalsts are
largely getting their way, terrorism has declined among them. But it
would likely reemerge if they stopped getting their way. In fact, one of
the arguments Israeli politicians give for allowing Israeli squatters
to keep the Palestinian land in the West Bank that they have usurped is
that attempting to move them back out would produce violence. I.e., the
settlers not only actually terrorize the Palestinians, but they form a
terrorism threat for Israel proper (as the late prime minister Yitzhak
Rabin discovered).
Even more recently, it is difficult for me to see much of a difference between Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Baruch Goldstein, perpetrator of the Hebron massacre.
Or there was the cold-blooded bombing of the Ajmer shrine in India by Bhavesh Patel
and a gang of Hindu nationalists. Chillingly, they were disturbed when a
second bomb they had set did not go off, so that they did not wreak as
much havoc as they would have liked. Ajmer is an ecumenical Sufi shrine
also visited by Hindus, and these bigots wanted to stop such open-minded
sharing of spiritual spaces because they hate Muslims.
Buddhists
have committed a lot of terrorism and other violence as well. Many in
the Zen orders in Japan supported militarism in the first half of the
twentieth century, for which their leaders later apologized. And, you
had Inoue Shiro’s assassination campaign in 1930s Japan. Nowadays
militant Buddhist monks in Burma/ Myanmar are urging on an ethnic cleansing campaign against the Rohingya.
As for Christianity, the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda initiated hostilities
that displaced two million people. Although it is an African cult, it
is Christian in origin and the result of Western Christian missionaries
preaching in Africa. If Saudi Wahhabi preachers can be in part blamed
for the Taliban, why do Christian missionaries skate when we consider
the blowback from their pupils?
Despite the very large number of European Muslims, in 2007-2009 less than 1 percent of terrorist acts in that continent were committed by people from that community.
Terrorism
is a tactic of extremists within each religion, and within secular
religions of Marxism or nationalism. No religion, including Islam,
preaches indiscriminate violence against innocents.
It
takes a peculiar sort of blindness to see Christians of European
heritage as “nice” and Muslims and inherently violent, given the
twentieth century death toll I mentioned above. Human beings are human
beings and the species is too young and too interconnected to have
differentiated much from group to group. People resort to violence out
of ambition or grievance, and the more powerful they are, the more
violence they seem to commit. The good news is that the number of wars
is declining over time, and World War II, the biggest charnel house in
history, hasn’t been repeated.
- 73
- 2445
- 5083
- 159
THE HYPOCRITICAL WEST THAT ALWAYS MANAGES WARS SUCCESSFULLY (+100,000,000 million dead in only the past century) but cannot manage its trash!!!
Trash strikes from Naples to Marseilles (Photos)
By
Melissa Bell
A woman walks past a pile of garbage in downtown Naples. (Agnfoto/Reuters)
In Naples, the trash issue has long been a contentious one, with Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi promising two years ago to devise a solution to the full trash dumps in Naples. Plans to build a new dump have met with violent protests over the last week.
The streets of the southern Italian city have been filled with 2,400 tons of piled up trash. The European Commission has threatened Italy with sanctions if the mess is not cleaned up.
Meanwhile the massive strikes in France over the proposed raise in the retirement age have crippled the ports, oil refineries and trash incineration plants. Nearly 10,000 tons of garbage have been piling up in southern Marseille and its suburbs.
Garbage collectors clean up after garbage was purposely piled in the middle of a street in protest against uncollected trash, in central Naples, Italy. (Salvatore Laporta/AP)
A man walks past piles of garbage in Marseille, southern France. (Laurent Cipriani/AP)
A man walks past piles of garbage in Marseille, southern France. (Laurent Cipriani/AP)
Categories: The Daily Catch
"The best jihad is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant."
Friday, December 26, 2014
Ken O’Keefe and the Battle for 9/11 Reality
[Editor's note: Anthony Hall will appear tonight on Truth Jihad Radio to discuss this article and why it is being published here rather than at Veterans Today. -KB]
A Commentary on Ken O'Keefe's Expanded and Improved Documentary, 911 False Flag: American Traitors and Mossad.
by Anthony Hall
Background Information on Mr. O'Keefe: Having served in the US Marine Corps this soldier for truth, justice and peace on many fronts renounced his US citizenship in 2001. Observing the huge disparity in the valuation of the lives of Western and non-Western people, Mr. O'Keefe then offered himself up as a human shield. He sought to encourage others to join him in this campaign to protect Iraqi people and their public health infrastructure from the wanton destruction of so-called "smart bombing by US Armed Forces.
A tireless proponent of various projects aimed at helping the caged
Palestinians of Gaza to overcome the blockade imposed by their Israeli
jailers, O'Keefe tried famously to defend in 2010 the Mavi Marmara from
hostile military attack by the Israeli Defense Force. The Mavi Marmara
was carrying humanitarian aid to the inmates of the Gazan concentration
camp.
As part of an episode that saw nine Turkish sailors murdered by Israeli gun men, O'Keefe was captured, locked up and beaten in an Israeli prison. When describing the episode subsequently on the BBC, Ken O'Keefe had the rare opportunity to introduce to a wider audience the concept that that the real nature of the 9/11 debacle was was not anything like what has been reported in the Murdoch press and the other propaganda instruments of international Zionism. He asserted that 9/11 had been an Israeli-led Mossad job done with the help and complicity of many American saboteurs.
The ultimate aim of of the designers of this false flag terrorist event was to poisoning public opinion against Arab and Muslim populations, to transform Israel's regional enemies into the perceived enemies of the "West," which Benjamin Netanyahu and others have wrongly described as an exclusively Judeo-Christian entity. The aim of the 9/11 global coup was to demonize and thus dehumanize the predominant Muslim populations about to be targeted in Israeli-led, US-implemented wars of aggression in the Middle East and throughout Eurasia.
In this documentary Ken O'Keefe elaborates this interpretation and gets very specific by naming many of the culprits. Mr. O'Keefe lays out the essential evidence that, if the rule of law really existed for the rich and the powerful as well as for the poor and middle classes, would form the basis of multiple criminal prosecutions in international and domestic courts of law. This eloquent and thoughtful man, who has frequently put his life and reputation on the line to advance the quest for justice, underlines that one's position on 9/11 has become a primary litmus test of the authenticity of any person or group claiming the objective of bringing about a better world. In this documentary Mr. Okeefe demonstrates that we have moved far beyond the point where merely asking authorities for an independent investigation of the events of 9/11 is sufficient. We need arrests and trials as organized either by law enforcement officials, or, if failing that, by conscientious and upstanding world citizens if necessary.
Ken O'Keefe Gives an Overview of the Fruits of a Thirteen-Year Citizens Investigation into 9/11, Including into the Media Manipulations That Have Been a Core Feature and Facilitator of the Lies and Crimes of 9/11:
Former US Marine Ken O’Keefe is one of the genuinely heroic figures of
our times in a class with the likes of Malcolm X, Patrice Lumumba, Che
Guevara, José Rizal, Mother Jones, Ho Chi Minh, Sitting Bull, Sun
Yat-Sen, and Hugo Chavez. In another era Mr. O’Keefe most likely would
have operated in some tyrannized country helping to stir up the
peasantry for armed resistance against the illegitimate authority of its
oppressors.
Now that this kind of liberation struggle has been rendered more or less impossible, one of his primary fields of operation is social media on the Internet. Ken O'Keefe is becoming one of the new Geronimos of guerrilla warfare even as those interests seeking to persecute Edward Snow embody the new digital imperialism of cyberspace. With the old mainstream media venues completely sold out to the enticements of Jewish and corporate power, the Internet is the sole medium where the wretched of the earth can have a voice in what the Canadian-Israeli neocon agent, Jonathan Kay, has correctly dubbed the battle for reality. As one of the Internet's most iconographic freedom fighters Ken O'Keefe's latest digital documentary event is an expanded and technically improved version of his classic investigation into the lies and crimes of 9/11. In 911 False Flag, American Traitors and Mossad, the auteur demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that “there are stunningly incriminating Jewish, Israeli, Zionist finger prints all over” the 9/11 debacle and the mainstream medias’ subsequent cover up of the true nature of the crime.
The new introduction features a Russell Brand-style commentary highlighting Mr. O’Keefe’s assessment of David Cameron’s abysmal speech at the United Nations in September of 2014. In Hack Attack Cameron has been exposed by the Guardian’s lead investigative reporter, Nick Davies, as yet another UK Prime Minister under the control of Rupert Murdoch’s deeply corrupt media empire.
Davies was the primary journalists who broke the series of stories leading to the investigation by Lord Justice Leveson into the dark collaboration between the police and the Muroch press in Britain. A core objective of the collaboration between Scotland Yard and the Murdoch press was to blackmail, bribe and thus control elected officials with the aim of subverting British parliamentary democracy. All of the politicians of the Anglo-American-Commonwealth countries have pretty much become mere performers who are precluded from winning elected office unless they adhere to the Zionist agendas developed for them on Fleet Street or in New York and Tel Aviv.
Not
surprising the interaction between Rupert Murdoch and Lord Leveson,
both high-ranking operatives in the same Jewish Zionist Israeli networks
of power, never touched on the deeper levels of subversion necessary to
promote the Islamophobic propaganda of aggressive warfare in the name
of the Global War on Terror. Cameron's sound bites on ISIL and homegrown
"extremism" as exemplified by.... say.... Ken O'Keefe, replayed and
extended the same memes of hate
speech developed initially for former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
and former US President George W. Bush. Both tools of the leading
Israel-Anglo-American imperium are criminal psychopaths installed into
office by the media manipulations of the Murdoch press including Fox
News in the USA.
Son of a Jewish mother and one of the chief Zionist propagandists who directed the Israeli-Anglo-American imperium’s popular incitement to hate Muslims, Murdoch is only one of the 9/11 culprits identified by O’Keefe. Also prominent among the accused are are a number of Israel First Americans including Michael Chertoff, Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Philip D. Zelikow, and “Lucky” Larry Silverstein. This is only a very partial list of the fingered culprits of the 9/11 psychological operation, a criminal class that includes most of the Israeli-American owners and directors of the major media cartels dominating Western public opinion.
The 95-minute production is, like many Internet videos, an amalgam of original material and excerpts from other 9/11 productions including Canadian James Corbett’s hilarious, 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory. This now-legendary 5- minute clip is perhaps the most effective short synthesis surveying the absurd internal contradictions and impossibilities embedded throughout officialdom’s Big Lie of 9/11. Among his many primary sources, O’Keefe draws also on, for instance, the geopolitical scholarship of high-level military strategist Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the starkly clear and illuminating work of the Australian truth teller, Anthony Lawson, and on the bold intervention with Larry Silverstein by Luke Rudkowski, a founder of We Are Change.
I very much agree with Ken O’Keefe’s thesis that the way individuals relate to the story of what did or did not happen on 9/11 becomes an extremely telling “litmus test” of honesty and integrity especially for figures such as educators, public officials, and celebrities. Given the extent to which our world has been transformed for the worse by those culprits that so far have not faced accountability for their role in the lies and crimes of 9/11, the 9/11 litmus test becomes particularly important in assessing the authenticity of any and all individuals proclaiming an intention to work for social justice.
As Ken O'Keefe emphasizes in his film, the sequence of events set in
motion by the religious fable that Islamic jihadists successfully
attacked America on 9/11 are so lethally consequential to the nature of
the imperilled global civilization we share that there is really no way
to avoid some basic societal reckoning with the truth of what really
happened on the fateful day.
\
The corrosive power of the religious symbolism woven into the fable of 9/11 has been emphasized by many scholars including, Professor David Ray Giffin. Professor Griffin is an esteemed historian of religious philosophy who has authored ten very important books deconstructing various aspects of the grossly audacious lies fed to the general public from day one of the post- 9/11 world. Beginning on Sept. 11, 2001 the 9/11 wrecking ball has been systematically deployed by Zionist operatives to finish off the job of destroying our now-pretty-much-defunct democracies throughout the so-called "West."
The
very idea of mounting a global war to defeat "terrorism," a slippery
concept if ever there was one, is bogus from its inception. War by its
very nature is the ultimate expression of the extremes of terror, of the
capacity of human beings to inflict pain and death on one another on
massive scales.
There is no possibility of developing decent responses to virtually any of the crises we genuinely face, whether, for instance, from climate change or violated human rights or declining public health or diminished biodiversity. As long as long as some sort of War on Terror is allowed to dominate the heights of public policy in virtually every government in the world there can be very little genuinely effective work to achieve a better world. Any and all initiatives along these lines will be countered by the military-industrial complex directed by primarily by Jewish banksters now afforded free reign to exploit and repress us through many demeaning tactics not the least of which is to reduce us too the status of debt slaves.
Universities as Enemies of Truth; The Academy as an Instrument and Complicit Partner in the Lies and Crimes of 9/11
As a tenured full professor in a Canadian university I have to report sadly that many faculty members throughout the Academy tend to be especially complicit or even directly involved in the commission of the lies and crimes of 9/11.
Many dishonest professors have passed themselves off as supposed experts on various aspects of Terrorist Studies in order to exploit the funding possibilities attached to adhering to the officially sanctioned narrative that Ken O'Keefe and millions of others now know for sure is entirely false. Perhaps even worse are those pseudo-academics who refuse to risk the recriminations that tend to arise from merely asking even the most rudimentary questions about the discrepancies between existing evidence and the concocted fable of 9/11.
The main purpose of the religious myths permeating the 9/11 cover story is to generate the Islamophobia.
Especially now that there is no Soviet enemy to justify huge transfers of public wealth to the military-industrial complex, the Murdochesque promotion of hatred and distrust of Muslims generically serves the interests of arms merchants, the Jewish state, the banksters, and the proponents of expanded police powers. In order to continue along their current trajectory of growth and expansion these interests have all joined forces to help develop, train, fund and publicize the required replacement enemy.
A good research project would be to survey text books at all levels right up to University graduate programs to see the nature of 9/11 narratives incorporated into school curricula. To what extent are the events of 9/11 and the still-continuing 9/11 wars being misrepresented in our educational institutions?
These and many other derivative questions flow from Ken O'Keefe's exposure of the extent of the actions of a particular cabal of Israeli-American power brokers whose treason is not only against the United States but against all humanity. Indeed, contemplating the huge implications of what they have been allowed to get away with gives new meaning to the very idea of crimes against humanity.
In his concluding on-camera presentation, Ken O’Keefe is insistent that calling for a new independent investigation of 9/11 is not nearly enough given what has already been proven about what did or did not transpire on the fateful day. O’Keefe’s documentary names many names of the credibly accused culprits. He does not put forward such serious allegations lightly but rather cites powerful evidence that ultimately belongs in a court of law.
Ken O’Keefe’s contends that now, thirteen years after such a clearly exposed false flag event, mere requests for a genuinely independent investigation are not nearly sufficient to deal with such huge magnitude of the abuses of power entailed in the lies and crimes of 9/11. This remark resonated especially forcefully for me given what has been going on here in my home jurisdiction of Canada. My reaction to this aspect of Ken O'Keefe video is animated in part by controversies that have arisen concerning a request for a Canadian investigation into 9/11. This request, which carries my own signature along with those of about 1500 other Canadians, took the form of a petition that a Member of Parliament, Elizabeth May, recently agreed to read into the parliamentary transcript known as Hansard.
Some
organizers of this petition congratulated Elizabeth May for being the
only one of 308 federal parliamentarians who was willing to grant even
this small concession. The leader of the Canadian Green Party tried to
distance herself from the petition’s content, however, by indicating she
did not agree with its contents. She so far Ms. May has refused my
written request that she give explicit reasons for her unwillingness to
articulate the basis for her disagreement with the text of a petition
that could be seen as being mild and unconfrontational to a fault. What
grade should Elizabeth May be assigned in the 9/11 litmus test?
Ken O’Keefe has convincingly demonstrated that it is impossible to develop an accurate picture of humanity’s actual condition these days without coming to terms with what did or did not happen on 9/11, without becoming informed enough to achieve at least a passing grade in the 9/11 litmus test.
One suggestion I would make to Ken and to others for the future of 9/11 truth work is that we emphasize in our public presentations the US 9/11 Commission report. This document is the primary receptacle of the cover story outlining what is supposed to have happened in the skies and on the land of New York, Washington DC, and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001. The authorship of the text and the primary construction of the report's architecture was largely the work of public mythology expert Philip Zelikow, an Israel First political operative of the Bush White House who is well profiled in Ken O'Keefe's video.
Even the Co-Chairs and the legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission heavily criticized its work. The Commission's report is the outcome of a highly politicized process of concocting politicized lies and fabrications to conform to the 9/11 fable fed to the world within hours of the debacle without any real investigation whatsoever. Part of this process of fabrication involved accepting supposed evidence obtained through torture as a proper means of obtaining information for the formulation of public policy. That travesty in itself constitutes a practise and a precedent that must not be allowed to stand.
Another direct Canadian involvement in the 9/11 debacle is that the Canadian government is a member of NORAD, the North American Aerospace Defense Command. The huge failures of NORAD on 9/11 have become the stuff of legend. The outright lies told with impunity by NORAD officials to the 9/11 Commissioners is a matter of well documented public record.
Of course Canadians require a Canadian investigation into the Canadian aspects of a debacle that has resulted in remaking Canada's laws, policies, and political culture in a fashion that definitely undermines the public interest and the common good.
As I have come to understand it, all Canadian parliamentarians are complicit in torture in accepting the US 9/11 Commission report as the basis for the formulation of Canadian legislation and public policy after 9/11. This complicity in the international crime of torture applies especially to the leadership of the executive branch of the Canadian federal government and to the current leadership of the opposition parties in the Canadian Parliament, namely Elizabeth May of the Green Party, Justin Trudeau of the Liberal Party, and Thomas Mulcair of the New Democratic Party.
In recent years there has been a huge breakdown in the willingness of opposition parties to oppose the policies of Prime Minister Stephen Harper when it comes to the big issues of war and peace, life and death. For instance, when the Israeli Defense Force was attacking last summer in Operation Protective Edge the Palestinian inmates of the Israeli concentration camp known as Gaza, there was no debate from our MPs that included clear criticism of this very clear violation of human rights and international law. Indeed, Parliament was not recalled to deal with the crisis as happened in the UK where many British MPs spoke out with conscience and conviction to oppose this massive denigration of international laws and common decency. The outcry at Westminster extended to the beginning of parliamentary efforts aimed at somewhat mitigating the terrible humanitarian disasters that flowed from the genocidal actions of the Jewish state of Israel.
The contrast between the response of opposition politicians in UK and Canada was illustrative of the depths of our democratic deficit in this country where the concentration of Zionist ownership of the mass media is perhaps even more destructive of free expression than it has been in Great Britain. There has been no equivalent in Canada of the Leveson inquiry into the corrupt practises by police and collaboration with media agents whose joint aim is to control politicians and thereby subvert democratic processes.
Parliamentarians representing all the citizens of Canada, many of whom expressed great anguish and revolt at what was taking place in Gaza, took to the streets, wrote letters to the editor, and made personal testimonials of all kinds. These Canadians of conscience and good will remained almost entirely unrepresented by elected officials of all political stripes due to a conspiracy imposed on us by Canada's real governors, the Jewish Zionist Israeli cabal that calls the shots especially when it comes to issues like media regulation, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the quest for 9/11 Truth.
This experience of witnessing the gross failure of Canadian parliamentary democracy in the face of Operation Protective Edge reinforced my conclusion that there is something really rotten going on in the state of Canada and in the territories of most of its EU and Anglo-American allies as well. Much was exposed in the uniform opposition-party backing of the Netanyahu-Harper line. This line involved the incessant repetition of a specious rationale for the mass murder of civilians.
Israeli citizens were declared the real victims notwithstanding the IDF's 2014 invasion of Gaza including the heavily militarized murder of scores of Palestinian children in their homes, schools, and beach playground. Once again the mass murder, maiming, displacement, and destruction of the feeble life support systems of the Occupied Palestinians were declared to be acts of Israeli self-defence. Alternatively very clear acts of Palestinian self-defence were declared the actions of Islamic and Arab "terrorists" such as those said to be committed by patsies blamed for what were in fact controlled demolitions of the three WTC towers.
This common front in Parliament suggests that Canadian politicians are even more subject to Zionist manipulation than those in Great Britain where Ken O'Keefe is currently based. In Canada as in every other so-called democracy in the West politicians fear being smeared in the mainstream media, which is largely Jewish-owned and Zionist-run.
In Canada a shady Jewish-owned syndicate by the name of Golden Tree Asset Management pulls many of the strings that keep our politicians in line. Golden Tree's Chairman is a Council on Foreign Relations member and an influential New York Zionist who wins awards for his support of Israel. The name of this Israeli First US investment banker is name is Steven A. Tannanbaum.
The media chain currently owned by Golden Tree was started in part by Conrad Black, a neocon supporter of Israeli expansionism who also owned the Jerusalem Post. This same media chain was also developed under the control of Izzy Asper and his offspring, members of a very prominent Zionist family based in Winnipeg. The flagship of this network of Zionist propaganda in Canada is The National Post.
The Post hatched the journalistic career Jonathan Kay, author of a vicious smear volume written to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the "Islamic terror attacks" of 9/11. Deploying classic guilt-by-association tactics of the CIA's anti-communist propaganda techniques developed during the Cold War, Kay's volume is tellingly entitled, Among the Truthers: A Journey into the Growing Conspiracist Underground of 9/11 Truthers, Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics, Hollywood Know-Nothings and Internet Addicts.
Kay medicalizes all those who question the official cover story of 9/11 as clinically insane. He starts the book with a dubious explanation for not addressing the actual evidence of what did or did not happen on 9/11. Apparently his editor advised The National Post's editor that most readers would be bored with discussions of evidence while would-be readers would be more interested in Kay's explorations of the dark caves apparently inhabited by "the Growing Conspiracist Underground."
The book is published by HarperCollins, a Murdoch-owned publishing company. Kay was funded to write the book by the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a Zionist neocon agency that is an outgrowth of the Project for the New American Century. The volume does not contain citation s or even a rudimentary bibliography. It definitely is not peer reviewed.
As Ken O'Keefe outlines in his film, PNAC called for something like a "new Pearl Harbor" a year before the 9/11 coup to took place to spin public opinion in a way that would accept the US build up of military-industrial complex and the national security state toward "full spectrum dominance." PNAC's main members included many of the Israel First neocons featured in Ken O'Keefe film. These PNAC members like Paul Wolfowitz filled many of the seats in President George W. Bush's war cabinet.
Kay also was recently appointed Editor-In-Chief of the Walrus, a liberal magazine that once could be taken seriously as a genuine vehicle of investigative journalism and speaking truth to power. Jonathan Kay was also hired to be a ghost writer of the autobiography of Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party leader and son of a former Canadian prime minister who was building momentum in public opinion polls until his expression of unqualified support for Israel's assault in Gaza last summer signalled to many progressive Canadians that he is a Zionist puppet of the usual suspects when comes to Canada's relationship to the Jewish state and the Palestinian people.
For much of the twentieth century the Liberal Party dominated Parliament and thereby governed Canada. The false interpretative twist given the events of Sept. 11, however, created the underlying basis for foreign-backed regime change in Canada. Ultra-Zionist Stephen Harper came to power as a minority status prime minister in 2006 and then as a majority status prime minister in 2011. Harper's mandate to govern is tainted by the importation from the United States of Republican Party-style election fraud whose full extent remains unclear.
Harper will probably be able to renew his majority status in the federal election of 2015 on the back of a classic Mossad-style concocted terror event whose centrepiece involved a shooter episode on Oct. 22 (10/22) by a "recent Muslim convert" at the Canadian War Memorial and then inside the main Parliament building. Within hours of the event a Rupert Murdoch venue, the New York Post, superimposed a headline, "State of War," over a photograph of the Canadian War Memorial." This image justifying Canada's inclusion in military operations against the non-state entity ISIL, a replacement for the role once assigned al-Qaeda, repeated much of the same spin given 9/11 within hours of the plane crashes and mass murders. The media message was that this shooter episode on 10/22 was not to be understood as a serious crime requiring meticulous investigation but rather as an act of war justifying the invocation of emergency measures including military attacks abroad and increased police incursions at home.
Indeed, Ken O'Keefe is helping to pioneer the way towards a judiciable form of global citizenship that I believe could and should form the jurisdictional basis of the trials the global community needs to enforce some legal accountability on those who commit the most serious crimes against humanity, the most serious crimes against all life on earth.
So much of the really high-level criminality these days abuses as a cover and an alibi the 9/11 fable, the mostly constructed imagery of international terrorism, and the sweeping legal powers invoked by the resort to so-called national security. This international crime wave from those who rule us from the top of the pyramid is accelerating at such a quick pace that the need grows daily to follow Ken O'Keefe prescription by arresting and arbitrating the defences of those that can be most credibly accused of the 9/11 crime and the ongoing cover up of the true nature of the events and implications of what happened on Sept. 11 2001.
The recent experiences of, among many invited delegates, Ken O'Keefe and I and Veteran's Today Senior Editor, Kevin Barrett, at the recent New Horizon conference in Tehran speaks to the fact that the lies and crimes of 9/11 cast such a very wide net because they affect so profoundly the entire global population These affects tend to extend with particular harshness especially to Arab people, Persian people, and the ummah which is the worldwide community of all Muslims in all their vast pluralism of nationality, ethnicity, language, culture, class, ideology, and sect.
As a polity essentially smeared for the 9/11 crime through the reference to Iran in George W. Bush's notorious "Axis of Evil" speech, it is very clear why the government and people of the Islamic Republic of Iran would be seriously interested in the international quest for 9/11 truth. The Islamic Republic of Iran has been ruthlessly targeted since 1979, but especially since 9/11 with Israeli-directed economic warfare, with Mossad assassinations of its scientists, with high tech Israeli-America cyber attacks targeting the operation of its peaceful nuclear energy program, and with lethal physical attacks and propaganda attacks by the Mossad-trained-and-run MeK commandos etc etc etc. This list of consequences of the Bush's Israeli-instigated slander of Iran is far from complete.
Other possible fallout from the Bush-Frum hit job include the actions of my own federal government that withdrew in 2012 the Canadian ambassador from Iran and broke off all formal diplomatic relations under orders from Benjamin Netanyahu to his Likudnik Lieutenant, Stephen Harper. An important friend of the Islamic Revolution, Ken O'Keefe is in a good position to develop analysis of these kinds of broader international processes that continue to arise from the global geopolitical shifts that arise from our collective failure to come to come to grips with the truth of what happened or what didn't happen on 9/11.
Certainly Mr. O'Keefe's decision to restrict his coverage to the United States allows Israel First operatives in Canada like Jonathan Kay and David Frum to slip through the cracks of the work of the Born-In-the-USA Freedom Fighter who is emerging as an important citizen investigator and citizen jurist. Both Kay and Frum are every bit as deeply implicated in the lies and crimes of 9/11 as many of the figures that Ken O'Keefe does cover in his Internet movie. Both Kay and Frum should be on the list of the credibly accused when it becomes possible to break the hold of our jailers by mounting criminal proceedings in a more transnationally empowered type of international criminal court.
How should the people and government of Iran respond to being fingered as the 9/11 culprits along with Saddam's Iraq and Communist North Korea by the very folks who most likely are the real 9/11 culprits? The Israeli First neocon Canadian, David Frum is said to have authored the potent "Axis of Evil" line to prepare American public opinion for a US-led invasion of Iran. The son of the legendary Jewish Canadian CBC broadcaster, Barbara Frum, David was a Bush White House speech writer and co-author with Richard Perle of the war propaganda text, An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror.
The freedom fighter began and concluded his 9/11 documentary with the observation that humanity will remain in a sense incarcerated in a psychological prison of oppression from within and from above until we can free ourselves from the enormously consequential 9/11 deception. This and many other vital messages contained in Ken O'Keefe's bold and uncompromising account of the most difficult yet pressing issue of contemporary times deserves a wide audience. This factor is the very reason that this Internet movie is bound to be ignored by the many media venues including the CBC that regularly opens the supposed public airwaves to Israeli First proponents of aggressive warfare like Jonathan Kay.
About the author:
A Commentary on Ken O'Keefe's Expanded and Improved Documentary, 911 False Flag: American Traitors and Mossad.
by Anthony Hall
 |
Ken O’Keefe as a US Marine Before He
Renounced His US Citizenship To Serve the Common People of Iraq as a Human Shield. |
Includes Original Material From Anthony Hall Extending O'Keefe's Assessment of the Crippling Effect of Jewish Power Over US Institutions to a Similar Dysfunction Plaguing Canada's Parliamentary Institutions. The Totalitarianism Implicit in This Oppressive State of Affairs is No Where So Well Illustrated as in the Tactics Deployed to Block Out Evidence-Based Discourse From Most Media Venues, Elected Assemblies, and Educational Institutions Concerning the World's First Global Coup d'Etat Executed Through the 9/11 False Flag Terror Event.
Background Information on Mr. O'Keefe: Having served in the US Marine Corps this soldier for truth, justice and peace on many fronts renounced his US citizenship in 2001. Observing the huge disparity in the valuation of the lives of Western and non-Western people, Mr. O'Keefe then offered himself up as a human shield. He sought to encourage others to join him in this campaign to protect Iraqi people and their public health infrastructure from the wanton destruction of so-called "smart bombing by US Armed Forces.
 |
Ken O’Keefe as a US Marine Before He Renounced His US Citizenship To Serve the Common People of Iraq as a Human Shield.
|
As part of an episode that saw nine Turkish sailors murdered by Israeli gun men, O'Keefe was captured, locked up and beaten in an Israeli prison. When describing the episode subsequently on the BBC, Ken O'Keefe had the rare opportunity to introduce to a wider audience the concept that that the real nature of the 9/11 debacle was was not anything like what has been reported in the Murdoch press and the other propaganda instruments of international Zionism. He asserted that 9/11 had been an Israeli-led Mossad job done with the help and complicity of many American saboteurs.
The ultimate aim of of the designers of this false flag terrorist event was to poisoning public opinion against Arab and Muslim populations, to transform Israel's regional enemies into the perceived enemies of the "West," which Benjamin Netanyahu and others have wrongly described as an exclusively Judeo-Christian entity. The aim of the 9/11 global coup was to demonize and thus dehumanize the predominant Muslim populations about to be targeted in Israeli-led, US-implemented wars of aggression in the Middle East and throughout Eurasia.
In this documentary Ken O'Keefe elaborates this interpretation and gets very specific by naming many of the culprits. Mr. O'Keefe lays out the essential evidence that, if the rule of law really existed for the rich and the powerful as well as for the poor and middle classes, would form the basis of multiple criminal prosecutions in international and domestic courts of law. This eloquent and thoughtful man, who has frequently put his life and reputation on the line to advance the quest for justice, underlines that one's position on 9/11 has become a primary litmus test of the authenticity of any person or group claiming the objective of bringing about a better world. In this documentary Mr. Okeefe demonstrates that we have moved far beyond the point where merely asking authorities for an independent investigation of the events of 9/11 is sufficient. We need arrests and trials as organized either by law enforcement officials, or, if failing that, by conscientious and upstanding world citizens if necessary.
Ken O'Keefe Gives an Overview of the Fruits of a Thirteen-Year Citizens Investigation into 9/11, Including into the Media Manipulations That Have Been a Core Feature and Facilitator of the Lies and Crimes of 9/11:
 |
| Paul Wolfowitz, a Key Member of the Bush War Cabinet and a Primary Israeli-American Suspect Widely Identified by the Citizens Jurists Emerging from the Citizens' Investigation into the Lies and Crimes of 9/11. In All Probability Wolfowitz Wrote the Key Passage in the PNAC Report Calling for a "New Pearl Harbor" in the Year Before the 9/11 Hit on What Remained of Our Democracies Before the 9/11 Coupd'Etat. |
Now that this kind of liberation struggle has been rendered more or less impossible, one of his primary fields of operation is social media on the Internet. Ken O'Keefe is becoming one of the new Geronimos of guerrilla warfare even as those interests seeking to persecute Edward Snow embody the new digital imperialism of cyberspace. With the old mainstream media venues completely sold out to the enticements of Jewish and corporate power, the Internet is the sole medium where the wretched of the earth can have a voice in what the Canadian-Israeli neocon agent, Jonathan Kay, has correctly dubbed the battle for reality. As one of the Internet's most iconographic freedom fighters Ken O'Keefe's latest digital documentary event is an expanded and technically improved version of his classic investigation into the lies and crimes of 9/11. In 911 False Flag, American Traitors and Mossad, the auteur demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that “there are stunningly incriminating Jewish, Israeli, Zionist finger prints all over” the 9/11 debacle and the mainstream medias’ subsequent cover up of the true nature of the crime.
The new introduction features a Russell Brand-style commentary highlighting Mr. O’Keefe’s assessment of David Cameron’s abysmal speech at the United Nations in September of 2014. In Hack Attack Cameron has been exposed by the Guardian’s lead investigative reporter, Nick Davies, as yet another UK Prime Minister under the control of Rupert Murdoch’s deeply corrupt media empire.
Davies was the primary journalists who broke the series of stories leading to the investigation by Lord Justice Leveson into the dark collaboration between the police and the Muroch press in Britain. A core objective of the collaboration between Scotland Yard and the Murdoch press was to blackmail, bribe and thus control elected officials with the aim of subverting British parliamentary democracy. All of the politicians of the Anglo-American-Commonwealth countries have pretty much become mere performers who are precluded from winning elected office unless they adhere to the Zionist agendas developed for them on Fleet Street or in New York and Tel Aviv.
Not
surprising the interaction between Rupert Murdoch and Lord Leveson,
both high-ranking operatives in the same Jewish Zionist Israeli networks
of power, never touched on the deeper levels of subversion necessary to
promote the Islamophobic propaganda of aggressive warfare in the name
of the Global War on Terror. Cameron's sound bites on ISIL and homegrown
"extremism" as exemplified by.... say.... Ken O'Keefe, replayed and
extended the same memes of hate
speech developed initially for former British Prime Minister Tony Blair
and former US President George W. Bush. Both tools of the leading
Israel-Anglo-American imperium are criminal psychopaths installed into
office by the media manipulations of the Murdoch press including Fox
News in the USA.Son of a Jewish mother and one of the chief Zionist propagandists who directed the Israeli-Anglo-American imperium’s popular incitement to hate Muslims, Murdoch is only one of the 9/11 culprits identified by O’Keefe. Also prominent among the accused are are a number of Israel First Americans including Michael Chertoff, Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Philip D. Zelikow, and “Lucky” Larry Silverstein. This is only a very partial list of the fingered culprits of the 9/11 psychological operation, a criminal class that includes most of the Israeli-American owners and directors of the major media cartels dominating Western public opinion.
The 95-minute production is, like many Internet videos, an amalgam of original material and excerpts from other 9/11 productions including Canadian James Corbett’s hilarious, 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory. This now-legendary 5- minute clip is perhaps the most effective short synthesis surveying the absurd internal contradictions and impossibilities embedded throughout officialdom’s Big Lie of 9/11. Among his many primary sources, O’Keefe draws also on, for instance, the geopolitical scholarship of high-level military strategist Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the starkly clear and illuminating work of the Australian truth teller, Anthony Lawson, and on the bold intervention with Larry Silverstein by Luke Rudkowski, a founder of We Are Change.
 |
| Lord Leveson Answered to the Same Zionist Handlers as Rupert Murdoch in Making Sure the Leveson Inquiry in the UK Never Got into the Corruption Involved in Promoting the Engineering of Islamophobia to Arouse Public Fears of Islamic Terrorism. This Fear, Involving By Now Many Concocted False Flag Terrorist Events Like That Which Probably Took Place in Canada on Oct. 22, Has Been a Key Psychological Instrument of the Aggressive Warfare Mounted After 9/11. All the Major Media Cartels Are Deeply Integrated into the Isreali-Anglo-American Imperium's Conduct of the Seemingly Never Ending 9/11 Wars. The (/11 Wars Including the Current Campaign Against the Constructed Non-State Entity Assigned the Orwellian Label of the "Islamic State." The Supposed Leader of ISIL, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi aka Simon Elliot, is Thought to Be a Jewish Actor Trained by Mossad. |
Creating the Required Enemy to Justify the Expansionary Operations of the Arm's Industry,
the Jewish State, the Rothschild Banksters and the Proponents of Increased Police Powers
I very much agree with Ken O’Keefe’s thesis that the way individuals relate to the story of what did or did not happen on 9/11 becomes an extremely telling “litmus test” of honesty and integrity especially for figures such as educators, public officials, and celebrities. Given the extent to which our world has been transformed for the worse by those culprits that so far have not faced accountability for their role in the lies and crimes of 9/11, the 9/11 litmus test becomes particularly important in assessing the authenticity of any and all individuals proclaiming an intention to work for social justice.
\
The corrosive power of the religious symbolism woven into the fable of 9/11 has been emphasized by many scholars including, Professor David Ray Giffin. Professor Griffin is an esteemed historian of religious philosophy who has authored ten very important books deconstructing various aspects of the grossly audacious lies fed to the general public from day one of the post- 9/11 world. Beginning on Sept. 11, 2001 the 9/11 wrecking ball has been systematically deployed by Zionist operatives to finish off the job of destroying our now-pretty-much-defunct democracies throughout the so-called "West."
The
very idea of mounting a global war to defeat "terrorism," a slippery
concept if ever there was one, is bogus from its inception. War by its
very nature is the ultimate expression of the extremes of terror, of the
capacity of human beings to inflict pain and death on one another on
massive scales.There is no possibility of developing decent responses to virtually any of the crises we genuinely face, whether, for instance, from climate change or violated human rights or declining public health or diminished biodiversity. As long as long as some sort of War on Terror is allowed to dominate the heights of public policy in virtually every government in the world there can be very little genuinely effective work to achieve a better world. Any and all initiatives along these lines will be countered by the military-industrial complex directed by primarily by Jewish banksters now afforded free reign to exploit and repress us through many demeaning tactics not the least of which is to reduce us too the status of debt slaves.
Universities as Enemies of Truth; The Academy as an Instrument and Complicit Partner in the Lies and Crimes of 9/11
As a tenured full professor in a Canadian university I have to report sadly that many faculty members throughout the Academy tend to be especially complicit or even directly involved in the commission of the lies and crimes of 9/11.
Many dishonest professors have passed themselves off as supposed experts on various aspects of Terrorist Studies in order to exploit the funding possibilities attached to adhering to the officially sanctioned narrative that Ken O'Keefe and millions of others now know for sure is entirely false. Perhaps even worse are those pseudo-academics who refuse to risk the recriminations that tend to arise from merely asking even the most rudimentary questions about the discrepancies between existing evidence and the concocted fable of 9/11.
The main purpose of the religious myths permeating the 9/11 cover story is to generate the Islamophobia.
Especially now that there is no Soviet enemy to justify huge transfers of public wealth to the military-industrial complex, the Murdochesque promotion of hatred and distrust of Muslims generically serves the interests of arms merchants, the Jewish state, the banksters, and the proponents of expanded police powers. In order to continue along their current trajectory of growth and expansion these interests have all joined forces to help develop, train, fund and publicize the required replacement enemy.
A good research project would be to survey text books at all levels right up to University graduate programs to see the nature of 9/11 narratives incorporated into school curricula. To what extent are the events of 9/11 and the still-continuing 9/11 wars being misrepresented in our educational institutions?
These and many other derivative questions flow from Ken O'Keefe's exposure of the extent of the actions of a particular cabal of Israeli-American power brokers whose treason is not only against the United States but against all humanity. Indeed, contemplating the huge implications of what they have been allowed to get away with gives new meaning to the very idea of crimes against humanity.
Asking For an Independent Investigation of 9/11 is Not Enough
The 9/11 wars are in the process of being rebranded as the role previously afforded to the all-purpose Islamic boogeyman of al-Qeada is being taken over by the so-called “Islamic State.” As O’Keefe explains, the funding, training and manipulation of the Islamic State leads back to the same general crime cartel responsible for pulling off the 9/11 global coup d'état. The illegitimate authority seized by the perpetrators of 9/11 coup can only be retained by constantly extending and renewing an especially elaborate and many-faceted cover up.
The 9/11 wars are in the process of being rebranded as the role previously afforded to the all-purpose Islamic boogeyman of al-Qeada is being taken over by the so-called “Islamic State.” As O’Keefe explains, the funding, training and manipulation of the Islamic State leads back to the same general crime cartel responsible for pulling off the 9/11 global coup d'état. The illegitimate authority seized by the perpetrators of 9/11 coup can only be retained by constantly extending and renewing an especially elaborate and many-faceted cover up.
In his concluding on-camera presentation, Ken O’Keefe is insistent that calling for a new independent investigation of 9/11 is not nearly enough given what has already been proven about what did or did not transpire on the fateful day. O’Keefe’s documentary names many names of the credibly accused culprits. He does not put forward such serious allegations lightly but rather cites powerful evidence that ultimately belongs in a court of law.
Ken O’Keefe’s contends that now, thirteen years after such a clearly exposed false flag event, mere requests for a genuinely independent investigation are not nearly sufficient to deal with such huge magnitude of the abuses of power entailed in the lies and crimes of 9/11. This remark resonated especially forcefully for me given what has been going on here in my home jurisdiction of Canada. My reaction to this aspect of Ken O'Keefe video is animated in part by controversies that have arisen concerning a request for a Canadian investigation into 9/11. This request, which carries my own signature along with those of about 1500 other Canadians, took the form of a petition that a Member of Parliament, Elizabeth May, recently agreed to read into the parliamentary transcript known as Hansard.
Some
organizers of this petition congratulated Elizabeth May for being the
only one of 308 federal parliamentarians who was willing to grant even
this small concession. The leader of the Canadian Green Party tried to
distance herself from the petition’s content, however, by indicating she
did not agree with its contents. She so far Ms. May has refused my
written request that she give explicit reasons for her unwillingness to
articulate the basis for her disagreement with the text of a petition
that could be seen as being mild and unconfrontational to a fault. What
grade should Elizabeth May be assigned in the 9/11 litmus test?Ken O’Keefe has convincingly demonstrated that it is impossible to develop an accurate picture of humanity’s actual condition these days without coming to terms with what did or did not happen on 9/11, without becoming informed enough to achieve at least a passing grade in the 9/11 litmus test.
One suggestion I would make to Ken and to others for the future of 9/11 truth work is that we emphasize in our public presentations the US 9/11 Commission report. This document is the primary receptacle of the cover story outlining what is supposed to have happened in the skies and on the land of New York, Washington DC, and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001. The authorship of the text and the primary construction of the report's architecture was largely the work of public mythology expert Philip Zelikow, an Israel First political operative of the Bush White House who is well profiled in Ken O'Keefe's video.
Even the Co-Chairs and the legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission heavily criticized its work. The Commission's report is the outcome of a highly politicized process of concocting politicized lies and fabrications to conform to the 9/11 fable fed to the world within hours of the debacle without any real investigation whatsoever. Part of this process of fabrication involved accepting supposed evidence obtained through torture as a proper means of obtaining information for the formulation of public policy. That travesty in itself constitutes a practise and a precedent that must not be allowed to stand.
9/11, 10/22 and Jewish Power in Canada
Of course I have a major problem with my own Canadian government
accepting as the basis of for the formulation of public policy on
Canadian national security issues a US report outlining a severely
flawed explanation of an episode in which two dozen Canadians were
killed in the Twin Towers. |
| The 9/11 Commission Report is Widely Acknowledged as the Outcome of a Deeply Flawed and Heavily Politicized Process that Violated Basic Principles of Judicial Impartiality. The Report is Based on Many Well Documented Lies of Witnesses Who Were Not Tortured. It was Also Based on Supposed Evidence From Witnesses Who Were Tortured on Behalf of the US Government. The Affect of This Travesty Was to Introduce the Trojan Horse of an Idea That It Is OK to Formulate Public Policy Based on Information Obtained to Through Outlawed Torture Techniques. Hence It Can Be Said That the Report of the 9/11 Commission, on Which Canadian Parliamentarians Like Elizabeth May and Justin Trudeau Depend for Their Understanding of 9/11, Itself Demonstrably Fails the 9/11 Litmus Test Described by Ken O'Keefe. |
Another direct Canadian involvement in the 9/11 debacle is that the Canadian government is a member of NORAD, the North American Aerospace Defense Command. The huge failures of NORAD on 9/11 have become the stuff of legend. The outright lies told with impunity by NORAD officials to the 9/11 Commissioners is a matter of well documented public record.
Of course Canadians require a Canadian investigation into the Canadian aspects of a debacle that has resulted in remaking Canada's laws, policies, and political culture in a fashion that definitely undermines the public interest and the common good.
As I have come to understand it, all Canadian parliamentarians are complicit in torture in accepting the US 9/11 Commission report as the basis for the formulation of Canadian legislation and public policy after 9/11. This complicity in the international crime of torture applies especially to the leadership of the executive branch of the Canadian federal government and to the current leadership of the opposition parties in the Canadian Parliament, namely Elizabeth May of the Green Party, Justin Trudeau of the Liberal Party, and Thomas Mulcair of the New Democratic Party.
In recent years there has been a huge breakdown in the willingness of opposition parties to oppose the policies of Prime Minister Stephen Harper when it comes to the big issues of war and peace, life and death. For instance, when the Israeli Defense Force was attacking last summer in Operation Protective Edge the Palestinian inmates of the Israeli concentration camp known as Gaza, there was no debate from our MPs that included clear criticism of this very clear violation of human rights and international law. Indeed, Parliament was not recalled to deal with the crisis as happened in the UK where many British MPs spoke out with conscience and conviction to oppose this massive denigration of international laws and common decency. The outcry at Westminster extended to the beginning of parliamentary efforts aimed at somewhat mitigating the terrible humanitarian disasters that flowed from the genocidal actions of the Jewish state of Israel.
The contrast between the response of opposition politicians in UK and Canada was illustrative of the depths of our democratic deficit in this country where the concentration of Zionist ownership of the mass media is perhaps even more destructive of free expression than it has been in Great Britain. There has been no equivalent in Canada of the Leveson inquiry into the corrupt practises by police and collaboration with media agents whose joint aim is to control politicians and thereby subvert democratic processes.
Parliamentarians representing all the citizens of Canada, many of whom expressed great anguish and revolt at what was taking place in Gaza, took to the streets, wrote letters to the editor, and made personal testimonials of all kinds. These Canadians of conscience and good will remained almost entirely unrepresented by elected officials of all political stripes due to a conspiracy imposed on us by Canada's real governors, the Jewish Zionist Israeli cabal that calls the shots especially when it comes to issues like media regulation, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the quest for 9/11 Truth.
This experience of witnessing the gross failure of Canadian parliamentary democracy in the face of Operation Protective Edge reinforced my conclusion that there is something really rotten going on in the state of Canada and in the territories of most of its EU and Anglo-American allies as well. Much was exposed in the uniform opposition-party backing of the Netanyahu-Harper line. This line involved the incessant repetition of a specious rationale for the mass murder of civilians.
Israeli citizens were declared the real victims notwithstanding the IDF's 2014 invasion of Gaza including the heavily militarized murder of scores of Palestinian children in their homes, schools, and beach playground. Once again the mass murder, maiming, displacement, and destruction of the feeble life support systems of the Occupied Palestinians were declared to be acts of Israeli self-defence. Alternatively very clear acts of Palestinian self-defence were declared the actions of Islamic and Arab "terrorists" such as those said to be committed by patsies blamed for what were in fact controlled demolitions of the three WTC towers.
This common front in Parliament suggests that Canadian politicians are even more subject to Zionist manipulation than those in Great Britain where Ken O'Keefe is currently based. In Canada as in every other so-called democracy in the West politicians fear being smeared in the mainstream media, which is largely Jewish-owned and Zionist-run.
In Canada a shady Jewish-owned syndicate by the name of Golden Tree Asset Management pulls many of the strings that keep our politicians in line. Golden Tree's Chairman is a Council on Foreign Relations member and an influential New York Zionist who wins awards for his support of Israel. The name of this Israeli First US investment banker is name is Steven A. Tannanbaum.
The media chain currently owned by Golden Tree was started in part by Conrad Black, a neocon supporter of Israeli expansionism who also owned the Jerusalem Post. This same media chain was also developed under the control of Izzy Asper and his offspring, members of a very prominent Zionist family based in Winnipeg. The flagship of this network of Zionist propaganda in Canada is The National Post.
The Post hatched the journalistic career Jonathan Kay, author of a vicious smear volume written to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the "Islamic terror attacks" of 9/11. Deploying classic guilt-by-association tactics of the CIA's anti-communist propaganda techniques developed during the Cold War, Kay's volume is tellingly entitled, Among the Truthers: A Journey into the Growing Conspiracist Underground of 9/11 Truthers, Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics, Hollywood Know-Nothings and Internet Addicts.
Kay medicalizes all those who question the official cover story of 9/11 as clinically insane. He starts the book with a dubious explanation for not addressing the actual evidence of what did or did not happen on 9/11. Apparently his editor advised The National Post's editor that most readers would be bored with discussions of evidence while would-be readers would be more interested in Kay's explorations of the dark caves apparently inhabited by "the Growing Conspiracist Underground."
 |
| Israeli-Canadian Zionist journalist and author Jonathan Kay was One of the Ghost Writers of Liberal Party Leader Justin Trudeau's Fluffy Autobiography. Kay's Collaboration with Trudeau Reflects an Effort to Flash Out a Renewed Liberal Version of Canadian Zionism. |
The book is published by HarperCollins, a Murdoch-owned publishing company. Kay was funded to write the book by the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a Zionist neocon agency that is an outgrowth of the Project for the New American Century. The volume does not contain citation s or even a rudimentary bibliography. It definitely is not peer reviewed.
As Ken O'Keefe outlines in his film, PNAC called for something like a "new Pearl Harbor" a year before the 9/11 coup to took place to spin public opinion in a way that would accept the US build up of military-industrial complex and the national security state toward "full spectrum dominance." PNAC's main members included many of the Israel First neocons featured in Ken O'Keefe film. These PNAC members like Paul Wolfowitz filled many of the seats in President George W. Bush's war cabinet.
Kay also was recently appointed Editor-In-Chief of the Walrus, a liberal magazine that once could be taken seriously as a genuine vehicle of investigative journalism and speaking truth to power. Jonathan Kay was also hired to be a ghost writer of the autobiography of Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party leader and son of a former Canadian prime minister who was building momentum in public opinion polls until his expression of unqualified support for Israel's assault in Gaza last summer signalled to many progressive Canadians that he is a Zionist puppet of the usual suspects when comes to Canada's relationship to the Jewish state and the Palestinian people.
For much of the twentieth century the Liberal Party dominated Parliament and thereby governed Canada. The false interpretative twist given the events of Sept. 11, however, created the underlying basis for foreign-backed regime change in Canada. Ultra-Zionist Stephen Harper came to power as a minority status prime minister in 2006 and then as a majority status prime minister in 2011. Harper's mandate to govern is tainted by the importation from the United States of Republican Party-style election fraud whose full extent remains unclear.
Harper will probably be able to renew his majority status in the federal election of 2015 on the back of a classic Mossad-style concocted terror event whose centrepiece involved a shooter episode on Oct. 22 (10/22) by a "recent Muslim convert" at the Canadian War Memorial and then inside the main Parliament building. Within hours of the event a Rupert Murdoch venue, the New York Post, superimposed a headline, "State of War," over a photograph of the Canadian War Memorial." This image justifying Canada's inclusion in military operations against the non-state entity ISIL, a replacement for the role once assigned al-Qaeda, repeated much of the same spin given 9/11 within hours of the plane crashes and mass murders. The media message was that this shooter episode on 10/22 was not to be understood as a serious crime requiring meticulous investigation but rather as an act of war justifying the invocation of emergency measures including military attacks abroad and increased police incursions at home.
On The Need to Continue the Internationalization of the Quest for 9/11 Truth
This foray into Canadian politics demonstrates that many of the patterns
Ken O'Keefe identifies in his film apply as much to Canada as to the
United States. With this in mind I could mildly criticize Ken's general
approach for being centred too much on a rather cloistered US
perspective on 9/11. While understandable given the extent of the
betrayal of the core constitutional principles and interests of the
United States, this USAocentric approach is somewhat discordant with the
reality that Mr. O'Keefe is no longer a US citizen. Rather Mr. O'Keefe
can make an excellent case that he has demonstrated his willingness to
act as a genuine global citizen even as he has become a major
international figure in the 9/11 Truth movement.Indeed, Ken O'Keefe is helping to pioneer the way towards a judiciable form of global citizenship that I believe could and should form the jurisdictional basis of the trials the global community needs to enforce some legal accountability on those who commit the most serious crimes against humanity, the most serious crimes against all life on earth.
So much of the really high-level criminality these days abuses as a cover and an alibi the 9/11 fable, the mostly constructed imagery of international terrorism, and the sweeping legal powers invoked by the resort to so-called national security. This international crime wave from those who rule us from the top of the pyramid is accelerating at such a quick pace that the need grows daily to follow Ken O'Keefe prescription by arresting and arbitrating the defences of those that can be most credibly accused of the 9/11 crime and the ongoing cover up of the true nature of the events and implications of what happened on Sept. 11 2001.
The recent experiences of, among many invited delegates, Ken O'Keefe and I and Veteran's Today Senior Editor, Kevin Barrett, at the recent New Horizon conference in Tehran speaks to the fact that the lies and crimes of 9/11 cast such a very wide net because they affect so profoundly the entire global population These affects tend to extend with particular harshness especially to Arab people, Persian people, and the ummah which is the worldwide community of all Muslims in all their vast pluralism of nationality, ethnicity, language, culture, class, ideology, and sect.
 |
| Most of the Delegates at the New Horizon Conference That Recently Took Place in Tehran. The Conference Chair was Nader Talebzadeh Pictured Front Row Centre with Glasses and a Brown Sports Jacket. One of the Panels in the Conference was on Israel and 9/11. |
As a polity essentially smeared for the 9/11 crime through the reference to Iran in George W. Bush's notorious "Axis of Evil" speech, it is very clear why the government and people of the Islamic Republic of Iran would be seriously interested in the international quest for 9/11 truth. The Islamic Republic of Iran has been ruthlessly targeted since 1979, but especially since 9/11 with Israeli-directed economic warfare, with Mossad assassinations of its scientists, with high tech Israeli-America cyber attacks targeting the operation of its peaceful nuclear energy program, and with lethal physical attacks and propaganda attacks by the Mossad-trained-and-run MeK commandos etc etc etc. This list of consequences of the Bush's Israeli-instigated slander of Iran is far from complete.
Other possible fallout from the Bush-Frum hit job include the actions of my own federal government that withdrew in 2012 the Canadian ambassador from Iran and broke off all formal diplomatic relations under orders from Benjamin Netanyahu to his Likudnik Lieutenant, Stephen Harper. An important friend of the Islamic Revolution, Ken O'Keefe is in a good position to develop analysis of these kinds of broader international processes that continue to arise from the global geopolitical shifts that arise from our collective failure to come to come to grips with the truth of what happened or what didn't happen on 9/11.
 |
| Israel First Jewish Operatives All Prominent in the US Power Structure. All These Neocons Are Deeply Implicated in the Lies and Crimes of 9/11 |
Certainly Mr. O'Keefe's decision to restrict his coverage to the United States allows Israel First operatives in Canada like Jonathan Kay and David Frum to slip through the cracks of the work of the Born-In-the-USA Freedom Fighter who is emerging as an important citizen investigator and citizen jurist. Both Kay and Frum are every bit as deeply implicated in the lies and crimes of 9/11 as many of the figures that Ken O'Keefe does cover in his Internet movie. Both Kay and Frum should be on the list of the credibly accused when it becomes possible to break the hold of our jailers by mounting criminal proceedings in a more transnationally empowered type of international criminal court.
How should the people and government of Iran respond to being fingered as the 9/11 culprits along with Saddam's Iraq and Communist North Korea by the very folks who most likely are the real 9/11 culprits? The Israeli First neocon Canadian, David Frum is said to have authored the potent "Axis of Evil" line to prepare American public opinion for a US-led invasion of Iran. The son of the legendary Jewish Canadian CBC broadcaster, Barbara Frum, David was a Bush White House speech writer and co-author with Richard Perle of the war propaganda text, An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror.
The freedom fighter began and concluded his 9/11 documentary with the observation that humanity will remain in a sense incarcerated in a psychological prison of oppression from within and from above until we can free ourselves from the enormously consequential 9/11 deception. This and many other vital messages contained in Ken O'Keefe's bold and uncompromising account of the most difficult yet pressing issue of contemporary times deserves a wide audience. This factor is the very reason that this Internet movie is bound to be ignored by the many media venues including the CBC that regularly opens the supposed public airwaves to Israeli First proponents of aggressive warfare like Jonathan Kay.
About the author:
Anthony Hall
Currently Professor of Globalization Studies at University of Lethbridge
in Alberta Canada.His been a teacher in the Canadian university system
since 1982. Dr. Hall, has recently finished a big two-volume publishing
project at McGill-Queen's University Press entitled "The Bowl with One
Spoon"
Labels:
9/11 truth,
911 false flag,
Anthony Hall,
Israel,
Ken O'Keefe,
Mossad,
traitors,
Zionism
No comments:
Post a Comment