judéo-maçonniques - Holocaustes (Shoahs), Antisémitisme, Nazisme, Islamisme, Laïcisme, Démocratie et LGBT !
Chronique d’un éveil citoyen, épisode 1 : l’électrochoc Dieudonné
Chronique d'un eveil citoyen - épisode 1 L'electrochoc Dieudonné
Published on 1 Nov 2014
Page Facebook d'Alban: https://www.facebook.com/articlesalba...
Page Tipee d'Alban: https://www.tipeee.com/articles-d-alb...
Page RuTube: http://rutube.ru/video/person/655112/
L’article original adapté en vidéo (avec les sources): http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/cit...
L’intégralité des articles d'Alban sur son profil AgoraVox : http://www.agoravox.fr/auteur/human-iste
Page Tipee d'Alban: https://www.tipeee.com/articles-d-alb...
Page RuTube: http://rutube.ru/video/person/655112/
L’article original adapté en vidéo (avec les sources): http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/cit...
L’intégralité des articles d'Alban sur son profil AgoraVox : http://www.agoravox.fr/auteur/human-iste
Chronique d'un éveil citoyen, épisode 2 : De Dieudonné au sionisme
Chronique d'un eveil citoyen - épisode 2 De Dieudonné jusqu'au Sionisme
Chronique d'un éveil citoyen – Episode 3 : Un pied dans la théorie du complot
September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
Published on 11 Jan 2014
September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor
For Educational Purposes Only - Producer Grants Permission To Distribute Freely
"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" is a 5 hour documentary that summarizes 12 years of public debate on 9/11. All the most important issues in the debate are presented in full detail, showing both the positions of those who reject the official version, the 9/11 Truth Movement, and the positions of those who support it, called "the debunkers." You can be the judge.
Source: September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor - http://www.usfilms.ea29.com/september...
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor - Trailer - http://youtu.be/OmM4Tra-rg0
VIDEO - September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL) - http://youtu.be/g2WFZ1G2QR4
Time - 4:53:42
You can also purchase the DVD from Amazon - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00F... ($29.00)
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
For Educational Purposes Only - Producer Grants Permission To Distribute Freely
"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" is a 5 hour documentary that summarizes 12 years of public debate on 9/11. All the most important issues in the debate are presented in full detail, showing both the positions of those who reject the official version, the 9/11 Truth Movement, and the positions of those who support it, called "the debunkers." You can be the judge.
Source: September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor - http://www.usfilms.ea29.com/september...
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor - Trailer - http://youtu.be/OmM4Tra-rg0
VIDEO - September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL) - http://youtu.be/g2WFZ1G2QR4
Time - 4:53:42
You can also purchase the DVD from Amazon - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00F... ($29.00)
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-
Category
911 False Flag - American Traitors & Mossad - Where are the Oath Keepers? - Ken O'Keefe
Chronique d’un éveil citoyen – Episode 3 : Un pied dans la théorie du complot
Résumé de l’épisode précédent : Derrière le mensonge colossal qui m’explosa en plein visage se cachait le sionisme. Une idéologie déviante bien qu’exempte de critiques médiatiques. Sujet à une curiosité frénétique, je déniche des documents contradictoires, plus ou moins factuels et objectifs. Parmi eux, le documentaire « l’oligarchie et le sionisme » élargit la problématique du sionisme sur une oligarchie dominante. Pour certains, cette « oligarchie dominante » est la tête d’un empire tentaculaire, occulte et maléfique. Pour d’autres, cette « oligarchie dominante » est l’ultime fruit d’un système économique ultralibéral et autodestructeur. Aujourd’hui, je suis persuadé d’avoir visionné la seconde partie de « l’oligarchie et le sionisme » au cours de mes recherches mais je ne parviens plus à la retrouver. Si vous souhaitez vous la procurer, elle s’intitule : « L'oligarchie et le sionisme 2ème partie : la déroute de la mondialisation ». Par avance, je remercie les lecteurs éclairés qui pourront indiquer un lien valide pour télécharger ou visionner cette dernière…)
Par le passé, j’avais vaguement entendu le nom de Thierry Meyssan dans les médias, précisément pour ses « théories complotistes » au sujet du 11 septembre… je n’y avais pas prêté attention.
Le 11 septembre
Je découvrais un premier reportage :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGjF...
Par l’un des sketchs de Dieudonné, j’apprends que Jean-Marie Bigard dénonce la version officielle du 11 septembre. Jean-Marie Bigard fait référence à un second reportage (http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6...), connu sous le nom de « Loose change » :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hlu...
Alors que je recherche un point de vue contradictoire, je découvre une émission diffusée sur France 2 en octobre 2009 dans laquelle Jean-Marie Bigard et Mathieu Kassovitz critique la version officielle des attentats :
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xa...
Comme lors de l’affaire Dieudonné, j’ai une terrible nausée en constatant le parti pris et la malhonnêteté des journalistes. J’achève de cultiver mes doutes sur le 11 septembre en publiant un clip amusant découvert sur http://www.reopen911.info au sujet de la version officielle sur mon mur facebook : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnWAugpHGCI
Pour ceux qui souhaitent étoffer leurs doutes, un dossier existe ici même sur agoravox : http://www.agoravox.fr/mot/11-septembre-2001
N’avais-je jamais eu de doute sur le 11 septembre ? Peut-être… vaguement… mais comme la majorité de la population j’étais bien conditionné : « Ils l’ont bien cherché avec leur impérialisme à la con. » « Ce serait le gouvernement américain ? Non, c’est tellement gros que c’est impossible. » « Si c’était vrai, les américains auraient fait une révolution depuis longtemps… ou alors ils sont vraiment idiots. » « Même si ce n’était pas des terroristes et que le gouvernement américain s’est effectivement tiré une balle dans le pied… quelle importance ? Je suis français, ça ne me concerne pas vraiment… »
L’union européenne
Dans l’oligarchie et le sionisme apparait un conférencier nommé François Asselineau. Ce dernier est un énarque qui travaille à l’inspection générale des finances et préside un petit parti politique nommé UPR. Ses conférences sont nombreuses, factuelles et pertinentes. Selon les thèmes, elles retracent :
L’histoire de la construction de l’Union Européenne :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZZf703Ck3o&list=PLKVgrNogVYWK41wLTn8MUD_UO6n1V64RC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWKBp32IFmk&list=PLKVgrNogVYWK41wLTn8MUD_UO6n1V64RC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MUBLRZahc0&list=PLKVgrNogVYWK41wLTn8MUD_UO6n1V64RC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90cbjV9IqC8&list=PLKVgrNogVYWK41wLTn8MUD_UO6n1V64RC
L’Europe, l’Union Européenne et la guerre :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zti4aV2WL5w
L’Union Européenne et la démocratie :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLKVgrNogVYWIjmvmK0pkaqmgPSXBiG5GD&v=36y3dEfgvmo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXjnlLRM8LY&list=PLKVgrNogVYWIjmvmK0pkaqmgPSXBiG5GD&index=3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os4V49xZ_e4&index=4&list=PLKVgrNogVYWIjmvmK0pkaqmgPSXBiG5GD
Les raisons qui justifient la sortie de l’union européenne :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLKVgrNogVYWKmDNwvuC6pq9AMyRYqZjZQ&v=Ch5Bfe5j29A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPK7_iavHTs&index=2&list=PLKVgrNogVYWKmDNwvuC6pq9AMyRYqZjZQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5chZ6fPI1A&list=PLKVgrNogVYWKmDNwvuC6pq9AMyRYqZjZQ&index=3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ccHnbtXPFM&index=4&list=PLKVgrNogVYWKmDNwvuC6pq9AMyRYqZjZQ
Les impasses de la construction européenne :
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xgbp2b_les-12-impasses-de-la-construction-europeenne_news#from=embediframe
L’aboutissement de l’Union Européenne vers une dictature :
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xvedgi_l-europe-la-mise-en-place-d-une-dictature-francois-asselineau-annecy-22-septembre-2012_news?start=2
Les raisons qui conduisent l’Union Européenne :
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xlyfvq_pourquoi-l-europe-est-elle-comme-elle-est_news?start=2
Les abus des technocrates européens :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zP6_h5Y42ak
Il serait trop ambitieux de résumer ces conférences en un seul article mais je ne peux que vous encourager à les visionner. Je ne reprendrais dans cet article que certains éléments qui traitent de l’histoire de la construction européenne.
- Les déclarations de personnages d’état au sujet d’une guerre froide avec les américains :
Ce que disait Charles De Gaulle à Alain Peyrefitte :
« Vous savez ce que ça veut dire, la supranationalité ?
La domination des Américains. L’Europe supranationale, c’est l’Europe sous commandement américain. Les Allemands, les Italiens, les Belges, les Pays Bas sont dominés par les Américains. Les Anglais aussi, mais d’une autre manière, parce qu’ils sont de la même famille.
Alors, il n’y a que la France qui ne soit pas dominée. Pour la dominer aussi, on s’acharne à vouloir la faire entrer dans un machin supranational aux ordres de Washington. »
Ce qu’écrivait François Mitterrand dans son dernier livre « Le dernier Mitterrand » (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Der...) :
« La France ne le sait pas, mais nous sommes en guerre avec l’Amérique. Oui, une guerre permanente, une guerre vitale, une guerre économique, une guerre sans mort apparemment.
Oui, ils sont très durs les américains, ils sont voraces, ils veulent un pouvoir sans partage sur le monde.
C’est une guerre inconnue, une guerre permanente, sans mort apparemment et pourtant une guerre à mort. »
- Outre ces deux citations, la conférence de François Asselineau apporte et démontre :
Les éléments probants sur la stimulation de la formation de l’Union Européenne par les américains. (Notamment sur la monnaie unique)
La stratégie diplomatique qui consiste à « attacher » la souveraineté nationale des pays européens aux autres souverainetés nationales pour mieux les entraver. (Souveraineté sur la circulation des biens et personnes, souveraineté monétaire, souveraineté diplomatique…)
Le mensonge médiatique/éducatif qui consiste à présenter l’Union Européenne comme un contrepoids aux États-Unis, au Japon, à la Chine.
Le rôle complice de l’Allemagne et de l’Angleterre dans la formation de l’Union Européenne sous subversion américaine.
La stratégie et la résistance de De Gaulle au processus européen.
Le rôle de l’OTAN dans la construction de l’Union Européenne.
Les conflits d’intérêts des dirigeants européens et nationaux.
Les raisons de l’impuissance politique et les manipulations médiatiques récurrentes.
Évidemment, je suis révolté par l’ampleur de ces mensonges que l’on m’a inculqués depuis l’enfance. Je suis dépité de ma naïveté mais ce qui me dégoute le plus c’est l’effroyable propagande, d’une affligeante de médiocrité, qu’osent infliger les médias mainstream au reste de la population. A titre d’exemple, je vous propose ce documentaire de Caroline Fourest intitulé : « Les réseaux de l'extrême - Les obsédés du complot » : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eez5yOBQe9A
Étrangement, c’est ce documentaire « officiel » mis en contraste avec tous les autres qui me confirme que je ne suis pas manipulé par « des réseaux extrémistes ». C’est l’inconsistance des arguments avancés et les procédés manipulateurs de Caroline Fourest qui ont conduit mon esprit sceptique à transformer mes « doutes sur la vérité officielle » en « convictions à l'encontre de mensonges politiques et médiatiques ».
C’est certain, comme le dit Caroline, j’ai un pied dans la « théorie du complot »… et c’est un peu grâce à elle ! Avec le 11 septembre et l’Union Européenne : j’ajoute deux nouvelles perles au collier de mensonges et de manipulations publics qui ont conditionnés ma vision historique, politique et géopolitique.
Je dois poursuivre mes recherches et rester débrancher. Heureusement, de nombreuses initiatives existent pour poursuivre mon propre débranchement et m’aider à débrancher mes proches. C’est le cas des brèves « Restez débranchés ! » qui ont un format court (5 à 10 min) et une petite note d’humour :
Restez débranchés ! Épisode 1 – La seconde guerre mondiale :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cCykCEHkaY
Restez débranchés ! Épisode 2 – L’Union Européenne :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYxXNdR26uU
Restez débranchés ! Épisode 3 – La révolution française :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZqZmTqZoos
Restez débranchés ! Épisode 4 – Les médias :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEv-DyYQ94E
Restez débranchés ! Épisode 5 – Terrorisme et Printemps Arabes :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRAtrA76wAU
Restez débranchés ! Épisode 6 (court métrage) – La Théorie du genre :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDf4R9GTgRU
Chronique d’un éveil citoyen – Episode 4 : Un lobby parmi les lobbies
par
mardi 10 juin 2014
mardi 10 juin 2014
Résumé des épisodes précédents : La découverte des faces cachées de l’affaire Dieudonné, du sionisme, du 11 septembre, de l’Union Européenne bouleverse ma conception naïve de la politique et de la géopolitique. En réalité, ces sujets d’actualité ne semblent être que les symptômes de l’influence de deux lobbies : le lobby israélien/ultra-sioniste et le lobby américain. A cet instant, je m’interroge : Comment fonctionne le lobbying ? Existe-t-il d’autres lobbies ? Existe-t-il un lobby dominant ?
Le fonctionnement des lobbiesPour atteindre et influencer le pouvoir politique, on peut s’appuyer sur deux types de lobbying.
- Le lobbying communautaire.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79Ab1oBCRYk
- Le lobbying public.
Dans le cas du lobbying public, le nerf de la guerre (d’influence) est l’argent. Un documentaire intitulé « Les nouveaux chiens de garde », relativement populaire dans les milieux dissidents, en fait la démonstration :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FW4Ealqx2Q
Un autre documentaire, un peu moins relayé, détaille les stratégies de communication :
Partie 1 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFuilpt4EZQ
Partie 2 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1ttPvwSNi0
Comme le démontre « Les nouveaux chiens de garde », en France, les médias « verticaux/descendants » sont tenus par les pouvoirs publics ou de grands groupes privés.
Par ailleurs, lorsque la libéralisation de l’information pose des difficultés à la propagande officielle, les stratégies de manipulation mises en œuvre sont connues : http://lesmoutonsenrages.fr/nous-sommes-manipules/les-techniques-de-manipulation-des-masses-2/
De plus, lorsque des personnalités dissidentes s’apprêtent à livrer une critique trop incisive du système économique dans un média mainstream, on peut toujours recourir à de discrètes menaces de mort en direct en déplaçant un index le long de sa jugulaire : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOpaABWaeLo
Enfin, on doit observer que l’action des lobbies « communautaires » est généralement combinée avec l’action des lobbies « publics ». D’une certaine manière, les lobbies « public » sont réduits à des outils pour les lobbies « communautaire ».
L’affaire Dieudonné est particulièrement intéressante car elle est l’expression d’un point de friction entre une morale « libertaire » et une morale « antiraciste » (dans le cas présent « anti-antisémite ») que la gauche prétendait incarner simultanément.
La morale « libertaire » était issue du mouvement de mai 1968 qui s’était opposé à une droite autoritaire et catholique, c’est-à-dire prétendument liberticide. Comme le souligne François Asselineau dans sa conférence « Qui gouverne la France et l’Europe », de nombreux éléments conduisent à penser que les mouvements de mai 68 ont été stimulés par les américains*.
*(Cf à partir de la minute 54 : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWKBp32IFmk&list=PLKVgrNogVYWK41wLTn8MUD_UO6n1V64RC&index=2 )
La morale « antiraciste » est héritée de la marche des beurs, de sa récupération par Miterrand avec SOS racisme et la stimulation du FN. Du point de vue médiatique, le FN est l’expression politique de la xénophobie et se situe à l’extrême droite.
Ainsi, l’interdiction de Dieudonné provoque une terrible fracture au cœur de cette morale mixte (libertaire et antiraciste), affiliée politiquement à la gauche française. On peut parler ici de double incohérence :
Première incohérence : Par cette interdiction, la gauche renie fortement sa fibre « libertaire » en contrevenant à 80ans de jurisprudence sur la liberté d’expression par un jugement en référé prit par le conseil d’Etat en quelques heures.
Seconde incohérence : Par cette interdiction, la gauche prétend combattre le « racisme et l’antisémitisme » d’un humoriste métis tandis que les dérapages racistes de toute la classe politique sont largement tolérés.
Je m’avance probablement, mais cette maladresse continuera d’infuser dans la société française jusqu’à une inévitable explosion de la classe politique.
Le lobby dominant
Le lobby qui se manifeste par l’action des banques et des multinationales semble dominer les autres. En langage populaire, on peut qualifier ce groupe d’influence de « lobby financier » mais pour les lecteurs de Karl Marx on pourrait le qualifier de « Capital ».
Les raisons qui me conduisent à penser que ce « lobby financier » est le lobby dominant seront développer dans le prochain épisode de cet « éveil citoyen ». Avant d’entreprendre cette démonstration, il est nécessaire de comprendre ce qu’est l’argent moderne. Le documentaire de Paul Grignon permet de mieux cerner ce qu’est « l’argent dette » :
Version courte : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgA2-bWXSN4
Version longue : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMOFBioFNvc
Un second documentaire intitulé « Dette, crise, chômage : qui crée l'argent ? » reprend également ces notions : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syAkdb_TDyo#t=412
Pour comprendre l’influence du lobby financier (c’est-à-dire le Capital) sur le monde, il est nécessaire de confronter votre conception du monde économique et financier (généralement hérité de l’idéologie dominante) avec le point de vue de certains analystes financier et macroéconomique :
Je commence avec l’analyse d’Olivier Berruyer dont je vous recommande le blog (http://www.les-crises.fr/) et le livre « Les faits sont têtus ». Une interview pertinente sur la fin d’un monde : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GcufoPxOPA
En duo avec Jacques Sapir : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQtfq65I1KA
On peut également ajouter les analyses de Frédéric Lordon (vu dans les nouveaux chiens de garde) sur la prise en otage par les banques : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRCRiGiCCxo ou sur l’hypothèse d’un défaut sur la dette publique : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds85pZcUiys
D’autres analyses macroéconomiques méritent également que l’on s’y intéresse :
- Olivier Delamarche : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oat5tJPk0Sk
- Philippe Murer : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6wF8z-nAm0
- Pierre-Yves Rougeyron : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJx-VnL7_uQ
Version courte : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV87QvLhbuk
Version longue : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMC_MpGE0dw
C’est ici que vous arrivez au point culminant de cet « éveil citoyen » avec la (re)découverte de la démocratie et les nombreuses vidéos d’Etienne Chouard :
- Par la Mutinerie : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZVsnXOB10U
- Par Avant-Garde Economique : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fnGbpUnkMQ
- Par @rrêt Sur Image : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Khb-cBbugC0
- Lors d’une conférence : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opxbFy7xCgM
- Par enquête et débat : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LB462z-j70
« La plus part de tes propos sont très justes et ils me conduisent à une réponse assez complète. Tu dis que tu m’as connu très « social-démocrate » et, au risque de te surprendre, je le suis toujours.
Je dirais même que je suis socialiste + démocrate + libéral. Mais la différence, maintenant, c’est que je sais ce que signifient ces mots qui ne sont pour toi (comme pour moi, il y a seulement 4 mois) que des étiquettes de l’échiquier politique. Par exemple, lorsque je dis que je suis démocrate, cela signifie que je supporte, que j’encourage, la démocratie. Or, lorsque je dis que nous ne sommes pas en démocratie, je pèse mes mots. Une démocratie « représentative » n’est pas une démocratie mais une aristocratie. Je m’explique, aristocratie vient du grec, aristos « meilleur - excellent » et kratos « pouvoir » tandis que démocratie vient de dêmos « peuple » et kratos « pouvoir ». Or, lorsque tu votes lors d’une élection, tu désignes les « meilleurs » pour le « pouvoir ». Notre régime n’est donc pas une démocratie mais une aristocratie, le terme « démocratie représentative » est un barbarisme conçu pour nous éloigner de la vérité, de la réalité (qui serait plus une « aristocratie élective » et plus exactement encore une « ploutocratie »).
Tu dis que ma désillusion est grande… c’est bien pire, elle est abyssale. Mais elle n’a rien à voir avec la politique réalisée par rapport à mes « attentes initiales ». Pour être honnête, sans la brèche de l’affaire Dieudonné, je trépignerais toujours devant « C dans l’air » en me demandant pourquoi Hollande ne fait pas ces fichues réformes pour améliorer notre économie et pourquoi il ne se lance pas à cœur perdu dans le fédéralisme européens… comme un « parfait » mouton. Je soupirerais en me demandant pourquoi il y a autant de réactionnaires qui s’opposent à la construction Européenne, je fustigerais les syndicats qui bloquent tout dès la moindre réforme sur les retraites, le chômage ou la flexibilité du travail…. comme un parfait mouton.
En réalité, ma désillusion est beaucoup plus profonde. Cette désillusion est issue de l’immense mensonge que l’on nous raconte dès notre éducation, lors de nos études, puis dans les médias et la politique. »
par
mardi 10 juin 2014
mardi 10 juin 2014
(21 votes) Votez
Sur le même thème
Chronique d’un éveil citoyen – Episode 5 : L’influence du CapitalII/ Les lobbyistes, opérateurs en territoires troubles. 1/2 : Les trois voies du lobbying
Chronique d’un éveil citoyen – Épisode 7 : Penser la monnaie et la dette
Ukraine : Histoire d'une guerre (5)
Chronique d’un éveil citoyen – Episode 6 : L’influence d’Internet
Friday, December 26, 2014
Ken O’Keefe and the Battle for 9/11 Reality
[Editor's note: Anthony Hall will appear tonight on Truth Jihad Radio to discuss this article and why it is being published here rather than at Veterans Today. -KB]
A Commentary on Ken O'Keefe's Expanded and Improved Documentary, 911 False Flag: American Traitors and Mossad.
by Anthony Hall
Background Information on Mr. O'Keefe: Having served in the US Marine Corps this soldier for truth, justice and peace on many fronts renounced his US citizenship in 2001. Observing the huge disparity in the valuation of the lives of Western and non-Western people, Mr. O'Keefe then offered himself up as a human shield. He sought to encourage others to join him in this campaign to protect Iraqi people and their public health infrastructure from the wanton destruction of so-called "smart bombing by US Armed Forces.
A tireless proponent of various projects aimed at helping the caged Palestinians of Gaza to overcome the blockade imposed by their Israeli jailers, O'Keefe tried famously to defend in 2010 the Mavi Marmara from hostile military attack by the Israeli Defense Force. The Mavi Marmara was carrying humanitarian aid to the inmates of the Gazan concentration camp.
As part of an episode that saw nine Turkish sailors murdered by Israeli gun men, O'Keefe was captured, locked up and beaten in an Israeli prison. When describing the episode subsequently on the BBC, Ken O'Keefe had the rare opportunity to introduce to a wider audience the concept that that the real nature of the 9/11 debacle was was not anything like what has been reported in the Murdoch press and the other propaganda instruments of international Zionism. He asserted that 9/11 had been an Israeli-led Mossad job done with the help and complicity of many American saboteurs.
The ultimate aim of of the designers of this false flag terrorist event was to poisoning public opinion against Arab and Muslim populations, to transform Israel's regional enemies into the perceived enemies of the "West," which Benjamin Netanyahu and others have wrongly described as an exclusively Judeo-Christian entity. The aim of the 9/11 global coup was to demonize and thus dehumanize the predominant Muslim populations about to be targeted in Israeli-led, US-implemented wars of aggression in the Middle East and throughout Eurasia.
In this documentary Ken O'Keefe elaborates this interpretation and gets very specific by naming many of the culprits. Mr. O'Keefe lays out the essential evidence that, if the rule of law really existed for the rich and the powerful as well as for the poor and middle classes, would form the basis of multiple criminal prosecutions in international and domestic courts of law. This eloquent and thoughtful man, who has frequently put his life and reputation on the line to advance the quest for justice, underlines that one's position on 9/11 has become a primary litmus test of the authenticity of any person or group claiming the objective of bringing about a better world. In this documentary Mr. Okeefe demonstrates that we have moved far beyond the point where merely asking authorities for an independent investigation of the events of 9/11 is sufficient. We need arrests and trials as organized either by law enforcement officials, or, if failing that, by conscientious and upstanding world citizens if necessary.
Ken O'Keefe Gives an Overview of the Fruits of a Thirteen-Year Citizens Investigation into 9/11, Including into the Media Manipulations That Have Been a Core Feature and Facilitator of the Lies and Crimes of 9/11:
Former US Marine Ken O’Keefe is one of the genuinely heroic figures of our times in a class with the likes of Malcolm X, Patrice Lumumba, Che Guevara, José Rizal, Mother Jones, Ho Chi Minh, Sitting Bull, Sun Yat-Sen, and Hugo Chavez. In another era Mr. O’Keefe most likely would have operated in some tyrannized country helping to stir up the peasantry for armed resistance against the illegitimate authority of its oppressors.
Now that this kind of liberation struggle has been rendered more or less impossible, one of his primary fields of operation is social media on the Internet. Ken O'Keefe is becoming one of the new Geronimos of guerrilla warfare even as those interests seeking to persecute Edward Snow embody the new digital imperialism of cyberspace. With the old mainstream media venues completely sold out to the enticements of Jewish and corporate power, the Internet is the sole medium where the wretched of the earth can have a voice in what the Canadian-Israeli neocon agent, Jonathan Kay, has correctly dubbed the battle for reality. As one of the Internet's most iconographic freedom fighters Ken O'Keefe's latest digital documentary event is an expanded and technically improved version of his classic investigation into the lies and crimes of 9/11. In 911 False Flag, American Traitors and Mossad, the auteur demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that “there are stunningly incriminating Jewish, Israeli, Zionist finger prints all over” the 9/11 debacle and the mainstream medias’ subsequent cover up of the true nature of the crime.
The new introduction features a Russell Brand-style commentary highlighting Mr. O’Keefe’s assessment of David Cameron’s abysmal speech at the United Nations in September of 2014. In Hack Attack Cameron has been exposed by the Guardian’s lead investigative reporter, Nick Davies, as yet another UK Prime Minister under the control of Rupert Murdoch’s deeply corrupt media empire.
Davies was the primary journalists who broke the series of stories leading to the investigation by Lord Justice Leveson into the dark collaboration between the police and the Muroch press in Britain. A core objective of the collaboration between Scotland Yard and the Murdoch press was to blackmail, bribe and thus control elected officials with the aim of subverting British parliamentary democracy. All of the politicians of the Anglo-American-Commonwealth countries have pretty much become mere performers who are precluded from winning elected office unless they adhere to the Zionist agendas developed for them on Fleet Street or in New York and Tel Aviv.
Not surprising the interaction between Rupert Murdoch and Lord Leveson, both high-ranking operatives in the same Jewish Zionist Israeli networks of power, never touched on the deeper levels of subversion necessary to promote the Islamophobic propaganda of aggressive warfare in the name of the Global War on Terror. Cameron's sound bites on ISIL and homegrown "extremism" as exemplified by.... say.... Ken O'Keefe, replayed and extended the same memes of hate speech developed initially for former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and former US President George W. Bush. Both tools of the leading Israel-Anglo-American imperium are criminal psychopaths installed into office by the media manipulations of the Murdoch press including Fox News in the USA.
Son of a Jewish mother and one of the chief Zionist propagandists who directed the Israeli-Anglo-American imperium’s popular incitement to hate Muslims, Murdoch is only one of the 9/11 culprits identified by O’Keefe. Also prominent among the accused are are a number of Israel First Americans including Michael Chertoff, Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Philip D. Zelikow, and “Lucky” Larry Silverstein. This is only a very partial list of the fingered culprits of the 9/11 psychological operation, a criminal class that includes most of the Israeli-American owners and directors of the major media cartels dominating Western public opinion.
The 95-minute production is, like many Internet videos, an amalgam of original material and excerpts from other 9/11 productions including Canadian James Corbett’s hilarious, 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory. This now-legendary 5- minute clip is perhaps the most effective short synthesis surveying the absurd internal contradictions and impossibilities embedded throughout officialdom’s Big Lie of 9/11. Among his many primary sources, O’Keefe draws also on, for instance, the geopolitical scholarship of high-level military strategist Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the starkly clear and illuminating work of the Australian truth teller, Anthony Lawson, and on the bold intervention with Larry Silverstein by Luke Rudkowski, a founder of We Are Change.
I very much agree with Ken O’Keefe’s thesis that the way individuals relate to the story of what did or did not happen on 9/11 becomes an extremely telling “litmus test” of honesty and integrity especially for figures such as educators, public officials, and celebrities. Given the extent to which our world has been transformed for the worse by those culprits that so far have not faced accountability for their role in the lies and crimes of 9/11, the 9/11 litmus test becomes particularly important in assessing the authenticity of any and all individuals proclaiming an intention to work for social justice.
As Ken O'Keefe emphasizes in his film, the sequence of events set in motion by the religious fable that Islamic jihadists successfully attacked America on 9/11 are so lethally consequential to the nature of the imperilled global civilization we share that there is really no way to avoid some basic societal reckoning with the truth of what really happened on the fateful day.
\
The corrosive power of the religious symbolism woven into the fable of 9/11 has been emphasized by many scholars including, Professor David Ray Giffin. Professor Griffin is an esteemed historian of religious philosophy who has authored ten very important books deconstructing various aspects of the grossly audacious lies fed to the general public from day one of the post- 9/11 world. Beginning on Sept. 11, 2001 the 9/11 wrecking ball has been systematically deployed by Zionist operatives to finish off the job of destroying our now-pretty-much-defunct democracies throughout the so-called "West."
The very idea of mounting a global war to defeat "terrorism," a slippery concept if ever there was one, is bogus from its inception. War by its very nature is the ultimate expression of the extremes of terror, of the capacity of human beings to inflict pain and death on one another on massive scales.
There is no possibility of developing decent responses to virtually any of the crises we genuinely face, whether, for instance, from climate change or violated human rights or declining public health or diminished biodiversity. As long as long as some sort of War on Terror is allowed to dominate the heights of public policy in virtually every government in the world there can be very little genuinely effective work to achieve a better world. Any and all initiatives along these lines will be countered by the military-industrial complex directed by primarily by Jewish banksters now afforded free reign to exploit and repress us through many demeaning tactics not the least of which is to reduce us too the status of debt slaves.
Universities as Enemies of Truth; The Academy as an Instrument and Complicit Partner in the Lies and Crimes of 9/11
As a tenured full professor in a Canadian university I have to report sadly that many faculty members throughout the Academy tend to be especially complicit or even directly involved in the commission of the lies and crimes of 9/11.
Many dishonest professors have passed themselves off as supposed experts on various aspects of Terrorist Studies in order to exploit the funding possibilities attached to adhering to the officially sanctioned narrative that Ken O'Keefe and millions of others now know for sure is entirely false. Perhaps even worse are those pseudo-academics who refuse to risk the recriminations that tend to arise from merely asking even the most rudimentary questions about the discrepancies between existing evidence and the concocted fable of 9/11.
The main purpose of the religious myths permeating the 9/11 cover story is to generate the Islamophobia.
Especially now that there is no Soviet enemy to justify huge transfers of public wealth to the military-industrial complex, the Murdochesque promotion of hatred and distrust of Muslims generically serves the interests of arms merchants, the Jewish state, the banksters, and the proponents of expanded police powers. In order to continue along their current trajectory of growth and expansion these interests have all joined forces to help develop, train, fund and publicize the required replacement enemy.
A good research project would be to survey text books at all levels right up to University graduate programs to see the nature of 9/11 narratives incorporated into school curricula. To what extent are the events of 9/11 and the still-continuing 9/11 wars being misrepresented in our educational institutions?
These and many other derivative questions flow from Ken O'Keefe's exposure of the extent of the actions of a particular cabal of Israeli-American power brokers whose treason is not only against the United States but against all humanity. Indeed, contemplating the huge implications of what they have been allowed to get away with gives new meaning to the very idea of crimes against humanity.
In his concluding on-camera presentation, Ken O’Keefe is insistent that calling for a new independent investigation of 9/11 is not nearly enough given what has already been proven about what did or did not transpire on the fateful day. O’Keefe’s documentary names many names of the credibly accused culprits. He does not put forward such serious allegations lightly but rather cites powerful evidence that ultimately belongs in a court of law.
Ken O’Keefe’s contends that now, thirteen years after such a clearly exposed false flag event, mere requests for a genuinely independent investigation are not nearly sufficient to deal with such huge magnitude of the abuses of power entailed in the lies and crimes of 9/11. This remark resonated especially forcefully for me given what has been going on here in my home jurisdiction of Canada. My reaction to this aspect of Ken O'Keefe video is animated in part by controversies that have arisen concerning a request for a Canadian investigation into 9/11. This request, which carries my own signature along with those of about 1500 other Canadians, took the form of a petition that a Member of Parliament, Elizabeth May, recently agreed to read into the parliamentary transcript known as Hansard.
Some organizers of this petition congratulated Elizabeth May for being the only one of 308 federal parliamentarians who was willing to grant even this small concession. The leader of the Canadian Green Party tried to distance herself from the petition’s content, however, by indicating she did not agree with its contents. She so far Ms. May has refused my written request that she give explicit reasons for her unwillingness to articulate the basis for her disagreement with the text of a petition that could be seen as being mild and unconfrontational to a fault. What grade should Elizabeth May be assigned in the 9/11 litmus test?
Ken O’Keefe has convincingly demonstrated that it is impossible to develop an accurate picture of humanity’s actual condition these days without coming to terms with what did or did not happen on 9/11, without becoming informed enough to achieve at least a passing grade in the 9/11 litmus test.
One suggestion I would make to Ken and to others for the future of 9/11 truth work is that we emphasize in our public presentations the US 9/11 Commission report. This document is the primary receptacle of the cover story outlining what is supposed to have happened in the skies and on the land of New York, Washington DC, and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001. The authorship of the text and the primary construction of the report's architecture was largely the work of public mythology expert Philip Zelikow, an Israel First political operative of the Bush White House who is well profiled in Ken O'Keefe's video.
Even the Co-Chairs and the legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission heavily criticized its work. The Commission's report is the outcome of a highly politicized process of concocting politicized lies and fabrications to conform to the 9/11 fable fed to the world within hours of the debacle without any real investigation whatsoever. Part of this process of fabrication involved accepting supposed evidence obtained through torture as a proper means of obtaining information for the formulation of public policy. That travesty in itself constitutes a practise and a precedent that must not be allowed to stand.
Another direct Canadian involvement in the 9/11 debacle is that the Canadian government is a member of NORAD, the North American Aerospace Defense Command. The huge failures of NORAD on 9/11 have become the stuff of legend. The outright lies told with impunity by NORAD officials to the 9/11 Commissioners is a matter of well documented public record.
Of course Canadians require a Canadian investigation into the Canadian aspects of a debacle that has resulted in remaking Canada's laws, policies, and political culture in a fashion that definitely undermines the public interest and the common good.
As I have come to understand it, all Canadian parliamentarians are complicit in torture in accepting the US 9/11 Commission report as the basis for the formulation of Canadian legislation and public policy after 9/11. This complicity in the international crime of torture applies especially to the leadership of the executive branch of the Canadian federal government and to the current leadership of the opposition parties in the Canadian Parliament, namely Elizabeth May of the Green Party, Justin Trudeau of the Liberal Party, and Thomas Mulcair of the New Democratic Party.
In recent years there has been a huge breakdown in the willingness of opposition parties to oppose the policies of Prime Minister Stephen Harper when it comes to the big issues of war and peace, life and death. For instance, when the Israeli Defense Force was attacking last summer in Operation Protective Edge the Palestinian inmates of the Israeli concentration camp known as Gaza, there was no debate from our MPs that included clear criticism of this very clear violation of human rights and international law. Indeed, Parliament was not recalled to deal with the crisis as happened in the UK where many British MPs spoke out with conscience and conviction to oppose this massive denigration of international laws and common decency. The outcry at Westminster extended to the beginning of parliamentary efforts aimed at somewhat mitigating the terrible humanitarian disasters that flowed from the genocidal actions of the Jewish state of Israel.
The contrast between the response of opposition politicians in UK and Canada was illustrative of the depths of our democratic deficit in this country where the concentration of Zionist ownership of the mass media is perhaps even more destructive of free expression than it has been in Great Britain. There has been no equivalent in Canada of the Leveson inquiry into the corrupt practises by police and collaboration with media agents whose joint aim is to control politicians and thereby subvert democratic processes.
Parliamentarians representing all the citizens of Canada, many of whom expressed great anguish and revolt at what was taking place in Gaza, took to the streets, wrote letters to the editor, and made personal testimonials of all kinds. These Canadians of conscience and good will remained almost entirely unrepresented by elected officials of all political stripes due to a conspiracy imposed on us by Canada's real governors, the Jewish Zionist Israeli cabal that calls the shots especially when it comes to issues like media regulation, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the quest for 9/11 Truth.
This experience of witnessing the gross failure of Canadian parliamentary democracy in the face of Operation Protective Edge reinforced my conclusion that there is something really rotten going on in the state of Canada and in the territories of most of its EU and Anglo-American allies as well. Much was exposed in the uniform opposition-party backing of the Netanyahu-Harper line. This line involved the incessant repetition of a specious rationale for the mass murder of civilians.
Israeli citizens were declared the real victims notwithstanding the IDF's 2014 invasion of Gaza including the heavily militarized murder of scores of Palestinian children in their homes, schools, and beach playground. Once again the mass murder, maiming, displacement, and destruction of the feeble life support systems of the Occupied Palestinians were declared to be acts of Israeli self-defence. Alternatively very clear acts of Palestinian self-defence were declared the actions of Islamic and Arab "terrorists" such as those said to be committed by patsies blamed for what were in fact controlled demolitions of the three WTC towers.
This common front in Parliament suggests that Canadian politicians are even more subject to Zionist manipulation than those in Great Britain where Ken O'Keefe is currently based. In Canada as in every other so-called democracy in the West politicians fear being smeared in the mainstream media, which is largely Jewish-owned and Zionist-run.
In Canada a shady Jewish-owned syndicate by the name of Golden Tree Asset Management pulls many of the strings that keep our politicians in line. Golden Tree's Chairman is a Council on Foreign Relations member and an influential New York Zionist who wins awards for his support of Israel. The name of this Israeli First US investment banker is name is Steven A. Tannanbaum.
The media chain currently owned by Golden Tree was started in part by Conrad Black, a neocon supporter of Israeli expansionism who also owned the Jerusalem Post. This same media chain was also developed under the control of Izzy Asper and his offspring, members of a very prominent Zionist family based in Winnipeg. The flagship of this network of Zionist propaganda in Canada is The National Post.
The Post hatched the journalistic career Jonathan Kay, author of a vicious smear volume written to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the "Islamic terror attacks" of 9/11. Deploying classic guilt-by-association tactics of the CIA's anti-communist propaganda techniques developed during the Cold War, Kay's volume is tellingly entitled, Among the Truthers: A Journey into the Growing Conspiracist Underground of 9/11 Truthers, Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics, Hollywood Know-Nothings and Internet Addicts.
Kay medicalizes all those who question the official cover story of 9/11 as clinically insane. He starts the book with a dubious explanation for not addressing the actual evidence of what did or did not happen on 9/11. Apparently his editor advised The National Post's editor that most readers would be bored with discussions of evidence while would-be readers would be more interested in Kay's explorations of the dark caves apparently inhabited by "the Growing Conspiracist Underground."
The book is published by HarperCollins, a Murdoch-owned publishing company. Kay was funded to write the book by the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a Zionist neocon agency that is an outgrowth of the Project for the New American Century. The volume does not contain citation s or even a rudimentary bibliography. It definitely is not peer reviewed.
As Ken O'Keefe outlines in his film, PNAC called for something like a "new Pearl Harbor" a year before the 9/11 coup to took place to spin public opinion in a way that would accept the US build up of military-industrial complex and the national security state toward "full spectrum dominance." PNAC's main members included many of the Israel First neocons featured in Ken O'Keefe film. These PNAC members like Paul Wolfowitz filled many of the seats in President George W. Bush's war cabinet.
Kay also was recently appointed Editor-In-Chief of the Walrus, a liberal magazine that once could be taken seriously as a genuine vehicle of investigative journalism and speaking truth to power. Jonathan Kay was also hired to be a ghost writer of the autobiography of Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party leader and son of a former Canadian prime minister who was building momentum in public opinion polls until his expression of unqualified support for Israel's assault in Gaza last summer signalled to many progressive Canadians that he is a Zionist puppet of the usual suspects when comes to Canada's relationship to the Jewish state and the Palestinian people.
For much of the twentieth century the Liberal Party dominated Parliament and thereby governed Canada. The false interpretative twist given the events of Sept. 11, however, created the underlying basis for foreign-backed regime change in Canada. Ultra-Zionist Stephen Harper came to power as a minority status prime minister in 2006 and then as a majority status prime minister in 2011. Harper's mandate to govern is tainted by the importation from the United States of Republican Party-style election fraud whose full extent remains unclear.
Harper will probably be able to renew his majority status in the federal election of 2015 on the back of a classic Mossad-style concocted terror event whose centrepiece involved a shooter episode on Oct. 22 (10/22) by a "recent Muslim convert" at the Canadian War Memorial and then inside the main Parliament building. Within hours of the event a Rupert Murdoch venue, the New York Post, superimposed a headline, "State of War," over a photograph of the Canadian War Memorial." This image justifying Canada's inclusion in military operations against the non-state entity ISIL, a replacement for the role once assigned al-Qaeda, repeated much of the same spin given 9/11 within hours of the plane crashes and mass murders. The media message was that this shooter episode on 10/22 was not to be understood as a serious crime requiring meticulous investigation but rather as an act of war justifying the invocation of emergency measures including military attacks abroad and increased police incursions at home.
Indeed, Ken O'Keefe is helping to pioneer the way towards a judiciable form of global citizenship that I believe could and should form the jurisdictional basis of the trials the global community needs to enforce some legal accountability on those who commit the most serious crimes against humanity, the most serious crimes against all life on earth.
So much of the really high-level criminality these days abuses as a cover and an alibi the 9/11 fable, the mostly constructed imagery of international terrorism, and the sweeping legal powers invoked by the resort to so-called national security. This international crime wave from those who rule us from the top of the pyramid is accelerating at such a quick pace that the need grows daily to follow Ken O'Keefe prescription by arresting and arbitrating the defences of those that can be most credibly accused of the 9/11 crime and the ongoing cover up of the true nature of the events and implications of what happened on Sept. 11 2001.
The recent experiences of, among many invited delegates, Ken O'Keefe and I and Veteran's Today Senior Editor, Kevin Barrett, at the recent New Horizon conference in Tehran speaks to the fact that the lies and crimes of 9/11 cast such a very wide net because they affect so profoundly the entire global population These affects tend to extend with particular harshness especially to Arab people, Persian people, and the ummah which is the worldwide community of all Muslims in all their vast pluralism of nationality, ethnicity, language, culture, class, ideology, and sect.
As a polity essentially smeared for the 9/11 crime through the reference to Iran in George W. Bush's notorious "Axis of Evil" speech, it is very clear why the government and people of the Islamic Republic of Iran would be seriously interested in the international quest for 9/11 truth. The Islamic Republic of Iran has been ruthlessly targeted since 1979, but especially since 9/11 with Israeli-directed economic warfare, with Mossad assassinations of its scientists, with high tech Israeli-America cyber attacks targeting the operation of its peaceful nuclear energy program, and with lethal physical attacks and propaganda attacks by the Mossad-trained-and-run MeK commandos etc etc etc. This list of consequences of the Bush's Israeli-instigated slander of Iran is far from complete.
Other possible fallout from the Bush-Frum hit job include the actions of my own federal government that withdrew in 2012 the Canadian ambassador from Iran and broke off all formal diplomatic relations under orders from Benjamin Netanyahu to his Likudnik Lieutenant, Stephen Harper. An important friend of the Islamic Revolution, Ken O'Keefe is in a good position to develop analysis of these kinds of broader international processes that continue to arise from the global geopolitical shifts that arise from our collective failure to come to come to grips with the truth of what happened or what didn't happen on 9/11.
Certainly Mr. O'Keefe's decision to restrict his coverage to the United States allows Israel First operatives in Canada like Jonathan Kay and David Frum to slip through the cracks of the work of the Born-In-the-USA Freedom Fighter who is emerging as an important citizen investigator and citizen jurist. Both Kay and Frum are every bit as deeply implicated in the lies and crimes of 9/11 as many of the figures that Ken O'Keefe does cover in his Internet movie. Both Kay and Frum should be on the list of the credibly accused when it becomes possible to break the hold of our jailers by mounting criminal proceedings in a more transnationally empowered type of international criminal court.
How should the people and government of Iran respond to being fingered as the 9/11 culprits along with Saddam's Iraq and Communist North Korea by the very folks who most likely are the real 9/11 culprits? The Israeli First neocon Canadian, David Frum is said to have authored the potent "Axis of Evil" line to prepare American public opinion for a US-led invasion of Iran. The son of the legendary Jewish Canadian CBC broadcaster, Barbara Frum, David was a Bush White House speech writer and co-author with Richard Perle of the war propaganda text, An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror.
The freedom fighter began and concluded his 9/11 documentary with the observation that humanity will remain in a sense incarcerated in a psychological prison of oppression from within and from above until we can free ourselves from the enormously consequential 9/11 deception. This and many other vital messages contained in Ken O'Keefe's bold and uncompromising account of the most difficult yet pressing issue of contemporary times deserves a wide audience. This factor is the very reason that this Internet movie is bound to be ignored by the many media venues including the CBC that regularly opens the supposed public airwaves to Israeli First proponents of aggressive warfare like Jonathan Kay.
About the author:
A Commentary on Ken O'Keefe's Expanded and Improved Documentary, 911 False Flag: American Traitors and Mossad.
by Anthony Hall
 |
Ken O’Keefe as a US Marine Before He
Renounced His US Citizenship To Serve the Common People of Iraq as a Human Shield. |
Includes Original Material From Anthony Hall Extending O'Keefe's Assessment of the Crippling Effect of Jewish Power Over US Institutions to a Similar Dysfunction Plaguing Canada's Parliamentary Institutions. The Totalitarianism Implicit in This Oppressive State of Affairs is No Where So Well Illustrated as in the Tactics Deployed to Block Out Evidence-Based Discourse From Most Media Venues, Elected Assemblies, and Educational Institutions Concerning the World's First Global Coup d'Etat Executed Through the 9/11 False Flag Terror Event.
Background Information on Mr. O'Keefe: Having served in the US Marine Corps this soldier for truth, justice and peace on many fronts renounced his US citizenship in 2001. Observing the huge disparity in the valuation of the lives of Western and non-Western people, Mr. O'Keefe then offered himself up as a human shield. He sought to encourage others to join him in this campaign to protect Iraqi people and their public health infrastructure from the wanton destruction of so-called "smart bombing by US Armed Forces.
 |
Ken O’Keefe as a US Marine Before He Renounced His US Citizenship To Serve the Common People of Iraq as a Human Shield.
|
As part of an episode that saw nine Turkish sailors murdered by Israeli gun men, O'Keefe was captured, locked up and beaten in an Israeli prison. When describing the episode subsequently on the BBC, Ken O'Keefe had the rare opportunity to introduce to a wider audience the concept that that the real nature of the 9/11 debacle was was not anything like what has been reported in the Murdoch press and the other propaganda instruments of international Zionism. He asserted that 9/11 had been an Israeli-led Mossad job done with the help and complicity of many American saboteurs.
The ultimate aim of of the designers of this false flag terrorist event was to poisoning public opinion against Arab and Muslim populations, to transform Israel's regional enemies into the perceived enemies of the "West," which Benjamin Netanyahu and others have wrongly described as an exclusively Judeo-Christian entity. The aim of the 9/11 global coup was to demonize and thus dehumanize the predominant Muslim populations about to be targeted in Israeli-led, US-implemented wars of aggression in the Middle East and throughout Eurasia.
In this documentary Ken O'Keefe elaborates this interpretation and gets very specific by naming many of the culprits. Mr. O'Keefe lays out the essential evidence that, if the rule of law really existed for the rich and the powerful as well as for the poor and middle classes, would form the basis of multiple criminal prosecutions in international and domestic courts of law. This eloquent and thoughtful man, who has frequently put his life and reputation on the line to advance the quest for justice, underlines that one's position on 9/11 has become a primary litmus test of the authenticity of any person or group claiming the objective of bringing about a better world. In this documentary Mr. Okeefe demonstrates that we have moved far beyond the point where merely asking authorities for an independent investigation of the events of 9/11 is sufficient. We need arrests and trials as organized either by law enforcement officials, or, if failing that, by conscientious and upstanding world citizens if necessary.
Ken O'Keefe Gives an Overview of the Fruits of a Thirteen-Year Citizens Investigation into 9/11, Including into the Media Manipulations That Have Been a Core Feature and Facilitator of the Lies and Crimes of 9/11:
 |
| Paul Wolfowitz, a Key Member of the Bush War Cabinet and a Primary Israeli-American Suspect Widely Identified by the Citizens Jurists Emerging from the Citizens' Investigation into the Lies and Crimes of 9/11. In All Probability Wolfowitz Wrote the Key Passage in the PNAC Report Calling for a "New Pearl Harbor" in the Year Before the 9/11 Hit on What Remained of Our Democracies Before the 9/11 Coupd'Etat. |
Now that this kind of liberation struggle has been rendered more or less impossible, one of his primary fields of operation is social media on the Internet. Ken O'Keefe is becoming one of the new Geronimos of guerrilla warfare even as those interests seeking to persecute Edward Snow embody the new digital imperialism of cyberspace. With the old mainstream media venues completely sold out to the enticements of Jewish and corporate power, the Internet is the sole medium where the wretched of the earth can have a voice in what the Canadian-Israeli neocon agent, Jonathan Kay, has correctly dubbed the battle for reality. As one of the Internet's most iconographic freedom fighters Ken O'Keefe's latest digital documentary event is an expanded and technically improved version of his classic investigation into the lies and crimes of 9/11. In 911 False Flag, American Traitors and Mossad, the auteur demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that “there are stunningly incriminating Jewish, Israeli, Zionist finger prints all over” the 9/11 debacle and the mainstream medias’ subsequent cover up of the true nature of the crime.
The new introduction features a Russell Brand-style commentary highlighting Mr. O’Keefe’s assessment of David Cameron’s abysmal speech at the United Nations in September of 2014. In Hack Attack Cameron has been exposed by the Guardian’s lead investigative reporter, Nick Davies, as yet another UK Prime Minister under the control of Rupert Murdoch’s deeply corrupt media empire.
Davies was the primary journalists who broke the series of stories leading to the investigation by Lord Justice Leveson into the dark collaboration between the police and the Muroch press in Britain. A core objective of the collaboration between Scotland Yard and the Murdoch press was to blackmail, bribe and thus control elected officials with the aim of subverting British parliamentary democracy. All of the politicians of the Anglo-American-Commonwealth countries have pretty much become mere performers who are precluded from winning elected office unless they adhere to the Zionist agendas developed for them on Fleet Street or in New York and Tel Aviv.
Not surprising the interaction between Rupert Murdoch and Lord Leveson, both high-ranking operatives in the same Jewish Zionist Israeli networks of power, never touched on the deeper levels of subversion necessary to promote the Islamophobic propaganda of aggressive warfare in the name of the Global War on Terror. Cameron's sound bites on ISIL and homegrown "extremism" as exemplified by.... say.... Ken O'Keefe, replayed and extended the same memes of hate speech developed initially for former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and former US President George W. Bush. Both tools of the leading Israel-Anglo-American imperium are criminal psychopaths installed into office by the media manipulations of the Murdoch press including Fox News in the USA.Son of a Jewish mother and one of the chief Zionist propagandists who directed the Israeli-Anglo-American imperium’s popular incitement to hate Muslims, Murdoch is only one of the 9/11 culprits identified by O’Keefe. Also prominent among the accused are are a number of Israel First Americans including Michael Chertoff, Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Philip D. Zelikow, and “Lucky” Larry Silverstein. This is only a very partial list of the fingered culprits of the 9/11 psychological operation, a criminal class that includes most of the Israeli-American owners and directors of the major media cartels dominating Western public opinion.
The 95-minute production is, like many Internet videos, an amalgam of original material and excerpts from other 9/11 productions including Canadian James Corbett’s hilarious, 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory. This now-legendary 5- minute clip is perhaps the most effective short synthesis surveying the absurd internal contradictions and impossibilities embedded throughout officialdom’s Big Lie of 9/11. Among his many primary sources, O’Keefe draws also on, for instance, the geopolitical scholarship of high-level military strategist Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the starkly clear and illuminating work of the Australian truth teller, Anthony Lawson, and on the bold intervention with Larry Silverstein by Luke Rudkowski, a founder of We Are Change.
 |
| Lord Leveson Answered to the Same Zionist Handlers as Rupert Murdoch in Making Sure the Leveson Inquiry in the UK Never Got into the Corruption Involved in Promoting the Engineering of Islamophobia to Arouse Public Fears of Islamic Terrorism. This Fear, Involving By Now Many Concocted False Flag Terrorist Events Like That Which Probably Took Place in Canada on Oct. 22, Has Been a Key Psychological Instrument of the Aggressive Warfare Mounted After 9/11. All the Major Media Cartels Are Deeply Integrated into the Isreali-Anglo-American Imperium's Conduct of the Seemingly Never Ending 9/11 Wars. The (/11 Wars Including the Current Campaign Against the Constructed Non-State Entity Assigned the Orwellian Label of the "Islamic State." The Supposed Leader of ISIL, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi aka Simon Elliot, is Thought to Be a Jewish Actor Trained by Mossad. |
Creating the Required Enemy to Justify the Expansionary Operations of the Arm's Industry,
the Jewish State, the Rothschild Banksters and the Proponents of Increased Police Powers
I very much agree with Ken O’Keefe’s thesis that the way individuals relate to the story of what did or did not happen on 9/11 becomes an extremely telling “litmus test” of honesty and integrity especially for figures such as educators, public officials, and celebrities. Given the extent to which our world has been transformed for the worse by those culprits that so far have not faced accountability for their role in the lies and crimes of 9/11, the 9/11 litmus test becomes particularly important in assessing the authenticity of any and all individuals proclaiming an intention to work for social justice.
\
The corrosive power of the religious symbolism woven into the fable of 9/11 has been emphasized by many scholars including, Professor David Ray Giffin. Professor Griffin is an esteemed historian of religious philosophy who has authored ten very important books deconstructing various aspects of the grossly audacious lies fed to the general public from day one of the post- 9/11 world. Beginning on Sept. 11, 2001 the 9/11 wrecking ball has been systematically deployed by Zionist operatives to finish off the job of destroying our now-pretty-much-defunct democracies throughout the so-called "West."
The very idea of mounting a global war to defeat "terrorism," a slippery concept if ever there was one, is bogus from its inception. War by its very nature is the ultimate expression of the extremes of terror, of the capacity of human beings to inflict pain and death on one another on massive scales.There is no possibility of developing decent responses to virtually any of the crises we genuinely face, whether, for instance, from climate change or violated human rights or declining public health or diminished biodiversity. As long as long as some sort of War on Terror is allowed to dominate the heights of public policy in virtually every government in the world there can be very little genuinely effective work to achieve a better world. Any and all initiatives along these lines will be countered by the military-industrial complex directed by primarily by Jewish banksters now afforded free reign to exploit and repress us through many demeaning tactics not the least of which is to reduce us too the status of debt slaves.
Universities as Enemies of Truth; The Academy as an Instrument and Complicit Partner in the Lies and Crimes of 9/11
As a tenured full professor in a Canadian university I have to report sadly that many faculty members throughout the Academy tend to be especially complicit or even directly involved in the commission of the lies and crimes of 9/11.
Many dishonest professors have passed themselves off as supposed experts on various aspects of Terrorist Studies in order to exploit the funding possibilities attached to adhering to the officially sanctioned narrative that Ken O'Keefe and millions of others now know for sure is entirely false. Perhaps even worse are those pseudo-academics who refuse to risk the recriminations that tend to arise from merely asking even the most rudimentary questions about the discrepancies between existing evidence and the concocted fable of 9/11.
The main purpose of the religious myths permeating the 9/11 cover story is to generate the Islamophobia.
Especially now that there is no Soviet enemy to justify huge transfers of public wealth to the military-industrial complex, the Murdochesque promotion of hatred and distrust of Muslims generically serves the interests of arms merchants, the Jewish state, the banksters, and the proponents of expanded police powers. In order to continue along their current trajectory of growth and expansion these interests have all joined forces to help develop, train, fund and publicize the required replacement enemy.
A good research project would be to survey text books at all levels right up to University graduate programs to see the nature of 9/11 narratives incorporated into school curricula. To what extent are the events of 9/11 and the still-continuing 9/11 wars being misrepresented in our educational institutions?
These and many other derivative questions flow from Ken O'Keefe's exposure of the extent of the actions of a particular cabal of Israeli-American power brokers whose treason is not only against the United States but against all humanity. Indeed, contemplating the huge implications of what they have been allowed to get away with gives new meaning to the very idea of crimes against humanity.
Asking For an Independent Investigation of 9/11 is Not Enough
The 9/11 wars are in the process of being rebranded as the role previously afforded to the all-purpose Islamic boogeyman of al-Qeada is being taken over by the so-called “Islamic State.” As O’Keefe explains, the funding, training and manipulation of the Islamic State leads back to the same general crime cartel responsible for pulling off the 9/11 global coup d'état. The illegitimate authority seized by the perpetrators of 9/11 coup can only be retained by constantly extending and renewing an especially elaborate and many-faceted cover up.
The 9/11 wars are in the process of being rebranded as the role previously afforded to the all-purpose Islamic boogeyman of al-Qeada is being taken over by the so-called “Islamic State.” As O’Keefe explains, the funding, training and manipulation of the Islamic State leads back to the same general crime cartel responsible for pulling off the 9/11 global coup d'état. The illegitimate authority seized by the perpetrators of 9/11 coup can only be retained by constantly extending and renewing an especially elaborate and many-faceted cover up.
In his concluding on-camera presentation, Ken O’Keefe is insistent that calling for a new independent investigation of 9/11 is not nearly enough given what has already been proven about what did or did not transpire on the fateful day. O’Keefe’s documentary names many names of the credibly accused culprits. He does not put forward such serious allegations lightly but rather cites powerful evidence that ultimately belongs in a court of law.
Ken O’Keefe’s contends that now, thirteen years after such a clearly exposed false flag event, mere requests for a genuinely independent investigation are not nearly sufficient to deal with such huge magnitude of the abuses of power entailed in the lies and crimes of 9/11. This remark resonated especially forcefully for me given what has been going on here in my home jurisdiction of Canada. My reaction to this aspect of Ken O'Keefe video is animated in part by controversies that have arisen concerning a request for a Canadian investigation into 9/11. This request, which carries my own signature along with those of about 1500 other Canadians, took the form of a petition that a Member of Parliament, Elizabeth May, recently agreed to read into the parliamentary transcript known as Hansard.
Some organizers of this petition congratulated Elizabeth May for being the only one of 308 federal parliamentarians who was willing to grant even this small concession. The leader of the Canadian Green Party tried to distance herself from the petition’s content, however, by indicating she did not agree with its contents. She so far Ms. May has refused my written request that she give explicit reasons for her unwillingness to articulate the basis for her disagreement with the text of a petition that could be seen as being mild and unconfrontational to a fault. What grade should Elizabeth May be assigned in the 9/11 litmus test?Ken O’Keefe has convincingly demonstrated that it is impossible to develop an accurate picture of humanity’s actual condition these days without coming to terms with what did or did not happen on 9/11, without becoming informed enough to achieve at least a passing grade in the 9/11 litmus test.
One suggestion I would make to Ken and to others for the future of 9/11 truth work is that we emphasize in our public presentations the US 9/11 Commission report. This document is the primary receptacle of the cover story outlining what is supposed to have happened in the skies and on the land of New York, Washington DC, and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001. The authorship of the text and the primary construction of the report's architecture was largely the work of public mythology expert Philip Zelikow, an Israel First political operative of the Bush White House who is well profiled in Ken O'Keefe's video.
Even the Co-Chairs and the legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission heavily criticized its work. The Commission's report is the outcome of a highly politicized process of concocting politicized lies and fabrications to conform to the 9/11 fable fed to the world within hours of the debacle without any real investigation whatsoever. Part of this process of fabrication involved accepting supposed evidence obtained through torture as a proper means of obtaining information for the formulation of public policy. That travesty in itself constitutes a practise and a precedent that must not be allowed to stand.
9/11, 10/22 and Jewish Power in Canada
Of course I have a major problem with my own Canadian government accepting as the basis of for the formulation of public policy on Canadian national security issues a US report outlining a severely flawed explanation of an episode in which two dozen Canadians were killed in the Twin Towers. |
| The 9/11 Commission Report is Widely Acknowledged as the Outcome of a Deeply Flawed and Heavily Politicized Process that Violated Basic Principles of Judicial Impartiality. The Report is Based on Many Well Documented Lies of Witnesses Who Were Not Tortured. It was Also Based on Supposed Evidence From Witnesses Who Were Tortured on Behalf of the US Government. The Affect of This Travesty Was to Introduce the Trojan Horse of an Idea That It Is OK to Formulate Public Policy Based on Information Obtained to Through Outlawed Torture Techniques. Hence It Can Be Said That the Report of the 9/11 Commission, on Which Canadian Parliamentarians Like Elizabeth May and Justin Trudeau Depend for Their Understanding of 9/11, Itself Demonstrably Fails the 9/11 Litmus Test Described by Ken O'Keefe. |
Another direct Canadian involvement in the 9/11 debacle is that the Canadian government is a member of NORAD, the North American Aerospace Defense Command. The huge failures of NORAD on 9/11 have become the stuff of legend. The outright lies told with impunity by NORAD officials to the 9/11 Commissioners is a matter of well documented public record.
Of course Canadians require a Canadian investigation into the Canadian aspects of a debacle that has resulted in remaking Canada's laws, policies, and political culture in a fashion that definitely undermines the public interest and the common good.
As I have come to understand it, all Canadian parliamentarians are complicit in torture in accepting the US 9/11 Commission report as the basis for the formulation of Canadian legislation and public policy after 9/11. This complicity in the international crime of torture applies especially to the leadership of the executive branch of the Canadian federal government and to the current leadership of the opposition parties in the Canadian Parliament, namely Elizabeth May of the Green Party, Justin Trudeau of the Liberal Party, and Thomas Mulcair of the New Democratic Party.
In recent years there has been a huge breakdown in the willingness of opposition parties to oppose the policies of Prime Minister Stephen Harper when it comes to the big issues of war and peace, life and death. For instance, when the Israeli Defense Force was attacking last summer in Operation Protective Edge the Palestinian inmates of the Israeli concentration camp known as Gaza, there was no debate from our MPs that included clear criticism of this very clear violation of human rights and international law. Indeed, Parliament was not recalled to deal with the crisis as happened in the UK where many British MPs spoke out with conscience and conviction to oppose this massive denigration of international laws and common decency. The outcry at Westminster extended to the beginning of parliamentary efforts aimed at somewhat mitigating the terrible humanitarian disasters that flowed from the genocidal actions of the Jewish state of Israel.
The contrast between the response of opposition politicians in UK and Canada was illustrative of the depths of our democratic deficit in this country where the concentration of Zionist ownership of the mass media is perhaps even more destructive of free expression than it has been in Great Britain. There has been no equivalent in Canada of the Leveson inquiry into the corrupt practises by police and collaboration with media agents whose joint aim is to control politicians and thereby subvert democratic processes.
Parliamentarians representing all the citizens of Canada, many of whom expressed great anguish and revolt at what was taking place in Gaza, took to the streets, wrote letters to the editor, and made personal testimonials of all kinds. These Canadians of conscience and good will remained almost entirely unrepresented by elected officials of all political stripes due to a conspiracy imposed on us by Canada's real governors, the Jewish Zionist Israeli cabal that calls the shots especially when it comes to issues like media regulation, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the quest for 9/11 Truth.
This experience of witnessing the gross failure of Canadian parliamentary democracy in the face of Operation Protective Edge reinforced my conclusion that there is something really rotten going on in the state of Canada and in the territories of most of its EU and Anglo-American allies as well. Much was exposed in the uniform opposition-party backing of the Netanyahu-Harper line. This line involved the incessant repetition of a specious rationale for the mass murder of civilians.
Israeli citizens were declared the real victims notwithstanding the IDF's 2014 invasion of Gaza including the heavily militarized murder of scores of Palestinian children in their homes, schools, and beach playground. Once again the mass murder, maiming, displacement, and destruction of the feeble life support systems of the Occupied Palestinians were declared to be acts of Israeli self-defence. Alternatively very clear acts of Palestinian self-defence were declared the actions of Islamic and Arab "terrorists" such as those said to be committed by patsies blamed for what were in fact controlled demolitions of the three WTC towers.
This common front in Parliament suggests that Canadian politicians are even more subject to Zionist manipulation than those in Great Britain where Ken O'Keefe is currently based. In Canada as in every other so-called democracy in the West politicians fear being smeared in the mainstream media, which is largely Jewish-owned and Zionist-run.
In Canada a shady Jewish-owned syndicate by the name of Golden Tree Asset Management pulls many of the strings that keep our politicians in line. Golden Tree's Chairman is a Council on Foreign Relations member and an influential New York Zionist who wins awards for his support of Israel. The name of this Israeli First US investment banker is name is Steven A. Tannanbaum.
The media chain currently owned by Golden Tree was started in part by Conrad Black, a neocon supporter of Israeli expansionism who also owned the Jerusalem Post. This same media chain was also developed under the control of Izzy Asper and his offspring, members of a very prominent Zionist family based in Winnipeg. The flagship of this network of Zionist propaganda in Canada is The National Post.
The Post hatched the journalistic career Jonathan Kay, author of a vicious smear volume written to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the "Islamic terror attacks" of 9/11. Deploying classic guilt-by-association tactics of the CIA's anti-communist propaganda techniques developed during the Cold War, Kay's volume is tellingly entitled, Among the Truthers: A Journey into the Growing Conspiracist Underground of 9/11 Truthers, Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics, Hollywood Know-Nothings and Internet Addicts.
Kay medicalizes all those who question the official cover story of 9/11 as clinically insane. He starts the book with a dubious explanation for not addressing the actual evidence of what did or did not happen on 9/11. Apparently his editor advised The National Post's editor that most readers would be bored with discussions of evidence while would-be readers would be more interested in Kay's explorations of the dark caves apparently inhabited by "the Growing Conspiracist Underground."
 |
| Israeli-Canadian Zionist journalist and author Jonathan Kay was One of the Ghost Writers of Liberal Party Leader Justin Trudeau's Fluffy Autobiography. Kay's Collaboration with Trudeau Reflects an Effort to Flash Out a Renewed Liberal Version of Canadian Zionism. |
The book is published by HarperCollins, a Murdoch-owned publishing company. Kay was funded to write the book by the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a Zionist neocon agency that is an outgrowth of the Project for the New American Century. The volume does not contain citation s or even a rudimentary bibliography. It definitely is not peer reviewed.
As Ken O'Keefe outlines in his film, PNAC called for something like a "new Pearl Harbor" a year before the 9/11 coup to took place to spin public opinion in a way that would accept the US build up of military-industrial complex and the national security state toward "full spectrum dominance." PNAC's main members included many of the Israel First neocons featured in Ken O'Keefe film. These PNAC members like Paul Wolfowitz filled many of the seats in President George W. Bush's war cabinet.
Kay also was recently appointed Editor-In-Chief of the Walrus, a liberal magazine that once could be taken seriously as a genuine vehicle of investigative journalism and speaking truth to power. Jonathan Kay was also hired to be a ghost writer of the autobiography of Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party leader and son of a former Canadian prime minister who was building momentum in public opinion polls until his expression of unqualified support for Israel's assault in Gaza last summer signalled to many progressive Canadians that he is a Zionist puppet of the usual suspects when comes to Canada's relationship to the Jewish state and the Palestinian people.
For much of the twentieth century the Liberal Party dominated Parliament and thereby governed Canada. The false interpretative twist given the events of Sept. 11, however, created the underlying basis for foreign-backed regime change in Canada. Ultra-Zionist Stephen Harper came to power as a minority status prime minister in 2006 and then as a majority status prime minister in 2011. Harper's mandate to govern is tainted by the importation from the United States of Republican Party-style election fraud whose full extent remains unclear.
Harper will probably be able to renew his majority status in the federal election of 2015 on the back of a classic Mossad-style concocted terror event whose centrepiece involved a shooter episode on Oct. 22 (10/22) by a "recent Muslim convert" at the Canadian War Memorial and then inside the main Parliament building. Within hours of the event a Rupert Murdoch venue, the New York Post, superimposed a headline, "State of War," over a photograph of the Canadian War Memorial." This image justifying Canada's inclusion in military operations against the non-state entity ISIL, a replacement for the role once assigned al-Qaeda, repeated much of the same spin given 9/11 within hours of the plane crashes and mass murders. The media message was that this shooter episode on 10/22 was not to be understood as a serious crime requiring meticulous investigation but rather as an act of war justifying the invocation of emergency measures including military attacks abroad and increased police incursions at home.
On The Need to Continue the Internationalization of the Quest for 9/11 Truth
This foray into Canadian politics demonstrates that many of the patterns Ken O'Keefe identifies in his film apply as much to Canada as to the United States. With this in mind I could mildly criticize Ken's general approach for being centred too much on a rather cloistered US perspective on 9/11. While understandable given the extent of the betrayal of the core constitutional principles and interests of the United States, this USAocentric approach is somewhat discordant with the reality that Mr. O'Keefe is no longer a US citizen. Rather Mr. O'Keefe can make an excellent case that he has demonstrated his willingness to act as a genuine global citizen even as he has become a major international figure in the 9/11 Truth movement.Indeed, Ken O'Keefe is helping to pioneer the way towards a judiciable form of global citizenship that I believe could and should form the jurisdictional basis of the trials the global community needs to enforce some legal accountability on those who commit the most serious crimes against humanity, the most serious crimes against all life on earth.
So much of the really high-level criminality these days abuses as a cover and an alibi the 9/11 fable, the mostly constructed imagery of international terrorism, and the sweeping legal powers invoked by the resort to so-called national security. This international crime wave from those who rule us from the top of the pyramid is accelerating at such a quick pace that the need grows daily to follow Ken O'Keefe prescription by arresting and arbitrating the defences of those that can be most credibly accused of the 9/11 crime and the ongoing cover up of the true nature of the events and implications of what happened on Sept. 11 2001.
The recent experiences of, among many invited delegates, Ken O'Keefe and I and Veteran's Today Senior Editor, Kevin Barrett, at the recent New Horizon conference in Tehran speaks to the fact that the lies and crimes of 9/11 cast such a very wide net because they affect so profoundly the entire global population These affects tend to extend with particular harshness especially to Arab people, Persian people, and the ummah which is the worldwide community of all Muslims in all their vast pluralism of nationality, ethnicity, language, culture, class, ideology, and sect.
 |
| Most of the Delegates at the New Horizon Conference That Recently Took Place in Tehran. The Conference Chair was Nader Talebzadeh Pictured Front Row Centre with Glasses and a Brown Sports Jacket. One of the Panels in the Conference was on Israel and 9/11. |
As a polity essentially smeared for the 9/11 crime through the reference to Iran in George W. Bush's notorious "Axis of Evil" speech, it is very clear why the government and people of the Islamic Republic of Iran would be seriously interested in the international quest for 9/11 truth. The Islamic Republic of Iran has been ruthlessly targeted since 1979, but especially since 9/11 with Israeli-directed economic warfare, with Mossad assassinations of its scientists, with high tech Israeli-America cyber attacks targeting the operation of its peaceful nuclear energy program, and with lethal physical attacks and propaganda attacks by the Mossad-trained-and-run MeK commandos etc etc etc. This list of consequences of the Bush's Israeli-instigated slander of Iran is far from complete.
Other possible fallout from the Bush-Frum hit job include the actions of my own federal government that withdrew in 2012 the Canadian ambassador from Iran and broke off all formal diplomatic relations under orders from Benjamin Netanyahu to his Likudnik Lieutenant, Stephen Harper. An important friend of the Islamic Revolution, Ken O'Keefe is in a good position to develop analysis of these kinds of broader international processes that continue to arise from the global geopolitical shifts that arise from our collective failure to come to come to grips with the truth of what happened or what didn't happen on 9/11.
 |
| Israel First Jewish Operatives All Prominent in the US Power Structure. All These Neocons Are Deeply Implicated in the Lies and Crimes of 9/11 |
Certainly Mr. O'Keefe's decision to restrict his coverage to the United States allows Israel First operatives in Canada like Jonathan Kay and David Frum to slip through the cracks of the work of the Born-In-the-USA Freedom Fighter who is emerging as an important citizen investigator and citizen jurist. Both Kay and Frum are every bit as deeply implicated in the lies and crimes of 9/11 as many of the figures that Ken O'Keefe does cover in his Internet movie. Both Kay and Frum should be on the list of the credibly accused when it becomes possible to break the hold of our jailers by mounting criminal proceedings in a more transnationally empowered type of international criminal court.
How should the people and government of Iran respond to being fingered as the 9/11 culprits along with Saddam's Iraq and Communist North Korea by the very folks who most likely are the real 9/11 culprits? The Israeli First neocon Canadian, David Frum is said to have authored the potent "Axis of Evil" line to prepare American public opinion for a US-led invasion of Iran. The son of the legendary Jewish Canadian CBC broadcaster, Barbara Frum, David was a Bush White House speech writer and co-author with Richard Perle of the war propaganda text, An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror.
The freedom fighter began and concluded his 9/11 documentary with the observation that humanity will remain in a sense incarcerated in a psychological prison of oppression from within and from above until we can free ourselves from the enormously consequential 9/11 deception. This and many other vital messages contained in Ken O'Keefe's bold and uncompromising account of the most difficult yet pressing issue of contemporary times deserves a wide audience. This factor is the very reason that this Internet movie is bound to be ignored by the many media venues including the CBC that regularly opens the supposed public airwaves to Israeli First proponents of aggressive warfare like Jonathan Kay.
About the author:
Anthony Hall
Currently Professor of Globalization Studies at University of Lethbridge in Alberta Canada.His been a teacher in the Canadian university system since 1982. Dr. Hall, has recently finished a big two-volume publishing project at McGill-Queen's University Press entitled "The Bowl with One Spoon"
No comments:
Post a Comment