REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM, VERITATIS SPLENDOR, REBÂTIR LA CHRÉTIENTÉ. RE-POST. BLOG HACKED, POST REMOVED.

POSTED on Wednesday, 25 July 2012

REPOSTED on 17 September 2020 - Messed up again?)

CUI BONO?  MY BLOG WAS HACKED AND THE POST REMOVED AFTER ONE COMMUNIST JOACHIM GARNIER, THE ILLEGITIMATE SON OF AN ALGERIAN JEW (BLACK FOOT - PIED-NOIR) (ACCORDING TO HIS OWNMOTHER)   HAD ASKED HIS MOTHER (MY WIFE SYLVIANE PAULETTE GARNIER) TO HAVE IT REMOVED???

MUHAMMAD ALI BEN MARCUS

Thursday, 17 September 2020

REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM, VERITATIS SPLENDOR, REBÂTIR LA CHRÉTIENTÉ.

MUHAMMAD ALI BEN MARCUS

Wednesday, 25 July 2012

REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM, VERITATIS SPLENDOR.

We Will Not Go Down (Ghazza Song) ~Michael Heart~ Piano [NOT AVAILABLE ON YOUTUBE ANYMORE]

RE-UPLOADED 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlfhoU66s4Y&t=41s

 MAHER ZAIN - PALESTINE WILL BE FREE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlfhoU66s4Y&t=41s

 

REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM (too late!!!)

Dedicated to Gérard Charles Augustin Marcel Marie Frémaux and Sylviane Paulette Garnier & our son and his wife (wives), and my grand children

REBÂTIR LA CHRÉTIENTÉ, VERITATIS SPLENDOR. 

Dédié à Charles Gérard Frémaux et Sylviane Paulette Garnier & notre fils et son épouse (ses épouses), et nos petits enfants.

Maman, c’est pour toi seule que, ce soir, je chante! 

 LAYANA & KENJI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YudJXXC3sg

Tuesday 20th of October 2015 

 

DRISHTIKA BIDOO

Maman

Quoi de plus doux , de plus tendre, Que le cœur d'une maman 

 (et d'un PAPA!) !  

Qui donc sait mieux nous comprendre

Et calmer tous nos tourments. 

Vers celle qui m'a donné le jour 

S'en va mon refrain d'amour

Maman, c'est pour toi seule que, ce soir, je chante! 

Maman, toi la grâce et la douceur m'enchantent! 

Que m'importe si l'âge a creusé ton cher visage, 

Et si je vois tomber peu à peu la neige sur tes cheveux. 

Pour moi tu gardes toujours ton sourire charmant. et tout comme autrefois, 

Mon seul bonheur: c'est de te dire maman.

Dès que j'ouvrais les paupières, Dans tes bras tu me pressais. 

Et pendant des nuits entières, En chantant tu me berçais, 

Me rappelant ces instants trop courts, 

Pour te bercer à mon tour

EN VÉRITÉ, ce ne fut pas maman, mais bien PAPA qui fut la vraie mère de notre fils l'ayant eu dans son lit pendant plus de 10 ans! 

 Et, ce n'est pas Maman non plus qui, depuis dix ans, est la GRANDE MAMAN de nos petits enfants, mais bien GRAND PAPA qui avait ses deux petites filles dans son lit pendant au moins 7 ans car ayant 'épousé' et volé, escroqué l'argent, la fortune des Frémaux, la part qui ne lui revenait pas, Grand-mère a bien autre chose à faire, nous ayant tous flanqués dehors en nous dépossédant pour le profit de son fils naturel Joachim!  ME BATTRE POUR DE L'ARGENT DANS LES COURS D'INJUSTICE? JAMAIS, PAS MOI!

Triste France, et triste monde!

 

Photo prise en 1986 à Paris, 10, rue d’Hauteville.

Aimer, c'est quoi, ma chérie? 

Tu n'as jamais su ce qu'est l'Amour!

Sylviane Paulette Garnier (Maman) and Basheer Ahmad Soormally (Papa)

aka Frémaux-Soormally - Gentilhomme Digne et Honorable

Dear Love, may our union be harmonious, blessed by God and eternal for the welfare of our child.” - Sylviane 1990

Cher Amour

Que notre union (mariage devant Dieu) soit harmonieuse, bénite par Dieu et éternelle pour le bien-être de notre enfant.* 

 

* ENFANT que la maman n’a jamais cessé (diaboliquement) de détruire par n’importe quel moyen depuis au moins 1983, et officiellement depuis 1996-1997.

 

MAMAN ET NOTRE FILS UNIQUE MUHAMMAD CÉDRIC ET PETIT-FILS KENJI
 

JACK Lantier -La Femme aux Bijoux 

 

Sacha Guitry -Une Folie -Genève 1994

Erasing Muslims From American Versions of History

1,543 views

31 Aug 2022

422

The CJ Werleman Show

32.9K subscribers

Please help me counter injustices in the Muslim world by supporting my journalism and CJWS here: https://www.patreon.com/cjwerleman

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGUKNd8K7z4

Carmina Burana ~ O Fortuna | Carl Orff ~ André Rieu

AVE MARIA by Mirusia Louwerse with André Rieu (2008).

 

PREUVES DU RACISME CATHOLIQUE FRANÇAIS DE LA FAMILLE QUI M'A COMPLÈTEMENT ET LÂCHEMENT IGNORÉ COMME SI JE N'AVAIS JAMAIS EXISTÉ!   

ET QUE LE FILS ILLÉGITIME DU PIED NOIR, LE COMMUNISTE JOACHIM GARNIER NE FAISAIT NON PLUS PAS PARTIE DE LEUR TRIBU!

Charles Gérard Frémaux was my French Catholic employer and partner in business and in bed with his wife, with his blessings and the blessings of his family and friends (1975-1983) who, condemned by medical science, allowed me, a Muslim, to have my only son with his own Atheist wife Sylviane Paulette, and my own Muslim wife Shirin and I allowed Gérard to register my son in his name. Both Gérard and Shirin were not able to bear children. This is life, as we say in France. By mutual agreement, my (our) son was baptised in a Catholic Church in Méréville, Essonne, and circumcised according to Muslim Tradition (by a Jewish Doctor) and brought up as a Muslim. 

Unfortunately, it was a unique and beautiful love story that was destroyed by the vicissitudes of life. As 'our' son is both Catholic (although not Roman and Apostolic) and Muslim (of no sect at all), I feel I owe Gérard this memoriam although he always hated me! But, may he rest in peace!

However, my efforts (together with Mark Glenn, Dr. Kevin Barrett of the USA, and others) for several decades to reconcile Christians and Muslims have proved an almost impossible task as well as my efforts to reconcile Muslims with Islam because of a variety of readings of the Holy Scriptures and of political affiliations that have plunged most Believers into the abyss and the hands of the evil ones. It is my view that most Christians have been misled by their respective Churches and that the Christian Holy Texts are not authentic and no matter how hard I try Believers will almost always stick to their inherited beliefs. So, it is not my intention to change anybody except to make them aware of the truth as it stands and as any sincere and honest person can see.

My sincere wish and prayer are to rebuild Christendom for the general good of humanity and not the hatred of Islam and Muslims, with the help of an awakened and charitable Ummah of Muhammad because only together do we have a chance to conquer the Devil and his armies. If Jesus and Muhammad, peace and blessings upon them both, cannot unite and does not unite on common grounds like love, freedom and justice, the Synagogue of Satan will surely win.[AND THEY HAVE ALREADY WON!]

Basheer Ahmad Frémaux-Soormally Thursday 26th of July 2012

Dedicated also to all my beloved friends, Christians, Muslims, Atheists, Jewish and Hindus, whether this friendship is reciprocated or not, including Mark Glenn and his wonderful wife and children, Ruby and Susan (Capricornians first!), Reverend Mark Dankof, Professor Pastor Texe Marrs, Michael Collins Piper, Jonathan Azaziah, Vickie Jacobs, Dianna, Ingrid, Adalberto Erazo, Nashid al Khaliq, Odartei Muhammad, Keith Johnson, Joe Cortina, Kenneth O'Keefe, Daryl Bradford Smith, Christopher Everard, Russel Pine aka Jordan Maxwell, Gérard, Mirella, Michael and Nathalie Désiré, Dorine Béchet, to name just a few, and, of course, to my beloved son, his wife (wives) and his blessed mother, and to my grand children.

L'hôpital militaire du Val-de-Grâce, situé dans le Ve arrondissement de Paris, est un des établissements de soin les plus connus de France. Cela est dû au fait qu'il accueille régulièrement des personnalités politiques de premier plan, françaises ou étrangères. C'est ici qu'a été soigné Charles Gérard Frémaux.

 

DADA = GRANDFATHER

 

ALEKSANDR DUGIN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if5SzZ-AA8M

Islam et Occident - Juin 2013

Imran Nazar Hosein Fr·81 videos 1,124

406 views 7 0

Published on 19 Dec 2013

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if5SzZ-AA8M

Traduction 

IMRANHOSEIN

FR: http://youtu.be/RN1HzpicCnk  

Avec Alexandre Douguine, Russie, Moscou, 

En Juin 2013, à l'université d'Etat de Moscou, eu lieu un colloque composé d'intellectuels russes dont notamment le théoricien, sociologue, polyglotte et chrétien orthodoxe, Alexandre Douguine (Alexandr Dugin) et le Sheikh Imran Hosein, érudit musulman spécialisé en Economie et en Eschatologie Islamique.

Autour d'un échange intellectuel convivial sur la politique internationale à la lumière des eschatologies islamique et chrétienne orthodoxe, les penseurs présents mettront en évidence les corrélations et points de convergences entre les prophéties tant attendues par les musulmans et les chrétiens orthodoxes, notamment la Conquête de Constantinople pour les musulmans, le retour du Siège pour les chrétiens orthodoxes, la Cathédrale Aya Sophia de Constantinople, qui fut transformée en Mosquée lors de la chute de l'empire byzantin par les khalifs Ottomans et transformée ensuite en Musée.

Une rencontre qui rappelle l'alliance entre le monde musulman et chrétien orthodoxe que le Prophète (pbsl) prophétisa, et pour laquelle, notre honorable Sheikh Imran Hosein, combat !

Fraternellement, INHFR

Facebook INHFR: http://www.facebook.com/inhfr Site INHFR: http://imranhosein.fr

Islam, Russia and Crimea -23/03/2014

SheikhImranHosein·298 videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SadkPvPTooo&list=UU3Xlgbc8gq3NOMmdEUAlf Gg

#23 by Adalberto Erazo Jr. on July 26, 2012 -11:05 pm @ Basheer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZGAaTXEj0&list=TLSMjUiLgpY4QxNzAyMjAxNg [NOT AVAILABLE ANHMORE?]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EniNJYhmt_M [NOT AVAILABLE ANYMORE???]

United Methodist, Reverend Wess Magruder (L) prays

American Pastor partakes in the holy month of Ramadan 

 

My apologies for the late reply. Thank you for the very moving story about your good friend Charles Gerard Fremaux. Now I know why you add the name Fremaux to your own name and I can say you are truly the embodiment of Muslim Christian unity. God works in strange ways and it is my firm belief that God had brought you along in your journey to meet Mr. Fremaux. It is an honor to have you as a friend despite being thousands of miles apart,if not in person, then in spirit. Brother Basheer, I completely agree with you in that the Christian scriptures have been corrupted over the centuries due to the works of men who had an agenda of their own and that is why Christianity today is in the mess it is in.

We are in the month of Ramadan where the world’s 1.5 billion Muslims are presently fasting in order to practice self discipline, get closer to God spiritually, and to know what the less fortunate in the world have to go through.I have decided I am going to try fasting as well even if it is only for a short time. For those who don’t know, Ramadan started this year on July 20 and it ends on August 17. Please correct me if I am wrong in this.

Again, my apologies for the late reply brother Basheer.

St Jude's Church, Plymouth Comments (17) A PLYMOUTH church has organised an online petition to change the language that is used when speaking about 'Islamic' terrorists following Friday’s attack in Paris. St Jude’s Church, which held a special service at the weekend to remember the victims, says it wants to stop any reference to terrorists being Islamic or Muslim. Vicar Tim Smith from the church said: “We are recognising that our language of this terror group may be as important as any other actions the world may take. “By the world changing the name we use for this group we will be refusing to use the branding of ‘Islamic’ they want which gives them more power and influence than they should have and to remove their ‘slur by inference’ from good Muslims.

next to his Muslim friend, Imam Yaseen sheikh (R). (file photo)

Tue Aug 7, 2012 3:39PM GMT

35

It (fasting) keeps me conscious of God, of God’s presence, of God’s will that is bursting to become real in the world. And so when something else isn’t going on in front of me, the buzz reminds me to speak to God."

United Methodist Rev. Wess Magruder

An American Pastor, Reverend Wess Magruder, has decided to partake in the Muslims holy month of Ramadan this year with his Muslim friends, by fasting, praying and reading the Holy Quran.

The United Methodist has not only decided to observe the Ramadan fast this year but also to share his experience on his personal blog, Shia-Online reported.

"I feel a constant “buzz” [during the fast] in my head," Magruder wrote on his blog.

"This buzz serves a useful purpose, by the way. It keeps me conscious of God, of God’s presence, of God’s will that is bursting to become real in the world. And so when something else isn’t going on in front of me, the buzz reminds me to speak to God," he added.

Magruder also wrote that he turned to the Muslim faith for inspiration since he knew that Muslims have successfully been fasting for 30 days each year during Ramadan for over fourteen hundred years.

“I feel very happy and fortunate now,” Magruder wrote, who has succeeded in fasting from sunrise till sunset.

In his blog, Magruder invited all people of the Christian faith to try the fasting experience even for one day.

The Muslim fast is a total abstention from eating and drinking during the daylight hours. Furthermore, the fast goes beyond stomach and includes the eyes, the tongue, the ears, and all limbs which are expected to be trained to submit to the pleasure of God by refraining from ill manners and moral vice.

PG/PKH/AZ

Plymouth church starts petition to stop referring to terrorists as 'Islamic'

By Plymouth Herald | Posted: November 17, 2015 

When the organization of the world is out of harmony with the supernatural end of man, scarcely anybody except the saints and martyrs can avoid mortal sin and abide in charity.

Related content

 BACKSTAGE PASS: Plymouth, never take for granted the freedom that music brings.

“In time maybe we can return the word Islamic to Muslims without it being a prejudiced term. “As the closest church to Plymouth’s largest mosque we want to be a good neighbour and also help them protect their name. “By this name change we can also move towards de-politicising DAESH by removing the word ‘state’ from them. “They are neither Islamic nor a state.” The petition says: TO CHANGE THE NAME THE UK GOVERNMENT USES FOR IS, ISIS AND ISIL TO DAESH Also to encourage others similarly. There can then be benefits by removing: a) the name ‘Islamic’ from them as it can stop the inferential slandering of good Muslims b) the word ‘State’ as it de-politicises them and their ‘branding’ to just a terrorist group Why use the name they want used? The petition can be found here

Rabbi Josef Antebi exposing Zionists, even after being tortured by them!

Uploaded on 30 Jan 2011

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIT9sLz29iQ

Most people don't know, that many orthodox jews oppose Israel and the occupation of Palestine. These orthodox jews believe Zionism endangers peace on earth. One of them is Rabbi Josef Antebi (born in Hebron), who was tortured by Zionists. This is an interview made in Amsterdam, the last day of Hanuka.

Did the mainstream media ever inform you about the numerous protests worldwide, made by Jews against Zionism?

http://nkusa.org/activities/demonstra...

This video has been published on http://bewusst.tv/english/rabbi-again... bewusst.tv depends on your donations: http://bewusst.tv/spenden

P.S.: a response to the video, called "Rabbi Josef Antebi exposes himself as a fraud" ...for the comprehension: Rabbi Josef Antebi talks about his grandparents (see 02:19 ) from his mother's side and shows us their birth certificate, Yehuda and Hanna Labi (Lavy) and his mother Perla Labi, they were all Palestinians. Rabbi Josef is also Palestinian. This is to learn from this birth certificate given by the British mandate. Rabbi Josef says (at 02:40 ) "...and I prepare to show you THEIR birth certificate in which it says that I'm Palestinian."

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v...

 Category

o Non-profits & Activism

$200.00

—Charles Journet, 1931

 Home

 Venue

 Conference Aims

 Schedule

 Registration

 CDs/DVDs

 Co-sponsors

 Contact

Doug Bersaw Founder & Publisher, Loreto Publications and IHM Media

$250.00 at door (Prices include all speeches and meals.)

Reverend Mark Dankof and Dr David Duke

James Bruen, Esq. Contributor to "Culture Wars"

Dr. Peter Chojnowski Professor of Philosophy

Jim Condit, Jr. Catholic political activist and advocate for an honest vote

Robert Hanten Board Member American Chesterton Society

Daniel McAdams Centre for the Study of Interventionism (Paris)

Gary Potter Veteran journalist and author

John Sharpe Managing Editor

IHS Press

Dr. Robert Sungenis Catholic apologist, author, international speaker

Robert A. Sungenis (born 1955) is an American Catholic apologist. He is the founder of The Bellarmine Report, renamed from the Bellarmine Theological Forum in 2011. He is the president of CAI Publishing, Inc. Sungenis is known for his apologetic works critiquing the Protestant doctrines of sola fide and sola scriptura. More recently, he has become known for his advocacy of geocentrism and also for his beliefs about Jews and Judaism that have created controversy.

Biography

Robert Sungenis was raised in a Catholic family, but became a Protestant Christian at age nineteen.^{[1][dead link]} He held various posts (e.g., elder, preacher, adult Sunday school director) in several Protestant churches including a two-year employment under prophecy teacher Harold Camping of Family Radio.^[2] He obtained his B.A. in Religion from George Washington University in 1979, and an M.A. in theology from Westminster Theological Seminary in 1982. Sungenis obtained a Ph.D. in 2006 from the Calamus International University, a private distance-learning institution in Vanuatu which is noted according to Sungenis "for its academic freedom and alternative science and religious curriculum".^[1][3][4] His 700-page dissertation was on the subject of geocentrism^[5] and was then edited and published as the two-volume set, Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right.

Sungenis returned to Catholicism in 1992 at the age of thirty-seven. In 1994 he was the principal author of a book critiquing the eschatological views of Harold Camping.^[6] The story of his conversion to Catholicism is chronicled in the first of the Surprised By Truth books^[7] edited by Catholic apologist and author Patrick Madrid. He has debated many Protestant apologists, including James R. White, Dave Hunt, Michael Horton, Robert Godfrey and Robert Zins on doctrinal, theological, and historical issues such as sola scriptura, the papacy and papal infallibility, transubstantiation and the Mass, salvation and justification. He is the author of twenty books and over 100 published articles on theology and science.^{[citation needed]} In the past, his articles were published in Our Sunday Visitor, The Catholic Answer, Catholic Faith and Family, The Coming Home Journal, Envoy Magazine, This Rock, Catholic Family News, The Remnant, Latin Mass Magazine and reviews of his work appeared in Homiletic and Pastoral Review, Touchstone Magazine, Culture Wars

magazine and at Salon.com. He has also begun his own non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation and publishing company, Catholic Apologetics International Publishing, Inc.^[8].

Views on Jews and Judaism

Sungenis has become known for controversial views of the Jewish people and Judaism that have been sharply criticized by some of his fellow Catholics and by the Southern Poverty Law Center as being anti-semitic.^[3][9][10] In 2002 he questioned the Holocaust, and according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, "repeated a series of ancient anti-Semitic canards" and later wrote about the involvement of Jews and Israel in a New World Order Satanic conspiracy aimed at world domination.^[10][9]

Sungenis has responded that he is against Zionism, but that he is not anti-semitic. "Antisemitism is a hatred for the Jewish race. There isn't a bone in my body that feels that way about Jewish people," he wrote.^[11] In 2008, Sungenis' bishop, Kevin C. Rhoades, denounced his views of the Jewish people and Judaism as "hostile, uncharitable, and un-Christian" and required Sungenis to stop writing about them. He also directed him to stop using the word "Catholic" in his organization's name.^[3] Sungenis has stated that he will only comply with Bishop Rhoades' directive to stop writing about Jews and Judaism if he is forced to do so "under the aegis of a canonical trial".^[12]

Geocentrism

Sungenis has become known for his advocacy of geocentrism. He believes that physics and the Bible prove that the sun and all the planets orbit the Earth and that the Earth does not rotate. In support of his beliefs, Sungenis published the book Galileo Was Wrong in the hope that people will "give Scripture its due place and show that science is not all it's cracked up to be." Mainstream scientists reject this cosmological view as demonstrably false and untenable.^[13]

Source: Wikipedia

John Vennari Editor "Catholic Family News"

Welcome to Jacob J. Nammar Website 

 

In Islam the "innermost Self" has to be conquered by righteous actions and not by meditation alone! (BAFS)

Just another WordPress.com site Skip to content

 Home

 Articles

 Biography

 Compliments

 Contact Us

 Resources

 Reviews

 Speaking Engagements

Announcing the publication of my book “Born in Jerusalem, Born Palestinian, A Memoir” by Interlink Publishing. For immediate signed copy, please contact: jnammar@gmail.com

Posted on January 12, 2012 Born in Jerusalem, Born Palestinian A Memoir

Jacob J. Nammar, Forward by Salim Tamari

5.5″ x 8″ • 152 pages • b&w photos ISBN 9781566568869 • paperback • $15.00

“Very compelling and personal… fragrant details, great zoom-lens scenes of Palestinian family life… pull us right into the landscape and the domain… I support this book and salute its honesty and stirring intentions. We need it in our world. We need every single politician to have a copy in his/her back pocket. As the daughter of a Palestinian also from Jerusalem, I can say that this book rings deeply true to me, and assuages my sorrow somewhat over all the injustice which has pervaded the Holy City for far too long… Nammar makes a strong stride in all the right directions.”

—Naomi Shihab Nye, award-winning author, writer and poet

“Told with exquisite detail and beauty… this readable memoir will help many people around the world understand the reality of Palestine and its dispossessed people.”

—Mazin B. Qumsiyeh, author of Sharing the Land of Canaan

“This is a compelling and compassionate memoir of a Jerusalem life during wartime and after… stands out as one of very few works that addresses the life for those Palestinians who stayed behind in the Israeli occupied part of (West) Jerusalem… On this level the book is original and has significant ethnographic value for the historical researcher, as well as for students of the Arab Israeli conflict.”

—Salim Tamari, editor, The Jerusalem Quarterly, Institute of Jerusalem Studies

A poignant memoir of an eye witness of a major historical event in Jerusalem

When Jacob Nammar was a young boy growing up in Harret al-Nammareh, his family, his friends, and the streets of his West Jerusalem neighborhood were the center of his life. It wasn’t long, however, before his existence was turned upside down when his family was forced out of their home during al-nakba, the catastrophe that resulted in the ethnic cleansing of nearly 750,000 natives and the destruction of over 500 Palestinian villages and towns.

In this heartwarming memoir, Jacob paints a vivid portrait of Palestinian life—from his childhood days in pre-1948 Jerusalem, the struggles of the Palestinian community under Israeli rule, to his ultimate decision to leave for America at age 23. It is a relevant and deeply personal tale of a man struggling to hold his world together as his beloved homeland is torn apart before his eyes and a chronicle of a love story with a city and a Palestinian family’s resilience and determination to survive even in their weakest moments. Readers will laugh, cry, and be inspired by this charming coming of age story set amid the backdrop of one of the most tragic historical events that engulfed the region.

Jacob Nammar was born in Jerusalem in 1941. He is a retired business executive. He lives in San Antonio, Texas. Interlink Books 

 

In Islam the "innermost Self" has to be conquered by righteous actions and not by meditation alone! (BAFS)

Mark Dankof is a contributor to the Willis Carto's American Free Press which was described by political scientist George Michael as "the most important newspaper of the radical right".^[1][2] Dankof also broadcasts The Ugly Truth Podcast which has invited guests such as the distinguished Dr. David Duke, author of "Jewish Supremacism: My Awakening to the Jewish Question."^[3] Dankof's broadcasts are carried by the Republic Broadcasting Network^[4] which also has loose ties to the American Free Press and carries many programs critical of US foreign policy and Israel.

Dankof is a also an American correspondent for Press TV, the news network owned by the state-owned media corporation Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) with headquarters in Tehran, Iran His articles have also appeared in Veterans Today and globalresearch.ca.^[5]

His website is dedicated to "the American Constitution, the Old Republic, and Christian Orthodoxy". His viewpoints protest the negative influences of Israel and international bankers, and promotes peace and moderation towards Iran. In an article entitled "Mossad in America: What Did William Colby Know About the 'Hidden Hand'?" Dankof states "The cause of the American malady is abundantly clear. Our leadership and institutions have been co-opted by International Central Bankers, Transnational Corporate Interests, and the Israeli Lobby."

Source: Wikipedia

 

MILLIONS of Christians disillusioned with their respective denominational religions have opted for the UN-BACKED NEW AGE RELIGION, others for Vedantic and Buddhist philosophies or even reverted to Islam. But, one good thing with Transcendental Meditation is that it is alleged to make BETTER Christians, BETTER Muslims and BETTER HUMANS of us all. But, how far is this true? (BAFS)  

"The Transcendental Meditation technique allows your mind to settle inward beyond thought to experience the source of thought, the most silent and peaceful level of consciousness—your innermost Self."

If you want more information on Transcendental Meditation (TM) just check the link.

"To ensure maximum effectiveness, the Transcendental Meditation technique is taught through personalized instruction by a certified teacher in the same systematic way as the teachers of thousands of years ago."

"Certified" does not make TM right! (BAFS)

What TM technique is and is not

What religious leaders say

To contact your nearest certified TM teacher, complete the short form below, or call toll free

888-LEARN-TM 888-LEARN-TM (888-532-7686 888-532-7686)

Having a problem submitting this form? Please call toll-free 1-888-LEARN TM

(1-888-532-7686 1-888-532-7686) or click here.

"What is the Transcendental Meditation (TM) technique? It is a simple, natural, effortless procedure practiced 20 minutes twice each day while sitting comfortably with the eyes closed. It’s not a religion, philosophy, or lifestyle. It’s the most widely practiced, most researched, and most effective method of self-development."

So, with TM we can dispense with Christianity and Islam altogether, but not of Vedantism! (BAFS)

"What happens when you meditate?

The Transcendental Meditation technique allows your mind to settle inward beyond thought to experience the source of thought — pure awareness, also known as transcendental consciousness. This is the most silent and peaceful level of consciousness — your innermost Self. In this state of restful alertness, your brain functions with significantly greater coherence and your body gains deep rest."

This should definitely be practiced by the HINDU racists and fanatics who have stolen Kashmir and are oppressing 100-150 million Indian Muslims, killing many at will, but the problem with TM is that it also makes the worst among us IMPROVE OUR EVILNESS! (BAFS)

"How many people practice the TM technique?

More than five million people worldwide have learned this simple, natural technique — people of all ages, cultures, and religions."

Knowledgeable and Believing Christians and Muslims do not need TM to be better human beings! Only the disillusioned might need it! (BAFS)

"How much scientific research has been done on the TM technique?

Over 600 research studies have been conducted at more than 200 universities and research centers (including Harvard, UCLA, and Stanford). These studies have been published in more than 100 journals"

This does not make TM more valid or better than Christianity or Islam! (BAFS)

"Where did the TM technique come from?

The Transcendental Meditation technique is based on the ancient Vedic tradition of enlightenment in India. This knowledge has been handed down by Vedic masters from generation to generation for thousands of years. About 50 years ago, Maharishi — the representative in our age of the Vedic tradition — introduced Transcendental Meditation to the world, restoring the knowledge and experience of higher states of consciousness at this critical time for humanity. When we teach the Transcendental Meditation technique today, we maintain the same procedures used by teachers thousands of years ago for maximum effectiveness."

The problem with TM is that it failed to attract the Vedantists themselves and waited for Christendom to become decadent to attract millions among the so-called Christians and the European apostates (renegades). (BAFS)

WESTERN MENTALITY IS BAFFLING!

They would find it wrong to allow Muslims Halaal (Kosher) food in public institutions and free time for Salaat (prayers) at work, but are praising VEDANTIC MEDITATION as good in the work place where you can be allowed free time to meditate -one or two chunks of 20 minutes a day! (BAFS)

THE DANGER!

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Deeply Touched

I wanted to share something that touched me in a really special way. Im in love with the way Maharishi Mahesh Yogi saw and understood life.

Maharishi's nine rules of life:

Don't analyze 

Don't complain 

Don't compare yourself to others 

Don't expect things to be done for you 

Don't expect perfection in the relative 

Look to the knowledge aspect daily 

Own the movement 

Problems are all in your head 

Hold yourself together

Maharishi was an avaricious old man with a penchant for young girls who ruined the greatest pop group in history...

The Inner Light -The Beatles

Without going out of my door I can know all things on earth With out looking out of my window I could know the ways of heaven

The farther one travels The less one knows The less one really knows Without going out of your door You can know all things of earth With out looking out of your window You could know the ways of heaven

The farther one travels 

The less one knows 

The less one really knows

Arrive without travelling 

See all without looking 

Do all without doing

"The achievements of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi are profound in the field of knowledge and immense in the field of action. During the past 50 years, more than five million people have learned the Transcendental Meditation technique and are rising to enlightenment through their twice-daily practice. Maharishi has trained over 40,000 teachers, opened thousands of teaching centers, and founded hundreds of schools, colleges and universities. Maharishi Vedic Science programs are being applied in private businesses, public institutions and homes in every country."

http://www.tm.org/maharishi

Maharishi inspired Beatles but died leaving £2b and rape rumours

 00:00, 7 February 2008  By Nick Webster

Maharishi died leaving £2 billion amid rumours of rape and murder.

He was the Sixth Beatle, a spiritual force with the potential to create world peace and end famine.

Jeremy Paxman calling Bible's Genesis 'hogwash' ruled offensive – Daily TV round-up

It rather depends on your point of view, but one thing is certain about the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi who died this week aged somewhere between 91 and 97 -he was one of the richest religious leaders in history.

The 'giggling guru' -so called because of his high-pitched laugh -lived in an opulent 200-room mansion, with helicopters and dozens of cars at his disposal, and was

worth an estimated £2billion. He was the head of a movement with five million followers worldwide, all seeking a higher consciousness through transcendental meditation.

But while the Maharishi promised world peace, and cynics laughed at his wacky teachings and yogic flying, sinister stories of sex, debauchery, and even murder cast dark shadows over his life.

All but one of the Beatles cut their ties with their apparently celibate guru after it emerged he'd made a pass at Mia Farrow. The Maharishi's people, on the other hand, insist they simply fell out when he discovered the band were using LSD.

Later another British disciple, Linda Pearce claimed the Maharishi had seduced her when he was in his 60s.

"He was a brilliant manipulator," said Mrs Pearce. "I just couldn't see that he was a dirty old man. We made love regularly. At one stage I even thought I was pregnant by him. And I don't think I was the only girl. There was a lot of talk that he'd tried to rape Mia Farrow."

And there was worse scandal to come. In 1987, when the Maharishi was living in a highsecurity complex on the outskirts of Delhi, India, the Telegraph newspaper of Calcutta alleged five boys had died after being used as guinea pigs in the ashram's "medical institute" searching for cures for cancer, heart ailments and Aids. Nothing was ever proved.

At the same time the fabulously wealthy guru's employees went on strike to increase their £10-a-month wages. The Maharishi simply moved into a five-star hotel in New Delhi until it was over.

Mahesh Prasad Varma (or Mahesh Srivastava, depending on your source) was born in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, sometime between 1911 and 1918. The son of a government tax inspector, he initially studied physics but then trained with a Vedic spiritual mentor, undertaking two years of silence in the Himalayas where he developed his ideas on transcendental meditation.

The movement the Maharishi leaves behind, after his death at his luxurious retreat in Vlodrop in the Netherlands, has been called the world's richest cult. Yet when he began his first world tour as a spiritual leader in Burma in 1958, the Maharishi was praised for his austerity.

One commentator wrote: "He asks for nothing. His worldly possessions can be carried in one hand." Meeting the Beatles a decade later changed all that. The band had been encouraged to attend a lecture by George Harrison's wife Patti, and were impressed enough by what they heard to accompany him to a weekend retreat in to North Wales.

Along with Mick Jagger and Marianne Faithfull, they took the train to Bangor -where the Maharishi assumed the mob of screaming fans were there for him.

Only a day into the retreat the news broke that the Beatles influential manager Brian

Epstein had died from a suspected drugs overdose.

Rather than let them grieve for their friend and first mentor, the Maharishi told them their tears would cause "vibrations" which could trap Epstein's spirit on this spiritual plane rather than let it travel to the next. And he instructed them to be joyful and laugh.

Months later all four Beatles, their partners and 60s stars Donovan, Mike Love of the Beach Boys, and Mia Farrow and her sister Prudence headed off for a three-month retreat to the Maharishi's centre on the banks of the Ganges.

Funded by a tithe of one week's wages from each of its students, the bank balance of the ashram received a massive boost from the world's biggest pop stars.

They expected to find spiritual enlightenment, but what they actually found was what Ringo called "a bit like Butlins." He and his then wife Maureen left after a fortnight, desperate for "egg and chips." Paul McCartney and his girlfriend Jane Asher quit too.

Then came the stories of the Maharishi's attempt to have sex with

Mia Farrow. John Lennon said later: "There was a hullabaloo about him trying to rape Mia and a few other women. The whole gang charged down to his hut and I said: 'We're leaving!' He asked why and I said: 'If you're so cosmic, you'll know why.' The Maharishi gave me a look that said: 'I'll kill you, you bastard!'"

But none of this dented the Maharishi's growing global popularity. Travelling the world in a pink aeroplane, his fame and his movement grew and he featured on the front cover of Time

magazine in 1975. His transcendental meditation technique involved silently repeating a Sanskrit mantra for 20 minutes twice a day.

And since scientific studies have now concluded it has some real health benefits, it is never short of new adherents

And at £1,300 per person for a standard introduction course, it's easy to see where the Maharishi's cash came from. But there were times when the guru's ego got the better of him... He once told an audience in New York that if just one per cent of the world's population adopted his teaching it would "neutralise the power of war for thousands of years". Consequently, he claimed credit for peacein the Lebanon and Mozambique, and forreducing crime in Washington and Merseyside.

And after the terrorist outrages of September 11, 2001 the Maharishi claimed if any government gave him a billion dollars he could end terrorism and create peace.

His claims were ridiculed -as were his 40,000 yogic fliers who, as the Natural Law Party, promised that levitating while in the Lotus position would bring peace and enlightenment.In the end it brought just 0.4 per cent of the votes in the election.

Last month the guru, who lately communicated through a videolink, announced his retirement. His spokesman Bob Roth says:"He'd done what he set out to do." Apart from world peace.

GURUS: GOOD, BAD & HUGLY

Osho: The "Rolls-Royce guru" -his followers wanted to buy him one for every day of the year. Charles Manson: Serving life after Manson Family killed Sharon Tate, pregnant wife of Roman Polanski in LA in 1969. Timothy Leary: Former Harvard professor of psychology championed psychedelic drugs. Amma: Mata Amritanandamayi -the Hugging Saint -gives her services free to all religions. May have given out 26 million hugs.

THE CROSS REPLACED BY LORD SHIVA'S PHALLUS!

La figure du Christ dans l’Islam

Niece Ann Dankof, Mother Vera and Reverend Mark Dankof

Thus, Magruder’s blog includes a lot of comparative religion as well as spiritual efforts for a quest for the Divine. "I feel a constant “buzz” [during the fast] in my head," he wrote. "This buzz serves a useful purpose, by the way. It keeps me conscious of God, of God’s presence, of God’s will that is bursting to become real in the world. And so when something else isn’t going on in front of me, the buzz reminds me to speak to God."

By Ben Arnold | Yahoo! TV News – 3 hours ago

Jeremy Paxman's description of the book of Genesis in the Bible as 'hogwash' has been ruled 'offensive' by the BBC Trust.

The presenter of 'Newsnight' also said those who believe in the Old Testament in a literal sense were 'stupid people'.

Paxman on Newsnight (Credit: BBC)

[Related feature: Eamonn Holmes' most memorable gaffes]

His remarks, which were made during an item on writer Richard Dawkins' latest book 'The Magic Of Reality: How We Know What's Really True' last October, were investigated by the Trust's Editorial Standards Committee, which deemed them 'offensive to some parts of the audience'.

The decision was appealed, but the Trust upheld the original complaint.

It said: “Although Mr Paxman's use of the terms 'religious hogwash' and 'stupid people' was not intended to cause deliberate offence, particularly to those with religious views and beliefs, the use of the terms was offensive to some of the audience and there was no clear editorial purpose for their use in the context of this 'Newsnight' item.”

It then added that viewers of the show were 'unlikely to have expected Jeremy Paxman's typically robust and confrontational interviewing style to extend to the use of the terms 'religious hogwash' when introducing the story of Genesis, and 'stupid people' when talking about those with a literal belief in the Old Testament in the context of the item about religious myths'. [Media Guardian]

Also in today's press

The new series of 'Celebrity Big Brother' could be set to start in two weeks, according to reports. Rumours abound that it will start two days after the non-celebrity version finishes later this month. [Daily Star]

One of Team GB's Olympic gymnasts auditioned for 'The X Factor', it has emerged. 22-yearold Louis Smith reached the fourth round of the talent show in 2009. He won a bronze medal earlier this week, as well as another bronze in Beijing in 2008. [Metro]

Star of 'The Wire' Lance Reddick has said that 'Downton Abbey's success could be thanks to the Baltimore-based cop drama. “The legacy of 'The Wire' is tricky,” he said. “It changed television in that it set the bar to a whole new level -a level that I think has never been done before. I also think that something like 'Downton Abbey' -which is so complex and so rich in characters -in some ways its popularity is possibly due to 'The Wire'. People realised that this can be done and that people want to watch.” Meanwhile, writer Julian Fellowes has said that a fourth series of the show is in the planning stages. The third begins in September. [Digital Spy/Daily Mail]

Why a Dallas UM pastor is observing the Muslim fast of Ramadan

by IMO admin | August 01‚ 2012 at 10:02 AM 0 comments Featured Interfaith Relations Islam Latest News Photo Gallery

By Dina Malki

United Methodist Rev. Wess Magruder has not only decided to observe the Ramadan fast this year with his Muslim friends, blog about his experience, but break his fast with Muslims as well. Last night, Magruder accepted the invitation of a local Muslim to eat “iftar,” the fast-breaking meal at the McKinney Islamic Association. Having succeeded in fasting from sunrise till sunset for eight consecutive days, the pastor appreciated God's grace in this communal meal. Most importantly, this celebration reminded him of the main reason why he had decided to fast: neighborly love.

Magruder writes on his blog how he has been feeling spiritually stale lately and how he was yearning to the old Christian fast that he believes Americans are not big fans of. Therefore, Magruder turned to the Muslim faith for inspiration since he knew that Muslims have successfully been fasting for 30 days each year during Ramadan for over fourteen hundred years. The Muslim fast is a total abstention from eating and drinking during the daylight hours. Furthermore, the fast goes beyond the stomach to include the eyes, the tongue, the ears, and all limbs which are expected to be trained to submit to the pleasure of God by refraining from ill manners and moral vice. A few Muslims succeed in attaining a heart-fast where they become spiritually submissive to the divine as well.

2.

Another main reason that the pastor took on the Muslim fast is his Christian ethics of loving God and loving neighbors. “But there’s another reason that I have chosen to ‘act like a Muslim’ over the next thirty days. I truly want to stand in solidarity with my friend, [Imam Sheikh] Yaseen, and his congregation in Plano. I want them to know that I do not resent their presence in my community and country. In fact, I am very glad that they are here.” (The New MethoFesto)

Not realizing what his blogging experience might trigger, Rev. Magruder woke up on July 26, the seventh day of Ramadan, to a flooded email inbox with comments from his blog. His blog posts have been picked up by local Muslims and Christians as well as by nation-wide readers who sent words of encouragement, advice, and support. The Huffington Post Ramadan Liveblog even included his posts. “I am overwhelmed by the response,” Magruder wrote.

Most Muslim commentators gave the pastor “high fives,” advice on surviving the fast, and thank you notes for sharing the experience online. One particular reader, Osman, invited Magruder to the break-fasting meal at the McKinney mosque mentioned earlier. Thus, this individual initiative on the part of a loving Christian neighbor was received with outpouring love and compassion and resulted in more friendships.

However, not all blog readers are Muslim. A few are Christian fellows who appreciated Magruder’s initiative in building bridges within the Abrahamic faith and in sharing the Muslim experience. Others were not quite impressed as they believed that this fast is a tough one and meaningless. Some non-Muslim readers also expressed their critical views about Islam and Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia as far as tolerance and the status of women. In a nut shell, the blog turned out to be an interfaith dialog where people from every faith contribute a thought or two and carry on a civilized conversation.

The DFW Muslim community has always been blessed with friendships, alliances, and bridges it shares with the larger American community. But this year, as more non-Muslims like Rev. Magruder are choosing to observe the Ramadan fast with Muslims as signs of compassion and solidarity, American Muslims locally and nationally are appreciative of such initiatives to close gaps between faith traditions and bring more understanding to our nation. American Muslims know that they are not alone in fasting this year because they are home.

(Courtesy: Examiner.com)

Mark Dankof shared Mark Dankof's photo.

Monday This was taken yesterday. Today, I learned that my loss of 20 pounds and Gym Regimen plus Low Carb reasonability have returned my blood sugar and blood pressure to normal. Last doctor visit: 197 pounds. This doctor visit: 175 pounds. . . . No rocket science here. Off to the Gym tonight! I couldn't discuss idiots McCain, Lieberman, and Lindsay Graham with Press TV Iran

U.S. Desk yesterday since I was doing my Sunday gig with Immanuel Lutheran here. Watched a 007 episode with the Rescue Puppies in lieu of more Olympic coverage after services.

· · Share

1.

o

L'abbé Ratzinger contredit le Credo, la Tradition et le Magistère

Mark Dankof shared Mark Dankof's photo.

Monday

This was taken yesterday. Today, I learned that my loss of 20 pounds and Gym Regimen plus Low Carb reasonability have returned my blood sugar and blood pressure to normal. Last doctor visit: 197 pounds. This doctor visit: 175 pounds. . . . No rocket science here. Off to the Gym tonight!

I couldn't discuss idiots McCain, Lieberman, and Lindsay Graham with Press TV Iran

U.S. Desk yesterday since I was doing my Sunday gig with Immanuel Lutheran here. Watched a 007 episode with the Rescue Puppies in lieu of more Olympic coverage after services.



· · Share

 You and 12 others like this.



Mark Dankof shared Mark Dankof's photo.

Monday

Nostalgia from my Northern Idaho trip to visit with radio partner Mark Glenn of The Ugly Truth in November 2010:

"Mark Dankof spends Thanksgiving Eve in the woods of Northern Idaho, blazing away at a tree stump with a Colt AR-15 with a 30 round magazine of. 223 Remington. This round travels at 3200 feet per second.

"It is cold here, and was -12 degrees Fahrenheit overnight." Mark Dankof spends Thanksgiving Eve in the woods of Northern Idaho, blazing away at a tree stump with a Colt AR-15 with a 30 round magazine of. 223 Remington. This round travels at 3200 feet per second.

It is cold here, and was -12 degrees Fahrenheit overnight.

3. · · Share

o You and 5 others like this.

THE REAL CHRISTIAN RIGHT

Mark Dankof’s broadcast with Mark Glenn and John Sharpe – 8 August 2012

MAX from Canada: When I think of Christ, I think of peace and strength and as a political and military figure. We need him right here and right now. I look at “The Ugly truth” as a WAR COLLEGE!

But Jesus is right here. He has always been right here. The problem is that those who say they believe in him and his Message cannot see him because their heart is so hardened and they are unable to find the Kingdom of God within. I try to keep away from too much faith because this too tends too often to cloud the issues and the realities.

It is easier for me to think as a Christian because I have managed to find comfort in my religion as a non Roman, non Apostolic Catholic Muslim, that is, Islam. This has shocked and confused both mainstream Christians and Muslims. But, we will see the end of Zionism and Jewish Supremacism only the day we see Christians admit they too are Muslims, non Roman Muslim Catholics. I waste my time explaining any further as I will make no disciples and do not intend to. I cannot even find thinking or simple curious people who want to know what I really mean by Muslim Catholic and Catholic Muslim.

But, let me say it anyway otherwise nobody reading this will understand what the heck I am talking about!

I understand by MUSLIM CATHOLIC, any Muslim who practices universal (Catholic) Islam, and by non Roman and non Apostolic I understand and simply mean non sectarian. Islam is universal, that is a Catholic religion!

I understand by NON ROMAN CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN MUSLIM, simply a non Sectarian Catholic or Christian who fully submits to God Almighty and this by definition means MUSLIM!

This looks like a play on words, but it is not. This is exactly what it is, but humans have the tendency of giving different meanings to the same word and this causes the rift.

One simple example is when Western Christians write or speak about AL LAH, which in English is THE GOD, they insist this is THE GOD of Muslims and not of Christians. This is a big mistake. Muslims do use the word GOD for AL LAH. So, the day Christians will understand and feel comfortable calling GOD AL LAH, like their Brothers and Sisters whose mother tongue is Arabic, they will understand how mistaken and misled by the respective Churches they have been for more than a millennium. This Christian-Muslim rapprochement is vital.

But, in the West they use the word God and Jesus interchangeably. This is a serious blunder. In Arab speaking countries, Christians call God Allah and ‘Isa and Mary the Mother of Allah, Um Allah! This is blasphemous to Muslims, but this is the Christian religion and there is nothing we can do about it! Did you hear of any Catholic or Christian being killed by Muslims in any Arab countries for calling Mary UM ALLAH?

Reverend Mark Dankof says he is an “Evangelical Orthodox Lutheran Christian”, yet I would feel happy if I could hear followers of Christ calling them simply CHRISTIANS! Followers of Muhammad cannot call themselves Muhammadan because Islam has already called anybody that submits to the will of God MUSLIMS.

Followers of Christ are Muslims too, but they cannot see that because they submit to Jesus and not to God!

This very day Ghyslaine ROC had to tell a young Shia girl by the name Nizlah Sheik Panchoo this:

“Correct your details on facebook as they are laughable and even blasphemous: Muslims are WILLING SERVANTS (or “slaves” as some put it!) of ALLAH and not “SLAVES OF “PANJATAN PAAK” because this is damn SHIRK! You did not say you were a Muslim but a “SHIA”!

Shias and some crazy (ignorant) Muslims are notorious for worshipping Saints like in many other religions, but this is strictly forbidden in Islam. Nizlah clearly associates God with the “Five Holy Ones” and we often see pictures of a hand with five fingers and an eye on the palm in Shias’ homes. They pray to it!

WHO WILL BENEFIT THE SUNNI-SHIA AND CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM WARS?

A $6,000,000 question that you all will win except the dummies!

Do you realise how shameful the future generations of the warmongers and predators of the planet would feel when they look at the images or live footage (assuming they are still available!) of the atrocities and abominable monstrosities committed by their Christian and non Christian forefathers and foremothers against defenceless nations?

As for the innocent Muslims who have been dragged into these Western-MOSSAD orchestrated rebellions in the Middle East, I do understand why they are doing it. When the killings and slaughter start, the people go crazy! Do not ask people who see their kids and loved ones slaughtered or starved right before their eyes to think straight! They are not dealing with civilised armies with honour, but ruthless killers and savage mercenaries, including some of their own who have been brainwashed for decades and living under oppression at home as well as abroad. Britain is arming and training many Pakistani apostates, renegades and traitors to do their dirty job abroad!

I am also a first hand witness of organised (orchestrated) “Sunni” degeneracy, backwardness, treachery, money-mindedness, selfishness, hypocrisy, but I would not mix Islam with that decadence of poorly educated and vulnerable people who have themselves survived so many holocausts perpetrated by the warmongers and plundering barbarians and savages and lived under oppression and cultural terrorism for centuries under the yoke of Western Judeo-Christian, Secular, Communist and Buddhist yoke, and under Hindu yoke since more than half a century.

So, our task is made much harder, but is not impossible.

BAFS

Thursday 9^th of August 2012

FROM THE UGLY TRUTH

Christ Almighty! US Foreign Policy vs. Middle Eastern Christianity

1 Vote

American tax dollars fund anti-Christian pogrom

Justin Raimondo

The US State Department has quietly ceased cataloging violations of religious freedom in its “Country Reports on Human Rights.” Of course, it’s just a coincidence that this comes at a time when Washington is allying with radical Islamists in Libya, Syria, and Iraq. As CNS reports:

“The U.S. State Department removed the sections covering religious freedom from the Country Reports on Human Rights that it released on May 24, three months past the statutory deadline Congress set for the release of these reports.

“The new human rights reports—purged of the sections that discuss the status of religious freedom in each of the countries covered—are also the human rights reports that include the period that covered the Arab Spring and its aftermath.

“Thus, the reports do not provide in-depth coverage of what has happened to Christians and other religious minorities in predominantly Muslim countries in the Middle East that saw the rise of revolutionary movements in 2011 in which Islamist forces played an instrumental role.

“For the first time ever, the State Department simply eliminated the section of religious freedom in its reports covering 2011 and instead referred the public to the 2010 International Religious Freedom Report — a full two years behind the times — or to the annual report of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), which was released last September and covers events in 2010 but not 2011.”

(Read more on "The Ugly Truth)

DEAR YOU ALL

The next time I will see that name Justin Raimondo (QUASIMODO), I will just ignore it as the stink is unbearable, but as a first reading it is quite enlightening about the mindset of both those in favour of Christianity and the welfare of Christians and those against Islam and Muslims. We have here all the ingredients that we need to explode that bloody planet! I am not going to attack Christians or blast Christian virtues because of that racist donkey and blind fanatic Justin Raimondo (Quasimodo).

Quasimodo has made some good points though not regarding Islam and Muslims but about his own Christian country turned anti-Christian because of its decadence. Is it the fault of Islam and of Muslims if America has become degenerate to the point of waging war against Christian virtues and Christians not only at home but in particular in Muslim majority countries?

I thank Quasimodo for telling us

1. American (CHRISTIAN) tax dollars fund anti-Christian pogrom
1. America does not give a damn about “violations of
2. (CHRISTIAN) religious freedom!
2. The Obama administration tried to force Catholic institutions — hospitals, clinics, etc. — to provide the “full-range” of contraceptive services, including abortion, to their employees.
3. The city governments of Chicago, New York, and San Francisco want to punish the company whose CEO opposes gay marriage on religious grounds.
4. America is hostile to organized (CHRISTIAN) religion — unless you’re a Unitarian,

1. Quasimodo confirms the existence of radical anti-clericalism in Europe. (This, by the way, transformed Europe into a huge brothel, a drug dealing citadel, a Jewish gambling, prostitution and pornography stronghold, a den of homosexuals and all kinds of perverts, and the dwelling place of Satan himself!)
2. The anti-clericals are waging war against Christians with the Catholic Church as their favourite anti-clericalist target. (This means that nearly one billion are set up to be exterminated, neutralised, subdued, enslaved, etc.)

1. There is a war on the Church here on the American front!
2. Anti-Catholicism is back in fashion in America!
3. America is carrying an intentional campaign to eradicate Christianity from the Middle East.
4. America is orchestrating the pogrom of Christians in Muslim countries where they have themselves planned to “TOPPLE” the legitimate governments!
5. Washington is cheering and funding those who are to carry out the anti-Christian pogroms!
6. Christian Rev. John Hagee is busy anticipating World War III and supporting Israel!
7. America is pursuing a policy that puts the Christians of the Middle East and North Africa in mortal danger!
8. America’s Religious Right is silent in front of the screaming pogroms!
9. America’s Religious Right is carrying the banner of Mitt Romney!
10. Former Mormon (Freemason) Mitt Romney wants America to openly arm the Syrian rebels! (They already have, buddy!)
11. America is causing Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches to be razed to the ground! (WOW!)
12. The mainstream media in the Western world is content to close its collective eye to the anti-Christian pogrom!
13. Quasimodo is asking if America has completely lost its moral compass! (My question is: Has America ever had a moral compass and when?)
14. Quasimodo is also asking if the triumph of militant secularism is so complete! (My answer is: It has been complete since a very long time!)
15. America is waging war on Christianity in the Middle East! (You said it, buddy!)

CONCLUSION

When Quasimodo and his likes have so much SHIT on their bloody hands, please, leave ISLAM and MUSLIMS outside their own SHIT unless they and their likes really want this planet to be turned into hell which it has already started to be for many!

Many people, even good intentioned ones, speak of WWIII between heavily armed Christian nations, mercenary killers and almost unarmed and defenceless Muslim nations! But, WWIII is very unlikely to happen

unless enough Muslims acquire adequate weaponry to DEFEND themselves, their loved ones and their way of life. Only then it will really be HELL on earth for EVERYBODY as it has been exclusively for Muslims for quite some time.

It seems that we need to be thankful to Justin Raimondo for writing such SHIT for everybody to read because this is indeed and IN ALL TRUTH the mindset of those 'Christians' who have allied with Satan to destroy our world and way of life. I do share 100% of what that devil wrote about the war against Christians and Christian values, but it is the own doings of the Christians and of America and there is no need using Islam and Muslims as scapegoats! The truth will never set those Christians of the Synagogue of Satan free because their truths are based on lies!

BAFS

Thursday 9^th of August 2012 N° 38, janvier 2009

Amélie Neuve-Eglise

Si mon ami plein de douceur me fait asseoir dans la poussière, Pourquoi s’affligerait un pauvre hère qui possède un puissant Ami ? Le chagrin qu’il me cause est dans mon cœur comme un trésor, Mon cœur est "Lumière sur lumière", Pareil à la belle Maryam qui porte en son sein Jésus. Mon ami est le soleil, il ne se promène que seul ; C’est la lune qui est à la tête de l’armée des étoiles

(Jalâl-ud-Dîn Rûmî, Dîwân-e Shams-e Tabrîzî, Ode 565)

565) (

Jésus et Marie représentés dans une ancienne miniature persane, date et auteur inconnus.

Prophète central de l’islam, Jésus -appelé "’Îsâ" dans le Coran -fait partie, avec les prophètes Noé, Abraham, Moïse et Mohammad, des "élus" à qui a été révélé un Livre ou une Loi divine. [1] Dans l’islam, Jésus a donc été choisi par Dieu pour transmettre aux hommes un nouveau texte sacré, l’Evangile (Injîl), censé contenir le sens profond et vrai de la Thora, ainsi que pour rappeler aux "Enfants d’Israël" (Banî Isrâ’îl) le dogme central du monothéisme et la nécessité de se soumettre à la volonté divine.

Jésus est évoqué dans le Coran comme indissolublement lié à Marie et constitue un modèle à suivre pour l’ensemble des croyants : "Ô Marie ! Dieu t’annonce la bonne nouvelle d’un verbe émanant de Lui. Son nom est : le Messie, Jésus, fils de Marie (Al-Masîh, ’Îsâ ibn Maryam) ; illustre en ce monde comme dans l’au-delà ; il est au nombre de ceux qui sont proches de Dieu." [2] Il fait partie de la "famille de ’Imrân" comprenant sa mère Marie, Yahyâ (Jean-Baptiste), son cousin, ainsi que le père de ce denier, Zacharie. Jésus est également considéré pur de tout péché.

Le ’Îsâ de l’islam est cependant très différent du Jésus du christianisme : bien que favorisé de grands dons et "fortifié par l’Esprit Saint", la vision coranique le considère essentiellement comme un homme et lui dénie donc la part de divinité qui constitue le fondement de la religion chrétienne. Ainsi, dans une optique comparée, la vision et conception profondément différente du monothéisme ainsi que de la relation entre Dieu et les hommes dans ces deux religions apparaît avec toute sa force au travers de leur différente vision du personnage de Jésus. Cependant, dans les deux traditions, il n’en demeure pas moins le prophète qui bouleverse les lois, tant par sa naissance et sa mort que par la profondeur de son message, et qui a constitué une source inépuisable de méditation pour de nombreuses grandes figures de l’islam au cours des siècles.

Le contexte de l’époque

Nous ne savons pas avec précision dans quelle mesure le prophète Mohammad lui-même connaissait le personnage de Jésus et les différents aspects de la doctrine chrétienne de l’époque, qui, à la fin du VIe siècle, était loin d’être unifiée. La révélation coranique s’est ainsi déroulée dans un contexte où foisonnaient une multitude de communautés chrétiennes -nestoriens, priscilliens, monophystes… ayant notamment des conceptions différentes de la nature de la personne du Christ lui-même.

Rencontre du jeune Mohammad avec le moine chrétien Bahîra, illustration de Jamî’ al-Tawârikh, XIV^e siècle.

Selon certains éléments de la tradition islamique, le prophète Mohammad se serait trouvé au contact de plusieurs chrétiens tels que le moine nestorien Bahîra -qui, alors que Mohammad n’était encore qu’enfant, le reconnaît comme un futur prophète [3] -, Waraqa ibn Nawfal, chrétien parent de sa femme Khadîja qui lui apportera la confirmation de sa mission prophétique, ou encore Salmân de Perse, qui se convertira à l’islam et fut l’un de ses plus proches compagnons.

A l’époque de la Révélation, l’Arabie entretenait également des relations avec les chrétiens monophysites du Najrân au Yémen [4], les Lakhmides nestoriens de Hira, et certaines communautés chrétiennes de Syrie. En outre, au temps des persécutions des compagnons de Mohammad à la Mecque, ce dernier les invita à se réfugier en Abyssinie, auprès du roi chrétien Négus qui, touché par le respect et la haute estime accordés à Jésus et Marie dans le Coran, décida de leur accorder protection et soutien.

La figure du Christ dans le Coran

Tantôt qualifié de Parole de Vérité (Qawl al-Haqq), d’Esprit de Dieu (Rûh Allah), de serviteur de Dieu (’Abdollah) ou encore de "signe pour l’Heure" (’ilm lilsa’ât) et de "Masîh" (signifiant le "oint") [5], le Coran présente également Jésus comme le "Verbe" (Kalima) de Dieu -dont la signification est cependant bien différente de la notion de "Verbe" de l’Evangile de Saint Jean selon lequel Dieu s’est fait chair.

Pour l’islam, le Verbe reste une créature, même s’il n’en demeure pas moins doté d’un rang éminent en ce qu’il est chargé de véhiculer la Parole de Dieu et parler en son nom : "Jésus devient le Verbe de Dieu non pas à cause de son incarnation par laquelle sa chair devient divine, mais parce que son esprit est parvenu à un tel degré de perfectionnement qu’il est devenu un miroir au travers duquel la divinité se révèle". [6]

Jésus-’Îsâ faisant descendre une "table servie" (mâ’ida) du ciel pour ses disciples, miniature persane, date et auteur inconnus.

La dimension exceptionnelle de la naissance virginale de Jésus est soulignée par le fait que Jésus a été conçu par le souffle de l’Esprit divin (Rûh) [7] insufflé en Marie. Le mystère de sa conception a parfois été comparé à celle d’Adam, créés tous deux par la Parole divine existentiatrice "Soit" (Kun !) [8], avec cependant pour différence essentielle qu’Adam n’eut pas de mère. Le miracle de la naissance de Jésus est renforcé par le caractère extraordinaire du nouveau-né qui parle dès sa naissance [9] et répond aux accusations lancées contre samère : "Je suis vraiment le serviteur de Dieu. Il m’a donné le Livre et m’a désigné Prophète. Où que je sois, Il m’a rendu béni ; et Il m’a recommandé, tant que je vivrai, la prière et la Zakat ; et la bonté envers ma mère. Il ne m’a fait ni violent ni malheureux." [10] Comme le prophète Mohammad après lui, Jésus-Isâ ne vient pas apporter un nouveau message, mais davantage confirmer les révélations précédentes et inviter les hommes au monothéisme pur, dans la continuation de Noé, d’Abraham et de Moïse. Il confirme ainsi le message de la Torah, tout en modifiant certaines de ses prescriptions légales. En outre, le Coran évoque que Jésus fut aidé par l’Esprit Saint (Rûh al-Qudus) [11] ainsi que par un groupe de "disciples" (hawâriyûn). C’est également à la demande de ces derniers que Jésus demande à Dieu de faire descendre du ciel une "table servie" (mâ’ida) [12] -qui rappelle aux commentateurs tantôt l’épisode de la Cène, tantôt celui de la multiplication des pains -comme ultime preuve de la véracité de sa prophétie. Ainsi, si le contenu de cette dernière fut rejeté par une grande partie des Juifs (Banî Isrâ’îl), seuls les apôtres (hawâriûn) ont réellement "crû" à l’issu de l’envoi de ce signe du ciel. Dieu a également donné à Jésus la capacité de réaliser des miracles "par sa permission", notamment de guérir les malades ou de donner vie à des formes inertes : "Tu fabriquais de l’argile comme une forme d’oiseau par Ma permission ; puis tu soufflais dedans. Alors par Ma permission, elle devenait oiseau. Et tu guérissais par Ma permission, l’aveugle-né et le lépreux. Et par Ma permission, tu faisais revivre les morts." [13]

Concernant la conception même de la personne du Christ, toute idée d’incarnation ou de divinité est fermement rejetée. Nous touchons ici au cœur même de l’islam qui insiste avant tout sur l’idée d’unicité (tawhîd), d’unité et de transcendance divine absolue, proscrivant ainsi formellement toute idée d’association (shirk) entre Dieu et ses créatures. [14] Malgré son statut d’élu et de messager, le Christ reste donc avant tout un homme, dont l’existence est sans commune mesure avec l’essence divine. Cette différence essentielle est clairement exprimée dans le Coran qui rapporte les paroles du Christ à son Créateur : "Tu sais ce qu’il y a en moi, et je ne sais pas ce qu’il y a en Toi. Tu es, en vérité, le grand connaisseur de tout ce qui est inconnu." [15] Isâ se présente également comme un serviteur de Dieu (’abd) et se défend d’être à l’origine de tout associationnisme : "Je ne leur ai dit que ce que Tu m’avais commandé, (à savoir) : "Adorez Dieu, mon Seigneur et votre Seigneur"". [16] La figure de Jésus-Isâ telle qu’elle est présentée dans le Coran souligne la centralité de la transcendance du divin en islam, qui ne peut en aucun cas s’incarner dans l’histoire et être appréhendé en soi au travers des notions de matérialité ou de corporéité.

L’Evangile (Injîl) comme "guide et lumière"

Marie venant de donner naissance à Jésus près du palmier, miniature persane, date et auteur inconnus.

Comme nous l’avons évoqué, il fut révélé à Jésus un Evangile (Injîl) [17] qualifié par le Coran de "guide et lumière" [18] et censé contenir le sens vrai de la Thora. Cependant, le texte original fut ensuite perdu et son application dévoyée : "Nous […] lui avons apporté l’Evangile, et mis dans les cœurs de ceux qui le suivirent douceur et mansuétude. Le monachisme qu’ils inventèrent, Nous ne le leur avons nullement prescrit. [Ils devaient] seulement rechercher l’agrément de Dieu." [19] Le sens et le contenu du mot "évangile" font donc référence à deux réalités fondamentalement différentes dans la chrétienté et en islam : recueil de témoignages écrits plusieurs décennies après la mort du Christ pour le christianisme, l’Injîl lui fut au contraire directement révélé par Dieu de son vivant selon l’islam.

Il faut néanmoins relever certaines similitudes, comme ce verset du Coran indiquant que l’Injîl présente les vrais croyants comme "une semence qui sort sa pousse, puis se raffermit, s’épaissit, et ensuite se dresse sur sa tige, à l’émerveillement des semeurs" [20] ; faisant ainsi écho à certains passages de l’Evangile selon Saint Matthieu : "Celui qui a reçu la semence dans la bonne terre, c’est celui qui entend la parole et la comprend ; il porte le fruit, et un grain en donne cent, un autre soixante, un autre trente" [21] ; "la bonne semence, ce sont les fils du royaume ; l’ivraie, ce sont les fils du malin". [22]

L’annonceur du "Paraclet"

Le Christ est également considéré par l’islam comme l’annonciateur de la venue du prophète Mohammad. [23] Cette vision s’appuie notamment sur une lecture particulière des paroles du Christ rapportées dans l’Evangile selon Saint Jean, annonçant la venue d’un "Paraclet" : "J’ai encore beaucoup de choses à vous dire, mais vous ne pouvez pas les porter maintenant. Quand le consolateur sera venu, l’Esprit de vérité, il vous conduira dans toute la vérité (Jean, 16:12-13).

L’authenticité de la traduction chrétienne courante évoquant un "consolateur" (du grec parakletos) est contestée par les musulmans qui considèrent que le mot grec original était periklytos, signifiant "glorieux", "plus loué" ou encore "Ahmad" en arabe, provenant luimême de la racine "h-m-d", évoquant l’idée de louange et de glorification, et à partir duquel est formé le nom de "Mohammad". Cette interprétation est selon eux confirmée par la seconde partie de la parole du Christ qui poursuit : "car il ne parlera pas de lui-même, mais il dira tout ce qu’il aura entendu, et il vous annoncera les choses à venir" (Jean, 16:13) ; ce qui s’accorde totalement avec la révélation coranique qui fut "dictée" à Mohammad par l’intermédiaire de l’Ange Gabriel et comporte une dimension eschatologique essentielle. La continuité des prophéties christique et mohammadienne, expressément affirmée dans le Coran, est, selon les musulmans, également énoncée par le Christ à la suite des paroles que nous venons de rapporter : "Il me glorifiera, parce qu’il prendra de ce qui est à moi, et vous l’annoncera", (Jean, 16:15).

Eschatologie

Selon l’islam, le Christ ne serait pas mort sur la croix : un sosie lui aurait été substitué peu avant la crucifixion, tandis que, comme les prophètes Hénoch et Elie, il serait monté au ciel vivant : "Ils ne l’ont ni tué ni crucifié ; mais ce n’était qu’un faux semblant. […] Dieu l’a élevé vers Lui." [24] Le Christ a cependant un rôle eschatologique essentiel en ce qu’il doit revenir à la fin des temps au côté du "mahdî" pour rétablir le règne de la justice et vaincre l’Antéchrist. [25] Cependant, à la différence du christianisme, l’islam ne considère pas le Christ comme un sauveur, étant donné qu’il ne reconnaît pas la notion d’Alliance ni de péché originel et que la rédemption ne s’obtient qu’au travers des efforts de chaque croyant pour suivre les préceptes révélés dans le Coran. L’essentiel des dogmes chrétiens (divinité du Christ, incarnation, Trinité, crucifixion, rémission des péchés) est donc rejeté. [26] Malgré ces différences, ces deux traditions n’en partagent pas moins un horizon commun, caractérisé par une même attente eschatologique du retour de Jésus-Christ à la fin des temps.

La question de l’étymologie :

le "Jésus" des chrétiens est-il le "’Îsâ " des musulmans ?

Dans le Coran, Jésus apparaît soit sous le nom de " ’Îsâ ", soit celui de "Masîh" ; or, le Jésus des chrétiens arabes se nomme Yasû’, lui-même issu de l’hébreu Yéshû’, diminutif de Yéhôshûa (Josué) signifiant "Dieu sauve". Yasû’ viendrait donc de la racine Yâsha’, "sauver", distincte dela racine de ’Îsâ, dont l’origine et la signification demeurent incertaines. [27] Certains ont évoqué une simple déformation du nom par déplacement du ’ayn final au début du mot (métathèse) et modification de voyelle longue "û" en "â", mais qui n’en fait pas moins référence à une même personne ; cependant, l’ampleur de la transformation rend cette hypothèse douteuse. [28] François Jourdanpenche pour la version selon laquelle ’Îsâ proviendrait de ’Ysaû, nom sémitique d’Esaü, alors utilisé par les Juifs pour désigner les chrétiens. Sans rentrer dans l’ensemble des analyses linguistiques et historiques venant étayer telle ou telle affirmation, ces hypothèses n’en révèlent pas moins la difficulté à assimiler de fait le "Yasû’ " du NouveauTestament au "’Îsâ " du Coran, bien que le fait qu’il y soit désigné comme "fils de Marie" nous autorise à penser qu’il s’agit bel et bien d’un même personnage.

Jésus dans la tradition musulmane

Les nombreux récits de la tradition musulmane consacrés à Jésus insistent notamment sur sa pureté, comme ce célèbre hadîth de Bukhârî : "Lorsque chaque être humain naît, Satan touche de ses deux doigts les deux côtés de son corps, sauf Jésus, fils de Marie, que Satan n’a pas réussi à toucher, n’effleurant que le placenta." [29] De même, selon un hadîth attribué au prophète Mohammad, ce dernier aurait affirmé que "De tous les prophètes, le plus proche de moi est Jésus, fils de Marie. Il y a entre lui et moi aucun autre prophète". Le message du Christ apparaît donc comme étroitement lié à la révélation mohammadienne qui ne viendrait que l’approfondir et en restaurer le sens vrai ; Jésus et Mohammad n’étant cependant que les deux pôles d’une vérité unique. De façon générale, les chrétiens sont également considérés comme les croyants les plus proches des musulmans : "Tu trouveras certes que les plus disposés à aimer les croyants [musulmans] sont ceux qui disent "Nous sommes chrétiens". [30]

Sermon sur la montagne du Christ, miniature persane, date et auteur inconnus.

Jésus est également "présent" dans plusieurs événements de la vie du Prophète : comme le relate Martin Lings dans sa biographie consacrée au prophète Mohammad, lors de son voyage nocturne (isrâ’) suivi de son ascension céleste (mi’raj), accompagné de sa monture Burâq et de l’Archange Gabriel, "ils filèrent en direction du nord, dépassèrent Yathrib et Khaybar et parvinrent enfin à Jérusalem. Là, un groupe de prophètes -Abraham, Moïse, Jésus et d’autres -se porta à leur rencontre…" [31] Cet événement n’est bien sûr pas à situer dans le temps "historique" qui est le nôtre, mais dans le monde imaginal, lieu des évènements mystiques au-delà de toute temporalité terrestre, où, dégagées de la linéarité du temps matériel, toutes les rencontres deviennent possibles…

Jésus selon la gnose chiite

Dans la gnose chiite, Jésus est avant tout considéré comme une épiphanie (mazhar) de l’un des aspects de la gloire divine apparaissant dans le monde sensible sans s’y incarner, telle une image se reflétant dans un miroir sans pour autant se confondre avec lui.

L’importance de la figure du Christ est également soulignée par plusieurs Imâms dont l’Imâm Sâdiq qui aurait déclaré : "Sache que si quelqu’un renie Jésus le fils de Marie, et reconnaît tous les prophètes sauf lui, il n’est pas au nombre des croyants" [32] ; tandis que l’Imâm Bâqir va même jusqu’à s’identifier avec le Christ, en s’inspirant des versets du Coran lui étant consacrés : "Je suis le Christ qui guérit les aveugles et les lépreux, qui donne vie aux oiseaux d’argile et qui dissipe les nuées. Je suis lui et il est moi". [33] Enfin, le septième Imâm, Mûsâ Kâzim, choisit de faire figurer une partie du texte des béatitudes de l’Evangile dans son testament spirituel.

L’ascension au ciel de Jésus, miniature turque ancienne.

En outre, Narkès, la mère de l’Imâm du Temps, le douzième imâm chiite, était une princesse grecque chrétienne et descendante de l’un des apôtres du Christ, Simon-Pierre [34]. Un jour, cette dernière voit en songe le Prophète Mohammad demander au Christ sa "fille" pour son propre fils, l’Imâm du temps : "Christ, ayant regardé longuement Simon-Pierre, lui dit : "Honneur insigne et noblesse sont venus à toi. Noue donc ce lien entre ta propre famille et la famille de Mohammad". [35] Les deux prophètes ainsi que les douze apôtres et les douze imâms du chiisme duodécimain seront par la suite témoins de cette union, qui scelle également dans la conscience chiite un lien et une proximité unique entre Jésus et l’Imâm du Temps. De façon générale et comme l’a souligné Henry Corbin dans son œuvre, l’imâmologie chiite est proche d’une certaine christologie des origines, celle des premiers siècles ayant suivi la mort du Christ ayant essentiellement développé une conception théophanique du Christ ou "Christos Angelos", présenté comme le reflet de l’un des attributs divin mais non son incarnation ; idée qui fut par la suite totalement évincée par la christologie paulinienne ayant fait prévaloir le dogme de l’incarnation. [36] Or, cette conception se rapproche de la vision chiite des Imâms conçus comme étant l’épiphanie de la "Forme" de Dieu au travers de laquelle il manifeste ses Attributs sans s’y incarner.

Jésus dans la mystique musulmane

Jésus est une figure quasi-omniprésente de la littérature mystique musulmane où il incarne souvent l’invitation adressée à chaque homme à partir à la recherche de la part de divin cachée en lui. Etroitement liée à la figure de Maryam, le Christ typifie essentiellement la naissance spirituelle destinée à s’accomplir au sein de chaque être ; le corps devant auparavant être "purifié" de toute mauvaise pensée ou acte pour pouvoir donner naissance au "Jésus de son être". [37]

Dans ce sillage, au cours d’une réflexion sur la douleur, Mowlânâ Jalâlod-Dîn Rûmî compare notre corps à celui de Marie, que les douleurs de l’enfantement incitèrent à se réfugier vers un palmier desséché qui porta alors ses fruits : "Le corps est pareil à Marie, et chacun possède en lui un Jésus. Si nous éprouvons en nous cette douleur, notre Jésus naîtra" [38] pour enfin conclure : "Cherche un remède tant que ton Jésus est sur la terre : une fois ton Jésus parti vers le ciel, ton remède aura disparu". La figure du Christ, symbolisant ici l’âme et la dimension spirituelle de chaque homme, souligne la nécessité de l’action dans cette vie, étant donné que l’occasion de nous perfectionner au travers nos actes ne nous sera plus donnée dans l’au-delà. Nous retrouvons la même thématique dans nombre de ses poèmes : "Situ es à la recherche de l’âne, dans cette étable du monde, Va chercher ton âne, mais Jésus ne doit pas être cherché là. Jésus est séparé de l’âne par la lumière du cœur. [...] N’entre pas en lice avec un âne ; celui qui est monté sur l’âne." [39] ; "Le chagrin qu’il [40] me cause est dans mon cœur comme un trésor, mon cœur est "lumière sur lumière" [41], pareil à la belle Maryam qui porte en son sein Jésus." [42] Jésus est encore ici indissolublement lié à Marie, symbolisant la pureté du corps nécessaire à la naissance de l’enfant de l’âme (tefl-e jân). Le Christ incarne également la lutte et le nécessaire détachement de toute âme à la recherche de son vrai principe. [43]

Dans l’anthropologie mystique de ’Alâoddawleh Semnânî (XIVe siècle) selon laquelle l’homme possède sept organes subtils (latâ’if) correspondant à une couleur et à un prophète particulier, le "Jésus de ton être" correspond au "mystère" (khafî) de la naissance spirituelle destinée à s’accomplir dans chaque être, annonçant ainsi la venue du "Vrai Moi", ou le "Mohammad de ton être". Dans cette intériorisation de la figure christique, l’ "enlèvement au monde" de ce dernier symbolisera dès lors le retour du mystique à son Principe et son occultation au monde.

Le motif de la Croix de Lumière a également été largement évoqué par la gnose ismaélienne qui présente une vision selon laquelle la vraie croix et le vrai Christ ne sont pas à rechercher dans ce monde mais dans les profondeurs même de la conscience du gnostique.

Jésus occupe également une place centrale dans l’œuvre d’Ibn ’Arabî qui le considère comme "le sceau de la sainteté (walâyat)" [44], face à Mohammad qui est le "sceau des prophètes". L’étroite dépendance de Jésus à Marie -qui incarne la Sophia éternelle -est également largement évoquée dans son œuvre. De façon générale, le couple Jésus-Maryam a souvent été mis en parallèle avec celui de Adam et Eve, avec qui il entretient une relation d’opposition : si le Féminin a originellement été existentialisé par le Masculin sans besoin d’une mère, la naissance miraculeuse du Christ marque l’apparition du Masculin existencié par le Féminin sans recours à un père. Le féminin se voit alors conférer une dimension créatrice essentielle, qui sera à la source de tout un ensemble de réflexions gnostiques sur la notion de "Sophia" divine ou de "Féminin-créateur".

Malgré les différences profondes existant entre le Christ des chrétiens et le ’Îsâ des musulmans révélant deux différentes façons de concevoir la spiritualité et le rapport au divin, nous pouvons cependant constater certaines similitudes essentielles concernant le contenu même du message du Christ et de l’islam : le Jésus du Nouveau Testament vient prêcher l’avènement proche du royaume de Dieu, rejoignant ainsi l’une des thématiques centrales du Coran. Le message du Christ est essentiellement centré non sur la fondation d’une nouvelle religion, mais sur l’accomplissement de la Loi de Moïse, faisant écho à la nécessité d’un retour au monothéisme pur d’Abraham dans le Coran qui se définit essentiellement comme un "rappel". Enfin, l’appel coranique à une soumission à Dieu ainsi que la nécessité de renoncer à tout bien matériel et même à ses attaches familiales n’est pas sans rappeler certains passages centraux de l’Evangile : ainsi, le verset "Les hommes sont irrésistiblement attirés, dans leurs passions trompeuses, par les femmes, les enfants, les amoncellements d’or et d’argent, les chevaux de race, les troupeaux et les champs. C’est là une jouissance éphémère de la vie d’ici-bas , mais c’est auprès de Dieu que se trouve le meilleur séjour." [45] fait écho à ce passage de l’Evangile de Saint Matthieu : "Et quiconque aura quitté, à cause de mon nom, ses frères, ou ses sœurs, ou son père, ou sa mère, ou sa femme, ou ses enfants, ou ses terres, ou ses maisons, recevra le centuple, et héritera la vie éternelle." [46]

Cependant, contrairement au christianisme où l’éradication des mouvements gnostiques des premiers siècles après Jésus-Christ et les différents Conciles ont donné lieu à l’émergence d’une définition "officielle" de la nature du Christ, l’absence d’un magistère dogmatique unique en islam a favorisé un véritable foisonnement de la conscience gnostique ainsi que la multiplication des réflexions sur les différentes dimensions théophaniques et mystiques du Christ. Jésus s’affirme donc en islam comme un prophète qui sauve non au travers de sa crucifixion, mais en incarnant lui-même la parole de Dieu, et en invitant chacun à la suivre : "Il faut achever la marche d’Abraham ; c’est cela entendre les verset qorâniques "par le Jésus de ton être", et c’est te mettre en mesure, toute vaine gloire bannie de ta pensée quand s’épiphanise la Lumière sacrosainte, de répondre toi aussi par les mots mêmes que Jésus prononce dans le Qorân : "Tu sais ce qu’il y a au fond de moi-même, mais je ne sais pas ce qu’il y a en Toi. Car c’est Toi qui connais les mystères"". [47]

Bibliographie

Anawati, Georges C.,"’Îsâ", Encyclopaedia of Islam Online, Brill Academic Publishers.

Brague, Rémi, Du Dieu des chrétiens et d’un ou deux autres, Flammarion, 2008.

Corbin, Henry, En islam iranien, aspects spirituels et philosophiques,

T. 1, 3 et 4, Gallimard, 1971. Corbin, Henry, L’Imagination créatrice dans le soufisme d’Ibn ’Arabî, Entrelacs, 2006. Gloton, Maurice, Une approche du Coran par la grammaire et la langue, Albouraq, 2002. Ibn ’Arabî, Le livre des chatons de la sagesse (Fosûs al-Hikam), traduction en français de Charles-André Gilis, Albouraq, 1999. Jourdan, François, Dieu des chrétiens, Dieu des musulmans, des repères pour comprendre, Editions de l’Œuvre, 2007. Khalidi, Tarif, The muslim Jesus : sayings and stories in islamic literature, Harvard University Press, 2001. Lehenhausen, Muhammad (trad.), Jesus through shi’ite narration,

selected by Mahdî Muntazir Qâ’im, Ansaryan Publication 2004.

Lings, Martin, Le prophète Muhammad, Seuil, 2002.

Rûmî, Jalâl-ud-Dîn, Le livre du dedans (Fihi-mâ-fîhi), traduit du persan par Eva de Vitray-Meyerovitch, Albin Michel, Spiritualités Vivantes, 1997.

Rûmî, Jalâl-ud-Dîn, Odes mystiques (Dîwân-e Shams-e Tabrîzî), traduit du persan par Eva de Vitray Meyerovitch et Mohammad Mokri, Points, Sagesses, 1973.

Urvoy, Marie-Thérèse, article "Jésus" in Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali (dir.), Dictionnaire du Coran, Robert Laffont, 2007.

Notes

[1] Ces prophètes sont appelés "ulû’-l-’azm", ou hommes de la décision. Certaines traditions incluent également David et son psautier.

[2] (3:45).

[3] Bahîra aurait ainsi reconnu le "Sceau de la Prophétie" ou "marque du Prophète" sur l’épaule du prophète Mohammad enfant.

[4] Le prophète Mohammad signa un pacte avec cette communauté, fondant ainsi leur protection et leur droit en tant que minorité en terre musulmane. Ceci permettra par la suite de fonder le statut de "protégé" (dhimmi) ayant permis au cours des siècles suivants une riche -et souvent trop rare -coexistence entre les "religions du livre", notamment au Maghreb, en Espagne, en Mésopotamie, en Syrie…

[5] La signification de "masîh" comme "oint" est distincte de celle du christianisme, étant donné qu’il est dénié à ’Isâ toute nature divine.

"Masîh" n’en provient pas moins de la racine arabe "m-s-h" signifiant "oindre d’huile", provenant elle-même de l’hébreu.

[6] Lehenhausen, Muhammad (trad.), Jesus through shi’ite narration, selected by Mahdî Muntazir Qâ’im, Ansaryân Publication 2004.

[7] Cette notion est parfois traduite par "Esprit Saint" (Rûh al-Qudus), qui est cependant fondamentalement différente de la notion d’Esprit Saint comme troisième personne de la Trinité telle qu’elle est conçue par le christianisme. L’ "Esprit divin" ou "l’Esprit de Dieu" tel qu’il est le plus souvent évoqué dans la tradition islamique fait référence au souffle divin ayant insufflé la vie à Adam et qui, par extension, désigne la part de divin présent dans chaque être animé par ce "souffle". Concernant l’ "annonce" faite à Marie et la naissance miraculeuse du Christ selon l’islam, se référer à l’article "De Sainte Marie à Maryam Moqaddas : la Vierge dans la tradition islamique et la "Maison deMarie" à Éphèse", Revue de Téhéran, avril 2008.

[8] "Pour Dieu, l’origine de Jésus est similaire à celle d’Adam. Dieu l’a créé d’argile, puis lui a dit "Sois !" et il fut." (3:59).

[9] "Et quand Dieu dira : "Jésus, fils de Marie, rappelle-toi Mon bienfait sur toi et sur ta mère quand Je te fortifiais du Saint-Esprit. Au berceau tu parlais aux gens, tout comme en ton âge mûr."(5:110).

[10] Coran, 19:30-32.

[11] Cf. note 8.

[12] "(Rappelle-toi le moment) où les Apôtres dirent : "ô Jésus, fils de Marie, se peut-il que ton Seigneur fasse descendre sur nous du ciel une table servie ?" Il leur dit : "Craignez plutôt Dieu, si vous êtes croyants". Ils dirent : "Nous voulons en manger, rassurer ainsi nos cœurs, savoir que tu nous as réellement dit la vérité et en être parmi les témoins"."Dieu, notre Seigneur, dit Jésus, fils de Marie, fais descendre du ciel sur nous une table servie qui soit une fête pour nous, pour le premier d’entre nous, comme pour le dernier, ainsi qu’un signe de Ta part. Nourris-nous : Tu es le meilleur des nourrisseurs." "Oui, dit Dieu, Je la ferai descendre sur vous. Mais ensuite, quiconque d’entre vous refuse de croire, Je le châtierai d’un châtiment dont Je ne châtierai personne d’autre dans l’univers." (5:112-115). "La Table Servie" est également le nom de la cinquième sourate du Coran.

[13] Ibid, 5:110.

[14] La sourate Al-Ikhlâs résume cette idée d’unicité et de transcendance absolue : "Dis : "Il est Dieu, Unique. Dieu, Le Seul à être imploré pour ce que nous désirons. Il n’a jamais engendré, ni n’a été engendré. Et nul n’est égal à Lui" Ibid, 112:1-4.

[15] Ibid, 5:116.

[16] Ibid, 5:117.

[17] "Je t’enseignais le Livre, la Sagesse, la Thora et l’Evangile." (5:110).

[18] "Et Nous avons envoyé après eux Jésus, fils de Marie, pour confirmer ce qu’il y avait dans la Thora avant lui. Et Nous lui avons donné l’Evangile, où il y a guide et lumière, pour confirmer ce qu’il y avait dans la Thora avant lui, et un guide et une exhortation pour les pieux." (5:46).

[19] Coran, 57:27.

[20] "Mohammad est le Messager de Dieu. Et ceux qui sont avec lui sont durs envers les mécréants, miséricordieux entre eux. Tu les vois inclinés, prosternés, recherchant de Dieu grâce et agrément. Leurs visages sont marqués par la trace laissée par la prosternation. Telle est leur image dans la Thora. Et l’image que l’on donne d’eux dans l’Evangile est celle d’une semence qui sort sa pousse, puis se raffermit, s’épaissit, et ensuite se dresse sur sa tige, à l’émerveillement des semeurs. [Dieu] par eux [les croyants] remplit de dépit les mécréants. Dieu promet à ceux d’entre eux qui croient et font de bonnes œuvres, un pardon et une énorme récompense." (48:29).

[21] Matthieu, 13:23. Nous retrouvons la même parabole dans l’Evangile selon Saint Marc : "D’autres reçoivent la semence dans la bonne terre ; ce sont ceux qui entendent la parole, la reçoivent, et portent du fruit, trente, soixante, et cent pour un", Marc, 4:20.

[22] Matthieu, 13:38.

[23] "Et quand Jésus fils de Marie dit : "ô Enfants d’Israël, je suis vraiment le Messager de Dieu [envoyé] à vous, confirmateur de ce qui, dans la Thora, est antérieur à moi, et annonciateur d’un Messager à venir après moi, dont le nom sera "Ahmad"." (61:6).

[24] Coran, 4:157-158. Au sein même du christianisme, cette thèse est également soutenue par les docétistes.

[25] La figure de l’antéchrist ou du "Christ imposteur" (al-Masîh ad-Dajjâl) est une figure de l’eschatologie islamique prétendant tantôt égaler Dieu, tantôt être Dieu lui-même. Selon la tradition islamique, il est notamment prévu que lors du jour du Jugement Dernier, il apparaîtra aveugle de l’œil droit et engagera un ultime combat contre l’Imâm Mahdî ou "l’Imâm du Temps" (Imâm az-Zamân).

[26] "O gens du Livre [chrétiens], n’exagérez pas dans votre religion, et ne dites de Dieu que la vérité. Le Messie Jésus, fils de Marie, n’est qu’un Messager de Dieu, Sa parole qu’Il envoya à Marie, et un souffle (de vie) venant de Lui. Croyez donc en Dieu et en Ses messagers. Et ne dites pas "Trois". Cessez ! Ce sera meilleur pour vous. Dieu n’est qu’un Dieu unique. Il est trop glorieux pour avoir un enfant. C’est à Lui qu’appartient tout ce qui est dans les cieux et sur la terre et Dieu suffit comme protecteur." (4:171).

[27] Nous nous appuyons ici essentiellement sur la précieuse étude réalisée par François Jourdan dans son ouvrage Dieu des chrétiens, Dieu des musulmans, des repères pour comprendre, Editions de l’Œuvre, 2007.

[28] Ibid, p.143.

[29] Bukhârî, 4:54:506.

[30] Coran, 5:82.

[31] Lings, Martin, Le prophète Muhammad, Seuil, 2002.

[32] ’Allâmeh Majlîsî, Bihâr al-Anwâr, 23, 96, 3.

[33] Prône de l’Imâm Mohammad Bâqir (Ve Imâm du chiisme), cité par Corbin, Henry, En islam iranien, aspects spirituels et philosophiques, Gallimard, T. 4., 1971, p.442.

[34] Selon la tradition chiite, la princesse Narkès serait la descendante de Simon-Pierre (Sham’ûn), présenté comme étant l’ "héritier spirituel" (wasî) du Christ. Cf. "L’hagiographie du XIIe Imâm" in Corbin, Henry, En islam iranien, aspects spirituels et philosophiques, Gallimard, T. 4., 1971, p.442.

[35] Hagiographie du XIIe Imâm selon Shaykh Sadûq, traduit par Henry Corbin in Corbin, Henry, En islam iranien, aspects spirituels et philosophiques, Gallimard, T. 4., 1971, p.313.

[36] "La conception théophanique (nullement limitée à quelques savants spéculatifs, mais partagée par tous les milieux spirituels où firent éclosion les Apocryphes) est celle d’une Apparition qui est transparition de la divinité par le miroir de l’humanité, à la façon dont la lumière ne devient visible qu’en prenant forme et en transparaissant à travers la figure d’un vitrail. C’est une union qui est perçue non pas au plan des données sensibles, mais au plan de la Lumière qui les transfigure, c’est-à-dire dans la "Présence Imaginative". La divinité est dans l’humanité comme l’Image dans un miroir. […] Par contre, l’Incarnation est une union hypostatique. Elle advient "dans la chair".", Corbin, Henry, L’Imagination créatrice dans le soufisme d’Ibn ’Arabî, Entrelacs, 2006, p.286.

[37] Cette vision est fondée sur l’anthropologie coranique selon laquelle Dieu aurait "insufflé" l’âme de chaque être. Cet événement est notamment relaté dans la sourate al-Hijr, lorsque Dieu s’adresse aux anges : "Je vais créer un homme d’argile crissante, extraite d’une boue malléable, et dès que Je l’aurais harmonieusement formé et lui aurait insufflé Mon souffle de vie, jetez-vous alors, prosternés devant lui" Alors, les Anges se prosternèrent tous ensemble", (15:28-30).

[38] Rûmî, Jalâl-ud-Dîn, Le livre du dedans (Fihi-mâ-fîhi), traduit du persan par Eva de Vitray-Meyerovitch, Albin Michel, Spiritualités Vivantes, 1997.

[39] Rûmî, Jalâl-ud-Dîn, Odes mystiques (Dîwân-e Shams-e Tabrîzî), traduit du persan par Eva de Vitray Meyerovitch et Mohammad Mokri, Points, Sagesses, 1973.

[40] "Il" fait ici référence à l’ "Ami", c’est à dire la recherche de Dieu, ou de l’esprit divin présent dans chaque homme symbolisé par Jésus.

[41] Allusion à la sourate "La Lumière" du Coran.

[42] Rûmî, Jalâl-ud-Dîn, Odes mystiques (Dîwân-e Shams-e Tabrîzî), traduit du persan par Eva de Vitray Meyerovitch et Mohammad Mokri, Points, Sagesses, 1973.

[43] Cette conception du Christ est parfaitement reflétée par cette anecdote citée par Semnânî : "Jésus sommeillait, ayant une brique pour coussin de tête. Alors vint le démon maudit, qui s’arrêta à son chevet. Lorsque Jésus eut perçu la présence du maudit, il s’éveilla et dit : "Pourquoi es-tu venu près de moi, ô maudit ? -Je suis venu chercher mes affaires. -Et quelles affaires sont donc à toi ici ? -Cette brique sur laquelle tu reposes ta tête." Alors Rûh Allah (Spiritus Dei = Jésus) saisit la brique et lui lança à la face". Op. cit. Corbin, Henry, En islam iranien, aspects spirituels et philosophiques, T.3, Gallimard, 1971, p.284.

[44] Cette position a néanmoins été fortement critiquée par certains penseurs et gnostiques chiites comme Haydar Amolî, pour qui le sceau de la walâyat ne peut être que le Premier Imâm.

[45] Coran, 3:14.

[46] Mat. 19:29.

[47] "Les Sept organes subtils selon Semnânî" in Corbin, Henry, En islam iranien, aspects spirituels et philosophiques, T.3, Gallimard, 1971, p.287.

IOANNES PAULUS PP. II

VERITATIS SPLENDOR

1993

CHAPTER I -"TEACHER, WHAT GOOD MUST I DO...? " (Mt 19:16) -Christ and the answer to the question about morality

"Someone came to him..." (Mt 19:16)

6. The dialogue of Jesus with the rich young man, related in the nineteenth chapter of Saint Matthew's Gospel, can serve as a useful guide for listening once more in a lively and direct way to his moral teaching: "Then someone came to him and said, 'Teacher, what good must I do to have eternal life?' And he said to him, 'Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments. 'He said to him, 'Which ones?' And Jesus said,

'You shall not murder; You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness; Honour your father and mother; also, You shall love your neighbour as yourself.'

The young man said to him, 'I have kept all these; what do I still lack?' Jesus said to him,

'If you wish to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me' "

(Mt 19:16-21).¹³

BAFS:

Note that in the very First Commandment (God’s, not Jesus’s!) the Pope has changed the word KILL into that of MURDER, which is the correct translation as made by the “Hebrews” or today’s JEWS. For nearly 2,000 years Rome had preached the wrong religion.

Now, Catholics are allowed TO KILL, but not MURDER! So, KILLING Arabs, Muslims, Palestinians and other defenceless nations on earth amounts just to KILLING which is no more stressed as before!

This position of Rome is in contradiction with Saint Paul’s teachings who got rid of the Mosaic Law, nailing it to the Cross! And, by that one magical stroke, the Pope has also got rid of the doctrine of TURN THE OTHER CHEEK, which was a fallacy anyway!

Until Christians do not start thinking BY THEMSELVES and not stop listening blindly to Churches and Popes, they will never be obeying God’s Commandments! Thank God, in Islam, we do not need Churches or Popes to tell humankind what to believe or not and what to do or not.

But, after Council Vatican II, Rome and the Churches worldwide sold out to Zionism and the International Jewish Mafia!

BAFS 20 September 2012

Vendredi 21 septembre 2012

Benoît XVI : «Chrétiens et musulmans, unissez-vous» (Le Figaro du 15/09/12)

Conflits et malheurs d'ici-bas se résoudront à travers l'unité des chrétiens et des musulmans entre eux. Voici ce qu'a déclaré en substance Benoît XVI lors de son déplacement au Liban le 15 septembre. Cet enseignement, qui s'inscrit dans la lignée doctrinale de Vatican II, est clairement erroné. Deux erreurs majeures sont à relever :

1. Il est nécessaire que musulmans et chrétiens s'unissent ensemble

L'islam a toujours été une fausse religion, condamnée par l'Eglise. Comment un musulman pourrait-il être uni à un catholique ? Ceci est radicalement impossible. Car qui dit unité dit même et unique foi (cf. encyclique Mortalium Animos du Pape Pie XI).

"Il y a un seul corps et un seul esprit, comme vous avez été appelés à une seule espérance par votre vocation.Il y a un seul Seigneur, une seule foi, un seul baptême. Il y a un seul Dieuet Père de tous, qui est au-dessus de tous, qui agit par tous, et qui réside en nous tous."

(Epitre de Saint Paul -Ephes. 4, 1-7 et 13-21. -de la Messe pour l'unité de l'Eglise)

L'unité dans l'Eglise se rapporte à la communion des saints, dogme de foi selon lequel tous les chrétiens membres de l'Eglise sont en communion les uns avec les autres et que, par conséquent, les infidèles, hérétiques, apostats et schismatiques sont exclus de cette communion.

N'est-ce pas contredire cette vérité que d'affirmer impunément que chrétiens et musulmans peuvent et doivent s'unir entre eux ?

-Chrétiens et musulmans n'adorent pas le même Dieu, les premiers adorant la Sainte Trinité, les derniers adorant un démon : "Les dieux des Gentils (fausses religions) sont des démons" (Psaume 95 : 5). Voici ce que prêchait Mgr Louis Pavy, évêque d’Alger, en sa cathédrale d'Alger en 1853 :

"Est-ce le Dieu véritable que le dieu de Mahomet ? Non ! ... Son dieu unique est le plus cruel des tyrans... Le dieu de Mahomet change l’éternelle beauté du ciel en un lieu de prostitution, dont les orgies dépassent en lubricité multiple et stérile tout ce que l’idolâtrie ellemême, dans ses conceptions les plus abjectes, avait pu rêver. Le dieu de l’islam, c’est un être tellement immonde, en sa complaisante faiblesse, que si l’autorité chargée de la garde des mœurs rencontrait dans nos rues quelque chose de semblable, elle devrait à l’instant l’arrêter et le dérober aux yeux d’un public, hélas, pourtant si facile ! Et se serait là le vrai Dieu ? Oh, non, non, ce n’est pas là le vrai Dieu du ciel et de la terre, le Dieu des nations, le Dieu des prophètes, le Dieu de Moïse, le Dieu de Jésus-Christ. Ce n’est pas Vous, ô Sainte Trinité, que cet homme a violemment combattue. Ce n’est pas Vous, ô Père saint, ô Verbe éternel, ô Esprit de lumière et de charité ! Ce n’est pas Vous, Jésus, le salut et la vie de mon âme… Cet homme, Mahomet, ne vous a pas connu, il n’a pas su vous aimer, lui. Pardon, Seigneur, si, pour la défense de votre nom, j’ai parlé d’un autre dieu que vous !"

-L'Islam est une fausse religion, blasphématoire et hérétique. Un musulman ne peut donc faire partie de l'Eglise et de la communion des saints. Ceci est un article du Credo, il suffit de lire le Grand Catéchisme de saint Pie X.

143. Que nous enseigne le neuvième article du Credo :«la sainte Église catholique», «la communion des saints»?

Le neuvième article du Credo nous enseigne que Jésus-Christ a fondé sur la terre une société visible qui s’appelle l’Églisecatholique et que tous ceux qui font partie de cette Église sont en communion entre eux.

147. Où se trouvent les membres de l’Église?

Les membres de l’Église se trouvent partie au ciel, et ils forment l’Église triomphante; partie au purgatoire et ils forment l’Églisesouffrante; partie sur terre, et ils forment l’Église militante.

224. Qui sont ceux qui n’appartiennent pas à la communion des saints?

Ceux qui n’appartiennent pas à la communion des saints sont dans l’autre vie les damnés, et en cette vie ceux quin’appartiennent ni à l’âme ni au corps de l’Église, c’est-à-dire ceux qui sont en état de péché mortel et se trouvent hors de la véritable Église.

225. Qui sont ceux qui se trouvent hors de la véritableÉglise?

Ceux qui se trouvent hors de la véritable Église sont les infidèles, les juifs, les hérétiques, les apostats, les schismatiques et les excommuniés.

226. Qu’est-ce que les infidèles?

Les infidèles sont ceux qui ne sont pas baptisés et qui ne croient pas en Jésus-Christ; soit qu’ils croient à de fausses divinités et les adorent, comme les idolâtres; soit que tout en admettant le seul vrai Dieu ils ne croient pas au Christ Messie, venu en la personne de Jésus-Christ ou encore à venir: tels sont les mahométans et autres semblables.

Il ne peut y avoir d'union si le lien de la foi fait défaut. Cependant, qu'il y ait une unité entre l'islam et la nouvelle religion moderniste de Vatican II n'est pas inconcevable, bien au contraire. La nouvelle religion mondialiste enseignée au Vatican a pour objectif le rassemblement de toutes les croyances entre elles, l'islam en faisant partie. Il suffit de lire la déclaration conciliaire Nostra aetate (1965) pour s'en convaincre :

"L'Eglise regarde aussi avec estime les musulmans, qui adorent le Dieu Un, vivant et subsistant, miséricordieux et tout-puissant, Créateur du ciel et de la terre, qui a parlé aux hommes. Ils cherchent à se soumettre de toute leur âme aux décrets de Dieu, même s'ils sont cachés, comme s'est soumis à Dieu Abraham, auquel la foi musulmane se réfère volontiers. Bien qu'ils ne reconnaissent pas Jésus comme Dieu, ils le vénèrent comme prophète ; ils honorent sa mère virginale, Marie, et parfois même l'invoquent avec piété. De plus, ils attendent le jour du jugement, où Dieu rétribuera tous les hommes ressuscités. Aussi ont-ils en estime la vie morale et rendent-ils un culte à Dieu, surtout par la prière, l'aumône et le jeûne. Si, au cours des siècles, de nombreuses dissensions et inimitiés se sont manifestées entre les chrétiens et le musulmans, le Concile les exhorte tous à oublier le passé et à s'efforcer sincèrement à la compréhension mutuelle, ainsi qu'à protéger et à promouvoir ensemble, pour tous les hommes, la justice sociale, les valeurs morales, la paix et la liberté."

2. La liberté religieuse et l'unité des religions, dimensions sociales et politiques indispensables à la paix

L'Eglise catholique professe le contraire : les désordres sociaux, humains, économiques et les guerres sont les conséquences des atteintes du genre humain à Dieu et ses commandements. Il ne peut y avoir de paix sur terre sans que règne le Christ-Roi sur les nations. La liberté religieuse et l'oecuménisme moderniste sont condamnées comme hérésies par l'Eglise car ces conceptions sont une injure à la Majesté Divine et renient la mission de l'Eglise catholique.

"Omnia instaurare in Christo"

"Tout restaurer dans le Christ"

(devise du Pape saint Pie X)

Pie XI : "Nous avons déjà montré qu'une des causes principales du chaos où nous vivons réside dans ce fait que de graves atteintes ont été portées au culte du droit et au respect de l'autorité, -ce qui s'est produit le jour où on s'est refusé à voir en Dieu, Créateur et Maître du monde, la source du droit et de l'autorité. Ce mal trouvera lui aussi son remède dans la paix chrétienne, qui se confond avec la paix divine et par là même prescrit le respect de l'ordre, de la loi et de l'autorité. [...]

Il ne saurait donc y avoir aucune paix véritable — cette paix du Christ si désirée — tant que tous les hommes ne suivront pas fidèlement les enseignements, les préceptes et les exemples du Christ, dans l'ordre de la vie publique comme de la vie privée. [...]

Il apparaît ainsi clairement qu'il n'y a de paix du Christ que par le règne du Christ, et que le moyen le plus efficace de travailler au rétablissement de la paix est de restaurer le règne du Christ." (Lettre Encyclique Ubi arcano Dei du Pape Pie XI)

Qui plus est, comme le démontre Dom Guéranger dans son ouvrage Jésus-Christ roi de l'histoire, l’Islam est le fléau choisi par Dieu pour punir les nations chrétiennes infidèles. Il est donc évident que ce n’est pas en collaborant avec l’Islam (secte hérétique niant la divinité du Christ et rejetant la Sainte Trinité) que les catholiques édifieront un monde meilleur, ce monde voulu par la vraie Eglise de toujours, à savoir la cité catholique.

Il ne nous reste plus qu'à prier pour la conversion des musulmans et de l'ensemble des infidèles. Récitons cette belle supplique de saint François Xavier qui a converti des milliers d'hommes à la vraie foi :

Père Créateur de toutes choses, souvenez-vous, s'il vous plait, que vous avez créé les âmes des infidèles à votre image et ressemblance : voyez néanmoins comme l'enfer s'en remplit au préjudice de votre gloire ; souvenez-vous du sang que Jésus-Christ, votre très cher Fils, a libéralement versé, et de tout ce qu'il a souffert pour elles.

Ne permettez pas que ces pauvres âmes l'ignorent plus longtemps, et le méprisent davantage ; laissez-vous toucher par les prières de vos élus et de votre église, son épouse ; souvenez-vous de vos miséricordes ; oubliez leur idolâtrie; faites qu'elles connaissent leur Rédempteur que vous leur avez envoyé, et qu'elles adorent l'aimabele Jésus, votre Fils et notre Seigneur, notre salut, notre vie, notre résurrection, par qui nous avons été délivrés et sauvés, et a qui en doivent être rendus l'honneur et la gloire en les siècles infinis.

Ainsi soit-il.

Mardi 18 septembre 2012

23 septembre : Prière mondiale des juifs pour l'avènement de l'Antéchrist

Selon de nombreux sites juifs et l’étrange page Facebook All Jews as One, le dimanche 23 septembre 2012 à 17h précises, heure de Paris (11h à Montréal, 8h à Los Angeles), les Juifs du monde entier sont invités, sur fond d’opération pièces jaunes (pour la Tsedaka : aumône officiellement pour les frères de religion dans le besoin) à réciter la prière suivante :

"MAÎTRE DE L’UNIVERS, NOUS, ENFANTS D’ISRAËL, NOUS TE DEMANDONS LE MASHIAH* AFIN DE NOUS DÉLIVRER MAINTENANT ET AVEC MISÉRICORDE DE CET EXIL ET DE NOS SOUFFRANCES, DE RÉVÉLER TON NOM DANS LE MONDE ET D’Y AMENER LA PAIX. AMEN".

* Messie en hébreu.

L’ancien grand rabbin de France, Sitruk, intervient à la fin pour expliquer le caractère magique et blasphématoire de cette opération : « G.od » (ou le Diable) ne saurait s’opposer à une prière collective de juifs, quoi qu’ils demandent.

Est-ce alors une coïncidence que ce même jour en France, le 23 septembre, est dédié à la journée d’éveil au judaïsme pour les paroisses modernistes et protestantes? Lire ICI

Il est évident que cette demande de l'avènement du Mashiah correspond, en fait, pour nous catholiques, à l'arrivée (prochaine ou non) de l'Antéchrist. Car c'est le sentiment commun des Pères de l'Église et de nombreux exégètes que les Juifs recevront et acclameront l'Antéchrist comme Messie :

-Saint Grégoire de Nazianze : "L'Antéchrist sera cru comme Messie par les Juifs." (Gregor. Nazianz., Orat. XLVII.)

-Saint Éphrem : "C'est d'une manière exceptionnelle que l'Antéchrist entourera de faveurs la nation juive. Mais c'est aussi d'honneurs extraordinaires que la nation déicide le couvrira et qu'elle applaudira son règne." (Ephr., Serm. de Antichr.)

-Saint Ambroise citant cette parole de Jésus-Christ : Je suis venu au nom de mon Père, et vous ne me recevez pas ; si un autre vient en son nom vous le recevrez, dit : "Cela montre que les Juifs, qui n'ont pas voulu croire en Jésus-Christ, croiront à l'Antéchrist." (Ambros., in Psalm. XLIII.)

Nous ne pouvons pas rester à regarder les bras croisés cette mobilisation mondiale de la synagogue de Satan. Ainsi, non seulement nous devons prier pour la conversion des juifs qui ont refusé de suivre la nouvelle Alliance :

“Prions aussi pour les perfides juifs, afin que Dieu notre Seigneur enlève le voile de leurs cœurs et qu’ils reconnaissent avec nous Jésus-Christ Notre Seigneur”

(prière pour la conversion des juifs de l'office du Vendredi saint)

mais nous devons surtout réciter ce dimanche 23 septembre, si possible à 17h00, l'exorcisme contre Satan et les anges apostats, publié pour les fidèles du monde entier par l'ordre du Pape Léon XIII. Utilisons les armes que la Sainte Eglise nous a donnée !

"Cette prière, composée par le Pape LÉON XIII, d'après le formulaire des Exorcismes du Rituel Romain devrait être récitée fréquemment par tous, en public comme en privé, pour mettre en fuite les démons, diminuer leur action perverse sur les pécheurs, préserver l'Eglise, la Patrie et les familles de grands maux [...] Les fidèles doivent, plus que jamais le réciter, mieux que cela : le prier. Ils seront, comme je l'ai été moi-même, confirmés dans cette pratique et divinement consolés, en revenant à la source, et à la Vérité." (Mgr Guerard des Lauriers)

> Texte de l'exorcisme ici (à partir de la 4° page)

Par la même occasion, ayons soin d'implorer le secours et la protection de Dieu et de sa cour céleste afin que nous résistions aux séductions des ennemis très rusés de l'Eglise.

"Que personne ne vous séduise d'aucune manière ; car il faut que l'apostasie soit arrivée auparavant, et qu'on ait vu paraître l'homme de l'iniquité, le fils de la perdition, l'adversaire qui s'élève au-dessus de tout ce qu'on appelle Dieu ou de ce qu'on adore, jusqu'à s'asseoir dans le temple de Dieu, se proclamant lui-même Dieu.

Ne vous souvenez-vous pas que je vous disais ces choses, lorsque j'étais encore chez vous ? Et maintenant vous savez ce qui le retient, afin qu'il ne paraisse qu'en son temps. Car le mystère de l'iniquité* agit déjà ; il faut seulement que celui qui le retient encore ait disparu. Et alors paraîtra l'impie, que le Seigneur Jésus détruira par le souffle de sa bouche, et qu'il anéantira par l'éclat de son avènement. L'apparition de cet impie se fera, par la puissance de Satan, avec toutes sortes de miracles, de signes et de prodiges mensongers, et avec toutes les séductions de l'iniquité pour ceux qui périssent parce qu'ils n'ont pas reçu l'amour de la vérité pour être sauvés. Aussi Dieu leur envoie une puissance d'égarement, pour qu'ils croient au mensonge, afin que tous ceux qui n'ont pas cru à la vérité, mais qui ont pris plaisir à l'injustice, soient condamnés." (Saint Paul -Thessaloniciens 2).

> A lire ou relire : Le déicide

Vendredi 22 avril 2011

Le déicide

En ce vendredi saint, nous publions l'article Le Déicide de M. l'abbé Nitoglia, publié en 1992 dans la revue Sodalitium.

Sommaire :

1. La responsabilité des Juifs dans la mort de Notre-Seigneur selon les Pères de l'Eglise
2. Le meurtre du Christ selon Saint Thomas
3. Le déicide selon un Juif converti
4. La culpabilité de la foule
5. L'opinion de Maritain
6. L'opinion de Mgr Spadafora
7. L'opinion de Mgr Carli
8. Peut-on appeler les Juifs "réprouvés" de Dieu ?
9. Peut-on appeler les Juifs "maudits" de Dieu ?
10. Le déicide et le Concile de Vatican II
11. L'opinion d'un Juif converti sur 'Nostra Aetate'
12. Conclusion

Introduction

Pour tous les Pères, unanimement, le judaïsme religieux dans son ensemble est responsable de la mort de Notre-Seigneur Jésus-Christ.

"Les Pères se placent dans une perspective... religieuse, et aucunement raciale. …Il faut d'abord distinguer entre la réalité naturelle qu'est le peuple juif et le judaïsme religieux : celui-ci ne représente qu'une branche de ce peuple. Dans la mise à mort du Christ, c'est la communauté religieuse d'Israël qui est impliquée, et non le peuple juif qui... par cet événement... s'est trouvé scindé en deux. La branche fidèle d'Israël, le "petit reste" a donné naissance à l'Eglise. (…). Au contraire, certains chefs religieux ont voulu la condamnation de Jésus, ...[on ne peut donc] rendre tous les Juifs responsables d'un péché commis jadis par certains de leurs ancêtres. Seuls sont coupables devant Dieu ceux qui renouvellent la faute originelle par leur refus personnel. Toutefois, il ne s'agit pas d'innocenter en bloc tous les Juifs... Les Juifs conservent encore une certaine forme de culpabilité dans la mesure où ils adoptent l'attitude de leurs ancêtres (…) Le judaïsme religieux... s'oppose à l'Eglise exactement comme il s'est opposé, dans la personne de ses chefs... au message du Christ" (D. Judant, judaïsme et Christianisme, Les Editions du Cèdre, Paris 1969, pp. 88-91).

Suite de l'article -lire le dossier PDF

Le mensonge de l'abbé Ratzinger

Dans le second tome de son livre Jésus de Nazareth, l'abbé Ratzinger, qui se prétend être le Vicaire de Celui qui a été mis à mort par les "juifs talmudiques" (!), s'attache à démonter le concept selon lequel le peuple juif serait collectivement responsable de la mort du Christ. Ainsi, l'Eglise catholique n'aurait jamais parlé de la communauté religieuse juive comme étant déicide. Ceci est entièrement faux : en lisant le document mis en ligne ci-dessus, les lecteurs pourront constater ce mensonge. L'Eglise, par la voix unanime des Pères de l'Eglise, de Saint Thomas d'Aquin et des Papes, enseigne avec raison que le judaïsme religieux (à ne pas confondre avec le peuple juif) est coupable de tentative de déicide :

Saint Thomas : "On se pose alors une objection : si les Juifs n'ont pas tué la Divinité (qui dans le Christ ne meurt pas), ils sont seulement coupables de simple homicide (et non de DEICIDE, ndr). A cela je réponds : Si quelqu'un salit volontairement le vêtement du Roi, n'est-il pas considéré comme aussi coupable que s'il avait souillé la personne elle-même? Pour cette raison, bien qu'ils n'aient pas tué la nature divine du Christ (chose impossible), les auteurs moraux de la mort ont mérité, à cause de leurs intentions, une très grave condamnation. … Qui lacère un décret royal attente à la majesté royale elle-même ; et donc LE PECHE DES JUIFS EST UN PECHE DE TENTATIVE DE DEICIDE" ( In Symb. Ap., a. 4, n° 912, Opuscula theologica ; De re spirituali,

Marietti, Torino 1954).

Comme le montre l'abbé Nitoglian Saint Thomas [S. Th. III, q. 47, a. 5, ad 3um] démontre que "les Juifs ont pêché pour avoir crucifié le Christ non seulement comme homme, mais aussi comme Dieu" (Et ideo Judaei peccaverunt, non solum hominis Chrisit, sed tamquam Dei Crucifixores).

Le faux argument de Vatican II repris par l'abbé Ratzinger

Le Conciliabule de Vatican II déclare que la mort de Notre-Seigneur est "DUE AUX PECHES DE TOUS LES HOMMES" (Nostra Aetate, 4) "ce qui n'est aucunement contesté si l'on veut parler de la cause éloignée ; mais par contre ce furent les juifs la CAUSE PROCHAINE de la mort de Jésus (Judas, les princes des prêtres et la foule), comme on l'a démontré 'ad abundantiam' pour le DEICIDE." (abbé Nitoglia).

Nous finirons en citant un extrait d'un écrit du Père Isidoro da Alatri (Qui a tué Jésus-Christ):

"... Alléguant ce que dit Jésus dans le jardin de Gethsémani: "C'est assez, l'heure est venue; voici que le Fils de l'Homme va être livré aux mains des pécheurs" (Mc XIV, 41), nos adversaires croient pouvoir s'en tirer en affirmant: "Puisque nous sommes tous pécheurs, nous L'avons tous tué". Voilà qui est passer ici brutalement de l'ordre historique à l'ordre moral et mystique. Il est vrai que tous nous sommes pécheurs et que, comme tels, nous avons participé à la mort du Christ venu sur la terre justement pour sauver les pécheurs et mort pour les pécheurs; cela ne fait aucun doute. Mais on ne peut néanmoins affirmer que tous les pécheurs L'ont tué de leurs propres mains, L'ont conduit à Pilate et ont demandé Sa mort avec instance. Et en effet dire que le Christ est mort pour sauver tous les pécheurs est une chose; une autre est d'affirmer que tous les pécheurs L'ont tué en insistant comme des forcenés pour que Pilate Le condamne à mort, Le remette entre leurs mains et à la merci de leur volonté perverse, tyrannique et sanguinaire exigeant à plusieurs reprises le supplice de la croix... Qu'Il soit mort pour les pécheurs est une vérité si rebattue dans la Foi des chrétiens que cela ne vaut même pas la peine de le prouver; en font foi les textes bibliques bien connus du prophète Isaïe (Is. LIII, 4-5), l'autorité de saint Paul (Rom. V, 5-8), et tant d'autres témoignages qui abondent dans les Livres Saints et toute la littérature chrétienne dogmatique, morale, ascétique et mystique. [...] Qui donc a tué le Christ? Les paroles de saint Pierre, de saint Paul et de saint Etienne sont unanimes et devraient suffire, il me semble, à convaincre quiconque le veut bien ou a cru le contraire: le Christ a été trahi, tué et crucifié par le peuple juif et ses chefs."

Il nous reste plus qu'à prier pour la conversion des juifs qui ont refusé de suivre la nouvelle Alliance :

“Prions aussi pour les perfides juifs, afin que Dieu notre Seigneur enlève le voile de leurs cœurs et qu’ils reconnaissent avec nous Jésus-Christ Notre Seigneur”

(prière pour la conversion des juifs de l'office du Vendredi saint)

ENSEIGNEMENT CATHOLIQUE

Pour CONTACTER le webmaster, envoyez un email à

catholique.sedevacantiste@laposte.net

Le pape Paul IV affirme qu'un prélat tombé dans l'hérésie ne peut pas être pape :

"...Si jamais il advient qu’un évêque, même ayant fonction d’archevêque, de patriarche ou de primat; qu’un cardinal de l’Église romaine, même légat; qu’un souverain pontife même, avant leur promotion ou leur élévation au cardinalat ou au souverain pontificat, ont dévié de la foi catholique ou bien sont tombés dans quelque hérésie, la promotion ou l’élévation, même si cette dernière a eu lieu avec l’assentiment unanime de tous les cardinaux, est NULLE, INVALIDE, VAINE... Toutes leurs paroles, tous leurs faits et gestes, tous leurs actes administratifs, avec tout ce qui en découle, N’ONT PAS LE MOINDRE EFFET JURIDIQUE, et ne confèrent à personne le moindre droit. Ces personnes ainsi promues ou élevées serait, par le fait même, SANS QU’IL FAILLE QUELQUEAUTRE DÉCLARATION ULTÉRIEURE, privées de toute dignité, position, honneur, titre, autorité, fonction et pouvoir à la fois..."

(Constitution apostolique "Cum ex apostolatus )

> Un non-catholique ne peut pas être pape

Le pape Saint Pie X condamne solennellement le modernisme et excommunie ses partisans :

-Les modernistes sont les pires ennemis de l'Eglise (Pascendi dominici gregis)

-Le modernisme est l'égoût collecteur de toutes les hérésies (Motu proprio Praestantia)

INFAILLIBILITE PONTIFICALE

> Le pape Pie IX condamne ceux qui ne croient pas à l'infaillibilité extraordinaire ET ordinaire du Pape

-"Le pape est TOUJOURS pur de toute erreur doctrinale et sa foi est à JAMAIS indéfectible" (Pie IX Pastor aeternus)

-"On doit croire d'une foi divine et catholique tout ce qui est contenu dans les saintes Ecritures et dans la tradition, et tout ce qui est proposé par l'Eglise comme vérité divinement révélée, soit par un jugement solennel, soit par son magistère ordinaire et universel." (Pie IX-Dei Filius)

Lire ICI

> Les Papes, les Pères et les docteurs de l'Eglise affirment qu'un Pape ne peut pas enseigner des hérésies. Il est la règle de la foi sur terre.

-Saint Léon I : "Aucune hérésie ne peut souiller celui qui est assis sur la chaire de Pierre, car c’est le Saint-Esprit qui l'enseigne" (Sermon 98)

-Saint Cyprien : "La chaire de Pierre est cette Église principale d’où est sortie l’unité sacerdotale auprès de laquelle l’erreur ne peut avoir d’accès" (Lettre 40 et 55)

-Saint Thomas d'Aquin : " L’Eglise universelle ne peut errer, car Celui qui est exaucé en tout au titre de sadignité a dit à Pierre, sur la profession de foi duquel est fondée l’Église: J’ai prié pour toi pour que ta foi ne défaille point" (Somme théologique, supplément de la IIIe partie, q. 25, a. 1)

Lire ICI

> Sept arguments théologiques contre l'hérésie du Pape hérétique : ICI

La vacance du Siège de Pierre, la crise de l'Eglise : événements prédits

-Notre Seigneur : "L'abomination de la désolation régnera dans le lieu saint" (Matthieu 24, 15)

-Notre Dame à la Salette (1848) :

"Rome perdra la foi et deviendra le siège de l'antéchrist... L'Eglise sera éclipsée, le monde sera dans la consternation."

-Le pape Léon XIII prédit l'occupation du chaire de Saint Pierre par des imposteurs :

"L'Eglise, épouse de l'Agneau Immaculé, la voici saturée d'amertume et abreuvée de poison, par des ennemis très rusés ; ils ont porté leurs mains impies sur tout ce qu'elle désire de plus sacré. Là où fut institué le siège du bienheureux Pierre, et la chaire de la Vérité, là ils ont posé le trône de leur abomination dans l'impiété ; en sorte que le pasteur étant frappé, le troupeau puisse être dispersé. (Exorcisme de Léon XIII contre Satan et les anges apostats, 1884)

L'ENSEIGNEMENT

CATHOLIQUE PEUT-IL ÊTRE CHANGE ?

NON !

-"L'Esprit-Saint n'a pas été promis aux successeurs de Pierre pour dévoiler par son inspiration une nouvelle doctrine, mis pour qu'avec son assistance ils gardent saintement et exposent fidèlement la Révélation transmise par les Apôtres, c'est-à-dire le Dépôt de la Foi."

(Constitution Pastor Aeternus)

-"Le dogme chrétien n'admet aucune altération, aucune atteinte à ses caractères spécifiques, aucun variation dans ce qu'il a de défini."

(Commonitorium V° Siècle)

-"La Foi catholique est d'une nature telle qu'on ne peut rien lui ajouter, rien lui retrancher : ou on la possède toute entière, ou on ne la possède pas du tout. Telle est la Foi catholique : quiconque n'y adhère pas avec fermeté ne pourrait être sauvé." (Symbole de Saint Athanase)

Vatican II : Concile INVALIDE car HERETIQUE

Le dossier ICI

La Réforme liturgique Vatican II absolument NULLE, VAINE et INVALIDE

Le dossier ICI

Aujourd'hui, les sacres sans mandat romain explicite sont valides et licites

Le dossier ICI

Concernant la juridiction à notre époque

Le dossier ICI

Où trouver des centres de Messes catholiques non una cum ?

cliquez ICI

Lundi 13 décembre 2010

Important ! Le Grain d’Encens : les "sédévacantistes" et les Messes Una Cum

En 2007, M. l'abbé CEKADA, prêtre et théologien "sédévacantiste" avait rédigé un important document (The Grain of incense) concernant les messes una cum Benoit XVI. Grâce à l'investissement d'une bonne volonté et de M. l'abbé ROMERO, la traduction en français vient d'être achevée. C'est avec joie que nous la publions et que nous vous invitons à diffuser largement ce travail sérieux aboutissant à l'incontestable conclusion qu'un catholique ne peut pas aller à la messe una cum Benoit XVI.

Abbé Cekada : "D'innombrables martyrs choisirent des morts horribles plutôt que d'offrir un seul grain d'encens en hommage à la fausse religion oecuménique de l'empereur romain. A plus forte raison, il faut absolument éviter les Messes de prêtres qui, avec le una cum, offrent un grain d'encens à l'hérésiarque Ratzinger et sa fausse religion oecuménique…" (extrait)

Comme le démontre l'abbé CEKADA, assister activement à une Messe una cum consiste à :

-Proférer un mensonge pernicieux. -Professer être en communion avec des hérétiques. -Reconnaitre l’Eglise Oecuménique comme légitime. -Professer implicitement une fausse religion. -Participer à une violation de la loi de l’Eglise -Participer à un péché. -Offrir une Messe en union avec le faux pape hérétique Ratzinger. -Accepter l’usurpateur d’un office ecclésiastique. -Etre la cause du péché de scandale. -Pour les Messes offertes par le clergé "résistant" (FSSPX, ses affiliés et nombre de prêtres indépendants), participer à des Messes gravement illicites et au péché de schisme.

> Pour lire-téléchager le document français (22 pages), cliquez ICI

> Pour lire la page HTML du document, merci de se reporter au site ami catholicapedia

> Pour lire le résumé français de 3 pages, cliquez ICI

Rappel de ce qu'on appelle messe una cum ou non una cum :

Dans la première prière du canon de la messe de saint Pie V, le nom du Pape régnant est mentionné excepté bien sûr en période de vacance du Siège apostolique. C'est une prière qui demande à Notre-Seigneur Jésus-Christ d'agréer les offrandes, le sacrifice de la messe, afin qu'Il gouverne l'Eglise par toute la terre, qu'Il la gouverne unie avec (una cum) le Pape, les évêques et tous ceux qui professent la foi catholique.

Cette prière signifie donc que le Pape régnant fait l'unité de l'Eglise en tant qu'instrument de Jésus-Christ qui gouverne l'Eglise. Or puisque les occupants du Saint Siège, au moins depuis Paul VI (mais très probablement dès Jean XXIII), enseignent objectivement l'erreur et l'hérésie, ils ne peuvent pas avoir le charisme d'infaillibilité qui les unit au Christ dans le gouvernement de l'Eglise, donc ils ne peuvent être ceux qui font l'unité de l'Eglise. C'est donc un sacrilège que de mentionner le nom de l'occupant actuel du Saint-Siège au canon de la messe.

> Relire notre article La Messe (una cum) et les laïcs

> Centres de messes non una cum en France ICI

WIKIPEDIA

Sedevacantism (derived from the Latin words sedes "seat" und vacans "vacant")"^[1]) is the position, held by a minority of Traditionalist Catholics,^[2][3] that the present occupant of the papal see is not truly Pope and that, for lack of a valid Pope, the see has been vacant since the death of either Pope Pius XII in 1958 or Pope John XXIII in 1963. A few sedevacantists claim that the vacancy goes back further, as far back as the death of Pope Pius X in 1914.

Sedevacantists believe that Paul VI (1963–1978), John Paul I (1978), John Paul II (1978–2005) and Benedict XVI (since 2005) have been neither true Catholics nor true Popes, by virtue of allegedly having espoused the heresy of Modernism, or of having otherwise denied or contradicted solemnly defined Catholic dogmas. Some of them classify John XXIII (1958–1963) also as a Modernist antipope.

The term "sedevacantism" is derived from the Latin phrase sede vacante, which literally means "the seat being vacant", the seat in question being that of a bishop. A specific use of the phrase is in the context of the vacancy of the Holy See between the death or resignation of a Pope and the election of his successor. "Sedevacantism" as a term in English appears to date from the 1980s, though the movement itself is older.^[4]

Among those who maintain that the see of Rome, occupied by what they declare to be an illegitimate pope, was really vacant, some have chosen an alternative pope of their own, and thus in their view ended the vacancy of the see. They are sometimes called "conclavists".^[citation

needed]

Franc-maçonnerie

Jeudi 26 juin 2008

La Franc-Maçonnerie, oeuvre de Satan

La franc-maçonnerie a toujours été dénoncée par les papes comme une entreprise travaillant à la destruction du catholicisme.

La franc-maçonnerie a notamment été dénoncée par :

Les francs-maçons eux-mêmes reconnaissent en la papauté leur pire ennemi. Gustave Bord dans “La Franc-Maçonnerie en France” écrit: “La Papauté fut le seul pouvoir qui se rendit nettement compte du péril que présentait la Maçonnerie et cela presque dès le début. La Papauté avait bien vu le péril; en temps utile elle l’avait signalé. Elle ne fut pas crue; en France elle ne fut même pas écoutée. Les parlements refusèrent d’enregistrer les bulles pontificales, qui, n’étant pas fulminées, ne pouvaient avoir aucun effet utile. Un monde allait disparaître”.

• Clément XII, encyclique In Eminenti, 1738 (« constitution valable à perpétuité »),
• Benoît XIV, encyclique Providas,
• Pie VII, Ecclesiam a Jesu Christo, 1821
• Léon XII, Lettre apostolique Quo graviora, 1826
• Pie VIII, Traditi,
• Pie IX, Qui pluribus
• et Léon XIII, Humanum genus, 1884

Dans un ancien livre de catéchisme on pouvait lire ceci:

«Au début du XVIIIème, toutes les forces anticatholiques (déistes, matérialistes, libres penseurs) se groupèrent en une puissante association qui prit le nom de Franc-Maçonnerie. D’abord société philanthropi-que et politique, la Franc-Maçonnerie devint, après la fondation de la grande loge de Londres en 1717, le centre de la libre-pensée et comme l’armée de l’incrédulité. D’Angleterre, elle se répandit en France où elle eut sa première loge à Dunkerque en 1721. Le Grand-Orient de France qui a son siège à Paris fut fondé en 1772.

Par son aspect philanthropique la Franc-Maçonnerie fut ce qu’elle est toujours: l’Ange des ténèbres déguisé en lumière. Elle séduisit ainsi de nombreuses nobles âmes, des prêtres,... Ces gens n’avaient pas discerné le but caché de la Franc-Maçonnerie.

Plus clairvoyants, les papes s’aperçurent qu’ils avaient en face d’eux les plus graves ennemis de l’Eglise. Elle fut condamnée assez vite par Clément XII en 1738, par Benoît XIV en 1751, par Pie VII en 1821, par Pie IX en 1865, par Léon XIII en 1884 dans son encyclique “Humanum genus”»

En 1738, année où fut publiée la seconde édition des Constitutions d’Anderson, le pape Clément XII (1730-1740) mit en garde pour la première fois contre la nouvelle société secrète des francs-maçons dans sa bulle “In Eminenti”, du 28 avril 1738.

Conscient du danger de la Secte, le 14 janvier 1739, Clément XII l’interdisait dans les Etats pontificaux, tandis qu’en France, la bulle pontificale ne fut jamais présentée à l’enregistrement du Parlement par le roi Louis XV. Aussi le gallicanisme fut-il un des plus sûrs alliés de la Franc-Maçonnerie.

La bulle donnait un bon aperçu de la Secte. Le pontife avait ajouté qu’il condamnait les francs-maçons encore “pour d’autres causes justes et raisonnables à nous connues”. Or R. Peyrefitte eut connaissance à la Bibliothèque Vaticane d’une Lettre secrète de Clément XII, de dix-huit pages, annexée à la bulle “In Eminenti” dont il publia de larges extraits: l’Eglise n’en contesta pas une phrase.

Cette lettre commence par poser le principe que le devoir d’un catholique, dans les choses de la con-science et de la foi, est d’éviter le risque de tomber en tentation et d’adopter des idées dont il ne sait pas exactement la nature.

Benoît XIV (1740-1758) qui succède à Clément XII réitère la condamnation. Afin de lever toute ambiguïté, il confirma l’excommunication dans sa constitution apostolique sous forme de bulle, “Providas romano-rum pontificum”, du 18 mai 1751.

Le 6 juillet 1758 le cardinal Rezzonico lui succède et devient Clément XIII (17581769). Son pontificat s’ouvre sur une époque où les idées philosophiques sont à la mode, l’incrédulité en expansion. Le Pape lutta surtout contre les écrits pernicieux que la Secte répandait de toutes parts. Citons la vigoureuse exhortation du Souverain Pontife dans l’encyclique “Christianae reipublicae salus” du 25 novembre 1766 hélas sans effet: “Il faut combattre avec courage... et exterminer de toutes ses forces le fléau de livres funestes; jamais on ne fera disparaître la matière de l’erreur, si les criminels éléments de la corruption ne périssent consumés par les flammes” (cité par Grégoire XVI dans son encyclique “Mirari vos”).

Le 25 décembre 1775, Pie VI (1775-1799) condamne les “sectes de perdition”. Même constance avec Pie VII (1800-1823) qui jugea nécessaire de dénoncer les sociétés secrètes, “gémissant de ce que le zèle du Saint-Siège n’ait pas obtenu les effets qu’il attendait et de ce que ces hommes pervers ne s’étaient pas dé-sistés de leur entreprise” (“Ecclesiam a Jesu Christo”, du 13 septembre 1821).

Dans cette même encyclique le pape révéla l’existence d’une nouvelle secte, encore plus dangereuse que les précédentes, désignée sous le nom de “carboneria” (charbonnerie).

Pour Léon XII (1823-1829) il est “absolument certain” qu’existe malgré la diversité de leurs noms, une unité “de toutes les sectes pour un projet infâme”. Selon lui ces hommes “sont les mêmes que nos pères n’hésitèrent point à appeler les premiers nés du diable”. Le carbonarisme et les autres sociétés secrètes prirent une extension telle que Léon XII dut revenir à la charge dans sa constitution apostolique “Quo graviora” du 13 mars 1825.

Les avertissements de Léon XII ne portèrent pas les fruits espérés. Aussi Pie VIII (1829-1830) mit-il à nouveau en garde contre la corruption de la jeunesse dans son encyclique “Traditi humiliati” du 24 mai 1829.

“Au Consistoire” du 9 décembre 1854, Pie IX (1846-1878) applique aux membres des sociétés secrè-tes ces paroles du Christ: “Vous êtes les enfants du diable, et vous voulez faire les oeuvres de votre père” (...) “sectes abominables de perdition / peste / enfants du démon / synagogue de Satan”. La lutte contre la Franc-Maçonnerie et le libéralisme, qui sont intimement liés , fut le souci principal de son pontificat.

En témoignent ses documents: encyclique “Qui pluribus” du 9 novembre 1846, allocution “Quibus quantisque” du 20 avril 1849, encyclique “Noscitis et nobiscum” du 8 décembre 1854, encyclique “Quanto conficiamur moerore” du 10 août 1863, “Syllabus” (mot qui signifie “recueil” des erreurs modernes) du 8 dé-cembre 1864, allocution consistoriale “In ista” du 29 avril 1876, bref “Ex epistolae” du 26 octobre 1865, bref “Quamquam” du 29 mai 1873, encyclique “Etsi multa luctuosa” du 21 novembre 1873.

Dans cette dernière Pie IX rappela: “Si quelques-uns pensent que les constitutions apostoliques pu-bliées sous peine d’anathème contre les sectes occultes et leurs adeptes et fauteurs n’ont aucune force dans les pays où ces sectes sont tolérées par l’autorité civile, assurément ils sont dans une bien grande erreur”.

Peu avant de mourir Pie IX précisera pour les futurs prélats: ceux “qui s’efforcent d’établir une alliance entre la lumière et les ténèbres sont plus dangereux que les ennemis déclarés”.

Voilà des propos bien acerbes pour les prélats conciliaires et ceux qui prétendent faire l’expérience d’un mariage impossible de la lumière avec les ténèbres, de la Tradition avec le progressisme au Concile Vatican II.

Léon XIII (1878-1903) précisera les buts de la secte des francs-maçons dans son encyclique “Humanum genus”. Il enjoindra aux catholiques d’“arracher à la Franc-Maçonnerie le masque dont elle se couvre”. Il souligne que “le Christianisme et la Franc-Maçonnerie sont essentiellement inconciliables, si bien que, s’agréger à l’une, c’est divorcer de l’autre”.

Tout au long de son pontificat Léon XIII, comme auparavant Pie IX, multiplia les mises en garde contre la Franc-Maçonnerie: encyclique “Etsi nos” du 15 février 1882, encyclique “Humanum genus” du 20 avril 1884, allocution “Dall’alto” du 15 octobre 1890, allocution “Spesse volte” du 5 août 1898, encyclique “Inimica vis” du 8 décembre 1892, lettre “Custodi” du 8 décembre 1892, encyclique “Praeclara” du 20 juin 1894, allo-cution “Parvenu à la 25ème année” du 19 mars 1902, allocution “Nobis quidem” du 22 juin 1903.

Saint Pie X (1903-1914) combat l’esprit maçonnique qui s’infiltre dans le sein de l’Eglise. Le Pape écrit la célèbre encyclique “Pascendi” du 8 septembre 1907 qui condamne le modernisme, en le définissant “égoût collecteur de toutes les hérésies” puis impose au clergé, en septembre 1910, le serment anti-moderniste. Dans son encyclique “Maximum illud” du 30 novembre 1919, Benoît XV (1914-1922) reste fidèle à l’enseignement de ses prédécesseurs.

Puis Pie XI (1922-1939) condamne, le 19 mars 1937, avec l’encyclique “Divini Redemptoris” le communisme, fils de la Franc-Maçonnerie. Enfin Pie XII (1939-1958) qui dira par exemple le 24 juillet 1958: “Les racines de l’apostasie moderne sont: l’athéisme scientifique, le matérialisme dialectique, le rationalisme, le laïcisme et leur mère commune: La Maçonnerie” (Doc. cath., 1958, p.918). Pour tous ces Papes, le Siècle des Lumières et les idées dévastatrices contenant le venin de l’apostasie ont donc une seule et même origine: la Franc-Maçonnerie.

Le juge Agnoli rappelle: “La maçonnerie est l’institution la plus anathématisée et exécrée par l’Eglise au cours de son existence bimillénaire (le Père Esposito a compté environ 590 condamnations disséminées dans de nombreux documents)” .

«L’idée fondamentale du Christianisme, c’est que la morale et tout l’ordre social reposent sur la vérité révélée, sur Dieu et son Christ: Omnia instaurare in Christo. Or cette base est dès l’abord renversée par l’article des statuts qui considère la morale et la vertu comme indépendantes de toutes les religions. L’Eglise a donc justement frappé d’excommunication les francs-maçons dès leur entrée dans l’ordre. Elle ne peut pas, sous peine de trahir le dépôt de son divin Maître, renoncer à être la seule et infaillible directrice des hommes dans la route qui doit les conduire à la vie future» (Père Deschamps, op. cit., p.LXIV).

Vissarion (aka Sergey Anatolyevitch Torop, aka the Teacher), founder of the Church of the Last Testament.

"[...] Aucun catholique, s'il veut rester digne de ce nom et avoir de son salut le souci qu'il mérite, ne peut, sous aucun prétexte, s'affilier à la secte des francs-maçons. Que personne donc ne se laisse tromper par de fausses apparences d'honnêteté. Quelques personnes peuvent en effet croire que, dans les projets des francs-maçons, il n'y a rien de formellement contraire à la sainteté de la religion et des moeurs. Toutefois, le principe fondamental qui est comme l'âme de la secte, étant condamné par la morale, il ne saurait être permis de se joindre à elle ni de lui venir en aide d'aucune façon."

(Léon XIII, Humanum genus, 1884) Pie IX (1846-1878) applique aux membres des sociétés secrètes ces paroles du Christ aux juifs: “Vous êtes les enfants du diable, et vous voulez faire les oeuvres de votre père” (Jean, VIII).

Il dira le 15 septembre 1865 au sujet des sociétés secrètes: “Parmi les nombreuses machinations et les artifices par lesquels les enfants du nom de chrétien ont osé s’attaquer à l’Eglise de Dieu et ont essayé, quoique en vain, de l’abattre et de la détruire, il faut sans nul doute compter cette société perverse d’hommes vulgairement appelée maçonnique...” Pie IX dira encore le 20 septembre 1874: “Qu’ils sachent les ennemis de l’Eglise qui, pleins de confiance, sont dans l’enthousiasme de tout ce qui arrive et qui comptent sur certains événements, proches ou lointains, Dieu seul le sait, qu’ils sachent bien que les Pharisiens aussi et leurs amis étaient dans l’enthousiasme pour la mort du Christ comme s’ils avaient obtenu un triomphe; ils ne s’apercevaient pas que cette mort était l’origine de leur défaite complète”.

En juillet 1873, dans l’encyclique “Scite pro facto”, Pie IX démasque le chef d’orchestre secret qui n’est autre que Satan, cause première du développement et du triomphe politique de la Franc-Maçonnerie.

«Léon XIII dénonça la Maçonnerie comme étant l’agent de la guerre faite de toutes parts à la Sainte Eglise. Le Bulletin de la Grande Loge symbolique écossaise exprima en ces termes la pensée de la Secte: “La Franc-Maçonnerie ne peut moins faire que de remercier le Souverain Pontife de sa dernière encyclique. Léon XIII, avec une autorité incontestable et un grand luxe de preuves, vient de démontrer une fois de plus, qu’il existe un abîme infranchissable entre l’Eglise, dont il est le représentant, et la Révolution, dont la Franc-Maçonnerie est le bras droit. L’heure est venue d’opter entre l’ordre ancien, qui s’appuie sur la Révélation, et l’ordre nouveau, qui ne reconnaît d’autres fondements que la science et la raison humaine, entre l’esprit d’autorité et l’esprit de liberté” (cité par Don Sarda y Salvany: “Le Mal social, ses causes, ses remèdes”). Cette pensée a été exprimée de nouveau au Convent de 1902, par l’orateur chargé de prononcer le discours de clôture: “... Ce qui nous sépare? C’est un abîme, abîme qui ne sera comblé qu’au jour où triom-phera la Maçonnerie...”

Le 29 août 1896, le futur saint Pie X écrivait ceci au professeur don Antonio De Angelo, délégué du comité diocésain à la sous-commission antimaçonnique: «Combattre la maçonnerie est une oeuvre religieuse et éminemment sociale, parce que cette secte est hostile, non seulement à notre sainte religion dans toutes ses manifestations, mais s’applique à ruiner aussi la tranquillité de l’ordre. Je recommande aux membres de cette ligue de s’intéresser tout spécialement à ces pauvres jeunes gens qui, séduits par d’adroites paroles, se font gloire d’être affiliés à la secte anticléricale, laquelle, sous prétexte de raison et de science, combat directement la foi».

CHRISTENDOM CANNOT BE REBUILT UNTIL CHRISTIANS GET RID OF THEIR BABYLONIAN JEWISH TALMUDIST THEOLOGY

TALMUDISM IS POLYTHEISTIC, PANTHEISTIC, PHALLIC AND SATANIST!

The Meaning of "God"

Tree of Life by Daivd Friedman

http://www.learnkabbalah.com/the_meaning_of_god/

For Kabbalists, the visible world is only the superficial skin of Reality. Because of the way our minds are constructed to interact with the world, we imagine ourselves as separate selves, going about our business, trying to be happy. In fact, we, the stars, our friends and enemies, and everything around us — all of us are dreams in the mind of God. Nothing has any separate reality — it only looks like there are separate tables, chairs, computers, and people from a certain, limited perspective. Being in itself is actually nothing but God. From God’s point of view, all of the distinctions we make — between ourselves and the world outside ourselves, among objects in the world, etc. — are completely illusory, because ultimately there is only the undifferentiated unity of the ein sof, the Infinite.

Of course, this is not how things look from our point of view. Why is this the case? And how do you know that everything is really one?

Let's pause for a moment, before answering those questions, for a “reality check.” For most of us today, the concept of God is a problematic and controversial one. I’ve taught Kabbalah to adults, adolescents, Jews, non-Jews, and I’ve noticed that the large majority of my students, when they hear the word “God,” seem to say “hold on — you’ve lost me.” So, as soon as someone mentions “God,” we go off on a tangent.

For most Kabbalists, the situation was very different. The concept and reality of God were felt and known from their earliest memories. These were, by and large, rabbis soaked in the God of Judaism, which they experienced and related to all the time; traditional Jewish practice puts one in constant relationship with God. So, that important [hold on,] that question of how we intellectually know that God exists is itself a somewhat non-Kabbalistic question. The kind of knowledge we are looking for is experiential knowledge. Not knowledge on faith or dogma, but knowledge based on first-hand experience. This is called da’at — true knowledge. The kind lovers have. Union.

For this reason, the Kabbalah is more interested in how we relate to God than how we can speculate about God. In particular, it asks how we know God through the concepts of the [sefirot], or how we unite with God through meditation, or how we can use our relationships with God for various purposes. The Kabbalah is also not a philosophical system. In fact, historically, much of the Kabbalah arose directly in response (and opposition) to rationalist philosophy. So we will not find systematic “proofs” of God’s existence in the Zohar or anywhere else. Really, if such proofs existed, wouldn’t you already know them by now anyway?

Since, for the Kabbalah, the Infinite — the ein sof — is utterly different from what most people call “God,” many contemporary teachers choose not to use the word “God” at all. This might be a good idea. After all, let’s look at two short texts from one of the most important Kabbalists, Rabbi Moshe Cordovero, as translated by scholar Daniel Matt:

An impoverished person thinks that God is an old man with white hair, sitting on a wondrous throne of fire that glitters with countless sparks, as the Bible states: “The Ancient-of-Days sits, the hair on his head like clean fleece, his throne–flames of fire.” Imagining this and similar fantasies, the fool corporealizes God. He falls into one of the traps that destroy faith. His awe of God is limited by his imagination. But if you are enlightened, you know God’s oneness; you know that the divine is devoid of bodily categories — these can never be applied to God. Then you wonder, astonished: Who am I? I am a mustard seed in the middle of the sphere of the moon, which itself is a mustard seed within the next sphere. So it is with that sphere and all it contains in relation to the next sphere. So it is with all the spheres — one inside the other — and all of them are a mustard seed within the further expanses. And all of these are a mustard seed within further expanses. Your awe is invigorated, the love in your soul expands.

This is a remarkable teaching. Of course, Cordovero uses his scientific framework — the idea that the universe is comprised of concentric spheres — instead of ours. But the principle is the same. God is not some old man in the sky who makes sure that only good things happen to good people, and bad things happen to bad. The universe doesn’t work that way. In fact, the universe is inconceivably vast, and every subatomic particle of it is filled with God. Here’s another important Cordovero text about the God idea:

The essence of divinity is found in every single thing — nothing but it exists.... Do not attribute duality to God. Let God be solely God. If you suppose that Ein Sof emanates until a certain point, and that from that point on is outside of it, you have dualized. God forbid! Realize, rather, that Ein Sof exists in each existent. Do not say, “This is a stone and not God.” God forbid! Rather, all existence is God, and the stone is a thing pervaded by divinity.

Think about it. “Ein Sof” means infinite — really infinite. If this computer screen is not the Ein Sof, we’ve made a mistake, because we’ve given the Ein Sof a sof — an end. Kabbalists take the idea of infinity very seriously. God is that which Is — YHVH, one of the main Hebrew terms for this Reality, might even be translated “Is.” God is not an old man; God is What Is. The Infinite is everything. It is the only thing.

“God” is an imprecise name for the only thing in the universe that actually exists. Next question: If everything is God, why do things appear as they do? And how can we have knowledge of God, in this lifetime?

The Mysteries of the Teacher

Vissarion’s Church of the Last Testament Is the Only Reason to Visit Siberia

By Rocco Castoro

submit

The view of the Abode of Dawn from the Temple Mount.

Ten hours into my first trip to Russia I catch an express train back to the airport. It’s August in Moscow so I’m sweating in a particularly gross and unfamiliar way, as I have since my arrival, and I’m running late. If I miss my flight, I probably won’t make it to Petropavlovka in time for the Holiday of Good Fruits, or speak with a Siberian man who looks like Jesus and believes his is the Word of God.

I buy a ticket and arrive at the platform with a couple minutes to spare, enough time to find the emptiest car and take a seat in the back. It departs three minutes later. This makes me feel a bit better, but I’m still suppressing a freak-out over the possibility of missing my plane. The flight only happens once a day, and I can’t fathom having to deal with whoever answers the phones at Vladivostok Air, Siberia’s largest carrier.

If I don’t make it in time I’ll also have to reschedule my ride. This will involve begging a woman named Tamriko, whom I’ve only corresponded with via email, to persuade a fellow member of what many consider to be a cult to wake up at 4 AM tomorrow, make the three-hour drive to Abakan International Airport to pick up a nosy American stranger, and take him to a remote and deeply religious community of about 4,000 people living in the middle of the Taiga forest. On any other day it would be a borderline-reasonable request, one that I have already made when I rescheduled because of a last-minute issue with my visa. But if I’m not in front of a check-in counter in 30 minutes, the earliest I can possibly arrive is August 18. This is the Church of the Last Testament’s holiest of holidays—the day, more than two decades ago, when a 29-year-old patrol officer and talented painter named Sergey Anatolyevitch Torop publicly declared himself reborn as Vissarion. Since then he’s fostered a “unified religion” that is a vast amalgam of Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, pagan, and other spiritual beliefs.

Just about everything Vissarion has ever said or thought has been recorded in the never-ending Last Testament, which currently spans ten volumes and thousands of pages. More than 5,000 followers around the world consider him a messiah of sorts, known as “the Teacher.” They also believe that the universe has two origins (one spawned nature, the other the human soul) and in something called the “outer-space mind” (aliens, basically), and that the end of the word is nigh. Or at least this is what I understand from the handful of scriptures that have been (somewhat poorly) translated into English.

On the train ride I reflect on my whirlwind impression of Moscow: It’s mostly gray, a little brown, and strangely efficient. And sure enough, I arrive at Vnukovo precisely on time and sprint to my gate. As I step to the end of a short line I look back at the neon-lit bar behind me. I was hoping to have time to get a beer, mostly because it’s not allowed where I’m going. Instead I distract myself by thinking about how fucked I would’ve been if this were JFK, and how I have to be careful not to say fuck over the next week because cussing is also forbidden within the church. So are tobacco, meat, and I’m guessing a lot of other things, but the above were specifically enumerated by Tamriko before I arrived.

Four hours, a gray piece of chicken, and two weird lemon candies later, I land in Abakan at 7:30 AM, half an hour late. I walk into the tiny lobby. It smells weird. Everything looks like it was assembled by a giant Soviet airport machine that produced identical airports, all of which have been left to rot in isolation. Worst of all, I don’t see anyone with a sign that says ROCCO. Tamriko assured me a guy named Ruslin would be here, holding it. Too exhausted to panic, I sit and wait for 15 minutes, when a tall, wiry blond man in his 20s with a piece of cardboard tucked under one arm walks through security and scans the room rapidly. Even before noticing the sign, I know it’s him—the type of guy you see coming. I get up and walk over to him. He snaps his head toward me.

“Rocco,” I say, pointing at my chest. He looks me in the eye and stares for a few seconds before holding the sign out in front of him. I just nod. “Yes,” he says, and puts something that looks vaguely Islamic on his head. We walk out of the exit and to the parking lot in silence. It creeps me out.

Standing alongside his car, a four-wheel-drive station wagon with a steering wheel on the right side, I meet who I assume is his wife or girlfriend. She’s young and pretty in a peculiar way, and smiles as she introduces herself. But there’s no way I’ll ever be able to properly pronounce—or remember—her name right now. I don’t even attempt to write it down in my notepad.

They quietly converse in the front seats for a few seconds, and then the man points to a thermos sitting in the console. “Coffee?” I nod. He pours me a cup while the woman rummages around her floorboard and comes up holding a mason jar of what looks like Elmer’s Glue. She pours some into my coffee and hands it to me. They stare until I take a sip. If it’s poison or brainwash juice, it doesn’t taste so bad. I quickly finish it, and we sit for another minute or two without talking. “We go,” the man says, and turns the key.

I quickly realize that Ruslin and his lady either don’t speak much English, or don’t, for whatever reason, wish to talk to me, so I stay busy trying to get a 3G stick I bought in Moscow to work with my laptop. I manage to connect and attempt to choppily video-chat, then iChat, with my girlfriend. I tell her everything’s going fine, that I haven’t slept in something like 26 hours, and joke about how I just drank really weird coffee given to me by people who are technically cult members and who are now driving me into one of the most remote regions of Siberia. Then the connection goes out and doesn’t come back.

The many friendly faces of the Church of the Last Testament, and a few visitors.

We make a few pit stops for food and other supplies in what I— probably rudely—assume is Russia’s version of the most rural parts of Tennessee. But yeah, it is. Orange vests and fatigues run rampant, stores don’t seem to have signs, and I’m pretty sure one of our errands is to a place that sells giant garbage bags full of secondhand clothing. Also, the landscape is majestic and wild. At one point, we randomly pull over in front of a house and the young woman gets out of the car while Ruslin waits. She returns with a giant jar of what I assume is milk, and it assuages my fears about what I drank earlier.

An hour later we leave the highway and alternately hit dirt and paved roads for the next half hour, until it’s just dirt. Ruslin rolls up the windows so the dust doesn’t suffocate us while he floors it. The engine and rocks hitting the chassis make it too loud to talk, so everyone’s silent the rest of the ride as we bake in the 90-degree heat.

We make the final turn toward Petropavlovka, greeted by a sign-sculpture that literally looks like it belongs in front of one of the lesser Orlando theme parks. But the place is beautiful. Lakes, clear skies, trees, bountiful vegetable gardens, and grass forever, encircled by the Sayan Mountains. A few hundred structures of various sizes dot the landscape, most of which are of an architectural style unique to the community. I spot the temple I’ve seen in photos, the one Vissarion and his followers built more than a decade ago as they transformed an unfertile mud pit into a self-sufficient village at least 100 miles away from civilization. Somewhere around 4,000 followers live between here and Abode of Dawn, the area where Vissarion and his closest disciples moved after Petropavlovka got too busy for their liking. I feel like I’ve driven into a Tolkien novel.

I arrive at the German House—a sort of spiritual halfway house run by Ruslin and Birgitt, a German woman who hosts students, Vissarionites from abroad, and the spiritually curious. Tamriko works here too, but she’s not around. I introduce myself to Birgitt, and she asks whether I’m hungry. I tell her that I’d rather sleep than eat, so she directs me upstairs to my room. She also instructs me to come back down in an hour and a half to meet the rest of the guests and speak with Vladimir, one of Vissarion’s minders and an important community leader. He will explain what is expected of guests invited to the Abode of Dawn. I also learn that I won’t be sleeping here tonight, or tomorrow, which is news to me. “Spah-see-bahh,” I say as I thank her with the inflection of a recent stroke victim.

I manage a 45-minute nap, my first sleep in 30-odd hours, before being roused by a guy unpacking his stuff on the bunk across from mine.

“Sorry if I woke you,” he says. I figure if I go back to sleep, I won’t wake up. He’s Maciej, a Pole studying anthropology of religion at a university in Slovenia. He says he’s come here via the Siberian Express, followed by a Soviet monster bus. “Some people I met on the train told me they brainwashed visitors here,” he says. “They tried to persuade me not to come, but I didn’t think I’d be in danger.”

We go downstairs for lunch—lots of fresh potatoes and green things— and meet our fellow lodgers, who include two female anthropology students and a German photographer and his wife. Tamriko is here too, and she isn’t what I expected (in a good way). She’s only 24, and tells me that less than a year ago she was practicing civil law in Moscow.

“I didn’t feel like I was comfortable living in Moscow,” she says. “I realized that I didn’t like my job. When I came here I felt this very good feeling, that maybe I wanted to live here.”

She has known about Vissarion since she was 18, when her uncle first introduced her to his teachings. She tells me that at first her parents— folks who lived through the fall of Communism and didn’t think much of religion—disapproved of her decision to leave Moscow and her job.

“[My family] didn’t talk about ‘God’ or anything. But I was a very open person. For example, for me it’s OK to go to a Catholic church or to go meet Baptist people, but when someone told me about Vissarion it was like, ‘Wow, if this is the truth, it’s so interesting. I should try to find his books.’”

Tamriko tells me that her parents have since come around—that they had some “soul problems” and her uncle explained to her “very logical” father that the Teacher held all the answers. Within six months, her father had virtually all of Vissarion’s books, and her mother, while not quite as emphatic in her belief, thinks the Teacher is a “good guy who has done good things.” She then says they have told her they want to move to Petropavlovka or a nearby community someday soon, even though they have yet to visit. Later I learn that she has never met Vissarion personally. Yet she has somehow facilitated my interview with him, the first he’s granted in at least three years after deciding he would no longer talk to journalists. She initially told me that an audience with the Teacher was highly unlikely, but I persisted, emailing my questions weeks before my trip. Five days before I left she sent me an email saying that the Teacher had approved our meeting, which will hopefully take place the day after next. She provided no explanation as to why I was bestowed with this honor, but that was fine with me.

After lunch, we meet with Vladimir, a stout and energetic man wearing a gray ponytail and hat similar to Ruslin’s. He tells us what’s expected of visitors invited to the Abode of Dawn, specifically those who wish to document their experience. In other words, myself and the middle-aged German photographer sitting at the other end of the table. He tells us we will leave in two hours, and gives tips on what to do if we run into a bear. Apparently I will be staying with a family who lives in the Abode of Dawn, or in the grass under the stars (I neglected to bring a sleeping bag); it’s not clear which. Either way, I will sleep soundly.

The procession to the Temple Mount on the Holiday of Good Fruits.

I manage to grab an hour or so of shut-eye upstairs before my roommate again wakes me and says it’s time to go. It takes me a bit to get dressed and check my supplies because I’m deliriously tired and half-dreaming in a place that could easily be a dream itself. I run downstairs with my shoes still untied, almost forgetting the sleeping bag loaned to me by Tamriko, who decides to stay behind, and squeeze into a rusty yet seemingly indestructible Soviet-era bread loaf packed with my new friends from the German House and a few fresh faces.

It’s an even bumpier ride than the one I took this morning, but our skilled driver—who looks like he probably knows his way around a Soviet tank—easily navigates endless potholes and muddy puddles that could pass for small ponds. I try to make small talk with my fellow passengers, but it’s so loud and uncomfortable that shouting is necessary to communicate. Mostly we just stay quiet and hang on. In the seat adjacent to mine, facing the opposite direction, is a young blond man wearing a ball cap. His eyes—piercing and greenish brown—remind me of Ruslin’s, and he anxiously rolls what appears to be a black rosary between his fingers. I am later told that he is Vissarion’s son, but it’s obvious he does not want to speak with me or anyone else in the van.

An hour later we arrive at the base of the mountain trail, which is filled with parked cars and travelers who’ve come to celebrate the community’s equivalent of Easter. I’m told that last year more than 2,000 made the pilgrimage. It looks like this year the turnout could be even higher. The hike up the mountain is nowhere near as strenuous as I imagined. Much of it is covered with wood planks, and no rock climbing is involved. Still, a few people have trouble keeping up with Vladimir’s brisk pace, and we stop a few times to rest. I shuffle around in the pack, chatting with my fellow travelers to find out why they’ve come all this way.

One woman, who appears to be in her 50s—all smiles and bright eyes—tells me she has been traveling the world for decades, with a vague general mission of celebrating all religions and spreading the good word. She also mentions that a friend of hers recently invented a television that is capable of broadcasting the viewer’s soul. She’s come here many times before, and encourages others to do so, but spends most of her time in India. A couple—from Sweden—talk a lot about the environment and how the creator is present in everything, and how eating meat is reprehensible. It makes me crave a hamburger and a beer. Another guy—in his late teens or early 20s—has what appear to be small triangular cuts all over his face and forehead. I try to steer clear of him.

We reach the end of the trail 30 minutes ahead of schedule, and Vladimir instructs us to walk to a small green structure in the distance and form a line in front of what is basically a makeshift customs office. The attendant inside the shack takes our names and grants admission to the Abode of Dawn. We walk in silence to the city gates, a narrow and sloped-roof structure made of pine, where a small group of what looks to be town elders is waiting for us. They greet Vladimir and have a short conversation. I make out the word American, and one of the men motions for me to follow him and Nina—a woman in her mid-30s who took the van up with me and seems to speak good English—to an unknown destination.

“Where are we going?” I ask. “To the house,” Nina says. I laugh nervously.

We walk up to a small dwelling and are excitedly greeted in Russian by a woman in a skirt. Nina tells me that her name is Marina and that we will be staying here for the next two days along with another half-dozen guests. I finally realize that Nina will be serving as my guide and translator for the rest of the trip; it seems they are fond of letting people figure things out on their own here.

Marina shows us where we will be sleeping—the floor of an attic that has been converted into a living area just outside a curtain that leads to Marina and her husband’s room. She insists that we head downstairs for lunch immediately, where we are treated to simple food—cold vegetable soup, cheese, bread, potatoes, and black tea. Marina, communicating through Nina, gives us the lay of the land: where to find the outhouse, shower, and headlamps that will help us get to those places at night. I ask Nina why Vissarion requires his followers to adhere to a vegetarian diet (strict veganism was practiced in the earliest days of the community, but underwhelming crop yields and complaints of babies getting sick prompted the Teacher to change dietary restrictions). She says it’s because meat contains “information of death,” and I quickly change the subject. We wind up talking about her family. “I have a son here in the monastery, on the temple peak,” she says. “He’s 18, and I used to visit him all the time but…” She also tells me a little about herself—that she used to translate Stephen King’s books into Russian before moving to the community many years ago. She likes fantasy novels. “That’s what this place is,” she says. “It’s like stepping into a fairy tale.”

I try to finish my bowl of soup but can’t, handing it back to Marina and hoping she takes no offense. A man who introduced himself as Slava appears, seemingly out of nowhere, smiling widely, and tells Nina and me to meet him outside Marina’s at 7 PM sharp if we wish to attend tonight’s liturgy. We do.

The liturgy consists of a few hundred people praying and kneeling around something that resembles an ankh from afar. When I get closer I realize the shape is that of a standard Christian cross, but with a circle around the crux. Statues of angels surround it. Nina tells me the circle represents the all-encompassing nature of their faith and then makes what appears to be the sign of the cross, ending with the additional motion of tracing a clockwise circle around her head and upper torso. She also points out the 14 roads of varying prominence that radiate out from the city center. “Thirteen was a number of significance in the New Testament,” she explains. “And so, we have 14 because it is the beyond.” A bell then tolls 14 times while everyone closes his or her eyes to pray.

After the last toll I’m handed a thin yellow candle from a stranger who lights it for me. Darkness falls, and even the most steadfast atheist would have to admit that the scene here is pure and beautiful in a way few things are in this world. After about an hour of hymnals and blessings, I sit down on a rock and nod off with my head in my hands. Nina soon rouses me, and we return to Marina’s for the night. I sleep like a dead dad.

Vissarion addresses his followers in a sermon on the Holiday of Good Fruits.

I awake at sunrise. Today’s the big day, the Holiday of Good Fruits, and the reason that thousands of followers from all over the world have come here—to catch a glimpse of their lord as he gives his annual address on the mountain. Many of these people converted after meeting Vissarion on one of his many missions throughout Russia, Europe, and other parts of the world during the early and mid-2000s. American visitors, however, are a rarity.

By 8 AM we’re back at the circle-cross, as if last night’s liturgy never ended, but this morning there are at least three times as many people surrounding it, and more keep streaming in through the gates. I stare at the trail to the temple mount—and Vissarion’s home—in the distance and leave the liturgy to take a stroll around town. Quite a few journalists have visited the community throughout the years, many of whom made the place out to seem like it was primitive and full of hardship. And while I’m sure the brutal Siberian winters suck in ways I can’t imagine, looking around the place it seems almost entirely self-sufficient. Most of the houses appear to be solar powered, and some have satellite TV and internet. Freakishly huge vegetables grow in meticulously manicured gardens that dot the landscape. I’m beginning to understand the allure of this place, and so far, everyone I’ve met seems to be extremely happy and at peace with his or her decision to drop out of a world they consider beyond hope and start anew on this virgin plot.

For whatever reason I get the impression that some of its inhabitants are more into the lifestyle than the faith, but considering that one cannot be had without the other, they happily go through whatever motions are required to stay. Most, however, are wholeheartedly devoted to Vissarion and his teachings. I also consider that they might have it right—perhaps humanity can’t sustain itself in its current, self-destructive state, and we should throw the whole thing out and start over. Also, if the end-times are coming soon, you’d be hard-pressed to find a better place to wait it out than on the top of a mountain in Siberia.

Nina tracks me down to let me know that the procession to the Temple Mount will begin in 20 minutes, and we make our way back to the gates, where the congregation is growing by the minute. Around the perimeter, musicians—many of them children—tune their violins and blow notes from wind instruments. Soon it’s time to start walking, and I watch as a couple thousand stream through the gates and join them. We halt when the front of it reaches the entrance of the path up the mountain. It begins to rain about halfway up, but it’s still a beautiful day and no one seems to mind. By the time we reach the monastery it’s sunny again, and we continue on to a small temple tucked away inside a clearing. And it’s more of the same: singing, bells, incantations, and lots of white robes. I try to stay engaged, but I’ve never been one to enjoy mass.

Afterward I’m invited to tour the monastery, an impressive two-story cabin in which Vissarion used to live before donating it to the headmaster, Andrey, and an inaugural class of eight teenage monks. Andrey tells me he always felt out of place in life before his first visit to the community, which instantly felt like home. I ask him about the movement’s earliest days, soon after the fall of the Soviet Union. “The universe was preparing this place before the collapse of Communism,” he says. “It stayed preserved from development.” He then details the boys’ daily routine, which seems to include nothing but chores, prayer, academics, and lots of physical fitness. Later he asks me how I feel about the community, and whether I would ever consider moving here. I tell him it seems like a very interesting place but I’m not sure what a city boy like me would have to offer. “You are a writer,” he says. “It’s a profession that is fascinating to us because we strive to create new works where negative characters do not exist.” Trying to change the subject, I ask whether I can perhaps speak with one of the young monks. He agrees and takes me upstairs, to the room Vissarion had formerly used as his painting studio.

I meet John, a third-year student who seems better adjusted than most 16-year-olds I’ve met, but that may be because he doesn’t know much outside of this community, and for the first time I imagine what it must be like to be born here (even though John tells me he was not—his parents moved here when he was nine). I ask him to name his favorite subject or daily activity. “To be helpful to others,” he replies, almost reflexively. After a bit of prying, I get him to admit that he enjoys construction and using “power tools and gas-powered equipment.” He’s reluctant to answer anything too personal, and the hour of Vissarion’s holiday sermon is fast approaching, so we exchange good-byes and I head about halfway down the mountain with Nina to a massive stage carved out of rock where thousands of followers await a few words from their teacher.

Suspense mounts, and the crowd pushes forward as one of Vissarion’s high priests (there are only two) appears on the stone platform a few minutes before sundown. He preps the crowd, revving them up with an extended homily. Then he sits in a chair off to the side, and everyone grows silent with anticipation for the Teacher’s grand entrance.

Vissarion appears in the distance, and walks slowly, like a good showman, before pausing to scan the crowd. Then he takes a seat in a kingly throne covered by a red umbrella that appears to be made of velvet. He swings the microphone toward him, audibly breathes into it for 20 or 30 seconds, and begins. I can’t understand a word, but whatever he says only takes ten minutes before he pushes the microphone away, slowly rises, and walks back up the path from which he came—disappearing around a bend.

Nina gives me the gist of what he said: “He told us that he was happy to see us all together and that we are all staying on the path. And that we have to stay cautious and determined so that we can celebrate another anniversary together.” She relays a few more things, but they all seem like circular statements without a point. But maybe that’s my problem, because everyone in the crowd is radiating with happiness. I stop a few people at random, asking them what they think about Vissarion. It’s all more or less the same: “When I saw him for the first time, he is the one I had been looking for all my life.” “I feel he is my close friend.” “I have a feeling that he has his own state of being.” “Everything he says gets into my soul.” Was I missing something?

Slava, the guide who greeted us on arriving at the Abode of Dawn, joins Nina and me on our walk down the mountain, back to Marina’s house. He tells me that one night a few years ago he looked into the night sky and saw three glowing spheres in the shape of a triangle. “Extraterrestrials?” I ask. But after that he drops it, saying that the subject matter doesn’t interest him. He tells me that my meeting with Vissarion—which has already been rescheduled twice—will take place tomorrow morning, at the Teacher’s house on the mountain. I wish him

Elle prétend que 50 millions de leurs « Croisés évangélisateurs » se sont mobilisés pour aller convertir au christianisme le « Tiers-Monde satanique », principalement les Musulmans, qui sont, disent-ils, victimes d’une « déception spirituelle », c’est-à-dire, l’ISLAM. Leurs missionnaires oeuvrent plus ou moins en liberté dans les « 100 Cités Gateway », dont 22 se trouvent au Moyen Orient, habitées, selon eux, par Satan. Elles comprennent la plupart des pays dits musulmans. Ces « Croisés » sont « armés du Saint Esprit », mais disposaient aussi, en???

The next day Slava arrives at our scheduled time and escorts Nina and me through a usually off-limits back road, where machinery and supplies are stored. The walk is taking longer than planned, so we pick up the pace, and I start sweating like I was on the train in Moscow.

Nothing like showing up to meet a person many consider to be a deity looking like a total slob. We arrive at his house, which is covered in stucco and features a different style of architecture from the rest of the village. It throws me for a loop; the place looks like something you’d find inside a gated community in Florida. We are greeted outside by Vladimir and brought up to the porch, where we meet Vadim, the Teacher’s official biographer, who apparently will be including the answers to my questions in some sort of official literature.

Vissarion steps out from his patio door. I was half-hoping he’d be wearing loungewear, or maybe pajamas, but of course he’s in a white robe. He eschews the drawn-out posturing of yesterday’s sermon and holds out one of his hands, which are massive and seemingly bloated. Up close he’s a bit older and heavier than I anticipated, but he seems to have a gregarious way about him. We sit down and get right to it, Nina translating our exchange for the group.

“Why did you agree to meet with me today?” I ask. “I know that you

have	been	refusing	interviews	for	a	while	now.”
“I		am		not			sure.”
“Are	you	regretting	it	now?”		He	laughs.

I tell him that I am 29, the same age at which he experienced his spiritual awakening, hoping it will prompt him to talk about it. “It’s extremely hard to express in words,” he says. “I’m not even sure how to do so.”

Over the course of our 45-minute conversation he reveals that his “feelings” first guided him to this land, that my residence in New York City is “not life,” that every object has a “unique energy,” that “outerspace minds do not have a soul,” the pitfalls of modern science, and that he can “feel a person” in my soul but its features are “undefined.” At one point I watch in awe as a fly lands on his sleeve, where he begins petting its wings. It doesn’t fly away.

Perhaps the most poignant thing he says has to do with his supposed knowledge of a doomsday event: “The less truth a human knows, the fewer responsibilities he carries on. A human is safer to make a mistake without knowing the cause of it, instead of consciously making that mistake in response to wrong guidelines.”

Vladimir signals me that it’s time to wrap things up, so I take a risk and ask Vissarion a couple personal questions: his favorite food and whether he likes the Beatles. He doesn’t bite, skirting the question by saying, “I don’t have preferences for anything. It would be hard to explain how it works with me.”

The following day I leave Petropavlovka, and Ruslin drives me back the way we came. I wonder how many times a year he has to make this trip, and whether he minds. After checking into the Hotel Siberia in Abakan, I manage to get my laptop to work with Russian internet and catch up on all I’ve missed over the past week. I’m greeted with headlines about violent upheaval around the world, more than 750 emails from work, a credit-card bill, and a Gmail message from my roommate, telling me that my alcoholic Polish neighbor dropped dead the day before from delirium tremens. I close my laptop and lie down. For a few minutes, I seriously contemplate what life would be like as a member of the Church of the Last Testament. Could I hack it? Probably not. But then again I don’t have much of a problem with the way the world is right now. Sure, it’s nowhere near perfect, but things like indoor plumbing and chicken wings make it worth it—at least for me— and I’m lucky enough to have access to them, so why not enjoy?

I close my eyes and feel myself drifting into sleep, chuckling as I imagine what I’ll say the next time I hear someone complaining about how everyone is corrupt, money is evil, and our problems are unsolvable: “Well, there’s this place you can go in Siberia…” PHOTOS BY JASON MOJICA

Watch Rocco traverse Vissarion’s Siberian Kingdom on a new episode of The VICE Guide to Travel, this month.

CHRISTIANISATION DU TIERSMONDE: Évangélistes ou Satanistes ?

16 mai 2003

[20] commentaires

Assalaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullahi ta’ala wa barakatuhu!!

Selon certains « Croisés chrétiens », SATAN se trouve

et opère principalement chez les Musulmans, les Hindouistes et les Bouddhistes !!! Parmi des milliers d’autres mouvements prosélytistes et désislamisatristes, il existe au moins une puissante église évangélisatrice, dite chrétienne, notoirement intolérante, raciste, fanatisée à l’extrême, qui prêche que le domaine de Satan est représenté par ce qu’elle appelle le 10/40 WINDOW, comprenant 3 milliards de personnes, représentées par 60 pays, soit les 80% des habitants les plus pauvres de la planète qui sont concentrés en Asie et en Afrique, dit-elle.

1995,	et			surtout,				de
21,300	agences		«	caritatives					»,
4,050	agences	de		missions			étrangères,
99,580							institutrices,
3,980,000							employés,
89,600							ordinateurs,
2,340	stations			de		radio/télévision,
$1,059	milliards				(chiffres	1995)

l’appui de leurs gouvernements respectifs, et aussi l’appui des gouvernements d’occupation ou serviles à l’occident impérialiste et hégémoniste !

Partout où ces « Croisés Évangélistes Sataniques » passent, ils sèment la haine et la division, et quand les gens ou les états refusent de se convertir, ils se lancent alors dans une campagne de désinformation totale (aidés par les médias judéo-maçonniques) contre ces pays-là, mais principalement contre l’Islam qui est la religion qu’ils craignent le plus et contre la Shari’ah islamique. Les guerres actuelles se font contre l’Islam et non contre l’hindouisme ou le bouddhisme. Mais, ils reconnaissent cependant que 9 sur 10 Musulmans convertis au Christianisme en Inde retournent à l’Islam ! Que Dieu soit loué !

Ces missionnaires zélés ont un programme politique, social et économique bien défini, celui établi par la CIA et le Pentagone !

« Convertir » ces trois milliards « fils et filles de Satan, ces mécréants », et « conquérir le monde entier pour Jésus Christ » dont ils disent attendre le retour incessamment.

En fait, il n’y a absolument rien de Chrétien dans leurs motivations. Ils sont uniquement en train d’utiliser leur religion à des fins sataniques, dajjaliques, et leur Messie n’a qu’un œil et n’est que le symbole américain pour la conquête du monde et la création d’un Nouvel Ordre Mondial sans Dieu ! L’Anté-Christ est déjà parmi nous !

1. Les Guerres Mondiales entre colonialistes, capitalistes et communistes furent financées à tour de rôle par les mêmes banquiers !
2. Ces « Croisés » de Satan ne « mentent » pas quand ils prétendent que l’autre moitié du monde, les autres 3 milliards, est déjà évangélisée et propriété exclusive de Jésus Christ ! Mais, ils entendentpar cela, Évangile de Satan, et leur Messie n’est autre que l’Anté-Christ !
3. En réalité, cette moitié du monde appartient déjà à Satan (aux Francs-Maçons et aux Banquiers usuriers, juifs ou pas), et leur plan esttout simplement d’apporter à ISRAËL (USA et EUROPE-UNIE) le reste du monde sur un plateau, tâche aisée s’il n’y avait pas les Musulmans pour défendre (très mal, il est vrai !) la Religion de Dieu, la Morale et le Droit à la Vie et à la Liberté ! Mais, celui qui dit du mal d’Israël est un homme mort ! Même le Saint Qur’ân, aurait été interdit dans des écoles publiques de Los Angeles pour « anti-sémitisme » ! (Je n’ai malheureusement pas pu vérifier cette « information » publiée sur Assabyle.com)
4. Prétendre convertir les Israéliens au christianisme ne fait que prouver que ces « Croisés » ne sont que des fieffés MENTEURS ! George W. Bush est à leur tête en ce moment-même ! Il y a (ou avait) aussi un autre Bush chez les « Croisés évangélistes » qui s’empressait de convertir les survivants (OPTIMUM HARVEST) alors que les bombes américaines, israéliennes, slaves ou britanniques et les embargos décimaient des populations entières!
5. Pour parvenir à leurs fins, ces « Croisés » sont obligés de diaboliser le « Tiers-Monde », surtout les pays dits musulmans, et inciter les minorités, armées et financées par l’occident, les alliés et leurs services secrets, à se battre contre leurs gouvernements respectifs, quand ces derniers refusent d’obéir, et à les faire massacrer par des « guerres contre le terrorisme », des « nettoyages ethniques » et même des opérations « d’aide humanitaire » !
1. Leur but n’est pas de convertir ces 3 milliards de personnes mais les faire massacrer par des guerres, car SATAN a un plan qui semble marcher à merveille : décimer quelques milliards de personnes (5,500,000,000 selon certains) et atteindre un taux ZÉRO de
2. reproduction d’ici 2050, pour les races dites inférieures, bien sûr ! Je ne serais plus de ce monde (d’ailleurs je n’y suis plus depuis déjà un certain temps !), mais les générations à venir confirmeront ou non cette réalité, s’il reste encore un monde, bien sûr !
6. Ces « Croisés » disent « prier pour une guerre hindouiste musulmane afin qu’ils puissent mener à bien leurs campagnes d’évangélisation » comme ils sont actuellement en train de faire en Afghanistan !!! Suite à l’Holocauste afghane récente, et acclamés (incités) par Laura Bush, l’épouse de Satan lui-même, ils se sont immédiatement précipités pour « sauver les Afghans de l’Islam » ! Cela ressemble-t-il au christianisme ? Bien sûr que non ! Par contre, la stratégie militariste et génocidaire, néo-colonialiste et néo-impérialiste n’est que trop évidente !
7. Consultez SVP : http://www.ad2000.org/1040city.htm Regardez aussi, SVP, leur propre cassette vidéo destinée à leurs missionnaires et adeptes, très maladroitement « commentée » par un certain Ali-Tamimi et distribuée par Asgar Halim (07956625036 ?), si vous parvenez à en trouver une « originale », bien sûr.

Méditez sur le contenu et AGISSEZ en conséquence, car c’est bien NOUS et nos générations futures que ces assassins visent ! ! !

Et, CESSONS nos perpétuelles et stupides querelles sur le dogme ou de poser des questions idiotes et de tenir inlassablement les mêmes

propos puérils, suppôts		sinon	nous de	finirons		par	ressembler Satan		à	ces	fidèles !
Ghyslaine Le		serviteur			de						ROC Dieu
pour Ce	‘La	Voix 28		des	Opprimés’ mars			htt		p://stc	om.net 2002

S.O.S.

Les chrétiens de Syrie demandent la protection de la Russie

• Publié le : vendredi 15 novembre
• Mots-clés : Christianisme; international; religion
• Commentaires : 16
• (dernier : 16 novembre 13:30 par le redoutable)
• Source : 24hgold.com •

Environ 50 000 Syriens Chrétiens ont demandé à obtenir la nationalité Russe. Dans une lettre au ministère Russe des affaires étrangères, ils ont expliqué qu’ils n’avaient pas pour objectif de fuir la Syrie, mais que s’ils se trouvaient menacés d’élimination, ils feraient de la Russie la gardienne de leur survie. Les analystes pensent que malgré les difficultés qu’implique leur requête, elle ne sera pas ignorée.

La lettre est parvenue jusqu’à Moscou par les canaux diplomatiques. Elle explique que les terroristes soutenus par l’Occident sont prêts à tout pour éliminer les Chrétiens de Syrie. Les auteurs de la lettre disent n’avoir aucune intention de fuir la terre sur laquelle a marché Jésus et promettent de défendre leur pays, leur dignité et leur foi. Ils perçoivent la Russie comme la gardienne de leur paix et de leur stabilité. Ils ne demandent pas d’argent ou d’aide humanitaire, juste l’obtention de la nationalité Russe. "Nous serions ainsi sous la protection de la Russie si les terroristes menaçaient de nous éliminer". Stanislav Tarasov, directeur du centre de recherche d’Asie Centrale-Caucase, expliquait récemment à Voice of Russia qu’au vu de ce qui se passe en Syrie, leur demande d’obtention de passeports Russes semble justifiée. "Pour eux, il ne s’agit que d’obtenir un laisser-passer. Personne ne sait ce qui se passera en Syrie. Certains suggèrent qu’avec ou sans Assad, la Syrie pourrait devenir une confédération ou être divisée en trois ou quatre territoires. C’est pourquoi les Chrétiens de Syrie tentent d’obtenir le soutien de la Russie". Près de 50 000 Syriens ont signé la lettre – médecins, avocats et hommes d’affaires résident de la région de Kalamoun, près de Damas. Le fait que tant de personnes aient signé la lettre en fait une requête importante, mais rend selon Sergei Sergeichev, membre de l’institut d’études sur le Proche-Orient à Moscou, également la situation plus complexe pour la Russie. "Non pas qu’elle nous mette dans une situation difficile, mais elle force le ministère des Affaires Etrangères à réagir. Nous ne pouvons pas tourner le dos à ces gens. Mais si nous acceptons leur demande, si quelque chose venait à se produire, nous aurions à évacuer des dizaines de milliers de citoyens Russes. Peu importe que ces gens aient deux passeports. Si le président demande une évacuation, ils devront être évacués". La Syrie n’est pas le seul pays au sein duquel les Chrétiens ne sont pas en sécurité. Selon les recherches du Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, les Chrétiens sont persécutés dans 130 pays. Aujourd’hui, la communauté Chrétienne est la plus persécutée de toutes. Chaque heure, un Chrétien est tué quelque part dans le monde. Et s’ils sont tués, c’est simplement pour leur croyance.

Rebondir sur le sujet avec Kontre Kulture :

"Les Égarés. Le wahhabisme est-il un

"La Quatrième Théorie politique"

contre-islam ?"

d’Alexandre Douguine

de Jean-Michel Vernochet

S.O.S.

L’église Saint-Nicolas du Chardonnet attaquée

• Publié le : dimanche 17 novembre
• Mots-clés : Antifa; Christianisme; politique; religion
• Commentaires : 71
• (dernier : 18 novembre 20:29 par Gather)
• Source : gollnisch.com

•

Communiqué de Bruno Gollnisch :

Ce matin, en pleine célébration de la grand Messe dominicale, l’église St. Nicolas du Chardonnet dans le Ve arrondissement de Paris a été attaquée en toute vraisemblance par un groupe « antifa ». La haine gauchiste et anarchiste a encore frappé. Dans n’importe quel autre lieu de culte, ces faits susciteraient l’indignation générale… Depuis des mois, les agissements de ces milices extrêmement violentes se généralisent, sans la moindre intervention des pouvoirs publics. Hier c’est un jeune militant pro-vie qui était caillassé dans un rassemblement parfaitement déclaré. Faudra-t-il un drame pour agir ? Je tiens à réaffirmer ma solidarité envers les victimes de plus en plus nombreuses de ces violences, et dénonce fermement les sauvages qui agissent et les politiques qui les protègent.

Sur la destruction de l’Église catholique en France, chez Kontre Kulture :

"Comprendre l’empire" d’Alain Soral

S.O.S.

À Alger, un révérend britannique met en garde contre le danger du sionisme chrétien

• Publié le : vendredi 15 novembre

• Mots-clés : Christianisme; géo-politique; Islam; religion; Sionisme

• Commentaires : 38

• (dernier : 17 novembre 18:11 par Pierre Ghi)

• Source : letempsdz.com

• 86 votes

Le directeur de l’association du Livre sacré en Grande-Bretagne, le révérend Steven Cesar, a mis en garde à Alger contre le danger du sionisme chrétien qui repose sur la discrimination raciale. Le révérend César, qui était l’invité de l’émission Sijalate (« Débats »), de Radio culture a affirmé qu’il n’y avait pas de différence entre les religions et que la Terre appartenait à l’humanité tout entière pour y vivre en paix mettant en garde les chrétiens du monde contre les idées du sionisme chrétien.

Il a préconisé une lecture de l’évangile authentique estimant que les politiciens pouvaient transmettre le message en s’éloignant des idées ségrégationnistes reposant sur le seul profit matériel et qui sont à l’origine de guerres dévastatrices. Pour le révérend Cesar le sionisme chrétien véhicule une vision moderniste de la réalité mais implique unedénaturation de l’Évangile. Certains responsables britanniques ont contribué au cours des dernières années à la diffusion de ce concept, a-t-il soutenu. Il est revenu sur les moyens mis en œuvre par ce mouvement pour propager ses idées dans le monde et convaincre ses adeptes de combattre ceux qu’ils considèrent comme leurs ennemis, l’islam en particulier. L’occasion était pour cet homme d’église de revenir sur les similitudes entre les préceptes de l’islam et du véritable christianisme. Le révérend Steven Cesar visite l’Algérie à l’invitation de l’église de la trinité en Algérie représentée par le pasteur Hamdi Sadki Daoud qui l’a convié à visiter l’établissement ecclésiastique et y officier durant la période du 11 au 18 novembre.

) In the Various Muhammad (

World Religious Scriptures -Part 1 -Dr Zakir Naik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxpaU7DyY-U&feature=emuploademail

In his latest revelations, Pope Francis said:

PART 1 Part 2 PART 3 PART 4

screen grab/fox 28

Christians Protest 'Jesus Is Muslim' Billboards in Ohio

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Share
• Email

(Christian Post)

Controversial billboards in Columbus, Ohio, reading

"Jesus is Muslim"

and

"Muhammad is in the Bible"

are drawing protests from local Christians who say Muslims are "hijacking" the name of Jesus.

"Although we support the Islamic community's right to free speech, as well as their right to post messages on billboards, we do not support the hijacking of the name of Jesus Christ in their attempt to lure uninformed Christians into their religion," Coach Dave Daubenmire of Pass the Salt Ministries said in a statement Thursday.

Daubenmire is hosting a prayer vigil on Saturday alongside the Rev. Rusty Thomas of Operation Save America and Pastor Bill Dunfee of New Beginnings Church in Warsaw.

Approfondir le sujet avec Kontre Kulture :

"Choc et simulacre" "Chronique du choc des civilisations" de Michel Drac d’Aymeric Chauprade

o http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/

o "The original content on this blog is largely satirical."

o

????????????????????

ZIONIST JESUIT POPE FRANCIS DESTROYS CATHOLIC DOGMA FURTHER!

????????????????????

WELCOMES HOMOSEXUAL AND LESBIAN POPE!

????????????????????

GOD IS NOT GOD ANYMORE AS HE (IT) EVOLVES!

????????????????????

There Is No Hell Fire; Adam & Eve Not Real – Pope Francis Exposes

????????????????????

Posted On: 29th December 2013

1. o By: Naijaurban
2. o With 938 Comments o

?"One man who is out to open many old “secrets” in the Catholic church is Pope Francis. Some of the beliefs that are held in the church but contrary to the loving nature of God are now being set aside by the Pope who was recently named The Man of The Year by TIME Magazine.

The source of this quiz is the father of the student who took it. He will not identify the school until June, after his daughter finishes the school year there, after which she will move to another school. Snopes rates this item as "probably true. I'm pretty much speechless here. Plus, the test speaks for itself.

There is an Internet hoax claiming Pope Francis has said "All religions are true." Here are 5 things to know and share . . .

“Through humility, soul searching, and prayerful contemplation we have gained a new understanding of certain dogmas. The church no longer believes in a literal hell where people suffer. This doctrine is incompatible with the infinite love of God. God is not a judge but a friend and a lover of humanity. God seeks not to condemn but only to embrace. Like the fable of Adam and Eve, we see hell as a literary device. Hell is merely a metaphor for the isolated soul, which like all souls ultimately will be united in love with God.”

In a shocking speech that is reverberating across the world, Pope Francis declared that: “All religions are true, because they are true in the hearts of all those who believe in them. What other kind of truth is there? In the past, the church has been harsh on those it deemed morally wrong or sinful. Today, we no longer judge. Like a loving father, we never condemn our children. Our church is big enough for heterosexuals and homosexuals, for the pro-life and the pro-choice! For conservatives and liberals, even communists are welcome and have joined us. We all love and worship the same God.”

In the last six months, Catholic cardinals, bishops and theologians have been deliberating in the Vatican City, in discussing the future of the church and redefining long-held Catholic doctrines and dogmas. The Third Vatican Council, is the largest and most important since the Second Vatican Council was concluded in 1962.

Pope Francis convened the new council to “finally finish the work of the Second Vatican Council.”

The Third Vatican Council concluded with Pope Francis announcing that…

Catholicism is now a “modern and reasonable religion, which hasundergone evolutionary changes. The time has come to abandon all intolerance. We must recognize that religious truth evolves and changes. Truth is not absolute or set in stone. Even atheists acknowledge the divine. Through acts of love and charity the atheist acknowledges God as well, and redeems his own soul, becoming an active participant in the redemption of humanity.”

One statement in the Pope’s speech has sent traditionalists into a fit of confusion and hysteria…

“God is changing and evolving as we are, For God lives in us and in our hearts. When we spread love and kindness in the world, we touch our own divinity and recognize it. The Bible is a beautiful holy book, but like all great and ancient works, some passages are outdated. Some even call for intolerance or judgement. The time has come to see these verses as later interpolations, contrary to the message of love and truth, which otherwise radiates through scripture. In accordance with our new understanding, we will begin to ordain women as cardinals, bishops and priests. In the future, it is my hope that we will have a woman pope one day. Let no door be closed to women that is open to men!”

A few cardinals in the Catholic church are against Pope Francis’ latest declarations. Watch out for the report.

SOURCE: Copyright © 2013 Diversity Chronicle All Rights

Reserved.???"

RELATED POST.

PHOTOS: Doves Released By Pope Francis As A Sign Of Peace Attacked By Angry Birds SCANDAL: Catholic Nun Gives Birth, Names Baby After Pope

Catholics Will Go To Hell – Chris Okotie How Catholic Church is Corrupting the Gospel of Jesus Christ – Pastor Chris Okotie

????????????????????

Don’t fall for this Pope Francis hoax: 5 things to know and share

o o o

by Jimmy Akin Thursday, January 02, 2014 6:52 PM Comments (258)

Some Internet sites are reporting that Pope Francis has declared that “all religions are true,” that there is no hell, and other provocative things. But the whole thing is an Internet hoax. Here are 5 things to know and share . . .

1) What is being attributed to Pope Francis?

Among other things, he is claimed to have said:

“Through humility, soul searching, and prayerful contemplation we have gained a new understanding of certain dogmas. The church no longer believes in a literal hell where people suffer. This doctrine is incompatible with the infinite love of God. God is not a judge but a friend and a lover of humanity. God seeks not to condemn but only to embrace. Like the fable of Adam and Eve, we see hell as a literary device. Hell is merely a metaphor for the isolated soul, which like all souls ultimately will be united in love with God” Pope Francis declared.

In a speech that shocked many, the Pope claimed “All religions are true, because they are true in the hearts of all those who believe in them. What other kind of truth is there? In the past, the church has been harsh on those it deemed morally wrong or sinful. Today, we no longer judge. Like a loving father, we never condemn our children. Our church is big enough for heterosexuals and homosexuals, for the pro-life and the pro-choice! For conservatives and liberals, even communists are welcome and have joined us. We all love and worship the same God.”

2) Where did the hoax come from?

It originally appeared on a blog called Diversity Chronicle. The post that contains it apparently was written by the site’s creator, Erik Thorson. Subsequently, the story has been recycled elsewhere on the Internet, such as in the “Entertainment” section of VacancyNigerians.com.

3) How do we know it’s a hoax?

Through several means. One is the fact that the piece itself claims Pope Francis was speaking at the conclusion of the Third Vatican Council:

For the last six months, Catholic cardinals, bishops and theologians have been deliberating in Vatican City, discussing the future of the church and redefining long-held Catholic doctrines and dogmas. The Third Vatican Council, is undoubtedly the largest and most important since the Second Vatican Council was concluded in 1962. Pope Francis convened the new council to “finally finish the work of the Second Vatican Council.” While some traditionalists and conservative reactionaries on the far right have decried these efforts, they have delighted progressives around the world.

The Third Vatican Council concluded today with Pope Francis announcing that Catholicism is now a “modern and reasonable religion, which has undergone evolutionary changes.

Of course, there has been no Third Vatican Council.

If there had been, it would have been all over the news for months, and every semi-informed Catholic would be aware of it. Ecumenical councils are huge events in the life of the Church, and modern media and the Catholic Internet would have focused on it intensively.

4) How else do we know it’s a hoax?

The site which originated it contains a disclaimer, which states:

The original content on this blog is largely satirical.

“I ceased in the year 1764 to believe that one can convince one’s opponents with arguments printed in books. It is not to do that, therefore, that I have taken up my pen, but merely so as to annoy them, and to bestow strength and courage on those on our own side, and to make it known to the others that they have not convinced us.” – Georg Christoph Lichtenberg.

It is in the spirit of the above quote that I write. Who am I you may ask? My name is Erik Thorson. I created this blog for my own personal amusement.

5) Are there other resources exposing this hoax?

Sure. For example, there is also a Snopes page on this subject.

What Now?

If you like the information I've presented here, you should join my Secret Information Club.

If you're not familiar with it, the Secret Information Club is a free service that I operate by email. I send out information on a variety of fascinating topics connected with the Catholic faith. In fact, the very first thing you’ll get if you sign up is information about what Pope Benedict said about the book of Revelation.

He had a lot of interesting things to say! If you’d like to find out what they are, just sign up at www.SecretInfoClub.com or use this handy sign-up form:

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/dont-fall-for-this-popefrancis-hoax-5-things-to-know-and-share#ixzz2yDdIK8CN 

 

REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM? It's very tough with "fundamentalist" idiots like these! It seems that it is the "Bible" that has to be rebuilt from scratch!

SENT BY KATE BATES from Pittsburgh PA.

Fri Apr 26, 2013 at 02:28 PM PDT 

 

South Carolina Christian School Fourth Grade Science Quiz

by gizmo59Follow

o o

1. o Email
2. o 335 Comments / 335 New

Via Joe.My.God:

9/11 and American Empire: Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak Out

Tags

* Note that if the pages are authentic the filling in may be fake because it does not look like any student will fill in "GOD !!!!" and "BIBLE !!!" all in block capitals and with all these exclamation marks! I may be wrong, of course! (BAFS)

Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth Who We Are

Crédit : AP

9/11 and American Empire: Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak Out

Please join our interactive dialogue on the essays in this book! Email your comments to kevin@mujca.com General comments will be placed on this page (scroll down). To read comments on specific essays, click on the essay title in the Table of Contents below.

9/11 and American Empire: Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak Out 
Edited by Kevin Barrett, John Cobb, and Sandra Lubarsky 

Interlink Books, Spring 2007 

MUJCA-NET is pleased to announce that a new collection of essays on 9/11 and empire has been published by Interlink, publisher of the 9/11 revisionist works of David Griffin and Nafeez Ahmed. 9/11 and the American Empire: Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak Out presents a variety of perspectives on 9/11 and empire from authors who identify with one of the major Abrahamic traditions. Co-edited by a major Christian theologian (John Cobb), a Jewish scholar (Sandra Lubarsky) and a Muslim scholar (Kevin Barrett) the book will include contributions by such well-known figures as Rabbi Michael Lerner, Nafeez Ahmed, MUJCA-NET's own co-founder Faiz Khan, and others. The writers will offer reflections on 9/11 and empire—reflections informed by the moral principles of their religious traditions as well as the necessity to engage in thoughtful dialogue with those of other traditions. Table of Contents Kevin Barrett, “Introduction: Toward an Interfaith Dialogue on 9/11 and Empire”

Christians: John Cobb, “The Evil that Results from Erroneous Beliefs” David Griffin, “9/11 and the American Empire: A Christian Theologian Speaks Out." Carter Heyward, “Shattering Illusion” Catherine Keller, "Elemental Love Toward a Counter-Apocalyptic Coalition" Rosemary Ruether, "American Empire and the War Against Evil” Jews: Sandra Lubarsky, “Terrible Fears, Terrible Desires: A Jewish Response to 9/11” Marc Ellis, “After 9/11: The Struggle to Define Jewish Identity” Tamar Frankiel, “Spiritual Community in the Post-9/11 World: A Jewish Perspective” Roger Gottlieb “9/11 and the American Empire: Some Jewish Questions and Answers” Rabbi Michael Lerner, “What Next? Will It Make a Difference if We Succeed in Exposing 9/11 as a Fraud?”

Muslims: Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, “Muslim Problem or Covert Operations Nightmare?: The Question of the Root of International Terrorism” Kevin Barrett, "Interpreting the Unspeakable: The Myth of 9/11" Faiz Khan: "American Muslims and ‘9/11 Truth': The Paralysis of Discourse, The Incompetence of Academia, and The Need for an Accurate Diagnosis" Enver Masud, "The War on Islam" Yasmin Ahmed: "The Remaking of Islam in the Post-9/11 Era" Biographies John Cobb, “The Evil that Results from Erroneous Beliefs” John B. Cobb, Jr., is Professor Emeritus of the Claremont School of Theology. He is Founding Director of the Center of the Center for Process Studies and Co-founder of Progressive Christians Uniting, for

which he edited Progressive Christians Speak. He is an ordained minister of the United Methodist Church . Among his books are The Liberation of Life with Charles Birch (1984) and For the Common Good with Herman Daly (1997) as well as Christ in a Pluralistic Age (1999) and Postmodernism and Public Policy (2001). David Griffin, “"9/11 and the American Empire: A Christian Theologian Speaks Out." David Ray Griffin is Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology, Emeritus, at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University in Claremont , California , where he remains a co-director of the Center for Process Studies. His 30 books include God, Power, and Evil: A Process Theology (1976); Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition (1976); Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Theology (2004); and Deep Religious Pluralism (2005). He has also written The New Pearl Harbor : Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (2004) and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005), both published by Interlink Books. Carter Heyward, “Shattering Illusion” An ordained Episcopal priest and the author of more than 20 books, Carter Heyward is the Howard Chandler Robbins Professor of Theology at the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge , Massachusetts . Among her recent works are God in the Balance: Christian Spirituality in Times of Terror (2002), When Boundaries Betray Us (2000), and Saving Jesus from Those Who Are Right: Rethinking What It Means to Be Christian

(1999). Catherine Keller, "Elemental Love Toward a Counter-Apocalyptic Coalition" Catherine Keller has taught at the Theological School of Drew University since 1986, where as Professor of Constructive Theology she teaches courses in systematic, process, ecological, postcolonial and feminist theology. Her books include From a Broken Web: Separation, Sexism and Self (1986); Apocalypse Now and Then: A Feminist Guide to the End of the World (1996); The Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming (2003); Postcolonial Theologies: Divinity and Empire (2004); and God and Power: Counter-Apocalyptic Journeys (2005). Rosemary Ruether, "American Empire and the War Against Evil” Rosemary Radford Ruether, one of America 's leading Christian theologians, has been a leader in many areas. Her many books include

Liberation Theology: Human Hope Confronts Christian History and American Power (1972); Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology (1983); Gaia & God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing (1992); Religion and Sexism: Images of Woman in the Jewish and Christian Traditions (1998); To Change the World: Christology and Cultural Criticism (2001); and Goddesses and the Divine Feminine: A Western Religious History (2005). Having long taught at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in Evanston , Illinois , she has most recently taught at Pacific School of Religion in Berkeley . Marc Ellis “After 9/11: The Struggle to Define Jewish Identity” Marc Ellis is University Professor of American and Jewish Studies at Baylor University, where in 2000 he founded and became the first director of the Center for American and Jewish Studies. In 1980, Dr. Ellis joined the faculty of the Maryknoll School of Theology where he founded the Institute for Justice and Peace. From 1995-1998 he was a Senior Fellow at the Center for the Study of World Religions and a Visiting Scholar at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University as well a Visiting Professor in Religious Studies at Florida State University. Among his books are Toward a Jewish Theology of Liberation: The Challenge of the 21st Century (2004), Israel And Palestine -Out Of The Ashes : The Search for Jewish Identity in the Twenty-first Century (2002), Revolutionary Forgiveness: Essays on Judaism, Christianity, and the Future of Religious Life (2000), A Year at the Catholic Worker: A Spiritual Journey Among the Poor (2000 ). Unholy Alliance : Religion and Atrocity in Our Time (1997). Tamar Frankiel, “Spiritual Community in the Post-9/11 World: A Jewish Perspective” Tamar Frankiel is Dean of Students and Professor of Comparative Religion at the Academy for Jewish Religion in California. She holds a Ph.D. in the History of Religions from the University of Chicago and is the author of The Gift of the Kabbalah (2001); The Voice of Sarah: Feminine Spirituality and Traditional Judaism (1990); co-author of Minding the Temple of the Soul and Entering the Temple of Dreams (1997 and 2000, with Judy Greenfeld) as well as four other books and numerous scholarly articles on comparative religion in America. Roger Gottlieb “9/11 and the American Empire: Some Jewish Questions and Answers” Roger Gottlieb is a Professor of Philosophy at Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts . He is the author of A Spirituality of Resistance (2003), Joining Hands: Politics and Religion Together for Social Change (2002), Marxism: Origin and Betrayal (1992) and editor of Liberating Faith: Religious Voices for Justice, Peace, and Ecological Wisdom (2003), and This Sacred Earth: Religion, Nature, Environment (1995). Rabbi Michael Lerner, “What Next? Will It Make a Difference if We Succeed in Exposing 9/11 as a Fraud?” Rabbi Michael Lerner is editor of the world's largest circulation progressive Jewish magazine, TIKKUN, and rabbi of Beyt Tikkun Synagogue in San Francisco . Rabbi Lerner is author of more than ten books, including Jewish Renewal (1995), The Politics of Meaning: Restoring Hope and Possibility in an Age of Cynicism (1997), Spirit Matters (2002), Healing Israel/Palestine (2003) and The Geneva Accord : And Other Strategies for Healing the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

(2004). Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, “Muslim Problem or Covert Operations Nightmare?: The Question of the Root of International Terrorism” Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is executive director of the Institute for Policy Research and Development in Brighton, England, and the best-selling author of The War on Freedom: How and Why America was Attacked: September 11, 2001, which won him the Naples Prize, Italy's most prestigious literary award, and The War on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation and the Anatomy of Terrorism . A regular political commentator on BBC Radio, Ahmed has been named a Global Expert on War, Peace and International Affairs by The Freedom Network of the International Society for Individual Liberty in California . He is the author of many internationally acclaimed research papers and reports on human rights practices and Western foreign policy. His latest book is Behind the War on Terror: Western Secret Strategy and the Struggle for Iraq .

Kevin Barrett, "Interpreting the Unspeakable: The Myth of 9/11" Kevin Barrett has taught English, French, Arabic, American Civilization, Humanities, African Literature, Folklore, and Islam at colleges and universities in the San Francisco Bay area, Paris, and Madison, Wisconsin. His Ph.D. dissertation on Moroccan legend compares contemporary legends to classic saints' legends. He is serving as president of Khidria, a non-profit corporation dedicated to Islamic socioenvironmental awareness, writing and editing for the Muslim magazine al-Jumuah, and spearheading MUJCA-NET, the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth. Faiz Khan: "American Muslims and ‘9/11 Truth': The Paralysis of Discourse, The Incompetence of Academia, and The Need for an Accurate Diagnosis" Faiz Khan is a Muslim scholar and educator as well as an M.D. with a dual specialty in emergency and internal medicine. He has been living and working in New York City since 1969. A 9/11 first responder, he has been in the forefront of post-9/11 peace and education efforts in New York and elsewhere. He is well-known as a staunchly outspoken opponent of terror in all its guises, and has participated in two memorial services for the victims of 9/11, as well as the New York group Muslims Against Terrorism. Dr. Khan is the author of “9/11: An Islamic Perspective” published by Belief Net in their selection of essays on religion and 9/11. An Assistant Imam at two New York area mosques, Dr. Kahn has treated subjects related to Islam, politics, and 9/11 at numerous speaking engagements and publications. Dr. Khan is a cofounder of MUJCA-NET, the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth. Enver Masud, "The War on Islam" Enver Masud is an engineering management consultant, and has worked for the U.S. Department of Energy, the World Bank, EBRD and USAID in Albania, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Latvia, Pakistan, Russia, and Tanzania. He is the founder and CEO of The Wisdom Fund, a think tank and information outlet based near Washington , DC dedicated to advancing social justice and interfaith understanding through presenting the truth about Islam. Yasmin Ahmed: "The Remaking of Islam in the Post-9/11 Era" Yasmin Ahmed is an Egyptian-born American freelance journalist based in Madison , Wisconsin . She grew up in Madison and earned a BS in Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is currently a graduate student in Journalism/Mass Communications. Her work has been published by Middle East Times , the Wisconsin State Journal , Islamicity , Q Magazine , al-Jumuah Magazine , Islamonline , Media Monitors Network, and other outlets.

Please Support MUJCA-NET MUJCA-NET needs your support. We are a non-profit organization and the scale of our activities depends entirely on your generosity. We would like to get copies of David Griffin's two 9/11 books (see above) into the hands of every religious leader in America. And we would like to push 9/11 truth onto the front pages of every newspaper in America. But we can't do it without your help. If you would like to donate to MUJCA-NET, click here.

TOP

Please join our interactive dialogue on the essays in this book! Email your comments to

kevin@mujca.com

General comments will be placed on this page (scroll down). To read comments on specific essays, click on the essay title in the Table of Contents below.

9/11 and American Empire: Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak Out 
Edited by Kevin Barrett, John Cobb, and Sandra Lubarsky 

Interlink Books, Spring 2007 

MUJCA-NET is pleased to announce that a new collection of essays on 9/11 and empire has been published by Interlink, publisher of the 9/11 revisionist works of David Griffin and Nafeez Ahmed. 9/11 and the American Empire: Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak Out presents a variety of perspectives on 9/11 and empire from authors who identify with one of the major Abrahamic traditions. Co-edited by a major Christian theologian (John Cobb), a Jewish scholar (Sandra Lubarsky) and a Muslim scholar (Kevin Barrett) the book will include contributions by such well-known figures as Rabbi Michael Lerner, Nafeez Ahmed, MUJCA-NET's own co-founder Faiz Khan, and others. The writers will offer reflections on 9/11 and empire—reflections informed by the moral principles of their religious traditions as well as the necessity to engage in thoughtful dialogue with those of other traditions.

Table of Contents

Kevin Barrett, “Introduction: Toward an Interfaith Dialogue on 9/11 and Empire”

Christians:

John Cobb, “The Evil that Results from Erroneous Beliefs”

David Griffin, “9/11 and the American Empire: A Christian Theologian Speaks Out."

Carter Heyward, “Shattering Illusion”

Catherine Keller, "Elemental Love Toward a Counter-Apocalyptic Coalition"

Rosemary Ruether, "American Empire and the War Against Evil”

Jews:

Sandra Lubarsky, “Terrible Fears, Terrible Desires: A Jewish Response to 9/11”

Marc Ellis, “After 9/11: The Struggle to Define Jewish Identity”

Tamar Frankiel, “Spiritual Community in the Post-9/11 World: A Jewish Perspective”

Roger Gottlieb “9/11 and the American Empire: Some Jewish Questions and Answers”

Rabbi Michael Lerner, “What Next? Will It Make a Difference if We Succeed in Exposing 9/11 as a Fraud?”

Muslims:

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, “Muslim Problem or Covert Operations Nightmare?: The Question of the Root of International Terrorism”

Kevin Barrett, "Interpreting the Unspeakable: The Myth of 9/11"

Faiz Khan: "American Muslims and ‘9/11 Truth': The Paralysis of Discourse, The Incompetence of Academia, and The Need for an Accurate Diagnosis"

Enver Masud, "The War on Islam"

Yasmin Ahmed: "The Remaking of Islam in the Post-9/11 Era"

Biographies

John Cobb, “The Evil that Results from Erroneous Beliefs”

John B. Cobb, Jr., is Professor Emeritus of the Claremont School of Theology. He is Founding Director of the Center of the Center for Process Studies and Co-founder of Progressive Christians Uniting, for which he edited Progressive Christians Speak. He is an ordained minister of the United Methodist Church . Among his books are The Liberation of Life with Charles Birch (1984) and For the Common Good with Herman Daly (1997) as well as Christ in a Pluralistic Age (1999) and Postmodernism and Public Policy (2001).

David Griffin, “"9/11 and the American Empire: A Christian Theologian Speaks Out."

David Ray Griffin is Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology, Emeritus, at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University in Claremont , California , where he remains a co-director of the Center for Process Studies. His 30 books include God, Power, and Evil: A Process Theology (1976); Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition (1976); Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Theology (2004); and Deep Religious Pluralism (2005). He has also written The New Pearl Harbor : Disturbing Questions about the Bush

Administration and 9/11 (2004) and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005), both published by Interlink Books.

Carter Heyward, “Shattering Illusion”

An ordained Episcopal priest and the author of more than 20 books, Carter Heyward is the Howard Chandler Robbins Professor of Theology at the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge , Massachusetts . Among her recent works are God in the Balance: Christian Spirituality in Times of Terror (2002), When Boundaries Betray Us (2000), and Saving Jesus from Those Who Are Right: Rethinking What It Means to Be Christian (1999).

Catherine Keller, "Elemental Love Toward a Counter-Apocalyptic Coalition"

Catherine Keller has taught at the Theological School of Drew University since 1986, where as Professor of Constructive Theology she teaches courses in systematic, process, ecological, postcolonial and feminist theology. Her books include From a Broken Web: Separation, Sexism and Self (1986); Apocalypse Now and Then: A Feminist Guide to the End of the World (1996); The Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming (2003); Postcolonial Theologies: Divinity and Empire (2004); and God and Power: Counter-Apocalyptic Journeys (2005).

Rosemary Ruether, "American Empire and the War Against Evil”

Rosemary Radford Ruether, one of America 's leading Christian theologians, has been a leader in many areas. Her many books include Liberation Theology: Human Hope Confronts Christian History and American Power (1972); Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology (1983); Gaia & God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing (1992); Religion and Sexism: Images of Woman in the Jewish and Christian Traditions (1998); To Change the World: Christology and Cultural Criticism (2001); and Goddesses and the Divine Feminine: A Western Religious History (2005). Having long taught at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in Evanston , Illinois , she has most recently taught at Pacific School of Religion in Berkeley .

Marc Ellis “After 9/11: The Struggle to Define Jewish Identity”

Marc Ellis is University Professor of American and Jewish Studies at Baylor University, where in 2000 he founded and became the first director of the Center for American and Jewish Studies. In 1980, Dr. Ellis joined the faculty of the Maryknoll School of Theology where he founded the Institute for Justice and Peace. From 19951998 he was a Senior Fellow at the Center for the Study of World Religions and a Visiting Scholar at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University as well a Visiting Professor in Religious Studies at Florida State University. Among his books are Toward a Jewish Theology of Liberation: The Challenge of the 21st Century (2004), Israel And Palestine -Out Of The Ashes : The Search for Jewish Identity in the Twenty-first Century (2002), Revolutionary Forgiveness: Essays on Judaism, Christianity, and the Future of Religious Life (2000), A Year at the Catholic Worker: A Spiritual Journey Among the Poor (2000 ). Unholy Alliance : Religion and Atrocity in Our Time (1997).

Tamar Frankiel, “Spiritual Community in the Post-9/11 World: A Jewish Perspective”

Tamar Frankiel is Dean of Students and Professor of Comparative Religion at the Academy for Jewish Religion in California. She holds a Ph.D. in the History of Religions from the University of Chicago and is the author of The Gift of the Kabbalah (2001); The Voice of Sarah: Feminine Spirituality and Traditional Judaism (1990); co-author of Minding the Temple of the Soul and Entering the Temple of Dreams (1997 and 2000, with Judy

Greenfeld) as well as four other books and numerous scholarly articles on comparative religion in America.

Roger Gottlieb “9/11 and the American Empire: Some Jewish Questions and Answers”

Roger Gottlieb is a Professor of Philosophy at Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts . He is the author of A Spirituality of Resistance (2003), Joining Hands: Politics and Religion Together for Social Change (2002), Marxism: Origin and Betrayal (1992) and editor of Liberating Faith: Religious Voices for Justice, Peace, and Ecological Wisdom (2003), and This Sacred Earth: Religion, Nature, Environment (1995).

Rabbi Michael Lerner, “What Next? Will It Make a Difference if We Succeed in Exposing 9/11 as a Fraud?”

Rabbi Michael Lerner is editor of the world's largest circulation progressive Jewish magazine, TIKKUN, and rabbi of Beyt Tikkun Synagogue in San Francisco . Rabbi Lerner is author of more than ten books, including Jewish Renewal (1995), The Politics of Meaning: Restoring Hope and Possibility in an Age of Cynicism (1997), Spirit Matters (2002), Healing Israel/Palestine (2003) and The Geneva Accord : And Other Strategies for Healing the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (2004).

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, “Muslim Problem or Covert Operations Nightmare?: The Question of the Root of International Terrorism”

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is executive director of the Institute for Policy Research and Development in Brighton, England, and the best-selling author of The War on Freedom: How and Why America was Attacked: September 11, 2001, which won him the Naples Prize, Italy's most prestigious literary award, and The War on Truth: 9/11, Disinformation and the Anatomy of Terrorism . A regular political commentator on BBC Radio, Ahmed has been named a Global Expert on War, Peace and International Affairs by The Freedom Network of the International Society for Individual Liberty in California . He is the author of many internationally acclaimed research papers and reports on human rights practices and Western foreign policy. His latest book is Behind the War on Terror: Western Secret Strategy and the Struggle for Iraq .

Kevin Barrett, "Interpreting the Unspeakable: The Myth of 9/11"

Kevin Barrett has taught English, French, Arabic, American Civilization, Humanities, African Literature, Folklore, and Islam at colleges and universities in the San Francisco Bay area, Paris, and Madison, Wisconsin. His Ph.D. dissertation on Moroccan legend compares contemporary legends to classic saints' legends. He is serving as president of Khidria, a non-profit corporation dedicated to Islamic socioenvironmental awareness, writing and editing for the Muslim magazine al-Jumuah, and spearheading MUJCA-NET, the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth.

Faiz Khan: "American Muslims and ‘9/11 Truth': The Paralysis of Discourse, The Incompetence of Academia, and The Need for an Accurate Diagnosis"

Faiz Khan is a Muslim scholar and educator as well as an M.D. with a dual specialty in emergency and internal medicine. He has been living and working in New York City since 1969. A 9/11 first responder, he has been in the forefront of post-9/11 peace and education efforts in New York and elsewhere. He is well-known as a staunchly outspoken opponent of terror in all its guises, and has participated in two memorial services for the victims of 9/11, as well as the New York group Muslims Against Terrorism. Dr. Khan is the author of “9/11: An Islamic Perspective” published by Belief Net in their selection of essays on religion and 9/11. An Assistant Imam at two New York area mosques, Dr. Kahn has treated subjects related to Islam, politics, and 9/11 at numerous speaking engagements and publications. Dr. Khan is a co-founder of MUJCA-NET, the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth.

Enver Masud, "The War on Islam"

Enver Masud is an engineering management consultant, and has worked for the U.S. Department of Energy, the World Bank, EBRD and USAID in Albania, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Latvia, Pakistan, Russia, and Tanzania. He is the founder and CEO of The Wisdom Fund, a think tank and information outlet based near Washington , DC dedicated to advancing social justice and interfaith understanding through presenting the truth about Islam.

Yasmin Ahmed: "The Remaking of Islam in the Post-9/11 Era"

Yasmin Ahmed is an Egyptian-born American freelance journalist based in Madison , Wisconsin . She grew up in Madison and earned a BS in Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is currently a graduate student in Journalism/Mass Communications. Her work has been published by Middle East Times , the Wisconsin State Journal , Islamicity , Q Magazine , al-Jumuah Magazine , Islamonline , Media Monitors Network, and other outlets.

Please Support MUJCA-NET MUJCA-NET needs your support. We are a non-profit organization and the scale of our activities depends entirely on your generosity. We would like to get copies of David Griffin's two 9/11 books (see above) into the hands of every religious leader in America. And we would like to push 9/11 truth onto the front pages of every newspaper in America. But we can't do it without your help. If you would like to donate to MUJCA-NET, click here.

TOP

Le Carême : une prévention active du cancer

1. o Publié le : mercredi 18 février
2. o Auteur(s) : Rédaction E&R
3. o Mots-clés : Christianisme; France; Religion; Santé; Science
4. o Commentaires : 8 o

52 votes

Pour les chrétiens, le carême, qui commence ce mercredi, puise ses origines dans le souvenir de la retraite que Jésus Christ effectua quarante jours durant dans le désert. Lieu où il se retira pour méditer et prier. Outre la tentation à laquelle il fut soumis par Satan, la privation de nourriture sera un élément clef de cette épreuve, dont il sortira encore plus grand. Plus de 2000 ans après quel sens donner à ce moment ? Et si, au-delà de l’aspect religieux, il nous offrait la possibilité d’améliorer notre santé globale, mieux encore : d’éloigner le cancer et pourquoi pas de l’éviter ?

Le cancer est une réalité, pas une fatalité. Avec 355 000 nouveaux cas chaque année en France, le cancer touche 200 000 hommes pour 155 000 femmes. Au total, 148 000 en mourront. L’âge médian de cette maladie dégénérative est de 68 ans. Cela veut concrètement dire qu’au final, un homme sur deux et une femme sur trois croiseront sa route. Voilà pour les chiffres, ils font mal. Cette maladie est meurtrière, terriblement traumatisante et handicapante. Elle mutile toujours dans le corps et trop souvent dans la tête.

Depuis plus de 50 ans, force est de constater que l’establishment a échouédans sa capacité d’éradication du cancer. De plan en plan, l’État, à coup de milliards, fait ce qu’il peut. Ce qu’il peut ou ce qu’il veut ? C’est là le nœud du problème. Dans les années 70, un médecin Lillois du nom d’André Gernez révolutionna le pré carré des mandarins de la faculté de médecine, en développant auprès de ses confrères une théorie sur les mécanismes et la prévention de la carcinogénèse. S’en suivirent débats et commentaires en plus haut lieu. La faculté des sciences était en ébullition. Par la révision du concept des cellules souches, André Gernez, d’un coup d’un seul, était capable d’expliciter les lois et les règles de la cancérisation, la dynamique cancéreuse et par là même son éradication, le tout sur la base scientifiquement solide de néo-postulats biologiques et pathogéniques. L’accueil fut enthousiaste. Le président de l’Académie de médecine écrivit à André Gernez, lui mentionnant qu’il méritait d’être au Cénacle, rien de moins. Puis plus rien. André Gernez resta incompris, volontairement incompris. Trop en avance sur son temps, dirent certains. André Gernez, connu de tout le milieu médical, s’est éteint le 8 janvier 2014 dans l’indifférence générale d’un monde scientifique rivé sur ses convictions et peu enclin à faire bouger les lignes. Nous pourrons à l’occasion d’un prochain rendez-vous décortiquer le pourquoi de cet immobilisme. Sans en connaître les méandres, vous en devinez les contours. Concrètement, que proposait André Gernez ? Avant d’aller plus avant, petit retour en arrière sur les grands principes qui régissent le processus cancéreux.

Comment naît le cancer ?

Nous sommes constitués, entre autre, de 100 000 milliards de cellules. Chacune d’elle à un potentiel divisionnel limité. C’est pour cela que nous mourons. À chacun instant dans notre corps, nos cellules se divisent pour que d’une cellule souche – saine – naisse une cellule génératrice et une cellule fonctionnelle. La génératrice – dite cellule fille – fera le même parcours que sa mère, elle se divisera. Pour imager notre propos, on peut la comparer à la reine des abeilles. La cellule fonctionnelle quant à elle, attachée à une fonction précise, effectuera sa tâche et disparaîtra. C’est en quelque sorte l’abeille ouvrière monotâche. C’est la constante cellulaire, celle qui fait que nous ne mesurons pas 5 mètres de haut et que notre foie ne pèse pas 3 kilos. Seulement, une fois sur mille – le taux mutatif –, il y a un accroc à ce processus parfaitement huilé. Il y a mutation génétique. La cellule saine fabrique deux cellules génératrices, pour le coup des cellules mutantes qui vont avoir la possibilité de croître indéfiniment de manière géométrique. Deux cellules malignes donnant à leur tour quatre cellules, puis les quatre vont en donner huit, puis seize, etc. Le cancer peut s’installer. Pas immédiatement à vrai dire. Dame nature fait bien les choses. Comme dans le règne animal, la loi de la sélection naturelle s’applique. Tout comme le lionceau chétif, mal formé, qui ne sera pas nourri par sa mère et donc mourra, la cellule maligne – dite dysplasique –, cernée de toutes parts par une cohorte de cellules saines, n’aura pas la possibilité de croître, se développer, essaimer. La mort par apoptose sera sa seule issue. Ce qui fit dire à André Gernez en son temps que si la carcinogénèse était permanente, la cancérisation, elle, était exceptionnelle. Et c’est vrai. En effet, avec le nombre de cellules qui à chaque seconde se divisent dans notre organisme, et malgré un taux mutatif de 1/1000, si à chaque mitose division cellulaire-un processus de cancérisation se mettait en marche, le nombre de 355 000 nouveaux cas de cancer serait très largement dépassé. Malgré ce bouclier de protection, une cellule cancéreuse va pouvoir éviter la mise à l’isolement, passer les mailles du filet et croître – de manière géométrique – en toute quiétude dans un silence assourdissant ; ce qui fait que le cancer est mortel parce qu’il n’est pas de prime abord douloureux. En moyenne, vous mettrez huit ans pour vous rendre compte, cliniquement parlant, que vous madame, avez un cancer du sein. Quant à vous monsieur, vous attendrez onze ans avant de ressentir les effets dévastateurs d’un cancer du poumon. Que de temps perdu, que de terrain gagné par des colonies cellulaires envahissantes qui ne font d’ailleurs jamais que ce que la vie nous impose, instinctivement parlant s’entend : survivre ! Dans ses premières années d’existence, un cancer est particulièrement fragile. La colonie cellulaire est friable. Sa destruction serait de facto particulièrement aisée. Le dépistage officiel que l’on propose aujourd’hui, est hélas, globalement inefficace. Nous sommes dans l’infiniment petit. Quand un scanner décèle pudiquement une « grosseur », il est souvent trop tard, les années ont passé. Le cancer a atteint son seuil d’irréversibilité. Il ne vous reste plus – sauf pour ceux qui sont ouverts à des thérapies alternatives – qu’à entrer dans les protocoles de santé publique : chirurgie, chimiothérapie, radiothérapie. Le processus mortifère par excellence, si éprouvant physiquement et psychologiquement. L’apport de la chimiothérapie sur la survie à cinq ans n’excède pas 2,2 % [1].

L’idée simple et géniale d’un médecin du Nord

C’est là qu’André Gernez entre en jeu. Au lieu de taper sur un cancer déclaré dont vous avez maintenant compris le cheminement, la progression virulente, pourquoi ne pas annuellement faire une cure préventive dont l’unique objectif serait d’éliminer d’éventuelles cellules cancéreuses naissantes, et donc particulièrement instables ? Ces néoplasies ne résisteront pas à une simple chiquenaude. S’il est besoin d’une tronçonneuse pour abattre un chêne, il suffit d’un marteau pour écraser un gland. C’est juste du bon sens. Le protocole de prévention active du cancer à cette ambition. Avant de rentrer dans les détails, précisons l’utilisation de l’expression « prévention active » que l’on pourrait mettre en regard de la prévention passive. Qu’en est-il ?

La prévention passive, selon André Gernez, c’est l’alimentation, l’hygiène de vie, l’activité sportive. La prévention active s’inscrit dans un protocole éprouvé, logique dont voici les grandes lignes. On peut le décrire en trois grandes phases.

La première, essentielle, incontournable : la réduction alimentaire sur 30 jours. Et revoilà pour le coup le Carême. Toutes les études convergent, aussi bien sur l’animal que sur l’homme : la restriction calorique inscrite dans la durée favorise l’allongement de la vie. Si vous voulez manger beaucoup, mangez peu ; vous mangerez longtemps, car vous vivrez plus vieux. Simple, et surtout redoutablement efficace. Entendons-nous bien : nous parlons là de restriction alimentaire, et non de jeûne hydrique. Sujet qui fera l’objet d’un prochain article.

La deuxième phase consiste à se complémenter en vitamines et minéraux. L’on sait pertinemment l’effet positif que certaines substances ont sur l’organisme ; des qualités anti-inflammatoires, antioxydantes. Une sorte de cocktail gagnant anticancer.

La troisième phase, plus délicate, mais tout aussi importante, consiste à l’absorption d’un antimitotique – produit anticancéreux – afin d’éliminer sans effets secondaires des cellules, dont nous avons évoqué l’extrême fragilité et instabilité. Nul besoin d’une armada chimiothérapique pour anéantir quelques cellules pré-cancéreuses. Rappelons que la chimiothérapie n’est pas cytosélective. Elle frappe indifféremment les cellules saines et les cellules malignes. Ce qui a pour conséquence d’engendrer beaucoup de dégâts dans des organismes très affaiblis. La condition, car il y en a une, est de faire cette cure annuellement à date anniversaire, de préférence au printemps. Vous éviterez ainsi la progression exponentielle – dite géométrique – d’une année sur l’autre, en écrasant d’une année sur l’autre des cellules précancéreuses ou cancéreuses. Elles n’auront ainsi jamais le temps de créer une colonie suffisamment nombreuse pour bouleverser l’homéostasie et permettre l’apparition de signes cliniques. Soit le cancer disparaîtra, soit il restera à un niveau inoffensif, muré dans une impossible expression. C’est implacablement logique, simple et efficace ? Alors parlons-en. Ce protocole dont André Gernez traça les grandes lignes fut expérimenté sous le manteau à son insu à l’Inserm au service de toxicologie du professeur Thruaut dans les années 70. Le résultat fut saisissant. Sur des lots de rats cancérisés par inoculation d’un hépatocarcinome – cancer primitif du foie, très virulent – les données fournies officieusement à André Gernez furent les suivantes. Reprenons le processus en trois phases décrit ci-dessus.

Phase 1 : réduction alimentaire de 30 % de l’apport calorique journalier durant 30 jours. Un lot de rat fut soumis uniquement à cette phase. Taux d’éradication du cancer du foie à l’issue de l’expérimentation : 52 %.

Phase 2 : réduction alimentaire, plus complémentation vitaminique : Un autre lot de rat fut soumis uniquement à ces deux phases. Taux d’éradication du cancer du foie à l’issue de l’expérimentation : 72 %.

Phase 3 : réduction alimentaire, plus complémentation vitaminique et prise d’anti mitotique : Un autre lot de rat fut soumis uniquement à ces trois phases. Taux d’éradication du cancer du foie à l’issue de l’expérimentation : 93%. Les résultats dépasseront les espérances les plus folles.

André Gernez ne sera jamais informé officiellement de ces résultats. On lui communiquera les données, sous le manteau, un soir sur une aired’autoroute. À ce jour encore, l’Inserm reste sourd à toute demande officielle de communication de l’étude. Près de 45 ans après, le silence reste entier. Concrètement, rapprochez-vous de l’Association Pour André Gernez (APAG) afin d’en savoir plus. Le protocole, et c’était le vœu d’André Gernez, ne peut pas, ne doit pas être communiqué au grand public. Il doit se faire par l’intermédiaire d’un praticien de santé. Il ne s’agit pas d’une affaire d’argent, mais du simple bons sens. L’automédication peut être dangereuse. En son temps, l’affaire Gernez a fait grand bruit. L’excellent livre de Soline Abbeville, Les Maladies dégénératives. Les propositions d’André Gernez, édité chez Kontre Kulture, reprend dans le détail, mais de façon extrêmement accessible le parcours d’André Gernez. Lisez ou relisez cet ouvrage. Il est une porte d’entrée dans l’univers gernézien. André Gernez restera un des plus grands savants que le siècle passé ait compté. L’accession au prix Nobel lui sera rendu impossible, par la cohorte de mandarins français qui s’organisa afin que son nom ne soit même pas présélectionné. La jalousie des médiocres face à la clairvoyance d’un esprit brillant. André Gernez ce n’est pas simplement une solution contre le cancer. Il a eu l’intime conviction que dérouler la pelote l’amènerait à solutionner l’ensemble des maladies dégénératives. Pour le corps médical s’en était trop, trop d’un coup. Son credo, l’hormone de croissance. Mais de cela nous reparlerons bientôt. Le mot de la fin, laissons-le lui, sous forme d’hommage :

« Les solutions surtout quand elles sont simples, sont évidentes, et quand c’est évident, c’est humiliant. »

Notes

[1] Étude publiée sous le titre : « The contribution of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy to 5-year Survival in Adult Malignancies ».

Les musulmans de Russie veulent concilier islam et patriotisme

2 juin, 2015 Oleg Egorov, pour RBTH

Le 27 mai dernier, le Conseil des muftis de Russie a adopté la doctrine sociale des musulmans russes, un document précisant la place et le rôle des musulmans dans la vie de la Russie du point de vue de l’islam comme de la loi laïque. La doctrine revêt un caractère patriotique et appelle les croyants àêtre loyaux envers l’État.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VN8xXYDPnk

De nombreux experts figurent parmi les auteurs de la doctrine des musulmans : des représentants du Conseil des muftis de Russie (CMR), l’une des principales organisations musulmanes, ainsi que des théologiens, des savants et des scientifiques. Le document réunit des recommandations destinées aux musulmans sur un large éventail de questions allant del’attitude vis-à-vis de l’État jusqu’aux problèmes quotidiens. Les dispositions de la doctrine reposent tant sur les règlements émanant des sources du droit musulman – le Coran et la Sunna (la vie du prophète Mahomet), que sur les postulats de la législation laïque russe. En essence, la doctrine est une vision des théologiens islamiques pro-pouvoir de ce que doit être un vrai musulman. Le fidèle est avant tout vu comme un patriote. « L’amour pour la partie n’est pas seulement acceptable, il est indispensable du point de vue des orientations de l’islam », précise le texte de la doctrine. Cela concerne tant les sentiments patriotiques que le respect des lois. La doctrine explique que le musulman adopte les obligations du contrat social prévu par la Constitution. Il doit également être un homme de paix : la doctrine précise que les guerres en tant que formes du djihad (guerre sainte, ndlr) doivent être soigneusement évitées. Le djihad militaire ne peut être effectué que sur ordre du dirigeant légitime.

Le spectre du radicalisme

A lire aussi

Un mariage tchétchène qui divise l'opinion

Kadyrov sans frontières

Cette doctrine sociale n’est pas la première adoptée par les théologiens islamiques russes, la précédente remontant à 2001. Dans un entretien avec RBTH, l’un des scientifiques ayant participé à l’élaboration du document de 2015, le recteur de l’Institut islamique de Moscou Damir Khaïretdinov, explique :  

« Depuis la création de la première doctrine, la situation a changé. Elle s’est stabilisée en Russie (il fait référence à la cessation des hostilités dans le Caucase du Nord, ndlr), mais dans le monde, c’est malheureusement la tendance inverse. M. Khaïretdinov indique que de nombreux jeunes musulmans, notamment sur le territoire russe, sont influencés par les extrémistes, certains partent au Proche-Orient pour combattre dans les rangs de groupes terroristes ». 

 Le dignitaire religieux souligne que l’un des principaux objectifs de la nouvelle doctrine est de retenir les jeunes dans le cadre de l’islam traditionnel. La menace de radicalisation de l’islam est l’une des raisons pour lesquelles la doctrine actuelle revêt un caractère ostensiblement pacifique. M. Khaïretdinov précise :  

« Les deux principaux volets de la doctrine sont consacrés à la cohabitation pacifique des musulmans avec les représentants des autres confessions et à la bonne attitude à l’égard du djihad et du takfir. Le takfir est une pratique religieuse par laquelle l’autorité religieuse déclare un État comme mécréant et appelle les musulmans à le combattre (cette pratique est l’une des bases des activités de l’EI, ndlr). La doctrine stipule que le takfir ne doit pas être appliqué aujourd’hui ».

Cela portera-t-il ses fruits ?

La doctrine entrera officiellement en vigueur en juin, après sa signature officielle par les trois principales organisations musulmanes du pays. Damir Khaïretdinov estime que le document fera autorité au sein de la population musulmane.

Par ailleurs, dans son commentaire sur les perspectives de la doctrine, Varvara Pakhomenko, consultante de l'International Crisis Group et spécialiste du Caucase, nous a expliqué que l’autorité des théologiens ayant adopté la doctrine n’est pas absolue pour tous les fidèles.  

« Il faut se rappeler que dans l’islam, contrairement à la chrétienté, il n’existe pas d’institut unique de l’Eglise qui peut dire : « agis comme ci ou comme ça ». Les organisations musulmanes jouissent indiscutablement de respect auprès de nombreux musulmans, mais pas chez tout le monde. Il existe de nombreuses communautés et prédicateurs influents, notamment radicaux, qui sont en opposition vis-à-vis de l’islam officiel ».

L’autre faiblesse de la doctrine, selon Pakhomenko, est son orientation sur« l’islam traditionnel » comme soutien de l’État russe. Ainsi, les partisans des courants plus radicaux sont exclus du dialogue entre le pouvoir et la communauté islamique.

The Apostle Paul Founder of Christianity

by Lewis Loflin

Jesus was not the founder of Christianity as we know it today. Most of the New Testament doesn't even concern the historical Jesus. The Apostle Paul and his followers define what became Christianity. Paul never met Jesus in the flesh. Influenced by Greek Hellenism and various mystery cults he turned the man Jesus into spiritual deity. Paul (formally Saul) was a hired hit man and enforcer for the Roman appointed-controlled High Priest the traitorous Caiaphas. He was hostile to Judaism and there's no real proof he had any knowledge of it outside the Greek Septuagint. Jesus left his brother James in charge of the Jerusalem Church after His execution for sedition by the Romans. James tolerated Paul only because the money he could extract from wealthy gentiles supported the penniless church. Paul had no direct connection to Jesus' apostles other than Peter. The was illustrated in Luke (Luke never met Jesus either) claimed Peter had special visions to do away to Jewish dietary laws. Paul broke with James and Judaism in total about 50 A.D. over circumcision. (See Galatians). With James enforcing circumcision as God dictated this meant the end of Paul's wealthy gentile followers.

The Jerusalem Church would be destroyed during the Jewish revolt of 70 A.D. The survivor's of Jesus Church such as the Ebionites would be destroyed for heresy by the official Christian church later on. Because there are no known writings from Jesus or His actual Apostles, most of what He really taught is remains controversial. Also see the disputed Gnostic Gospels.

According to Paul, Jesus' Jewish teachings are not relevant to salvation. While Jesus is regarded by Christians as the founder of the faith. Paul's role in defining Christianity can't be ignored. Roman Catholicism chose Paul over Jesus.

"Paul is regarded as the great interpreter of Jesus' mission, who explained, in a way that Jesus himself never did, how Jesus' life and death fitted into a cosmic scheme of salvation, stretching from the creation of Adam to the end of time."

The doctrines of Christianity come mostly from the teaching or influence of Paul, an alleged Pharisee(?) who rejected his Pharisaic Judaism. His worship was that of a "Christ" totally unrelated to the Jewish Messiah, a nationalist (and human) figure that was supposed to free the nation from foreign (Roman) rule.

Paul would later be placed over his Jewish-Christian rivals by a Gnostic heretic named Marcion. See Marcion. The Church in its struggles with both Marcion and the Gnostics was forced to define itself and launch an internal war to silence opponents. What is shown below is taken word for word from The Sierra Reference Encyclopedia. Copyright 1996 P. F. Collier, L. P. All rights reserved. PAUL, ST. PAUL, ST. (died c. A.D. 68), founder of Pauline Christianity. His name was originally Saul. He later claimed that he was a Jew of the tribe of Benjamin, from a long-established Pharisee family in Tarsus. According to Acts (though not according to Paul himself) he studied in Jerusalem under Gamaliel, the leader of the Pharisees and grandson of Hillel.

This account of Paul's youth, however, is subject to doubt, since the tribe of Benjamin had long ceased to exist, and Pharisee families are otherwise unknown in Tarsus. According to Paul's opponents, the Ebionites, he came from a family of recent converts to Judaism. He learnt the trade of tent-making (or perhaps leather-working), by which he made his living. While still a youth in Jerusalem, Saul became part of the opposition to the newly formed Jerusalem Church (the disciples of Jesus, who, believing that Jesus had been resurrected, continued to hope for his return to complete his messianic mission).

Saul was present at the death of Stephen. Soon after, Saul was an active persecutor of the Jerusalem Church, entering its synagogues and arresting its members. Acts represents this as due to Saul's zeal as a Pharisee, but this is doubtful, as the Pharisees, under Gamaliel, were friendly to the Jerusalem Church (see Acts 5). Moreover, Saul was acting in concert with the high priest (Acts 9:2), who was a Sadducee opponent of the Pharisees. It seems likely that Saul was at this period an employee of the Roman-appointed high priest, playing a police role in suppressing movements regarded as a threat to the Roman occupation. Since Jesus had been crucified on a charge of sedition, his followers were under the same cloud. The high priest then entrusted Saul with an important mission, which was to travel to Damascus to arrest prominent members of the Jerusalem Church. This must have been a clandestine kidnapping operation, since Damascus was not under Roman rule at the time but was in fact a place of refuge for the persecuted Nazarenes.

On the way to Damascus, Paul experienced a vision of Jesus that converted him from persecutor to believer. Paul joined the Christians of Damascus, but soon he had to flee Damascus to escape the officers of King Aretas (II Corinthians 11:32-33), though a later, less authentic, account in Acts 9:22-25 changes his persecutors to "the Jews." After his vision, according to Paul's own account (Galatians 1:17), he went into the desert of Arabia for a period, seeking no instruction. According to Acts, however, he sought instruction first from Ananias of Damascus and then from the apostles in Jerusalem.

These contradictory accounts reflect a change in Paul's status: in his own view, he had received a revelation that put him far higher than the apostles, while in later Church opinion he had experienced a conversion that was only the beginning of his development as a Christian. Paul's self-assessment is closer to the historical truth, which is that he was the founder of Christianity. Neither Jesus himself nor his disciples had any intention of founding a new religion. The need for a semblance of continuity between Christianity and Judaism, and between Gentile and Jewish Christianity, led to a playing-down of Paul's creative role.

The split that took place between Paul and the Jerusalem Church is minimized in the Pauline book of Acts, which contrasts with Paul's earlier and more authentic account in Galatians 2. Paul's originality lies in his conception of the death of Jesus as saving mankind from sin. Instead of seeing Jesus as a messiah of the Jewish type human savior from political bondage, he saw him as a salvation-deity whose atoning death by violence was necessary to release his devotees for immortal life.

This view of Jesus' death seems to have come to Paul in his Damascus vision. Its roots lie not in Judaism, but in mystery-religion, with which Paul was acquainted in Tarsus.

The violent deaths of Osiris, Attis, Adonis, and Dionysus brought divinization to their initiates. Paul, as founder of the new Christian mystery, initiated the Eucharist, echoing the communion meal of the mystery religions.

The awkward insertion of eucharistic material based on I Corinthians 11:23-26 into the Last Supper accounts in the Gospels cannot disguise this, especially as the evidence is that the Jerusalem Church did not practice the Eucharist.

Paul's missionary campaign began c.44 in Antioch. He journeyed to Cyprus, where he converted Sergius Paulus, the governor of the island. It was probably at this point that he changed his name from Saul to Paul, in honor of his distinguished convert.

After journeys in Asia Minor where he made many converts, Paul returned to Antioch. His second missionary tour (51-53) took him as far as Corinth; and his third (54-58) led to a three-year stay in Ephesus.

It was during these missionary periods that he wrote his Epistles. Paul's new religion had the advantage over other salvation-cults of being attached to the Hebrew Scriptures, which Paul now reinterpreted as forecasting the salvation-death of Jesus. This gave Pauline Christianity an awesome authority that proved attractive to Gentiles thirsting for salvation.

Paul's new doctrine, however, met with disapproval from the Jewish-Christians of the Jerusalem Church, who regarded the substitution of Jesus' atoning death for the observance of the Torah as a lapse into paganism. Paul was summoned to Jerusalem by the leaders James (Jesus' brother), Peter, and John to explain his doctrine (c.50). At the ensuing conference, agreement was reached that Paul's Gentile converts did not need to observe the Torah. This was not a revolutionary decision, since Judaism had never insisted on full conversion to Judaism for Gentiles. But Paul on this occasion concealed his belief that the Torah was no longer valid for Jews either.

He was thus confirmed in the role of "apostle to the Gentiles," with full permission to enroll Gentiles in the messianic movement without requiring full conversion to Judaism. It was when Peter visited him in Antioch and became aware of the full extent of Paul's views that a serious rift began between Pauline and Jewish Christianity.

At a second conference in Jerusalem (c.55), Paul was accused by James of teaching Jews "to turn their backs on Moses" (Acts 21:21). Again, however, Paul evaded the charge by concealing his views, and he agreed to undergo a test of his own observance of the Torah.

His deception, however, was detected by a group of "Asian Jews" (probably Jewish Christians) who were aware of his real teaching. A stormy protest ensued in which Paul feared for his life and was rescued by the Roman police, to whom he declared for his protection that he was a Roman citizen. This surprising announcement was the end of Paul's association with the Jerusalem Church, to whom the Romans were the chief enemy. The Roman commandant, Claudius Lysias, decided to bring Paul before the Sanhedrin in order to discover the cause of the disturbance. With great presence of mind, Paul appealed to the Pharisee majority to acquit him, claiming to be a Pharisee like James. Paul was rescued by the Pharisees from the high priest, like Peter before him.

However, the high priest, resenting this escape, appointed a body of men to assassinate Paul. Learning of the plot, Paul again placed himself under the protection of the Romans, who transported him by armed guard from Jerusalem to Caesarea. The High Priest Ananias was implacable, no doubt because of Paul's defection from his police task in Damascus, and laid a charge of anti-Roman activity against him.

Paul appealed for a trial in Rome before Caesar, his right as a Roman citizen. The assertion of Acts that the Jewish "elders" were also implicated in the charges against Paul is unhistorical, since these same elders had just acquitted him in his Sanhedrin trial. Paul was sent to Rome, and here our information ends. Legends speak of his eventual martyrdom in Rome. Paul's authentic voice is found in his Epistles. Here he appears as an eloquent writer, skilled in asserting his authority over his converts as their inspired teacher.

The view often asserted, however, that Paul writes in the style of a rabbi is incorrect. His occasional attempts to argue in rabbinical style (e.g., Romans 7:1-6) reveal his lack of knowledge of rabbinic logic.

Paul's letters belong to Greek literature and have affinity to Stoic and Cynic literature. His knowledge of the Scriptures is confined to their Greek translation, the Septuagint. Paul was a religious genius, who invested Greek mystery-religion with the historical sweep and authority of the Jewish Bible. HYAM MACCOBY An excellent book on this subject by Hyam Maccoby is titled The Mythmaker, Paul and the Invention of Christianity. (ISBN 0-06-015582--5)

1. o Paul the Apostle and Salvation Thru Faith
2. o James, Paul, and the Dead Sea Scrolls by John Oller
3. o The Theology of Paul
4. o Review of Hyam Maccoby's Paul and Hellenism by John Mann
5. o Paul's Bungling Attempt At Sounding Pharisaic by Hyam Maccoby
6. o Hyam Maccoby was mostly right
7. o The Problem of Paul Introduction
8. o The Problem of Paul 1
9. o The Problem of Paul 2
10. o Jesus and the Jewish Resistance Introduction
11. o Jesus and the Jewish Resistance: The Messiah
12. o Jesus and the Jewish Resistance: The Pharisees
13. o Jesus and the Jewish Resistance: The King of the Jews
14. o Jesus and the Jewish Resistance: The Day of the Lord

Pauline Epistles

The Pauline Epistles (or Corpus Paulinum) constitute those epistles traditionally attributed to Paul. Their names are based on the Christian groups or individuals to whom they are addressed.

1. o Epistle to the Romans --Paul the Apostle
2. o First Epistle to the Corinthians --Paul
3. o Second Epistle to the Corinthians --Paul
4. o Epistle to the Galatians --Paul
5. o Epistle to the Ephesians --Paul
6. o Epistle to the Philippians --Paul
7. o Epistle to the Colossians --Paul
8. o First Epistle to the Thessalonians --Paul
9. o Second Epistle to the Thessalonians --Paul
10. o First Epistle to Timothy --Paul
11. o Second Epistle to Timothy --Paul
12. o Epistle to Titus --Paul
13. o Epistle to Philemon --Paul
14. o Epistle to the Hebrews --Anonymous, traditionally attributed to Paul.

Paul, as true of all New Testament writings wrote in Greek. He was a Hellenistic Jew (or from a family of converts) and a member of the vast Jewish Diaspora. Paul's Hellenistic Judaism wasn't new at all, but part of a process begun about 300 BC. The Jewish populations at that time may have been between 5-7 million concentrated mainly in what is called the Middle East and Turkey today. There were a million in Babylon descended from those taken by the Assyrians and Babylonians, another 300,000 in the Greek cultural city of Alexandria, Egypt. From the beginning, outside Jews and Gentiles as well were often met with hostility in the Holy Land. They brought in new ideas and spawned new cults. There were also deep divisions within Judaism even in Israel itself. There was a great influence from the Persians and later their bitter enemies the Greeks. 80% of the Jews didn't even live in Judea. Paul was one of those Hellenistic Jews.

1. o Alexander, the Jews, and Hellenism
2. o Hellenistic period
3. o Syncretism
4. o Platonism and Christianity
5. o Docetism
6. o ALLEGORICAL INTERPRETATION
7. o Hyam Maccoby [The Mythmaker] was mostly right
8. o Marcion's Church Not Really Gnostic?
9. o Jewish Origins of Gnosticism

But if Greek philosophy and Zoroastrian theology gave Jewish officials problems in the Holy Land, Hellenistic Judaism made millions of converts outside Judea. Foremost stands Paul's contemporary Philo of Alexandria. His synthesis of Platonism and Judaism would influence not only the Church Fathers, but the writer of John's Gospel, believed to have lived in Ephesus.* This is one of the churches Paul founded.

* Ephesus is favored, others argue Antioch in Syria or Alexandria Egypt. (New American Bible) According to the Eastern Orthodox Church, all of the New Testament Gospels "written in the vernacular Greek, an Alexandrian dialect, called koine." See The Gospels

1. o The gospel roots of Christian pantheism
2. o Neoplatonism
3. o Judaism, Hellenism, and the Logos
4. o Judaism meets Zoroastrianism
5. o St. Augustine, Neoplatonists
6. o Humanism, the Early Church, and Rational Religion
7. o Jews Killed Christ?
8. o The Gospel of John, an overview
9. o Judaism Meets Hellenism and the Logos
10. o Salvation is not just "faith alone"
11. o Anabaptists: Separate by Choice, Marginal by Force

Matthew, Mark, and John never mention Paul or Luke. The Gospel of Luke doesn't either, but the same writer (believed to have written Acts) introduces Paul and also knew Mark. (Acts 12:25, And Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem, when they had fulfilled their ministry, and took with them John, whose surname was Mark.) Peter (not written by Peter) also mentions and endorses Paul (2 Peter 3:15), but the whole Gospel sounds too much like Paul. Paul mentions Mark (2 Timothy 4:11, Only Luke is with me. Take Mark, and bring him with thee: for he is profitable to me for the ministry.) and in particular Luke his "beloved" physician. (Colossians 4:14) Mark's Gospel never mentions Paul. The original (Jewish) sect Jesus founded were those attacked as "Judanizers" and were exterminated for heresy after Nicaea in 325 AD. One group was the Nazarenes who followed the Torah while believing Jesus only to be human. Another was the Ebionites, who believed Jesus was human, but also observed the Torah. (The two groups seem interchangeable.) Putting the New Testament books in the approximate correct order by date written:

1. o James (50-60 AD?) opposed Paul
2. o Paul's Epistles plus Hebrews (50-64 AD) (secular and Evangelical seem to agree here.)
3. o Matthew, Mark, Luke/Acts (Evangelicals 65-70 AD) or Mark, Matthew, Luke/Acts (Secular Mark, 70 AD; Matthew, Luke/Acts 70-80 AD) Luke and Acts were one work.
4. o I, II Peter (65-80 AD?)
5. o Book of Revelation 81-96 AD during the rule of Domitian.
6. o Gospel of John (96 AD or later) See John
7. o I, II, III John, 96+ AD "an extension of John." (New American Bible)
8. o Jude (Writer unknown, could proceed John)

Paul, like the other writers, expected the Kingdom of God in their lifetimes and the end of the world in their lifetimes. (Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled. Matthew 24:34, Mark 13:30, Luke 21:32, John 21:22) Matthew 16:28, "Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son ofman coming in his kingdom." This is about the only place Paul agrees with the other gospel writers.

For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.

For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord... (1 Thessalonians 4:15-17)

Paul's theology

Paul's theology is the main basis of Christian dogma. First was the concept that the death and resurrection of Jesus superseded the value of the Mosaic Law, a belief that is often expressed as "Jesus died for our sins." It is unclear how much of this idea is original with Paul; Jerome notes the existence in the 4th century of a Christian sect in Syria called the Ebionites who still observed the Mosaic Law, thus suggesting at least some Christians may not have believed in the salvation theology of the Passion. However, there is some evidence that suggests Paul's concept of salvation coming from the death of Jesus was not unique amongst Christians; Philippians 2:5-11 which expounds a Christology similar to Paul's, has long been identified as a hymn of the early Christians, and dated as existing before Paul's letter.

Related to Paul's interpretation of the resurrection are his concepts of faith, which he explains through his explanation of Abraham, and of righteousness and the forgiveness for sins, using language that Augustine of Hippo later elaborated on in his formulation of original sin. In the New Testament the doctrine of original sin is most clearly expressed by Paul's writings. His writings also clearly express the doctrine that salvation is not achieved by conforming to Mosaic law. Salvation is through faith in (or knowledge of) Jesus Christ. Paul was first Evangelist to expound the doctrine of Christ's divinity. Like most forms of gnosticism this isn't by faith-knowledge in the rational sense. It's the spiritual sense of mysticism. Paul also develops a strong doctrine of the Holy Spirit. Much of Romans and particularly the ending to 2 Corinthians portrays the Spirit in equality to the Father and Son. These inferences would later be developed into the doctrine of the Trinity. Paul's notion that the Holy Spirit dwells in all believers at the time of their conversion. (source Wikipedia)

The Only Begotten Son?

In the New Testament Jesus is often called the "Son of God." Paul in Hebrews 11:17 claims Isaac was Abraham's "only begotten son." Isaac was begotten in the sense the Lord made it possible through Sarah, but Isaac was in no manner divine. But what does "son of God" really mean?

That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; andthey took them wives of all which they chose. (Genesis 6:2) There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

(Genesis 6:4)

Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselvesbefore the LORD, and Satan came also among them. (Job 1:6) Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himselfbefore the LORD. (Job 2:1) John also used the term: "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on hisname..." (John 1:12) Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.

Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. (1 John 3:1) and "Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as heis." (1 John 3:2) Paul uses the term in an identical manner: For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. (Romans 8:14) For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. (Romans 8:19) So as Paul and John illustrate, one who is righteous becomes a "son of God." The term "only begotten Son" is used in relation Jesus only by the writer of John: For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. (John 1:17-18. Also John 3:16, 3:18, and 1 John 4:9) The writer of John is believed to be a Greek convert and his lack of knowledge of Judaism and the Torah is as appalling as his hatred of Jews. (He uses "Jews" as a slur over 60 times in the Gospel of John alone.) First, the Law was given directly by God to Moses. Whomever wrote John is not quoting Jesus, he is giving us his own opinion. Third, Jesus is not the only "only begotten Son" of God: I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. (Psalms 2:7) Psalms is believed to be written by David. When the writer of John does quote Jesus, "But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham." (John 8:40) And according to Paul's follower Luke, "Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead."

(Acts 17:31)

But John 8:40 is contradicted by John 5:18, "Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the Sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God."

That was one of several anti-Semitic lies Paul and his followers concocted to undermine Judaism. Paul was what we call today a self-hating Jews so removed from his roots and culture that he would wish them harm. The problem exists today with the likes of George Soros and Noam Chomsky. See "Killed Their Own Prophets": New Testament Libel of the Jews According to the New American Bible most scholars believe John had been altered and rewritten. That is the opinion of the writer of John, Jesus did not say it. The same story is in the other Gospels without that claim. Does that mean anyone that becomes a "son of God" becomes an equal to God? (These claims are lies. See Did Jews Kill Jesus Christ? Jesus was a man, a human ordained by God to show us the way. So like David (Psalms 132:10, etc.), he was an "anointed" servant of God. Jesus and David were not the only "anointed," "Thus saith the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden.." (Isaiah 45:1) One doesn't even have to be a Jew to be "anointed" and anyone can be a "son" (or daughter) of the Lord as long we act in righteous manner and obey God's Laws. What does Paul say about God's Law? "For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to dothem." (Galatians 3:10)

But Paul goes on, "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree..." (Galatians 3:13) Paul, under the influence of Gnosticism, believed anything of the "world" was vile and corrupt. Thus he sought a spiritual way to salvation as opposed to Judaism and the Law which are of the physical world. Does he mean Jesus? Jesus is cursed? Nowhere in the Bible does it say the Law was a curse, except by Paul. What does Jesus say about the Law?

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." (Matthew 5:17) "But this people who knoweth not the law are cursed." (John 7:49) And what does God say? "Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this law to do them. And all the people shall say, Amen." (Deut 27:26) Paul contradicts both God and Jesus at every turn. The Gentile writer of John was certainly not the Apostle John, referring to the "Jews" and "their Law" in many places. It's a second hand story mixed with a lot of Greek Platonism and anti-Semitic rhetoric.

Nearly all Christian dogma is based on Paul and a misreading of John. Jesus, the "anointed" servant of God, is reduced to mere shadow. An object of worship (idolatry), not one to be followed. Jesus is no Platonic Logos. But is Jesus God? "I and my Father are one." said Jesus. (John 10:30) But that must stand beside John 17:22-23, "And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one. I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou

hast loved me."

That's Gnostic pantheism. Paul had no interest in the earthly life of Jesus and cared little for those that did. He spoke only of a spiritual Christ. Even in his own words, he claims to be sent directly by God to be an apostle. (1 Corinthians 1:1, Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God...) Thus Paul by his own claims, had a direct line to God, something the original apostles never had. By tradition, Mark brought the Gospel to Egypt while Peter brought the Gospel to Rome. But the connection back to Paul is clear. Mark and in particular Peter being one of the original twelve, directly disobeyed Jesus. But what did Jesus have to say?

"These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not..." (Matthew 10:5)

This was missing from Luke and Mark, Paul's followers. In Acts Luke claims Peter had a special revelation that overruled earlier teachings. What does Paul say about preaching to Gentiles? "And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preachamong the Gentiles..." (Galatians 2:2) So who did Paul get revelations from? Jesus himself never mentioned Adam, the Garden, etc. All of this is based on Paul alone, and the entire concept of no death before the Fall of Adam is also Paul:

"Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come." (Romans 5:14) "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive." (1 Corinthians 15:22)

Paul's claims we are all being punished for Adam's sin, even if we never sinned ourselves. This is so unjust from God who stands for justice. But what does God has to say?

But if a man be just, and do that which is lawful and right... he shall surely live, saith the Lord GOD. If he beget a son that is a robber, a shedder of blood, and that doeth the like to any one of these things...he (the son) shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him..." (Ezekiel 18:5, etc.)

As God explained in Ezekiel, only the sinner will be punished for their own sins and not the sins of others. Nor will others be punished for sins they did not commit. Paul also misquotes the Torah in relation to Abraham, "For if Abraham were justified by works, he had whereof to glory; but not before God. For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and was counted unto him for righteousness. Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation.

However, to the man who does not work but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness." (Romans 4:2-5) The Pauline book Hebrews made a similar claim: "By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promisesoffered up his only begotten son..." (Hebrews 11:17) But is that what God had to say? "[B]ecause thou [Abraham] hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son: That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyedmy voice." Genesis 22:16-18. James agrees with God, "Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? Was not Abraham justified by works when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by his works was made perfect?"

(James 2:19-22) In no manner had Abraham "offered up" his son Isaac. He was ordered by God to sacrifice Isaac (as a test) and because Abraham obeyed God's commands, he was blessed. Paul rewrote this vital passage to reflect his own theology, not that of God. It's clear that without Paul, there would no Christianity outside a Jewish sect following the Torah. The church in order to make it look like Jesus was the founder of Pauline Christianity, rearranged the order in which the New Testament books were written. (We should note there was no New Testament as such until Marcion in the 2nd century.)

1. o More on the Apostle Paul, Original Sin, etc.
2. o Apostle Paul Founder of Christianity
3. o Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet
4. o Modern Ebionites
5. o Comments on the Ebionites
6. o Comments on the Apostle Paul
7. o Jesus and The Day of the Lord
8. o Paul: the Father of Sexism and Anti-Semitism?
9. o Reassessing the Apostle Paul
10. o The Heresy of Thomas: Mystery & Wisdom
11. o James the Just and Salvation via Works
12. o The Heresy of Peter: Compromised Christianity
13. o The Heresy of Luther: Reformation Undone
14. o "Killed Their Own Prophets": New Testament Libel of the Jews

Paul's social views and Christian doctrine

Paul's writings on social issues were just as influential on the life and beliefs of the Christian culture ever since as were his doctrinal statements. In fact, being part of the texts that were generally accepted as inspired scripture, these views were and still are considered part and parcel of the broader Christian doctrine by the more conservative Christians. Paul condemned sexual immorality, including homosexuality, apparently based on the strict moral laws of the Old Testament, as well as presumably his own private revelation from the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 6:9f; Eph. 5:21-33). (Paul is traditionally considered a virgin.) Some of his other dictums included advice to his contemporaries not to marry in the expectation of the near return of Jesus and the Apocalypse; permission to marry, or at least to stay married to, an unbeliever, in the hope that the spouse of a Christian will be converted sooner or later.

The recommendation for women to obey men (based on the story of Eve"man was not made for woman, but woman was made for man") and raise families; the "he who does not work, neither shall he eat" dictum; and the command to young men who have trespassed by sleeping with a woman to marry her, a notion that remained prominent in the European culture and the English Common Law until relatively recently. Paul may have been ambivalent towards slavery, saying that pending the near return of Jesus, people should focus on their faith and not on their social status (1 Cor. 7:21f). Due to his authority, these views have had an influence in Western society into modern times; Paul's apparent failure to explicitly condemn slavery in his Epistle to Philemon may have been sometimes interpreted as justifying the ownership of human beings. (Wikipedia)

Is Christianity Just Zoroastrianism?

Many accuse Christianity of being a rehash of Zoroastrianism. I don't believe it is. If we take most of Christianity, there is nothing new or original accept one thing: Paul's theology of Original Sin, which doesn't exist in Judaism or Zoroastrianism. (While the term doesn't appear in the Bible either, it is clearly stated by Paul.)

The idea Jesus was some sort of human/blood/deity sacrifice for sin (even Christians can't agree on details) is unique to Christianity. Without Paul, all we would have is an apocalyptic Jewish sect. Paul's idea (in particular Augustine's version in the West) is an utter contradiction of the Old Testament while Augustine's views are rejected by the Eastern Orthodox Churches.

1. o What Jesus actually taught and later changes
2. o Why did the Apostles Reject Paul?
3. o Paul the Apostle and Salvation Thru Faith
4. o What is a Former Christian Minister to Do? Convert?
5. o Jewish Proselytizing? by Lorma
6. o Zoroastrianism and the Bible
7. o Original Sin General Views
8. o John Calvin: Free Will and Predestination
9. o Historical Jesus
10. o Debunking the Virgin Birth Prophecy
11. o General Contradictions in the New Testament
12. o The Non-Messianic Genealogy of Jesus
13. o Crucifixion/Resurrection Chart Compare for yourself.
14. o The Real Jesus
15. o Bible Contradictions
16. o The Apostle Paul, Christ's Blood, and the Mithra Cult
17. o Christian Orthodoxy debunks Six Day Creationism
18. o Marcion and Early Christianity The first Protestant
19. o Pelagius the Briton that almost saved the Church
20. o John Calvin
21. o Arminianism Opposed Calvinism
22. o The Trinity Debunked
23. o A Look at Arius and Arianism Opposed the Trinity
24. o Neoplatonism and Christianity 10/9/02
25. o Who Really Killed Jesus?
26. o Judaism is not a Race
27. o Gospel of John

1. o Good Wars for Christians
2. o Humanism and Reason Rejected
3. o Salvation is not faith alone.
4. o Servetus and John Calvin
5. o Christianity in Egypt
6. o My View of other faiths
7. o Among the Goths and the Jews
8. o The Crusades: When Christianity Pushed Back after Four Centuries of Being Attacked
9. o Overview of the The Byzantines or Eastern Christian Empire
10. o Holy Warriors: Islam and the Demise of Classical Civilization
11. o Religion in the Persian Sassanid Dynasty
12. o Overview of the Byzantine Persian Conflict
13. o What Tore Early Christianity Apart?
14. o What is Ethical Monotheism?

Salvation is not by faith alone!!!

Psalm 62:12, For you render to each one according to his works. Proverbs 10:16, The labour of the righteous tendeth to life: the fruit of the wicked to sin. Jeremiah 17:10, I the Lord ... give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings. Ezekiel 18:27, When the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness ... and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul. Matthew 12:37, For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned. Matthew 16:27, For the Son of Man will come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and then He will reward each according to his works. Matthew 19:17, If you want to enter into life, keep the commandments. Matthew 25:41-46, Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or

naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal. Luke 10:26-28, He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. John 5:29,And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. Romans 2:6, 13, Who will render to each one according to his deeds. ... For not the hearers of the law are just in the sight of God, but the doers of the law will be justified. 2 Corinthians 5:10 For we must all appear before the jugment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. 2 Corinthians 11:15, Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works. Philippians 2:12, "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling." James 2:14, What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? James 2:17, Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead. James 2:21-25, Was not Abraham our father justified by works? You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only. Likewise, was not Rabab the harlot also justified by works? For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also. 1 Peter 1:17, The Father, who without partiality judges according to each one's work. Revelation 2:23, I will give unto every one of you according to your works. Revelation 20:12-13, And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. Revelation 22:14, Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life.

Salvation is by faith alone???

Mark 16:16, He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. John 3:18, 36, He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already .... He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the

wrath of God abideth on him. Acts 16:30-31, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. Romans 1:16-17, For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God salvation to every one that believeth.... As it is written, The just shall live by faith. Romans 3:20, By the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight. Romans 3:28, A man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. Romans 4:2, For if Abraham were justified by works he hath whereof to glory? Romans 4:13, For the promise ... was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. Romans 5:1, Therefore, being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. Romans 10:9, If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. Galatians 2:16, A man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ. Galatians 3:11-12, The just shall live by faith. And the law is not of faith. Ephesians 2:8-9, For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast. Titus 3:5, Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost.

CHRISTENDOM CAN BE REBUILT, BUT NOT WITH THOSE JEWISH MYTHS IN THE "HOLY BIBLE"!

How many people did God kill in the Jewish Bible?

This is the audio book introduction for "Drunk With Blood: God's Killings in the Bible."

For the rest of the audiobook: http://bit.ly/J668lz

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this, If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth.” – Dr. Carl Sagan

But I do not need Dr Carl Sagan to tell me that. My wife calls it "cognitive dissonance" or cognitive inconsistency whereby an individual runs away from the truth and feels so uncomfortable psychologically when confronted with it that he or she will persist in believing the unbelievable despite all the evidence to the contrary. BAFS

Posted by FRÉMAUX SOORMALLY at Wednesday, July 25, 2012 Reactions:

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest Labels: ALLAH, FREEMASONRY, GÉRARD FRÉMAUX, GHYSLAINE ROC, JUSTIN RAIMONDO, KABBALAH, MARK DANKOF, MARK GLENN, MUJCA, QABBALAH, REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM, ROBERT SUNGENIS, TEHERAN, VERITATIS SPLENDOR

11 comments:

1.

BASHEER AHMAD28 July 2012 at 07:30

FROM "THE UGLY TRUTH" of Mark Glenn (Crescent & Cross) - Idaho, USA

#26 by ruby22-kate on July 27, 2012 -4:33 am

Basheer, I was sad to see I didn’t make the cut on your list of friends. Silly me.

BASHEER AHMAD28 July 2012 at 07:28

Love

It was my mistake. Silly me! But, it is rectified now!

TRUE STORY

A woman who was convinced she was possessed by a demon or demons turned to a Catholic Exorcist for help! The exorcist advised her to APPLY to a Catholic Diocese nearby and bla bla bla!

A woman from Belgium (Malika el Aroud) told me on the telephone (around 4 o’clock in the morning or earlier) she thought she was possessed by the Devil. I am not an exorcist, but asked her to bear with me while I tried to communicate with that Devil by telepathy while we were both on the telephone and IT WORKED as she went into a trance almost immediately!  But, as an amateur, there was nothing more I could do.

LESSON

 When a woman is drowing, we do not advise her to APPLY FOR HELP TO THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE! This is a total lack of compassion!  But, what I did on the telephone, I would not advise anybody to copy as this is a very dangerous science!

I wish to believe that we are all made into the essence of GOD and as such we are all ONE IN ESSENCE except the very evil ones, of course who are made of the essence of the DEVIL.

Love Basheer

2.

BASHEER AHMAD5 August 2012 at 20:29

FROM "The Ugly Truth"

#27 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on July 27, 2012 -2:08 pm

#24 by ruby22-kate on July 27, 2012 – 1:23 am “#20 Basheer: I hope all is well with you & yours. As always you give me something to think about.”

I am a very curious creature and sometimes I do venture into strange holes. I wrote many times that Satan was so smart that he fooled people into believing that he did not exist. And the believing world, and in particular Christians and Muslims, is going about their daily lives as if SATAN DID NOT EXIST! This is the cause of all our problems.

“When Benedict XVI went to ‘israel’ and met with the occupiers and ignored the Christians of Gaza and West Bank, this was the moment I became totally ashamed of the Roman Catholic Church.” The Vatican has been playing a very dirty role at least since I encountered the first Antichrists at least at the time of the First Papal Crusades where enough evidence exist that the Crusaders murdered, raped and plundered Eastern European and Arab Christians alike and not only the Muslims. These could not have been Christians at work, but ANTICHRISTIANS, what Islam calls the DAJJALS.

The Vatican supported the 1947 UN General Assembly Resolution 181, which stole the best part of Palestine from the Palestinian people, descendants of Jesus Christ, the Apostles and the Early Christians, to give it to the Jewish invaders and barbaric hordes.

Then, in 1993, during the Jewish False Accords of Oslo, the Vatican recognised the bastard Entity known as Eretz Israel as a Jewish State even if this went against Church teachings of heavenly Israel, and Israel and the Vatican signed a Diplomatic Treaty!

Today "experts" say the Vatican and Israel are like “cul et chemise” – inseparable, as thick as thieves, complicit in crime, …

When Pope John XXII (Ratzinger), the Cardinal who covered up all the paedocriminal reported to him and the agent who was given the job to destroy Catholic Dogma, visited occupied Palestine, HE ‘WEPT’ OR WAILED AT THE WAILING WALL OF JUPITER FOR THE JEWS BUT NOT FOR THE SUFFERING PALESTINIANS WHO HE EVEN IGNORED COMPLETELY AND ONLY MET WITH THEIR TORTURERS AND BUTCHERS – THE ASHKENAZI "JEWISH" THIEVES!

There is much more I can write, but people are not ready to listen and refuse to think as they have already made up their minds about almost everything.

When most in America speak of the Council on Foreign Relations (from where Hilary, Obama and the Satanic Team gets their marching orders!), the Trilateral Commission and Skull and Bones, I always add the Vatican, the Knights of Malta and the World Council of Churches. Why? Because I have documented it.

Why have the Rothschilds been handling Vatican Finances since 1823? This is not from me but but from Pr Pastor Texe Marrs, GOOGLE, and the Jews themselves!

Thanks for paying attention 

Basheer

3.

BASHEER AHMAD28 July 2012 at 07:31

#29 by ruby22-kate on July 28, 2012 -2:21 am

Dear Basheer, imo you are one of the best teachers I’ve come across on the web. I say this because you not only introduce me to new ideas but you do it in a way that captures my attention.

Apologize for the whining, as a motherless child I’m too sensitive, but thank you for acknowledging my post. It is hard to believe that what happened over 60 years ago still has an emotional impact.

I do believe we are all connected, what I call the universal conscience or universal mind , I think it is where we come from and return to when it is our time. It explains how the same idea becomes ‘popular’ around the world, fads, even children’s names go through cycles. How else to explain the selection of the repressive leaders such as Ratzinger, Obama (a wolf in sheep clothing) & the loss of our liberties?

4.

BASHEER AHMAD30 July 2012 at 02:34

I love Russel Pine aka Jordan Maxwell who has been studying and talking about the occult for the past 50 years or so. But, when he says to Kerry Lynn Cassidy of the Project Camelot that the Gods or Aliens or whoever who created us "are preparing us to be mutated soon", probably by December 2012 according to the Mayan calendar, without providing an iota of evidence I say Jordan is wrong.

He further says that the Aliens have been protecting him all throughout his "mission on earth", one out of 7 billion people! Most people do not even know that Jordan exists. I just asked an English "Anglo-Saxon" lady of roughly my age if she knew David Icke. She said NO!

Despite all the good things and truths Jordan has told us for the past several decades, it is sad to see him 'deluded' or misled to that extent.

BAFS

5.

Although I have referred many times to some famous non Christian personalities, it is to be noted that many of them have been contaminated by or believe in the (HINDU) NEW AGE UN SPONSORED RELIGION that is deadly against Christianity and Islam for the wrong reasons.

6.

BASHEER AHMAD23 August 2012 at 04:33

Rebuilding Christendom? UTOPIA! [23 August 2012]

7.

BASHEER AHMAD23 September 2012 at 14:04

Catégories

Actualité de l'Eglise conciliaire Actualité de la "tradition" FSSPX : Voie sans issue Un Pape ne peut pas dévier de la Foi Un Pape ne peut pas enseigner une hérésie Un non-catholique ne peut pas être Pape! Peut-on résister au Pape ? 

Histoire : Il n'y a jamais eu de "Pape hérétique" 

Histoire : Antipapes et Conciliabules Vatican II : Conciliabule non catholique Franc-maçonnerie Paul VI, Jean-Paul II, Benoît XVI antipapes 

Ratzinger (Benoît XVI) n'est pas Pape 

Wojtila (Jean-Paul II) n'est pas Pape 

Montini (Paul VI) n'est pas Pape 

Roncalli (Jean XXIII) n'est probablement pas Pape 

Prophéties de la situation actuelle de l'Eglise 

Réformes liturgiques de Paul VI invalides Motu Proprio Messes non una cum 

Le problème des messes una cum 

Ratzinger Hérésies Encycliques des papes 

Absence de Pape dans l'Eglise 

Evêques catholiques non una cum 

Juridiction à notre époque 

Sacres sans mandats 

Livres à lire 

Le sédévacantisme sur le web 

Réponse à certaines objections 

Papauté : divers Sermons 

Apologétique -défense de la foi 

Spiritualité Politique Judaïsme Divers Annonces http://www.catholique-sedevacantiste.com/categorie-10479590.html

8.

FRÉMAUX SOORMALLY30 March 2014 at 11:20

Ghyslaine Roc

A Muslim = ANYBODY, ANYTHING (including pigs, rats, trees, the laws of Physics, etc.) who/that submits to the One God!

"Muslims" 'hijacked' "Jesus Christ" (Jesse, Yeshua, Yehoshua, Isho, 'Isa...) 1400 years ago, but JESUS WAS A PALESTINIAN ARAB, wasn't he?

"Hebrew" came into existence AFTER Arabic - only after the cross-overs (bandits?) or Hibirus or Hebrews came to and settled in Palestine! Those Christian idiots should read Dr Deepak Chopra's "THE THIRD JESUS"!

9.

FRÉMAUX SOORMALLY24 August 2015 at 07:50

THE JEW KLUX KAHN 

The greatest demonic forces in the world for quite some time have been Atheists, Jews, Zionists, Televangelists, Satanists, Freemasons and their fanatical followers because of the decadence of Christendom, of the corruption of Christian dogmas, and because of the Muslims who are no more the Nation of Muhammad but that of Satan just like the Christians and the Paulians who worship all kinds of Gods except God ! Both Christians and Muslims have become nations of hypocrites, cowards and greedy materialists. And they hate it, all of them, when they are being told the truth, and I wasted decades of my life fighting a lost battle in advance, but, the fight must go on no matter what!

BAFS Monday 24th of August 2015

1.

FRÉMAUX SOORMALLY24 August 2015 at 07:58

However, I am a lot luckier than all those, Prophets, Messengers, Messiahs, and freedom, truth, justice and morality loving and fighting people who have been murdered or even crucified while I survived 70 years without stopping warning and advising humanity, the few I could reach! But, they never listen because they know it all and keep making the same mistakes over and over again, and I am one of them, although not quite. 

BAFS 

Monday 24th of August 2015

10.

FRÉMAUX SOORMALLY20 March 2016 at 12:34

http://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/challenge-of-dr-kevinbarrett-former.html

Links to this post

Create a Link

Newer Post Older Post Home Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Search This Blog

Popular Posts

HEALTH, GINGER, GARLIC, LEMON, HONEY, CANCER AND HEART DISEASE CURE, STROKE.

12 antibiotiques naturels que nos ancêtres utilisaient plutôt que des pilules juin 5, 2015 ...

Rape of Iraqi Women by US Forces

THIS THE WEST CALLS CIVILISATION! SADDAM DID WHAT? Browse > Home / Featured Stories , Iraq / Rape of Iraqi Women by US ...

THE IRISH SLAVE TRADE -THE FORGOTTEN HISTORY OF BRITAIN'S WHITE SLAVES IN AMERICA

Sen t by Kate Bates The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten History of Britain's White Slaves in America The Slaves That Time Fo...

HOMAGE TO HINDUSTANI SINGER MUHAMMAD RAFI

Nasir's Eclectic Blog This Blog is mainly a Tribute to the Legendary Indian Playback Singer, Mohammed Rafi (1924-1980)...

SYRIA US-ISRAEL HOLOCAUSTS -SPEAK UP FOR THOSE WHO CANNOT SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES!

SYRIA US-ISRAEL HOLOCAUSTS -SPEAK UP FOR T HOSE WHO CANNOT SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES! Proverbs 31:8-9 New International Version ...

REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM, VERITATIS SPLENDOR.

We Will Not Go Down (Ghazza Song) ~Michael Heart~ Piano REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM Dedicated to Gérard Charles Augusti...

BROTHER MARK GLENN'S ADVICE ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE

BROTHER MARK GLENN’S ADVICE ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE Anti-Islam movie, West’s conspiracy against Muslim world: Analyst Wed...

 CHERYL D. UZAMERE PRESIDENT A.D.E. ON JEWISH RACISM

CHERYL D. UZAMERE PRESIDENT A.D.E. ON JEWISH RACISM A Word From AFRICAN DIASPORAL ENTERPRISES 's President Cheryl D. Uzamere Lac...

JUDEO CHRISTIAN SATANIC RITUAL SACRIFICE 2012 ! MERRY CHRIST MASS TO YOU ALL!

PALESTINE... IMAGINE... QUE LA TERREUR S'INSTALLE CHEZ TOI... NEW HOLOCAUSTS OF PALESTINIANS...



MUSLIM HOLOCAUSTS GOOOD, JEWISH HOLOCAUST BAAAD!

MUSLIM HOLOCAUSTS GOOOD, JEWISH HOLOCAUST BAAAD! https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=Ix2sJWZGT0Q&app=des...

 

 Blog Archive

 ► 2016 (64)

 ► 2015 (186)

 ► 2014 (208)

 ► 2013 (140)

 ▼ 2012 (250) o ► December (13) o ► November (14) o ► October (18) o ► September (23) o ► August (18) o ▼ July (21)

• FIELD McCONNELL, DAVID WILCOCK WITH KERRY LYNN CAS...
• 311 FUKUSHIMA WAS JAPAN'S 911 JIM STONE NSA
• KATE – TRUTH IS ALWAYS WITH THE OPPRESSED (Malcom ...
• AL QUDS TEMPLE MOUNT OFFENSIVE 2012
• REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM, VERITATIS SPLENDOR.
• JEWISH DEATH LEAGUE STRIKES AGAIN!
• EVANGELICAL ARMY TO HOLOCAUST ARABS, CHRISTIANS AN...
• THE JEWISH STATE BY MARK GLENN
• MUSLIM HOLOCAUSTS GOOOD, JEWISH HOLOCAUST BAAAD!
• M. Ramlallah Mauritius Times’ Crusade against Musl...
• INDIA NAMED THE WORST PLACE IN THE WORLD FOR WOMEN...
• WESTERN MENDACITY ON CIRCUMCISION
• FREEMASONS PREPARE FOR RITUAL SACRIFICE AND MARTIA...
• ROTHSCHILD SAMUEL UNTERMYER SCOFIELD ZIONIST BIBLE...
• A.J.MACDONALD JR -CHRISTIANITY
• JEWS DO CONTROL THE MEDIA -THE TIMES OF ISRAEL -...
• DEAD MEAT INDIA AND NOT DEAD MEAT PAKISTAN
• THE ILLUMINATUS OBSERVOR -ARAB SPRING
• WHAT 1.4 BILLION MUSLIMS THINK ON WESTERN ISSUES O...
• FAMILY BREAKERS -ZIONIST FREEMASONIC JEHOVAH WITN...
• 1983 JEWISH ENGINEERED NUCLEAR WAR FAILED

o ► June (15)

o ► May (28) o ► April (13) o ► March (20) o ► February (19) o ► January (48)

 ► 2011 (373)  ► 2010 (363)  ► 2009 (120)  ► 2008 (2)  ► 2007 (3)

Feedjit

THE FRENCH CONNECTION

 ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH  CAPTAIN JOE CORTINA  DR KEVIN BARRET MUSLIM JEWISH CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE  La Laïcité falsifiée

About  MARK DANKOF'S AMERICA  MICHAEL KING & SUGAR

Me

 PERSONAL PAIN REVEALED  REHMAT WORLD  SHEIKH IMRAN NAZAR HOSEIN  THE UGLY TRUTH  TIMU TELE  The Naked Truth in a Confused World FRÉMAUX  The Power of Prophecy TEXE MARRS SOORMAL  VETERANS TODAY LY  http://antiilluminati.over-blog.com/ View my  http://islamic-intelligence.blogspot.com/ complete  http://news.stcom.net/index.php profile  http://theautobiographyofbenjaminmerhav.blogspot.com/

 http://www.drday.com/  http://www.iamthewiki.com/index.php?title=Britain%27s_Police_daily_t

error_campaign  http://www.iamthewitness.com/  http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/

Picture Window template. Powered by Blogger.

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Search This Blog

Popular Posts

• 

  HEALTH, GINGER, GARLIC, LEMON, HONEY, CANCER, HEART DISEASE CURE, STROKE, GERSON MIRACLE.

  January 2012  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quuvi6Gvvmc The Gerson Therapy - Charlotte Gerson on Curing Cancer ...
• 

  MUHAMMAD RAFI'S 5,052 HINDUSTANI SONGS

  List of All Songs Sung by Mohd Rafi Home » Mohammad Rafi Songs » List of All Songs Sung by Mohd Rafi 24 December 1924 - 31 Ju...
• 

  HOMAGE TO HINDUSTANI SINGER MUHAMMAD RAFI

    Nasir's Eclectic Blog This Blog is mainly a Tribute to the Legendary Indian Playback Singer, Mohammed Rafi (1924-1980)...
• 

  Rape of Iraqi Women by US Forces

  THIS THE WEST CALLS CIVILISATION!    SADDAM DID WHAT? Browse > Home / Featured Stories , Iraq / Rape of Iraqi Women by US Fo...
• 

  THE IRISH SLAVE TRADE - THE FORGOTTEN HISTORY OF BRITAIN'S WHITE SLAVES IN AMERICA

  Sen t by Kate  Bates   The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten History of Britain's White Slaves in America The Slaves That Time F...
• 

  YANKEE JIHAAD, LIBYA, EGYPT, SYRIA US-ISRAEL HOLOCAUSTS, SHEIKH IMRAN HOSEIN.

    THE WHOLE WORLD IS BLEEDING EXCEPT THE CHOSEN ONES! WHO GIVES A DAMN?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6I6I35EMB4 Yankee Ji...
• 

  CHERYL D. UZAMERE PRESIDENT A.D.E. ON JEWISH RACISM

   CHERYL D. UZAMERE PRESIDENT A.D.E. ON JEWISH RACISM A Word From AFRICAN DIASPORAL ENTERPRISES 's President Cheryl D. Uzamere Lac...
• 

  BROTHER MARK GLENN'S ADVICE ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE

  BROTHER MARK GLENN’S ADVICE ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE Anti-Islam movie, West’s conspiracy against Muslim world: Analyst Wed...
• 

  BILL GATES, THE CROWN, CORPORATIONS, AND GOVERNMENTS BEHIND THE CORONA SARS COV2 COVID19 VIRUS SCARE!

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dUFZ3zSiXM  DR. RASHID BUTTHAR   BILL GATES, JACQUES ATTALI AND OTHER TOP JEWS HAVE BEE...

Blog Archive

• ▼  2020 (91)
  • ▼  September (7)
    •  MUHAMMAD ALI BEN MARCUS Wednesday, 25 July 2012 R...
    • Edward Said, Orientalism, Arabs, Palestine, and Is...
    • WORSE THAN COVID-19, USA-ISRAEL-EU SANCTIONS MURDE...
    • The Truth is Hate to Those Who Hate the Truth
    • Jean-Jacques Crèvecœur, Jeux de Pouvoir, Croissanc...
    • MONOPOLICS - DECADENT CHRISTENDOM AND MUSLIM SYNAG...
    • ACHTUNG! THAT SHITTY GOVERNMENT AND ITS SEWAGE SCH...
  • ►  August (13)
  • ►  July (15)
  • ►  June (16)
  • ►  May (8)
  • ►  April (7)
  • ►  March (13)
  • ►  February (8)
  • ►  January (4)

• ►  2019 (97)

• ►  2018 (75)

• ►  2017 (174)

• ►  2016 (124)

• ►  2015 (186)

• ►  2014 (207)

• ►  2013 (140)

• ►  2012 (248)

• ►  2011 (373)

• ►  2010 (363)

• ►  2009 (120)

• ►  2008 (2)

• ►  2007 (3)

Feedjit

About Me BAFS View my complete profile

THE FRENCH CONNECTION ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH CAPTAIN JOE CORTINA DR KEVIN BARRET MUSLIM JEWISH CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE Fredrick Töben http://antiilluminati.over-blog.com/ http://islamic-intelligence.blogspot.com/ http://news.stcom.net/index.php http://theautobiographyofbenjaminmerhav.blogspot.com/ http://www.drday.com/ http://www.iamthewiki.com/index.php?title=Britain%27s_Police_daily_terror_campaign http://www.iamthewitness.com/ http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/ La Laïcité falsifiée MARK DANKOF'S AMERICA MICHAEL KING & SUGAR PERSONAL PAIN REVEALED REHMAT WORLD SHEIKH IMRAN NAZAR HOSEIN Snippits and Snappitts The Naked Truth in a Confused World The Power of Prophecy TEXE MARRS THE UGLY TRUTH TIMU TELE VETERANS TODAY

Picture Window theme. Powered by Blogger.

 

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Search This Blog

Popular Posts

• 

  MUHAMMAD RAFI'S 5,052 HINDUSTANI SONGS

  List of All Songs Sung by Mohd Rafi Home » Mohammad Rafi Songs » List of All Songs Sung by Mohd Rafi 24 December 1924 - 31 Ju...
• 

  HEALTH, GINGER, GARLIC, LEMON, HONEY, CANCER, HEART DISEASE CURE, STROKE, GERSON MIRACLE.

  January 2012  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quuvi6Gvvmc The Gerson Therapy - Charlotte Gerson on Curing Cancer ...
• 

  HOMAGE TO HINDUSTANI SINGER MUHAMMAD RAFI

    YUSUF KHAN, hinduised as DILIP KUMAR, my favourite Hindustani Actor, but only earlier in his film career! At the end, he was pathetic! A...
• 

  Rape of Iraqi Women by US Forces

  THIS THE WEST CALLS CIVILISATION!    SADDAM DID WHAT? Browse > Home / Featured Stories , Iraq / Rape of Iraqi Women by US Fo...
• 

  STARVED BY THE BRITISH, SULTAN ABDULMEJID I HELPED THE IRISH. BRITAIN'S WHITE SLAVES IN AMERICA.

      SULTAN ABDULMEJID I Turkey , World , Europe ...
• 

  YANKEE JIHAAD, LIBYA, EGYPT, SYRIA US-ISRAEL HOLOCAUSTS, SHEIKH IMRAN HOSEIN.

    THE WHOLE WORLD IS BLEEDING EXCEPT THE CHOSEN ONES! WHO GIVES A DAMN?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6I6I35EMB4 Yankee Ji...
• 

  CHERYL D. UZAMERE PRESIDENT A.D.E. ON JEWISH RACISM

   CHERYL D. UZAMERE PRESIDENT A.D.E. ON JEWISH RACISM A Word From AFRICAN DIASPORAL ENTERPRISES 's President Cheryl D. Uzamere Lac...
• 

  BROTHER MARK GLENN'S ADVICE ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE - CHARLIE HEBDO PORN

  BROTHER MARK GLENN’S ADVICE ABOUT ANTI MUHAMMAD MOVIE Anti-Islam movie, West’s conspiracy against Muslim world: Analyst Wed Sep 19, ...
• 

  BILL GATES, THE CROWN, CORPORATIONS, AND GOVERNMENTS BEHIND THE CORONA SARS COV2 COVID19 VIRUS SCARE!

  MY BLOG ATTACKED AS SOON AS I POSTED THIS, AND MY FACEBOOK ACCOUNT DE-ACTIVATED IN SEPTEMBER 2020!!! DR. CHARLIE WARD ABOUT BILL GATES VACC...

Blog Archive

• ►  2022 (115)

• ►  2021 (177)

• ▼  2020 (137)
  • ►  December (17)
  • ►  November (15)
  • ►  October (8)
  • ▼  September (13)
    • BAFS_BRENDON O'CONNELL 66. 5G & GREATER ISRAEL, YO...
    • Hervé Ryssen, jailed in Fleury-Mérogis by THE JEW...
    • Alex Awad on the Christ at the Checkpoint Conferen...
    • Rev. Kevin Annett - MARY NOT A VIRGIN. December 15...
    • DR. SALIM LAIBI, LA FRANCE RACISTE ET SIONISTE TOU...
    • Rabbi tested Prophet Muhammad's proverbial forbear...
    • REBUILDING CHRISTENDOM, VERITATIS SPLENDOR, REBÂTI...
    • Edward Said, Orientalism, Arabs, Palestine, and Is...
    • WORSE THAN COVID-19, USA-ISRAEL-EU SANCTIONS MURDE...
    • The Truth is Hate to Those Who Hate the Truth
    • Jean-Jacques Crèvecœur, Jeux de Pouvoir, Croissanc...
    • MONOPOLICS - DECADENT CHRISTENDOM AND MUSLIM SYNAG...
    • ACHTUNG! THAT SHITTY GOVERNMENT AND ITS SEWAGE SCH...
  • ►  August (13)
  • ►  July (15)
  • ►  June (16)
  • ►  May (8)
  • ►  April (7)
  • ►  March (13)
  • ►  February (8)
  • ►  January (4)

• ►  2019 (96)

• ►  2018 (75)

• ►  2017 (172)

• ►  2016 (123)

• ►  2015 (186)

• ►  2014 (201)

• ►  2013 (140)

• ►  2012 (247)

• ►  2011 (373)

• ►  2010 (361)

• ►  2009 (120)

• ►  2008 (2)

• ►  2007 (3)

Feedjit

About Me BAFS View my complete profile

THE FRENCH CONNECTION ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH CAPTAIN JOE CORTINA DR KEVIN BARRET MUSLIM JEWISH CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE Fredrick Töben http://antiilluminati.over-blog.com/ http://islamic-intelligence.blogspot.com/ http://news.stcom.net/index.php http://theautobiographyofbenjaminmerhav.blogspot.com/ http://www.drday.com/ http://www.iamthewiki.com/index.php?title=Britain%27s_Police_daily_terror_campaign http://www.iamthewitness.com/ http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/ La Laïcité falsifiée MARK DANKOF'S AMERICA MICHAEL KING & SUGAR PERSONAL PAIN REVEALED REHMAT WORLD SHEIKH IMRAN NAZAR HOSEIN Snippits and Snappitts The Naked Truth in a Confused World The Power of Prophecy TEXE MARRS THE UGLY TRUTH TIMU TELE VETERANS TODAY

Picture Window theme. Powered by Blogger. 

 

 

 

MUHAMMAD ALI BEN MARCUS

Monday, 10 April 2017

AL LAH, ARABIC FOR THE GOD OF ALL CREATION, IF THERE IS SUCH A GOD!

And there is obviously ONE in the hearts and minds of all moral humans for those who are not dumb, deaf and blind!
AL LAH, ARABIC FOR THE GOD OF ALL CREATION, ATHEISTS, POLYTHEISTS, HINDUS, JEWS, CHRISTIANS, MUSLIMS, ETC.

 DADI (GRANDMOTHER) KAAMILAH BINT QADR (Kathaleen Bates) OF PENNSYLVANIA (USA) SAYS SHE MISSES HER LONDON GRANDCHILDREN!
 Kate Bates I miss my beautiful girls & baby in London..sigh..

Like · Reply · 16 hours ago

Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus They all miss you too! (But, they are not toys!)

Kate Bates Layana - charming smile & eyes seem to be knowing, like an old soul

Unlike · Reply · 1 · 24 minutes ago

Kate Bates Superb video, thank you dada

Unlike · Reply · 1 · 24 minutes ago

Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Kate Bates Superb is not bad! At least 10 hours of work on this one and it was only a trial!

Like · Reply · a few seconds ago

There will never be any worldwide Christian-Muslim unity to counter the forces of evil on this planet as long as ignorance, blind faith and deliberate or unconscious racism will guide the thoughts and actions of, for example, Christians and Muslims.  I keep hearing Christians all over the world using the expression AL LAH as if it has to do exclusively with Muslims. The word “Holocaust” used in the Torah as a burnt offering to the exclusively Israelite God, of either human or animal origin, was used about mass murders having occurred at the hands of European and Colonial armies in the twentieth century prior to the Second World War.  This term was hijacked later by Jews and Israel to mean exclusively one alleged and unproven to this day Holocaust of Six Million Jews mainly in homicidal gas chambers, and for which no evidence has ever been found to this very day and unlikely ever to be found as it has been proven over and over again that it was a hoax.  French Judaics, Jews and Zionists have stopped using the term Holocaust, and instead are now using the term Shoah which again can only be Jewish.  Jews claim to have an exclusive God, a unique past and present of suffering, and a supremacist human type (or “race”) incomparable to the rest of humankind.  Many even claim they are the Gods that created humankind!   

People reading this will still not understand because they are blinded by their faith based on a corruption of Israelite Judaism, and non Christic and Paulian dogmas, and not open-minded enough, and refuse to research the truth, or when they find it just refuse to admit it.  Cognitive dissonance plays a great part in preventing many from accepting the truth.  However, many Christians have shown much understanding of this reality and shown great compassion to Muslims and Islam in general, especially the Arab-speaking Christians and Jews alike because they too are being victimised when they hear Western and other Christians globally vilify the Arabic term AL LAH, the Arabic word by which they call The God.  AL LAH is just an Arabic term, and not The God of Muslims exclusively, but THE GOD of all Creation according to some belief systems.

I will inform the readers one million times, and they will ignore everything and keep on with their old ways.   I never asked anybody to believe what I write, but to do their own research.  Shall I give you another example of racist Christians?  When they see Muslims praying in Christian Churches, they say it is an invasion and a blasphemy!  The “Last Sermon”, as recorded, whether authentic or not, had got rid of racism for ever in Islam or among Muslims.  Muhamad signed an everlasting Covenant with Christians while he was alive, but Christians, and even Muslims, tend to forget it!

THE DAY, CHRISTIANS WILL ACCEPT AL LAH AS THE GOD OF CREATION IN ARABIC, THIS WORLD STANDS A GREATER CHANCE TO BE SAVED FROM THE EVIL FORCES!  

  

The day Christians will accept that Arabia and the FERTILE CRESCENT were Jewish, Christian, Zoroastrian, Atheist, Polytheist land WITH NO BORDERS, that day they will embrace Arab-speaking people as their Brothers and Sisters of Faith or of no faith, despite their differences.  Christ cannot be kept eternally in a box!   

Finally, do not believe all the lies that have been written and said about one ABRAHAM!  Isaac was never the father of all Israelites and Christians nor Ishmael the father of all Arabs!  THEY WERE ALL ARABIC SPEAKING (or some other sister dialects), PERSIANS, EGYPTIANS, AND A MIXTURE OF NATIONS THAT HAD AN ARABIC LINGUA FRANCA THAT THE WEST WRONGLY CALLED ARAMAIC JUST BECAUSE THEY HATE ARABS AND CLASSICAL ARABIC!  

Did Mel Gibson not make Jesus Christ cry out to ILAHI?  So, what the damn heck?

We are one human family, and Christians of Christ and Muslims of Christ are ONE VERY CLOSE FAMILY TOO!  Stop the racism!

BAFS

Monday 10^th of April 2017   

Kevin Barrett's radio show schedule

To find Kevin's articles, interviews, books, youtubes, and more, go to www.TruthJihad.com

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Islam expert Prof. Khaled Abou El Fadl on shariah, 9/11 truth, and much more 

Broadcast here April 17th, 11 to noon Eastern then archived. For less than a dollar a week you can subscribe...and listen to this show RIGHT NOW!  Click HERE.

Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl is one of the world’s leading authorities on Islamic law and Islam, and a prominent scholar in the field of human rights. He is author of 14 books (five forthcoming) and over 50 articles on various topics in Islam and Islamic law.  The Omar and Azmeralda Alfi Distinguished Professor in Islamic Law at the UCLA School of Law, he teaches International Human Rights, Islamic Jurisprudence, National Security Law, Law and Terrorism, Islam and Human Rights, Political Asylum and Political Crimes and Legal Systems.

 
In this interview, Dr. Abou El Fadl begins with a concise and eloquent introduction to what Shariah law really means. (You may be surprised.) We briefly discuss the Sunni/Shia issues that came up in my recent interview with Ibrahim Soudy. Then Dr. Abou El Fadl movingly apologize for his years of acceptance of the official story of 9/11, which, after further study of the issue, he now rejects as an obvious impossibility. Going even further, he states that, as a member of the legal team for defendants in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, he has long recognized that there are extremely serious questions about likely US government or insider involvement in that atrocity as well. On the basis of those two problematic events, Dr. Abou El Fadl suggests that we need to question the official history of the so-called "war on terror" and take a skeptical attitude toward the series of spectacular post-9/11 terror events blamed on "radical Muslims." But historical truth, he asserts, often takes many decades to emerge.
Other topics in this special 90-minute show include Islamophobia, Wahhabism, spirituality, the intersection of religion and politics, the rise of psychopathic philosophies of selfishness (neoconservatism, Ayn Rand) and the roles of truth, beauty, critiques of power, and opposition to injustice and oppression in the religion of Islam.

Posted by Kevin Barrett at 7:37 PM

2 comments:

Islam expert Prof. Khaled Abou El Fadl on shariah, 9/11 truth, and much more. Posted by Dr. Kevin Barrett at 7:37 PM

1. 
   BAFS11 April 2017 at 02:09

   THERE IS NO SUCH GOD AS MOST OF US BELIEVE IN, but there is certainly ONE in the hearts of the pure ones and in our mind when we are not sold out partly or completely to Satan!  

   But, why do I have to tell you that?
   Do you deserve to be told?
   BAFS

2. 
   BAFS11 April 2017 at 04:32AM

   Once upon a time, I was sleeping peacefully in the Jannah of Eden (GANNA in Egyptian Arabic from where the English derived the word GARDEN, and the French the word JARDIN) I never ventured out of the Garden because it was Paradise and I did not give a damn about those humans living outside JANNAH.
   I suddenly heard a loud voice like thunder addressing me! EARTH MAN, Adam in Arabic, are you happy in Paradise?
   Of course, I am, I answered. This is Paradise, don’t you know? I am very happy!
   - Are you sure, My Son?
   - What a stupid question?
   - Are you sure you do not miss anything?
   - Yes, nothing at all! Just leave me alone! Go away!
   - Adam, do not talk to your Creator with such disrespect!
   - You, my Creator? Let me laugh! What do you want of me, now?
   - Just to make you HAPPIER!
   - Nothing can make me happier; I am already in Paradise!
   - I am sure you need a companion!
   - Are you saying you made me imperfect?
   - No, but after making you, I just realised that I forgot something important!
   - What kind of a Creator are you?
   - Well, I can repair my mistake if you just let me.
   - All right, go on and show me how good you will prove yourself to be this time!
   - And I awoke all of a sudden to find two glaring eyes fixed on me. And I heard the same loud voice warning me.
   - LOOK, BUT DO NOT TOUCH!
   - Of course, I did not understand what the voice meant! I looked and I did not touch as the Voice had ordered. Then, the more I looked, the more the eyes kept staring at me and then a paradisiac electric current passed through my whole body without me understanding what was happening to me. Did My Creator trick me and gave me some kind of drugs?
   - As we were two now in Paradise, we both went to sleep together!
   - The next morning the sun came up as usual and we both felt very happy. Was I happier? A lot happier. So, My Creator did not lie to me after all!
   - But, then, I heard his Voice shouting my name over and over again. He could not find us as we were both in our Harem.
   - Why are you hiding from me?
   - Can’t we have some privacy even in Paradise?
   - No, you can’t because now I have come to punish you both!
   - What did we do?
   - You disobeyed me!
   - By accepting your gift?
   - No, for sleeping together with Ha Wa?
   - Oh, that’s her name! Why did you not tell me!
   - I think I made another mistake by creating Ha Wa!
   - Just too bad and too late now to regret anything! Ha Wa is expecting a baby from our paradisiac union!
   - But, you do not know that you are going to produce a monster that would create hell on Earth!
   - So, this is how bad you are and you pretend to be My Creator! Get lost, you incompetent engineer! I will sort out my problems all by myself and learn to never trust you again!
   - Adam and Ha Wa, get out of My Garden! And be miserable until the end of times when I will recall all yours souls back!
   - For what are you going to recall all our souls back? Have you not done enough harm already? Go away! I do not want to see you ever again! Shalom!
   
   BAFS

   Tuesday 11 April 2017