| Last visit was: Sun Apr 2011, 2010 12:16 pm |
It is currently Sun Apr 18, 2010
9:27 pm
|
View
unanswered posts | View
active topics
View
new posts | View
your posts
SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
| Author |
Message |
|
Ghyslaine ROC
Explorer
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:08 am
Posts: 98
Location:
France
|
 SEVEN REASONS
WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GODThe Alien Beginning and End of Humankind
By
Basheer A. Frémaux-Soormally
From
Daryl's Encyclopedia
Rashida (Rosetta)
Stone
The Rashida
(Rosetta) Stone (part only) taken in 1899 from the town of Rashid
(Egypt) by the invading French armies, later taken by the British
invaders. In the “Demotic” section Arabic script is clearly visible. Abu
Bakr Ahmad Ibn Wahshiyah (founder of the science of
Algebra) was the first scholar to decode hieroglyphs, one thousand years
before Jean Champollion according to Dr Okasha El Daly
Chapter One
THE
ARROGANCE OF A PROMINENT SCIENTIST
BBC
interviewer: "Is Evolution a Theory?" Pr Dawkins: "No, it is a fact!"
Oxford
University Professor Richard Dawkins – UK
Addressing University students, Oxford Zoologist
Professor Richard Dawkins [1941-….], an Atheist, Evolutionist and
Humanist lecturer, stated once to a huge gathering of students
(seemingly ready and willing to be indoctrinated) that the cleverest
ape-man that has ever lived was Aristotle, a soldier in Alexander of
Macedonia’s army, a man who never went to a real school (the first
modern schools and universities came with the Muslims) and who spent
twenty years learning “philosophy” while “walking with Plato”, and Pr
Dawkins was seen on British television (where freedom of speech is
absent) boasting that the “White European race” sprung from the
Aristotelian racial lineage. If Irish George
Bernard Shaw was alive today, he would have gladly given that
arrogant Professor a piece of his uniquely great human mind, but any
striving and tolerant Muslim (by definition, a Muslim is moderate and
tolerant), have the duty to pray to God Almighty to guide the deluded
Professor and show him the Light, although there is little hope that
this may ever happen. His ape-man religion has been proven many times to
be the fabrication of scientists lacking in honesty. The fact is that
no indisputable trace of humankind or of its civilisation seems to have
yet been discovered beyond ten (twenty) thousand years. Could we, humans, old pyramid
(ziggurat) builders, have come from another far away planet or from
another dimension or are we simply the recent product of an
interbreeding with some extraterrestrial beings (the extraterrestrial
gods)? Or are we simply the product of an almost impossible to fathom
Creator?
A selected few, people of great knowledge, faith
and wisdom, like Sheikh Hamza Yusuf
Hanson, a Greek Orthodox Christian reverted to Islam, and one of
the brightest scholars in Islamic and human matters, a man who has
attained the highest level of faith and spirituality, seems to have
definite answers about God, Mankind, the world and its origins. Such
great souls are convinced the world was created by design and that we
were created human, while others like the Nairobi-born Zoologist Richard
Dawkins maintain that all we see around us is just an accident of
multiple evolutionary processes with no design and no purpose at all,
and that we are only animals (rock and bacteria) that have evolved into
humans in a world “of savage competition, ruthless exploitation, and
deceit”. Of course this is not science but only the Professor’s atheist
religion!
WHERE
THERE IS GOD (invented or real, or what He represents), don’t we
see more LOVE, hope, goodness, decency, cleanliness, charity, morality,
patience in adversity, compassion, forgiveness, freedom, justice, mercy,
and humankind as also SPIRITUAL and HUMAN?
And, WHERE THERE IS NO GOD, don’t we see
more HATE, inhumanity, evil, indecency, filth, greed and selfishness,
immorality, perversions, despair, suicide, cruelty, vengeance, slavery,
racism, injustice, covetousness, ruthlessness, ABOMINATIONS OF ALL
KINDS, and Man as only material and only an (evolved) animal, an INHUMAN
and monstrous being sprung from “thousands or millions of accidental
genetic mutations”?
What did Karl
Mordecai Marx himself “the last of the great Jewish prophets”
turned atheist, really mean when he wrote “religion is the opium of the
people”. We witness rich and poor, black and white, scientists and
poets, Atheists and Believers, good and bad people being addicted to
religion, all kinds of religion, and not only the “vile populace” of
indoctrinated beings (human sheep). Only by going beyond faith, we can
manage to understand much of what is happening in a world that belongs
to the powerful, the mercilessly cruel, and the rich, and not to
humankind anymore, not even to GOD. Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Hanson argues
that if one believes in God, he or she is strengthened in that belief
and God is then with him or her, but if someone does not believe in God,
he or she is strengthened in his or her unbelief and abandoned by God.
Professor Richard Dawkins drowns himself in an ocean of unbelief and
pseudo-scientific beliefs when it concerns God. His opium is the
religion of atheism and animalism (‘humanism’). Isn’t it a paradox that
Atheists should call themselves Humanists when they believe and claim
they are only (evolved) animals?
While the Greco-Roman Holy
Christian Bible recognises Satan as the ruler of the world, Dawkins
gives us a clue as to who now rule and should rule our world thanks to
their “rebellious selfish genes” as tale-told by himself in his famous
pseudo-scientific “thriller-manual-manifesto” (The Selfish Gene, 1976) in which he zealously defends the
hoax (deceit) of macro evolution, and propounds his “fundamental law of gene selfishness”.
Pr Dawkins is paid by our tax-money (with the full blessings of Queen
Elisabeth II) to preach his fabricated religion of selfishness to our
youth. According to him, there is no Merciful, Compassionate, Generous
and Just God, no Creator, but, instead, eternal selfish genes competing
directly with their alleles for survival created man, and they are
“naturally selecting” the best genes for survival, meaning the White
European genes inherited from Aristotle, and he, Richard Dawkins, the
disciple of the Selfish Gene-God, is one of the worshippers and
defenders of Animalism and of western secular ‘democratic’ regimes.
Pr
Dawkins would be one of those who survived this savage competition,
which gives his “naturally selected” race the right to wipe out the 5-6
billion weaker “poorly-evolved animals” for his own survival. Although
billions of people in such a materialist world find it more and more
very hard today, due to western cultural and political oppression and
terrorism, to believe in a real Invisible (Unseen) God-Creator, why does
the Professor show such arrogance and scoff at others who are believers
in God, whether He exists or not? His delusion (sickness of the mind)
prevents him from seeing and admitting his own fanatical belief in the
Selfish Gene-God, his opium! Even Atheists have their prophets like
Sigmund Freud, his nephew Edward Bernays (who inspired Adolph Hitler,
George W. Bush and other western fascist and Zionist regimes), Charles
Darwin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and their likes. We are living in a
society and a world where morality has been replaced by force by all
kinds of perversions of mind and body, where the New Age religion with
its Earth god aims at the breaking down of the family and the
prostitution of men, women and children, the abduction of our babies to
be sold into sex slavery (carried out by state-protected corporations to
Israel and other western and western-client countries), the worshipping
of money and fame, the poisoning of mind and body by drugs (including
nicotine, alcohol and mainly Jewish owned pharmaceutical so-called
medicine), Zionist television, pornography, and the complete control and
dehumanisation of mankind. Those who resist the western military
regimes and their allies are ruthlessly murdered along with their entire
families by the Zionist New Secular (Talmudist) World Order, their
countries relentlessly bombed and devastated, and their peoples
slaughtered mercilessly, jailed, tortured, mentally and physically
shattered, maimed for life and starved to death by the tens of millions.
Margaret Temple
(Maryam Noor) aged 65 - How I Found the Truth - SCOTLAND
But,
millions other people do not go along with Pr Richard Dawkins’ animal
ideology and choose to believe in a God or in many gods. Unfortunately,
by their own fault, they do not have adequate armies to protect their
beliefs and nations from attacks and destruction by the Atheist,
Secular, ‘Humanist’ and Zionist New World Order super military powers.
Of apparently intolerant Atheist parents, Mrs Margaret Temple of Scotland (above) found God through
Islam (for others it is through Christianity or Christ) at the age of 65
in very mysterious circumstances, and took the Shahadah, the Islamic
Testimony that there is none worthy of worship (no other god) except God
and that Muhammad is His Messenger. When you sincerely and
wholeheartedly look for God, you will find Him, so goes the saying. This
is evidence that “God” (or a Godly inspired Arab, Muhammad) was right
about the fitra (natural
inclination towards Islam) He says in the Holy Furqân (Criterion) or Holy Qur’ân (Recitation) He had put at birth in every
human being He had Himself created, and thus disproving the selfish gene
fabricated by our learned but misguided and unscientific Professor.
On Saturday 26th June 2004, the author was sent an
Email from one of his correspondents, Christian
Cotten (chriscotten@wanadoo.fr)
entitled “A Story of Angels and of a Father : UNE HISTOIRE D'ANGES ET DE PÈRE by “Philippe” philippeplantey@free.fr.
Is it a fabrication or a true story? One M. Lloyd Glenn (USA) rushed to
the hospital to see his 3 year-old son Brian who was crushed to death
by his automatic garage door. The boy miraculously survived and doctors
confirmed that his heart and brain suffered no apparent damage. The near
tragedy brought the whole family closer together. One day at home young
Brian surprised his mother by addressing her using an unusually long
sentence for his age.
“Sit down mother, I have something to tell
you. Do you remember when I was stuck by the garage door? You know, it
was so heavy and really painful. I called you, but you could not hear
me. I started crying but it was too painful. Suddenly the small birds
came. They chirped and flew around in the garage and took care of me.
One of them came and made you come. It came to tell you I was stuck by
the door. They were so beautiful. They were all white. Some were white
and green. They told me the baby will be okay, the baby lying on the
garage floor. You went out, opened the garage door and ran to the baby.
You told him to stay and not to go away.”
Kneeling by the side
of the crushed baby, Lloyd’s wife had indeed said: "Don’t leave us
Brian, stay with us if this is possible!”
Brian continued: “We
have travelled very far away from here. We have flown so quickly in the
air. They are so beautiful, Mummy! There are many, many birds.”
[PHOTO – confidential and not provided] A
three year-old boy was nearly crushed to death under an office partition
glass panel weighing over 100kg, but was ‘miraculously’ saved from a
certain death by a wall radiator. (Paris 1986)
Brian
said the birds told him he had to come back to life to tell about them
to everybody, and they brought him back home. There was a big fire
engine truck, an ambulance. A man carried the baby on a white bed and he
was told the baby would be okay.
Brian said the birds were
always with us but we do not see them because we look with our eyes, and
we do not hear them because we listen with our ears. They are all there
and we can see them here (putting his hand on his heart).
Brian
continued: “I have a destiny, mother. You have a destiny. Father has a
destiny. Everybody has a destiny. We must all live our destiny and
fulfil our promises. The birds help us to live our destiny and fulfil
our promises because they love us very much.”
What is true, what is false? It is
true however that God seems really a figment of our imagination, but
does denying the existence of God solve the problem of millions of human
beings who will never quench their thirst for the divine and the
sacred? It is an established fact that millions of people, without
having to be indoctrinated in any religion, thirst for God or for some
kind of Providence – just like an addict for his opium. But, those who
have lived miracles know the truth; a truth that intelligent people like
Pr Richard Dawkins are unable to comprehend – the possibility of
another reality. The “Heart”, not the mind, perceives certain truths. Pr
Dawkins’ very existence is a miracle, but he refuses to be grateful to
the One Who (might have) created him. Does God or angels exist or not?
Many have known God, and seen angels, been with them, talked to them,
been assisted by them, and saved by their belief in God, whether He
exists or not, simply by their strong Faith in any deity whatsoever or
even in any absolutely fabricated being. Hindus have been very well
known to turn humans into gods. Christians have turned at least one
human into God and another human into the mother of God. Hindus have
millions of them, and do still believe in them and practice rituals even
to this day every single day of their lives! Many lead quite a happy
and peaceful life by being a Hindu.
Even the ones who claim to
have had near-death experience and swear they have seen GOD, a male,
white, blond hair and blue eye Jesus Christ or the “Mother of God”, a
white, blond and blue-eyed female, “the Virgin Mary”, when they died
have definitely seen and lived something wonderful and beyond
description when they were certified dead clinically. But, what they saw
was the fruit of their own imagination and beliefs. As a historian it
may be completely out of question to believe in or rely upon such an
unhistorical figure as Jesus Christ, but as a scientist why not? Jesus
Christ was an Arab (Middle Eastern Palestinian) and cannot be as
“Caucasian” as the White (rather Pink!) European Christians or the Black
Africans have been made to believe for now two millennia. But, many
people are sincere and have indeed experienced life after death, and
seen and heard incredible things before they returned to their bodies.
Although some stories are incredible to believe, like in Betty J.
Eadie’s book “EMBRACED BY THE LIGHT” (Thorsons, UK, 1995) in which a
woman saw the white Jesus Christ as the God-Creator, as One and at the
same time as two separate Beings. One common thing to all these
miraculous beings coming back from the other side of life is the message
of love they bring us, but neither Dawkins’ nor his “selfish genes” can
explain this human reality. Whether he is a myth or a real being, many
lives have been saved from immorality and a life of crime and sin by the
Jewish Jesus Christ, and by the love Jewish or Pauline Christians
attribute to him.
Is there not more to man than Pr Dawkins’
“selfish genes” that are devoid of compassion, hope and a real sense of
justice? There is definitely more to life and truth than what we
perceive, see, hear, think and are made to believe. But, whatever the
truth, it is beyond doubt that we, humans and animal-humans, the kinds
that are ruling our world (reptilians would say David Icke) are all
victims (or accomplices) of a an Elite that has taken over through
bloodshed and extreme savagery the entire world with their headquarters
in the United States of America, Britain, Europe, Eretz Israël and their
satellites – the real Axis of Evil. Former US Attorney Ramsey Clark
admitted that his country was “the greatest purveyor of violence in the
world”. US Pr Chomsky, Pr Howard Zinn and many other academics confirm
this point of view.
Dr. KENT HOVIND
challenged the world of scientists believing in and teaching the
“religion of macro-evolution”. A few took up the challenge and failed,
and the others ignored it.
“I have a standing offer of $250,000
to anyone who can give any empirical evidence (scientific proof) for
evolution.* My $250,000 offer demonstrates that the hypothesis of
evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.[36]
[36] ^ a b
Hovind, Kent. "Hovind's $250,000 Offer", Dr. Dino.com, 2005. Retrieved
on 2006-10-18. “
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#_note-8
When Pr Richard Dawkins was asked by a BBC correspondent to
provide any proof for macro-evolution, he was unable to do so. When
asked whether macro-evolution was just a theory or a fact, he answered
it was a fact. Coming from a man of science of such a reputation, Pr
Dawkins should be ashamed to utter such a big lie. Whether Dr Hovind is
right or wrong about his religious beliefs is not relevant here. The
truth is that evolutionists, including Pr Dawkins, have never provided
any scientific evidence to conclusively prove their claim of a theory
that on the contrary has been proven to be a hoax by many: Harun Yahya
(Adnan Oktar) in The Evolution Deceit,
the Origin of life lecture by
Dr A.E. Wilder Smith, the work of “Jehovah Witnesses” on the subject,
etc.
“Kent Hovind had been
charged with falsely declaring bankruptcy, making threats against
federal officials, filing false complaints, failing to get necessary
building permits, and various tax-related charges. He was convicted of
federal tax and related charges, for which he is currently serving a
10-year sentence.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#_note-8
Dr Kent Hovind was jailed on 2
November 2006. Although very informative, the wikipedia article
is very prejudiced against Dr Hovind both on the science side and the
legal aspect. Arun Russo, filmmaker showed in his documentary Democracy to Fascism that there is no
law that can force US citizens to pay income taxes on their wages. Jo Banister who used to work for the
IRS (US Inland Revenue Service), denounced the IRS as a fraudulent
organisation. When victims of the IRS asked in Court to be shown the
law, the Judge says: I do not want the Law in my Court; I am
the Law!
SEVEN REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
The following article of Mr A.Cressy Morrison, former President of the New York
Academy of Sciences first appeared in the Reader's Digest of January,
1948; then, on the recommendation of Professor C.A.Coulson. F.R.S.,
Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University (the same university where
Pr Richard Dawkins teaches), was republished in the Reader's Digest of
November, 1960. – It shows how science compels the scientists to admit
the essential need of a Supreme Creator. But Pr Richard Dawkins chose
not to admit this scientific reality.
“We are still in the dawn
of the scientific age and every increase of light reveals more brightly
the handiwork of an intelligent Creator. In the ninety years since
Darwin we have made stupendous discoveries; with a spirit of scientific
humility and of faith grounded in knowledge we are approaching even
nearer to an awareness of God. For myself, I count seven reasons for my
faith:-
FIRST
By unwavering mathematical law we can prove that
our universe was designed and executed by a great engineering
Intelligence.
Suppose you put ten coins, marked from one to ten,
into your pocket and give them a good shuffle. Now try to take them out
in sequence from one to ten, putting back the coin each time and shaking
them all again. Mathematically, we know that your chance of first
drawing number one is one in ten; of drawing one and two in succession,
one in hundred; of drawing one, two and three in succession, one in a
thousand, and so on; your chance of drawing them all, from one to number
ten in succession, would reach the unbelievable figure of one chance in
ten thousand million.
By the same reasoning, so many exacting
conditions are necessary for life on earth that they could not possibly
exist in proper relationship by chance. The earth rotates on its axis at
one thousand miles an hour; if it turned at one hundred miles an hour,
our days and nights would be ten times as long as now, and the hot sun
would then burn up our vegetation during each long day while in the long
night any surviving sprout would freeze.
Again, the sun, source
of our life, has a surface temperature of 12,000 degrees Fahrenheit,
and our earth is just far enough away so that this “eternal fire” warms
us just enough and not too much! If the sun gave off only one-half of
its present radiation, we would freeze, and if it gave half as much
more, we would roast.
The slant of the earth, tilted at an angle
of 23 degrees, gives us our seasons; if it had not been so tilted,
vapours from the ocean would move north and south, piling up for us
continents of ice. If our moon were, say, only fifty thousand miles away
instead of its actual distance, our tides would be so enormous that
twice a day all continents would be submerged; even the mountains would
soon be eroded away. If the crust of the earth had been only ten feet
thicker, there would be no oxygen without which animal life must die.
Had the ocean been a few feet deeper, carbon dioxide and oxygen would
have been absorbed and no vegetable life could exist. Or, if our
atmosphere had been thinner, some of the meteors, now burned in space by
the million every day, would be striking all parts of the earth,
starting fire everywhere.
Because of these, and host of other
examples, there is not one chance in millions that life on our planet is
an accident.
SECOND
The resourcefulness of life to accomplish its
purpose is a manifestation of all-pervading intelligence.
What life
itself is, no man has fathomed. It has neither weight nor dimensions,
but it does have force; a growing root will crack a rock. Life has
conquered water, land and air, mastering the elements, compelling them
to dissolve and reform their combinations.
Life, the sculptor,
shapes all living things; an artist, it designs every leaf of every
tree, and colours every flower. Life is a musician and has each bird
sing its love songs, the insects to call each other in the music of
their multitudinous sounds. Life is a sublime chemist, giving taste to
fruits and spices, and perfume to the rose, changing water and carbonic
acid into sugar and wood and, in so doing, releasing oxygen so that
animals may have the breath of life.
Behold an almost invisible
drop of protoplasm, transparent and jelly-like, capable of motion,
drawing energy from the sun. This single cell, this transparent
mist-like droplet, holds within itself the germ of life, and has the
power to distribute this life to every living thing, great and small.
The powers of this droplet are greater than our vegetation and animals
and people, for all life came from it. Nature did not create life;
fire-blistered rocks and a salt-less sea could not meet the necessary
requirements.
“Who, then, has put it there?”
THIRD:
Animal wisdom speaks irresistibly of a good Creator
who infused instinct into otherwise helpless little creatures.
The
young salmon spends years at sea, then comes back to his own river, and
travels up the very side of the river into which flows the tributary
where he was born. What brings him back so precisely? If you transfer
him to another tributary, he will know at once that he is off his course
and he will fight his way down and back to the main stream and then
turn up against the current to finish his destiny more accurately.
Even
more difficult to solve is the mystery of eels. These amazing creatures
migrate at maturity from all ponds and rivers everywhere those from
Europe across thousands of miles of ocean all bound for the same abysmal
deeps near Bermuda. There they breed and die. The little one, with no
apparent means of knowing anything except that they are in a wilderness
of water, nevertheless find their way back not only to the very shore
from which their parents came but thence to the rivers, lakes or little
ponds so that each body of water is always populated with eels. No
American eel has ever been caught in Europe, no European eel in American
waters. Nature has even delayed the maturity of the European eel by a
year or more to make up for its longer journey. Where does the directing
impulse originate?
A wasp overpowers a grasshopper, digs a hole
in the earth, stings the grasshopper in exactly the right place so that
he does not die but becomes unconscious and lives on as a form of
preserved meat. Then the wasp will lay her eggs handily so that her
children when they hatch can nibble without killing the insect on which
they feed; to them dead meat would be fatal. The mother then flies away
and dies; she never sees her young. Surely the wasp must have done all
this right the first time and every time, or else there would be no
wasp. Such mysterious techniques cannot be explained by adaptation; they
were bestowed.
FOURTH:
Man has something more than animal instinct the
power of reason.
No other animal has ever left a record of its
ability to count ten or even to understand the meaning of ten. Where
instinct is like a single note of a flute, beautiful but limited, the
human brain contains all the notes of all the instruments in the
orchestra. No need to belabour this fourth point; thanks to the human
reason we can contemplate the possibility that we are what we are only
because we have received a spark of universal intelligence.
FIFTH:
Egyptian pyramid at Giza and the Sphinx
Provision
for all living is revealed in phenomena which we know today which
Darwin did not know such as the wonders of genes. So unspeakably tiny
are these genes that, if all of them responsible for all living people
in the world could be put in one place, there would be less than a
thimbleful. Yet these ultra-microscopic genes and their companions, the
chromosomes, inhabit every living cell and are the absolute keys to all
human, animal and vegetable characteristics. A thimble is a small place
in which to put all the individual characteristics of two thousand
million human beings. However, the facts are beyond question. Well,
then, how do genes lock up all the normal heredity of a multitude of
ancestors and preserve the psychology of each in such an infinitely
small place? Here evolution really begins at the cell, the entity that
holds and carries genes. How a few million atoms, locked up as an ultra
microscopic gene, can absolutely rule all on earth is an example of
profound cunning and provision that could emanate only from a Creative
Intelligence no other hypothesis will serve.
SIXTH:
Aztec Pyramid
By the economy of nature, we are
forced to realise that only infinite wisdom could have foreseen and
prepared with such astute husbandry.
Many years ago a species of
cactus was planted in Australia as a protective fence. Having no insect
enemies in Australia the cactus soon begun a prodigious growth; the
alarming abundance persisted until the plants covered an area as long
and wide as England, crowding inhabitants out of the towns and villages,
and destroying their farms. Seeking a defence, the entomologists
scoured the world; finally they turned up an insect, which exclusively
feeds on cactus, and would eat nothing else. It would breed freely too;
and it had no enemies in Australia. So, animal soon conquered vegetable
and today the cactus pest has retreated, and with it all but a small
protective residue of the insects enough to hold the cactus in check
forever.
Such checks and balances have been universally
provided. Why have not fast-breeding insects dominated the earth?
Because they have no lungs such as man possesses; they breathe through
tubes. But, when insects grow large, their tubes do not grow in ratio to
the increasing size of the body. Hence, there has never been an insect
of great size; this limitation on growth has held them all in check.
If
this physical check had not been provided, man could not exist. Imagine
meeting a hornet as big as a lion!
SEVENTH:
The fact that man conceives the idea of God is in
itself a unique proof.
The conception of god rises from a divine
faculty of man, unshared with the rest of our world the faculty we call
imagination. By its power, man and man alone can find the evidence of
things unseen. The vista that power opens up is unbounded; indeed, as
man is perfected, imagination becomes a spiritual reality. He may
discern in all the evidence of design and purpose, the great truth that
heaven is everywhere and in everything, but nowhere so close as in our
hearts.
It is scientifically as well as imaginatively true; in
the words of the psalmist: “ The heavens declare the glory of God and
the firmament sheweth His handiwork.”
A. Cressy Morrison
Former
President of the New York Academy of Sciences
From “GOD OF ISLAM” by Sayyid Saeed Akhtar
Rizvi, revised edition published by World Organization for Islamic
Services, 1978/1398, Tehran, IRAN. A previous edition was distributed
free 1971-1974 by the author who was then the head of the UNIVERSAL
SOCIETY OF ISLAM at both People’s & Trinity Colleges, Mauritius. The
author was also Head of Biology at the Trinity College until 1974.
But,
whether there is a God or not, whether we are mere evolved animals or
humans don’t we have to get out of the mess our predecessors have put us
into? But, the big question is how?
Is it possible to get out
the clutches of the military state system called democracy? Democracy is
evil mediacracy according to many US personalities, and always ends up
in dictatorship, according to Baptist Christian Evangelist Dr Kent
Hovind, as it has done now in the USA, Canada, Australia, and in Europe –
all white supremacist regimes, according to Alex Jones, Aaron Russo
(Democracy to Fascism), David Icke (Democracy or Fascism), Pr Noam
Chomsky (US Fascism), and many others.
Is it possible to get out
of the mind controlled and centralised system of government that has
replaced all the gods? Fascism is racism. Military Zionism is Nazism,
racism and Fascism, all in one. Karl Marx predicted Jews would one day
take over the whole world and be the supreme masters.
Is it
possible to get back our liberties taken away by the state terrorist
religion? Atheist hegemony is evil.
Is it possible to get rid of
the fascist military that has taken control of our civil life and
liberties, that is scavenging our roads, micro-chipping our citizens,
curtailing our freedom to circulate, running our governments, police,
media, civil services and educational and health institutions, with the
complicity of (paid by) the United Nations and big business corporations
and the servile taxpayers themselves? We are not eternal sheep that the
Élite can take to the slaughterhouse without some of us standing up and
putting up a fierce fight or are we?
Is it possible to fight
the religion of immorality and savage capitalism (pornography,
prostitution, drugs, homosexuality, paedophilia, genetic engineering,
wars of conquest, genocide, global slavery, political kidnapping and
assassination, global immorality and planet pollution) imposed upon the
masses by our controlled political, social and cultural institutions?
Finally,
do we have the right to answer yes to these questions?
We have
reached a stage in the evolution of mankind where even thinking has
become a crime, where freedom of expression is curtailed more and more,
and even hating the criminal deeds of a particular group is a crime.
(The first 800 page manuscript of this book
was deliberately destroyed by an ex British soldier turned computer
engineer and salesman while he had the author’s computer in for repairs,
but the Chemsford Trading Standards concluded that he was too
honourably known in Chelmsford that he could not possibly have committed
such an act. However, it was not a bad thing after all because this new
book looks a lot better thanks to new material from the Internet.)
The beauty of the Internet, you just have to click on a button
and the whole world is displayed before your very eyes, both sound and
picture. Let us give it a try at this very minute at 04.00 AM, Sunday
2nd September 2007, and see what Alex Jones is talking about!
Well, the first two articles are blood
curdling:
1. “Marine tells of order to execute Haditha
women and children”
2. “Porter: Kill More Iraqis or Pay $9 per
Gallon”
Now, let us check the Email box! This is the last one
received.
Information Clearing House Newsletter (Pr Michel
Chossudovsky)
Exposed: Pentagon's
plan for Iran attack 09/01/07
Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered Since The U.S. Invaded Iraq
1,028,907
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html
Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially
acknowledged) In America'sWar On Iraq 3739
http://icasualties.org/oif/
Cost of U.S. War and Occupation of Iraq $447,884,620,921
This
is what we call history in the making and it is frightening – global
plunder and genocide after genocide, endless lies and deception, and who
is behind them? Is this the kind of world we really want for our
children?
END OF CHAPTER ONE
Sunday 2nd
September 2007
Chapter Two will deal with David Icke :
“THE ILLUSION OF A MODERN PROPHET”.
Retrieved
from
"http://www.iamthewiki.com/index.php?title=The_Alien_Beginning_and_End_of_Humankind"
This
page was last modified 19:27, 2 September 2007.
http://freehovind.com/download
Last edited by Ghyslaine
ROC on Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:33 pm |
  
|
|
|
hsindi
Explorer
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:00 pm
Posts: 147
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
Ghyslaine ROC, jazakullah khairun, thanks
for the long post. It even has photos, it probably took a while to post,
may Allah(swt) bless you and your family for your efforts...Very good
information in it. Good job on using Shiekh Hamza Yusuf's knowledge in
this topic. I want to ask if there is a lecture where he talks about
this subject, that you may have pulled the information from? If you have
the video or audio link, please share it...I would greatly appreciate
it, thanks.
Salaam-u-alikum, hsindi
_________________
"Cartoon on Gaza/Israel situation"
"How
to find the correct, true religion"
"Questions/answers about
Islam"
"Stories/poems about Muslims, Islam"
"My YouTube
channel, I know you'll like my videos!"
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:47 pm |
|
|
|
JC0747
Specialist
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:11 am
Posts: 1490
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
i use to listen to that american
convert...until i recently found out he's suufi....if he really is a
suufi what a loss
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:20 pm |
|
|
|
hsindi
Explorer
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:00 pm
Posts: 147
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
JC0747 wrote: i use to
listen to that american convert...until i recently found out he's
suufi....if he really is a suufi what a loss
Don't
follow allegations, without researching them first. I've listened to him
for a while now and I believe he doesn't belong to the Sufi branch of
Islam. Here is an article I found outlining a lecture he gave on
"Tasawwuf/Sufism in Islam" http://www.sunnah.org/events/hamza/hamza.htm
but
this guy is saying he's one of those imams misleading others
-Video,
"Deviants in the West - Hamza Yusuf, Yasir Qadhi...etc"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oJhYqDt6qA
I
just started listening to that guy on Youtube, I don't know if he is
right or not-but its necessary to hear his point of view, before I make a
judgment.
-I have linked two sites proving he is guided and not
guided-you can make your own choice into what you want to believe
towards Sheikh Hamza Yusuf. But as Muslims, we must hear the two
arguments to a situation and then we use our 'Aqell(knowledge) to make a
decision.
Salaam-u-alikum
_________________
"Cartoon on Gaza/Israel situation"
"How
to find the correct, true religion"
"Questions/answers about
Islam"
"Stories/poems about Muslims, Islam"
"My YouTube
channel, I know you'll like my videos!"
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:33 pm |
|
|
|
JC0747
Specialist
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:11 am
Posts: 1490
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
God knows best
hsindi wrote: Don't follow allegations,
ill
look into it....such a great person sheik hamza but suufi i know the
suffis have different ideals than of islam, ill do my research thanks
brother
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:41 pm |
|
|
|
MJFI
Specialist
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 1354
Location:
Buffalo, NY
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
The first half of this post made me
physically sick at some of the ridiculous comments and statements made.
I'll get to the second half of your post later, and I hope that it's not
as sweepingly spiteful and ignorant as the first half was.
Ghyslaine ROC wrote: WHERE THERE IS
GOD (invented or real, or what He represents), don’t we see more
LOVE, hope, goodness, decency, cleanliness, charity, morality, patience
in adversity, compassion, forgiveness, freedom, justice, mercy, and
humankind as a also SPIRITUAL and HUMAN?
And, WHERE THERE IS NO GOD, don’t we see
more HATE, inhumanity, evil, indecency, filth, greed and selfishness,
immorality, perversions, despair, suicide, cruelty, vengeance, slavery,
racism, injustice, covetousness, ruthlessness, ABOMINATIONS OF ALL
KINDS, and Man as only material and only an (evolved) animal, an INHUMAN
and monstrous being sprung from “thousands or millions of accidental
genetic mutations”?
The former is the good of man. The
latter is the evil of man. The 60s counterculture (who partook in what
you call "new age" religious beliefs) fell primarily into the first
category, and yet they did not as a whole belief in a God as you know
it. The second half of this is a result of materialism and man's free
will.
Ghyslaine
ROC wrote: Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Hanson
argues that if one believes in God, he or she is strengthened in that
belief and God is then with him or her, but if someone does not believe
in God, he or she is strengthened in his or her unbelief and abandoned
by God.
Let's make a mathematical formula here. X=Faith,
G=God.
Gx = -Gx, by what Hanson here says. Thus, as x = x, G = -G,
and G can be removed from the formula without affecting the results of
x. Belief in God, or a lack of, is not the cause of the problems or the
solutions to these problems in the world.
Ghyslaine ROC wrote: Pr Dawkins would be one of those who survived this
savage competition, which gives his “naturally selected” race the right
to wipe out the 5-6 billion weaker “poorly-evolved animals” for his own
survival. Although billions of people in such a materialist world find
it more and more very hard today, due to western cultural and political
oppression and terrorism, to believe in a real Invisible (Unseen)
God-Creator, why does the Professor show such arrogance and scoff at
others who are believers in God, whether He exists or not?
Dawkins
is not the voice of Atheists, he's the voice of weak people who need
someone else to speak for them. There are voices like this in all
religious beliefs. How would you feel if I said Ahmenijhad or Osama Bin
Laden was the voice of Islam? Would you not be offended?
Furthermore,
I don't think Dawkins has ever said "lets wipe out the 5-6 billion
weaker people on this planet". If you have proof of otherwise,
preferably an audio clip or a video clip with the quotation, please feel
free to present it. Otherwise, don't make such ridiculous statements.
Many
atheists are perfectly fine coexisting with believers. Many atheists do
not scoff at believers for their beliefs. On the same hand, many
believers are perfectly fine coexisting with atheists. Many believers do
not scoff at atheists for their beliefs. Do you see where I'm getting
at here? You can't take radicals and claim them as the majority, or else
you're doing the same as people who say all Muslims are bomb-strapped
terrorists who want to blow up infidels. This is insulting, and
reasonable people do not make these claims.
Ghyslaine ROC wrote: Isn’t it a paradox that Atheists should call
themselves Humanists when they believe and claim they are only (evolved)
animals?
Not all atheists are humanists. Humanists
believe in the progression of mankind. There are many religious people
who are humanists. Please keep this in mind.
Ghyslaine ROC wrote: Even Atheists have their prophets like Sigmund
Freud, his nephew Edward Bernays (who inspired Adolph Hitler, George W.
Bush and other western fascist and Zionist regimes), Charles Darwin,
Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and their likes.
Thats a
sweeping generalization, and one that's wretchedly wrong. Most people
would not say that Hitler, Bush, Stalin or Mao are "prophets" or even
people to be looked up to. This is an insult to everyone who disagrees
with you, and a slap in the face.
Ghyslaine ROC wrote: We
are living in a society and a world where morality has been replaced by
force by all kinds of perversions of mind and body, where the New Age
religion with its Earth god aims at the breaking down of the family and
the prostitution of men, women and children, the abduction of our babies
to be sold into sex slavery (carried out by state-protected
corporations to Israel and other western and western-client countries),
the worshipping of money and fame, the poisoning of mind and body by
drugs (including nicotine, alcohol and mainly Jewish owned
pharmaceutical so-called medicine), Zionist television, pornography, and
the complete control and dehumanisation of mankind.
New
Age religious beliefs do not support the breakdown of family,
prostitution of any people, sex slaves, corporations, worshipping of
money or fame (it's actually quite immaterial), or the use of most
drugs, especially nicotine and alchohol, which are some of the more
destructive drugs man has created. This whole paragraph is ridiculous.
I'll
get to the rest of this later.
_________________
Nightmare
Rock.
"When you realize how perfect everything is you will tilt
your head back and laugh at the sky."
-Siddhartha Gautama
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:42 pm |
|
|
|
Ghyslaine ROC
Explorer
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:08 am
Posts: 98
Location:
France
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
JC0747 wrote: i use to
listen to that american convert...until i recently found out he's
suufi....if he really is a suufi what a loss
The
title of the post is "SEVEN REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD". So,
please, let us not be distracted by other matters.
However,
I would like to clear one misunderstanding regarding the author of The
Alien Beginning and End of Humankind and Sheikh
Hamza Yusuf Hanson, a revert to Islam like myself. The
author of that unpublished book is my mentor, and Sheikh Hamza Yusuf
Hanson who I saw and heard at one of his talks in London is my best
teacher in Islamic matters.
A
Sufi is not a devil. Some Sufis like some Muslims are evil. Are
we justified to say "what a loss" if someone says he or she is a
Muslim? Of course not!
Being a
Sufi is not a crime. Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Hanson has been accused
of being a Sufi by mostly Muslims calling themselves Salafis. Some of
those misguided Salafis even pounced upon him at one of his talks here
in London. I was shattered! Sheikh Hamza is one of the best Muslims
and one of the greatest human beings I have met in my life although we
had some disagreement regarding his role as George Bush's advisor!
To
this day, the so-called Salafis have banned all his works in their
bookshops. Is this right? I
have listened to hundreds of his talks and watched several of his videos
including on the Dajjal and have been greatly impressed.
In
my view, he is the best non Sectarian teacher of Islam for English
speaking people. If there are others, I would like to
know who they are. Dr Jamal Badawi is very good too.
Sheikh
Yusuf himself said he was not a Sufi. So, please, do not let us be
distracted. Many times, some Muslims have accused even me
of being a Sufi because I speak of things they regard as blasphemous. Some
Muslims tried to attack Sheikh Hamza physically, but how many of them
have you heard having attacked Salman Rushdie physically?
Many
thanks for your comment and God bless you and your loved ones.
Ghyslaine
ROC
23/3/6009
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:37 pm |
|
|
|
Ghyslaine ROC
Explorer
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:08 am
Posts: 98
Location:
France
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
JC0747 wrote: God
knows best
hsindi
wrote: Don't follow allegations,
ill
look into it....such a great person sheik hamza but suufi i know the
suffis have different ideals than of islam, ill do my research thanks
brother
Just see one
of the reasons why some Muslims accused me of being a Sufi!
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:27 pm |
|
|
|
tayah84
Researcher
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 313
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
JC0747 wrote: i use to
listen to that american convert...until i recently found out he's
suufi....if he really is a suufi what a loss
Omg a
suuuuffffi run  Shaykh Hamza is an orthodox sunni
Muslim who follows the Maliki Madhab and one of the three aqidas of
Ahlus sunna Wal Jammah and yes he considers sufism to be an Islamic
science just like the majority of scholars.
But oh wait some
youtubers posted a lecture bashing him and Shaykh Yasir Qadhi who's a
Salafi, people shouldn't pay attention to all that aalim bashing going
on online seriously I can't think of one scholar who I haven't heard
being insulted by laymen sad but true
@hsindi here he talks a
little about it, it's from the lecture the "17 benefits of tribulation"
which can also be found on youtube
_________________
True religion invites us to become better
people. False religion tells us that this has already occurred
|
| Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:08 pm |
|
|
|
Ghyslaine ROC
Explorer
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:08 am
Posts: 98
Location:
France
|
Re: SEVEN
REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
tayah84 wrote: @hsindi
here he talks a little about it, it's from the lecture the "17 benefits
of tribulation" which can also be found on youtube
You
are right. What he says essentially is very simple to understand. If
you look into a mirror, you will find yourself. David Icke said
something similar. If you project positive energy, you get positive
energy back. When you say God exists, HE WILL EXIST not only in your
mind but also in your daily way of life. If you say God does not exist,
what is to prevent you from stealing, coveting your neighbour's wife or
husband, lying, disrespecting your parents, prostituting yourself and
others, taking drugs, gambling, practicing usury, killing your babies
legally (abortion), or even marrying your own sister, brother, mother,
father, son or daughter?
The Furqaan is the CRITERION, but Atheists have no such
criterion to distinguish good from bad, unless some of them adopt a
similar criterion like that of the Holy Qur'aan, which then will
obviously bring them closer to the Muslims.
Many thanks for
helping out.
Ghyslaine
24/3/6009
|
| Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:11 am |
|
|
| |
No comments:
Post a Comment