WE WERE RIGHT - THE NEW-YORK TIMES CONFIRMED POLAND, UK & FRANCE STARTED WW2 IN 1939. MIKE KING, THE BAD WAR.

 

1939: The NY Times "Confirms" That Poland, UK & France Started WW2 - MIKE KING

1939: The NY Times "Confirms" That Poland, UK & France Started WW2 By Mike King

Most regular readers of the Real History Channel know by now that the Sulzberger-Ochs Crime Family has --  ever since buying up the Gentile-owned New York Slimes on the cheap (post "Panic of 1893") in 1896 -- used its status and influence as "the paper of record" to promote the Globalist agenda. What is less known is the fact that, owing to the generally conservative and patriotic political / cultural realities of decades gone by, the propagandists had to tread carefully as (((they))) went about their dirty business. Today, the Slimes, if it should so choose, could probably sell the existence of flying Unicorns to their dumb-as-dirt "educated" worshipers. Back in the day, they could not. For that reason, one will find many instances of "the other side of the story" pertaining to this or that issue being presented fully and truthfully -- albeit offset by the more numerous poison pills.
 
The "Times Machines Archives" -- which your generous donations help to pay for (hint hint) have proven to be very useful to your favorite Real Historian here when it comes to the never-ending search for all important original-source data. It's really interesting to note how -- when read with a "third eye" and combined with other data -- the Jewish-owned New York Slimes seemed to confirm the version of events presented in the banned and "controversial" book, The Bad War (by yours truly).

Let's have a critical look at the day-by-day headlines leading up to that fateful and avoidable September 1, 1939 breakout of World War 2, and also those of the first days after the shooting started. Any historian who would dare to merely present this "other side of the story" today -- even with obligatory and pathetic "anti-Nazi" qualifiers -- would be booted out of Quackademia quicker than Professor Christina Jeffrey was dumped as Congressional historian in 1995 for having, 10 years prior, suggested precisely that in her assessment of a history curriculum she had been tasked with reviewing. It's amazing.

Washington Post

"The program gives no evidence of balance or objectivity. The Nazi point of view, however unpopular, is still a point of view, and it is not presented."

In 1995, History Professor Jeffrey was tarred as "anti-Semitic" and fired (at the insistence of the ADL) merely for having written (10 years earlier) that "the Nazi point of view" should be presented --- which is actually what the Jewish NY Times often did (by necessity) from 1939-1941.

August 23: Analysis: Britain & France "rush plans for war" as their Polish patsie continues to provoke Germany. The Germans are "elated" because they believe that the recent non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union would discourage the UK / France alliance from going through with those "war plans."

August 23: Analysis: Hitler wants to be reasonable with Poland, but Britain, France and, from "behind the scenes," FDR continue on with their plot to use Poland to provoke war with Germany.

August 27: Analysis: Hitler wants Britain and France to cease inciting Poland to make war. The Allies "reject" Hitler's plea.

August 28: Analysis: Danzig is a totally German port city (Baltic Sea) that was isolated from Germany proper after the horrible map re-write which followed World War I. The Poles surround Danzig and want to make it part of Poland (today, it is indeed Gdansk, Poland). Berlin (Hitler) believes that peace can be maintained if an agreement on Danzig can be worked out.

August 29: Analysis: Hitler remains hopeful of peaceful agreement. "Tension is eased," but the aggressive UK / France (also FDR & Jewish Globalist) alliance is still "poised for war"

August 30: Analysis: Hitler is STILL trying to keep the peace, but the UK House of Commons is cheering the British "pledge" to "resist force."

September 1:  Analysis: Though the headline pins the start of the war on Germany, other front page articles present Hitler's claim that the Poles used "irregular" fighters (including Jewish Bolshevik partisans) to commit atrocities against Germans living under Polish rule and penetrated German borders in order to force the start of the war.

September 2:  Analysis: The Allies issue threats and Poland calls for Allied military action against Germany from the West.

September 3:  Analysis: Britain and France declared war on Germany --- not the other way around.

September 5: Analysis: Britain and France then drew "first blood" against Germany --- not the other way around.

September 7: Analysis: "French INVADE Reich" (not the other way around) as Brits arrive in France. FDR stirs up trouble too.

September 10: Analysis: French continue to "advance" into German territory (Saarland) -- Germany's response (via #2 man Herman Goering) is to offer a peace bid to the French! Meanwhile, the Brits predict a "three year war."

September 11: Analysis: French "shift their drive" into German territory, but Hitler, still hoping for peace, refuses to engage them.

September 12: Analysis: The French still "continue" with "gains." It would not be until October before the Germans finally expel the limited invasion from France. This was long before the Germans were finally forced to take the fight to the French aggressors, in Spring of 1940.

 

These sorts of surprising (by today's standards, that is) headlines and articles about "the other side of the story" would continue up to and even a few months after Japan's justifiable non-surprise attack upon the Pearl Harbor naval base in the US territory of Hawaii in 1941. Entire communiques issued by the German, Italian and Japanese Foreign Ministries, as well as statements by Hitler himself, were published -- albeit not as frequently nor as well-placed as the dirty lies of Churchill and FDR. It wasn't until US troops started to physically engage the "Axis" nations that the Slimes could show its true colors and descend into pure "Yellow Journalism." But prior to that, the "paper of record" dumped a load of truth gems for anyone with the time, sense of smell and patience to dig them out.

A heartfelt "thank you" to all of "youse guys" who -- especially in the wake of the Amazon / Kindle ban -- have kept me in a position to keep doing just that.

1. Long before Germany invaded France, invading French soldier reads a poster in German village of Lauterbach. 

// 2. You know those "scary" images we all grew up seeing on TV documentaries and in history books -- the ones in which the Germans and Hitler strut through Paris?  ... Well, the missing context is the fact that the Germans went into France about 8 & 1/2 months AFTER France had declared war upon and invaded peaceful Germany -- AFTER Hitler had been deliberately baited into a conflict by Anglo-Franco-backed military dictator of Poland.


DONATE TO KEEP US GROWING

MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS & PDFS

FREE SAMPLE // "THE BAD WAR"