Monday 21 February 2022

RON UNZ - NOVEMBER 2019 US-ISRAEL STARTS BIO-WARFARE AGAINST IRAN LINKED WITH COVID-19 USING INSTITUT PASTEUR AND WUHAN.

 


 US-ISRAEL BIOWARFARE AGAINST IRAN

 COVID-19 Bio-Attack Smoking Gun!

Published February 16, 2022 45,926 Views

 https://rumble.com/vv49f8-covid-19-bio-attack-smoking-gun.html

 
The Long-Forgotten Early Iranian Outbreak

Contents

American Pravda: Our Coronavirus Catastrophe as Biowarfare Blowback?


 

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

American Pravda: Covid-19, Its Impact and Origins After One Year

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

American Pravda: “The Truth” and “The Whole Truth” About the Origins of Covid-19

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

American Pravda: George Orwell’s Virus Lab-Leak

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

American Pravda: the Covid Epidemic as Lab-Leak or Biowarfare?

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

American Pravda: Waging Biological Warfare

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

American Pravda: Confronting Covid Crimestop

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

Podcast Interviews

Kevin Barrett, FFWN • February 16, 2022 • 15m

Video Link

Truth Jihad with Kevin Barrett • March 22, 2021 • 56m

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

Truth Jihad with Kevin Barrett • May 16, 2021 • 56m

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

Truth Jihad with Kevin Barrett • August 17, 2021 • 55m

Audio Player
00:00
00:00

Truth Jihad with Kevin Barrett • December 17, 2021 • 62m

Audio Player

00:00
00:00


Geopolitics & Empire • February 1, 2022 • 75m • SoundCloud Audio

Red Ice TV • February 3, 2022 • 250m

Video Link.

 
Hide 3 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to Follow
Trim Comments?
  1. The khazar fauci has been deliberately paying money eg the 3.2m to Wuhan lab, to keep the Chinese in a possible bioattack, as the main suspects.

    In reality it was made at Fort Detrick, the inheritor of Japan’s WW2 bio weapons research. The coincidence of a simultaneous covid outbreak in Qom and China is alone grounds for investigation. A definite lead are the mysterious “vaping deaths” in the US which have not occurred since?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. This Commenter
  2. “Our Covid 19 Catastrophe”

    The author may indeed be onto something substantial in his investigations, but he does no one any favors by using such ill-defined pronouns as “Our” in describing the phenomenon in question. For that term implies that all America is responsible for this heinous and preventable catastrophe. That is not at all the case; ordinary Americans had nothing to do with this, just as ordinary Chinese likely had nothing to do with it. This cataclysm is the result of governments out of control, and perhaps a select group of billionaire oligarchs out of control.

    If these lines of investigation lead someplace tangible, and they very well may, then something like the post-WWII Nuremberg Trials will be called for in order to untangle the evidence and assign blame. That blame must be laid at specific feet – both individually and institutionally – but the operative word is “specific.” As in people and organizations with names and identifying information.

    The billionaire oligarchs – Gates et al. – have undoubtedly laid false trails leading to others should their schemes fall apart, and they also have expendable underlings to take the fall if necessary, i.e., Dr. Anthony Fauci. That should not deter investigators; those responsible for these crimes against humanity must be held to account for their evil actions.

    The same goes for those now hiding behind the veil of secrecy provided to the intelligence-national security apparatus, not just in the U.S. but elsewhere. It is becoming more and more apparent that it is time for that veil to be torn off. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

    The job at hand is going to be dirty, tough and difficult one, because all of the stakeholders are desperate to avoid being tagged with responsibility, and the air is thick with the fog of disinformation, lies, and assorted smokescreens designed to obscure the truth.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. This Commenter
  3. SupremeLaw says: • Website

    Hantavirus, Not Ebola, Prompted The Pre-Olympics Lockdown Of Xian Covid Part 31

    By Yoichi Shimatsu
    Exclusive To Rense.com
    1-19-22

    [MORE]
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. This Commenter
Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Unz Comments via RSS
THE [RACIST ANTI-ISLAM] FEDERALIST PAPERS
US News
 
" Christianity (and also Judaism) is conducive to the civilization of mankind, meaning the public recognition of the equal natural rights of all human beings. It moderates man’s passions and increases the propensity for toleration. Islam does not."
Mewe Share P Share

Winston Churchill's Brutal Takedown of Islam Means More Today than Ever

Mewe Share P Share

churchill

We’ve written before in response to President Obama’s false claim that Islam was “woven into the fabric” of the United States since the Founding here. More recently, we explained here how John Quincy Adams, sixth President of the United States, summed up the religion of Islam in one succinct sentence.

These things call to mind another harsh and brilliant critic of Islam, Sir Winston Churchill. The British Prime Minister and winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature never held anything back when it came to condemning Islam’s frequent recurrence to brutality and slaughter. You might be familiar with Churchill’s famous line, “Islam is as dangerous in a man as rabies in a dog.” The quote is somewhat inaccurate [DAMN YOU, WHICH IS THE ACCURATE ONE, THEN???], but summarizes the sentiment well enough.

It comes from Churchill’s unabridged The River War:

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property—either as a child, a wife, or a concubine—must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science—the science against which it had vainly struggled—the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

In a story that is almost a year old, but certainly worth remembering at such a critical time as now, a British man was arrested for publicly quoting this exact passage of Churchill’s.

From The Washington Times:

Quoting Winston Churchill’s opinions on Islam contributed to a U.K. politician’s arrest — and possible imprisonment of up to two years.

Paul Weston, chairman of the party Liberty GB, was making a speech Saturday outside the Winchester Guildhall in Hampshire, when he quoting the famous prime minister, the Independent reported.

After a member of the public complained, Mr. Weston was subsequently arrested for religious harassment when he did not comply with officers’ orders to leave the area.

The text that contributed to Mr. Weston’s arrest came from Churchill’s book “The River of War: [DAMN YOU, WHICH TEXT???] An Account of the Reconquest of the Sudan,” written by the former prime minister in 1899 during his time as an Army officer in Sudan.

winston

America’s Thomas Jefferson, in his Notes on the State of Virginia, expressed an identical sentiment as Churchill later did, regarding the unjust and vile treatment of women by “the merciless Indian savages”:

The women are submitted to unjust drudgery. This I believe is the case with every barbarous people. With such, force is law. The stronger sex therefore imposes on the weaker. It is civilization alone which replaces women in the enjoyment of their natural equality. That first teaches us to subdue the selfish passions, and to respect those rights in others which we value in ourselves. Were we in equal barbarism, our females would be equal drudges.

Again, Jefferson said this regarding the Indians, but one can easily imagine the same rule generally applied to the religion of Islam, which refuses to recognize the equal rights of women.

Here’s Churchill again on Islam, this time from The Story of the Malakand Field Force:

That religion, which above all others was founded and propagated by the sword—the tenets and principles of which are instinct with incentives to slaughter and which in three continents has produced fighting breeds of men—stimulates a wild and merciless fanaticism. The love of plunder, always a characteristic of hill tribes, is fostered by the spectacle of opulence and luxury which, to their eyes, the cities and plains of the south display. A code of honour not less punctilious than that of old Spain is supported by vendettas as implacable as those of Corsica. …


Indeed it is evident that Christianity, however degraded and distorted by cruelty and intolerance, must always exert a modifying influence on men’s passions, and protect them from the more violent forms of fanatical fever, as we are protected from smallpox by vaccinations. But the Mohammaden religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since its votaries have been subject, above all the peoples of all other creeds, to this form of madness.

Christianity (and also Judaism) is conducive to the civilization of mankind, meaning the public recognition of the equal natural rights of all human beings. It moderates man’s passions and increases the propensity for toleration. Islam does not.

H/T Powerline.

No comments:

Post a Comment