I HAD A DREAM, A FANTASY, AND I BELIEVED IN ANGELS.
When my Common-Law wife, Sylviane Paulette Frémaux-Soormally, mother of my unique child, and her new Chevalier Servant Freemasonic "Jehovah Witness" Christopher Dean Harrington told the "Copford" Police that because of me her life was in danger, meaning I had the intention or had threatened to KILL HER, I found myself in hell as I know how vicious and evil can some women can be, especially when they have found another man to replace me! And, I knew then that the best solution was to get the hell out of there as quicky as possible! When my son decided to follow me after his mother and Christopher had my own solicitor serve me with a letter asking me to leave my house, this complicated things, but I was hoping that together we would sort out things, but he very soon became a victim of this betrayal. I do not blame his mother, but myself for not having taken enough legal precautions to protect us both! I never expected Christopher who I helped stop the repossession of his house to betray me. This made me change my entire outlook on God, religion, and humans. But, now, it had become a life and death situation and I knew that by leaving as fast as I could I would avoid the worst for both my son and me! My wife did not want our son to stay as this would have compromised her affair (?) with Christopher who was often present in the house and would answer the telephone everytime I rang my wife from London! I firmly decided to avoid the War of the Frémaux-Soormally also because I had watched the "WAR OF THE ROSES" by Michael Douglas as I found myself in a similar situation!
Innocent man sent to jail for rape by his own fiancée
Randy Johnston to Tomo Thompson
My beloved son broke his leg today. He's three years old. Go on, ask me what I'm doin to alleviate his pain. Perhaps ya want some specifics on the incident.
When a father can't be there for his kids due to a blind, psychotic, narcissistic CUNT OF A MOTHER who uses MY children as not only sympathy tickets, but as pawns to SOMEHOW prove she's the better parent, (coz you kno, she was able to get a JP to sign off on a heap of situations not only blown outta proportion, but initiated by her fukken stupid actions to start with, which automatically makes those pages of false happenings able to be tended as 'cough cough' evidence, so OBVIOUSLY she's the good parent), you know the system is not only fukkkkkkd, but they know and smile whilst waving, 'hava nice day pal'. There's only one more 'worst case scenario' to unfold, my second and third worst have already unfolded for all to be damaged by, really makes ya wonder why you're bothering to survive.
Save your sympathy for some other cunt, the Lord knows JEVs always got her fukken hand out, ready to collect...
When a father can't be there for his kids due to a blind, psychotic, narcissistic CUNT OF A MOTHER who uses MY children as not only sympathy tickets, but as pawns to SOMEHOW prove she's the better parent, (coz you kno, she was able to get a JP to sign off on a heap of situations not only blown outta proportion, but initiated by her fukken stupid actions to start with, which automatically makes those pages of false happenings able to be tended as 'cough cough' evidence, so OBVIOUSLY she's the good parent), you know the system is not only fukkkkkkd, but they know and smile whilst waving, 'hava nice day pal'. There's only one more 'worst case scenario' to unfold, my second and third worst have already unfolded for all to be damaged by, really makes ya wonder why you're bothering to survive.
Save your sympathy for some other cunt, the Lord knows JEVs always got her fukken hand out, ready to collect...
Published on 8 Apr 2019
On 60 MINUTES Liz Hayes investigates the terrifying case of the innocent man falsely accused by his fiancé of violent sexual crimes. How the woman he loved fooled police into believing she was a victim when in fact she was an evil liar.
WATCH more of 60 Minutes Australia: https://www.60minutes.com.au
LIKE 60 Minutes Australia on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/60Minutes9
FOLLOW 60 Minutes Australia on Twitter: https://twitter.com/60Mins
FOLLOW 60 Minutes Australia on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/60minutes9
For forty years, 60 Minutes have been telling Australians the world’s greatest stories. Tales that changed history, our nation and our lives. Reporters Liz Hayes, Allison Langdon, Tara Brown, Charles Wooley, Liam Bartlett and Sarah Abo look past the headlines because there is always a bigger picture.
Sundays are for 60 Minutes. #60MinutesAustralia
Above we have 100% evidence how corrupt the Law, the DPP, Police and the Satanic Maritime Courts are as they were the ones guilty for using a SICK citizen, a sick woman, a maniac, Satanic or whatever we can rightly call her, TO MAKE MONEY at the expense of the people. More evidence is the lenient way they dealt with her after she was guilty of making false accusations that made the accused spent $600,000 to DEFEND THEMSELVES, when the onus was on the authorities to find them guilty, and THEY HAD NONE except unproven allegations! And, I knew all that right from the start having been victim of it in at least three countries: Mauritius, France and Britain! [BAFS]
Did I act like a coward by running away?
I will never know what would have happened if I had stayed and fought back, not my wife and her new "partner", but the Police and the Satanic Freemasonic Maritime Courts!
Thank God, I am not violent, do not take drugs, smoke or drink alcohol or sleep out with women!
But, deep inside, I am convinced I did the right thing! Unfortunately, both my son and I paid a horrificly tremendous price!
MY BOSS-WIFE SAID SHE NEVER EVEN MARRIED ME!
A marriage made in Hell
May Contain Spoilers
I've I've had to defend myself for loving "The War of the Roses" so much. The majority of people I've discussed it with found it too mean-spirited. I realize it deals with an ugly subject but this is a prime example of a movie being great at how it is about its core subject, no matter how touchy. This is one of my all-time favorite films.Page design by Marie Haws.
"The War of the Roses" is surely the best thing Danny DeVito has ever done. In discussing him we may not be talking about the most renowned or prolific film director but I doubt there is any other living filmmaker who could have made a better movie with this particular material. It seems to fit his personality so well. DeVito is a guy that I can't help but admire. His sensational Louie DePalma character of "Taxi" fame was voted as the best ever on TV guide's 50Th anniversary and this could have never been done by just anybody reading the lines as written. Here is a round, balding, five foot man who became a star of the screen thanks to personality and true genius.
DeVito had a decent directorial debut with "Throw Momma from the Train," but in retrospect that movie seems like an exercise in the style that he mastered here. There is an incredible attention to detail in every shot and scene of "The War of the Roses." While watching it we can sense the director having a ball with this material, fully aware of the great script he got to work with and the exact approach it requires.
"The War of the Roses" starts with a fairy tale feeling but quickly evolves into the blackest of comedies. This could have truly been a terrible movie in the wrong hands. The film depicts the journey of Barbara and Oliver Rose (Kathleen Turner and Michael Douglas) through two decades in their lives in a marriage takes them from love and happiness to mutual disgust. DeVito plays Gavin D'Amato, Oliver's friend and business partner who narrates the story to a poor soul of a client, a man of few words (or none) who Gavin realizes might be going in a path similar to that of our heroes.
"The War of the Roses" is one of those rare comedies in which countless lines are memorable and hilarious, but what makes it unique is its visual style, told mostly through DeVito's own eye-level POV -- which makes all taller characters look like giants. There is a constant use of odd angles that seem to spring from the subject matter and never feel gratuitous. The film comes alive with countless visual and audio gags such as those showing the steam related to the "pissed-on fish" and the sizzling sound of frying onions while Olivier is stuck in the sauna, with his subsequent recovery by drinking what seems like a gallon bottle of Gatorade. The film is also full of oddities designed to constantly unsettle the audience, like the presence of the loud and overweight children and the constant handling of raw liver. What can one say about a comedy on divorce that manages to include a monster-truck jumping scene? Anything goes.
One of the most enjoyable aspects of "The War of the Roses" is its merciless attitude toward lawyers, from Gavin's auto-critical attitude to Oliver's self grandiose poise. There's also Barbara's stone-faced attorney played by the late G.D. Spradlin, who will only dare to show a smile upon being referred to as a "tiny little infinitesimal worm-like prick" by Oliver (this surely tells him he has done his work properly).
"Roses" isn't even kind to the usually sacred children or animals groups, even though DeVito does relent for the briefest of moments by pardoning the life of Bennie the dog, which I guess spared the movie from the wrath of even more people. Was he right in caving in, if just for a second? Much like Roger does in his "A Fish Called Wanda" review, I'm perplexed by some audience's concern for on-screen animals and their simultaneous lack of the same for humans -- but in this case, DeVito's canine point was nonetheless made and his audience cringed (if only for the briefest of moments), which in retrospect should be enough.
Behind the greatness in "The War of the Roses" is the fact that no matter how outlandish the scenes and how silly the two main characters always end up looking, there is an implicit truth to them. As Robert DeNiro's Al Capone once said (regarding an all-together different subject) "we laugh because it's funny and we laugh because it's true." An old teacher of mine who taught about the peculiarities of Family Corporations, always used to say there can be no worst hatred than that between family members who once loved each other and I believe this explains why some people involved in family rifts end up doing things totally out of their character.
Barbara and Oliver Rose seem like nice and loving people when dealing with just about anybody else but each other. Then they get to play monsters. Even though there are plenty of psychological aspects to discuss from a subject of this nature, we have to remember this is not a movie about the causes of war so much as the fun of the war itself. Sure, it is rather obvious that Oliver became a controlling husband and has a knack for putting down his insecure wife, with Barbara in turn going completely "medieval" on him, something that even at the very end he cannot comprehend. "Love means never having to say you are sorry," but the Roses prove it surely can never hurt.
The film becomes a critique of materialism and consumerism as little by little the Roses destroy the contents of their tacky-taste house that they spent a lifetime collecting. The film finds the perfect excuse to claustrophobically keep these characters together all the way through as both refuse to relent on their absurd quest. We end up recalling the fire which burned their Christmas Tree and wish it had taken the whole house along, as it would have been to their benefit to rid themselves of the subject at the center of their dispute.
Much has been made about Turner and Douglas' screen chemistry, but what's truly amazing is that it translated to roles of absolute hate as well. "The War of the Roses" is yet another of the films of the period in which the latter played a character who was tormented by his leading lady (Demi Moore and, Glenn Close also come to mind) and I've always doubted this to be just a coincidence as he's always seemed to have a talent for playing the victim of strong female figures. Gavin recalls his father telling him "men can never outdo women when it comes to love and revenge" and right or wrong, this clearly became this film's personal philosophy.
Whatever both character's numerous faults, only Barbara is depicted as wholly cold-hearted from a certain point onward, going so far to reject Oliver in her last breath. This is the reason why I can personally explain the slightest of personal sympathies only for Oliver, though I realize this kind of reaction may also depend on the sex and personal experiences of each individual viewer.
"The War of the Roses" is relentless in its approach. We are shocked when two thirds into this ride Gavin tells his client: "so far this was a normal divorce story, but you may need a drink to listen to the rest" and the last chapter certainly doesn't prove him wrong. The violence here sometimes resembles a road-runner cartoon but the movie never ceases to be funny.
Upon its release, "Roses" was heavily criticized for its nasty, unhappy ending but the truth of the matter is that any kind of reconciliation between these characters would have felt phony, as the couple we've grown to know have nothing to do with the concept of happiness. At any rate, when the credits roll we realize it was the DeVito character that gradually became the central focus of the story and he in turn has become a voice of reason, a loving husband and an overall good man. Heck, he's even become a lawyer willing to yield his fee for his fellow man. Now that's your happy ending right there.
My Mona Lisa Daughter-in-law No 1 - Only in my dream!
My French wife accompanied by her new Chevalier Servant, a "Jehovah Witness", our own business partner, informed the RACIST ANTI-MUSLIM AND ANTI-ARAB (PRO-ISRAEL) Police that her life was in danger because of me. But, when the Police (ONE YOUNG AND UNARMED POLICE OFFICER) came my wife could think of nothing to tell the Police officer why she said and thought that her life was in danger because of me. She was advised to stay in a hotel for the night if she felt her life was threatened and see a solicitor in the morning!
I NEVER COMMITTED ANY ACT OF VIOLENCE IN MY ENTIRE LIFE SINCE MY COLLEGE YEARS!
Is it a coincidence that Michael's wife AMANDA in "FALLING DOWN" bears the same name as my Mona Lisa daughter-in-law AMANDA?
See my Testament on RASPUTIN & SIMBA!
Write a comment...
MOVIE - "FALLING DOWN" - SHORT EXTRACT
My fave movie - next to, "They Live"
This movie was released in 1993 and is more relevant than ever.
My fave movie - next to, "They Live"
This movie was released in 1993 and is more relevant than ever.
Michael Douglas plays a "middle class" man at the end of his tether. Out of work and watching his life fall apart under the economic rationalist policies of the Reagan and Thatcher era, he takes matters into this own hands and expresses his frustration with the "American dream".
In this segment the Douglas character makes the point that the fast food hamburger picture on the wall does not live up to the actual hamburger passed to him across the counter. CLASSIC.
The American Dream - a "miserable squashed thing".
- "You see, this is what I'm talking about. Turn around and look at that! You see what I mean? Its plump, it's juicy, it's three inches thick. Now...look at this sorry, miserable squashed thing! Can anybody tell me whats wrong with this picture? Anybody? Anybody at all?" -
This movie was released in 1993 and is more relevant than ever. Michael Douglas
- One very wrong thing in the FILM is the "Nazi" stereotype! (BAFS)
My French wife accompanied by her new Chevalier Servant, a "Jehovah Witness", our own business partner, informed the RACIST ANTI-MUSLIM AND ANTI-ARAB (PRO-ISRAEL) Police that her life was in danger because of me. But, when the Police (ONE YOUNG AND UNARMED POLICE OFFICER) came my wife could think of nothing to tell the Police officer why she said and thought that her life was in danger because of me. She was advised to stay in a hotel for the night if she felt her life was threatened and see a solicitor in the morning!
I NEVER COMMITTED ANY ACT OF VIOLENCE IN MY ENTIRE LIFE SINCE MY COLLEGE YEARS!
MY WIFE WAS SCARED TO DEATH BECAUSE SHE WAS BETRAYING ME BEHIND MY BACK AND I DID FIND OUT! AND STEALING MY LEGAL AND OTHER DOCUMENTS TO TAKE TO CHRISTOPHER D. HARRINGTON'S HOME, HER NEW CHEVALIER SERVANT!
Is it a coincidence that Michael's wife AMANDA in "FALLING DOWN" bears the same name as my Mona Lisa daughter-in-law AMANDA?
See my Testament on RASPUTIN & SIMBA!
(BAFS)
Johann Strauss Orchestra with Andre Rieu - "And The Waltz Goes On" (Anthony Hopkins)
And the waltz goes on - Andre Rieu/ Anthony Hopkins
84,068
Couple married 67 years holds hands in final hours together
By | Associated Press – 11 hours ago- View Photo
ETonline - Remember in The Notebook, how Noah went off to World War II and wrote a love letter to Allie for each day he was gone (even though she never wrote back because her mom hid them from her)? And they
FRESNO, Calif. (AP) — After spending 67 years together as devoted husband and wife, there was no question how Floyd and Violet Hartwig would end their lives — together.
Sensing the couple was close to death, their children pushed their two hospice beds together and gently placed their father's hand in the mother's palm.Floyd, 90, died first. Violet, 89, followed five hours later. They died Feb. 11 at home, just as they had wished, the family said.
"They wanted to go together," their daughter, Donna Scharton, said Thursday. "It was meant to be that way."
The two knew each other as children, growing up in the Central California farming community of Easton. Romance sparked at a local dance hall one night when Floyd, a decorated Navy sailor, was home on shore leave. They were married on Aug. 16, 1947, and while away Floyd showered Violet with affection through love letters the family cherishes.
Returning home for good, the two raised three children on their small farm, growing cotton and raising turkeys. Violet helped on the ranch and kept the house. She prepared breakfast early each morning for her husband, seeing him off to work as a ranch foreman and delivering eggs.
"They were dedicated to each other," Scharton said. "Even other people who met them said they had that connection."
The couple, who had four grandchildren and 10 great-grandchildren, remained active until recently. Around the holidays, the family noticed that Violet's dementia had worsened, and in late January a doctor said Floyd's failing kidneys gave him two weeks to live.
The family moved the couches from the living room of their ranch house, making space for the hospice beds. Cynthia Letson said that after her grandfather passed, they told her grandmother that she could go, too. They told Violet that Floyd was waiting for her.
Letson said her grandparents are a positive example at a time with too many broken marriages.
"It would be nice if the world got back to the core of marriage," Letson said. "I don't think people realize that anymore. They need to go back to the basics that marriage is forever."
‘Being attacked by a woman is nothing to be ashamed of’
Ken Gregory has been left with permanent scars after his wife poured boiling water over his head, following a row over household chores
Ken Gregory who was left horrifically scarred after his wife poured scalding water over him Photo: PA
A man was left with permanent scarring on his back after his wife poured boiling water over his head, following an argument about finances and household chores.
This image shows the results of Teresa Gilbertson’s attack on Ken Gregory in Peterborough during March last year.
Gilbertson, 60 who is now divorced from Gregory, 65, is awaiting sentencing after being convicted of grievous bodily harm with intent.
The couple met seven years ago, following the death of Gregory’s first wife, to whom he had been married for more than three decades.
On the day of the attack, retired BT manager Gregory had been planning to lay flowers on his late wife’s memorial to mark her birthday, but became embroiled in a row with Gilbertson.Related Articles
The argument became so intense that the couple agreed they should divorce.
Gilbertson then offered to make her husband a cup of tea, but returned with a jug of scalding-hot water, which she tipped over his head, saying, “There you go”.
Remembering the moment, Gregory said: “It was unbearable, searing pain - I'd never known anything like it.”
He has decided to speak out now to challenge the stigma which remains around men who suffer abuse at the hands of a female partner.
“Being attacked by a woman is nothing to be ashamed of,” he said.
“I had never imagined something like this would happen to me.
Ken Gregory (PA)
“As a man who is a bit older and who isn't exactly small, there is a perception that you can't be a victim of domestic violence.
“I was worried that people would assume that it was my fault and she was the victim - there is still a general perception that, as a strong man against a weaker female, you must have been the protagonist.”
But he added: “From the start, the police took it very seriously and even our mutual friends were able to see that I was the innocent party.
“If other men find themselves in this position, I would say don't be embarrassed or ashamed - my case goes to show that this can happen to anybody.”
Woman who tried 'to boil her husband' with scalding water because he couldn't satisfy her unrealistic financial demands is jailed for four years
- Ex-wife is jailed for four years and given a restraining order
- Judge said Teresa Gilbertson, 60, had shown 'no trace of remorse'
- She attacked with the scalding water during row in Peterborough home
- Gilbertson had demanded money for household chores and to buy cars
- Ken Gregory suffered first and second degree burns to his body
- One year on, horrific scars are still visible and some may never fade
A woman who poured scalding water over her husband after he failed to satisfy her 'unrealistic' financial demands has been jailed for four years.Ken Gregory, 65, suffered horrific first and second degree burns to 14% of his body after the assault by his wife Teresa Gilbertson, 60, at their bungalow in Peterborough.Pictures of the injuries show painful blistering stretching from his scalp to his lower back. The scars remain almost a year on and some may never fade.Scroll down for video
Former special constable Gilbertson (pictured), 60, was sentenced to four years imprisonment and given a restraining order. Judge Peter Murphy described it as a 'very sad case' but he said he saw 'no trace of remorse' in herInjuries show painful blistering stretching from his scalp to his lower back. The scars remain almost a year on and some may never fadeFormer special constable Gilbertson appeared at Peterborough Crown Court today for sentencing after being convicted of causing grievous bodily harm with intent.Judge Peter Murphy described it as a 'very sad case' but he said he saw 'no trace of remorse' in her.'He told you he wanted a divorce and feelings were running high,' the judge said. 'The pouring of hot water is the use of a weapon and you clearly intended to injure him but mercifully his injuries were not more serious.The court was told the pouring of hot water had been the use of a weapon and Gilbertson clearly intended to injure her ex-husbandRoger Harrison, mitigating, said Gilbertson had been provoked by Mr Gregory.He said his client continued to claim the incident was an accident but any decision to pour water over her husband was spontaneous.Mr Gregory decided to speak out after the conviction, saying it was important to challenge the stigma surrounding men who are victims of abuse.The retired BT manager said: 'I had never imagined something like this would happen to me.
Mr Gregory, who suffers from limited mobility because of arthritis suffered depression following the attack'As a man who is a bit older and who isn't exactly small, there is a perception that you can't be a victim of domestic violence.'But it should be the same message that they put out for women many years ago: don't be frightened, you don't have to put up with it.'He was suddenly aware of excruciating painProsecutor Thomas BrownThree weeks before the incident she had thrown tea over him while he slept.On the day of the attack in April last year, the couple had argued before Gilbertson offered to make a cup of tea.Mr Gregory, who has limited mobility due to arthritis, turned down the offer but his wife left the room and returned with the two-litre jug of freshly-boiled water.The couple are now in the process of getting divorced.
The couple met through ballroom dancing and were married for five years. They are now in the process of getting a divorceWoman reveals details of her 5:2 marriage: That's five days of sex with STRANGERS and two with her husband (and how after 12 lovers she left him for good)
- 'Good girl' writer Robin Rinaldi, 50, was with Scott Mansfield since 1990s
- Decided to take lovers and negotiated 'open marriage' for a year
- Had planned on going back after 12 months of casual sex
- But she fell in love with one of the men and now lives with him instead
- Appeared on ITV's This Morning to tell her story
A woman who described herself as a 'good girl' and had been married to the same man for 17 years has spoken about her 'year off' trying an open marriage.Writer Robin Rinaldi, now 50, slept with ten men and two women during her year of promiscuity in 2008, but is now divorced from her husband.Appearing on ITV's This Morning, Robin opened up about her unorthodox decision, which she says was triggered by her husband's vasectomy.Scroll down for video
Appearing on ITV's This Morning Robin Rinaldi, now 50, opened up about her unorthodox lifestyle
Robin was content in marriage for years - but she wanted kids and he didn't she decided to try an open marriage'The arrangement which she described as '5:2 marriage' involved spending weekdays sleeping with strangers and weekends with her husband.'I would say before the year I was in a somewhat inhibited but satisfied, normal loving relationship,' she said of her 17 year marriage to Scott Mansfield, a brewer and wine-maker.'But when I got into my early 40s my husband got a vasectomy and I knew the discussion of having a baby was over, which kick-started this experience,' she explained.'I looked forward to my death bed and thought. "What will I have?" I won’t have children and grandchildren. Will I at least have lived fully?"''If I couldn’t have one I wanted the other,' she explained.'Like a lot of women at that age I was hitting my confidence and sexual peak and suddenly realised very dramatically that I wasn’t going to have children. It was the perfect storm.
Robino said having 'very little sexual variety' in her youth was a motivating factor, as the fact that she was living in San Francisco, which she described as 'a very liberal city'
'WIld oats': Robin, 50, negotiated an open marriage with her husband of 17 years, which allowed her to bed 12 strangers in 12 months - which ultimately broke her relationship'I have had lots of people telling me I should have travelled the world, tried painting classes or cooking – but I already know how to cook!'She also said having 'very little sexual variety' in her youth was a motivating factor, as the fact that she was living in San Francisco, which she described as 'a very liberal city'.'I was also at a marital crisis and was thinking about trying a partial separation, ' she said.'So I thought OK whilst we do that I need to sow some wild oats and let him do the same.'Under the terms of her new deal, Rinaldi took out an apartment, where she lived from Monday to Friday and would bed her conquests.The ground rules were safe sex, not to get seriously involved with anyone and to refrain from mutual acquaintancesBut over the weekend she would go back to Mansfield, and the two would live as a married couple, without asking what the other had been doing while they were apart.'The ground rules were safe sex, not to get seriously involved with anyone and to refrain from mutual acquaintances,' she explained. 'But at the end of the year, we each broke two rules.'To find willing participants in her project Robin decided not to pick up men at bars, but to be more strategic in her search.'I was a very busy magazine editor working long hours and never in my life had I picked up a man at a bar or had a one night stand,' she explains.'So I felt like going about it in a more clear-headed, conscious way.'Robin posted an online ad, entitled Good Girl Seeks Experience. In the post, she wrote: 'I'm a 44-year-old professional, educated, attractive woman in an open marriage, seeking single men age 35-50 to help me explore my sexuality.''I said I wanted to meet in public for dinner and drinks. I explained that if it led to sex then great, but that I couldn’t get seriously involved or see them more than a few times.'The next day, Robin had 23 offers and over the course of the year had 12 sexual partners, including two women.Struggle: Robin said her husband, Scott Mansfield, right, was loving and dependable - but did not share her desire to have children, driving her to want lovers insteadSo would she advise it? ‘Not if you want to stay married,' she told This Morning hosts Philip Schofield and Amanda Holden. 'Read my book instead and have an armchair adventure.''I was well aware it would be very risky – but I didn’t think we had that much to lose.'This 5:2 idea of weekends together and weekdays apart was to put a bit of distance between us to see each other in a new light and add some sparkle.'That happened at first,' she said, but admitted their sexual exploits ended up pushing them apart.
Account: Rinaldi describes every step of the 'project' in intimate detail in her newly-released book, The Wild Oats Project'It was hard to put it all back in the box,' she exlained.Robin, who made the life-changing decision to pursue sex with other people in 2008, has written a book about her exploits called The Wild Oats Project.In the book she describes her relationship with Mansfield, a brewer and wine-maker, as 'stuck in a rut', adding that 'our once-a-week sex life was loving, but lacked spontaneity and passion'.Recounting her exploits in her book, Robin described her first encounter with a 40-year-old lawyer, whom she bedded in her apartment on the second date: 'We stumbled to the bed, where he turned me onto my hands and knees and took me from behind.'We had intercourse twice and, after he left, I felt satiated.'She later moved on to much younger men, and described texting her husband goodnight from a Las Vegas hotel room moments after a 23-year-old paramour left the room.Two of her 12 encounters were with women, one of which was a threesome.Describing another encounter, she writes explicitly about taking a new-found pleasure in fellatio.However, after the raucous year, Rinaldi admitted, she could not turn back.Attempts to rekindle their marriage after the year failed - and Rinaldi began sleeping with one of the men from the past year, whom she refers to by a pseudonym.She wrote: 'The turning point was hearing from Alden. He sent me an e-mail, out of the blue, several months after the project had come to an end.'Before long, we were having sex again. Being with him was exquisite. After reconnecting with Alden and falling deeply in love with him, there was no going back.'Irretrievable: After Rinaldi's year of uninhibited encounters, she was unable to rekindle her loving marriage with Mansfield, and the two now have different partnersRinaldi has now lived with 'Alden' for five years in a monogamous relationship, while Mansfield has also moved on.The former couple now consider themselves at peace - and Mansfield was even happy with her writing the book, detailing every aspect of their sex lives and her previously secret exploits with other men.Speaking to the Daily Beast about how he responded to the book, she said: 'His response was, "You have to write it. If you write it well, it won’t really be about us, it will be about lots of marriages."'
Mother, 24, sobs as she is jailed for life for stabbing her two young daughters to death in their beds at a woman's refuge as revenge on her 'violent partner'
- Samira Lupidi stabbed her two girls while staying in Bradford refuge centre
- 17-month-old Jasmine Weaver and Evelyn Lupidi, 3, knifed to death in bed
- Mother admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility
- But a jury today took just 90 minutes to convict her of her daughters' killing
Samira Lupidi has been told she must serve a minimum of 24 years in prison after stabbing her two young daughters to deathA mother who murdered her two young daughters 'in a spasm of violence' has been told she must serve a minimum of 24 years in prison.Samira Lupidi, 24, stabbed 17-month-old Jasmine Weaver and three-year-old Evelyn Lupidi to death at a women's refuge in Bradford, West Yorkshire, in November last year.She admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility but denied murdering the girls.But she was found guilty of both killings by a jury of six men and six women after just 90 minutes of deliberation this morning, sobbing uncontrollably as the verdict was announced.Lupidi was jailed for life this afternoon at Bradford Crown Court by Mr Justice Edis, who said the girls were 'both as vulnerable as anyone can be'.Sentencing Lupidi in her absence after she failed to re-enter the court room, the judge acknowledged she was suffering from a depressive disorder at the time of the 'violent rage' which led to the killings.He said: 'I believe you killed these children in a spasm of violence triggered by a weekend of violent arguments.'You had formed a delusional belief that you were in danger of being killed and that you were going to be abandoned and that you would not see the children again.'He continued: 'You killed the things you loved in a temporary rage, which will have everlasting and disastrous consequences for you.'This passion was not long lasting, but it lasted long enough to see them both dead.'Even a week later you were telling the prison medical staff that the most important thing was that Carl Weaver was suffering.'The judge said Lupidi stabbed each of her daughters nine times after arguments continued with her partner by phone.
The young mother stabbed 17-month-old Jasmine Weaver (left) and three-year-old Evelyn Lupidi (right) to death at a women's refuge in Bradford, West Yorkshire, in November last yearHe said: 'You killed Evelyn first and then Jasmine. Jasmine, you say later, had been crying while you were killing her sister in a way she had never cried before.'They were each killed with nine violent blows to the chest with a large knife.'It does not take much imagination to know what that dreadful scene and the way in which Jasmine has died has traumatised their father who has only just learned of it.'These were very grave murders. There were two victims and they were both as vulnerable as anyone could be. They trusted you.'The Weaver family, especially Carl, the girls' father, has suffered dreadfully because of the loss of these two beautiful girls and their lives, I am sure, will never be the same again.'Mr Edis told the court that Italian Lupidi was friendless and alone in a foreign country and came to see her partner's family as 'the enemy'.
Samira Lupidi (pictured, with daughter Evelyn), 24, sobbed uncontrollably after being found guilty of murdering her two young girlsHe said that once she had fallen out with Mr Weaver, she 'reacted...by saying: 'If I cannot have them, neither can he.'The judge continued: 'This is a crime that speaks of rage and I sentence you on the basis that you killed them in anger and out of a desire for revenge.'Even a week later you were telling the prison medical staff that the most important thing was that Carl Weaver was suffering.'He added that he accepted Lupidi was a 'good mother' who is genuinely remorseful for what she has done, but that 'you have, in ending these two lives and ruining so many others, destroyed your own.'There were shouts of 'yes' from the packed public gallery as the guilty verdicts against Lupidi were read out earlier today.Share this article
Upon hearing the decision, Lupidi, dressed sombrely in a grey jumper and white shirt with beige trousers, sat in tears with her head bowed. She was offered small comfort by a female security guard.The week-long trial heard how she and the girls ended up in the refuge after the panicked mother called police to her home in Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire.She told officers that the girls' father - her now former partner Carl Weaver, 31 - slapped her twice the night before and she was scared he was going to kill her.She claimed she was suffering depression and paranoia as she did not speak English, and lived an isolated life.The jury heard that the following day staff at the refuge found Lupidi running out of the flat she had been allocated, shouting that she had 'killed the children'.
The jury heard staff at the refuge found Lupidi running out of the flat she had been allocated, shouting that she had 'killed the children' (pictured together)
The week-long trial heard how she and the girls ended up in the refuge after the panicked mother called police to her home in Heckmondwike, West YorkshireBoth girls were found on their beds, each with nine stab wounds to the chest.The court was told the defendant had blood smeared on her hands when she ran from the room.Lupidi admitted that she killed the girls but claimed she was suffering from diminished responsibility at the time. She provided no evidence during her trial.But the jury refuted her defence, instead accepting the prosecution's case that she knew what she was doing when she suffocated then stabbed her daughters as they fought and struggled.The girls' father, a car valet, was falsely accused of domestic violence by his ex, who the jury heard had a 'complete misinterpretation of reality'.She feared Mr Weaver was plotting her death and that he wanted to take the girls away from her.Lupidi had a poor upbringing. Her mother Marietta was an abusive alcoholic and her father Dario treated his daughter as a 'scivvy' at home for him and her two brothers.In a statement read during her trial, Mr Weaver explained how they met via the internet when he was working in Italy.He went on to say: 'Her mother was violent towards all three children and she tried to kill all the children by opening a gas pipe.'Lupidi's father disapproved when his daughter fell pregnant. When Mr Weaver lost his job it was decided the pair would return to England together.They set up home in Heckmondwike. Lupidi spoke in 'broken English' and was isolated having no bank account and no job.She gave birth to Jasmine on June 26, 2014, with the couple discovering soon after that Evelyn was autistic.Despite their daughter's problematic behaviour, Mr Weaver said Lupidi always coped and never lost her temper, adding that she was 'a wonderful mother'.But she is believed to have thought people were against her and was extremely jealous if Mr Weaver returned home late from work and she would go through his Facebook account.He said they had heated arguments but he was never physically violent towards her.Speaking after the case, the girls grandfather, Peter Weaver, speaking on behalf of the family, said: 'We have been left utterly devastated at the tragic events last November.'We were preparing to celebrate Evelyn and Jasmine's christening, that should have been a joy, but instead Evelyn and Jasmine were cruelly taken away from us.'We will all remember that day.
Lupidi (left) admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility but denied murdering the girls. There were shouts of 'yes' from the packed public gallery - which included the family of her former partner Carl Weaver (right), 31 - as the verdicts were read out'Our lives are now filled with sorrow and our broken hearts will never heal.'The girls were typical toddlers, always wanting to play and always happy but never far away from being from being mischievious.'They have been robbed of their precious lives and we, as a family, have been robbed of being able to watch these beautiful girls grow into beautiful young women.'They were loved deeply and are missed terribly.'Det Chief Insp Richard Holmes, who lead the investigation, said: 'This has been a tragic case and one which has a devastating effect on all these involved, not least the family of Evelyn and Jasmine whose lives were taken so tragically from them.'We may never know why Miss Lupidi took the tragic actions she did last November but hope that with the length of sentence that's been passed today she'll be able to consider the consequences of her actions.'We hope that the length of sentence can provide some le
Mother, 24, who 'stabbed her two young daughters to death in... 
Mother charged with stabbing her two young daughters to... 
My French wife accompanied by her new Chevalier Servant, a "Jehovah Witness", our own business partner, informed the RACIST ANTI-MUSLIM AND ANTI-ARAB (PRO-ISRAEL) Police that her life was in danger because of me. But, when the Police (ONE YOUNG AND UNARMED POLICE OFFICER) came my wife could think of nothing to tell the Police officer why she said and thought that her life was in danger because of me. She was advised to stay in a hotel for the night if she felt her life was threatened and see a solicitor in the morning!
ReplyDeleteI NEVER COMMITTED ANY ACT OF VIOLENCE IN MY ENTIRE LIFE SINCE MY COLLEGE YEARS! MY WIFE WAS SCARED TO DEATH BECAUSE SHE WAS BETRAYING ME BEHIND MY BACK AND I DID FIND OUT! AND STEALING MY LEGAL AND OTHER DOCUMENTS TO TAKE TO CHRISTOPHER D. HARRINGTON'S HOME, HER NEW CHEVALIER SERVANT!
Is it a coincidence that Michael's wife AMANDA in "FALLING DOWN" bears the same name as my Mona Lisa daughter-in-law AMANDA?
See my Testament on RASPUTIN & SIMBA!
(BAFS)