™
An "Almost Daily" Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Headlines
"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"
An "Almost Daily" Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Headlines
"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"
*
JULY 21, 2021
NY Times: ‘The Red Studio,’ Matisse’s Masterpiece, Gets a Life All Its Own
The objects in the painting are brought together in a spectacular show at the Museum of Modern Art. It’s a marvel of detective work by the curators.
NY Times: ‘The Red Studio,’ Matisse’s Masterpiece, Gets a Life All Its Own
The objects in the painting are brought together in a spectacular show at the Museum of Modern Art. It’s a marvel of detective work by the curators.
REBUTTAL BY
The Manhattan Monstrosity Museum known as MoMA (Museum of Modern Art) is pushing Henri Matisse again. The standard bio of the "great" and "legendary" French fraud reads as follows:
"French artist Henri Matisse is commonly regarded, along with Pablo Picasso, as one of the artists who best helped to define the revolutionary developments in the visual arts throughout the opening decades of the twentieth century. He was responsible for significant developments in painting and sculpture."
In other words, sight unseen -- we may properly infer that his work was crap on canvas (although some of it, though amateurish, is at least recognizable) But for the sake of thoroughness, let's have a look at some of his million dollar manure.
"French artist Henri Matisse is commonly regarded, along with Pablo Picasso, as one of the artists who best helped to define the revolutionary developments in the visual arts throughout the opening decades of the twentieth century. He was responsible for significant developments in painting and sculpture."
In other words, sight unseen -- we may properly infer that his work was crap on canvas (although some of it, though amateurish, is at least recognizable) But for the sake of thoroughness, let's have a look at some of his million dollar manure.
|
|
|
Sublime!
|
|
|
Magnifique!
|
|
|
Wow! Just wow.
And sculptures too!
Plenty more where those came from. Wanna see them? -- I didn't think so.
As you can see, Matisse painted (and "sculpted") many nudes. To "get his jollies," he actually paid women and boys to strip and pose (and do God-only-knows-what-else) for him -- as if one really needed a live image in order to paint such unrealistic rubbish!
Matisse was born into a wealthy family in 1869. His father had wanted him to become a lawyer. While studying law and working as a law clerk, his mother gave him a gift of some art supplies to keep himself busy while recovering from an illness. It was then that the lazy student, much to his father's disappointment, decided that he wanted to become an "artist" instead. He studied "impressionism" -- a form of art which, although it requires far less talent than the realistic stuff -- can still have some visual appeal. But Matisse couldn't even cut it as an impressionist. Fortunately for Matisse, the "art world" (cough cough) had already deteriorated so much by the turn of the century that the doors of a once exclusive community were rapidly opening up to cultural vandals, untalented degenerates and deranged perverts of every stripe.
|
|
|
1.
Matisse abandoned the study of law in pursuit of easy shekels painting
ugliness. // 2. His impressionism, though amateurish at best, was at
least refrigerator-worthy. // 3. But most of his junk was downright ugly
and twisted.
How did a ne'er-do-well like Matisse achieve such an astonishing level of "international acclaim" ™ -- still lasting nearly 70 years after his death? What powerful hand must have boosted this bum and his "artworks?" Well, he was very good friends with a leading French communist named Louis Aragon. That's always a career booster in the "art world." But climbing even higher up the ladder, we found this bit of data, from the New Yorker:
"Matisse and Picasso met in April of 1906, at the salon of Gertrude and Leo Stein."
So the two great friendly frauds, Matisse of France and Pablo Picasso (a communist) from Spain, aged 37 and 25 -- neither being famous at the time -- met at the "art" salon of Gertrude and Leo Stein (cough cough) -- the Paris-based siblings known for their "patronage of art." Soon afterwards, their careers took off like rockets.
Under. Every. Rock --- Every. Single. Time. ... Ah, show us the shekels, Henri --- and Pablo. Show us the shekels.
|
Picasso & Matisse
|
The
"great" Picasso and the "great" Matisse --- both bought, paid for, and
MADE by the Stein siblings -- who later profited nicely off of the
garbage they cheaply bought from the two unknown frauds before they
themselves made these hired whores so rich and famous.
|
|
Boobus Americanus 2: Ah yes, Henri Matisse. It was he and Picasso who revolutionized art in the early 20th century.
St. Sugar: Thosse bumss couldn't 'revolutionize' anything, Boobuss! Only I didn't know until this day that it was the Steinss all along.
Editor: The number of ambitious and degenerate goyim who will sell their souls for fame and fortune is limitless. That's how the game is played.
No comments:
Post a Comment