9/11 Truth: Let's Face The Facts (FULL 2014 DOCUMENTARY)
TALMUDIC, JUDAIC ISRAELI VENGEANCE!!!
UK PM declares 9/11 and 7/7 Truthers must be dealt with as harshly as ISIS
The recent speech by UK Prime Minister (PM) David Cameron proposed dealing with “non-violent extremists” as harshly as with ISIS.Mainstream purveyors of JFK disinformation: Noam Chomsky and Larry Sabato
Mainstream purveyors of JFK disinformation: Noam Chomsky and Larry Sabato
by Jim Fetzer
“The agency owns everyone of significance in the major media”–attributed to William Colby, former Director of the CIANo doubt, I am not the only student of JFK and of 9/11 who has been offended and outraged by the stance adopted by the leading liberal icon, Noam Chomsky.
Chomsky maintains that, even if there had been a conspiracy to kill JFK, it would have been of no significance, because no major policy issues were involved.
But that requires feigned ignorance of JFK’s decision to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces, of get out of Vietnam, to abolish or reform the FED, and to cut the oil depletion allowance.
And on 9/11, he again pretends to be ignorant of the massive body of evidence that implicates the CIA, the Neo-Cons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad.
Chomsky is not alone in attempting to minimize the assassination, but it came as a surprise to me to discover that a prominent professor from the University of Virginia was taking a similar line.
Larry Sabato, who has frequently been featured as a political commentator on mainstream networks, now claims that, while the Warren commission made a mess of its investigation, it nevertheless got its conclusion right: Lee Oswald was the lone assassin of JFK.
Having taught twice at Mr. Jefferson’s University, I took exception to his stance and publish a commentary about it, “FETZER: Truth or Conspiracy” (24 October 2013), in The Cavalier Daily, the student newspaper of the University of Virginia. And when he made no effort to respond to my complaints, a year later, I published a sequel, “FETZER: Continuing the Conspiracy” (22 October 2012), the text of which I am republishing with a few comments.
The American people deserve to know that some of the most admired and astute political commentators in the United States–persons whose integrity and character the public would never consider challenging–are in fact functioning on behalf of the cover-up in the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. I have been outing Chomsky for years now, as videos I have embedded below reflect, but Larry Sabato is a new and profoundly disturbing addition.
The Case of Noam Chomsky
Click here to listen to the interview, “Fetzer blasts Chomsky over his silence about 9/11, JFK murder”
An American philosopher has questioned Noam Chomsky’s continued silence over the September 11, 2001, attacks and the assassination of former US President John F. Kennedy.
In an interview with Press TV on Wednesday, Professor James Henry Fetzer said, Chomsky “neglects to observe that 9/11 was a false flag operation; he neglects to observe that the assassination of John F. Kennedy was deliberately contrived by the powerful special interests in the US.”
Many independent observers reject the government version of the September 11 attacks and believe rogue elements within the US government orchestrated or at least encouraged the 9/11 attacks in order to make America a police state by encroaching on the people’s civil liberties and advance the agenda of the military-industrial complex.
“If you go on to ‘Fetzer on Chomsky’ on the internet, I take him apart for claiming that there were no policy issues involved in the death of JFK, where nothing can be further from truth,” Fetzer said.
“JFK was planning to pull out forces from Vietnam; he was threatening to shatter CIA into a thousand pieces; he was cracking down on organized crime;… he was going to cut the oil depletion allowance; he was opposing Israeli development of nuclear weapons, all of which went forward with Lyndon Johnson at the helm – none of which were sustained,” he noted.
“JFK even wanted to have AIPAC – the Israeli lobby – registered as a foreign agent,” the editor of the Veterans Today said.
In an article published by Truthout on Monday, Chomsky described the US as the “world’s leading terrorist state” due to its global operations run by the CIA.
Fetzer said the leading US intellectual is “correct in recognizing that the United States is engaged in a history of terrorist acts” but he believes the timing of Chomsky’s recent comment is “extremely suspicious,” adding that “as we approach the 51st observance of the death anniversary of JFK that Noam Chomsky is continuing to abuse his position as a left-wing gatekeeper, and to inhibit clear thinking on the part of progressives who still idealize him.”
Although US official inquiries have determined Lee Harvey Oswald, a former Marine Corps veteran, was responsible for the assassination, Kennedy’s murder is still shrouded in mystery.
The 46-year-old president, who had been in office only for three years, is often ranked among the country’s most revered presidents.
Kennedy was also the only US president, who strongly opposed Israel’s nuclear weapons program.
The Case of Larry Sabato
Most Americans are unaware that, by the evening of the assassination, the FBI and the Secret Service had concluded that three shots had been fired with three hits: JFK had been hit in the back; Texas Governor John Connally had also been hit in the back; and JFK had been hit in the back of the head, killing him. There was only one shooter and no “magic bullet.”The most important defense of Larry Sabato came, not from Larry Sabato himself, but a friend and colleague:
The theory that a single bullet had hit JFK in the back of his neck, passed through and exited his throat, then entered the back of John Connally to cause all of his additional wounds was only introduced after it was discovered that James Tague, a bystander, had been injured by a shot that missed. That left only two shots for seven wounds to avoid multiple assassins.
A year ago, I observed that Larry Sabato, a professor of politics at the University, had taken the absurd position that, although the Warren Commission had bungled its investigation, it had arrived at the right result: Lee Oswald was the lone assassin of our 35th president. But without offering any supporting evidence, he was in the position of accepting a conclusion with no premises.
The gross differences in the description of the wound at the back of Kennedy’s head — from Parkland, where it was the size of your fist; at Bethesda, where it took out the whole back of his head; and from the HSCA, which contracted it to a small entry at the top of his head — by itself show that a cover-up was taking place. But the proof of conspiracy is actually even simpler than that.
Merely by determining where JFK was hit in the back, we can prove that he was killed by a conspiracy. We have the jacket and the shirt he was wearing, which have holes about 5.5″ below the collar, just to the right of the spinal column. A wound was identified on the official autopsy diagram from Bethesda at that same location.
We have an FBI sketch showing that the wound to the back was lower than the wound to the throat and the death certificate by JFK’s personal physician, who stated he had been killed by a wound to the head but that there was a second wound to the back at the level of the third thoracic vertebra, the same location.
We have re-enactment photographs where the stand-in for JFK has a small patch on the back of his head but a larger one on his jacket, at that same location. And we have Arlen Specter, a junior counsel for the Commission, using a pointer to demonstrate the trajectory the “magic bullet” would have had to have taken.
Below his hand several inches, however, is the large patch on the back, which means that a photograph intended to illustrate the theory actually refutes it. And we have the mortician’s summary of the wounds, which describes a wound to the back five to six inches below the shoulder.
The wound was shallow and only entered about as far as the second knuckle of your little finger. But if JFK was not hit in the back of the neck, then the “magic bullet” theory cannot be true and the wounds to his throat and to Connally have to be accounted for on the basis of other shots and other shooters.
David W. Mantik, the leading expert on the medical evidence in this case, took a patient with similar chest and neck dimensions and created a CAT scan. He then plotted the official trajectory and discovered that it is anatomically impossible because cervical vertebrae intervene.
It may sound surprising to you, since there have been so many documentaries that claim to show the official trajectory was possible, including ABC and other channels. But what you did not notice is that, while they model the muscles of the neck, they do not include the cervical vertebrae.
Even Michael Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York and the head of the HSCA medical panel when it re-investigated the case in 1977-78, observed that if the “magic bullet” theory is false, then there had to have been at least six shots from three different directions.
And the “magic bullet” theory is not only false and provably false but is not even anatomically possible. You don’t have to take my word for it. Just download my Cambridge presentation, “Reasoning about Assassinations,” which I published in an international, peer-reviewed journal.
In my article “Truth or conspiracy?” I cited this study and made the points about the changes in the description of the wound to the back of JFK’s head. I wrote to Professor Sabato and asked him about it, only to receive a reply from an assistant that he admired my research but was too busy with interviews to respond.
William Colby, former director of the CIA, allegedly observed that the agency owns everyone of significance in the major media. Larry Sabato is someone of significance in the major media. It would be reassuring for him to come clean about JFK and let the students, faculty and staff of Mr. Jefferson’s University know that he is on the up-and-up.
James Fetzer has published 29 books, including “Assassination Science” (1998), “Murder in Dealey Plaza” (2000) and “The Great Zapruder Film Hoax” (2003). He was a visiting associate professor at the University (1979-80) and a visiting professor (Spring 1985).
Ken Stroupe • 17 days ago
Perhaps Professor Fetzer misread Mr. Sabato’s book and the numerous sections that point to countless missteps and irregularities in the medical procedures at Parkland and Bethesda. Sabato’s book contains whole passages about Bethesda physicians not conferring with Parkland before they began the autopsy; that the President’s clothing was removed at Parkland and that Bethesda did not have the opportunity to examine those articles; that Bethesda did not dissect Kennedy’s back-to-neck wound and how that could have proven useful; and that the autopsy occurred under highly irregular conditions, among many other important points.
Contrary to Professor Fetzer’s assertions, Sabato’s book notes repeatedly that the research and conclusions therein DO NOT rule out the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy. Further, Sabato states that “the chance of a conspiracy of some sort…cannot be dismissed out of hand.”
What Sabato argues – and it’s backed up by empirical evidence by scientists trained in audio forensics – is that the key “evidence” used by the House Select Committee on Assassinations to determine that the President’s death was the result of a conspiracy, i.e. the Dallas Police Dictabelt, is not valid. Why? Contrary to what “the government” told the American public via the HSCA conclusions, the recording contains NO evidence of gunfire and therefore COULD NOT have been recorded in Dealey Plaza.
• Reply•Share ›
James Henry Fetzer Ken Stroupe • 14 days ago
Ken lists some “missteps and irregularities” that take on a far more ominous significance for those of us who are familiar with the evidence, where leaving the shirt and jacket behind was a violation of autopsy protocol but makes excellent sense if the plan was to conceal the true causes of the death of JFK. Bob Livingston, M.D., world authority on the human brain and an expert on wound ballistics, heard a description of the small, clean puncture wound to the throat broadcast over the radio that day and, in part because he was then Scientific Director of two of the National Institutes of Health (which are located across the street from Bethesda Naval Hospital), he called Commander Humes and explained to him that this was an entry wound and that the neck had to be carefully dissected, because if there were proof of shots from behind, there had been multiple shooters and therefore a conspiracy. Humes feigned not to have learned about the throat wound until after the autopsy, which is one of many deceptions on his part and far from the worst.
That the autopsy was conducted “under highly irregular conditions” is hardly new, because all this was explained by the experts, including Bob Livingston, who contributed to the first of my books on JFK, Assassination Science (1998), which also includes studies by David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., proving that the official autopsy X-rays had been altered to conceal a massive, fist-sized blow out at the back of his head. That was certainly “irregular” but was obviously deliberate. As Bob explains in the same volume, they also substituted another man’s brain for that of JFK, a conclusion he based upon the difference between the consistent reports from seven or eight of the Parkland physicians, who had observed cerebellar as well as cerebral tissue extruding from the wound, while the brain shown in photographs and diagrams–which is virtually undamaged–has a completely intact cerebellum and cannot possibly be the same brain. Once they had “patched” the blow-out, there was no where for those brains to go, so they simply made the substitution.
Any serious student of the death of our 35th president would know these things because that book shattered the cover-up and exposed the complicity of medical officers of the US Navy, agents of the Secret Service and even the president’s personal physician, who offered to testify to the HSCA but, astonishingly, whose offer was declined. How could the HSCA expect to sort out the medical evidence when it would not even receive the testimony of JFK’s personal physician? That does not appear to have been its intent, which the contraction of the wound to a small wound of entry at the top of the head reflects. When it struck me that the HSCA had performed a massive sleight-of-hand, I called Cyril Wecht, M.D., whom I know, who had been on the panel, and asked him how they had accounted for the enormous discrepancy between the description in the official autopsy report from Bethesda and their conclusion, he told me, “I’ll have to check my notes”!
As though that were not bad enough, Douglas Horne, who had served as the Senior Analysis for Military Records for the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB), created by Congress in the wake of the resurgence of interest in the case generated by Oliver Stone’s film, “JFK”, discovered during the course of their depositions that Humes had taken a cranial saw to the skull of JFK and enormously enlarged the wound to make it look more like the effect of a bullet fired from behind. I am distressed and dismayed that Sabato is putting a spin on these “irregularities” to suggest that they were the result of haste and incompetence rather than deliberate deception. When you know the evidence, there is no room for doubt about it, where Horne published a five-volume summary of what he had learned in Inside the ARRB (2009). Among the first steps in research is to conduct a search of the literature on the subject, which Professor Sabato appears not to have done. My Cambridge study on the true location where JFK was hit in the back was also published in 2009.
When Ken observes that Sabato does not rule out “the chance of a conspiracy of some sort”, he would like you to overlook that Larry’s conclusion is that, even though the Warren Commission was not properly conducted, it reached the correct conclusion. Because the acoustical evidence had induced the HSCA to go beyond The Warren Report (1964), when he discounts it, he leaves the impression that its original conclusion (of Lee Oswald as “the lone assassin”) was correct, even though its own investigation, as Ken reaffirms, was botched and bungled. The problem is that we have overwhelming proof of conspiracy WITHOUT THE ACOUSTICAL EVIDENCE, which means that Larry Sabato has not made his case. That he offers a conclusion that is not supported by premises was what first led me to describe his position as “absurd”–and there is nothing here that changes my mind. I sought to keep it simple by focusing on the gross discrepancies between the descriptions of the wound in my earlier article and the non-existent “magic bullet” in the second. Either way, Professor Sabato has to answer for misrepresenting the evidence in the death of JFK.
• Edit• Reply•Share ›
James Henry Fetzer Ken Stroupe • 16 days ago
A year ago, I published an earlier piece here, in which I made the following observations:
As a long-time student of the death of JFK and a former visiting member of the University faculty in the department of philosophy, I was fairly astonished to watch Larry Sabato, Ph.D., a prominent member of your faculty, maintain to a national television audience that, even though the Warren Commission’s investigation was bungled, it correctly identified Lee Oswald as the “lone, demented gunman.”
Knowing how much of the evidence that it had relied upon was planted, fabricated or faked, that struck me as a virtual admission that the Warren Commission had framed Lee Oswald, but he had done it, after all. Since it should not have been necessary to frame a guilty man, I wrote the following letter to Dr. Sabato:
“Larry,
I just watched you with Krystal Ball talking about your book, which claims that, while the Warren Commission has its reasoning wrong, it still had its conclusion — that Lee Oswald was the lone demented gunman — right. As a retired professor of philosophy who spent 35 years offering course in logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning, I have to ask, how do you know? Since you discount the evidence presented by the Warren Commission, what is your proof?
In the brief for your book on amazon.com, it states, “Sabato reexamines JFK’s assassination using heretofore unseen information to which he has had unique access…” What information could that possibly be? I have spent more than 20 years investigating the case with the best qualified experts to have ever studied it, have three edited books on his death—Assassination Science (1998), Murder in Dealey Plaza (2000), and The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003)—and I am fascinated that you might have “new information.”
Given your background, I have to ask if you have made any studies of the medical evidence in this case, which is especially complicated, involving altered X-rays and fake autopsy photos. At Parkland the wound was described as the size of your fist when you double it up, but at Bethesda it had grown to a huge wound close to 1/3 the size of his skull, yet the HSCA reduced it to a small entry at the crown of his head. I am attaching a comparison of those descriptions. How do you explain this?
The proof of conspiracy in this case is actually very simple. All you have to do is locate where JFK was hit in the back. Without the “magic bullet” theory, the Warren Commission — and the case for a lone gunman — falls apart. Are you aware that the “magic bullet” theory is not only false but provably false and, indeed, not even anatomically possible? I attach a peer-reviewed article establishing this, which I presented during a conference at Cambridge. I would be grateful to know what I have wrong.
As someone who has admired your work in the past, I am concerned.
Best wishes,
Jim”
There was more, but the argument was crystal-clear and deserved a substantial response.
He did not respond then and your discussion of his book, which comparatively few will ever read, is non-responsive to my complaint about what he told a national television audience. I am struck that you are not rebutting anything that I have said here because, even when we discount the acoustical recording, the case for conspiracy is overwhelming. I not only reported the gross discrepancy in the description of the head wound but also explained that, merely by determining where JFK was hit in the back, we can prove the existence of conspiracy.
If there was no “magic bullet”, then the wound to JFK’s throat and those to Connally have to be accounted for on the basis of other shots and other shooters. I issued that complaint to him on 24 October 2013. My proof was published in 2009 in an international, peer-reviewed journal. It is not a difficult argument, yet Professor Sabato has yet to respond and either defend the indefensible or admit that he made a serious mistake. After more than 20 years of research on the assassination, I am not letting him off the hook. Mr. Jefferson’s University deserves better.
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth. He was a visiting associate professor at the University of Virginia (1979-80) and a visiting professor (Spring 1985).
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=330068
The views expressed herein
are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views
of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors,
partners and technicians. Legal Notice
Posted by Jim Fetzer
on Nov 9 2014,
With
4380 Reads,
Filed under Editor, Of Interest, WarZone.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
40 Comments for “Mainstream purveyors of JFK disinformation: Noam Chomsky and Larry Sabato”
Zeshan Raza
The normal human reflex is to grab hold of the loved one, baby or spouse, and not to chase a piece of brain leaving the scene of crime.
To me, this scene is damning as it would seem that she knew and was complicit in the assassination conspiracy unless I see evidence of the contrary! Given her name Bouvier, I wonder if she is not of the bloodline of another Bouvier (Helene) I knew in Paris, a Jewish Medium who used to speak with horses or something like that.
And that Zapruder is Jewish is not a coincidence too!
BAFS
Anthony Prolad · Top Commenter · University of Durban-Westville
Zeshan Raza
I don't think it means that Jackie was complicit. But if the driver of
the limo also fired a shot, that may her explain her reflex to move away
from the driver.
Anthony Prolad
My perspective was that of the Jew rightly or wrongly. When I was young I was indoctrinated into looking for the woman when any civil crime was committed, but when I grew older I found out that the golden rule was: "Look for the Jew", and in most of the cases I investigated I found a 'Jew' or Jews behind.
I did not use the word MEAN, but only said that it would seem that she knew and was complicit because I was very surprised at her behaviour. If my baby was shot at I would grab her and not let go even if I am shot at.
If we can retrace Jackie's bloodline, maybe there would be a strong argument in favour of her complicity role. When she (the American Catholic "Lady") later (after several amourous adventures, I read) married a Jew, to me it was a betrayal, and this re-inforced my initial impression.
I also read about JFK's, RFK's, LBJ's and Clinton's Jewish lovers and about the US "Swedish Jew" President as well as the Jewish wife (male?) of Communist homosexual Obama, and it is not easy to make out what is true or not when laws are being passed in Europe to prevent us question, talk or write about any event where Jews are behind or suspect.
Regards
Basheer
My perspective was that of the Jew rightly or wrongly. When I was young I was indoctrinated into looking for the woman when any civil crime was committed, but when I grew older I found out that the golden rule was: "Look for the Jew", and in most of the cases I investigated I found a 'Jew' or Jews behind.
I did not use the word MEAN, but only said that it would seem that she knew and was complicit because I was very surprised at her behaviour. If my baby was shot at I would grab her and not let go even if I am shot at.
If we can retrace Jackie's bloodline, maybe there would be a strong argument in favour of her complicity role. When she (the American Catholic "Lady") later (after several amourous adventures, I read) married a Jew, to me it was a betrayal, and this re-inforced my initial impression.
I also read about JFK's, RFK's, LBJ's and Clinton's Jewish lovers and about the US "Swedish Jew" President as well as the Jewish wife (male?) of Communist homosexual Obama, and it is not easy to make out what is true or not when laws are being passed in Europe to prevent us question, talk or write about any event where Jews are behind or suspect.
Regards
Basheer
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
MASS RAPE OF GERMAN WOMEN AND YOUNG GIRLS BY ENLIGHTENED (ILLUMINATI) BOLSHEVIK, SATANIST, ATHEIST, SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST, DEMOCRAT, LIBERALIST, NEO-DARWINIST, AMERICAN, BRITISH, FRENCH SAVAGES AND THEIR COLONIAL ALLIES - LONG LIVE ISRAEL!
Hellstorm: The Devil’s Cauldron
The Mass Rape of German Women
by the Red Army and its Allies
. . . by JA Sexton and Lasha Darkmoon
RED ARMY RAPISTS
“In the German race there is nothing but evil. Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill!”
— Ilya Ehrenberg, Jewish propagandist for the Stalin regime
This 6000-word article consists of two parts. Part 1, by Lasha Darkmoon, sets the scene and provides many factual details about rape atrocities against German women by Allied soldiers in the 1944-1947 period. Part 2, by JA Sexton, is a review of Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany (1944-1947). This brings to life in vivid detail all the horrors defeated Germany had to go through at the hands of the victorious Allies.
If you have a delicate constitution and want to protect your mind from images of extreme terror, images bordering on the grotesquely obscene, please read no further. If, on the other hand, you have an appetite for the gruesome truth and wish to take a peek into the Devil’s cauldron, then by all means read on.
Part 1: The Devil’s Cauldron
by Lasha Darkmoon
One German woman came to her priest and broke down in tears. “Father, I can’t go on living! Thirty of them raped me last night.” (Goodrich, p.158).The German clergy were only too aware of the rape and mass murder of Catholic nuns, many of them bedridden geriatric women. One of these priests writes in his diary:
“The girls, women and nuns were raped incessantly for hours on end, the soldiers standing in queues, the officers at the head of the queues, in front of their victims.The Americans and the Brits knew all these atrocities were going on but did nothing to stop them. They stood by and saw it all happening, cruel accomplices to crime. Indeed, many of them joined in the bloodbath of sadistic sexuality: Americans, Brits, French, and French Moroccans in particular.
During the first night many of the nuns and women were raped as many as fifty times.The Russians knocked them down, kicked them, beat them on the head and in the face with the butt-end of their revolvers and rifles.
The same dreadful scenes were enacted in the hospitals, homes for the aged, and other such institutions. Even nuns who were seventy and eighty years old and were ill and bedridden were raped and ill-treated by these barbarians. (Ibid. p.84)
“Staggered by what he had seen and heard, a German officer tried desperately to make sense of the disaster; to understand the minds of men ‘who find . . . pleasure in raping the same woman over and over, dozens of times, even while other women are standing near.’” (Ibid. p.93)Inflicting savage sex wounds on German women, including their children in the presence of their parents, was one the perks of war for these coldhearted killers. “Our fellows were so sex-starved,” a Soviet major told a British journalist at the time, “that they often raped old women of sixty, seventy or even eighty — much to these grandmothers’ surprise, if not downright delight.”
This cynical throwaway comment is indicative of the surreal atmosphere of war fever that possessed so many otherwise sane and well-balanced people at that time: the bizarre idea that an 80-year-old German grandmother should actually be flattered and pleased to be raped.
Several German women recorded how even Soviet servicewomen watched and laughed while they were being gang-raped.
While the idea that the Russians were largely to blame for this orgy of mass rape cannot be denied, the overall picture is more nuanced. “There were Russian freebooters who drank and raped quite shamelessly,” British historian Anthony Beevor tells us, “but there were also idealistic, austere communists and members of the Russian intelligentsia who were appalled by such behaviour.”
“Beria and Stalin, back in Moscow, knew perfectly well what was going on from a number of detailed reports….Marshal Rokossovsky issued order No 006 in an attempt to direct “the feelings of hatred at fighting the enemy on the battlefield.” It appears to have had little effect. The commander of one rifle division is said to have “personally shot a lieutenant who was lining up a group of his men before a German woman spreadeagled on the ground”. But either officers were involved themselves, or the lack of discipline made it too dangerous to restore order over drunken soldiers armed with submachine guns.” — Historian Anthony Beevor, acclaimed author of “Berlin: The Downfall 1945.”Drink of every variety, Beevor discloses, including dangerous chemicals seized from laboratories and workshops, was a major factor in the violence.
“It seems as if Soviet soldiers needed alcoholic courage to attack a woman. But then, all too often, they drank too much and, unable to complete the act, used the bottle instead with appalling effect. A number of victims were mutilated obscenely.”According to Beevor, estimates of rape victims from Berlin’s two main hospitals ranged from 95,000 to 130,000. One doctor calculated that out of approximately 100,000 women raped in Berlin, roughly 10,000 died as a result. Mostly from suicide. The death rate was thought to have been much higher among the 1.4 million estimated victims in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia. “Altogether at least two million German women are thought to have been raped,” Beevor concludes, “and a substantial minority, if not a majority, appear to have suffered multiple rape.” (See here)
Note that we are talking about 2 million different women being raped, not about two million rapes. Given that women were often raped several times a day—sometimes 60-70 times according to one authority—the total number of rapes could well have numbered over 20 million.
Since the Red Army included a substantial number of Jews in it, many in supervisory positions, there appears to have been an unwritten rule that Jewish women should be exempt from rape. After all, the Bolshevik regime whose forces were carrying out most of these rapes was known to be an essentially Jewish regime, with the cheka or secret police and other top government functionaries being predominantly Jewish. There is a curious account, however, of one German Jewess being raped by Soviet troops. When this was pointed out to the rapists as some kind of anomaly — “Hey, don’t rape her, she’s Jewish!” — the brutalized soldiers are reported to have sneered, “So what? A woman is a woman. Frau ist Frau.”
Here are some relevant facts which the reader might wish to bear in mind when reading JA Sexton’s chilling review of Goodrich’s Hellstorm that follows in Part 2 of this article:
These acts of sexual violence against German women, described by Beevor as “the greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history,” took place mostly in 1944-1945 as the Western Allies and the Red Army fought their way into the Third Reich. They began in October 1944 and reached their climax in 1945, continuing until the winter of 1947-1948.
Of the 2 million German women who were raped, an estimated 240,000 died in the process after sustaining multiple wounds and being gang-raped several times—sometimes as many as 100 times in a single day. A large number of these women are said to have committed suicide.
Stalin knew that these rapes were going on and that the reputation of the Red Army and the Soviet Union was suffering as a consequence. There was a notable difference between the official Soviet attitude to these rapes—one of severe disapproval and condemnation—and Stalin’s own laissez-faire attitude which reflected the view of many around him, especially the Jews in his entourage who hated the Germans with an unquenchable hatred.
Remember that it was Ilya Ehrenberg, Stalin’s Jewish Red Army propagandist, who had authored and signed several leaflets urging Soviet troops to kill the Germans without mercy and to take German women as their “lawful booty.”
In January 1945 Stalin signed an order criminalizing Red Army misconduct. It stated that civilians “should not be subjected to violence. The perpetrators will be punished. In liberated territories, sexual relations with females are not allowed. Perpetrators of violence will be shot.”
These regulations however were seldom applied with any degree of stringency. Leniency, laissez-faire and connivance were the rule rather than the exception—exactly as in Israel today where the IDF and Jewish settlers break Israeli law with impunity and are seldom punished for their crimes of violence against the Palestinians.
Nothing changes in this respect. The law says, Thou Shalt Not. But the state-backed criminal does what he pleases.
Stalin’s easygoing attitude to the mass rape and murder of German women was revealed in an unofficial, off-the-cuff comment he made to Yugoslav politician Milovan Djilas who had complained to him about Red Army rapes in Yugoslavia.
“Understand it ,” Stalin is reported to have said cynically, “that if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometres through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle.” On another occasion, when told that Red Army soldiers had sexually maltreated some German women, he said dismissively: “We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative.”Boys will be boys. Let the lads have their fun.
According to Oleg Rzheshevsky, a professor and President of the Russian Association of World War II Historians, 4,148 Red Army officers and soldiers had been convicted of atrocities. He explained that plunder and rapine were an inevitable part of war and that other Allied forces committed such crimes too, not just the Soviets. On the whole, he believed Soviet servicemen had been well-behaved and treated the German enemy in a humane and civilized manner.
The German woman who had been raped sixty times in a single day clearly would not have agreed with this rosy picture of Russian civility.
This claim of exemplary behavior by “most” Soviets soldiers later became the refrain among Soviet commentators, too traumatized with guilt and shame to be able to admit what their own people had done. Russian soldiers were credited with “feeding the German population, rescuing children, and helping to restore normal life in the country.” In many cases this was true. Not all Russians were brutes. Many were indeed kind and decent, noble and self-restrained, deeply impregnated with the Christian values of the great race that had given the world Tolstoy and Dostoevsky.
Indeed one Russian official, Makhmut Gareev, said that “he had not even heard about any sexual violence.” (See here)
♣
The number of rapes committed by US servicemen in
Germany are officially estimated at 11,040. Many of these were gang
rapes committed by armed American soldiers at gunpoint. The journalist
Osmar White, a war correspondent from Australia who served with American
troops during the war, writes:“I know for a fact that many women were raped by White Americans. No action was taken against the culprits. A typical victimization with sexual assault by drunken American personnel marching through occupied territory involved threatening a German family with weapons, forcing one or more women to engage in sex, and putting the entire family out on the street afterward.”In May-June 1946, no fewer than five dead German women were found in American barracks. Maybe they were being kept as trophies or for continued use after death. Blood-spattered sex dolls. We’ll never know. Punishment was sporadically meted out to American rapists, the maximum severity being reserved for black American soldiers by their white racist officers. Some one had to be singled out for punishment, after all, so why not Jim Crow? (See here)
British troops were also guilty of raping German women. On a single day in mid-April 1945, three German women were raped by British soldiers in Neustadt. A senior British army chaplain was quite matter-of-fact about British participation in rape. “A good deal of rape is going on,” he admitted, adding somewhat callously: “The women probably deserved it.”
Let us see what these German women “deserved”. Here are a few grisly quotes from Hellstorm which you will not find in Sexton’s book review below, though you will find other quotes there that are equally horrifying.
“Of all the methods used to express its anger, the Red Army said it best with rape. From eight to eighty, healthy or ill, indoors or out, in fields, on sidewalks, against walls, the spiritual massacre of German women continued unabated. (p.155)The haunting book review that follows in Part 2 will take you to hell and back. Prepare for a roller coaster ride into a landscape of terror that neither Dante in his Inferno nor Hieronymus Bosch in his maddest paintings could ever have imagined.
The mothers had had to witness how their ten and twelve-year-old daughters were raped by some 20 men; the daughters in turn saw their mothers being raped, even their grandmothers. Women who tried to resist were brutally tortured to death. There was no mercy. (p. 159)
When even violated corpses could no longer be of use, sticks, iron bars and telephone receivers were rammed up their vaginas. (p. 155)
The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women. (p.79)
“Those women who were pregnant, on their menstrual cycle, or enduring diarrhea, suffered like all the rest. Nothing, it seemed—not age, ailment or ugliness—could repel the Red rapist.
Even death was no defense.
‘I saw some twenty Red Army men standing in line before the corpse of a woman certainly beyond sixty years of age who had been raped to death,’ one sickened witness recorded. ‘They were shouting and laughing and WAITING FOR THEIR SATISFACTION OVER HER DEAD BODY.’” (Emphasis added, p.84)
Part 2: Into the Inferno,
by JA Sexton
A review of Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany (1944-1947),
What is hell?
I’ve often pondered what the concept “hell” entailed; what it means to be living in the absence of “God,” the supreme creative force behind all life. After reading Thomas Goodrich’s breathtaking and physically nauseating analytical narrative of the burnt offering – Holocaust – of Germany I now know what hell looks like and how its inhabitants live and behave.
Relentless, reckless, and senseless hate of a magnitude so profound, so immense, that I am still unable to understand it. And then the irony of it all: that former inhabitants of Europe – Europeans – were responsible for inculcating hell in their own Heimat (homeland).
Who but the Devil itself could make a family turn on itself, causing it to tear itself apart in such a murderous, inhuman fashion that the victims are left unrecognizable after all the torture, abuse, burning, systematic rape, and beatings subsides?
Who or what could inspire such madness? Thomas Goodrich answers this question silently, subtly, but matter-of-factly : the Jews in Communist Russia (the former USSR) were to blame — and so, too, were the Jews of Capitalist America and Britain.
Hellstorm is the type of book that changes lives. Goodrich is the type of author who literally puts you, the reader, there in the midst of hell. And what is this hell that he forces you to experience page after page, torture after torture, and rape after rape? One that has been all but forgotten; the only hell the modern age really knows.
The Allied Holocaust of National Socialist Germany
Goodrich describes the Allied-induced inferno in more detail than most need to know to gain an understanding of the depths of Allied criminality and hatred, but the detail is necessary. Without the detail no one will really know what hell is like. Here’s a taste of it.A German woman has her jaws forced open by the filthy brutish hands of a Soviet serial rapist. He literally spits into her mouth and forces her to swallow his salivary filth as he rams her body again . . . and again . . . and again – until he’s satisfied fulfilling his oath to Stalin and his chief Holocaust propagandist, Ilya Ehrenburg.
Stalin officially sanctioned the systematic rape of German women. Ilya Ehrenburg, for his part as the lascivious advocator of rape of German women, helped the Red Army perpetrate the largest gynocide and mass rape in recorded history.Commissar Ehrenburg’s pamphlet urged Soviet troops to plunder, rape and KILL. This pamphlet was distributed in the millions among Red Army troops on the front lines of battle — men who were already intoxicated with hate and vengefulness as a result of over two decades of Bolshevik oppression: the collectivization of their farms, the confiscation of their grain and property, and the mass murder of their families.
Here are the final paragraphs of Ilya Ehrenberg’s pamphlet entitled “Kill”:
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day.And in another leaflet, this is what the same psychopath has to say:
If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime. If you have already killed a German, then kill another one — there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.
Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed.
Kill the Germans!… Kill the Germans!…Kill!”
“The Germans must be killed. One must kill them….Do you feel sick? Do you feel a nightmare in your breast?…Kill a German! If you are a righteous and conscientious man, kill a German!. . . Kill!”Ehrenburg, like any skilled propagandist with a penchant for revenge and training in human psychology, appealed to the basest instincts of his men, urging them to rape and wantonly slaughter other human beings at will. There would be no penalties for this injustice. It was all officially sanctioned.
Here is Ehrenburg again, rising to new heights of mental derangement, this time giving Soviet troops the green light to rape and kill as many German women as they wanted:
“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, KILL, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army!”
There is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.”
— Ilya Ehrenberg
LASHA DARKMOON: Ilya Ehrenberg’s attitude to German women—that they should be treated as”lawful booty” by Soviet troops—is strikingly similar to the attitude attributed by Russian history professor Alexander Statiev to the average Soviet soldier: “Avenge! You are a soldier-Avenger! Kill the German, and then jump the German woman! This is how a soldier celebrates victory!” (See here)JA SEXTON (continues) : The thought of being burned alive is horrific, but the thought of being burned alive because you are trapped in melted asphalt and literally stuck by your own disfigured hands and knees and screaming is worse.
Ilya Ehrenberg, directly responsible for the rape, torture and mass murder of 2 million German women after WWII, is now honored in Israel, his papers being lovingly preserved by the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum.
In his 6-volume memoirs, Ehrenberg openly boasts about being aware of the crimes of the Stalin regime, his own included, and actually admits that a veil of silence has been drawn over these matters.
He is buried in Moscow at the Novodevichy Cemetery where his tomb is graced with a crude, cartoonish portrait by his close friend Picasso. One cannot help wondering if the great Spanish painter was aware that his Jewish pal, who won the absurdly named “Stalin Peace Prize” in 1952, was a psychopath with a lot of blood on his hands.. (See here).
What did you do to be burned or boiled alive? What was your crime?
You supported Adolf Hitler, the man who dared to stand up to international finance and the Jewish system of systematic international monetary and spiritual enslavement.
THAT was your “crime” and the crime of millions of others in Germany and Europe who were incinerated, melted, tortured, strafed, raped or blown into body parts by their own racial and cultural kindred in the USSR, Britain and America.
The core of the firestorms often reached 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit; the flames 1,300 to 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit. A Holocaust in the truest sense of the word: a burnt offering of the Germanic race – women, children, refugees, POWs, the elderly, and even animals at the Berlin Zoo – to the Christian-Jewish “god” Jahve. The truth is that this was the single largest burnt offering of human flesh to the Devil in recorded history. And for what? For what did hundreds of thousands of German victims suffer: international finance Capitalism.
And WHY? This is why: So that a few people, mostly ethnic Jews, could continue to make money from money and enslave millions of people in the process.
Eisenhower’s camps were designed with one purpose in mind: mass death. They were, quite literally, death camps.
Millions of German men and boys died from starvation, disease, exposure, heat exhaustion, thirst, and of course torture, slave labor, random massacre, and systematic execution.
After having served in the worst war in Western history, and one of the worst in world history, German men came “home” to nothing more than rubble. Their wives, girlfriends, and children were dead, enslaved, mutilated, driven to madness, missing, lost, or had gone with the enemy to survive and prevent further systematic rape by Polish, Russian, and Mongolian soldiers.
There were very few “homes” to return to, so thousands of men ended their lives in despair. They had survived six years of horror and warfare only to end it all in the rubble-strewn wasteland once called “Germany.”
Why?
Because their own blood kindred in America and Britain — and even in much of Europe — had betrayed them: had turned on them to appease their Jewish overlords.
An older German woman is approached by filthy Soviet soldiers. She knows what awaits her because Goebbels did not lie. She tries to talk them out it. She has children with her. They dispose of the children rapidly, viciously: their heads are rammed into the side of the building. The woman is gang-raped. What does she recall . . . the rape? No. The sound of a child’s skull when it is crushed against a wall. She’ll never forget that sound.
Nor will I because I too can hear it. I too witnessed it. I witnessed it through Goodrich.
And then there were the death camps where over a million German men perished because Eisenhower (pictured) hated Germans: “God, how I hate the Germans,” he confided in a letter to his wife.
His racism and hate became official policy, a policy of genocide—an American orchestrated Holodomor. Countless thousands of German men were shipped off to Britain and Siberia to serve as slave laborers for the “victors”.
Victors of what? Total destruction.
While this horror is unfolding, Roosevelt (and later Truman) and Churchill cheerfully offer Stalin half of Europe. They are more than happy to accommodate nearly every demand drafted up by this “Man of Steel.” The result of these Anglo-Soviet arrangements nearly defies description:
The greatest mass expulsion and deportation in history (upwards of 13 million); the mass murder of millions of Germans and their allies in Russian, French, Jewish, and Polish retribution camps and prisons dotted all throughout Europe and the USSR; the systematic mass rape and murder of German and collaborator women (an estimated two million); and the deliberate secret starvation of the Germanic race as spelled out by the Jewish adviser to Roosevelt and Truman, Henry Morgenthau.
Between 20 and 25 million Germans and collaborators perished in the years AFTER the war had officially ended. It is a crime that will never be forgotten, and it is a crime that will forever stain the hands and national consciences of the former USSR, the United States of America, Great Britain and her Commonwealth nations, and perhaps more pointedly the Anglo and Slavic races of the White race.
A little German boy holds a lantern as he sits in a wagon en route to the Allied lines in the bitter winter snow. He’s with his mother. She’s bleeding profusely; she’s dying. The German doctor who the little boy was lucky enough to hunt down is doing his best to perform a tamponade (a blockage) of her uterus. She was brutally, viciously raped. Did she survive? Goodrich doesn’t say, but the prognosis and tone suggests she didn’t make it. She was a German. She supported Hitler. She was a Nazi. She deserved it.
She deserved it.
So said the Allies in the years following the war: Germany merely got what she deserved. The ‘morally superior’ White nations of the globe had smashed ultimate evil: the Nazis; the German race.
GERMAN CHILD VICTIM:
RAPED, TORTURED, AND LEFT TO DIE IN THE WOODS
“She deserved it . . . because she was a Nazi!”
Never has a greater lie been told. Never has so much hatred and vengeance been poured forth onto one people and one nation that had chosen not to abide by the laws of international bankers and financiers who wish only to enslave, plunder, steal and when necessary, kill.And most of the White races of the world were more than willing and eager to take up the flag of international Jewish money power and to smash the one White race that opposed it with such honor, valor and sheer might — so much so that it took all the best brain-power and material wealth of the entire White race, and all the monetary power of its Jewish financiers and overlords, to break its back.
I went into Goodrich’s book expecting to read little more than I already knew about the worst gynocide and mass rape of womankind in recorded history, but I was in for a shock. As an individual who looks out for women’s interests, I was repeatedly overcome with emotion while reading of the indescribable genital mutilations, deliberate and systematic terrorism, gang-rape and wanton mass murder of women.
Here is Brazilian German Leonora Cavoa who was an eyewitness to these sexual atrocities:
“Suddenly I heard loud screams, and immediately two Red Army soldiers brought in five girls.
The Commissar ordered them to undress. When they refused out of modesty, he ordered me to do it to them, and for all of us to follow him.
We crossed the yard to the former works kitchen, which had been completely cleared out except for a few tables on the window side. It was terribly cold, and the poor girls shivered. In the large, tiled room some Russians were waiting for us, making remarks that must have been very obscene, judging from how everything they said drew gales of laughter.
The Commissar told me to watch and learn how to turn the Master Race into whimpering bits of misery.
The horror that ensued nearly defies written description, as no written description can actually make a reader of either sex feel and genuinely know the pain and suffering inflicted in this never-ending horror show. The victims’ pain and suffering must have seemed like hours and hours . . . an entire lifetime . . . I can’t imagine. I try not to imagine it because about 2,000 women in the Nemmersdorf area alone suffered a similar fate.
Now two Poles came in, dressed only in their trousers, and the girls cried out at their sight. They quickly grabbed the first of the girls, and bent her backwards over the edge of the table until her joints cracked.
I was close to passing out as one of them took his knife and, before the very eyes of the other girls, cut off her right breast.
He paused for a moment, then cut off the other side.
I have never heard anyone scream as desperately as that girl. After this operation he drove his knife into her abdomen several times, which again was accompanied by the cheers of the Russians.”Stop.
Picture it.
Imagine it.
Live it!
Force yourself to see your
own body mutilated in similar fashion; force yourself to picture a
knife plunging into your abdomen again . . . and again . . . your short
lifetime come to this end: you know you are about to die. You are being
murdered; your body brutally tortured by a mob of brutal sadists. Try to
imagine the horror and the helplessness you would feel as your person
was mutilated and your very life bleeding away on a table.
Now . . . step back out of the scene and analyze this needless, inhuman horror with the gift of hindsight. This victim was not just the victim of these Red Army men, reduced to base animal instinct and mentality, but she was also the victim of an ideology inspired by Judaism and a Jewish propagandist named Ilya Ehrenburg.
Brazilian eyewitness Leonora Cavoa again :
“The next girl cried for mercy, but in vain—it even seemed that the gruesome deed was done particularly slowly because she was especially pretty.
The other three had collapsed, they cried for their mothers and begged for a quick death, but the same fate awaited them as well.
The last of them was still almost a child, with barely developed breasts. They literally tore the flesh off her ribs until the white bones showed.
Loud howls of approval began when someone brought a saw from a tool chest. This was used to tear up the breasts of the other girls, which soon caused the floor to be awash in blood. The Russians were in a blood frenzy. More girls were being brought in continually.
I saw these grisly proceedings as through a red haze.
. . . Over and over again I heard the terrible screams when the breasts were tortured, and the loud groans at the mutilation of the genitals. . . . It was always the same, the begging for mercy, the high-pitched scream when the breasts were cut and the groans when the genitals were mutilated.
The slaughter was interrupted several times to sweep the blood out of the room and clear away the bodies. . . . When my knees buckled I was forced onto a chair. The Commissar always made sure that I was watching, and when I had to throw up they even paused in their tortures.
One girl had not undressed completely, she may also have been a little older than the others, who were around seventeen years of age. They soaked her bra with oil and set it on fire, and while she screamed, a thin iron rod was shoved into her vagina . . .
. . . until it came out of her navel.
In the yard entire groups of girls were clubbed to death after the prettiest of them had been selected for this torture. The air was filled with the death cries of many hundred girls” (pp. 156–57).And this is where I have to stop transcribing . . .
LASHA DARKMOON: It is a closely documented fact that most of the supervisory jobs among the Red Army Bolsheviks were held by Jews. The sadistic commissar mentioned above is therefore likely to have been Jewish.
As for the Red army rapists, we have a great deal of circumstantial evidence that the bulk of these may have belonged to three ethnic groups with an ancient animosity toward the White race: Mongols, Tatars, and Asiatic Russian Jews. Remember there were no fewer than 500,000 Jews in the Red Army, many of them primed for “revenge sex” against white women.
Don’t forget also that these mentally deranged degenerates, some of them just let out of prison, had been given the green light to rape and kill with impunity by Stalin’s psychotic Jewish propagandist, Ilya Ehrenberg: “Use force and break the racial pride of these German women,” Ehrenberg had instructed. “Take them as your LAWFUL BOOTY! Kill!”
ADDENDUMSince publishing this article two days ago, I have received further information from a trusted correspondent that furthers my thesis—and it only a thesis at this stage—that Russian Jews were among the most likely rape perpetrators. Not only were there 500,000 Jews in the Red Army, there were also regiments in the Red Army consisting entirely of Jews led by Jewish commanders.
Here is a quote from Solzhenitsyn on the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and later:
“In 1918 Trotsky . . . created the Red Army. Jewish soldiers were numerous in its ranks. Several units of the Red Army were composed entirely of Jews, as, for example, the brigade commanded by Joseph Forman. Among the officers of the Red Army, the share of Jews grew in number and importance…”
It is my contention that Jewish units such as the one mentioned above were largely responsible for the majority of rapes that took place in Germany at this time.
Covering up this fact would have been of vital importance to the Stalin regime with its heavy Jewish component.
Note that the execution of 22,000 Polish officers at Katyn in 1943, known as the Katyn Massacre, was a war crime for which the Nazis were blamed for several decades, before the shocking truth finally emerged only as late as 2010: that Stalin had ordered the massacre and that his loyal henchman, the Jew Lazar Kaganovich, had been the evil genius who had helped to carry it out — the same man, incidentally, who had been behind the starvation of 7-10 million Ukrainians in 1933, known as the Holodomor Famine.
(See “Russian Lawmakers Say Stalin Ordered Massacre of Polish Soldiers.” CNN, November 27, 2010)
That the rape of 2 million German women was carried out largely by Jews within the Red Army is, I believe, another of those grisly facts that have been carefully concealed by the hyper-secretive Stalin regime. This truth will only emerge into the light of day when Soviet archives are finally thrown open to public scrutiny.
♣Never in the history of the world has such an orgy of rape and mass murder taken place, all of it against the helpless women and children of a great defeated nation, and all with the full connivance of the three great leaders of the victor countries: the blood-bespattered Franklin D. Roosevelt, the coldhearted war criminal Winston Churchill, and that ultimate psychopath and monster in human form, Josef Stalin.
“We must never forget,” Jewish writer Sever Plocker tells us, “that some of the greatest murderers of modern times have been Jewish.”
It is sobering to reflect that the three statesmen pictured below—Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin—may have been little more than helpless puppets in the hands of the shadowy puppet masters standing behind them.
CHURCHILL, ROOSEVELT, STALIN: THE THREE STOOGES OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY?
Conclusion
And yet . . . and yet Germany’s back was not broken . . . Goodrich ends his book on a note of hope.When all had been destroyed, when all seemed to have been lost forever in Year Zero, the Germans proved once again that such was just not the case.
Brick by brick, and hour by hour, they rebuilt upon the ruins of God’s Empire a new Germany. No Holocaust by fire, no gynocide, no viricide, no famine, no other inhuman atrocities, could subdue or quench the noble Germanic spirit — which is the essence of the White race of humankind.
Even though Germany today is still an occupied nation with a hurting people, she still possesses that flicker of life and spirituality that the other White races and nations lost long ago when they sold their souls to Judaism and the Jewish “god” of hatred and revenge.“Unbowed, unbent, unbroken.”
Such are the words of an album released by a European band named Hammerfall. And such are the words that describe the German people, the German folk, the German race.
The only ones who bear the burden of bloodstain and guilt are the Allies. No crimes in recorded history surpass those inflicted against Germany and Europe by the United States, Great Britain and the former Soviet Union—all with the ideological and financial backing of international Jewry.
The death of National Socialist Germany was the death of Western man and everything he once stood for.
I must thank Thomas Goodrich. Hellstorm has changed my life.
read more ...
“JFK Part 1 A National Security Event – Oswald didn’t do it”
http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1lCYzGD7Lk
“JFK Part 2 A National Security Event – How it was done”
http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9eu7VI-ZGo
“JFK at 50 The Assassination of America”
http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/03/jfk-at-50-the-assassination-of-america/
I dont need to be convinced but the point I was making is Chomsky wants official confirmation.
JFK & 9/11are cases of coverup from the entire establishment. It is annoying that an MIT professor does not accept logic as sufficient to take a stand but it is in agreement with his previous method.
Now, I once enjoyed listening to Chomsky. Such a wealth of knowledge. I even admired him. I don’t anymore. I don’t have the platform nor the readers you do Mr. Fetzer. No where to go, and nothing I can do about much of any of this. Many of us out here are pretty disgusted when they reduce the JFK murder to merely a dog getting run over on a country road. On 11/22/14, as I
read more ...
I always thought there was somethings fishy with this “LIGUISTICS CHAMPIONSHIP” of prof. Chomsky. Now here it is folks..
Re;;; MAGIC BULLET;;; we should see who invented it;;; an actual cannibal called Arlene Specter who cut up and cannibalized an abducted San Francisco boy Kevin Collins in 1984 according to this testimony of one of the abductors & accomplices in the murder;;;
YouTube his name & it comes up;;; “PETER ALEXANDER CHERNOFF”