Friday, 21 November 2014



Truthers as Terrorists: Who are the terrorists today?

Truthers as Terrorists: Who are the terrorists today?

 by Jim Fetzer

“The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media”–attributed to William Colby, its former Director
Canadian Jihad terrorist
The alleged Canadian Jihad terrorist

A Canadian reporter has introduced a new phrase, “terrorist truthers”, as the initial stage in creating a new semantic club to use against critics of government ops and of false flag attacks. The reporter, Brian Lilley, has used the occasion of the alleged attack on the Canadian Parliament–almost certainly itself an arranged event–to assail those who do not condemn it as “terrorism”.

While that sounds like typical politics, where right-wingers are eager to politicize such events and left-wingers more cautious and hesitant, a bit more appears to be going on here than that.
Joshua Blakeney, for example, has observed that this event appears tailor-made to be used as a justification to silence critics of Israel. And it also looks as though the phrase, once introduced, will then gradually be extended in meaning to include 9/11 Truthers and 7/7 Truthers, as David Cameron, the UK PM, recently proposed.
In a bizarre performance, Cameron recommended that those who are skeptical of the “official accounts” of 9/11 and of 7/7 should be dealt with has harshly as members of ISIS, which seems rather extreme, considering that ISIS is being bombed and strafed by US and British fighters and bombers. It conjures up the image of having these intellectuals being lined up against the wall and shot for the “thought crimes” of questioning stories the public has been fed by their own governments that are unable to withstand critical scrutiny. So, are we now required to accept fanciful theories that are provably false just because the government supports them or face a firing squad?
The Canadian government tends to regard any criticism of Israel as “terrorism” and is contemplating new laws to affect even internet discussions. When George Galloway went to Gaza and gave donations to unpaid nurses in the hospitals there, he was labelled by the government as a “member of a banned terrorist organization”. Ian Macdonald of the Foreign Service and John McMurtry, a distinguished philosopher, are speaking out about these draconian forms of censorship and violations of freedom of speech, but the situation is appalling.

The Ottawa deception

The proper definition of terrorism is of acts of violence that are intended to instill feat into a target population to make it more amenable to political manipulation. The element of fear is enhanced by the murder of innocent women and especially children, which is why the Sandy Hook hoax has been so effective. Once people are convinced an atrocity has occurred, it becomes extremely difficult to correct false initial impressions. As Mark Twain observed,”It’s easier to fool people that it is to convince them they have been fooled.”
Click here to watch, “Terrorist Truthers: Prime Time”
This is not the first time that the Ottawa Sun has been used to convey the message of rejecting the skeptics and depend upon your government. On 27 June 2014, for example, it published “Beware terrorists, not the government”, in which its author, Charles Adler, suggests that its purely “paranoia” to be concerned about the NSA’s surveillance of our phone calls, email messages and financial and medical records. “Osama Bin Laden is dead,” he writes, “but his criminally insane ideology is very much alive.” According to Adler, the problem is not the government, which is there to protect us, but leakers like Edward Snowden, who reveal what’s going on.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

As Joshua Blakeney has recently observed, “Israel’s puppet regime in Ottawa wants to use Canadian dollars and the country’s military to help Israel implement the Oded Yinon plan in the Middle East. Ordinary Canadians are waking up to the fact that it is not in Canada’s national interest to be expending her blood and treasure to destroy countries like Iraq and Syria on behalf of Israel. Hence a series of emotive ‘incidents’ were enabled by pro-Zionist actors to a) evoke jingoism among a sufficient number of Canadians so as to make Canadian involvement in the further destruction of Iraq and Syria more tenable and b) enable Orwellian ‘anti-radicalization’ policies to be implemented so the most accurate analysts of Canadian foreign policy can be criminalized for ‘preaching radicalism’ and ‘proselytizing for terrorism’.”

The threat of an Ebola pandemic

There are many reasons to believe that this latest Ebola outbreak is another attempt to instill fear into the American people, possibly with the ultimate objective of using the necessity of maintaining quarantines to impose martial law upon the United States. There are many indications of fakery, including documentaries that show a young man simply lying down and being described as having Ebola, while his father walks away with a handful of cash; after a while, the young man gets up and walks away himself. Or loading an Ebola patient aboard a plane, where the official in charge, who is not wearing a Hazmat suit, sets down a cup of coffee where it could easily be contaminated if the patient were infected. Here is one study of what appears to be going on:
Without taking a definitive stand, Mike Adams of NaturalNews offers a summary of reasons why an Ebola scare could be effective and all-too-easily contrived:
There’s no way for us to really know for sure whether Ebola has been intentionally released anywhere as a weapon, but here are some important things we do know which might be valuable clues:
• Ebola would be ridiculously easy to harvest right now and deploy as a bioterrorism weapon. There’s almost no chance that a person intentionally carrying Ebola would be detected at U.S. entry points unless they were highly symptomatic.
• Ebola is the “perfect” weapon for evil-minded terrorists because it is untraceable, self-replicating and it does not damage the infrastructure of society. (It kills people but doesn’t destroy refineries and bridges, in other words…) It also causes a very large psychological change in society, driving some people into a state of fear and others into a state of preparedness.
• There are many parties that would benefit enormously from an Ebola bioterrorism event. You can probably figure out all the usual suspects yourself, but the list would likely include vaccine companies, population control zealots and anyone in government that wanted to declare medical martial law and benefit from the concentration of power into the hands of the few.
• There is also a reasonable argument circulating now that says the banksters need a scapegoat for the massive market crash (and debt implosion) they’ve been staving off for years with the Fed’s desperate cash pumping. If Ebola gets released, they can allow the crash to unravel while nullifying all financial contract claims because a viral pandemic would be deemed an “act of God.” (There is specific language in nearly all contracts that provide a no-fault out for any such “act of God.”)
• It’s crystal clear right now that the White House is dictating the national media’s downplaying of Ebola news. There might be multiple Ebola infections happening right now at hospitals across America, but news of those outbreaks might be censored in order to prevent the public from losing faith in government right before the mid-term elections. Once the elections are over, it will be interesting to see if there’s an uptick in Ebola coverage.
If you don’t think such a media blackout can occur in a nation with a supposed “free press,” check out the recent nationwide media blackout on the CDC vaccine whistleblower story, which received absolutely zero coverage in the establishment media even though it was one of the largest medical stories of the decade. Make no mistake: When the media is ordered to censor a news story, they censor it across the board and immediately distract the public with something else, usually a juicy celebrity scandal of some kind.
And I have advanced reflections on why Obama might be sending troops into West Africa, as though a virus could be killed by a bullet:

Ebola virus and martial law in the USClick here to watch, “Ebola hoax to justify imposing martial law”

A new “Ebola Warning” suggests that the virus is being deliberately introduced into the United States for the sake of promoting a political agenda, which may have to do with oil prices, the stock market or the coming elections. Killing miners to get them back to work is tried and true, but corporations need new cover stories to conceal their exploits to enhance their profits. It is being used to justify sending troops to Sierra Leone and other West African countries, where there is a strike by miners which those troops could bring to an end to promote the owner’s profits. But the aim may also be to create a justification for imposing martial law in the USA.

American treachery in the Middle East

 Even the beheadings are fake, but still good enough to dupe a gullible American public. Perhaps most telling of all is that a new terrorist entity, the Khorasan group, has been invented out of thin air in order to claim that it poses an “imminent threat” to the United States in order to justify American strikes in another nation without securing the permission of the UN Security Council, because one nation may attack another under the Charter of the United Nations only if it has permission from the Security Council “unless it confronts an ‘imminent threat’”. So between David Cameron and Barack Obama, we see the depths of depravity to which the West will sink to attack Syria.
And all of this is being done to promote the agenda of the Project for the New American Century, which needed a new Pearl Harbor to reverse US foreign policy from one in which we never attacked any nation that had not attacked us first to one in which we have become the greatest aggressor nation the world has ever seen and are undertaking one war after another on behalf of Israel by dismantling every Arab nation that served as a counterbalance to its domination of the Middle East, which it aspires to control from the Tigris-Euphrates to the Nile, which is why we are still there. The Neo-Con agenda is alive and well in the Middle East today.

The Assassination of JFK

Anyone who has ever believed in the United States as the moral leader of the world must be appalled at the gross abuse of its power, where instead of treating other nations with respect, the US is adhering to the principle that “might makes right”, which is the most corrupt of all. Since the Bush/Cheney administration, there has been a precipitous decline in the quality of American leadership in the world. But many of us believe that it traces back much further to the assassination of our 35th President, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, by force, an event that was carefully orchestrated by the most powerful special interests in the country and meticulously covered up.

As I explained most recently during the Santa Barbara Conference, “JFK at 50: The Assassination of America” (2013), the most appropriate framework for understanding this event requires drawn a three-level distinction between THE SPONSORS (the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, the anti-Castro Cubans, the Mafia, the Eastern bankers associated with the FED, the Texas oil men and Israel), THE MECHANICS (the shooters who took him out and their supervisors and coordinators), and THE FACILITATORS (LBJ for the assassination, J. Edgar Hoover for the cover-up), where stunning new evidence has emerged blowing apart the alteration of the Zapruder film:

YouTube - Veterans Today -

We now know have confirmation from the escort officers, whom the Warren Commission never called, of the bullet hole in the windshield, of the limo stop (where one of the officers ran in between the limos to get to the north side of Elm Street) and of the conduct of the Secret Service at the time (where three agents climbed out and covered the left side of the Lincoln and two others the right, where one of them retrieved a piece of JFK’s skull and tossed it into the back seat of the limo with the body of the dead president). None of this is in the film.

It looks as though the phrase, “truther terrorist”, has been designed to join the ranks of other semantic clubs that have been wielded for political purposes, such that anyone who has been critical of the actions or policies of the government of Israel is therefore “anti-Semitic”, or anyone who challenges the “official account” of World War II and its gas chambers using Zyklon-B to exterminate 6,000,000 Jews is therefore a “Holocaust denier” or that anyone who doubts that Lee Oswald was the lone assassin of JFK is therefore a “conspiracy theorist”, regardless of consideration for logic, evidence and proof. There are terrorists among us, but they are not those who are seeking the truth.

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.


English - Holocaust
©1984 by ZIONIST CHRISTIAN Jack T. Chick LLC

Holocaust: Evolution the Religion of Death

<a href="/channel/UCIna-X4PMG8-jHNEqLlXOLQ" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-ytid="UCIna-X4PMG8-jHNEqLlXOLQ" data-sessionlink="ei=l950VPCnJY_2igba6YC4DQ" data-name="">Dave Flang</a>

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 12

Page 13

Page 14

Page 15

Page 16

Page 17

Page 18

Page 19

Page 20

Page 21

Page 22

Page 23
Published on 1 Nov 2013
Ravensbrück Camp by Corrie Ten Boom
"You mentioned Ravensbrück in your talk," he was saying. "I was a guard in there." No, he did not remember me. "I had to do it — I knew that. The message that God forgives has a prior condition: that we forgive those who have injured us." "But since that time," he went on, "I have become a Christian. I know that God has forgiven me for the cruel things I did there, but I would like to hear it from your lips as well. Fraulein, ..." his hand came out, ... "will you forgive me?" And I stood there —

Dr. David Ben Lew - Holocaust Survivor
Dr.David Ben Lew's book
Bible Baptist Bookstore
P.O. Box 7173
Pensacola, FL 32534

Trapped in Hitler's Hell: Includes many images released by Germany.
Anita Dittman was just a little girl when the winds of Hitler and Nazism began to blow through Germany. Raised by her Jewish mother, she first heard about Jesus when she was just six years old. By the time she was eight, she came to believe that He was her Messiah. By the time she was 10, the war had begun. Trapped in Hitler's Hell is the true account of holocaust horror but also of God's miraculous mercy on a young girl who spent her teen-age years desperately fighting for survival yet learning to trust in Young Anita Dittmanthe One she had come to love. You will never read another story like this one, and you will be changed forever through the life of this courageous and lovely young woman.
Social Darwinism Leads to Mass Murder

"My abhorrence of Darwinism is understandable, for what member of the 'lower races' could remain indifferent to the statement attributed to the great master (Darwin, 1881, in a letter to W. Graham) that 'at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.' "—*Kenneth J. Hsu, in Geology, April 1987, p. 377. (*) non-creationist

*Engels, *Marx's disciple, was the first to discover *Darwin's book.
"Friedrich Engels, one of the founders of Communism, wrote to Karl Marx, December 12, 1859, 'Darwin, whom I am just now reading, is splendid.' "—*C. Zirkle, Evolution, Marxian Biology, and the Social Scene (1959), p. 85.

Evolution, Morality & Violence
*Marx then read it and wrote back:

"Karl Marx wrote to Friedrich Engels, December 19, 1860, 'Although it is developed in the crude English style, this is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our views.' "—*C. Zirkle, Evolution, Marxian Biology, and the Social Scene (1959), p. 88.

"Again, Marx wrote to Engels, January 16, 1861, 'Darwin's book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural selection for the class struggle in history . . not only is a death blow dealt here for the first time to 'teleology' in the natural sciences but their rational meaning is emphatically explained.' "—*C. Zirkle, Evolution, Marxian Biology, and the Social Scene (1959), p. 88.

"Defending Darwin is nothing new for socialists. The socialist movement recognized Darwinism as an important element in its general world outlook right from the start. When Darwin published his Origin of the Species in 1859, Karl Marx wrote a letter to Fredrick Engels in which he said: '. . this is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view . .' By defending Darwinism, working people strengthen their defenses against the attacks of these reactionary outfits, and prepare the way for the transformation of the social order."—*Cliff Conner, "Evolution vs. Creationism: In Defense of Scientific Thinking," International Socialist Review, November 1980. w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=sCOKrO6SCwc

"Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919) was an avid, self-appointed spokesman for Darwinism in Germany . . Haeckel professed a mystical belief in the forces of nature and a literal transfer of the laws of biology to the social realm. The movement he founded in Germany was proto-Nazi in character; romantic Volkism and the Monist League (established 1906), along with evolution and science, laid the ideological foundations of [German] National Socialism.

" . . English Darwinism interlinked two main themes, natural selection and the struggle for existence. Social Darwinism is an attempt to explain human society in terms of evolution, but Haeckel's [proto-Nazi] interpretation was quite different from that of capitalist Herbert Spencer or of communist Marx. For him a major component was the ethic of inherent struggle between higher and lower cultures,—between races of men."—*Michael Pitman, Adam and Evolution (1984), p. 48. w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=sCOKrO6S


ISIL Israeli mercenary army

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

Is “Islamic State” really “Jewish State” ?
ISIL claims to be a Muslim liberation movement – yet it never attacks Israel or its supporters. Instead, its fighters are treated in Israeli hospitals and visited, complete with accolades, by the likes of Netanyahu. 
Why would Jewish State (JS) support Islamic State – and vice-versa?
JS is occupying and ethnically cleansing Muslim holy land. JS launched a global war on Islam with the 9/11 coup d’état. JS is obviously the prime enemy of Muslims. In fact, the struggle to liberate Palestine from the JS extremists should be the top item on every Muslim’s political agenda – the one thing that brings all Muslims, everywhere, together. (Alongside all fair-minded people from all faiths and outlooks.)
Yet IS’s top priority is fighting the Axis of Resistance of Iran, Hezbollah, and Syria – the most capable and competent Islamic resistance movement against JS. And they’re destabilizing Iraq in service to the Oded Yinon plan to smash that country into pieces.
What kind of “Islamic resistance movement” is this?
It’s either a false flag group or a bunch of idiots…or some combination thereof.
Virtually every reputable Islamic scholar on earth, as well as all Muslim political leaders, have condemned IS. Yet the group is not without some popularity on social media, and hundreds of Muslims, mostly young and unsophisticated, have traveled to Iraq and Syria to join the group.
What explains the (limited) appeal of IS?
VT Senior Editor Gordon Duff says the young men who join IS are in it for the “jihadi brides.” Somehow I don’t think that’s a full and complete explanation. There are easier ways to get l- – I mean, married.
Eric Walberg is closer to the mark. Eric writes:
“The caliphate project, implementing sharia, the determination to overthrow the Saudi monarchy, the rejection of fiat money–these are legitimate goals and deserve serious analysis.”
Indeed, all four of these goals are widely shared by Muslims all over the world. Many Muslims would be tempted to follow Attila the Hun or Charlie Manson or Jack the Ripper if that individual said “la ilaha ila llah” and proclaimed a caliphate that would implement sharia, overthrow the Ibn Sauds, and reject fiat money. The Muslim world is more than ready for a new Islam-based social order, and any group that looks like it is having any success whatsoever at achieving it is likely to win a fair amount of support. So it shouldn’t be entirely surprising that such a flawed and dubious group as IS is able to drum up some followers.
I will be discussing “whence the appeal of IS?” on AlEtejah TV this Wednesday Nov. 26th at 1 pm Eastern.
And then I will interview Eric Walberg about the same topic Friday, Nov. 28th, 9 to 10 pm on Truth Jihad Radio.
While you’re waiting, check out my latest debate with IS supporter Anjem Choudary on Press TV:

Watch the video at Press TV


Press TV
An outspoken American author and Islamic studies expert says the Takfiri ISIL terrorist group is advancing the agenda of the Israeli regime.
Dr. Kevin Barrett told Press TV from Madison that the ISIL is a “mercenary army,” which has been organized by the Zionists.
The ISIL has been fighting on behalf of Zionism in order to “destabilize Syria” and “cripple the anti-Israeli resistance” across the region, Barrett said.
He also said that the ISIL ideology is similar to the Israeli forces committing crimes against the Palestinians in East Jerusalem al-Quds and elsewhere across the occupied Palestinian territories.
He strongly criticized the “Zionist-dominated” Western media for demonizing Muslims by attributing the ISIL atrocities to Islam. The analyst said that the Saudi-backed Wahhabi fanatics and ISIL terrorists were contributing to the Zionists’ global war against Islam.
“The former members of the defunct Iraqi Ba’ath Party and the supporters of slain Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein have teamed up with the ISIL in order to commit acts of terror against thousands of innocent people,” Barrett said.
The ISIL terrorists control several areas in Syria and Iraq. They have been carrying out horrific acts of violence, including public decapitations and crucifixions, against all communities in the two countries, including against Shias, Sunnis, Kurds, and Christians.
A US-led coalition has been conducting airstrikes against ISIL positions in Iraq and Syria, but there is wide skepticism about the real objective of the airstrikes as well as their effectiveness.
Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki told Press TV that the United States’ military strategy in Iraq and Syria has failed.
Barrett concluded by saying that Press TV is the sole news channel that has played a crucial role in exposing the Takfiri militants’ crimes.

Short URL:

Will Larry Silverstein ever be brought to justice for 9/11 insurance fraud? by Dr Kevin Barrett

Larry Silverstein, who made a killing out of insurance payouts after 9/11, is to have his case for MORE payments reviewed in court today by — guess who? By Judge Alvin Hellerstein, his partner in crime.  

Source: 9/11 could be insurance fraud as “trial” of conspiring duo begins in NY today
Pictures and captions by Lasha Darkmoon


The insurance companies are not openly accusing Silverstein of insurance fraud, presumably because doing so would threaten to demolish the 9/11 cover-up and bring down the US and Israeli governments at free-fall speed.
Is this the world’s worst case of insurance fraud . . . ever?
That’s what many are saying, as the world’s biggest real-estate swindler and the world’s most corrupt judge meet in a Manhattan courtroom on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. At issue: billions of dollars in loot from the demolition of the World Trade Center complex on September 11th, 2001.
World Trade Center owner Larry Silverstein – who confessed on national television to “pulling” World Trade Center Building 7 – will appear in the courtroom of Judge Alvin Hellerstein at 500 Pearl St. in New York City. The non-jury trial, which is expected to last three days, will decide whether Silverstein is entitled to recover $3.5 billion from airlines and airport-related companies, in addition to the $4.9 billion he has already received for his “losses” on September 11th.
The question on everyone’s mind is: Why is Silverstein claiming that airliners destroyed his buildings, when he has already confessed to demolishing at least one of them himself? In the 2002 PBS documentary “America Rebuilds,” Silverstein admitted to complicity in the controlled demolition of WTC-7, a 47-story skyscraper that dropped into its own footprint in 6.5 seconds.

Larry-Silverstein-with-quoteHere Silverstein is seen admitting to the controlled demolition of Building 7. So how come he has received billions in insurance payments after openly admitting—by a slip of the tongue obviously—that he knocked down Building 7 with explosives? This is one of the many mysteries about 9/11 which remain unsolved. (LD)

The mysterious destruction of Building 7 has become the Rosetta Stone of 9/11. Virtually all independent experts who have studied the case, including thousands of architects and engineers, agree that the government’s explanation – that a few small office fires somehow destroyed WTC-7 – is a non-starter. Building 7, these experts say, was obviously taken down in a controlled demolition, as Silverstein himself admitted. (A nationwide ad campaign called “Re-Think 9/11” will remind millions of Americans about Building 7 this September.)
Despite his confession to demolishing his own building, Silverstein has already received $861 million from insurers for Building 7 alone, as well as over $4 billion for the rest of the Trade Center complex. That $861 million for WTC-7 was paid on the basis of Silverstein’s claim that airplanes were somehow responsible for making Building 7, which was not hit by any plane, disappear at free-fall acceleration.
The insurance companies are not openly accusing Silverstein of insurance fraud, presumably because doing so would threaten to demolish the 9/11 cover-up and bring down the US and Israeli governments at free-fall speed. But they have gone so far as to call Silverstein’s demand for more money “absurd,” a considerable understatement.
The insurance companies claim that Silverstein’s demands amount to “double recovery.” They say that Silverstein was already paid $4.9 billion – vastly more than the paltry $115 million or so that he and his backers paid for the complex just weeks before it was demolished – so why is he asking for another $3.5 billion? Silverstein’s answer: He needs the money.
And does he ever. He was originally demanding an extra $11 billion, before Hellerstein capped it at $3.5 billion.
The insurers have not mentioned the fact that the World Trade Center Towers were condemned for asbestos in early 2001, just months before Silverstein bought them in July, six weeks prior to their demolition. They have not mentioned that Silverstein doubled the insurance coverage when he purchased the Trade Center. They have not mentioned that Silverstein hardballed his insurers to change the coverage to “cash payout.” They have not mentioned that Silverstein engineered his purchase of the Trade Center through fellow Zionist billionaire Lewis Eisenberg, Chair of the Republican National Committee and head of the New York Port Authority.
As Christopher Bollyn wrote in 2002:
Silverstein and Eisenberg have both held leadership positions with the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a billion dollar Zionist ‘charity’ organization. Silverstein is a former chairman of the United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, Inc. This is an umbrella organization which raises hundreds of millions of dollars every year for its network of hundreds of member Zionist agencies in the United States and Israel.
According to Ha’aretz, Silverstein is a close friend of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. They speak on the phone every weekend.
The insurance companies have likewise neglected to mention that after doubling his insurance coverage immediately before 9/11, Silverstein re-doubled his winnings after 9/11 by claiming double indemnity. According to Silverstein’s spokesman, “the two hijacked airliners that struck the 110-story twin towers Sept. 11 were separate ‘occurrences’ for insurance purposes, entitling him to collect twice on $3.6 billion of policies.” The bizarre double-indemnity claim was approved in 2004.
Additionally, the insurers have failed to mention that on the morning of 9/11, Silverstein and his daughter both failed to show up for their daily breakfast at Windows on the World restaurant atop the North Tower. Both offered flimsy pretexts — Silverstein claiming that he had suddenly remembered a dermatologist’s appointment.
It seems Lucky Larry had a fortuitous appointment with a dermatologist that morning. Both his son and daughter Lisa, moreover, were due in the building at the time when the “terrorist” attack took place. Fortunately, both were delayed in separate traffic jams. (LD)
How has Silverstein managed to get away with murder, in the most obvious case of insurance fraud ever?

Thanks to his partner in crime, Judge Alvin Hellerstein.

Hellerstein’s courtroom is Ground Zero in the cover-up of the crimes of 9/11. Virtually all 9/11 litigation has been funneled through his courtroom, including Ellen Mariani’s recent lawsuit against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and others.
Like Silverstein and Eisenberg, Hellerstein is a rabid Zionist with close ties to Israel. The judge’s son and sister both emigrated from the US to orthodox Zionist settlements in the Occupied Territories.
Investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn writes:
Hellerstein’s son is an Israeli lawyer who emigrated to Israel in 2001 and whose law firm works for and with the Rothschild-funded Mossad company responsible for the 9-11 terror attacks.
Bollyn notes that Hellerstein’s son, an Israeli lawyer, represents
the Mossad-controlled airport security firm named International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) N.V., which is the owner of Huntleigh U.S.A., the passenger screening company that checked the passengers that boarded the aircraft at the key airports on 9-11.
Additionally, Bollyn writes:
Both Alvin Hellerstein and his son Joseph worked for the well-known Jewish law firm of Stroock, Stroock & Lavan before moving to the positions they now hold…Stroock, Stroock & Lavan played a key role in the setting up of 9-11…Stroock has a long history of representing the Rothschilds and other high-level Zionists.
Will New York City 9/11 skeptics protest the Silverstein-Hellerstein trial this Monday through Wednesday?
Will truth and justice ever triumph . . .
Hellerstein_close_up_in_hat. . . with this man as judge?
In order to triumph, truth and justice will have to defeat the world’s wealthiest and most powerful criminal network.
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror. Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He is the co-founder of the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance, and author of the books Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle Against the 9/11 Big Lie (2007) and Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters (2009). His website is More articles by Dr. Kevin Barrett

No comments:

Post a Comment