God, Christianity, and Islam have been vilified non stop, but WE are still around more than one thousand years later!
Adolf Hitler has been vilified by the warmongers for the past 80 years or so, his memory will live on forever as long as truth will have some say in the affairs of humankind! (20.2.2017)
Adolf Hitler The greatest story Never told Full 6 hours Documentary
World War 1: What Happened?
A reformed and converted Jew, Benjamin Freedman speaks out. Did
you know that Germany won the First World War? They did, that is until
England made a deal with the devil: the Zionists, for the creation of
Israel in Palestine. It was called the Balfour Declaration.
WORLD WAR II, The Jewsish Question, and Palestine
In 1939, as the new war against Germany was declared, the BRIZIS reneged on the “Balfour Declaration” by issuing the White Paper, which stated that “creating a Jewish state was no longer a British policy”. It was also the BRIZIS change in policy toward Palestine (which was under BRIZI control), especially the White Paper, that prevented many Jews from leaving Europe as the Zionists wanted, and whom Hitler was trying to accommodate with the “Transfer Agreement” of 1933 (as no one else wanted them either!).
As a result, Hitler was stuck with them, and these non-elite Jews were stuck and left in the camps, where a good many died, NOT from any “extermination” policy of the Germans, but rather, a policy of the ELITE JEWZIS, BRIZIS and the YANKIZ!
The RUSKIZ at least created an autonomous Jewish homeland for them in Eastern Russia called Birobidjan, in an area bigger than Switzerland.. BUT, the ELITE INTERNATIONAL JEWZI ZIONISTS refused it!
Meanwhile, the French scuttled the Madagascar plan. Thus, though emigration continued unofficially for some time during the war years, many the peon Jews were left to suffer the effects of CHURCHILL’S barbaric bombardment of Germany, in conjunction with the YANKIZ, and later the RUSKIZ, which eventually cut all supplies, causing starvation for Germans and Jews alike, not to mention rampant disease which broke in the camps toward the end of the war, which killed very many.
Why did the BRIZIS reneg? Who was trying to capitalize on the plight of these Jews? Hmmm? Who benefited? Hitler? Really? Ummm, I think not! He wanted them out, remember? That was the “final solution:”. NOT EXTERMINATION!
And this “holocaust” myth is still used today to blackmail and extort Germany, and to guilt everyone else into going along with whatever the Israelis do, and they have certainly hoodwinked the majority of American Christians too, who adore Israel and heap tons of money there, as does the US government.
In this discussion it is essential to look into the so-called Transfer Agreement, how it came about, what inspired it, and who was behind it, as well as, Jewish Nationalism. Mark Weber covers these topics brilliantly in the following three articles:
1. Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild
2. Straight Talk About Zionism: What Jewish Nationalism Means
Audio:
3. Zionism and the Third Reich
WORLD WAR II, The Jewsish Question, and Palestine
In 1939, as the new war against Germany was declared, the BRIZIS reneged on the “Balfour Declaration” by issuing the White Paper, which stated that “creating a Jewish state was no longer a British policy”. It was also the BRIZIS change in policy toward Palestine (which was under BRIZI control), especially the White Paper, that prevented many Jews from leaving Europe as the Zionists wanted, and whom Hitler was trying to accommodate with the “Transfer Agreement” of 1933 (as no one else wanted them either!).
As a result, Hitler was stuck with them, and these non-elite Jews were stuck and left in the camps, where a good many died, NOT from any “extermination” policy of the Germans, but rather, a policy of the ELITE JEWZIS, BRIZIS and the YANKIZ!
The RUSKIZ at least created an autonomous Jewish homeland for them in Eastern Russia called Birobidjan, in an area bigger than Switzerland.. BUT, the ELITE INTERNATIONAL JEWZI ZIONISTS refused it!
Meanwhile, the French scuttled the Madagascar plan. Thus, though emigration continued unofficially for some time during the war years, many the peon Jews were left to suffer the effects of CHURCHILL’S barbaric bombardment of Germany, in conjunction with the YANKIZ, and later the RUSKIZ, which eventually cut all supplies, causing starvation for Germans and Jews alike, not to mention rampant disease which broke in the camps toward the end of the war, which killed very many.
Why did the BRIZIS reneg? Who was trying to capitalize on the plight of these Jews? Hmmm? Who benefited? Hitler? Really? Ummm, I think not! He wanted them out, remember? That was the “final solution:”. NOT EXTERMINATION!
The “Final Solution” spoken of in the German documents was a program of evacuation, resettlement and deportation of Jews with the ultimate objective of expulsion from Europe. During the war Jews of various nationalities were being moved east, as one stage in this Final Solution. The legend claims that the motion was mainly for extermination purposes. ~ Arthur R. Butz – A Brief Introduction to Holocaust RevisionismWell the deaths of many of these Jews, the real-time war propaganda campaign, and the stories of those who did survive what became the “death camps” (by virtue of the BRIZIS, ELITE JEWZIS, and the RUSKIZ) resulted in a major post-war propaganda coup, and really ensured world support later for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine didn’t it?
And this “holocaust” myth is still used today to blackmail and extort Germany, and to guilt everyone else into going along with whatever the Israelis do, and they have certainly hoodwinked the majority of American Christians too, who adore Israel and heap tons of money there, as does the US government.
In this discussion it is essential to look into the so-called Transfer Agreement, how it came about, what inspired it, and who was behind it, as well as, Jewish Nationalism. Mark Weber covers these topics brilliantly in the following three articles:
1. Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild
2. Straight Talk About Zionism: What Jewish Nationalism Means
Audio:
3. Zionism and the Third Reich
Like this:
You like this. Follow this Blog?
This entry was posted in Balfour Declaration, Israel, Palestine, Uncategorized, Word War I, Zionism and tagged Balfour Declaration, Bejamin Freedman, England, Germany, Palestine, UK, World War I, WWI, Zionism. Bookmark the permalink.
My responses to a draft article, to which my comments were sought regarding Hitler and WWII...
by JusticeFor Germans on Thursday, 8 November 2012 at 09:29 ·
JUSTICE FOR GERMANS: This is an extract from a draft I received today from BAFS. I would like your comments, please. Thanks.
OK, here is that text with my responses:
TRUE! I would just add the caveat 'Jewish iniated and controlled war', and fighting for the very survival of the German people, politcally, economically, socially, spiritually and culturally.
FALSE! Hitler did not ally himself with the Zionists, he negotiated with them to help solve a long-term problem for Germany, and whereas, there was no other countries who wished to take large numbers of Jews, and no other organization in place with whom they could negotiate. This was also at a time when World Jewry had declared war on Germany (1933) and was boycotting Germany and attempting to strangle her economically, in the hope that the Hitler's government would then collapse., and they could then go back to "business as usual" in bleeding the Germans to a slow and painful death.
Please See:
The Transfer Agreement and the Boycott Fever of 1933 - Udo Walendy
http://archive.org/details/TheTransferAgreementAndTheBoycottFeverOf1933-UdoWalendy
FALSE! Firstly, Hitler never wanted war ... period! The economic miracle of the Third Reich did not come through re-armamnet as many assume. Hitler wanted peace and offered peace consistantly. The allies of WWI were, however, always seeking to encircle Germany, They had never dis-armed as they had promised and were obliged to under Versailles. They could not wait to resume the war and to crush Germany for good (which they failed to do in WWI). Germany did not begin to earnestly re-arm until about 1937, when it was very clear that the WWI allies still had no intention of disarming. It would have been stupid to not to do so. Even when Hitler was finally forced to declare war on Poland, the Germans were a far inferior force in terms of weapons and mechanization, and trained, battle ready soldiers. They had about 650,000 horses for their cavalry and with which to carry their heavy guns, munitions and supplies. It was Germany's battle stratheies and tactics that enabled them to quickly defeat Poland. Only in 1939 did Germany begin to fully re-arm. Hitler, however, had made a deal with Stalin for mutual non-agression as a deternent to the Brits and France. It was a deal with the devil. Stalin was a liar and double-crosser who all the while was building up his forces massively, with assistance from Roosevelt, and had a plan to attack Gemrany from the rear and to roll across Europe, once Germany was at war in the west. Germany's miltary intelligence, however, got wise to the plan and the heavy build of offensive tanks and planes, as well as, air-fields along the eastern Polish frontier. Hitler again had no choice but to attack the Soviets, even though they too were a superior force. Again, it was the element of surprise and extraordinary planning and tactics that quickly defeated Stalin and chased his remaining troops back to Moscow. It was necessary for survival. Germany was a victim of her own success, as they now had 2 million Russian soldiers in captivity. to look after. It was never an "over-estimation" of might nor a plan or goal of Hitler's to wage this war. Hitler cannot at all be compared with Napoleon. Hitler dd not want war nor to rule the world.
Please see my documentary "Hitler's War? - What the Historians Neglect to Mention" ... this can be found on my blog.
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2012/10/16/documentary-hitlers-war-what-the-historians-neglect-to-mention/
The New Germany desires Work and Peace : Adolf Hitler; Joseph Goebbels
http://archive.org/details/TheNewGermanyDesiresWorkAndPeace
See also: What the World Rejected: Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1939
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html
TRUE in my estimation.
FALSE: Hitler was NOT a Jew. That is malicious Jewish inspired propaganda which has been thoroughly debunked! See my blog post on this topic.
FALSE Germany was the ONLY country blamed and punished for WWII even though, as stated already, Germany wanted peace all along, and Hitler was NOT a Jew, but a brave, heroic German patriot and freedom fighter. WWII was a racket and Hitler was the alleged aggressive evil doer. They created the false bogeyman image of Hitler to justify their criminal actions, and have followed the same pattern ever since in wars around the world ever since, and especially in the Middle-East. This is why they always demonize Arab/Muslim leaders as "the next Hitler" or as "Islamo-Fascists". Totally absurd and JEWZI inspired.
See: Hitler was a Jew? A Rothschild?? Really ???
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2012/10/13/hitler-was-a-jew-a-rothschild-really/
I generally concur, except that after WWII Germany was occupied, raped and plundered, and her governement destroyd and usurped without treaty or "armistace" and remains occupied to this day, under a pretense of "democracy". After this, the largley fake cold war commenced. The Soviets never changed, only the attitude of America towards the USSR. Though it may have been real even to most of the players, I think it was all a charade, by the International Bankster Gangsters to keep both sides in fear, while they made lots of money, and then later, disposed of the USSR and either created or usurped the democracy movement there. The oligarchs won. Only Putin has revered much of that.
FALSE: Again, Germany was an occupied nation and still is. There was no reconciliation, only "De-Nazification", mass murder, ethnic-cleansing, slavery, theft and cultural genocide.. Berlin was the former capital and was basically an island in the midst of Soviet East Germany, and was divided down the middle between East and West Berlin, with Soviets wanting all of it, and it stop it from being used as an escape route to the West. At least so we are told. And they began a blockade to starve West Berlin. Kennedy went there to stand up for the people of Berlin and ensured that there was a constant flow of food and other essentials being flown into Berlin to keep them fed and secure. One might think this was a stunt, however, this was not JFK's first trip to Berlin. After the war ended, he was a jornalist and he went and toured Germany, and saw the devastion and horrors, and attrocities of the Red Army, including in Berlin. He wrote that ""After visiting these places, you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. ..."He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.". I think he was deeply and personally motivated to help the Germans when he visited Berlin on June 26, 1963. Five months later, on November 22, 1963, he was murdered.
See: John F. Kennedy's 1945 Visit to Germany
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n3p30_Kennedy.html
TRUE ... BUT missing the fact that JFK was agaisnt Israeli development of a Nuclear Ractor at Dimona. He also began, as Hitler did, to print money and issue coins that were not under control of the JEWZI owned Federal Reserve Bank. He also planned to destroy thr CIA. And there were many other reasons too. He was becoming a threat to them.
As to the rest, I don't have any real disagreement.
Thanks for asking and I wish you and your friends sucess with yoru article!
OK, here is that text with my responses:
"Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union and the United States of America waged a ruthless and merciless Jewish war against Germany led by Adol(f) Hitler and who was trying to work for the upliftment of his people.
TRUE! I would just add the caveat 'Jewish iniated and controlled war', and fighting for the very survival of the German people, politcally, economically, socially, spiritually and culturally.
"Unfortunately Hitler allied with the wrong people, the Zionists and signed Pacts with the Vatican and the Bolsheviks. "
FALSE! Hitler did not ally himself with the Zionists, he negotiated with them to help solve a long-term problem for Germany, and whereas, there was no other countries who wished to take large numbers of Jews, and no other organization in place with whom they could negotiate. This was also at a time when World Jewry had declared war on Germany (1933) and was boycotting Germany and attempting to strangle her economically, in the hope that the Hitler's government would then collapse., and they could then go back to "business as usual" in bleeding the Germans to a slow and painful death.
Please See:
The Transfer Agreement and the Boycott Fever of 1933 - Udo Walendy
http://archive.org/details/TheTransferAgreementAndTheBoycottFeverOf1933-UdoWalendy
"Overestimating its military strength, Germany weakened its forces by invading Russia which saw the defeat and destruction of the strong invading French armies under Napoleon. "
FALSE! Firstly, Hitler never wanted war ... period! The economic miracle of the Third Reich did not come through re-armamnet as many assume. Hitler wanted peace and offered peace consistantly. The allies of WWI were, however, always seeking to encircle Germany, They had never dis-armed as they had promised and were obliged to under Versailles. They could not wait to resume the war and to crush Germany for good (which they failed to do in WWI). Germany did not begin to earnestly re-arm until about 1937, when it was very clear that the WWI allies still had no intention of disarming. It would have been stupid to not to do so. Even when Hitler was finally forced to declare war on Poland, the Germans were a far inferior force in terms of weapons and mechanization, and trained, battle ready soldiers. They had about 650,000 horses for their cavalry and with which to carry their heavy guns, munitions and supplies. It was Germany's battle stratheies and tactics that enabled them to quickly defeat Poland. Only in 1939 did Germany begin to fully re-arm. Hitler, however, had made a deal with Stalin for mutual non-agression as a deternent to the Brits and France. It was a deal with the devil. Stalin was a liar and double-crosser who all the while was building up his forces massively, with assistance from Roosevelt, and had a plan to attack Gemrany from the rear and to roll across Europe, once Germany was at war in the west. Germany's miltary intelligence, however, got wise to the plan and the heavy build of offensive tanks and planes, as well as, air-fields along the eastern Polish frontier. Hitler again had no choice but to attack the Soviets, even though they too were a superior force. Again, it was the element of surprise and extraordinary planning and tactics that quickly defeated Stalin and chased his remaining troops back to Moscow. It was necessary for survival. Germany was a victim of her own success, as they now had 2 million Russian soldiers in captivity. to look after. It was never an "over-estimation" of might nor a plan or goal of Hitler's to wage this war. Hitler cannot at all be compared with Napoleon. Hitler dd not want war nor to rule the world.
Please see my documentary "Hitler's War? - What the Historians Neglect to Mention" ... this can be found on my blog.
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2012/10/16/documentary-hitlers-war-what-the-historians-neglect-to-mention/
The New Germany desires Work and Peace : Adolf Hitler; Joseph Goebbels
http://archive.org/details/TheNewGermanyDesiresWorkAndPeace
See also: What the World Rejected: Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1939
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html
"We never seem to learn from history. Muslims learned nothing from the Jewish treachery of old, from the Crusades, from Western imperialism and colonialism."
TRUE in my estimation.
"WWII was Jewish because at least four of the warring nations’ leaders are said to have had Jewish blood: Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin and Hitler. "
FALSE: Hitler was NOT a Jew. That is malicious Jewish inspired propaganda which has been thoroughly debunked! See my blog post on this topic.
"The victims of WWII are not the victims of “Nazism”, but those of the Axis of Evil and the all powerful Jewish bank gangsters. Yet, it was Germany alone that was mainly punished for crimes committed during WWII, against the Jews mainly as the warmongers were Jewish and the victors were Jewish. WWII became the greatest racket of the century and a pretext for more wars of a « just » and « pre-emptive » kind. "
FALSE Germany was the ONLY country blamed and punished for WWII even though, as stated already, Germany wanted peace all along, and Hitler was NOT a Jew, but a brave, heroic German patriot and freedom fighter. WWII was a racket and Hitler was the alleged aggressive evil doer. They created the false bogeyman image of Hitler to justify their criminal actions, and have followed the same pattern ever since in wars around the world ever since, and especially in the Middle-East. This is why they always demonize Arab/Muslim leaders as "the next Hitler" or as "Islamo-Fascists". Totally absurd and JEWZI inspired.
See: Hitler was a Jew? A Rothschild?? Really ???
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2012/10/13/hitler-was-a-jew-a-rothschild-really/
"Germany was destroyed by Jewish power and occupied by the victorious warmongers. Now, completely on its knees, like at Versailles, Germany was forced to sign Agreements (regarding reparations to the Jews) not with any country that existed during the war, but with an abominable entity that was created on stolen Palestinian land under the British illegal Mandate and which officialised by the West and the United Nations in 1948 – the Apartheid Jewish Entity of Israel, the Swistzerland of the Middle East which became the new dumping ground of western capitalism and of all the criminal networks of the planet with no fear ever of prosecution as Israel is the only country in the worls above all laws and answerable to no one for all its crimes and threats of war against defenceless and innocent nations, and the extermination of millions of people, the total destruction of infrastructures, of all civilisation heritage, the plunder of resources and the enslavement of the conquered nations."
I generally concur, except that after WWII Germany was occupied, raped and plundered, and her governement destroyd and usurped without treaty or "armistace" and remains occupied to this day, under a pretense of "democracy". After this, the largley fake cold war commenced. The Soviets never changed, only the attitude of America towards the USSR. Though it may have been real even to most of the players, I think it was all a charade, by the International Bankster Gangsters to keep both sides in fear, while they made lots of money, and then later, disposed of the USSR and either created or usurped the democracy movement there. The oligarchs won. Only Putin has revered much of that.
"After the Jews and Apartheid Israel had been paid fabulous sums of money as compensation just on demand without any official accounts being made, a unique phenomenon in history, John Fitzgerald Kennedy came to Berlin and showed that the victors had reconciled with the Germans: Ich ein Berline(r)."
FALSE: Again, Germany was an occupied nation and still is. There was no reconciliation, only "De-Nazification", mass murder, ethnic-cleansing, slavery, theft and cultural genocide.. Berlin was the former capital and was basically an island in the midst of Soviet East Germany, and was divided down the middle between East and West Berlin, with Soviets wanting all of it, and it stop it from being used as an escape route to the West. At least so we are told. And they began a blockade to starve West Berlin. Kennedy went there to stand up for the people of Berlin and ensured that there was a constant flow of food and other essentials being flown into Berlin to keep them fed and secure. One might think this was a stunt, however, this was not JFK's first trip to Berlin. After the war ended, he was a jornalist and he went and toured Germany, and saw the devastion and horrors, and attrocities of the Red Army, including in Berlin. He wrote that ""After visiting these places, you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. ..."He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.". I think he was deeply and personally motivated to help the Germans when he visited Berlin on June 26, 1963. Five months later, on November 22, 1963, he was murdered.
See: John F. Kennedy's 1945 Visit to Germany
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n3p30_Kennedy.html
"But, the Jews were still not satisfied with the tons of gold and wealth they had already fraudulently acquired after their war, had JFK assassinated. "
TRUE ... BUT missing the fact that JFK was agaisnt Israeli development of a Nuclear Ractor at Dimona. He also began, as Hitler did, to print money and issue coins that were not under control of the JEWZI owned Federal Reserve Bank. He also planned to destroy thr CIA. And there were many other reasons too. He was becoming a threat to them.
As to the rest, I don't have any real disagreement.
Thanks for asking and I wish you and your friends sucess with yoru article!
- Carolyn Hamlett likes this.
- Ghyslaine Roc Many thanks. It is the very first time that anybody has made any intelligent remark (contribution) to any of my posts. I wholeheartedly agree with what you have written and will wait for the response of my friend BAFS. He agrees with Pr Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce and many others like Vincent Reynouard (who is now facing another jail sentence or fine for questioning the official (Jewish) version of WWII history) and Michael Hoffman that Hitler was a great man who was dedicated to uplift his nation free from foreign influence and that many lies have been told about him and his achievements. Ghyslaine Roc
- JusticeFor Germans WWI and The Balfour Declaration is also essential to include in this discussion about the Genesis of IsraHell. Also, Churchil's Zionism.
- JusticeFor Germans See ... http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2012/10/12/world-war-1-what-happened/
justice4germans.wordpress.com
A reformed and converted Jew, Benjamin Freedman speaks out. Did you know that Ge
rmany won the First World War? They did, that is until England made a deal with the devil: the Zionists, for the crea... - JusticeFor Germans http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/sir-winston-churchill-zionist-hero-8277918.html
www.independent.co.uk
Jewish supporters of Winston Churchill are to unveil a bust of the British warti
me leader in Jerusalem this weekend in what they say is a long-overdue recognition of his staunch and unwavering support of the Jewish cause and their desire for a homeland. - Head Krusher Churchill a.k.a. Jacobson, a crypto-Jew !!!49 minutes ago · Unlike · 1
Exploring the little known, but true history of National Socialism, Hitler and WWII, what was really behind it, and seeking truth, justice and honour for the German peopleA Crime Against Humanity – The Allied Starvation of Millions of Germans
Did the Allies Starve Millions of Germans? by James Bacque
This article first appeared in the Toronto Globe & Mail, 20 September 1997.
As soon as the Second World War ended in 1945, Canada and the United States began shipping food to the hundreds of millions of people who were facing starvation as a result of the war. Unprecedented in world history, this massive program fulfilled the highest ideals for which the Western Allies had fought. Their generosity seemed to have no limit. They fed former enemies — Italy and Japan — as well as a new enemy, the Soviet Union.
Only Germany was left out.
It is well-known in the West that the Allies hanged Nazis for crimes — the murder of Jews, the brutal mass expulsions, the deadly forced-labour camps, the starvation of entire nations. What is not generally known is that these occupying Allied armies carved off 25 per cent of Germany’s most fertile land and placed it under Russian and Polish control, forcibly expelling about 16 millions people into what remained. It has also been forgotten — or hidden — that the Allies forbade emigration and kept millions of prisoners in forced-labour camps. International charitable aid to Germany was banned for another year, then restricted for more than a year. When it was permitted, it came too late for millions of people.
In a plan devised by U.S. secretary of the treasury Henry C. Morgenthau Jr., the Allies “pastoralized” Germany. They slashed production of oil, tractors, steel and other products that had been essential to the war effort. They cut fertilizer production by 82 per cent. They undervalued German exports (which they controlled), depriving Germans of cash needed to buy food. And a large percentage of young male workers were kept in forced-labour camps for years. During the six months following the end of the war, Germany’s industrial production fell by 75 per cent.
The loss of so much fertile land and the drop in fertilizer supplies caused agricultural production to fall by 65 per cent. Sixty million people began to starve in their huge prison.
The mass explusions from one part of Germany to another, approved at the Allied victory conference in Potsdam in July and August, 1945, were enforced “with the very maximum of brutality,” wrote British writer and philantropist Victor Gollancz in his book, Our Threatened Values (1946). Canadian writer and TV producer Robert Allen, in an article titled “Letter From Berlin”, in Reading magazine (February, 1946), described the scene in a Berlin railway station as refugees arrived in late 1945: “They were all exhausted and starved and miserable…. A child only half alive… A woman in the most terrible picture of despair I’ve seen… Even when you see it, it’s impossible to believe….God, it was terrible.”
In the West, the plan to dismantle German industrial capacity began at the British headquarters of General Dwight Eisenhower in August, 1944. Meeting with Mr. Morgenthau, Gen. Eisenhower prescribed a treatment for Germany that would be “good and hard,” giving as his reason that “the whole German population is a synthetic paranoid.”
Mr. Morgenthau took a written version of their discussion to U.S. president Franklin Roosevelt and British prime minister Winston Churchill when the two met in Quebec City in September, 1944. British foreign secretary Anthony Eden, U.S. secretary of Cordell Hull and the U.S. secretary for war Henry L. Stimson all protested vigorously against the Morgenthau Plan because a pastoralized Germany could not feed itself. Mr. Hull and Mr. Stimson told Roosevelt that about 20 million Germans would die if the plan were implemented.
Most historians say the Morgenthau Plan was abandoned after the protests, but Mr. Morgenthau himself said it was implemented.
In the New York Post for Nov. 24, 1947, he wrote, “The Morgenthau Plan for Germany [...] became part of the Potsdam Agreement, a solemn declaration of policy and undertaking for action… signed by the United States of America, Great Britain and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.”
I first happened on the outlines of this story while researching my 1989 book Other Losses, about the mass deaths of German prisoners of war in Allied camps. For 45 years, historians have never disputed a massive survey conducted over four years by the government of chancellor Konrad Adenauer, which stated that some 1.4 million German prisoners had died in captivity. What is still disputed by the two sides is how many died in each side’s camps. Each has blamed the other for nearly all the deaths.
The fall of the Soviet empire in 1989 provided a spectacular test of the truth: If the KGB archives recorded how many Germans died in Soviet camps, the world would know how many died in the West.
In 1992, I went to the KGB archives in Moscow, where I was permitted to troll the long, gloomy aisles, free to read and photocopy anything I wanted. And there I found the reports from KGB Colonel I. Bulanov and others showing that 450,600 Germans had died in Soviet camps. Given the figure of 1.4 million deaths, this meant that close to one million had died in Western camps.
In addition, the KGB records show that the Soviets had also imprisoned hundreds of thousands of civilians, of whom many thousands died.
This was the shadow of a greater tragedy, the fate of German civilians.
The recent declassification of the Robert Murphy Papers at the Hoover Institute in Stanford, California, and the Robert Patterson manuscript papers in Washington focused the picture. Mr. Murphy had been chief U.S. diplomatic adviser in Germany, and Mr. Patterson the secretary for war after 1945.
TITLE:[Five starving men in German concentration camp at time of liberation by U.S. Army]Some of Mr. Murphy’s papers show a catastrophic death rate in Germany, highlighted by a surprising comment by Mr. Murphy in discussing German demographics. He said in a State Department position paper in 1947 that the U.S. statistical projection of births, immigration and officially reported deaths showed that over the next three years the German population should be 71 million, but that “to be conservative and in view of the present high death rate in Germany, a figure of 69 million will be used.” In other words, Mr. Murphy was basing high-level U.S. policy on the knowledge that the actual German death rate was approximately double the rate officially reported to Washington by the U.S. military governor.
In the National Archives in Ottawa, I found a document seized by Canadians in 1946, showing a death rate in the city of Brilon in north-central Germany almost triple the total reported by the Allies for their zones of Germany in 1945-46. The U.S. Army medical officer in Germany secretly reported that the actual death rate in the U.S. zone in May, 1946, was 21.4 per 1,000 per year, or 83 per cent higher than the military governor was reporting to Washington.
These documents in Ottawa, Moscow, Washington and Stanford, recently revealed or long neglected, show that the Allies not only destroyed most major German industry, they also reduced German food production to the point that Germans received less food for long periods during several years than the starving Dutch had received under German occupation.
Starving German Civilians Scavenge for Food – Frankfurt – November 5, 1947
“From 1945 to the middle of 1948, one saw the probable collapse, disintegration and destruction of a whole nation,” These are not the words of a revisionist historian of the 1990s, but the sober judgment of a U.S. Navy medical officer on the scene. Captain Albert Behnke compared German and Dutch starvation: For months in parts of Germany, the ration set by the occupying Allies was 400 calories per day; in much of Germany it was often around 1,000, and officially for more than two years it was never more than 1,550. The Dutch always got more than 1,394.
And for his part in starving people in the Netherlands, Nazi commander Arthur Seyss-Inquart was hanged by the Allies.
A comparison of the German censuses of 1946 and 1950 show the effect of the food shortages. The 1950 census showed 5.7 million people fewer than there should have been according to the number of people recorded in the 1946 census, minus officially reported deaths, plus births and “immigrants” (people expelled from the east and returning prisoners) in the period from 1946 to 1950.
Mr. Murphy had, indeed, been conservative, partly because he underestimated the number of prisoners due to return to Germany from Russia. The total tally of unacknowledged deaths among the prisoners, refugees and non-expelled civilians comes to around nine million people between 1945 and 1950, far more than the number who died during the war itself. All of these deaths were surplus to those actually reported.
While Germans starved, the Canadian-U.S. relief program swung into action in other parts of the world. Former U.S. president Herbert Hoover, then chief food adviser to president Harry Truman, flew around the world assessing need and supply. He found big regions of food poverty, as there has always been and still are, but not insurmountable world food shortage. In fact, world food production in 1945, according to the U.S. government statistics, was 90 per cent of the average of the years from 1936 to 1938. By the end of 1946, it was virtually normal.
Mr. Hoover begged, borrowed and bought enough food from the few other surplus countries — Australia and Argentina — to feed nearly all the world’s starving. He congratulated Canadians warmly for their co-operation in a CBC speech in Ottawa in 1946: “To Canada flows the gratitude of hundreds of millions of human beings who have been saved from starvation through the efforts of this great Commonwealth.”
As Mr. Hoover pronounced victory over the greatest famine threat in world history, Germans were entering their worst year ever. In early 1946, reports of conditions in Germany led U.S. senators, among them Kenneth Wherry and William Langer, to protest against “this addlepated… brutal and vicious Morgenthau Plan.”
Belatedly, Mr. Truman asked Mr. Hoover to intervene. Mr. Hoover spoke to all North Americans: “Millions of mothers are today watching their children wilt before their eyes.” Infant mortality rates in some German cities were 20 per cent per year, catastrophically higher than the average in Germany before the war or in contemporary Europe.
Cases of tuberculosis among children in Kiel, in the British zone, increased by 70 per cent over the prewar period.
Mr. Hoover called for mercy to Germany.
“I can only appeal to your pity and your mercy…Will you not take to your table an invisible guest?”
Canadians and Americans set the table for the invisible guest.
According to prime minister Mackenzie King’s chief foreign-affairs adviser, Norman Robertson, Canada was the only country that had kept its food commitments to help the starving. Only in Canada did rationing and price controls continue long after the war so that others could be fed.
This unique campaign saved 800 million lives, according to Mr. Hoover.
Some older Germans treasure the memory of the “Hoover Speise” (meal) that warmed their bodies at school in 1947. Many millions — including hundreds of thousands of Canadians born in Germany — also remember their homes in parts of Germany now under Polish or Russian rule. None dreams of reparations; all yearn for us to know their story.
[End]
FURTHER READING:
The Great Humanitarian Herbert Hoover’s Food Relief Efforts
The following books are in stock at Justice for Germans Books and DVD Store
Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after World War ll
By James Bacque
CDN$ 15.64
Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950
By James Bacque
CDN$ 15.64
Like this:
You and one other blogger like this. Follow this Blog?This entry was posted in genocide, Germany, holocaust, Policies, War Crimes, World War II and tagged atrocities, genocide, Germans, Germany, history, mass murder, Nazis, policy, war crimes, World War II, WWII. Bookmark the permalink.
A Memorial for the Millions of German Women and Girls Who Were Raped and Pillaged by the WWII Allied “liberators”
Dr. Austin J. App (professor and specialist in English literature at the Catholic University Skrentonskom Lasallskom University and College, which, among others, risked his career and livelihood, brought out the truth. When, in April 1946, he published his work, which is based on the article, “The Rape of Women conquered Europe “(Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe), he was a lone voice calling for justice in America.Dr. Austin J. App’s “Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe”
Article by Kevin Alfred Strom
One of this century’s greatest crimes, and probably one of the greatest crimes against women in history, was the mass rape of the conquered women of Europe after the Judeo-Communist victory there in 1945. The rapists were mainly Red Army soldiers, some of them non-White troops from the Far East and Central Asian Republics of the Soviet Union. But I am sorry to say that many of the rapists were men of our own race, and some were Americans. They were brutes no doubt, but they were permitted and encouraged to indulge their lower than bestial urges by official “Allied” policies which incited hatred particularly against the Germans, but also against those of other European nationalities which were then allied with Germany in an anti-Communist bloc. One cannot contemplate this great mass orgy of rape, gang rape, and sexual slavery of innocent women and little girls without revulsion. It would be easy for you to toss this newsletter aside and pickup more pleasant or amusing reading. But if you want to know the truth about one of the darkest secrets of our present establishment, a horrible crime against women about which the Politically Correct feminists are strangely silent, then I urge you to read on.
I claim no originality for the documentation or recounting of this ghastly crime perpetrated mainly by what Franklin Roosevelt called “our noble Soviet ally.” We are indebted to Dr. Austin J. App, a professor and scholar of English literature at Catholic University, the University of Scranton, and LaSalle College, among others, who risked career and livelihood to bring these truths to light. In April, 1946, when he published the work upon which this article is based, entitled Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe, he was a lone voice crying out for justice in an America still high on war propaganda and on a “victory” that in the later Cold War years and after would be seen clearly as a defeat for America and the West as much as it was for Germany.
As the Red Army advanced toward her in 1945, the city of Berlin had become a city virtually without men. Out of a civilian population of 2,700,000, 2,000,000 were women. It is small wonder that the fear of sexual attack raced through the city like a plague. Doctors were besieged by patients seeking information on the quickest way to commit suicide, and poison was in great demand.
In Berlin stood a charity institution, the Haus Dehlem, an orphanage, maternity hospital, and foundling home. Soviet soldiers entered the home, and repeatedly raped pregnant women and women who had just given birth. This was not an isolated incident. No one will ever know how many women were raped, but doctors’ estimates run as high as 100,000 for the city of Berlin alone, their ages ranging from 10 to 70.
On March 24, 1945, our “noble Soviet allies” entered Danzig. A 50-year-old Danzig teacher reported that her niece, 15, was raped seven times, and her other niece, 22, was raped fifteen times. A Soviet officer told a group of women to seek safety in the Cathedral. Once they were securely locked inside, the beasts of Bolshevism entered, and ringing the bells and playing the organ, “celebrated” a foul orgy through the night, raping all the women, some more than thirty times. A Catholic pastor in Danzig declared, “They violated even eight-year-old girls and shot boys who tried to shield their mothers.”
VIDEO: “The Lost Girl” - BERLIN 1945
The Most Reverend Bernard Griffin, British Archbishop, made a tour of Europe to study conditions there, and reported,
“In Vienna alone they raped 100,000 women, not once but many times, including girls not yet in their teens, and aged women.”
A Lutheran pastor in Germany, in a letter of August 7, 1945, to the Bishop of Chichester, England, describes how a fellow pastor’s “two daughters and a grandchild (ten years of age) suffer from gonorrhea, [as a] result of rape” and how “Mrs. N. was killed when she resisted an attempt to rape her,” while her daughter was “raped and deported, allegedly to Omsk, Siberia, for indoctrination.”
The day after our noble Soviet allies conquered Neisse, Silesia, 182 Catholic nuns were raped. In the diocese of Kattowitz 66 pregnant nuns were counted. In one convent when the Mother Superior and her assistant tried to protect the younger nuns with outstretched arms, they were shot down.
A priest reported in Nord Amerika magazine for November 1, 1945, that he knew
“several villages where all the women, even the aged and girls as young as twelve, were violated daily for weeks by the Russians.”
VIDEO: Raped by Red Army soldiers, they talk for the first time (France 24)
Sylvester Michelfelder, a Lutheran pastor, wrote in the Christian Century:
“Bands of irresponsible bandits in Russian or American uniforms pillage and rob the trains. Women and girls are violated in sight of everyone. They are stripped of their clothes.”
On April 27, 1946 Vatican Radio charged that in the Russian occupation zone of Eastern Germany cries of help are going up “from girls and women who are being brutally raped and whose bodily and spiritual health is completely shaken.”
VIDEO: German women raped during WWII by the Soviets
The rapists did not all wear a red star.
John Dos Passos, writing in Life magazine for January 7, 1946, quotes a “red-faced major” as saying that “Lust, liquor and loot are the soldier’s pay.” A serviceman wrote to Time magazine for November 12, 1945
“Many a sane American family would recoil in horror if they knew how ‘Our Boys’ conduct themselves, with such complete callousness in human relationships over here.”
An army sergeant wrote
“Our own Army and the British Army … have done their share of looting and raping … This offensive attitude among our troops is not at all general, but the percentage is large enough to have given our Army a pretty black name, and we too are considered an army of rapists.”
An Italian survivor of American bombing states that Black American troops, stationed in Naples, were allowed by their superiors free access to poor, hungry, and humiliated Italian women. The result of this interracial rape and sexual slavery was the production of a generation of pitiable mixed-race children, a legacy of the brutal conqueror.
According to an AP dispatch of September 12, 1945, entitled “German- American Marriages Forbidden”, the Franklin Roosevelt government instructed its soldiers that marriage with the inferior Germans was absolutely forbidden, but those having illegitimate children by German women, whose husbands and boyfriends were conveniently dead or held as prisoners or slave laborers, could count on allowance money. And, according to Time magazine of September 17, 1945, the government provided these soldiers with an estimated 50 million condoms per month, and graphically instructed them as to their use. For all practical purposes, our soldiers were being told: “Teach these Germans a lesson — and have a wonderful time!” Such were the great crusaders who brought “democracy” to Europe.
For the Americans and British, open rape was not as common as among the Soviet troops. The Soviets simply raped any female from eight years up and if a German man or woman killed a Russian soldier for anything, including rape, 50 Germans were killed for each incident, as reported in Time magazine, June 11, 1945. But for most of our boys, having that “wonderful time” depended a great deal on the “cooperation” of the German and Austrian women. From the starving and the homeless, of course, sexual “cooperation” could be bought for a few pennies or a mouthful of food. I don’t think we ought to dignify this arrangement with any other than its true name of sexual slavery.
The Christian Century for December 5, 1945 reported “the American provost marshal, Lieutenant Colonel Gerald F. Beane, said that rape presents no problem for the military police because a bit of food, a bar of chocolate, or a bar of soap seem to make rape unnecessary. Think that over, if you want to understand the situation in Germany.” The Weekly Review of London, for October 25, 1945, described it thus:
“Young girls, unattached, wander about and freely offer themselves for food or bed … very simply, they have one thing left to sell, and they sell it … as a way of dying it may be worse than starvation, but it will put off dying for months — or even years.”
Dr. George N. Shuster, president of Hunter College, wrote in the Catholic Digest of December 1945 after a visit to the American Zone of occupation,
“You have said it all when you say that Europe is now a place where woman has lost her perennial fight for decency because the indecent alone live.”
By official policy, the Allies created conditions in which the only German mothers who could keep their young children alive were those who themselves or whose sisters became mistresses of the occupying troops. Our own officials admittedly brought the Germans down to a total daily food intake less than that of an American breakfast, a level which leads to slow but sure death unless relieved.
According to testimony given in the United States Senate on July 17, 1945, when the colonial French troops under Eisenhower’s command, presumably mostly Africans, entered the German city of Stuttgart, they herded German women into the subways and raped some two thousand of them. In Stuttgart alone, troops under Eisenhower’s command raped more women in one week than troops under German command raped in all of France for four entire years. In fact, of all the major belligerents in World War II, the German troops had by far the smallest record of rape and looting. The German army’s incidence of rape in all of Germany’s occupied territories was even lower than that of American troops stationed on American soil!
According to the International News Service in London, January 31, 1946, when American soldier’s wives were brought to Germany, they were given special authorization to wear military uniforms because “the GIs did not want their wives mistaken for Fraeuleins by other occupation troops.” A writer for the New York World Telegram January 21, 1945 stated “Americans look on the German women as loot, just like cameras and Lugers.” Dr. G. Stewart, in a health statement submitted to General Eisenhower, reported that in the first six months of American occupation, venereal disease jumped to twenty times its former level in Germany.
I want you to imagine an orgy of rape like this happening in your country, in your neighborhood, to your family, to your wife, your sister, your daughter. I want you to imagine what it would feel like to be totally powerless to stop it from happening, completely unable to bring the criminals to justice. And I want to ask you, were there ever any “war crimes” or “hate crimes” trials of these butchers and rapists and inciters to butchery and rape? We in America are very good at raining “smart bombs” on our adversaries, and in violently enforcing the dictates of the United Nations on faraway peoples that our press have vilified. But we have really been very insulated from the horrors of mass warfare on our own territory.
Few today remember that in the 1940s, the Allies, who even then were calling their world-government-in-the-making the “United Nations,” were pursuing a policy of unconditional surrender, which meant that the Germans would be obligated to accept an occupation government whose announced intentions, the infamous and genocidal Morgenthau Plan, would have reduced Germany to medieval conditions and cut her population by enforced starvation. Go to a large library and check out Secretary Morgenthau’s book, Germany Is Our Problem, Harper and Brothers, 1945. You will note the use of the term “United Nations” on the front flyleaf and in the foreword by Franklin D. Roosevelt. A prominent Jewish writer in America, Theodore Kaufman, had in 1941 written a book entitled Germany Must Perish, which advocated the extermination of all Germans by sterilization. Kaufman’s book received favorable reviews in major American magazines and newspapers. Other books, such as Louis Nizer’s What To Do With Germany, also contributed to this atmosphere of strident anti-German hatred. War propaganda and official policy combined to create an image of the German as sub-human and deserving of almost infinite punishment if not annihilation.
Churchill said to the Germans in January, 1945,
“We Allies are no monsters. This, at least, I can say, on behalf of the United Nations, to Germany … Peace, though based on unconditional surrender, will bring to Germany and Japan immense and immediate alleviation of suffering and agony.”
Against that false claim the late Dr. Austin App proclaimed the truth: Those Allies who were “no monsters” literally raped more European women than had ever before been raped in the history of the world. They put Germany on a starvation-level diet. Under direct orders from Dwight Eisenhower, they killed more than a million German POWs. They looted 12 million people of their homes, goods, food, and even clothes and drove them from their homelands. They took one-fourth of their farmland, they took their ships and their factories and their farm implements and then told them to live by farming. They abused and starved to death more German babies than there ever were Jews in Germany. They raped and debauched hundreds of thousands of German, Austrian, and Hungarian girls and women from eight to eighty. They brought to their death five times as many Germans in one year of peace as died during five years of war. Yes, yes, of course, these men of the United Nations, these men of the New World Order are no monsters.
Quite apart from any ethnic or ideological considerations, World War II was a war between, on the one side, the elitists who created Communism as a way-station on the road to their New World Order; and on the other, those who opposed that New World Order. It is a tragedy of millennial proportions that America and Britain were induced to fight on the side of Communism and Communism’s masters.
SOURCE: http://library.flawlesslogic.com/massrape.htm
(BUY BOOK)Berlin women, it seems, were short of food, but well provided with poison. There were instances of mass-suicide by poison. The actor Paul Bildt and some twenty others dispatched themselves thus, only he woke again and lived for another dozen years. His daughter was among the dead. Attesting once more to the incidence of suicide among the nobles, especially those who lived on isolated estates in the Mark Brandenburg, the writer cites a number of cases showing how far the old families would go to protect the dignity of their daughters: death was preferable to dishonour.
After The Reich by Giles Macdonogh P 99
( BUY BOOK)Sociologist and criminologist Professor Bob Lilly makes unprecedented use of military records and trial transcripts to throw light on one of the overlooked consequences of the US Army’s presence in Western Europe between 1942 and 1945: the rape of an estimated 14,000 civilian women in the United Kingdom, France and Germany.Like this:
You like this. Follow this Blog?This entry was posted in Germany, Interviews, War Crimes, World War II and tagged atrocities, ethnic cleansing, genocide, Germans, mass rape, rape, revenge, war crimes, WWII. Bookmark the permalink.Leave a Reply
(1940)
Author: Foreign Office, Germany
Keywords: World War II; propaganda; Poland;
Publisher: Berlin: Volk und Reich Verlag
Year: 1940
Language: English
Collection: opensourceDescription
Be the first to write a review
Downloaded 1,446 times Reviews
HOW DR KENT HOVIND AND THE ENTIRE WEST LIED ABOUT HITLER'S 'GUN CONTROL'! Gun Control in Germany, 1928-1945 by William L. Pierce
One can understand why many American gun owners want to believe this. They see in the current effort of their own government to take away their right to keep and bear arms a limitation of an essential element of their freedom and a move toward tyranny, and they want to characterize the gun-grabbers in the most negative way they can. Adolf Hitler has been vilified continuously for the past 60 years or so by the mass media in America, and certainly no politician or officeholder wants to be compared with him. If the gun-confiscation effort can be portrayed convincingly as something of which Hitler would have approved, it will have been effectively tarred.
This identification of the inclination to deny citizens the right to keep and bear arms with National Socialism and Adolf Hitler has been strengthened recently by clever magazine advertisements which show Hitler with his arm outstretched in a Roman salute under a heading: "All in favor of gun control raise your right hand." A Jewish group, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), quite noisy for its size, has been especially zealous in promoting the idea that the current gun-control effort in America has its roots in Germany during the Hitler period. This group has gone so far as to claim in several articles published in popular magazines read by firearms enthusiasts that the current restrictive legislation being proposed by the U.S. government is modeled on a gun-control statute enacted by Germany's National Socialist government: the German Weapons Law (Waffengesetz) of March 18, 1938.
Again, one can understand the motivation of the JPFO. Many non-Jewish firearms owners are well aware that the movement to restrict their rights is led and promoted primarily by Jews, and anti-Jewish feeling has been growing among them. They know that the controlled news media, which are almost unanimously in favor of abridging or abolishing the Second Amendment, are very much under the influence of Jews, and they know that the most vocal anti-gun legislators in the Congress also are Jews. It is natural for a group such as the JPFO to mount a damage- control effort and attempt to prevent anti-Jewish feeling from becoming even stronger among gun owners. Their strategy is to deflect the blame from their kinsmen in the media and the government and direct it onto their most hated enemies, the National Socialists -- or at least to create enough smoke to obscure the facts and keep the gun-owning public confused.
Unfortunately for those who would like to link Hitler and the National Socialists with gun control, the entire premise for such an effort is false. German firearms legislation under Hitler, far from banning private ownership, actually facilitated the keeping and bearing of arms by German citizens by eliminating or ameliorating restrictive laws which had been enacted by the government preceding his: a left-center government which had contained a number of Jews.
It is not just that the National Socialist firearms legislation was the opposite of what it has been claimed to have been by persons who want to tar modern gun-grabbers with the "Nazi" brush: the whole spirit of Hitler's government was starkly different from its portrayal by America's mass media. The facts, in brief, are these:
- The National Socialist government of Germany, unlike the government in Washington today, did not fear its citizens. Adolf Hitler was the most popular leader Germany has ever had. Unlike American presidents, he did not have to wear body armor and have shields of bulletproof glass in front of him whenever he spoke in public. At public celebrations he rode standing in an open car as it moved slowly through cheering crowds. Communists made several attempts to assassinate him, and his government stamped down hard on communism, virtually wiping it out in Germany. Between upright, law-abiding German citizens and Adolf Hitler, however, there was a real love affair, with mutual trust and respect.
- The spirit of National Socialism was one of manliness, and individual self-defense and self- reliance were central to the National Socialist view of the way a citizen should behave. The notion of banning firearms ownership was utterly alien to National Socialism. In the German universities, where National Socialism gained its earliest footholds and which later became its strongest bastions, dueling was an accepted practice. Although the liberal-Jewish governments in Germany after the First World War attempted to ban dueling, it persisted illegally until it was again legalized by the National Socialists. Fencing, target shooting, and other martial arts were immensely popular in Germany, and the National Socialists encouraged young Germans to become proficient in these activities, believing that they were important for the development of a man's character.
- Gun registration and licensing (for long guns as well as for handguns) were legislated by an anti-National Socialist government in Germany in 1928, five years before the National Socialists gained power. Hitler became Chancellor on January 30, 1933. Five years later his government got around to rewriting the gun law enacted a decade earlier by his predecessors, substantially amel ior a ting it in the process (for example, long guns were exempted from the requirement for a purchase permit; the legal age for gun ownership was lowered from 20 to 18 years; the period of validity of a permit to carry weapons was extended from one to three years; and provisions restricting the amount of ammunition or the number of firearms an individual could own were dropped). Hitler's government may be criticized for leaving certain restrictions and licensing requirements in the law, but the National Socialists had no intention of preventing law-abiding Germans from keeping or bearing arms. Again, the firearms law enacted by Hitler's government enhanced the rights of Germans to keep and bear arms; no new restrictions were added, and many pre-existing restrictions were relaxed or eliminated.
- At the end of the Second World War, American GIs in the occupying force were astounded to discover how many German civilians owned private firearms. Tens of thousands of pistols looted from German homes by GIs were brought back to the United States after the war. In 1945 General Eisenhower ordered all privately owned firearms in the American occupation zone of Germany confiscated, and Germans were required to hand in their shotguns and rifles as well as any handguns which had not already been stolen. In the Soviet occupation zone German civilians were summarily shot if they were found in possession of even a single cartridge.
- Jews, it should be noted, were not Germans, even if they had been born in Germany. The National Socialists defined citizenship in ethnic terms, and under Hitler Jews were not accorded full rights of citizenship. National Socialist legislation progressively excluded Jews from key professions: teaching, the media, the practice of law, etc. The aim was not only to free German life from an oppressive and degenerative Jewish influence, but to persuade Jews to emigrate. The German Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, specifically excluded Jews from manufacturing or dealing in firearms or munitions, but it did not exclude them from owning or bearing personal firearms. The exclusion of Jews from the firearms business rankled them as much as any other exclusion, and in their typically ethnocentric fashion they have misrepresented the law involved as an anti-gun law in an effort to cast their enemies in a bad light.
Much the same type of distortion is seen in the portrayal of the United States in the early 1950s: the so-called "McCarthy Era." Senator Joseph McCarthy (Republican, Wisconsin) used his position as chairman of the Senate's Government Operations Committee to expose the widespread communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other U.S. institutions which had taken place during the Second World War. A substantial majority of the communists who were dragged reluctantly out into the light of day by his efforts were Jews. As a result, the controlled media always have portrayed the period as one of terror and repression, when everyone was frightened of Senator McCarthy's "witch-hunt." Of course, it was nothing of the sort to non-Jewish Americans, who were not intimidated in the least. History viewed through a Jewish lens -- i.e., through media controlled by Jews -- always is distorted in a way corresponding to Jewish interests and concerns.
Both the German Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, enacted by the National Socialists, and the Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 12, 1928, which was enacted by an anti-National Socialist government, are given below in full, first in facsimile and then in English translation. A little background information first, however, may help the reader to understand their significance.
After Germany's defeat in the First World War (a defeat in which Germany's Jews played no small part, demoralizing the home front with demonstrations and other subversive activity much as they did in America during the Vietnam war), the Kaiser abdicated, and liberals and leftists seized control of the government in 1918. Hitler, recovering in a military hospital from a British poison-gas attack which had blinded him temporarily, made the decision to go into politics and fight against the traitors he felt were responsible for Germany's distress.
The tendency of Germany's new rulers after the First World War was much the same as it is for the liberals in America today: they promoted cosmopolitanism, internationalism, and egalitarianism. By 1923 economic conditions in Germany had become catastrophic, and there was much public unrest. The communists had made major inroads into the labor movement and were a growing threat to the country.
Hitler had indeed gone into politics, and his National Socialists battled the communists in the streets of Germany's cities and gradually came to be seen by many patriotic Germans in the working class and the middle class as the only force which could save Germany from a communist takeover and total ruin. Hitler's National Socialists continued to win recruits and gain strength during the 1920s. The communists, with aid from the Soviet Union, also continued to grow. The political situation became increasingly unstable as the government lost popular support.
The government's response was to substantially tighten up restrictions on the rights of German citizens to keep and bear arms. The Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 12, 1928, was the most substantial effort in this regard. This law was enacted by a left-center government hostile to the National Socialists (the government was headed by Chancellor Wilhelm Marx and consisted of a coalition of Socialists, including many Jews, and Catholic Centrists).
Five years later, in 1933, the National Socialists were in power, Hitler headed the government, and the communist threat was crushed decisively. The National Socialists began undoing the social and economic damage done by their predecessors. Germany was restored to full employment, degeneracy and corruption were rooted out, Jews and their collaborators were removed from one facet of national life after another, and the German people entered a new era of national freedom, health, and prosperity.
Finally, in 1938, the National Socialist government got around to enacting a new firearms law to replace the one enacted by their opponents ten years earlier. The highlights of the 1938 law, especially as it applied to ordinary citizens rather than manufacturers or dealers, follow:
- Handguns may be purchased only on submission of a Weapons Acquisition Permit (Waffenerwerbschein), which must be used within one year from the date of issue. Muzzle- loading handguns are exempted from the permit requirement. [The 1928 law had required a permit for the purchase of long guns as well, but the National Socialists dropped this requirement.]
- Holders of a permit to carry weapons (Waffenschein) or of a hunting license do not need a Weapons Acquisition Permit in order to acquire a handgun.
- A hunting license authorizes its bearer to carry hunting weapons and handguns.
- Firearms and ammunition, as well as swords and knives, may not be sold to minors under the age of 18 years. [The age limit had been 20 years in the 1928 law.]
- Whoever carries a firearm outside of his dwelling, his place of employment, his place of business, or his fenced property must have on his person a Weapons Permit (Waffenschein). A permit is not required, however, for carrying a firearm for use at a police-approved shooting range.
- A permit to acquire a handgun or to carry firearms
may only be issued to persons whose trustworthiness is
not in question and who can show a need for a permit. In
particular, a permit may not be issued to:
-
1. persons under the age of 18 years;
2. legally incompetent or mentally retarded persons;
3. Gypsies or vagabonds;
4. persons under mandatory police supervision [i.e., on parole] or otherwise temporarily without civil rights;
5. persons convicted of treason or high treason or known to be engaged in activities hostile to the state;
6. persons who for assault, trespass, a breach of the peace, resistance to authority, a criminal offense or misdemeanor, or a hunting or fishing violation were legally sentenced to a term of imprisonment of more than two weeks, if three years have not passed since the term of imprisonment.
- The manufacture, sale, carrying, possession, and
import of the following are prohibited:
-
1. "trick" firearms, designed so as to conceal their
function (e.g., cane guns and belt-buckle
pistols);
2. any firearm equipped with a silencer and any rifle equipped with a spotlight;
3. cartridges with .22 caliber, hollow-point bullets.
That is the essence. Numerous other provisions of the law relate to firearms manufacturers, importers, and dealers; to acquisition and carrying of firearms by police, military, and other official personnel; to the maximum fees which can be charged for permits (3 Reichsmark); to tourists bringing firearms into Germany; and to the fines and other penalties to be levied for violations.
The prohibitions of spotlight-equipped rifles and hollow-point .22 caliber ammunition were based on considerations that the former were unsporting when used for hunting, and the latter were inhumane.
Now read the German firearms laws for yourself, either in the original German exactly as they were published by the German government in the Reichsgesetzblatt or in the complete English translations which are provided here. If you want to skip over most of the legal gobbledygook and go directly to the most pertinent part of the National Socialist Firearms Law -- the part pertaining to the purchase, ownership, and carrying of firearms by private citizens -- turn to page 35 (Part IV of the Law). Note, as already mentioned above, that two separate and distinct types of permits are referred to: a Weapons Acquisition Permit (Waffenerwerbschein), required only for purchasing a handgun; and a Weapons Permit (Waffenschein), required for carrying any firearm in public. Interestingly enough, as also mentioned above, a hunting license could take the place of both these permits.
When you have read the two laws reproduced here, you will understand that it was Hitler's enemies, not Hitler, who should be compared with the gun-control advocates in America today. Then as now it was the Jews, not the National Socialists, who wanted the people's right of self- defense restricted. You will understand that those who continue to make the claim that Hitler was a gun-grabber are either ignorant or dishonest. And you will understand that it was not until 1945, when the communist and democratic victors of the Second World War had installed occupation governments to rule over the conquered Germans that German citizens were finally and completely denied the right to armed self-defense.
For further information, write National Vanguard Books, PO Box 330, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA.
The serialisation of the book will furnish the far-Right in Germany with arguments to back its revisionist claims.
--The Daily Telegraph
London, Wednesday, November 19, 2002
Germans call Churchill a war criminal
By Kate Connolly
in Berlin
WINSTON Churchill was effectively a war criminal who sanctioned the extermination of Germany's civilian population through indiscriminate bombing of towns and cities, an article in the country's biggest-circulation newspaper claimed yesterday.
In an unprecedented attack on Allied conduct during the Second World War, the tabloid Bild has called for recognition to be given to the suffering inflicted on the German population during the strategic air campaign of 1940-45.
The newspaper's campaign, provoked by a new German history of the bomber offensive, breaks six decades of virtual silence on the subject, and is being seen as the latest manifestation of a belief among Germans that they too were victims of the war - albeit a war started by their country.
The newspaper is serialising Der Brand (The Fire: Germany Under Bombardment 1940-45) by the historian Jörg Friedrich, which claims to be the most authoritative account of the bombing campaign so far.
Mr Friedrich claims the British government set out at the start of the Second World War to destroy as many German cities and kill as many of their inhabitants as possible. Civilian deaths were not collateral damage, he says, but rather the object of the exercise. He argues that Churchill had favoured a strategy of attacking the civilian population centres from the air some 20 years before Hitler ordered such raids.
Britain's war leader is quoted during the First World War as saying: "Perhaps the next time round the way to do it will be to kill women, children and the civilian population."
Friedrich goes on to quote Churchill defending the morality of bombing: "Now everyone's at it. It's simply a question of fashion - similar to that of whether short or long dresses are in."
Der Brand is far removed from the dry style of most German histories, and is filled with emotive accounts of the horrors of bombing, but carries few references to the man who brought retribution on Germany, Adolf Hitler.
Friedrich argues that the Allied policy of seeking to break German morale through bombing proved mistaken, the attacks merely serving to weld together the German population.
The debate is certain to anger those in Britain who see the strategic air campaign as a necessary evil.
The British, led by Sir Arthur Harris, C-in-C Bomber Command, were the leading proponents of "night area bombing", involving the systematic destruction of German industrial capacity and housing. The policy resulted in the laying to waste of city after city, including Hamburg, Cologne and Dresden (right), and the deaths of some 635,000 Germans.
The policy was to some extent forced on the RAF by the failure of daylight operations against pinpoint targets early in the war. It also reflected the fact that, for much of the conflict, bombing was the only method by which Britain could attack Germany.
German raids on Britain in the Blitz of 1940-41 were seen to have freed the British from the obligation not to attack civilian centres.
The serialisation of the book will furnish the far-Right in Germany with arguments to back its revisionist claims. It is also likely to overshadow recent reconciliation attempts between Britain and Germany over the bombing of Dresden in February 1945 in which tens of thousands died.
In a symbolic sign of friendship, British businesses have paid into a fund to reconstruct the Frauenkirche or Church of Our Lady which was destroyed in the raid and is set to be reopened in 2006.
Yesterday Antony Beevor, the British historian and author of the bestselling Berlin: The Downfall, 1945, criticised the German claim that Britain's war of attrition was unnecessarily brutal. "The trouble is this argument is removed from the context that they were the ones who invented terror bombing," he said, referring to German attacks on Coventry, Rotterdam and Warsaw.
"They literally obliterated whole cities and that certainly preceded what the British did," he said. "What we did was more terrifying and appalling, but it was a natural progression in this war.
"One can certainly debate the whole morality of bombing, but for Germans to say Churchill was a war criminal is pushing it a bit," he said.
Friedrich, 58, said his two years of research prompted him to change his views radically on the Allied bombing.
"Previously it appeared to me to be a just answer to the crimes of the Third Reich, but I've since changed my mind," he said. "Until the Second World War there was a common consensus that the massacre of civilian populations was illegal."
For the past year Germans on both the Left and Right have been locked in a new and intense debate about the war and their role as its victims as well as perpetrators. The debate was sparked by Günther Grass, the Nobel prize winner, in a novel fictionalising the wartime account of a passenger ship torpedoed by the Soviet navy killing thousands of Germans on board.
© Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2002.
Anniversary of 1945 sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff, with 9,000 deathroll
Exploring the little known, but true history of National Socialism, Hitler and WWII, what was really behind it, and seeking truth, justice and honour for the German peopleMovie: Hitler’s Shadow – In the Service of the Fuehrer (Beta Release)
After a grueling month or more of translation, narrating and audio/video editing, I am very pleased to announce the beta release of this 60 minute, high resolution film. There are still a few things I would like to tweak in it, but I am pretty happy with it as is. I still hope to flesh it out further and make it a full 90 minutes using additional related footage, however, you do have the whole story right here in this video.
Note: I was on Deanna Spingola‘s radio program on Monday, February 18th, 2013 , on Republic Broadcasting Network (RBN) to discuss the film. The archive is posted here:
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/radio-interview-on-the-topic-of-the-new-film-hitlers-shadow/
“Hitler’s Shadow” is basically a sequel to my previous film “Hitler’s War – What the Historians Neglect to Mention” Please be sure to enlarge the YouTube screen when you view it!
Description:
It is the personal story of Karl Wilhelm Krause, who was the valet. of the Fuehrer from 1934 to 1939, and was also responsible for his personal safety and security. Through his daily contact with Adolf Hitler, and those of his most intimate circle, both in his public life, as well as, inside the Fuehrer’s private quarters, no one had access like Herr Krause. Nor was anyone ever in a better position to observe Hitler; his personal habits, character, and demeanor, and to assess his social interactions with average citizens, employees, friends and colleagues, public figures, academics, leaders of industry, as well as, with foreign leaders and dignitaries. In this one and only interview, recorded on camera in the early 90s, Herr Krause testifies of his duties, his daily routine, and what he saw, heard and experienced, while in the constant presence of, and service to, the leader of the the Third Reich. Hitler called him “mein Schatten” (my shadow).
The testimony which you are about to hear is of invaluable historical importance, and forms a comprehensive and highly relevant, contemporary documentation, revealing surprising facts about the most talked about and enigmatic man in history, painting a far different picture of Adolf Hitler, than the court historians, Hollywood, and the Mass Media have typically portrayed.
This German language interview took place around 1990 and has been kept under wraps. We have translated it into English, paying close attention to accuracy. We do not have access to the original tapes. What is contained here is exactly what was published in Germany in its original form. We have also translated the text captions into images, inserted some extra pictures, added a musical score, and created both an intro and outtro. A 90 minute version is planned with some extra related footage.
Some of the topics covered include:
What Hitler was really like as a person and as a boss, his habits, his mission, the so-called Annexation of Austria, Crystal Night, the beginnings of the war with Poland, England’s declaration of war against Germany, Germany’s decision to attack the Soviet Union, etc. There is a wonderful anecdotal story about a private, unscheduled taxi ride and walk around Munich, just the two of them together, one night at Christmas time.
The script is included, just click the C.C. button in the YouTube window (lower bar) and you read the text as well as translate it into virtually any language!
If you appreciate the information and the effort we have made to bring this interview to the world at large in the English language, and our continued efforts on these topics, please consider making a donation.
Thanks!
If you are unable to use PayPal, please e-mail me for alternative options: justice4germans @ gmail.com
WAHRHEIT MACHT FREI!
Truth will make you free! … So, let’s keep it going forward.
Share this:
Published on 19 Jan 2013(Engl Subs) In this speech from 8th November 1940.in Munich, Adolf Hitler first makes fun Churchill's propaganda figures regarding the sinking of German U-Boats, calling him the "General Liar of World History". He then discusses Churchill's policy of aerial bombing of cities, targeting civilians. Hitler states that "for years I had made proposals to the world to forsake aerial bombing in warfare, especially against civilian populations, but that it was England who refused this, probably anticipating a new war, because democrats are such psychics". He states that he himself did not use this method and wage war against civilians in Poland, and nor did he allow nightly air raids on Polish cities, as at night you cannot accurately hit your targets, so bombing was mostly by day and against military targets, and that the same was true in the battles in Norway, Holland, Belgium and France. Suddenly, Hitler says, Churchill realized he was not having success penetrating German airspace by day, so he came up with the idea of night attacks to "terrorize the German civilian population".. He speaks of how patient he was and allowed the Brits to continue for some time, in the hopes that they would stop, but it did not. Hitler says regarding Churchill, "I thought to myself the man is crazy! He is introducing a new type of warfare, and one which can only lead to England's destruction!" He talks about how, after Germany had already won the war on the western front, he had again extended his hand in peace to England, and how once again he was chided and spat upon. "Halifax behaved like a madman!" Instead of halting, he says, they stepped up the bombing attacks, so it put more pressure upon him from the German side to retaliate. He states how he waited three months before issuing orders for retaliation strikes against British cities. "Alas, I'm taking up this battle" he states, and "that means the fight to the end from now on! They wanted this fight; they shall have it!" "They wanted to destroy Germany by an air war; I shall show the what will be destroyed!" He says that he has "petty on the English people" and how "they can only thank the common criminal Churchill for this!". He carries to chastise Churchill and then says that he made a mistake in testing the resolve of the German people; that this is a new Germany he is dealing with,which will become more zealous in her resolve with every bomb dropped. Germany has had enough of this nonsense and is determined to put an end to it. He repeats "they wanted this fight; they shall have it!" and Germany will never capitulate. He says they must fight to the finish and not run the risk of a short war that would resume again in a few years. Hitler says "The German Folk want to have peace finally! A peace (as he had always said) that would allow the Germans to work and which does not allow international scoundrels to agitate other peoples against us! These are the vermin who make their fortunes through war. I have no reason to wage war for material considerations. For us it is a sad enterprise that robs the German people and entire community of so much time and manpower. I do not possess any stocks in the armament industry; I do not earn anything in this war. I would be happy if we could work again as I used to for my people. But these international War Criminals are at the same time, the armament industry's greatest black market profiteers! They own the factories; they make business! The same people we had previously had here in Germany. There can be but one confrontation with these people; one of us must break, and this will not under any circumstances be Germany!"
Hitler goes on then to honour the early fallen comrades who shed their blood for the National Socialist movement and for their love of Germany. He spoke of the commitment of those men to restoring Germany's honour and dignity after crime of the Versailles Treaty, how it could not remain and be permitted to burden and shame the German people for forever., that it had to be erased from our history. Finally, Hitler says, is the type of spirit that is now again needed.
"In this spirit we face the outside world today and we will complete what they fought for back then! Our enemies believe they are destroying Germany. They will be proved mistaken. Germany will rise from battle all the more! "
and makes the analogy to what will henceforth be necessary to preserve the nation they had fought for over all of those years
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/Published on 19 Jan 2013(Engl Subs) In this speech from 8th November 1940.in Munich, Adolf Hitler first makes fun Churchill's propaganda figures regarding the sinking of German U-Boats, calling him the "General Liar of World History". He then discusses Churchill's policy of aerial bombing of cities, targeting civilians. Hitler states that "for years I had made proposals to the world to forsake aerial bombing in warfare, especially against civilian populations, but that it was England who refused this, probably anticipating a new war, because democrats are such psychics". He states that he himself did not use this method and wage war against civilians in Poland, and nor did he allow nightly air raids on Polish cities, as at night you cannot accurately hit your targets, so bombing was mostly by day and against military targets, and that the same was true in the battles in Norway, Holland, Belgium and France. Suddenly, Hitler says, Churchill realized he was not having success penetrating German airspace by day, so he came up with the idea of night attacks to "terrorize the German civilian population".. He speaks of how patient he was and allowed the Brits to continue for some time, in the hopes that they would stop, but it did not. Hitler says regarding Churchill, "I thought to myself the man is crazy! He is introducing a new type of warfare, and one which can only lead to England's destruction!" He talks about how, after Germany had already won the war on the western front, he had again extended his hand in peace to England, and how once again he was chided and spat upon. "Halifax behaved like a madman!" Instead of halting, he says, they stepped up the bombing attacks, so it put more pressure upon him from the German side to retaliate. He states how he waited three months before issuing orders for retaliation strikes against British cities. "Alas, I'm taking up this battle" he states, and "that means the fight to the end from now on! They wanted this fight; they shall have it!" "They wanted to destroy Germany by an air war; I shall show the what will be destroyed!" He says that he has "petty on the English people" and how "they can only thank the common criminal Churchill for this!". He carries to chastise Churchill and then says that he made a mistake in testing the resolve of the German people; that this is a new Germany he is dealing with,which will become more zealous in her resolve with every bomb dropped. Germany has had enough of this nonsense and is determined to put an end to it. He repeats "they wanted this fight; they shall have it!" and Germany will never capitulate. He says they must fight to the finish and not run the risk of a short war that would resume again in a few years. Hitler says "The German Folk want to have peace finally! A peace (as he had always said) that would allow the Germans to work and which does not allow international scoundrels to agitate other peoples against us! These are the vermin who make their fortunes through war. I have no reason to wage war for material considerations. For us it is a sad enterprise that robs the German people and entire community of so much time and manpower. I do not possess any stocks in the armament industry; I do not earn anything in this war. I would be happy if we could work again as I used to for my people. But these international War Criminals are at the same time, the armament industry's greatest black market profiteers! They own the factories; they make business! The same people we had previously had here in Germany. There can be but one confrontation with these people; one of us must break, and this will not under any circumstances be Germany!"
Hitler goes on then to honour the early fallen comrades who shed their blood for the National Socialist movement and for their love of Germany. He spoke of the commitment of those men to restoring Germany's honour and dignity after crime of the Versailles Treaty, how it could not remain and be permitted to burden and shame the German people for forever., that it had to be erased from our history. Finally, Hitler says, is the type of spirit that is now again needed.
"In this spirit we face the outside world today and we will complete what they fought for back then! Our enemies believe they are destroying Germany. They will be proved mistaken. Germany will rise from battle all the more! "
and makes the analogy to what will henceforth be necessary to preserve the nation they had fought for over all of those years
http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/
InYourFaceBook – Cyberspace Thugs Expelling Thought Criminals from Social Media
“In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.” ~ George Orwell
IN YOUR FACE BOOK!
Welcome to the world of “Anti-Social media”! Virtual Pogroms and Cyber-Expulsions are now underway across the Internet to prevent awake and aware thought criminals and activists from socializing and sharing information, as well as, from organizing to protect themselves and their interests from global tyranny and the New World Order agenda.
Over the past few weeks, this writer has experienced Bolshevik style stalking, surveillance harassment and bullying first hand! Both my J4G Facebook profile and my personal FB profile have been the subject of continual attacks resulting several temporary blocks ranging from 12 to 24 hours, as well as repeated deletion of material and status messages that I’ve posted, on completely bogus charges of having violating their “community standards”. My posts have in no way shape or form violated these standards of conduct! The same has happened to dozens of my “Facebook friends”!
Early on Monday morning I was finally expelled from Facebook. My J4G account was disabled by the Cyber-Thugs and I was locked out, probably for good, based upon yet even more dangerous, ludicrous and absurd charges. I have sent them a letter of protest, though I am not holding by breath for a response nor any sort of hearing, much less a reversal of their decision. This process is entirely arbitrary and sudden. No warnings are given, no proof provided, and and no chance of rebuttal is given. They act as judge, jury and executioners, much like the Soviet Secret Police.
Here is a screenshot of what they said ….
Excuse me ??
I can assure my readers that I have NEVER posted any material or messages which promote violence or which depict, promote or condone ANY of the above, and many of my Facebook friends and followers can attest to this fact! Nor have I permitted any such comments on my “wall”. In fact, I have previously deleted and blocked well over 100 people from friends’ list due the content they shared or comments they posted on my wall which violate the FB terms and thereby put my account at risk, and in some cases, which also offended me. They are welcome to their opinions, but not within my realm, be that on Facebook or other social media, or as comments on my blog, or in such a way that puts work and reputation at risk.
So, what’s really behind this?
It is pure Soviet style censorship of the TRUTH under the guise of “antisemitism”. Sadly, most of the sheeple have been conditioned to believe that word to mean “hatred of Jews” with an implied meaning of “intention to harm Jews”. In fact, the term refers to a variety of middle-eastern languages “Semitic languages”, and not at all to “race”, much less to so-called “Jews” but who are in fact overwhelmingly “Khazars” and thus, perpetrating fraud against humanity (the Gentiles).
thefreedictionary.com says:So, if anything really needs to be banned, it should be the use of that fully perverted word, as it’s implied meaning is a farce and used as a weapon of mass destruction , just as much as the word “Nazi” is another bogus term, as I have explained in a previous post. It is used to smear, tar and feather all those who speaks the truth about the International Bankster Gangsters or “Usury Mafia” (and who call themselves “Jews”, and are not) which run this planet, and to stifle dissent and to bully anyone who exposes how this criminal gang operates, and what their agenda really is. Other such epithets used to stifle dissent and debate include terms like “conspiracy theorist”, or when they are really desperate, they will use the word “terrorist” too demonize the truth-tellers and activists, because apparently, the truth scares them to death!
Se·mit·ic (s-mtk) adj.
1. Of or relating to the Semites or their languages or cultures.
2. Of, relating to, or constituting a subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic language group that includes Arabic, Hebrew, Amharic, and Aramaic.
n.
1. The Semitic languages.
2. Any one of the Semitic languages.
Indeed, it is all very Orwellian. Black is white, white is black. Up is down. Wrong is right. Right is wrong. And it is “in your face” now. They are not only liars, criminals and thugs, but also haters; the very thing they accuse everyone else of being.
FACEBOOK IS BIG BROTHER
They are engaged in “Anti-Gentilism” with an agenda to co-opt, subjugate and rule over ALL of humanity (all races, nations and cultures). And no, I am NOT talking of a “Jewish Conspiracy” but a “Criminal Conspiracy” of global proportions. Again, THEY are the ones who call themselves “Jews”, not me!. I don’t buy their BS nor use their terminology, but rather, I attempt to expose it. They are haters of truth and of truth-tellers, because they know that “THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE” from their tyranny and global hegemony, and so, and as history has shown, this criminal cabal will go to any and all lengths, including inciting, causing and funding World Wars to protect their interests, or to further them. They care not how many millions of lives are lost in the process, nor how much long-term suffering is caused, and will also profit from it. They did it twice with Germany and to many other countries since, and are doing even today.
Some assert that this is a Zionist agenda and all for a rinky-dink peace of real estate in Palestine, but I don’t buy that. They already have that. These fraudsters or posers merely use IsraHell and the lessers of their Khazarian Klan as a wedge, and as a “firewall” to protect and furhter their global interests. These Bankster Gangsters could care less what happens to those of the lower caste as they have demonstrated many times in the past. Indeed, they are very happy to see the peons get the blame and to take the repercussions for their own innumerable evil deeds and “crimes against humanity”, which go on to this day, all because of “sheeple” (including self-described “Jews”) who buy into their BS and swallow it whole, or even use it to their own ends. They too need a “wake up” call, to grow a conscience, and some balls, and to start speaking the truth, as have Brother Nathaniel, Henry Makow, Benjamin Friedman, Myron Fagan and others.
Here is how they are manipulating the sheeple and social media, in addition to Law Enforcement and Alphabet Soup agencies to do their “dirty work” and do so to their OWN detriment, at their own expense, out of their own ignorance and gullibility.
“My people perish for lack of knowledge” ~ God
Here’s to all the trolls and morons on Facebook!Facebook’s blind spot to Antisemitism
Jerusalem PostBy Internet EngagementInternet Engagement
Monday Mar 25, 2013
Facebook’s refusal to recognize Holocaust denial as hate speech, and ban it from the social media platform, is today well known. I have monitored this and other manifestations of antisemitism on social media platforms since first exposing the problem of “Antisemitism 2.0” five years ago. Last week, however, I released a major new report [2] revealing additional blind spots in Facebook’s understanding of antisemitism. The nature of these blind spots is startling, from racist images directly based on Nazi propaganda to copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. (snip)
Subtle and insidious forms of antisemitism, like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and messages calling for the elimination of the Jewish state are (and blah, blah, blah…)
Enter Abe Foxman …
Huffington Post, o6.04.13
“[...]Today, while it is a marvelous medium for education, communication, entertainment and commerce, the ways in which the Internet is being used to disseminate and promote hateful and violent beliefs and attitudes are astounding, varied and continually multiplying. In an effort to look more closely at the extent of the problem — and to probe for possible solutions – I recently joined together with my longtime friend and colleague Christopher Wolf, an expert in Internet law and Chair of the Anti-Defamation League’s Civil Rights Committee, to explore these issues and to offer a blueprint for the Internet industry, the world community and societies to work together toward a solution.The result of this collaborative effort is our new book, Viral Hate: Containing Its Spread on the Internet (Palgrave Macmillan), available in bookstores and for download to e-readers today. Facebook’s announcement that it would tighten its policies on hate speech posts in response to complaints from users about misogynistic posts, including pictures of women being beaten and messages promoting violence against women,* was the most recent reminder of the problems posed by online hate speech.In a letter in today’s New York Times, we commend Facebook for tackling the issue head on, and will be working with them in the coming months as they see to develop new tactics to address hate speech on their pages.“* that this is what Facebook has FALSELY accused me and others I know of doing!
Well, well, well. Isn’t it wonderful that these fraudsters and racketeers, who already control the media, are allowed to spew their story all over the internet too, and with mere accusations, in no time flat, can invoke the government, NGOs and Social Media sites to immediately do their bidding? And they are obviously complying too, aren’t they? It’s as if God himself has spoken to Facebook, except that, in reality it would be the Devil. And do not put it past them to be creating fake user profiles to disseminate ”fake hate” images and messages in order to justify a massive and tyrannical response either!
The truth is, Facebook is turning a blind eye to antigentilism perpetrated by frauds like YOU and others of your Khazar Klan, who are not asking, but ordering websites to cover up mass murder, genocide, theft, rape and torture being carried out by international war criminals at the behest of your Overlord Banker Buddies who own your ass. Because, and you readers can bet, that if anyone harms one hair on the head of one of their Klan it will be all over their media and the Internet, and they will not say a word about it being “offensive” content! …will they, hmmm?
And oh, in case you haven’t noticed, they HATE YOUR FREEDOM too. So use it while you can, think for yourself and stop letting them get away with this BULLYING! You can bet that all of this is going to get a whole lot worse now, unless YOU are prepared to speak up about it and will stop going along with it.
To wrap up, here is a one hour interview which also exposes the real agenda behind all this. I do NOT necessarily agree with everything said, but I invite you to listen and make up your own minds. Isn’t that what “freedom” is about?
Revolt of the Plebs Broadcast June 6, 2013
Description: “Keith welcomes Professor Ray Goodwin of the Barnes Review to discuss ADL director Abe Foxman’s latest book, entitled Viral Hate, and the concerted efforts to censor discourse on the Internet.”
The only people who would applaud such tyranny and thought control, and who would attack your most basic right to freedom of expression are guys like this one …
“It is necessary to repeat the truth over and over again, because the falsehoods around us are also being constantly repeated, not by individuals but by the masses, in newspapers and encyclopedias, in the schools and at the universities. Everywhere, falsehood is on top, comfortable and secure in the knowledge that the majority is on its side.” ~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 1828.
J4GPosted in Uncategorized Tagged antigentilism, antisemitism, Big Brother, bullying, censorship, crime against humanity, Facebook, fear, Foxman, free expresion, freedom of speech, Goethe, hate, hate speech, Israel, Jews, Nazis, New World Order, NWO, propaganda, Stalin, thought crimes, tyranny 3 Comments
Who can see things you're tagged in?When you're tagged in a post, your friends can also see it. You can change this in your settings.News Feed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PhhhZJ9kmQ Their Was no Plans to KILL JEWS! Period. No Holocaust, that means Burnt Offering! No one Was Burnt, Ovens used for Disease Cremation Himmler wanted to lower the death rate in the camps as much as possible, which seems odd if the extermination of prisoners was the goal. The death-rate in the camps forced the S.S. to take notice. With the help of copious statistics they watched its progress, not to save human lives, but to economize on man-power. On 30th September 1943 Pohl informed Himmler that the number of deaths in August was 40 out of an average work force of 17,300, that is 0.23 per cent, whereas the previous month the percentage had been 0.32 per cent They had achieved a reduction of 0.09. Results were obtained from other camps too. Out of a total strength estimated at 224,000 in August, there had been 4,699 deaths, that is 2.09 per cent, compared with 2.23 per cent in July: the improvement was therefore 0.14 per cent. Himmler congratulated Pohl on the results he had obtained even though they were difficult to check! (p. 94-95) Black NAZI's How and why did so many non-German ethnic minorities and foreigners fight for the Nazis in World War II? This study answers these questions, among others, by re-examining the Third Reich from an entirely new perspective. Hitler's Military - Amazing Diversity Of Nationalities Prove that the holocaust happened. With all the millions of innocent men, women, and children that the Zionists have killed, we are to be so concerned over an alleged 6 million Jews? What about the 40 to 60 million white Christian Israelites that Stalin (a Jew) and his Jewish Bolsheviks killed? Where is their monument in Washington, DC? What about the Ukrainians? If it wasn't for Hitler, the Ukrainians would have been literally wiped out. What about the murders conducted by communists around the world? Communism is a Jewish invention. What about the millions of German soldiers murdered by Eisenhower after the end of the War? What about the 5-13 million German civilians killed during the War and on up until 1953? On and on it goes. Where is the balance? Where is the equal treatment in terms of honoring the dead of War and Zionism? http://www.rense.com/general88/divers.htm https://www.amazon.com/Black-Nazis-Veronica-Cl…/…/1934703516 https://justice4germans.wordpress.com/…/liberating-dachau-…/ the French scuttled the Madagascar plan. Thus, though emigration continued unofficially for some time during the war years, many the peon Jews were left to suffer the effects of CHURCHILL’S barbaric bombardment of Germany, in conjunction with the YANKIZ, and later the RUSKIZ, which eventually cut all supplies, causing starvation for Germans and Jews alike, not to mention rampant disease which broke in the camps toward the end of the war, which killed very many.
Why did the BRIZIS reneg? Who was trying to capitalize on the plight of these Jews? Hmmm? Who benefited? Hitler? Really? Ummm, I think not! He wanted them out, remember? That was the “final solution:”. NOT EXTERMINATION!
The “Final Solution” spoken of in the German documents was a program of evacuation, resettlement and deportation of Jews with the ultimate objective of expulsion from Europe. During the war Jews of various nationalities were being moved east, as one stage in this Final Solution. The legend claims that the motion was mainly for extermination purposes. ~ Arthur R. Butz – A Brief Introduction to Holocaust Revisionism
Well the deaths of many of these Jews, the real-time war propaganda campaign, and the stories of those who did survive what became the “death camps” (by virtue of the BRIZIS, ELITE JEWZIS, and the RUSKIZ) resulted in a major post-war propaganda coup, and really ensured world support later for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine didn’t it?
And this “holocaust” myth is still used today to blackmail and extort Germany, and to guilt everyone else into going along with whatever the Israelis do, and they have certainly hoodwinked the majority of American Christians too, who adore Israel and heap tons of money there, as does the US government. Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus http://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.com/…/justice-for-g…
FAIR USE STATEMENT This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been…youtube.com
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Adolf Hitler The greatest story Never told Full 6 hours Documentary - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XExjrZxTdk
![[item image]](https://ia600304.us.archive.org/7/items/PolishAtrocitiesAgainstTheGermanMinorityInPoland/Poland.gif?cnt=0 "[item image]")
No comments:
Post a Comment