The Rashida (Rosetta) Stone
(part only) stolen in 1899 from the town of Rashid
(Egypt)
by the invading French armies, later stolen by the British invaders. In the
“Demotic” section Arabic script is clearly visible. Abu
Bakr Ahmad Ibn Wahshiyah(founder of
the science of Algebra) was the first scholar to decode hieroglyphs, one
thousand years before Jean Champollion according to Dr Okasha El Daly
Demotic
script on a replica of the rosetta stone on display in Magdeburg. Photo
by Chris 73. Creative Commons License. Source: Wikimedia Commons. Chapter One THE ARROGANCE OF A PSEUDO SCIENTIST
BBC interviewer: "Is Evolution a
Theory?" Pr Dawkins: "No, it is a fact!"
Oxford University
Professor Richard Dawkins – UK
Oxford University
Professor and “Evolved Animal Humanist” Richard Dawkins – ZIONIST IMPERIALIST UK
Addressing University students, Oxford Zoologist
Professor Richard Dawkins [1941-….], an intolerant and fanatical Atheist, Evolutionist and Humanist
lecturer, stated once to a huge gathering of students (seemingly ready and
willing to be indoctrinated) that the cleverest ape-man that has ever lived was
Aristotle, a mercenary soldier in Alexander of Macedonia’s army, a man who never went to
a real school (the first modern schools and universities came with the Muslims)
and who spent twenty years learning “philosophy” while “walking with Plato”,
and Pr Dawkins was seen on British television (where freedom of speech is
absent) boasting that the “White European race” sprung from the Aristotelian
racial lineage. If Irish George Bernard Shaw
was alive today, he would have gladly given that arrogant Professor a piece of
his uniquely great human mind, but any striving and tolerant Muslim (by
definition, a Muslim is moderate and tolerant of everything except evil
practices), have the duty to pray to God Almighty to guide the deluded
Professor and show him the Light, although there is little hope that this may
ever happen. His ape-man religion has been proven many times to be the
fabrication of scientists lacking in honesty. The fact is that no indisputable
trace of humankind or of its civilisation seems to have yet been discovered
beyond ten (twenty) thousand years.Could we,
humans, old pyramid (ziggurat) builders, have come from another far away planet
or from another dimension or are we simply the recent product of an
interbreeding with some extraterrestrial beings (the extraterrestrial gods)? Or
are we simply the product of an almost impossible to fathom Creator?
David Berlinski - Evolution destroyed in under 5 minutes
David Berlinski shows how Darwinism, or the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection advanced by Charles Darwin, does not stand up to scientific or mathematical scrutiny. (Rights belong to Coldwater Media - Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.)
A great mind among modern intellectuals, David Berlinski, a secular Jew, was a research assistant in molecular biology at Columbia University, and was a research fellow at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Austria and the Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques (IHES) in France. He has taught philosophy, mathematics, and English at Stanford University, Rutgers University, The City University of New York, the University of Washington, the University of Puget Sound, San Jose State University, the University of Santa Clara, the University of San Francisco, San Francisco State University, and taught mathematics at the Université de Paris. He has a PhD in philosophy from Princeton University and has written on philosophy and mathematics. He authored "The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions" (Paperback edition, Basic Books, September 2009), a true masterpiece.
A selected few, people of great knowledge, faith and wisdom, like Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Mark Hanson, a Greek Orthodox
Christian reverted to Islam, and one of the brightest world scholars in Islamic and
human matters, a man who has attained the highest level of faith and
spirituality, seems to have definite answers about God, Mankind, the world and
its origins. Such great souls are convinced the world was created by design and
that we were all created human, while others like the Nairobi-born Zoologist
Richard Dawkins maintain that all we see around us is just an accident of
multiple evolutionary processes with no design and no purpose at all, and that
we are only animals (rock and bacteria) that have evolved into humans in a
world “of savage competition, ruthless exploitation, and deceit”. Of course this is not science, but only the Professor’s
atheist religion!
WHERE THERE IS GOD (invented or real, or
what He represents), don’t we see more LOVE, hope, goodness, decency,
cleanliness, charity, morality, patience in adversity, compassion, forgiveness,
freedom, justice, mercy, and humankind as also SPIRITUAL and HUMAN?
And, WHERE THERE IS NO GOD, don’t we see
more HATE, inhumanity, evil, indecency, filth, greed and selfishness,
immorality, perversions, despair, suicide, cruelty, vengeance, slavery, racism,
injustice, covetousness, ruthlessness, ABOMINATIONS OF ALL KINDS, and Man as
only material and only an (evolved) animal, an INHUMAN and monstrous being
sprung from “thousands or millions of accidental genetic mutations”?
What did Karl Mordecai Marx himself,
“the last of the great Jewish prophets” turned atheist, really mean when he
wrote “religion is the opium of the people”. We witness rich and poor, black
and white, scientists and poets, Atheists and Believers, good and bad people
being addicted to religion, all kinds of religion, and not only the “vile
populace” of indoctrinated beings (human sheep). Only by going beyond faith, we
can manage to understand much of what is happening in a world that belongs to
the powerful, the mercilessly cruel, and the rich, and not to humankind
anymore, not even to GOD. Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Hanson argues that if one believes
in God, he or she is strengthened in that belief and God is then with him or
her, but if someone does not believe in God, he or she is strengthened in his
or her unbelief and abandoned by God. Professor Richard Dawkins drowns himself
in an ocean of unbelief and pseudo-scientific beliefs when it concerns God. His
opium is the religion of atheism and animalism (‘humanism’). Isn’t it a paradox
that Atheists should call themselves Humanists when they believe and claim they
are only (evolved) animals?
While the Greco-Roman Holy Christian Bible
recognises Satan as the ruler of the world, Dawkins gives us a clue as to who
now rule and should rule our world thanks to their “rebellious selfish genes”
as tale-told by himself in his famous pseudo-scientific
“thriller-manual-manifesto” (The Selfish Gene, 1976) in which he
zealously defends the hoax (deceit) of macro evolution, and propounds his “fundamental
law of gene selfishness”. Pr Dawkins is paid by our tax-money (with the
full blessings of Elisabeth II of "Battenberg Saxe-Coburg Gotha") to preach his fabricated
religion of selfishness to our youth. According to him, there is no Merciful,
Compassionate, Generous and Just God, no Creator, but, instead, eternal selfish
genes competing directly with their alleles for survival created man, and they
are “naturally selecting” the best genes for survival, meaning the White
European genes inherited from Aristotle, and he, Richard Dawkins, the disciple
of the Selfish Gene-God, is one of the worshippers and defenders of Animalism
and of western secular ‘democratic’ regimes.
Pr Dawkins would be one of those who
survived this savage competition, which gives his “naturally selected” race the
right to wipe out the 5-6 billion weaker “poorly-evolved animals” for his own
survival. Although billions of people in such a materialist world find it more
and more very hard today, due to western cultural and political oppression and
terrorism, to believe in a real Invisible (Unseen) God-Creator, why does the
Professor show such arrogance and scoff at others who are believers in God,
whether He exists or not? His delusion (sickness of the mind) prevents him from
seeing and admitting his own fanatical belief in the Selfish Gene-God, his
opium! Even Atheists have their prophets like Sigmund Freud, his nephew Edward
Bernays (who inspired Adolph Hitler, George W. Bush and other western fascist
and Zionist regimes), Charles Darwin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and their
likes. We are living in a society and a world where morality has been replaced
by force by all kinds of perversions of mind and body, where the New Age
religion with its Earth god aims at the breaking down of the family and the
prostitution of men, women and children, the abduction of our babies to be sold
into sex slavery (carried out by state-protected corporations to Israel and
other western and western-client countries), the worshipping of money and fame,
the poisoning of mind and body by drugs (including nicotine, alcohol and mainly
Jewish owned pharmaceutical so-called medicine), Zionist television,
pornography, and the complete control and dehumanisation of mankind. Those who
resist the western military regimes and their allies are ruthlessly murdered
along with their entire families by the Zionist New Secular (Talmudist) World
Order, the Tikkun
Olam Yehudim, their countries relentlessly bombed and devastated
(germ, chemical, electronic, wave, space…warfare), and their peoples
slaughtered mercilessly, jailed, tortured, mentally and physically shattered,
maimed for life and starved to death by the tens of millions.
Margaret Temple
(Maryam Noor) aged 65 - How I Found the Truth - SCOTLAND
But, millions other people do not go along with Pr Richard
Dawkins’ animal ideology and choose to believe in a God or in many gods.
Unfortunately, by their own fault, they do not have adequate armies to protect
their beliefs and nations from attacks and destruction by the Atheist, Secular,
‘Humanist’ and Zionist New World Order super military powers. Of apparently
intolerant Atheist parents, Mrs Margaret Temple of Scotland (above)
found God through Islam (for others it is through Christianity or Christ) at
the age of 65 in very mysterious circumstances, and took the Shahadah, the
Islamic Testimony that there is none worthy of worship (no other god) except
God and that Muhammad is His Messenger. When you sincerely and wholeheartedly
look for God, you will find Him, so goes the saying. This is evidence that
“God” (or a Godly inspired Arab, Muhammad) was right about the fitra (natural
inclination towards Islam) He says in the Holy Furqân (Criterion) or Holy
Qur’ân (Recitation) He had put at birth in every human being He had Himself
created, and thus disproving the selfish gene fabricated by our learned, but
misguided and unscientific Professor.
On Saturday 26th June 2004, the author was sent an Email
from one of his correspondents, Christian Cotten (chriscotten@wanadoo.fr) entitled “A
Story of Angels and of a Father” in its French translation: “UNE HISTOIRE
D'ANGES ET DE PÈRE” by Mr. Lloyd Glenn.
Is it a fabrication or a true story? It
is more likely a fabrication as some Sects are known for inventing such stories
to promote their sectarian religions.But,
does it really matter?Can Richard
Dawkins and others like him ever prove that this is simply a delusion?But, a similar event occurred in my own
personal life, and I have no evidence to prove that it is true, and have only
my salvaged autobiographical notes.In
this XXst Century, many famous “non believers” and researchers claim they have
had similar experiences, including that of visits, encounters, contacts from
outer space or from the other dimensions.Are our very young not fed trash on a daily basis by school (Harry Potter,
etc.), television, cinema, newspaper and magazine?
“Below is a
true story, but it was
“sanitized” for mainline Christian churches. It was originally written in 1994
by Mr. Lloyd Glenn, a Mormon, living in California,
about the true accident that happened to his son in 1993.”
The Birdies
“On July 22nd I was en route to Washington, DC
for a business trip. It was all so very ordinary, until we landed in Denver for a plane change.
As I collected my belongings from the overhead bin, an announcement was made
for Mr. Lloyd Glenn to see the United Customer Service Representative
immediately. I thought nothing of it until I reached the door to leave the
plane, and I heard a gentleman asking every male if they were Mr. Glenn. At
this point I knew something was wrong and my heart sunk. When I got off the plane
a solemn faced young man came toward me and said, "Mr. Glenn, there is an
emergency at your home. I do not know what the emergency is, or who is
involved, but I will take you to the phone so you can call the hospital."
My heart was now pounding, but the will to be calm took over. Woodenly, I
followed this stranger to the distant telephone where I called the number he
gave me for the Mission
Hospital. My call was put
through to the trauma center where I learned that my three year old son had
been trapped underneath the automatic garage door for several minutes, and that
when my wife had found him he was dead. CPR had been performed by a neighbor,
who is a doctor, and the paramedics had continued the treatment as Brian was
transported to the hospital. By the time of my call, Brian was revived and they
believed he would live, but they did not know how much damage had been done to
his brain, nor to his heart.
They explained that the door had completely closed on his little sternum right
over his heart. He had been severely crushed. After speaking with the medical
staff, my wife sounded worried but not hysterical, and I took comfort in her
calmness.
The return flight seemed to last forever, but finally I arrived at the hospital
six hours after the garage door had come down. When I walked into the intensive
care unit, nothing could have prepared me to see my little son lying so still
on a great big bed with tubes and monitors everywhere. He was on a respirator.
I glanced at my wife who stood and tried to give me a reassuring smile. It all
seemed like a terrible dream. Doctor's filled me in with the details and gave a
guarded prognosis. Brian was going to live, and the preliminary tests indicated
that his heart was OK, two miracles in and of themselves. But only time would
tell if his brain received any damage.
Throughout the seemingly endless hours, my wife was calm. She felt that Brian
would eventually be all right. I hung on to her words and faith like a
lifeline. All that night and the next day Brian remained unconscious. It seemed
like forever since I had left for my business trip the day before.
Finally at two o'clock that afternoon, our son regained consciousness and sat
up uttering the most beautiful words I have ever heard spoken. He said,
"Daddy hold me" and he reached for me with his little arms. By the
next day he was pronounced as having no neurological or physical deficits, and
the story of his miraculous survival spread throughout the hospital. You cannot
imagine our gratitude and joy. As we took Brian home, we felt a unique
reverence for the life and love of our Heavenly Father that comes to those who
brush death so closely.
In the days that followed there was a special spirit about our home. Our two
older children were much closer to their little brother. My wife and I were
much closer to each other, and all of us were very close as a whole family.
Life took on a less stressful pace. Perspective seemed to be more focused, and
balance much easier to gain and maintain. We felt deeply blessed. Our gratitude
was truly profound.
The story is not over
Almost a month later to the day of the accident, Brian awoke from his afternoon
nap and said, "Sit down mommy. I have something to tell you." At this
time in his life, Brian usually spoke in small phrases, so to say a large
sentence surprised my wife. She sat down with him on his bed, and he began his
sacred and remarkable story.
"Do you remember when I got stuck under the garage door? Well, it was so
heavy and it hurt really bad. I called to you, but you couldn't hear me. I
started to cry, but then it hurt too bad. And then the 'birdies' came."
"The birdies?" my wife asked puzzled. "Yes," he replied.
"The birdies made a whooshing sound and flew into the garage. They took
care of me." "They did?" "Yes," he said. "One of
the birdies came and got you. She came to tell you I got stuck under the
door." A sweet reverent feeling filled the room. The spirit was so strong
and yet lighter than air. My wife realized that a three year old had no concept
of death and spirits, so he was referring to the beings who came to him from
beyond as "birdies" because they were up in the air like birds that
fly.
"What did the birdies look like?" she asked. Brian answered,
"They were so beautiful. They were dressed in white, all white. Some of
them had green and white. But some of them had on just white." "Did
they say anything?" "Yes," he answered. "They told me the
baby would be all right." "The baby?" my wife asked confused.
Brian answered. "The baby laying on the garage floor." He went on,
"You came out and opened the garage door and ran to the baby. You told the
baby to stay and not leave." My wife nearly collapsed upon hearing this,
for she had indeed gone and knelt beside Brian's body and seeing his crushed
chest whispered, "Don't leave us Brian, please stay if you can." As
she listened to Brian telling her the words she had spoken, she realized that
the spirit had left his body and was looking down from above on this little
lifeless form.
"Then what happened?" she asked. "We went on a trip." He
said, "Far, far away." He grew agitated trying to say the things he
didn't seem to have the words for. My wife tried to calm and comfort him, and
let him know it would be okay. He struggled with wanting to tell something that
obviously was very important to him, but finding the words was difficult.
"We flew so fast up in the air. They're so pretty Mommy," he added.
"And there is lots and lots of birdies."
My wife was stunned. Into her mind the sweet comforting spirit enveloped her more
soundly, but with an urgency she had never before known. Brian went on to tell
her that the "birdies" had told him that he had to come back and tell
everyone about the "birdies." He said they brought him back to the
house and that a big fire truck, and an ambulance were there. A man was
bringing the baby out on a white bed and he tried to tell the man that the baby
would be okay, but the man couldn't hear him. He said the birdies told him he
had to go with the ambulance, but they would be near him. He said they were so
pretty and so peaceful, and he didn't want to come back.
Then the bright light came. He said that the light was so bright and so warm,
and he loved the bright light so much. Someone was in the bright light and put
their arms around him, and told him, "I love you but you have to go back.
You have to play baseball, and tell everyone about the birdies." Then the
person in the bright light kissed him and waved bye-bye. Then woosh, the big
sound came and they went into the clouds. The story went on for an hour. He
taught us that "birdies" were always with us, but we don't see them
because we look with our eyes and we don't hear them because we listen with our
ears. But they are always there, you can only see them in here (he put his hand
over his heart). They whisper the things to help us to do what is right because
they love us so much.
Brian continued, stating, "I have a plan, Mommy. You have a plan. Daddy
has a plan. Everyone has a plan. We must all live our plan and keep our
promises. The birdies help us to do that cause they love us so much." In
the weeks that followed, he often came to us and told all, or part of it, again
and again. Always the story remained the same. The details were never changed
or out of order. A few times he added further bits of information and clarified
the message he had already delivered. It never ceased to amaze us how he could
tell such detail and speak beyond his ability when he talked about his birdies.
Everywhere he went, he told strangers about the "birdies." Surprisingly,
no one ever looked at him strangely when he did this. Rather, they always got a
softened look on their face and smiled.
Needless to say, we have not been the same ever since that day, and I pray we
never will be."
END OF TRUE (OR MADE-UP) STORY
[PHOTO –
confidential and not provided because of this world of beasts and evil doers!]
A three year-old boy was nearly crushed to
death under an office partition glass panel weighing over 100kg, but was
‘miraculously’ saved from a certain death by a wall radiator. (Paris 1986)
What is true, what is false?It is true
however that to billions of us God seems really a figment of our imagination,
but does denying the existence of God solve the problem of billions of human
beings who will never quench their thirst for the divine and the sacred? It is
an established fact that millions of people, without having to be indoctrinated
in any religion, thirst for God or for some kind of Ethereal Providence – just
like an addict for his opium, as would say Mr Karl Marx, the plagiarist
(Tsarion). But, those who have lived real miracles know the truth; a truth that
intelligent people like Pr Richard Dawkins is unable to comprehend – the
possibility of another reality, another world. The “Heart”, not the mind, perceives
and understands certain truths. Pr Dawkins’ very existence is a miracle, but he
refuses to be grateful to the One Who (might have) created him. Does God or
angels exist or not? Many have known God, and seen angels, been with them,
talked to them, been assisted by them, and saved by their belief in God,
whether He exists or not, simply by their strong Faith in any deity whatsoever
or even in any absolutely fabricated Supreme Being. Hindus have been very well
known to turn humans into gods. Christians have turned at least one human into
God and another human into the mother of God. Hindus have millions of them, and
do still believe in them and practice rituals even to this day every single day
of their lives! Many lead quite a happy and peaceful life by being a Hindu or a
Vedantist.
Even the ones who claim to have had near-death experiences and swear they have
seen God, a male, white, blond hair and blue eye Jesus Christ or the “Mother of
God”, a white, blond and blue-eyed female, “the Virgin Mary” when they died
have definitely seen and lived something wonderful and beyond description after
they were certified dead clinically. But, what they saw was at worst the fruit
of their own imagination and beliefs. As a historian it may be completely out
of question to believe in or rely upon such an unhistorical figure as Jesus
Christ, but as a scientist why not? Jesus Christ was an Arab (Middle Eastern
Palestinian or Phoenician) and cannot be as “Caucasian” as the White (rather
Pink!) European Christians or the Black Africans have been made to believe for
now two millennia. But, many people are sincere and have indeed experienced
life after death, and seen and heard incredible things before they returned to
their bodies. Although some stories are incredible to believe, like in Betty J.
Eadie’s book “EMBRACED
BY THE LIGHT” (Thorsons, UK, 1995) in which a woman saw the white
Jesus Christ as the God-Creator, as One and at the same time as two separate
Beings. One common thing to all these miraculous beings coming back from the
other side of life is the message of love they bring us, but neither Dawkins’
nor his “selfish genes” can explain this human reality. Whether he is a myth or
a real being, many lives have been saved from immorality and a life of crime
and sin by the Israelite Jesus Christ (of Bani Isra’il), and by the love Jewish
or Pauline Christians attribute to and bestow upon him.
Is there not more to man than Pr Dawkins’ “selfish genes” that are devoid of
compassion, hope and a real sense of freedom and justice? There is definitely
more to life and truth than what we perceive, see, hear, think and are made to
believe. But, whatever the truth, it is beyond doubt that we, humans and human-beasts,
the kinds that are ruling our world (the reptilians, would say our great David
Icke) are all victims (or accomplices) of a an Elite that has taken over
through bloodshed and extreme savagery almost the entire world with their
headquarters in the United States of America, Britain, Europe, Eretz Israël and
their satellites – the real Axis of Evil. Former US Attorney Ramsey Clark
admitted that his country was “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world”.
US
Professor Noam Chomsky, Professor Howard Zinn, Professor Norman Finkelstein
(all three of Jewish ancestry?) and many
other academics and researchers confirm this point of view.
Dr. KENT HOVIND challenged the world of
scientists believing in and teaching the “religion of macro-evolution”. A few
took up the challenge and failed, and the others ignored it.
“I have a standing offer of $250,000 to anyone who can give any empirical
evidence (scientific proof) for evolution.* My $250,000 offer demonstrates that
the hypothesis of evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.[36]
[36] ^ a b Hovind, Kent. "Hovind's $250,000
Offer", Dr. Dino.com, 2005. Retrieved on 2006-10-18. “
When Pr Richard Dawkins was asked by a BBC correspondent to provide any proof
for macro-evolution, he was unable to do so. When asked whether macro-evolution
was just a theory or a fact, he answered it was a fact. Coming from a man of
science of such a reputation, Pr Dawkins should be ashamed to utter such a big
lie. Whether Dr Hovind is right or wrong about his religious beliefs is not
relevant here. The truth is that evolutionists, including Pr Dawkins, have
never provided any scientific evidence to conclusively prove their claim of a
theory that on the contrary has been proven to be a hoax by many: Harun Yahya
(Adnan Oktar) in The Evolution Deceit, the Origin of life lecture
by Dr A.E. Wilder Smith, the work of “Jehovah Witnesses” on the subject, etc.
“Kent Hovind had been charged with falsely declaring bankruptcy, making
threats against federal officials, filing false complaints, failing to get
necessary building permits, and various tax-related charges. He was convicted
of federal tax and related charges, for which he is currently serving a 10-year
sentence.”
Dr Kent Hovind was jailed on 2 November 2006. Although very informative,
the wikipedia article is very prejudiced against Dr Hovind both on the science
side and the legal aspect. Arun Russo, filmmaker showed in his documentary Democracy
to Fascism that there is no law that can force US citizens to pay income
taxes on their wages. Jo Banister who used to work for the IRS (US
Inland Revenue Service), denounced the IRS as a fraudulent organisation. When
victims of the IRS asked in Court to be shown the law, the Judge says:I do not want the Law in my Court; I am the Law!Another
Freemason Judge said somwhere else: TRUTH IS NOT A DEFENCE!
1. EVOLUTION - FAITH OR FACT? - An Embarrassing Conundrum (VID 6 In A 7 Part Series)
SEVEN REASONS
WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
The following article of Mr A.Cressy Morrison, former President of the
New York Academy of Sciences first appeared in the Reader's Digest of January,
1948; then, on the recommendation of Professor C.A.Coulson. F.R.S., Professor
of Mathematics at Oxford
University (the same
university where Pr Richard Dawkins teaches), was republished in the Reader's
Digest of November, 1960. – It shows how science compels the scientists to
admit the essential need of a Supreme Creator. But Pr Richard Dawkins chose not
to admit this scientific reality.
“We are still in the dawn of the scientific age and every increase of light
reveals more brightly the handiwork of an intelligent Creator. In the ninety
years since Darwin
we have made stupendous discoveries; with a spirit of scientific humility and
of faith grounded in knowledge we are approaching even nearer to an awareness
of God. For myself, I count seven reasons for my faith:-
FIRST
By unwavering mathematical law we can prove that our universe was designed and
executed by a great engineering Intelligence.
Suppose you put ten coins, marked from one to ten, into your pocket and give
them a good shuffle. Now try to take them out in sequence from one to ten,
putting back the coin each time and shaking them all again. Mathematically, we
know that your chance of first drawing number one is one in ten; of drawing one
and two in succession, one in hundred; of drawing one, two and three in
succession, one in a thousand, and so on; your chance of drawing them all, from
one to number ten in succession, would reach the unbelievable figure of one
chance in ten thousand million.
By the same reasoning, so many exacting conditions are necessary for life on
earth that they could not possibly exist in proper relationship by chance. The
earth rotates on its axis at one thousand miles an hour; if it turned at one
hundred miles an hour, our days and nights would be ten times as long as now,
and the hot sun would then burn up our vegetation during each long day while in
the long night any surviving sprout would freeze.
Again, the sun, source of our life, has a surface temperature of 12,000 degrees
Fahrenheit, and our earth is just far enough away so that this “eternal fire”
warms us just enough and not too much! If the sun gave off only one-half of its
present radiation, we would freeze, and if it gave half as much more, we would
roast.
The slant of the earth, tilted at an angle of 23 degrees, gives us our seasons;
if it had not been so tilted, vapours from the ocean would move north and
south, piling up for us continents of ice. If our moon were, say, only fifty
thousand miles away instead of its actual distance, our tides would be so
enormous that twice a day all continents would be submerged; even the mountains
would soon be eroded away. If the crust of the earth had been only ten feet
thicker, there would be no oxygen without which animal life must die. Had the
ocean been a few feet deeper, carbon dioxide and oxygen would have been
absorbed and no vegetable life could exist. Or, if our atmosphere had been
thinner, some of the meteors, now burned in space by the million every day,
would be striking all parts of the earth, starting fire everywhere.
Because of these, and host of other examples, there is not one chance in
millions that life on our planet is an accident.
SECOND
The resourcefulness of life to accomplish its purpose is a manifestation of
all-pervading intelligence.
What life itself is, no man has fathomed. It has neither weight nor dimensions,
but it does have force; a growing root will crack a rock. Life has conquered
water, land and air, mastering the elements, compelling them to dissolve and
reform their combinations.
Life, the sculptor, shapes all living things; an artist, it designs every leaf
of every tree, and colours every flower. Life is a musician and has each bird
sing its love songs, the insects to call each other in the music of their
multitudinous sounds. Life is a sublime chemist, giving taste to fruits and
spices, and perfume to the rose, changing water and carbonic acid into sugar
and wood and, in so doing, releasing oxygen so that animals may have the breath
of life.
Behold an almost invisible drop of protoplasm, transparent and jelly-like,
capable of motion, drawing energy from the sun. This single cell, this
transparent mist-like droplet, holds within itself the germ of life, and has
the power to distribute this life to every living thing, great and small. The
powers of this droplet are greater than our vegetation and animals and people,
for all life came from it. Nature did not create life; fire-blistered rocks and
a salt-less sea could not meet the necessary requirements.
“Who, then, has put it there?”
THIRD
Animal wisdom speaks irresistibly of a good Creator who infused instinct into
otherwise helpless little creatures.
The young salmon spends years at sea, then comes back to his own river, and
travels up the very side of the river into which flows the tributary where he
was born. What brings him back so precisely? If you transfer him to another
tributary, he will know at once that he is off his course and he will fight his
way down and back to the main stream and then turn up against the current to
finish his destiny more accurately.
Even more difficult to solve is the mystery of eels. These amazing creatures
migrate at maturity from all ponds and rivers everywhere those from Europe
across thousands of miles of ocean all bound for the same abysmal deeps near Bermuda. There they breed and die. The little one, with
no apparent means of knowing anything except that they are in a wilderness of
water, nevertheless find their way back not only to the very shore from which
their parents came but thence to the rivers, lakes or little ponds so that each
body of water is always populated with eels. No American eel has ever been
caught in Europe, no European eel in American
waters. Nature has even delayed the maturity of the European eel by a year or
more to make up for its longer journey. Where does the directing impulse
originate?
A wasp overpowers a grasshopper, digs a hole in the earth, stings the
grasshopper in exactly the right place so that he does not die but becomes
unconscious and lives on as a form of preserved meat. Then the wasp will lay
her eggs handily so that her children when they hatch can nibble without
killing the insect on which they feed; to them dead meat would be fatal. The
mother then flies away and dies; she never sees her young. Surely the wasp must
have done all this right the first time and every time, or else there would be
no wasp. Such mysterious techniques cannot be explained by adaptation; they
were bestowed.
FOURTH
Man has something more than animal
instinct the power of reason.
No other animal has ever left a record of its ability to count ten or even to
understand the meaning of ten. Where instinct is like a single note of a flute,
beautiful but limited, the human brain contains all the notes of all the
instruments in the orchestra. No need to belabour this fourth point; thanks to
the human reason we can contemplate the possibility that we are what we are
only because we have received a spark of universal intelligence.
FIFTH
[Photo] Egyptian pyramid at Giza
and the Sphinx
Provision for all living is revealed in phenomena which we know today which Darwin did not know such
as the wonders of genes. So unspeakably tiny are these genes that, if all of
them responsible for all living people in the world could be put in one place,
there would be less than a thimbleful. Yet these ultra-microscopic genes and
their companions, the chromosomes, inhabit every living cell and are the
absolute keys to all human, animal and vegetable characteristics. A thimble is
a small place in which to put all the individual characteristics of two
thousand million human beings. However, the facts are beyond question. Well, then,
how do genes lock up all the normal heredity of a multitude of ancestors and
preserve the psychology of each in such an infinitely small place? Here
evolution really begins at the cell, the entity that holds and carries genes.
How a few million atoms, locked up as an ultra microscopic gene, can absolutely
rule all on earth is an example of profound cunning and provision that could
emanate only from a Creative Intelligence no other hypothesis will serve.
SIXTH
[Photo] Aztec Pyramid
By the economy of nature, we are forced to realise that only infinite wisdom
could have foreseen and prepared with such astute husbandry.
Many years ago a species of cactus was planted in Australia as a protective fence.
Having no insect enemies in Australia the cactus soon begun a prodigious
growth; the alarming abundance persisted until the plants covered an area as
long and wide as England, crowding inhabitants out of the towns and villages,
and destroying their farms. Seeking a defence, the entomologists scoured the
world; finally they turned up an insect, which exclusively feeds on cactus, and
would eat nothing else. It would breed freely too; and it had no enemies in Australia. So,
animal soon conquered vegetable and today the cactus pest has retreated, and
with it all but a small protective residue of the insects enough to hold the
cactus in check forever.
Such checks and balances have been universally provided. Why have not
fast-breeding insects dominated the earth? Because they have no lungs such as
man possesses; they breathe through tubes. But, when insects grow large, their
tubes do not grow in ratio to the increasing size of the body. Hence, there has
never been an insect of great size; this limitation on growth has held them all
in check.
If this physical check had not been provided, man could not exist. Imagine meeting
a hornet as big as a lion!
SEVENTH
The fact that man conceives the idea of God is in itself a unique proof.
The conception of god rises from a divine faculty of man, unshared with the
rest of our world the faculty we call imagination. By its power, man and man
alone can find the evidence of things unseen. The vista that power opens up is
unbounded; indeed, as man is perfected, imagination becomes a spiritual
reality. He may discern in all the evidence of design and purpose, the great
truth that heaven is everywhere and in everything, but nowhere so close as in
our hearts.
It is scientifically as well as imaginatively true; in the words of the
psalmist: “ The heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament sheweth His
handiwork.”
A. Cressy Morrison
Former President of the New
York Academy of Sciences
From “GOD OF ISLAM” by Sayyid Saeed Akhtar Rizvi, revised edition
published by World Organization for Islamic Services, 1978/1398, Tehran, IRAN.
A previous edition was distributed free 1971-1974 by the author who was then
the head of the UNIVERSAL SOCIETY OF ISLAM at both People’s & Trinity Colleges, Mauritius. The author was also Head
of Biology at the Trinity
College until 1974.
But, whether there is a God or
not, whether we are mere evolved animals or humans don’t we have to get out of
the mess our predecessors have put us into? But, the big question is how?
Is it possible to get out the clutches of the military state system called
democracy? Democracy is evil mediacracy according to many US personalities, and
always ends up in dictatorship, according to Baptist Christian Evangelist Dr
Kent Hovind, as it has happened now in the USA, Canada, Australia, and in
Europe – all white supremacist regimes, according to Alex Jones, Aaron Russo
(Democracy to Fascism), David Icke (Democracy or Fascism), Pr Noam Chomsky (US
Fascism), and many others (including the author).
Is it possible to get out of the mind controlled and centralised system of
government that has replaced all the gods? Fascism is racism. Military Zionism
is Nazism, racism and Fascism, all in one. Karl Marx predicted Jews would one
day take over the whole world and be the supreme masters.
Is it possible to get back our liberties taken away by the state terrorist
religion? Atheist hegemony is evil.
Is it possible to get rid of the fascist military and corporations that have
taken control of our civil life and liberties, that is scavenging our roads,
micro-chipping our citizens, curtailing our freedom to circulate, running our
governments, police, media, civil services and educational and health
institutions, with the complicity of (paid by) the United Nations and big
business corporations and the servile taxpayers themselves? We are not eternal
sheep that the Élite can take to the slaughterhouse without some of us standing
up and putting up a fierce fight or are we?
Is it possible to fight the religion of immorality and savage capitalism
(pornography, prostitution, drugs, homosexuality, paedophilia, genetic
engineering, wars of conquest, genocide, global slavery, political kidnapping
and assassination, global immorality and planet pollution, engineered famines,
diseases and climatic catastrophes) imposed upon the masses by our controlled
political, social and cultural institutions?
Finally, do we have the right to answer yes to these questions?
We have reached a stage in the evolution of mankind where even thinking has
become a crime, where freedom of expression is curtailed more and more, and
even hating the criminal deeds of a particular group is a crime.
(The first 800 page manuscript of this book was deliberately destroyed by Denis
Yates, an ex British soldier turned computer engineer (technician) and salesman
while he had the author’s computer in for repairs, but the Chemsford Trading
Standards concluded that he was too honourably known in Chelmsford that he
could not possibly have committed such an act. However, it was not a bad thing
after all because this new book looks a lot better thanks to new material from
the Internet and elsewhere.)
The beauty of the Internet, you just have to click on a button and the whole
world is displayed before your very eyes, both sound and picture, with all its
lies and truths. Let us give it a try at this very minute at 04.00 AM, Sunday
2nd September 2007, and see what Alex Jones is talking about!
Well, the first two articles are blood curdling:
1. “Marine tells of order to execute Haditha women and children” 2. “Porter: Kill More Iraqis or Pay $9 per Gallon”
Now, let us check my Email box! This is
the last one received.
Information Clearing House Newsletter
(Pr Michel Chossudovsky) Exposed: Pentagon's plan for
Iran attack 09/01/07
Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially acknowledged) In
America'sWar On Iraq 3739 http://icasualties.org/oif/
Cost of U.S. War and Occupation
of Iraq $447,884,620,921
This is what we call history in the making and it is frightening – global
plunder and genocide after genocide, endless lies and deception, and who is
behind them? Is this the kind of world we really want for our children? America and the entire West and
their Allies drumming for wars non stop on all Muslim countries who say no to
their hegemony.
Hanford:
[at dinner] ... So what are your world views, Driscoll? Paul Driscoll: ...I
don't have any, Mr. Hanford. Hanford: Of course you
do, man. We ALL do! Like all this nonsense about giving the Indians land. What
we need are twenty General Custers and a hundred thousand men! What we should
have done is swept across the prairie, destroying every redskin that stood
before us. After that, we should have planted the American flag deep, high and
proud! Abigail Sloan: I think
the country is tired of fighting, Mr. Hanford. I think we were bled dry by the
Indian Wars. I think anything we can accomplish peacefully, with treaties, we
should accomplish that way. Hanford: Now, I trust
this isn't the path you spoon-feed your students. Treaties, indeed! Peace,
indeed! Why, the virility of a nation is in direct proportion to its military
prowess. I LIVE for the day when this country SWEEPS AWAY...
[notices Driscoll's disapproving look] Hanford: ... You some
kind of a pacifist, Driscoll? Paul Driscoll: No,
just some sick idiot who's seen too many boys die because of too many men who
fight their battles at dining room tables... and who probably wouldn't last
forty-five seconds in a REAL skirmish if they WERE thrust into it. Hanford: ... I
take offense at that remark, Mr. Driscoll! Paul Driscoll: And I
take offense at "armchair warriors," who don't know what a shrapnel,
or a bullet, or a saber wound feels like... who've never smelled death after
three days on an empty battlefield... who've never seen the look on a man's
face when he realizes he's lost a limb or two, and his blood is seeping out.
Mr. Hanford, you have a great affinity for "planting the flag deep."
But you don't have a nodding acquaintance of what it's like for families to
bury their sons in the same soil!
Paul Driscoll was played by Dana Andrews.Abigail Sloan was the school teacher and
guess who Hanford
was? THE BANKER! You do not mess up
with the Rothschild Banking Cartel!All US Presidents
who had tried were murdered.
17 December1992, Los Alamitos, California,
USA (pneumonia,
complicated by congestive heart failure)
Birth Name
Carver Dana Andrews
Height
5' 10" (1.78 m)
END OF CHAPTER ONE
Sunday 2nd September 2007
Updated 4th of May 2013
Chapter Two will deal with David Icke : “THE
ILLUSION OF A MODERN PROPHET”.
Retrieved from "http://www.iamthewiki.com/index.php?title=The_Alien_Beginning_and_End_of_Humankind"
This page was last modified 19:27, 2 September 2007.
http://freehovind.com/download
Last edited by Ghyslaine
ROC on Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
From my unpublished
book “THE ALIEN BEGINNING AND END OF HUMAN KIND” (more than 1200 pages, fully
illustrated).I never managed to publish
it because of lack of funds (I had other priorities), time, opportunity,
incentives (other more qualified authors had written better works than mine),
but more importantly because of the Jewish Zionist control of the first London
Publishing House I contacted back in 1999 or 2000 - “TA-HA Publishing” whose
owner admitted this sad truth to me on the telephone.For the same reasons, he admitted that he
could not publish Adnan Oktar’s (Harun Yahya’s) “The Holocaust Hoax”.My first attempt at writing “A Different
Perspective of World History” (over 800 pages with illustrations) was thwarted in
or around 1996 when one Denis Yates (an ex soldier) from Chelmsford deliberately deleted the entire book
(draft) when he had my computer in for repairs.He did this because he was outraged by what I had written in the book
about his beloved mass murdering Prime Minister John Major (who was then the
leader of the European Union) who I had accused of being behind the mass murders
of Muslims in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the Balkans!
Were he living at the time of giant beings, Pr. Richard Dawkins would have provided them with one tenth of a (nice?) meal! Lucky chap!
- FIRST AND FOREMOST: please read "ZETETIC ASTRONOMY' at our website (http://www.PlanetPlane.Com) under "RESOURCES", and also, watch the videos under "MULTIMEDIA", in order to get answers to the most frequently asked questions. These steps are VITAL to understand the subject at hand. Thank you!
By the time you start your "education" you are being gradually
indoctrinated into nonsense, your ability to think critically and
logically disappears and only the illusion of that remains.
Gradual +
indoctrination = graduation.
Congratulations you just became another
mindless drone that will fight tooth and nail to protect your
investment. Because anyone admitting they were wrong, for their entire
life, has to do some serious thinking, and most people would rather die
than think.
EPILOGUE
The modern world is plagued with believing nations
in permanent disobedience to God’s Laws, Will, and Commandments and completely
heedless of His Guidance and dire Warnings.Whether we retrace the decadence of some of them back to the ancient
history of the so-called Semitic people, Mayans, the Mesopotamians, Sumerians,
Babylonians, Phoenicians, Palestinians, Hittites, Druids, Magi, Wiccans,
Persians, Hindus, Chinese, Greeks, Romans of the Biblical Era, Arabs of the
Islamic Era, the Crusaders, the Inquisitors, Europeans of the Colonial,
Imperial and Slave Trade Era or the economically, intellectually and militarily
backward Ottomans, one well documented historical fact is indisputable: the
sustainable world was immediately overrun by wild predators in human form and clothing
and by civilisation destroyers as soon as Islam ceased to be the driving force
of modern civilisation.
Taking over from Muslims, White Christian Europeans
produced the greatest and more advanced civilisation of history.But, the White bloodthirsty, racist and over
greedy European barbaric hordes conquered the peaceful and highly civilised
Islamic Spain under the false banner of Christian civilisation to be followed
by the fall of Islamic Hindustan and the conquest of far away lands of Oceania
and the continent already known to some ancient Europeans (Vikings), Arabs
(Phoenicians), Muslims and Africans alike that they called the “Americas” (most
probably from the name of a Crypto Jewish merchant and financier close to the
de Medicis, Amerigo Vespucci.They had no
hesitation at all to savagely exterminate so many of these far away indigenous
populations in order to steal their wealth, natural resources as well as their
lands. (See also Paul Warburg’s and other financiers’ role in the modern wars
and revolutions!)
However, we would not bother if this was just past
history, but it is currently repeating itself and is ongoing and getting worse
to the point that even the Whites are now under constant attacks, not by
Muslims, but by their acolytes the Jews, the Ashkenazis, the Zionists, the
Illuminati, and the Freemasons that are running their government in the
shadows!When John Fitzgerald Kennedy
denounced those Secret and powerful Societies, he was assassinated by them!
At the Majlis al Shura fi Britaniya (Muslim
Parliament of Great Britain under Dr Kalim Siddiqui), Muslim experts and
analysts have proved that those same barbaric hordes allied with the murderous
Jews are now on a New Crusade to exterminate, this time, entire Muslim nations
who are seen now rising and posing a threat to Godless (Secular) Christian,
Jewish, Hindu, Chinese and Russian hegemony in the world. We have seen Algeria scorched, the Balkans
ethnically cleansed of their Muslim populations, Islam under permanent attack,
and Muslims being forcibly de-Islamised and de-Arabised worldwide. Like in
Turkey, the Western Secular Judeo-Christian colonial agenda was to secularise
(Atheise) all Muslim nations, replace Islam with Nationalism, Liberalism,
corporate democratism, Socialism, Communism, Feminism, Humanism (Atheism), Militarism,
Materialism, and other anti-Islamic isms where the all powerful “democratic”
Totalitarian State replaces God at the head of all public and private
institutions, and in particular in Banking, the Judiciary and Education.
God’s Laws (HUDDUD), both Christian and Islamic have
thus been replaced by man made laws that override all spirituality, morality
and inherited virtues and way of life.As all attempts of political
struggle for the re-establishment of the Islamic State and way of life have
failed and proved catastrophic with millions of Muslim deaths and the gradual
destruction of what was left of Islamic and Christian civilisation, we are left
with two alternatives:
Abandon Islam and join the Forces of Evil!
Or resist by whatever means at our disposal
the imposition of a Satanic way of life on our Christian and Muslim children
and grand children, and the best weapon actually at our disposition is civil
disobedience and total political, cultural, and economic boycott and
independence (emancipation).But, it is
sad to see that most Christians and Muslims, due to both political and
religious corrupt leadership, have been made to adopt the slavish in between path:
That of collaboration with the Devil while
still claiming to be Christians or Muslims!
I
fail to see how both Christians and Muslims can get out of such a quagmire when
they work with Fascists and racists, study and promote their Eurocentric Social
Sciences where God is out of the curriculum, and where we never find a single
Muslim thinker ever mentioned.What is
the relevance of “Max Weber, Karl Mannheim, Karl Marx, Emile
Durkheim, Erich Fromm, Edward Shils, and Edward Carr” to Muslims?None whatsoever!Islam does not need philosophers when more
than 90% of Muslims worldwide are not even educated in Classical Arabic,
Islamic Sciences, Traditions, History and Eschatology due to the decadence of
the Ummah of Muhammad and European colonialism, neo-colonialism,
totalitarianism and fascism.
Who amongst the Muslims ever read or studied the works of Muhammad
Iqbal, Muhammad Hamidullah, Morteza Mohtahari, Ali Shariati or Dr Kalim
Siddiqui?While accepting being
brainwashed by the European School System, there is no way there can ever be a
Revival of the Ummah or of Christendom.Mauritius
is a very tiny country, but can be used to explain the evils of neo-colonialism
and European hegemony on the lives and way of life of the inhabitants where
they have been brainwashed to accept as norms of a modern society such evils as
gambling (including lottery), drugs (alcohol, cigarettes, etc.), lethal
vaccines, abortion, prostitution, pornography, GM ‘food’, poisonous additives
in drinks and food, cannibalism (some of our food may even contain additives of
human origins!), corporate drugs (medicine), corporate sports, corporate
television, corporate cinema, corporate media, incest (with all the
illegitimate children around and single mothers with many lovers, who knows who
we are getting married to?), and so on.
Muslims have been lured into using Western nonsensical terminology
like “democracy”, “independence”, “autonomy”, “sovereignty”, “freedom”,
“justice”, “equality”, “progress”, “modernity”, “patriotism”, etc., when these
have never existed even in their own countries.However, there can never be any constructive dialogue between a super
military power and a completely unarmed and disarmed Muslim nation, first
because the super military power is always right and is not here to debate but
to impose its might and will over weaker people, including its own people at
home. We have seen the results of
Western political ‘reforms’ imposed on the conquered Muslims of Turkey:
Closure of the Sufi Tekkes
Closure of Zaviyes
Closure of religious schools
The imposition of secularism
The establishment of nationalist principles instead of Islam
The wearing of the brimmed hat
The banning of Islamic dress for women
The enforced use of the Latin alphabet in place of the Qur’anic
alphabet
The banning of the Azaan and Iqaama in Arabic and replaced with Turkish
instead
The prohibition of religious instruction in schools
The recognition of equal rights for women and in inheritance
The abolition of polygyny (“polygamy”)
The persecution and arrest of dissidents
The acceptance of homosexuality
The manufacture, trade and consumption of alcohol and cigarettes
The acceptance of prostitution and pornography
The imposition of casinos
So,
I say, to hell with Western patronising the Muslims or anybody!Governments lie.Religious leaders lie.Scientists lie.Jews are liars.Christians and Muslims lie.We must inform ourselves by reading and doing
our own research.
We have no evidence
that the human biological type(s) evolved from pre-human types.All we can be sure of is that humans appeared
all of a sudden on this planet as the best (created) living form (species)
compared to all other life forms, but also the worst when we consider the
madness of their political, religious and non religious leaders.The leading countries are very heavily armed
and are terrorising the entire planet including their own people at home.Having abandoned God’s Law, they have made up
their own laws and religions, and genocide, global plunder, pollution and endless
wars are their fundamental values.
Humans found God to guide them in order to lead a moral life
in peace and harmony with their neighbours, aimed at freedom and justice for
all.The victims of oppression found
solace in God’s Promise of a Day of Judgement after death because criminals get
very rarely punished for their crimes, and their victims are almost never
compensated for their losses.The weaker
hopes for better days and is forced to be patient without ever fully realising
that the oppressor is strong only because of his or her own weaknesses.
Watch out for the money Jews (the International Jewish
Mafia) as they are the ones who are currently engineering the end of the world
where only an Elite is expected to survive in already prepared bunkers or space
facilities.For those who still are not
informed about the danger that Jewish Supremacism represents in our world
today, they should read at least
The
International Jew by Henry Ford 1920-1922
The Jew by Hilaire Belloc
The Jews, Masters of the World by LEON DE PONCINS (The Secret
Forces of Revolution) 1932.
Just a
few facts from that last named book
On 28 June 1914, the Jew Gavrillo
Princip murdered Archduke François-Ferdinand in Sarajevo.This was used as a pretext to start World War I, a Jewish War.
The Jew Kerensky took over from the
Tsar (like the Jew Kemal Mustapha will do later on in Turkey) and Sovietised the
Russians. The Soviets would then proceed
in mass slaughter of the Russian and Central Asian nations, both Christians and
Muslims.
The Jew provocateur (agitateur)
Parvus Helphand with the support of a half-Jew the Chanceller Bethmann-Hollweg
obtained from Ludendorf to send Lenin to Russia.
The immense majority of the
Bolsheviks were Jews for at least ten years.They set up and put into practice a doctrine propounded by the Jewish
Prophets Karl Marx and Lasalle.
The slaughter of the Tsar and of his
entire family at Iekaterinbourg was organised and led by the Jews Yourovski et
Golostcheguine who were under the orders of the Jew Jacob Sverdloff, then Presdent
of the Tsik of Moscow.
Both Bela Kun and Tibor Szamuelly were
Jews as well as all the leaders of the Hungarian bloodthirsty Bolshevism.
The leaders of the German Spartakism
were all Jews: Liebknecht, Rosa Luxembourg, Kurt Eisner.
The American and Austrian Socialist
leaders were all Jews.
The Jew Léon Blum was the leader of
French Socialism
The Jewish International Bloodline
were behind the Versailles Treaty (Paul Warburg and
others)
the recent British Debacle
control American Destiny
are currently the absolute masters of Germany
financed the Russian Revolution and supported
the Five Year Economic Plan
own or control the banks
own or control the media
own or control the cables (telegraphs)
own or control the radio
are masters over public opinion
are the Invisible government behind the visible
government
control all the world gold
SOME
JEWISH ORGANISATIONS
ISRAËL.A race, a religion, a people
cemented by powerful organisations:
The Jewish Committee of America
The Jewish Board of Deputies of the
British Empire (set up on 16.2.1883) to collaborate with the government like
the Pharisees and Sadducees did with the illegal Roman occupiers of Palestine
The Universal Israelite Alliance (founded in Paris
in 1860)
The Universal Freemasonic Order of
the Bnai-Brith reserved exclusively for Jews and founded in New-York in 1843
with 75,000 members spread over 492 Lodges and 10 Grand Lodges in the US,
Germany, Romania, Austria, Hungary, Czecho-Slovakia, Egypt, Palestine, etc.
(1920 figures published by the Jewish Encyclopaedia) - with ties to the
Israelite Alliance and the other big Jewish organisations.
The Revolutionary Bund, the greatest
revolutionary group in Russia
(later to be absorbed into the Communist and Menshevik Parties) and the Priory
(Poale) of Zion played both major roles in Russia before the Great War and in Palestine.
The L.I.C.A. (LICRA) or the International
league against Anti Semitism (Paris)
All the leaders of the Polish Social
Democratic Party, the Revolutionary Socialist Party and the Socialist Party
were Jews.
About the Revolutionary Priory of Zion, the Jew Elie Eberlin said:
« The Priory of Zion has assigned
as its final goal the creation of a Socialist Jewish State in Palestine”
We have here all the proofs required
to see Jews as being the root causes of our human tragedy of modern times.Jews (representing then some 15 million
people) have turned the world upside down and threaten to destroy civilisation.And, if we do not stop them in time, it will
be too late.Whether God or Aliens
created humankind, the Jews are bent on destroying it for good and they have
already been largely successful!
Jim
maybe it is time to flush evolution down the toilet. It never had any
credible evidence associated with it,there is no missing link and we
have proof that a superior being existed right here in our country.
A
US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to
release classified papers dating from the early 1900's that proves the
organization was...
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus"Life
on Earth makes no sense absent evolution" Jim, this is a careless
statement. I would love to read your books: THE EVOLUTION OF
INTELLIGENCE (2005) and RENDER UNTO DARWIN (2007). I do not know what
is in it, but as a former Head of Biology I never came across any
evidence about MACRO EVOLUTION. Evolution is not the correct term. I
challenged Pr Richard Dawkins many times and he always either run away
or lie outright about his evidence arguing live on British Television
that the expression "Theory of Evolution" in reality means FACT OF
EVOLUTION. He explicitly said live on television that in this context
THEORY = FACT! He was never able to provide one single irrefutable
evidence to prove MACRO EVOLUTION. Just like the Jewish Holocaust of
Six Million, MACRO EVOLUTION has become a dogma of Neo-Darwinists and
anti-God and antireligion fanatics and militants. There is not one iota
of evidence that humans have evolved from the rock or from an ape as
"evolutionists" preach and argue. I agree with you that Life on Earth"
makes "no sense", but I have seen no sense at all in scientists and
believers who claim that MACRO EVOLUTION makes sense! I would love to
read how you proved that INTELLIGENCE EVOLVED. Truth stands by itself.
When I asked Russian Communist Israel Israelovitch if Russians had any
evidence of MACRO EVOLUTION back in the sixties as they were teaching
"scientific" Atheism, he said they had none and that the so-called
discovery in the island of Java of the famous "missing link" by Dr
Eugene Dubois was a hoax like all the other 'discoveries'. I hope you
understand the implications if humans are only MACRO EVOLVED ANIMALS!
Then, all your struggle to teach the truth would have been in vain
because you will never be able to prove scientifically that humans
should have or have a conscience. Regards. Basheer
Timothy SinsheimerJim I will definitely look into it more because I want to learn but this discovery of the Nephilim and the Smithsonian appears to be authentic. This evidence appears to be coroborated that the info came out in a lawsuit. There are plenty of old newsp...See More
Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusThe Alien Beginning and End of Humankind By Basheer A. Frémaux-Soormally Dedicated to my very dear and faithful friend Adalberto Erazo Jr.
Greg GibsonWhy do people believe in aliens? Because the self-proclaimed aliens claimed, "We are aliens." IOW, people believe the "aliens" word. But, what if the "aliens" are lying?
Yes, numerous giant skeletons have been discovered which have similarities to the Nephilim in Genesis 6 and other ancient literature. Gen. 6. tells how fallen angels (demons) mated with human women to produce half-breeds (demon spirits in human bodies).
And, we see phenomena similar to Gen. 6 when we study UFO literature today. Numerous women report UFO abductions where self-proclaimed aliens (Neph.) raped them and/or stole their eggs. This is genetic engineering of an evil, master race.
I predict that when the NWO comes, alleged UFO aliens will go public, and proclaim, "We are your gods who created you. Worship our Messiah!" (Antichrist who will come to the rebuilt Judeo-Freemasonic-Luciferian temple in Jerusalem.)
Let's put it this way, if the day comes when the NWO leaders promote the alien theory in their news propaganda, you know these "aliens" are fake and evil like the NWO leaders.
Dr. Fetzer, I too am surprised you believe in evolution, because you're so skilled at following the evidence wherever it leads. How much have you researched Intelligent Design/creation? More importantly, have you ever researched the evidence for Jesus' resurrection?
Published on Friday, 07 June 2013 11:48 | Written by Administrator | |
"O thou man! Verily thou art ever Toiling on towards thy Lord- Painfully toiling, -but thou Shalt meet Him... So I do call To witness the ruddy glow Of Sunset; The Night and its Homing; And the Moon In her Fullness: Ye shall surely travel From stage to stage*."
Surah 84 Inshiqaq verses 6, 16-19
Darwin's theory of Evolution describes a growth process that takes
place in the biological or physical form that is necessary for us to
survive. Natural selection states:
Natural selection is the means by which
beneficial variations in a population tend to be preserved while
unfavorable variations tend to be lost. One of the key concepts behind
the theory of natural selection is that there is variation within
populations. As a result of that variation, some individuals are better
suited to their environment while other individuals are not so
well-suited. Because members of a population must compete for finite
resources, those better suited to their environment will out-compete
those that are not as well-suited.
Darwin's theory of evolution was referred to by scholars of his time as the "Mohammadan theory of evolution of man from lower forms".
Contrary to popular belief the theory of evolution NEVER stated that
man evolved from apes and other misguided concepts blamed on that
theory. Muslim scholars and scientists did not have the problems with
evolution as Christians did and also as later Muslims does who never
truly understood Darwin's theory of evolution. In fact the ideas
proposed by Darwin about evolution was proposed by Muslim scientists
hundreds of years before Darwin.
The Muslim theory of "evolution" ???
By Ghaffar Hassan
Denying evolution not only puts Muslims out of touch with established
science, it puts them out of touch with their own scientific heritage.
Is evolution compatible with Islam?
The debate amongst Muslims about the compatibility of
evolution by natural selection with Quranic teachings has gained real
momentum in recent years. With an increasing number of Muslim scientists
coming forward and publicly declaring their belief in evolution, the
debate has also began to attract the wrath of conservatives, who feel
threatened by evolution and view it as a falsifiable western concoction.
Belief in evolution remains a minority position in virtually all
Muslim societies around the world today. According to studies, 22
percent of Turks, 16 percent of Indonesians, 14 percent of Pakistanis,
11 percent of Malaysians, and 8 percent of Egyptians believe in
evolution. In comparison, belief in evolution is between 60 – 80 percent
in most European societies, and 40 percent in the US.
But things may not always have been this way. Traditionally, western
scientists considered evolution a theory primarily promulgated by their
Muslim counterparts. A contemporary of Charles Darwin, Sir William
Draper, in his book 'The Conflict Between Religion and Science,' refers to “...the Muhammaden theory of the evolution of man from lower forms” (p188).
Draper's observation was based on the fact that Muslim scientists
since the 9th century CE have been alluding to the idea that humans
evolved from less sophisticated life forms over a long period of time.
Al-Jahiz (781-869 CE), a Muslim scholar based in present day Iraq, states in 'The Book of Animals': Animals engage in a struggle for existence; for resources, to
avoid being eaten and to breed. Environmental factors influence
organisms to develop new characteristics to ensure survival, thus
transforming into new species. Animals that survive to breed can pass on
their successful characteristics to offspring.
Ibn Khaldun, perhaps one of the most famous Muslim Polymaths of all time, published a book called 'The Muqadimmah' in 1377 CE. In it he states:
One should then take a look at the world of creation. It started
out from the minerals and progressed, in an ingenious, gradual manner,
to plants and animals. The last stage of minerals is connected with the
first stage of plants, such as herbs and seedless plants. The last stage
of plants, such as palms and vines, is connected with the first stage
of animals, such as snails and shellfish.
He adds:
The animal world then widens, its species become numerous, and,
in a gradual process of creation, it finally leads to man, who is able
to think and reflect. The higher stage of man is reached from the world
of monkeys, in which both sagacity and perception are found...
There were also many other Muslim scholars, writing between the 9th
and the 14th century, that expressed ideas similar to those of al-Jahiz
and Ibn Khaldun. Persian scholar, Ibn Miskawahy (932-1030) provided
perhaps the most vivid account of evolution from that period, seeking to
harmonise it with the Quranic description of creation in the process.
So why didn't these ideas take off and integrate into the fabric of
mainstream Muslim thought and society? There are a number of reasons.
Firstly, Muslim empires in the past believed in centralising
knowledge rather than disseminating it en masse. Centres of learning,
such as Baghdad and Cordoba, had their houses of knowledge in which
scientists would work, preserving and developing on, primarily,
Hellenistic knowledge. There was no printing press, and even when it did
arrive it was rejected, thus such knowledge was largely reserved for an
elite audience. When centres of learning were conquered and destroyed,
as Baghdad was in 1256 by the Mongols, most of the knowledge was lost
too.
Secondly, the religious authorities of the time were largely opposed
to ideas being put forward by scientists and other rationalist thinkers
such as Ibn Rushd, and before him, Ibn Sina. They felt threatened by
non-theological attempts to ascertain truths and Muslim leaders often
sided with the religious authorities for political reasons.
Thirdly, literalist and dogmatic strands of Islamic theology have
been aggressively promoted all around the Muslim world over the past few
decades or ever since huge oil deposits were discovered in the Arabian
Gulf. The Saudi state, in an attempt at cultural imperialism, has done
its best to mainstream Wahabi thinking in Muslim communities everywhere.
The result: a retardation and stagnation of thinking in parts of the
world that were already very stagnant.
Most conservative Muslims today feel threatened by the idea of
evolution, especially since the evidence for it is over-whelming and an
increasing number of believers are starting to accept it. History
illustrates that this doesn't have to be the case. Evolution is not a
modern western construct. Like most great ideas, it has been developed
over hundreds of years by many great thinkers, from Aristotle all the
way to Dawkins.
Most importantly of all, the theory of evolution today, especially
with the advances in our understanding of DNA, is fact. Denying it not
only puts Muslims out of touch with established science, it puts them
out of touch with their own scientific heritage.
Quran 29:20
Say: "Travel through the Earth and see how He began the Creation. Then,
Allah makes the latter Creation. Allah is capable of (doing)
everything".
24.45 . Allah has created every animal out of water .
Of them (is a category which) walks upon its belly, (another which)
walks upon two legs, and ( a third which) walks upon four . Allah
creates what He wills. Allah is Able to do everything (He wants).
21: 30 Have not those who disbelieve seen (known) that the heavens and
the Earth were of one connected entity, then We separated them (from
each other), and We made every living thing out of water? Will they not
then believe?
71.17. And Allah has caused you to grow out of the earth like plants.
32.7. (Allah is He) who has made everything He created better, and He began the creation of the human (being) out of clay.
Please
read the article linked at the end of the video description for more
Quranic verses about our evolution in this 1400 years old book.
A Message to Atheists:
Evolution
theory and natural selection was the work of many scientists and
philosophers. However, Muslim scientists contributed a lot to it and
they didn't believe many myths from Greek philosophers like Aristotle
who believed in spontaneous generation of life for example.
I'm a
Muslim who strongly believes in evolution by design NOT in blind
evolution and chance, natural selection and chance alone CANNOT make
such a wonderful tree of life. Life in this universe is guided same as
the universe itself is guided by ingenious laws that we just started to
understand. If you think blind evolution and chance can bring
sophisticated life answer the Quranic challenge in my other video:
If
you still want to attribute evolution to the Greeks please send me a
link with advanced knowledge like Muslim scientists had not just the
vague ideas Greeks had about evolution, if you disagree ask John William
Draper to change the name of evolution his book :)
A Message To Muslims:
-Eve
from Adam's rib: Most of the ideas that contradict evolution among
Muslims are from the myths of other religions which were imported to
Islam and attributed falsely to the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon
him). Our father Adam (peace be upon him) was preferred or chosen over
other people of his time as Allah stated clearly in Quran 3:33-34,
just like Allah chose any prophet after him also Quran stated in these
verses that all were "offspring", Adam was included and Allah is never
short of words.
-Creation of Adam in Heaven: There is no such thing
in the Quran, Adam was reworded to stay in Heaven with his wife AFTER he
won the contest against the angels (the naming of creatures) as Quran
stated clearly in 2:35 and 7:19. When Adam disobeyed Allah and ate from the tree him and his wife were sent back to Earth.
-Why
Adam disobeyed Allah? Because Allah didn't promise Adam to be immortal
in Heaven, Adam was growing older and Satan promised him that if he ate
from the immortality tree then he will not grow older. Quran: 20:120 and
7:20
-Creation of Adam from dust: We are all created from dust, just like our father Adam. Quran 18:37, Quran 30:20, Quran 35:11, Quran 40:67.
-Adam
was created suddenly: Just This verse is enough to refute such claim
and there are many others Quran 7:11: And We created you (humans, in
plural form), then fashioned you (made you in the image you are, also
addressing humans in plural form), then said to the angels: Prostrate to
Adam!
-How can Adam be our father if there were many humans?: The
children of the smart man that Allah chose were the most fit to survive
to our days (survival of the fittest), there are many other human
species which we found their fossils only and they didn't make it to our
time.
-How Adam children got married? If Adam and Eve were the only
humans then the only answer is that brothers married their sisters, do
you accept such answer? Of course there were other humans and Adam
children married them.
-Allah is NOT a wizard, He does NOT pull new
stars and new galaxies from a magic hat and certainly He doesn't do that
for new species. Allah created and planned this universe on scientific
laws; evolution is just one of them. Evolution means way more ingenious
creator than a wizard who had to come to Earth and pull species one
after another because he couldn't plan that from the beginning and you
know very well that Allah is the best planner, evolution was part of the
plan from the beginning of creation of this universe.
Please read the article linked here, don't be brainwashed by the myths of other religions. Thank you.
Success can be defined as the
continued expansion of happiness and the progressive realisation of worthy
goals.Success is the ability to fulfil
our desires with effortless ease.Material wealth is only one component of success.Success is a journey not a destination.Material abundance makes the journey more
enjoyable.Success includes good health,
energy and enthusiasm for life, fulfilling relationship, creative freedom,
emotional and psychological stability, a sense of well being and peace of
mind.Yet, even with all that, we will
remain unfilled unless we nurture the seeds of divinity inside us.In reality we are divinity in disguise and
the gods and goddesses in embryo that are contained within us seek to be fully
materialised.True success is therefore
the experience of the miraculous.It is
the unfolding of the divinity within us.
Law is the process by which
the unmanifest becomes the manifest.It
is the process by which the observer becomes the observed.It is the process by which the seer becomes
the scenery. It is the process by which the dreamer manifests the dream.
All of creation, everything
that exists in the physical world is the result of the unmanifest transforming
itself into the manifest.Everything
that we behold comes from the unknown, our physical body, the physical
universe, anything and everything that we can perceive through our senses is
the expression of the unmanifest becoming manifest.
The physical universe is nothing
other than the self - curving back within itself to experience itself as
spirit, mind and physical matter.In
other words, all processes of creation are processes through which the self or
divinity expresses itself.Consciousness
in motion expresses itself as the object of the universe in the eternal downs
of life. The source of all creation is
divinity of (or?) the spirit.The
process of creation is divinity in motion or (of?) the mind.The object of creation is the physical
universe, which includes the physical body.
And threes three components
of reality, spirit, mind and body are observer, the process of observing and
the observed are essentially the same thing.They all come from the same place, the field of pure potentiality, which
is purely unmanifest.The physical laws
of the universe are actually this whole process of divinity in motion or
consciousness in motion.When we
understand these laws and apply them in our lives, anything we want can be
created because the same laws that nature uses to create a forest or a galaxy
or a human body can also bring about the fulfilment of all our other desires.
THE FIRST LAW OF SUCCESS
Pure potentiality = Pure
consciousness. It is the field of all possibilities and infinite creativity. Other attributes of consciousness are pure
knowledge, unboundedness, perfect balance, infinite silence, invincibility,
simplicity and bliss.This is our
essential nature.Our essential nature
is one of pure potentiality.When you
discover your essential nature and know who you really are, in that knowing
itself is the ability to fulfill any dream you have because you are the eternal
possibility, the immeasurable potential of all that was, is and will be.The field of pure potentiality is your own
self…
Dr Deepak Chopra
The rest of the law is
unfortunately more of the same hogwash.I
love Dr Deepak Chopra, like I love Pr Texe Marrs, but he feeds on the
gullibility of the Western disillusioned masses and the hippies who lost hope
and faith in their respective churches.
See David Icke’s new age
religion of infinite consciousness, infinite love and of self creation or the Zionist
United Nations Dictatorship (UNO) New Age religion that it is trying to impose
manu militari on the entire world.
“God is also a human
being”, says Minister Louis Farrakhan (2011) of the Black racist Sect known as
“Nation of Islam” and is the Shriners’ (Master Masons’) “Father of the Sons of
Islam”, that is, the Black “direct descendants of God” destined to “create a
new earth and a new heaven”.
“A Shriner belongs to the
ancient Arabic order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine.”
BAFS
Richard Dawkins has lost:meet the new new atheists
Secular humanism is recovering from its Dawkinsite phase – and beginning a more interesting conversation
The atheist spring that began just over a decade ago is over,
thank God. Richard Dawkins is now seen by many, even many non-believers,
as a joke figure, shaking his fist at sky fairies. He’s the Mary
Whitehouse of our day.
So what was all that about, then? We can see it a bit more clearly
now. It was an outpouring of frustration at the fact that religion is
maddeningly complicated and stubbornly irritating, even in largely
secular Britain. This frustration had been building for decades: the
secular intellectual is likely to feel somewhat bothered by religion,
even if it is culturally weak. Oh, she finds it charming and interesting
to a large extent, and loves a cosy carol service, but religion really
ought to know its place. Instead it dares to accuse the secular world of
being somehow -deficient.
The events of 9/11 were the main trigger for the explosion of this
latent irritation. There was a desire to see "Islamic terrorism" as the
symbolic synecdoche of all of religion. On one level this makes some
sense: does not all religion place faith above reason? Isn’t this
intrinsically dangerous? Don’t all religions jeopardise secular freedom,
whether through holy wars or faith schools? On another level it is
absurd: is the local vicar, struggling to build community and help
smelly drunks stay alive, really a force for evil — even if she has some
illiberal opinions? When such questions arise, a big bright
‘Complicated’ sign ought to flash in one’s brain. Instead, in the wake
of 9/11, many otherwise thoughtful people opted for simplicity over
complexity. They managed to convince themselves that religion is
basically bad, and that the brave intellectual should talk against it.
(This preference for seeming tough and clear over admitting difficult
complexity is really cowardice, and believers are prone to it too.)
The success of five or six atheist authors, on both sides of the
Atlantic, seemed to herald a strong new movement. It seemed that
non-believers were tired of all the nuance surrounding religion, hungry
for a tidy narrative that put them neatly in the right.
Atheism is still with us. But the movement that threatened to form
has petered out. Crucially, atheism’s younger advocates are reluctant to
compete for the role of Dawkins’s disciple. They are more likely to
bemoan the new atheist approach and call for large injections of nuance.
A good example is the pop-philosopher Julian Baggini. He is a stalwart
atheist who likes a bit of a scrap with believers, but he’s also able to
admit that religion has its virtues, that humanism needs to learn from
it. For example, he has observed that a sense of gratitude is
problematically lacking in secular culture, and suggested that humanists
should consider ritual practices such as fasting. This is also the
approach of the pop-philosopher king, Alain de Botton. His recent book Religion for Atheists rejects
the ‘boring’ question of religion’s truth or falsity, and calls for ‘a
selective reverence for religious rituals and concepts’. If you can take
his faux-earnest prose style, he has some interesting insights into
religion’s basis in community, practice, habit.
And liberal punditry has softened. Polly Toynbee’s younger sisters,
so to speak, are wary of seeing all of religion as a misogynist plot.
When Zoe Williams attacks religious sexism or homophobia she resists the
temptation to widen the attack and imply that all believers are dunces
or traitors. Likewise Tanya Gold recently ridiculed the idea of religion
as a force for evil. ‘The idea of my late church-going mother-in-law
beating homosexuals or instituting a pogrom is obviously ridiculous,
although she did help with jumble sales and occasionally church
flowers.’
All
these writers admirably refuse to lapse into a comfortably sweeping
ideology that claims the moral high ground for unbelief. Life’s
complicated, they admit. Institutional religion might be dubious, but
plenty of its servants buck that trend with a flair that puts secular
culture to shame. To adapt a Katharine Hepburn line, the time to make up
your mind about religion is never.
In these pages Douglas Murray recently recounted debating alongside
Richard Dawkins and being embarrassed by the crudity of his approach.
Murray is not one of life’s fence-sitters: it must have occurred to him
that atheism has polemical possibilities that would suit him rather
well. But he has the sense to turn down the role of the new Christopher
Hitchens. A polemical approach to religion has swung out of fashion. In
fact, admitting that religion is complicated has become a mark of
sophistication. Andrew Brown of the Guardian has played a role in
this shift: he’s a theologically literate agnostic who is scornful of
crude atheist crusading, and who sometimes ponders his own attraction to
religion. On a more academic level, the philosopher John Gray has had
an influence: he is sceptical of all relics of Enlightenment optimism,
including the atheist’s faith in reason.
What, if anything, do these newer atheists have to say? In previous
generations, the atheist was keen to insist that non-believers can be
just as moral as believers. These days, this is more or less taken for
granted. What distinguishes the newer atheist is his admission that
non-believers can be just as immoral as believers. Rejecting religion is
no sure path to virtue; it is more likely to lead to complacent
self-regard, or ideological arrogance.
It might sound odd to cite Alain de Botton as a critic of complacent
self-regard, but this is central to his stated purpose. Attending to the
religious roots of humanism can prod us out of seeing secular humanism
as natural, the default position, and incite us to ponder our need for
discipline, structure, community, and so on. At one point he commends
the Christian perspective, that we are ‘at heart desperate, fragile,
vulnerable, sinful creatures, a good deal less wise than we are
knowledgeable, always on the verge of anxiety, tortured by our
relationships, terrified of death — and most of all in need of God’. Is
this mere posturing at depth, for ultimately he does not affirm the idea
of our need of God in a sustained, serious way? Yes and no: it is also a
mark of the intelligent humanist’s desire to avoid simplistic
ideologising and attempt some honesty about the human condition. The key
novelty of the newer atheism, perhaps, is its attentiveness to human
frailty.
The religious believer might say: we do not need humanism to tell us
this. Indeed not, but it might not hurt non-believers, inoculated
against all religious talk, to hear of it.
This article first appeared in the print edition of The Spectator magazine, dated 13 April 2013
Subscribe with our offer of the summer:
three months’ print and digital subscription to the Spectator —
including our apps for iPad, iPhone and Kindle Fire — for just £12. Click here to join us.
When I picked up “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins, I was
expecting to encounter new reasons put forward to form a positive case
for the Atheist worldview, but I have to say that I was disappointed.
What I read were rehashed, incoherent and outdated arguments that made
me realize that Richard Dawkins is not very well read in philosophy. In
light of this I thought it would be useful to provide a compilation of
arguments from existing material and respond to his main arguments in
the following way:
1. Respond to what Dawkins considers his central argument;
2. Respond to what Philosophers consider his best argument.
Responding to what Dawkins considers his central argument
On pages 157-158 of “The God Delusion,” Dawkins summarises what he maintains as “the central argument of my book”:
1. One of the greatest challenges to the human intellect has been to
explain how the complex, improbable appearance of design in the universe
arises.
2. The natural temptation is to attribute the appearance of design to actual design itself.
3. The temptation is a false one because the designer hypothesis
immediately raises the larger problem of who designed the designer.
4. The most ingenious and powerful explanation is Darwinism evolution by
natural selection and we don’t have an equivalent explanation for
physics.
5. We should not give up the hope of a better explanation arising in physics, something as powerful as Darwinism is for biology.
God almost certainly does not exist. Preliminary Note
Before I go into Dawkins’ main points, I would like to address his
conclusion “God almost certainly does not exist.” My main issue is – how
does he conclude that God doesn’t exist from the above statements? It
seems to me that his conclusion just jumps out of thin air, to infer
that God does not exist just shows how invalid his argument is. It seems
to me that the only delusion is Dawkins’ conviction that his arguments
undermine the existence of God.
If we could conclude anything from Dawkins’ argument it would be that
we should not conclude that God exists based on the design of the
universe. However, even if that is true, it doesn’t mean that God
doesn’t exist; we can believe in God’s existence from many other
arguments, which include:
• The argument from morality;
• The miracle of the Qur’an;
• The cosmological argument;
• The argument from personal experience;
• The argument from consciousness.
If we were to accept all of Dawkins’ statements, it would not be
enough to reject the idea that God exists, and it certainly does not
provide a positive case for Atheism. However, many of his statements are
false. Let us take his statements and respond accordingly. Statement #1: One of the greatest challenges to the
human intellect has been to explain how the complex, improbable
appearance of design in the universe arises.
I believe that it is only a challenge if you wish to take God out of
the picture. It is indeed a challenge if you presume atheism to be true.
However for someone who is reflective and thinks deeply about things, I
think the simplest and the best explanation – with the greatest
explanatory power – is that there is a supernatural designer. The next
point will address why God makes sense of the design in the universe. Statement #2: The natural temptation is to attribute the appearance of design to actual design itself.
This is not only a natural temptation but a rational conclusion
brought to light based upon the fine-tuning of the initial conditions of
the universe. Let me start off by presenting the premises of this
argument:
1. The fine-tuning of the universe to permit life is due to physical necessity, chance, or design.
2. It is not due to physical necessity or chance.
3. Therefore, it is due to design. Explaining Premise One
The existence of a universe that permits human life is due to
conditions that must have been fined-tuned to a degree that is beyond
comprehension. Take the following examples into consideration:
• The Strength of Gravity & the Atomic Weak Force: Physicist P.
C. W. Davies concludes that a small change in the strength of gravity or
of the atomic weak force would have prevented a universe that permits
our existence. P. C. W. Davies argues that this small change is as small
as one part in 10100 .
• Volume of the phase space of possible universes: Roger Penrose of
Oxford University explains that the creator would have to aim for a very
tiny volume of the “phase space of possible universes” to create a
universe that resembles our own. This is quite technical science, but we
should ask the question: how tiny is this volume? According to Penrose
the volume would be 1/10 to the power of X which is 10123.
The precision required to produce a universe that resembles our own is
much greater than the precision that would be required to hit one proton
if the universe were a dartboard!
In light of the above, there are only three possible explanations for the presence of the above fine tuning of the universe:
1. Physical necessity;
2. Chance;
3. Design. Why it cannot be Physical Necessity
This option is irrational. There is just no physical reason why these
constants and quantities should have the values they do. As P. C. W.
Davies explains:
“Even if the laws of physics were unique, it doesn’t follow that the
physical universe itself is unique…the laws of physics must be augmented
by cosmic initial conditions…there is nothing in present ideas about
‘laws of initial conditions’ remotely to suggest that their consistency
with the laws of physics would imply uniqueness. Far from it…it seems,
then, that the physical universe does not have to be the way it is: it
could have been otherwise.”
Additionally if anyone was to take the view that the fine-tuning of
the universe to permit human life is due to physical necessity, it would
imply that it would be impossible to have a universe not fit for life!
However physicists maintain that the universe in which we live didn’t
have to be the way that it is, and there could have been many other
universes that did not permit human life. Why it cannot be Chance
Some people who do not understand the impossibility of the universe
coming into being by chance exclaim, “It could have happened by chance!”
However would they say chance explains how an elephant was sleeping in
their garage overnight? Or how a 747 ended up parked in their garden?
Even after their irrational perspective is highlighted, they still hold
on to the theory that the universe can exist due to chance. In response
to this I would argue that it is not just about chance but something the
theorists such as William Dembski call “specified probability.”
Specified probability is a probability that also conforms to an
independent pattern. To illustrate this, imagine you have a monkey in a
room for twenty-four hours, typing a way on your laptop. In the morning
you enter the room and you see, “To be or not to be!” The monkey has
miraculously written out a part of a Shakespearian play! What you may
have expected is random words such as “house,” “car,” and “apple.”
However, in this case not only have you seen the improbability of typing
English words – but they also conform to the independent pattern of
English grammar! To accept this is just the result of blind chance would
be irrational and counter discourse, as anyone can claim anything from
this perspective. To put this in to context, British mathematicians have
calculated that if a monkey did type on a laptop at every possible
moment, it would take 28 Billion years (!!!) to produce “To be or not to
be”. In conclusion, accepting the chance hypothesis is tantamount to
rejecting the existence of our own universe!
Since premises one and two are true, it follows that supernatural
design is the most reasonable explanation for the fine-tuning of the
universe to permit human life. Statement #3: The temptation is a false one because
the designer hypothesis immediately raises the larger problem of who
designed the designer.
The above statement, which is a contention to the design argument is
flawed for two main reasons. Firstly, anyone with a basic understanding
of the philosophy of science will conclude that in the inference to the
best explanation, the best explanation does not require an explanation!
The following example illustrates this point. Imagine 500 years from
now, a group of archaeologists start digging in London’s Hyde Park only
to find parts of a car and a bus. They would be completely justified in
inferring that these finds were not the result of any biological process
but the products of an unknown civilization. However if some skeptics
were to argue that we cannot make such inferences because we do not know
anything about this civilization, how they lived and who created them,
would that make the archaeologists conclusions untrue? Of course not!
Secondly, if we take this contention seriously it could undermine the
very foundations of science and philosophy themselves. If we require an
explanation for the basic assumptions of science, for example that the
external world exists, where do you think our level of scientific
progress would be? Additionally if we were to apply this type of
question to every attempt at explaining the explanation, we would end up
with an infinite regression of explanations. And an infinite regression
of explanations would defeat the whole purpose of science in the first
place – which is to provide an explanation! A Note on Rejecting the Supernatural
Dawkins’ also rejects a supernatural designer because he thinks, as
an explanation, it lack explanatory power; in other words, no progress
is made with an explanation to the apparent fine-tuning. He raises this
objection because he feels that a supernatural designer is just as
complex as design. However Dawkins’ objection is problematic as he
assumes that a supernatural designer is as complex as the universe. But a
supernatural designer, in other words God, is one of the simplest
concepts understood by all. This opinion is expressed by many
Philosophers including the famous atheist turned theist Professor
Anthony Flew.
Dawkins’ other assumption is that God is made of many parts; however,
God is immaterial, transcendent and one. Just because God can do
complex things does not make him complex, it seems to me that Dawkins
confuses ability with nature. In other words, just because God can do
complex things (such as creating the universe) it does not make His
nature complex.So it stands to reason that God is the simplest, and
therefore the best, explanation. Statement #4: The most ingenious and powerful
explanation is Darwinism evolution by natural selection and and we don’t
have an equivalent explanation for physics.This statement is irrelevant
due to the following reasons:
1. Evolution does not have its foot in the door;
2. Evolution is based upon incalculable probabilities;
3. Evolution is impossible because we have not spent enough time on Earth yet.
Let me expand upon these points. 1. Evolution does not have its foot in the door
With regards to the existence of God, evolution does not even have
its foot in the door; it’s billions years away. The fine-tuning
argument mentioned above refers to the initial conditions of the
universe and various constants that pre-date any evolutionary process.
Simply put, evolution has no say. 2. Evolution is based upon incalculable probabilities
The odds against assembling the human genome spontaneously are
incalculable. The probability of assembling the genome is between 4-180 to 4-110,000 and 4-360 to 4-110,000.
These numbers give some feel for the unlikelihood of the species Homo
sapiens. And if anyone were to accept evolution by chance, they would
have to believe in a miracle as these numbers are so high! Therefore
evolution itself would prove the existence of God! 3. Evolution is impossible because we have not had enough time on Earth yet
According to John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler, the odds of assembling a single gene are between and 4-180 to 4-360.
The implications of this are that there simply has not been enough time
since the formation of the earth to try a number of nucleotide base
combinations that can even remotely compare to these numbers! Statement #5: We should not give up the hope of a better explanation arising in physics, something as powerful as Darwinism is for biology.
Dawkins basically says that since there is a naturalistic explanation
for the apparent design in species and we do not have a similar
explanation for physics, we should just wait. Does this not sound like
blind faith to you? The statement presumes scientism to be the only way
of establishing facts or sound conclusions. Why else would he want to
wait for a naturalistic explanation? Dawkins’ presumption that scientism
is the only way to establish facts is not true because:
scientism, which is the view that we should believe only what can be
proven scientifically, is self-defeating. Scientism claims that a
proposition is not true if it cannot be scientifically proven. However,
the above claim itself cannot be scientifically proven. Therefore,
according to this claim, the claim itself is not true, hence scientism
defeats itself.
scientism cannot prove necessary truths like mathematics and logic. For example, “if p implies q, and p, then q”
and “3 + 3 = 6″ are necessary truths and not merely empirical
generalisations. In fact, scientism requires these necessary truths, but
it cannot prove them, and any attempt to do so would be tantamount to
arguing in a circle.
scientism is limited in its scope as it cannot address political or
moral realities. Concerning morality, scientism can only provide
“well-being” as a yardstick for moral truths. However, rapists, liars,
and thieves could all have “well-being” due to their actions, therefore
the moral landscape, as defined by science, is occupied by good and bad
people, and from this perspective morality has no meaning.
It can be seen from the above that Dawkins’ central argument fails
and is an embarrassment to the scientific community, as atheist
Philosopher Michael Ruse explains,
“unlike the new atheists, I take scholarship seriously. I have
written that The God Delusion made me ashamed to be an atheist and I
meant it. Trying to understand how God could need no cause, Christians
claim that God exists necessarily. I have taken the effort to try to
understand what that means. Dawkins and company are ignorant of such
claims and positively contemptuous of those who even try to understand
them, let alone believe them. Thus, like a first-year undergraduate, he
can happily go around asking loudly, “What caused God?” as though he had
made some momentous philosophical discovery.” Responding to what Philosophers consider his best argument
According to Philosopher and lecturer at Yale University, Gregory E.
Granssle, Dawkins’ strongest argument can be found on page 55:
“A universe with a creative superintendent would be a very different kind of universe from one without.”
Dawkins’ argument can be summarised in the following way:
1. A universe created by God would be different than the one created by nature;
2. The universe we live in fits better to a universe created by nature;
3. Therefore the universe we live in is most likely to have been created by nature.
I would argue that Dawkins’ argument couldn’t be any further away
from the truth; this is because the universe that we live in actually
makes more sense being created by God for the following reasons. 1. The universe is ordered and open to rational anaylsis
If God did not exist, the universe would not display the order it
does, and it would not be finely-tuned to permit human life. Professor
Roger Penrose states, “There is a certain sense in which I would say the
universe has a purpose. It’s not there just somehow by chance…I don’t
think that’s a very fruitful or helpful way of looking at the universe.”
Additionally, the very fact that we can observe and perform rational
analysis on the patterns we perceive in the universe makes more sense if
God did exist, because in a naturalistic universe things would be
expected to be more chaotic. This does not mean a universe without a God
could not be ordered; however it is more likely that God would create
an ordered universe, and since the universe we live in is ordered it
makes sense that God’s existence fits well with our universe 2. The universe contains conscious and aware beings
A universe that contains consciousness and awareness makes sense with
the existence of God. A universe without a God would be very different
to the one we are living in.Explanation
Human beings experience things all the time. This article you are
reading is an experience; even talking about your experience is an
experience. However the ultimate reality that we know from any
experience is the one who experiences it – in other words ourselves.
When we realise that there is a first-person, an “I”, “me” or “mine,” we
come to face a profound mystery. The Philosopher Roy Abraham Varghese
puts it nicely when he wrote, “To reverse Descartes, ‘I am, therefore I
think…’ Who is this ‘I’? ‘Where’ is it? How did it come to be? Your self
is not just something physical.”
The self is not a physical thing; it is not contained in any cell or
biological structure. The most unchallenged and intuitive reality is
that we are all aware, but we cannot describe or explain what this
awareness is. One thing that we can be sure of is that the self cannot
be explained biologically or chemically. The main reason for this is
that science does not discover the self; it is actually the other way
round. For science to try and explain the truth of the self would be
tantamount to arguing in a circle! Even scientists recognise this; the
physicist Gerald Schroeder points out that there is no real difference
between a heap of sand and the brain of an Einstein. The advocates of a
physical explanation for the self end up in a muddle as they require
answers to even bigger questions, such as “How can certain bits of
matter suddenly create a new reality that has no resemblance to
matter?”So if the self cannot be explained physically then the next
question must be asked: “How did it come to be?” The history of the
universe indicates that consciousness spontaneously arose, and language
emerged without any evolutionary forerunner. So where did it come from?
Even the neo-atheists have failed to come to terms with the nature of
the self and its source, because no physical explanation is coherent
enough to be convincing. Even Richard Dawkins almost admits defeat
concerning the self and consciousness; he states, “We don’t know. We
don’t understand it.”
The best explanation for the nature and source of the self is that it
came from a source that is thinking, aware and conscious. How else can
the self, which is an entity with a capacity to reflect and experience,
manifest itself? It cannot have come from unconscious matter incapable
to experience and ponder. Simply put, matter cannot produce concepts and
perceptions, therefore we can conclude that the self cannot have a
material basis but must have come from a living source that transcends
the material world; and this is best explained by God. No other answer
provides an adequate explanation for this phenomenon. 3. The universe contains objective morality
We all believe that killing 6 million Jews during World War II was
morally wrong, however not only do we believe it was morally wrong we
believe it was objectively morally wrong. What I mean by objective is
that if the Nazis had successfully taken over Europe and brainwashed us
to believe that it was ok to commit genocide, it would still be
objectively morally wrong regardless of human experience. However since
our universe contains objective morality then it can only make sense
with God’s existence, because God is required as rational basis for
objective morality. Without God morality is subjective, because God is
the only conceptual anchor that transcends human subjectivity. So the
universe with objective morality makes no sense without God. In this
light the Muslim or theist may argue:
1. If God does not exist, then objective moral values do not exist;
2. The universe with objective moral values does exist;
3. Therefore, God exists.Explaining the key premise
The question about objective good or bad, in other words objective
morality, has been discussed by various moral philosophers. Many have
concluded that there is no objective morality without God, for instance
the late J. L. Mackie in his book “Ethics” states that there are no
objective moral values. Humanist philosopher Paul Kurtz aptly puts it
as,
“The central question about moral and ethical principles concerns
this ontological foundation. If they are neither derived from God nor
anchored in some transcendent ground, are they purely ephemeral?”
Paul Kurtz is right; God is the only conceptual anchor that
transcends human subjectivity, so without God there is no rational basis
for objective morality. To explain this further let us discuss
alternative conceptual foundations for morality.In God’s absence, there
are only two alternative foundations:
1. Social pressure
2. Evolution
Both social pressures and evolution provide no objective basis for
morality as they both claim that our morality is contingent on changes:
biological and social. Therefore morality cannot be binding and true
regardless of who believes in them. Therefore without God, there is no
objective basis for morality. God as a concept is not subjective,
therefore having God as the basis for morality makes them binding and
objective, because God transcends human subjectivity. The following
statement by Richard Taylor, an eminent ethicist, correctly concludes,
“Contemporary writers in ethics, who blithely discourse upon moral
right and wrong and moral obligation without any reference to religion,
are really just weaving intellectual webs from thin air; which amounts
to saying that they discourse without meaning.”
Since the universe contains objective morality, and Gods existence is
necessary as a conceptual foundation for objective morals, then the
universe we live in makes sense with the existence of God. A Quick Note on Religious “Evils”
Before I conclude I would like to highlight that a response to
Dawkins’ other contentions with the concept of God and religious life.
Dawkins seems to attribute all the negative and evil things to religion.
However there is a strong argument that these things are not unique to
religion itself, but the common conceptual dominator is humanity. This
is summarised well by Keith Ward, the former Regius Professor of
Divinity at the University of Oxford, he writes,
“It is very difficult to think of any organised human activity that
could not be corrupted…The lesson is that anti-religious corruptions and
religious corruptions are both possible. There is no magic system or
belief, not even belief in liberal democracy, which can be guaranteed to
prevent it.”
To illustrate this let me use the outdated cliché of “religions are
the cause war and conflict” and show how war and conflict are not unique
to religions. In the relatively short history of secularism the
following massacres have committed in the name of non-religious
ideologies such a communism, nationalism and social-Darwinism:
• 70,000,000 under chairman Mao
• 20,000,000 under Stalin
• 2,000,000 no longer exist because of Pol Pot
• 700,000 innocent Iraqi’s in the current occupation
• 500,000 Iraqi children in the 10 year sanctions
So it can be clearly seen above that war and conflict are not
religious monopolies, rather they are human phenomena and not unique to
religion. As Professor Stephen L. Carter argues in “Civility”:
“[T]he statement that wars have been fought in the name of God is a
non sequitur. As the theologian Walter Wink once pointed out, more
people have died in the twentieth century’s secular wars than in the
preceding fifty centuries of fighting combined…. No religious war in
history, not all the religious wars of history added together, did as
much damage as this century’s wars of nationalism and ideology.” Conclusion
This article attempted to respond to Richard Dawkins’ best-seller
“The God Delusion” by responding to his central argument and the
argument that Philosophers consider to be his best. However,
intellectual gymnastics – no matter how truthful – seldom convinces
others, so I thought it would best to allow the expression of God – the
Qur’an – to have the final say. In the wonderful eloquence and sublime
style God says,
“In the creation of the heavens and Earth, and the alternation of the
night and day, and the ships which sail the seas to people’s benefit,
and the water which God sends down from the sky – by which He brings the
Earth to life when it was dead and scatters about in it creatures of
every kind – and the varying direction of the winds, and the clouds
subservient between heaven and Earth, there are signs for people who use
their intellect.” Qur’an, 2:164 Bibliography
The majority of this article has been compiled from:
Contending with Christianity’s Critics: Answering New Atheists and Other Objectors. Edited by Paul Copan and William Lane Craig.
There is a God: How The World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind. By Professor Anthony Flew.
The anthropic cosmological principle. By John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler.
The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. By William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland.
God?: A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist. By William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
"Inherit the Wind"- How the Illuminati Brainwashed Christians
April 23, 2014
(left,
In the movie, Clarence Darrow, played by Spencer Tracy, interrogates William
Jennings Bryan, played by Frederic March.) The movie "Inherit
the Wind" (1960) based
on the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, helped make
Americans adopt the doctrine of evolution.
James Perloff shows how Hollywood
distorted the facts to advance the Illuminati agenda.
"We are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence
in these theories... Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are
empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism."
(Protocols 2:2-3)
"Now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of
that Christian religion." (Protocol 17:2)
Perhaps nothing advanced evolution so effectively as the play and movie Inherit
the Wind. It depicts the 1925 "Monkey Trial." The defendant was
John Scopes, a Dayton, Tennessee schoolteacher charged with violating the
Butler Act, a state law that forbade teaching that man descended from lower
forms.
Leading Scopes's defense was famed attorney Clarence Darrow. Assisting the
prosecution was former Democratic Presidential candidate William Jennings
Bryan. The most common impression about this trial is that Darrow humiliated
Bryan in cross-examination, scoring a powerful victory for Darwinism over
religious fundamentalism.
Public beliefs regarding the trial are based mostly on Inherit the Wind,
which portrayed a battle between enlightened evolutionists and imbecilic
Christians. My book Tornado in a Junkyard compares the screenplay (the
Oscar-nominated Spencer Tracy version) to the trial transcript and other
records. Here are highlights. (The complete comparison is posted on my blog.)
THE MOVIE opens with the grim town minister and other prudes marching to the
local high school. They arrest young Scopes, who is forthrightly teaching
biology using Darwin.
IN REALITY, Scopes was not a biology teacher. He taught math, but had briefly
substituted for a biology teacher during an illness. The ACLU recruited him to
challenge the Butler Act. Scopes never taught evolution. He wrote in his
autobiography, Center of the Storm: "Darrow had been afraid for me
to go on the stand. Darrow realized that I was not a science teacher and he was
afraid that if I were put on the stand I would be asked if I actually taught
biology."
"If the boys had got their review of evolution from me, I was unaware of
it. I didn't remember teaching it."
IN THE MOVIE, we see Scopes in jail, a persecuted martyr. Aroused by the town
preacher's sermon, a lynch mob gathers outside the jail, burning Scopes in
effigy. A rock sails through the window, injuring him.
IN REALITY, Scopes didn't spent one second in jail. Violating the Butler Act
was not an imprisonable offense. Furthermore, no bad blood existed between
Scopes and Dayton's people, who were delighted that the trial put Dayton on the
map.
IN
THE MOVIE, Clarence Darrow arrives, bravely taking the case singled-handedly.
The local Christians boo him; a mob outside his hotel threatens a lynching.
IN REALITY, Darrow, left, brought a team of lawyers, and here's what he himself
said of his Dayton experience: "Yet, I came here a perfect stranger and I
can say what I have said before that I have not found upon anybody's part - any
citizen here in this town or outside, the slightest discourtesy. I have been
better treated, kindlier and more hospitably than I fancied would have been the
case in the north."
IN THE MOVIE, William Jennings Bryan is an ignorant bigot opposed to science.
He says: "The people of this state have made it very clear that they do
not want this zoological hogwash slobbered around the schoolrooms!"
"The way of scientism is the way of darkness."
IN REALITY, Bryan was a member of the American Association for the Advancement
of Science. What he really said about science during the trial: "Give
science a fact and it is not only invincible, but of incalculable service to
man."
IN THE MOVIE, the judge disallows any testimony from eminent scientists whom
Darrow has brought. The judge declares "zoology" (which he can barely
pronounce) and other sciences "irrelevant to the case."
IN
REALITY, Darrow called as a witness zoologist Maynard Metcalf, who testified at
length. Bryan, left, quickly recognized that the atheistic Darrow was
orchestrating a parade of witnesses to promote Darwinism. (The trial was being
broadcast on radio nationwide, and reported in newspapers globally.) Bryan
asked Judge John Raulston: "Will we be entitled to cross-examine their
witnesses?" Raulston said they would.
This enraged Darrow, who knew Bryan would ask his witnesses embarrassing
questions like "Where are Darwin's missing links?" and "Are you
an atheist?" Darrow therefore had his remaining witnesses submit
affidavits. These totaled 60,000 words and occupy 54 pages of trial transcript;
excerpts were read in court. The decision to stay off the stand was not made by
a bigoted judge, but by Darrow himself, to elude cross-examination. Ironically,
most of the "evidence" Darrow's experts discussed - Piltdown Man,
"useless vestigial organs" - are long discredited.
THE "DEBATE"
But what of that famous "debate" where Darrow supposedly trounced
Bryan, symbolizing Darwinian triumph over the Bible?
It was not a debate. Darrow called Bryan as a witness. Thus only Darrow could
ask questions, completely controlling the exchange. He peppered Bryan with
anti-Bible questions he had spent years developing. On the preceding evening,
he rehearsed his inquisition with an associate; Bryan, on the other hand, had
to answer everything off-the-cuff.
Naturally, with these advantages, Darrow looked better than Bryan - but not
nearly as decisively as in Inherit the Wind, which grossly distorts the
event. For example, it has Bryan say that the Bible defines sex as
"original sin" (nothing resembling this was said.) And when the
movie's cross-examination finishes, Bryan cracks up mentally, wildly shouting
the names of the Bible's books (another complete fabrication).
Hollywood distortions aside, why did Bryan place himself in a position where
only Darrow could go on offense? The answer is simple. Darrow tricked Bryan
into believing that, after this, their roles would reverse: Bryan would be able
to question Darrow about Darwinism. This was important to Bryan, since he had
been denied cross-examination of Darrow's "experts."
But the next morning, Bryan sat stunned as Darrow changed Scopes's plea from
"not guilty" to "guilty," thus ending the trial.
Darrow's words to the judge: "We will ask the court to bring in the jury
and instruct the jury to find the defendant guilty."
Darrow had no intention of going on the stand and letting Bryan get revenge by
quizzing him on evolution. The trial had NEVER been about John Scopes's guilt
or innocence. Its sole purpose was to disseminate Darwinism and assail
Christianity.
But in Inherit the Wind, Darrow fights to the bitter end for his client.
The backwoods jury finds Scopes "guilty."
Gloom falls on the defendant and his noble attorney, as "bigotry and
ignorance" have won the day.
---
You know, Henry, I remember watching "Inherit the Wind" on TV
when I was a kid way back in the 1950's and 60's. Even then I knew and said to
myself, "This kind of movie is a real putdown to the Christian community
and Christian Faith." Only much later did I come to understand just
how sinister the agenda was: the Christ-hating, Christianity-despising Talmudic
Jews and "illuminati-elite" were [and continue to this very moment]
mock and cartoonize Christians and biblical faith oriented values. The idea of
Darwinism and luciferian/satanism is to make "the Animal Kingdom of
Mankind" divided between just three classes: the elite who rule and lend
money hither & yon; the masses whom they use as "employable &
useful to create wealth"; ... and "the useless eaters" who are
to be eliminated from the "ecological equation."
Yeah. A nice little cabal of Darwinists they are. In their mind
& mindset: they are "the gods who rule." we are only the animals
and cattle and pack-mules that they manage.
And the truth is: WITHOUT DIVINE INTERVENTION they will probably pull this off.
... but only over my dead body and over the dead bodies of those who love
freedom and decent human [and divine] values. I will NEVER yield to their
sinister and vile satanic agenda.
ANIMOLOGIST RICHARD DAWKINS, THE POPE OF ATHEISM AND OF QUANTUM PHYSICS LOSING IT AGAIN!!!
Richard Dawkins, what on earth happened to you?
Dawkins
in 2014 is a man so convinced that he possesses God-like powers of
omniscience that he can’t understand why everyone is angry at him for
pointing out the obvious
Another day, another tweet
from Richard Dawkins proving that if non-conscious material is given
enough time, it is capable of evolving into an obstreperous crackpot who
should have retired from public speech when he had the chance to bow
out before embarrassing himself.
“Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse,” huffs
Dawkins. Seeming to have anticipated, although not understood, the
feminist reaction this kind of sentiment generally evokes, he finishes
the tweet: “If you think that’s an endorsement of date rape, go away and
learn how to think.”
You can almost imagine him tweeting this, his fingers jabbing away at
the keyboard as his glasses slide down a face contorted with
disappointment at how irrational everyone is being. This is Dawkins in
2014: a figure of mockery, a man so convinced that he possesses God-like
powers of omniscience that he can’t understand why everyone’s getting
angry at him for pointing out the obvious. Why won’t we all just learn
how to think, damn it! Then we could all live together in a peaceful
society where nobody wears “bin liners”, and women shut up about sexual harassment.
Remember when Dawkins was widely respected? When his biggest detractor was late evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould? I don’t. Having grown up after Dawkins made the transition from lauded science communicator to old man who shouts at clouds, it’s hard for me to understand why anyone continues to listen to him about anything.
Sure, he wrote some pop science books back in the day, but why do we
keep having him on TV and in the newspapers? If it’s a biologist you’re
after, or a science communicator, why not pick from the hundreds out
there who don’t tweet
five or six Islamophobic sentiments before getting off the toilet in
the morning? If you need an atheist, there are many philosophers,
scholars of religion, and public intellectuals available who don’t refuse to acknowledge the existence of theology.
Dawkins has been arrogant for years, a man so convinced of his
intellectual superiority that he believes the one domain in which he
happens to be an expert, science, is the only legitimate way of
acquiring or assessing knowledge. All of his outbursts in recent years
follow from this belief: he understands the scientific method, a process
intended to mitigate the interference of human subjectivity in data
collection, as a universally applicable way of understanding not just
the physical world but literally everything else as well. Hence his
constant complaint that those appalled by his bigoted vituperations are simply offended by clarity;
feeble-minded obscurantists who cling to emotion, tradition or the
supernatural to shield themselves from the power of his truth bombs.
You don’t have to be religious to find this level of hubris baffling. In his review of The God Delusion, Terry Eagleton remarks:
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the
subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what
it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.
Dawkins’ narrowmindedness, his unshakeable belief that the entire
history of human intellectual achievement was just a prelude to the
codification of scientific inquiry, leads him to dismiss the insights
offered not only by theology, but philosophy, history and art as well.
To him, the humanities are expendable window-dressing, and the
consciousness and emotions of his fellow human beings are byproducts of
natural selection that frequently hobble his pursuit and dissemination
of cold, hard facts. His orientation toward the world is the product of a
classic category mistake, but because he’s nestled inside it so snugly
he perceives complex concepts outside of his understanding as
meaningless dribble.If he can’t see it, then it doesn’t exist, and
anyone trying to describe it to him is delusional and possibly
dangerous.
All we can do at this point is hope his decline into hysterical
dogmatism culminates in a reverse deathbed conversion. But if there’s
one thing Dawkins has tried to impress upon us, it’s that miracles don’t
exist. So I’ll do him the courtesy of not holding my breath.
A US
Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release
classified papers dating from the early 1900′s that proves the
organization was involved in a major historical cover up of evidence
showing giants human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered
all across America and were ordered to be destroyed by high level
administrators to protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution
at the time.
The allegations stemming from the American Institution of Alternative Archeology (AIAA)
that the Smithsonian Institution had destroyed thousands of giant human
remains during the early 1900′s was not taken lightly by the
Smithsonian who responded by suing the organization for defamation and
trying to damage the reputation of the 168-year old institution.
During the court case, new elements were brought to light as several
Smithsonian whistle blowers admitted to the existence of documents that
allegedly proved the destruction of tens of thousands of human skeletons
reaching between 6 feet and 12 feet in height, a reality mainstream
archeology can not admit to for different reasons, claims AIAA
spokesman, James Churward.
«There has been a major cover up by
western archaeological institutions since the early 1900′s to make us
believe that America was first colonized by Asian peoples migrating
through the Bering Strait 15,000 years ago, when in fact, there are
hundreds of thousands of burial mounds all over America which the
Natives claim were there a long time before them, and that show traces
of a highly developed civilization, complex use of metal alloys and
where giant human skeleton remains are frequently found but still go
unreported in the media and news outlets» he explains.
A
giant human femur uncovered in Ohio in 2011 by the American Association
for Alternative Archeology, similar to the evidence presented in court
A turning point of the court case was when a 1.3 meter long human
femur bone was shown as evidence in court of the existence of such giant
human bones. The evidence came as a blow to the Smithsonian’s lawyers
as the bone had been stolen from the Smithsonian by one of their high
level curators in the mid 1930′s who had kept the bone all his life and
which had admitted on his deathbed in writing of the undercover
operations of the Smithsonian.
«It is a terrible thing that is being
done to the American people» he wrote in the letter. «We are hiding the
truth about the forefathers of humanity, our ancestors, the giants who
roamed the earth as recalled in the Bible and ancient texts of the
world».
The US Supreme Court has since forced the Smithsonian Institution to
publicly release classified information about anything related to the
“destruction of evidence pertaining to the mound builder culture” and to
elements “relative to human skeletons of greater height than usual”, a
ruling the AIAA is extremely enthused about.
«The public release of these documents
will help archaeologists and historians to reevaluate current theories
about human evolution and help us greater our understanding of the mound
builder culture in America and around the world» explains AIAA
director, Hans Guttenberg. «Finally, after over a century of lies, the
truth about our giant ancestors shall be revealed to the world» he
acknowledges, visibly satisfied by the court ruling.
The documents are scheduled to be released in 2015 and the operation
will be coordinated by an independent scientific organization to assure
political neutrality.
"Inherit the Wind"- How the Illuminati Brainwashed Christians
April 23, 2014
(left, In the movie, Clarence Darrow, played by Spencer Tracy, interrogates William Jennings Bryan, played by Frederic March.) The movie "Inherit the Wind" (1960) based on the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, helped make Americans adopt the doctrine of evolution. James Perloff shows how Hollywood distorted the facts to advance the Illuminati agenda.
"We
are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in
these theories... Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are
empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for
Darwinism." (Protocols 2:2-3)
"Now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion." (Protocol 17:2)
Interesting Facts You Might Not Know about US Presidents
Ancient Man and His First Civilizations
Etruria
Italy
Concerning Literature
Egyptians, Sumerians,
Mohenjo-daroans, Harappans, and Cretans, Elamites, and Nubians, were
literate 3,000 years, 4,000 years, who knows how many thousands of
years, before the world ever heard of Greeks or Romans. And there is
ample evidence of their literacy.
Yet there is not one single entry: describing any of the
people of their times, whether it be friends, foes, or invaders: or even
more incredulously, there is not one single entry describing invading
Whites in any of their literature.
Contrast that with Greek and Roman writings, in which these
NEWLY literate people, after suffering through the "Dark ages" caused by
the Albinos invasion, describe EVERYTHING and EVERYONE - except
themselves!
These discrepancies are of course, not accidental, nor for
lack of material. Hopefully, the White man has simply withheld this
material, and not destroyed it.
On a related matter:
We the lied-to and oppressed, often comfort ourselves
by believing that things are getting better, and perhaps in some ways
that is so. But in regards to the Albinos trying to steal Black history,
well, in that regard things are definitely getting worst! It comes as a shock to some, that the current, and
very false assertion by the Albinos that they are native to Europe, is
NEW! Surprisingly, Albino scholars of only a hundred years ago, freely
admitted that Albinos MOVED into Europe, and were NOT native to those
lands. While they were in error on other things, some even correctly
identified the Albino homeland as Central Asia. Please note this example:
The North American Review
The North American Review (NAR) was the first
literary magazine in the United States. Founded in Boston in 1815 by
journalist Nathan Hale and others, it was published continuously until
1940.
Until the founding of the Atlantic Monthly in 1857, the NAR was
the foremost publication in New England and probably the entire United
States.[citation needed] For all its lasting impact on American
literature and institutions, however, the Review had no more than 3000
subscribers in its heyday.
The NAR's first editor, William Tudor (1779-1830), and other
founders had been members of Boston's Anthology Club, and launched The
North American Review to foster a genuine American culture. In its first
few years the NAR published poetry, fiction, and miscellaneous essays
on a bi-monthly schedule, but in 1818 it became a quarterly with more
focused contents intent on improving society and on elevating culture.
The NAR promoted the improvement of public education and administration,
with reforms in secondary schools, sound professional training of
doctors and lawyers, rehabilitation of prisoners at the state
penitentiary, and government by educated experts.
The NAR's editors and contributors included several literary and
political New Englanders as John Adams, George Bancroft, Nathaniel
Bowditch, William Cullen Bryant, Lewis Cass, Edward T. Channing, Caleb
Cushing, Richard Henry Dana, Sr., Alexander Hill Everett, Edward
Everett, Jared Sparks, George Ticknor, Gulian C. Verplanck, and Daniel
Webster.
Please note this entry from:
The North American Review Volume 0139 Issue 334 (Sept 1884)
Title: Our Remote Ancestry [pp. 246-256]
Author: Winchell, Alexander, Prof.
Collection: Journals: North American Review (1815 - 1900)
MORE!
ANCIENT TYPES OF MAN
BY ARTHUR KEITH (1911)
CHAPTER VI, THE GRIMALDI OR NEGROID TYPE IN EUROPE, PAGE 59-63:
At the close of the last and at the beginning of the present century,
largely owing to the interest taken in the history of primitive man by
the Prince of Monaco, systematic excavations were carried out in deep
strata of their floors. In one of these, the "Grotte des Enfants,"
usually named the Grimaldi Cave In the lowest layer of all were found
two skeletons—one of a woman past middle life, with a stature estimated
(5 ft. 2 in.) and the other of a boy about sixteen to seventeen years of
age, and about (5 ft. 1 in.) in height. With them were found traces of a
civilization and of a fauna which has led anthropologists to assign
them to the end of the Mousterien or beginning of the Aurignacien Period
[40,000 to 28,000 years ago]. French anthopologist Dr. Verneau, who has
published the results of a minute examination of these two ancient
individuals, from various features seen in the skeletons, had no
hesitation in assigning them to a Negroid race.
MAN'S PLACE IN NATURE AND OTHER ANTHROPOLOGICAL ESSAYS
BY THOMAS H. HUXLEY (1899)
HUMAN FOSSILS
I shall confine myself, in discussing this question, to those
fragmentary Human skulls from the caves of Engis in the valley of the
Meuse, in Belgium, which have been examined with so much care by Sir
Charles Lyell; upon whose high authority I shall take it for granted,
that the Engis skull belonged to a contemporary of the Mammoth and of
the woolly Rhinoceros. The skull from the cave of Engis was originally
discovered by Professor Schmerling, and was described by him, together
with other human remains disinterred at the same time, in his valuable
work, " Recherches sur les Ossemens fossiles decouverts dans les
Cavernes de la Province de Liege, published in 1833 (p. 59, et seq.),
from which the following paragraphs are extracted, the precise
expressions of the author being, as far as possible, preserved.
In order to neglect no point respecting the form of
this fossil skull, we may observe that, from the first, the elongated
and narrow form of the forehead attracted our attention. In fact, the
slight elevation of the frontal, its narrowness, and the form of the
orbit, approximate it more nearly to the cranium of an Ethiopian than to
that of a European.
CIVILIZATION OR BARBARISM: AN AUTHENTIC ANTHROPOLOGY
BY CHEIKH ANTA DIOP (1981): PP. 15-16 The Grimaldi Negroids have left their numerous traces
all over Europe and Asia, from the Iberian Peninsula to Lake Baykal in
Siberia, passing through France, Austria, the Crimea, and the Basin of
Don, etc. In these last two regions, the late Soviet Professor Mikhail
Gerasimov, a scholar of rare objectivity, identified the Negroid type
from skulls found in the Middle Mousterian period.
Click here for the genesis of the European languages: Click >>>
Etruria is probably the best example: aside from Britain; (Click here for British History)
of the White Mans attempts at creating a false history for himself, and
in that process, obliterating actual history. In its traditional
foundation myth, Romulus and Remus are Rome's twin founders . They are
descendants of the Trojan prince and refugee Aeneas, and are fathered by
the god Mars or the demi-god Hercules on a royal Vestal Virgin, Rhea
Silvia (also known as Ilia), whose uncle exposes them to die in the
wild. They are found by a she-wolf who suckles and cares for them. The
twins are eventually restored to their regal birthright, acquire many
followers and decide to found a new city - Rome. The Romans are also
known as Latin's: But the Latin's (or Latini, as they called themselves)
were an "Original" people of ancient Italy. Quite different from the
White invaders from Central Asia.
The most common hypothesis is that the
Italic peoples migrated into the Italian peninsula from Central Asia,
sometime during the Italian Bronze Age (ca. 1800-900 BC). The most
likely route for the "so-called" Italic migration was from the Balkan
peninsula along the Adriatic coast. But it is already accepted that the
original Europeans were Black people (and no, they did not turn into
White people because of vitamin D deficiency), Note People like the
"Iceman" below, whose mitochondrial DNA belongs to the K1 subcluster of
the mitochondrial haplogroup K, which appears abundantly in ancient
North Africa. Also, the Latin's already existed in Italy BEFORE the
White people we erroneously call Romans arrived - thus the people we
call Romans could not have been italics either!
Logically then: if the people who were
originally called Romans, are descendants of Black Anatolians (Troy),
and if the other name that we know them by (Latin's) are a "Native"
Black Italian people: then just WHO were the White people from Central
Asia who usurped these names, and what name did they go by? In the
process of creating their "False" history, Whites, as usual, destroyed
the writings of the ancients (the last being the Etrusca Disciplina, the
Etruscan books of cult and divination, which were collected and burned
in the 5th century), and created "False" artifacts to backup their false
historical claims (note Capitoline Wolf below). The stupid irony in all
of this, is that not only have Whites wiped out the true history of the
original Italians, they also wiped out their own history.
As is always the case with Europeanized history, there
has always been an attempt by European Academics and researchers to
establish a genetic link between modern White Europeans and Europe’s
Original Black inhabitants. To that end, there has been no lack of Bogus
and mis-attributed Artifacts, along with the requisite bogus history.
But today, a new breed of researchers have taken the stage; a group less
insecure and more honest - but still not completely honest: Though they
present the data, they still present it in a confusing and obfuscating
way, and they still can't seem to bring themselves to actually say it,
i.e. The first Europeans were Black People and we are Albinos from
Central Asia! Note the studies below: there must be some type of
Phobia, peculiar only to White people.
As we know, there are three direct ways of entering Europe from Africa:
(1) Cross the Strait of Gibraltar and Enter in Spain, or
Cross in Anatolia/Turkey (2) at the Bosphorus (now known as the
Istanbul Strait) or (3) the Dardanelle's (formerly known as
Hellespont). We know that modern Africans (The Khoisan like Grimaldi)
first entered Europe by way of the Strait of Gibraltar (circa 45,000
ya), because the oldest skeletons are found in nearby France/Monaco.
At about 7,500 ya, African FARMERS moved into Europe by way
of Anatolia. These "NEW" Africans mixed with the Grimaldi Africans who
were already there. Out of this mixture was born the modern Black
European. For centuries, since they first "Usurped" rule in Europe, the
Albinos have tried to convince the world that they are "Original"
Europeans. It's a lie, and even their own scientists prove it.
Here is some of the nonsense the Albinos write about the Etruscans:
The study goes on to say:
Various tests show that the Tuscans (see next
study below) are the Etruscans’ closest neighbors in terms of genetic
distances. Despite that broad similarity, however, Etruscans and Tuscans
share only two haplotypes. This finding is difficult to interpret in
the absence of data on any other European population of the
pre-classical period. One possible interpretation is that all or most
European populations of that time period were as different from their
modern counterparts as the Etruscans appear to be. This would imply
either extensive gene flow or a high rate of extinction of mitochondrial
haplotypes, both processes causing a drastic change of the
mitochondrial pool in the last 2,500 years. More importantly, a result
of that kind would force us to reconsider the universally held
assumption that patterns in the DNA of modern individuals reflect the
evolutionary processes affecting their prehistoric ancestors.
Alternatively, should other ancient populations prove similar to
comparable modern ones, one should conclude that the Etruscans’
mitochondrial sequences underwent extinction at a particularly high rate
and look for an explanation for that. Until more ancient DNA data
become available, both scenarios will remain possible, although we favor
the latter.
But then they go on to say obfuscating nonsense like this:
Etruscans show closer relationships both to North Africans and to Turks
than any contemporary population. In particular, the Turkish component
in their gene pool appears three times as large as in the other
populations. (Note: The Turks are an Albino people from Asia - now
heavily admixed with the indigenous Black people of Anatolia - who first
entered the west in the 6th. century A.D, and later conquered Anatolia,
then called the Byzantine or Eastern Roman Empire in 1453.Obviously what these liars are seeing is the genes of the original Black Anatolians - NOT the Turks!
Albino scientists can't help but lie:
because the alternative is to admit that they are Albinos, and invaders
of Europe. So the say obfuscating things like this, see above: "Various
tests show that the Tuscan's are the Etruscans’ closest
neighbors in terms of genetic distances". The problem for them, is that
they have no way to cross reference other studies to see if the author
is furthering the Albino lies, or trying to tell the truth. In this
case, there is another study debunking that lie.
Ancient Etruscans Unlikely Ancestors Of Modern Tuscans, Testing Reveals.
News story from the Science Daily — For the first
time, Stanford university researchers have used statistical computer
modeling to simulate demographic processes affecting the population of
the Tuscany region of Italy over a 2,500-year time span. Rigorous tests
used by the researchers have ruled out a genetic link between Ancient
Etruscans, the original inhabitants of central Italy, and the region's
modern day residents. The findings indicate (as is obvious from the pictured artifacts),
that the Ancient Etruscans had little in common with the people who
later came to Italy, said Joanna Mountain, assistant professor of
anthropological sciences. The findings as documented in ''Serial
Coalescent Simulations” indicate a Weak Genealogical Relationship
Between Etruscans and Modern Tuscans. The study was published May 15,
2006 in the online version of the National Academy of Sciences. Uma
Ramakrishnan, a former Stanford postdoctoral fellow, and Elise M. S.
Belle along with Guido Barbujani of the University of Ferrara in Italy,
co-authored the paper with Mountain. To date; the Etruscans are the only pre-classical European
population that has been genetically analyzed, Mountain said. Two years
ago, Italian geneticists extracted maternally inherited mitochondrial
DNA from the bones of 27 people called Etruscans found in six different
necropolises (burial sites) in Tuscany. The female lineage was
investigated because, unlike the male Y chromosome, many copies of
mitochondrial DNA are found in each cell and thus are easier to extract,
Mountain explained. The finding is important because it questions the
common assumption that residents of a particular place are descendants
of its earlier inhabitants, Mountain said. Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Stanford University.
So who, or more correctly, WHAT are these modern White people of Europe?
They are Albinos, many now admixed with the indigenous
Black Europeans they found in Europe: and who they eventually conquered
and exterminated: or shipped to the Americas. They originally left
Africa with, and as the Albinos, of the Black Dravidians now in India.
Physically the only difference between a Black Indian, and a European,
is that the European has no, or little, "Melanin" in their skin. Simply
looking at a Dravidian, and a Dravidian Albino, bears this out.
The Bhatti tribe of Pakistan still
produces Albinos identical to the original Germanics (see their
descriptions in the writings of the Roman historian Tacitus). (Note:
Pakistan was originally part of India).
The National Geographic "Genographic Project" is an
ambitious attempt to answer fundamental questions about where we
originated and how we came to populate the Earth. The Genographic
Project is a multiyear research initiative led by National Geographic
Explorer-in-Residence Dr. Spencer Wells. Dr. Wells and a team of
renowned international scientists are using cutting-edge genetic and
computational technologies to analyze historical patterns in DNA from
participants around the world to better understand our human genetic
roots.
(For full sized map, click link at top of page).
Note: The "Migration Period" referenced, reflects only
the movements of "MODERN ALBINO EUROPEANS": it does NOT reflect the
incursions of the first Albinos from Central Asian (circa 1,200 B.C.)
who became a part of the Black Greek and Roman civilizations.
Also note: the above Wiki article is not intended as a
citation, it is merely to demonstrate that even some Albinos academics
acknowledge that their people are NOT native to Europe "Proper".
However, in true lying Albino fashion, the Wiki article goes on to say:
To put the above paragraph into lucid though, let us paraphrase:
"God laid down the Albinos in Scandinavia and said "Go forth and Multiply".
No word on how they got to Scandinavia, or where they came from, so obviously God just dropped them there!
This is totally in keeping with the various Albino founding myths:
First they were the original Europeans.
Then they were the original Black Europeans, but they turned White because they weren't getting enough vitamin "D". When we said, that's nonsense, you're Albinos: they said
that they're NOT Albinos because Albinos have "BAD EYESIGHT" and they
don't. (They never explain why the Africans with "GOOD EYESIGHT" are
still Albinos, but they aren't. (Shouldn't we call those many African
Albinos who overwhelmingly have good eyesight "Europeans" or some such
thing)?
And now they say that White Europeans: what, grew out of a "Cabbage patch" in Scandinavia, and from there conquered the world?
Genetics clearly traces the
Dravidians, and their Albinos, out of Africa, into India, and finally,
into Europe. (The predominate Haplogroup of White/Albino Europeans is
Y-dna Haplogroup "R").
Haplogroup R (Y-DNA) In human genetics, Haplogroup R is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup, a subgroup of haplogroup P, defined by the M207 mutation. This haplogroup is believed to have arisen around
26,800 years ago, somewhere in Central Asia or South Asia, where its
ancestor Haplogroup P is most often found at polymorphic frequencies.
Cambridge University geneticist Kivisild et al. (2003) suggests that
southern and western Asia might be the source of this haplogroup: Given the geographic spread and STR diversities of
sister clades R1 and R2, the latter of which is restricted to India,
Pakistan, Iran, and southern central Asia, it is possible that southern
and western Asia were the source for R1 and R1a differentiation. The R haplogroup is common throughout Europe and
western Asia and the Indian sub-continent, and in those whose ancestry
is from within these regions. It also occurs in North and Sub-Saharan
Africa.
The "Real" History
Malta
On the Island of Malta, the Ghar Dalam culture is the
earliest known phase of Malta culture. At the Cave Ghar Dalam the
earliest evidence of human settlement on Malta, some 7,400 years ago was
found. Because of debris left by these ancient Humans, this cave is
also a veritable depository of semi-fossilized remains and extinct
species such as dwarf elephants and hippopotami which roamed the island
some 250,000 years ago, ostensibly when it was still part of the
mainland.
It is suggested that a rise in sea level stranded these large
mammals on the island and that the lack of food caused the dwarf
versions to evolve. This theory is however challenged by the existence
of Pygmy Hippopotamus native to the forests and swamps of western Africa
– particularly in the country of Liberia.
During the neolithic Age from 5,000 to 4,500 B.C, the cave
was also one of the sites used by a new wave of man who crossed to the
Maltese islands from Sicily via a land bridge.
By 3,600-3,000 B.C, Temples began to be constructed, simply at first,
but then increasingly more sophisticated. So that by 3,000 B.C,
construction had become very sophisticated: such as the immense stone
blocks and the intricate facades of Hagar Qim.
During the Temple building phase, Egyptian influence on the
Maltese is evident in the manner in which they built their tombs and
temples and buried their dead. (However, the nature of their statuary,
particularly their “Mother Goddesses” which are depicted as Steatopygia
females, indicates ethnic commonality with the peoples of the Cyclades
islands in the Aegean Sea, and the civilization at Catal Huyuk in
Anatolia (Turkey). These civilizations trace their begins to the ancient
Khoisan of Southern Africa (Grimaldi man); who were the first “Fully
Modern Humans” to cross over to Europe in about 45,000 B.C). Click here for more on Grimaldi Man >>>
This phase of Malta culture came to a sudden end at about
2,000 B.C, possibly as a result of invasions. The culture that replaced
it, of Mycenaean flavor, is evidenced today only by fragmentary remains;
Bronze Age tools and weapons have been found at Borg in-Nadur (near
Birzebbuga) and Tarxien Cemetery (near Paola), while Iron Age relics
from about 1,200 to 800 B.C, include cart ruts at Bingemma (near Nadur
Tower).
The Phoenicians
At around 700 B.C, the White Greeks settled on Malta,
especially around the area where Valletta now stands. A century later;
Phoenician traders, who used the islands as a stop on their trade routes
from the eastern Mediterranean to Great Britain, (from where they
obtained Tin, which when smelted with copper (from Cyprus) created the
durable metal alloy bronze; Strabo states that there was a highly
lucrative Phoenician trade with Britain for tin). They also joined the
natives on the island. The Phoenicians inhabited the area now known as
Mdina, and its surrounding town of Rabat, which they called Maleth. The
later arriving Romans, who also lived in Mdina, referred to it (and the
island) as Melita.
Cyrus the Great conquered Phoenicia in 539 B.C. After the fall
of Phoenicia proper; the area came under the control of the Phoenician
colony in North Africa called Carthage, (which was founded in 814 B.C,
under Pygmalion, King of Tyre), it's remains are a suburb of Tunis in
present-day Tunisia. During this time, the people on Malta mainly
cultivated olives and carobs, and produced textiles.
During the First Punic War (wars with Rome) of 218 B.C,
tensions led the Maltese people to rebel against Carthage and turn
control of their garrison over to the Roman Republic consul Sempronius.
Malta remained loyal to Rome during the Second Punic War and the Romans
rewarded it with the title Foederata Civitas, a designation that meant
it was exempt from paying tribute or the rule of Roman law, although at
this time it fell within the jurisdiction of Sicilia province. Finally,
in 146 B.C, after a third war with Rome, Carthage suffered total
destruction. It was rebuilt as a Roman colony in 44 B.C. The ancient
Phoenician language survived in use as a vernacular in some of the
smaller cities of North Africa at least until the time of St. Augustine,
bishop of Hippo (5th century A.D). Click here for the story of Hannibal >>>
Around 100 A.D, the Maltese Islands were a thriving part of
the Roman Empire, being promoted to the status of Municipium under
Hadrian. The Bible in the Acts of the Apostles, relates that during 60
A.D, Jesus Christ's apostle Saint Paul, was shipwrecked on the northern
shore of the island at Saint Paul's Bay, being received by the person
who would be known to posterity as Saint Publius, and stayed in Malta
for three months, introducing Christianity and performing various
miracles. When the Roman Empire split into Eastern and Western
divisions in the 4th century, Malta fell under the control of the Greek
speaking Byzantine Empire from 395 to 870 A.D, which ruled from
Constantinople. Although Malta was under Byzantine rule for four
centuries, not much is known from this period. There is evidence that
Germanic tribes, including the Goths and Vandals, briefly took control
of the islands before the Byzantines launched a counter attack and
retook Malta. Euphemius was a Byzantine admiral, Probably born in Messina
Sicily, and may have been non-White; at about 826 A.D, he proclaimed
himself emperor in Syracuse, and the whole territory of the islands. He
was subsequently defeated by Byzantine troops and escaped to Ifriqiya
(North Africa), where he asked for help from the Arabs to take Sicily
and Malta from the Byzantines. In 827 A.D, he returned to Sicily with a
large Arab fleet. Euphemius was killed later that year during an attack
on Enna, but the Arabs were successful in taking the Islands. The Arabs introduced new irrigation methods, new fruits and
cotton, and the Siculo-Arabic language was adopted on the islands, and
from Sicily to Southern Italy: it would eventually evolve into the
Maltese language. The native Christians were allowed freedom of
religion, but had to pay an extra tax. The Normans from the Duchy of
Normandy successfully invaded Sicily and the Maltese Islands in 1091
A.D, and "Roger I" was warmly welcomed by the native Christians. The
Maltese offered to fight for him and in response Roger reportedly tore
off a portion of his flag, half-red half-white, presenting it to the
Maltese; this formed the basis of the flag of Malta.
The Catholic Church was re-instated as the state religion,
with Malta under the See of Palermo. Norman architecture sprung up
around Malta, especially in its ancient capital Mdina. Tancred of
Sicily, the last Norman monarch, made Malta and Gozo a feudal lordship
or fief within the kingdom, and a Count of Malta was instituted. The
kingdom passed on to the House of Hohenstaufen from 1194 until 1266 A.D,
and Malta was part of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation for 72
years. It was under Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II of Hohenstaufen
(1194 – 1250 A.D.), that all remaining Muslims were expelled from Malta
(in 1224 A.D.) and the entire Christian male population of Celano in
Abruzzo, was exported to Malta to replace them - Thus Malta became a
purely White Island.
The Etruscans
Having established the true race of the Etruscans, let us now learn about their civilization.
The Etruscans
Etruscans were members of the ancient civilization of
Etruria, a country in what is now Italy. Their urban civilization is
though to have started well before 800 B.C. But it's true beginnings
cannot be ascertained, because their literature, especially the
Etrusca Disciplina, the Etruscan books of cult and divination,
were collected and burned in the 5th century A.D. by White Christian
elements. Some say the Etruscans were originally pelasgians (the
original people of Greece), some say that they were Phrygian migrants
from Anatolia. But both of those theories seem to miss the fact that the
entire area was inhabited by Black people, since about 45,000 B.C, when
Grimaldi man first entered Europe. Therefore there is absolutely no
reason why the Etruscans could not have evolved In situ.
All that remains of Etruscan writings are inscriptions like this.
If past behavior is any guide, the ridiculous dating
of Etruscan civilization to 800-900 B.C, by White people, is in response
to the Etruscans being scientifically proven to be Black people. That
very late dating, would serve to make it seem that they were not truly
"Ancient". The Etruscans called themselves "Rasenna" which was
syncopated to Rasna or Raśna. Those that joined the "Sea People" exodus
were known as the Tyrrhenians.
The Etruscan pendant (below), which has several
Swastika symbols (an ancient sign for good luck), connects Etruscans
with ancient Nubia (Sudan) on whose pottery it is first found: and also
the Indus valley civilization, as well as the Mesopotamian
civilizations. The design of their chariots is similar to Egyptian
Chariots - one rider, two horses.
The Etruscan cities were large, and in all ways
comparable to cities of the other great ancient civilizations. Etruscan
state government, like others of those times, was a theocracy (the king
was deified, and considered a god). Their religion employed elaborate
cults and rituals.
Very little is known about their social and civic
structure, except that their city-states weren't particularly unified.
The heads of Etruscan cities, apparently at times, met to discuss
military and political affairs. But apart from this, the Etruscans could
be considered, as many ancient sources describe them, “duodecim populi
Eturiae” or “the twelve peoples of Eturia”, (the twelve peoples,
referring to the twelve major city-states).
^Whites can't help themselves. A fisherman dressed like that, who could afford such a fine statue?
Although the divisions between the Etruscan states
were not as extreme as those found in other areas; like Sumer, where
they were constantly at war with each other. Still, these individual
Etruscan states were strange in that they apparently felt no obligation
to cooperate with each other, and provide aid to each other in times of
need. Consequently they had no mechanism to unify, when faced with a
common threat.
Their agriculture was advanced and efficient, and their
trading and commercial relationships were far ranging and profitable.
Mining and the commerce of metal, especially copper and iron, led to the
enrichment of the Etruscans and to the expansion of their influence in
the Italian peninsula and the western Mediterranean sea.
Paestum
Around the end of the 7th century B.C, colonists
from the Greek city of Sybaris founded the city of Paestum near Naples
(and originally known as Poseidonia). Outside of archaeological evidence
very little is known about Paestum during its first centuries.
Archaeological evidence indicates that the city was expanding with the
building of roads, temples and other features of a growing city. Paestum
is also renowned for its painted tombs, mainly belonging to the period
of the Lucanian rule, while only one of them dates to the Greek period.
It was found, on 3 June 1968, in a small necropolis some 1,5 km south of
the ancient walls. The burial monument was named Tomb of the Diver
(Italian: Tomba del tuffatore) after the enigmatic scene, depicted on
the covering slab, of a lonely young man diving into a stream of water.
Click Here for pictures of Paestum tomb paintings:Click here >>>
Paestum tomb painting
Those wishing to pursue
an understanding of the Human Journey, and Specifics of the ancient
East African migrations, which led to Modern Man's colonization of the
entire world; please visit the National Geographic – Genographic Project
– Atlas of the Human Journey. Though as one would
expect, when it comes to European and Anatolian (Turkey) settlement, it
is not only inaccurate, it is often Racist. But what would you expect? http://www.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/atlas.html
Please visit the "Additional Material Area" for many more photographs of each civilization, and related material <Click>
When
last we left Etruria, we were mystified by the Etruscan's policy of not
helping each other when faced with a common threat. This incredible
policy would of course, have devastating effects. Moving ahead to
perhaps 1100 B.C. It is at about this time, that Albino people from the
Eurasian plains now called "the Latin's" later known as the Romans -
migrate in. These Latins may have accompanied the Hellenes into Greece,
and then continued on into Italy. The nature of the early contact
between the two peoples, is unknown. But, the later relationship is well
known to be one of violence. (Please remember that we are using the
terms Latin's and Hellenes in reference to Eurasian Albinos as a
convenience ONLY).
Soon after the invasion of Whites from Eurasia began, a
coalition of the original Black inhabitants of Italy, Greece and the
Aegean area, formed a conglomeration called the "Sea People". They
boarded ships with all of their belongings and fled the area. But those
that stayed behind, still had to deal with the White newcomers.
Etruscan settlements were frequently built on a hill—the
steeper the better—and surrounded by thick walls. So according to Roman
mythology, Rome may have actually have been built by Etruscans, they did
so on the Palatine Hill according to the Etruscan model: that is, they
began with a pomoerium or sacred ditch. Then, they proceeded to the
walls.
Were the original Romans Black People?
Were
the original Romans Black People? As we have shown on many pages, all
of those marble statues and busts of "Supposed" White Greeks and Romans,
that we find in museums today, are really 1600-1800s fabrications.
White history is so replete with lies and fake artifacts, that it would
be impossible for this, or any other "Truth Seeking" publication, to
investigate every possibility. So for convenience, we will not delve
into this founding of Rome, as documented in the Aeneid. But rather,
will work with the conventional story.
The Aeneid
The Aeneid is a Latin epic poem written by Virgil in the late 1st century BC (70–19 B.C.) that tells the legendary story of Aeneas, a Trojan who traveled to Italy, where he became the ancestor of the Romans. It is composed of roughly 10,000 lines in dactylic hexameter.
The first six of the poem's twelve books tell the story of
Aeneas's wanderings from Troy to Italy, and the poem's second half tells
of the Trojans' ultimately victorious war upon the Latins (Whites), under whose name Aeneas and his Trojan followers are destined to be subsumed.
The hero Aeneas was already known to Greco-Roman legend and myth,
having been a character in the Iliad; Virgil took the disconnected
tales of Aeneas' wanderings, his vague association with the foundation
of Rome and a personage of no fixed characteristics other than a
scrupulous piety, and fashioned this into a compelling founding myth or
nationalist epic that at once tied Rome to the legends of Troy,
glorified traditional Roman virtues and legitimized the Julio-Claudian
dynasty as descendants of the founders, heroes and gods of Rome and Troy.
Entellus
was a Trojan hero from whom the town of Entella in Sicily was believed
to have received its name. He was a friend of the Trojan king Acestes. A
boxing match between Entellus and Dares is described in Virgil's
Aeneid.
The fight between Entellus and Dares, Roman mosaic, ca. 175 A.D.
The reason
the poem is important, is because the Trojans were Phrygian's - and this
is what the Phrygian king Midas looked like.
And this is how Etruscans depicted the Trojans (the guy on the ground).
Quote:
Although it was commissioned by the Emperor Augustus, the poem is more
than early imperial propaganda. It proclaims the divine mission of
Aeneas to found Rome and the divine injunction of the Romans to unite
the world under a noble Emperor such as Augustus.
As a logical matter then, why
would the Romans tolerate, much less enthusiastically accept (the Aeneid
was very popular), a founding story that gives credit to Blacks for the
nations creation, if they (the elites), themselves were not Black?
The other inescapable conclusion,
is that the Emperor Augustus was himself Black. In which case, we can
chalk this statue up, to the same people as "The Dying Gaul" statue.
With it being nothing more than "Pure White fantasy" probably done in
the 1600-1700s.
Augustus of Prima Porta
From Wiki
Augustus of Prima Porta (Italian: Augusto di Prima
Porta) is a 2.04m high marble statue of Augustus Caesar which was
discovered on April 20, 1863, in the Villa of Livia at Prima Porta, near
Rome. Augustus Caesar's wife, Livia Drusilla, retired to the villa
after his death. The sculpture is now displayed in the Braccio Nuovo of
the Vatican Museums. The dating of the Primaporta piece is widely contested.
It is thought to be a marble copy of a possible bronze original. This
original, along with other high honors, was devoted to Augustus by the
Senate in 20 B.C, and set up in a public place. Up until this time
Augustus had lived modestly, but the fact that the statue was found in
his widow's villa shows that he was thoroughly pleased with it. It is also contested that this particular sculpture is a
reworking in marble of a bronze original, possibly a gift from Tiberius
Caesar to his mother Livia (since it was found in her villa Ad Gallinas
Albas in the vicinity of the ninth marker of the via Flaminia, and
close to a late Imperial gate called Prima Porta) after Augustus' death
and in honor of the woman who had campaigned so long for him to become
the next Caesar. This would explain the divine references to Augustus in
the piece, notably his being barefoot, the standard representation of
gods or heroes in classical iconography. Also, the reliefs in the
cuirass depict the retrieval of Crassus' standards captured by the
Parthians, an event in which the young Tiberius himself took a part,
serving as intermediary with the Parthian king, in the act that is shown
in the central scene of the armor, possibly his grandest service to his
adopted father Augustus. With the introduction of Tiberius as the
figure responsible for the retrieval of the standards, he associates
himself with Augustus, the emperor and the new god, as Augustus himself
had done previously with Julius Caesar. Under this hypothesis, the
dating of the statue can be placed during the first years of Tiberius'
reign as emperor (14 — 37 A.D.).
As a further demonstration of the problems Whites have
with the actual race of Augustus: there is the matter of this statue
head "Supposedly" Discovered at Meroe in 1910 by J. Garstang. Based on
accounts of the Roman wars with Meroe in Strabo's Geography, circa
22 A.D. It was decided that it was the head from one of the many giant
statues of Augustus, which were scattered all over Egypt. Aside from
that absurdity, of which there is no evidence, the statue head of
course, has no inscription.
Like Herodotus, Strabo wrote entertainment in the guise
of history. His accounts of the wars is obviously fanciful, and to use
that type of material to make historical judgments, is a clear
indication of the fragility of White history.
Click Here for some authentic and very reveling images of Roman Emperor Valerian:Click >>>
In time, the Romans had learned how to built cities, now
there is great competition for power and territory. Wars rage, but the
Etruscan cities fight alone, and the Romans can simply attack and annex
each individual city; divide and conquer was the order of the day. This
disunity is further illustrated by the fact that the Romans concluded
treaties with individual Etruscan city/states, rather than the whole. But the Etruscans reemerged as a local power during 800 - 700
B.C, spreading their trade to Corsica, Sardinia and Iberia and creating
a powerful navy to guard their interests. The Phoenicians and Etruscans
became trading partners and rivals, exchanging goods and opportunistic
raids with each other. However the situation changed after the "Whites"
of Greece, had consolidated power and began to expand into the Western
Mediterranean at about 750 B.C.} In approximately 600 B.C, the Etruscans attacked and occupied
the area of Latium and settled themselves in the city of Rome, from
here the influence of Etruscan civilization and art made itself felt in
the entire Latin sphere. But their expansion soon collided with that of the Greeks,
especially in the sixth century B.C, when Phoceans (Greeks in Italy)
founded colonies along the coast of France, Catalonia and Corsica. This
led the Etruscans to ally themselves with the Carthaginians
(Phoenicians), whose interests also collided with the Greeks. {Note: The Phoenicians had planted trading posts in Africa,
Sicily, Sardinia and Iberia during 1100-900 B.C. while creating their
trading monopoly. They had a relatively free hand during that period as
other civilizations were suffering from a "Dark Age" during that period
because of the invasion of Whites from Eurasia.
In 540 B.C, at the Battle of Alalia; which took place
off the coast of Corsica, between Phocaeans and allied Etruscans and
Carthaginians. The Punic-Etruscan fleet of 120 ships defeated the Greek
force of sixty ships and the nearby colony of Alalia (now Aléria) was
taken over by the Etruscans. Corsica was shared by the Carthaginians and
Etruscans, and Carthage retained Sardinia.
This led to a new distribution of power in the western
Mediterranean Sea. Though the battle had no clear winner, Carthage
managed to expand its sphere of influence at the expense of both the
Etruscans and the Greeks, and Etruria saw itself relegated to the
northern Tyrrhenian Sea. From the first half of the fifth century, the
new international political situation meant the beginning of the
Etruscan decline after losing their southern provinces.
As Caucasians kept coming in, Rome soon became a large city,
similar to the powerful cities of southern Etruria, and it had also
become predominately Caucasian. Accordingly, it was a Caucasian uprising
that drove the Etruscans from Rome in 509 B.C. In 480 B.C, Etruria's ally Carthage, was defeated by a
coalition of Magna Graecia (the Greek colonized zone encompassing Sicily
and Southern Italy) cities led by Syracuse. Later, it was a coalition
of Caucasians - Latin’s and the "new" Greeks, that led to the Etruscans'
withdrawal from the whole of Latium in 475 B.C. A year later, in 474 B.C, Syracuse's tyrant Hiero, defeated
the Etruscans at the Battle of Cumae. Later, Etruria saw a Gallic
(Celtic - see next page for more on the Gauls/Celts) invasion end its
influence over the Po valley and the Adriatic coast. Meanwhile, Rome had
started annexing Etruscan cities. This first led to the loss of their
north provinces. The Etruscans continued to decline, until finally Etruria was
incorporated into Rome. Over time the Etruscans ceased to exist as a
separate people, and they along with their culture and technology were
totally absorbed into Rome. However, it should be pointed out, that if
Etruscan Tomb Paintings are any indication, absorption by the Latin's
was not unduly traumatic.
Once again, we must as the question: "Were
the original Romans and Greeks Black People?" Please consider: aside
from the marble statues and busts (which we know to be 1600-1800s
creations), which depict them as Whites. And the constant bombardment of
White media; such as Books, Movies, and Television, which serves to
"Condition" us to the concept - What evidence is there really that these
people were White?
Certainly there can be no argument that Whites eventually took
over. The question is "Which" Whites, and When? When we cast aside all
of those fake marble Statues and Busts, and rely on only the authentic
artwork which was done by the people themselves, in their own ancient
times, we see a very different story of ancient Greece and Rome.
Below are pictures of authentic ancient artwork, and links to
more: When we look at them, something very revealing is instantly
apparent: the main subjects and owners of the tombs, were all Black
people - as were the "Gods". If all of the wealthy "Elites" and Gods,
were Black people, what does that tell us about the nature of these
ancient societies?
later history relates that some Etruscans lived in the
Tuscus vicus, the “Etruscan quarter”, and that there was an Etruscan
line of kings (albeit ones descended from a Greek, Demaratus the
Corinthian) which succeeded kings of Latin and Sabine origin.
Pompeii
The city of Pompeii is a partially buried Roman
town-city near modern Naples in the Italian region of Campania, in the
territory of the comune of Pompei. The name “Pompeii” in Latin is a
second declension plural (Pompeii, -orum). According to Theodor Kraus,
“The root of the word Pompeii would appear to be the Oscan word for the
number five, pompe, which suggests that either the community consisted
of five hamlets or, perhaps, it was settled by a family group (gens
Pompeia).” Along with Herculaneum, its sister city, Pompeii was
destroyed and completely buried during a long catastrophic eruption of
the volcano Mount Vesuvius spanning two days in 79 AD.
Erotic art in Pompeii and Herculaneum was discovered
in the ancient cities around the bay of Naples (particularly of Pompeii
and Herculaneum) after extensive excavations began in the 18th century.
The city was found to be full of erotic art and frescoes, symbols, and
inscriptions regarded by its excavators as pornographic.
Click Here for more Pompeii frescoes (Caution: some are of a pornographic nature). Click Here >>>
Pompeii Wall mural of Mercury/Priapus - between 89 B.C. and 79 A.D.
The Celts/Gaul's
By the end of the ancient era (B.C.), new invaders had
migrated into western Europe from the east; and pushed the remaining
indigenous peoples south. These new people were mainly Celts, who had
been pushed out of their central European lands by the invading White
Germanic tribes.
By now, the original people had accepted rule of the
conquering Romans, though the acceptance was uneasy. As would be
expected, there was almost constant warfare between these two peoples,
the western Celts known as Gaul's, and the eastern Celts. But their
hatred of each other was less than their hatred of Roman rule. There
were many rebellions against Rome by both groups. As we can see from
Julius Caesar's comments below; Gaul's and Celts were the same people.
As with all the ancient people of Europe, modern racists have sought to
portray them as White people. The famous marble statue "The Dying Gaul"
is a fake, just as is the statue of Vercingetorix that was put up by
Napoleon III in 1865. See photo below.
As we have said and demonstrated many times: modern
Whites have institutionalized the falsification of history. Even their
translations of ancient texts and historians, cannot be trusted.
However, sometimes a bit from one place, coupled with a bit from another
place, yields the truth. In "THE HISTORY OF COUNT ZOSIMUS" circa 500 A.D. Sextus
Julius Saturninus (the governor of Syria) is described as a Moor. In
other texts, he is described as a Gaul. Such interchangeability of
description, would not be possible if Gaul's and Moors were not the same
thing: Black People!
Strangely; the statue "The Dying Gaul"
does seem to be in exact conformity with the "Supposed" description of
"Diodorus Siculus" who is said to describe them as such: “The Gauls are tall in body, with rippling muscles...
They are always washing their hair in limewater and pull it back from
the forehead... , so that that they look like Satyrs and Pans; the
treatment of their hair makes it so heavy and coarse that it looks like
the mane of a horse... some of them shave the beard, but others let it
grow a little. The nobles shave their cheeks but let the mustache grow
until it covers the mouth". Click here for more "Supposed" ancient comments and their true worth.
Julius Caesar, in his book, Commentarii de Bello Gallico - ca. 50 B.C, comments:
All Gaul is divided into three parts, one of which the Belgae
inhabit, the Aquitani another, those who in their own language are
called Celts, in ours Gauls, the third. All these differ from each other
in language, customs and laws. The Garonne River (roughly divides
France and Spain) separates the Gauls from the Aquitani; the River Marne
(runs east and southeast from Paris) and the River Seine separate them
from the Belgae. Of all these, the Belgae are the bravest, because they
are furthest from the civilisation and refinement of (our) Province, and
merchants least frequently resort to them, and import those things
which tend to effeminate the mind; and they are the nearest to the
Germani, who dwell beyond the Rhine (runs north from eastern Switzerland
through Germany and the Netherlands to its two-pronged outlet on the
North Sea), with whom they are continually waging war. For which reason the Helvetii also surpass the rest of the
Gaul's in valour, as they contend with the Germani in almost daily
battles, when they either repel them from their own territories, or
themselves wage war on their frontiers. One part of these, which it has
been said that the Gauls occupy, takes its beginning at the River Rhone;
it is bounded by the Garonne River, the Atlantic Ocean, and the
territories of the Belgae; it borders, too, on the side of the Sequani
and the Helvetii, upon the River Rhine, and stretches toward the north.
The Belgae rises from the extreme frontier of Gaul, extend to the lower
part of the River Rhine; and look toward the north and the rising sun.
Aquitania extends from the Garonne to the Pyrenees and to that part of
the Atlantic (Bay of Biscay) which is near Spain: it looks between the
setting of the sun, and the north star.
Note: The Helvetii, refers to a conglomeration of Celtic
tribes formed by the Helvetian's of southern Germany and numbering in
excess of 300,000, who decided to flee the invading White Germanic
tribes.
Vercingetorix
One
of the last, or perhaps the last, of the original Black civilizations
to be destroyed by the Whites, were the Arverni of southern France. They
were an advanced culture who lived in cities and were wealthy in gold
and silver, (as attested to by the huge booty taken from them by the
Romans).
Their demise came about because of a revolt against Rome by another Black Gaul city called "Carnutes".
In early 52 B.C, Carnutes used the turmoil that accompanied the death
of Publius Clodius Pulcher; a Roman politician, as an opportunity to
rebell; they slaughtered all of the Romans in their territory.
Seeing this, "Vercingetorix" a young nobleman of the
Arvernian capital city of Gergovia, moved to join the rebellion. He was
however rebuffed by the nobles of Gergovia, forcing him to raise an army
in the countryside. He then returned to Gergovia and took the city,
whereupon he was declared king.
In most historical accounts, it is said that
Vercingetorix unified ALL of the Gaul's under his command. In his
campaign against Julius Caesar, Vercingetorix was at first successful,
but over time, the tide began to turn. The end came at the Battle of
Alesia, the capital city of another of the Black Gaul people, the Mandubii.
At Alesia, Vercingetorix made his last stand.
Caesar instead of making a direct assault, surrounded the city with
fortifications in order to starve them out. When Vercingetorix sent for
reinforcements, Caesar built another set of fortifications
to his rear, to hold back the reinforcements. When the reinforcements
arrived, they were of insufficient number to break through Caesars line.
After many loosing battles to break out, Vercingetorix was forced to
mount his horse, ride out and surrender to Caesar.
Vercingetorix was taken prisoner and imprisoned in the
Tullianum in Rome for five years, before being publicly displayed in
Caesar's triumph in 46 B.C, after which he was executed. Gergovia,
Alesia, and all the other Black Gaullic cities were destroyed. It is
estimated that one million persons died in the wars, and another million
were sold into slavery; at the end, Caesar had effected an
unprecedented genocide. The destruction was so complete, that at this
time, the only known evidence of their existence is Roman coins, (such
as the one above), and written Roman accounts.
Ancient references to the Celts/Gauls
The first literary reference to the Celtic people, as
(Κeltoi) is by the Greek historian Hecataeus of Miletus in 517 B.C; he
locates the ''Keltoi'' tribe in Rhenania (West/Southwest Germany). The
next Greek reference to the ''Keltoi'' is by Herodotus in the mid 5th
century B.C. He says that "the river Ister (Danube) begins from the
''Keltoi'' and the city of Pyrene and so runs that it divides Europe in
the midst (now the ''Keltoi'' are outside the Pillars of Heracles (Rock
of Gibraltar) and border upon the Kynesians, who dwell furthest towards
the sunset (West) of all those who have their dwelling in Europe)".
According to Greek mythology, (''Celtus'') was the son of Heracles and
(''Keltine''), the daughter of (''Bretannus''). Celtus became the
eponymous ancestor of Celts. In Latin ''Celta'' came in turn from
Herodotus' word for the Gauls, ''Keltoi''. The Romans used ''Celtae'' to
refer to continental Gauls, but apparently not to Insular Celts. The
latter were long divided linguistically into Goidhels and Brythons,
although other research provides a more complex picture. Another
complication is that in the case of the Romans, Gaul (Latin Gallia) is a
historical name used in the context of the Roman Empire in references
to the region of Western Europe approximating present day France and
Belgium, but also sometimes including the Po Valley, western
Switzerland, and the parts of the Netherlands and Germany on the west
bank of the River Rhine. In the third century B.C, Gauls immigrated from Thrace into
the highlands of central Anatolia (modern Turkey). These people, called
Galatians, later merged with the local population but retained many of
their own traditions. The Galatia became its ruling caste in the 3rd
century B.C. It has been called the "Gallia" of the East, Roman writers
calling its inhabitants Galli. St. Jerome states that as of the fourth
century A.D. their language was similar to that of the Treveri. This
language is in fact German. (The Romans called all people between the
Pyrenees and the Rhine Gauls. The word 'Gaul' didn't imply a specific
language). The German Celts were great warriors, respected by Greeks and
Romans. They hired themselves out as mercenary soldiers, sometimes
fighting on both sides in the great battles of the times. For years the
chieftains and their war bands ravaged the western half of Asia Minor,
as allies of one or other of the warring princes, without any serious
check, until they sided with the renegade Seleucid prince Antiochus
Hierax, who reigned in Asia Minor. Hierax tried to defeat king Attalus I
of Pergamum (241–197 B.C.), but instead, the hellenised cities united
under his banner, and his armies inflicted several severe defeats upon
them, about 232 forcing them to settle permanently and to confine
themselves to the region to which they had already given their name. The
theme of the ''Dying Gaul'' (a famous statue displayed in Pergamon)
remained a favorite in Hellenistic art for a generation. Their right to
the district was formally recognized. The three Celtic tribes were
settled where they afterwards remained, the Tectosages round Ancyra, the
Tolistobogii round Pessinus, sacred to Cybele, and the Trocmi round
Tavium. Diodorus Siculus and Strabo both suggest that the Celtic
heartland was in southern France. The former says that the Gauls were to
the north of the Celts but that the Romans referred to both as Gauls.
Before the discoveries at Hallstatt and La Tene, it was generally
considered that the Celtic heartland was southern France, see
Encyclopedia Britannica for 1813. The Celts also expanded down the Danube river and its
tributaries. One of the most influential tribes, the Scordisci , had
established their capital at Singidunum in 3rd century BC, which is
present-day Belgrade , Serbia . The concentration of hill-forts and
cemeteries shows a density of population in the Tisza valley of
modern-day Vojvodina , Serbia , Hungary and into Ukraine . Expansion
into Romania was however blocked by the Dacians . Further south, Celts settled in Thrace ( Bulgaria ), which
they ruled for over a century, and Anatolia , where they settled as the
Galatians (see also: Gallic Invasion of Greece ) . Despite their
geographical isolation from the rest of the Celtic world, the Galatians
maintained their Celtic language for at least seven hundred years. St
Jerome , who visited Ancyra (modern-day Ankara ) in 373 AD, likened
their language to that of the Treveri of northern Gaul. The Boii tribe gave their name to Bohemia , Bologna and
possibly Bavaria , and Celtic artefacts and cemeteries have been
discovered further east in what is now Poland and Slovakia . A celtic
coin ( Biatec ) from Bratislava 's mint is displayed on today's Slovak 5
crown coin. As there is no archaeological evidence for large scale
invasions in some of the other areas, one current school of thought
holds that Celtic language and culture spread to those areas by contact
rather than invasion. However, the Celtic invasions of Italy and the
expedition in Greece and western Anatolia , are well documented in Greek
and Latin history. There are records of Celtic
mercenaries in Egypt serving the Ptolemies. Thousands were employed in
283-246 B.C. and they were also in service around 186 BC. They attempted
to overthrow Ptolemy II. It had been known for long
time that there was an early Celtic (Lepontic, sometimes called
Cisalpine Celtic) presence in Northern Italy since inscriptions dated to
the sixth century B.C. have been found there.
The site of Golasecca, where the Ticino exits from Lake
Maggiore, was particularly suitable for long-distance exchanges, in
which Golaseccans acted as intermediaries between Etruscans and the
Halstatt culture of Austria, supported on the all-important trade in
salt.
In 391 B.C. Celts "who had their homes beyond the Alps
streamed through the passes in great strength and seized the territory
that lay between the Appennine mountains and the Alps" according to
Diodorus Siculus. The Po Valley and the rest of northern Italy (known to
the Romans as Cisalpine Gaul) was inhabited by Celtic-speakers who
founded cities such as Milan. Later the Roman army was routed at the
battle of Allia and Rome was sacked in 390 B.C. by the Senones. At the battle of Telamon in 225 B.C. a large Celtic army was trapped between two Roman forces and crushed. The defeat of the combined Samnite, Celtic and Etruscan
alliance by the Romans in the Third Samnite War sounded the beginning of
the end of the Celtic domination in mainland Europe, but it was not
until 192 B.C. that the Roman armies conquered the last remaining
independent Celtic kingdoms in Italy. The Celts settled
much further south of the Po River than many maps show. Remnants in the
town of Doccia, in the province of Emilia-Romagna, showcase Celtic
houses in very good condition dating from about the 4th century B.C.
Rome would continue to grow, and in time it would come to absorb the classical Greek civilization as well.
As Rome extended its influence and presence throughout the
Mediterranean world, it encountered and absorbed deities and religious
practices of those it encountered. Attempts were made periodically to
suppress religions that seemed to threaten traditional morality and
unity; the Dionysian mysteries provoked unseemly exhibitions of
enthusiasm and wild behaviour, Christianity was superstition, or
atheism, or both; and druidism was thought to employ human sacrifice.
Judaism was merely tolerated.
By late antiquity, numerous foreign cults had gained vast popularity in
the farthest reaches of the Empire, including the mystery cult of the
syncretized Egyptian goddess Isis, and deities of solar monism such as
Mithras and Sol Invictus, found as far north as Roman Britain.
Roman myth is complicated by the early influence of Greek
religion on the Italian peninsula during Rome's protohistory, and by the
later self-conscious imitation of Greek literary models by Roman
authors, who borrowed narratives of Greek deities reinterpreted as the
counterparts of Rome's own pantheon. Rome's early myths and legends also
have a dynamic relationship with Etruscan religion, less documented
than that of the Greeks.
Some examples of Egyptian-to-Greek-to-Roman Mythology
Egyptian
Greek
Roman
Amun
Zeus
Jupiter ("Zeus pater")
Hathor
Aphrodite
Venus
Khonsu
Heracles
Hercules
Isis
Demeter (Io)
Ceres
Osiris
Dionysus
Bacchus
Horus
Apollo
Apollo
According to Greek myth Heracles
was a divine hero, the son of Zeus and Alcmene, foster son of
Amphitryon and great-grandson (and half-brother) of Perseus. He was the
greatest of the Greek heroes, a paragon of masculinity, the ancestor of
royal clans who claimed to be Heracleidae and a champion of the
Olympian order against chthonic monsters. In Rome and the modern West,
he is known as Hercules, with whom the later Roman Emperors, in
particular Commodus and Maximian, often identified themselves. The
Romans adopted the Greek version of his life and works essentially
unchanged. Alcmene was born to Electryon, king of Mycenae and a son of
Perseus. Her mother was either Anaxo, daughter of Alcaeus and Astydamia,
or Lysidice, daughter of Pelops and Hippodameia. Hesiod describes
Alcmene as the tallest, most beautiful woman with wisdom surpassed by no
person born of mortal parents. It is said that her face and dark eyes
were as charming as Aphrodite's, and that she honoured her husband like
no woman before her. She was the great-granddaughter of Zeus.
According to Roman myth, Rome was founded
by Romulus and his twin brother Remus, descendants of Aeneas, divinely
fathered by Hercules on a virgin princess or priestess of Vesta, who
was exposed to die, but saved by a series of miraculous interventions.
They were eventually restored to their royal birthright but decided to
found a new city for themselves and their followers. When they could not
agree on its site, they used augury to seek the opinion of the gods.
Romulus was sent the most favourable signs, and established a city on
the Capitoline Hill, and created its sacred boundary; Remus insulted the
new city and was killed. Romulus named the new city "Rome" after
himself, appointed its first senate and organised its armies. Faced with
a shortage of marriageable young women, he invented a religious
festival, the Consualia, invited the neighbouring Sabines then kidnapped
their daughters.
Each of Rome's legendary or
semi-legendary kings was associated with one or more of the religious
institutions familiar to the later Republic. Tullus Hostilius and Ancus
Marcius devised the fetial priests and their rites. The first "outsider"
Etruscan king, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus founded a Capitoline temple to
Jupiter, Juno and Minerva which served as a later model for the highest
official cult throughout the Roman world. The benevolent, divinely
fathered Servius Tullius established the Latin League and built its
Aventine Temple to Diana, and instituted the Compitalia to mark his
social reforms. His arrogant successor (and murderer) Tarquinius "the
Proud" was expelled, and Rome became a Republic, run by annually
appointed consuls.
Correction to the lies of the White Mans History
Contrary to the racist revisionism of
modern Whites: Rome, like Greece, was a multi-ethnic, multi-racial
society. With many Black or mixed-race kings, Black Popes, Black
Commanders, soldiers, sailors, and of course citizens. (Being mindful of
the White mans propensity for manufacturing fake artifacts to show
Whites, there is no guarantee that the following Busts are accurate).
And of course, much of our current crop of Greek and Roman sculpture are
18th - 19th century creations. We oftentimes compare Coins with Busts
to ascertain the truth. But unfortunately, Whites are also expert at
creating perfect fake coins, which look like ancient coins, so there is
no guarantee there either. The one saving grace, is that with Black
kings, the fabricators will sometimes leave a hint of Blackness in the
image, rather than making it appear pure White. Thus from that hint, we
can extrapolate.
A perfect example of the difference between the White Mans History: and "Real" factual History!
The legend of Saint Maurice and the Theban legion (circa 250 A.D.)
St. Maurice was an Egyptian from Thebes in Upper Egypt,
and General (primicerius) of the Theban Legion. The Theban legend
relates that the legion, composed entirely of Christians, had been
called from Thebes in southern Egypt, to suppress a revolt of the
Bagandae (also Christians) in Gaul (now Saint-Maurice Switzerland).
After victory, the soldiers were ordered to sacrifice (Bagandae
prisoners?) to the gods in thanksgiving by Roman Emperor Maximian
Herculius. But at Maurice’s urging, they refused. Every tenth soldier
was then killed (decimation). Another order to sacrifice and another
refusal caused a second decimation, and then a general massacre of the
Legion. (A Roman legion was typically composed of perhaps 6,000
soldiers, divided into "cohorts" and further divided into "centuries"). So reads the earliest account of their martyrdom,
contained in the public letter of Eucherius, bishop of Lyon (434–450),
addressed to his fellow bishop Salvius. Alternate versions have the
legion refusing Maximian's orders only after discovering a town they had
just destroyed had been inhabited by innocent Christians. And some have
Maurice as a captain of the legion. This legend and its historical implications are a
wonderful example of the pathetic racism and outrageous stupidity; of
the nonsense Whites try to pass of as history. Lets deconstruct this
nonsense for examination. First, Maurice is not an Egyptian name.
Now lets look at the logistics of this: If Emperor Maximian was in
Rome at the time he sent for Maurice, it would have taken a minimum of
32 days for the message to reach Maurice. It would have taken Maurice
15-30 days to gather up his 6,000 men and supplies for the journey. On
his 80 day (armies travel slow) 2,000 mile journey to Switzerland he
would have PASSED Rome. All told, 4-5 months have passed: the Bagandae
couldn’t have been much of a threat, and Emperor Maximian must have been
very weak militarily. So then, exactly who were the Roman troops with
the strength to impose a decimation, and then a massacre, on Maurice’s
6,000 strong Army? Pure nonsense! Maurice is said to have the title of "Primicerius". But
in the military, the use of the term was restricted to units associated
with the imperial court, chiefly imperial guards. WHAT WOULD THE
IMPERIAL GUARD BE DOING IN EGYPT? Worst yet logically - PERMANENTLY
STATIONED THERE? Pure nonsense! Maurice died 287 A.D. Eucherius, Bishop of Lyon,
discovered his story, and wrote about him in about 450 A.D. THEN about
ONE THOUSAND years LATER: Whites SUDDENLY started making Statues and
Paintings of Maurice in MEDIEVAL UNIFORM, not ROMAN UNIFORM! Pure
nonsense! Why would Whites need to come up with such a ridicules story?
Simple: they needed an explanation for the presence of a prominent
Black man in Europe. There are just too many statues and paintings of
him to hide or destroy, and replace with White depictions of him – as
they usually do. So that ridiculous story was the only way to explain
his presence in Europe. Take note that they were careful to place his
origin in Africa. Because as we all know, that is the only place Blacks
were found in those days – according to the nonsense of Whites. So who was Maurice? Owing to the fact that he became
the Patron saint of the Germany based, Holy Roman Empire: He was
probably a Celt from what is now Germany. But to be clear - the images of Black knights commonly
called Saint Maurice by Albino historians WERE REAL BLACK KNIGHTS of the
medieval period! Research has revealed that the one above was Ulrich
von Hutten (1488 – 1523) who was a German scholar, poet and reformer. He
was an outspoken critic of the Roman Catholic Church and a bridge
between the humanists and the Lutheran Reformation. He was a leader of
the Imperial Knights of the Holy Roman Empire.
Roman Citizens
The Germanic's
also Slav's
The point has been made in these pages, many times,
that modern Whites are derived from Central Asian Albinos, who invaded
Europe in the early modern era. And that modern Whites have little
relationship to Ancient Europeans, Greeks or Romans. To make this point,
we quote "Cornelius Tacitus" (who was likely a Celt, 56 - 117 A.D.)
He was a senator, and a historian of the Roman Empire: We quote from his
book, The Germania (Latin: De Origine et situ Germanorum, literally
Concerning the Origin and Situation of the Germanics).
Cornelius Tacitus, Germany and its Tribes
The Germans themselves I should regard as aboriginal, and
not mixed at all with other races through immigration or intercourse.
For, in former times, it was not by land but on shipboard that those who
sought to emigrate would arrive; and the boundless and, so to speak,
hostile ocean beyond us (the north Sea), is seldom entered by a sail
from our world. And, beside the perils of rough and unknown seas, who
would leave Asia, or Africa, or Italy for Germany, with its wild
country, its inclement skies, its sullen manners and aspect, unless
indeed it were his home? In their ancient songs, their only way of
remembering or recording the past, they celebrate an earth-born god,
Tuisco, and his son Mannus, as the origin of their race, as their
founders.
The name Germany, on the other hand, they say, is
modern and newly introduced, from the fact that the tribes which first
crossed the Rhine and drove out the Gauls, and are now called Tungrians,
were then called Germans. Thus what was the name of a tribe, and not of
a race, gradually prevailed, till all called themselves by this
self-invented name of Germans, which the conquerors had first employed
to inspire terror.
For my own part, I agree with those who think that
the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of inter-marriages with
foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like
none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities
throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair,
(classic Albinism), huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They
are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the
least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure
them.
Decline of the Roman Empire
When Constantine became the sole Roman Emperor in 324,
Christianity became the leading religion of the empire. After the death
of Constantine in 337, two of his sons, Constantius II and Constans
took over the leadership of the empire. Constans, ruler of the western
provinces, was like his father, a Christian. In 341, he decreed that all
pre-Christian Graeco Roman worship and sacrifice should cease; warning
those who still persisted in practising ancient Graeco-Roman polytheism
with the threat of the death penalty.
Lay Christians took advantage of new anti-Graeco-Roman
polytheism laws by destroying and plundering the temples. Temples that
survived were converted into Christian churches: the Pantheon is the
most notable example, having once been a temple to all the gods and
later, removing the statues of the so-called 'pagan' gods and replacing
them with Christian saints, becoming a church in honor of their own one
god. Many of the buildings in the Roman Forum were similarly converted,
preserving the structures if not their original intent. Later on, the emperor Julian the Apostate attempted to
reverse the process of Christianization and bring back the native forms
of polytheism, but his death in Persia caused the empire to once again
fall under the power of Christian control, this time permanently.
The decline of the Roman Empire was a slow process,
which occurred over a period of over 350 years. Beginning at about 100
A.D. and culminating on September 4, 476, when Romulus Augustus, the
last Emperor of the Western Roman Empire, was deposed by Odoacer, a
Germanic chieftain.
Though by appearance, Odoacer was probably a
Celt/Gaul: they being the original people of Germany. With the actual
true (White) Germaic's following. Note that Odoacers hair stands
straight up, White peoples hair cannot do that naturally. (Laugh at the
example if you will, but the point still holds true, also note
Vercingetorix's hair).
Today's descendants of the Germanic, Slav, and Turk
Albinos from Central Asia, have so confused and obfuscated history with
their false accounts and fake artifacts, that it is impossible at this
time, to say definitively what the hierarchy of ancient western Rome was
like, (from artifacts, we know that the Eastern Empire was ruled by
Blacks). What little that we do have of artifactual evidence, suggests
that like the Eastern Empire, the Western Empire was also ruled by
Blacks. This painting of unknown provenance and period, may well be
fanciful, but we feel that it accurately depicts the hierarchy of the
Western Roman Empire.
Charlemagne
Rome's replacement "The Holy Roman Empire" was a
realm that existed for about a millennium in West and Central Europe:
ruled by a Holy Roman Emperor. Charlemagne (meaning Charles the Great;
possibly 742 – 28 January 814 - King of the Franks). He expanded the
Frankish kingdom (France) into an empire that incorporated much of
Western and Central Europe. During his reign, he conquered Italy and was
crowned Imperator Augustus by Pope Leo III on 25 December 800 A.D. This
temporarily made him a rival of the Byzantine Emperor in
Constantinople. His rule is also associated with the Carolingian
Renaissance, a revival of art, religion, and culture through the medium
of the Catholic Church. Through his foreign conquests and internal
reforms, Charlemagne helped define both Western Europe and the Middle
Ages.
He is numbered as Charles I in the regnal lists of
Germany (where he is known as Karl der Große), the Holy Roman Empire,
and France. He was crowned Emperor of the Romans in 800 A.D. and was
then the forerunner of the Holy Roman Emperors, largely because he had
inaugurated the tradition of imperial coronation by the Pope of the
Catholic Church. This continued as a significant institution in the Holy
Roman Empire until the 16th century. In a decree following the 1512
Diet of Cologne, the name was officially changed to Holy Roman Empire of
the German Nation. Charlemagne's policy of "renovatio Romanorum
imperii" (reviving the Roman Empire) remained at least in theory, as the
official position of the Empire until its end in 1806.
Was Charlemagne a Black man? At this point there is no
way to know - and that information is not likely to be forthcoming. But
it appears that contrary to what Whites say, the Franks were probably a
"Native" NOT Germanic people. As such, Charlemagne would have indeed,
probably been a Black man. But because Whites have so interwoven
European history with lies, there are really no safe assumptions, and
no safe place to start.
As to the false Coin: In 1861, Charlemagne's tomb was
opened by scientists who reconstructed his skeleton and estimated it to
be measured 74.9 inches (190 centimeters). A modern study based on the
dimensions of his tibia estimate his height as 1.84 m. This puts him in
the 99th percentile of tall people of his period given that average male
height of his time was 1.69 m. The width of the bone suggest he was
gracile not robust in body build. So at least one thing we know for
sure: that COIN image is NOT of Charlemagne. But what's new, Whites
routinely use fake artifacts to bolster their lies. Charlemagne was
actively and personally involved in wars into distant lands throughout
his 46 year reign - Fat guys don't get around like that! So whoever
decided to falsely use that coin, didn't even know the history of the
man.
But there is no ambiguity about Charlemagne's successor as Holy Roman Emperor: Otto I, he was most certainly a Black man!
Holy Roman Emperor: Otto I
Note: Otto I is the Black Freising King on the "Coat
of Arms" of the current Pope: Pope Benedict XVI, who is of German
extraction.
Otto
I, the Great (23 November 912 in Wallhausen – 7 May 973 in Memleben),
son of Henry I the Fowler and Matilda of Ringelheim, was Duke of Saxony,
King of Germany, King of Italy, and "the first of the Germans to be
called the emperor of Italy" according to Arnulf of Milan. While
Charlemagne had been crowned emperor in 800, his empire had been divided
amongst his grandsons, and following the assassination of Berengar of
Friuli in 924, the imperial title had lain vacant for nearly forty
years. Otto succeeded his father as king of the Saxons in 936, on
February 2, 962, Otto was crowned Emperor of what would later become the
Holy Roman Empire.
Edith of England (910 – 26 January 946), also spelt Eadgyth
or Ædgyth, was the daughter of Edward the Elder, King of England and
Ælfflæd. Her paternal grandparents were Alfred the Great, King of
Wessex, and his wife Ealhswith. (The obvious corollary is that Edith
came from a long line of Black British royalty).
Click Here for more on Black British Royalty: Click >>>
In order to seal an alliance between two Saxon kingdoms, her
half-brother, King Athelstan of England, sent two of his sisters to
Germany, instructing the Duke of Saxony (later Otto I, Holy Roman
Emperor) to choose whichever one pleased him best. Otto chose Edith and
married her in 929. The remaining sister Algiva or Adiva was married to a
"king near the Jupiter mountains" (the Alps). The precise identity of
this sister is debated. She may have been Eadgifu of England, who
married King Charles III of France, or another sister otherwise unknown
to history. As queen, Eadgyth undertook the usual state duties of a
Queen: when she turns up in the records it is generally in connection
with gifts to the state's favoured monasteries or memorials to female
holy women and saints. In this respect she seems to have been more
diligent than her now widowed and subsequently sainted mother-in-law
Queen Matilda whose own charitable activities only achieve a single
recorded mention from the period of Eadgyth's time as queen. There was
probably rivalry between the Benedictine Monastery of St Maurice founded
at Magdeburg by Otto and Eadgyth in 937, a year after coming to the
throne and Matilda's foundation at Quedlinburg Abbey, intended by her as
a memorial to her husband, the late King Henry I. Like her brother,
Athelstan, Edith was devoted to the cult of Saint Oswald and was
instrumental in introducing this cult into Germany after her marriage to
the emperor. Her lasting influence may have caused certain monasteries
and churches in Saxony to be dedicated to this saint. Eadgyth died at a relatively young age. Her
tomb is located in the Cathedral of Magdeburg, Germany. A lead coffin
inside a stone sarcophagus with her name on it was found and opened in
2008 by archaeologists during work on the building. An inscription
recorded that it was the body of Eadgyth, reburied in 1510. It was
examined in 2009, then brought to Bristol, England, for tests in 2010.
Professor Mark Horton of Bristol University said that "this may prove to
be the oldest complete remains of an English royal." Edith and Otto's children were: 1. Liutgarde, married Conrad the Red,
2. Liudolf, Duke of Swabia (930-September 6 957)
Click Here for medieval Christian frescos from northern Greece: Click >>>
Click Here for histories and images of some of the first Christians: Click >>>
From
the words of Cornelius Tacitus, and others: Herodotus, Xenophanes, it
is clear that the ancient Romans and Greeks did NOT look like the White,
Blue-eyed, Red haired Germaic's. And of course from modern studies, we
know that aside from being Germaic, the modern populations also have
significant Turk admixture. But just WHO were these White Germanic
invaders?
The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to the perceived period
of both cultural and economic deterioration as well as disruption that
took place in Western Europe following the decline of the Roman Empire:
the phrase was first recorded in 1602. Originally, the term
characterized the bulk of the Middle Ages as a period of intellectual
darkness between the extinguishing of the light of Rome, and the
Renaissance or rebirth from the 14th century onwards. The concept of a Dark Age originated with the Italian scholar
Petrarch (Francesco Petrarca) in the 1330s, and was originally intended
as a sweeping criticism of the character of Late Latin literature.
Petrarch regarded the post-Roman centuries as "dark" compared to the
light of classical antiquity. Later historians expanded the term to
refer to the transitional period between Roman times and the High Middle
Ages, including not only the lack of Latin literature, but also a lack
of contemporary written history, general demographic decline, limited
building activity and material cultural achievements in general. Popular
culture has further expanded on the term as a vehicle to depict the
Middle Ages as a time of backwardness, extending its pejorative use and
expanding its scope.
The Problem!
Just as the Hellenes and Romans were an illiterate nomadic
people, when they first entered Black Europe over a thousand years
earlier. And just as they struggled to learn the ways and technologies
of civilization, so it was also for the Germanic's. And just as before,
there was a "Dark Ages" of regression, while they learned the ways of
civilization. But unlike the Hellenes, the Germanic's did NOT attribute
their inheritance of civilization to the rightful benefactor (albeit an
unwilling benefactor), the Black ancients. They perhaps ignorantly,
perhaps racistly, attributed it to the Classical Greeks. Though somewhat
eclipsed by technology today, the sense of a legacy was strongly felt
by post-Renaissance European elite, who saw themselves as the spiritual
heirs of Greece. As late as 1939 Will Durant could write "excepting
machinery, there is hardly anything secular in our culture that does not
come from Greece," and conversely "there is nothing in Greek
civilization that doesn't illuminate our own". Had it remained just a sense of debt to the ancient Greeks,
the world would have been a much better place today. But it did not, the
Germanic's not having any history of their own, decided to make one up,
with the Hellenes and Romans as the base. They decided that they were
the descendants of the Hellenes and Romans, but since they were White
skinned, Blue-eyed, Blond haired, and the Hellenes and Romans were not.
They decided to create statues and other artifacts depicting Hellenes
and Romans as such. Then, perhaps as a "Snowballing" effect, they decided that
ALL ancient civilizations must be White like them also: soon White
Egyptian artifacts began to appear (exclusive of the legitimate Greek
and Roman period type). Then ancient Europeans, Mesopotamian's, Hebrews,
and Persians became White. Then with their success in wars of expansion
and colonization, they decided that because they were so great, then
everyone previous of any consequence must also have been White - and the
requisite artifacts thus appeared. (All this from a people who just a
few hundred years earlier, couldn't figure out why it was a bad idea to
shit in the same places that you took your drinking water from).
The Turks
The next, and final wave of White Asians, the Turks,
continued their migrations into Europe, North Africa, and Western Asia,
well into the modern era. And just like the previous Whites, they were
bent on conquest. And just like the Germanic's, having no history, they
decided to create a place in history for themselves. Thus they became
the descendants of the Berbers, Egyptians, Mesopotamian's, Persians,
Phoenicians, and Arabs - and oh yes, the Hebrews, vis-à-vis the Khazar
Turks. Interestingly though, Turks in Turkey proper, are taught
something quite different. In the Turkish Nations creation myth (a
modern country with a creation myth?). From tomes: a large or scholarly
book, produced by the Ministry of Education in 1932; Turks are taught
that at the dawn of history, their ancestors, led by a mythical gray
she-wolf, started migrating outwards from the heart of Central Asia. As
the numbers of their people swelled and droughts dried the traditional
grazing lands on the steppe, some of them, they are told, even crossed
the Bering Strait into the Americas. Presumably becoming the American
Indians. In his later years, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (the founder of the
modern Turkey nation), himself adopted a creed known as the "Sun
Theory", which depicts the Turks as the mother race of all mankind, and
proposed that all human languages are descendants of one proto-Turkic
primal language. (Note: though the theory may sound outlandish, there is
justification, and anecdotal evidence, for believing that at least the
"North American Indian" was a Turk mulatto). Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, taught that the Turks discovered the
America's fifty years before Christopher Columbus. The proof of this
assertion, he told journalist, was that the Turks and Caicos Islands in
the Caribbean, had obviously been named by Turks, especially since their
capital was called Grand Turk. (The islands are in fact named after a
fez-shaped cactus). All-in-all, it seems fair to say that Whites have done a
great job of screwing-up, not only history, but the Planet and it's
people.
The Worlds Greatest Painter:
Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni - 6 March 1475 – 18 February 1564.
Michelangelo left no documented self-portrait. The often
fanciful portraits, said to have been done by his contemporary artists,
are of course not accurate, or done by his contemporaries, except the
Ghisi engraving. His contemporaries would have known exactly what he
looked like, and there would not have been such variation in his
appearance as depicted in the various portraits that now exist ( Whites
do lie about these things). The description by the 16th century painter
and art historian Giorgio Vasari is all there is. It seems that in
reality, Michelangelo wasn't exactly a refined man, according to Vasari,
"he wore stockings of dogskin constantly for months together, so that
when he took them off the skin of the leg often came away with them." The only known self-portrait of the artist, is scratched into
the margin of one of Michelangelo's poems. It is said that the image is
a sort of caricature of the artist, done during the years he was
painting the frescoes of the Sistine Chapel in Rome. The drawing is
described as showing him with cartoon-like features including huge eyes
and hair standing straight up on ends." Interestingly, no photograph of
the drawing seems to exist.
A painter must paint that which the customer demands.
But the problem of reconciling the incongruities of the scene above -
Black Parents, White Children - seems to be reflected in the faces of
Jacob and Michelangelo.
Who are these modern White (Albino) Europeans?
Through means and methods that we can still only guess at, these
least of all humans, both numerically and otherwise, had managed to
gain control over much of the world. Though that control is now waning,
many, especially the uneducated, are still dependent on them to tell us
exactly who they are. But even this simple task is complicated by the
fact that these people once claimed to be native to Europe, and today,
the uneducated still do. Therefore their researchers and educators tend
to lie and double-talk as relates to the origins of the European
Albinos.
The Germanics:
This is particularly true of the Germanics: The basic ethnic
stock in the composition of the modern peoples of Sweden, Norway,
Denmark, Iceland, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Northern Italy, the
Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, North and central France, Lowland
Scotland, and England. When we go to the Encyclopedia to look-up
Germanics, we are greeted with pure nonsense as to their origins. But
when we use a lateral approach, such as looking up their former
tormentors, the Huns, then we see more truthful entries.
Encyclopedia:
The Huns
The Huns occupied North China from the 3rd century until 581. Having swept across Asia, they
invaded the lower Volga valley (Russia - see map) c.372 and advanced
westward, pushing the Germanic Ostrogoths and Visigoths before them
and thus precipitating the great waves of migrations (into Europe) that
destroyed the Roman Empire and changed the face of Europe.
Bibliography
See T. Hodgkin, Italy and Her Invaders, Vol. I (rev. ed. 1892,
repr. 1967); W. M. McGovern, Early Empires of Central Asia (1939); E. A.
Thompson, A History of Attila and the Huns (1948); F. Teggart, China
and Rome (1969, repr. 1983); J. D. Maenchen-Helfen, The World of the
Huns (1973).
The Slavs
The Slavs are the largest ethnic and linguistic group of peoples
in Europe belonging to the Indo-European linguistic family. It is
estimated that the Slavs number over 300 million in the world. They are
usually classified in three main divisions. The West Slavs include the
Poles, the Czechs, the Slovaks, and the Wends (also known as Lusatians)
and other small groups in East Germany. The South Slavs include the
Serbs, the Croats, the Slovenes, the Macedonians, the Montenegrins, the
Bosniaks, and the Bulgars. The East Slavs, the largest group, include
the Great Russians, Ukrainians, and Belorussians (or White Russians).
Origins
Ethnically the Slavs possess little unity, for they have mixed
for centuries with other peoples, including Turko-Tatars, Finnic
peoples, Germans, Mongols, Greeks, and Illyrian tribes. The Bulgarians
are not of Slavic origin. The obscure beginnings of the Slavs have given
rise to several theories, all of which include as a possible place of origin the area of the Polesie marshes in Galicia (region spanning southeastern Poland and western Ukraine ).
The ancestors of the Slavs were Neolithic tribes who occupied this
territory a few centuries before the Christian era. (The Albinos will
not venture into their origins before this time, as that would surely
lead to Central Asia and Albinohood).
Bibliography
See K. Jazdzewski, Atlas to the Prehistory of the Slavs (tr., 2
vol., 1948—49); J. S. Roucek, ed., Slavonic Encyclopaedia (4 vol., 1949,
repr. 1969); F. Dvornik, The Slavs (1956) and The Slavs in European
History and Civilization (1962, repr. 1986); S. H. Cross, Slavic
Civilization through the Ages (1963); A. P. Vlasto, The Entry of the
Slav
s into Christendom (1970); M. A. Gimbutas, The Slavs (1971).
Turks
Because the Turks are now a predominately Mulatto people, no
efforts are made to hide their origins. Therefore all Albino sources
will freely admit that Turks were an Asian People.
Greeks and Romans
Greeks and Romans were a Black and Mulatto people comprised of
the Original Black Europeans and the first Central Asian Albinos to
reach Europe, circa 1200 B.C. Modern Albinos have nothing to do with
these people, as they were the victims of the marauding Albinos from
Central Asia. But modern Albinos do falsely claim that the Hellenes of
Greece were Albinos. The Greek historian Herodotus clearly explains the
Hellenes were only "partly Albino" thusly:.
Herodotus (circa 440 B.C.)
Book 1 – CLIO
[1.58] The Hellenic race has never, since its first origin,
changed its speech. This at least seems evident to me. It was a branch
of the Pelasgic, which separated from the main body, and at first was
scanty in numbers and of little power; but it gradually spread and
increased to a multitude of nations, chiefly by the voluntary entrance into its ranks of numerous tribes of barbarians.
Please visit the "Additional Material Area" for many more photographs of each civilization, and related material <Click>
Arab scholar 'cracked Rosetta code' 800 years before the West
It is famed as a critical moment in code-breaking history. Using a
piece of basalt carved with runes and words, scholars broke the secret
of hieroglyphs, the written 'language' of the ancient Egyptians.
A
baffling, opaque language had been made comprehensible, and the secrets
of one of the world's greatest civilisations revealed - thanks to the
Rosetta Stone and the analytic prowess of 18th and 19th century European
scholars.
But now the supremacy of Western thinking has been
challenged by a London researcher who claims that hieroglyphs had been
decoded hundreds of years earlier - by an Arabic alchemist, Abu Bakr
Ahmad Ibn Wahshiyah.
'It has taken years of painstaking research
to prove this,' said Dr Okasha El Daly, at UCL's Institute of
Archaeology. 'I was convinced that Western scholars were not the first,
and I have found evidence that shows Arabian scholars broke the code a
thousand years ago.'
The Rosetta Stone was found embedded in a
fort wall by French engineers during Napoleon's campaign in Egypt. The
stone - now displayed in the British Museum - contains a text in Greek,
Coptic and hieroglyph, but still required another 23 years' work to be
decoded, a task achieved by Jean-François Champollion, a student of
ancient languages.
Champollion's breakthrough came in 1822 when
he realised hieroglyphs should be read, not as symbols of ideas or
objects, but as a phonetic script. The sound associated with each symbol
was crucial to deciphering it. It was a 'eureka' moment. 'Je tiens mons
affaire (I've done it),' Champollion shouted, before falling into a
dead faint for five days. He awoke to continue his work, but died 10
years later of exhaustion and is buried in Paris's Père Lachaise
cemetery. Pieces of papyrus are still placed on his grave in recognition
of his great work.
But now it is claimed that Champollion had
been beaten by Arabian scholars who, eight centuries earlier, had
twigged that sounds were crucial to their decoding. 'For two and half
centuries, the study of ancient Egypt has been dominated by a
Euro-centric view that virtually ignored Arabic scholarship,' said El
Daly. 'I felt that was quite unjustified.'
An expert in both
ancient Egypt and ancient Arabic scripts, El Daly spent seven years
chasing down Arabic manuscripts in private collections around the world
in a bid to find evidence that Arab scholars had unlocked the secrets of
the hieroglyph. He eventually found it in the work of the ninth-century
alchemist, Ibn Wahshiyah. 'I compared his studies with those of modern
scholars and realised that he understood completely what hieroglyphs
were saying.'
El Daly stressed that Muslim scholars had not
simply been handed the secrets of hieroglyphs after Egypt was taken over
by Islam.
'The secret of the hieroglyph was lost and then
rediscovered by Arab scholars, who used diligent work to break their
code, eight centuries before Champollion,' he said. 'These were people
who possessed great astronomical and mathematical knowledge. Decoding
hieroglyphs was just the kind of thing they would have been good at.'
WESTERN LUNACY
Andrew Robinson
The polymath Thomas Young (1773-1829) — physicist, physiologist,
physician and polyglot, among several other things — became hooked on
the scripts and languages of ancient Egypt in 1814, the year he began to
decipher the Rosetta Stone. He continued to study the hieroglyphic and
demotic scripts with variable intensity for the rest of his life,
literally until his dying day. The challenge of being the first modern
to read the writing of what appeared then to be the oldest civilization
in the world — far older than the classical civilization of Young’s
beloved Greeks — was irresistible to a man who was as equally gifted in
languages, ancient and contemporary, as he was in science. He himself
described his Egyptian obsession as being driven by “an attempt to
unveil the mystery, in which Egyptian literature has been involved for
nearly twenty centuries.” His epitaph in London’s Westminster Abbey
states, accurately enough, that Young was the man who “first penetrated
the obscurity which had veiled for ages the hieroglyphics of Egypt” —
even if it was the linguist and archaeologist Jean-François Champollion
(1790-1832) who in the end would enjoy the glory of being the first
actually to read the hieroglyphs in 1822-23.
From 1814 until the publication of his important Encyclopaedia Britannica
article (‘Egypt’ in 1819), Young had had the field of hieroglyphic
decipherment largely to himself. Champollion, though actively interested
in the Rosetta Stone from 1808, did not tackle its decipherment in
earnest until 1821. He quickly overtook Young and became the founder of
Egyptology as a science.
During the 1820s, the two men sometimes cooperated with each other,
but mostly they competed as rivals. Their relationship could never have
been a harmonious one. Young claimed that Champollion had built his
system of reading hieroglyphics on Young’s own discoveries and his
tentative hieroglyphic ‘alphabet’, published in 1819. While paying
generous and frequent tribute to Champollion’s unrivalled progress since
then, Young wanted his early steps recognized. This Champollion was
adamantly unwilling to concede, claiming that he had worked
independently; and in his vehemence he determined to give all of Young’s
work the minimum possible public recognition. Just weeks before Young’s
death in May 1829, Champollion, writing in the midst of his 1828-29
expedition to ancient Egypt — he was then at Thebes in the Valley of the
Kings — exulted privately to his brother in Paris: “So the poor Dr
Young is incorrigible? Why stir up old matter that is already mummified?
Thank M. Arago for the cudgels he has so valiantly taken up for the
honour of the Franco-Pharaonic alphabet. The Briton can do as he pleases — it shall be ours: and all of old England will learn from young France to spell hieroglyphs by a totally different method.”
Such defiantly nationalistic overtones — at times evident in Young’s
writings, too — have to some extent bedevilled honest discussion of
Young and Champollion ever since those Napoleonic days of intense
Franco-British political rivalry. Even Young’s loyal friend and admirer,
the physicist Dominique Arago, turned against his work on
hieroglyphics, at least partly because Champollion was an honoured
fellow Frenchman.
Alongside this, Egyptologists, who are the people best placed to understand the intellectual nitty-gritty
of the dispute, are naturally drawn to Champollion more than Young
because he founded their subject. No scholar of ancient Egypt would wish
to think ill of such a pioneer. Even John Ray, the Cambridge University
Egyptologist who has done most in recent years to give Young his proper
due, admits: “the suspicion may easily arise, and often has done, that
any eulogy of Thomas Young must be intended as a denigration of
Champollion. This would be shameful coming from an Egyptologist.”
Demotic
script on a replica of the rosetta stone on display in Magdeburg. Photo
by Chris 73. Creative Commons License. Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Then there is the cult of genius to consider; many of us prefer to
believe in the primacy of unaccountable moments of inspiration over the
less glamorous virtues of step-by-step, rational teamwork. Champollion
maintained that his breakthroughs in 1822-23 came almost exclusively out
of his own mind, arising from his indubitably passionate devotion to
ancient Egypt and his unrivalled knowledge of the Coptic language
descended from ancient Egyptian. He pictured himself for the public in
his writings as a ‘lone genius’ who solved the riddle of ancient Egypt’s
writing single-handedly. The fact that Young was known primarily for
his work in fields other than Egyptian studies, and that he published
his studies on Egypt anonymously up to 1823, made Champollion’s solitary
self-image easily believable for most people.
Lastly, in trying to assess the differing styles of Young and
Champollion, there is no avoiding the fact that they were highly
contrasting personalities and that this contrast sometimes influenced
their research on the hieroglyphs. Champollion had tunnel vision
(“fortunately for our subject,” says Ray); was prone to fits of euphoria
and despair; and had personally led an uprising against the French king
in Grenoble in 1821, for which he was put on trial. Young, apart from
his polymathy and a total lack of engagement with party politics, was a
man who “could not bear, in the most common conversation, the slightest
degree of exaggeration, or even of colouring” (wrote his closest friend
after Young’s death). Young and Champollion were poles apart
intellectually, emotionally and politically.
Consider their respective attitudes to ancient Egypt. Young never
went to Egypt and never wanted to go. In founding an Egyptian Society in
London in 1817, to publish as many ancient inscriptions and manuscripts
as possible so as to aid the decipherment, Young remarked that funds
were needed “for employing some poor Italian or Maltese to scramble over
Egypt in search of more.” Champollion, by contrast, had long dreamt of
visiting Egypt and doing exactly what Young had depreciated, ever since
he saw the hieroglyphs as a boy, and when he finally got there, he was
able to pass for a native, given his swarthy complexion and his
excellent command of Arabic. “I am Egypt’s captive — she is my be-all,”
he thrilled from beside the Nile in 1828.
Later he described entering
the temple of Ramses the Great at Abu Simbel, which was blocked by
millennia of sand: “I undressed almost completely, down to my Arab shirt
and long linen underpants, and pushed myself flat on my stomach through
the small opening in the doorway that, if cleared of sand, would be at
least 25 feet in height. I thought I was entering the mouth of a
furnace, and, when I had slid entirely into the temple, I found myself
in an atmosphere heated to 52 degrees: we went through this astonishing
excavation, Rosellini, Ricci, I and one of the Arabs holding a candle in
his hand.”
Such a perilous adventure would probably not have appealed to Young,
even in his careless youth as an accomplished horseman roughing it in
the Highlands of Scotland. Unlike Champollion, Young’s motive for
‘cracking’ the Egyptian scripts was fundamentally philological and
scientific, not aesthetic and cultural — in contrast with his attitude
to the classical literature of Greece and Rome. Many Egyptologists, and
humanities scholars in general, tend not to sympathize with this motive.
They also know little about Young’s work in science and his renown as
someone who initiated many new areas of enquiry (such as a theory of
colour vision) and left others to develop them. As a result, some of
them seriously misjudge Young. Not knowing of his fairness in
recognizing other scientists’ contributions and his fanatical
truthfulness in his own scientific work, they jump to the obvious
conclusion that Young’s attitude to Champollion was chiefly one of envy.
But not only would such an emotion have been out of character for
Young, it would also not have made much sense, given his major
scientific achievements and the fact that these were increasingly
recognized from 1816 onwards — starting with French scientists, who
awarded Young their highest honours.
For Champollion, the success of his decipherment was a matter of make
or break as a scholar and as a man. For Young, his Egyptian research
was essentially yet one more fascinating avenue of knowledge to explore
for his own amusement. Both men were geniuses, though of exceptionally
different kinds, and both deserve to be remembered in the story of the
decipherment of the Egyptian hieroglyphs: Young for taking some
difficult but crucial initial steps in 1814-19; and Champollion for
discovering a coherent system in 1822-23, and thereafter demonstrating
its validity with a vast array of virgin inscriptions.
Speculation of a link between Christianity and Buddhism first arose
as a result of the translation of Buddhist texts into European languages
during
the
British
colonisation
of India. Similarity
in the stories of the births and lives of Jesus and Buddha were immediately
apparent to scholars. It was also noted that many of
their teachings had close parallels. Buddhism was unquestionably centuries older than Christianity.
Was it possible the authors of Christianity copied their ideas
from Buddhism?
East meets West – trade and religious influence
Trade
between East and West is of great antiquity. Cuneiform tablets as early
as 2400 BC describe shipments of cotton cloth, spices, oil, grains, and
such exotic items as peacocks from the Indus Valley region to the
Middle East. We can be certain that the silk and spice routes carried more than trade goods. An Oxyrhynchus papyrus fragment from Egypt even contains a passage in a South Indian language.
Long
before the word 'missionary' came to be synonymous with Christianity, Buddhist
monks ('dharma-bhanakas') were traipsing across
Asia. From the Buddhist heartland on the Ganges, notions of the sacred
accompanied the spice and incense. Travelling
the trade routes they spread their doctrines all the
way from Khotan in central Asia to Antioch and Alexandria in
the west.
One such visit
is documented in 20 BC in Athens. A Buddhist philosopher, Zarmarus,
part of an embassy from India, made a doctrinal point by setting
himself
alight. His tomb became a tourist attraction and is mentioned
by several historians.
Clearly, the
evangelists of Buddha were committed to their cause. Is it simply coincidence that
the hero of the Buddhist tale is just a tad similar to the Christian
superman? In both the story of the Buddha and the story of Jesus
we read of a mystic or holy man, travelling from village to village.
Each lives off the hospitality of the people and gets into
trouble with the ruling elite by ignoring social status and taking
food
and refuge from prostitutes.
Is it just
possible that the miracles ascribed to Jesus merely mimic the
tricks practised by the 'holy men' in India?
Alexander and
Asoka
Alexander (336-323
BC) carried Greek civilization to the east. Cities along the
trade route – Merv, Bactra, Taxila etc. – became
Greek military colonies. The Indian province in the north west – Gandhara – had
been a Persian satrap before the arrival of the Greeks and
here, in the 2nd century BC, Greek kingdoms with a distinctive
Graeco-Bactrian culture emerged.
But the flow
of culture was two way – for example, the Greeks
adopted the Indian war elephant and a great deal of speculative
Indian thinking. Greek philosophers, like Anaxarchus and Pyrrho,
had been in the train of Alexander and had mixed with the Indian gymnosophists or
'naked philosophers.' Even the more ancient Pythagoreans may
have been influenced by Indian ideas – vegetarianism,
communal property and the 'transmigration of souls.'
After their
conquest of the Indus valley the Greeks never again returned
to the simple pantheon of their Olympian gods – and founded
their first school of Skepticism (see Flintoff, E. (1980),
'Pyrrho and India', Phronesis 25: 88-108.).
At the time
of Alexander, the Magadha empire had dominated the middle
and upper Ganges but Alexander never got that far. Yet into the
vacuum created by Alexander's departure, and bringing east and
west closer together, moved Chandragupta (Sandracottus to
the Greeks), founder of the Mauryan empire. He conquered
Magadha, and also the Greek kingdoms of the north west and much
of northern India. His empire included the northern province
of Kosala, where a Hindu reformer Gautama Siddhartha (aka "Shakyammuni
Buddha") began advocating his 'Middle Path' between
greed and asceticism.
Siddhartha's
philosophising had little consequence during his own lifetime
but in 270 BC, the grandson of Chandragupta, Asoka,
ascended the Mauryan throne. Initially a ruthless imperialist
he seems – like Marcus Aurelius – to have spent his
later life in soul-searching and pondering the afterlife.
In an action
that anticipated Constantine's religious revolution five hundred
years later, Asoka adopted Buddhism as a unifying and pacifying
ideology for his vast empire and propagated it's doctrines with
all the usual zeal of a new convert.
Judging by
his still extant edicts, inscribed on rocks and stone pillars
to be found everywhere from Afghanistan to south India, Asoka
sought further 'conquest' beyond his frontiers by dispatching
Buddhist missionaries in all directions – "Conquest
by Dhamma". Carved
in stone is Asoka's urging of Forgiveness:
"The killing,
death or deportation of a hundredth, or even a thousandth
part of those who died during the conquest of Kalinga now
pains Beloved-of-the-Gods. Now Beloved-of-the-Gods thinks
that even those who do wrong should be forgiven where forgiveness
is possible."
By
this stage the Buddha's words of wisdom had been codified into
a number of "sutras", propagated by a growing
number of rival sects.
Worlds
Collide
The
3rd century BC empire of Asoka included a vast
area of the Greeks' eastern empire established
a century earlier.
After
Alexander, the Seleucides ruled the Greek empire
east of the Euphrates. A century later they had
taken over the kingdom of Antigonus in Syria and
Asia Minor but had lost control of Parthia, Bactria
and the Indus Valley.
Wooden
horse of Troy shows up in Indian art (Gandhara)
"Conquest
by Dhamma"
"Now
it is conquest by Dhamma that Beloved-of-the-Gods
considers to be the best conquest ...
And
conquest by Dhamma has been won here, on the
borders, even six hundred yojanas away, where
the Greek king Antiochos rules, beyond there
where the four kings named Ptolemy, Antigonos,
Magas and Alexander rule ...
Here
in the king’s domain among the Greeks,
the Kambojas, the Nabhakas ... everywhere people
are following Beloved-of-the-Gods’ instructions
in Dhamma.
Even
where Beloved-of-the-Gods’ envoys have
not been, these people too, having heard of the
practice of Dhamma and the ordinances and instructions
in Dhamma given by Beloved-of-the-Gods, are following
it and will continue to do so ...
This
conquest has been won everywhere, and it gives
great joy – the joy which only conquest
by Dhamma can give. But even this joy is of little
consequence. Beloved-of-the-Gods considers the
great fruit to be experienced in the next world
to be more important.
I
have had this Dhamma edict written so that my
sons and great-grandsons ... consider making
conquest by Dhamma only, for that bears fruit
in this world and the next."
– Asoka’s
rock edict at Girnuri in Guzerat.
Buddhist
monks in Egypt?
There are records
from Alexandria that indicate the arrival of a steady stream
of Buddhist monks and philosophers. They would surely have contributed
to the philosophical speculations and syncretism for which the
city was noted.
In particular,
it seems the original Therapeutae were
sent by Asoka on an embassy to Pharaoh Ptolemy II in 250 BC.
The
word 'Therapeutae' is itself of Buddhist origin, being a
Hellenization of the Pali 'Thera-putta' (literally 'son of
the elder.')
Philo Judaeus,
a 1st century AD contemporary of Josephus, described the Therapeutae in
his tract 'De Vita Contemplativa'. It appears they were
a religious brotherhood without precedent in the Jewish world.
Reclusive ascetics, devoted to poverty, celibacy, good deeds
and compassion, they were just like Buddhist monks in fact.
From the Therapeutae it
is quite possible a Buddhist influence spread to both the
Essenes (a similar monkish order in Palestine) and to the Gnostics – adepts
of philosophical speculations.
Influence
of Buddhism on Gnosticism
Buddha
gives benediction to his 12 apostles
Buddhism was
a religion of quite a different order to earlier 'pagan' cults.
It was a scriptural religion, making
a strong appeal to the emotions. It
offered a moral code – and hope.
The
doctrine of Incarnation
The Gnostic
idea of liberating the soul from entrapment in matter is
not dissimilar to the teachings embodied in the "4
Noble Truths" of the Buddha.
In Buddhism,
Mankind is seen as trapped in suffering (dukkha) by
desire (tanha).
Its cessation (nirodha) is to be realised by an eight-fold path of 'right
thought, right deed, right attitude' etc. (magga). Rather than Salvation an
equally whimsical Nirvana is postulated.
Nirvana
Lite
The path of
self-liberation (by meditation, asceticism etc.) is demanding
and fails to deliver the immediate consolation ordinary people
hope for. An easier option ('outer mystery') soon developed,
within both Gnosticism and Buddhism by which 'devotion
to the god' (prayer, chanting, ringing of bells, waving
incense sticks about, etc.) bestowed liberation (salvation/nirvana)
to the god's devotees.
From Gnosticism
emerged the Literalists of Christianity,
for whom the Saviour was given a real historic presence.
From Buddhism, Mahayana ("greater
vehicle") Buddhism emerged, in which the real historical
Buddha was gradually raised to the status of a divine incarnation (one
in a series of enlightened beings). The Lotus
Sûtra (Saddharmapundarîka-sûtram)
emphasizes mere faith in the Buddha as
sufficient for salvation, and advises Buddhist missionaries
to convert humanity, where necessary, through symbolic language,
codes, parables, etc.
And interestingly,
both developments occurred towards the end of the 1st century
AD.
Where
Did They Get Their Ideas From?
More
than two dozen story elements borrowed from the Buddha
1. Pre-existence.
2. Royal origin and genealogy. 3. Virginal Conception
by mother/Virgin Birth. 4. Dream Vision. 5. White Elephant
/ White Dove parallel. 6. Annunciation to the Husband.
7. Annunciation of Birth by a Woman 8. Righteous foster
father. 9. Marvellous Light/Star. 10. Angels and others
at birth. 11. The Magi's´ visit 12. Giving of
Gifts. 13. Presentation in the Temple. 14. Infant prodigy
/ precocious youth. 15. Nature Miracle. 16. The Naming
Ceremony. 17. The Taming of Wild Animals. 18. The Miracles
of the Bending Tree and Gushing Water. 19. The Fall
of Idols. 20. Healing Miracles. 21. Sage recognition
- Asita / Simeon parallel 22. Anna and Shabari/Old
Women parallel. 23. The Appellation of King. 24. Mary
/ Mahâprajâpati parallel 25. Fast in wilderness
/ temptation by the devil. 26. Preparing the Way. 27.
Reference to Signs 28. Offer of universal Salvation.
BIRTH
of the Saviour
The
conception and birth of Christ in the Gospel
of Luke has an uncanny resemblance to the birth
stories of Buddha.
In
both cases the mother was a paragon of virtue,
had a vision and, without sex, became pregnant
with an extraordinary child. Each was delivered
while the mother was on a journey and their
births were both announced by angels.
After
the birth of Buddha a hermit sage, who had
heard the celebrations of angels, was told
by them that the infant would sit on the throne
of enlightenment.
In
the Christian story, the angels appeared and
told shepherds that a child was born who is
Christ the Lord.
Both
narratives stress that holy people came to
pay homage to the world's saviour.
LOST
and FOUND
The
homespun 'wisdom' of Buddha & Christ
Sinner
returns to the Father!! Younger son leaves home and squanders his inheritance on wild living;
bankrupt and reduced to feeding pigs he returns home; delighted
father kills the fattened calf for him. Sensible elder brother
indignant and angry but father explains celebration is justified
because his brother had been 'lost and is found'. (Luke 15:11-32)
Sufferer
attains Nirvana!!
Young
son leaves home for distant lands. Father distraught.
Years later, looking for work, son doesn't
recognize his now rich father (who does recognize
him). He flees. Father secretly hires him as
a scavenger. Years later, dying, he tells son
of his inheritance. (Lotus Sutra)
TRIAL
After
a meal, an innocent man Charudatta is accused
of murdering the courtesan Vasantasena, and is
brought to trial. The judge, admitting his
incompetence to condemn a Brahmin, sends the
case over to the king who condemns the man
to be executed and impaled with an inscription
on him.
Charudatta
is then ordered to carry his cross (Sanskrit
sulam) to the place of execution. Meantime,
the king’s brother-in-law, who actually
murdered the courtesan, buries her body under
a pile of leaves. But she is found by a Buddhist
monk who raises her from her 'deadly swoon.'
Vasantasena then saves Charudatta from death.
Charudatta
forgives his accuser, Samsthanaka, and appoints
the Buddhist monk as the head of all the Buddhist
monasteries in the realm. There is a marriage
in the end as well: Charudatta accepts Vasantasena
as his second wife.
2nd
BC Sanskrit play Mrchchakatika (Little
Clay Cart)
PASSION
In
this story of 'Gautama, a holy man' our hero
is wrongfully condemned to die on the cross for
murdering the courtesan Bhadra. Gautama is impaled
on a cross, and his mentor Krishna Dvapayana
visits him and enters into a long dialogue, at
the end of which Gautama dies at the place
of skulls after engendering two offspring – the
progenitors of the Ikshavaku Dynasty.
1.
The death episode begins for Buddha crossing
the Ganges at Magadha, from whence he
goes on to Kusinagari for a last meal.
The fable of Matthew (15:39) similarly has
JC aboard ship, to the (unknown) "coasts of Magdala",
from whence he goes on to Jerusalem for a
last meal.
2. Both Buddha and JC forecast their own death 3 times.
3. Buddha arrives at Ku-kut-tha, JC at 'Gol ga tha'.
4. Both Buddha and JC twice refuse a drink.
5. Buddha dies between 2 trees, JC between 2 criminals.
6. Both promise their last convert that "today you will
be in paradise."
7. Death occurs during 'darkness'.
8. A disciple of Buddha – Kas ya pas – travelling
with 500 monks – encounters an unknown personage from whom
he learns of the death of Buddha. Another unnamed disciple disparages
the dead Buddha.
The fable of Luke has the disciple Kle
o pas encounter an unknown personage on the
road to Emmaus. This 'unrecognised' Jesus disparages
the evident lack of faith.
In a variation of the story, the 500 Buddhist monks become Paul's
500 brethren (1 Cor. 15.6) – though Paul renders Kas
ya pas as 'Cephas' (Simon Peter has his own origin
in Sâri Putra, also in the Buddhist 'gospel').
9. The dead Buddha is burned and it is the smoke of his corpse
which rises– the true "resurrection."
– From
a 2nd/1st century BC play 'Samghabhedavastu'
(Mahâparinirvâna sûtra)
Essenes – esoteric
Buddhists?
The Essenes
were a monastic order having much in common
with contemporary Buddhists.
Most lived
an austere existence in the desert where they eschewed the animal
sacrifice of the Jerusalem temple priesthood (they were vegetarians).
Renouncing
all normal enjoyments, they lived without personal property,
money or women (they recruited from newcomers.) The
Essenes extolled the merits of asceticism, penance, and self-torture.
They were,
however, interested in the magical arts and the occult sciences.They
believed in the pre-existence of the soul and
in angels as divine intermediaries or messengers from God.
Influence
of Buddhism on the Christians – Q?
Close, striking
parallels exist between early Buddhist texts and what Bible scholars
postulate as the 'Q' material – ('Q' is shorthand for
Quelle, the German for 'source'). The earliest translations
of Buddhist texts into Greek date back to the time of king Asoka
(3rd century BC).
It seems highly
probable that the core of the body of Q material
was made up of aphorisms, sayings originally ascribed to the
Buddha but later attributed to Jesus. To these sayings were added
mini-stories and micro-scenes to produce what became the Gospels
of Matthew and Luke.
Aphorisms
From the Dhammapada, Buddha's
observation:
"The faults
of others are more easily seen than one's own, but seeing
one's own failings is difficult."
Compare to Gospel
of Thomas 26
"You see
the mote which is in your brother's eye; but you do not see
the beam which is in your own eye."
This subsequently
was given a more theatrical flourish when it became Matthew
7:3
"And why
beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye,
but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? "
From the Dhammapada:
"When a
mendicant, though still young, yokes himself to the Buddha's
teachings, the world is illuminated like the moon freed of
clouds."
Jesus's statement:
"He who
wishes to follow me must know himself and bear my yoke."
The Mûlasarvâstivâdavinaya beginswith
a long list of kings. This is combined with a list of the last
seven Buddhas, to give three periods of “fourteen generations” and
a total of 42 – an identical format to
the Gospel of Matthew!
Love?
The whole
idea that man should care about his brother, that he should accept
responsibility for society as a whole or for needy human beings
in particular, clearly precedes Christianity – in Greek
thought and in Buddhism.
The Buddha's
philosophy of compassion, his vision of Dhamma, the
eternal law that sustains the cosmos, manifests itself among
humanity as the moral law.
The Buddha's
most celebrated dictum is:
"Hostility
is never conquered by hostility in this world; hostility
is conquered by love. That is the eternal law."
500
Witnesses
"After that, he was seen of above five hundred
brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto
this present, but some are fallen asleep."
1 Corinthians 15:6
Buddhist tradition
states that shortly after the passing away of the Buddha five
hundred of his Arhats and disciples met in council
at Rajagaha for the purpose of recalling to mind the truths they
had heard directly from their hero during the forty-five
years of his teachings.
The Coptic
biblical text actually identifies the 500 as 'Indian Brahmans'!
In short,
we find opportunity, motive, method, location and scriptural
evidence, for a profound and detailed Buddhist influence in
Christianity's origins. That it was so cannot be doubted.
Sources:
Symposium on “ The Sanskrit and Buddhist Sources of the New Testament" Klavreström, Sweden 9/11 2003 Z. P. Thundy, Buddha and Christ: Nativity Stories and Indian Traditions (Leiden,
1993)
L. Adelskogh, Jesus in Comparative Light
E. R. Gruber, H.
Kersten,The Original
Jesus (Element Books, 1995) J. Duncan M. Derrett, The Bible and the Buddhists (Sardini
2000) N. S. Chandramoul, Did Buddhism influence early Christianity?
(The Times of India May 1, 1997)
Nothing would change for me... Regardless of whether or
not a man lived and taught these things, you can see for yourself the
inherent truths that the teachings contain. The dhamma speaks for itself
- it needs no messenger.
As an agnostic, not much. I still get alot out of
meditation. I find that the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold
Path are of great ethical value. I've come from a religious background
that is full of myths that have their purpose but found that the basic
foundation is a belief that I found I could no longer buy. If this is
all a myth, it is a well thought out one.
Remember that the Buddah said for us to make sure we agreed with
what he taught with to start. I do agree with most of what I've read so
far. Some of it I can see as myth and those parts I use as a possible
psychological statement of how our mind might react to certain
behaviors. I'm not sure if those "planes of existence" are real.
Third, do you have too much time on your hands BF?
Your Friend,
"Proof" of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon’s Journey into the Afterlife (38-min. video)
Near-death
experiences, or NDEs, are controversial. Thousands of people have had
them, but many in the scientific community have argued that they are
impossible. Dr. Eben Alexander was one of those people.
A highly trained neurosurgeon who had operated on thousands of brains
in the course of his career, Alexander knew that what people of faith
call the “soul” is really a product of brain chemistry. NDEs, he would
have been the first to explain, might feel real to the people having
them, but in truth they are simply fantasies produced by brains under
extreme stress.
Then came the day when Dr. Alexander’s own brain
was attacked by an extremely rare illness. The part of the brain that
controls thought and emotion—and in essence makes us human—shut down
completely. For seven days Alexander lay in a hospital bed in a deep
coma. Then, as his doctors weighed the possibility of stopping
treatment, Alexander’s eyes popped open. He had come back. Alexander’s recovery is by all accounts a medical miracle.
But the real miracle of his story lies elsewhere. While his body lay in
coma, Alexander journeyed beyond this world and encountered an angelic
being who guided him into the deepest realms of super-physical
existence. There he met, and spoke with, the Divine source of the
universe itself.
This story sounds like the wild and wonderful imaginings of a skilled
fantasy writer. But it is not fantasy. Before Alexander underwent his
journey, he could not reconcile his knowledge of neuroscience with any
belief in heaven, God, or the soul.
This story would be remarkable no matter who it happened to. That it
happened to Dr. Alexander makes it revolutionary. No scientist or person
of faith will be able to ignore it. Learning about it will change your
life.
Like this? Share it now.
"Evolution"
is not science but philosophy, dogma, religion, politics!
Destruction of
the Theory of Evolution in 11 minutes by a world famous Geneticist.
Destruction
de la théorie de l'évolution en 11 Minutes, par un généticien renommé mondial.
COMMENTAIRE
: Nous vous l'avons toujours dit que l'homme noir est la seule vraie
créature du VRAI Dieu sur la terre. Les autres descendent des Bene Ha
Elohim et des Néphilims qu'on les appelle Neanderthal ou pas. Les
généticiens occidentaux reconnaissent que la race blanche possède au
moins 23% de gènes de l'homme de Néanderthal qui survit en l'homme
blanc. Et ils savent aussi que Néanderthal comme Cro-Magnon étaient des
cannibales. C'est un détail qui a un rapport avec le livre d'Hénoch qui
évoque le cannibalisme des anges déchus et des Néphilims.
La génétique, c'est le livre de chair de notre histoire et de notre rapport au créateur.
Les propriétés de l'ADN sont extraordinaiires. Savez-vous qu'exposé à
la lumière, l'ADN se dédouble en créant une autre hélice presque
virtuelle ? Les expériences sur les brins d'ADN n'ont pas encore tout
révélé et ceux qui savent ne livrent pas tout. La génétique peut
vous dire d'où viennent les prétendus Juifs actuels, par exemple. A ma
connaissance, ils n'ont aucune goutte de sang avec Abraham.L'ADN ne ment pas.
Il faut aussi savoir que 97% de l'ADN est inactif - comme s'il était
bloqué. Il n'y a que 3 % du génome nécessaire à l'existence d'un être
humain.
Sommes-nous tous sur la terre originaires de cette planète ? La réponse est non.
Et tous les livres anciens sont unanimes là-dessus. Des races qui sont
venues d'ailleurs se sont installées sur terre et ont livré des guerres
terribles sur cette planète et ailleurs. Les récits anciens que
l'on trouve dans le Mahabharata, dans la mythologie égyptienne ou
grecque ou dans la Bible évoquent la même histoire d'extranéens sur
cette planète devenue la planète-prison des anges déchus et
des Néphilims après la destruction de la planète Krypton qui forme
aujourd'hui la ceinture d'astéroïdes en Marset Jupiter.C'est
dire la puissance des armes que possédaient ces peuples venus du ciel,
des armes capables de détruire une planète entière en la réduisant en
débris ! Ceux qui lisent attentivement la Bible savent que le déluge
n'avait pas détruit tous les géants puisque les Anakim vivaient encore
sur terre après le déluge. Et ils n'étaient pas les seuls...
La Bible
semble survoler des sujets essentiels comme pour mieux hypnotiser le
lecteur afin qu'il ne se pose pas de questions mais nous qui pensons
qu'il n'y a rien qui ne puisse être interrogé, n'avons pas de tabou. Notre croyance, la seule que nous ayons, c'est la quête de la vérité. Le reste a peu d'importance.
C'est vrai qu'il y a des sujets graves dans le monde en ce moment, il
se passe un génocide dans mon pays mais je ne peux ne pas évoquer cette
question sur laquelle je fais des recherches depuis plus de vingt ans.
Il faut bien lire Nombres 21 : 14 qui parle du livre des guerres de l'Eternel. D'accord,
le livre est certainement perdu - même si Esdras, le rédacteur assumé
de la Bible, l'avait lu mais l'idée de savoir que l'Eternel livrait des
guerres m'amène à me poser des questions :
1) Contre qui guerroyait l'Eternel identifié comme Yavhé ?
2) Quelles armes utilisaient les armées de l'Eternel ?
3) Pourquoi le Dieu créateur était-il obligé de livrer des guerres - alors qu'il lui aurait suffi de parler pour gagner ?
4) Qui était le bon ? Le méchant ?
5) Où se déroulaient ces guerres ?
6)
Quelle était la nature de ces guerres : conquête ? Défense ?
Agrandissement du territoire ? Luttes intestines ? Guerres pour le
pouvoir planétaire, cosmique ?
7) Qui de l'Eternel ou de ses adversaires remporta la bataille finale ?
Vous direz
que je suis trop curieux mais c'est ainsi que j'avance dans la
connaissance des choses cachées. Je cherche et le hasard m'ouvre des
portes. Les questions restent entières car il faut aller chercher les
réponses.
Il
y a dans la Bible et tous les livres sacrés anciens une histoire
sérieuse que l'on camoufle derrière une prétendue spiritualité qui somme
toute est précieuse (du fait que l'homme véritable se trouve dans une
prison de chair et c'est lui le royaume de Dieu qui est au-dedans de
nous) mais quelque chose de concret, de physique s'est produit sur la
terre qui a modifié le cours naturel de son histoire. Il me
tient à coeur de savoir ce qu'il en est. Le pouvoir hypnotique des
pasteurs empêche au croyant de chercher la vérité par lui-même. Sachez
que si vous ne vous penchez que sur une religion, vous n'en connaîtrez
aucune puisque même votre Bible plonge ses racines dans les religions
égyptienne, sumérienne, mazdanéenne voire hindoue. Ne lisez pas que la
Bible car il y a des choses intéressantes à découvrir dans l'Avesta,
dans le livre des morts (égyptien ou tibétain), le Mahabharata, la
Bagavad-Gîta, le Coran, etc. Tous les textes anciens évoquent
la même histoire d'un roi qui reviendra sur terre prendre la place qui
lui est échue. Qu'importe qu'on l'appelle Maitreya, le Meshiah, le
madhi, Ahura Mazda, etc ? Pour l'instant, la terre est livrée
au courroux d'esprits méchants qui essaient de détruire la création de
Dieu. Ceux qui contrôlent et manipulent la terre et les terriens
essaient de s'échapper avant le retour d'un être céleste qui va les
exposer et les condamner. Aussi, ils cherchent des exoplanètes où ils
peuvent aller se réfugier.
Quand un
professeur de collège blanc affirme que l'homme noir est le seul être
100% humain, ce n'est pas nouveau pour nous qui le savons. Le problème,
c'est qu'il faut en tirer les déductions qui s'imposent. Si seul le Noir est à 100% humain, alors, il est aussi le seul à être créé à 100% à l'image du VRAI Créateur.Il
n'est pas étonnant que ceux qui connaissent cette vérité essaient de le
plonger dans l'ignorance. Le Noir est haï parce que ceux qui le
haïssent savent qu'ils ne sont pas faits à l'image de Dieu.Plus
malins, ils nous manipulent, nous poussant à nous battre, à nous
entretuer quand ils ne nous tuent pas et c'est ici que se fait la
jonction avec la politique et le cours des événements en Afrique.
Si les
anges venus du ciel purent copuler avec les femmes la terre, c'est
qu'ils avaient l'aspect humain - sans être de cette planète. En
conclusion, les Néphilims, leurs enfants, avaient aussi l'aspect d'êtres
humains. Or, eux se prétendent plus humains que ceux qui sont
humains et qui étaient les seuls destinés à vivre sur cette planète. Ils
travaillent à notre insu à nous modifier de l'intérieur pour qu'on ne
ressemble plus à notre créateur. Cette guerre qui vise à modifier notre
ADN se fait par la nourriture, les médicaments, les vaccins, le
rayonnement électromagnétique, les vêtements, l'éducation, la culture,
la fausse religion, etc.
Qu'on ne vous dise pas que les anges déchus sont les enfants ou les descendants de Seth (Genèse 6 : 2). C'est faux !
Ce n'est pas compatible avec ce qui est écrit dans le livre de Job. Les
Bene Ha Elohim sont les fils des Elohim qui ont un chef. Et Satan est
l'un d'eux (Job 1: 6). L'expression hébreue ‰„Œ€„‰„Œ€est bien la même dans le livre de la Genèse et dans le livre de Job.
A moins de vouloir nous faire avaler que les fils de Seth sont des
êtres célestes, il n'y aucune chance quand on lit l'hébreu de croire à
une telle dissimulation. Si les Bene Ha Elohim ont pu forniquer
en chair avec les filles de la terre, les Elohim ne peuvent qu'avoir
l'aspect humain - sans être humains. C'est une conclusion qui s'impose.
Et en le faisant, ils ont violé la sixième loi de Dieu qui interdit
l'hybridisme (remplacé par l'adultère).
Si lorsque
un Blanc vous dit que les seuls humains à 100% sont les Noirs, pourquoi
ne le croirez-vous pas puisque vous avez tendance à ne pas croire quand
c'est votre semblable de Katiopa qui vous le dit ? D'où vient l'homme de Neanderthal dont il parle si le Noir seul est de cette planète ?
Cette
planète qu'on détruit est la nôtre. C'est notre Eden, notre Paradis. Eux
cherchent des exoplanètes pour s'enfuir un jour quand elle sera proche
de la destruction. Peut-être même ont-ils à coeur de la détruire.
Pensez-y.
LION DE MAKANDA, MWAN MINDZUMB', MBUTA MUNTU
*
LA DÉCLARATION CHOC D’UN PROFESSEUR D’UNIVERSITÉ BLANC : "LES NOIRS SONT LES SEULS À ÊTRE 100% HUMAINS SUR TERRE"
Un
professeur de collège blanc fait grand bruit sur le net. Il y a
désormais une vidéo d’une de ses conférences universitaires qui
circulent dans le monde.
La
conférence de ce professeur d’université se penche sur le sujet des
origines de l’humanité, les espèces de Néandertal et de leurs connexions
(ou non-connexions) avec certains hommes modernes. Ses découvertes sont
renversantes.
Le
professeur dit qu’il utilise outils de recherche génétique de pointe
pour dénicher ses nouvelles découvertes anthropologiques. Les réseaux
sociaux sont tous en effervescence avec ce qu’il a à dire. Et ce qu’il a
à dire sort pendant contexte socio-politiques intéressants autour de la
race aux Etats-Unis ainsi que dans le monde entier.
Comme
tout le monde le sait, les Noirs sont tués en masse dans les rues des
Etats-Unis [et partout ailleurs dans le monde, NDLR] d’aujourd’hui, sans
doute parce que leurs meurtriers blancs pensent qu’ils sont des
sous-hommes. Cependant l’argument de ce professeur peut faire la lumière
sur les raisons qui poussent ceux qui voient les Noirs comme des
sous-hommes à parfois agir de manière sous-humaine envers ceux qu’ils
choisissent à craindre.
Dans
la vidéo, le professeur énonce ses preuves scientifiques réfutant que
les membres de la race noire physique ont évolué à partir de toute
origine animale ou de toute origine Néandertalienne.
Le
professeur déclare de manière concise que ses conclusions montrent
clairement que les Africains sont la seule race sur la Terre
non-mélangée ou dérivé des Néandertaliens. Le professeur affirme
carrément: “Ils (les Africains) sont les seuls vrais humains purs,
homo-sapiens”. Il termine en disant: “Cela vous donne beaucoup à
réfléchir”.
I will not say that I have wasted my knowledge, time, energy and skills trying to inform, wake up and motivate humans having still an ounce of humanity in them to STOP the Satanisation of our vegetal, animal amd human life on earth, but it came out that there were not many non zombified, non-haarped and non mkultraifed humans left in the world to achieve anything worthwhile. Ever since I started writing publicly I will give the amateur readers a 0 over 10 for their useless intelligence and a 10 over 10 for their criminal stupidity.
It has nothing to do with ME as I am just the MESSENGER, like thousands others, but when we tell readers that Western two-legged animals are commiting all kinds of abominations on planet earth, murdering millions of babies by abortion, sanctions, embargoes, bombings, murdering pregnant women, defenceless men, women and children, torturing them and using them as guinea pigs, polluting our habitat, destroying all traces of past Islamic civilisation, the only civilisation that is still valid today, mass murdering Indo-Chinese, Latinos, Arabs, Africans and Muslims alike, mixing plant, animal and human DNA non stop in their secret laboratories and underground cities and research centres producing abominable creatures, and all this with ou tax money and in the name of democracy and western civilisation, THEY DO ALMOST NOTHING TO STOP THE SUPER MONSTERS!
They cannot even see they are living in slavery and soon to be interned in massive Labour Concentration Camps, and exterminated by the billions!
N.B. I apologise for not being able to correct any mistake on my posts as Google has taken over my Blog and I cannot edit or post without causing some kind of catastrophe. Many of my posts are just being deleted and others have seen their contents removed. In one of my comments to Pr. Fetzer (an "agnostic")I wrote: "Then, all your struggle to teach the truth would have been in vain because you will never be able to prove scientifically that humans should have or have a conscience." Please, read: ...should have or not have a conscience. BAFS
https://reasons.org › explore › publications › articles › nobel-winning-dna-research-challenges-evolutionary-theory Nobel-Winning DNA Research Challenges Evolutionary Theory by. May 31, 2016. In 2015, three scientists won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for decades of research into DNA —research that reinforces the idea that evolution is mythology and makes the modern evolutionary theory of abiogenesis seem more and more indefensible. It turns out that DNA is inherently unstable, and the preservation of genetic ... Only include results for this site Hide site from these results Share feedback about this site https://www.youtube.com › watch?v=Pkxz773Ei1I Evolution Impossible - 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the ... Black Screen Audio Evolution Impossible presents a powerful and authoritative critique of evolution in contemporary discussions. The audiobook elucidates how... Only include results for this site Hide site from these results Share feedback about this site https://www.youtube.com › watch?v=YkS1U5lfSRw What is Impossible in Evolution? - YouTube PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: http://to.pbs.org/DonateOKAY↓ More info and sources below ↓We're on PATRE... Only include results for this site Hide site from these results Share feedback about this site https://www.nature.com › articles › s41559-017-0228-1 Evolution of complex adaptations in molecular systems There are two fundamental problems with reconstructing the evolutionary history of complex adaptations: shortage of intermediate forms in extant organisms and improbable fossilization ('missing ... Only include results for this site Hide site from these results Share feedback about this site https://books.google.com › books › about › Evolution_Impossible.html?id=6MUjcka2INQC Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the ... In Evolution Impossible, he uses discoveries in genetics, biochemistry, geology, radiometric dating, and other scientific disciplines to explain why the theory of evolution is a myth. Discover for yourself: Why the fossil record is evidence of extinction, not evolution. How erosion and sedimentation dates conflict with radiometric dating. Only include results for this site Hide site from these results Share feedback about this site https://books.google.com › books › about › Evolution_Impossible.html?id=xAyRaBka7KEC Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the ... Dr. John Ashton has dedicated 40+ years to teaching and researching science, and exposing the lack of proven evidence for Darwin's theories. In Evolution Impossible, he uses discoveries in genetics, biochemistry, geology, radiometric dating, and other scientific disciplines to explain why the theory of evolution is a myth. Only include results for this site Hide site from these results Share feedback about this site https://www.psychologytoday.com › gb › blog › six-impossible-things-breakfast › 202112 › evolution-is-not-random No, Evolution is Not Random | Psychology Today United Kingdom Evolution is a chance process. Conclusion: Therefore, these complex parts of the body and brain cannot be a product of evolution. The fatal flaw in this argument is that premise 2 is incorrect. Only include results for this site
Increasing our ability to predict contemporary evolution Here we focus on predictability defined as the ability to forecast future trait values or allele frequencies using existing data (Fig. 1). Such predictive ability can be studied using temporal ... • Only include results for this siteHide site from these results • Share feedback about this site
https://royalsocietypublishing.org › doi › pdf › 10.1098 › rsob.130156
Towards an evolutionary theory of the origin of life based on kinetics ... of evolution proposed a century before. Combined with evol-utionary processes, these thoughts provided a profound insight into the most puzzling facets of living organisms, but gave no definitive characterization of the processes by which life originated. As a matter of fact, Monod resorted to a highly improbable random event generating a system • Only include results for this siteHide site from these results Share feedback about this site
Evolution is evolving: 13 ways we must rethink the theory of nature Tim McDonagh. Our modern conception of evolution started with Charles Darwin and his idea of natural selection - "survival of the fittest" - to explain why certain individuals thrive while ...
Ghaffar Hassan "... the theory of evolution today, especially with the advances in our understanding of DNA, is fact. Denying it not only puts Muslims out of touch with established science, it puts them out of touch with their own scientific heritage."
| 
.jpg)
(left,
In the movie, Clarence Darrow, played by Spencer Tracy, interrogates William
Jennings Bryan, played by Frederic March.) 
THE MOVIE opens with the grim town minister and other prudes marching to the
local high school. They arrest young Scopes, who is forthrightly teaching
biology using Darwin.
IN
THE MOVIE, Clarence Darrow arrives, bravely taking the case singled-handedly.
The local Christians boo him; a mob outside his hotel threatens a lynching.
IN
REALITY, Darrow called as a witness zoologist Maynard Metcalf, who testified at
length. Bryan, left, quickly recognized that the atheistic Darrow was
orchestrating a parade of witnesses to promote Darwinism. (The trial was being
broadcast on radio nationwide, and reported in newspapers globally.) Bryan
asked Judge John Raulston: "Will we be entitled to cross-examine their
witnesses?" Raulston said they would.
When
last we left Etruria, we were mystified by the Etruscan's policy of not
helping each other when faced with a common threat. This incredible
policy would of course, have devastating effects. Moving ahead to
perhaps 1100 B.C. It is at about this time, that Albino people from the
Eurasian plains now called "the Latin's" later known as the Romans -
migrate in. These Latins may have accompanied the Hellenes into Greece,
and then continued on into Italy. The nature of the early contact
between the two peoples, is unknown. But, the later relationship is well
known to be one of violence. (Please remember that we are using the
terms Latin's and Hellenes in reference to Eurasian Albinos as a
convenience ONLY). 
One
of the last, or perhaps the last, of the original Black civilizations
to be destroyed by the Whites, were the Arverni of southern France. They
were an advanced culture who lived in cities and were wealthy in gold
and silver, (as attested to by the huge booty taken from them by the
Romans). 
Otto
I, the Great (23 November 912 in Wallhausen – 7 May 973 in Memleben),
son of Henry I the Fowler and Matilda of Ringelheim, was Duke of Saxony,
King of Germany, King of Italy, and "the first of the Germans to be
called the emperor of Italy" according to Arnulf of Milan. While
Charlemagne had been crowned emperor in 800, his empire had been divided
amongst his grandsons, and following the assassination of Berengar of
Friuli in 924, the imperial title had lain vacant for nearly forty
years. Otto succeeded his father as king of the Saxons in 936, on
February 2, 962, Otto was crowned Emperor of what would later become the
Holy Roman Empire.
From
the words of Cornelius Tacitus, and others: Herodotus, Xenophanes, it
is clear that the ancient Romans and Greeks did NOT look like the White,
Blue-eyed, Red haired Germaic's. And of course from modern studies, we
know that aside from being Germaic, the modern populations also have
significant Turk admixture. But just WHO were these White Germanic
invaders?
Brian
Admin
Jerbear
Member
I will not say that I have wasted my knowledge, time, energy and skills trying to inform, wake up and motivate humans having still an ounce of humanity in them to STOP the Satanisation of our vegetal, animal amd human life on earth, but it came out that there were not many non zombified, non-haarped and non mkultraifed humans left in the world to achieve anything worthwhile. Ever since I started writing publicly I will give the amateur readers a 0 over 10 for their useless intelligence and a 10 over 10 for their criminal stupidity.
ReplyDeleteIt has nothing to do with ME as I am just the MESSENGER, like thousands others, but when we tell readers that Western two-legged animals are commiting all kinds of abominations on planet earth, murdering millions of babies by abortion, sanctions, embargoes, bombings, murdering pregnant women, defenceless men, women and children, torturing them and using them as guinea pigs, polluting our habitat, destroying all traces of past Islamic civilisation, the only civilisation that is still valid today, mass murdering Indo-Chinese, Latinos, Arabs, Africans and Muslims alike, mixing plant, animal and human DNA non stop in their secret laboratories and underground cities and research centres producing abominable creatures, and all this with ou tax money and in the name of democracy and western civilisation, THEY DO ALMOST NOTHING TO STOP THE SUPER MONSTERS!
They cannot even see they are living in slavery and soon to be interned in massive Labour Concentration Camps, and exterminated by the billions!
BAFS
GOOGLE is part of the US-ISRAEL Project!
You are absolutely right... Good day to you...
DeleteAdnan Oktar (pen name Harun Yayha)offered $1 trillion (?) for any scientist to provide him with CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE PROVING MACRO-EVOLUTION!
ReplyDeleteRichard Dawkins was personally challeneged and even invited to debate.
HE CHICKENED OUT!
BAFS
N.B. I apologise for not being able to correct any mistake on my posts as Google has taken over my Blog and I cannot edit or post without causing some kind of catastrophe. Many of my posts are just being deleted and others have seen their contents removed.
ReplyDeleteIn one of my comments to Pr. Fetzer (an "agnostic")I wrote:
"Then, all your struggle to teach the truth would have been in vain because you will never be able to prove scientifically that humans should have or have a conscience."
Please, read: ...should have or not have a conscience.
BAFS
https://reasons.org › explore › publications › articles › nobel-winning-dna-research-challenges-evolutionary-theory
ReplyDeleteNobel-Winning DNA Research Challenges Evolutionary Theory
by. May 31, 2016. In 2015, three scientists won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for decades of research into DNA —research that reinforces the idea that evolution is mythology and makes the modern evolutionary theory of abiogenesis seem more and more indefensible. It turns out that DNA is inherently unstable, and the preservation of genetic ...
Only include results for this site
Hide site from these results
Share feedback about this site
https://www.youtube.com › watch?v=Pkxz773Ei1I
Evolution Impossible - 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the ...
Black Screen Audio Evolution Impossible presents a powerful and authoritative critique of evolution in contemporary discussions. The audiobook elucidates how...
Only include results for this site
Hide site from these results
Share feedback about this site
https://www.youtube.com › watch?v=YkS1U5lfSRw
What is Impossible in Evolution? - YouTube
PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: http://to.pbs.org/DonateOKAY↓ More info and sources below ↓We're on PATRE...
Only include results for this site
Hide site from these results
Share feedback about this site
https://www.nature.com › articles › s41559-017-0228-1
Evolution of complex adaptations in molecular systems
There are two fundamental problems with reconstructing the evolutionary history of complex adaptations: shortage of intermediate forms in extant organisms and improbable fossilization ('missing ...
Only include results for this site
Hide site from these results
Share feedback about this site
https://books.google.com › books › about › Evolution_Impossible.html?id=6MUjcka2INQC
Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the ...
In Evolution Impossible, he uses discoveries in genetics, biochemistry, geology, radiometric dating, and other scientific disciplines to explain why the theory of evolution is a myth. Discover for yourself: Why the fossil record is evidence of extinction, not evolution. How erosion and sedimentation dates conflict with radiometric dating.
Only include results for this site
Hide site from these results
Share feedback about this site
https://books.google.com › books › about › Evolution_Impossible.html?id=xAyRaBka7KEC
Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the ...
Dr. John Ashton has dedicated 40+ years to teaching and researching science, and exposing the lack of proven evidence for Darwin's theories. In Evolution Impossible, he uses discoveries in genetics, biochemistry, geology, radiometric dating, and other scientific disciplines to explain why the theory of evolution is a myth.
Only include results for this site
Hide site from these results
Share feedback about this site
https://www.psychologytoday.com › gb › blog › six-impossible-things-breakfast › 202112 › evolution-is-not-random
No, Evolution is Not Random | Psychology Today United Kingdom
Evolution is a chance process. Conclusion: Therefore, these complex parts of the body and brain cannot be a product of evolution. The fatal flaw in this argument is that premise 2 is incorrect.
Only include results for this site
ReplyDeletehttps://www.nature.com › articles › s41467-020-19437-x
Increasing our ability to predict contemporary evolution
Here we focus on predictability defined as the ability to forecast future trait values or allele frequencies using existing data (Fig. 1). Such predictive ability can be studied using temporal ...
• Only include results for this siteHide site from these results
• Share feedback about this site
https://royalsocietypublishing.org › doi › pdf › 10.1098 › rsob.130156
Towards an evolutionary theory of the origin of life based on kinetics ...
of evolution proposed a century before. Combined with evol-utionary processes, these thoughts provided a profound insight into the most puzzling facets of living organisms, but gave no definitive characterization of the processes by which life originated. As a matter of fact, Monod resorted to a highly improbable random event generating a system
• Only include results for this siteHide site from these results
Share feedback about this site
https://www.newscientist.com › article › mg24733010-800-evolution-is-evolving-13-ways-we-must-rethink-the-theory-of-nature
Evolution is evolving: 13 ways we must rethink the theory of nature
Tim McDonagh. Our modern conception of evolution started with Charles Darwin and his idea of natural selection - "survival of the fittest" - to explain why certain individuals thrive while ...
Ghaffar Hassan
ReplyDelete"... the theory of evolution today, especially with the advances in our understanding of DNA, is fact. Denying it not only puts Muslims out of touch with established science, it puts them out of touch with their own scientific heritage."
A REAL PIECE OF UNSCIENTIFIC GARBAGE! BAFS