The Great Professor Antonius J. Hall
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Torture (HBO)
Is the 9/11 scam coming undone? BY Prof. Tony Hall
Why did the US government destroy evidence in the Guantanamo Bay trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed?
By Prof. Tony Hall
Editor In Chief, AHT; Co-Host. False Flag Weekly News
Mastermind of 9/11?
The so-called “mastermind of 9/11” is appearing before the kangaroo court at the US Torture Chamber and Concentration Camp in Guantanamo Bay Cuba. The main defendant appearing before the secretive military proceedings is a person the US government says is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, aka KSM.
In 2003 the Asia Times highlighted the controversy over the actual status of the entity said to be KSM. A person by this same name was earlier reported to have been killed by Pakistani authorities in Karachi. Sayed Saleem Shahzad reported for AT, “Clearly, no one has the final word on whether Khalid is dead, was captured earlier, or is still free.”
In 2003 and 2004 the US government depended heavily on
the real or concocted personae of KSM as a major source of “evidence” in
the Philip Zelikow-authored fable known as the 9/11 Commission Report.
An expert in the engineering of public mythology to secure popular
consent for so-called pre-emptive warfare, Professor Zelikow was one of
the key point persons responsible for pinning the false flag terror
extravaganza of 9/11 on CIA asset Osama bin Laden.
Interestingly bin Laden’s homies in al-Qaeda have reverted back to a role similar to that assigned them by the US government during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Along with its offshoot, al-Nusra, al Qaeda is part of the so-called “moderate rebels” engaged in Syria in something of a repeat of the US-backed operation in Afghanistan in the 1980s. As in Afghanistan and now in the Syrian theatre of superpower confrontation, al-Qaeda is part of a US proxy army put together by the CIA to bring about violent regime change. The current target is the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad.
Once cast in the role of #3 jihadist in the staged drama associated with al-Qaeda, KSM was assigned an important part in Zelikow’s fictionalized narrative of 9/11. KSM was alleged to be the primary source of “evidence” that pinned the 9/11 debacle on Islamic jihadists rather than on a closely knit group of Zio-American Israel Firsters including Zelikow himself. A growing body of evidence has exposed this neocon clique, many of whom are dual Israeli and US citizens, as the primary group that led the planning, execution and attempted cover up of the 9/11 crimes.
Much to the eventual chagrin of even the figure heads set up to be co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, the concocted evidence on which Philip Zelikow drew was obtained in torture sessions at secret CIA dark sites where the entity know as KSM was supposedly locked away until he was delivered to Guantanamo Bay in 2006. Even by the government’s own accounting of this torturing of KSM included 183 waterboardings over the period of a single month.
Like a New Pearl Harbor
George W. Bush’s war-cabinet-in-waiting signaled its plans for the global coup d'é·tat a year prior to the 9/11 false flag terror event. In a report of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), the Israel Firsters laid out a plan whose real aim was to transform the Jewish state’s dispossessed regional enemies into one part of a worldwide Islamic enemy said to be posed against the so-called “West.” In order to build up the military muscle of the US Armed Services so it could act as an enforcer of the interests of a “Greater Israel,” public consent for this agenda would have to be engineered through the manufacturing of a surprise attack “like New Pearl Harbor.”
On 9/11 the United States was delivered its new Pearl Harbour. In 2004 the Zelikow Report, also known as The 9/11 Commission Report, formalized officialdom’s adoption of the Israeli Firsters’ cover story of what transpired on September 11, 2001. The 9/11 Commission helped reify as supposed fact an engineered fable purposely saturated with evocative religious symbolism. This religious fable attributed the strikes on the major architectural icons of US military and commercial might to a globalized Islamic fighting force said to be acting with self-directed independence.
Within the flash of a single news cycle the military-industrial complex and its attending national security apparatus were supplied with precisely the kind of malleable global enemy required to maintain and grow the business of aggressive warfare abroad, police state intervention at home. Obsolete Cold Warriors like Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney immediately walked into new and prestigious roles as czars of an open-ended War on Terror.
The vast military and intelligence establishment formerly built up as an instrument of US-directed anti-communism was thereby turned to the task of anti-terrorism. Old elites and pyramids of power were thereby preserved. Many of those at the heights of these structures of privilege were further empowered, entitled and entrenched, all in the name of a specious Global War on Terror.
In the course of this process the entity said to be KSM became an important prize and asset for those engaged in cashing in on the lucrative privatized growth of the national security business. Through the intervention of White House operative Philip Zelikow, KSM’s supposed testimony was transferred from a torture chamber in Eurasia to serve the interests of insiders buzzing in and around the Washington Beltway. One of the patsies had to be singled out to incriminate the other patsies and the entity know as KSM was inducted to serve that strategic function.
The shape of things to come was foreshadowed on the morning of 9/11 with the BBC’s extension to Ehud Barak, a former Prime Minister of Israel, of full license to finger on world television the targets for post-9/11 revenge. Without any formal investigation at all, the former Israeli General and intelligence officer named as probable culprits Osama bin Laden, Yasser Arafat, Iraq, Iran and Libya. Barak provided this list only minutes after an aircraft was pictured not even slowing down as it cut into the South Tower like a hot knife slicing through butter.
Some of the most basic laws of physics were apparently defied by the televised spectacle of an aluminum plane smashing seemingly unobstructed through thick steel beams; of massive skyscrapers plunging symmetrically down to earth through the course of maximum resistance at near free fall speeds. What was the exotic technology that transformed three massive steel-frame WTC Towers into huge plumes of vapor and toxic dust clouds? Such a dramatic change in the composition of gargantuan masses of matter could not have been realized without the igniting of energy sources far more explosively powerful than some combination of jet fuel fires, melted metal and the pancaking effects of gravity.
The demise of a third structure, sometimes known as Lucky Larry Silverstein’s World Trade Center 7, poses its own unique set of questions. It is completely impossible that an office fire caused this 47-story steel-frame structure not hit by any airplane to instantly collapse late in the afternoon of 9/11. The only credible explanation is that of the late Danny Jowenko, Europe’s leading expert in controlled demolition before he died under mysterious circumstances in 2011. In his filmed response to a 9/11 researcher Jowenko insisted that only a group of pros would be in a position to wire the Building 7 in a way that would make it plunge to the ground as it did on 9/11.
9/11 and the US Government’s Destruction of Damning Evidence
It was the 9/11 Commission Report that bestowed on the real or constructed personae of KSM his title as “the mastermind of 9/11.” Gradually even the figure heads that co-chaired the 9/11 Commission have tried to distance themselves from their own study, one that they have asserted was “set up to fail.” And fail it did in very consequential ways. As Benjamin DeMott explained in his review in Harper’s Magazine of The 9/11 Commission Report, it’s a “whitewash” and a “fraud” that “dangerously reenergizes a national relish for fantasy.”
As they came to understand the deceptiveness to which they had been subjected, the co-chairs became especially chagrined that they were not permitted to question KSM and the other “witnesses” whose supposed damning evidence was derived from illegal torture. The resort of key US officials to criminal acts of internationally outlawed torture became the subject of a major report of the US Senate Committee that presented in 2014 a very damning account of Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program.
Chaired by Diane Feinstein, the Senate investigation came in response to news that CIA officials had destroyed about 100 videos recording the intelligence agency’s ghastly extremes in extracting supposed information from those it so violently abused. Among the destroyed tapes were some on which the 9/11 Commission based some of its key conclusions.
The massive and systematic destruction of state evidence has itself become something of a smoking gun exposing the fraud and deception integral to the Global War on Terror that originated in the false flag events of 9/11. An early example of the rush to destroy evidence was marked by the actions at Ground Zero of the Federal Emergency Measures Agency, FEMA. The FEMA agents’ priority was to cart away the remnants of the three steel frame structures mostly pulverized into dust clouds on 9/11. The physical evidence of the high-tech takedown of the three WTC structures was whisked out of Manhattan and then out of the USA to be sold at discount prices to Chinese firms.
Now the US government’s already highly problematic prosecution of KSM for the crimes of 9/11 is running into telling revelations that key evidence in the case has been destroyed without so much as a notice to KSM’s lawyers, David Nevin and Marine Corp Major Derek Poteet. The result is that these jurists are asking the judge, Army Colonel James Pohl, and the prosecutor, Army Brigadier General Mark Martins, to withdraw themselves from the proceedings. “There’s at least the appearance of collusion between the prosecution and the judge,” Poteet said.
As reported in The Guardian, “Nevin and Poteet said that they were ultimately seeking the end of Mohammed’s military commission, even if Pohl recuses himself in favor of a different available military judge and a new prosecution is appointed. ‘The effect is there would be no further prosecution,’ Nevin said.”
We Need Trials of the Real Culprits, Not the Patsies
The withholding of the much-publicized 28 pages from the Joint Congressional Report on the events of September 11, 2001 is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the destruction and secreting away of evidence about what really happened on 9/11. Before the Twin Towers were pulverized, Ehud Barak floated the fiction that Osama bin Laden was the chief culprit. Then it was made to seem that the main imperative flowing from the events of 9/11 was for the US Armed Forces to invade and overthrow the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein.
The disinformation that Saddam’s government possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction is just one piece of a vast complex of lies involving 9/11 and its aftermath. The growing awareness of millions of citizens the world over of the extent of these lies and subsequent cover up has long been eroding the credibility of many major institutions starting with the US government and the mainstream media outlets that regularly report on its operations.
After the administration of Barack Obama decided to take over the neocon lies and deceptions first disseminated on the very day of 9/11, the focus of public attention was shifted onto Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. It seemed for a time that the Obama administration would conduct in New York a public criminal trial of KSM as its way of commemorating the tenth anniversary of 9/11.
That concept, however, was shelved in favor of concocting a fake hunting down of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. This way of shutting down the contemporary life of a fabricated myth from the Bush era was meant as a way for President Obama to begin engineering his own specious justifications for the Democratic Party’s extension of 9/11 Wars.
There have been many reports that KSM is a very unstable individual wanting to take credit for dozens and dozens of terror attacks. Some reports claim he has a martyr complex and covets the possibility of being executed by the US government. Among the violent actions he claims as his own is the beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Bernard-Henry Levy, the neocon propagandist who is France’s leading Israel First advocate, put great emphasis on KSM in advancing his favored political agenda in his volume, Who Killed Daniel Pearl?
The breakdown of due process even in the rigged system of military-style jurisprudence at the Guantanamo Bay Concentration Camp helps illuminate the latest chapter in the task of trying to keep the 9/11 scam alive. Fortunately there is now a large and growing body of genuine scholarship subjecting the lies and crimes of 9/11, including those contained in fraudulent 9/11 Commission report, to skeptical scrutiny.
Surely the US government’s destruction of yet more evidence in the prelude to the long-delayed trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, or whoever it is that is currently cast in the part, is yet another indication that there is much for authorities to hide when it comes to 9/11. What will it take to force some genuine reckoning with the role of 9/11 and the long series of false flag terror events that will continue to accelerate in frequency unless and until the corrupt core of this vile psychological operation is exposed? When will the real culprits rather than the patsies of 9/11 be brought to justice?
For a discussion of the trial of KSM and many others issues see this week’s edition of False Flag Weekly News which is co-hosted by Prof. Tony Hall and Dr. Kevin Barrett.
Editor In Chief, AHT; Co-Host. False Flag Weekly News
May 14 ,2016
BY Prof. Tony Hall The so-called “mastermind of 9/11” is appearing before the kangaroo court at the US Torture Chamber and Concentration Camp in Guantanamo Bay Cuba. The main defendant appearing before the secretive military proceedings is a person the US government says is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, aka KSM.
In 2003 the Asia Times highlighted the controversy over the actual status of the entity said to be KSM. A person by this same name was earlier reported to have been killed by Pakistani authorities in Karachi. Sayed Saleem Shahzad reported for AT, “Clearly, no one has the final word on whether Khalid is dead, was captured earlier, or is still free.”
Interestingly bin Laden’s homies in al-Qaeda have reverted back to a role similar to that assigned them by the US government during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Along with its offshoot, al-Nusra, al Qaeda is part of the so-called “moderate rebels” engaged in Syria in something of a repeat of the US-backed operation in Afghanistan in the 1980s. As in Afghanistan and now in the Syrian theatre of superpower confrontation, al-Qaeda is part of a US proxy army put together by the CIA to bring about violent regime change. The current target is the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad.
Once cast in the role of #3 jihadist in the staged drama associated with al-Qaeda, KSM was assigned an important part in Zelikow’s fictionalized narrative of 9/11. KSM was alleged to be the primary source of “evidence” that pinned the 9/11 debacle on Islamic jihadists rather than on a closely knit group of Zio-American Israel Firsters including Zelikow himself. A growing body of evidence has exposed this neocon clique, many of whom are dual Israeli and US citizens, as the primary group that led the planning, execution and attempted cover up of the 9/11 crimes.
Much to the eventual chagrin of even the figure heads set up to be co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, the concocted evidence on which Philip Zelikow drew was obtained in torture sessions at secret CIA dark sites where the entity know as KSM was supposedly locked away until he was delivered to Guantanamo Bay in 2006. Even by the government’s own accounting of this torturing of KSM included 183 waterboardings over the period of a single month.
Like a New Pearl Harbor
George W. Bush’s war-cabinet-in-waiting signaled its plans for the global coup d'é·tat a year prior to the 9/11 false flag terror event. In a report of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), the Israel Firsters laid out a plan whose real aim was to transform the Jewish state’s dispossessed regional enemies into one part of a worldwide Islamic enemy said to be posed against the so-called “West.” In order to build up the military muscle of the US Armed Services so it could act as an enforcer of the interests of a “Greater Israel,” public consent for this agenda would have to be engineered through the manufacturing of a surprise attack “like New Pearl Harbor.”
On 9/11 the United States was delivered its new Pearl Harbour. In 2004 the Zelikow Report, also known as The 9/11 Commission Report, formalized officialdom’s adoption of the Israeli Firsters’ cover story of what transpired on September 11, 2001. The 9/11 Commission helped reify as supposed fact an engineered fable purposely saturated with evocative religious symbolism. This religious fable attributed the strikes on the major architectural icons of US military and commercial might to a globalized Islamic fighting force said to be acting with self-directed independence.
Within the flash of a single news cycle the military-industrial complex and its attending national security apparatus were supplied with precisely the kind of malleable global enemy required to maintain and grow the business of aggressive warfare abroad, police state intervention at home. Obsolete Cold Warriors like Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney immediately walked into new and prestigious roles as czars of an open-ended War on Terror.
The vast military and intelligence establishment formerly built up as an instrument of US-directed anti-communism was thereby turned to the task of anti-terrorism. Old elites and pyramids of power were thereby preserved. Many of those at the heights of these structures of privilege were further empowered, entitled and entrenched, all in the name of a specious Global War on Terror.
In the course of this process the entity said to be KSM became an important prize and asset for those engaged in cashing in on the lucrative privatized growth of the national security business. Through the intervention of White House operative Philip Zelikow, KSM’s supposed testimony was transferred from a torture chamber in Eurasia to serve the interests of insiders buzzing in and around the Washington Beltway. One of the patsies had to be singled out to incriminate the other patsies and the entity know as KSM was inducted to serve that strategic function.
The shape of things to come was foreshadowed on the morning of 9/11 with the BBC’s extension to Ehud Barak, a former Prime Minister of Israel, of full license to finger on world television the targets for post-9/11 revenge. Without any formal investigation at all, the former Israeli General and intelligence officer named as probable culprits Osama bin Laden, Yasser Arafat, Iraq, Iran and Libya. Barak provided this list only minutes after an aircraft was pictured not even slowing down as it cut into the South Tower like a hot knife slicing through butter.
Some of the most basic laws of physics were apparently defied by the televised spectacle of an aluminum plane smashing seemingly unobstructed through thick steel beams; of massive skyscrapers plunging symmetrically down to earth through the course of maximum resistance at near free fall speeds. What was the exotic technology that transformed three massive steel-frame WTC Towers into huge plumes of vapor and toxic dust clouds? Such a dramatic change in the composition of gargantuan masses of matter could not have been realized without the igniting of energy sources far more explosively powerful than some combination of jet fuel fires, melted metal and the pancaking effects of gravity.
The demise of a third structure, sometimes known as Lucky Larry Silverstein’s World Trade Center 7, poses its own unique set of questions. It is completely impossible that an office fire caused this 47-story steel-frame structure not hit by any airplane to instantly collapse late in the afternoon of 9/11. The only credible explanation is that of the late Danny Jowenko, Europe’s leading expert in controlled demolition before he died under mysterious circumstances in 2011. In his filmed response to a 9/11 researcher Jowenko insisted that only a group of pros would be in a position to wire the Building 7 in a way that would make it plunge to the ground as it did on 9/11.
9/11 and the US Government’s Destruction of Damning Evidence
It was the 9/11 Commission Report that bestowed on the real or constructed personae of KSM his title as “the mastermind of 9/11.” Gradually even the figure heads that co-chaired the 9/11 Commission have tried to distance themselves from their own study, one that they have asserted was “set up to fail.” And fail it did in very consequential ways. As Benjamin DeMott explained in his review in Harper’s Magazine of The 9/11 Commission Report, it’s a “whitewash” and a “fraud” that “dangerously reenergizes a national relish for fantasy.”
As they came to understand the deceptiveness to which they had been subjected, the co-chairs became especially chagrined that they were not permitted to question KSM and the other “witnesses” whose supposed damning evidence was derived from illegal torture. The resort of key US officials to criminal acts of internationally outlawed torture became the subject of a major report of the US Senate Committee that presented in 2014 a very damning account of Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program.
Chaired by Diane Feinstein, the Senate investigation came in response to news that CIA officials had destroyed about 100 videos recording the intelligence agency’s ghastly extremes in extracting supposed information from those it so violently abused. Among the destroyed tapes were some on which the 9/11 Commission based some of its key conclusions.
The massive and systematic destruction of state evidence has itself become something of a smoking gun exposing the fraud and deception integral to the Global War on Terror that originated in the false flag events of 9/11. An early example of the rush to destroy evidence was marked by the actions at Ground Zero of the Federal Emergency Measures Agency, FEMA. The FEMA agents’ priority was to cart away the remnants of the three steel frame structures mostly pulverized into dust clouds on 9/11. The physical evidence of the high-tech takedown of the three WTC structures was whisked out of Manhattan and then out of the USA to be sold at discount prices to Chinese firms.
Now the US government’s already highly problematic prosecution of KSM for the crimes of 9/11 is running into telling revelations that key evidence in the case has been destroyed without so much as a notice to KSM’s lawyers, David Nevin and Marine Corp Major Derek Poteet. The result is that these jurists are asking the judge, Army Colonel James Pohl, and the prosecutor, Army Brigadier General Mark Martins, to withdraw themselves from the proceedings. “There’s at least the appearance of collusion between the prosecution and the judge,” Poteet said.
As reported in The Guardian, “Nevin and Poteet said that they were ultimately seeking the end of Mohammed’s military commission, even if Pohl recuses himself in favor of a different available military judge and a new prosecution is appointed. ‘The effect is there would be no further prosecution,’ Nevin said.”
We Need Trials of the Real Culprits, Not the Patsies
The withholding of the much-publicized 28 pages from the Joint Congressional Report on the events of September 11, 2001 is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the destruction and secreting away of evidence about what really happened on 9/11. Before the Twin Towers were pulverized, Ehud Barak floated the fiction that Osama bin Laden was the chief culprit. Then it was made to seem that the main imperative flowing from the events of 9/11 was for the US Armed Forces to invade and overthrow the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein.
The disinformation that Saddam’s government possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction is just one piece of a vast complex of lies involving 9/11 and its aftermath. The growing awareness of millions of citizens the world over of the extent of these lies and subsequent cover up has long been eroding the credibility of many major institutions starting with the US government and the mainstream media outlets that regularly report on its operations.
After the administration of Barack Obama decided to take over the neocon lies and deceptions first disseminated on the very day of 9/11, the focus of public attention was shifted onto Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. It seemed for a time that the Obama administration would conduct in New York a public criminal trial of KSM as its way of commemorating the tenth anniversary of 9/11.
That concept, however, was shelved in favor of concocting a fake hunting down of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. This way of shutting down the contemporary life of a fabricated myth from the Bush era was meant as a way for President Obama to begin engineering his own specious justifications for the Democratic Party’s extension of 9/11 Wars.
There have been many reports that KSM is a very unstable individual wanting to take credit for dozens and dozens of terror attacks. Some reports claim he has a martyr complex and covets the possibility of being executed by the US government. Among the violent actions he claims as his own is the beheading of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Bernard-Henry Levy, the neocon propagandist who is France’s leading Israel First advocate, put great emphasis on KSM in advancing his favored political agenda in his volume, Who Killed Daniel Pearl?
The breakdown of due process even in the rigged system of military-style jurisprudence at the Guantanamo Bay Concentration Camp helps illuminate the latest chapter in the task of trying to keep the 9/11 scam alive. Fortunately there is now a large and growing body of genuine scholarship subjecting the lies and crimes of 9/11, including those contained in fraudulent 9/11 Commission report, to skeptical scrutiny.
Surely the US government’s destruction of yet more evidence in the prelude to the long-delayed trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, or whoever it is that is currently cast in the part, is yet another indication that there is much for authorities to hide when it comes to 9/11. What will it take to force some genuine reckoning with the role of 9/11 and the long series of false flag terror events that will continue to accelerate in frequency unless and until the corrupt core of this vile psychological operation is exposed? When will the real culprits rather than the patsies of 9/11 be brought to justice?
For a discussion of the trial of KSM and many others issues see this week’s edition of False Flag Weekly News which is co-hosted by Prof. Tony Hall and Dr. Kevin Barrett.
WRITER
Prof. Tony Hall
A
Critical Look at the Facts and the Hype Concerning the Moncton Shooting
Episode. Is the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Deploying Disinfo at the
Behest of US Black-Ops Funders?
The shooting spree said to have resulted in the murder and wounding of five Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers in Moncton New Brunswick raises many questions. Here’s some that occur to me after my curiosity was piqued by FB post published today by American author and pundit Naomi Wolf.
Wolf suggests that the Moncton episode’s whole US-counterterrorist-style might be explained by following the flow of US-black-op-financing apparently now streaming into the burgeoning Canadian police state. Wolf’s observations about possible US involvement in the Moncton shootings helped me to remember theories going around in 2013 about the possible role of US Delta Force/Statfor (see below) in the heavily-armed raids of the RCMP on Native Mi’Kmaq anti-fracking activists in and around Elsipogtog.
This thought raises further questions. Could the Moncton RCMP be
somehow involved centrally in all the blending of US and Canadian
policing and military operations as secretly negotiated in the so-called
Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America? Is there more
than meets the eye to the Ramboesque style of this whole operation in
New Brunswick, a Canadian maritime province essentially owned by the
Irving Natural Resources Company?
Alternative Media
As raunchy and crude as is some of the internet coverage of the Moncton shooter incident is, the citizen journalists covering this matter tend to run circles around the well-paid stenographers of press releases from official sources. This stenography, evading at all cost any critical evaluation of the actual evidence, is pretty much what discerning people have come to expect from the mainstream media these days.
I have been learning from citizen journalists that shooter drills took place in Sackville, just a twenty minute drive from Moncton, only days before the lethal incident. Apparently the alleged shooter, Justin Bourque, was apprehended and taken to the RCMP detachment in Sackville, not Moncton, after he was apprehended. Why?
It has been credibly argued that the juxtaposition of drills that approximate concurrent or subsequent episodes of mass murder such as on 9/11 embody classic signs of false flag terrorism.
I have learned from one of the You Tubes linked to below that a key witnesses in this matter is a professional actress. Another witness filmed by CTV clearly has huge internal contradictions in her story. I have seen the allegation that relevant Facebook pages, including the one attributed to the alleged shooter Justin Bourque, have been tampered with and altered. I want that allegation to be addressed on the record by the responsible authorities.
Obvious Questions
What am I to make of the allegation that the Rambo-style shooting episode in Moncton seems like a poorly-produced replica of other fairly obvious false-flag events? What is the story behind the dissemination of the key image sent viral of Bourque strolling along with his hunting rifle? Is that a bow and arrow on Bourque’s shoulder? What if anything was the role of RCMP tweeters in sending this image viral? Who is taking responsibility for the appallingly poor police work if it turns out that one or more aspects of the rather implausible official version of these lethal events is actually true? One thing that is almost certainly true is the existence of dead RCMP officers.
Was the Moncton shooting in whole or in part a staged event to secure increased budgets and new powers for police-state attacks on our human rights and civil liberties? Could the event have anything to do with a strategy for re-electing the “law-and-order” party that presently control the national government in Ottawa?
Could the episode be in any way a diversion from the RCMP’s failure to enforce the criminal law on high-ranking officials involved in, for instance, the Senate scandal, election fraud, the torturing of prisoners in Canadian custody, the wholesale and illegal police invasions of our private communications by the ubiquitous surveillance state, the lethal tasering of civilians including subsequent RCMP misrepresentations, the propensity of police to clear other police of any charge of wrongdoing in cases involving the deaths of civilians, the failure (or worse) of law enforcement in the unsolved cases involving hundreds of missing and murdered Aboriginal women in Canada? This list is far from complete.
There is more than enough contradictory evidence out there on the
Moncton shooting to justify at least the asking of some critical and
penetrating questions by reporters in Canadian media venues such as CTV,
The Globe and Mail, and the CBC (the CPC Broadcasting Company?). The
lack of such questioning screams of journalist malfeasance similar to
what happened when Sgt. Peter Montague and other RCMP spin doctors
concocted a tapestry of lies and half-truths to paint a false picture of
Aboriginal terrorism in British Columbia in 1995.
As RCMP media relations officer Sgt. Peter Montague boasted during the 1995 episode, “smear campaigns are an RCMP specialty.” Another police official was caught on camera asking for journalistic help with the RCMP’s “disinformation and smear campaign” targeting especially the Native activists’ controversial lawyer, Bruce Clark.
Presumably the RCMP expect to pay for this kind of professional media help in spreading politically expedient lies. The integration of journalists into the national security state has a long history in the Cold War when the CIA in Project Mockingbird put thousands of journalists on its payroll to spin, lie, and censor for the manufacturing of consent for certain policies.
The spread of purposeful, planned and coordinated disinformation is nothing new in police work, journalism and politics. This kind of activity was accelerated after 9/11 when anti-terrorism replaced anti-communism as the major justification for the even tighter merger of journalists and police into the fast-growing military-industrial complex.
Does this current failure of critical reportage not suggest that the media venues named above have allowed themselves to become extensions of the police and of those that have transformed the RCMP from a law enforcement unit to a political enforcement unit?
Citizen Deserve Genuine Evidence-Based Answers
Might the asking of hard questions by mainstream journalists result in the possibility that those who step out of line might lose the prospect of lucrative jobs such as PR spin doctors or even as Senators with sweetheart deals like those formerly extended by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to CTV reporters Pamela Wallin and Mike Duffy.
Given the list of crimes, violations, and misdemeanors delivered on Canadians so far with impunity by the election-fraud government of Stephen Harper and the smear-and-disinformation RCMP, the time has now passed for the extension of the benefit of the doubt in cases such as this one where the smell of deceit is so unmistakable.
Tony Hall
Here is an excerpt from an article by Sakej Ward in a United Church web publication on the Indigenous resistance to the Moncton RCMP’s protection of the contested fracking operations in New Brunswick in 2013
In reference to the Mi’kmaq warrior society being targeted and raided I spoke in the interview about the similarities it had to the raid made by INSET (Integrated National Security Enforcement Team – Canada’s counter terrorism law enforcement department) against Dave Dennis and I. I wanted to add that these similarities are not coincidental. They are part of an overall strategy at defeating any grass roots movement. Stratfor, is a US company, created by former Delta Force (U.S. Army Counter terrorism unit) operatives. After leaving the military the owners of the company utilized and modified a war strategy model of counter-insurgency to be employed against grass roots movements opposing corporations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrwkLAo-ByQ
Robot Voice assesses modification of Facebook pages etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBcrn-BLZgE
A critical look the Canadian version of what may be a Rambo-style meme of false flag police work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Izi5nC2OAw
Slightly more polished Rambo assessment focusing on the stretch of credulity required to accept the police version of events as entirely true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5cyjd7qvxM
Discussion of media spin on the Canadian Rambo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ_qmkTlQtY&list=UUXJvAKcEJpWAOsPcOTGxMSg
Amazingly Retrograde Spin, Delivered as a Crappy Sappy Hollywood Replica of a Really Bad Cop Show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMT_P2zaLa0
“I found a series of bills pumping DHS [Homeland Security] money (the unaccountable billions out of our budget) into…Canada’s borders and national security. Now Canada does not have a terrorism problem (no one hates Canadians, those sweet, peaceful, rational people). So to justify all that money ….it has to have a crazy people problem. This is not to say Moncton “didn’t happen.” It is to say VERIFY DETAILS as there is a major financial incentive for senior Canadian officials and their closely related news outlets, to have the same fear climate in Canada we now lucratively have in the US. I hope this is clear by now. It is the same reasoning behind everything I will ask you to verify. Money’s relationship to lies.”
Thanks to my friend and colleague Mark Taliano for introducing to me to the false flag implications of the Moncton shooting incident and the pertinent observations of Naomi Wolf who has questioned the veracity of RCMP, eye witness, and media reports
http://naomiwolf.org/2014/06/canada-in-the-crossfire/
A Canadian Rambo?
Unanswered Questions on the Moncton Shooter and the RCMP
A
Critical Look at the Facts and the Hype Concerning the Moncton Shooting
Episode. Is the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Deploying Disinfo at the
Behest of US Black-Ops Funders?
How
did it happen that this young man, Justin Bourque, was able to stroll
down the street in Moncton New Brunswick to kill and wound five
heavily-armed RCMP officers? Where is any evidence of the actual
shootings? Is Justin Bourque a patsie?
by Anthony Hall
The shooting spree said to have resulted in the murder and wounding of five Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers in Moncton New Brunswick raises many questions. Here’s some that occur to me after my curiosity was piqued by FB post published today by American author and pundit Naomi Wolf.
Wolf suggests that the Moncton episode’s whole US-counterterrorist-style might be explained by following the flow of US-black-op-financing apparently now streaming into the burgeoning Canadian police state. Wolf’s observations about possible US involvement in the Moncton shootings helped me to remember theories going around in 2013 about the possible role of US Delta Force/Statfor (see below) in the heavily-armed raids of the RCMP on Native Mi’Kmaq anti-fracking activists in and around Elsipogtog.
A
special ops operative deployed near Moncton New Brunswick in 2013 to
defend the fracking operation of an Irving related US Company from the
interventions of Mi’Kmaq anti-fracking activists.
Alternative Media
As raunchy and crude as is some of the internet coverage of the Moncton shooter incident is, the citizen journalists covering this matter tend to run circles around the well-paid stenographers of press releases from official sources. This stenography, evading at all cost any critical evaluation of the actual evidence, is pretty much what discerning people have come to expect from the mainstream media these days.
I have been learning from citizen journalists that shooter drills took place in Sackville, just a twenty minute drive from Moncton, only days before the lethal incident. Apparently the alleged shooter, Justin Bourque, was apprehended and taken to the RCMP detachment in Sackville, not Moncton, after he was apprehended. Why?
It has been credibly argued that the juxtaposition of drills that approximate concurrent or subsequent episodes of mass murder such as on 9/11 embody classic signs of false flag terrorism.
I have learned from one of the You Tubes linked to below that a key witnesses in this matter is a professional actress. Another witness filmed by CTV clearly has huge internal contradictions in her story. I have seen the allegation that relevant Facebook pages, including the one attributed to the alleged shooter Justin Bourque, have been tampered with and altered. I want that allegation to be addressed on the record by the responsible authorities.
Obvious Questions
What am I to make of the allegation that the Rambo-style shooting episode in Moncton seems like a poorly-produced replica of other fairly obvious false-flag events? What is the story behind the dissemination of the key image sent viral of Bourque strolling along with his hunting rifle? Is that a bow and arrow on Bourque’s shoulder? What if anything was the role of RCMP tweeters in sending this image viral? Who is taking responsibility for the appallingly poor police work if it turns out that one or more aspects of the rather implausible official version of these lethal events is actually true? One thing that is almost certainly true is the existence of dead RCMP officers.
Was the Moncton shooting in whole or in part a staged event to secure increased budgets and new powers for police-state attacks on our human rights and civil liberties? Could the event have anything to do with a strategy for re-electing the “law-and-order” party that presently control the national government in Ottawa?
Could the episode be in any way a diversion from the RCMP’s failure to enforce the criminal law on high-ranking officials involved in, for instance, the Senate scandal, election fraud, the torturing of prisoners in Canadian custody, the wholesale and illegal police invasions of our private communications by the ubiquitous surveillance state, the lethal tasering of civilians including subsequent RCMP misrepresentations, the propensity of police to clear other police of any charge of wrongdoing in cases involving the deaths of civilians, the failure (or worse) of law enforcement in the unsolved cases involving hundreds of missing and murdered Aboriginal women in Canada? This list is far from complete.
Former
RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli took the politicization of
Canada’s ailing federal police to new levels when he intervened in the
2006 election with the goal of putting his friend Stephen Harper in the
prime minister’s job. At the beginning of the election campaign
Zaccardelli held a press conference to announce the RCMP’s criminal
investigation into the activities of the Finance Minister of the
then-Liberal government of Canada. Zaccardelli’s purposeful intervention
into the election campaign had the desired effect. The RCMP had nothing
more to say on the matter once the Mounties helped Harper to move into
Canada’s top job. More recently the RCMP seems to have walked away from
its investigation into the well documented $90,000 bribe handed over to
Senator Mike Duffy by Harper’s top aid to entice the former CTV reporter
to play by the script of a concocted fable hatched and implemented in
the Prime Minister’s closest circle of advisers. More and more politics,
show biz, and political policing are merging
As RCMP media relations officer Sgt. Peter Montague boasted during the 1995 episode, “smear campaigns are an RCMP specialty.” Another police official was caught on camera asking for journalistic help with the RCMP’s “disinformation and smear campaign” targeting especially the Native activists’ controversial lawyer, Bruce Clark.
Presumably the RCMP expect to pay for this kind of professional media help in spreading politically expedient lies. The integration of journalists into the national security state has a long history in the Cold War when the CIA in Project Mockingbird put thousands of journalists on its payroll to spin, lie, and censor for the manufacturing of consent for certain policies.
The spread of purposeful, planned and coordinated disinformation is nothing new in police work, journalism and politics. This kind of activity was accelerated after 9/11 when anti-terrorism replaced anti-communism as the major justification for the even tighter merger of journalists and police into the fast-growing military-industrial complex.
Does this current failure of critical reportage not suggest that the media venues named above have allowed themselves to become extensions of the police and of those that have transformed the RCMP from a law enforcement unit to a political enforcement unit?
Citizen Deserve Genuine Evidence-Based Answers
Might the asking of hard questions by mainstream journalists result in the possibility that those who step out of line might lose the prospect of lucrative jobs such as PR spin doctors or even as Senators with sweetheart deals like those formerly extended by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to CTV reporters Pamela Wallin and Mike Duffy.
Given the list of crimes, violations, and misdemeanors delivered on Canadians so far with impunity by the election-fraud government of Stephen Harper and the smear-and-disinformation RCMP, the time has now passed for the extension of the benefit of the doubt in cases such as this one where the smell of deceit is so unmistakable.
Tony Hall
Here is an excerpt from an article by Sakej Ward in a United Church web publication on the Indigenous resistance to the Moncton RCMP’s protection of the contested fracking operations in New Brunswick in 2013
In reference to the Mi’kmaq warrior society being targeted and raided I spoke in the interview about the similarities it had to the raid made by INSET (Integrated National Security Enforcement Team – Canada’s counter terrorism law enforcement department) against Dave Dennis and I. I wanted to add that these similarities are not coincidental. They are part of an overall strategy at defeating any grass roots movement. Stratfor, is a US company, created by former Delta Force (U.S. Army Counter terrorism unit) operatives. After leaving the military the owners of the company utilized and modified a war strategy model of counter-insurgency to be employed against grass roots movements opposing corporations.
On Stratfor see
Alternative Media You Tubes
Actress is the main witness
Shooter drill only days before the publicized shooter incident, a common feature of this genre of false flag episodes
The changing story and internal contradictions of the woman who
claims to been the first, or one of the first, to call 911 for RCMP helphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrwkLAo-ByQ
Robot Voice assesses modification of Facebook pages etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBcrn-BLZgE
A critical look the Canadian version of what may be a Rambo-style meme of false flag police work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Izi5nC2OAw
Slightly more polished Rambo assessment focusing on the stretch of credulity required to accept the police version of events as entirely true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5cyjd7qvxM
Discussion of media spin on the Canadian Rambo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ_qmkTlQtY&list=UUXJvAKcEJpWAOsPcOTGxMSg
Amazingly Retrograde Spin, Delivered as a Crappy Sappy Hollywood Replica of a Really Bad Cop Show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMT_P2zaLa0
CBC on the gun story
“True Evidence” inserted pictures from Italy into Moncton story
Something Rather Sinister Here, Something going on in Canada
Arsenault’s Reprehensible CBC report, Canadians are the most asleep people on earth, Canadians should stop sipping so much Tim’s
“On a Mission”
An excerpt from Naomi Wolf’s FB post on possible US Funding of
Canadian “counter-terrorism” operations and the need for evidence to
support the reported facts of Canada’s supposed Rambo-style shooting
episode.“I found a series of bills pumping DHS [Homeland Security] money (the unaccountable billions out of our budget) into…Canada’s borders and national security. Now Canada does not have a terrorism problem (no one hates Canadians, those sweet, peaceful, rational people). So to justify all that money ….it has to have a crazy people problem. This is not to say Moncton “didn’t happen.” It is to say VERIFY DETAILS as there is a major financial incentive for senior Canadian officials and their closely related news outlets, to have the same fear climate in Canada we now lucratively have in the US. I hope this is clear by now. It is the same reasoning behind everything I will ask you to verify. Money’s relationship to lies.”
Thanks to my friend and colleague Mark Taliano for introducing to me to the false flag implications of the Moncton shooting incident and the pertinent observations of Naomi Wolf who has questioned the veracity of RCMP, eye witness, and media reports
http://naomiwolf.org/2014/06/canada-in-the-crossfire/
V
The US-led coalition went to war, and
in the process killed almost a million people, in order to capture Usmah bin
Laden, who allegedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks from the caves in
Afghanistan. To avenge the killing of innocent civilians, by killing many more
innocent civilians is a perverse notion of justice. If dispensing collective
punishment is the policy, then it makes little sense to talk of innocence or
guilt. Thus a suicide bomber is no different to those dropping bombs from a
distance, both dispensing collective punishment on a community.