Helmuth Wilberg, a German officer of Jewish ancestry, was the last general of the Luftwaffe during the Second World War
Watch Part 1 above
David Musa Pidcock, founder of the Islamic Party of Britain, passed away last week. May Allah bless, forgive, and reward him and admit him to Paradise. His funeral will be held tomorrow, Friday, December 10, near Sheffield (UK). Those who wish to attend can email me (truthjihad/at/gmail/dot/com) for the location. -KB
From Moeen Yaseen of Global Vision 2000:
INNA LILLAHI WA INNA ILAYHI RAJIUN.
GLOBAL VISION 2000 IS SORRY TO ANNOUNCE THE PASSING AWAY OF DAUD MUSA PIDCOCK MAY ALLAH REST HIS SOUL IN PEACE. WE WERE PLEASED TO COLLABORATE WITH HIM IN
SEVERAL HOUSE OF LORDS MONETARY, BANKING AND POLITICAL ECONOMY EVENTS
INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF PARLIAMENT SINCE 2004. OVER THE LAST 5 YEARS HE
CONTRIBUTED TO GLOBAL VISION 2000'S ESCHATOLOGY IN THE
21ST CENTURY EVENTS IN LONDON. THIS ASPECT OF HIS WORK IS PERHAPS THE
MOST SIGNIFICANT AS IT IS VERY RELEVANT TO ALL OF HUMANTY AS A NEW ERA
OF DARKNESS SPREADS ITS WINGS ACROSS THE WORLD.
DAUD PIDCOCK WAS A LEADING BRITISH MUSLIM CAMPAIGNER AND COMMENTATOR AT LEAST SINCE 1989 WITH THE RUSHDIE AFFAIR. MANY IN
THE BRITISH MUSLIM COMMUNITY WILL NOT EVEN KNOW OF HIM AS THEY WERE NOT
EVEN BORN IN THE 80’S. A VIDEO IS POSTED ON OUR HOME PAGE DURING A
HOUSE OF LORDS SEMINAR FEATURING HIM. OUR NOTE HERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN
PUBLISHED IN THE FINANCIAL TIMES BUT THAT IS ANOTHER STORY.
A
FORMER ROMAN CATHOLIC, DAVID MUSA PIDCOCK HAS PASSED AWAY THIS MORNING.
A SHEFFIELD MAN, HE WAS BORN IN 1942 AND BECAME A MUSLIM IN 1975 WHEN
WORKING AS AN ENGINEER IN SAUDI ARABIA. HE WAS THE FOUNDER AND THE
LEADER OF THE ISLAMIC PARTY OF BRITAIN, WHICH WAS LAUNCHED IN SEPTEMBER
1989 IN THE MIDST OF THE BRITISH MUSLIM MOBILISATIONS AGAINST SALMAN
RUSHDIE'S NOVEL, THE SATANIC VERSES. THE IPB WAS MOST ACTIVE IN THE 1992
GENERAL ELECTION WHEN IT UNSUCCESSFULLY CONTESTED 3 SEATS. ITS PURPOSE
WAS TO PROVIDE AN ISLAMIC ALTERNATIVE AT ELECTION TIME AND TO ENGAGE THE
BRITISH PUBLIC FOR PROSELYTISING PURPOSES. IT WAS DISSOLVED IN 2006.
DAUD
MUSA PIDCOCK WAS ALSO AN HONORARY MEMBER OF THE ECONOMIC RESEARCH
COUNCIL AND A DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE FOR RATIONAL ECONOMICS. HE
CO-FOUNDED THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR VICTIMS OF FRAUD AND BANKING
MALPRACTICE. HE CONTRIBUTED TO A NUMBER OF PUBLICATIONS FOR EXAMPLE HIS
REBUTTAL "SATANIC VERSES: ANCIENT AND MODERN " AND WROTE REGULARLY FOR
IPB's QUARTERLY COMMON SENSE. DAUD IS SURVIVED BY HIS WIFE AND HIS TWO CHILDFREN. MARY AND JAKE,
MAY ALLAH HAVE MERCY ON DAUD's SOUL.
"Signs of the 'End Times' Are All Around Us!"
David Pidcock interviewed by Kevin Barrett, June 17 2020
Kevin Barrett: Hi, I'm Kevin Barrett of Truth Jihad Radio. Have you noticed that the world isn't getting any less crazy? In fact, it's getting so crazy that more and more people are beginning to wonder whether we may be living in the end times, the akhir-uz-zamman. Sheikh Imran Hussein is the world's most interesting eschatologist, that is, student of the end times. Today, we're bringing on another very interesting and accomplished student of the end times, David Musa Pidcock. He's the co-founder of the Islamic Party of Britain, and his views are way outside the mainstream box.
David is a Muslim leader from the UK who has done all kinds of interesting work on a wide array of issues. And today we're going to talk about one that he's especially well versed in, which is the question of end times scenarios. And in Islam, we call that akhir-uz-zaman. Are we living in the end times? If we're going to apply any template to the crazy events going on in today's world to try to make sense of it and tell an overall story about it—some might call it a myth, others might call it an accurate story—this akhir-uz-zaman or end times template strikes me as rather uncannily appropriate in many ways. So let's hear what David thinks. Welcome! As-salaamu alaikum.
David Pidcock: Wa alaikum as-salaam. This is a particularly interesting subject and one that I've concentrated on for quite some time. We've put out a book in response to Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses. It’s called Satanic Voices, Ancient and Modern. And in it I came across some very interesting material, particularly on the issue of the British Embassy in Constantinople (and a hadith about the end times). Now this is very interesting for our times from the beginning of the 20th century till today.
Now, the British Embassy had written a letter basically notifying the British government of what had just happened on July the 8th 1908 in Constantinople. A coup d'etat had taken place on July the 8th, and the whole of the Ottoman Empire basically was then taken over by 70,000 Masonic Jews from Salonika. And he gives a whole background to what's going on and what would happen.
Kevin Barrett: This was the so-called Young Turks, right?
David Pidcock: Oh yes, the young Turks, up to their old tricks, I suppose you could say. But what's interesting is that they (the Salonika Jews) had congregated in the Ottoman Empire. After the the Spanish Inquisition, the sultan opened Salonika and allowed them to congregate in Salonika, which of course, then became the most Jewish town in Europe.
Kevin Barrett: And these weren't all normal Jews, were they? Some of them were crypto-Jews who had falsely converted to Islam following Sabbatai Zevi, the the rather satanic heretical Jewish Zionist (whose career peaked in 1666). He was the first real Zionist, wasn't he?
David Pidcock: Absolutely. You've hit exactly on the point. Interesting things happened in 1666. There was the Great Fire of London, which was set on purpose by the bankers so they could pass the Coinage Act. We had the Great Plague in a village not far from where I'm sitting now. And, of course, there was Sabbatai Zevi, who had come to "liberate" Al-Quds/Jerusalem. Now, when he got to Constantinople, the sultan ordered him to stop, go back, lose his head or convert. Now being a devout coward, he converted. He was then basically ordered to to remove himself. And he ended up in Salonika. What's particularly nasty about this particular individual is that he had a madhhab (religious law school)—his Ten Commandments consisted of the reverse of the Mosaic Law. But "Thou shalt commit adultery" was the first.
Kevin Barrett: That was his personal favorite.
David Pidcock: Oh, of course. And (the favorite of) those who followed him, obviously. There was one day in the year when they had a festival of wife swapping. And so nobody knew who their real father was. And of course this applied to Mustafa Kemal, and to all of them who ruled and continued to rule almost until today. And they still have a massive influence. When you see Mustafa Kamal's picture behind Erdogan, you wonder why, why would he be there, when you know the history?
Kevin Barrett: I know a little bit about that because I did a speaking tour of Turkey with a group of people brought over from the U.S. about 10 years ago. The people who brought me over were part of a Muslim group called Yeni Asya, and they're part of the Islamic revival in Turkey that looks to Bediuzzaman Said Nursi as an inspiration. He was the great Muslim reformer who helped preserve Islam in Turkey. And anyway, these people, I don't want to name too many names or anything and get them in trouble. But essentially what they said is "we all know that Mustafa Kemal was a pedophile, a monster, a degenerate, a Satanist coming out of this crypto-Jewish movement of Sabbatai Zevi. We know this but we can't say it because of the brainwashing that's been imposed on Turkey—that Mustafa Kemal Ataturk saved Turkey and so on and so forth. “He's the father of the nation.” If you come out and tell the truth openly and directly about that in today's Turkey, you'll basically be beheaded. They'll crucify you. And so I think that's the reason that somebody like Erdogan who probably knows full well the truth about these matters, is still playing the game and having that picture of of Ataturk behind him in his office.
David Pidcock: I was invited by Necmettin Erbakan when we formed the Islamic Party.
Kevin Barrett: He was better than Erdogan.
David Pidcock: Oh, absolutely superb. He was an engineer. They invited us to go to Basel, where the first Zionist Conference was held in 1897. And what happened? We came out of the building at lunchtime and it was right next to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS, nerve center of New World Order financial power). And we looked up and we saw a very large Alpine vulture starting to circle around the top of the building. Then a second one joined it and a third one in a triangle.
These three vultures (appropriately, vulture capitalism) were rotating around the top of the Bank for International Settlements. I got the photographs, but somebody purloined them at some point. Anyway, the issue being that we went there, and I was able to pick up a lot of information from Erbakan. He was certainly very smart, and he wanted to wake up Moslems.
But Mustafa Kemal...When I was in Turkey, I gave a talk. And unfortunately, I made the mistake of calling him Ataturk. And of course that upset a few people. But anyway, from that, we started to build a good relationship. And Ataturk and the whole system that basically took over from July the 8th 1908... Now in the Sahih Muslim and Bukhari and the Mishkat al-Masabih, the Hadith said that Yawm al-Qiyyama (Judgment Day, the Day of Ressurection) will not occur until seventy thousand sons of Isaac (Ishaq) will attack Constantinople. But when they arrive, when they land, they will not fight with swords or shower projectiles. They will simply say, la ilaha il Allah and one of its defenses will be opened. They'll recite it for a second time: la ilaha il Allah — and the second of its defenses will open. And they will enter it. Because it is on three defense levels, Constantinople or Istanbul. Then they will recite it for a third time: la ilaha il Allah. And they will enter it and start gathering the spoils of war. Now, he says, from this day count six years to Jihad Akbar. Now, the (Sabbatean) sign, by the way, was the Masonic core sign, because they didn't say Muhammad rasul Allah, they just said la ilaha il Allah. And from that day, they pretty well took control of everything. But then Rasul Allah said count six years. So from July the 8th 1908, we come to July 1914. And they say exactly in that month, after Archduke Ferdinand is assassinated a month previously, then the Great War, Jihad Akbar, begins. Abdul Hamid the Caliph has already been deposed and is under house arrest, but he declares Jihad Akbar in favor of Germany because Germany built the Baghdad to Berlin Railway.
And so that's how it happened. So Jihad Akbar (World War I) begins exactly in the sixth year, in the month when the Jihad Akbar was supposed to begin. Now there's an additional piece to this: He says from this day-count miss one year. So we miss 1915. Now, the book that I completed, the Times History of the War, said in this year there was no open revolt in the Hejaz. There was nothing there. So skip one year. So we come to 1916. He says, “and then look for the emergence of Dajjal, Antichrist, and revolution entering every Arab house by mutual hatred and hostility between the Arabs.” Now, Lawrence, of course, arrives in June of that year. And he said it was unfortunate but necessary because they wanted to make sure that they got a cheap and speedy victory over Iraq and the Mesopotamian oil. So it was all about destroying the Ottoman Empire, getting the oil and controlling the Middle East.
Kevin Barrett: I was wondering if this is related to what Sheikh Imran Hussain says when he speaks of the ahadith that cite this great war, the Malhama, being fought over a mountain of gold that will be uncovered in Mesopotamia. And Sheikh Imran thinks that mountain of gold is the oil-based petrodollar, which is black gold. And that sounds like it would be in line with what you're saying.
David Pidcock: People like to interpret literally, but I think it's true. Whatever gold is there, one would have thought that Saddam would have dug it up by now. But they've been digging up the oil. And of course it is a source of massive revenue.
But that was the agenda. And I met a former American ambassador to Saudi Arabia, and he told me quite a lot — I'll come back to that in a second — but just to stick with this hadith because it is so precise and accurate. But then people are saying, But who is the Dajjal? Now, if we look at the British Empire, what it stands for, what it stood for and then became the Anglo-American Empire, it's the same firm, the Masonic cult, and they're a pretty nasty bunch. So that's that's where it takes us to.
Kevin Barrett: But do you think there is an individual (Dajjal/Antichrist) or just this group?
David Pidcock: Well, according to the hadith, there are at least 30 dajjals. So these are people who will come like Sabbatai Zevi and others, and they will claim to be the Messiah. But I think it is definite, because the Prophet describes him doing tours around the Kaaba, describes his personage: wavy hair, one eyed, and (unintelligible). So I think it is certainly an individual…...
Subscribe to Kevin’s Newsletter to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Kevin’s Newsletter to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
PART 2
David Pidcock on Signs of the End Times (Part 2)
RSS
Audio Player
I invited Mona Shaykh, a leading “woke” comedian and self-professed “naughty Muslim,” for what I thought would be a friendly conversation. After all, we’re both American Muslims, we both have an offbeat sense of humor (check out my satire), we both sympathize with underdogs and oppressed folks, and we’re both committed to telling in-your-face truth exactly the way we see it, social niceties be *#@*ed.
My wife warned me: “What kind of Muslim is this? She’s flashing her body around, spewing her potty mouth, exploiting her background for cheap laughs, selling tasteless woke NWO crap. Don’t dignify her with an interview.”
“Well,” I said, “I’m sure Mona and I have different takes on a long list of issues. But I love interviewing people who see things differently from me. We can discuss our areas of disagreement reasonably, so the listeners can gain a better idea of what’s at stake and make up their own minds.”
I should have listened to my wife.
Six minutes in, the interview started going off the rails. Shaikh told me two of her brothers had contracted polio from expired vaccinations, and the trauma destroyed her family. I asked whether that bad vaccine experience made her wary of COVID vaccines, mentioning the previous guest, Tom Breidenbach’s, long, well-documented list of reasons not to trust the “vax everybody” party line. Her response: “I’m sorry, are you an anti-vaxer?” From what happened after that, it might as well have been Julius Streicher asking “I’m sorry, are you a Jew?” (Except that Streicher probably couldn’t keep up with Mona’s profanity.)
Unfortunately, Mona’s wish that COVID provide a final solution to the anti-vaxxer problem (starting around the 23 minute mark) might not be as far-fetched as it sounds. Nobel Laureate virologist Luc Montagnier agrees with vaccine expert Geert Vanden Bossche (among many others) that mass “leaky” vaccinations in the midst of a viral pandemic are sheer madness, just as mass “leaky” antibiotics would be during a bacterial pandemic, for roughly the same reasons: they put selective pressure on the pathogen to breed more virulent variants. Though it is unclear whether the vaccinated or unvaccinated would suffer the most under a worst case scenario, the closest real-world precedent is the case of Marek’s disease in chickens. What happened, briefly, was that mass leaky vaccinations of chickens bred ever-more-virulent variants that ever-more-disproportionately targeted the unvaccinated chickens. Eventually, the selective pressure produced a virus that was mostly non-lethal in vaccinated chickens, but killed all unvaccinated chickens.
Personally, I wouldn’t wish a Marek’s disease scenario on a chicken, much less a human being, much less hundreds of millions of human beings.
But at least it would be a final solution to the anti-vaxxer problem. Right, Mona?
Being
an explanation of the Islamic prohibition of riba (i.e borrowing and
lending on interest, among other things), and an effort:
