Showing posts with label YASER ARAFAT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label YASER ARAFAT. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 December 2021

DAVID MUSA PIDCOCK RA, HITLER'S DEATH, COMMON PURPOSE, DR. KEVIN BARRETT, EUSTACE MULLINS, JEWISH ARAFAT, NASER, AND GHADDAFI.

 

MORE 'REVELATIONS' ABOUT HITLER'S DEATH!  [N.B. Collage with Jew Helmuth Wilberg's Uniform!]
 

Helmuth Wilberg, a German officer of Jewish ancestry, was the last general of the Luftwaffe during the Second World War

Tribute to David Pidcock: "Signs of the 'End Times' Are All Around Us!"

Kevin Barrett from Kevin’s Newsletter <kevinbarrett@substack.com>Unsubscribe
To:bafremauxsoormally@......
Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 20:04

Watch Part 1 above

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0H1h5wNXPo

 

David Musa Pidcock, founder of the Islamic Party of Britain, passed away last week. May Allah bless, forgive, and reward him and admit him to Paradise. His funeral will be held tomorrow, Friday, December 10, near Sheffield (UK). Those who wish to attend can email me (truthjihad/at/gmail/dot/com) for the location. -KB

From Moeen Yaseen of Global Vision 2000:

 

INNA LILLAHI WA INNA ILAYHI RAJIUN.

GLOBAL VISION 2000 IS SORRY TO ANNOUNCE THE PASSING AWAY OF DAUD MUSA PIDCOCK MAY ALLAH REST HIS SOUL  IN PEACE. WE WERE PLEASED TO COLLABORATE WITH HIM  IN SEVERAL HOUSE OF LORDS MONETARY, BANKING AND POLITICAL ECONOMY EVENTS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF PARLIAMENT SINCE 2004. OVER THE LAST 5 YEARS HE CONTRIBUTED TO GLOBAL VISION 2000'S ESCHATOLOGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY EVENTS IN LONDON. THIS ASPECT OF HIS WORK IS PERHAPS THE MOST SIGNIFICANT AS IT IS VERY RELEVANT TO ALL OF HUMANTY AS A NEW ERA OF  DARKNESS SPREADS ITS WINGS ACROSS THE WORLD.

DAUD PIDCOCK WAS A LEADING BRITISH MUSLIM CAMPAIGNER AND COMMENTATOR AT LEAST SINCE 1989 WITH THE RUSHDIE AFFAIR. MANY  IN THE BRITISH MUSLIM COMMUNITY WILL NOT EVEN KNOW OF HIM AS THEY WERE NOT EVEN BORN IN THE 80’S. A VIDEO IS POSTED ON OUR HOME PAGE DURING A HOUSE OF LORDS SEMINAR FEATURING HIM. OUR NOTE HERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE FINANCIAL TIMES  BUT THAT IS ANOTHER STORY. 

A FORMER ROMAN CATHOLIC, DAVID MUSA PIDCOCK HAS PASSED AWAY THIS MORNING. A SHEFFIELD MAN, HE WAS BORN IN 1942 AND BECAME A MUSLIM IN 1975 WHEN WORKING AS AN ENGINEER IN SAUDI ARABIA. HE WAS THE FOUNDER AND THE LEADER OF THE ISLAMIC PARTY OF BRITAIN, WHICH WAS LAUNCHED IN SEPTEMBER 1989 IN THE MIDST OF  THE BRITISH MUSLIM MOBILISATIONS AGAINST SALMAN RUSHDIE'S NOVEL, THE SATANIC VERSES. THE IPB WAS MOST ACTIVE IN THE 1992 GENERAL ELECTION WHEN IT UNSUCCESSFULLY CONTESTED 3 SEATS. ITS PURPOSE WAS TO PROVIDE AN ISLAMIC ALTERNATIVE AT ELECTION TIME AND TO ENGAGE THE BRITISH PUBLIC FOR PROSELYTISING PURPOSES. IT WAS DISSOLVED IN 2006.

DAUD MUSA PIDCOCK WAS ALSO AN HONORARY MEMBER OF THE ECONOMIC RESEARCH COUNCIL AND A DIRECTOR OF THE INSTITUTE FOR RATIONAL ECONOMICS. HE CO-FOUNDED THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR VICTIMS OF FRAUD AND BANKING MALPRACTICE. HE CONTRIBUTED TO A NUMBER OF PUBLICATIONS FOR EXAMPLE HIS REBUTTAL "SATANIC VERSES: ANCIENT AND MODERN " AND WROTE REGULARLY FOR IPB's QUARTERLY COMMON SENSE. DAUD IS SURVIVED BY HIS WIFE AND HIS TWO CHILDFREN. MARY AND JAKE,

MAY ALLAH HAVE MERCY ON DAUD's SOUL.

"Signs of the 'End Times' Are All Around Us!"

David Pidcock interviewed by Kevin Barrett, June 17 2020

 

Kevin Barrett: Hi, I'm Kevin Barrett of Truth Jihad Radio. Have you noticed that the world isn't getting any less crazy? In fact, it's getting so crazy that more and more people are beginning to wonder whether we may be living in the end times, the akhir-uz-zamman. Sheikh Imran Hussein is the world's most interesting eschatologist, that is, student of the end times. Today, we're bringing on another very interesting and accomplished student of the end times, David Musa Pidcock. He's the co-founder of the Islamic Party of Britain, and his views are way outside the mainstream box.

David is a Muslim leader from the UK who has done all kinds of interesting work on a wide array of issues. And today we're going to talk about one that he's especially well versed in, which is the question of end times scenarios. And in Islam, we call that akhir-uz-zaman. Are we living in the end times? If we're going to apply any template to the crazy events going on in today's world to try to make sense of it and tell an overall story about it—some might call it a myth, others might call it an accurate story—this akhir-uz-zaman or end times template strikes me as rather uncannily appropriate in many ways. So let's hear what David thinks. Welcome! As-salaamu alaikum.

David Pidcock: Wa alaikum as-salaam. This is a particularly interesting subject and one that I've concentrated on for quite some time. We've put out a book in response to Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses. It’s called Satanic Voices, Ancient and Modern. And in it I came across some very interesting material, particularly on the issue of the British Embassy in Constantinople (and a hadith about the end times). Now this is very interesting for our times from the beginning of the 20th century till today.

Now, the British Embassy had written a letter basically notifying the British government of what had just happened on July the 8th 1908 in Constantinople. A coup d'etat had taken place on July the 8th, and the whole of the Ottoman Empire basically was then taken over by 70,000 Masonic Jews from Salonika. And he gives a whole background to what's going on and what would happen.

Kevin Barrett: This was the so-called Young Turks, right?

David Pidcock: Oh yes, the young Turks, up to their old tricks, I suppose you could say. But what's interesting is that they (the Salonika Jews) had congregated in the Ottoman Empire. After the the Spanish Inquisition, the sultan opened Salonika and allowed them to congregate in Salonika, which of course, then became the most Jewish town in Europe.

Kevin Barrett: And these weren't all normal Jews, were they? Some of them were crypto-Jews who had falsely converted to Islam following Sabbatai Zevi, the the rather satanic heretical Jewish Zionist (whose career peaked in 1666). He was the first real Zionist, wasn't he?

David Pidcock: Absolutely. You've hit exactly on the point. Interesting things happened in 1666. There was the Great Fire of London, which was set on purpose by the bankers so they could pass the Coinage Act. We had the Great Plague in a village not far from where I'm sitting now. And, of course, there was Sabbatai Zevi, who had come to "liberate" Al-Quds/Jerusalem. Now, when he got to Constantinople, the sultan ordered him to stop, go back, lose his head or convert. Now being a devout coward, he converted. He was then basically ordered to to remove himself. And he ended up in Salonika. What's particularly nasty about this particular individual is that he had a madhhab (religious law school)—his Ten Commandments consisted of the reverse of the Mosaic Law. But "Thou shalt commit adultery" was the first.

Kevin Barrett: That was his personal favorite.

David Pidcock: Oh, of course. And (the favorite of) those who followed him, obviously. There was one day in the year when they had a festival of wife swapping. And so nobody knew who their real father was. And of course this applied to Mustafa Kemal, and to all of them who ruled and continued to rule almost until today. And they still have a massive influence. When you see Mustafa Kamal's picture behind Erdogan, you wonder why, why would he be there, when you know the history?

Kevin Barrett: I know a little bit about that because I did a speaking tour of Turkey with a group of people brought over from the U.S. about 10 years ago. The people who brought me over were part of a Muslim group called Yeni Asya, and they're part of the Islamic revival in Turkey that looks to Bediuzzaman Said Nursi as an inspiration. He was the great Muslim reformer who helped preserve Islam in Turkey. And anyway, these people, I don't want to name too many names or anything and get them in trouble. But essentially what they said is "we all know that Mustafa Kemal was a pedophile, a monster, a degenerate, a Satanist coming out of this crypto-Jewish movement of Sabbatai Zevi. We know this but we can't say it because of the brainwashing that's been imposed on Turkey—that Mustafa Kemal Ataturk saved Turkey and so on and so forth. “He's the father of the nation.” If you come out and tell the truth openly and directly about that in today's Turkey, you'll basically be beheaded. They'll crucify you. And so I think that's the reason that somebody like Erdogan who probably knows full well the truth about these matters, is still playing the game and having that picture of of Ataturk behind him in his office.

David Pidcock: I was invited by Necmettin Erbakan when we formed the Islamic Party.

Kevin Barrett: He was better than Erdogan.

David Pidcock: Oh, absolutely superb. He was an engineer. They invited us to go to Basel, where the first Zionist Conference was held in 1897. And what happened? We came out of the building at lunchtime and it was right next to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS, nerve center of New World Order financial power). And we looked up and we saw a very large Alpine vulture starting to circle around the top of the building. Then a second one joined it and a third one in a triangle.

These three vultures (appropriately, vulture capitalism) were rotating around the top of the Bank for International Settlements. I got the photographs, but somebody purloined them at some point. Anyway, the issue being that we went there, and I was able to pick up a lot of information from Erbakan. He was certainly very smart, and he wanted to wake up Moslems.

But Mustafa Kemal...When I was in Turkey, I gave a talk. And unfortunately, I made the mistake of calling him Ataturk. And of course that upset a few people. But anyway, from that, we started to build a good relationship. And Ataturk and the whole system that basically took over from July the 8th 1908... Now in the Sahih Muslim and Bukhari and the Mishkat al-Masabih, the Hadith said that Yawm al-Qiyyama (Judgment Day, the Day of Ressurection) will not occur until seventy thousand sons of Isaac (Ishaq) will attack Constantinople. But when they arrive, when they land, they will not fight with swords or shower projectiles. They will simply say, la ilaha il Allah and one of its defenses will be opened. They'll recite it for a second time: la ilaha il Allah — and the second of its defenses will open. And they will enter it. Because it is on three defense levels, Constantinople or Istanbul. Then they will recite it for a third time: la ilaha il Allah. And they will enter it and start gathering the spoils of war. Now, he says, from this day count six years to Jihad Akbar. Now, the (Sabbatean) sign, by the way, was the Masonic core sign, because they didn't say Muhammad rasul Allah, they just said la ilaha il Allah. And from that day, they pretty well took control of everything. But then Rasul Allah said count six years. So from July the 8th 1908, we come to July 1914. And they say exactly in that month, after Archduke Ferdinand is assassinated a month previously, then the Great War, Jihad Akbar, begins. Abdul Hamid the Caliph has already been deposed and is under house arrest, but he declares Jihad Akbar in favor of Germany because Germany built the Baghdad to Berlin Railway.

And so that's how it happened. So Jihad Akbar (World War I) begins exactly in the sixth year, in the month when the Jihad Akbar was supposed to begin. Now there's an additional piece to this: He says from this day-count miss one year. So we miss 1915. Now, the book that I completed, the Times History of the War, said in this year there was no open revolt in the Hejaz. There was nothing there. So skip one year. So we come to 1916. He says, “and then look for the emergence of Dajjal, Antichrist, and revolution entering every Arab house by mutual hatred and hostility between the Arabs.” Now, Lawrence, of course, arrives in June of that year. And he said it was unfortunate but necessary because they wanted to make sure that they got a cheap and speedy victory over Iraq and the Mesopotamian oil. So it was all about destroying the Ottoman Empire, getting the oil and controlling the Middle East.

Kevin Barrett: I was wondering if this is related to what Sheikh Imran Hussain says when he speaks of the ahadith that cite this great war, the Malhama, being fought over a mountain of gold that will be uncovered in Mesopotamia. And Sheikh Imran thinks that mountain of gold is the oil-based petrodollar, which is black gold. And that sounds like it would be in line with what you're saying.

David Pidcock: People like to interpret literally, but I think it's true. Whatever gold is there, one would have thought that Saddam would have dug it up by now. But they've been digging up the oil. And of course it is a source of massive revenue.

But that was the agenda. And I met a former American ambassador to Saudi Arabia, and he told me quite a lot — I'll come back to that in a second — but just to stick with this hadith because it is so precise and accurate. But then people are saying, But who is the Dajjal? Now, if we look at the British Empire, what it stands for, what it stood for and then became the Anglo-American Empire, it's the same firm, the Masonic cult, and they're a pretty nasty bunch. So that's that's where it takes us to.

Kevin Barrett: But do you think there is an individual (Dajjal/Antichrist) or just this group?

David Pidcock: Well, according to the hadith, there are at least 30 dajjals. So these are people who will come like Sabbatai Zevi and others, and they will claim to be the Messiah. But I think it is definite, because the Prophet describes him doing tours around the Kaaba, describes his personage: wavy hair, one eyed, and (unintelligible). So I think it is certainly an individual…...

Subscribe to Kevin’s Newsletter to read the rest.

Become a paying subscriber of Kevin’s Newsletter to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

 

PART 2

David Pidcock on Signs of the End Times (Part 2)

1,318 views
29 Jun 2020
74DislikeShare
8.49K subscribers
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPWh7AvWfHU
 
This is Part 2 of my two-part Truth Jihad Radio interview with David Pidcock, recorded June 14, 2020. Watch Part 1 at 
 
 
David Musa Pidcock, co-founder of the Islamic Party of Britain (the first Islamic party in the West) is the author of Satanic Voices – Ancient and Modern – a classic discussion of the Salman Rushdie Satanic Verses affair from a Muslim perspective. His other books include Dark Knights of the Solar Crossand Inside the Brotherhood (co-authored with Martin Short).

 

The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
Comedian Mona Shaikh: Antivaxxers to the Gas Chambers? No, COVID Itself Is the Final Solution! (Full Interview)



Audio Player


Comedian Mona Shaikh


I invited Mona Shaykh, a leading “woke” comedian and self-professed “naughty Muslim,” for what I thought would be a friendly conversation. After all, we’re both American Muslims, we both have an offbeat sense of humor (check out my satire), we both sympathize with underdogs and oppressed folks, and we’re both committed to telling in-your-face truth exactly the way we see it, social niceties be *#@*ed.

My wife warned me: “What kind of Muslim is this? She’s flashing her body around, spewing her potty mouth, exploiting her background for cheap laughs, selling tasteless woke NWO crap. Don’t dignify her with an interview.”

“Well,” I said, “I’m sure Mona and I have different takes on a long list of issues. But I love interviewing people who see things differently from me. We can discuss our areas of disagreement reasonably, so the listeners can gain a better idea of what’s at stake and make up their own minds.”

I should have listened to my wife.

Six minutes in, the interview started going off the rails. Shaikh told me two of her brothers had contracted polio from expired vaccinations, and the trauma destroyed her family. I asked whether that bad vaccine experience made her wary of COVID vaccines, mentioning the previous guest, Tom Breidenbach’s, long, well-documented list of reasons not to trust the “vax everybody” party line. Her response: “I’m sorry, are you an anti-vaxer?” From what happened after that, it might as well have been Julius Streicher asking “I’m sorry, are you a Jew?” (Except that Streicher probably couldn’t keep up with Mona’s profanity.)

Unfortunately, Mona’s wish that COVID provide a final solution to the anti-vaxxer problem (starting around the 23 minute mark) might not be as far-fetched as it sounds. Nobel Laureate virologist Luc Montagnier agrees with vaccine expert Geert Vanden Bossche (among many others) that mass “leaky” vaccinations in the midst of a viral pandemic are sheer madness, just as mass “leaky” antibiotics would be during a bacterial pandemic, for roughly the same reasons: they put selective pressure on the pathogen to breed more virulent variants. Though it is unclear whether the vaccinated or unvaccinated would suffer the most under a worst case scenario, the closest real-world precedent is the case of Marek’s disease in chickens. What happened, briefly, was that mass leaky vaccinations of chickens bred ever-more-virulent variants that ever-more-disproportionately targeted the unvaccinated chickens. Eventually, the selective pressure produced a virus that was mostly non-lethal in vaccinated chickens, but killed all unvaccinated chickens.

Personally, I wouldn’t wish a Marek’s disease scenario on a chicken, much less a human being, much less hundreds of millions of human beings.

But at least it would be a final solution to the anti-vaxxer problem. Right, Mona?

 

 

 

 

Monday, 4 November 2013

WHO 'MURDERED' SHEIKH AHMED DEEDAT, ZIONISTS OR CHRISTIAN FANATICS?



WHO 'MURDERED' SHEIKH AHMED DEEDAT, ZIONISTS OR CHRISTIAN FANATICS?



Sheikh Deedat fell ill in 1996, "shortly after his trip to Australia"???

AUSTRALIA IS ZIONIST CONTROLLED!!!
 Remenber what happened to Yaser Arafat!
I believe Sheikh Ahmed Deedat was assassinated
Adalberto Erazo Jr.


5 Nov 2013 at 9:48 PM
Sheikh Ahmed Deedat was definitely assassinated*. This man was healthy as a horse that you could feel his energy. I have seen the Sheikh's lectures on the internet and I can tell you this man was energetic and persuasive in his debates especially for a man his age. He totally demolished the arguments of his adversaries exposing the contradictions in the Bible.  Some of his opponents would refuse to debate him or even use underhanded tactics in a debate such as the one with Anis Shorrosh who proved absolutely vacuous that I had to skip over his part as it bored me to the point that I almost fell asleep. Others were just outright lying snakes such as Christian Zionist Bapduh Jimmy Swaggart who had such religiosity that he was caught cheating on his wife with a prostitute. And Jimmy Swaggart had the nerve to criticize the Islamic institution of polygyny which is divinely ordained in the Quran which says to marry women in twos, threes, or fours but if you can't do justice than marry only one. The only holy book in the world that says this. 
The Sheikh on the other hand got your attention with the way he spoke and you can feel the integrity this man had in him that I knew he was telling the truth. The zionist Australian government, along with the Christian zionist elite, were obviously afraid of him because they knew that Sheikh Ahmed Deedat had the power to make people flock to Islam which would have demolished zionist control over Australia so they had him assassinated. After all had Islam been allowed to spread, would Australia now find itself involved in western zionist backed wars of aggression?
This is the video of his last lecture in Sydney, Australia 1996 which includes news clips in the beginning about Sheikh Ahmed Deedat.
 * You are absolutely right! (Basheer)

 READ WITH CARE: THE FOLLOWING IS WRITTEN BY MUSLIM AND ISLAM HATERS


Update (8 August 2005): Ahmed Deedat died this morning in South Africa. For more details, see the IPCI website, Durban's newspaper Daily News, and a report by Al-Jazeera who were among the first to report it. In the coming days, this news will certainly be all over the Muslim media.

DEEDAT’S DOWNFALL

Many readers have been asking whether Ahmed Deedat, the Muslim debater, is still alive. As of this writing (July 2005) he is alive, but he cannot speak and he is completely paralysed. In fact, Deedat has been in this condition since he suffered a rare kind of stroke nine years ago. Few people outside his home city of Durban are aware of this, and even fewer, know the sequence of events leading to this tragedy.
Four weeks before Deedat was stricken he attacked the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ in front of a large audience in Australia. These provocative lectures “raised the ire of the Australian government”, causing them to “threaten to deport him unless he toned down the content of his Good Friday lecture in Sydney.” (Daily News, Durban, 6 May 1996) Incidentally, Deedat’s inflammatory reputation caused Singapore to ban him from entering their country.

If a secular entity like the Australian government was so offended, what was the Christian church feeling? And more importantly what were they doing about it? Following is the record of how Christians responded in Durban where Deedat founded and directed the Islamic Propagation Centre International.

The publication of Deedat’s book “Combat Kit” (1992) marked the beginning of the end. This vicious and ridiculing attack on the Bible set in motion events which proved to be Deedat’s undoing. During the next year a small group of Christians prayed about these provocations. Finally I wrote Mr. Deedat a personal letter, in which I refuted two of his most vile and vicious attacks. He did not acknowledge receiving the hand-delivered letter — much less answer it.

[This personal letter is now displayed here. An expanded rebuttal which correlates with this letter has been available on this page already since 1996. This article reports about another visit to Deedat that is related to the same issue.]

In the following months a group of nearly two dozen pastors from many different churches and denominations deliberated and prayed about these mocking attacks on the Holy Bible. They decided to issue a stern public rebuke through an open letter in the Daily News of Durban. They warned him of God’s judgement because Deedat refused to retract his defamatory and unscholarly attacks against the Bible.
[See this page for a reproduction of the open letter.]

This confrontation — and the stroke that Deedat suffered 21 months later — is reminiscent of another confrontation between the apostle Paul and Elymas, the sorcerer. We read that Paul sharply rebuked him, “O full of all deceit and all fraud, you son of the devil, you enemy of all righteousness, will you not cease perverting the straight ways of the Lord? And now indeed, the hand of the Lord is upon you, and you shall be blind, not seeing the sun for a time.” (Acts 13:10,11) It should not surprise us that God vindicated his holiness by striking Elymas with temporary blindness. So also with Deedat: he suffered a severe stroke, rendering him speechless and paralysed.

God declares in his word, "Whoever stubbornly refuses to accept criticism will suddenly be broken beyond repair." (Proverbs 29:1)

Some readers might object to this line of reasoning, arguing that the stroke happened 21 months after the rebuke was issued. They would argue that there is no cause/effect relationship. However, the Bible (and also the Qur’an) clearly teach that God does not always punish sin immediately (Romans 2:1-4; surah 16:61). He shows forbearance and patience. God gave Deedat ample time to repent. It seems more than coincidental that Deedat was struck down four weeks after mocking the crucifixion in his Autralia lecture tour, climaxing with another attack on Good Friday, the highest commemorative day of Christianity. We believe that the stroke which silenced Deedat was an act of judgment, timed by God to happen on the heels of this broadside attack against the cornerstone doctrine of salvation. This particular provocation needs to be understood against the backdrop of Deedat’s repeated disregard to refutations and finally to a public warning. His mouth was shut and continues to be shut as long as he remains obstinate.

Giving a sharp rebuke should not be misunderstood as a vengeful act. Deedat was reminded — in the open letter of rebuke — that God could forgive him if he would admit his wrong. Unfortunately, neither at that time, nor on subsequent occasions when we visited him in his paralysed condition, did he stop attacking the Bible. Interestingly, he allowed me (and one of my friends) to pray for him when we visited him at his home — without any apparent healing taking place. On our next visit we followed up this unfinished matter by reminding Deedat that God’s Word says sin hinders our prayers from being answered. We read King David’s words, “If I regard iniquity in my heart, the Lord will not hear.” (Psalm 66:18) Then we reminded Deedat of the open letter of rebuke which preceded his stroke. We asked him whether he was now prepared to admit having done wrong.

Deedat spelled out his emphatic reply, one letter at a time, “I have no guilt on my head.” (Such communiques from Deedat are obviously inaudible. He indicates his choice of individual letters by blinking his eye.) It was — and still is — our sincere prayer that Deedat would humble himself and experience God’s mercy and healing.
David Foster
Durban, 10 July 2005

Postscript
Some readers have wondered why this article was written such a long time after the events had happened. Considering that it vindicates the Christian worldview, why did the author not report on the events leading up to Deedat’s downfall much sooner?

My refutation of ‘Combat Kit’ — an article similar to the personal letter I had given Deedat, but slightly longer — was offered to the public in an advertisement in the Daily News on the same page as the open letter to Deedat. But I did not follow this up with a report explaining our Christian interpretation of Deedat’s subsequent stroke (21 months later). Only my ‘Combat Kit’ refutation was published on the internet in 1996.
In the early months after Deedat was stricken, I reasoned that, as much as the warning against Deedat had been public knowledge so also, when he was stricken, those who lived in Durban (and probably other South Africans too) would connect the dotted lines and interpret this humbling event as punishment for his continued attacks on the Bible. What I did not fully realise was that the general public often does not clearly discern such implications, especially when these events stretched out over a 21 month period. Furthermore, many people outside of South Africa, who were aware of Deedat's mockeries, did not know he had been corrected and warned so they could not draw proper conclusions. They lacked the basic facts to come to understand that, indeed, God was vindicating and glorifying himself through these events.

As time passed I felt increasingly uneasy — even guilty — about not clarifying these matters. I realised that God vindicated his Word and his holiness by fulfilling the warning his servants had proclaimed 21 months earlier. It made more and more sense to me that we ought to now write an article which clearly explains how God glorified himself by punishing Deedat (note well: God did not immediately strike him dead). In 2002, I was grateful for the opportunity to write up salient aspects of this story in a Christian magazine but this still fell far short of making a widespread public announcement.

From time to time, during these last 9 years of Deedat’s confinement, I remember having misgivings about writing the story of Deedat's downfall. I wanted to keep my focus on loving Muslims by acts of kindness and witnessing to them with ‘gentleness’. I rationalized that, to divert my energies into writing this kind of an article, would undermine my main calling. Eventually, after consulting with other ministers of the gospel, the growing conviction I felt in my conscience was confirmed and I wrote the article, ‘Deedat's Downfall’. Let me assure you: writing it was not at all easy. Many times I either wanted to put it off or wanted to do other things.

I pondered the question of whether this story should be circulated primarily in Durban or on the worldwide web. I came to the conclusion, it should not be restricted to a local Durban audience since Deedat’s mockeries and attacks impacted the wider world, and indeed they still do — though perhaps to a lesser degree.

The above article on Deedat’s downfall was originally written in September 2004, but the editor of Answering Islam insisted that all claims need to be meticulously documented before it could be published. Since I was out of the country for twelve months, I was only able to access the text of my personal letter to Deedat and of the open letter published in the newspaper in July 2005.

Further Documentation
(Researched and compiled by Jochen Katz)
Appendix 1
On Monday May 6, 1996, the following made the front page of the Daily News, Durban’s main newspaper:
Deedat in Fight for Life
by Karen Jackman, Medical Reporter
 Controversial Muslim leader Mr. Ahmed Deedat is fighting for his life in Durban's Entabeni Hospital after suffering a stroke Mr. Deedat is in the neurological ward and is in a "very poor condition", ward staff said this morning.
Mr. Deedat, head of the Islamic Propagation Centre in Grey Street, Durban, collapsed on Friday afternoon immediately after a meeting with the centre's trustees, a distraught relative told the Daily News.
"We rushed him to Wentworth Hospital for a brain scan and later to Entabeni where he underwent another scan," said the relative.

"He is able to focus and is aware of what is going on around him, but he can't move. He is communicating with us by blinking his eyes."

The charismatic Mr. Deedat, 78, has had a life fraught with controversy, the most recent last month when he raised the ire of the Australian government.

The immigration authorities there had threatened to deport him unless he toned down the content of his Good Friday lecture in Sydney. The news of his illness had been received with shock in the Muslim world, particularly in Saudi Arabia.
(Source: originally discovered in this public mailing list archive (*), this article was verified directly with the newspaper.)

Appendix 2
The following paragraph reveals how Deedat came to “sow the seed of religious hatred”. It is found on the offical Hansard website of the government of New South Wales, one of the states in the nation of Australia.
Of course, other victims of racism are often Australians who are visibly different, especially women who wear Muslim attire. While I condemn such attacks, I also condemn attacks against Christians by Muslims who come to Australia to sow the seed of religious hatred. In this regard I refer to Islamic evangelist Sheik Ahmed Deedat, a South African who, on Good Friday, spoke about Easter, indulged in bible-bashing and incited racial hatred. I am all for freedom of speech, but our leaders should show some understanding and, above all, respect for the views and beliefs of others. Australia can do without people like Sheik Deedat. I do not know why he came to Australia or why he adopted such a confrontationist approach on Good Friday at a big public meeting at Sydney Town Hall when he disparaged the Christian faith. I certainly do not support such an approach. (Source)

Appendix 3
The official website of the Islamic Propagation Centre International states the following about its founder, Ahmed Deedat:
It was a sad day for us, particularly at the IPCI, when Sheikh Ahmed Deedat suffered a stroke, and lost his speech, his most potent gift that he used so effectively in his debates to propagate Islam.
Sheikh Deedat fell ill in 1996, shortly after his trip to Australia, which was a momentous tour. He gave one of his most passionate talks in front of a capacity crowd in Sydney, on the theme Easter: A Muslim viewpoint.
This was his last lecture before he suffered a stroke, and he has been bedridden since then. ...
(Source, accessed on 6 July 2005; bold and underline emphasis ours)
“Momentous” and “most passionate” may be the view of the representatives of this center of vicious anti-Christian polemics. In the end, it is God's view that counts.

Addition after the death of Deedat: Even the memorial message on the entry page of the IPCI website (published on the day of Deedat's death), indirectly admits to the charge of stirring up religious hatred when they state in their eulogy:
So fearless was his stand in defending the truth that Sheikh Deedat was refused entry into France and Nigeria on the pretext that ‘he would cause a civil unrest’. (Source, accessed on 8 August 2005)

Appendix 4
The information about Deedat's physical conditions given at the official IPCI website is so technically medical that a layperson can hardly understand what it means. However, there are a number of articles on the internet in which Muslims who love and admire Ahmed Deedat report about their visits of him. The following cuts out most of the eulogies and focuses on the health conditions. The full articles can be found at the links given as sources.
Bala A. Muhammad reports:
But perhaps a greater miracle than his existence, according to the Shaikh himself, is his ability to communicate, using his eyes only. Yusuf Deedat, who is almost always at the side of his father, has devised a simple method of communicating with the Shaikh using the letters of the alphabet. The 26 letters A-Z are grouped into five lines, each given a number from one to five. In this method A-E, for example, fall in Line One, F-J in Line Two, and so following. So, if for example the Shaikh wants Yusuf to call someone with the name Jabir, the Shaikh would indicate with his eyes that he wants to say something. Yusuf would then ask: Line One? (or just: One?) and the Shaikh would shake his head, meaning no, as the first letter of the name Jabir does not fall in Line One. Line Two? The Shaikh would nod his agreement as ‘J’ is in Line Two. Yusuf would call out the letters F, G, H, I, J? On the correct letter, the Shaikh would nod yes. Back again to Line One for the next letter. By the time Yusuf spells J.A. he knows that his father wants a JABIR.
... Mrs Deedat told me that the last doctor to visit the Shaikh came many years ago, as she has learnt all there is to treat her husband: she is now very familiar with all things intravenous and intra-muscular, she feeds the Shaikh through a tube directly inserted into his stomach, and prepares all the necessary medicaments. ...
(Source: Published originally in Weekly Trust, 29 March 2002, quoted as found on this page.)
The report of Muhammad Bin Abdullah Caraballo first circulated on various mailing lists, then posted on some forums and published in at least one Muslim magazine. This is an excerpt:
... Sheikh Ahmed Deedat has the locked in syndrome because of a cerebral vascular accident affecting the brain stem about 7 years ago. When this happened he was taken to Saudi Arabia for treatment together with his wife for about nine month after that the returned back to his house at Verulam and now being nursed by his wife. All I can say is to pray to Allah Subhana wataallah to give him shifaa. He obtains his nutrition via a gastrotomy (a pipe through his stomach). His wife has looked after him remarkably well considering the fact he has no bed sores whatsoever. His current medication comprises a twice daily regimen of humulin 30/70 as well as daily heparin. He requires ferrimed, one daily for his iron deficiency anaemia.
Although his body is total paralysed apart from his upper part of his head (from his nose upward) he cannot eat, drink, speak or swallow anything, but he is fully alert and he can communicate via a chart (on the wall at the back of his head-see the photo Attached), whereby each word is formed by him looking at the letters of the alphabet and in turn he nods his head with the appropriate word. In this way he is able to communicate with complete sentences. Subhanallah, he is paralysed but he hears what is so ever conveyed to him, understand and answer back using the chart.
(Source: A posting on this forum, dated 30 March 2004, (this forum is currently closed); most of this report — including a photo of Deedat — was also published in Islamic Voice, April 2004, online edition)
This posting (on a public discussion forum) displays another newspaper article about Deedat, New hi-tech bed for ailing scholar, Sunday Times, Durban, South Africa, Sunday 26 January 2003.
The World Islamic Propagation Establishment (UK) / The Comparative Religion Centre (WIPE(UK) / CRC Ltd.) published some photographs of Deedat taken in 1996 and February 1998. Their website, www.wipecrc.com, is now defunct, but another Muslim site has archived those pictures here. IPCI published one picture in its May/June 2004 newsletter. The IIS Photo Gallery has pictures of Deedat dated September 2004.
[Added on 14 August 2005] In a memorial article for Deedat by IslamOnline.net the following statements again confirmed the above reported details:
On May 3, 1996, Sheikh Ahmed Deedat suffered a stroke which left him paralyzed from the neck down, and also meant that he could no longer speak or swallow. He was flown to a hospital in Riyadh, where he was taught to communicate through a series of eye-movements. He spent the last nine years of his life in a bed in his home in Verulam, South Africa, ... (Source; accessed on 14 August 2005)

Postscript:
One should not make too much of such observations, but it is nevertheless interesting to note the timing of events.
6 April 1996     (Good Friday) Deedat gave a highly offensive talk in Sydney, mocking the death and resurrection of Jesus.
3 May 1996     Four weeks later, Friday afternoon in Durban (late night in Sydney), Deedat is cut down by a stroke and remains totally paralyzed.
11 July 2005     (Monday, 10 AM German and South African time), Answering Islam published the story behind Deedat's downfall.
8 August 2005     Four weeks later, Monday morning, Deedat died.
Along with many other Christians, we have prayed for Mr. Deedat to repent, to turn to Jesus, and to be healed. Deedat has certainly had more occasions than most people to learn about God's true message and offer of salvation, and God has given him much time to respond. Yet, he persisted in his rejection of the Gospel.
I want to leave the reader with two verses from the Word of God.
"Say to them, ‘As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live. Turn! Turn from your evil ways! Why will you die, O house of Israel?’" Ezekiel 33:11
God commanded Ezekiel to speak this warning to Israel in its disobedience, but the heart of God is the same today. He still desires that sinners repent instead of dying in their sins and perish. Yet the other is equally true when people persist in their rejection of God's message:
"Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows." Galatians 6:7
In the case of Ahmed Deedat, God has shown both his patience and his punishment.

Responses to Ahmed Deedat
Answering Islam Home Page



Tzipi Livni claims she had sex with two Palestinian figures, Erekat and Abed Rabbo and threatens them with video proof

Tel Aviv : Israel | Nov 06, 2013 at 12:40 PM PST
3 0
Views: 12,181
Back
1 of 5
Next
Tzipi Livni claims she had sex with two Palestinian figures, Erekat and Abed Rabbo and threatens them with video proof
Saeb Erekat , Tzipi Livni , Yasser Abed Rabbo Source: http://mtv.com.lb/en/News/271113
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and Israel's Justice Minister Tzipi Livni shake hands before their meeting in Jerusalem
The chief Israeli negotiator and Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, said this week that she has had sex with the chief negotiator for the Palestinian Authority in the peace negotiations with Israel, Saeb Erekat and the Secretary of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organisation(PLO) Yasser Abed Rabbo.

Livni's sexual misdemeanours have been the fodder of the political Arab rumour mill for years, but until now, what the foxy Israeli politician got up to behind closed doors was all guess work.

Lebanese newspaper Al Diyyar broke the story earlier this week that the Knesset Beauty had publicy stated that she and the chief Rabbi of Israel had decided that "It was ok for her to sleep and have sex with strangers, as long as it benefits Israel".

According to Al Diyyar, Livni said :“The room where I had sex with Palestinian figures as Saeb Erekat and Yasser Abed Rabbo was equipped with cameras.”

She also confirmed that the videos show Palestinian officials, nude, having sex with her.

Livni is now threatening a number of Arab figures to post these shot videos on YouTube if they do not execute what she orders them.

The Israeli paper Yedioth Ahronoth republished an interview with Livini by Time Magazine in which she admitted that during her years working for the intelligence agency Mossad, she performed "special operations" -- including having sex with prominent political figures and then blackmailing them. We're sure it was "special" for both of you, Livni!

Yedioth Ahronoth quoted the Rabbi Ari Shefat as saying: " The Jewish religion allows Israeli women to have sex with enemies to get important information that leads to their arrest".

According to the Arab press, Livni has previously admitted that she doesn't mind killing or having sex with someone in exchange for information that could benefit Israel.

Commentary

Of course, the Palestinian people are very shocked from these allegations. Many are calling for the Palestinian leadership to respond to these allegations, which if proven, will certainly destroy the Palestinian Authority.

The Palestinian Authority is negotiating since 1993, for the Palestinian people to have an independent state on the territories occupied in 1967.

I think if Livini's allegations are true, she should publish the video to prove her claims.

The Israel minister has previously admitted that she had sex with Arab leaders. She also admitted that she assassinated an Iraqi scientist in Paris, in addition to the assistant of one of the Palestinian revolution leaders, Khalil al-Wazir, in Athens. None of these allegations had been confirmed or proven either by videos or photos as she claimed.

However, her statements, this time, carry several meanings, one of them is to impose pressure on the Palestinian people to give up on their conditions for negotiations, most important among these conditions is East Jerusalem to be the capital of Palestine.

For sure, Livni's declarations are the beginning of the storm. Certainly, more details on this regard, will be released in the coming days.

 MY COMMENTARY

This "news" could be fake, but I always claimed the PLO in Paris was an Israeli front used to assassinate all real Freedom fighters joining the French Zionist Organisation (PLO).  I said that to Vanessa Redgrave once in Paris.

So, this would not surprise me at all!

BAFS


Blog Archive