be-tachbūlōt ta`aseh lekhā milchāmāh
Hebrew בתחבולות תעשה לך מלחמה
Ha Mossad, le Modiyn ve le Tafkidim Mayuhadim [the Institute for
Intelligence and Special Operations].
Our motto is: By way of
deception, thou shalt do war.
Devise des services terroristes sionistes.
See also: Victor Ostrovsky
I am always watching you! SIMBA
Bible (Proverbs 24:6): “For by ruses thou shalt make thy war.”
(In the King James version, the Hebrew word Takhbulot is translated as “wise counsel”.
(In the King James version, the Hebrew word Takhbulot is translated as “wise counsel”.
In Modern Hebrew it means ruses, tricks, ploys – and
that is the way it is understood by all Hebrew-speakers today.)"
24 September 2005 - BAFS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE2EozgEUt0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQQClUWLxY0
Conor McGregor vs Khabib Nurmagomedov - No Respect Moments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EG_2-IE1J3Y
Published on 7 Oct 2018
Conor McGregor vs. Khabib Nurmagomedov
Full Title Fight 6th October 2018 : khabib team attacks conor
Best of UFC 229: Conor McGregor vs.
Khabib Nurmagomedov
#UFC #UFC229 #KhabibMcGregor
In the Name of Allah, Most Beneficent, Most Merciful.
26 Sep
2005 at 17:48
Home Office Task Force on Preventing
Islamic "Extremism"
Soon after the 7 July London bombings, Tony Blair
speaking at a meeting of Muslim “leaders”
and opposition politicians, said that that it was time to confront and defeat
"this evil ideology". A
task force to tackle Muslim extremism "head on" was set up.
The network had as its aim to dissuade
young Muslims from turning to “extremism”. [1]
No sooner had the British Government
said jump; some Muslims responded by saying in true colonial subject style, “Yes Sir how high would you like us to jump”. To some Muslims, saying No to Government is simply not in their
vocabulary. To them, just being in the presence of Government Officials
is an awe inspiring experience. Others are involved for the progression
of their political party careers and to serve their Leader, Blair. Many others
are on board to milk the system for their own pet interests and projects.
There is also another group of participants, a new breed of Muslims seeking to
become Islamic consultants in the manner of Race consultants (so the
recommendations will inevitably involve commissioning out identified areas of
work). These Muslims have made, or wish to make a career in an Islamic
Relations Industry to rival the race experts. Of course there are also
many that are sincere but politically naïve, and then there are also those who
genuinely believe that their version of Islam is the true one, and has been
hijacked by extremists who need to be countered.
This task force is part of the
Governments agenda. It is exactly this same mainstreaming process which has
been adopted with the Black community here and in the United States. It
is a strategy for disempowering Muslims, strengthening the position of
establishment Muslims and creating division and dissension between Muslims.
The British Government understands the
psychology of some Muslims well. It has its own agenda and knows how to get it
through. It knows it can always hoodwink these types of Muslims, time and
time again. Take the Downing Street meeting in July for example, in which
Blair basically called along Muslims for his photoshoot for the media, and to
launch his tirade against Islam. One prominent Sheikh who attended, admitted on
Islam Channel that they were unprepared, they were invited late on the evening
before, they had little idea what they were being called for, yet they still
turned up! It is this style of operation which has been a hallmark
of the Governments so called fact finding meetings led by Hazel Blears.
The agendas and terms of discussion are already set before selected local
Muslims turn up. The result is that the Government hears what it wants to hear
“tackle extremism” tackle “social problems”.
“Muslim leaders recognized that it is not enough
just to condemn the bombings but that they must also act with us to tackle
extremism”.[2]
Of course, the Government had already decided that
this was the issue to be tackled.
But who amongst this group of compliant Muslims
understood the Governments agenda and was prepared to question the very
thinking underlying it.
Like the reports by Cantle on Community Cohesion,
in which right wing extremists provoked riots in Northern Towns, but the cause
and remedy focused on Muslim “separatism”
and “parallel lives”; so too the
Governments agenda is to reform Islam and Muslims instead of reforming their own
foreign policies and support for the State of Israel. This despite the fact
that we now have the words of both the suspected bomber of 7/7 and those of the
copycat attacks later; telling us exactly what led them to their “extremism” - the actions of the British
Government in the Muslim world.
So if we know the causes, what need is their for
such a task force? Except that this is has become some kind of collective
Inquisition/punishment for the actions of a handful of Muslims. When a
non-Muslim attacked a number of pubs in London, (frequented by homosexuals and
caused death and destruction) some years ago, there was no collective
punishment or inquiry into right wing extremism despite the links. The attacks
were classed by the Police and the media as the actions of a lone individual.
Yet here, not only is the Islamic faith under interrogation but also all of its
institutions.
A further question that should have
been asked is what is the definition of “Islamic
extremism”? To be fair to Tony Blair, he
openly defined it in his Downing Street meeting with Muslims. (Muslims who
support Shariah, are against the State of Israel, and wish to see an Islamic
State or States. i.e those who view Islam as an all encompassing way of life
(Deen) as opposed to a spiritual lifestyle choice that does no challenge the
dominant political ideologies of the West, namely, Capitalism, Socialism, and
Secularism (it is okay to have an Islamic lifestyle as long as you join
Socialist Parties and your politics are based on a product of Western
ideology). But when your ideas are shaped by the politics of Islam then that is
extremism. So George Galloway’s or Ken Livingstone’s comments and
opposition to the occupations of Iraq and Palestine are not classed as
extremism, even though their comments, in terms of language, are more extreme
than those of Islamists.
Muslims on the task force have either
accepted Blair’s definition of extremism, in which case they are part and
parcel of the Governments agenda, or, they are working on a task force in which
the basic nature and scope of the problem remains undefined. So, how can
you tackle a problem that is not defined? Since the task force was
launched the scope of the problem has now been extended yet again. One of
the working groups is about “Tackling
Extremism and Radicalization”.
Now, being radicalized is also a problem, but who questioned what this
means? Once again this applies only to Islamists. Being radicalized into
left wing/socialist activism is not considered problematic by either the
Government or the Muslims on this task force.
A further question that should have
been raised is, why only an investigation into Muslim Extremism, what about
Jewish, Christian and Hindu Extremism. Isn’t this discriminatory in
itself. Or have these Muslims accepted that only Muslims can be “extremists”? Many other religious groups
have “extremist” ideologies. For example, one only needs to switch on satellite
channels and watch some of the Christian Channels, or, listen to some of the
broadcasts on Christian radio to find examples of preachers of hate and
extremist ideas. What about the report by Dr. Ram Punyani on Hindu
Extreme Right Wing Groups: ideology and consequences published by Leicester
University. What about the neo-conservative ideology that both Blair and Bush
subscribe to?
Extremism is in the eye of the
beholder. For example, many Muslims and non-Muslims alike would consider
the Jewish State, (Israel) which many Jews believe was promised to them by God,
as the epitomy of fundamentalism, intolerance and extremism. Jews all over the
world pay for this State, they support the emigration of Jews from other lands,
to steal and occupy the land and property of indigenous Palestinians. Yet Blair
accepts this racist state for the Jews, presumably because the European psyche
has a sense of guilt over the Holocaust. But, Blair would not accept a
separate state for African Americans and Indigenous people in the United
States, they too suffered at the hands of the Europeans. Its okay for Jews to have
a Jewish State, but not for Muslims to have an Islamic State.
Home Office officials would undoubtedly
argue that Muslims have gone overseas for military training and were
responsible for the London bombs. But, does anyone for one instance
think that if Britain so much as mentioned attacking the State of Israel, let
alone attack invade and kill their people that their would be no retaliation by
Jews in this country? And don’t Jews from Britain raise funds for
extremist Israel and go for military training? If a single Jew was killed by
the British State or held in conditions like Guanatanamo, British Jews would
likely sever all relations with the Government here, and if Britain ever went
to war with Israel few would support “our boys”
A further fallacy is to compare Right
Wing extremists with so called Muslim “extremists”. This has
happened partly because of comments in the media by so called moderate Muslims
such as from the Muslim Council of Britain, who when faced with media hype
about so called Muslim “extremist preachers” declared that these individuals are our equivalent to BNP
extremists. The drawing of comparisons between Right wing extremists and
Islamic Extremism is a false one. Right wing extremist organizations have
an ideology which is essentially racist and based on white supremacy; they
incite hatred between white and non white communities. So called Islamic
“extremists” have an ideology based on a political agenda of liberating the Muslim
world from occupation and tyrannical regimes.
Part of the task force’s aim is supposedly to come
up with policies towards “disaffected”
young Muslims who are turning towards a non-Western Islamic political ideology
(considered as “extremism”). This
argument is based on an arrogant and racist - Eurocentric assumption i.e you
are disaffected if you adopt Islamic political ideas. Who says so? Can
young Muslims not turn to Islamic political ideas because they believe that
they are the better political option for people? Might not these young Muslims
simply have been convinced by the intellectual veracity of the Islamic
arguments?
Western politicians, consider only Western
political ideas can be universal and aspired too. Anyone who does not
adopt them is considered backward and medieval and must be deeply disaffected,
impoverished or brainwashed by some “extremist”
preacher. Hence there are a number of working groups looking at social issues
within the task force. Whilst many of the issues may be worth considering
on their own, they cannot be linked to a growing Islamic Political resurgence
in the Muslim world, which stems from a failure of western secular and
nationalistic political ideas in the Muslim world and Western foreign policies.
The task force is about to report soon. It does not
take a genius to understand the Governments Agenda and its likely
outcomes.
Its agenda is simple, to reform Islam and
Muslims. It will advance this in a number of ways.
1.
It will increase Government interference in the
Islamic faith, thus further eroding Muslim rights to freedom of religion.
2.
It will further seek to influence and take control
of Islamic institutions such as Mosques, training of Imams and delivery
of Khutbas (something that has already happened in the rest of Europe).
3.
It will seek to further integrate Muslims into
Western political activity and ideas, even if that means directing them towards
Socialist parties and groups.
4.
It will seek to create a class of establishment
career Muslims (a Muslim Middle Class who will play the same role as members of
the Black community who have become part of the establishment).
5.
It will focus on Muslims themselves fighting “extremism” and try to create division by
endorsing the Moderate/extremism divide.
6.
There may also be a special unit within the Police
to combat extremism, likely to be led by a Muslim.
No doubt there will be some carrots thrown in such
as more funding for Islamic schools, and some kind of development/regeneration
agency for Muslims/young Muslims/women.
Blair however, will achieve what he wants, and will
now have the ability to say that his agenda has been developed “in consultation with Muslims”, including high
profile individuals such as Tariq Ramadan, Yusuf Islam, and Hamza Yusuf
(there to give the agenda added legitimacy). Blair will likely present his
plans at the Labour Party conference in a couple of week’s time in front of the
media. Opportunist Muslim Parliamentarians will use the task force to
promote themselves as Blair loyalists, hence working their way up the ladder at
the expense of British Muslims. There will be plenty of work for
consultants and Muslims seeking to establish their careers, and places on “influential” committees.
The net result however will be to endorse the idea
that genuine Islam is the “moderate”
spiritual Islam devoid of Islamic political ideas, which has to be reclaimed
from the “extremists”. The
control of Islam in Britain will be further handed to the British Government
thus paving the way for the development of an Islam in the model of the Church
of England, one that is secular in nature and subservient to the State.
Muslims unfortunately are in danger of becoming partners in providing the
British Government a decisive role in shaping a reformed Islam.
Jahangir Mohammed
Director Centre for Muslim Affairs.
c-m-a@fsmail.net
To unsubscribe from: Party for
Islamic Renewal, just follow this link:
Click this link, or copy and
paste the address into your browser.
Powered by Mojo Mail
2.8.8
Copyright © 1999-2003, Justin Simoni.
Copyright © 1999-2003, Justin Simoni.
· Home Office Task Force on Preventing Islamic
Extremism
Yahoo/PIR
Party for
Islamic Renewal <list@tajdeedmail.net>
To:bafremauxsoormally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqOba9et0lY
Reed Elsevier 7/7 drills: 'spooky coincidence' Peter Power Visor Consultants on CBC
Published on 3 Jul 2015
Peter Power 'exercise' by arms firm consultant Reed Elsevier
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/view...
Peter Power on the Canadian Broadcasting Service
In the days after 7th July, rather than face questioning about his role, in conjunction with a 'company of over a thousand people' on the day that 56 were killed on London transport, Power flew to Toronto for the 15th World Conference on Disaster Management.
Power appeared on a discussion panel for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's news discussion programme CBC News: Sunday, in which the host remarked upon the 'extraordinary' coincidence of Power's rehearsal scenario:
Evan Solomon: We've heard something quite extraordinary - could be a coincidence or not - that your firm, on the very day that the bombs went off in London, were running an exercise simulating three bombs going off, in the very same tube stations that they went off. How did this happen? Coincidence, or were you acting on information that you knew?
Peter Power: I don't think you could say that we had some special insight into the terrorist network, otherwise I would be under arrest myself. The truth of it is -
Solomon: But it is a coincidence.
Power: It's a coincidence, and it's a spooky coincidence. Our scenario was very similar - it wasn't totally identical, but it was based on bombs going off, to the time, the locations, all this sort of stuff. But it wasn't an accident, in the sense that London has a history of bombs, and the reason why our emergency services did so well, and prepared probably better than any other city in the world, sadly they have to be. So it wasn't exactly rocket science or totally out of the pale to come up with that scenario unusual though it be to stop the exercise and go into real time, and it worked very well, although there was a few seconds when the audience didn't realise whether it was real or not.
Power went on to tell delegates at the disaster management conference that Canadians needed to open their eyes, advising:
"You can't just lay back and say, 'Well it's cozy, we've been lucky. We're just nice guys. It won't happen to us. Sorry. The alarm bell is ringing now. When it happens, you don't want to say, 'well that was a wake-up call'.n
'Mock Broadcasts' and the 7/7 terror rehearsal
On 8th July 2005, the day after the death and destruction in London, an interview with Peter Power appeared on page 5 of the Manchester Evening News in which Mr Power revealed that, not only had he coincidentally been running a terror rehearsal 'based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened' on 7th July, he had also organised a series of 'mock broadcasts' for the rehearsal operation that were apparently so realistic those participating in the exercise became confused about what was real and what was not:
Mr Power said: "I was an inspector at the time of the King's Cross fire and was involved in co-ordinating the operation.
"After leaving the Met, I set up my own crisis managment consultancy. Yesterday we were actually in the City working on an exercise involving mock broadcasts when it happened for real.
" When news bulletins started coming on, people began to say how realistic our exercise was - not realising there was an attack.
We then became involved in a real crisis which we had to manage for the company."
Mr Power added: "During the exercise we were working on yesterday, we were looking at a situation where there had been bombs at key London transport locations - although we weren't specifically looking at a scenario where there had been a bomb on a bus.
"It's a standard exercise and briefing that we carry out."
Source: Manchester Evening News, Page 5 - 8th July 2005
Indeed, rehearsing attacks on public transport networks -- now seemingly known by their Americanised name of 'transit systems' -- are fairly commonplace in the world of State and Corporate terror exercises. On 8th January 2006, the government of Singapore conducted their own "standard exercise and briefing" called Operation Northstar V, a multi-agency civil emergency exercise:
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-t...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwyzpzEgUWE
7/7 Ripple Effect 2
Published on 6 Jul 2012
Muad'Dib's expanded new version of the acclaimed original 7/7 Ripple Effect.
After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.
Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by claimed by the official and corporate media.
"I must say, in my opinion this is a masterpiece. In less than an hour, the film explains how this whole event was planned, how it was staged, what went wrong, how the authorities sought to cover it up and the failure of the press to cover it adequately. I think it is as marvellous a microcosm for understanding the nature of inside-jobs as anyone has ever produced, so I must congratulate you and tell you how much I admire your work."
- James H. Fetzer, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota about the original 7/7 Ripple EFfect.
"It is an example of critical journalism thatdraws wholly on public news sources to formulate a controversial, but plausible, theory. After deploying three different theories of truth to develop insights into new and existing evidence, it is the BBC / Government theory that has alower level of correspondence with known .facts., is incoherent to the point of being implausible, and is more likely to distort its reports because of institutional controls and political pressures."
- Rory Ridley-Duff Ph.D., senior lecturer in human resource management and organisation behaviour, Sheffield Hallam University.
No comments:
Post a Comment