"When
will Muslims wake up and
unite?"
Title
question posed by our Brother in Islam Dr Kevin Barrett
of "TRUTH
JIHAD RADIO" recorded on Ashura
Guest:
Ibrahim Soudy of Architects
and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
I
am a nobody compared to those highly qualified Ph.D.s. and Truth
Jihaadists, but I still want my voice out (whether it is heard or not
is not my immediate concern) even as an amateur, but I am very well
aware that I am a quite knowledgeable lifelong researcher (to some
extent) in matters of Truth Jihaad which I have been waging since my
teens (well over half a century now) against all Muslim, Arab and
Islam haters, and against even the so-called Muslims, including my
own decadent blood family. But, let me see what those two Truth
Jihaadist Brothers of the Faith have to offer us although my "faith"
may not be comparable to theirs. With his "ten different
structural engineering licenses", I am curious to see what Truth
that great Ph.D. Ibrahim Soudy has to offer to the world, and to
Muslims, and as possible solutions to the problems of humanity in
general, and in particular to the decadent Ummah of Muhammad.
First,
decades ago, I did not need a Ph.D. to have understood and to suggest
that there was an "urgent need for intra-Muslim dialogue aimed
at finding a basis for unity", but more than 20 years later, I
found out to my horror that despite intra-Muslim dialogue at many
levels the division among Muslims grew worse for many reasons, mainly
political and materialistic, which caused the spiritual impotency of
the well educated (mostly westernised) Middle Class Muslims.
I
was unable to see the point of Pr Ibrahim Soudy when he said
"So, let's refrain from using words like "terrorists",
during this broadcast, and when talking about "Al Shabaab, ISIS,
Boko Haraam and Al Qaeda". But, his point was clear to me when
he speaks of Muslim reactionaries instead of creativity, but I
disagree with him when he speaks of Muslims being "inactive
politically in America". First, I do not like that term
"America". I prefer the word US America.
Yes,
Islam has remained intact as a world view, thank God, but to what
purpose? The well documented fact is that the Christian and now
decadent Judeo-Christian West has been waging war against the entire
world for world domination and in particular against the Muslim
worlds (people) who always acted as opposition forces to their
ambition of global hegemony for material gains by mass murder and
plunder!
Yes,
Dr Kevin Barrett is right in stressing the closeness of Islam to
Christianity, and the necessity of Muslims to reach out to Non
Muslims as well as to all Muslims, but unfortunately as Pr Ibrahim
Soudy says Western Christianity is dying fast. This would have been
an appropriate moment to remind us about the great Jihaad of Sheikh
Imran Nazar Hosein in promoting Eastern Christianity and Islam
rapprochement and the role of French essayist and philosopher Alain
Soral in promoting Catholic and Islam rapprochement.
What
really shocked me however was the incredible statement made by Pr
Ibrahim about changing wrong "with your
hands peacefully"! Was is just a lapsus on his part
as he should know that this is an impossibility and exactly what the
tyrants want of their victims Muslims and non Muslims alike! They
call it "peaceful and non violent resistance" through
useless petitions, public demonstrations (State and Police controlled
picnics, and "democratic elections" meant only to guarantee
a status quo in their favour !
When
Pr Ibrahim Soudy recommends and suggests that Muslims must go out and
build locally and globally a dialogue with other Muslims (intra-Islam
dialogue), is he suggesting that this is something new? Why did he
not mention what has already been attempted by so many others before
and with what results? Is he also saying that we must "create"
International Conference as if this has never happened before even if
I am in agreement with that old idea?
At
long last, at 56:50 of the interview I hear the Professor mention in
his concluding remarks the word "Shura", but strangely
enough he did not seem to be aware that decades ago there was already
a very serious attempt at this kind of Shura trying to unite Sunnis,
Shia's. and all Muslims worldwide including even the Black racist or
racialist "Nation of Islam" under the Majlis al Shura fi
Britaniya name by the media as the Muslim Parliament of Great
Britain. I 'heard' or read somewhere only after the death of Dr
Kalim Siddiqui in South Africa that is was funded by Iran! But, his
successor Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui betrayed its ideals and sold out to
the British government and went out to found with another traitor Dr
Shaaz Mahboob the "British Muslims for Secular Democracy"
(BMSD) with a view to please their British and Jewish masters and
join their Kufr system of government. Years later, when I saw a lady
promoting the BMSD on my facebook page "Ghyslaine ROC", I
responded straight away denouncing it in just a few lines of
commentary, but this was sufficient for facebook to block my account
(to this very day!) which I held for several years since the
introduction of Jewish Mark Zuckberg (Mark?) social media monopoly.
This was more evidence to me how bogus was the BMSD. I denounced
years ago many such bogus so-called Muslim Movements here in London,
like the post Dr Kalim Siddiqui's "Muslim Parliament" led
by that traitor Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui!
GHYSLAINE ROC'S REPLY TO MARK ZUCKERBERG & CO FOR STEALING HER PRIVATE PROPERTY ON FACEBOOK (ZIOBOOK)
Tuesday, 19 August 2014
Ziobook
- Hazardous to the Truth
A
message to the ZioNazi’s at ZioBook. This
is for all the good people posting the truth and getting their
accounts deleted, for that Ziobook,
go f... yourself.
For all the ZioTrolls coddled and sheltered in their Ziobook
home, how
about, go f... yourself.
A person should use Ziobook only as required, then treat it
like the soiled condom of the most obnoxious guest imaginable. TJP
(Kenneth O'Keefe Truth Justice Peace)
I
read a couple of Dr Jeffery Lang's books, his great journey to Islam,
and another must read book:
Struggling to Surrender - Rahnuma eBooks Library
Even
Angels ask; A Journey to Islam in America
I
think if Pr Ibrahim Soudy were to be more credible, he should not
ignore the Jihaad of others in their effort and dedication to unite
the Ummah of Muhammad. He did not even mention the efforts of Dr
Kevin Barrett to bring Jews, Christians and Muslims together. In
conclusion, I have serious doubts about his entire truthfulness
because of his damning statement about "peaceful"
resistance to evil (wrong, tyranny, oppression, etc.), which is not
at all logical or even Islamic!
How
long will Muslims let themselves be hoodwinked,
divided, and
conquered?
FOR EVER!!!
BAFS
Saturday
31st of October 2015
From Daryl's Encyclopaedia
THE MUSLIM MANIFESTO - a strategy for survival
Sunday, 8 January 2012
MUHARRAM - HAPPY ISLAMIC NEW YEAR 1433-36 AH (2011-2014)
Sunday, 4 December 2011
ASHURA IN THE QUR'AAN AND SUNNAH - MUSLIM RÊVERIE - JEHANZEB DAR
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
Sunday, 8 January 2012
THE MUSLIM MANIFESTO - a strategy for survival
Muslim Parliament Manifesto
From Daryl's Encyclopaedia
THE MUSLIM MANIFESTO - a strategy for survival
Dr Kalim
Siddiqui (RA) Former Director of The Muslim Institute
Dr Kalim Siddiqui former leader of Majlis al-Shura fi
Britanya (Muslim Parliament)
INTRODUCTION
This manifesto is the outcome of a process of consultation, writing and revision over several months. It is now being offered for wider debate in the Muslim community. We hope that a number of regional consultation conferences will be held all over the country in the next few months. To set that process of consultation in motion, the Muslim Institute has arranged a one-day conference on “The Future of Muslims in Britain”. This conference will be held in the Logan Hall, the Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1, on 14 July 1990.
(Dr) Kalim Siddiqui
Director of The Muslim Institute
6 Endsleigh Street
London WC1H 0DS
CONTENTS
Page No
The Historical Situation 1
Assumptions 2
The Founders’ Council 3
The Council of British Muslims 4
The General Assembly of Muslims in Britain 5
The Council of Muslim Women in Britain 6
The Congress of Muslim Youth and Students in Britain 7
Relationship with the British authorities 8
Goals of the Muslim community in Britain 9
General guidelines for the life of the Muslim individual in Britain 11
A strategy for survival 13
History – the British obsession 14
History – the Muslim response 15
What is survival? 16
Mosques in Britain 17
Ulama in Britain 18
Role of trustees of mosques 19
The Muslim Agenda 20
The Satanic Verses 21; Islam in Britain 23; Da’wah 24;
Existing Muslim or Islamic organisations 25; Education 26;
Muslim Personal Law 27; The Muslim Law Commission 28;
Financing higher education 29; Muslim Weekend Colleges 30;
The Islamic University 31; The Muslim Ummah Fund 42.
Glossary 33
- 1 -
THE HISTORICAL SITUATION
It is a matter of deep regret that the Government, all political parties and the mass media in Britain are now engaged in a relentless campaign to reduce Muslim citizens of this country to the status of a disparaged and oppressed minority. We have no alternative but to resist this invidious campaign. To do so Muslims in Britain must define their collective goals and move towards a consensus on major issues. The established network of 1,000 mosques and a wide range of organisations already serving the community must develop greater cohesion and dynamism. This manifesto attempts to provide a common text defining the Muslim situation in Britain. It also seeks to provide a framework for the healthy growth of all parts of the community as well as a common Muslim identity and purpose. Maxim: Muslims will resist and fight all forms of oppression.
- 2 -
ASSUMPTIONS
Of all the major religions of the world, Islam is the most “politicised”. At its inception Islam created a political platform from which Muslims were to launch themselves on a global role as founders of great States, empires and a world civilisation and culture. Political and cultural subservience goes against their grain. Yet in Britain today Muslims are being asked to accept subservience and the total disintegration of their identity, culture and religion, as the only real options open to them. This manifesto is based on the following assumptions:
1. that Muslims in Britain have to accept neither subservience as their inevitable and permanent condition nor the disintegration of their identity, culture and religion;
2. that, despite being a minority, Muslims here can define and pursue goals compatible with the goals of the global Ummah, the world community of Muslims, of which they are an integral part;
3. that Muslims in Britain need to create institutions and mobilise resources in pursuit of these goals;
4. that for Muslims this is also the only way to secure an honourable place in the wider British society;
5. that the option of “integration” and/or “assimilation” that is on offer as official policy in Britain must be firmly resisted and rejected.
Maxim: Muslims must develop their own identity and culture within Britain and as part of a global Muslim community, the Ummah.
- 3 -
THE FOUNDERS’ COUNCIL
It is proposed that a Founders’ Council is created to adopt and launch this manifesto. The composition of the Founders’ Council will be announced in due course.
- 4 -
THE COUNCIL OF BRITISH MUSLIMS (CBM)
Muslims in Britain need a platform to debate issues vital to them as citizens of this country. They also need a platform where all shades of opinion can be freely expressed. Above all, Muslims need a body that can speak with authority on their behalf. A process of debate and deliberation to guide Muslim opinion towards a consensus requires a “house of representatives”. However, the mechanism for achieving an “elected” house does not at present exist. Community-wide institutionalisation and organisation will have to reach a very advanced stage before an “electoral” process can be introduced. It is possible for a carefully selected, balanced and “invited” house to be “representative of the Muslim community in Britain. This is the only practical option open to us at present. This body will be known as The Council of British Muslims (CBM). It will act as a “Muslim parliament” in Britain. Maxim: Consultation and consensus is our method.
- 5 -
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MUSLIMS IN BRITAIN
Once The Council of British Muslims has been set up, steps will be taken to create a General Assembly of Muslims in Britain. The General Assembly may consist of up to 500 members. The membership of the General Assembly will be by invitation. It will consist of individuals and representatives of organisations, including those catering for the specialised needs of women, youth, students, businessmen, professionals and academics, etc. The General Assembly will be so constituted as to reflect the full spectrum of Muslim life in Britain. Every effort will be made to invite a large number of women to be members of the General Assembly. The General Assembly will meet once a year.
- 6 -
THE COUNCIL OF MUSLIM WOMEN IN BRITAIN
Muslim women have to play a crucial part in securing the future of Muslims in Britain. Muslim women in Britain are going into higher education and their numbers in the professions are rapidly expanding. But, ironically, women are more oppressed and exploited in the allegedly sexually “liberated” and “emancipated” west today than was the case in the traditional Islamic, or even non- Islamic, societies of Asia and Africa. Western-style “liberation” and “emancipation” does not meet the needs of Muslim women living in Britain. A sea-change in the lifestyle and social role of Muslim women in inevitable and desirable. It is for Muslim women themselves to develop an Islamic lifestyle in the context of the needs of the Muslim community in Britain. It is also for Muslim women to play a major part in the public life of the Muslim community in Britain. The position of women has long been the target of a vicious hate campaign directed against Islam itself. The west’s jaundiced view of women in Islam has gained strength by the attempt of women from some westernised Muslim families to feign a bogus “liberated” lifestyle. The fact is that a Muslim woman cannot be a western woman. Neither is the social role or lifestyle of Muslim women merely a question relating to modes of dress and hijab. The position of women in a Muslim community goes deeper than hijab, education, career, right to work, property, divorce, etc. Muslim women in Britain are in a unique position to develop a comprehensive lifestyle all their own in which they can develop their talents and achieve their ambitions to the full, always guided by Islam. However, this will only happen if Muslim women have a platform of their own. We propose the setting up of The Council of Muslim Women in Britain (CMWB). Maxim: Muslim women have a higher and nobler place in society than the so-called “emancipated” women have in the west.
- 7 -
THE CONGRESS OF MUSLIM YOUTH AND STUDENTS IN BRITAIN
The public commitment of the Muslim youth in Britain to Islam and their Muslim culture and identity has been a major revelation of The Satanic Verses affair. There is clearly no “generation gap” between the first generation Muslim immigrants and their children born and brought up in Britain. What is more, our youth is largely uncontaminated by the culture of alcoholism, drugs, sexual promiscuity and other forms of delinquency that is rampant among the youth of mainstream British society. Studies have shown that Muslim children are among those groups who have performed way above average in schools, colleges and universities. The young Muslims, men and women, must be well represented in all the new and old Muslim institutions and organisations. “Islamic societies” have long been established in British universities, polytechnics and colleges of higher and further education. However, so far their activities have been limited to arranging Friday prayers and mixing a little Islamic culture with their secular education. Few Islamic societies have ever attempted to improve their members’ understanding of the Islamic philosophy of science or the wider questions of epistemology. Education for the sake of a secular career and lifestyle has remained unaffected by the existence of Islamic societies. We must now develop a specialised body to help the Muslim youth and students to fashion a lifestyle committed to the attainment of the wider and long-term goals of Islam and the Muslim community in Britain.
To achieve this goal and to provide youth and students a platform for the growth and development of their own potential, steps will be taken to set up a Congress of Muslim Youth and Students in Britain. Maxim: Muslim youth must participate fully in shaping the future of Muslims in Britain.
- 8 -
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BRITISH AUTHORITIES
1. Islam allows Muslims to accept protection of life, property, and liberty from non-Muslim rulers and their political systems. Muslims placed in this situation may also pay taxes and other dues to a non-Muslim State ...
2. Muslims living under the protection of a non-Muslim State must obey the laws of that State, so long as such obedience does not conflict with their commitment to Islam and the Ummah. Other minorities in Britain, notably Jews and Roman Catholics, do the same.
3. There are laws on the British Statute Book that are in direct conflict with the laws of Allah; these relate to such matters as usury, abortion, homosexuality, gambling, sale and consumption of alcohol, and the abolition of capital punishment; Muslims can neither agree with nor condone any part of a legal and social agenda which so flagrantly violates the laws of nature as well as of God.
4. Muslims will co-operate with the appropriate authorities for the maintenance of law and order and the promotion of peaceful and wholesome conditions for all our fellow citizens ...
5. Muslims will insist, and continue to insist for as long as it may be necessary, that the British State provide them, their religion and culture protection from gratuitous insult, obscenity and abuse ...
6. Muslims make it clear to the State, and all sections of British society, that they do not expect to be and will not tolerate being insulted and abused on grounds of their religion, culture and traditions.
Maxim: We are Muslims first and last.
- 9 -
GOALS OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY IN BRITAIN
1. To perform the Qur’anic requirement of “enjoining right conduct and forbidding indecency”.1
2. To consolidate the Muslim population in Britain into an organised community in pursuit of the goals set by Islam ...
3. To achieve the highest possible level of collective taqwa and all-round moral and material excellence ...
4. To develop the Muslim community as an island of peace, harmony and moral excellence, free of promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, drinking, gambling, drug-addiction, fornication and the related social and moral disorders which plague our age ...
5. To create and develop institutions capable of serving the Muslim community in such specialised fields as education, health, research, publishing, the arts, trade and investment ...
6. To develop and microcosm of unity in the Ummah across the cultural, ethnic and theological diversity that is found in the Muslim community in Britain ...
7. To create, where such do not already exist, specialised bodies for Muslims in the major professions, e.g., medicine, engineering, law, accountancy, teaching, etc ...
8. To secure for Muslim men and women at work or children in schools the right to worship, the right to halal food and the right to dress in the proper Islamic manner ...
9. To develop community and family based support for the less fortunate – widows, orphans, old, sick, infirm, disabled and the unemployed ...
Maxim: Muslims will pursue moral excellence under all circumstances.
1 Al-Qur’an, Luqman: 17.
- 10 -
GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE LIFE OF THE MUSLIM INDIVIDUAL IN BRITAIN
1. Every Muslim, man or woman, must practice Islam in all its dimensions in order to achieve the greatest possible degree of taqwa in his/her private, personal, family, social and professional life ...
2. Every Muslim must pursue excellence in all departments of life, especially in the acquisition of all-round knowledge ...
3. Every Muslim must ensure that his/her and his/her family’s private and public life be committed to the pursuit of Allah’s good pleasure alone ...
4. Every Muslim must ensure that his/her lifestyle does not absorb the moral laxity prevalent in the secular culture of modern Britain today ...
5. Every Muslim must live within the Statute Laws of the United Kingdom ...
6. Every Muslim should seek to develop an identity in terms of the goals of Islam and participate in the struggle of the global Islamic movement toward these goals ...
7. Jihad is a basic requirement of Islam and living in Britain or having British nationality by birth or naturalisation does not absolve the Muslim from his or her duty to participate in jihad: this participation can be active service in armed struggle abroad and/or the provision of material and moral support to those engaged in such struggle anywhere in the world ...1
8. Every Muslim must contribute a regular proportion of his or her income to the Islamic movement instead of the habit of giving small or insignificant amounts only when faced with a “collection box” ...2
9. Every Muslim must pursue his or her personal goals within the framework of the Muslim community in Britain, of the Ummah, and of the global Islamic movement ...
Maxim: Islam is our guide in all situations.
1 Al-Qur’an, Taubah: 86, 88.
2 Al-Qur’an, Hadid: 7, 10.
- 11 -
A STRATEGY FOR SURVIVAL
Recent events have made it clear that Muslims in Britain, indeed throughout Europe and North America, will have to make a conscious effort if they are to survive. The time-honoured assumption that the generally liberal, open and tolerant ethos of the west would guarantee the survival of Islam and Muslims is a thesis no longer tenable. Muslims are faced with a vicious assault on their identity. Recent statements by leading figures in British Government and public life have made it clear that they expect, demand and will not be satisfied with anything less than our total “assimilation”. Essentially their attitude towards Islam has not changed since the Crusades; their strategy remains the same, only their tactics have changed. Muslims living in the west have to adjust to an environment that is far more hostile than had been assumed.
Muslim communities in the west now need a comprehensive strategy for survival. The Council of British Muslims will debate and develop a comprehensive STRATEGY FOR SURVIVAL as a matter of urgency, made more, not less, urgent by every day that passes.
Maxim: Survive we must, live we may.
- 12 -
HISTORY – THE BRITISH OBSESSION
The history that is immediately relevant to the Muslim situation in Britain relates largely to British colonialism. The British colonial mind is the immediate source of their fear of Muslims. Muslims in Britain are viewed as “ex-colonials” who have received the additional favour of having been allowed to settle in mainland Britain. Britain as a colonial power, having “civilised” its possessions and then “granted” them freedom, now feels entitled to expect the ex-colonials to become British like the British. Any assertion of the superiority of Islam or Islamic culture or civilisation on British soil is not to be tolerated. The British State sees it as its duty to achieve total assimilation. Moreover, as the controversy over The Satanic Verses has revealed, the British also want Muslims to accept their view of all religions, including Islam. That is that all religious beliefs are a throwback to the Dark Ages of ignorance and superstition and therefore unacceptable in this day and age of reason, science and technology. Those who want to retain religious convictions must exercise them in the sphere of private conscience. No religion, least of all Islam, can be allowed a place in public affairs, even those affairs that affect Muslims themselves. Public policy cannot therefore take into account Islam or the Islamic sensibilities of Muslims. It is for Muslims to “grow up” and join the mainstream of western civilisation.
Maxim: British view of Islam and Muslims is rooted in colonial history.
- 13 -
HISTORY – THE MUSLIM RESPONSE
The relevant Muslim response to the British view of Islam and Muslims is more complex but also determined in large part by the colonial experience. Among us there is the truly “ex-colonial” fringe that accepts the British view of Islam and Muslims and is offended by what it calls the Islam of the mullahs and the “ignorant” masses. This is the “modernist” position. They pay lip-service to Islam but are embarrassed by such strong assertion of our faith as has been visible in the Muslim campaign against The Satanic Verses. In today’s Britain these modernist, apologetic Muslims want to keep “politics” out of mosques and maintain a submissive posture towards the British government. In their role as a colonial power the British used the modernists to deflect and abort Muslim opposition to their rule; they promoted an emasculated form of Islam from which the component of jihad was subtracted. They are now attempting to do the same in dealing with Muslims living in Britain. The same language (“moderates”) is used to describe these individuals and the regimes that promote and support them. But the Muslim masses living in Britain today have seen through the game. The British design to destroy Islam and assimilate Muslims, in partnership with the modernist “Islamic lobby”, has been exposed by The Satanic Verses affair. Their plan to deflect and render ineffectual Muslim anger over The Satanic Verses was defeated by Imam Khomeini’s fatwa on February 14, 1989. Even before the fatwa, ulama in Britain had played a major role in mobilising opinion against The Satanic Verses. It was this initial awakening created by the ulama in Britain that made the total endorsement of that fatwa by the Muslim masses in Britain possible. The Satanic Verses affair has also exposed the insincerity of most Muslim governments, including the Saudi regime, towards issues that are vital for the defence of Islam and the honour of the Prophet of Islam, upon whom be peace. The new historical situation demands a new and comprehensive Strategy for Survival. Maxim: Muslims will not surrender to cultural blackmail.
WHAT IS SURVIVAL?
Survival does not mean physical “safety”, or a set of guarantees in such matters as “equal opportunities”, or the verbiage put out by the Race Relations industry, as Islam does not fit into any of their neat categories. Equally, British law does not, and cannot be expected to, provide an adequate framework for our survival. Recent events should leave no one in any doubt that the British Government is prepared to use the law against us as an instrument of oppression. The only survival kit that will work is the one that is entirely community based and integrated with a global Islamic movement that protects us in the way France or Russia once claimed to be the “protectors” of Christian communities in the Middle East. The shield of Islam is our only protection under all circumstances. Survival within Islam is the only form of survival that has any meaning. If we protect Islam, Islam will protect us. If we weaken our links with Islam we shall be swallowed up. Maxim: Only Islam can protect Muslims.
- 14 -
MOSQUES IN BRITAIN
The creation of a network of about 1,000 mosques in Britain is one of the great achievements of the first generation of Muslim migrants to this country. In financial terms (at 1990 values), these mosques represent an investment of perhaps as much as £200 million. These mosques have to be developed into major foci of Muslim community life. The part played by the mosques in The Satanic Verses affair has shown that at times of crises Muslims turn to the mosque for guidance. However, so far the full potential of these mosques has not been realised. Among the first steps we should take is to put the khateebs and imams of mosques on financial terms compatible with their status and role in society. As a first step their salaries should be raised to £20,000 per annum. The management of the mosques should also begin to attract the attention and talents of Muslims born and educated in Britain. The mosques should begin to develop in the role of problem-solving resource centres. The ulama should cease to be mere employees. They should be offered membership of restructured committee structures. A new partnership will have to develop between the original founders and trustees, the ulama, and the younger generation of Muslims. New committees should begin to emerge in all mosques to chalk out a new and dynamic role for mosques in Britain.
Maxim: Mosques are the primary institutions of Islam.
- 15 -
ULAMA IN BRITAIN
The ulama will always remain one of our major resources and a pool for leadership and knowledge. In a society where the bulk of available education is likely to be secular, the role of ulama as teachers, guides and leaders will be of paramount importance. The Satanic Verses affair has shown the leadership potential of the ulama, but the ulama will have to develop a wider range of capabilities over the whole range of social and political issues that confront the Muslims in Britain. This should include a better command of the English language and an understanding of the social, political and administrative systems and procedures of Government. Some of these roles can be undertaken with the help of Muslims who are doctors, civil servants, solicitors, policemen, probation officers, etc. Similarly, the ulama should begin to use their weekly wa’z (speech preceding khutba on Fridays) to inform the community of major changes that may be taking place, either in Britain or in the world of Islam as a whole. Every mosque should become part of the Islamic movement in its widest sense.
Maxim: Ulama must come forward in leadership roles.
- 16 -
ROLE OF TRUSTEES OF MOSQUES
The founders of mosques and their trustees have performed a great service to the Muslims in Britain. Without their commitment and sacrifice we would not have the network of mosques that we have today. For their sacrifice and service the founders and trustees of mosques have secured them an honourable place in our society, for which they will be generously rewarded in the Hereafter, insha’Allah.
The founders and trustees of mosques must, however, realise that the role of the mosques must evolve to keep pace with changes in the Muslim society. Already more than half the Muslim population in Britain consists of people born here. The trustees largely belong to a generation from a different background. It is high time for trustees to start to bring in the younger generation as partners in the management of the mosques. The first step may be the creation or appointment of “management committees” comprising members of the younger generation. The mosques ought to begin to change in directions desired by the new generation, guided and advised by their elders. Unless this transition be conscientiously undertaken and sensitively managed, our mosques run the risk of becoming obsolete monuments to the religious practices of first-generation migrants. Were this to take place, our children and grandchildren would sell the mosques to the highest bidders in much the same way as lapsed Christians have sold their churches to us. The disused churches were fortunate to become mosques; the disused mosques of the future may be less fortunate.
The founders and trustees of mosques labour under a greater obligation to future generations than to the first generation of migrants. The mosques were built to secure the future of our children, not to stand as monuments to our past piety.
Maxim: Trustees of mosques must seek partnership with the younger generation brought up in Britain.
- 17 -
THE MUSLIM AGENDA
In this section an attempt has been made to identify key areas that will occupy Muslim attention in the immediate future.
- 18 -
1. The Satanic Verses
This is a major conflict with implications for most aspects of our future in Britain; it also encapsulates the whole range of issues that are likely to dominate Islam’s relations with the west for a long time to come. The British Government refuses to acknowledge the validity of the Muslim position. In this conflict rational argument has come up against a blank wall of colonial and cultural presuppositions. The only alternative is for Muslims to extend their agitation to a point where the social, political and economic cost of keeping The Satanic Verses in circulation becomes prohibitive. At some stage we may have to engage in a campaign of civil disobedience1 in Britain. The Satanic Verses is not an ordinary “book”, it amounts to a declaration of war on Islam and Muslims. The circumstantial evidence, e.g., the size of the advance paid to the author, and the media and literary hype that accompanied its publication, leaves us in no doubt that The Satanic Verses is the result of a conspiracy. This means, above all, that Muslims have to fight a prolonged campaign to defeat the designs of the conspirators and their supporters.
The obvious solution to The Satanic Verses affair is for this book to be unconditionally withdrawn by the author and his publishers. We realise that withdrawal cannot mean the recall of all copies. However, withdrawal must mean (a) an undertaking that existing stocks in shops and warehouses will be pulped, (b) no further editions will be published in any shape or form, (c) the book will be removed from public libraries, and (d) anyone who wants to return his copy will receive a full refund. In addition, the author and publishers will pay an agreed sum to relieve the suffering of those, mainly in India, Kashmir, Pakistan and Bangladesh, who have been bereaved, maimed or injured in protests against The Satanic Verses. Muslims in Britain will continue to pursue the author and publishers of The Satanic Verses until this conflict is satisfactorily resolved. We are a law-abiding community seeking a peaceful settlement of a dangerous conflict. Such conflicts, unless peacefully settled, often lead to violence.
The Satanic Verses is not acceptable now and will not become acceptable at any time in the future.
1 See Alan Ryan’s article, “The Right to Disobey”, in The Times, April 4, 1990, and Tony Benn’s article, “When Principle is above the Law”, in The Guardian, April 4, 1990. Both Alan Ryan and Tony Benn would of course deny that their arguments can be used by Muslims. In our view we can and we must.
- 19 -
2. Islam in Britain
Muslims in Britain need to undertake a close examination of what, if any, legal and/or constitutional position could be secured for Islam in Britain, bearing in mind that a number of European States have accorded Islam the status of an “official religion”. This will include the question of laws against blasphemy to protect all religions. We must note that the existing laws against blasphemy have failed to prevent grossly obscene and sacrilegious attacks on the person of Jesus Christ, upon whom be peace, so much so that influential opinion within the Church of England, whose creed alone is protected, now supports the abolition of blasphemy as a criminal offence. The penetration of the secular creed into Anglican thought is a matter of deep regret. The operation of existing laws against blasphemy shows that their extension to protect Islam as well is unlikely to prevent the kind of attacks on religion that the “liberal” lobby claims is its right. The Muslim community may have to define “no go” areas where the exercise of “freedom of speech” against Islam will not be tolerated. It is only by taking a firm position now that Muslims in Britain may in the long term succeed in defining a common cause within a secular society. The one thing we must not do is to surrender to the demands of rampant, immoral secularism.
- 20 -
3. Da’wah
Performing da’wah, or inviting non-Muslims to accept Islam, is a basic duty of all Muslims. Muslims have come to live in the west in large numbers at a time when the western civilisation is beginning to develop disorders of the mind, body and soul as a direct consequence of unmitigated secularism. In this situation the role of da’wah is clear. However, the method of da’wah is often and unnecessarily contentious among Muslims. There are those who take the passive route, and there are those who believe in working through revolutionary change, beginning with Muslim societies and countries. In Britain, in the short-term, the great impact is likely to be achieved through the example of moral and material excellence set by Muslim individuals and families living in a post-Christian, largely pagan, society. The collective effort of the Muslim community in Britain to lead a muttaqi life in a corrupt environment is bound to play a major role in da’wah. Similarly, the taqwa of Muslim youth, the modesty of Muslim women, the stability of Muslim family life, the absence of drinks-, drugs- and sex-related crimes and the overall discipline of Muslims living in the west will itself send powerful signals to non-Muslims. But this will only happen if we succeed in arresting the “integration” and “assimilation” of Muslims themselves into the corrupt bogland of western culture and supposed “civilisation”. The emergence of a distinctive Muslim presence, individual and collective, is an essential first step towards effective da’wah.
- 21 -
4. Existing Muslim or Islamic Organisations
These organisations have played important roles in the life of the Muslim community. They will continue to exist and develop. It is anticipated that most will accept the framework offered in this manifesto. They may indeed already be pursuing at least some of the goals of the community identified here. The role of the established organisations and the new structures and institutions that may be created will be complementary and cooperative. We cannot imagine a situation in which it may not be possible to find areas of mutual cooperation with existing organisations.
- 22 -
5. Education
A great deal of very useful work is already being done in this field by a number of groups and organisations. However, a common syllabus for the teaching of Islam to Muslim children in Britain is an urgent need of all of those engaged in education. A Muslim Education Commission (MEC) will be set up to examine all the relevant issues such as voluntary-aided schools, single sex education, provision of Muslim teachers as religious instructors, collective acts of worship in schools, Islamic dress, and alterations to the National Curriculum where it can be shown that the content of that curriculum is inimical to Islam. The report and recommendations of the MEC would then form the basis of negotiations with the Secretary of State for Education and Science and the LEAs in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
- 23 -
6. Muslim Personal Law
The vexed question of the application of Muslim Personal Law in such matters as marriage, divorce and inheritance needs a Law Commission comprising Muslim jurists and lawyers to examine the situation and make recommendations. So far all approaches to the British Government on this issue have been vague, ill formulated, largely emotional and incompetent. In the past British courts have recognised Muslim marriage, divorce and inheritance issues decided according to Muslim Personal Law outside Britain. This issue may well revolve around the creation of a Muslim legal framework to decide cases that may then be recognised as valid in British Law.
- 24 -
7. The Muslim Law Commission
The Muslim community needs a standing commission to keep the legislative programmes of Government and opposition parties constantly under review. Similarly, the Commission would monitor cases decided in law courts that may have implications for the Muslim community. The Commission could also submit written proposals to Government and opposition parties on major proposals in their legislative programmes. The Commission may also initiate debate in the Muslim Consultative Council and the General Assembly of Muslims in Britain in order to create informed public opinion on major legal issues.
- 25 -
8. Financing Higher Education
The financing of students in higher education in Britain is moving towards greater parental contributions and student loans. This is an area in which mosques are equipped to play a significant role. Most mosque trusts have surplus funds lying idle in the banks. Some of these funds can be used to set up loan (gard-i hasana) schemes for Muslim students in higher education. A major advantage of such schemes will be the goodwill for Islam that this will create among young Muslims during the most formative years of their lives. This experience will give them a further incentive to strengthen the institution of the mosque and to maintain their attachment to it.
- 26 -
9. Muslim Weekend Colleges
At present, only small children receive supplementary education in mosques in the evenings and at weekends. There is a need for more advanced classes for teenagers, youths and adults. A curriculum of courses on such subjects as the Seerah1 of the Prophet (upon whom be peace), Tafsir2, Qir’at3, Hifz4, Islamic history, Islamic civilisation and culture, Islamic art, the Islamic movement and Muslim political thought, etc., can be offered at a network of Muslim Weekend Colleges throughout the country. Wherever possible such colleges should operate within mosques. Most mosques have large unused space; carefully designed “folding” partitions can be erected to create smaller classrooms.
1 Life.
2 Exegeses of the Qur’an.
3 Recitation of the Qur’an.
4 Memorisation of the Qur’an.
- 27 -
10. The Islamic University
Prestigious institutions are symbols of the maturity and identity of a community. Muslims, though only a minority in Britain, belong to a global civilisation and culture. Moreover, the intellectual tradition of Islam is a major part of our inheritance. We have a different worldview to offer. We adhere to a different philosophy of life, philosophy of knowledge and philosophy of science.
After the collapse of communism, the intellectual encounter of the future is liable to be between the west and Islam. The obvious platform from which to conduct our debate and make our contribution is the Islamic University. However, the Islamic University we need must not be a cosmetic and hypocritical creation of the Saudi regime; just another western university under the banner of Islam. We suggest that the intellectual foundations laid by the pioneering work of The Muslim Institute in London over the last two decades could provide a solid foundation on which an International Islamic University (IIU) could be erected. So far as possible, the proposed Islamic University should be locally supported and financed. A planning committee could start work on this long-term project almost immediately.
- 28 -
11. The Muslim Ummah Fund
Experience tells us that financial freedom, indeed strength, must be an essential part of our strategy. Already we know of instances where Muslims in public service have either been reprimanded, dismissed or had other pressures put on them. Some Muslim organisations in receipt of grants from public funds have had them stopped. All this for expressing their views in The Satanic Verses affair. We must mobilise resources and raise funds within the Muslim community on a large scale. Substantial funds will be needed for the implementation of the programme outlined in this manifesto. For example, such proposals as the establishment of the Muslim Education Commission, the Muslim Law Commission, a Loan Fund for Students in Higher Education, Muslim Weekend Colleges, and eventually the Islamic University, are all capital intensive. Each of the commissions will require full-time research staff backed by secretarial and office facilities. Members serving on the various commissions will have to be reimbursed their travelling and other expenses. Some may also have to be paid professional fees.
We propose to launch The Muslim Ummah Fund (MUF) with an eventual target of about £5 million a year.
- 29 -
GLOSSARY
da’wah: inviting non-Muslims to Islam.
fatwa: a religious opinion or, if given by the head of an Islamic state, decree.
halal: permitted.
hifz: memorisation of the Qur’an.
hijab: modesty of women’s dress in public required by Islam. In particular, the wearing of a headscarf.
imam: lit. leader. One who leads prayers. Also used for the leader of an Islamic state.
insha’Allah: God willing.
jihad: struggle (often armed) in the way of Allah.
khateeb: one who gives the khutba, usually the imam.
khutba: formal sermon before or after a congregational prayer.
mullah: lit. master. Often used pejoratively for ulama.
muttaqi: adjective from taqwa.
gard-i hasana: lit. “beautiful loan”. A loan which is returnable at the convenience of the borrower or not at all.
qir’at: recitation of the Qur’an.
Seerah: Life of the Prophet, upon whom be peace.
tafsir: exegeses of the Qur’an.
taqwa: moral excellence acceptable to Allah. Also fear of Allah, piety.
ulama: persons learned in the sciences of Islam (pl. of alim).
Ummah: world body of Muslims.
wa’z: general speech or lecture given before or after a formal sermon at a prayer meeting.
Dr Kalim Siddiqui - Director of The Muslim Institute
Retrieved from
Daryl's Encyclopaedia
Addendum
Dr Pr
Muhammad al-Massari and B.A.Frémaux-Soormally – Trafalgar Square
I have met with our Mujaahid Dr Kalim
Siddiqui (RA) many times as well as with many other courageous members
of the Majlis al
Shura fi Britaniya (Muslim
Parliament of Great Britain) like Pr Muhammad Al-Massari (exiled from occupied
Arabia), Imâm Muhammad Al-‘Asi (Washington) and Imâm Musa (USA), Brother Ahmed
Huber (Switzerland), Dr Yakub Zaki (James Dickie from Scotland) at the Muslim
Parliament Conferences and have been promoting their works (as well as those of
our wonderful Brother Minister Louis Farrakhan’s video conferences with minor
edits because of our unfortunate doctrinal differences) for some two decades,
but never found a single Muslim or Muslimah who was interested in them either
in France, Belgium, Switzerland, England or Mauritius. Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui (not a relative of Dr
Kalim) who replaced him as leader of the now defunct “Muslim Parliament”, has
turned traitor and with other traitors bows down to the British establishment
and he was co-founder with his acolyte Dr Shaaz Mahboob of the bogus “British
Muslims for Secular Democracy” (BMSD), another government front used to control
genuine grassroots Muslim activism. One
of the trustees of the BMSD is woman journalist and media commentator Yasmin
Alibhai-Brown from the
very secretive and dangerous Sect of the Ismailis (Sect of the Assassins) with
other (most probably) infiltrators or British spies.
Our very beautiful Imâm Musa in front of the United States Capitol building
Alibhai-Brown from the
very secretive and dangerous Sect of the Ismailis (Sect of the Assassins) with
other (most probably) infiltrators or British spies. Our very beautiful Imâm Musa in front of the United States Capitol building
Check out our hard-hitting interviews and news items at the main page for The French Connection
BAFS
Sunday 8th of January 2012Wednesday, 21 September 2011
The ‘Six Million’ Myth
Facebook
Twitter
GooglePlus
more
Must read book by Don Heddesheimer, The First Holocaust.
by Zander C. Fuerza (ZCF) aka Zion Crime Factory
Author Don Heddesheimer’s book, The First Holocaust: Jewish Fundraising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During and After World War One, is an important piece of the revisionist puzzle. Heddesheimer cogently documents the slew of previous attempts by Jews to disseminate deceitful and untrue atrocity propaganda before, during and after World War I. The First Holocaust features an amazing collection of press clippings and propaganda articles dating back to the late 19th century that make claims of the suffering and imminent extermination of European Jewry. Among such articles we find that Jews have, dozens of times before WWII, invoked the cabalisitc “6,000,000″ number as the amount of Jews on the verge of death and destruction during various periods of turmoil and conflict in Europe and Russia. Undoubtedly, this book exposes the deliberate fraudulence of these sinister Zionist campaigns and media blitzes — long before Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933 — designed to elicit public sympathy and financial support for Jewish political ambitions, principally the establishment of the State of Israel.The obsessive invocation of the cabalistic fable of “6,000,000 dead or dying Jews” dating back at least four decades prior to the events of WWII directly undermines and betrays the notion that 6,000,000 Jews perished in Europe between 1939-1945, as Jews have claimed. It was a lie the first time, and it is a lie today!
Young White children are taught to hate their own kind over something that never even happened!
A question that you might ask is: “what is the significance of the ‘Six Million’ figure and where did it originate?”
The mythical “Six Million” figure has intriguing origins indeed. Jews have staunchly emphasized the 6,000,000 figure in atrocity propaganda from the years 1890 through 1945. World War II ended in 1945, and since that time the cabalistic 6,000,000 figure has now reached sacrosanct status. This was achieved through a sleazy and deceptive campaign of repetitive HoloHoax swindlespeak in the news and entertainment media, centered in Jewish Hollywood. As the Jewish-Communist mass murderer, Vladimir Lenin, once said: “a lie told often enough becomes the truth.” This campaign of Jewish deceit has steadily intensified over the years. When Jews sense an increase in awareness of their treachery and global crimes against humanity amongst the Gentile public (a natural reaction of which is resentment and hostility), the louder they begin to wail about their invented holocaust in the octopus of media organs they control. That’s why they are always gauging the pulse of public opinion.
World leaders, Presidents, Prime Ministers, ceremonial Kings and Queens, Popes, Priests and Holy Men of all faiths, genuflect in groveling reverence of the mythical “6,000,000 Jews” who didn’t perish in “Nazi gas chambers”, as such chambers did not exist and were impossible. (See: VHO, IHR, CODOH, WSMOT, Zundelsite, Nazi Gassings Never Happened) Research shows that the reason for this bizarre Jewish fixation on the number 6,000,000 primarily stems from an ancient religious prophecy in the Torah. According to some sources, the prophecy envisioned that before the Jewish people could reclaim and reconquer Palestine to establish a Jewish homeland called “Israel”, 6,000,000 Jews would first have to perish in a fiery burnt offering (i.e. “Holocaust”), as a sacrifice to their bloodthirsty tribal deity, YHWH. (See: Weintraub, Ben. The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism: Keystone of the New World Order. Washington, D.C.: Cosmo Pub., 1995.) Jewish author, Benjamen Blech, confirmed this reality in his book “The Secrets of Hebrew Words” (J Aronson Inc., 1991, p. 241), stating,
“You
shall return minus 6,000,000″; Jewish scripture relates a prophecy that
6,000,000 Jews must vanish before they can reclaim Palestine as their
ancient ancestral homeland.
“The Hebrew word for ‘ye shall return’(TaShuVU), seems to have been spelled incorrectly. Grammatically it requires another (vav). It ought to read (TaShUVU). Why is it lacking the letter (vav) which stands for six?. [TaShuVU] without the vav is a prediction to the Jewish people of ultimate return to their national homeland. TaShuVU in numbers adds up to 708: tav=400, shin=300, vei=2, vey=6. When we write the year, we ignore the millennia. In 1948 on the secular calendar, we witnessed the miracle of Jewish return to Israel. On the Hebrew calendar it was the year 5708. That was the year predicted by the incomplete word (TaShuVu), you shall return. We did return, lacking 6 – an all important 6 million of our people who perished in the holocaust. Yet the fulfillment of the prediction of return in precisely that year implied by the gematria of TaShuVU gives us firm hope that the words of the prophets for Final Redemption will come true as well.”Here are two additional commentaries on the origins of the “Six Million” from History & Scriptural Origins of the Six Million Number:
[Quote 1] Jewish prophecies in the Torah require that 6 million Jews must “vanish” before the state of Israel can be formed. “You shall return minus 6 million.” That’s why Tom Segev, an Israeli historian, declared that the “6 million” is an attempt to transform the Holocaust story into state religion. Those six million, according to prophecy, had to disappear in “burning ovens”, which the judicial version of the Holocaust now authenticates. As a matter of fact, Robert B. Goldmann writes: “. . . without the Holocaust, there would be no Jewish State.” A simple consequence: Given six million Jews gassed at Auschwitz who ended up in the “burning ovens” (the Greek word holocaust means burned offerings), therefore, the prophecies have now been “fulfilled” and Israel can become a “legitimate state”. –Unknown
[Quote 2] Regarding the ‘six million’ number you should know the following: In the Hebrew text of the Torah prophesies, one can read “you shall return”. In the text the letter “V” or “VAU” is absent, as Hebrew does not have any numbers; the letter V stands for the number 6. Ben Weintraub, a religious scientist, learned from rabbis that the meaning of the missing letter means the number is ’6 million’. The prophesy then reads: You will return, but with 6 million less. See Ben Weintraub: “The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism”, Cosmo Publishing, Washington 1995, page 3. The missing 6 million must be so before the Jews can return to the Promised Land. Jahweh sees this as a cleaning of the souls of the sinful people. The Jews must, on the return to the Promised Land, be clean — the cleaning shall be done in burning stokes. — A CorrespondentIs it just coincidental that the flimsy and farcical story of “6,000,000 Jews” being murdered in “gas chambers” and burned up in “ovens” in concentration camps during WWII gave the Jews the impetus and PR ammunition they needed to make their “gallant return” to the “promised land” at the war’s end — occupying and ethnically cleansing much of Palestine through terrorism and force of arms — establishing a racist/apartheid “Jewish state” called “Israel” in 1948? And this all just happens to fit the previously cited ancient Torah prophecy to the letter? I hardly think so!
Today, the holocaust™ tall tale has taken the form of a bizarre cult-like State-enforced and protected religious dogma of the West (i.e. Holocaustianity), as it is illegal to question, dispute or deny in over a dozen European countries, under punishment of heavy fines and imprisonment! This farfetched Zionist-trumpeted conspiracy theory is being utilized by Jewish hucksters and scam artists as a money-making enterprise — a larcenous con of near-planetary proportions which Jewish professor Norman Finkelstein dubbed “The Holocaust Industry”. (The Holocaust Industry: Reflection on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. London: VERSO, 2000.) On top of that, this myth has been wielded by Jewish zealots as an ideological sledgehammer to club Gentiles over the head with any time non-Jews dare criticize or oppose the global banditry and menacing influence of the self-professed “Chosen People”.
Below are reproductions of many press clippings and articles featuring the cabalistic 6,000,000 number, dating back to the year 1900. Note the ceaseless references to “6,000,000 Jews”, the continuous begging for money and land (Palestine), and the term “holocaust” used well before the events of the 1940s. It is also noteworthy that the authors of the vast majority of these propaganda articles were the richest of Wall Street’s Jewish bankers as well as leaders of Zionist pressure groups — Schiffs and Warburgs among them. (More examples can be found here, here and here; credit also goes to this blogger for unearthing many of these article clippings).
1900-
American Zionist leader, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, let slip the Zionist agenda behind the Holocaust Hoax: to promote public sympathy for Zionism (Jewish takeover of Palestine).
“There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.”
(“ZIONISTS’ MASS MEETING: Rabbi Wise’s Address.” New York Times. June 11, 1900.)
(“ZIONISTS’ MASS MEETING: Rabbi Wise’s Address.” New York Times. June 11, 1900.)
The Zionist pronouncement that kick-started the hoax of the twentieth century.
Under its entry on “anti-Semitism”, the tenth edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica references “Six Million Jews” of Rumania and Russia being “systematically degraded.”
1905-
A Jewish preacher declares that if the (Jewish-led) Communist uprising in Russia succeeds in its long-time goal of overthrowing the Tsarist government, Zionism would be obsolete. “6,000,000 Jews” is mentioned.
The New York Times reports: “From 1890 to 1902 he caused 6,000,000 Jewish families to be expelled from Russia.”
1906-
A Jewish publicist addresses an audience in Germany where he claimed that the Russian Government had a “solution of the Jewish Question” and that this solution entailed the “murderous extermination” of “6,000,000 Jews.” Of course, the Russians never had any such plans but the fictional story was resurrected during WWII with the Germans being on the receiving end of these slanderous accusations this time around.
As
a side note: 1906 was the year after the first Jewish-led Communist
uprising in Russia had failed. This lame sob story was nothing more than
a ploy to distract public attention from the fact that the
Communist-led upheaval that took place in Russia a year earlier was the
handiwork of his fellow Jews who perpetrated widespread atrocities
against Russian patriots (anti-Communists).
Donmeh Jews organize a coup d’etat in the Ottoman Empire and seize power from the Sultan.
1910-
In the American Jewish Committee’s annual report it is claimed that since 1890 Russia has had a policy to “expel or exterminate” Six Million Jews. (Source: American Jewish Yearbook pg. 15)
1911-
Max Nordau, co-founder of the World Zionist Organization together with Theodore Herzl, made an astonishing pronouncement at the tenth Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland. He claimed that 6,000,000 Jews would be annihilated. This was twenty-two years before Hitler came to power and three years before World War I started.
Quoted in Ben Hecht’s book, Perfidy. Hecht, a Zionist Jew himself, would go on to make the very same claim in 1943.
The bloodbath of World War I kicks off and the Jews are already whining that “6,000,000 Jews” are in danger.
1915-
Jewish leader Louis Marshall proclaims: “In the world today there are about 13,000,000 Jews, of whom more than 6,000,000 are in the heart of the war zone: Jews whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow…”
Jewish leader Louis Marshall proclaims: “In the world today there are about 13,000,000 Jews, of whom more than 6,000,000 are in the heart of the war zone: Jews whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow…”
The crypto-Jewish “Young Turks” orchestrate a mass murder of 1.5 million Armenian Christians, as well as 250,000 Greek and Assyrian Christians.
1917-
Jewish lobbyists convince the British government to support the Zionist project of making Palestine the national homeland for the Jews. British official James Arthur Balfour decrees the “Balfour Declaration.” The letter is addressed to Zionist big-wig Lord Rothschild.
Jewish lobbyists convince the British government to support the Zionist project of making Palestine the national homeland for the Jews. British official James Arthur Balfour decrees the “Balfour Declaration.” The letter is addressed to Zionist big-wig Lord Rothschild.
Britain becomes a deadly pawn of Zionism.
The British take control of Palestine, and occupy the country militarily. Eventually the British Mandate for Palestine is administered, against the will of the Arabs living there.
This same year Jewish Communist leader Grigory Zinoviev announces plans for the annihilation of 10,000,000 Russians.
Jewish
Communists plot genocide of Russians. They put out stories of Jewish
persecution at this same time to hide their blood-curdling atrocities in
Russia.
Shortly after the end of World War I hostilities, Zionists claim a “Holocaust” of “Six Million Jews” is imminent in Europe in a deceitful campaign to raise money for Jewish charities and also to distract public attention from the Jewish origins of Communism, the Bolshevik atrocities in Russia and the Armenian Genocide.
The first reported “Holocaust” of “Six Million Jews.” Nothing more than Zionist propaganda.
Elder of Zion Nathan Straus published this article in the San Fransico Chronicle claiming 6,000,000 Jews were in peril.
More persecution propaganda in the same year. Again “6,000,000 Jews” as victims, of course.
Full article of above clipping
1920- A Jewish relief campaign advertisement states: “Today 6,000,000 Jews are facing the darkest days ever known in the history of the race.”
1921-
Russian patriots gain ground on the Jewish Bolshevik usurpers of their nation. In a vein attempt to hide their heavy involvement in the brutal Bolshevist atrocities being committed in Russia, Jews reel out the “six million” myth once again.
1922-
Zionist leader, Nahum Sokolow, boasts about Organized Jewry’s globalist ambitions when, at a Zionist conference in Carlsbad, California, he proclaimed: “The League of Nations is a Jewish idea, and Jerusalem some day will become the capital of the world’s peace.”
Six
Million again. Jews demand that Gentiles hand over their food to the
poor, innocent Jews while they murder millions, and ship millions more
off to Gulag slave camps in Communist Jew-controlled Russia.
Jews commit a deliberate genocide. To put down nationalist resistance to a Communist takeover, Soviet Dictator Josef Stalin orders the Jewish-dominated Soviet Secret Police (NKVD) to orchestrate a man-made famine in the Ukraine. Stalin’s Jewish deputies and secret police chiefs (Kaganovich, Beria, Yagoda, etc) ruthlessly implement the murderous starvation policy. Between six and seven million Ukrainian men, women and children, are annihilated in this genuine Holocaust. It is now known as the “Holodomor.”
1933-
Adolf Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany in 1933. Jews immediately seek his complete destruction.
Because of this World Jewry declares war on Germany in 1933. Jews around the world launched a global economic boycott of German goods in an effort to economically strangle Germany to death and topple Hitler’s new government.
Jews don’t like it when Gentiles revolt against their tyranny and control. Their motto is: be our slave or be dead.
1936-
As early as 1936, Zionists who originally coined the phrase Final Solution of The Jewish Question, somehow knew exactly 6,000,000 Jews had “neither hope nor future.”
Appearing
before the Peel Commission, World Zionist Organization chairman, and
first Israeli president, Chaim Weizmann, declares that “6,000,000 Jews
are destined to be imprisoned,” (in Europe) “where they are unwanted.”
Jewish
leaders meet to discuss their schemes, swindles and sinister
conspiracies. “Six Million Hebrews” is mentioned in the article title.
1938-
Jew propagandists amp up the “Six Million” b.s. as World War II draws closer.
This
article references “five or six million Jews uprooted by dictatorships”
and calls for them to be settled in the “Holy Land” (Palestine).
Poland, under British influence, refuses to concede to Hitler any of his relatively modest territorial demands. Hitler sought to recover the territory stripped away from Germany and given to Poland at the end of WWI; specifically the formerly German city of Danzig. Hitler also demanded an autobahn in the Danzig corridor connecting the German mainland to East Prussia. Poland categorically refused all of Hitler’s somewhat reasonable demands.
Hitler
wanted back the German city of Danzig and an autobahn through the
Danzig corridor connecting the German mainland to East Prussia. Poland,
under British/Jewish direction, refused to acquiesce to Hitler’s modest
demands.
The reason the Allies only found fault with Germany for invading Poland, and not the Soviets, was because the USSR was under Jewish rule, and had been since 1917. The purpose of WWII all along was not to free Poland but to destroy Germany, who had broken loose from the grip of the Jews. The Allies, who originally claimed to be concerned for Poland’s sovereignty, dumped Poland, along with the rest of Eastern Europe, off to the Soviet-Communist butchers at the end of the war! This Allied betrayal proves that the Allies never cared about Poland at all. Poland was nothing more than a pawn used by the Allied warmongers to sucker the Third Reich into a war.
The
Allies, who waged war on Germany in 1939 using as a justification the
excuse that Germany breached Polish sovereignty by invading, DUMPED
Poland off to Stalin and the Communist butchers who had murdered 22,000
Poles in the Katyn Forest in 1940!
Over half a year before the war began Jews were already squawking about “6,000,000 helpless victims of persecution.”
A Jewish newspaper, The Jewish Criterion, predicts that “the coming world war would be the annihilation of six million Jews in East and Central Europe.”
1940-
Jewish leader Nahum Goldmann predicts “Six Million” Jewish victims before Nazi concentration camps have even fully completed construction.
1941-
An American Jew named Theodore Newman Kaufman devises a plan for the extermination of all Germans through forced sterilization. He publishes his evil aspiration to annihilate the German people in a book called “Germany Must Perish!” This Jewish “Final Solution” to Germans is praised by Jewish-owned publications in America.
1943-
A Zionist organization, The American Jewish Committee, claims the Nazis had set in motion a plan to kill 6,000,000 Jews.
Zionist propaganda build up nearing the end of the war.
During the Nazi offensive on the eastern front, German soldiers discover the mass graves of some of the 22,000 Polish military officers and intelligentsia who were murdered and then buried in mass graves in the Katyn Forest by the Soviets in 1940. The insidious Allies knew their “gallant Soviet ally” was a mass murderer but kept quiet about it. When it could no longer be kept hidden from the public they then tried to blame the atrocity on the Germans!
1944-
In September of 1944, eight months before the end of WWII, U.S. Communist (Jewish) Union leaders prematurely proclaim that nearly Six Million Jews have been killed, long before that could have been known or calculated.
In late 1944, half a year before the official end of the war, at least three newspapers printed stories informing us of the mythical deaths of “six million Jews.” All of these propaganda articles were based on the lies of Ilya Ehrenburg, a Jewish propagandist in the USSR.
The New York Times reports that Jewish groups were urging the governments of Britain and America to launch gas attacks against the Nazis.
1945-
In January, still many months prior to the end of the war, before any official body count for any group could have reasonably been calculated or ascertained, Zionists proclaim exactly “Six Million Jews” had died. (more premature ’6,000,000 Jews have died’ pronouncements)
Ilya Ehrenburg, a notorious Jewish Propagandist in the USSR who agitated for genocide against Germans and incited the mass rape of German women by the Red Army, prematurely proclaimed that “the world now knows that Germany has killed Six Million Jews” before anyone could have known that was the number.
Jewish
Communist devil, Ilya Ehrenburg, prematurely announces 6,000,000 Jews
killed, thus exposing himself as a fraud and the holocaust as a
premeditated hoax.
Communist Jew demons, Ilya Ehrenburg and Vassily Grossman.
“The German people murdered, in cold blood, in excess of 6,000,000 European Jews … I accuse the whole German people that in the years 1939 to 1945 they slaughtered upward of 15,000,000 men, among which there were 6,000,000 Jews.”
Zionist
liar, Joseph Thon, let slip the “6,000,000 Jews have died” hoax a bit
too early. These Jews just can’t help themselves can they?
In May of 1945 the New York Times reported that “more than 6,000,000 people” had been “liberated” from Nazi concentration camps.
The New York Times reports 6,000,000 had been liberated, not killed. OOPS!
A year after the war Jews are already spouting the “six million” myth as fact.
Meanwhile, as the Jews whine about a phony Holocaust in Europe, Zionist terrorist groups wreak havoc in Palestine slaughtering Arab men, women and children, at will, like the massacre at Deir Yassin.
Inhuman
Jewish terror agents of the Irgun ruthlessly slaughtered Arab women and
babies, then mutilated their corpses in the Palestinian village of Deir
Yassin.
Begin
the beast; terrorist leader of the Irgun; mastermind of the King David
Hotel bombing in 1946 and other atrocities; Prime Minister of Israel. A
complete animal.
Over the course of two years Zionist Jews obliterate 419 Arab villages and build Jewish settlements in their place. This process of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their own homeland by Jews continues to this very day.
The
Zionist colonization and ethnic cleansing of Palestine — a crime
against humanity that goes unpunished and is, in fact, supported by many
Western governments.
The Encyclopedia Britannica prints its 1963 edition, within which it states that 2,000,000 people, mostly Jews, were exterminated by the Nazis in Mauthausen, a concentration camp in Austria. This absurd figure has been officially revised quite a lot. Now it is claimed that only 95,000 people died in Mauthausen, of which only 14,000 were Jews. An exaggeration of 1,905,000! (more info) This camp is no longer considered by official sources who support the holocaust legend as an “extermination camp,” nor is it still claimed that any camps on German soil were either.
1976-
The influential Zionist leader Nahum Goldmann, co-founder and long-time head of the World Jewish Congress, publishes a book about Jews, The Jewish Paradox. In the book Goldmann candidly admits on pages 122 and 123 that years before the end of the second World War two influential co-conspiring Jews conceived the idea of a post-war Nuremberg show-tribunal and “German reparations” to be paid out to the Jews. Goldmann describes how he, and his fellow conniving Zionists at the World Jewish Congress, intended the reparations swindle to finance Jewish settlement in Palestine after the war.
Goldmann admits the swindle.
The Allied Nuremberg Trial indictment charged the Nazis with murdering 4,000,000 people at Auschwitz. This figure was printed on the plaques displayed to tourists visiting Auschwitz, and the figure was repeated as “fact” by governments, historians, journalists, politicians, and all authority figures, for 45 years. In 1990 it was all exposed as a big lie when the Auschwitz State Museum officially revised the death toll from 4,000,000 down to 1.1 million, of which 960,000 are claimed to be Jews. (source)
Auschwitz death toll reduced to a million, yet sacred “Six Million” figure remains unchanged and is still repeated by Jews.
The
original plaques were removed and replaced with new ones sporting the
“new” fake figure of 1.5 million. That’s at least 2.5 million people
erased from the official death toll overnight. They can’t even make up
their mind about what the new figure should be. This should tell you
right away that they are just making it up as they go along.
Despite substantial reductions in the official death toll’s of Mauthausen, Auschwitz and Majdanek, the mythical and obviously false “Six Million” figure is never revised and continues to be peddled by Zionist Jews everywhere. That’s because it has religious significance to Jews and fulfills their delusional ancient Torah prophecies. The Holocaust™ is nothing more than a religion to inoculate the “Goyim”.
Also in 1990, another Holocaust myth was vanquished; that being the preposterous lie that the Nazis used the skin of Jews to make “lampshades” and their fat to make “human soap.” Jewish groups in Israel have confessed that this widespread rumor was a myth.
Despite this admission, there are still Jews today going around claiming that this actually occurred.
Two Zionist Holocaust promoters, Deborah Lipstadt and Professor Peter Novick, both have stated in their books that Simon Wiesenthal, the infamous “Nazi hunter” and pathological liar, outright invented the “five million non-Jewish deaths” that supposedly happened in the Holocaust as a marketing ploy to garner interest of Non-Jews in the Holocaust religion, also known as “Holocaustianity.”
The revisionists estimate that the combined death toll in all German concentration camps was somewhere between 300,000 to 500,000. Of that amount about half the victims were Jews. Unlike the comical and discredited “6,000,000″, this figure is based on solid documentation, including the reports released by the International Red Cross who inspected the camps, the Auschwitz death registries released to the Soviet archives in 1990 (which recorded only 69,000 deaths in Auschwitz), and other evidence. The main cause of death was the typhus epidemic and starvation.
After decades of careful forensic investigation, scientific analysis, and intense study, scholarly revisionists have allocated the “gas chambers,” “steam chambers,” “electrocution conveyor belts,” “suffocation rooms,” “pedal-driven-brain-bashing-devices,” “Jew bone powder used for construction,” and other absurdities to the realm of science fiction. (See: Vho.org, Codoh.com, holocaustdenialvideos.com, Winston Smith Ministry of Truth)
A
report from the International Red Cross Tracing Service that tallied a
total of just under 300,000 German concentration camp victims. Main
cause of death: Typhus.
In 1991, a leading Jewish Freemason let slip the agenda behind the Holocaust religion. Ian J. Kagedan, an official for the Canadian branch of B’nai B’rith (a secretive organization founded in New York City in 1843 by Jewish Freemasons), told us:
“Memory of the Holocaust is central to the new world order. …Achieving our quest of a “new world order” depends on our learning the Holocaust’s lessons.”
Jewish Freemason admits Holocaust story a vehicle for Jewish World Domination.
Compendium of Jewish fund raising campaigns; 6,000,000 galore. Click to enlarge
34
appearances of the Kabbalistic 6,000,000 figure of Jews in the New York
Times from 1869 – 1945 (months before the end of WWII). Click to
enlarge.
Five early Jew holohoaxes. Click to enlarge.
More early hoaxocausts-
This
1897 “Science of Religion” American magazine, claims nearly six million
Jews were killed in the Bar Kokhba revolt 132-136AD. What a laugh!
Click to enlarge.
1899: New York Times speaks of a “mighty holocaust of jews”. Click to enlarge.
One Third of the Holocaust
Judea Declares War on Germany (by Fredrick Toben
The Persecution of Revisionists: The Holocaust Unveiled
The Last Days of the Big Lie (by Eric Hunt)
Facebook
Twitter
GooglePlus
more
No comments:
Post a Comment