DIAMOND IN A CESSPOOL!
1939: "BERLIN THINKS DOOR IS LEFT OPEN TO PEACEFUL SOLUTION"
*
* If you haven't already done so, be sure
to sign up for our FREE Report & FREE Updates List at bottom of page.
The
August 28th, 1939 headline of the Hitler-hating
New York Times confirmed that Hitler sought
to avoid war with Britain & France. Below is the abridged
text of the thoughtful and logical letter which Hitler wrote to
French President Edouard Daladier - a letter which The Times
published on its front page, and cannot now deny.
You won't see this letter on the History Channel or in a Ken Burns PBS crockumentary!
August 28, 1939
Hitler Note and Paris Communique
The text of Chancellor Hitler's letter to Premiere Daladier
of France:
Chancellor's Letter
Boxed
commentary and images added
My dear Minister President:
I
understand the misgiving to which
you give expression. I, too, have never overlooked
the grave responsibilities which are imposed upon those who
are in charge of the fate of nations. As
an old front line fighter,
I, like yourself, know the horrors of war. Guided by this
attitude and experience, I have tried to remove all matters
that might cause conflict between our two peoples.
ANALYSIS:
Under the terms of the post-World War I
Treaty of Versailles, the Saar region was to be occupied jointly by the
United
Kingdom and France for 15 years. The Saar's coal
production was controlled by France. In 1935, a referendum was permitted
and the people of the Saar region (which borders
France) voted, by a margin of 91%, to return to Germany.
After the Saar vote was held as promised, Hitler declared that Germany's western borders
were fixed.
|
As you
could judge for yourself during your last visit here, the
German people, in the knowledge of its own behavior held and
holds no ill feelings, much less hatred, for its one-time
brave opponent.
On the contrary, the pacification of our western
frontier led to an increasing sympathy. Certainly as far as
the German people are concerned, a sympathy which, on
many occasions, showed itself in a really demonstrative way.
ANALYSIS: This
is 100% true. Throughout the 1930's, neither in
the German press nor among the happy German people,
does one find any expression of animosity towards France or England.
This
is remarkable given what was done to the
defenseless nation after World War I (territorial losses, crushing
monetary reparations,
hunger blockade, occupation, theft of resources,
etc).
1-
After many years
of humiliation and suffering, the German people
under Hitler had obtained happiness. The last thing they or their
government
wanted was for another destructive war against
France and England.
2- Former British Prime Minister David Lloyd George visited Hitler in 1936,
and then wrote:
"There
is
for the first time since the war a general
sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater
sense of general gaiety of spirit
throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere
and Englishmen
I met during my trip and who knew Germany
well were very impressed with the change.
The idea of a Germany intimidating Europe with a threat that its irresistible army might march
across frontiers forms no part of (Hitler's) new vision." (here)
|
The
construction of the western fortifications, which swallowed
and still swallow many millions (of Marks) at the same time
constituted for Germany a document of acceptance and
fixation of the final frontiers of the Reich. In doing so, the
German people have renounced two provinces which
once belonged to the German Reich, later were conquered again
at the cost of much blood, and finally were defended
with even more blood.
I believed that by this renunciation and this attitude every conceivable source of conflict
between our two peoples that might lead to a repetition of the tragedy of 1914-1918 had been done away with.
ANALYSIS:
Hitler makes a very logical point here. If
someone builds an expensive fence
along a certain line on his
property, common sense tells us he has accepted that line as his
property line,
and everything on the other side as his neighbor's.
By spending millions of marks on
border fortifications at a certain location,
Hitler's verbal renunciation of additional territory
was
supported by actual deeds as well.
|
This
voluntary limitation of the German claims to life in the West,
can, however, not be interpreted as an acceptance of all other
phases of the Versailles dictate. I have really tried,
year after year, to achieve the revision of at least the most
impossible and unbearable provisions of this dictate
by way of negotiation. This was impossible.
In this sense I have tried to remove from
the world the most irrational provisions of the Versailles
dictate. I have made an offer to the Polish government which
shocked the German people. Nobody but myself could
even dare go before the public with such an offer. It could
therefore be made only once.
ANALYSIS: The
man is telling the truth, again! In its September
2nd issue, the New York Times will summarize the
details of the generous offer that Germany made to aggressive Poland.
Among
other concessions, Hitler offered to give Poland a
1-mile wide highway running through German territory so that it would
always
have access to the Baltic Sea. Poland's answer was
to increase the abuse of Germans who were stranded in Poland due to the
post-World War I land grab.
The
yellow
areas were stolen from Germany at gunpoint after
Germany was deceived and betrayed into unconditionally surrendering
during World War I. The ridiculous Danzig Corridor
handed all of Western Prussia to Poland, and cut off Eastern Prussia
from
the Reich. Germans trapped in the Corridor and the
"free city" of Danzig (today Gdansk, Poland) were abused
and denied the right of self-determination.
|
I am
deeply convinced that if, especially, England at that time had, instead
of starting a wild campaign against Germany in the press and
instead of launching rumors of a German mobilization, somehow
talked the Poles into being reasonable, Europe today and for
twenty-five years could enjoy a condition of deepest peace.
.
As
things
were, Polish public opinion was excited by a lie about German
aggression. Clear decisions that the situation called for were
made difficult for the Polish government. Above all, the
government's ability to see the limitations of realistic possibilities
was impaired by the guarantee promise that followed.
ANALYSIS:
Hitler was not
the only one to accuse the British press of warmongering. Among
others, Lord
Beaverbrook, the biggest newspaper man in England,
made this same observation in a pair of 1938 private letters.
Beaverbrook:
“There are 20,000 German Jews in England – in the professions, pursuing research. They all work against an accommodation with Germany.”
In a subsequent letter, Beaverbrook added:
“The Jews have got a big position in the press here. . At last I am shaken.
The Jews may drive us into war.”
Beaverbrook wrote privately what he dared not say publicly.
|
The Polish
government declined the proposals. Polish public opinion, convinced
that England and France would now fight for Poland, began to
make demands one might possibly stigmatize as laughable insanity
were they not so tremendously dangerous. At that point an
unbearable terror, a physical and economic persecution of the Germans
although they numbered more than a million and a half began in
the regions ceded by the Reich.
ANALYSIS: In
regard to Poland being propped up and encouraged to
fight Germany, again, Hitler can be corroborated by
an independent source. From Count Jerzey Potocki, Polish Ambassador to
the United States, written privately in 1934:
"Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands. When bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe ... President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for."
1- Polish Ambassador Jersey Potocki leaving FDR's
White House.
2- Marshal Rydz-Smigley was the effective military dictator
of Poland. Backed by the UK, France, & FDR, the "brave" Smigley (who later fled from his
defeated country) was very outspoken in his warmongering against Germany.
|
ANALYSIS: It's true, again! As the Polish government "looked
the other way", Germans suffered extreme abuse at the hands of Bolshevik terror gangs. The September 3rd massacre at Bromberg,
which propaganda historians have tried to mitigate, but cannot
deny, gives a clear indication of the malevolent and
envious hatred directed towards innocent Germans.
At Bromberg, as many as 3000 Germans, including women and children were
tied up, tortured, bludgeoned, mutilated, butchered
or shot - and it wasn't the first time that such events took place
in the Corridor.
|
May I
now take the liberty of putting a question to you, Herr
Daladier: How would you act as a Frenchman if, through
some unhappy issue of a brave struggle, one of your provinces
severed by a corridor occupied by a foreign power? And
if a big city - let us say Marseilles - were hindered from
belonging to France and if Frenchmen living in this
area were persecuted, beaten and maltreated, yes, murdered, in
a bestial manner?
You
are a Frenchman,
Herr Daladier, and I therefore know how you would act. I
am German, Herr Daladier. Do not doubt my sense of honor
nor my consciousness of duty to act exactly like you.
If, then, you had the misfortune that is ours, would you then,
Herr Daladier, have any understanding that Germany was
without cause to insist that the corridor through France remained,
that the robbed territory must not be restored, and that
the return of Marseilles be forbidden?
ANALYSIS: The
logic of Hitler's question to Daladier is impossible
to refute, which is why propaganda historians have
edited the existence of the Danzig Corridor, as well as the abuses and
murders which took place within it, out of the history books and off of the
TV crockumentaries.
Daladier (left) meeting with Hitler
in 1938 to peacefully diffuse the Sudetenland controversy.
|
Certainly I
cannot imagine, Herr Daladier, that Germany would fight against you
for this reason. For, I and all of us, have renounced
Alsace-Lorraine in order to avoid further bloodshed. Much less would
we shed blood in order to maintain an injustice that would as
unbearable for you as it would be immaterial to us.
AVAILABLE AS A PDF OR
IN PAPERBACK
Possibly
we, as old front
fighters, can best understand each other in a number of fields.
I ask you, however, do understand this also: That it is impossible
for a nation of honor to renounce the claim of almost two
million human beings and to them maltreated at its own borders.
I have therefore set up a clear demand to Poland. Danzig and
the Corridor must return to Germany.
I
see no way of persuading Poland,
which feels herself as unassailable, now that she enjoys the
protection of her guarantees, to accept a peaceful solution.
If
our two countries
on that account should be destined to meet again on the field
of battle, there would nevertheless be a difference in the motives.
I, Herr Daladier, shall be leading my people in a fight to
rectify a wrong, whereas the others would be fighting to preserve
that wrong.
ANALYSIS:
Touche! The Fuhrer got you on that one, Monsieur Daladier! Care to respond, Eddie?
Eddie? Hello? (sound of crickets)
|
That
is the more tragic since many important men, also among your
own people, have recognized the insanity of the solutions then
found (at Versailles) as also the possibility of maintaining
it lastingly.
That
our two peoples should enter a new, bloody
war of destruction is painful not only for you, but also for
me, Herr Daladier. As already observed, I see no possibility
for us on our part to exert influence in the direction of
reasonableness upon Poland for correcting a situation that is unbearable
for the German people and the German Reich.
- Adolf Hitler
SUMMARY
Nearly 7 years into Hitler's reign, at a time when Europe was still at peace and Jews were living well and prospering in Hitler's Germany (it's true!), Hitler's logical, thoughtful and truthful attempt to avert disaster fell on deaf ears. Neither the French nor the British even attempted to refute Hitler's claims. Instead, just like modern day 'court historians', they simply ignored the irrefutable points which Hitler expressed; and then babbled on about "the rights of Poland". By now, the warmongering pressures on Daladier and British Prime Minister Chamberlain were too much to hold back. Thus emboldened, the militaristic and ultra-nationalist government of Poland allowed the Polish-Jewish Bolshevik Partisans to escalate their border provocations of Germany; culminating with the September 1st German counter-attack against Poland, followed by the liberation of the Corridor and Danzig. Britain and France declared war on Germany, yet did not lift a finger to help Poland. Having been played for 'chumps', Poland was soon discarded by the Allies as Stalin's Soviet Union then invaded Poland from the east. While continuing to ignore Hitler's pleas for peace, the Allies will spend the next eight months plotting Scandinavian-based maneuvers and deploying a massive mechanized fighting force in northern France, in anticipation of invading Germany via Belgium and Holland, sometime in the Spring of 1940. The rest, as they say, is history.
The delirious people of German Danzig greet Hitler as their
liberator. Britain & France went to war and unleashed hell over this?!
|
You will NEVER hear the REAL story of World War II from this commie-creep, Ken
Burns, or his co-conspirator Lynn Novick. But Mike King & 'Sugar's 'The Bad War' will
give it to you straight!
"Sugar and I don't lie!"
HELP MIKE
KING & TOMATOBUBBLE TO STAY ONLINE, PRODUCING AND GROWING!
|
No comments:
Post a Comment