This
is the updated version (as of December 2014) of my 911 production
originally broadcast on The Peoples Voice in January 2014. It has
additional footage and commentary, improved graphics and is a direct
response to David Cameron's ridiculous speech at the UN General Assembly
in 2014.
A
clip from one of many radio programs conducted by the inimitable Dr.
William Pierce entitled "The Scorpion and the Frog". Want to hear more?
Visit https://archive.org/details/DrWilliam... and you will find this broadcast in full, along with many others ingenious analysis and prophecies by this great man.
BAFS:But, Mr Prophet, those "Jews" are Atheists, Luciferians, Satanists, Zionists, and the world's greatest perverts, and they are doing EXACTLY what decadent Christendom has allowed them to do after conquering all Muslim lands and neutralising Islam!
US, ISRAELI AND EUROPEAN WORSE THAN SAVAGES ...
LONG LIVE ISRAEL! THE WAR AGAINST ISLAM AND THE FREE WORLD!
When a Muslim is shown on television hitting a punching ball in a gym, or paint-balling the White English Zionist TV whores say MUSLIMS ARE PREPARING FOR WAR AGAINST BRITAIN!
WHAT IS THIS ONE?
Black Guy Explains Why Blacks Will Lose A Race War - Extended Version
WHILE
EVERYONE IS DISTRACTED BY THE ROYAL BABY: more than 50 civilians in
northern Syria, including seven children have been killed by
psychopathic pilots with supersonic fighter jets that are overloaded
with 'smart bombs'. These bombs are so 'smart' that yesterday morning
FIFTY CIVILIANS were murdered in one fail swoop in the quaint village of
Birmahle. The cost of the bombs used to kill these people is estimated
to be around $4million.
THE
JUDAS CONSPIRACY asks; "Is there a Jewish war against Islam?" Do
'ISIS' really exist? Is this a war which benefits Israel, and leves the
rest of the world bankrupt or dead? It is a TV series which no
broadcaster had the courage to show.
PLEASE
SUBSCRIBE and help us fund more investigations and report on subjects
which are never covered on the Mainstream. To start your subscription,
click here.
In 2012, Gordon Duff made the case that “Slowly, every police department in the United States, at the
behest of the Department of Homeland Security [DHS], is being trained
by Israeli groups. “As part of this training, there is an increased move to use
of military uniforms, armored vehicles, heavy weapons, illegal
surveillance, lying to the people, press and courts and systematic
interference in the electoral system…
“The door to this foreign influence in America was thrown open by the
Department of Homeland Security and, in particular, Michael Chertoff,
an Israeli citizen who was, in particular, most instrumental as former
Director of DHS in implementing policies challenged as unconstitutional,
policies the new ‘Israeli trained’ American police are tasked with
stopping opposition to.”
This “Israelization” process, said Duff, includes the following:
“• Total militarization of police, military tactics, utter disrespect
for civil law, the constitution, civil liberties, freedom of speech and
the unbridled growth of centralized power under unlimited corruption;
government by money and organized crime.
· Systematic suppression of dissent
· Systematic use of intimidation to control the electoral process at every level of government
· Seamless coordination with military and “internationalist” groups
to prepare for mass internment of sectors of the population, numbering
in the millions
· Coordinated use of full military power including but not limited
to bombing, strafing, heavy artillery and summary executions, the same
methods Israel uses on a daily basis
· Even more control of the press, based on the Israeli model, with
two “controlled” views, on pro-government and the second, “controlled
opposition.”
Perhaps some would think that this is an implausible scenario and can
never occur in the real world. Perhaps some would say that Duff is out
of touch with reality and is therefore wrong here. Well, go ahead. Prove
him wrong. Before you do, show Duff that that it is implausible that
the Israeli regime has controlled U.S. foreign policy for more than
fifty years. Show him that Michael Chertoff, who is an Israeli citizen,
has served the Department of Homeland Security well.
Show Duff that the Israeli Lobby has virtually little influence on U.S. foreign policy.[1] Show him that the twentieth century has not become, in the words of Yuri Slezkine, “The Jewish Century.”[2]
Show Duff that the Dreadful Few never had subversive cells in countries like Russia in the nineteenth century.[3] Show him that the Neoconservative movement is not Bolshevism under a new name.[4] Show him that the same movement did not create the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.[5]
Show him that the Neoconservative/Neo-Bolshevik ideology is not
responsible for the death of at least 4,811 Iraqis just last month.[6]
Show Duff that the Israeli regime has never been involved in literal ethnic cleansing.[7] Show him that they have stopped slaughtering civilian men, women and children in the Middle East.[8] Show him that the Dreadful Few never used the “Holocaust” as an ideology to exploit Jewish suffering.[9] Show him that they did not sexually liquidate the Germans after World War II.[10] Show him that they have stopped humiliating the Goyim through sexually explicit materials on the big screen.[11]
Show Duff that the Dreadful Few, or the “Khazarian Mafia,” as Preston
James would have put it, never used “anti-Semitism” as a weapon to
silence reasonable people.[12] Show him that they never tried to silence respected medical journals such as The Lancet for criticizing Israel’s ethnic cleansing.[13]
Show Duff that the Dreadful Few never aspire to control much of the world through the NSA.[14] Show him that they never tried to infiltrate the U.S. in the past.[15] Show him that they have never stolen weapons from the U.S.[16]
Show Duff him that the Israeli regime never possessed nuclear warheads[17] and never bragged about being capable of literally wiping out much of the world, including major cities in Europe.[18] Show him that they do not grab the Republican Party and to a large part even Congress by the balls.[19] Show him that Bush was not a puppet working for the big bosses.[20] Show him that Bush never said,
“I’m going to kick this sorry mother fucker [Saddam Hussein] all over the Middle East.”[21]
Throw Duff’s analysis away and never look at it again. Call it a
conspiracy theory. Better yet, step on it. Spit at it, and burn it. But
do so at your own peril, for this would not be the first time that the
Israeli regime would get involved in covert operations in the U.S. and
elsewhere.
Remember Abu Ghraib? Noted British journalist Robert Fisk pointed out
in 2004 that the people who ended up torturing prisoners at Abu Ghraib
were all trained in Israel. Fisk meticulously wrote:
“The actual interrogators accused
of encouraging U.S. troops to abuse Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib jail
were working for at least one company with extensive military and
commercial contacts with Israel.
“The head of an American company
whose personnel are implicated in the Iraqi tortures, it now turns out,
attended an ‘anti-terror’ training camp in Israel and, earlier this
year, was presented with an award by Shaul Mofaz, the right-wing Israeli
defense minister.
“According to J.P. London’s
company, CACI International, the visit of London — sponsored by an
Israeli lobby group and including U.S. congressmen and other defense
contractors — was “to promote opportunities for strategic partnerships
and joint ventures between U.S. and Israeli defense and homeland
security agencies.
“The Pentagon and the occupation
powers in Iraq insist that only U.S. citizens have been allowed to
question prisoners in Abu Ghraib but this takes no account of Americans
who may also hold double citizenship.
“The once secret torture report by
U.S. Gen. Antonio Taguba refers to “third country nationals” involved
in the mistreatment of prisoners in Iraq.
“Taguba mentions Steven
Staphanovic and John Israel as involved in the abuses at Abu Ghraib.
Staphanovic, who worked for CACI — known to the U.S. military as ‘Khaki’
— was said by Taguba to have ‘allowed and/or instructed MPs (military
police), who were not trained in interrogation techniques, to facilitate
interrogations by ‘setting conditions’ … he clearly knew his
instructions equated to physical abuse.’
“One of Staphanovic’s co-workers,
Joe Ryan — who was not named in the Taguba report — now says he
underwent an ‘Israeli interrogation course’ before going to Iraq.
“We know the Pentagon asked Israel
for its ‘rules of engagement’ in the occupied West Bank and Gaza.
Israeli officers have briefed their U.S. opposite numbers and, according
to The Associated Press, ‘in January and February of 2003, Israeli and
American troops trained together in southern Israel’s Negev desert …
“Israel has also hosted senior law enforcement officials from the United States for a seminar on counter-terrorism.’”[22]
Fisk concluded the article by saying that
“it is clear the torture trail at Abu Ghraib has to run much further
than a group of brutal U.S. military cops, all of whom claim
‘intelligence officers’ told them to ‘soften up’ their prisoners for
questioning.”[23]
General Janis Karpinski, who was at Abu Ghraib at the time, also
testified that “she met an Israeli interrogator at an undisclosed
facility while she was escorting a retiring four-star general through
Iraq last year.” Karpinski said,
“He was clearly from the Middle East and he said, ‘well I do some of
the interrogation here, and of course, I speak Arabic but I’m not an
Arab, I’m from Israel.”[24]
Abu Ghraib was one of the most brutal aspects of the war in Iraq, and
it was literally humiliating to Muslims in general. As Seymour M. Hersh
put it then:
“Such dehumanization is
unacceptable in any culture, but it is especially so in the Arab world.
Homosexual acts are against Islamic law and it is humiliating for men to
be naked in front of other men, Bernard Haykel, a professor of Middle
Eastern studies at New York University, explained. ‘Being put on top of
each other and forced to masturbate, being naked in front of each
other—it’s all a form of torture,’ Haykel said.”[25]
Because of these abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, which include
sexual assault, sodomy, and beating, numerous detainees attempted to
commit suicide. At least four of them succeeded;[26] some “hanged themselves with makeshift nooses.”[27] The U.S. of course closely guarded this fact.[28] George Santayana famously argued that “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”[29]
We have completely forgotten about how the Israelis have manipulated
the U.S., and because of this, some cannot see that the current event in
Baltimore is quite in favor of the regime itself because it distracts
people very easily. E. Michael Jones has recently gotten into the heart
of the issue and has done a great job assessing the real disease here:
The Dreadful Few have always been interested in agitating bad
situations for their own ends. For example, who flooded the bad
situations in Ferguson with at least $33 millions?
George Soros, the same guy who has done covert work in places like Ukraine.[30]
In other words, the Israeli regime seems to believe that one of the
best ways to distract people from focusing on Israel’s crimes is to lead
people away from the real issue and make them talk about other issues,
such inciting “racial” conflict in the U.S. This seems to be their plan,
and it is working pretty well.[31]
If angry blacks begin to think that white cops are their enemies, who
will win in the end? The cops? Those angry blacks? Or the people who
are playing with the remote control?
It seems to me that the issue indirectly goes back to what Daniel
Pipes has proposed in Syria: Let Assad and the Syrian terrorists fight
until they kill each other and then the Dreadful Few will become
victorious. Remember how the Dreadful Few used “racism” or
“anti-Semitism” as a remote control in the 1960s? In the end, only the Dreadful Few win when they try
to agitate social conflicts, not cops or angry blacks. In fact, numerous
studies show that “cops are more hesitant to shoot armed black suspects
than whites…”[32] In addition, some cops “claim harsher treatment when they shoot black suspects.”[33]
Another vitally important point is simply this: If “black lives matter,”[34] why aren’t protesters angry at abortion? Listen to this:
“Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) numbers indicate the horrific fact that nearly 72% of black babies are aborted in Mississippi. Whites outnumber blacks in Mississippi 2-to-1, but white abortions make up 26% of the total.
“In other heart-wrenching news, there are now more black babies aborted than born in
New York City, according to the NYC Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene’s Office of Vital Statistics. The number of black abortions in
NYC is over 42%, while Hispanics are not far behind at 31%
“The abortion figures are more staggering when you consider that 82% of New York City abortions were on black or Hispanic babies; in Georgia, 73%; and in Texas, 64% of abortions were on minorities…”
“Another tragic abortion-related
death took place after a counselor strongly advised 18-year-old Marla
Cardamone to abort her baby. Marla died at a Pennsylvania hospital from
complications.
“Her Mother, Deborah Cardamone,
vowed to expose the truth; so at Marla’s viewing, Deborah Cardamone
requested an open casket–even though Marla’s face and body were still
swollen. She hopes to raise awareness about the abortion industry and
wants people to understand that abortions may be legal, but are not
always safe.
“Also largely unreported is the fact that the anguish and trauma of abortions often
cause women years of emotional pain, torment, and guilt. Many young
women try to act normal and hide the fact that they are in physical or
emotional pain, often experiencing severe trauma soon after receiving an
abortion.
“Moreover, countless women have
experienced increased alcohol or drug use, eating disorders, depression,
nightmares, self-destructive behavior, and suicidal thoughts or
attempts.”[35]
Even the Huffington Post did not hesitate to document in
2013 that “African-American teenagers are having abortions at a rate
that is about four times higher than that of their white counterparts.
“In New York, the state with the highest abortion rate in the
country, the situation is even more grim, with pregnancies among black
teens — excluding miscarriages — resulting in abortion 67 percent of the
time.”[36]
In the same vein, the Atlantic pointed out, “Even as the
U.S. abortion rate is at its lowest since Roe v. Wade, women of color
are five times as likely to terminate a pregnancy as their white
counterparts.”[37]
Nikki Minaj, who never misses her opportunity to show her derriere on
stage and in videos, herself lamented that having an abortion “always
haunted me all my life.”[38] Furthermore, the public never points out that studies show that abortion itself “can lead to risk of heart disease and stroke.”[39]
Ryan Bomberger himself pointed out, isn’t abortion “racist”?[40]
If we are going to fight against irresponsible cops, then we also
should focus our attention on abortion. By the way, the abortion
movement is a largely Jewish enterprise.[41]
Which brings us to the key issue here: the black community should
morally fight against those who are pushing abortion, which became a big
issue shortly after the Civil Rights movement.[42]
The Dreadful Few have been seductively and deceptively using the
black community for far too long. It is time for a moral shift, and we
also shouldn’t let the Israeli regime distract us.
Lastly, if the same people in Baltimore cannot fight against
abortion, Planned Parenthood, and black-on-black crimes, we should
ignore their point. They are welcome to make background noise, but they
can leave us out of it. [1] See for example John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007). [2] Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004). [3] Eric Haberer, Jews and Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995). [4] Francis Fukuyama, “After Neoconservatism,” NY Times, February 19, 2006. [5] See Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004). [6] Margaret Griffis, “4,811 Killed in Iraq during April,” Antiwar.com, April 30, 2015. [7] See for example Ilan Pappe, The Forgotten Palestinians: A History of the Palestinians in Israel (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011); The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (Oxford: One World Publications, 2007); [8] Norman Finkelstein, Method and Madness: The Hidden Story of Israel’s Assault on Gaza (New York: OR Books, 2015). [9] Norman Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (New York: Verso, 2000). [10] See for example R. M. Douglas, Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans After the Second World War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012); Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans (New York: Palgrave, 2006); James Bacques, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of the German Civilians Under Allied Occupation,
1944-1950 (Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2007); Giles MacDonogh, After the
Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation (New York: Basic
Books, 2007); Thomas Goodrich, Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 (Sheridan, CO: Aberdeen Books, 2000). [11] See Nathan Abrams, The New Jew in Films: Exploring Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Cinema (Piscataway: Rutgers University Press, 2012). [12] Norman Finkelstein, Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005). [13]
Jeremy Laurance, “Lancet medical journal under attack for ‘extremist
hate propaganda’ over its coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,”
The Independent, April 24, 2015. [14] Glenn Greenwald, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA and the Surveillance State (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2014). [15] Grant F. Smith, Foreign Agents: The American Israel Public Affairs Committee from the 1963 Fulbright Hearings to the 2005 Espionage Scandal (Washington: Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy, 2007). [16] Grant F. Smith, Divert!: NUMEC, Zalman Shapiro and the Diversion of US Weapons Grade Uranium into the Israeli Nuclear Weapons Program (Washington: Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy, 2012). [17] Avner Cohen, Israel and the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998); The Worst-Kept Secret: Israel’s Bargain with the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010). [18] “The War Game,” Guardian, September 21, 2003. [19]
For a new development, see for example Maureen Shamee, “Two Republican
presidential contenders seek support of Jewish audience in Las Vegas,”
European Jewish Press, April 26, 2015; J. J. Goldberg, “In Stealth
Move, Congress Backs Israeli Right’s War on Settlement Boycotts,” Jewish
Daily Forward, April 24, 2015. [20] See for example Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack: The Definitive Account of the Decision to Invade Iraq (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004). [21] Quoted in Michael Isikoff and David Corn, Hubris: Inside the Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the War in Iraq (New York: Crown, 2007), 3. [22] Robert Fisk, “Abu Ghraib Torture Trail Leads to Israel,” The Independent, May 26, 2004. [23] Ibid. [24] “Abu Ghraib general says she met Israeli in Iraq,” CNN, July 4, 2004. [25] Seymour M. Hersh, “Torture at Abu Ghraib,” New Yorker, May 10, 2004. [26] “‘Fingernail Slash’ at Guantanamo,” BBC, December 7, 2007. [27] “Guantanamo Commander Says 3 Detainees Hanged Themselves with Makeshift Nooses,” USA Today, June 11, 2006; “Triple Suicide at Guantanamo Camp,” BBC, June 11, 2006; “Three Die in Guantanamo Suicide Pact,” The Times, June 11, 2006. [28] “Mass Guantanamo Suicide Protest,” BBC, January 25, 2007. [29] George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Vol. I (London: Archibald Constable, 1906), 284. [30] Kelly Riddell, George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action,” Washington Times, January 14, 2015. [31]
If I may add a note here: The so-called “racism” as espoused by the
people in Baltimore and Ferguson is news to me. I went to public
schools, taught for six years in Florida, and have never once seen this
nonsense. [32] “Cops are MORE hesitant to shoot armed black suspects than whites, study finds,” Daily Mail, January 6, 2015. [33] Ed Krayewski, “White Cleveland Cops Claim Harsher Treatment When They Shoot Black Suspects,” Reason, December 2, 2014. [34] Steven Ertelt, “Black Lives Matter? 78% of Abortions in New York City Were Done on Black, Hispanic Babies,” Life News, December 1, 2014. [35] David Fiorazo, “Margaret Sanger’s Mission Accomplished?,” Western Journalism, March 4, 2014. [36] Jessica Cumberbatch, “Abortion Rates Highest Among Black Teens, Study Shows, But Accuracy May Be Hard To Measure,” Huffington Post, June 14, 2013. [37] “Abortion’s Racial Gap,” Atlantic, September 22, 2014. [38] “Nicki Minaj Is Hip-Hop’s Killer Diva: Inside Rolling Stone’s New Issue,” Rolling Stone, December 30, 2014. [39] Amy Sobie, “New Study: Abortion Can Lead to Risk of Heart Disease and Stroke,” Life News, March 21, 2013. [40] Ryan Bombberger, “Abortion is Racist, For Every 1,000 Black Babies Born in New York City, 1,223 are Aborted,” Life News, November 14, 2014. [41] See E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1040-1044. We will discuss this more fully in the future. [42] Thomas Sowell himself has made similar arguments. See Black Rednecks and White Liberals (New York: Encounter Books, 2005); Education: Assumption vs. History (Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1987).
Jonas
E. Alexis studied mathematics and philosophy as an undergraduate at
Palm Beach Atlantic University and has a master's degree in education
from Grand Canyon University.
He
is currently teaching mathematics in South Korea. He plays soccer and
basketball in his spare time. He is also a cyclist. He is currently
writing a book tentatively titled Zionism and the West.
Alexis
welcomes comments, letters, and queries in order to advance, explain,
and expound rational and logical discussion on issues such as the
Israel/Palestine conflict, the history of Christianity, and the history
of ideas.
In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, Alexis
asks that all queries be appropriately respectful and maintain a level
of civility. As the saying goes, “iron sharpens iron,” and the best way
to sharpen one’s mind is through constructive criticism, good and bad.
However,
Alexis has no patience with name-calling and ad hominem attack. He has
deliberately ignored many queries and irrational individuals in the past
for this specific reason—and he will continue to abide by this policy.
Plus de 120 000 enfants africains morts en 2013 à cause de faux médicaments
En
Afrique, la question des médicaments pose un véritable problème et l’un
d’entre eux serait responsable de 122 350 décès selon une étude.
En Afrique, certains médicaments sont dégradés, falsifiés ou encore
diffusés dans des conditions insalubres. L’ASTMH (American Journal of
Tropical Medicine and Hygiene) a réalisé une étude dans le but de se
pencher sur les désastres causés par ces molécules.
L’enquête subventionnée par l’institut américain de médecine, le
Health Grand Challenges Program ainsi que le Global Antibiotic
Resistance Partnership montre que 122 350 enfants auraient perdu la vie.
Un antipaludéen de mauvaise qualité serait donc à l’origine de ces
multitudes décès.
Des enfants perdent la vie en Afrique à cause d’un médicament
Le journal constate que des analyses plus poussées doivent être
réalisées dans le but de connaitre avec certitude l’impact en Afrique de
ces médicaments qui ne possèdent pas une qualité similaire à ceux
diffusés dans d’autres pays ou en France. Il estime également qu’une
surveillance accrue doit être mise en place, car l’objectif consiste à
optimiser la réglementation pour éviter la vente de tels médicaments qui
n’ont pas une qualité adéquate.
L’ASTMH reconnait que le problème lié à ces molécules est mal
quantifié et le sujet mérite une attention particulière. Les calculs ont
été réalisés en 2013 et ils se sont basés sur les médicaments du
secteur privé consommés par les enfants.
La dangerosité d’un médicament contrefait ou périmé
Pour rappel, un médicament contrefait ou périmé a des conséquences
parfois désastreuses sur l’organisme. Si un traitement pour une maladie
est ingéré lorsque la date de péremption est passée, le principe actif
est moins présent.
De ce fait, le patient peut être victime d’un désagrément comme s’il
ne prenait pas de médicaments. La contrefaçon peut également entraîner
la mort notamment si la qualité est entachée ou si la véritable molécule
est remplacée par un placebo. Il faut savoir que la contrefaçon
concerne de nombreux médicaments comme les anticancéreux, les
antibiotiques ou encore les contraceptifs comme le précise Interpharma.
Pourquoi la "gauche" a un problème avec l'Islam - Conférence de P. Tevanian et S. Chichah
Le collectif Quart d’X ainsi que les Indigènes de Belgique ont organisé en avril dernier à Bruxelles une conférence intitulée « Pourquoi la « gauche » a un problème avec l’Islam ». Le philosophe français Pierre Tevanian, auteur du livre « La Haine de la Religion : Comment l’athéisme est devenu l’opium du peuple de gauche », était l’invité de cette conférence. Souhail Chichah, chargé de cours à l’université de Lyon, a tenu le rôle de discutant.
Nous tenons aussi à signaler que le
Cercle des Volontaires ne fait pas parti de l’organisation de
l’évènement. Soucieux à un réveil des consciences, nous avons été
invités à filmer cette conférence, que nous vous présentons avec grand
intérêt. Dans notre démarche d’ouverture, nous diffusons au plus grand
nombre d’entre vous des analyses que nous estimons utiles à l’avancée
d’un véritable débat public dans nos sociétés, et surtout une parole qui
n’a pas de tribune au sein des médias « traditionnels ».
Oil & Economic Wars with Russia, China & Iran - William Engdahl
Russia,
China, the US, and the seeds of World War III are explored--from oil
and energy, to economic sanctions and the hidden threat of Monsanto
crops. Putin’s role as a foil to the West, the failures of neocons,
consequences of the Iraq war and US intervention in Libya and Syria,
plus the western backing of ISIS, is detailed with William Engdahl. How
is China emerging in the struggle for resources of Africa and the Middle
East? Are international conflicts proxy wars of the larger struggle
between the US and Russia? Explore the geopolitical and expanded
military landscape that extends from oil fields to agricultural ones in
this uncensored Buzzsaw interview, hosted by Sean Stone.
GUEST BIO:
F.
William Engdahl is a political economist specializing for more than
thirty years in geopolitical analysis of global events. He is author of
the international best-selling book on oil and geopolitics, A Century of
War: Anglo-American Oil Politics, published as well in German, French,
English, Chinese, Russian, Czech, Korean, Turkish, Croatian, Slovenian
and Arabic. In 2010 he published Gods of Money: Wall Street and the
Death of the American Century and in 2013 a revised updated edition of
his best-selling Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic
Manipulation completing a trilogy on the power of oil, food and money
control. His book, Target China: How Washington and Wall Street Plan to
Cage the Asian Dragon appeared in 2014, and The Lost Hegemon: Whom the
gods would destroy is due for release in summer 2015.
EPISODE BREAKDOWN: 00:00 Welcome William Engdahl to Buzzsaw. 01:02 The current situation in the Middle East and oil politics. 05:05 Gaddafi and Mubarak working together a reason for the war in Egypt. 07:00 The Iran nuclear negotiations and stability in the Middle East. 10:25 Sanctions on Iran. 12:50 Is Russia really a nationalist banking system or is it still apart of Rothschild banking? 16:45 Putin has put most of Russia’s economy in oil and gas. 19:40 Anger at Putin’s reelection in 2012. 20:40 What are the motivations of the destabilization campaigns. 23:35 Are these campaigns used to keep China out? 25:53 Will we continue to just have proxy wars with China or will it become full blown war? 27:50 Attacking China’s food supply. 31:20 What Monsanto is exactly and GMOs. 36:50 Who is benefitting from the drought in California? 41:20 Investing in industrial projects in Russia and China. 44:00 Thank you and goodbye.
Témoignage.Appelons-le Arié. Disons qu’il a la
vingtaine et une tête bien faite. Arié fait partie de la soixantaine de
soldats israéliens qui ont accepté de témoigner auprès de l’organisation
non gouvernementale Breaking the Silence au sujet de l’opération
« Bordure protectrice », conduite à l’été 2014 dans la bande de Gaza.
Arié s’est longuement confié au Monde sur son expérience comme
tireur à bord d’un char de combat. Il abordait la dernière ligne droite
de son service militaire lorsqu’il a été envoyé à Gaza. Son témoignage,
édifiant, est confirmé sur de nombreux points par ceux qui figurent dans
le recueil de l’ONG, publié lundi 4 mai.
« Je suis tireur
dans un char. J’ai suivi une formation classique de quatre mois, puis
quatre autres de formation spécialisée. C’est beaucoup de balistique, de
calculs de distance, d’exercices pratiques. C’est vous qui contrôlez
les armes, il faut rester calme et précis. On a un bouton qui permet
d’allumer l’électricité dans le canon. Quand on le pousse, cela veut
dire qu’on se rapproche du tir. La règle élémentaire est : on ne joue
pas avec, on n’essaie même pas de vérifier s’il fonctionne, on ne le
pousse que si on va tirer. Et pour cela, il faut l’ordre du commandant.
Ça devient instinctif. J’ai aussi appris que tout devait être rapporté.
J’ai appris à scanner un paysage, de gauche à droite, de droite à
gauche, et à faire un rapport. La décision de tirer est ensuite prise
au-dessus de vous.
Lorsque j’ai été appelé début juillet [2014], on a été réuni dans le Golan [au nord d’Israël].
On a attendu que les camions arrivent, puis on est parti vers le sud, à
proximité de la bande de Gaza. On a commencé à préparer les chars.
Personne ne vous parle à ce moment-là de la mission. Tout est flou, on
discute entre soldats, on parle de nos peurs, on partage nos pensées. On
passe le temps. Un jour, le chef du bataillon nous a réunis, pour nous
briefer. « Demain soir, on entrera dans la bande de Gaza, nous a-t-il dit. Il faut penser à nos familles, à nos foyers. Ce qu’on fait, c’est pour leur sécurité. » Il nous a parlé des règles d’engagement.
« Il y a un cercle imaginaire de 200 mètres autour de nos forces. Si on
voit quelque chose à l’intérieur, on a le droit de tirer. »
« J’étais le seul à trouver ça bizarre »
J’étais le seul à trouver ça bizarre. Il m’a répondu : « Si une personne voit un char et ne s’enfuit pas, elle n’est pas innocente et peut être tuée. » A
ses yeux, il n’y avait pas de civils. Si quelqu’un peut nous causer du
tort, il est coupable. La marge de manœuvre était très large, ça
dépendait de moi et de mon commandant. On n’enquêtait pas sur la cible,
comme on me l’avait enseigné pendant la formation. C’était du genre : je
vois quelque chose de louche à la fenêtre, ou bien cette maison est
trop proche de nous, j’ai envie de tirer. « OK ! », disait le commandant. C’était la chaîne de décision, dans notre unité.
On
avait les mitrailleuses calibre 50 et les 7-62, pour les zones ouvertes
ou les buissons à proximité. Mais l’arme la plus efficace, c’était
l’obus. Lorsqu’il y avait un mouvement clair, qu’une fenêtre s’ouvrait,
obus. Lorsqu’une voiture bougeait et que je devais la viser, obus. On a
visé des choses, pas des personnes. On n’a jamais vu d’êtres humains de
près, sauf pendant les brefs cessez-le-feu de quelques heures. Les gens
croyaient alors qu’ils pouvaient rentrer chez eux en toute sécurité. Il y
avait des personnes âgées, des femmes, des enfants… On ne savait pas
quoi faire. Ils nous voyaient, ils continuaient à avancer. On avait peur
d’attentats kamikazes. Il m’est arrivé de prendre la mitrailleuse pour
viser à côté d’eux, pour leur faire peur, car on avait peur aussi. Même
les soldats politiquement de droite étaient désolés pour les civils,
coincés entre eux et nous, entre nos chars et les combattants du Hamas.
On se disait : ils les ont porté au pouvoir démocratiquement, mais quand
même… Les combattants, qu’ils aillent se faire foutre. On a toujours
comparé le Hamas au Hezbollah libanais, qui est vu comme l’élite de
l’élite. Le Hamas, ce sont des semi-pros, qui nous font peur quand même.
Je
n’ai jamais vu un combattant du Hamas. Ils sont très sournois, ils se
déplacent dans des tunnels. Tu entres dans une zone ouverte, et tout
d’un coup, ils te tirent dessus par-derrière. Tu te retournes, il n’y a
plus personne. Et puis, il y a les guetteurs, sur les toits. J’en ai tué
un. Guetteur, c’est un mot dans notre dictionnaire militaire. Cela
désigne une personne qui peut vous observer, qui est en hauteur et parle
au téléphone. Le guetteur est un semi-combattant. Même une grand-mère
peut l’être. Très souvent, on voyait au loin une personne sur un toit,
parlant au téléphone. On vérifiait auprès du commandant si ce n’était
pas les nôtres. Et puis on tirait un obus au bout de quelques minutes.
C’est arrivé très souvent dans ma zone car on était en plaine et il y
avait un quartier du Hamas juste en face, en hauteur. La plupart du
temps, je ne voyais qu’une tâche noire, jamais les visages, parce que je
regardais au loin avec le soleil de face. Mais on ne pouvait pas
prendre de risque.
« On visait des fermes, des bâtiments »
Il
n’était pas permis de viser les bâtiments des Nations unies. Ni même de
pointer le canon dans leur direction, il fallait le relever pour
empêcher un tir accidentel. Même chose pour l’hôpital ou la centrale
électrique et les bâtiments dits internationaux, à moins qu’on nous tire
clairement dessus de ces endroits. Il fallait alors demander
l’autorisation avant de répondre. Ces lieux étaient situés entre deux et
quatre kilomètres de nous.
On est entré dans la bande de Gaza le
19 juillet. On cherchait des tunnels du Hamas construits entre Gaza et
Israël. On devait aussi détruire les infrastructures du Hamas et causer
les plus grands dégâts possibles au paysage, à l’économie, aux
infrastructures, pour que le Hamas paie le prix le plus élevé pour le
conflit et qu’ils y réfléchissent à deux fois, pour le conflit prochain.
C’est de la dissuasion. On visait des fermes, des bâtiments, des
poteaux électriques. Si des immeubles civils sont élevés, on peut les
viser. Officiellement, on nous disait qu’il fallait éviter les victimes
civiles, mais en même temps, faire le plus de dégâts possibles. J’étais
le seul que ça dérangeait dans mon bataillon. Les autres disaient : « On doit le faire, c’est eux ou nous, ils finiront par nous tuer sinon, c’est OK… »
C’était vraiment triste. J’essaie de comprendre pourquoi c’était comme
ça. Je suis peut-être plus mature qu’eux, ou bien mon éducation veut ça.
Beaucoup essaient de ne pas penser, de survivre au jour le jour,
d’éteindre leur conscience.
On est entré la nuit dans la bande de
Gaza, c’était très chaotique, il y avait beaucoup de discussions radio.
On avait peur, on se disait qu’on allait se faire canarder. Mais rien ne
s’est passé. Après quelques jours où l’on a tiré sans jamais se faire
tirer dessus, ma vigilance était moins stricte. On a essayé, un jour, de
sortir du char parce qu’on avait un problème de moteur. Dans la minute,
plusieurs balles ont sifflé près de mon oreille, je me suis jeté à
terre. C’était intense, puis rien pendant plusieurs jours. La première
semaine, on sortait juste pour pisser, puis on a pris le temps – quinze
minutes – de faire un café. On dormait dans le char. Il faisait une
chaleur terrible, il n’y avait pas d’air conditionné.
« J’ai visé le 11e étage avec un obus »
image:
http://s1.lemde.fr/image/2015/05/04/534x0/4626920_6_37ad_une-enfant-palestinienne-le-12-avril-a-beit_07a35112212fa36f869155c51b11a0c5.jpg
Au lever du soleil, après notre arrivée, vers 8 heures ou 9 heures,
le commandant a demandé à six chars de s’aligner devant Al-Bourej [vaste zone d’habitation au centre de la bande de Gaza]. J’avais réglé ma radio pour entendre les autres chars, chaque tireur pouvait choisir sa cible, au hasard. C’était du genre : « Moi, je vise le bâtiment blanc, là ». Et il fallait attendre le décompte. Personne ne nous avait tiré dessus avant, ni pendant, ni après. Le commandant a appelé ça « Bonjour Al-Bourej ! »
A moitié en plaisantant, il disait qu’il voulait leur adresser le
bonjour de l 'armée. Officiellement, c’est de la dissuasion. On a donc
tiré sur des bâtiments civils ordinaires, au hasard. Al-Bourej, c’est un
nid de frelons du Hamas, nous a-t-on dit, il serait suicidaire d’y
entrer. On le contrôlait par le feu. Chaque jour, toutes les trente
minutes, un char s’installait en face et tirait. Lorsqu’un jour, l’un de
nos soldats a été tué par un tir de mortier, le commandant nous a dit
de le venger, en souvenir. On s’est mis en position. J’ai choisi au
hasard un immeuble à 3-4 km, près de la mer, et j’ai visé le 11e étage avec un obus. On a peut-être tué des gens.
Pendant
tout ce temps, on était surtout stationné dans une zone rurale autour
du village de Juhor ad-Dik, très verte, avec des fermes, beaucoup
d’arbres. Quand on est parti, il ne restait qu’un ou deux bâtiments
debout. Ils ont pris le bulldozer blindé, le D-9, et ont travaillé cette
zone vingt-quatre heures sur vingt-quatre, sept jours sur sept, pour la
transformer en désert. Le D-9 sert d’abord pour ouvrir la voie aux
chars, pour nettoyer les obstacles, les éventuels engins piégés. On nous
a dit qu’on voulait aplanir cette zone pour avoir une capacité
d’observation pour la prochaine fois.
On est entré au maximum
environ 3,5 km à l’intérieur de la bande. On se divisait et on partait
pour des missions de quelques heures, vers le sud et Al-Bourej, ou bien
au nord ou à l’ouest. J’ai vu un tunnel d’attaque du Hamas. Il était
tellement large qu’on pouvait pratiquement y faire entrer un char. J’ai
aussi vu un petit tunnel à Juhor ad-Dik, sous un bâtiment qui avait
abrité une pharmacie de la Croix-Rouge. Le bâtiment a été détruit. On
est resté environ deux semaines et demie dans la zone. La plupart du
temps, les chars scannaient les environs. On avait très peur
d’éventuelles incursions du Hamas, comme ça c’était produit ailleurs.
Pendant toute l’opération, les tireurs [dans les chars] étaient
ravis de pouvoir tirer des obus, car on ne pouvait jamais le faire en
temps normal, ça coûte trop cher. Je ne l’avais fait qu’à six ou sept
reprises au cours de ma formation. Là, c’était une bonne occasion, pour
tous, de vérifier nos compétences. On se montait la tête, on se
mesurait, c’était notre tour de briller. Au cours de toute l’opération,
j’ai dû tirer 20 ou 25 obus, les autres deux fois plus chaque semaine.
Moi, je voyais les civils derrière. Nos discussions étaient une guerre
d’ego.
« Lorsque j’ai quitté Gaza, j’étais amer et triste »
Il est arrivé, une fois, la 3e
semaine, qu’on soit posté en un endroit d’où l’on voyait la route
Salaheddine, la grande artère qui traverse la bande du nord au sud. Les
gens y circulaient car elle était hors de la zone de combat. On était
trois chars. On s’est dit : OK, voyons qui arrivera à atteindre un
véhicule ou un vélo. Le commandant a dit : « OK, rendez-moi fier ! » On
a parié entre nous, mais c’était trop dur, personne n’a réussi. Mon
char datait des années 1980, il ne peut atteindre des cibles se
déplaçant vite. Je devais tout calculer dans ma tête en cinq secondes
pour anticiper la trajectoire. Et je ne voyais qu’une partie de la
route. Il y avait un cycliste. On l’a visé avec une mitraillette de
calibre 50, une arme pas du tout précise. J’ai tiré à côté et devant
lui. Je l’ai pas vraiment ajusté. Il a détalé si vite, plus vite
qu’Armstrong, que tout le monde a ri. C’est l’épisode dont j’ai le plus
honte.
Lorsque j’ai quitté Gaza, j’étais amer et triste de ce qui
s’était passé. Mais j’étais soulagé de retourner à la vie civile. La
plupart des gens de ma compagnie sont de droite. Ils considèrent
Breaking the Silence comme une organisation antisioniste. « Crimes de guerre » ?
C’est un grand mot. Mais j’ai le sentiment d’avoir fait des trucs
amoraux, sur le plan international. J’ai visé des cibles civiles,
parfois juste pour le plaisir.
J’ai essayé d’en parler. Mais dans mon environnement, personne ne veut entendre tout cela, ces mauvaises choses. « T’es un héros, t’as fait ce que tu devais faire… » Ce n’est pas l’armée qu’ils connaissent, « la plus morale du monde ».
En Israël, tout le monde fait l’armée, et elle fait partie de nous.
C’est quelque chose d’intime. Mes parents m’ont dit la même chose. « Tu as fait ce que tu devais faire, on est content que tu sois rentré. »
Là-bas,
tout le système des valeurs était tête à l’envers. Les gens dans la rue
me disent que je suis un héros. Moi, j’étais juste assis dans un char
toute la journée. Je me suis habitué à cette présence, à tirer. Vous
prenez un homme libre, vous le transformez en esclave : au bout de
quelques années, il s’habitue. C’est comme une promenade au parc.
Je
n’avais pas de fenêtre. Mon monde à Gaza, c’était une boîte de 20
centimètres. Je voyais tout au travers d’un viseur, d’une croix sur
chaque route, sur chaque bâtiment. Les notions de bien et de mal, je les
ai encore. Quand j’ai tiré sur des bâtiments civils ou sur le cycliste,
j’avais la conscience de faire quelque chose de mal, mais on avait le
sentiment de pouvoir tout faire, qu’il n’y avait pas de loi. Dans les
limites de la logique militaire. Bien sûr, pas de violer des enfants ou
de tuer toute une famille juste parce qu’elle est là. Mais de pouvoir
détruire un immeuble vide, oui. De tirer sur une route, oui. Si on tue
quelques personnes, on aura des ennuis. Mais c’est tout. »
En
savoir plus sur
http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2015/05/04/j-ai-vise-des-cibles-civiles-parfois-juste-pour-le-plaisir_4626922_3218.html#gGH1RmjhiALW3567.99
SENT BY KATE BATES
Colors changed so the map can be seen by all. Original is below the fold.
Click to enlarge
There are neighborhoods in Baltimore in which the life expectancy is
19 years less than other neighborhoods in the same city. Residents of
the Downtown/Seaton Hill neighborhood have a life expectancy lower than
229 other nations, exceeded only by Yemen. According to the Washington Post, 15 neighborhoods in Baltimore have a lower life expectancy than North Korea.
North Korea.
And while those figures represent some of the most dramatic
disparities in the life expectancy of black Americans as opposed to
whites, a recent study of the health impacts of racism in America
reveals that racist attitudes may cause up to 30,000 early deaths every
year.
The study, Association between an Internet-Based Measure of Area Racism and Black Mortality,
has just been published in PLOS ONE and has mapped out the most racist
areas in the United States. As illustrated above, they are mostly
located in the rural Northeast and down along the Appalachian Mountains
into the South. How they did it and what it may mean are below the fold.
We already know about the racism that led to Jim Crow, the KKK, and
lynchings. We also know about the racism that has become embedded in our
justice system, from cops who kill, to prosecutors who ensure that
blacks receive longer prison terms than do whites. We know that those
sentencing disparities lead to greater disenfranchisement of blacks.
We think we know how racism has injured and killed black Americans.
But do we really? There are the obvious cases, like Freddie Gray,
Michael Brown, and Eric Garner, but what about the silent killers? The
hypertension and the chronic medical conditions that lead so many more
blacks to an early grave than they do whites. Could racist attitudes
lead to 30,000 early deaths every year?
According to the authors of the study, current research points to a
variety of causes for the disparities in health between white and black
Americans, many of which can be traced to racial segregation. Many
blacks are restricted to high-crime neighborhoods that are lacking in
outdoor recreational areas, access to healthy foods, and decent health
care. Discrimination in employment leads to lower wages that further
impact the ability to enjoy healthy food, exercise, and recreation.
The authors also point out that:
... racial discrimination may also directly impact health by engaging psychobiological mechanisms induced in the stress response
In other words, stress, especially chronic stress, is bad for your
health. This isn't really news. Experiences of racial discrimination are
often accompanied by a sense of powerlessness, of anxiety, and of
anger. These stressors, especially over a lifetime, can lead to negative
health impacts. Jon Stewart did not know how right he was when he said,
"If racism is something you're sick of hearing about, imagine how
exhausting it must be living it every day."
As a source of chronic psychosocial stress, repeated racism
may result in a heightened pro-inflammatory state that can have
particularly detrimental consequences for the etiology and progression
of cardiovascular and other immune disorders. Studies on discrimination
have found evidence for adverse consequences for hypertension,
atherosclerosis, and their inflammatory mediators. A recent study found
that racism-related factors may also be associated with accelerated
aging at the cellular level.
Past studies have had problems quantifying racism. They can look at
localized institutional racism via housing and employment, or they can
rely on self-reported incidents of racism. Of course, self-reported
attitudes are difficult to verify and are subject to self-censorship,
especially in regard to micro-aggressions and racism without a clear
perpetrator, and institutional studies don't actually reflect racist
attitudes as much as their results.
The authors of this study have turned to internet searches using the
"N-word" for help in finding areas of racist attitudes in America.
This measure, calculated based on Internet search queries
containing the “N-word”, was strongly associated with the differential
in 2008 votes for Barack Obama, the Black Democratic presidential
candidate, vs. 2004 votes for John Kerry, the White Democratic
presidential candidate.
The study authors used the designated market areas (DMA) as defined by
the Nielsen Media Research. Residents within these DMAs generally
receive their information from common television and/or radio broadcasts
and newspapers, providing similar messages that influence racial
attitudes. The authors make clear that not all searches for the "N-word"
are due to racial bias and that not all residents in a DMA share racist
attitudes, but the volume of the available data provides a high
signal-to-noise ratio.
Using this information to find areas in which racism is alive and
well, they then looked at black mortality rates using data from
2004–2009, collated by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).
They examined four leading causes of death among blacks: heart disease,
cancer, stroke, and diabetes. Unsurprisingly, they found a significant
association between the racism indicated by the internet searches and an
increase in black mortality.
Results from our study indicate that living in an area
characterized by a one standard deviation greater proportion of racist
Google searches is associated with an 8.2% increase in the all-cause
mortality rate among Blacks. This effect estimate amounts to over 30,000
deaths among Blacks annually nationwide.
...
These findings indicate that area racism, as indexed by the
proportion of Google searches containing the “N-word”, is significantly
associated with not only the all-cause Black mortality rate, but also
Black-White disparities in mortality.
Racism doesn't just kill with a bullet to the back, it also kills by a thousand cuts, silently and mostly unnoticed.
Was it only a year ago that Ta-Nehisi Coates made the Case for Reparations? Reparations, hell, how about we stop killing black Americans first, and then discuss a way to repay them for the massive wrongs that have been done.
Click to enlarge
Bin Laden was not terrorist mastermind, rather neocon patsy, American scholar says
American scholar Dr. Kevin Barrett: “Bin Laden was
patsy, who was groomed to take the blame for the neoconservatives’ coup
d'etat of September 11, 2001.”
An
American scholar in Wisconsin says Osama bin Laden was not a terrorist
mastermind, rather he was a patsy, a bogeyman for US neoconservatives
groomed to take the blame for Washington’s false-flag operations.
Dr.
Kevin Barrett, a founding member of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian
Alliance, made the remarks in a phone interview with Press TV while
commenting on investigative journalist Seymour Hersh’s recent article on
Bin Laden’s purported death in Pakistan four years ago.
In the 10,356-word article published by the London Review of Books
on Sunday, Hersh wrote that high-level lying “remains the modus
operandi of US policy, along with secret prisons, drone attacks, Special
Forces night raids, bypassing the chain of command, and cutting out
those who might say no.”
The report claims that Pakistani military
officers helped US helicopters enter the country and that a Pakistani
security official led the American troops directly to Bin Laden without
any resistance from guards.
American investigative journalist Seymour HershWashington
announced on May 2, 2011 that bin Laden was killed in his compound in
Abbottabad, Pakistan, by US special forces and CIA operatives. He was
the founder of al-Qaeda, the terrorist organization that allegedly
claimed responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United
States.
Dr. Barrett said that “whether you believe Seymour Hersh
in his story of how the government has been lying to us in so many ways
about this killing of Bin Laden, whether you believe people like Paul Craig Roberts
who said that Bin Laden was almost certainly dead of kidney failure in
December 2001 and was certainly not killed in Pakistan, or whether you
believe the government's official story according to which they went in,
killed Bin Laden and threw him in the ocean according to Islamic
custom, it’s clear that Bin Laden was not a terrorist mastermind.”
“In
fact, Bin Laden was patsy, who was groomed to take the blame for the
neoconservatives’ coup d'etat of September 11, 2001,” he added.
“They
needed to find someone to pin the crime on, after they blew up the
World Trade Center, bombed the Pentagon and killed the people who were
looking for the missing $2.3 trillion that were swindled from the
Pentagon by Rabbi Dov Zakheim, the Comptroller of the Pentagon,” he
noted.
The September 11 attacks, also known as the 9/11 attacks,
were a series of strikes in the US which killed nearly 3,000 people and
caused about $10 billion worth of property and infrastructure damage.
People covered in dust walk over debris near the World Trade Center in New York City, on September 11, 2001.US
officials assert that the attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda
terrorists but many experts have raised questions about the official
account, saying it was a false-flag operation and that Bin Laden was
just a bogeyman for the US military-industrial complex.
They
believe that rogue elements within the US government orchestrated or at
least encouraged the 9/11 attacks in order to accelerate the US war
machine and advance the Zionist agenda.
Dr. Barrett said that US
neoconservatives “had groomed Bin Laden for this for years after running
US-organized terrorist attacks on US embassies in Africa, the USS Cole
bombing, the false-flag attacks, organized by Ali Mohamed, a CIA agent
and a US military man, who acknowledged that he did this.”
“Bin
Laden had nothing to do with any of these big terrorist attacks. In
fact, the US government had admitted that the FBI said that he was never
wanted for 9/11,” he emphasized. “So he was a patsy, he was a bogeyman;
he was not a terrorist mastermind.”
The
damaged port side of the guided missile destroyer USS Cole after an
attack blamed on the al-Qaeda terror network in the Yemeni port of Aden,
October 12, 2000. (AFP photo)“The story the
government had fed us about killing him is a lie, whether it’s kind of
lie that Seymour Hersh claims or whether it’s kind of lie that Paul
Craig Roberts claims," Dr. Barrett noted.
GJH/GJH
Bin Laden died in Afghanistan in 2001, not in 2011 in Pakistan: American scholar
An
American scholar says the whole Osama bin Laden issue was an “elaborate
charade,” adding that the al-Qaeda leader died in December 2001 in
Afghanistan, not in May 2011 in Pakistan.
James Henry Fetzer, who is also a journalist with Veterans Truth Network
and a retired professor in Madison, Wisconsin, told Press TV on
Wednesday that American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh is only
telling a half-truth about the Bin Laden's death.
In the article published on the London Review of Books on
Sunday, Hersh wrote that high-level lying “remains the modus operandi
of US policy, along with secret prisons, drone attacks, Special Forces
night raids, bypassing the chain of command, and cutting out those who
might say no.”
The report claims that Pakistani military officers
helped US helicopters enter the country and that a Pakistani security
official led the American troops directly to Bin Laden without any
resistance from guards.
American investigative journalist SeymourWashington
announced on May 2, 2011 that bin Laden was killed in his compound in
Abbottabad, Pakistan, by US special forces and CIA operatives. He was
the founder of al-Qaeda, the terrorist organization that allegedly
claimed responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United
States.
Professor Fetzer said Hersh is not telling the
whole truth. “The situation is actually profoundly more disturbing, and
therefore I am surprised that Seymour Hersh hasn’t understood it.”
“The
fact of the matter is that Osama bin Laden died on December 15, 2001 in
Afghanistan. He was buried in an unmarked grave there in accordance
with Muslim traditions, with local obituaries,” he added.
“David Ray Griffin, who has ten books on 9/11, has published about it -- Osama bin Laden Dead or Alive,” he noted.
“Nicholas Kollerstrom, the leading expert on the 7/7 London bombing attacks, whose book, Terror on the Tubenow in its third edition, has published about it in an article entitled Osama bin Laden, 1957 – 2001,” he stated.
“Even Fox News published a notice of Osama bin Laden’s death on December 26, 2001, which you can still find online,” he pointed out.
“And
Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which I founded in December 2005, published
about the use of the fake audio tapes and fake Osamas, which you can
find in the press release for Scholars at 911truth.org,” the American scholar said.
Fake Osama bin Laden! (No question mark!)“What
Obama was doing was attempting to wipe questions about his birth
certificate off the front page, and trying to justifying” several of his
other actions, Professor Fetzer stated.
“The whole thing was an
elaborate charade. It worked as a political theater, as a public
relations stunt, by allowing him to proclaim that he had taken out the
most wanted man in the world,” he emphasized.
“But the fact of the
matter is that Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with the 9/11. He in
fact died ten years earlier. So what we were receiving from the press
were simply reports about the second death of Osama bin Laden,” he
underlined.
“It is pathetic. But the American government has been
reduced to nothing but to lying to the American people, fabricating
cases.”
The September 11 attacks, also known as the 9/11 attacks,
were a series of strikes in the US which killed nearly 3,000 people and
caused about $10 billion worth of property and infrastructure damage.
A man stands in the rubble after the collapse of the first World Trade Center Tower September 11, 2001, in New York. US
officials assert that the attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda
terrorists but many experts have raised questions about the official
account, saying it was a false-flag operation and that Bin Laden was
just a bogeyman for the US military-industrial complex.
They
believe that rogue elements within the US government orchestrated or at
least encouraged the 9/11 attacks in order to accelerate the US war
machine and advance the Zionist agenda.
GJH/GJH
Published on Thursday, 05 May 2011 07:06 | Written by Paul Joseph Watson | |
Editor's Note:
While we are not fans of Alex Jones and believe he is a shill who
presents half truths to hook his audience and then take them down a path
of lies, we feel the mainstream credibility and statements of his guest
will wake a lot of sleepers up regarding the death of Osama Bin Laden.
It verifies previous facts known about when Osama Bin Laden died and
especially pointed out in the following article:
Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three
different administrations Steve R. Pieczenik says he is prepared to tell
a federal grand jury the name of a top general who told him directly
9/11 was a false flag attack.
Dr Steve Pieczenik: Bin Laden Died In 2001 & 911 A False Flag Five (Full Interviews)
Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held
numerous different influential positions under three different
Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told
The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that
he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general
told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job.
Pieczenik cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”. He served
as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different
administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan
and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of
Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious
Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he
simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT.
Recruited by Lawrence Eagleburger as Deputy Assistant Secretary of
State for Management, Pieczenik went on to develop, “the basic tenets
for psychological warfare, counter terrorism, strategy and tactics for
transcultural negotiations for the US State Department, military and
intelligence communities and other agencies of the US Government,” while
also developing foundational strategies for hostage rescue that were
later employed around the world.
Pieczenik also served as a senior policy planner under Secretaries
Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Schultz and James Baker and worked
on George W. Bush’s election campaign against Al Gore. His record
underscores the fact that he is one of the most deeply connected men in
intelligence circles over the past three decades plus.
The character of Jack Ryan, who appears in many Tom Clancy novels and
was also played by Harrison Ford in the popular 1992 movie Patriot
Games, is also based on Steve Pieczenik.
Back in April 2002, over nine years ago, Pieczenik told the Alex
Jones Show that Bin Laden had already been “dead for months,” and that
the government was waiting for the most politically expedient time to
roll out his corpse. Pieczenik would be in a position to know, having
personally met Bin Laden and worked with him during the proxy war
against the Soviets in Afghanistan back in the early 80′s.
Pieczenik said that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001, “Not because
special forces had killed him, but because as a physician I had known
that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence
roster that he had marfan syndrome,” adding that the US government knew
Bin Laden was dead before they invaded Afghanistan.
Marfan syndrome is a degenerative genetic disease for which there is
no permanent cure. The illness severely shortens the life span of the
sufferer.
“He died of marfan syndrome, Bush junior knew about it, the
intelligence community knew about it,” said Pieczenik, noting how CIA
physicians had visited Bin Laden in July 2001 at the American Hospital
in Dubai.
“He was already very sick from marfan syndrome and he was already
dying, so nobody had to kill him,” added Pieczenik, stating that Bin
Laden died shortly after 9/11 in his Tora Bora cave complex.
“Did the intelligence community or the CIA doctor up this situation,
the answer is yes, categorically yes,” said Pieczenik, referring to
Sunday’s claim that Bin Laden was killed at his compound in Pakistan,
adding, “This whole scenario where you see a bunch of people sitting
there looking at a screen and they look as if they’re intense, that’s
nonsense,” referring to the images released by the White House which
claim to show Biden, Obama and Hillary Clinton watching the operation to
kill Bin Laden live on a television screen.
“It’s a total make-up, make believe, we’re in an American theater of
the absurd….why are we doing this again….nine years ago this man was
already dead….why does the government repeatedly have to lie to the
American people,” asked Pieczenik.
“Osama Bin Laden was totally dead, so there’s no way they could have
attacked or confronted or killed Osama Bin laden,” said Pieczenik,
joking that the only way it could have happened was if special forces
had attacked a mortuary.
Pieczenik said that the decision to launch the hoax now was made
because Obama had reached a low with plummeting approval ratings and the
fact that the birther issue was blowing up in his face.
“He had to prove that he was more than American….he had to be
aggressive,” said Pieczenik, adding that the farce was also a way of
isolating Pakistan as a retaliation for intense opposition to the
Predator drone program, which has killed hundreds of Pakistanis.
“This is orchestrated, I mean when you have people sitting around and
watching a sitcom, basically the operations center of the White House,
and you have a president coming out almost zombie-like telling you they
just killed Osama Bin Laden who was already dead nine years ago,” said
Pieczenik, calling the episode, “the greatest falsehood I’ve ever heard,
I mean it was absurd.”
Dismissing the government’s account of the assassination of Bin Laden
as a “sick joke” on the American people, Pieczenik said, “They are so
desperate to make Obama viable, to negate the fact that he may not have
been born here, any questions about his background, any irregularities
about his background, to make him look assertive….to re-elect this
president so the American public can be duped once again.”
Pieczenik’s assertion that Bin Laden died almost ten years ago is
echoed by numerous intelligence professionals as well as heads of state
across the world.
Bin Laden, “Was used in the same way that 9/11 was used to mobilize
the emotions and feelings of the American people in order to go to a war
that had to be justified through a narrative that Bush junior created
and Cheney created about the world of terrorism,” stated Pieczenik.
During his interview with the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Pieczenik
also asserted he was directly told by a prominent general that 9/11 was a
stand down and a false flag operation, and that he is prepared to go to
a grand jury to reveal the general’s name.
“They ran the attacks,” said Pieczenik, naming Dick Cheney, Paul
Wolfowitz, Stephen Hadley, Elliott Abrams, and Condoleezza Rice amongst
others as having been directly involved.
“It was called a stand down, a false flag operation in order to
mobilize the American public under false pretenses….it was told to me
even by the general on the staff of Wolfowitz – I will go in front of a
federal committee and swear on perjury who the name was of the
individual so that we can break it open,” said Pieczenik, adding that he
was “furious” and “knew it had happened”.
“I taught stand down and false flag operations at the national war
college, I’ve taught it with all my operatives so I knew exactly what
was done to the American public,” he added.
Pieczenik re-iterated that he was perfectly willing to reveal the
name of the general who told him 9/11 was an inside job in a federal
court, “so that we can unravel this thing legally, not with the stupid
9/11 Commission that was absurd.”
Pieczenik explained that he was not a liberal, a conservative or a
tea party member, merely an American who is deeply concerned about the
direction in which his country is heading. Watch the full interview with Dr. Pieczenik below.
#1Obama’s outburst in a Frenzy —
Dr. Mustafa Sherwani2015-05-15 18:54
(May,8,2011)
( On the death of Osama as some claim he had already died, while some say that he is still alive)
**********************************
What? What ? What they are saying?
He was already dead, and all this is fake,?
Oh, what this tragedy ! What this misfortune!
Must I bash my head against the wall ?
Or jump into the sea where I dumped him ?
My dark face will be blackened for ever.
The nefarious legacy of this evil Bush,
The billions of dollars of American wealth,
The life of thousands of our soldiers,
All this, I sought to justify through his death.
If he had died long back , then no problem,
None can ever unearth the secrets of our lie,
We will always say, we killed him in Pak,
Our stooges will have no courage to rebut us.
But, God forbid , if he is still alive,
And emerges like a phoenix,
What then I will do? What then I will do ?
Oh help me my God! Oh help me my God!.
A
recent article in the Moscow Times has led to a veritable cascade of
interconnected propaganda fronts, a renewal of the “black propaganda” of
the Cold War era. Saying these “organizations” or better termed
“fronts” support terrorism and genocide is not a stretch of the
imagination.
All of these groups are “run” for lack
of a better word out of the Hoover Institution whose operational heads
are Condoleezza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld, architects of America’s
unilateralist belligerency policies under George W. Bush. These and
dozens of media outlets, all more “independent” than the last are the
rebirth of the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, the CIA’s
psychological warfare program from the darkest days of the Cold War.
The methodologies are simple, “big lie,”
blackmail and smear and, of course, the old Cold War favorite, “divide
and conquer.” We will look at a couple of instances and review only a
few heads of the “hydra” and their “pet projects.”
MH 17
On July 17, 2014, a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 crashed in Ukraine
with all aboard. Any reasonable examination of the facts available, and
all certainly are except those purposefully withheld, comes to the same
conclusion.
During the past few days, using standard
analytical methodology for intelligence and psychological warfare, an
unusual publication, The Moscow Times, has virtually confessed to the MH
17 terror attack on behalf of not only Kiev but likely Israel as well.
We will get into how we assessed this later but first some background on
the Moscow Times itself.
One might almost think the Moscow Times
exists only to obscure all reporting and analysis of the downing of MH
17. Their methodologies are clearly “big lie” which they do unilaterally
or through Novaya Gazeta, both performing as assets of intelligence
agencies, feeding “seeded material” into the narrative, “black
propaganda” used to provide “sockpuppet” sourcing for briefing material
given to western political leaders like President Obama or Prime
Minister Cameron, people too inexperienced to know when they are
ingesting toxic material.
Not a Newspaper At ALL, Not Hardly
The Moscow Times, presented in America
as a major Russian newspaper with official standing and broad
acceptance, is “everything but.” In actuality, it has the circulation of
a small town shopping guide. It is owned by Sanoma Corporation, a
shadowy media company run by Arthur Hoffman, a former employee of Booz
Allen Hamilton, a CIA intelligence contracting firm. Before that he
worked for Arthur Andersen, the now defunct “Big Five” accounting firm
tied to CIA money laundering and “off the books” debt scams. In 2001,
Andersen as a corporation was convicted of broad criminality and full
complicity in the Enron scandal. This was the largest fraud in America’s
history with 20,000 employees losing their jobs and pensions and
investors losing up to $400 billion dollars.
Enron CEO, Kenneth Lay was the perhaps
the closest friend of George W. Bush and his largest financial backer.
Lay died weeks before beginning a prison sentence that would have
extended decades beyond his life expectancy.
This strange “heritage” for the Moscow
Times is far from simple “dot connecting.” Call it an assumption, but
anyone moving from Andersen to a CIA front to a CIA front might well be
working for the CIA or worse and there are things worse than the CIA,
believe it or not.
“MH 17, Who Dun It?”
The Kiev government, aided by security
services specializing in “radar spoofing,” most likely Israeli, attacked
and downed this passenger aircraft as part of a series of terror and
false flag attacks.
Intercepted communications released by
Russia had exposed US involvement in staging terror attacks across
Ukraine intended to be blamed on Russia. Repeatedly doctored photos of
tank columns, years old satellite imagery and unreliable “witness”
accounts were discredited and forgotten. This process continues on a
daily basis.
The Odessa massacre and one or more
tactical nuclear missile attacks on Donetsk set the tone for one of the
dirtiest conflicts in history. Downing an airliner filled with terrified
and quite innocent passengers requires no stretch of the imagination
when the Kiev junta is involved.
Suffice it to say that unchallenged and
comprehensive examination of wreckage indicates that MH 17 was shot down
by one or more aircraft.
As the United States had both high
resolution satellite coverage over Ukraine and two active AEGIS radars
on station, one brought to the region from the US and land based in
Romania to surveil the entire Black Sea/Belarus/Caucuses region, and
could present no evidence of any kind, it is reasonable to assume that
such evidence would not support Russia as culpable.
It isn’t like the United States wouldn’t
trump up evidence and run to the United Nations Security Council.
General Colin Powell can tell us about that one.
“Aircraft Roulette”
We turn to the issue of the Moscow Times
because the downing of MH 17 can be traced to a source most easily by
the “deception and cover” operations used to mislead the public and
supply official “investigators,” in this case a Dutch “commission,” with
foregone conclusions.
The largest single controversy over MH
17 involves radar tracking of one or more combat aircraft seen
intersecting with MH 17 when it was downed. All combat aircraft in the
area are admitted to be Kiev junta based. Kiev admitted they had two
SU25 attack aircraft near MH 17 but said these planes could only fly
20,000 feet and could not be responsible.
This left two issues:
Can an SU25 fly over 20,000 feet and
Why believe Kiev about the type of plane they claim they used to shadow MH 17?
The review of this issue brought forward two supported conclusion:
An SU25 can fly up to 52,000 feet with several pilots coming forward who have operated the plane at over 45,000 feet.
It was documented that Israeli radar
spoofing equipment can not only alter the type of plane “seen” by radar
but its altitude, speed and even location as well.
The Imaginary Report
The Moscow Times was exposed, to the
intelligence community on the whole anyway, when they claimed to have
accessed a secret Russian report citing a BUK missile, fired by Kiev
backed militants, as being the cause for the downing of MH 17.
To the uninitiated, this story would
kill any far better supported and reality based hypothesis involving
Kiev backed aircraft, based on the source of the story being Russia, the
nation that has pressed the “plane to plane” shootdown, which is
supported by radar and forensic evidence.
Of course, proving Kiev used a BUK
missile is impossible? Why is that? Because they used one or more
planes. Then why the Russian report?
What Russian report? Novaya Gazeta, the Moscow Times, Radio Liberty and, ultimately, the Hoover Institution made it all up.
Let’s have some “Spy Training 101” like out of the American TV series Burn Notice:
No one saw a BUK missile head skyward in the middle of the day though it would have been seen by up to 50,000 people
“Information” excluding Kiev backed planes based on performance
envelopes and forensic evidence is baseless and totally fabricated,
easily disproven
Information including Novorussian use of BUK missiles is unfounded.
This leaves one functioning hypothesis:
Kiev, noting their own planes at much lower altitude were shot down in
the region, directed MH 17 over a disputed area, closely trailed by
fighter interceptors who shot the airliner down over pro-Russian
territory. They then immediately introduced a story about a missile
shootdown.
If you look at the Wikipedia entry on MH
17, it is clear that Israel’s intelligence services were fully
complicit. An almost insanely biased Wikipedia page with accompanying
“discussion” dialog traces a cover up to Tel Aviv based Wiki editors
closely tied to other Israeli projects, like white washing the genocide
in Gaza in 2014.
Propaganda originates in blogs like
Novaya Gazeta, then migrate to the Moscow Times, and then are used as
sources by the Wall Street Journal and New York Times, and provide “rock
solid” approved media backing for Wikipedia, all pulled out of thin
air.
Novaya Gazeta
The Moscow Times regularly reports on
another English language blog called Novaya Gazeta. Recently Gazeta was
forced by the government to physically remove a story about a Russian
who had been in Ukraine, a young Russian with severe burns named Dorzhi
Batomunkuyev.
Reading the Novaya account of Dorzhi’s
fearful plight leaves nothing to the imagination. Russia simply invaded
Ukraine, why they didn’t take Kiev and fill their bayonets with the
hapless bodies of the brave, though rather fascistic city defenders, we
know not.
Remember the altered photographs of
Russian tank units crossing into Ukraine and the satellite images
presented in the Western media, the most embarrassing of which depicted
joint Russian/Ukrainian military exercises as a “Russian invasion?”
Well, Novaya Gazeta, interviewed the
heavily burned 20 year old, an interview loaded with highly agenda
driven leading questions, an interview intended to prove that the defeat
of Ukrainian forces was brought about by a full-scale assault into
Ukraine by Russian armor units, a charge that came out of Kiev on a
thrice daily basis prior to the Minsk agreements being penned.
What we see are the same names, the same
faces, the same stories, the same games, from the old Cold War to the
new improved version of today. What we also see is “connectivity,” the
wars of old are the wars of today, war in Ukraine is war in Turkey or
Syria or Iran or Afghanistan, perhaps even Kenya or further afield.
Gordon Duff is a Marine
combat veteran of the Vietnam War that has worked on veterans and POW
issues for decades and consulted with governments challenged by security
issues. He’s a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
Le collectif Quart d’X ainsi que les Indigènes de Belgique ont organisé en avril dernier à Bruxelles une conférence intitulée « Pourquoi la « gauche » a un problème avec l’Islam ». Le philosophe français Pierre Tevanian, auteur du livre « La Haine de la Religion : Comment l’athéisme est devenu l’opium du peuple de gauche », était l’invité de cette conférence. Souhail Chichah, chargé de cours à l’université de Lyon, a tenu le rôle de discutant.
Le collectif Quart d’X ainsi que les Indigènes de Belgique ont organisé en avril dernier à Bruxelles une conférence intitulée « Pourquoi la « gauche » a un problème avec l’Islam ». Le philosophe français Pierre Tevanian, auteur du livre « La Haine de la Religion : Comment l’athéisme est devenu l’opium du peuple de gauche », était l’invité de cette conférence. Souhail Chichah, chargé de cours à l’université de Lyon, a tenu le rôle de discutant.
We already know about the racism that led to Jim Crow, the KKK, and
lynchings. We also know about the racism that has become embedded in our
justice system, from cops who kill, to prosecutors who ensure that
blacks receive longer prison terms than do whites. We know that those
sentencing disparities lead to greater disenfranchisement of blacks.
We think we know how racism has injured and killed black Americans.
But do we really? There are the obvious cases, like Freddie Gray,
Michael Brown, and Eric Garner, but what about the silent killers? The
hypertension and the chronic medical conditions that lead so many more
blacks to an early grave than they do whites. Could racist attitudes
lead to 30,000 early deaths every year?
In other words, stress, especially chronic stress, is bad for your
health. This isn't really news. Experiences of racial discrimination are
often accompanied by a sense of powerlessness, of anxiety, and of
anger. These stressors, especially over a lifetime, can lead to negative
health impacts. Jon Stewart did not know how right he was when he said,
"If racism is something you're sick of hearing about, imagine how
exhausting it must be living it every day."
271
141
'Saudi princes patrons of al-Qaeda' A former al-Qaeda operative says Saudi Princes Bandar bin Sultan, Turki al-Faisal and Al-Waleed bin Talal were on the terror group’s list of donors in the 1990s.
Maduro says doesn't trust US president Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro says he doesn’t trust his counterpart, Barack Obama.
Hersh article on Bin Laden ‘garbage’ The former US Navy SEAL who claims he killed Osama bin Laden has rejected an article by journalist Seymour Hersh, calling it “garbage”.
‘Bin Laden died in Afghanistan in 2001’ An American scholar says Osama bin Laden died in December 2001 in Afghanistan, not in May 2011 in Pakistan.
| 
( On the death of Osama as some claim he had already died, while some say that he is still alive)
**********************************
What? What ? What they are saying?
He was already dead, and all this is fake,?
Oh, what this tragedy ! What this misfortune!
Must I bash my head against the wall ?
Or jump into the sea where I dumped him ?
My dark face will be blackened for ever.
The nefarious legacy of this evil Bush,
The billions of dollars of American wealth,
The life of thousands of our soldiers,
All this, I sought to justify through his death.
If he had died long back , then no problem,
None can ever unearth the secrets of our lie,
We will always say, we killed him in Pak,
Our stooges will have no courage to rebut us.
But, God forbid , if he is still alive,
And emerges like a phoenix,
What then I will do? What then I will do ?
Oh help me my God! Oh help me my God!.
( From my poetry book 'Voice of Heart')
MH 17, Who Dun It?
Author: Gordon Duff
MH 17 and the Moscow Times
First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2015/05/20/mh-17-and-the-moscow-times/