Putin's Warning Against
Electing Hillary Clinton
Published
on 8 Oct 2016
Hi! If
you like this video? Please visit my blog. http://www.livealifeilove.com/
QUO VADIS REZA MONTAZAMI?
David Icke Debunked (Full Movie)
"of all the people Porter chose to throw under the bus, guess who’s name was right at the top of the list? That’s right, it was none other than TUT founder, our own beloved Mr. Mark Glenn! This is proof positive that Mark Glenn is one of the world’s topmost marksmen when it comes to Zionism and Middle East politics, not that we faithful TUTters did not already know that! That fact that Mark is catching so much flak means he is right over the target, and our enemies cannot withstand his deadly-accurate barrage." THE UGLY TRUTH
The Book of Gareth: Why Persians Should Never Sleep With Jewish Whores
The Book of Gareth: Why Persians Should Never Sleep With Jewish Whores
By Trevor LaBonté
Whatsupic -- “A
nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot
survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable,
for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves
amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through
all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the
traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his
victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the
baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a
nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the
pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no
longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
A few curious events regarding the New Horizons conspiracy conference in Tehran in early October 2014 provide us with a crucial case study in what ails the anti-Zionist truth movement and how the situation needs to be improved.
For those in need of debriefing, here is the article based on emails that journalist Gareth Porter leaked to the Zionist-infested internet news media company "Buzz Feed."
(Here is my original op-ed about it, published on Oct 9, 2014)
Jewish "Anti-war" leftist journalist Gareth Porter managed to pull off a major double-cross against the government of Iran, which happens to be fighting to continue to exist amid a sea of Zionist-manufactured regional turmoil. Porter received a valuable assist from the inside by conference organizer Reza Montazami, who refrained from commenting in the aftermath of Porter leaking his personal emails to Buzz Feed in the interests of libeling and smearing the conference organizer and falsely implicating the government of Iran into the phony scandal.
The episode is a textbook example of why it is crucial to pay strict attention to a number of simple key factors in determining who should be allowed inside the Islamic Republic, and who should be considered an enemy to be barred at the door.
The leaked emails reveal that, beginning on Aug 15, 2014, Porter first demanded, as a prerequisite to his participation, as a prerequisite to his participation that respected author and political commentator, Mark Glenn of Press TV and The Ugly Truth, be dis-invited from the conference, a conference which was important to Iran's safety and national interests.
Parenthetically, Mark Glenn and USS Liberty survivor Philip F. Tourney happened to have co-authored a revealing book together, which reveals all the details of Israel's treacherous June 8, 1967 false flag attack against America, which was designed to frame Egypt, presumably so the Israeli government could trick America into entering the "Six Day War" for Israel's slated expansion, the establishment of "Greater Israel," and a Jewish one-world government. The book clearly illustrates how Zionist interests have an astonishing amount of control over America, with subversive Zionist elements in America conspiring with Israel and even trying to sink the USS Liberty together, and collaborating on the sloppy cover-up when the mission had to be aborted prior to completion. Even though Israel was caught red-handed perpetrating the unspeakably treacherous attack against its supposed ally, the story has yet to break to the public at large, thanks to the power of historical concealment. It is starkly reminiscent of 9/11 on multiple levels, but that is another story.
Porter
also, over several emails in the exchange, nosily prodded Montazami for
a list of all the other names of the would-be conference participants,
and what all of their topics of address would be. When Montazami
neglected to answer the questions sufficiently, Porter asked again.
Montazami quickly and inexplicably capitulated to Porter's demands, offering as his rationale, “We don’t invite him whether you come or not. It means that is vrery [sic] critical point for us. if not, what is the different between us and Takfirist. You know what means takfir. May you look at dicionary [sic], and you will find that it makes no differnt[sic] whether you are an American scholar or Libian [sic] primitive, While you hate other, you are takfirist just like Daesh.”
It's an interesting comparison, given that Glenn is not part of a known force of Zionist-backed foreign mercenaries posing as rebels in a fake civil war, nor has he played soccer with any decapitated heads or cooked up any human livers on his Webber grill. I do occasionally hear that his wife makes good spaghetti sauce, though.
For the record, Glenn's "problematic" observations about Judaism's core being an ideology of chosen-ness rather than providing a moral and ethical code which is universal and fair to all people and not just Jews, are simple statements of basic fact and are not based in hatred, bigotry, or prejudice.
Contemporary essentialist philosopher and former Israeli/ former Jew Gilad Atzmon has written on the subject of Jewish identity politics extensively, revealing the same facts which in turn prove Porter's tit-for-tat equation between Judaism and Islam (reprinted further down) to be a classic example of a logical fallacy.
Yet, it was successful as an appeal to Montazami's apparently faulty understanding of his own religious faith. Porter said to Montazami, "I’m sorry to delay my acceptance of the invitation in this way, but I hope you will understand the difficulty that Mr. Glenn’s participation presents. I would have the same reaction, of course, to the participation in a conference by someone who espoused the view that Islam is a faith that 'bring [sic] nothing but sickness and death'. I’m sure you have the same reaction."
Porter
failed to produce one example of anything Glenn has said which is not
empirically correct, instead making the plea, "I have only one problem
at this point. One of the people who has been invited to speak at the
conference, Mark Glenn, is someone about whom IPIS should be extremely
wary. He is notorious for his hatred of Judaism and Jews, which needless
to say, IPIS would certainly not want to be associated with."
Charging someone with being "anti-Semitic" is unfair. It vaguely alleges that there is hatred of Jews based on racial reasons, and makes no reference to the tribalist ideology around which Jewish culture revolves. Opposing a racist/supremacist ideology does not make one a racist.
This passage from the Old Testament summarizes Judaism:
“When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…”
Porter is a hypocrite for lashing out Glenn but taking no issue with the concept that the Earth and all its life forms are the property of the Jews.
When Porter got back to the US, he turned around and attacked Iran itself, the country he purports to be defending against Israel's "nuclear threat" lies. In an act of sheer deceit and betrayal to the Islamic Republic of Iran, Porter leaked the private emails, which dated back months, to the heavily Jewish-staffed Zionist media outlet "Buzz Feed" to falsely implicate the government of Iran in participating in and helping to organize what was then insultingly reported as an official conference of "9/11 truthers, Holocaust deniers, and anti-Semites," with Porter saying he "regretted attending." Porter's report conflicts with Montazami's clear and unambiguous statement that IPIS, Iran's Foreign Ministry think-tank, was not involved with organizing the conference, and therefore the government of Iran had nothing to do with the conference. He managed to paint a non-governmental conference of responsible adults discussing real Zionist crimes and deception...as a scandalous "anti-Semitic" conference done with the government of Iran's blessings and active participation. Yet, Porter seems to know a lot about "Manufactured Crisis," which, ironically, is the title of his book about the Israeli MOSSAD's plot to trick the US into attacking Iran based on Israel's phony stories about Iran's peaceful nuclear energy program.
Porter mentioned in the interview that a nonprofit organization called "Catalytic Diplomacy" paid for his travel to Iran. This statement regarding the conference episode to Buzz Feed by the Catalytic Diplomacy's founder, Jeremy Stone, reveals Stone's contempt for the truth movement, as well as his Zionistic bigotry against Middle Easterners and his sympathies with the Jewish Israeli imperialist project: “It is sad, but definitely true, that the Middle East is full of crazies, of which the Holocaust deniers and the 9/11 truthers are, certainly, among the sickest...But in our half-century of efforts to prevent war, terrorism and genocide, and forestall the collapse of civilization, it is not feasible to avoid attending Middle East conferences that might, in the end, be attended by various nuts in varying proportions. In particular, anti-semitism [sic] is endemic in the Middle East and rising.”
So the Sayan returned the favor of being invited to the conference by making numerous censorious demands, trying to do as much damage as possible to Mark Glenn's good reputation, lying about the government of Iran, and trying to tar as many people as possible as "anti-Semites," "conspiracy theorists," "crazies," and "Holocaust deniers," reaching potentially into the highest eschelons of the Iranian government. Only two things appear to have been forgotten, which was to call some of the conference participants "Nazis" and maybe call Iran's Supreme Leader "a new Hitler" or something like that. But maybe that is coming in the next libelous article featuring Porter, Benjamin, Weir, Escobar, and Co. in Buzz Feed.
Mark Glenn has justified grounds to sue Porter and Buzz Feed if he chooses.
And for those of you keeping score, while many prominent Jews used to claim that Jews are "Semitic," which is their incorrect and deceitful way of trying to monopolize Middle Eastern identity and claim everything from the Nile to the Tigris/Euprates as Jewish colonies, modern DNA science, which was not available during the origin of the Zionist movement, shows that a vast majority of these Chosenites are not at all Middle Eastern and emigrated mainly from Europe just about 70 years ago in the aftermath of WW II. Translation: their claim to Palestine being their "ancestral, holy homeland" is just as phony as can be.
Journalist,
blogger, Press TV political commentator and Lutheran Pastor Mark
Dankof, who enjoys a longtime and close personal friendship and
professional relationship with Mark Glenn, and who also received
numerous invites to the conference, summed it the Porter
caper succinctly:
The Islamic Republic of Iran has done a highly commendable job of resisting enemies from without, and we have many indicators that the anti-Zionist revolution originally founded in 1979 by the great Ayatollah Ruhollah Mostafavi Moosavi Khomeini has been a stunningly successful one, with Iran ousting it's illegitimate CIA Operation Ajax-installed western puppet dictator "Shah" and then forming and energizing a regional Axis of Resistance, which continues to grow stronger and more capable of handling the Zionist regime's menacing plots.
Iran continues to resist Zionist imperialism in its many forms, be it military, economic, cultural, and spiritual, and is an inspiration to the world as a hub of sanity in a world otherwise imperiled by global Zionism. But now that Iran has established itself solidly as this bulwark of resistance, it is beginning to make the mistake of opening itself up to corrupt, Zionist-aligned Western influence.
As Porter has demonstrated, the implications are devastating. If the story had gone as viral as Porter obviously intended it to be by leaking it to Buzz Feed, the name of Iran would be permanently blackened with the scandalous tar of "anti-Semitism," a non-sense word with no business being incorporated in serious contemporary discourse.
Also notable is that on August 10, just five days before Porter began his sordid email exchange with Montazami, BuzzFeed announced they had received an additional $50 million in funding from a venture capital firm called "Andreesen Horowitz." Buzz Feed's CEO is Huffington Post founder Jonah Peretti, its president is Greg Coleman, its editor-in-chief is Benjamin Eli Smith, and it's CRO is Andy Wiedlin, and Porter had no problem jumping right into bed with this Zionist organization to launch his attempted smear campaign against the government of Iran. Iran should never have granted this Porter character a visa, and now it is clear that Porter cares naught for Iran or its people, but is merely an opportunistic gatekeeper.
Presently, it seems necessary for all who seek truth to do a search-and-destroy mission which targets forces that seek to rot everything from within. These forces are not difficult to detect, since they have not yet found a way to get past several key litmus tests, although we are dealing with a clever bunch who has proven capable of slipping past some asleep-at-the-switch preliminary defenses, as was the case with Montazami's ill-advised collaboration with Porter and his many associates from the Jewish left who work hand in hard with the Zionists they supposedly exist to criticize.
With the Zionists stealing all the attention, a more dangerous, insidious incarnation of the enemy, wearing the mask of "anti-war" leftist, operates treacherously right in our midst, stabbing us in the back every chance we give them. Although they claim to be on our side, their actual mission is to protect several key pieces of information which are absolutely crucial to the warmongering Zionist imperialist project.
Litmus Test Number 1)
Adherence to the Orwellian doctrine of "political correctness." Political correctness is nothing but a tool of Jewish cultural imperialism. When someone such as Gareth Porter, who is reportedly Jewish, demands that no one speak about, let alone criticize, Jewish supremacism, Judaism, Jewish power, he is revealing that the subversive agenda of the New World Order's leftists is to protect the highly vulnerable racist core of Jewish identity. The advent of "Cultural Marxism" has taught the world more than ever that racism is absolutely abhorrent, and while Jews are not technically a race, Jewish ideology is racist and supremacist to the core, and cannot survive in the environment it itself created, absent the cloaking mechanism emitted by the odious gatekeepers on the left who exist to make sure nobody figures out the deception.
Porter claims in one of the leaked emails he forwarded to the Zionist media corporation "Buzz Feed" that Allison [sic] Weir agreed with him that Glenn's potential role in the conference was "a very big problem."
This seems to begs the question, "a very big problem to WHOM?"
Digressing briefly, we have all become familiar with the disinfo-based hate-campaign against Islam which steadily pours out of all mainstream media outlets, essentially mind-controlling the public to accept Israel's genocidal serial wars. Similarly, there is no taboo against any critical analysis of Christianity, nor is there any attempt to conceal Christian or Islamic writings from public view. It is easy to find openly militant groups of people whose singular goal is to wipe Christianity or Islam off the face of the Earth. Yet there remains one group of people who, as a rule, are totally intolerant not only of criticism but also of any discussion which is not overseen by Thought Police. How have they managed to inject so much "political correctness" into our discourse but have kept the Jewish religion/ideology's blatantly supremacist nature completely immune to their own Orwellian machinations?
While the universal moral codes of Islam and Christianity are under a constant, heavy barrage of mainstream criticism, mostly based on disinformation planted by the Zionists themselves, there is apervasive and very conspicuous taboo built up against discussing what is today called Judaism. Jews themselves know that it is wildly hypocritical for them to discuss such topics as peace or morality when the Jews themselves identify with an ideology that plainly states that gentiles are not human beings, and that Jews are of an order which exists unto itself, high, high above all other Earthly beings. To actually apply anything resembling "political correctness" to Judaism would be the equivalent of pointing the Jew's own cultural death-ray back on its creators--it would cease to exist.
All of this stifling "political correctness" needs to fall by the wayside.
Litmus Test Number 2)
The leftist subversive allows certain types of weak criticism of the Zionist entity, since it would be too obvious were they to just give all "Israel's" blatant atrocities a pass. But every time they offer their ineffectual and weak signature brand of lefty criticism, they fail another crucial test with flying colors: It proves they lack the ability to admit that "Israel's" very EXISTENCE is criminal.
It might be noted that The Left are becoming more and more angry at the Jewish state's overt, Likudnik warmongering, as this threatens to bring the entire world's wrath on Israel and to bring and end to the Zionist project once and for all.
But the left's criticism, in reality, is yet only another symptom of Jewish supremacism. Since the Left actually wishes to preserve the Jewish state, and they understand that in order for "Israel" to continue to exist, it must undergo a transformation in gentile public perception. The right must go, and the left must grab the wheel and steer if Israel wants to continue to exist.
This is another phenomenon that Mark Glenn is adept at illustrating. Glenn does not merely complain and voice concern over about Israel's conduct, he chops away energetically at the root of the problem, which is the fact that Israel EXISTS, not just that it commits "apartheid" and "war crimes" and so on. No state basing itself on the supremacist religion of the Pharisees can ever be positive or legitimate, and will only continue to burn everything in its relentless path to achieving total world domination, the worst of it being yet to come when "Israel" is mighty. The thinly-veiled closet-Zionists of the "anti-war" left cannot use Glenn's arguments against their arch enemies, the Jewish right, because Glenn's simple common sense logic and wisdom at once obliterates all of the arguments from both bickering factions of pro-"Israel" Jewish power.
Inviting
Porter but not Glenn was a bad trade-off for Iran for another big
reason: Porter's book is weak and only reiterates what people already
know. There is not one single person anywhere in the Middle East that
does not already know that Israel lies about Iran being a "nuclear
threat." "Israel" has been right up in the entire world's face for the
past 30 years, making a fool of itself by trying and failing to float
its fat whoppers about Iran and its allies. Everyone in the region is
painfully aware that Israel is the lone, rogue, nuclear threat which
possesses about 1000 illegal, unregistered nuclear weapons. Almost any
other topic would have been of more value to the conference.
Litmus Number 3) The 9/11 WTC attack
The "anti-war" left tends to subscribe to one two kosher versions of the 9/11/2001 World Trade Center and Pentagon attack story. Either it is the ridiculous MOSSAD-concocted, Hollywood-style fable of the evil "Muslims and their box cutters" who hate our freedoms, or it is the less-familiar version of the story where "the Muslims" still did it, but that they were possibly justified because America provides support for Israel. Both stories are pure fiction, and indicate that those who say they believe in one or the other of propaganda stories fail the 9/11 litmus test, usually another sure indicator that one is dealing with enemy Zionist gatekeepers. It's either that, or the person or group is not prepared to participate in a discussion about truth.
Here is another excerpt from the overtly Zionist "Buzz Feed" hit-piece by Rosie Gray:
"Porter, whose recent book Manufactured Crisis claims that Iran has never sought to build a nuclear weapon and that the evidence for its non-peaceful aims was concocted by Israel’s Mossad, told BuzzFeed News that he was upset by the content of the conference and that the organizers had assured him that extremists wouldn’t be there. He also said that Code Pink founder Medea Benjamin and Brazilian journalist Pepe Escobar, also in attendance, were equally upset about the conference."The conference last week featured several 9/11 truthers, Holocaust deniers, and anti-Semites, and included panel topics that accused the Mossad of having planned 9/11 and claiming that the Holocaust is a “public myth,” according to the schedule, which was posted online. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani canceled the conference last year but it was evidently allowed to take place this year. Also in attendance this year were former nuclear negotiators Saeed Jalili and Ali Asghar Soltanieh, according to the schedule." Here, these not-so-crypto agents are showing their hand yet again.
The first item of that jumps out here is that they sound exactly like the ADL. This particular terminology was cleverly invented specifically to conceal sensitive information.Let's start with current events.
~9/11. Why is it considered borderline "anti-Semitic" to discuss 9/11 truth? The concealers seem to have skipped over several pages of their own script in their zealous frenzy to shut everyone up before anyone can even begin to lay out the array of facts on the table.
For the purpose of a little comic relief, the above is reminiscent of when the Jewish lobby and its supporters in France shot themselves in the foot regarding comedian Dieudonne's clever invention of the "quenelle", which is basically just an "up yours" gesture directed at the establishment, according to the comedian. Dieudo never said that the gesture was against Jews, but nevertheless, Jews launched into an embarrassing collective fit, announcing that the gesture was "anti-Semitic," giving people all around the world every clue they need to know about whom it is that identifies as the hated "establishment."More comic relief: Partial-truther David Icke successfully provoked a similarly telling Jewish outburst while on a book tour of Canada. Icke's message was essentially that a group of shapeshifting 12-foot lizard people who live in the moon, which is a hollow dinosaur egg, control our minds and enslave us through usury, and manufacture all the wars, famines, and economic crashes. He was hounded, harassed, and followed by a group of Jews from B'Nai Brith of Canada, who were almost literally jumping up and down and screaming that David Icke was actually talking about Jews and not lizard-people. Apparently, they did not appreciate Icke crediting their achievements and contributions to society to any undeserving alien lizard people.Anyway, back to 9/11 and the kosher "anti-war" Leftist Thought Police: They give themselves away with their strange and unreasonable demands about what the others are allowed to discuss.When they are invited to make appearances, these folks find it necessary to always try to make sure the entire environment is sanitized of anyone who might bring up the facts such as:
~WTC building 7 falling at free-fall speed, symmetrically into its own footprint for no apparent reason. It is not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission. Larry Silverstein even admits in a PBS documentary that he gave the order to demolish it himself. How was it pre-rigged?
~Members of the 9/11 Commission admitting it was a cover up which was "set up to fail."
~WTCs 1 and 2 collapsing in obvious controlled demolition fashion, being the only skyscrapers in history to collapse from fire.
~On the morning September 11, 2001, Israeli MOSSAD agents, pre-positioned with camera on tripod, began to shout, dance, flick lighters, and celebrate as the FIRST plane hit WTC I, when everyone else in New York City was screaming in horror at the tragedy that an untold number of people were trapped inside a burning, smoking building which had been hit by an apparently aberrant plane, or so they thought. They even disclosed on an Israeli talk show that they had been there to "document the event."
~ One MOSSAD agent, when pulled over and questioned by police, blurted out, "We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem."
~Also on 9/11, Mossad agents were caught driving white vans loaded with tons of explosives, even detonating one (with a mural on the side depicting 9/11) on King Street. They were dressed as Arabs.
~The explosions that rocked the lower levels of the WTC's, blowing out windows and bending turnstiles in the lobby, which are not mentioned in any government report.
~The molten steel seen pouring out the side of the buildings.
~The lake of molten steel underneath the rubble.
~The list of 200 Israelis, the largest spy ring ever uncovered in US history, who were detained for weeks, failing polygraph tests, only to be released back into the wilds of Israel by then-head of the criminal division of Department of Justice and Israeli dual-citizen Michael Chertoff.
~"Lucky" Larry Silverstein, the Jewish billionaire and close personal friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, who curiously purchased the lease of the worthless, asbestos-ridden WTC complex just ten weeks before 9/11, citing as his only reason for obtaining the lease, "I felt compelled to own them [said buildings]"? And he made a simply obscene fortune off of the attacks he apparently helped orchestrate.This of course is just the very beginning of the clues that unravel 9/11 as a MOSSAD operationExamine more Zionist connections to the terrorist attacks that are conveniently used as pretexts to serial wars for Israel's expansionist manifesto here.
Does Gareth Porter and friends really think all those architects, engineers, firefighters, and pilots for 9/11 truth are nothing but wackos and "anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists" too? How is it possible for anyone to get away with being so obtuse? Meanwhile, the whole event is blamed collectively on "those evil Muslims," even though the FBI has never been able to provide even a single shred of evidence that Muslims or "Al Qaeda" had anything to do with the attacks. How is the official 9/11 story itself not considered at this point to be nothing but a ridiculous, far-fetched conspiracy theory which has GREATLY benefitted Israel and only Israel?
The term "conspiracy theory" is deeply problematic as well. In all of my and my many colleagues' research into conspiracies, I have never seen any need for any real theorizing or speculating about anything, since there is such a plethora of facts that all point in the same direstion. What I do see, however, is an overwhelming array facts which all line up perfectly.
This brings us to the last abusive term that needs to be jettisoned as far away as possible from any serious discussion: "Holocaust denial." As in all the other cases above, it is not much of a discussion or debate if every person is coerced into presupposed a certain conclusion.Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei himself publicly and definitively cast his doubts on the Jewish Holocaust story and was met with much irate squawking and jibber-jabber from the likes of the ADL's Abraham Foxman and World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder (one of the main 9/11 conspirators), who made it clear that they think "Holocaust Doubt" is a criminal offense. For those who are just discovering the myth-shattering field of Holocaust revisionism, here is a list of materials which proves Ayatollah Khamenei's "doubts." are in fact well founded. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also added: "If this event happened [the so-called Jewish 'Holocaust'], if it is an historical event, then we should allow everyone to research and study it. The more research and studies that are done, the more we can become aware of the realities that happened." In another occasion he stressed"If this happened [the Jewish 'Holocaust'], where did it happen? Had the Palestinian people had anything to do with it? Why should the Palestinians pay for it now? Five million displaced Palestinian people is what I'm talking about, over 60 years of living under threat, and losing the lives of thousands of dear ones in homes that are destroyed on a daily basis over people's heads."
Conclusion
While it is important to make preliminary investigations into people's backgrounds, careers, affiliations, sources of funding, etc, other indicators are their actual statements. Do they use the same tactics and lexicon as the ADL, recklessly calling anyone who questions or rejects official narratives "conspiracy theorists," "Holocaust deniers," and "anti-Semites?" Do they identify as "the left?" That in itself screams gatekeeper. Are they on a mission to kosherize the discourse, censoring, removing, or defaming anyone they don't like? Do they think it is their business to control what others think and say?Are they averse or censorious to facts regarding MOSSAD false flag operations such as the USS Liberty attack, 7/7, 9/11, or any of the long list of other things which are undeniably covered in Israeli fingerprints?Are they anxious to seek the approval of the West? Do they close themselves off to Holocaust revisionism? Are they willing and able to admit that "Israel's" very existence is totally illegitimate and criminal?Do they equate all religions as being equal, failing to note that Judaism's ultra-hostile tribalism is on the far opposite end of the spectrum from the universal moral code of Islam or Christianity? Do they panic or behave strangely when Judaism's pervasive, omnipresent anti-gentilism is mentioned, discussed, or analyzed? Do they give Judaism and Jewish supremacism an automatic pass?It is high time that the left is not seen as a harmless source of pathetically faint criticism of "Israel," but is viewed as a tyrannical enforcer of poisonous "political correctness." "Anti-war leftists" should be viewed strictly as enemies in our midst, with all the Zionist connections to prove it. A line must be drawn.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero Roman philosopher, politician, lawyer, orator, political theorist, consul and constitutionalist.
A few curious events regarding the New Horizons conspiracy conference in Tehran in early October 2014 provide us with a crucial case study in what ails the anti-Zionist truth movement and how the situation needs to be improved.
For those in need of debriefing, here is the article based on emails that journalist Gareth Porter leaked to the Zionist-infested internet news media company "Buzz Feed."
(Here is my original op-ed about it, published on Oct 9, 2014)
Jewish "Anti-war" leftist journalist Gareth Porter managed to pull off a major double-cross against the government of Iran, which happens to be fighting to continue to exist amid a sea of Zionist-manufactured regional turmoil. Porter received a valuable assist from the inside by conference organizer Reza Montazami, who refrained from commenting in the aftermath of Porter leaking his personal emails to Buzz Feed in the interests of libeling and smearing the conference organizer and falsely implicating the government of Iran into the phony scandal.
The episode is a textbook example of why it is crucial to pay strict attention to a number of simple key factors in determining who should be allowed inside the Islamic Republic, and who should be considered an enemy to be barred at the door.
The leaked emails reveal that, beginning on Aug 15, 2014, Porter first demanded, as a prerequisite to his participation, as a prerequisite to his participation that respected author and political commentator, Mark Glenn of Press TV and The Ugly Truth, be dis-invited from the conference, a conference which was important to Iran's safety and national interests.
Parenthetically, Mark Glenn and USS Liberty survivor Philip F. Tourney happened to have co-authored a revealing book together, which reveals all the details of Israel's treacherous June 8, 1967 false flag attack against America, which was designed to frame Egypt, presumably so the Israeli government could trick America into entering the "Six Day War" for Israel's slated expansion, the establishment of "Greater Israel," and a Jewish one-world government. The book clearly illustrates how Zionist interests have an astonishing amount of control over America, with subversive Zionist elements in America conspiring with Israel and even trying to sink the USS Liberty together, and collaborating on the sloppy cover-up when the mission had to be aborted prior to completion. Even though Israel was caught red-handed perpetrating the unspeakably treacherous attack against its supposed ally, the story has yet to break to the public at large, thanks to the power of historical concealment. It is starkly reminiscent of 9/11 on multiple levels, but that is another story.
Montazami quickly and inexplicably capitulated to Porter's demands, offering as his rationale, “We don’t invite him whether you come or not. It means that is vrery [sic] critical point for us. if not, what is the different between us and Takfirist. You know what means takfir. May you look at dicionary [sic], and you will find that it makes no differnt[sic] whether you are an American scholar or Libian [sic] primitive, While you hate other, you are takfirist just like Daesh.”
It's an interesting comparison, given that Glenn is not part of a known force of Zionist-backed foreign mercenaries posing as rebels in a fake civil war, nor has he played soccer with any decapitated heads or cooked up any human livers on his Webber grill. I do occasionally hear that his wife makes good spaghetti sauce, though.
For the record, Glenn's "problematic" observations about Judaism's core being an ideology of chosen-ness rather than providing a moral and ethical code which is universal and fair to all people and not just Jews, are simple statements of basic fact and are not based in hatred, bigotry, or prejudice.
Contemporary essentialist philosopher and former Israeli/ former Jew Gilad Atzmon has written on the subject of Jewish identity politics extensively, revealing the same facts which in turn prove Porter's tit-for-tat equation between Judaism and Islam (reprinted further down) to be a classic example of a logical fallacy.
Yet, it was successful as an appeal to Montazami's apparently faulty understanding of his own religious faith. Porter said to Montazami, "I’m sorry to delay my acceptance of the invitation in this way, but I hope you will understand the difficulty that Mr. Glenn’s participation presents. I would have the same reaction, of course, to the participation in a conference by someone who espoused the view that Islam is a faith that 'bring [sic] nothing but sickness and death'. I’m sure you have the same reaction."
Charging someone with being "anti-Semitic" is unfair. It vaguely alleges that there is hatred of Jews based on racial reasons, and makes no reference to the tribalist ideology around which Jewish culture revolves. Opposing a racist/supremacist ideology does not make one a racist.
This passage from the Old Testament summarizes Judaism:
“When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…”
–Book of Deuteronomy, 7:1-8
Porter is a hypocrite for lashing out Glenn but taking no issue with the concept that the Earth and all its life forms are the property of the Jews.
When Porter got back to the US, he turned around and attacked Iran itself, the country he purports to be defending against Israel's "nuclear threat" lies. In an act of sheer deceit and betrayal to the Islamic Republic of Iran, Porter leaked the private emails, which dated back months, to the heavily Jewish-staffed Zionist media outlet "Buzz Feed" to falsely implicate the government of Iran in participating in and helping to organize what was then insultingly reported as an official conference of "9/11 truthers, Holocaust deniers, and anti-Semites," with Porter saying he "regretted attending." Porter's report conflicts with Montazami's clear and unambiguous statement that IPIS, Iran's Foreign Ministry think-tank, was not involved with organizing the conference, and therefore the government of Iran had nothing to do with the conference. He managed to paint a non-governmental conference of responsible adults discussing real Zionist crimes and deception...as a scandalous "anti-Semitic" conference done with the government of Iran's blessings and active participation. Yet, Porter seems to know a lot about "Manufactured Crisis," which, ironically, is the title of his book about the Israeli MOSSAD's plot to trick the US into attacking Iran based on Israel's phony stories about Iran's peaceful nuclear energy program.
Porter mentioned in the interview that a nonprofit organization called "Catalytic Diplomacy" paid for his travel to Iran. This statement regarding the conference episode to Buzz Feed by the Catalytic Diplomacy's founder, Jeremy Stone, reveals Stone's contempt for the truth movement, as well as his Zionistic bigotry against Middle Easterners and his sympathies with the Jewish Israeli imperialist project: “It is sad, but definitely true, that the Middle East is full of crazies, of which the Holocaust deniers and the 9/11 truthers are, certainly, among the sickest...But in our half-century of efforts to prevent war, terrorism and genocide, and forestall the collapse of civilization, it is not feasible to avoid attending Middle East conferences that might, in the end, be attended by various nuts in varying proportions. In particular, anti-semitism [sic] is endemic in the Middle East and rising.”
So the Sayan returned the favor of being invited to the conference by making numerous censorious demands, trying to do as much damage as possible to Mark Glenn's good reputation, lying about the government of Iran, and trying to tar as many people as possible as "anti-Semites," "conspiracy theorists," "crazies," and "Holocaust deniers," reaching potentially into the highest eschelons of the Iranian government. Only two things appear to have been forgotten, which was to call some of the conference participants "Nazis" and maybe call Iran's Supreme Leader "a new Hitler" or something like that. But maybe that is coming in the next libelous article featuring Porter, Benjamin, Weir, Escobar, and Co. in Buzz Feed.
Mark Glenn has justified grounds to sue Porter and Buzz Feed if he chooses.
And for those of you keeping score, while many prominent Jews used to claim that Jews are "Semitic," which is their incorrect and deceitful way of trying to monopolize Middle Eastern identity and claim everything from the Nile to the Tigris/Euprates as Jewish colonies, modern DNA science, which was not available during the origin of the Zionist movement, shows that a vast majority of these Chosenites are not at all Middle Eastern and emigrated mainly from Europe just about 70 years ago in the aftermath of WW II. Translation: their claim to Palestine being their "ancestral, holy homeland" is just as phony as can be.
The Sayan accomplished his mission in Tehran and with Buzz Feed. Credit an Assist from the Conference Organizer, whose ingratiating emails to the Sayan trashing Glenn were deliberately leaked to Buzz Feed. An American baseball historian would call it Tinkers to Evers to Chance. The Sayan then rewards the Conference organizers in Tehran by publicly trashing them. One blindside hit deserves another. | ||
Dankof added:
"Glenn
and I had a history of official invitations from these guys. We'd
prepare our presentations. There would always be an unexplained lapse of
time in the granting of visas after everything was submitted in a
timely fashion ahead of every deadline. In September they rescheduled a
Conference for December at the Eleventh Hour. We had to read about the
subsequent December Eleventh Hour cancellation at the last minute in the
British and Zionist press.
"
I suspected my problem with these guys was my Father's past as an
American military advisor in the Pahlavi days, and my role as a Lutheran
clergyman. So why even invite me? I thought Glenn would be cleared for
Conference participation if I stayed away. So I politely declined to
accept an invitation this time around. Glenn even got a personal visit
from an individual with IRI connections saying his pathway to come was
clear. I received a personal contact from an individual with heavyweight
official connections to the Conference and Iranian media imploring me
to change my mind. I politely declined again. I assumed this insured
that Glenn was on his way with the 50 page project he'd prepared on
incredibly short notice under extreme duress.
"Now
we're reading about the collaboration of Gareth Porter and the
Conference organizer in Tehran (Reza Montazemi) to surreptitiously deny
Glenn a visa. The Conference organizer deliberately vilifies Glenn in
conversations with Porter now made public in a Jewish friendly media
outlet. I told Dr. Philip Giraldi of the Council for the National
Interest the other night that this whole nefarious business now exposed
for everyone to see suggests the New Horizon conference people have been
engaged in these Faustian deals and games from the beginning.
"
It's now apparent to me that Glenn and I, and everyone we have
represented in our work in the last 12 years in this fight, has been
sold out by the Conference organizer, and the people he's working with
in his current government, for a cup of Starbucks cappuccino. But it's
even worse than that. The average Iranian has been sold out in this
entire process. The Sayan won. All of the decent people of good will and
devotion from either country are Floating Down the Lazy River. It's a
very familiar story with the same bad ending.
"I
understand Tehran's fear of naked preemptive military attack. But this
Gareth Porter--Reza Montazemi pact which Porter leaked to BuzzFeed
underscores an even bigger threat to Iranians, Americans, and the world:
Cultural, political, and spiritual subversion from within by The Beast
and his Sayanim. His Assets are everywhere. His Methods always the
same."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dankof's
final assessment is correct. There is not an unlimited amount of time
for Iran to sort out its situation with "Israel." If WW III really kicks
off for real any time soon, the fable of Iran reaching out
to Jewish whores and compromising an urgent conference which was vital
for Iran's own survival and national self-interest, belongs in a
revised Old Testament, right next to the book of Esther.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis and Lessons
There is no doubt that the government of Iran is regretting allowing this treacherous
subverter, wearing the mask of an "anti-war" leftist journalist,
inside its-- for the most part unbreachable-- citadel of resistance
to Zionist global imperialism. However, this preventable episode
will makes a textbook-quality case study in the tactics of subversion,
revealing in the process a few simple, easy litmus tests to make sure in
the future that dangerous enemies remain outside the gates, where they
belong, until they can be dealt with appropriately when the timing is
appropriate.The Islamic Republic of Iran has done a highly commendable job of resisting enemies from without, and we have many indicators that the anti-Zionist revolution originally founded in 1979 by the great Ayatollah Ruhollah Mostafavi Moosavi Khomeini has been a stunningly successful one, with Iran ousting it's illegitimate CIA Operation Ajax-installed western puppet dictator "Shah" and then forming and energizing a regional Axis of Resistance, which continues to grow stronger and more capable of handling the Zionist regime's menacing plots.
Iran continues to resist Zionist imperialism in its many forms, be it military, economic, cultural, and spiritual, and is an inspiration to the world as a hub of sanity in a world otherwise imperiled by global Zionism. But now that Iran has established itself solidly as this bulwark of resistance, it is beginning to make the mistake of opening itself up to corrupt, Zionist-aligned Western influence.
As Porter has demonstrated, the implications are devastating. If the story had gone as viral as Porter obviously intended it to be by leaking it to Buzz Feed, the name of Iran would be permanently blackened with the scandalous tar of "anti-Semitism," a non-sense word with no business being incorporated in serious contemporary discourse.
Also notable is that on August 10, just five days before Porter began his sordid email exchange with Montazami, BuzzFeed announced they had received an additional $50 million in funding from a venture capital firm called "Andreesen Horowitz." Buzz Feed's CEO is Huffington Post founder Jonah Peretti, its president is Greg Coleman, its editor-in-chief is Benjamin Eli Smith, and it's CRO is Andy Wiedlin, and Porter had no problem jumping right into bed with this Zionist organization to launch his attempted smear campaign against the government of Iran. Iran should never have granted this Porter character a visa, and now it is clear that Porter cares naught for Iran or its people, but is merely an opportunistic gatekeeper.
Presently, it seems necessary for all who seek truth to do a search-and-destroy mission which targets forces that seek to rot everything from within. These forces are not difficult to detect, since they have not yet found a way to get past several key litmus tests, although we are dealing with a clever bunch who has proven capable of slipping past some asleep-at-the-switch preliminary defenses, as was the case with Montazami's ill-advised collaboration with Porter and his many associates from the Jewish left who work hand in hard with the Zionists they supposedly exist to criticize.
With the Zionists stealing all the attention, a more dangerous, insidious incarnation of the enemy, wearing the mask of "anti-war" leftist, operates treacherously right in our midst, stabbing us in the back every chance we give them. Although they claim to be on our side, their actual mission is to protect several key pieces of information which are absolutely crucial to the warmongering Zionist imperialist project.
Litmus Test Number 1)
Adherence to the Orwellian doctrine of "political correctness." Political correctness is nothing but a tool of Jewish cultural imperialism. When someone such as Gareth Porter, who is reportedly Jewish, demands that no one speak about, let alone criticize, Jewish supremacism, Judaism, Jewish power, he is revealing that the subversive agenda of the New World Order's leftists is to protect the highly vulnerable racist core of Jewish identity. The advent of "Cultural Marxism" has taught the world more than ever that racism is absolutely abhorrent, and while Jews are not technically a race, Jewish ideology is racist and supremacist to the core, and cannot survive in the environment it itself created, absent the cloaking mechanism emitted by the odious gatekeepers on the left who exist to make sure nobody figures out the deception.
Porter claims in one of the leaked emails he forwarded to the Zionist media corporation "Buzz Feed" that Allison [sic] Weir agreed with him that Glenn's potential role in the conference was "a very big problem."
This seems to begs the question, "a very big problem to WHOM?"
Digressing briefly, we have all become familiar with the disinfo-based hate-campaign against Islam which steadily pours out of all mainstream media outlets, essentially mind-controlling the public to accept Israel's genocidal serial wars. Similarly, there is no taboo against any critical analysis of Christianity, nor is there any attempt to conceal Christian or Islamic writings from public view. It is easy to find openly militant groups of people whose singular goal is to wipe Christianity or Islam off the face of the Earth. Yet there remains one group of people who, as a rule, are totally intolerant not only of criticism but also of any discussion which is not overseen by Thought Police. How have they managed to inject so much "political correctness" into our discourse but have kept the Jewish religion/ideology's blatantly supremacist nature completely immune to their own Orwellian machinations?
While the universal moral codes of Islam and Christianity are under a constant, heavy barrage of mainstream criticism, mostly based on disinformation planted by the Zionists themselves, there is apervasive and very conspicuous taboo built up against discussing what is today called Judaism. Jews themselves know that it is wildly hypocritical for them to discuss such topics as peace or morality when the Jews themselves identify with an ideology that plainly states that gentiles are not human beings, and that Jews are of an order which exists unto itself, high, high above all other Earthly beings. To actually apply anything resembling "political correctness" to Judaism would be the equivalent of pointing the Jew's own cultural death-ray back on its creators--it would cease to exist.
All of this stifling "political correctness" needs to fall by the wayside.
Litmus Test Number 2)
The leftist subversive allows certain types of weak criticism of the Zionist entity, since it would be too obvious were they to just give all "Israel's" blatant atrocities a pass. But every time they offer their ineffectual and weak signature brand of lefty criticism, they fail another crucial test with flying colors: It proves they lack the ability to admit that "Israel's" very EXISTENCE is criminal.
It might be noted that The Left are becoming more and more angry at the Jewish state's overt, Likudnik warmongering, as this threatens to bring the entire world's wrath on Israel and to bring and end to the Zionist project once and for all.
But the left's criticism, in reality, is yet only another symptom of Jewish supremacism. Since the Left actually wishes to preserve the Jewish state, and they understand that in order for "Israel" to continue to exist, it must undergo a transformation in gentile public perception. The right must go, and the left must grab the wheel and steer if Israel wants to continue to exist.
This is another phenomenon that Mark Glenn is adept at illustrating. Glenn does not merely complain and voice concern over about Israel's conduct, he chops away energetically at the root of the problem, which is the fact that Israel EXISTS, not just that it commits "apartheid" and "war crimes" and so on. No state basing itself on the supremacist religion of the Pharisees can ever be positive or legitimate, and will only continue to burn everything in its relentless path to achieving total world domination, the worst of it being yet to come when "Israel" is mighty. The thinly-veiled closet-Zionists of the "anti-war" left cannot use Glenn's arguments against their arch enemies, the Jewish right, because Glenn's simple common sense logic and wisdom at once obliterates all of the arguments from both bickering factions of pro-"Israel" Jewish power.
Litmus Number 3) The 9/11 WTC attack
The "anti-war" left tends to subscribe to one two kosher versions of the 9/11/2001 World Trade Center and Pentagon attack story. Either it is the ridiculous MOSSAD-concocted, Hollywood-style fable of the evil "Muslims and their box cutters" who hate our freedoms, or it is the less-familiar version of the story where "the Muslims" still did it, but that they were possibly justified because America provides support for Israel. Both stories are pure fiction, and indicate that those who say they believe in one or the other of propaganda stories fail the 9/11 litmus test, usually another sure indicator that one is dealing with enemy Zionist gatekeepers. It's either that, or the person or group is not prepared to participate in a discussion about truth.
Here is another excerpt from the overtly Zionist "Buzz Feed" hit-piece by Rosie Gray:
"Porter, whose recent book Manufactured Crisis claims that Iran has never sought to build a nuclear weapon and that the evidence for its non-peaceful aims was concocted by Israel’s Mossad, told BuzzFeed News that he was upset by the content of the conference and that the organizers had assured him that extremists wouldn’t be there. He also said that Code Pink founder Medea Benjamin and Brazilian journalist Pepe Escobar, also in attendance, were equally upset about the conference."The conference last week featured several 9/11 truthers, Holocaust deniers, and anti-Semites, and included panel topics that accused the Mossad of having planned 9/11 and claiming that the Holocaust is a “public myth,” according to the schedule, which was posted online. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani canceled the conference last year but it was evidently allowed to take place this year. Also in attendance this year were former nuclear negotiators Saeed Jalili and Ali Asghar Soltanieh, according to the schedule." Here, these not-so-crypto agents are showing their hand yet again.
The first item of that jumps out here is that they sound exactly like the ADL. This particular terminology was cleverly invented specifically to conceal sensitive information.Let's start with current events.
~9/11. Why is it considered borderline "anti-Semitic" to discuss 9/11 truth? The concealers seem to have skipped over several pages of their own script in their zealous frenzy to shut everyone up before anyone can even begin to lay out the array of facts on the table.
For the purpose of a little comic relief, the above is reminiscent of when the Jewish lobby and its supporters in France shot themselves in the foot regarding comedian Dieudonne's clever invention of the "quenelle", which is basically just an "up yours" gesture directed at the establishment, according to the comedian. Dieudo never said that the gesture was against Jews, but nevertheless, Jews launched into an embarrassing collective fit, announcing that the gesture was "anti-Semitic," giving people all around the world every clue they need to know about whom it is that identifies as the hated "establishment."More comic relief: Partial-truther David Icke successfully provoked a similarly telling Jewish outburst while on a book tour of Canada. Icke's message was essentially that a group of shapeshifting 12-foot lizard people who live in the moon, which is a hollow dinosaur egg, control our minds and enslave us through usury, and manufacture all the wars, famines, and economic crashes. He was hounded, harassed, and followed by a group of Jews from B'Nai Brith of Canada, who were almost literally jumping up and down and screaming that David Icke was actually talking about Jews and not lizard-people. Apparently, they did not appreciate Icke crediting their achievements and contributions to society to any undeserving alien lizard people.Anyway, back to 9/11 and the kosher "anti-war" Leftist Thought Police: They give themselves away with their strange and unreasonable demands about what the others are allowed to discuss.When they are invited to make appearances, these folks find it necessary to always try to make sure the entire environment is sanitized of anyone who might bring up the facts such as:
~WTC building 7 falling at free-fall speed, symmetrically into its own footprint for no apparent reason. It is not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission. Larry Silverstein even admits in a PBS documentary that he gave the order to demolish it himself. How was it pre-rigged?
~Members of the 9/11 Commission admitting it was a cover up which was "set up to fail."
~WTCs 1 and 2 collapsing in obvious controlled demolition fashion, being the only skyscrapers in history to collapse from fire.
~On the morning September 11, 2001, Israeli MOSSAD agents, pre-positioned with camera on tripod, began to shout, dance, flick lighters, and celebrate as the FIRST plane hit WTC I, when everyone else in New York City was screaming in horror at the tragedy that an untold number of people were trapped inside a burning, smoking building which had been hit by an apparently aberrant plane, or so they thought. They even disclosed on an Israeli talk show that they had been there to "document the event."
~ One MOSSAD agent, when pulled over and questioned by police, blurted out, "We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem."
~Also on 9/11, Mossad agents were caught driving white vans loaded with tons of explosives, even detonating one (with a mural on the side depicting 9/11) on King Street. They were dressed as Arabs.
~The explosions that rocked the lower levels of the WTC's, blowing out windows and bending turnstiles in the lobby, which are not mentioned in any government report.
~The molten steel seen pouring out the side of the buildings.
~The lake of molten steel underneath the rubble.
~The list of 200 Israelis, the largest spy ring ever uncovered in US history, who were detained for weeks, failing polygraph tests, only to be released back into the wilds of Israel by then-head of the criminal division of Department of Justice and Israeli dual-citizen Michael Chertoff.
~"Lucky" Larry Silverstein, the Jewish billionaire and close personal friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, who curiously purchased the lease of the worthless, asbestos-ridden WTC complex just ten weeks before 9/11, citing as his only reason for obtaining the lease, "I felt compelled to own them [said buildings]"? And he made a simply obscene fortune off of the attacks he apparently helped orchestrate.This of course is just the very beginning of the clues that unravel 9/11 as a MOSSAD operationExamine more Zionist connections to the terrorist attacks that are conveniently used as pretexts to serial wars for Israel's expansionist manifesto here.
Does Gareth Porter and friends really think all those architects, engineers, firefighters, and pilots for 9/11 truth are nothing but wackos and "anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists" too? How is it possible for anyone to get away with being so obtuse? Meanwhile, the whole event is blamed collectively on "those evil Muslims," even though the FBI has never been able to provide even a single shred of evidence that Muslims or "Al Qaeda" had anything to do with the attacks. How is the official 9/11 story itself not considered at this point to be nothing but a ridiculous, far-fetched conspiracy theory which has GREATLY benefitted Israel and only Israel?
The term "conspiracy theory" is deeply problematic as well. In all of my and my many colleagues' research into conspiracies, I have never seen any need for any real theorizing or speculating about anything, since there is such a plethora of facts that all point in the same direstion. What I do see, however, is an overwhelming array facts which all line up perfectly.
This brings us to the last abusive term that needs to be jettisoned as far away as possible from any serious discussion: "Holocaust denial." As in all the other cases above, it is not much of a discussion or debate if every person is coerced into presupposed a certain conclusion.Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei himself publicly and definitively cast his doubts on the Jewish Holocaust story and was met with much irate squawking and jibber-jabber from the likes of the ADL's Abraham Foxman and World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder (one of the main 9/11 conspirators), who made it clear that they think "Holocaust Doubt" is a criminal offense. For those who are just discovering the myth-shattering field of Holocaust revisionism, here is a list of materials which proves Ayatollah Khamenei's "doubts." are in fact well founded. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also added: "If this event happened [the so-called Jewish 'Holocaust'], if it is an historical event, then we should allow everyone to research and study it. The more research and studies that are done, the more we can become aware of the realities that happened." In another occasion he stressed"If this happened [the Jewish 'Holocaust'], where did it happen? Had the Palestinian people had anything to do with it? Why should the Palestinians pay for it now? Five million displaced Palestinian people is what I'm talking about, over 60 years of living under threat, and losing the lives of thousands of dear ones in homes that are destroyed on a daily basis over people's heads."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion
While it is important to make preliminary investigations into people's backgrounds, careers, affiliations, sources of funding, etc, other indicators are their actual statements. Do they use the same tactics and lexicon as the ADL, recklessly calling anyone who questions or rejects official narratives "conspiracy theorists," "Holocaust deniers," and "anti-Semites?" Do they identify as "the left?" That in itself screams gatekeeper. Are they on a mission to kosherize the discourse, censoring, removing, or defaming anyone they don't like? Do they think it is their business to control what others think and say?Are they averse or censorious to facts regarding MOSSAD false flag operations such as the USS Liberty attack, 7/7, 9/11, or any of the long list of other things which are undeniably covered in Israeli fingerprints?Are they anxious to seek the approval of the West? Do they close themselves off to Holocaust revisionism? Are they willing and able to admit that "Israel's" very existence is totally illegitimate and criminal?Do they equate all religions as being equal, failing to note that Judaism's ultra-hostile tribalism is on the far opposite end of the spectrum from the universal moral code of Islam or Christianity? Do they panic or behave strangely when Judaism's pervasive, omnipresent anti-gentilism is mentioned, discussed, or analyzed? Do they give Judaism and Jewish supremacism an automatic pass?It is high time that the left is not seen as a harmless source of pathetically faint criticism of "Israel," but is viewed as a tyrannical enforcer of poisonous "political correctness." "Anti-war leftists" should be viewed strictly as enemies in our midst, with all the Zionist connections to prove it. A line must be drawn.
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=6481
Just more on the mess, no mention of Mark Glenn.
Gosh, Mark Glenn, don’t you remember when Trevor was one of the young’uns we old folk marked as “going places”? All that book learnin’ is showing we were right. Never did you consider the idea that he would become such a well organized pistol coming to your defense!
Porter shot himself in the foot. I do believe the words from Ken O’Keefe carry great significance in this.
As for Gareth Porter and his actions at this conference is concerned. I hope he got his 50 Pieces Of Silver up front! He is just another Judas Goat! Because unlike Gareth Porter. Mark Glenn is a man! As opposed to sniveling child coward. Who snitches to his Zionist elders!
Once again, great article Trevor! A Star Has Been Born!
What a bunch of phony fools. Akin to the PalAuthority where the resistance is mostly for show.
But the only time I see Jews on PRESSTV. Is when Mark Glenn is virtually beating them to death. Through the art of debate. You must be watching a different PRESSTV than the one I’ve been exposed to.
What a crazy piece in Veterans’ Today, by Anthony Hall!
This conference was entitled, “Independent Thinkers & Film Makers”, yet excluded at least one thinker who’s thoughts and words are truly independent of that of the usual JMSM and of Mr Porter, and perhaps Anthony Hall, himself.
In this ridiculous tribute to Porter, Hall neglects to make note of the slight and slander of Mark Glenn, by Porter, while lauding Porter as a visionary and independent thinker? How absolutely inane. Nothing of Porter’s (banal) words about the manufacturing of rationality for why the world must attack Iran is actually timely. It should have been written at least back in the nineties. Yet Hall considers it a wonderfully timed piece. It begs the question; whose side IS Hall on (aside from that of Porter?)
I do understand why Hall did not mention the actions taken against Mark G., for Porter..; Hall does not wish to see Porter and his deeds shown in the light. He doesn’t wish for others to see Iran negatively, either (for now, at least.) I don’t know why this is. Also, Hall had a plan for his article: it is to prove how badly the US treats independent thinkers as opposed to how well independent thought is appreciated in Iran. Well, should Hall take a look at the piece by, “Rosie Gray”, he might learn a thing or two about truth and independent thinking. Of course, I expect Hall to do this as much as I believe Porter will retract his own words against both Mark Glenn and Iranians (all Iranians.)
Someone needs to send Anthony Hall a copy of Rosie Gray’s article just to find out what sort of response it might elicit.