SIGN PETITION TO OREGON GOVERNOR - NADIA SINDI VS A.G. DAVID FROHNMAYER

• Petitioning Oregon Governor

A.G. Ellen F. Rosenblum: Investigate the abuse of power & criminal forgery by David Frohnmayer and the Silence of Lane County Government.

1. 1. 
   2. Petition by
      Nadia Sindi
       
      
      

      
      

      
      

        

      Eugene, United States

I’m an Arab American Muslim woman who’s been targeted by all kinds of hatecrimes since 1985!

I’ve lost my fully paid Condo to the most corrupted former A.G Dave Frohnmayer! 

After the Condominium Associated of River Island Estates put a lien on it.. 
I hired Bob Ackerman -'which I filed a complaint against him with OSB'- to take care of the Lien that was imposed on me by the County Wide. 

Bob Ackerman, sent a letter to my nephew vilifying me, then forged my sister’s signature, hired Scarlett Lee from Barnhart Associates to sell our fully paid condo, that was marketed it- ‘$150,000.00 in 1998′.
Bob Ackerman only paid us back $42,000.00.  Dave Frohnmayer the one who’d committed the crime, getting my Condo with the cheapest price. We've been sold $62,000.00. It was actually sold & listed on the web/public record $85,000.00 

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/628-Wimbledon-Ct-Eugene-OR-97401/48458608_zpid/   
            
HUD, ACLU, SPLC, OSB, NAACP, BOLI, the previous A.G. Hardy Myers. The two senators Wyden, Smith, and Congressman DeFazio are silent. And the unscrupulous officials of Lane County, with the two Mayors Jim Torrey and Kitty Piercy are complicit & refused to prosecute Frohnmayer!
My nephew & I contacted Richard Clark a real estate attorney.  After we left his office, Richard Clark called me to inform me he wouldn't take it! 
Then I contacted the OSB to get a referral to an attorney. I went to see him, but again, he wouldn't take it!!
No attorney would take my case!
Stop this violent abuse & misogyny against us Muslim Arab Women!!!
Dave Frohnmayer had fired me from my teaching job at the UO, then, blocked me to be hired any place! I was hired by OSU, when I ran into one of the UO employees. I got fired the second day. My boss called me to tell me not to come any more!

• Noone can sue this criminal cabal! Frohnmayer has secured both the D.A. and the City Attorney by providing Harrag Long to be in charge of these two offices. Plus, Harrang Long is also represting the University of Oregon!
  
  
  

To:
Oregon Governor
U.S. Senate
Oregon State House
U.S. House of Representatives
State Rep. Brent Barton, Oregon-040
Rep. Peter DeFazio, Oregon-04
Sen. Barbara Boxer, California
Sen. Tom Harkin, Iowa
President Barack Obama
Sen. Ron Wyden, Oregon
Sen. Patrick Leahy, Vermont
State Sen. Ellen Corbett, California-010
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Massachusetts
State Sen. Doug Whitsett, Oregon-028
State Sen. Peter Courtney, Oregon-011
State Rep. David Osborne, Kentucky-059
State Rep. Ellen Story, Massachusetts-059
State Rep. Linda Rosenthal, New York-067
Rep. Earl Blumenauer, Oregon-03
State Sen. Chris Edwards, Oregon-007
State Rep. Jeff Barker, Oregon-028
State Rep. Betty Komp, Oregon-022
State Rep. Jennifer Williamson, Oregon-036
State Rep. Nancy Nathanson, Oregon-013
State Rep. Mary Hooper, Vermont-080A
State Sen. Floyd Prozanski, Oregon-004
Rep. Kurt Schrader, Oregon-05
Sen. Jeff Merkley, Oregon
Sen. Mark Warner, Virginia
Sen. Bernie Sanders, Vermont
Rep. Barbara Lee, California-13
Gov. John Kitzhaber, Oregon
Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, Oregon-01
Rep. Greg Walden, Oregon-02
Rep. Jim Jordan, Ohio-04
Rep. Jim McGovern, Massachusetts-02
Rep. Mike Rogers, Alabama-03

A.G. Ellen F. Rosenblum: Investigate the abuse of power by David Frohnmayer and the silent of Lane County Government.

Sincerely,
[Your name]

Recent signatures

• Thomas Holland CENTERVILLE, OH

  1d
• Lance Thruster LEONA VALLEY, CA

  7d
• Robert Dunn SAN JOSE, CA

  8d

News

1. No probable cause that Frohnmayer committed misconduct

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://www.uomatters.com/tag/i-am-so-done-with-this-topic

   

   I am so done with this topic - UO Matters

   Long story. The complaint to the bar's ethics committee against Frohnmayer, Gary, and Pilliod was initiated by the wife of the Deschutes county DA, after they made an ethics complaint about him over some weird public records case involving the county.

2. Frohnmayer sued over injury incident in driveway

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://special.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/updates/14872054-46/story.csp

   

   Frohnmayer sued over injury incident in driveway | City Region | The Register-Guard | Eugene, Oregon

   Brubaker charged that Baldwin and Mira Frohnmayer were negligent in failing to turn the car's front wheels toward the curb and effectively set its parking brake when they left the BMW parked on the inclined driveway in the 2300 block of Mc­Morran Drive.

3. SIGNIFICANCE: BELLA LEWITSKY DANCE FOUNDATION V. FROHNMAYER

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://ncac.org/resource/significance-bella-lewitsky-dance-foundation-v-frohnmayer/

4. Bar investigates Rudnick, Gary and Geller for allegations of lack of candor

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://www.uomatters.com/tag/dave-frohnmayer-uo-president

   

   Dave Frohnmayer: UO President - UO Matters

   Tagged Dave Frohnmayer: UO President, Frohnmayer salary and perks 5/16/2013: Presumably Randy Geller is getting competent legal advice somewhere. Frohnmayer wrote the original version. And if it's HLGR it would help explain Rudnick's bargaining table outbursts about keeping shared governance out of the contract.

5. Frohnmayer salary and perks Live-blog lite: UO Trustees finance committee

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://www.uomatters.com/tag/frohnmayer-salary-and-perks

   

   Frohnmayer salary and perks - UO Matters

   Moffitt convenes, discusses transition of retirement plans from OUS to UO. UO will manage them fro all the other universities. Three plans: ORP (defined contribution plan, alternative to PERS), TDI optional, ORSP (OPR add on) special president's golden parachute plan, as a PERS add on, with only ~$1M in assets.

6. NY Times on UO Athletic Scandals

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://www.uomatters.com/tag/athletics/page/12

   

   Athletics - UO Matters | Page 12

   This is a sad story for everyone involved, in just about every possible sense. And no one would argue that Frohnmayer benefited financially from these donations to the Fanconi Foundation. But they create an obvious potential for a conflict of interest. Frohnmayer should have immediately made them public, and recused himself from any decisions involving Pat Kilkenny.

7. Frohnmayer repays salary to UO

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://www.uomatters.com/2011/07/frohnmayer-repays-salary-to-uo.html

8. UO Matters’s worst of 2011

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://www.uomatters.com/tag/i-am-so-done-with-this-topic

   

   I am so done with this topic - UO Matters

   Long story. The complaint to the bar's ethics committee against Frohnmayer, Gary, and Pilliod was initiated by the wife of the Deschutes county DA, after they made an ethics complaint about him over some weird public records case involving the county.

9. Kitzhaber tells Knight, Frohnmayer to bug off from University of Nike board

   

   by Nadia Sindi

   Petition organiser

   http://www.uomatters.com/2013/08/uos-suggestions-for-board-trustees.html

   

   Kitzhaber tells Knight, Frohnmayer to bug off from University of Nike board

   8/16/2013 update: The good governor's nominations are due Monday. Jonathan Cooper has the story for the AP, in the RG. The official version is that they decided to withdraw their names from Gottfredson's bizarre 50 person list of nominees. We are supposed to believe that President Gottfredson neglected to get their permission before nominating them?

10. UO Professor filed an ethics complaint with OSB against Frohnmayer!!

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://www.uomatters.com/tag/dave-frohnmayer-uo-president

    

    Dave Frohnmayer: UO President - UO Matters

    Tagged Dave Frohnmayer: UO President, Frohnmayer salary and perks 5/16/2013: Presumably Randy Geller is getting competent legal advice somewhere. Frohnmayer wrote the original version. And if it's HLGR it would help explain Rudnick's bargaining table outbursts about keeping shared governance out of the contract.

11. FIRE Letter to University of Oregon President Dave Frohnmayer, February 11,

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://www.thefire.org/fire-letter-to-university-of-oregon-president-dave-frohnmayer-february-11-2005/

    

    FIRE Letter to University of Oregon President Dave Frohnmayer, February 11, 2005

    By admin February 11, 2005 February 11, 2005 President Dave Frohnmayer President's Office 110 Johnson Hall 1226 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403-1226 URGENT Sent by U.S.

12. Unions file lawsuit against PERS cuts

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://www.uomatters.com/2013/07/pers-updates-from-persinfo-blog.html
    7/20/2013: Brent Hunsberger writes an excellent personal finance column for the Oregonian. His take on the impact of the SB 822 PERS COLA cuts is here. http://www.oregonlive.com/finance/index.ssf/2013/07/pers_fix_will_hit_higher_earne.html7/3/2013: That was quick. From the law offices of BENNETT HARTMAN MORRIS & KAPLAN, full pdf here.
    For someone retiring with a $60K per year starting PERS annuity, the COLA cut in SB 822 would reduce the annuity 20 years out from $87.4K to $77.5K, and cost a total of $84K over 20 years.
    For someone like Dave Frohnmayer, with a current annual annuity of $257,373, the cuts will reduce the annuity 20 years out from $375K to $284K, and cost a total of $837K over 20 years.
    Replace “cost” with “save” if you are looking at this from the state’s point of view, and note that these costs or savings are not discounted back to present values.

    

    Unions file lawsuit against PERS cuts

    7/20/2013: Brent Hunsberger writes an excellent personal finance column for the Oregonian. His take on the impact of the SB 822 PERS COLA cuts is here. 7/3/2013: That was quick. From the law offices of BENNETT HARTMAN MORRIS & KAPLAN, full pdf here.

13. Steve Duin: The truth about power in Oregon!

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    See how much criminal power Frohnmayer has!! Noone will stand up to do the right thing. Frohnmayer must be locked behind bar for the rest of his life!!
    http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/steve_duin/index.ssf/2013/08/steve_duin_the_truth_about_pow.html

    

    Steve Duin: The truth about power in Oregon

    The Mark Long case is, attorney Bill Gary insists, "a sorry, dark chapter in the history of the Department of Justice." Vendettas were in play. Careers were trashed, and public records destroyed. When his authority was challenged, former Attorney General John Kroger resorted to a "scorched-earth approach in defending this case."

14. EMPLOYMENT DIV., ORE. DEPT. OF HUMAN RES. v. SMITH, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=494&invol=872

15. Most dangerous criminal Mind Frohnmayer: EMPLOYMENT DIVISION v. SMITH

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    Listen to the most dangerous criminal mind Dr. Insane Frohnmayer presenting his case against Smith with the Peyote Persecution Shows Societal Racism!
    http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_1213

16. Peyote Shows Social Racism: Frohnmayer Persecuting Native American Church

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1310&dat=19900215&id=sUNWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=huoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6655,3369919
    "Frohnmayer has attempted to delude the justices of Supreme Court, and the citizens of Oregon, by arguing that there is a connection between the religious use of Peyote and epidemic drug abuse in Oregon and the rest of the American.
    But Frohnmayer is operating without any shed of proof that religious us of Peyote by Church members is harmful.
    Members of the Church and other experts, in contrast attested to the positive spiritual and remedial effects from the use of the sacrament particularly in curing the abuse of Alcohol Cocaine, heroin and other drugs.
    By his effort, to destroy the Native American Church, Frohnmayer must now bear the legacy of perpetuating the social racism which native people wold prefer to put behind them. Frohnmayer's ethnocentric misinterpretation and abuse of Oregon's criminal law is shameful and wrong"
    Steven C. Moore is senior staff Attorney with the Native American Rights Fund in Boulder, Colorado
    That's what the criminal Frohnmayer has done to me too. Preventing me from getting employed.
    He's a tyrant, out of control sick man running a mock with the system and no one is stopping him!!
    
    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1310&dat=19900215&id=sUNWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=huoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6655,3369919

    

    Eugene Register-Guard - Google News Archive Search

17. Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 770 P.2d 914 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)/ Court of Appeal

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    https://www.courtlistener.com/orctapp/6MCU/samuel-v-frohnmayer/
    Plaintiff asserts that the supplemental relief that the court may grant includes the damages that he suffered because he had to bring the action to secure indemnification of the expenses of defending the civil action. He points out that he has spent over $10,000 to recover indemnity for approximately $1,870 that he spent in defending the civil action. The supplemental relief that he requests is necessary, he argues, "in order to vindicate the rights and duties of the parties as determined and declared in the judgment itself." Those damages are, he emphasizes in his reply brief, "the direct and forseeable consequence of Defendant's breach of his statutory duty to defend and indemnify Plaintiff." (Emphasis in original.)
    *916 What plaintiff seeks is an award of attorney fees under another name: "damages." The state quotes Shakespeare: "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet * * *."[1] It could also have quoted Gertrude Stein: "[A] rose is a rose is a rose." "Damages" that are determined by the charges that an attorney makes for services in the action in which those damages are sought are attorney fees, although fees incurred in maintaining a lawsuit may at times be damages in some other action. See, e.g., Sizemore v. Swift, 79 Or. App. 352, 358, 719 P.2d 500 (1986).
    The characterization of plaintiff's request for relief as fees instead of damages does not end the inquiry, however, because ORS 28.080 permits further "relief," without regard to its label, "whenever necessary or proper." The dispositive issue is whether an award of fees is "necessary or proper."

18. Scotty Perey response to Dr. Insane Frohnmayer

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    scotty perey Dr. Insane: "I don't mean to digress, but I will never forget watching the inimitable Albert Smith, a truly amazing state social-worker/counselor who Frohnmayer supported being fired for participating in his native religious ceremony. Smith was even a special guest on Nightline with Ted Koppel at some point during the course of his legal challenge to Frohnmayer's misguided crusade. And to this date I have yet to see *anyone* on national media who was more down to earth, less pretentious, and more humble as he cheerfully defended his right to practice his own religion. Even on national television, it was like he was your grandpa sitting and talking to you in your own living room. I thought to myself, "Frohnmayer is slamming *this* guy?" I was perplexed at best.
    Anyway, that's just my reflection. Frohnmayer is certainly no hero, and I don't understand how anyone can stand up for him, especially after he has been revealed to have sold his soul even further now, this time pimping himself at the behest of what is perhaps the single greatest scourge of our nation's health.
    And I find it interesting, almost hilarious, that someone who jokes that Nadia Sindhi should be "medicated" and "sedated" should choose to refer to themself as "Dr. Insane." It is quite revealing. We might even call this a "tautological projection."

19. Scotty Perey response to Dr. Insane Frohnmayer

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://dailyemerald.com/2013/10/11/american-academy-of-arts-sciences-adds-frohnmayer-to-board/•
    scotty perey: to Dr. Insane
    You know, Frohnmayer has a long history of displaying ethics that are "questionable" and it is by no means to be assumed that any "fight" against his soiled legacy should be categorically dismissed as "strange." As an alumnus and participant on this campus dating back to 1988, I have witnessed Mr Frohnmayer's choices not only in his capacity as U of O president but as Oregon Attorney General. You think it's atrocious for him to take $500/hr to stump for the death industry known as Big Tobacco? I would claim that his attempt to persecute the NATIVE AMERICAN RELIGION as a whole might be considered even more egregious than that.
    I don't mean to digress, but I will never forget watching the inimitable Albert Smith, a truly amazing state social-worker/counselor who Frohnmayer supported being fired for participating in his native

    

    American Academy of Arts & Sciences adds Dave Frohnmayer to board

    American Academy of Arts & Sciences adds Dave Frohnmayer to board Former University of Oregon President Dave Frohnmayer has been named as the newest member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences board of directors.

20. ROUNDS v. OREGON STATE BD. OF HIGHER EDUC., ___ 3d ___, 1999 U.S. App. LEXI

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://journalism.uoregon.edu/~tgleason/j385/cases/Rounds.html
    Noone can sue this criminal cabal! Frohnmayer has secured both the D.A. and the City Attorney by providing Harrag Long to be in charge of these two offices. Plus, Harrang Long is also represting the University of Oregon!
    The judiciary in Oregon is very much on his side (see Rounds v. University of Oregon, about 20 years ago.)

    

    Rounds v. Oregon St. Bd.

    ROUNDS v. OREGON STATE BD. OF HIGHER EDUC., ___ 3d ___, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2703 (9 th Cir. 1999) [T]he Oregon system bisects political and educational functions and limits university funding to educational activities.... Akin to the student fee at issue in Rosenberger v.

21. Margaret Hallock is a partner with Frohnmayer's fraudulent crime!

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    Margaret Hallock is the one who was cutting the deal with the realtor Barnhart Associate Scarlet Lee: http://waynemorsecenter.uoregon.edu/about/wayne-morse-center-staff-2/

    

    Wayne Morse Center Staff

    Margaret Hallock, Director 220C Knight Law Center (541) 346-3699 hallock@uoregon.edu Margaret Hallock has been active in economic and labor policy in Oregon since 1974. She is the founding director of the Wayne Morse Center for Law and Politics and has been coordinating the Wayne Morse Chair since 1988 when she was director of the UO's Labor Education and Research Center.

22. Dave Frohnmayer shoves Melinda Grier under the bus

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://www.uomatters.com/2010/05/frohnmayer-speaks.html
    5/1/2010: Greg Bolt of the RG finally gets Frohnmayer to talk about the Bellotti contract. Frohnmayer was waiting to see exactly how much the AG’s report unearthed before he went on the record with his version. And the report has just one mention of Frohnmayer – he delegated signing authority to Grier – and none of the $440,000 in donations from Pat Kilkenny, before and after Frohnmayer appointed Kilkenny AD and let him negotiate the Bellotti deal. This is a professional courtesy from the new AG to the old one. Neither wants anything in the papers that makes the office of Attorney General look bad.
    So, now that the Oregon DOJ and the investigator David Leith have let Dave Frohnmayer off the hook, he shoves Melinda Grier under the bus:
    http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/971644/uomatters/athletics/Kroger%20Belotti%20investigation.pdf

23. The Frohnmayer Fandango

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://oregoncommentator.com/2006/10/21/the-frohnmayer-fandango/
    "In 2005 Frohnmayer sold his home on Baker Boulevard for $405,000, and purchased a house on Spyglass Drive using a 1031 in-kind property exchange, allowing him to avoid paying taxes on the Baker revenue untill the Spyglass property is sold. This was possible because both homes were leased out as a source of income, due to the fact that the Frohnmayers are contractually obligated to live in McMorran house, the White House of the UO. The ethical problems are as follows.
    1-Frohnmayer did not disclose the sale on his annual financial report because he felt that as his private residence, the Baker house sale fit the exemption on disclosure of transactions involving private residences. This becomes problematic because the McMorran house is his official residence, he is registered to vote there, his resume lists it, etc. Therefore, the deal involved investment property and should have been disclosed."

    

    The Frohnmayer Fandango

    The Emerald reports that ethical complaints has been brought by Economics professor William Harbaugh against University president Dave (Das Frohn) Frohnmayer. The complaints (online thanks to Willamette Week) were filed with the Oregon Bar Association, and the Oregon Government Standards and Practices Commission, which are now investigating Frohnmayer, according to a number of news outlets.

24. Frohnmayer’s latest ethics problem

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    http://www.uomatters.com/2012/06/ethics-complaint-filed-against.html

    

    Frohnmayer's latest ethics problem

    6/15/2012 update: I'm no legal ethics professor, but this doesn't look good for Frohnmayer: The full letter is here. The Bar's disciplinary counsel has given Frohnmayer and Gary until 6/21 to respond. The Bend Bulletin reports that the county has spent about $100,000 on the matter so far, presumably much of it to Frohnmayer and Gary's firm.

25. The Spyglass house was sold to the Frohnmayer by the Williams Family

    

    by Nadia Sindi

    Petition organiser

    2- The Spyglass house was sold to the Frohnmayers by the Williams family of the recently purchased by the university Williams Bakery. Harbaughs complaint raises the spectre of a conflict of interest there, although the Williams’ have since claimed to have had no financial interest in the Bakery sale.
    Perhaps the most interesting thing about the whole affair, is that Harbaugh claims to have brought the complaint due to Johnson Halls feet-dragging over affirmative action policy records Harbaugh wanted to challenge the campus diversity plan. “I concluded that this was a pattern of refusing to provide basic information about public issues, so that’s when I filed the complaint” was Harbaughs explanation in the Emerald. I have an immense amount of respect for Frohnmayer, and this is the first ethical complaint brought against him in his long, distinguished career. Overlooking the disclosure seems to have been a pretty clear mistake, but hardly an earth-shattering one. Rumors of conflict….

    

    The Frohnmayer Fandango

    The Emerald reports that ethical complaints has been brought by Economics professor William Harbaugh against University president Dave (Das Frohn) Frohnmayer. The complaints (online thanks to Willamette Week) were filed with the Oregon Bar Association, and the Oregon Government Standards and Practices Commission, which are now investigating Frohnmayer, according to a number of news outlets.

More News

---

Supporters

Reasons for signing

• Most Popular
• Latest

• Anita Kanitz STUTTGART, GERMANY

  • 8 months ago
  • Liked 1
  Stalking & Hate Crimes
  The Predatory Stalker
  For the predatory stalker, stalking is foreplay; the real goal is sexual assault. While they may gain satisfaction from the sense of control and power stalking gives them over the victim, it’s the violent and sexual fantasies that they engage in while researching, planning, and following the victim that really gets them off as they prepare for the ultimate thrill – the sexual assault itself.
  The stalking may have a sadistic quality to it. For example, some predatory stalkers mess with their victim’s minds by leaving subtle clues that they are being followed without revealing their identity. However, even when the victim is unaware that she is being stalked, the perpetrator can still take delight in the details – deciding how long to prolong the suspense, rehearsing the attack, fantasizing about the victim’s response.
  Is the Predatory Stalker Mentally Ill?
  Not in the way most people think. Predatory stalkers are not “love-sick” (i.e., due to unrequited love). Nor are predatory stalkers motivated by strong emotional attachment to their victims. Their stalking does not reflect efforts to establish or maintain close, positive relationships with victims; nor did it reflect separation protest or intense personal distress over the dissolution of a close relationship. Predatory stalkers are more likely to use stalking o gratify their need for dominance and control and, ultimately, to gratify sadistic sexual desires.
  Predatory stalkers have a different set of problems. In comparison to other types of stalkers, predatory stalkers are more likely to have a history of convictions for other sexual offense and to have a diagnosable paraphilia (pattern of deviant sexual arousal), particularly involving sexual sadism. Unlike stalkers who develop delusions that their victim is really in love with them or has committed some imaginary offense, these stalkers rarely have psychotic disorders. They do, however, often have personality disorders.
  Is the Predatory Stalker a Psychopath?
  While most stalkers (or sexual offenders, for that matter) are not psychopaths, it is interesting that those stalkers who do have psychopathic traits tend to exhibit pursuit behaviors that are similar to stalking predators. For instance, research suggests that psychopathy is associated with what could be summarized as “boldness and coldness” in stalkers.
  Predatory stalkers are also most likely to lead double lives, leaving their friends and family stunned and disbelieving when they are finally caught. Night stalker Delroy Grant, for example, who stalked, raped and terrorized retired pensioners for years, was viewed as a friendly, self-sacrificing neighbor who religiously cared for his wife who was paralyzed from the neck down from multiple sclerosis. Midwestern “Mall Rapist” James Perry stalked young girls in the malls and shopping center parking lots, was a popular member of his suburban community, where he lived with his wife and two young children.
  The Bottom Line
  All stalkers have the potential for violence although, fortunately, few actually commit it. Predatory stalkers, however, are a particularly dangerous breed. Cold and calculating, on the surface they are often able to maintain a façade as a devoted husband, caring professional or kind-hearted neighbor. Underneath, though, lurks an underbelly of twisted sexual desires and predatory violence.
  Gang stalking is surveillance and harassment of a designated target, by stalkers who are members of groups, which are networked.
  Gang stalking has three essential elements:
  The harassment is done by a substantial number of people, not by an obsessed single stalker, nor by helpers who are recruited by an obsessed single stalker.
  The group members are given the name of the target and/or have the target identified for them. They rarely know the target beforehand.
  Organized stalking community groups are tightly networked with stalking groups in other communities.
  You can think of gang stalking as mobbing which is extended to all aspects of your life, so that you can never escape some degree of harassment.
  The harassment is often carried out in a way to blame the victim for the harassment. This is called victim blaming.
  There are strong hints that the gang stalkers are a satanist cult. Currently we can’t prove that. But, clearly, there’s more that we don’t know yet.
  The procedure:
  They choose more or less randomly a person.
  They isolate him from the people that he knew by making him appear crazy.
  He gathers new suspect people around him.
  All these people are put under investigation.
  Wherever the suspect people go, the army recruits snitches. They form a large network that collects information. This can be stimulated by means of quota and bonuses for writing reports.
  Where it goes from here depends on the circumstances:
  Normally it goes on forever.
  If the suspect people cause a financial loss for the government, especially when there’s much drug related crime, then they are quickly arrested.
  If the suspect people appear to be an apolitical network then they are dismantled by monitoring and analyzing their cell phone use: the army knows where they are when they call each other. In this way they dismantled a gang stalking network in Louvain-la-Neuve (which counts 10,000 citizens) in Belgium. That’s to the southeast of Brussels. The members were all over the city. There was 50 m between them.
  If the victim becomes aware of the harassment then he will resist. Generally, this is the situation of people who out themselves as a targeted individual. Then the goal changes: the victim has to be removed as quickly as possible from society so he can’t spread what he knows:
  prison,
  bedlam,
  forced suicide,
  murder. In this case, they will first toy some time with the victim to make him fear for his life. Then they suddenly kill him.
  Within the realm of criminal justice and psychology, Dr. Sinclair primarily focuses on research within two topics: stalking and hate crimes. Both of these interests grew out of initial research interests in violence the primarily targets women (e.g., rape, battering). However, it is on these two topics that she presently focuses.
  Stalking Research
  Her stalking research focuses on three main questions:
  1) What are the predictors of stalking behavior?
  2) What are people’s perceptions – including those of legal agents – of stalking?
  3) How does our culture (e.g., media, social norms) contribute to both the perceptions and the behavior?
  For example, in a recent experiment, they found that rejection – in particular rejection that threatens one’s positive self-image (i.e., by blaming the rejected person for why the relationship is ending) – can trigger stalking behavior especially when one has been depleted of self-regulation resources (their ability to engage in self-control). In contrast, a rejection that aims to “let the person down easy” (e.g., “it’s not you, it’s me”) is less likely to trigger aggressive responses to a relationship breakup.
  Also notable, individual difference variables, such as being high in Likelihood to Stalk or Stalking Myth Endorsement (both scales we have developed), can exacerbate reactions to ego-threatening rejection.
  In other research, Dr. Sinclair and her team have been engaging in an extensive Media Coding project to examine how the media portrays unwanted relationship pursuits. They find that, generally, the media provides a script of persistence in the face of rejection. Further, persistence is often portrayed as positive, successful, amusing, and secretly what the love interest really wants (despite what s/he says) – especially when the pursuer is male. Our next step is to examine what impact these pervasive media messages have on actual stalking behaviors and perceptions of stalking cases.
  Publications of interest:
  Sinclair, H. C. (forthcoming). Courtship in the Courts: Stalking and the cultural construction of romance. Blackwell-Wiley.
  Sinclair, H. C., Collier, K. E., & Sheridan, L. E. (forthcoming). A tangled web: Social network involvement in stalking incidents.
  Sinclair, H. C. & MacArthur, J. R. (forthcoming). Scripting stalking: The romantic comedy of popular media portrayals of unwanted pursuits.
  Ladney, R. T., Sinclair, H. C., & Lyndon, A. (under review). Self regulation and rejection: Effects on Obsessive Relational Intrusion.
  Sinclair, H. C. & Lyndon, A. (under review). Stalking in the courts: An archival examination of legal outcomes in stalking cases.
  Sinclair, H. C. (2010). Stalking myth-attributions: Examining the role of individual and contextual variables on judgments of unwanted pursuit scenarios. Sex Roles.
  Williams, S, Frieze, I. H., & Sinclair, H. C. (2007). Stalking and intimate violence. In J. Hamel & T. Nicholls (Eds.), Family Therapy for Domestic Violence: A practitioner’s guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment (pp. 109-123). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  Sinclair, H. C. & Frieze, I. H. (2005). When courtship persistence becomes intrusive pursuit: A comparison of rejecter and pursuer perspectives of unrequited attraction. Sex Roles, 52, 839-852.
  Sinclair, H. C. & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Initial courtship behavior and stalking: How should we draw the line? Violence and Victims, 15(1), 23-40.
  Hate Crime Research
  Dr. Sinclair’s hate crimes research has primarily focused on:
  1) What attitudes do people hold about hate crime policy?
  2) Why is there so much difficulty in applying the hate crime label to instances of gender-motivated bias crime?
  This domain of research is a newer avenue. Thus far, they have primarily focused on the difficulty people have with seeing any prejudicial motives as underlying crime against women. The goal of the research is to find what factors inhibit labeling of gender-motivated hate crimes. For example, the 2009 shooting of multiple women in Bridgeville, PA by George Sodini was not labeled a hate crime by many, and yet, Sodini was known for his hatred of women and had the attack targeted any other demographic (e.g., race, sexual orientation, religion), there wouldn’t have been any hesitation to applying the hate crime label. They apply the Prototype Model to potentially explain the lack of clarity surrounding gender-motivated bias crimes.
• Michael Adzema EUGENE, OR

  • 11 months ago
  • Liked 1
  Nadia is my friend
• David Evans VANCOUVER, WA

  • 11 months ago
  • Liked 1
  Nadia Sindi is being targeted for her political activism. If it happened to her it can happen to any of us!
• Nadine Akkerman GREAT FALLS, MT

  • 11 months ago
  • Liked 1
  Scumbags in government think they are above the law because of their position. They should be treating citizens with the utmost care. After all aren't they elected positions? Abuse of power.
• Vicki Nikolaidis STORRS/MANSFIELD, UNITED STATES

  • 11 months ago
  • Liked 1
  I still believe the USA should give justice to all.