The Ugly Truth
American Radio Host Mark Glenn Calls Iranian President Source of Inspiration, Hope
One of the main programs of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, while visiting New York to attend the 67th annual UN General Assembly session, was holding meetings with different groups of Americans, including the leaders of Abrahamic religions.
American journalist, radio host
and activist Mark Glenn was among tens of religious figures who attended
the meeting with the Iranian President.
Speaking of his viewpoints about
the Iranian President, Mark Glenn said, “during dark times such as these
in which we all find ourselves today, he has been a great source of
personal inspiration and hope for me. When we consider what passes as
“statesmen” these days, whether it is war criminals such as George Bush
or Barack Obama, how does someone watching all of this not find reasons
for hope when men such as Ahmadinejad stand up against the tyrants and
murderers of the world fearlessly?”
Kim Phuc pictured Vietnam war, running naked from an airborne attack, burned with napalm, June of 1972
Mark Glenn is the host of the
Ugly Truth Radio Show and a religious author and activist based in
Idaho. Glenn who leads the Cross and Crescent Solidarity Movement is a
strong supporter of Iran and believes that Iran is a country which the
Almighty God has selected for a special mission: “it is my strong
personal belief that God has touched the Iranian nation and her people
for a very special, we might even say divine task, for these dark days.”
What follows is the text of Fars
News Agency’s interview with Mark Glenn to whom we have talked about his
meeting with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the viewpoints the Iranian
President raised in the meeting.
Q: Mark; what’s your assessment
of your meeting with Iranian President? What impression did you get of
him? How much different is the reality of Mr. Ahmadinejad from what the
Western mainstream media portray of him?
A: Well, the first thing that
needs to be established in contextualizing my answer is that I did not
go to New York as an “unbiased journalist,” if such a thing could
actually exist. I am a big supporter of President Ahmadinejad and have
been for many years. During dark times such as these in which we all
find ourselves today, he has been a great source of personal inspiration
and hope for me. When we consider what passes as “statesmen” these
days, whether it is war criminals such as George Bush or Barack Obama,
how does someone watching all of this not find reasons for hope when men
such as Ahmadinejad stand up against the tyrants and murderers of the
world fearlessly?
Having said that, my personal
estimation of the man was not raised or lowered as a result of the
meeting. He was exactly what I have come to know of him over the many
years I have watched him on TV and read what he has had to say in the
printed media, both in the West and in Iran. He is decent, humble,
intelligent, and above all else, fair.
The difference in the way he is
portrayed in the western media owned and controlled by organized Zionist
interests is of such a stark nature that it probably cannot even be
measured. It is the motto of Israel intelligence/assassination agency
Mossad that “by way of deception we shall make war,” and the manner by
which Ahmadinejad has been portrayed in the Western Zionist media is but
one manifestation of this motto. Everything he has been described being
he is not, and by contrast, everything he is contradicts what has been
said and written about him.
The best way I could sum up and
compare the media-driven hysteria about him is to recall how the Jews of
Jesus’ day were raising riots against Him in order to destroy His
character and His message, and that is the way I would describe the 3
days I was in New York watching the insane behavior on the part of the
Zionist media and the hooligans on the street-Good Friday, 33 A.D. in
Jerusalem.
Q: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is among
the few political leaders in the world whose statements, speeches and
interviews always include religious overtones and allusions. He always
talks about the apocalyptic return of the last Savior to fulfill the
historic mission which has been entrusted to him by the Almighty God,
and that Jesus Christ will be accompanying Imam Mahdi when he returns.
What’s your take on that? What do you make of Iranian President’s
religious views?
A: I will admit as a Christian
that my faith has been strengthened and deepened as a result of studying
what Islam has to say about Jesus and His teachings. As I indicated in
the speech that I gave at the banquet honoring President Ahmadinejad, I
purchased a book on Islam shortly after 9/11 for a mere 50 cents (half a
US dollar) and it was a life changing event for me. It is the reason I
wound up at the gathering in New York and why you and I are doing this
interview right now.
Having said that, I am intrigued
with the Islamic and particularly the Shiite understanding of Jesus and
His return. My first encounter with this theme of the Islamic return of
Jesus was coincidentally when President Ahmadinejad granted me the honor
of sitting down in front of a video camera and recording a short speech
a few years ago that was then played at a conference I was helping to
put together entitled “No More Wars For Israel” out in California. You
can imagine how honored and humbled I was that he would grant me such a
request, but the truth is that I was much more moved by what he had to
say concerning Jesus’ return than I was by the honor he bestowed upon
me.
And in many ways, it is this
notion-that both Muslims and Christians are awaiting the return of Jesus
for the great battle between good and evil, that I use now in trying to
bring the 2 peoples together against their common enemy, meaning
organized Zionist interests.
Q: One of the issues which
President Ahmadinejad raised in his speech to your meeting was the
release and distribution of a sacrilegious movie which insulted Prophet
Mohammad (PBUH). What’s your idea about this movie, the people behind it
and similar attacks on the sanctities of Muslims which can be seen in
light of a growing wave of Islamophobia in the West?
A: I think it is important that
we understand this blasphemous movie for what it is-an intelligence
operation originating out of Israel that has but one express motive-to
throw a bucket of gasoline on an already out of control fire.
Organized Zionist interests
desperately want to see the Christian and Islamic worlds at war with
each other for the next 100 years, something that Israeli PM Benjamin
Netanyahu made expressly clear in a speech he recently made at an event
honoring Shimon Peres. Christianity and Islam represent the other two
Abrahamic faiths which organized Zionist interests consider to be pagan
in nature, and therefore must be destroyed. That is the goal behind the
Israeli-engineered “clash of civilizations”, to see Judaism’s two main
competitors wipe each other out through a century or more of apocalyptic
wars.
The other item that deserves
mention here is the hypocrisy of it all. In these same western nations
where Islam and Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) are blasphemed with impunity, a
person is thrown into prison for as much as 7 years for questioning the
“official” (meaning Zionist) narrative as far as the Holocaust is
concerned. And yet the west lectures other countries such as Iran on
what it means to be a “free” and “enlightened” country. How backwards
things have become.
Q: What do you think about
President Ahmadinejad’s comments on Israel and the Holocaust? Drawing
upon his comments with regards to Israel, many American critics of
Iranian President have accused him of propagating anti-Semitic
sentiments, while there are several Western scholars who have questioned
the official accounts of the Holocaust and sided with Iranian
President. What’s your idea?
A: Again, my position is the same
as that of President Ahmadinejad-why must we have laws protecting the
truth? Why threaten people with prison for questioning the official
narrative of the Holocaust if the facts are there to support it? What
are the guardians of this strange, relatively new religion afraid of? Is
this not intolerance, threatening people with prison if they refuse to
believe this strange new religion blindly? Is this not “conversion by
the sword,” exactly what organized Zionist interests allege about Islam?
“Anti-Semitism” is the hollow,
empty cry that organized Zionist interests use in shutting down a
discussion that threatens to reveal them for the criminals they are.
They know that their argument cannot withstand an open, honest
application of facts and reason, and this is the reason why no
discussion of this topic is permitted.
And the reasons for this are
obvious. For these organized Zionist interests the Holocaust is like the
goose that lays the golden egg, over and over and over. It is like a
winning lottery ticket that never expires and is redeemable every day,
week after week for eternity. By always claiming victim status,
organized Zionist interests have succeeded in robbing the world more
effectively than an armada of Pirates sailing the seas pillaging
everything in sight.
And as far as the President being
an “anti-Semite,” they might as well accuse him of being a little green
man from outer space, as this is actually more believable. Iran is home
to the largest Jewish population in the Middle East outside of Israel.
If he truly were the “anti-Semite” as organized Zionist interests claim,
why has he not rounded up all Iran’s Jews and sent them to the gas
chambers? Again, remember the motto of Israel’s intelligence service
Mossad-By way of deception (lying) we shall do war…
.jpg)
Q: How can Iran play an effective
role in fostering inter-faith dialogue? Iran has always been considered
as a country where the followers of divine religions co-exist with each
other in a peaceful manner and equally contribute to social progress of
the country. Iranian leaders have always called for the integrity and
solidarity between the followers of Abrahamic religions. What’s your
viewpoint in this regard?
A: I believe interfaith dialogue
is one of the most effective weapons at our disposal in defeating the
forces of organized evil. As I stated earlier, as a Christian my life
was permanently changed by reading what Islam had to say about Jesus. I
am confident that this would be the same with other Christians if they
were to come to realize how they are being seduced by organized Zionist
interests into believing these lies about Islam. Islam is not
responsible for defaming Jesus Christ and destroying, denigrating the
Christian character of the West. Are Muslims in control of the mass
media? Are Muslims in control of Hollywood? Are Muslims destroying the
moral fiber of the West? No, it is not Muslims, and we all know who it
is.
So in that regard, Iran is the
place for bringing about this interfaith dialogue you mention. In Iran
all faiths are protected by law. Israel certainly cannot make this
claim, as Christian churches and Islamic mosques are set on fire
everyday, where clerics from these two faiths are spat upon by those
claiming to be God’s chosen people. It certainly cannot be any of the
western countries that are under the domination of organized Zionist
interests who make it a point to insult Islam on a daily basis. The Arab
countries are in too much tumult and are suffering from deliberate
sectarianism.
Therefore, Iran should be the
player in all this to begin a rational, reasonable discussion of this
type. What I envision is an international conference along the same
lines as the Holocaust conference that took place in Tehran a few years
ago, and where major figures from the Christian and Islamic faiths can
meet, greet and speak like rational men of good will. The alternative to
this is what we see taking place right now; organized Zionist interests
pitting the two faiths against each other and all the suffering and
mayhem that it has produced.
Mass murderers and liars!
Q: I read that in your meeting,
President Ahmadinejad talked about the threats issued by the Israeli
regime against Iran over its nuclear program. He said that Iran doesn’t
take such threats seriously, and that Israel is not powerful enough to
confront Iran militarily or politically. What do you think about
Israel’s intensified war rhetoric against Iran?
A: I think that Israel is
desperate and that this desperation is evident. As the history of the
last half century has proven, Israel must have war every 10 years or so
in order to hold together what is an organically-fractured society. If
there were no war, Israel would disintegrate. That is the reason that it
is so important to her that the region be in a state of constant
turmoil and upheaval.
At the same time, it is important
for Israel that she maintain the notion that the US is her private
attack dog, and the fact that the US is dragging her feet in launching
this war against Iran as Israel has demanded is causing the Jewish state
a lot of embarrassment, and especially with the whole world watching.
The reason Israel demands Iran’s
destruction is simple. Iran is a free, sovereign state that dares to
oppose Zionist lies and oppression. Iran is not in turmoil and upheaval,
like the other countries of the region, and Israel fears that
eventually these other countries will begin to see Iran as a role model
in the region and begin allying themselves with her, and in the process,
peace, order and tranquility will return to the region, resulting in
Israel’s disintegration.
I agree with the president’s
assessment as well concerning Israel’s military capacity in destroying
Iran. As Israel has demonstrated time and again, she can only win wars
when the people she is attacking are defenseless men, women and
children.
Q: What do you think about the
efforts made by Iranian President to reach out to the American public?
He gave several interviews and held different meetings with groups of
American journalists, religious figures, academicians and students while
in New York. Given the unending animosity of the US against Iran and
the biased portrayal of Iran affairs by the American media, are such
efforts effective in presenting to the American public a realistic and
fair image of Iran?
A: I think that there are some
people in America who understand the nature of the game being played
here and for them, it is effective. However, what must be understood is
that when it comes to the propaganda dished out by organized Zionist
interests, the American people are in large part like drug addicts who
cannot be reasoned with. Zionism is a drug for them and they love it and
don’t want to part with it. And remember, they have been injecting this
poison into their intellectual veins now for almost half a century.
Therefore, President Ahmadinejad’s outreach through use of the American
media, as noble an attempt as it is, nevertheless will fall on a lot of
deaf ears. Unfortunately the American people are going to have to learn
the hard way, when they wake up one morning and find their country has
been destroyed as a result of a century of Zionist-led wars that have
bankrupted the nation. Then, and sadly, only then, will they come to
realize the error of their ways.
This is not to say however that
neither the President nor his successor should try. As I said in the
speech I gave in his presence, miracles happen everyday. I bought a book
for a mere 50 cents and it changed my life. We cannot underestimate
God’s power and providence in all of this, and as Jesus Himself said in
one of his many teachings, the Kingdom of God is like a mustard seed,
the tiniest of all seeds, that then grows into the mightiest of trees.
The real Islamic 'bomb' the West is scared of!
Q: How do you see the future of
Iran in the light of war threats, economic sanctions and media
propaganda directed by the United States, Israel and their European
allies? Can Iran withstand the pressures and realize its objectives?
A: It is my strong personal
belief that God has touched the Iranian nation and her people for a very
special, we might even say divine, task for these dark days. As I
pointed out in a personal letter I sent to President Ahmadinejad this
past summer, it was the Iranian people who first paid official homage to
Jesus Christ when He was visited by the three kings from the East who
honored Him with gifts of Frankencense and Mirrh shortly after His
birth, giving the rest of the world the celebration of Christmas that so
many know today.
I believe this, as well as many
others, is the reason Iran was blessed with victory in her revolution of
1979 and why she remains a stable, viable political and cultural entity
today in a part of the world where stability is as scarce as water.
At the same time however, I
cannot but be honest in admitting my concerns and fears for Iran in the
coming months and years. Israel is a mad dog and is beyond rational
behavior. She is not only capable of doing the worst, she is inclined
towards such, and we can dismiss the notion that she is simply going to
walk away from all this and admit defeat if she does not get the war she
demands. For Israel, this is worse than death itself.
It is for this reason therefore
that I foresee Israel doing something crazy, and I mean really crazy, in
order to get this fire lit.
Therefore, let us not play games
here. We know Israel was intimately involved in bringing about the
terrorist attacks of 9/11 that started this present clash of
civilizations. We know that Benjamin Netanyahu’s response to the deaths
of 3,000 Americans was one of glee, saying that the attacks were “good,”
because they would bring “immediate sympathy for Israel.” We know as
well that Netanyahu’s Defense Minister right now-Ehud Barak, was within
minutes of the attacks of 9/11, calling for a full scale war against
Israel’s enemies throughout the world.
Therefore, it is not that
difficult for thinking men to envision what lengths Israel in the
persons of Netanyahu and Barack is willing to go to in getting the war
started. But instead of hijacked airliners, what will it be instead? An
Israeli nuclear weapon smuggled into the US under diplomatic pouch
detonated in a major American city that is then blamed on Iran? A series
of coordinated attacks across the country? The assassination of the
American President or of many American officials that is then blamed on
Iran? The list is endless.
So it is then in these dark days
that we must do what we can in shedding the light of truth on this
situation and hope that God, the merciful and compassionate, will look
upon our meager efforts and reward us with His protection and defeat of
the present evil, reminding ourselves along the way what it says in the
Holy Qur'aan concerning the machinations of the evil doers:
"They plot and plan, but Allah also plans and Allah is the best of Planners."
Qur’an VIII – 30
Qur’an VIII – 30
قال الله عزَّ وجل:
ويمكرون ويمكر الله والله خير الماكرين "
سورة الأنفال"
”
Like this:
You and one other blogger like this.
- National Prayer Network
PAM GELLER: IF IRAN ATTACKS, ISRAEL SHOULD NUKE EUROPE
By Rev. Ted Pike
9 Oct 12She is beautiful, articulate, and controversial. But she is also fanatical, and even dangerous. Radical Jewish anti-Islamic activist and Fox News regular Pamela Geller said on her blog in 2010: “And I pray dearly that in the ungodly event that Tehran or its jihadi proxies (Hez’Ballah, Hamas, etc.) target Israel with a nuke, that she retaliate with everything she has at Tehran, Mecca, Medina……not to mention Europe. They exterminated all their Jews, but that wasn’t enough. These monsters then went on to import the next generation of Jew-killers.” By “Jew-killers,” she means Muslims: “This new hatred comes from Muslim immigrants. The Jewish people are afraid now.”
Geller shares a similar view with Israeli advocates of “The Samson Option”: if Israel is to be destroyed by nuclear attack, it should destroy the whole world by unloading its entire nuclear arsenal upon it. (See Does the Bible Predict Israel's "Nuclear Shield?")
Geller Supports Norway MassacreGeller is also a supporter of Norway mass-murderer Anders Behring Breivik. “The Right wing terrorist in Norway, Anders Behring Breivik, had praised her blog and thoroughly cited her writing in his political manifesto…Geller justifies Breivik’s attack on the Norwegian Labor Party Summer Youth Camp because she says the camp is part of an anti-Israel ‘indoctrination training center.’” She says the victims would have grown up to become “future leaders of the party responsible for flooding Norway with Muslims who refuse to assimilate, who commit major violence against Norwegian nationals including violent gang rapes, with impunity, and who live on the dole.”
Favored by Anti-Muslim RepublicansGeller portrays herself as an admirer of Ayn Rand and an anti-Obama political conservative. Some leaders of the Republican and anti-Islamic right have publically supported her. Geller’s website, “Atlas Shruggs,” shows her posed with House Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA). It says she has also posed with Newt Gingrich. Here are luminaries she says are also on her side:
- Ambassador John Bolton: “Well, I read Atlas Shruggs, Power Line, National Review blogs…Atlas Shruggs breaks more news than dozens of liberal blogs combined.”
- Mark Steyn: “I’m a fan.”
- Geert Wilders: “You do great work. You are a hero.”
- Veteran hate law foe, Rep. Steven King (R-LA) describes her as “a nationally- recognized authority on the threat of radical Islam.”
- Michael Freund of The Washington Post praises her at length.
- Her blog also lists her as a National Review, Human Events, American Thinker, and Big Government contributor.
- She has also received the Anne Taylor Award for Courage.
Muslims Are “Savage”At this moment, Geller is in the middle of a firestorm of controversy over her NYC subway ad promotion describing Muslims as “savage” in contrast to “civilized” Israelis. “A virulently Islamophobic advertisement campaign referring to Muslims as ‘savage’ went live this week in 10 New York City subway stations. The advertisements, created and funded by Pamela Geller’s American Freedom Defense Initiative, read, ‘In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.’” The NYC transit authority was forced to allow these ads as political free speech. But they would qualify as a hate crime (holding up an identifiable group for hatred and contempt) in hate law countries outside of the U.S.
Muslims are justified in their outrage against Geller’s depiction of them as “savage” versus “civilized” Israelis. The historical truth is that “civilized” nations have a sordid record of inhumane treatment toward “savage” peoples they have encountered. Remember what our “civilized” forefathers did to the Native American “savages” or what the Dutch Boers did to the South African blacks or the Australians to the Aborigines? This is precisely what the “civilized” Israelis did, and still do, toward the displaced and relentlessly oppressed Palestinians.
Heightening Racism and Intolerance WorldwideGeller is a manifestation of the heightening racism and intolerance I have warned against among many ethnic and religious groups worldwide—alienation that could lead to race war. It exists in the anti-Zionist right (see The "Bad Jewish Genes" Theory) and the Zionist right in Israel (see Israel’s Increasing Anti-Christianity). It is especially tragic that the evangelical/Republican right, scorning the reality that Jewish supremacy poses an exponentially greater threat than Islam (see Why We Should Fear Zionism More than Islam), have become bedfellows with the anti-Muslim Zionists.
As a result, as the Bible portrays, they have become “unequally yoked together” with a fundamentally anti-Christian lobby. Rejecting truth about the Zionist threat and its unbiblical occupation of Palestine (see List of Conditional Occupation Verses), the religious right confirms Christ’s prediction that in the last days, the powers of deception will be so pervasive and convincing that “even the very elect, if possible, will be deceived.” (Matt. 24:24) Scripture says because of scorning truth, “God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie.” (2 Thess. 2:11)
With Zionists like Geller advising Republicans and Zionist Christians, the outcome is certain: “If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the ditch.” (Matt. 15:14)
Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.
TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.
The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.
National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015It's All About IsraelJ. Raimondo has more on the Iran 'crisis'
Ignore Syrian Rebels' ThreatsIvan Eland foresees little gain in meddling
Disaster on AutopilotTom Engelhardt on our overwrought empireNATO Set to Defend Turkey Against SyriaPlans in place to protect and defend Turkey if necessary
How the US Quietly Lost the IED WarGareth Porter on Afghanistan
Attacks Signal Iraq al-Qaeda ComebackTraining camps reportedly established along Syrian borderSanctions Means WarAgainst civilians, says Jacob Hornberger
Brutal Drone Strikes in PakistanDavid Swanson on some activists speaking out
Israeli Clown Backs DownRay McGovern on Netanyahu's disgrace - Home
- About Antiwar.com
- Donate
- Blog
- US Casualties
- Contact
- Latest News
- Letters
How do we know this? An exile group of so-called “freedom-fighters” has made this “intelligence” available to a reporter for a widely-read US newspaper, which splashes this scoop all over its front pages.
I could be talking about the year 2002 — or 2012, with only difference being the names of the target countries. We have been down this road before
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is now saying it is only a matter of a year or so before Iran is ready to join the nuclear club — of course, he said the same thing last year, and the year before, and the year before that.
Adding to our sense of deja-vu, we have an Iranian version of the Iraqi National Congress exile group providing the same quality of “intelligence”: the Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), or Peoples’ Warriors, a weird Marxist-Islamic cult which once served Saddam Hussein and was given a base in Iraq to conduct terrorist activities in Iran. When the southern Shi’ites rose against Saddam in the 1990s, Saddam called in these mercenaries to slaughter the ill-armed rebels. The War Party won a big victory the other day when Hillary Clinton announced the MEK had been taken off the official list of designated terrorist groups. They have been a constant source of phony “evidence” that Iran is secretly working on nuclear weapons
Hardly a day goes by without some supposedly sensational revelation or claim about Iran’s alleged “weapons of mass destruction.” It seems like only yesterday, however, that we were seeing exactly the same headlines, and the same articles, only this time it is Iran instead of Iraq that stands accused. Back in 2002, it was a series of pieces bylined by a New York Times reporter, Judith Miller — whose name has become virtually synonymous with deception. Ms. Miller was being fed her information by Chalabi’s group, via her close connections to the administration, and in particular to a group of political operatives deemed the neoconservatives.
This was — is — a small but highly influential coterie of what used to be called cold war liberals, whose views were shaped by migratory ex-Trotskyites with a bone to pick with Stalin. Not your run of the mill European-style Social Democrats, mind you, but militant interventionists with a vision of a world reshaped by American military power. Or, as one neocon writing in a prominent foreign policy journal put it: the goal of US foreign policy ought to be “benevolent global hegemony” — as opposed, one must assume, to the malevolent global hegemony dreamed of by Communists, national socialists, and other villains throughout history.
The fabled journey of the neocons from far left to far right has been celebrated in story and song, and there is no need to go into all the gory details here: we’ve heard it all before — in a PBS documentary, “Arguing the World,” and in numerous memoirs by the participants. Yet this famous hegira didn’t take them anywhere: it was a journey standing still. For they had simply transferred their allegiance from the Soviet Union to the United States without changing the basic underlying assumptions of their radical universalism: instead of a world communist revolution as advocated by Leon Trotsky and his followers, these disillusioned Marxists now dreamed of a “global democratic revolution,” as one of George W. Bush’s speechwriters put it in a presidential oration celebrating the anniversary of the National Endowment for Democracy.
Having walked out of the Democratic party, disgusted with the alleged “pacifism” of George McGovern, these Scoop Jackson Democrats wound up in the Republican party just as the Reagan Revolution, so-called, was picking up steam. When Reagan went to Washington, the neocons followed in his wake, and wound up ensconced in the National Endowment for Democracy, which was founded with them in mind. There Reagan’s advisers could keep an eye on them, while they stayed largely out of sight of the general public.
From a small coterie of social democratic intellectuals, the neocons soon branched out and established a Washington network that tied them into the right-wing cold war coalition of social conservatives, free market types, and professional anti-communists. The neocons fit neatly into the latter category, but were never quite comfortable with the other members of the coalition. Some of them remained socialists, or at least social democrats of one sort or another, and as far as capitalism was concerned, they could only give it two cheers, at the most — as Irving Kristol put it in the title of one of his books. When it came to domestic issues, the neocons were all over the map, from Sidney Hook — the quintessential New York intellectual — who remained a socialist until his dying day, to Irving Kristol, a former Trotksyist who wound up founding a veritable dynasty based on the ideological assumptions to be found in the Republican party platform.
What unified them, and defined them as a cohesive group, was a fanatical hatred of Stalinism and their dedication to the idea of spreading democracy — at gunpoint, if necessary — throughout the world. During the cold war, the CIA made use of them as the US sought to counter Soviet influence on the international left. Having displaced the older generation of conservatives, who were derided as “isolationists,” these New Conservatives — or neoconservatives, as they came to be known — came to dominate the American right-wing and soon seized control of the philanthropic foundations that poured money into right-wing causes.
As the cold war ended, however, they saw their influence waning. When Reagan met with Gorbachev and signed a treaty limiting long-range missiles based in Europe, they accused the man who had coined the phrase “evil empire” with selling out to the commies and leaving the US defenseless against the Kremlin. They failed to understand what was happening when the Soviet colossus began to crack because they never “got it” that communism’s biggest enemies were its own internal contradictions.
With the fall of Communism, and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, the professional anti-communists were out of work. Suddenly there was a big hole in their worldview: the rationalization for our interventionist foreign policy had disappeared almost overnight. Worse, from their point of view, the Republicans were drifting back to their “isolationist” roots. When, during the Clinton administration, the Republicans in Congress threatened to pull the funding from our military adventure in Kosovo, Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, threatened to walk out of the Republican party.
Ah, but all was not lost. When George W. Bush went to Washington, a gaggle of neocons followed him. Showing up for work that fateful winter were all the familiar faces who had worked for Sen. Scoop Jackson (D-Boeing), organized the Committee on the Present Danger (and other neocon front groups), and served as the de facto command center of the War Party in previous administrations: Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Eliot Cohen, Elliott Abrams, Douglas Feith — and, sitting in the peanut gallery, the neocon publicists like Bill Kristol, son of Irving, editor of the Weekly Standard: Max Boot, former CIA analyst, the gang over at Commentary magazine, the staff of the American Enterprise Institute — the most prominent and certainly the wealthiest conservative think tank — and various and sundry Republican politicians, as well as ostensible Democrats like Sen. Joe Lieberman. The policy office of the Pentagon and the National Security Council were packed with neocons, and they had their agenda all set to go when George W. Bush entered the Oval Office.
They went to Washington with a plan: invade and subjugate Iraq. They had found a new enemy to take the place of the Kremlin, and it wasn’t just the Iraq dictator — although Saddam was their initial target — but the entire Muslim world, which they determined had to be transformed. The “swamp,” they averred, had to be “drained.” In their view, the entire Arab world had been deformed and kept back from achieving “modernity” due to certain characteristics of what they called the “Arab mind” — deformations that could be traced back to the all-pervasive influence of Islam on the development of Arab civilization.
The stage was set for the disaster that was about to unfold….
NOTES IN THE MARGIN
I regret to say that I’ve had to cancel my Vassar talk, which was scheduled for Wednesday, October 10 — I’ve apparently caught walking pneumonia! I was going to go anyway, but my doctor advised me against it. So I’m staying home, in bed, and the talk I didn’t get to deliver is being serialized this week in three parts. Part I is above: the second and third parts will appear on Wednesday and Friday.
Read more by Justin Raimondo
- It’s All About Israel – October 9th, 2012
- Getting Away With Murder – October 4th, 2012
- Deflowering the ‘Rose Revolution’ – October 2nd, 2012
- Race for the White House, 2012:
Whom to Root For? – September 30th, 2012 - Bibi’s Crazy UN Speech – September 27th, 2012
It’s All About Israel
Part II of “Roots of the Iranian ‘Crisis’”
Editorial note: This is the second part of a three-part article. Part I is here. Part III will appear on Friday.
It was and is a matter of high
principle for the neoconservatives that the US unconditionally support
Israel in its struggle against the Arab world. Disputing the neocons’
claim to the mantle of Wilsonianism, Michael Lind described
this odd nexus of radical universalism and ethno-nationalism as
“Trotsky’s theory of the permanent revolution mingled with the far-right
Likud strain of Zionism,” adding: “Genuine American Wilsonians believe
in self-determination for people such as the Palestinians.”
Saddam Hussein, you’ll recall, had been offering bounties for suicide bombers, at least according to the propaganda we heard, and — alongside the contention that he was also developing nuclear weapons — this was the pitch the neocons, and the Israel lobby,
gave in public to justify the invasion. Yet there was another layer of
rationalization which went largely undetected in America, and the
argument was contained in a paper prepared for then Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in 1996, under the auspices of the Israeli
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, which had
organized a “Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000.” The
paper was shaped by a series of seminars in which several figures who
would figure prominently in the administration of George W. Bush
participated, including Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser. Entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,”
the proposal proffered by these future American policymakers urged
Netanyahu to undertake a long-term project to break Israel out of its
geographic and demographic boundaries and engage in a campaign of
“regime change” in the Middle East. To the incoming Prime Minister, who
had upended the long rule of the Israeli Labor Party, they gave the
following advice: ditch the peace process, and make a “clean break” with
the policy of appeasing both the Palestinians and the
United States. Stand up to Uncle Sam, insist on mutuality, build up
support for Israeli objectives in the US Congress, and go on the
offensive against the enemies of the Jewish state:
“Israel can shape its
strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by
weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can
focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important
Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling
Syria’s regional ambitions.”
The entire regime change
operation we are seeing unfold in the Middle East is a veritable laundry
list of neoconservative goals as outlined in the “Clean Break”
document, as well as in the agenda of the Project for a New American Century(PNAC),
Bill Kristol’s vehicle for injecting a strong dose of interventionism
into the incoming Bush administration. Aside from calling for regime
change in practically every Middle Eastern state — all this prior to the
9/11 terrorist attacks — PNAC’s proposal for tripling the military
budget was prefaced by a yearning for “a new Pearl Harbor,” which would
wake the American people up to the imperative of American military
supremacy at any cost.
The neocons got their Pearl Harbor on September 11, 2001, and they were more than ready to take full advantage of the opportunity to implement their agenda ofpermanent war. While the administration made a half-hearted attempt
to capture Osama bin Laden they failed to corner him in Afghanistan,
and the top leadership slipped through the American dragnet with the help of its Taliban allies. This, however, didn’t really concern the neocons all that much: Paul Wolfowitz and others were arguing inside
the administration that the real enemy was in Baghdad. After the
preliminaries in Afghanistan, they turned their sights on the real
object of their war-lust: Iraq.
The “Clean Break” scenario envisioned the overthrow of Iraq’s Ba’athist regime as a prerequisite for Israel’s success, and the Israel lobby, in concert with the neoconservatives,
played a key role in dragging us into that disastrous war of
aggression. Yet that was just the beginning of the road they wanted to
take us on, and we are halfway down it already. As Ariel Sharon told a
delegation of American congressmen in 2003, after Iraq must some Iran, Libya, and Syria:
“These are irresponsible states,
which must be disarmed of weapons mass destruction, and a successful
American move in Iraq as a model will make that easier to achieve,” said
the Prime Minister to his guests, rather like a commander issuing
orders to his foot-soldiers. While noting that Israel was not itself at
war with Iraq, he went on to say that “the American action is of vital
importance.”
Of course it was, but as far as the Israelis and their American amen corner were concerned, it was to be just the beginning.
The Israelization of
American foreign policy under George W. Bush was a policy consciously
promoted by the neoconservatives from their well-situated perch at the
heights of the national security apparatus. The progenitors of the
“Clean Break” scenario saw the Israeli state facing a terminal crisis:
the Jewish state, in their view, was suffering from an “exhaustion” that
could lead to extinction. The idea was to break with the idea of
“containment” and go for a policy of preemption. As the “Clean Break”
document put it:
“Notable Arab intellectuals
have written extensively on their perception of Israel’s floundering and
loss of national identity. This perception has invited attack, blocked
Israel from achieving true peace, and offered hope for those who would
destroy Israel. The previous strategy, therefore, was leading the Middle
East toward another Arab-Israeli war. Israel’s new agenda can signal a
clean break by abandoning a policy which assumed exhaustion and allowed
strategic retreat by reestablishing the principle of preemption, rather
than retaliation alone and by ceasing to absorb blows to the nation
without response.”
This doctrine of preemption came to be known as the Bush Doctrine,
but it really ought to be called the Sharon-Bush Doctrine, given its
true origins. When George W. Bush declared that the United States has
the “right,” and even the obligation,
to attack any nation on earth, on the grounds that the target poses a
potential threat to US interests, he was merely echoing what had by that
time already become official Israeli policy. This policy was given free
rein in a whole series of wars, aside from the permanent state of war prevailing in the occupied territories of Palestine: twoinvasions of Lebanon, and, today, terrorist attacks inside Iran carried out by Israeli intelligence agencies in cooperation with their proxies, such as the Mujahideen Khalq.
The ultimate example of preemption would be an attack on Iran — and
here we see a real conflict developing between the Obama administration
and Netanyahu’s government.
The Israeli position on Iran is
an application of the Bush Doctrine taken to its logical extreme. While
the American intelligence community is clear that
the Iranians abandoned their embryonic nuclear weapons program in 2003,
and all subsequent “evidence” of a viable Iranian nuke in the making
has turned out to be either forgeriesor
pre-2003 materials, Netanyahu gets around this by upping the ante. The
danger, he says, is that the Iranians will achieve the capacity to
put together a nuclear weapon on very short notice. The Romney
campaign, taking its cues from Tel Aviv, has echoed this escalation of
Israeli demands, with the formulation that they don’t want Tehran “one turn of the screwdriver away” from acquiring nuclear weapons.
This is a technical
impossibility, a crude bit of war propaganda that has no basis in
reality: but then again, that’s what war propaganda usually is — blind
assertions meant to evoke an emotional response rather than one based on
reason, or, in this case, on science. As the Wilson Center study on
the costs and benefits of an attack on Iran put it, it would take at
least two years or more for Iran to develop a deliverable nuclear
warhead — and the effort would be detected long before that.
In short, the ticking time bomb
scenario described by Netanyahu and his American co-thinkers is pure
nonsense: in no sense could the Iranians ever be “one turn of the
screwdriver away” from nuking Israel. Even given the doctrine of
preemption, in light of these facts the justification for war simply
does not exist. Netanyahu and his defense minister claim Israel faces an
“existential” crisis, nothing less than the prospect of a second Holocaust.
Yet there are no facts to back up this assertion: it is simply an
emotional appeal. Something else is at work here other than fear of a
genuine threat, and it is quite simply politics — that is, the internal politics of Israel, and also of the United States.
Objectively, there is no threat to Israel, or to the West, emanating from Iran: armed with nuclear weapons, and so far advanced militarily
over its neighbors that the distance between them can only be measured
in light years, Israel has no real reason to fear an attack that is not
forthcoming in any event. The whole thing is manufactured by politicians
who have but one goal in mind: to stay in power.
Meir Dagan, former head of the Mossad, says the
idea of a preemptive attack on Iran is “the stupidest idea I’ve ever
heard,” and inside Israel support for Netanyahu’s gambit is far from solid. Shimon Peres,
one of the last of the old-style (i.e. rational) Israeli leaders,
recently went on television to expressly dissent from Netanyahu’s
apocalyptic rhetoric and to give support to President Obama as a
reliable ally.
What’s interesting is that the
rhetoric coming from Netanyahu and his defense minister, Ehud Barak, has
a distinctly anti-American strain. As Barak put it, in arguing for a unilateral Israeli strike on Iran:
“Ronald Reagan did not want
to see a nuclear Pakistan, but Pakistan did go nuclear. Bill Clinton did
not want to see a nuclear North Korea, but North Korea went nuclear.”
“If Israel forgoes the chance
to act and it becomes clear that it no longer has the power to act, the
likelihood of an American action will decrease… We cannot wait to
discover one morning that we relied on the Americans but were fooled
because the Americans didn’t act in the end…. Israel will do what it has
to do.”
Barak’s message is all too clear:
the Americans are mercurial, and weak-willed — they can’t be counted
on, and besides we have to do what we have to do. This is the spirit and
letter of the “Clean Break” document, which descried US “intervention”
in Israel’s internal affairs, and it is the language of the extreme
nationalists, such as Avigdor Lieberman,
the foreign minister, who once advocated bombing the Aswan dam and is a
former bouncer in a bar. His extremist right-wing party advocates a
“Greater Israel,” and is supported by the “settler” movement — violent
fanatics who want to create a Greater Israel based on their
interpretation of the Bible.
In the context of growing
extremism infecting the Israeli body politic, a politician like
Netanyahu is considered a centrist. To his right are even more
anti-American ultra-nationalists, and this movement is growing. In order
to accommodate it, and contain it within the confines of his own party,
Netanyahu has had to move in an even more extreme direction, even going
so far as to threaten that Israel will strike Iran on its own, without US support.
This, of course, is a policy of de facto blackmail, since any war between Israel and Iran will almost inevitably see
the Americans dragged in. This has been the whole Israeli strategy, so
far — except that it hasn’t worked. The President has steadfastly refused to give in, at least up until this point. He has even gone so far as to inform the Iranians in
advance that any such attack by Israeli forces will not have the
sanction or support of the US — and, in such an event, to please refrain
from attacking American targets in Iraq and the Persian Gulf.
In view of the lack of American
support for war, both in Washington and among the American electorate,
the persistence of the debate within Israel over whether they should
attack all on their own is disturbing. Such a scenario could only be
disastrous for the region, and for Israel in particular, as Gen. Dempsey,
head of the US joint chiefs of staff, has recently made plain. The
Israeli defense and intelligence establishment has been saying the same thing, and still Netanyahu and Barakcontinue to talk about it as if it were a real option.
While Netanyahu is bound to be
deterred by the cold reception this idea has received in Washington, in
this context we have to ask ourselves a sobering question: willAvigdor Lieberman’s
finger some day be on Israel’s nuclear trigger? This is a question the
Iranians, and others in the region, have no doubt asked themselves. That
it is even a possibility is profoundly unsettling — and this, not the
prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran, is the source of the real danger
looming over the Middle East.
Israel’s nuclear monopoly in the
region is the real issue at hand, and it is one the Israelis have not
had to face. It is known the Israelis possess at least two-hundredwarheads.
Their policy is one of “nuclear ambiguity,” neither confirming nor
denying the existence of their deadly arsenal. Unlike Iran, they have refused to
sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), and inspections of
their nuclear facilities are therefore out of the question.
Iran, on the other hand, regularly submits to a tight schedule of
inspections from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which
would soon discover any weaponization procedures in progress. Israel’s
contemptuous attitude toward the international community is given a free
pass by the US and its allies, while the Iranians are subjected to
crippling sanctions and an international campaign of vilification on the
mere suspicion that they might one day have the capacity to develop
nuclear weapons. To call this a double standard is to understate the
case.
The destabilizing effects of
Israel’s nuclear monopoly are a major cause of regional tensions — and
the entire basis for assuming Iran has nuclear ambitions above and
beyond its stated intention of harnessing nuclear energy for peaceful
purposes. One of the arguments against containing Iran, as opposed to
taking the military option, is that the acquisition of a nuclear arsenal
by Tehran will spark a dangerous arms racethroughout
the region. Yet this is disproved by the existence of Israel’s own
arsenal, which has sparked no such race — even though the Jewish state’s
Muslim neighbors have ample reason to believe the Israelis could
conceivably launch a first strike on them. This, after all, is the
essence of the doctrine of preemption, which the Israelis have embraced.
While there is zero evidence the
Iranians have restarted their nuclear weapons program, could one blame
them if they did? How else could they possibly hope to deter an Israeli
first strike? In a 2008 op-ed piece in the New York Times, the noted Israeli historian Benny Morris wrote:
“Iran’s leaders would do well
to rethink their gamble and suspend their nuclear program. Bar this,
the best they could hope for is that Israel’s conventional air assault
will destroy their nuclear facilities. To be sure, this would mean
thousands of Iranian casualties and international humiliation. But the
alternative is an Iran turned into a nuclear wasteland.”
An Israeli nuclear strike at Iran
is not inconceivable: indeed, it is all too conceivable. So who are the
real aggressors in the Middle East?
I have always though that the most convincing intellectual arguments to prove the guilt of certain mass criminals are those that they themselves say. I have discovered that one of the main weaknesses of the Jew is his unique arrogance. Even though lying is the most universal characteristic of the Jew – his “stiff-necked” character (as our Lord observed in Scripture) has identified them for what they are, till this very day.
I
had the unfortunate experience of having to deal in business with the
‘self-chosen’ for years and I have encountered in life, no more
disgusting creatures than the Jew. No other ethnicity in mankind has
exhibited their wickedness with such predictable ‘chutzpah’. Some
comments by Jews are obviously critical of the universally filthy nature
of fellow Jews – but they only reinforce my case against the hateful
evil nature of the tribe against ALL MEN.
This, from Scripture – Thess 2-15 pretty much says it all: “Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out. They are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men,”
Here
then is a modest ‘collection’ of self-incriminating statements that is
by no means complete. The first example pretty much says it all.
One of the comments by a modern day Rabbi (Eric Lankin) perhaps sums it all up in a speech where he references a comment by another Rabbi: “Rabbi Yitz Greenberg in his book, Living in the Image of God, (p.79) notes that _”Jews are not genetically programmed to be good.. It takes great effort-and religious training-to go on acting Jewishly”
[My comment] “ACTING JEWISHLY” ? How profound! Our Lord does NOT ‘program’ His children to be evil – BUT since He accused the Jews of being sons of the Devil in John of the NT – it stands to reason that if the Jew is programmed to be evil – as suggested by Rabbi Greenberg – that this could only be done by Satan. Thank you for PROVING my point. The Jew IS the spawn of hell!
My dear Rabbi – has it ever occurred to you that THE reason mankind has suffered HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS MURDERED – the horrors of Communism – the moral destruction of ENTIRE NATIONS – WORLD WARS – and more currently over a million murdered in the Mid-East – IS PRECISELY THAT THE JEW IS “ACTING JEWISHLY”!
One of the comments by a modern day Rabbi (Eric Lankin) perhaps sums it all up in a speech where he references a comment by another Rabbi: “Rabbi Yitz Greenberg in his book, Living in the Image of God, (p.79) notes that _”Jews are not genetically programmed to be good.. It takes great effort-and religious training-to go on acting Jewishly”
[My comment] “ACTING JEWISHLY” ? How profound! Our Lord does NOT ‘program’ His children to be evil – BUT since He accused the Jews of being sons of the Devil in John of the NT – it stands to reason that if the Jew is programmed to be evil – as suggested by Rabbi Greenberg – that this could only be done by Satan. Thank you for PROVING my point. The Jew IS the spawn of hell!
My dear Rabbi – has it ever occurred to you that THE reason mankind has suffered HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS MURDERED – the horrors of Communism – the moral destruction of ENTIRE NATIONS – WORLD WARS – and more currently over a million murdered in the Mid-East – IS PRECISELY THAT THE JEW IS “ACTING JEWISHLY”!
“I
am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the
possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the
spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and
rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through
the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society.
I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because
Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes
Jewish.” (Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, p. 32, January 18, 1972)
“There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian religion. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other.” (Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service ).
“Do not let the forces of evil take over to make this a Christian America.“ (Senator Howard Metzenbaum, 11/6/86)
[mycomment]
I have a news flash for you, Sen ’MetzenJew’ ! – THIS IS – or at least
it WAS a Christian country before your ilk turned it into a morally
rotted corpse. MY COUNTRY – AMERICA – was founded by decent brave
self-sacrificing Christians – NOT Godless Jew scum. Get it – scumbag?
Hope you have enjoyed the last 5 years rotting in Hell!
“The strongest supporters of Judaism cannot deny that Judaism is anti-Christian.” (Jewish World, March 15, 1924)
“I
am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the
possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the
spirit of the community, the non-ideological blend of the emotional and
rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through
the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society.
I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because
Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes
Jewish.” (Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, p. 32, January 18,
1972)
“A
Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian
which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because
the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A Free
thinker and Atheist always remains a Jew.” (Jewish World, London December 14, 1922)
On March 15th, 1923, the Jewish World asserted: “Fundamentally -Judaism is Anti-Christian.”(Waters Flowing Eastward, p. 108)
“The
Jew is not satisfied with de-Christianizing, he Judiazes, he destroys
the Catholic or Protestant faith, he provokes indifference but he
imposes his idea of the world of morals and of life upon those whose
faith he ruins. He works at his age old task, the annihilation of the
religion of Christ.” (Benard Lazare, L’Antisemitism, p. 350; Rabbi Benamozegh, quoted in J. Creagh Scott’s Hidden Government, page 58).
“Today
the Gentile Christians who claim of holy right have been led in the
wrong path. We, of the Jewish Faith have tried for centuries to teach
the Gentiles a Christ never existed, and that the story of the Virgin
and of Christ is, and always has been, a fictitious lie. In
the near future, when the Jewish people take over the rule of the
United States, legally under our god, we will create a new education
system, providing that our god is the only one to follow, and proving
that the Christ story is a fake…Christianity will be abolished.” (M.A. Levy, Secretary of the World League of Liberal Jews, in a speech in Los Angeles, California, August, 1949)
“Why
should we believe in God? We hate Christianity and Christians. Even the
best of them must be regarded as our worst enemies. They preach love of
one’s neighbor, and pity, which is contrary to our principles.
Christian love is a hindrance to the revolution. Down with love of one’s
neighbor; what we want is hatred. We must know how to hate, for only at
this price can we conquer the universe…The fight should also be developed in the Moslem and Catholic countries, with the same ends in view and by the same means.” (Lunatcharski, The Jewish Assault on Christianity, Gerald B. Winrod, page 44)
[my comment]: Regarding the parts in red - NOW
– do you need ANY other reason to destroy the Jew – before he destroys
us – ONLY the Jew would utter such hatred. Note that the jew Levy’s
prediction of over 60 years ago was spot on. The jewish people HAVE
taken over rule of the United States and the Arab people – once good
friends and allies have been morphed into enemies by endless jew lies –
and Christians have now been morphed into IsraHELL before America
-racist Christ mocking - war mongers! Are you people both blind and
deaf?
“The
facts on the ground, when not obscured by one or another Zionist
rationalization, show that the Zionists are the worst anti-Semites in
the world today, oppressing a Semitic people as no nation has done since
the Nazis.” — Jewish professor Bertell Olman .
[MY
comment] Of course he is speaking of the Palestinians – tortured
brutalized starved beaten humiliated raped and murdered for the past 65
years as we greedy ignorant Merkans could care less.
. On Nov. 12, 2004, one of Imus’s ( a well known talk show host) regular guests Sid Rosenberg referred to Palestinians as “stinking animals.” “They ought to drop the bomb right there, kill ‘em all right now,” he said
[My
comment] - That comment by Rosenberg was an incitement for mass murder
of innocent civilians – NOW try to imagine what would happen if such a
comment had been made by an Arab against jews.
Here’s what Joseph Weitz, director of the Jewish National Fund, had to say about making Israel [sic] ” Arabrein”: “The
only solution is Eretz Israel [Greater Israel], or at least Western
Eretz Israel [all the land west of Jordan River], without Arabs. There
is no room compromise on this point … We must not leave a single
village, not a single tribe.” (Sept. 29, 1967)
Israeli president Moshe Katsav on Arabs: “There
is a huge gap between us (Jews) and our enemies—not just in ability but
in morality, culture, sanctity of life, and conscience. They are our
neighbors here, but it seems as if at a distance of a few hundred meters
away, there are people who do not belong to our continent, to our
world, but actually belong to a different galaxy.” (May 10, 2001)
[My
comment] In typical jew fashion the Satan worshiping Katsav demonizes
his victims ( a decent Godly people I know well, who are persecuted by
the filthy jew) and lionizes the filthy jews ( an indecent Godless lying
murderous sadistic race of demonic reptiles which I ALSO know VERY VERY
well!
In “Letter of Resignation from the Jewish People,” Bertell Ollman, a professor at New York University, challenged Jews to face up to similarities between Nazism and Zionism:
IsraHELL
foreign minister Lieberman’s hatred of Arabs is indistinguishable from
Hitler’s hatred of Jews. It is so overt that it offends other members of
Israel’s government, such as when he urged total war against the
Palestinian resistance: ” `At 8 a.m. we’ll bomb all the commercial centers… at noon we’ll bomb their gas stations… at two we’ll bomb their banks,’ To
On May 5, 2006, Lieberman actually advocated the execution of any Arab
politician who even spoke to the Hamas government of Palestine.
“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” (Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957
[MY comment]: HELLO! Can ANY American patriot NOW wonder why the lying treacherous Jew is so universally hated – or why the Democrat Party has always been the haven for Jews, Communists and traitors? Remember – the JEW – NOT any Negro - organized the treasonous NAACP for his own evil schemes – as so clearly shown in the above. It is the JEW that keeps racial hatred alive in the USA
Truth
be known – a complete compendium of these corrosive damning statements
by the Christian hating Jew – would FILL A THICK TEXTBOOK! What are you
waiting for people? Get off your lazy derrieres and save OUR nation.
The ‘ENEMY’ is RIGHT HERE and is IN YOUR FACE 24-7! How much more
degradation – humiliation- loss of freedoms and destruction of our most
sacred core values and beliefs are you willing to tolerate at the hand
of these Godless, treacherous, cunning, lying, Christ hating, sons of
Satan scum?
WAKE UP AMERICA!
WAKE UP AMERICA!
My name is Joe Cortina. I was
a 60s Green Beret commander and a representative for IBM as well as a
scientist for Honeywell Aerospace in Florida. I later became President
of my own manufacturing company. I have two sons and 2 granddaughters
who are the reason for my dedication to expose the threats to the
freedoms I hope to see them enjoy as I did many decades ago when America
was still a Christian-based sovereign nation free of Zionist influence.
Book Of John Chapter 8 – as Christ damns the Jews ( and NOT JUST THE HIGH PRIESTS AND Pharisees – see notes below)
” Ye do the deeds of your father
(the devil). If God were your father. ye would love me; for I proceed
forth and came from God: neither came I of myself, but He sent me.”
” Ye are of your father the devil
and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie – he speaketh of his own; ( the Jews) for he is a
liar, and the father of it”
“That this SATANIC FATHERHOOD cannot be limited to the Pharisees is MADE CLEAR in 1 John 3;8-10″
Matthew 23:15″ Woe to you,
teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land
and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him
twice as much a son of hell as you are.
“You serpents, you generation of vipers, how can you escape the damnation of hell?” (Jesus – to the Jews; in Matthew 23:33)
“My opinion of Christian
Zionists? They’re scum. But don’t tell them that. We need all the useful
idiots we can get right now.” — Benyamin Netanyahu, at the time a
former IsraHELL prime minister
“There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people”
“Once we squeeze all we can out
of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.” — Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, 2002. (Widely reported, see here)
Israel, America’s albatross
You like this. Follow this Blog?
NOTHING NEW!
Why US media is biased against Arabs and Muslims
By Jamal Kanj
Jamal Kanj explains that lopsided US media coverage of the Arab and Muslim worlds is rooted not just in cultural biases and political motives, but in the fact that media reporters and editors themselves are sometimes part of the Israeli military establishment.
In previous article I referred to Edward Said’s scholarly work on Western media coverage of Muslim and Arab countries and how it is shaped by discreet cultural biases or political motives. This fact couldn’t be more pertinent than in recent coverage of protests against the film deriding the Prophet Muhammad.
For days, the media was fixated on protests and the ensuing senseless violence.
US presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s knee-jerk reaction to protests in Libya and Egypt was to admonish the Obama administration, blaming the violence on US ambassadors for condemning the movie and not “standing up for American values”.
The same media and candidate (until his speech last week) all but ignored the more than 30,000 Libyans who took to the streets of Benghazi, protesting against the attack on the US consulate.
Americans and Israelis are considered actual people, while others are “collateral damage” statistics.At least 10 Libyans were killed as they ransacked offices of the group allegedly linked to the assault on the consulate, but the Western media downplayed the sacrifices of Libyans fighting the suspected killers of the US diplomat and staff.
The cultural bias in reporting is prevalent in major US media outlets. For example, on 1 October US news station NBC reported that “three US soldiers” and “several Afghans” were killed in a suicide attack in Afghanistan. Viewers were not told that the “several Afghans” were actually 11 humans, including four police officers, an interpreter and six civilians.
This pattern of reporting exemplifies a subconscious cultural bias, where the loss of American or Israeli life is more important.
Americans and Israelis are considered actual people, while others are “collateral damage” statistics.
The cultural bias is complemented by self-serving reporters who manipulate the Middle East news narrative relayed to unsuspecting Westerners.
For example, many international correspondents in Jerusalem are reserve duty officers or have children serving in the Israeli army.
It is common to hear Western reporters [in Israel] boasting to one another about their Zionist credentials, their service in the Israeli army or the loyal service of their children.Jonathan Cook, a British journalist based in Nazareth, said: “It is common to hear Western reporters [in Israel] boasting to one another about their Zionist credentials, their service in the Israeli army or the loyal service of their children.”
Jonathan Cook, British journalist
The New York Times never disclosed that its Jerusalem bureau chief between 2010 and 2012, Ethan Bronner, was an Israeli citizen, with a son serving in the Israeli army.
Nor did National Public Radio reveal that its correspondent Linda Gradstein was married to an Israeli military sniper.
Other media pundits, including Joel Greenberg, once a New York Times bureau chief in Jerusalem, have served in the Israeli army and been on reserve duty. Mitch Weinstock, national editor of the Union Tribune in San Diego, is an Israeli military veteran.
Wolf Blitzer, otherwise known by his Israeli pen name Zev Barak, hosts a major CNN news programme, but was once the Middle East foreign policy analyst and editor for Near East Report, a mouthpiece of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the strongest US foreign lobby.
News correspondents, veterans or reserve army officers with conspicuous national allegiance cease to be objective, especially when reporting on their own military units or governments. Reporters with predisposed opinions are advocates incapable of being neutral.
The combination of a formidable Israeli lobby charting US foreign policy in the Middle East and special interest reporters manipulating America’s public opinion suggest more US involvement in new, Israeli-contrived adventures akin to the invasion of Iraq, is likely.
A version of this article was first published by Gulf Daily News. The version here is published by permission of Jamal Kanj.
-
The Being Which We Have Become
The following tidbits are just random samplings of things I’ve come across that some of you might find to be of interest. They are all completely totally utterly and thoroughly unrelated and anyone who thinks otherwise is just a conspiracy-minded wing-nut.
1. Remember the Solomon Dwek case that you read about here? Well recently a very spiritual man arrested in the case, Rabbi Mordchai Fish pled guilty to using Jewish charities as a cover for an embezzlement scheme. Of course we knew this would be coming. I find this interesting however, maybe you will too:
“Prosecutors said the checks were deposited into bank accounts held in the names of the charities, and Fish would subsequently arrange to make cash available through an underground money transfer network that stretched from Brooklyn all the way to Israel.”
(Yes, the red highlights are mine, stop texting me Ovadia.)
Of course the fact that Israel is involved in this is no surprise, just nice to see it in print. I also found this amusing:
“The transcripts show he would not use the word cash, but instead referred to laundered money as “gemoras,” a reference to part of the Talmud — the collection of Jewish law and tradition that explains the Five Books of Moses.”
And this too:
“Last week, another rabbi caught in the same sting, Saul Kassin, the 89-year-old spiritual leader of the nation’s largest Syrian Sephardic Jewish congregation, pleaded guilty to one count of operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business.”
2. “The Young Israel Movement for the past 99 years has taken the lead in ensuring that Torah true Judaism has survived in North America through its large network of Orthodox Synagogues. Its dedication to Israel has been unwavering.”
The Young Israel outfit is a bit more than that. It is a Jonathan Pollard supporting tax-deductable charity that ought to be driven out of business. Its full name is the National Council of Young Israel and here are some of its activities.
“Today, NCYI serves as the national coordinating agency for nearly 150 Orthodox congregations of nearly 25,000 member families throughout the United States and Canada. NCYI also serves as a resource to its sister organization in Israel, entitled Yisrael Hatzair – “The Young Israel Movement in Israel”, encompassing over 50 synagogues in Israel.[2] It is a grass roots organization administrated on the congregational model, taking its direction from local and national lay leadership as well as rabbis and professional staff. Its socio-cultural outlook is strongly influenced by the Religious Zionist Movement, with strong support of Israel as the homeland for the Jewish people. Congregations belonging to NCYI are generally named “Young Israel of…”, followed by the name of the city or neighborhood.
NCYI is a not-for-profit service organization, as defined by their 501(c)(3) status. The main headquarters is located in Manhattan, with regional offices in Florida, California, New Jersey and Jerusalem.”
They love Jonathan Pollard. As recently as December of 2010 the executive VP of NYCI, Rabbi Pesach Learner was speaking for Pollard in California. Here’s the a copy of and link to the poster advertising the event.
NCYI reports that it also has “multiple daily conversations” with Pollard. This outfit ought to be called Tax Deductions for Treason.Poster boy for treason
NCYI does lots of really cool charitable work in addition to advocating on behalf of Pollard. Ever heard of Gush Katif? That was a collection of illegal Israeli settlements in the Gaza strip that was dismantled a few years ago. You can now make tax-deductable donations to these religious fanatics through NYCI. Click here to read how you can help these poor oppressed religious wackos with your tax-deductable donations.
Maybe you’ll find this as interesting as I do.
“Spitzer’s office began looking at the organization, the National Council of Young Israel, in 1999, when the council made a routine application to the attorney general for a new mortgage. The mortgage was for a nursing home operated by the National Council in a suburb of New York City. The inquiry, routine in the case of a refinancing application by a non-profit, soon uncovered a $6.5 million liability that the nursing home had to the New York department of health.”
And this:
“The attorney general’s office also identified $130,000 in payments that went to the National Council’s executive vice president, Pesach Lerner, and were not backed up with contemporaneous documentation. The National Council provided explanations to the attorney general’s office for many of these payments, including $50,000 that was described as a loan to Lerner, and $25,000 described as an adjustment for sick days, according to the attorney general’s office. In the end, $20,000 was not accounted for and the attorney general’s office decided to hand the case over to state and federal tax authorities.”
3. I kind of like this blog.
4. We know that Wisconsin is in a bad state, pun intended, and that money is tight. But thanks to the American Israel Education Foundation David Clarke, a Sheriff from Milwaukee, will join a bunch of other law enforcement officials from around the US on a trip to Israel to study security issues. I’ve written about this foundation before, it is a part of AIPAC and it is infamous. AIEF is a tax-deductable non-profit part of AIPAC, just as is the Washington Institute on Near East Policy, the latter outfit set up according to this article to advance the cause of Israel tax free.
5. I like this webpage.
6. Rabbi Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto is a very influential dude. Until I saw this link on Xymphora’s site, I had thought that a Pinto was just a shitty car Ford foisted on us years ago to take advantage of rising oil prices. Anyway, this Pinto is influential both in Israel and in the US. No doubt this is a complete coincidence.
“And his reputation isn’t confined to the Jewish state’s grittier precincts. In the hallowed halls of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, Pinto is revered. A December 2010 reception in his honor was attended by five Cabinet members and an Israel Defense Forces major general. In January, he hobnobbed with opposition leader Tzipi Livni of the Kadima party at a dinner in a Tel Aviv hotel. And as the Forward prepared this story, current and former Israeli government officials contacted the paper on Pinto’s behalf.”
And you are going to love this:
“In New York, appearances by the charismatic rabbi can draw more than 100 people to his Midtown Manhattan yeshiva, including Israeli-born real estate moguls and Jewish communal heavyweights. LeBron James, the superstar professional basketball player, has also consulted with the rabbi.”
LeBron, I hope you lose every single fucking penny to these guys, but I digress and hell, I’m not even from Cleveland.
Pinto runs a non-profit – I’m sure you are shocked, called “Mosdot Shuva Israel.” The Forward article I’ve been quoting from notes that this outfit, which it says is about a 50 to 60 million dollar organization does have just a few problems. Read the article for the details.
His lectures are quite popular
“On that March evening, Pinto delivered his lecture in Hebrew with his 10-year-old son sitting by his side and Manhattan real estate dealer Ben Zion Suky, his closest associate in America, standing behind him, casually leaning against the yeshiva’s carved wood ark. As Pinto finished, the men in the room stood and shoved forward, creating a crush around the rabbi.”
Did I mention that Ben Zion Suky is a pornography distributor? Sorry, forgot to mention it. Yeah, and it’s boot-legged porn to boot, boot legged by another guy with a Jewish name from Canada. Suky is an Israeli who came to the US about 17 years ago. Anyway, go read all of this Forward article and you will come to understand some things.
7. Okay, it’s video time again and you are all in for a real treat. Here’s a lovely clip about Mosdot Shuva Israel and its founding Rabbi, the Pinto himself. I hope you find it inspiring.
We now move from the deeply spiritual to a story of love and romance, of hope and promises. A story which mirrors back to us in musical form the being which we have become.
Like this:
You and one other blogger like this.This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged Ben Zion Suky, Israel, Mordchai Fish, Mosdot Shuva Israel, NCYI, Pesach Lerner, Rabbi Pinto, Solomon Dwek. Bookmark the permalink.7 Responses to The Being Which We Have Become
-
B.A.Frémaux-Soormally
Dedicated also to the SIX MILLION MUSLIM SHEEP OF FRANCE
( Mafioso Charles Pasqua’s figure of Six Million some two decades ago!)
RISE UP, DAMNED SHEEP OF TH EARTH!
RISE UP, DAMNED SLAVES OF THE JEWISH KOSHER NOSTRA!
ENSLAVED MASSES OF THE WORLD RISE UP!
THE JEWS HAVE HIJACKED AND CORRUPTED OUR WORLD!
SHALL WE REMAIN THEIR SLAVES FOREVER?
THIS IS THE LONG DUE STRUGGLE IN THE NAME OF GOD!
SHALL WE NOT GROUP WHEN THE DEVILS ARE UNITED?
THE JEWS WILL NOT SUCCEED IF WE ARE UNITED!
THERE IS GOD, DO NOT LISTEN TO SATAN!
DAVID ICKE ASKS US TO GET OFF OUR KNEES,
THAT IS, STOP WORSHIPPING GOD!
LIKE PR RICHARD DAWKINS, HE TOO IS DELUDED!
THERE IS INDEED A SUPREME SAVIOUR
EVEN IF CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS DISAGREE ABOUT HIM!
SALVATION IS THROUGH RIGHTEOUS DEEDS
EVEN IF CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS DISAGREE ABOUT IT!
DO NOT LISTEN TO VAIN PREACHERS! IT IS NOW OR NEVER!
WE MUST STRIKE THE METAL WHEN IT IS STILL HOT!
LET US BE SELF-SUFFICIENT
AND INDEPENDENT OF THE JEWISH MONOPOLISTS!
THIS IS THE LONG DUE STRUGGLE IN THE NAME OF GOD!
LET US, CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS, UNITE!
LET US, ALL FREEDOM AND JUSTICE LOVERS,
UNITE NOW, AND NOT TOMORROW!
ALL STATES LIE, OPPRESS AND CHEAT!
STATES MAKE LAWS FOR THE RICH
AND AGAINST THE SUBJUGATED AND IMPOVERISHED!
STATES LEVY TAXES TO BLEED THE IMPOVERISHED!
THE IMPOVERISHED ALWAYS HAVE FEWER RIGHTS!
WE DO NOT WANT EQUALITY, BUT EQUITY, JUSTICE!
WE REFUSE ALL LAWS MADE BY JEWS!
WE REFUSE ALL PRISONS AND MIND CONTROL!
WE WANT TO BE FREE! FREE! FREE!
LET US UNITE NOW, NOT TOMORROW!
OBAMA, SARKOZY AND ALL CAESARS ARE ABOMINATIONS!
TO PLEASE THE JEWS, THEY MADE SLAVES OF US ALL!
CAESAR GAVE THEM ALL OUR WEALTH
INCLUDING OUR DRINKING WATER AND EVEN
OUR VERY RIGHT TO LIVE AND TO BE DECENTLY BURIED!
HAVE THEY EVER DONE ANYTHING ELSE
THAN PLUNDER OUR WAGES TO FINANCE ISRAEL
AND FILL THE VAULTS OF THE JEWISH BANK GANGSTERS?
WE WANT WHAT IS LEGITIMATELY OURS,
WHAT GOD GAVE US OUT OF HIS BOUNTY AND MERCY!
THIS IS THE LONG DUE STRUGGLE IN THE NAME OF GOD!
DO NOT LET OURSELVES BE DRUGGED BY THEIR LIQUORS,
BY THEIR MEDIA, SPORTS, NICOTINE, MERCURY AND ASPERTAME!
SALAAM, SHANTI, SHALOM, PEACE AMONGST US!
WAR ON THE TYRANTS! LET US REFUSE TO KILL!
TO KILL DEFENCELESS NON COMBATTANTS!
DEFENCELESS MEN, WOMEN, CHILDREN AND BABIES!
LET US AIM OUR WEAPONS ELSEWHERE
AND BREAK THE RANKS IF WE ARE NOT DEFENDING THE HOMELAND!
IF THEY PERSIST, THOSE CANNIBALS,
IN MAKING KILLER HEROES, RAPISTS AND THIEVES OF US,
LET THEM KNOW THAT OUR BULLETS
ARE FOR OUR OWN GENERALS!
THIS IS THE LONG DUE STRUGGLE IN THE NAME OF GOD!
LET US ALL UNITE, NOW, NOT TOMORROW!
WORKERS, PEASANTS, ALL MEN AND WOMEN,
THIS LAND IS OURS! GOD GAVE THIS LAND AND LIFE
TO ALL OF US, NOT ONLY TO THE JEWS!
LET THE JEWS GO ELSEWHERE, ANYWHERE
IF THEY WANT APARTHEID AND HUMAN FLESH FOR FOOD!
OUR CHILDREN ARE NOT FOR THEM TO MURDER AND SACRIFICE!
NOT FOR THEM TO STEAL THEIR ORGANS!
OUR WOMEN ARE NOT FOR THEM TO PROSTITUTE!
OUR CORPSES ARE NOT FOR THEM TO DEVOUR ANYMORE!
WHEN THEY ARE GONE, THE SUN WILL SHINE AGAIN!
THE BIRDS WILL NO MORE FALL DEAD AND
OUR FISH, FAUNA AND FLORA WILL BE SAFE FROM THEM
AND THEIR POLLUTED WAYS!
RISE UP, NOW, YOU DAMNED OF THE EARTH!
RISE UP NOW, NOT TOMORROW! OR NEVER!
THIS IS THE LONG DUE STRUGGLE IN THE NAME OF GOD!
BAFS
Second adaptation (I lost the first one!) from L’Internationale, (composed in 1871 by Eugène Pottier (1816–1887)
-
They have kidnapped a 14 year old girl in the latest raid.
-
mantiqaltayr
Yup. The link is here.
http://palsolidarity.org/2011/04/17554/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+palsolidarity+%28International+Solidarity+Movement%29
Also the family that was murdered in Itamar, which is what all these arrests are allegedly about, just happens to have been settlers in Gush Katif.
-
LMAO… from the article:
1) The business troubles at Mosdot Shuva Israel could be seen as ironic, given Rabbi Pinto’s reputation as an adviser to businessmen, and particularly to real estate brokers.
2) One former donor recalled his first meeting with Pinto, which took place at the office of a prominent real estate broker. “I walked into a room, not with Chabad, religious-looking people, but with secular-looking people. And I said, ‘Oh my goodness, why are there all these people here? There’s got to be something going on.’”
Later that evening, the donor was taken for a private meeting at the rabbi’s home. The next morning, one of the Manhattan gabbais, rabbinic aides who act as fundraisers for Mosdot Shuva Israel, showed up unannounced at the donor’s offices, offering the donor a menorah as a gift from the rabbi. “Pinto sees in you big blessings,” the donor remembered the rabbi’s employee saying. The employee asked for a $10,000 donation; the donor gave a smaller amount.
Twenty minutes later, a second gabbai arrived at the front desk of the donor’s office. “He’s not the guy to deal with, I’m the guy to deal with,” the second gabbai said of the first gabbai.
“They both wanted to claim me,” the donor said.
Considering Sarah and Brad, I wonder if the rabbi does weddings. I wonder how much that would cost.
-
I made it 59 seconds into the Sarah Silverman video…I already know “what we’ve become” and it makes me sad. What makes me happy is the thought of lovely little Sarah eternally roasting in excruciating pain…forever (with me not joining her and her like).
-
Just as a reminder, TWOFOLD THE CHILD OF HELL is the condition of the proselytes to Talmudic Judaism. Sick and TWISTED. Maybe Roy Tov got the orientation correct of the condition of Humanism {Silverman navel gazing}, however there were never any Israelites in the Old Testament that ever met a Yiddish speaking ashkenazim “JEW”, wearing a kippa and singing Hava nagila, or being meshuggunah about the “GOY”…which isn’t to say the “Israelites” showed true brotherly love one to another, EITHER…the real issue is who controls the MONEY, see John 8. Jesus admonished to ” KNOW THE TRUTH”; one seriously might consider confronting the previous false assumption{s}. Oh yeah, Jesus also said the WORKERS OF INIQUITY and the TARES are going into the OVENS. . .Be an Angel.
-
rehmat1
Rev. Ted Pike highlights the agenda behind the Dept of Global Anti-Semitism, as follows:
1. Any assertion that the Jewish community controls, the government, the media, international business and the financial world is anti-Semitism.
2. Strong anti-Israel sentiments are anti-Semite.
3. Criticism of Israeli leaders, past and present, is anti-Semitism.
4. Criticism of Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) – is anti-Semitism.
5. Criticism of US government being under the evil influence of Israel Lobby (AIPAC, ADL, AJC, etc.) – is anti-Semitism
6. Blaming Jewish leaders for the Crucification of Jesus – is anti-Semitism.
7. Diminishing the “six million” figure of Holocaust victims – is anti-Semitism.
8. Calling Zionist entity a “racist state” – is anti-Semitism.
9. Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia – is anti-Semitism.
10. Alleging that MOSSAD was behind 9-11, is anti-Semitism.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/israel-got-the-keys-to-white-house/
This world is hopeless. So few are really interested in proper knowledge (science) and few are interested in the truth.
ReplyDeleteToo few among those who have researched and found the truth as best as they could as truth is so elusive are ready to act upon it. It is like the smoker who is ready to admit that cigarette kills but is not willing to stop thus killing not only himself but others, the passive smokers, including the wife (who normally does not smoke although this is less and less true especially in the west) and the children.
This is one kind of child abuse that is legal in the west, contaminating/killing your children because of your addiction to smoking.
Judeo-Freemasonry is killing us and perverting our way of life and people refuse to see the truth.
BAFS