Why has Judaic hired former Scotland Yard Peter Power (Elsevier) never been investigated as the primary suspect of the 7/7 Flase Flag?
BECAUSE
he carried it out himself with his MI6-MOSSAD team and the complicity
of the UK Government (National & Local), Royals, Media and Churches!
Outside Southwark Crown Court, Muad’Dib (middle) with supporters: Me NK on left, Pr. Nicolas Kollerstrom, Belinda centre, Mark Windows (www.landofthefree.co.uk) on right.
Found at TerrorOnTheTube.co.uk
7/7 Ripple Effect 2
105,134
5 June 2011
VERDICT NOT GUILTY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB4ZzHIVzRg&feature=player_embedded (Not found anymore)
J for justice - The Incredible Story Of Muad Dib And His 7/7 Ripple Effect
Uploaded by MrSuperpotatotomato on 5 Jun 2011
John Anthony Hill - 7/7 Ripple Effect, The Arrest, Trial & Verdict
June 5, 2011
John Anthony Hill, also known as Muad'Dib is the producer of the film "7/7 Ripple Effect". The film disputes the official account of the July 7, 2005 London bombings (also known as 7/7), a terrorist attack on public transport in Central London, by four suicide bombers later named as Hasib Hussain, Germaine Lindsay,
June 5, 2011
John Anthony Hill, also known as Muad'Dib is the producer of the film "7/7 Ripple Effect". The film disputes the official account of the July 7, 2005 London bombings (also known as 7/7), a terrorist attack on public transport in Central London, by four suicide bombers later named as Hasib Hussain, Germaine Lindsay,
Shehzad Tanweer, and Mohammad Sidique Khan. The film was first released on the Internet on November 5, 2007, two years after the attacks. Physical copies were also sent to many of the people connected with the attacks. The film implicates the Metropolitan Police and Tony Blair, and claims that the true perpetrators of the attacks were MI5 and/or Mossad, who tricked the four men into travelling to London with rucksacks, in order to provide CCTV footage later to be used as evidence in the investigation of the attacks. It alleges that the four bombers were actually murdered in Canary Wharf, and did not die as suicide bombers in the explosions on the three tube trains and one bus where the attacks took place. John Anthony Hill was arrested in Ireland for the "crime" of sending DVD's of the film to the judge and jury of the first trial of three men: Waheed Ali, 25, Sadeer Saleem, 28, and Mohammed Shakil, 32, who were being tried at Kingston Crown Court, England. Muad'Dib was accused of "attempting to pervert the course of justice", when he sent copies of it to those in charge of delivering a verdict. In this interview, John Anthony Hill will discuss his film, the theories behind the attacks, his arrest and court case. He'll also convey his next plan to challenge the court system. Topics discussed: 7/7 London bombings, presumption of innocence, amicus curiae, Stone of scone, stone of destiny, BBC propaganda machine, legalese, pervert, influence, the judge, the jury, challenge to jurisdiction of sovereignty, lawful, legal, Gods law, the court and more.
UPDATE
16/03/2011 Wednesday - 1st Hour: With Paul Craig Roberts. 2nd Hour: With Muad'Dib.
http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_11.html
* The Hierarchy Enslaving You
Chronology of events relating to Muad’Dib’s arrest and trial.
created 04/03/2009 - 22:24, updated 15/09/2010 - 12:45
Muad’Dib also sends out physical DVD copies during May/June 2008, when the first trial of the three men is taking place at Kingston, because He believes those men to be innocent and cannot stand by and do nothing and allow innocent men to spend years in prison for something they did not do. Later, on 1st August 2008, it is reported that the jury in this trial cannot arrive at a verdict after three weeks of consideration, and the judge dismisses them. Perhaps “7/7 Ripple Effect” has something to do with THIS; as you might glean from reading on; ensuring the accused are not wrongfully found guilty and sentenced, yet.
On 19th August 2008, a BBC Conspiracy Files film crew which is preparing a hit-piece on 7/7 Truth, tracks down Muad’Dib’s residence and ambushes Him, cameras rolling, attempting to get Him to reply to evil loaded questions. Muad’Dib doesn’t speak a word to them and walks past them. This takes place AFTER email exchanges between BBC representatives and Muad’Dib, initiated by the BBC, where Muad’Dib states His conditions in order to agree to take part in their programme about His film, which they refused to agree to.
As a direct result of Muad’Dib’s non-compliance with the government propaganda organ called the BBC, in aiding them to produce a hit-piece to smear 7/7 Truth and undo the ripples caused by the film, the authorities are forced to resort to their plan B: His arrest, and (as of now) attempted extradition to face trial in England. Please bear in mind the DVD’s are sent in May/June, and they wait till AFTER the BBC’s failed attempts in August to trump up the charge of “attempting to pervert the course of justice”. Also bear in mind that the film "7/7 Ripple Effect" has already been publicly available for at least six months before Muad’Dib mails copies to the judge and jury.
A European arrest warrant requested by the British authorities is issued on the 17th January 2009, TWO DAYS before the re-trial of the three accused begins at Kingston, on 19th January 2009.
Then, on Tuesday 10th February 2009, Muad’Dib’s home is invaded by policy enforcers known as gardai, who broke the peace instead of keeping it. He is arrested and computers, printer, DVD-burner and also documents forming part of His Defence are stolen and remain so to this day. Not even a search warrant is produced. He is treated like a terrorist criminal. His home looked like it had been burgled when the gardai had finished turning it over, which is, in reality, what they did - burgle it.
On the same day, He is taken before a judge in a Dublin court, who orders His remand in custody for 8 days until the next hearing.
On Wednesday 18th February, the judge sets bail conditions and adjourns till Wednesday 4th March 2009. The conditions are:-
1. Surrender of passport.
2. Shall not communicate with any party in England or Wales save for wholly personal reasons or save for reasons wholly connected with the church and organisation known as The Way. (Effectively forbidding Him from discussing 7/7 with anyone in England and Wales, and a clear indication that they are attempting to keep His trial secret in those countries.)
3. Has to sign at Garda station every Monday, Wednesday and Friday between 8am and 8pm.
And the ransom money to be paid is the hefty sum of 3500 Euros.
On the evening of Thursday 19th February 2009, Muad’Dib is ransomed following a successful Bail Appeal for donations and freed, after spending nearly 10 whole days in prison.
That same day it is reported in the English press that some pupils in English schools are being encouraged to imagine they are the “suicide bombers” plotting the July 7 attacks. The real motive for this, being, to completely side-step the issue of whether the four men were actually guilty in the first place, so as; through role-playing in classrooms; to re-inforce in children’s minds the false belief that there is no doubt that they were (guilty), and that films like “7/7 Ripple Effect” are wrong.
According to reports, this “teaching pack” is then withdrawn after complaints, when it becomes public knowledge.
Muad’Dib attends another hearing on Wednesday 4th March 2009, where the judge quickly adjourns until the same time the following week. They need to prepare an affidavit and submit it before next week, to then see if everyone is ready for the real hearing.
On the hearing of Wednesday 11th March 2009, the proper hearing has now been set for Thursday 19th March 2009 at 2:00 PM, at the Four Courts building in Dublin, probably in Court 11 (will confirm in which just prior to the hearing).
At the Thursday 19th March 2009 hearing, the judge said he would take 2 weeks to consider the verdict which will be delivered on Thursday 2nd April 2009.
On the 2nd April 2009, at 11:00 AM in Court 11 of the Four Courts building in Dublin, the judge Mr Peart breaks his word by not watching 7/7 Ripple Effect before issuing a verdict, as he said he would do; but that doesn't stop him from issuing the verdict anyway and ordering Muad'Dib's surrender to the British "authorities" in 15 days time. And he does not have an excuse since envelopes containing DVD's of 7/7 Ripple Effect were mailed to him from all around the world (which he stated he did not open. Why not Mr Peart? Didn't you say you wanted to watch it?). Mr Peart also does not allow Muad'Dib to speak during the trial. It is reported by some who attend court, that Mr Peart acts like a different person from 2 weeks earlier, as if he has been "gotten to". In view of his actions, this would seem a strong possibility.
The crimes committed against Muad'Dib by the Irish and English "authorities of INjustice" now include:-
1. Handing mail to people it was not addressed to (to the policy enforcers).
2. Burgling Muad'Dib's home.
3. Stealing Muad'Dib's computers.
4. Stealing Muad'Dib's printer.
5. Stealing Muad'Dib's DVD-burner.
6. Stealing several documents belonging to Muad'Dib, including those forming part of His legal Defence.
7. Kidnapping Muad'Dib, and putting Him in prison for nearly 10 days.
8. Exacting a ransom of 3500 Euros in order to let Muad'Dib go.
9. The judge taking away Muad'Dib's right to freedom of speech by not allowing Him to discuss anything other than personal matters with people in England and Wales as part of the ransom conditions, preventing Him from discussing 7/7 with people in those countries.
10. The judge breaking his word and not watching the film at the centre of this dispute, before issuing the verdict.
11. The judge once again taking away Muad'Dib's right to freedom of speech, by not allowing Him to speak in the trial.
12. Re-incarcerating Muad'Dib on the 2nd April 2009, where He spent a further 23 days.
Talk about "perverting the course of justice"! What was Muad'Dib's "crime" again? - Sending a free DVD with the TRUTH to a courthouse of so-called "justice"! Only the BLIND cannot see reality - that Muad'Dib committed no REAL "crime" but has had PLENTY REAL crimes committed against Himself.
On 8th April 2009, an appeal was lodged with the Supreme Court in Dublin, and accepted.
The court now awaits proper filing of documents by the solicitor. After that, a certificate of readiness will be released by the court with information regarding a hearing date.
The current average wait time for a Supreme Court hearing date is 27 to 30 months. However, the solicitor may submit a request for priority consideration, after the certificate of readiness is released.
In a hearing on Wednesday 22nd April 2009, the judge has set another hearing for Friday 24th April 2009 at 2:00 PM in the Four Courts building, Dublin.
The prosecution do not want the judge to allow bail for Muad'Dib, even though He has behaved impeccably in His eleven years living in Ireland. He also did not break bail the first time around, recently, and went to sign every time He was expected to, at the Gardai station.
So what the prosecution is doing really is unjustifiable. Could there be a lot of pressure being brought to bear on them from "spiritual wickedness in high places"?
After judge Peart having decided on Friday the 24th April 2009 that Muad'Dib could be bailed/ransomed, He was ransomed the next day on Saturday the 25th, having spent 23 days in prison, at an estimated cost of €5300 for the taxpayer.
The bail conditions are the same before except that they wanted more money. They are now holding €6000.
He is well and in good spirit and has been out on bail for over a year, awaiting a date for the Irish Supreme Court to hear His appeal against the extradition for sending a DVD containing the truth. That date has now been set for the 11th November 2010.
To this day, no English newspaper has reported on Muad’Dib’s arrest and extradition trial. The authorities do not want the jury in the re-trial of the three innocent men at Kingston to know about Him and “7/7 Ripple Effect”, to try and make sure they find the accused guilty this time around, instead of unable to agree on a verdict, or, even better for TRUE JUSTICE: find the innocent men not guilty.
The three on trial are from Leeds in Yorkshire and their alleged offence was in London, so why aren't they being tried in Leeds or London? Why a sleepy, quiet, predominantly white suburb like Kingston? Doing their dirty deeds away in the dark, away from view, to keep it as quiet as possible?
T.H.E.Y.* are determined to convict these three innocent men to, by extension, CON-vince the British people that the original four were guilty also. And undo the effect of Muad’Dib’s ripples.
* The Hierarchy Enslaving You.
They will probably try the same with Him and His trial in England, if He is extradited. And if we allow them to get away with it.
On Tuesday 28th April 2009, the Kingston re-trial jury unanimously REFUSED to convict Waheed Ali, Mohammed Shakil and Sadeer Saleem, of helping to plot the 7/7 attacks, finding them not guilty. They have spent over two years in prison. Muad’Dib sent the 7/7 Ripple Effect DVD’s to the judge, laywers and jury (whom the judge had misled) of the first trial at Kingston, because they should never have been accused in the first place and had no case to answer. They should never have spent all that time in prison.
However, the following day, on Wednesday 29th April 2009, Waheed Ali and Mohammed Shakil were unjustly sentenced to seven years, for “planning to attend a terror training camp in Pakistan”. One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. Looking at the atrocious acts of mass terrorism committed by the United States and Britain over the years, together murdering over a million people, it is difficult to see how armed forces from other nations who have spent time training in the USA or Britain, should not logically be accused of the same thing.
They Need Your Fear: Jury Verdicts Overruled
In the spring of 2009, three Muslims were sentenced for life, for having allegedly intended to blow up a load of planes over America. My book Terror on the Tube, Behind the Veil of 7/7 has a chapter on their earlier trial, in 2008: ‘The Heathrow liquid bombs Hoax.’ The people arrested did not actually have plane tickets, nor had they made any bombs. They were put on trial in 2008, and the jury did not find them guilty of this allegedly-intended crime. Some were convicted of having planned an event that might have caused some ‘terror’ but they were not found guilty of the alleged airplane plot.
That should have been the end of it. There used to be a legal principle called ‘Double Jeopardy’ that prevented you from being tried twice for the same crime. If a jury found you innocent, or rather failed to find you guilty, that was it: but, no longer! Another big, Marathon three-month trial has now taken place, costing the British taxpayer over twenty million pounds, and this time three of them have been found guilty. The pretext for the re-trial was that some e-mails had not been cited in the previous trial! Nowadays, the Crown can override the Double Jeopardy principle if it reckons some ‘substantial’ new evidence has arisen: some e-mails, withheld from the first trial, were used as a basis for having a new one. These e-mails did not show a great deal.
The reports on this second trial did not go into the nature of the explosives intended-to-be-used, maybe because the ‘binary munitions’ story of the earlier trial had been ridiculed rather thoroughly. They were intending, it was said, to bring hydrogen peroxide, sulphuric acid and acetone into a plane toilet, and … There was a gee-whiz explosive called TATP which would allegedly have been formed, except that this would have been really quite impossible.
The story ends: Muslims go to jail, and we the people are supposed to be grateful for being ‘rescued’ from terror. That’s why we are not allowed to bring toothpaste onto the plane at Heathrow. Mothers were forbidden to bring milk on board, to feed their baby. Such an event as this is called in ToT ‘phantom terror’, in that no-one is injured and nothing actually happens, but fear is generated. Such phantom-terror events happen in the wake of real terror, in this case the July 7th London bombings, and they provide an aftermath of fear-and-terror.
Some readers may recall a repeated trial somewhat like this, in the case of the ‘July 7th’ trial. In the summer of 2008 a trial of three friends of the four alleged London bombers took place at Kingston County court, it was a huge affair for over three months. The charge was absurd, concerning the Victorian ‘Explosive Substances Act’ and the Jury did not in the end find them guilty. So, the Crown obtained a new jury and had a retrial! Another marathon three month trial, and this time the jury did agree – they were innocent!
Or at least, they were innocent of conspiring to cause explosions’ in London – the original charge. But, that did not mean they could go home, O no! Two of them were found guilty, on the grounds that they were going to attend a terror training camp in Pakistan. Where did that charge suddenly come from? Never mind that Waheed Ali, one of the accused, had explained to the court, that training to fight for the liberation of Kashmir (that’s what I heard they were training to do, while attending the Kingston Trial of 2008) was OK by Islamic principles, and was a world apart from ‘terrorism.’ But, the trial had not been about such a charge, had it? (1) What really matters in a trial like this, it seems to me, is that the meme of Islamic terror is reinforced, but also that no-one gets to talk to the key figures: there is no stage at which you or I can get to hear the viewpoint of these young men, over what is going on.
The only previous person charged over the 7/7 London bombings had been the chemist Al-Nashar, Leeds biochemistry graduate. His flat, which he rented out to Hasib Hussein, was dubbed the ‘bomb’ factory. He was arrested in Cairo, then released with no charges. His laptop was confiscated and found to be full of music: not bomb-making recipies, not Al-Quaeda contacts, but just – classical music. This situation was resembling the aftermath of 9/11 where, in the years that followed, the FBI seemed incapable of pressing charges against anyone.
Concerning the retrial of the three friends of the Four, its sole notable feature was the arrest of Muad’Dib in Ireland, immediately before it began in January 2008, on the grounds that he had sent some copies of his DVD ‘The Ripple Effect’ to the trial – a normal and traditional feature of British justice (see section on Muad’Dib), where citizens contribute material they believe may be relevant..
For these mega- three month fake-terror trials, no observers can sit though them. No independent observer prepares a resumé of their arguments. The press have to accept the summaries they are given, which contain the prepared ‘meaning’ of the trial, and they simply regurgitate that. I went to the Kingston Trial of 2008 quite a bit, because the BBC kept dragging me over there, for a Conspiracy Files program they were making (they didn’t show any of this – their goal turned out to be, to trash me for their program: guess I should have known that in advance). For this reason my chapter 11 on this trial is quite comprehensive: it describes a vital turning-point in the whole 7/7 story, and I may have been the only person to have an in-depth conversation with the brother-in-law of Mohammed ‘Sid’ Khan, one evening up in Leeds. (My visit to Leeds was more or less ruined by having the BBC film crew following me around, who insisted on coming, and made everyone thoroughly suspicious, quite understandably. But, at least I managed to shake them off for that evening) Those two things enabled me to exercise proper judgement and discernment, concerning the flood of official misinformation that was coming out in 2008, as the story twisted and turned.
……………………………………………………………………………………..
1. Here is Daniel Obachike’s blog-comment on that trial, which sums it up quite well: ‘So MI5’s crude attempts to apportion blame for the 54 killed in the London bombings has failed to convince anyone, judges and jury included. The 3 men charged with assisting a team of alleged suicide bombers had the charges dismissed. The case was based on footage of them in London on a trip with Siddeque Khan.
Yet the British media were told the trio’s fingerprints linked them with alleged bus bomber Hasib Hussain and Jermain Lindsey.
Then, in a comedic twist to justify £100 million of taxpayers money spent on this diversion, 2 of the aquitted were given 7 years for attempting to fly to Pakistan.’
31.3.2010
In the spring of 2009, three Muslims were sentenced for life, for having allegedly intended to blow up a load of planes over America. My book Terror on the Tube, Behind the Veil of 7/7 has a chapter on their earlier trial, in 2008: ‘The Heathrow liquid bombs Hoax.’ The people arrested did not actually have plane tickets, nor had they made any bombs. They were put on trial in 2008, and the jury did not find them guilty of this allegedly-intended crime. Some were convicted of having planned an event that might have caused some ‘terror’ but they were not found guilty of the alleged airplane plot.
That should have been the end of it. There used to be a legal principle called ‘Double Jeopardy’ that prevented you from being tried twice for the same crime. If a jury found you innocent, or rather failed to find you guilty, that was it: but, no longer! Another big, Marathon three-month trial has now taken place, costing the British taxpayer over twenty million pounds, and this time three of them have been found guilty. The pretext for the re-trial was that some e-mails had not been cited in the previous trial! Nowadays, the Crown can override the Double Jeopardy principle if it reckons some ‘substantial’ new evidence has arisen: some e-mails, withheld from the first trial, were used as a basis for having a new one. These e-mails did not show a great deal.
The reports on this second trial did not go into the nature of the explosives intended-to-be-used, maybe because the ‘binary munitions’ story of the earlier trial had been ridiculed rather thoroughly. They were intending, it was said, to bring hydrogen peroxide, sulphuric acid and acetone into a plane toilet, and … There was a gee-whiz explosive called TATP which would allegedly have been formed, except that this would have been really quite impossible.
The story ends: Muslims go to jail, and we the people are supposed to be grateful for being ‘rescued’ from terror. That’s why we are not allowed to bring toothpaste onto the plane at Heathrow. Mothers were forbidden to bring milk on board, to feed their baby. Such an event as this is called in ToT ‘phantom terror’, in that no-one is injured and nothing actually happens, but fear is generated. Such phantom-terror events happen in the wake of real terror, in this case the July 7th London bombings, and they provide an aftermath of fear-and-terror.
Some readers may recall a repeated trial somewhat like this, in the case of the ‘July 7th’ trial. In the summer of 2008 a trial of three friends of the four alleged London bombers took place at Kingston County court, it was a huge affair for over three months. The charge was absurd, concerning the Victorian ‘Explosive Substances Act’ and the Jury did not in the end find them guilty. So, the Crown obtained a new jury and had a retrial! Another marathon three month trial, and this time the jury did agree – they were innocent!
Or at least, they were innocent of conspiring to cause explosions’ in London – the original charge. But, that did not mean they could go home, O no! Two of them were found guilty, on the grounds that they were going to attend a terror training camp in Pakistan. Where did that charge suddenly come from? Never mind that Waheed Ali, one of the accused, had explained to the court, that training to fight for the liberation of Kashmir (that’s what I heard they were training to do, while attending the Kingston Trial of 2008) was OK by Islamic principles, and was a world apart from ‘terrorism.’ But, the trial had not been about such a charge, had it? (1) What really matters in a trial like this, it seems to me, is that the meme of Islamic terror is reinforced, but also that no-one gets to talk to the key figures: there is no stage at which you or I can get to hear the viewpoint of these young men, over what is going on.
The only previous person charged over the 7/7 London bombings had been the chemist Al-Nashar, Leeds biochemistry graduate. His flat, which he rented out to Hasib Hussein, was dubbed the ‘bomb’ factory. He was arrested in Cairo, then released with no charges. His laptop was confiscated and found to be full of music: not bomb-making recipies, not Al-Quaeda contacts, but just – classical music. This situation was resembling the aftermath of 9/11 where, in the years that followed, the FBI seemed incapable of pressing charges against anyone.
Concerning the retrial of the three friends of the Four, its sole notable feature was the arrest of Muad’Dib in Ireland, immediately before it began in January 2008, on the grounds that he had sent some copies of his DVD ‘The Ripple Effect’ to the trial – a normal and traditional feature of British justice (see section on Muad’Dib), where citizens contribute material they believe may be relevant..
For these mega- three month fake-terror trials, no observers can sit though them. No independent observer prepares a resumé of their arguments. The press have to accept the summaries they are given, which contain the prepared ‘meaning’ of the trial, and they simply regurgitate that. I went to the Kingston Trial of 2008 quite a bit, because the BBC kept dragging me over there, for a Conspiracy Files program they were making (they didn’t show any of this – their goal turned out to be, to trash me for their program: guess I should have known that in advance). For this reason my chapter 11 on this trial is quite comprehensive: it describes a vital turning-point in the whole 7/7 story, and I may have been the only person to have an in-depth conversation with the brother-in-law of Mohammed ‘Sid’ Khan, one evening up in Leeds. (My visit to Leeds was more or less ruined by having the BBC film crew following me around, who insisted on coming, and made everyone thoroughly suspicious, quite understandably. But, at least I managed to shake them off for that evening) Those two things enabled me to exercise proper judgement and discernment, concerning the flood of official misinformation that was coming out in 2008, as the story twisted and turned.
……………………………………………………………………………………..
1. Here is Daniel Obachike’s blog-comment on that trial, which sums it up quite well: ‘So MI5’s crude attempts to apportion blame for the 54 killed in the London bombings has failed to convince anyone, judges and jury included. The 3 men charged with assisting a team of alleged suicide bombers had the charges dismissed. The case was based on footage of them in London on a trip with Siddeque Khan.
Yet the British media were told the trio’s fingerprints linked them with alleged bus bomber Hasib Hussain and Jermain Lindsey.
Then, in a comedic twist to justify £100 million of taxpayers money spent on this diversion, 2 of the aquitted were given 7 years for attempting to fly to Pakistan.’
31.3.2010
J for justice - The Incredible Story Of Muad'Dib
And His 7/7 Ripple Effect
269
5,088
Published on 2 Oct 2012
Who is
the human+being Muad'Dib?
Human (name): John Anthony Hill.
Human (birth): Sheffield, England, 1948.
Spirit-being (names): Muad'Dib / JAH / Elijah.
Reasons why the "Elite" fear Muad'Dib
Human (name): John Anthony Hill.
Human (birth): Sheffield, England, 1948.
Spirit-being (names): Muad'Dib / JAH / Elijah.
Reasons why the "Elite" fear Muad'Dib
1. On
13/June/1988, in fulfillment of prophecy, Muad'Dib served a High Court Writ
upon the British Parliament, at court in the City of Sheffield, demanding that
He be allowed to immediately repeal all man-made "laws" which are all
illegal according to God's Law, and which enable the rich to
"legally" steal from everyone else. He would also re-institute the
"Year of Release", which is the forgiveness of debt every seven
years, and the REAL "Jubilee" and begin to redistribute their share
of the wealth that has been stolen from them back to the poor, and ban usury.
The ban on private gun ownership would be repealed and all would have exactly
the same powers to arrest persons committing real crimes.
2. T.H.E.Y.* KNOW Who He REALLY is.
3. Muad'Dib has proven that the Stone of Destiny (a.k.a. The Coronation Stone & Stone of Scone & Jacob's Pillar) was never returned by the Scots after four of them removed it from Westminster Abbey on "Christmas Day" 1950, also in fulfillment of prophecy. The stone handed to the authorities in 1951 was a fake and Elizabeth II was aware of this when she perpetrated a fraud upon the British people, by having herself crowned upon this fake stone. There were no specific camera shots of this stone, and she demanded no shots closer than 30 feet, so people couldn't see that it wasn't the real Stone. This means that she is not the rightful monarch of Britain, and moreover, has broken the Coronation Oath she took, in which she vowed to uphold God's Law, which prohibits the monarch (or anyone else) from making up new "laws", or taking away from God's Law. The real Stone will eventually re-surface so that the Rightful King can be crowned upon It. Bertie Gray, the stonemason who made two copies of the Stone, confessed on his death-bed that they had not returned the real Stone. Bertie's children confirmed this in 2008.
4. Muad'Dib has located the exact spot marking the entrance to the chamber which is the resting place of the Ark of the Covenant, at the Hill of Tara in Ireland. For over 10 years He has been campaigning to be allowed to dig down some metres in a space not more than 2m x 2m. Obviously, this, and He, have been a thorn in the side of the Irish authorities, who do not want to permit the Ark to be recovered because it doesn't form part of the N.W.O.'s plans. Quite the opposite, It is a tool which will help to defeat them. This could also explain the seeming eagerness of the Irish authorities to comply with the false British charge and extradition request against Muad'Dib, because He was not going away until He had recovered the Ark, also in fulfillment of prophecy.
The real power behind the N.W.O. is not any human, but Satan, and the N.W.O. is his evil mimic of God's Kingdom on Earth. All attempts to thwart or defeat Satan's N.W.O. are doomed to fail, UNLESS they are GOD'S WAY of doing it. The ONLY Person on Earth who knows Father's Will and is actively living It, is Muad'Dib. Your only chance of survival is through helping Him, to prove, without a shadow of a doubt, whose side you are on. As these End-times get progressively worse, in fulfillment of the Warnings delivered to mankind through God's Prophets, the Truth of this will become clearer and clearer, even to those who are still sleeping in the dust of the earth (inside Adams and Eves) and have not awakened spiritually.
2. T.H.E.Y.* KNOW Who He REALLY is.
3. Muad'Dib has proven that the Stone of Destiny (a.k.a. The Coronation Stone & Stone of Scone & Jacob's Pillar) was never returned by the Scots after four of them removed it from Westminster Abbey on "Christmas Day" 1950, also in fulfillment of prophecy. The stone handed to the authorities in 1951 was a fake and Elizabeth II was aware of this when she perpetrated a fraud upon the British people, by having herself crowned upon this fake stone. There were no specific camera shots of this stone, and she demanded no shots closer than 30 feet, so people couldn't see that it wasn't the real Stone. This means that she is not the rightful monarch of Britain, and moreover, has broken the Coronation Oath she took, in which she vowed to uphold God's Law, which prohibits the monarch (or anyone else) from making up new "laws", or taking away from God's Law. The real Stone will eventually re-surface so that the Rightful King can be crowned upon It. Bertie Gray, the stonemason who made two copies of the Stone, confessed on his death-bed that they had not returned the real Stone. Bertie's children confirmed this in 2008.
4. Muad'Dib has located the exact spot marking the entrance to the chamber which is the resting place of the Ark of the Covenant, at the Hill of Tara in Ireland. For over 10 years He has been campaigning to be allowed to dig down some metres in a space not more than 2m x 2m. Obviously, this, and He, have been a thorn in the side of the Irish authorities, who do not want to permit the Ark to be recovered because it doesn't form part of the N.W.O.'s plans. Quite the opposite, It is a tool which will help to defeat them. This could also explain the seeming eagerness of the Irish authorities to comply with the false British charge and extradition request against Muad'Dib, because He was not going away until He had recovered the Ark, also in fulfillment of prophecy.
The real power behind the N.W.O. is not any human, but Satan, and the N.W.O. is his evil mimic of God's Kingdom on Earth. All attempts to thwart or defeat Satan's N.W.O. are doomed to fail, UNLESS they are GOD'S WAY of doing it. The ONLY Person on Earth who knows Father's Will and is actively living It, is Muad'Dib. Your only chance of survival is through helping Him, to prove, without a shadow of a doubt, whose side you are on. As these End-times get progressively worse, in fulfillment of the Warnings delivered to mankind through God's Prophets, the Truth of this will become clearer and clearer, even to those who are still sleeping in the dust of the earth (inside Adams and Eves) and have not awakened spiritually.
Who is
JAH? http://jahtruth.net/mal4.htm
Muad'Dib's DVD "7/7 Ripple Effect" provided substantial evidence as to why the 7/7 London Bombings were not the work of Muslim terrorists, and that they were certainly not carried out in the manner claimed by the British government and security services. He also gave a very creditable alternative scenario as to "what really happened" on 7/7. He spent 157 days in prison awaiting trial for posting copies of his DVD to the Judge and Foreman of the jury of a trial at Kingston Crown Court, which concerned individuals accused of assisting the 2005 London bombings. They were subsequently found not guilty. Muad'Dib was also subsequently found not guilty. The stunning silence of the BBC and mainstream media regarding these trials says it all. This is his story.
Muad'Dib's DVD "7/7 Ripple Effect" provided substantial evidence as to why the 7/7 London Bombings were not the work of Muslim terrorists, and that they were certainly not carried out in the manner claimed by the British government and security services. He also gave a very creditable alternative scenario as to "what really happened" on 7/7. He spent 157 days in prison awaiting trial for posting copies of his DVD to the Judge and Foreman of the jury of a trial at Kingston Crown Court, which concerned individuals accused of assisting the 2005 London bombings. They were subsequently found not guilty. Muad'Dib was also subsequently found not guilty. The stunning silence of the BBC and mainstream media regarding these trials says it all. This is his story.
FOR MORE
INFORMATION Muad'Dib's Trial: www.mtrial.org www.JorJustice.co.uk His Films:
"7/7 Ripple Effect"
"The Nazi Banksters' Crimes Ripple
Effect"
"Elizabeth
To Go"
Use The
Court Defence Yourself: Download the challenge to the "Crown's
Jurisdiction and Sovereignty" www.JforJustice.co.uk/challenge Britain's
Biblical History: The Lia Fail is the Stone of Destiny and a good place to
start...
Essential
Reading: "The Way home or face The Fire"
http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.net
Britain’s Largest Terror Attack Likely “Mossad/MI-5″ Operation
Anthony John Hill, “Maud dib” Found Not Guilty for Exposing 7/7 “Inside Job”
“The story has been censored from the American media. Few Americans know of or remember the “British 9/11.” Fewer still are aware that a powerful legal case has been made showing full government complicity in the planning and execution of the attack and the extent the British government has gone to in order to suppress information about one of the worst kept secrets in history.
“Ripple Effect” (below) considered a threat to British “security” led to one of the most incomprehensible criminal cases in recent years.
On July 7, 2005, Britain suffered its largest terror attack, what they call “7/7,” their “9/11.” However, a wealth of evidence, much incontrovertible, has shown these terror attacks to have been something else, “false flag” terror meant to support the Blair government’s policy of continuing and even expand its participation in the “Global War on Terror.”
The 4 Muslim “suicide bombers” once believed responsible for the incident are now believed to have been recruited as part of a well documented mock terror drill scheduled for that day that included 1000 participants, some of them paid actors hired to carry dummy explosives.
After 151 days in dismal Wandsworth Prison, much of it in solitary confinement, John Anthony Hill is finally free. The crime he was accused of was the mailing of a “7/7 truther” DVD from Ireland to the United Kingdom. Yes, you are hearing me right, he was extradited from Ireland for sending a copy of the film, “Ripple Effect,” which outlines complicity by the Blair government in terror attacks that killed 56 back in 2005, including 4 “suicide bombers” now believed by many to have been murdered in a bizarre plot.
More frightening still is the idea that mailing a DVD, available worldwide on Youtube to anyone, could be considered “perverting the course of justice.”
Hill was found not guilty, not because his actions were considered legal but rather because his testimony made a powerful case against the British government. The jury was pressed to convict Hill but refused. The 10 members who sided with Hill and refused the instructions of the Crown did so, out of utter shock at the powerful case Hill made demonstrating that, not only 7/7 was an “inside job” but 9/11 as well. Hill took on both attacks and 10 of 12 jury members sided with what has been often called “conspiracy theory.” found here
Terror on the Tube: Behind the Veil of 7/7, an Investigation – 3rd Edition available on Available for purchase on Amazon
Now in an updated edition with a critique of the official 7/7 Inquest of Winter 2010-2011, Terror on the Tube remains the only book with the glaring evidence that all four Muslim scapegoats were innocent. 7/7 is Bliar’s Big Lie and Reichstag Fire, False Flag Terror as pretext for war and an Orwellian, neo-fascist British police state. If 9/11 was the great pretext for war and fascism in the USA, London’s 7/7 bombings brought Britain quickly closer to an Orwellian police state. Is there a basis to the “war on terror” – or is the state itself terrorizing the British populace? The answer is in this compelling investigation. In its indictment of the prime suspects – the UK, US and Israeli secret services. In its demolition of the fabricated evidence they brought into play. In its posthumous exoneration of four innocent young men, sacrificed and framed to shore up the rule of a crime cabal over our planet. In this appeal against the fascist propaganda trick of false-flag terror. Author Nick Kollerstrom has assembled the evidence and solved the mystery of the 7/7 bombings: something Britain’s billion-budget security apparatus will never do
Exposing London 7/7: UK Jury Sides With False Flag Whistleblower. The Ripple Effect
‘To know who rules over you, find out who you aren’t allowed to criticize.’ Voltaire
London Bombings done by UK Government
Galaxian » May 19 2011Britain’s Largest Terror Attack Likely “Mossad/MI-5″ Operation
Anthony John Hill, “Maud dib” Found Not Guilty for Exposing 7/7 “Inside Job”
“The story has been censored from the American media. Few Americans know of or remember the “British 9/11.” Fewer still are aware that a powerful legal case has been made showing full government complicity in the planning and execution of the attack and the extent the British government has gone to in order to suppress information about one of the worst kept secrets in history.
“Ripple Effect” (below) considered a threat to British “security” led to one of the most incomprehensible criminal cases in recent years.
On July 7, 2005, Britain suffered its largest terror attack, what they call “7/7,” their “9/11.” However, a wealth of evidence, much incontrovertible, has shown these terror attacks to have been something else, “false flag” terror meant to support the Blair government’s policy of continuing and even expand its participation in the “Global War on Terror.”
The 4 Muslim “suicide bombers” once believed responsible for the incident are now believed to have been recruited as part of a well documented mock terror drill scheduled for that day that included 1000 participants, some of them paid actors hired to carry dummy explosives.
After 151 days in dismal Wandsworth Prison, much of it in solitary confinement, John Anthony Hill is finally free. The crime he was accused of was the mailing of a “7/7 truther” DVD from Ireland to the United Kingdom. Yes, you are hearing me right, he was extradited from Ireland for sending a copy of the film, “Ripple Effect,” which outlines complicity by the Blair government in terror attacks that killed 56 back in 2005, including 4 “suicide bombers” now believed by many to have been murdered in a bizarre plot.
More frightening still is the idea that mailing a DVD, available worldwide on Youtube to anyone, could be considered “perverting the course of justice.”
Hill was found not guilty, not because his actions were considered legal but rather because his testimony made a powerful case against the British government. The jury was pressed to convict Hill but refused. The 10 members who sided with Hill and refused the instructions of the Crown did so, out of utter shock at the powerful case Hill made demonstrating that, not only 7/7 was an “inside job” but 9/11 as well. Hill took on both attacks and 10 of 12 jury members sided with what has been often called “conspiracy theory.” found here
Original Word Document available here
Chronology
found at Friends of Muad’Dib
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT
( Download>> 77 Ripple Effect.avi (694.9 MB) )
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT 2
Terror on the Tube: Behind the Veil of 7/7, an Investigation – 3rd Edition available on Available for purchase on Amazon
Now in an updated edition with a critique of the official 7/7 Inquest of Winter 2010-2011, Terror on the Tube remains the only book with the glaring evidence that all four Muslim scapegoats were innocent. 7/7 is Bliar’s Big Lie and Reichstag Fire, False Flag Terror as pretext for war and an Orwellian, neo-fascist British police state. If 9/11 was the great pretext for war and fascism in the USA, London’s 7/7 bombings brought Britain quickly closer to an Orwellian police state. Is there a basis to the “war on terror” – or is the state itself terrorizing the British populace? The answer is in this compelling investigation. In its indictment of the prime suspects – the UK, US and Israeli secret services. In its demolition of the fabricated evidence they brought into play. In its posthumous exoneration of four innocent young men, sacrificed and framed to shore up the rule of a crime cabal over our planet. In this appeal against the fascist propaganda trick of false-flag terror. Author Nick Kollerstrom has assembled the evidence and solved the mystery of the 7/7 bombings: something Britain’s billion-budget security apparatus will never do
No comments:
Post a Comment