Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus One of my best films ever is the Medusa Touch. When 9/11 was orchestrated it immediately reminded me of THE PILOT and of THE MEDUSA TOUCH - on that same day and at those very moments. I said, thank God, it was not a nuclear operation only to learn from Dmitri Khalezov years later that it was indeed a nuclear operation, but an underground one! Most experts have ignored Khalezov's expertise. BAFS (Monday 19 June 2017)

Close

Christopher Bollyn

Follow · June 17 · Edited ·

Avi Arad is an Israeli producer who has worked closely with Arnon Milchan, the senior Israeli agent in Hollywood who smuggled nuclear triggers for Israel's nuclear arsenal in the 1980s. Here Arad and Milchan are seen at the premiere of their film Daredevil in February 2003. Milchan also made a film depicting an airplane attack on a high-rise tower in New York.

Close

Christopher Bollyn

Follow · June 17 · Edited ·

Milchan's first film, The Medusa Touch (1978), depicted a large plane striking the Pan Am Building in New York City. Milchan has worked closely with Israeli military intelligence all of his adult life.

Close

9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff

Published on 14 Jun 2015

9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff Discus 9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov ...

Leaked Rare Video Missile Hitting Pentagon on 9 11. wow, an entire c... stagolmskaja stajanka - Åkeshov. My guest is Gordon Duff of "So, now we have it, the ...

This video is linked to Blogger entitled: "DIMITRI KHALEZOV AND THE MASTERMINDS" at: Leaked Rare Video Missile Hitting Pentagon on 9 11. wow, an entire ...

wow, an entire c... stagolmskaja stajanka - Åkeshov. My guest is Gordon Duff of "So, now we have it, the Gulf States, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt and ...

Duff saying hello to Bram and Judy. Leaked Rare Video Missile Hitting Pentagon on 9 11. Infamous Intervi

9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff

9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff

B-25 Bomber Hits Empire State Building (1945)

9/11 CLEAR bomb going off in WTC BEFORE first plane EVER hit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlMXkWW_LM

9/11 CLEAR bomb going off in WTC BEFORE first plane EVER hit

Uploaded on 9 Apr 2010

well this video is clips of people say there was a BOMB that when off in WTC then the first plane hit. But the best video is around 6:38 when there is live feed from a new camera setting on the ground where you can hear the plane coming in and you hear the bomb go off and it's felt by the camera from setting on the ground then you still hear the plane still coming in and then hear it hit WTC

Dimitri A. Khalezov website 911 GROUND ZERO

9/11thology - links to various information

Please, note down this web site too: http://www.911thology.cn (note, it is not a *.com domain, but a *.cn domain !). Should any of my web sites disappear, you will be able to find me still using a web site associated with that Chinese domain. Alternatively, you can always search the Internet by this keyword: '9/11thology' and you will be able to find some related information.

Welcome to the personal web page of

9/11thology - links to various information

Welcome to the personal web page of
Dimitri A. Khalezov -
an author of the "9/11tholgy" and of
"The 'third' truth about September 11,
or
Defending the US Government which has only the first two..."

I am pleased to inform everybody that "The Third Truth about 9/11 Foundation" intends to publish several information web-sites and discussion boards that deal with these topics:

nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center following 9/11 attacks;

nuclear demolition of the WTC-7 following 9/11 attacks;

true definition the "ground zero" term and its meaning in pre-9/11 English language;

technical principles of nuclear demolition of buildings in general and in relation to the WTC nuclear demolition in particular;

information related to the so-called "terrorism" in general and to the nuclear terrorism in particular (alias so-called suicidal and non-suicidal "truck-bombings" and "car-bombings").

These Internet projects are either available, or will be available soon:

A lot of information about our main research book - "The Third Truth about September 11, or defending the US Government, which has only the first two...", including some of its chapters is available on this website:

http://www.3truth911.com

An alternative description of this book, along with a very comprehensive explanation in regard to the WTC nuclear demolition is available here:

http://www.911books.net

Information on a exact science we try hard to pursue - "9/11thology" is published here:

http://www.911thology.com

in the above web site you could also find a new dedicated 9/11thology forum, news blog, questions and answers, detailed information about recently published video presentation on the WTC nuclear demolition, information about the above mentioned book "The Third Truth.." and more.

Information on pre-9/11 meanings and definitions of the "ground zero" term is published here:

http://www.what-is-ground-zero.com

Information on thermo-nuclear demolition in general (both related to the WTC nuclear demolition and to nuclear demolition scheme of the Sears Tower) is available here:

http://www.nuclear-demolition.com

Information on nuclear demolition principles in a form of a former Wikipedia article (now removed by "politically correct" Wikipedia's watchdogs) is available here:

http://www.nuclear-demolition-wikipedia.com

Details of the WTC nuclear demolition scheme in particular are available here: http://www.wtcnucleardemolition.com

Information on the 2002 Bali Nightclub bombing with a 'micro-nuke' are available here:

http://www.bali-bombing.com

Information on the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing with a 'mini-nuke is available here:

http://www.oklahoma-bombing.com

Information on the 1998 Khobar Towers bombing with a 'mini-nuke' is available here:

http://www.khobar-bombing.com

Some more web projects will be added soon.

Please, do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Funds are badly needed to keep things moving and the truth spreading.

Please, consider donating.

-
an author of the "9/11tholgy" and of
"The 'third' truth about September 11,
or
Defending the US Government
which has only the first two..."

I am pleased to inform everybody that "The Third Truth about 9/11 Foundation" intends to publish several information web-sites and discussion boards that deal with these topics:

nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center following 9/11 attacks;

nuclear demolition of the WTC-7 following 9/11 attacks;

true definition the "ground zero" term and its meaning in pre-9/11 English language;

technical principles of nuclear demolition of buildings in general and in relation to the WTC nuclear demolition in particular;

information related to the so-called "terrorism" in general and to the nuclear terrorism in particular (alias so-called suicidal and non-suicidal "truck-bombings" and "car-bombings").

These Internet projects are either available, or will be available soon:

Funds are badly needed to keep things moving and the truth spreading.

Please, consider donating.

9/11 The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (full version)

Eisblitzzz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPcUrbOhghM

Published on 15 Feb 2013

In my opinion,
it doesn't matter that the 'ground zero' term was used metaphorical long before 911,
it doesn't matter that Dimitri Khalezov is no medical expert,
it doesn't even matter if there were planes or not!

What does matter is that an official WTC nuclear demolition scheme exists and was later classified, as well as these hard facts about the measured radioactive isotopes at ground zero:

http://www.nucleardemolition.com/file...

Feds Finally Acknowledge 9/11 First Responders' Cancers
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2012/09/...

btw, I also doubt nanothermite as a realistic cause for the pulverization of WTC1/2 & 7 into pyroclastic clouds of dust.

http://www.bastison.net/RESSOURCES/Cr...

of course, what matters most is to stop the 'war on terror' and civil rights, and identify those cynically misleading the public to achieve their own ends.

· Music

"Cold Days" by Pianochocolate ( • • )

Dimitri Khalezov 911 video - the most prohibited item on the web

400

Uploaded on 8 Aug 2010

This is the intro to the most censored video on the web,
and the powers that be DO NOT want you to watch this .

See more info below :

If you want answers to the 911 mystery watch the
" Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear demolition " presentation.

For a quick overview of the evidence :
http://911crimescene.weebly.com/

For the original full presentation go here :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAV_BU...
or
http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-...
or
Download the free ebook
http://www.dimitri-khalezov-video.com...

Music
- "First" by Private Taste ( • • )
Category
- Education
Licence
- Standard YouTube Licence

Donald Fox

Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting

Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes

Posted on February 6, 2015

New research falsifies the nanothermite and DEW alternatives while confirming the mini-nuke hypothesis

by Don Fox (with Jim Fetzer) - REMOVED BY GORDON DUFF FROM VETERANS TODAY WEBSITE AND PR FETZER FIRED!

In accounting for the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11, there are three contending factions within the 9/11 research community. While virtually everyone agrees that WTC-7 was brought down in a (classic) controlled demolition, they differ with respect to how the Twin Towers were destroyed, which was obviously not by means of any kind of collapse, which we know, given their design, would have been impossible, but which the government has told the American people was the case. These three factions advance different alternative hypotheses of how it was done:
(h1) the nanothermite hypothesis, supported by A&E911, Steve Jones and Christopher Bollyn;
(h2) the mini-nuke hypothesis, supported by Scholars for 9/11 Truth and others here at VT;
(h3) the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) hypothesis, supported by Judy Wood and her associates.
A&E911 has received enormous support from the public, which has allowed its head, Richard Gage, to travel around the country and lead a comfortable life-style. His critics, however, are skeptical that A&E911 is on the up-and-up because its commitment to nanothernmite has been established to be inadequate as an explanation for the destruction of the Twin Towers, not least of all because in (its extant versions) nanothermite has an explosive force 1/13 as powerful as TNT. While A&E911 apologists maintain the organization does not deny other explosives may have been involved, it has made no effort to ascertain what those “other explosives” could possibly have been, which is inexcusable.
That is rather astonishing, all things considered, because (h1) has been based (virtually exclusively) upon dust samples that were gathered from an apartment in close proximity to “Ground Zero”, where the US Geological Survey has done overwhelmingly more through, detailed and extensive studies of dust samples take from a wide range of locations around Manhattan and subjected them to spectrographic analysis, which has revealed many elements whose presence in the quantities and correlations only appear to be explicable if 9/11 was nuclear event as (h2) asserts:
Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
These findings expose the pseudo-scientific pretensions of the proponents of (h1) and of (h3) alike, neither of whom take the USGS data into account. That is especially ironic in the case of the “thermite sniffers”, since Steven Jones and A&E911 pride themselves on being “scientific” in their approach, when science requires that reasoning be based upon all the available evidence, yet they ignore more copious and detailed “dust sample” evidence than that upon which they base their own theory. And the “DEW huggers” display their incompetence in precisely the same way by failing to adjust their theory to new evidence and alternative hypotheses. Since I published my review on amazon.com in mid-2012, I have been assailed by an astounding 5,000 attacks by her fans:

Donald Fox has done a brilliant job of exposing the role of Judy Wood as a “gatekeeper extraordinaire”, where the A&E911 (h1) group cannot be far behind. Unfortunately, a gullible public swoons over an organization composed of a thousand or more architects and engineers, even though they will not address WHO was responsible and WHY 9/11 took place and, like Judy Wood and her (h3) group, do not even provide an adequate explanation for HOW it was done. Here Don Fox advances a new line of argument confirming the use of nukes on 9/11 in support of (h2). This article has a more scientific and technical character than others, where we conclude with a glossary of terms related to the design, construction and detonation of nuclear weapons, the popularization of which Gordon Duff has pioneered, which, alas, must become part of the working knowledge of informed citizens today.

AveragerelativeThicknessofSteelanditsDistributioninaTwinTowe-640x479

Extensive studies by Charles Boldwyn have demonstrated that the Twin Towers could not have collapsed on 9/11

stock-footage-new-york-city-september-smoky-ground-zero-surrounded-by-skyscrapers-at-night

Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes
by Don Fox
The destruction of the World Trade Center buildings was a high energy event. In the case of the Twin Towers two 110 story buildings were largely converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust in about 20 seconds. What was the source of energy that was responsible for the demise of these behemoths? Kerosene has no ability to produce the results observed at Ground Zero on 9/11.
The evidence collected at Ground Zero tells us 9/11 was a nuclear event. The Department of Energy water samples contained tritium which is a rare hydrogen isotope and a telltale sign of a thermonuclear explosion. The USGS dust samples contained barium, strontium, yttrium and cesium amongst other fission products. The earth and water tell us what happened on 9/11: the WTC was nuked.
Most 9/11 researchers (and the general public) lack a basic understanding of nuclear physics. This lack of physics knowledge has allowed people like Steve Jones and Judy Wood to obfuscate the true method of destruction of the WTC buildings with bogus claims of non-explosive nanothermite and amorphous DEWs. Once one gains an understanding of concepts such as nuclear fission and alpha and beta decay, the destruction of the Twin Towers and the aftermath makes perfect sense.
Nuclear Physics Basics
In order to understand what happened at Ground Zero one must first have a grasp on some basic nuclear physics concepts. Fortunately there is an abundance of nuclear physics knowledge readily available on the internet. From Universe Today.com:

There are three parts of an atom: protons, neutron, and electrons. Protons have a positive charge, electrons have a negative charge, and neutrons possess no net charge.
Electrons are the smallest parts of the atom. They are the most numerous of the three. It has no known components or substructure, so it is an elementary particle. Its mass is 1/1836 of a proton. It is also considered to be a fermion. It has an antiparticle called the positron. The positron is identical to the electron except that it carries opposite charge. When an electron collides with a positron, both particles will either scatter or be destroyed producing gamma ray photons. Electrons can collide with other particles and be diffracted like light. Two electrons cannot occupy the same quantum state based on the Pauli Exclusion Principle.
The proton is the part of an atom that helps to form the nucleus and has a positive charge. Protons must have an equal number of neutrons except in the hydrogen atom where a single proton exists on its own. A proton is composed of 2 up quarks and one down quark. They are considered to be fermions and baryons. They are held together by the strong nuclear force. The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom determines the atomic number.
A neutron is the part of an atom that holds no charge. Neutrons and protons occur in equal numbers in stable atoms except in hydrogen. Protons and neutrons are often referred to together as nucleons. If there are more neutrons than protons, then the atom is considered an isotope. If a neutron becomes free of its proton, then it becomes unstable, undergoes beta decay, and will disintegrate in an average of 15 minutes. The neutron is also important in nuclear chain reactions both natural and artificial.

From Chemistry Explained.com:

The nucleus is composed of protons (charge = +1; mass = 1.007 atomic mass units ([μ]) and neutrons. The number of protons in the nucleus is called the atomic number (Z) and defines which chemical element the nucleus represents. The number of neutrons in the nucleus is called the neutron number (N), whereas the total number of neutrons and protons in the nucleus is referred to as the mass number (A), where A = N + Z. The neutrons and protons are referred to collectively as nucleons. A nucleus with a given N and Z is referred to as a nuclide. Nuclides with the same atomic number are isotopes, such as 12 C and 14 C, whereas nuclides with the same N, such as 14 C and 16 O, are called isotones. Nuclei such as 14 N and 14 C, which have the same mass number, are isobars. Nuclides are designated by a shorthand notation in which one writes, that is, for a nucleus with 6 protons and 8 neutrons, one writes, or just 14 C. The size of a nucleus is approximately 1 to 10 × 10 -15m, with the nuclear radius being represented more precisely as 1.2 × A 1/3 × 10 -15m. We can roughly approximate the nucleus as a sphere and thus we can calculate its density where 1.66 × 10-27 kg is the mass of the nucleon. Thus the nuclear density is about 200,000 tons per cubic millimeter and is independent of A. Imagine a cube that is 1 mm on a side. If filled with nuclear matter, it would have a mass of about 200,000 tons. This calculation demonstrates the enormous matter/energy density of nuclei and gives some idea as to why nuclear phenomena lead to large energy releases.
Of the 6,000 species of nuclei that can exist in the universe, about 2,700 are known, but only 270 of these are stable. The rest are radioactive, that is, they spontaneously decay. The driving force behind all radioactive decay is the ability to produce products of greater stability than one had initially. In other words, radioactive decay releases energy and because of the high energy density of nuclei, that energy release is substantial. Qualitatively we describe radioactive decay as occurring in three general ways: α -, β -, and γ -decay. Alpha-decay occurs in the heavy elements, and consists of the emission of a 4 He nucleus. Beta-decay occurs in nuclei whose N/Z ratio is different from that of a stable nucleus and consists of a transformation of neutrons into protons or vice versa to make the nucleus more stable. Gamma-decay occurs when excited nuclei get rid of some or all of their excitation energy via the emission of electromagnetic radiation, or via the radiationless transfer of energy to orbital electrons.

Nuclear Fission

When uranium-235 undergoes fission, the average of the fragment mass is about 118, but very few fragments near that average are found. It is much more probable to break up into unequal fragments, and the most probable fragment masses are around mass 95 and 137. Most of these fission fragments are highly unstable (radioactive), and some of them such as cesium-137 and strontium-90 are extremely dangerous when released to the environment.

Cesium-137 and strontium-90 are the most dangerous radioisotopes to the environment in terms of their long-term effects. Their intermediate half-lives of about 30 years suggests that they are not only highly radioactive but that they have a long enough half-life to be around for hundreds of years. Iodine-131 may give a higher initial dose, but its short half-life of 8 days ensures that it will soon be gone. Besides its persistence and high activity, cesium-137 has the further insidious property of being mistaken for potassium by living organisms and taken up as part of the fluid electrolytes. This means that it is passed on up the food chain and re-concentrated from the environment by that process.
Cesium-137 decay has a half-life of 30.07 years and proceeds by both beta decay and gamma emission from an intermediate state. Both the electron and gamma emissions are highly ionizing radiation. The gamma radiation is very penetrating, and the beta radiation, though very short range, is very dangerous when ingested because it deposits all that energy in a very short distance in tissue.

Cesium’s danger as an environmental hazard, damaging when ingested, is made worse by its mimicking of potassium’s chemical properties. This ensures that cesium as a contaminant will be ingested, because potassium is needed by all living things.
Strontium-90 and cesium-137 are the radioisotopes which should be most closely guarded against release into the environment. They both have intermediate half-lives of around 30 years, which is the worst range for half-lives of radioactive contaminants. It ensures that they are not only highly radioactive but also have a long enough half-life to be around for hundreds of years. Strontium-90 mimics the properties of calcium and is taken up by living organisms and made a part of their electrolytes as well as deposited in bones. As a part of the bones, it is not subsequently excreted like cesium-137 would be. It has the potential for causing cancer or damaging the rapidly reproducing bone marrow cells.
Strontium-90 is not quite as likely as cesium-137 to be released as a part of a nuclear reactor accident because it is much less volatile, but is probably the most dangerous component of the radioactive fallout from a nuclear weapon.
Strontium-90 undergoes beta decay, emitting electrons with energy 0.546 MeV with a half-life of 28.8 years. The decay product is yttrium-90.

Beta Decay
Radiation and Radioactive Decay:

Beta particles are electrons or positrons (electrons with positive electric charge, or anti-electrons). Beta decay occurs when, in a nucleus with too many protons or too many neutrons, one of the protons or neutrons is transformed into the other. In beta minus decay, a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an anti-neutrino: n Æ p + e – +. In beta plus decay, a proton decays into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino: p Æ n + e+ +n. Both reactions occur because in different regions of the Chart of the Nuclides, one or the other will move the product closer to the region of stability. These particular reactions take place because conservation laws are obeyed. Electric charge conservation requires that if an electrically neutral neutron becomes a positively charged proton, an electrically negative particle (in this case, an electron) must also be produced. Similarly, conservation of lepton number requires that if a neutron (lepton number = 0) decays into a proton (lepton number = 0) and an electron (lepton number = 1), a particle with a lepton number of -1 (in this case an antineutrino) must also be produced. The leptons emitted in beta decay did not exist in the nucleus before the decay–they are created at the instant of the decay.
To the best of our knowledge, an isolated proton, a hydrogen nucleus with or without an electron, does not decay. However within a nucleus, the beta decay process can change a proton to a neutron. An isolated neutron is unstable and will decay with a half-life of 10.5 minutes. A neutron in a nucleus will decay if a more stable nucleus results; the half-life of the decay depends on the isotope. If it leads to a more stable nucleus, a proton in a nucleus may capture an electron from the atom (electron capture), and change into a neutron and a neutrino.
Proton decay, neutron decay, and electron capture are three ways in which protons can be changed into neutrons or vice-versa; in each decay there is a change in the atomic number, so that the parent and daughter atoms are different elements. In all three processes, the number A of nucleons remains the same, while both proton number, Z, and neutron number, N, increase or decrease by 1.
In beta decay the change in binding energy appears as the mass energy and kinetic energy of the beta particle, the energy of the neutrino, and the kinetic energy of the recoiling daughter nucleus. The energy of an emitted beta particle from a particular decay can take on a range of values because the energy can be shared in many ways among the three particles while still obeying energy and momentum conservation.

Cherenkov Radiation

Is there an equivalent of the sonic boom for light?

When a charged particle does move through a medium at a speed higher than the speed of light in that medium, a faint radiation is produced by the medium. In water, for example, the charged particle excites the water molecules, which then return to their normal state by emitting photons of blue light. Because the particle is moving faster than the speed of light in water, it can trigger a cascade of photons that are in phase with each other and can interfere constructively to form a visible blue glow.

Nuclear Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility, Cherenkov Radiation, Hanford Site, U.S. Department of Energy, Southeastern Washington State
Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 Capsules

In the early 1970s operators at the Hanford, Washington, site removed a large fraction of the Cs-137 and Sr-90 from the site’s high-level tank waste in order to reduce the requirements for cooling the tanks. The cesium and strontium were concentrated and sealed in stainless steel (SS) capsules for potential uses, for example, thermoelectric generators and sterilizers. The expected applications for the Hanford capsules did not materialize and ceased entirely in 1988 after one capsule being used in the commercial sector was found to be leaking (USNRC, 1989).
In the capsules, cesium is in the form of cesium chloride (CsCl) and strontium as strontium fluoride (SrF2). The chemical composition has been described as being relatively uniform (NRC, 1997b). Each cesium capsule contains on average approximately 35,000 Ci of Cs-137 plus an unspecified amount of Cs-135 estimated to be 0.7 Ci and produces approximately 190 W of heat. Each strontium capsule contains approximately 33,000 Ci of Sr-90 and produces approximately 260 W of heat.

The blue glow from the cesium-137 and strontium-90 capsules is due to Cherenkov radiation.
Cesium-137 Glows Blue
Majia Nadesan has a blog post that discusses the Goiânia accident where a scavenger punctured a radiotherapy device containing cesium-137 with a screwdriver. A deep blue light came out of the hole.

Cesium and Strontium in the USGS Dust Samples
Both cesium and strontium were found in abundance in the USGS dust samples. Both cesium-137 and strontium-90 undergo β− decay. Cesium-137 decays into barium-137m and strontium-90 decays into yttrium-90. Barium and yttrium were also found in abundance in the USGS dust samples. There can be little doubt that the ominous blue glow in the above picture of Ground Zero is from Cherenkov radiation.
Tribute in Light

The Tribute in Light was first presented on March 11, 2002, six months after 9/11. The light memorial was done to provide a cover story for the blue light in the sky.
Conclusions
There can be no doubt that nuclear fission chain reactions took place at Ground Zero on 9/11. Fission products cesium and strontium were found in the USGS dust samples. These radioactive elements underwent beta minus decay and released high energy electrons. This is what caused the blue glow (Cherenkov radiation) over Ground Zero. Jet fuel, nanothermite or a Tesla inspired DEW have no explanatory power for beta minus decay and Cherenkov radiation.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS:
Nuclear Weapons Glossary
©2013 by Ara Barsamian, NNPI
High Explosive:chemical explosive that has high detonation velocity, usually in excess of 6000 m/s
Hohlraum: black body cavity, same as hydrogen bomb radiation confinement case
Hollow Boosting: refers to fission yield enhancement in a hollow fissile material pit filled with D+T boost gas that releases copious amounts of thermonuclear neutrons
Hydrodynamics: branch of Fluid Dynamics that explores behavior of materials under intense shock pressure; extensively used in implosion calculations to calculate time-dependent compression of pit or canned TN assembly, and thus, supercriticality or thermonuclear burn rate
IHE: Insensitive High Explosive, a very safe type of explosive that can be detonated only by a strong shock; a bullet impact will have no effect
Implosion: uniform squeezing of matter by shock waves or radiation. It can be in 3 dimensions (spherical), 2 dimensions (cylindrical), or 1 dimension (linear)
Implosion-type weapon: assembly of fissile core material by explosive-driven implosion
Initiator: device that provides a squirt of neutrons to start or “initiate” a divergent chain reaction in a super-prompt critical fissile core assembly. There are two basic types: internal Polonium-Beryllium types (original name “Urchin”), and external neutron generator tubes (original name “zipper”
Interstage: usually material containing BeO which absorbs the primary x-rays and re-radiates lower wavelength x-rays over longer time for a more complete secondary assembly implosion and compression
Interval Time: time between the fission primary emission of radiation and the production of thermonuclear output
Isentropic Compression: replaces shock compression with a smooth continuous pressure increase using soft, layered impactors, thereby decreasing heating and allowing much greater compression. Increases yields by a factor of 2 or 3…
Lens: a binary explosive device, where the difference in detonation velocity results in refractive shaping of the output detonation wave; used in early implosion weapons to produce spherical implosions. Superseded by air lenses, flat lenses, and multi-point laser detonation systems.
Levitation: method using a gap between fissile core and tamper, allowing tamper to gain momentum before slamming into the pit; the result is much higher compression due to amplification by the hammer (E=mv2/2) effect
Lithium: metal used either to breed Tritium in reactors to make boost gas, or used in Lithium Deuteride thermonuclear fuel; Li6 isotope has higher cross-section than natural Li7 and is the preferred TN fuel in miniaturized warheads, but both produce Tritium. Ignorance of Li7 cross-section caused the Castle Bravo TN bomb test in 1954 to run away by a factor of 3 yielding 15 MT.
Lithium Deuteride: solid gray salt used as TN fuel in the secondary assembly of a thermonuclear explosive. Usually the Li is enriched to 40 to 60% Li6. Sometime the Li6D is spiked with Tritium ( Sakharov’s 1953 Sloika layer cake design used Li6DT)
Margin: the additional yield of a fission explosive beyond what is needed to drive the explosion of the thermonuclear secondary assembly to full yield
Multipoint Detonation System: replaces the bulky lensed spherical high explosive implosion assembly with multiple individual detonators on the surface of HE sphere. Used successfully in UK in very compact and lightweight Octopus/ super-Octopus system; used in China’s first HEU implosion test (252 detonators). Currently implemented using a high power semiconductor laser and fiber optics cables.
Neutron Initiator: see Initiator
Neptunium: produced in reactors as a by-product, isotope 237 is fissile and can also be used in fission explosives
NTS: Nevada Test Site, used for testing nuclear weapons
Neutron Generator: an integrated assembly of a neutron tube, power supply, timers and triggering system. Some power supplies are electronic, some are explosive ferroelectric or magnetocumulative generators
Neutron Tube: see External Neutron Source
Neutronics: branch of nuclear reactor theory concerned with criticality calculations, such as the variation of degree of criticality with core compression by high explosives
NW: Nuclear weapon
PAL: Permissive Action Link, a mechanical or electronic combination lock preventing the use of a nuclear weapon by unauthorized persons; currently using crypto chips
PBX: Plastic Bonded Explosive, a mix of HE powder pressed together with a plastic binder to make easily handled and machined parts
Pit: the central metal core assembly containing an inner fissile shell of Pu or HEU, usually flashed with gold or Nickel, and an outer shell of either stainless steel, Beryllium, or Vanadium, or a combination; see also Core, and FRP
Pit Tube: a thin stainless steel tube carrying boost gas from the reservoir to the hollow core of the pit at the time of detonation
Plasma: fourth state of matter, whereby the material is completely ionized
Plutonium: element 94. The isotope 239 sustains fast neutron chain reaction and is the fissile material used in fission explosives. Reactors also produce the isotope 240 material, fissionable only by fast neutrons, which has high spontaneous neutron emission that could cause pre-initiation and fizzle yield.
PNE: peaceful nuclear explosives; typically minimizes fission products
Polonium: a high emitter of alpha particles with a half life of 138 days; it was used in combination with Beryllium to generate neutrons for initiating a fission chain reaction
Pre-detonation: detonation of fission explosive before the optimum time, usually before achieving maximum compression of fission core because of high rate of spontaneous fission – see Pre-initiation
Pre-heating: the heating of TN secondary assembly by fission primary before radiation implosion is completed, leading to reduced compression and TN fizzle yield
Pre-initiation: initiation before the optimum time, usually before achieving maximum compression of fission core; causes significant decrease in yield, usually a “fizzle” yield
Primary: primary bomb, usually a fission explosive providing the soft x-ray radiation driving the implosion of a secondary (thermonuclear) bomb to achieve high compression
Radiation Case: metal case containing the primary radiation long enough to implode the secondary; usually stainless steel, aluminum, or plastic with Uranium or Lead coating. Also known as a hohlraum
Radiation Implosion: thermal X-rays from a fission explosive cause ablation of the TN secondary assembly surface, thus driving a strong implosion and high compression of the assembly to make it yield most of the explosive energy. AKA Teller-Ulam principle
Radiation Implosion Compression Mechanism: in the initial US design, the radiation heated a radiation channel filler (foam) to a plasma that pushed against the secondary assembly to compress it (like steam pressure against turbine blades). Radiation driven ablation was discovered accidentally when trying to miniaturize a warhead by using a secondary with a Beryllium-reflected HEU wrap around the LiD fuel and sparkplug; Be is a very good ablator (very high velocity of ablated ejecta) thus providing much greater compression and increased yield from a smaller secondary assembly than “exploding” foam. Latest designs used “doped” or profiled ablators to provide a near isentropic compression, similar to laser fusion capsules. In UK and France, the initial design used the “explosive pusher” concept, where the external metal layer (iron) around the secondary was heated by the thermal x-rays, half blowing outwards, the other half pushing inside, for modest compression.
Reactor-grade Plutonium: Plutonium produced in power reactors with a high content (greater than 20%) of the undesirable isotope 240; unfortunately still a good nuclear explosive material
Reflector: material that reflects neutrons; a good reflector surrounding a fissile core decreases the critical mass of fissile material. Best core reflector is Beryllium metal
Reservoirs: metal containers, usually stainless steel, storing boost gas, deuterium and tritium, under high pressure or absorbed in metals as hydrides
RV: missile re-entry vehicle, housing the nuclear warhead and the arming, fuzing, and firing system, and interface to the missile “bus”
Secondary: secondary or auxiliary bomb, a physically separate component containing thermonuclear fuel such as Lithium Deuteride surrounded by a fusion tamper such as natural Uranium or, for increased yield in a compact package, HEU. Known as Canned Sub-Assembly (CSA)
Separation: process of enriching an element in the percentage of the desired isotope
Shocks: a steep pressure wave, generated by explosives, ballistic impact, electrostatic implosion, etc.
Shot: a nuclear test explosion
SNM: special nuclear material, same as fissile material, Plutonium 239, or HEU
Sparkplug: informal term denoting a fissile core inside a thermonuclear (TN) fuel container that is used to start the thermonuclear burn in the previously compressed TN fuel. Initially used Plutonium, currently HEU
Spontaneous Fission: typically natural spontaneous nuclear fission of Uranium 238 or Plutonium 240 nuclei producing high level of neutron background; main cause of pre-detonation
Sprytron: a gas filled triggered spark-gap tube used as an ultra fast switch to fire the detonators
SRD: Secret Restricted Data, one of the numerous information classification categories
Staging: physical separation of the primary fission stage from the TN secondary stage to allow time for radiation implosion and prevent its destruction by primary material debris
Stockpile: quantity of nuclear weapons ready for use
SSS: Science-based Stockpile Stewardship, a program whereby the stockpile can be certified using computer simulations and statistical sampling and dissection of stockpiled weapons that they are reliable and safe without nuclear testing

Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 PuzzleIn "9/11"

Mystery Solved: The WTC Was Nuked on 9/11In "9/11"

Hard Evidence Supports the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used to Demolish the WTC TowersIn "9/11"

2 thoughts on “Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes”

9/11 Conspiracy Author Phillip Marshall & His 2 Kids Found Dead in California

DNA / October 16, 2013 / 24 Comments

Phillip Marshall, a former airplane pilot and author whose works included the 2003 novel “Lakefront Airport,” - “False Flag 911: How Bush, Cheney and the Saudis Created the Post-911 World (08)” and “The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror,” a 2012 publication in which Marshall theorized it wasn’t al-Qaida but rather U.S. and Saudi government officials who orchestrated 9/11, was found dead along with his two children in their Murphrys-area home in California. Reports indicate all 3 died of gunshot wounds.

Friends of Marshall’s kids, Alex 17 and Macaila 14, discovered the gruesome scene after showing up to check on them on Saturday after not having heard from them for numerous days.

The Calaveras County Sheriff’s Office reported that both children as well as the family dog were shot once in the head with a handgun.

Marshall’s estranged wife and mother of the 2 kids was traveling abroad at the time of the shootings.
A possible motive for the shootings has not been determined but police reports indicated evidence that it was a murder suicide.

According to his Amazon author bio:

Philip Marshall, a veteran airline captain and former government “special activities” contract pilot, has authored three books on Top Secret America, a group presently conducting business as the United States Intelligence Community. Beginning with his role in the 1980s as a Learjet captain first as part of a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) sting on Pablo Escobar, and later in the covert arming of the Nicaraguan Contras, Marshall has studied and written 30-years worth of covert government special activities and the revolving door of Wall Street tricksters, media moguls, and their well funded politicians. Marshall is the leading aviation expert on the September 11th attack, as well as a masterful storyteller. The Big Bamboozle (2012) is his second work to focus on the flight training and preparation of 9/11 hijackers’ after False Flag 911 was published in 2008. His first book, Lakefront Airport (2003) was a novel based on his experience as a government contract pilot during the Iran-Contra operation. Philip Marshall began his 20-year career as an airline pilot in 1985, flying first with Eastern Airlines and then with United. He holds captain ratings on the Boeing 727, 737, 747, 757 and 767. Born and raised in New Orleans, Marshall currently resides in California.

Source :

http://dcxposed.com

Veterans Today

Get the Hell Out of Our Country! (Part I)

Posted by Preston James, Ph.D on February 5, 2015

Now that we have the Able Danger Report showing the names of the Israeli-American "Israeli first" Dual Citizens who did the nuclear attack on America on 9-11-01, it's time for them to leave America and take their Espionage Fronts and Fiat Counterfeiting Operations with them.

by Preston James and Mike Harris

Why does everything seem to be going against mainstream, ordinary Americans, making it almost impossible for hard working folks to just get by, trying to pay their bills and live modestly?
Why does the USG and the Major Mass Media seem to have become a tool of the rich 1% and other special interests, while ignoring the true needs and wishes of We The People?
Why does our elected Congress just keep passing an endless cascade of new laws (aka large financial Corporate Welfare packages) for special interests that are clearly against our interests, that is the interest of “We The People?”

Why does the Major Mass Media continue to tell lies which support Big Corporate Interests and Big Government Lies that are obviously false upon any close examination of the related evidence?
Why are average Americans working harder and harder, longer hours, many a second part-time job, just to get by?
Why are the prices in the grocery store continually rising with smaller and smaller portions?
Why is there continual inflation unaccompanied by adequate salary or hour wage increases?
Why do the ultra-rich 1% who now own 80% of American assets pay little or no taxes while the average middle class taxes just keep going up and how come our Funding Fathers only allowed Excise or import taxes?
How can we really own our own homes when they are confiscated for non-payment of property taxes which some experts say are completely Unconstitutional and the property taxes are increased almost every years despite dropping values?

Why are the amount of real estate taxes spent on school always going up when the birth rate and population of students is always dropping?
Why are the school administrations so bloated and why are the schools crawling with Intel and being militarized? Where is all this vast money going? Why is Wi-Fi so intense that some teachers, aides or kids are having psychomotor seizures?
The big tax dollars are not going to the teachers that’s for sure, because many are underpaid and harassed by Administration if they do not tow the Globalist Agenda?
Why do the public schools promote homosexuality, perversion, diversity and extreme political correctness as a normal?
Why is our USG and Major mass media obsessed with pushing political correctness, diversity, perversions and Globalism as normal?
Why does our USG claim Terrorists are hiding everywhere trying to get us, sneaking into America and waiting to blow us up, when they go to extreme limits to keep the Southern border open, allow and encourage millions of illegals to cross it and come to use American Welfare and hospitals and schools for free, which drags our economy down?
Why does the USG lie and say we are short of necessary high tech workers and then bring in so many foreign engineers and workers when we already have an excess and many who can’t find work?

Why are there so few good job opportunities for mainstream America and a continually falling standard of living while so many Wall Street Bankers are getting Trillion Dollar Bailouts?

Why are the CEOs of the major International Corporations getting huge, indecent multi-million dollar salaries and stock options on top of that when many of their workers barely earn enough to scape by?
Why is the economy so bad that many young people join the now all volunteer US Military to be sent to fight in wars for Israel, the Banksters, defense contractors, wars that are clearly illegal, Unconstitutional, unprovoked, undeclared, unwinnable and perpetual?
Why are the Military recruiters allowed to hang around High schools and lie through their teeth and deceive many young folks into fighting these illegal, Unconstitutional, unprovoked, undeclared, unwinnable, perpetual wars of acquisition for Israel and the World Zionists?

bank-run__thomas_jefferson___joeforamerica__com

Why do we have the Federal Reserve System which is always run by World Zionist Babylonian Talmudic Judaics and why is this system allowed in America when it is clearly illegal, Unconstitutional and against the interests of all mainstream Americans?

Why are our Police being militarized and armed by the USG with armored cars and tanks, fully automatic machine guns and grenade launchers and why do they often wear all black Nazi SS type uniforms and face masks that hide their identities?
Why do we have the presence of the sinister Homeland Security that has hijacked and combined all of our Alphabets and Law Enforcement into one large East German Stasi type Occupation Force for Israel inside America? How was this ever permitted to happen? Why didn’t our Congress protect us from this obvious foreign military occupation by Israeli World Zionists?

Mike Harris is the Financial Editor of Veterans Today, a radio host, a former GOP Finance Chairman, Gubernatorial Candidate for Arizona, and a Senior Vice President of Adamus Defense Group, Switzerland. Mike is an expert in full-contact mixed martial arts. His long term expertise in such has gained him a lot of respect and the nickname “Iron Mike”. Mike was a part of the Veterans Today group that attended the Damascus Conference to Combat Terrorism and Religious Extremism. Mike gave about twenty five televised interviews that were broadcast to millions of viewers in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Iran. In these interviews Mike emphasized and supported the historical declaration by Keynote Speaker, Veterans Today Senior Editor and Chairman Gordon Duff that the real problem behind World Terrorism is a large Organized Crime Syndicate.
Get Out of Our Country (Continued – part II)

Get the Hell Out of Our Country ! (Part II)

Posted by Preston James, Ph.D on February 6, 2015

by Preston James and Mike Harris

Why did our Congress and Presidents allow Israel to hijack our NSA on behalf of the WZs and allow the NSA to download all of their raw data to Israel, which is Treason?

Here is an excerpt from an NSA document entered into the public domain by Edward Snowden which shows that the top NSA leadership are now continually committing Treason and Sedition against America, and serving as accessories to espionage done against America by Israel.
Note these are capital crimes punishable by death upon conviction:

VOL. 44
2014/15
No. 1
P. 265
Documents and Source Material: United States
D6. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA), INTERNAL DOCUMENT ON RELATIONSHIP WITH ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, WASHINGTON, DC, PUBLISHED 4 AUGUST 2014
National Security Agency (NSA)

FULL TEXT
In June 2013, then-NSA contractor Edward Snowden leaked thousands of internal NSA documents to several international journalists, including Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras. Greenwald proceeded to report on those documents, releasing some of them to the public, initially for the Guardian and then for the Intercept, an online news site launched by French-Iranian-American billionaire Pierre Omidyar in February 2014.
On 4 August, Greenwald published an article on the Intercept titled “Cash, Weapons, and Surveillance: The U.S. is a Key Party to Every Israeli Attack” alongside two Snowden-leaked documents on U.S.-Israeli intelligence cooperation. Taken together, the article and documents showed that although the Obama administration largely acted as a bystander throughout the Israeli assault in July and August 2014, the U.S. was directly complicit in Israel’s action.
Reproduced below is the full text of one of the documents Greenwald published, a 19 April 2013 internal NSA assessment of the agency’s relationship with its Israeli counterpart, the SIGINT National Unit (ISNU), as well as broader U.S.-Israeli intelligence cooperation. The other document, an agreement made between the NSA and the ISNU in 1993, is available at http://www.firstlook.org/theintercept/. Greenwald’s article is available in the Press section of this issue.
Introduction
NSA maintains a far-reaching technical and analytical relationship with the Israeli SIGINT National Unit (INSU) sharing information on access, intercept, targeting, language, analysis and reporting. This SIGINT relationship has increasingly been the catalyst for a broader intelligence relationship between the United States and Israel. Significant changes in the way NSA and ISNU have traditionally approached SIGINT have prompted an expansion to include other Israeli and U.S. intelligence organizations such as CIA, Mossad, and Special Operation Division (SOD).
Key Issues
The single largest exchange between NSA and ISNU is on targets in the Middle East which constitute strategic threats to U.S. and Israeli interests. Building upon a robust analytic exchange, NSA and ISNU also have explored and executed unique opportunities to gain access to high priority targets. The mutually agreed upon geographic targets include the countries of North Africa, the Middle East, the Persian Gulf, South Asia, and the Islamic republics of the former Soviet Union. Within that set of countries, cooperation covers the exploitation of internal governmental, military, civil, and diplomatic communications; and external transnational target set. A dedicated communications line between NSA and ISNU supports the exchange of raw material, as well as daily analytic and technical correspondence. Both NSA and ISNU have liaison officers, who conduct foreign relations functions, stationed at their respective embassies.
What NSA Provides to ISNU
The Israeli side enjoys the benefits of expanded geographic access to world-class NSA cryptanalytic and SIGINT engineering expertise, and also gains controlled access to advanced U.S. technology and equipment via accommodation buys and foreign military sales.
What ISNU Provides to NSA
Benefits to the U.S. include expanded geographic access to high priority SIGINT targets, access to world-class Israeli cryptanalytic and SIGINT engineering expertise, and access to a large pool of highly qualified analysts.
Success Stories
A key priority for ISNU is the Iranian nuclear development program, followed b Syrian nuclear efforts, Lebanese Hizballah plans and intentions, Palestinian terrorism, and Global Jihad. Several recent and successful joint operations between NSA and ISNU have broadened both organizations’ ability to target and exploit Iranian nuclear efforts. In addition, a robust and dynamic cryptanalytic relationship has enabled breakthroughs on high priority Iranian targets.
NSA and ISNU continue to initiate joint targeting of Syrian and Iranian leadership and nuclear development programs with CIA, ISNU, SOD and Mossad. This exchange has been particularly important as unrest in Syria continues, and both sides work together to identify threats to regional stability. NSA’s cyber partnerships expanded beyond ISNU to include Israeli Defense Intelligence’s SOD and Mossad, resulting in unprecedented access and collection breakthroughs that all sides acknowledge would not have been possible to achieve without the others.
In July 2012, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) provided guidance for expanding sharing with the GOI (Government of Israel) on Egypt. This approval has allowed NSA to task for ISNU on select strategic issues, specifically terrorist elements in Sinai.
Beyond the traditional SIGINT relationship, NSA and ISNU signed a MOU in September 2011 providing for Information Assurance/Computer Network Defense collaboration. NSA’s information Assurance Deputy Director attended an IA/CND conference in Tel Aviv in January 2012 during which NSA and ISNU established objectives for the relationship. NSA intends to focus the collaboration on cyber threats from Iran, Hizballah, and other regional actors and may provide limited, focused support on specific Russian and Chinese cyber threats. Conferences to further develop this partnership were held in May 2012 and December 2012.
NSA and ISNU led their communities in the establishment of U.S.-Israeli Intelligence Community VTC connectivity that allows both sides to broaden and accelerate the pace of collaboration against targets’ use of advanced telecommunications. Target sets include, but are not limited to Iran Nuclear, Syrian Foreign Fighter movements, Lebanese Hizballah and Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps activities. Dialogue is ongoing, with each potential new intelligence or technology initiative considered for approval individually.
Problems/Challenges
The three most common concerns raised by ISNU regarding the partnership with NSA is NSA’s reluctance to share on technology that is not directly related to a specific target, ISNU’s perceived reduction in the amount and degree of cooperation in certain areas, and the length of time NSA takes to decide on ISNU proposals. Efforts in these three areas have been addressed with the partner and NSA continues to work to increase cooperation with ISNU, where appropriate and mindful of U.S. policy and equity concerns.
End [of Document]

Why this theft of American Intel by Israel is a very serious matter.
The ramifications of Israel being able to hijack our NSA are staggering. This has allowed Israel to steal almost every industrial and military secret we have and sell them to competitors (which they do continually) or give them to their state sponsored businesses. This has been harming the American business community incredibly.
This is has harmed our actual National Security beyond imagination. This major breech in American National Security allowed the Israeli and their American co-conspirators to plan, deploy and coverup the nuclear attack on America on 9-11-01.
Any honest USG officials or elected officials is listened in to and prevented from ever gaining any political traction. If this NSA matter is ever fully prosecuted with sound convictions we will see hundreds or traitors executed for Treason and Sedition and thousands jailed for long prison terms.

Mike Harris is the Financial Editor of Veterans Today, a radio host, a former GOP Finance Chairman, Gubernatorial Candidate for Arizona, and a Senior Vice President of Adamus Defense Group, Switzerland. Mike is an expert in full-contact mixed martial arts. His long term expertise in such has gained him a lot of respect and the nickname “Iron Mike”. Mike was a part of the Veterans Today group that attended the Damascus Conference to Combat Terrorism and Religious Extremism. Mike gave about twenty five televised interviews that were broadcast to millions of viewers in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Iran. In these interviews Mike emphasized and supported the historical declaration by Keynote Speaker, Veterans Today Senior Editor and Chairman Gordon Duff that the real problem behind World Terrorism is a large Organized Crime Syndicate.

MUHAMMAD ALI BEN MARCUS

Saturday, 4 September 2010

DIMITRI A. KHALEZOV 911 GROUND ZERO - B-52 BOMBER - CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN

Published on 14 Jun 2015

B-25 Bomber Hits Empire State Building (1945)

9/11 CLEAR bomb going off in WTC BEFORE first plane EVER hit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlMXkWW_LM

9/11 CLEAR bomb going off in WTC BEFORE first plane EVER hit

Dimitri A. Khalezov website 911 GROUND ZERO

9/11thology - links to various information

9/11thology - links to various information

9/11 The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (full version)

· Music

Dimitri Khalezov 911 video - the most prohibited item on the web

Music

Category

Licence

Donald Fox

Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting

Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes

Related

2 thoughts on “Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes”

9/11 Conspiracy Author Phillip Marshall & His 2 Kids Found Dead in California

Get the Hell Out of Our Country! (Part I)

by Preston James and Mike Harris

by Preston James and Mike Harris

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

THE FRENCH CONNECTION