Jim
Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus
at the University of Minnesota Duluth. He has published widely on the
theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science,
artificial intelligence, cognitive science and evolution and mentality.
Ole Dammegård is an author, international speaker, investigator, former
journalist, artist who is behind the website Light On Conspiracies. Ole
and Jim join us to speak about their new book collaboration called, "And
I suppose we didn't go to the Moon, either?" It is a collection of
essays on government lies that is intended to challenge some of our most
cherished and deeply held beliefs. Our conversation begins with the
first subject of the book – the Apollo 11 Moon landing. Jim takes us
through a few of the vast number of anomalies in the 5,000+ photographs
in existence, and he talks about the problem with the Van Allen
radiation belt, which continues to be a giant obstacle for space travel
today. Ole gives his interpretation of why so many connections exist
amongst various conspiracies within the government, and we discuss the
backlash that is felt by researchers who decide to look into some of the
most preposterous events in history. Then, we delve into the holocaust,
anti-Semitism, hate speech, and the big media promotors of
disinformation, as well as the deterioration of news coverage that is
pushing the mainstream to alternative sources. In the members’ segment,
we start with the fascinating tale of the Beatles and their golden boy,
Paul McCartney. Jim relates how the British invasion of pop music in the
US sparked a revival of spirit that was clung to by the grief-stricken
youth who were reeling from the shocking assassination of JFK. We get
into the details of the extreme operation that was used to replace the
original Paul, who is said to have died in a car accident in 1966. Jim
points to the numerous signs that suggest the Beatles placed clues about
the death in their album artwork, lyrics, and even in the way they
referred to Paul. Then, we look into the assassination of Saddam
Hussein’s double and the real death of this beloved boogeyman. We also
touch on the fakery surrounding Osama Bin Laden’s death and the
disproportionately influential AIPAC lobby power that has been granted
as a result of the sham. At the end, Jim gives us a rundown of the
latest insane operation that has even the mainstream buzzing – Jade
Helm. We chew over the different components of this military maneuver of
which we can apply deductive reasoning, and we speculate on what could
be in store for us if indeed we are on the road to Martial Law.
Subscribe to Red Ice Radio in iTunes: itpc://www.redicecreations.com/radio/radio.xml
Subscribe to Red Ice Radio
Jim Fetzer, a former
Marine Corps officer, has published widely on the theoretical
foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial
intelligence, cognitive science, and evol...Show More
Imagine the benefits that would be derived from a dictionary in
which the words were improperly defined, whether that occurred
accidentally or not. And similar considerations apply to encyclopedias.–The author
But of course challenging the role of dual-citizens in policy-forming
or decision-making positions because who knows whether their loyalty to
the United States might be outweighed by their loyalty to the other
state becomes, in the hands of Wikipedia, “Anti-Defamation League has critized Fetzer for allegedly focusing on “American government officials of Jewish background”.[62] But to be Jewish is not to be a citizen of another nation, which makes this a gross distortion.
The Academic Freedom Conference of 26 April 2014
The change in tenor between the entry of 17 April 2014, which is
presented below, and of 31 May 2014, which follows, is so blatant and
extensive that it has caused me to reflect upon what could have caused
this major revision, where my best guess is that it was precipitated by
my participation in the conference, “Academic Freedom: Are there limits to inquiry?”, using JFK, 9/11 and the Holocaust as examples. It just happened to be held in Champaign-Urbana, IL, on 26 April 2014.
I both organized the conference with Stephen Francis and served as
its moderator. But the crucial reason for trashing me now and making
massive revisions to my entry–which underwent an earlier revision, as I
have explained above, but not on the order of this one–has to be what I
had to say, not about JFK and 9/11, especially (even though I have
emphasized Israeli complicity in the events of 9/11), but what I said
about the Holocaust, which the American public needs to know:
The decimation of my entry–apart from the
summary of my academic contributions–was both savage and painstaking in
ways one might expect if Wikipedia were a Zionist disinformation
operation. I am no longer a “noted philosopher of science and leading
conspiracy theorist” but now merely “a philosopher of science and
conspiracy theorists”, where my research on 9/11, especially, where my
“allegations and speculations [on 9/11] have drawn strong
criticism.[7][8][9][10]”.
Wikipedia entry of 31 May 2014
The first crucial point that should be understood is that Wikipedia
eschews references to original sources. That is quite remarkable in
itself, since any professional scholar can confirm that serious research
has to be based on original sources. The benefit of relying upon
secondary or even tertiary sources is that Wikipedia can pick and choose
between those who comment on a subject to support its preferred
depiction and reject complaints that they are ignoring the best sources.
There is a nice smear at the end, which is intended to tarnish my
reputation, claiming that the University of Minnesota asserting I have
claimed “a false association between my views and those of the
university”. But if you trace the alleged source, no such claim is made; and the university has made no effort to rein me in. And for good reason: only administrators speak for institution. Faculty never speak for their institutions, which makes this a clever misrepresentation.
The presentation of my conspiracy claims is
contracted to the point of virtual unintelligibility. (Compare this with
the extended discussion in the earlier version of my entry, where JFK,
9/11 and Wellstone are accorded their own sections.) And the attack
focusing on my earliest article in VT about Sandy Hook completely
disregards a dozen subsequent ones, which explain that the evidence
substantiates that no children actually died and it was an elaborate
gun-control hoax.
Indeed, the earliest reports were consistent with a Mossad attack,
including what appeared to have been a three-man team that was arrested
but whose names were never released and reports of a van traveling to
Greenwich Village to a Mossad safe-house, where Gordon Duff, Mike Harris
and I believed at the time that this had been their handiwork. The
failure to report my later work illustrates the fallacy of only citing
evidence in your favor and simply ignoring the rest.
This is known as “special pleading”, which is a common practice among
used-car salesmen, politicians and disinformation operators. Notice the
novel insistence that “mainstream views” be taken into account, as if public interest in “conspiracy theorists” did not derive from their divergence from mainstream views.
So not only are Wiki editors having free reign by citing secondary
sources in preference to primary but they can also assail their targets
as being “out of step” with the mainstream media. Unreal!
Wikipedia entry of 17 April 2014
What is most revealing, however, is the drastic revision of the
discussion of my conspiracy research, which was gutted from the version
that appeared as recently as 17 April 2014, but where the precipitating
event for these massive changes appears to have been the Academic
Freedom Conference, which was held on 26 April 2014. This is the kind of
swift and massive retribution we might expert from the God of the Old
Testament, who takes no prisoners. Consider the following:
In the latest version, of course, I am no
longer “a noted philosopher of science and a leading conspiracy
theorist”, but simply someone who, in the early 1990s, “began promoting
JFK assassination conspiracy theories” and subsequently conspiracy
theories about 9/11 and Wellstone. The fact that I created a research
group consisting of the most highly qualified individuals to very study
the death of JFK, which led to three classic collections of expert
studies, is not even mentioned much less discussed.
Nor would a reader learn that I have chaired or co-chaired five
national conferences on JFK or that I am not only the founder of
Scholars for 9/11 Truth but organized its first national conference in
Madison (2007) and its first international conference in Vancouver
(2012) nor that edited the first book from Scholars, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY
(2007). None of that contributes to the effort undertaken to trivialize
and smear me as a scholar.
Indeed, it never ceases to amaze me how I could have attained so many forms of distinction for my past research as an academician,
yet suddenly lose my ability to conduct research when it comes to JFK,
9/11 or the death of Sen. Paul Wellstone, much less Sandy Hook and the
Boston bombing. But the editors of Wikipedia have a lot of confidence in
their readers being unable to add “2” and “2”, enabling them to be
played for saps.
The gratuitous smear for “falsely associating” my views with those of
the University of Minnesota is not present. But notice especially that the
introduction to my “conspiracy claims” in the earlier version is longer
than the entire section about my “conspiracy claims” in the new one. In the older version, there were separate
sections about the assassination of JFK, the 9/11 attacks, the death of
Sen. Paul Wellstone, my alleged “anti-Semitism” and my views on Middle
Eastern affairs. None of this appears in the new entry.
JFK, 9/11 and Wellstone
Reliance upon secondary or tertiary sources pays off “big time” when
one op is citing another, creating the false impression of confirmation
for the original source by an independent one. The reference to Josiah
Thompson, for example, is a perfect illustration, where he has attacked
me probably a thousand times since I organized and moderated the first
symposium on Zapruder film alteration during the JFK Lancer Conference
in Dallas in 1996. I have exposed his role as a JFK disinfo op in “JFK, the CIA and The New York Times”, which every student of the assassination should be required to read.
Moreover, other prominent figures in the field, such as Robert
Groden, who even served as an expert for the House Select Committee on
Assassinations when it reinvestigated the case in 1976-77, turns out to
be a limited hangout specialist, as I explained in “The JFK: The Challenging Case of Robert Groden”.
It might be a good idea for every American to come to grips with what
we know now about the death of our 35th president, which I present with
supporting evidence in “JFK at 50: The Who, the How and the Why”, which you will not find linked to any entry in Wikipedia.
Anti-Semitism and Middle Eastern Affairs
That Wikipedia included this section on “Middle Eastern Affairs” was
something that I greatly appreciated, because my interviews with Press TV,
for example, are among my most important current contributions. And the
Iranian press is far more open, accurate and informative than, say, The New York Times, where “Mossad Played a Crucial Role in 9/11 Attacks”, offers a nice illustration of something important that you will not read in The Times.
Wikipedia as an encyclopedia
While there are similarities between dictionaries and encyclopedias, there are important distinctions as well (as Wikipedia itself explains):
A dictionary is primarily focused on
words and their definition, and typically provides limited information,
analysis of different forms, and an etymology (in more complete
dictionaries) for the word defined. Hence, while it may offer a
definition, it may leave the reader still lacking in understanding the
meaning or import of a term, and how the term relates to a broader field
of knowledge. An encyclopedia, on the other hand, seeks to discuss
each subject in more depth and convey the accumulated knowledge on that
subject. This characteristic is especially true of those encyclopedias
with long monographs on particular subjects, such as the first ten
editions of the Encyclopædia Britannica. While often organized alphabetically, some encyclopedias were not.
The presumption, of course, is that the entires in dictionaries and
encyclopedias will be accurate and true, where those in encyclopedias go
beyond the meaning of words to explain core concepts and the basic
knowledge fundamental to a discipline. Imagine the benefits that would
be derived from a dictionary in which the words were improperly defined,
whether that occurred accidentally or not. It would defeat the purpose
of a reference work of that kind. And similar considerations apply to an
encyclopedia, which would otherwise be untrustworthy and unreliable. It
would mislead and deceive rather than enlighten and inform.
The situation with Wikipedia, therefore, is anomalous when viewed as
an encyclopedia. Its entries are often inaccurate and misleading, where
advancing accurate and complete entries on its subjects clearly does not
determine what is published. The very idea of avoiding primary sources
and demanding secondary or even tertiary instead is a recipe for
manufacturing false and deceptive entries, as this entry about me and earlier entires about Scholars for 9/11 Truth,
for example, exemplify. It has become increasingly apparent, over time,
that Wikipedia does not aspire to accuracy and completeness about its
subjects.
Why have an encyclopedia that does not aspire to truth and
completeness, especially when its subjects represent diverse political
and philosophical positions? We have an instructive instance where my
entry was savaged from one that was relatively, if not perfectly,
balanced to one that is grossly biased and misleading. The reason
appears to be that, between 17 April 2014 and 31 May 2014, I
addressed the Holocaust and explained why it deserves to be included in
the academic curriculum of colleges and universities here and elsewhere,
which was, for Wikipedia, an unpardonable sin. As we should expect from
a Zionist disinformation operation, politics of necessity trumps truth. Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer and
McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, is a
noted philosopher of science and a leading conspiracy theorist.
Strange, Inconceivable Fire: Leviticus And Holocaust Remembrance Day
Posted:
Updated:
There
are times when the weekly Torah portion dovetails neatly with
contemporary life. There are other weeks when writing a reflection
requires digging deep into the wells of creativity to find a resonant
connection. And then there are the weeks when it is uncomfortably
jarring to read the Torah portion in the context of a particular moment
in our lives. For me, this is one of those weeks.
The Torah portion of Shemini (Leviticus 9:1-11:47)
begins by instructing the priests -- Aaron and his sons -- on how to
carry out animal sacrifices, specifically sin offerings and burnt
offerings. The concept of sacrifices, not to mention the bloody details,
is strange enough to our modern ears. But this week, as we prepare to
commemorate Yom Ha'Shoah,
Holocaust Remembrance Day, on Thursday, it is almost sickening to read
how "the flesh and the skin were consumed in fire" (Leviticus 9:11), and
even more so to consider these words and acts something God would
command.
Furthermore, in a linguistic application whose theological implications make me shudder, the word "holocaust" is derived from the Greek word for the Temple sacrifices, suggesting that the victims of the Nazis were burnt offerings to God.
The
instructional narrative of this Torah portion is then interrupted by a
disturbing story in which two of Aaron's sons, the young priests Nadav
and Avihu, offer what the text calls esh zarah, usually
translated as "strange fire" -- an offering not requested by God -- and
are in turn themselves consumed by God's fire (Leviticus 10:1-2). In the
aftermath of this tragedy, Moses warns Aaron and his two remaining sons
to refrain from the outward signs of mourning, but reassures them that
the rest of the community will mourn their kinsmen.
Though the
story serves an obvious purpose in underscoring the tremendous power of
the priests and the need for them to be precise in fulfilling their
ritual duties, much is left unanswered. Were Nadav and Avihu righteous
men but inexperienced priests who made one fatal mistake, or were they
deviating from the priestly playbook in arrogance? Were they drunk, or
were they so holy that they ascended to God in fiery ecstasy? Are we to
mourn them, condemn them for their actions, or hold them in awe for
their direct encounter with God? Generations of rabbinic commentators
have argued these and other possibilities.
Rereading the story
this year, two elements struck me. First, the mourning prohibition Moses
requires of Aaron and his sons. How could Moses ask his brother and
nephews to forego these mourning rituals? I picture this family holed up
in the Mishkan, the portable Temple of the desert, afraid to
move for fear of breaking down or of eliciting more dangerous fire, but
filled to overflowing with rending grief. The text does not detail the
mourning of the community beyond saying that they will cry (Leviticus
10:6), but I cannot imagine that even the loudest communal wailing could
give appropriate voice to the personal grief of Aaron and his family.
In
light of Yom Ha'Shoah, this scene reminds me of the history of
uncertainty and discomfort around how to mourn publicly for the victims
of the Nazis. Note, for example, that the original Israeli proposal for a
commemoration pegged it to the anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising,
which began on April 19, 1943. It is, often, easier to speak of and
mourn for those who resisted than those who seemingly did not.
Ultimately, the Israeli date for Yom Ha'Shoah is determined in relationship to their Memorial Day
and Independence Day, thereby rooting the political origin story of the
State of Israel and its ongoing military struggles in the story of the
Holocaust. Public mourning always has its context and its purposes,
which may or may not relate to the personal needs of mourners.
I
am also struck by the power of personal stories and of naming. The story
of Nadav and Avihu is haunting not only because it is dramatic and
unresolved, but also because the two victims are named and are the sons
of Aaron and the nephews of Moses and Miriam, all characters we've come
to know well by this point in the biblical narrative. How, I wonder,
might we read this episode differently if the two young men consumed by
fire were unnamed, of unknown lineage?
Of course, mourning for
millions of lost lives is necessarily different than for two. Part of
the challenge of Yom Ha'Shoah is the inconceivable vastness of the
tragedy, which can be simultaneously overwhelming and distancing. How
can one wrap one's mind around a number like 6 million? And how can one
relate to the loss of each individual life, especially if one does not
have a specific relative or story in mind?
In college, I participated each year in a communal exercise to grapple with both the hugeness of the Shoah
and its individual impact. Each year on Yom Ha'Shoah, we organized
volunteers to read the names of the victims, in the middle of campus,
for 24 consecutive hours. During my sophomore year, I took the 3 a.m.
shift, and stood in front of the library in the dark, chilly April
night, reading names into the quiet emptiness. In the midst of this
rhythm, I stopped suddenly, my stomach sinking, my breath catching. For
there it was: my own name.
I have no idea who that Judith
Rosenbaum was, where she was from, or how old she was when she died.
Perhaps she was a relative, perhaps not. But I do know that reading her
-- our -- name changed me. It brought me into the story in a new way.
Maybe
that is the role of Nadav and Avihu, too. We never learn what really
happened, just as I won't know the story of this other Judith Rosenbaum.
But the possibilities left open by the absences in the biblical
narrative make room for us to identify with them, or with Aaron and his
family. And suddenly, in the midst of the litany of laws of priestly
sacrifices, we might find ourselves confronted by a consuming fire.
ON Scripture -- The Torah is a weekly Jewish scriptural commentary, produced in collaboration with Odyssey Networks and Hebrew College.
Thought leaders from the United States and beyond offer their insights
into the weekly Torah portion and contemporary social, political, and
spiritual life.
By Theodore Shoebat
From suing Christian businesses, now the sodomites are trying to sue
the Bible itself! A homosexual deviant is suing a Christian publishers
70 million dollars because the Bible they published has verses against
homosexuals. According to the report:
Bradley LaShawn Fowler, an ex-con turned author, filed
the federal suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan on Monday, the same day a judge refused to appoint him a lawyer
for his suit against Thomas Nelson, The Grand Rapids Press reported.
“The Court has some very genuine concerns about the nature and efficacy of these claims,” the judge wrote.
Fowler, who is representing himself in both cases, claims that
Zondervan manipulated Scripture by using the term “homosexuals” in 1
Corinthians 6:9 of their 1982 and 1987 revised edition Bibles. He also
contends that the reference to homosexuality were deleted by the
publisher in later versions without informing the public.
He alleges that since the older Kings James Version containing the
term “homosexuals” is used by his family pastor, he has been outcast by
his family.
The 39-year-old is suing the Grand Rapids publisher for compensation
of 20 years of “emotional duress and mental instability,” he told
WOOD-TV in Grand Rapids.
In a hand-written suit, Fowler lists all sorts of charges against
Zondervan including malicious negligence, strict liability, malice,
libel, and violating his civil rights. He filed a suit in June against
Tennessee-based publisher Thomas Nelson on similar grounds. He’s seeking
$60 million from Zondervan and $10 million from Thomas Nelson
Publishing.
Zondervan issued a statement to The Christian Post that said they do
not discuss ongoing litigation. The company’s spokesperson Tara Powers,
however, pointed out that they only publish Bibles, not translate them.
“Since Zondervan does not translate the Bible or own the copyright
for any of the translations we publish, we are not in a position to
comment on the merits of how a word should or should not be translated,”
said Powers.
“We rely on the scholarly judgment of the highly respected and
credible translation committees behind each translation and never alter
the text of the translations we are licensed to publish. We only publish
credible translations produced by credible biblical scholars,” she
noted.
According to Fowler, Zondervan has 20 days to respond to the claims listed.
The reprobates always argue that me telling the pro-gay bakeries to
make me a cake that says, “Gay marriage is wrong,” is inadequate because
the message is hateful, whereas a “gay wedding” cake is something that
is positive and not hateful to anything. This is what they argue. But
what nobody is saying, is that a “gay wedding” cake is hateful, it is
hateful against Christianity. It is a declaration of war against
Christianity itself. This is why the sodomites will attack the Bible
itself, because the war is against Christianity.
We have to prepare our minds and intellect for this spiritual war
that we are in. This is why I made a 2-disk DVD series on teaching the
warring spirit of the Christian Faith.
UPDATE: While the story is true, we were informed that the story is
from 2008, which does not undermine the truth that the homosexual agenda
is about a war against the Bible
I
am a nobody compared to those highly qualified Ph.D.s. and Truth
Jihaadists, but I still want my voice out (whether it is heard or not
is not my immediate concern) even as an amateur, but I am very well
aware that I am a quite knowledgeable lifelong researcher (to some
extent) in matters of Truth Jihaad which I have been waging since my
teens (well over half a century now) against all Muslim, Arab and
Islam haters, and against even the so-called Muslims, including my
own decadent blood family. But, let me see what those two Truth
Jihaadist Brothers of the Faith have to offer us although my "faith"
may not be comparable to theirs. With his "ten different
structural engineering licenses", I am curious to see what Truth
that great Ph.D. Ibrahim Soudy has to offer to the world, and to
Muslims, and as possible solutions to the problems of humanity in
general, and in particular to the decadent Ummah of Muhammad.
First,
decades ago, I did not need a Ph.D. to have understood and to suggest
that there was an "urgent need for intra-Muslim dialogue aimed
at finding a basis for unity", but more than 20 years later, I
found out to my horror that despite intra-Muslim dialogue at many
levels the division among Muslims grew worse for many reasons, mainly
political and materialistic, which caused the spiritual impotency of
the well educated (mostly westernised) Middle Class Muslims.
I
was unable to see the point of Pr Ibrahim Soudy when he said
"So, let's refrain from using words like "terrorists",
during this broadcast, and when talking about "Al Shabaab, ISIS,
Boko Haraam and Al Qaeda". But, his point was clear to me when
he speaks of Muslim reactionaries instead of creativity, but I
disagree with him when he speaks of Muslims being "inactive
politically in America". First, I do not like that term
"America". I prefer the word US America.
Yes,
Islam has remained intact as a world view, thank God, but to what
purpose? The well documented fact is that the Christian and now
decadent Judeo-Christian West has been waging war against the entire
world for world domination and in particular against the Muslim
worlds (people) who always acted as opposition forces to their
ambition of global hegemony for material gains by mass murder and
plunder!
Yes,
Dr Kevin Barrett is right in stressing the closeness of Islam to
Christianity, and the necessity of Muslims to reach out to Non
Muslims as well as to all Muslims, but unfortunately as Pr Ibrahim
Soudy says Western Christianity is dying fast. This would have been
an appropriate moment to remind us about the great Jihaad of Sheikh
Imran Nazar Hosein in promoting Eastern Christianity and Islam
rapprochement and the role of French essayist and philosopher Alain
Soral in promoting Catholic and Islam rapprochement.
What
really shocked me however was the incredible statement made by Pr
Ibrahim about changing wrong "with your
hands peacefully"! Was is just a lapsus on his part
as he should know that this is an impossibility and exactly what the
tyrants want of their victims Muslims and non Muslims alike! They
call it "peaceful and non violent resistance" through
useless petitions, public demonstrations (State and Police controlled
picnics, and "democratic elections" meant only to guarantee
a status quo in their favour !
When
Pr Ibrahim Soudy recommends and suggests that Muslims must go out and
build locally and globally a dialogue with other Muslims (intra-Islam
dialogue), is he suggesting that this is something new? Why did he
not mention what has already been attempted by so many others before
and with what results? Is he also saying that we must "create"
International Conference as if this has never happened before even if
I am in agreement with that old idea?
At
long last, at 56:50 of the interview I hear the Professor mention in
his concluding remarks the word "Shura", but strangely
enough he did not seem to be aware that decades ago there was already
a very serious attempt at this kind of Shura trying to unite Sunnis,
Shia's. and all Muslims worldwide including even the Black racist or
racialist "Nation of Islam" under the Majlis al Shura fi
Britaniya name by the media as the Muslim Parliament of Great
Britain. I 'heard' or read somewhere only after the death of Dr
Kalim Siddiqui in South Africa that is was funded by Iran! But, his
successor Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui betrayed its ideals and sold out to
the British government and went out to found with another traitor Dr
Shaaz Mahboob the "British Muslims for Secular Democracy"
(BMSD) with a view to please their British and Jewish masters and
join their Kufr system of government. Years later, when I saw a lady
promoting the BMSD on my facebook page "Ghyslaine ROC", I
responded straight away denouncing it in just a few lines of
commentary, but this was sufficient for facebook to block my account
(to this very day!) which I held for several years since the
introduction of Jewish Mark Zuckberg (Mark?) social media monopoly.
This was more evidence to me how bogus was the BMSD. I denounced
years ago many such bogus so-called Muslim Movements here in London,
like the post Dr Kalim Siddiqui's "Muslim Parliament" led
by that traitor Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui!
GHYSLAINE ROC'S REPLY TO MARK ZUCKERBERG & CO FOR STEALING HER
PRIVATE PROPERTY ON FACEBOOK (ZIOBOOK)
A
message to the ZioNazi’s at ZioBook. This
is for all the good people posting the truth and getting their
accounts deleted, for that Ziobook,
go f... yourself.
For all the ZioTrolls coddled and sheltered in their Ziobook
home, how
about, go f... yourself.
A person should use Ziobook only as required, then treat it
like the soiled condom of the most obnoxious guest imaginable. TJP
(Kenneth O'Keefe Truth Justice Peace)
I
think if Pr Ibrahim Soudy were to be more credible, he should not
ignore the Jihaad of others in their effort and dedication to unite
the Ummah of Muhammad. He did not even mention the efforts of Dr
Kevin Barrett to bring Jews, Christians and Muslims together. In
conclusion, I have serious doubts about his entire truthfulness
because of his damning statement about "peaceful"
resistance to evil (wrong, tyranny, oppression, etc.), which is not
at all logical or even Islamic!
How
long will Muslims let themselves be hoodwinked,
Dr Kalim
Siddiqui (RA) Former Director of The Muslim Institute
Dr Kalim Siddiqui former leader of Majlis al-Shura fi
Britanya (Muslim Parliament)
INTRODUCTION
This manifesto is the outcome of a process of consultation, writing and
revision over several months. It is now being offered for wider debate in the
Muslim community. We hope that a number of regional consultation conferences
will be held all over the country in the next few months. To set that process
of consultation in motion, the Muslim Institute has arranged a one-day
conference on “The
Future of Muslims in Britain”. This conference will be held in the
Logan Hall, the Institute of Education,
20 Bedford Way, London WC1, on 14 July
1990. (Dr) Kalim Siddiqui
Director of The Muslim Institute
6 Endsleigh Street
London WC1H 0DS CONTENTS
Page No The Historical Situation 1 Assumptions 2 The Founders’ Council 3 The Council of British Muslims 4 The General Assembly of Muslims in Britain 5 The Council of Muslim Women in Britain 6 The Congress of Muslim Youth and
Students in Britain 7 Relationship with the British
authorities 8 Goals of the Muslim community in Britain 9 General guidelines for the life of
the Muslim individual in Britain 11 A strategy for survival 13 History – the British obsession 14 History – the Muslim response 15 What is survival? 16 Mosques in Britain 17 Ulama in Britain 18 Role of trustees of mosques 19 The Muslim Agenda 20 The Satanic Verses 21; Islam in Britain 23; Da’wah 24; Existing Muslim or Islamic
organisations 25; Education 26; Muslim Personal Law 27; The Muslim
Law Commission 28; Financing higher education 29; Muslim
Weekend Colleges 30; The Islamic University 31; The Muslim
Ummah Fund 42.
Glossary 33
- 1 - THE HISTORICAL SITUATION
It is a matter of deep regret that the Government, all political parties and
the mass media in Britain
are now engaged in a relentless campaign to reduce Muslim citizens of this
country to the status of a disparaged and oppressed minority. We have no
alternative but to resist this invidious campaign. To do so Muslims in Britain
must define their collective goals and move towards a consensus on major
issues. The established network of 1,000 mosques and a wide range of
organisations already serving the community must develop greater cohesion and
dynamism. This manifesto attempts to provide a common text defining the Muslim
situation in Britain.
It also seeks to provide a framework for the healthy growth of all parts of the
community as well as a common Muslim identity and purpose. Maxim: Muslims will
resist and fight all forms of oppression.
- 2 - ASSUMPTIONS
Of all the major religions of the world, Islam is the most “politicised”. At
its inception Islam created a political platform from which Muslims were to
launch themselves on a global role as founders of great States, empires and a
world civilisation and culture. Political and cultural subservience goes
against their grain. Yet in Britain
today Muslims are being asked to accept subservience and the total
disintegration of their identity, culture and religion, as the only real
options open to them. This manifesto is based on the following assumptions:
1. that Muslims in Britain
have to accept neither subservience as their inevitable and permanent condition
nor the disintegration of their identity, culture and religion;
2. that, despite being a minority, Muslims here can define and pursue goals
compatible with the goals of the global Ummah, the world community of Muslims,
of which they are an integral part;
3. that Muslims in Britain
need to create institutions and mobilise resources in pursuit of these goals;
4. that for Muslims this is also the only way to secure an honourable place
in the wider British society;
5. that the option of “integration” and/or “assimilation” that is on offer
as official policy in Britain
must be firmly resisted and rejected. Maxim: Muslims must develop
their own identity and culture within Britain and as part of a
global Muslim community, the Ummah.
- 3 - THE FOUNDERS’ COUNCIL
It is proposed that a Founders’ Council is created to adopt and launch this
manifesto. The composition of the Founders’ Council will be announced in due
course.
- 4 - THE COUNCIL OF BRITISH MUSLIMS
(CBM)
Muslims in Britain
need a platform to debate issues vital to them as citizens of this country.
They also need a platform where all shades of opinion can be freely expressed.
Above all, Muslims need a body that can speak with authority on their behalf. A
process of debate and deliberation to guide Muslim opinion towards a consensus
requires a “house of representatives”. However, the mechanism for achieving an
“elected” house does not at present exist. Community-wide institutionalisation
and organisation will have to reach a very advanced stage before an “electoral”
process can be introduced. It is possible for a carefully selected, balanced
and “invited” house to be “representative of the Muslim community in Britain.
This is the only practical option open to us at present. This body will be
known as The Council of British Muslims (CBM). It will act as a “Muslim
parliament” in Britain.
Maxim: Consultation and consensus is our method.
- 5 - THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MUSLIMS
IN BRITAIN
Once The Council of British Muslims has been set up, steps will be taken to
create a General Assembly of Muslims in Britain.
The General Assembly may consist of up to 500 members. The membership of the
General Assembly will be by invitation. It will consist of individuals and
representatives of organisations, including those catering for the specialised
needs of women, youth, students, businessmen, professionals and academics, etc.
The General Assembly will be so constituted as to reflect the full spectrum of
Muslim life in Britain.
Every effort will be made to invite a large number of women to be members of
the General Assembly. The General Assembly will meet once a year.
- 6 - THE COUNCIL OF MUSLIM WOMEN IN BRITAIN
Muslim women have to play a crucial part in securing the future of Muslims in Britain.
Muslim women in Britain
are going into higher education and their numbers in the professions are
rapidly expanding. But, ironically, women are more oppressed and exploited in
the allegedly sexually “liberated” and “emancipated” west today than was the
case in the traditional Islamic, or even non- Islamic, societies of Asia
and Africa. Western-style “liberation” and
“emancipation” does not meet the needs of Muslim women living in Britain.
A sea-change in the lifestyle and social role of Muslim women in inevitable and
desirable. It is for Muslim women themselves to develop an Islamic lifestyle in
the context of the needs of the Muslim community in Britain.
It is also for Muslim women to play a major part in the public life of the
Muslim community in Britain.
The position of women has long been the target of a vicious hate campaign
directed against Islam itself. The west’s jaundiced view of women in Islam has
gained strength by the attempt of women from some westernised Muslim families
to feign a bogus “liberated” lifestyle. The fact is that a Muslim woman cannot
be a western woman. Neither is the social role or lifestyle of Muslim women
merely a question relating to modes of dress and hijab. The position of women
in a Muslim community goes deeper than hijab, education, career, right to work,
property, divorce, etc. Muslim women in Britain
are in a unique position to develop a comprehensive lifestyle all their own in
which they can develop their talents and achieve their ambitions to the full,
always guided by Islam. However, this will only happen if Muslim women have a
platform of their own. We propose the setting up of The Council of Muslim Women
in Britain (CMWB). Maxim: Muslim women have a higher and nobler place in
society than the so-called “emancipated” women have in the west.
- 7 - THE CONGRESS OF MUSLIM YOUTH
AND STUDENTS IN BRITAIN
The public commitment of the Muslim youth in Britain
to Islam and their Muslim culture and identity has been a major revelation of
The Satanic Verses affair. There is clearly no “generation gap” between the
first generation Muslim immigrants and their children born and brought up in Britain.
What is more, our youth is largely uncontaminated by the culture of alcoholism,
drugs, sexual promiscuity and other forms of delinquency that is rampant among
the youth of mainstream British society. Studies have shown that Muslim
children are among those groups who have performed way above average in schools,
colleges and universities. The young Muslims, men and women, must be well
represented in all the new and old Muslim institutions and organisations.
“Islamic societies” have long been established in British universities,
polytechnics and colleges of higher and further education. However, so far
their activities have been limited to arranging Friday prayers and mixing a
little Islamic culture with their secular education. Few Islamic societies have
ever attempted to improve their members’ understanding of the Islamic
philosophy of science or the wider questions of epistemology. Education for the
sake of a secular career and lifestyle has remained unaffected by the existence
of Islamic societies. We must now develop a specialised body to help the Muslim
youth and students to fashion a lifestyle committed to the attainment of the
wider and long-term goals of Islam and the Muslim community in Britain.
To achieve this goal and to provide youth and students a platform for the
growth and development of their own potential, steps will be taken to set up a
Congress of Muslim Youth and Students in Britain.
Maxim: Muslim youth must participate fully in shaping the future of Muslims in Britain.
- 8 - RELATIONSHIP WITH THE BRITISH
AUTHORITIES
1. Islam allows Muslims to accept protection of life, property, and liberty
from non-Muslim rulers and their political systems. Muslims placed in this
situation may also pay taxes and other dues to a non-Muslim State ...
2. Muslims living under the protection of a non-Muslim State must obey the
laws of that State, so long as such obedience does not conflict with their
commitment to Islam and the Ummah. Other minorities in Britain,
notably Jews and Roman Catholics, do the same.
3. There are laws on the British Statute Book that are in direct conflict
with the laws of Allah; these relate to such matters as usury, abortion,
homosexuality, gambling, sale and consumption of alcohol, and the abolition of
capital punishment; Muslims can neither agree with nor condone any part of a
legal and social agenda which so flagrantly violates the laws of nature as well
as of God.
4. Muslims will co-operate with the appropriate authorities for the
maintenance of law and order and the promotion of peaceful and wholesome
conditions for all our fellow citizens ...
5. Muslims will insist, and continue to insist for as long as it may be
necessary, that the British State
provide them, their religion and culture protection from gratuitous insult,
obscenity and abuse ...
6. Muslims make it clear to the State, and all sections of British society,
that they do not expect to be and will not tolerate being insulted and abused
on grounds of their religion, culture and traditions.
Maxim: We are Muslims first and
last.
- 9 - GOALS OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY
IN BRITAIN
1. To perform the Qur’anic requirement of “enjoining right conduct and
forbidding indecency”.1
2. To consolidate the Muslim population in Britain
into an organised community in pursuit of the goals set by Islam ...
3. To achieve the highest possible level of collective taqwa and all-round
moral and material excellence ...
4. To develop the Muslim community as an island of peace, harmony and moral
excellence, free of promiscuity, sexually transmitted diseases, drinking,
gambling, drug-addiction, fornication and the related social and moral
disorders which plague our age ...
5. To create and develop institutions capable of serving the Muslim
community in such specialised fields as education, health, research,
publishing, the arts, trade and investment ...
6. To develop and microcosm of unity in the Ummah across the cultural,
ethnic and theological diversity that is found in the Muslim community in Britain
...
7. To create, where such do not already exist, specialised bodies for
Muslims in the major professions, e.g., medicine, engineering, law,
accountancy, teaching, etc ...
8. To secure for Muslim men and women at work or children in schools the
right to worship, the right to halal food and the right to dress in the proper
Islamic manner ...
9. To develop community and family based support for the less fortunate –
widows, orphans, old, sick, infirm, disabled and the unemployed ...
Maxim: Muslims will pursue
moral excellence under all circumstances.
1 Al-Qur’an, Luqman: 17.
- 10 - GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE LIFE
OF THE MUSLIM INDIVIDUAL IN BRITAIN
1. Every Muslim, man or woman, must practice Islam in all its dimensions in
order to achieve the greatest possible degree of taqwa in his/her private,
personal, family, social and professional life ...
2. Every Muslim must pursue excellence in all departments of life,
especially in the acquisition of all-round knowledge ...
3. Every Muslim must ensure that his/her and his/her family’s private and
public life be committed to the pursuit of Allah’s good pleasure alone ...
4. Every Muslim must ensure that his/her lifestyle does not absorb the moral
laxity prevalent in the secular culture of modern Britain
today ...
5. Every Muslim must live within the Statute Laws of the United
Kingdom ...
6. Every Muslim should seek to develop an identity in terms of the goals of
Islam and participate in the struggle of the global Islamic movement toward
these goals ...
7. Jihad is a basic requirement of Islam and living in Britain or having
British nationality by birth or naturalisation does not absolve the Muslim from
his or her duty to participate in jihad: this participation can be active
service in armed struggle abroad and/or the provision of material and moral
support to those engaged in such struggle anywhere in the world ...1
8. Every Muslim must contribute a regular proportion of his or her income to
the Islamic movement instead of the habit of giving small or insignificant
amounts only when faced with a “collection box” ...2
9. Every Muslim must pursue his or her personal goals within the framework
of the Muslim community in Britain,
of the Ummah, and of the global Islamic movement ...
Recent events have made it clear that Muslims in Britain,
indeed throughout Europe and North America,
will have to make a conscious effort if they are to survive. The time-honoured
assumption that the generally liberal, open and tolerant ethos of the west
would guarantee the survival of Islam and Muslims is a thesis no longer
tenable. Muslims are faced with a vicious assault on their identity. Recent
statements by leading figures in British Government and public life have made
it clear that they expect, demand and will not be satisfied with anything less
than our total “assimilation”. Essentially their attitude towards Islam has not
changed since the Crusades; their strategy remains the same, only their tactics
have changed. Muslims living in the west have to adjust to an environment that
is far more hostile than had been assumed.
Muslim communities in the west now need a comprehensive strategy for
survival. The Council of British Muslims will debate and develop a
comprehensive STRATEGY FOR SURVIVAL as a matter of urgency, made more, not
less, urgent by every day that passes.
Maxim: Survive we must, live we
may.
- 12 - HISTORY – THE BRITISH OBSESSION
The history that is immediately relevant to the Muslim situation in Britain
relates largely to British colonialism. The British colonial mind is the
immediate source of their fear of Muslims. Muslims in Britain
are viewed as “ex-colonials” who have received the additional favour of having
been allowed to settle in mainland Britain.
Britain as a
colonial power, having “civilised” its possessions and then “granted” them
freedom, now feels entitled to expect the ex-colonials to become British like
the British. Any assertion of the superiority of Islam or Islamic culture or
civilisation on British soil is not to be tolerated. The British
State sees it as its duty to
achieve total assimilation. Moreover, as the controversy over The Satanic
Verses has revealed, the British also want Muslims to accept their view of all
religions, including Islam. That is that all religious beliefs are a throwback
to the Dark Ages of ignorance and superstition and therefore unacceptable in
this day and age of reason, science and technology. Those who want to retain
religious convictions must exercise them in the sphere of private conscience.
No religion, least of all Islam, can be allowed a place in public affairs, even
those affairs that affect Muslims themselves. Public policy cannot therefore
take into account Islam or the Islamic sensibilities of Muslims. It is for
Muslims to “grow up” and join the mainstream of western civilisation.
Maxim: British view of Islam
and Muslims is rooted in colonial history.
- 13 - HISTORY – THE MUSLIM RESPONSE
The relevant Muslim response to the British view of Islam and Muslims is more
complex but also determined in large part by the colonial experience. Among us
there is the truly “ex-colonial” fringe that accepts the British view of Islam
and Muslims and is offended by what it calls the Islam of the mullahs and the “ignorant”
masses. This is the “modernist” position. They pay lip-service to Islam but are
embarrassed by such strong assertion of our faith as has been visible in the
Muslim campaign against The Satanic Verses. In today’s Britain
these modernist, apologetic Muslims want to keep “politics” out of mosques and
maintain a submissive posture towards the British government. In their role as
a colonial power the British used the modernists to deflect and abort Muslim
opposition to their rule; they promoted an emasculated form of Islam from which
the component of jihad was subtracted. They are now attempting to do the same
in dealing with Muslims living in Britain.
The same language (“moderates”) is used to describe these individuals and the
regimes that promote and support them. But the Muslim masses living in Britain
today have seen through the game. The British design to destroy Islam and
assimilate Muslims, in partnership with the modernist “Islamic lobby”, has been
exposed by The Satanic Verses affair. Their plan to deflect and render
ineffectual Muslim anger over The Satanic Verses was defeated by Imam
Khomeini’s fatwa on February 14, 1989.
Even before the fatwa, ulama in Britain
had played a major role in mobilising opinion against The Satanic Verses. It
was this initial awakening created by the ulama in Britain
that made the total endorsement of that fatwa by the Muslim masses in Britain
possible. The Satanic Verses affair has also exposed the insincerity of most
Muslim governments, including the Saudi regime, towards issues that are vital
for the defence of Islam and the honour of the Prophet of Islam, upon whom be
peace. The new historical situation demands a new and comprehensive Strategy
for Survival. Maxim: Muslims will not surrender to cultural blackmail.
WHAT IS SURVIVAL?
Survival does not mean physical “safety”, or a set of guarantees in such
matters as “equal opportunities”, or the verbiage put out by the Race Relations
industry, as Islam does not fit into any of their neat categories. Equally,
British law does not, and cannot be expected to, provide an adequate framework
for our survival. Recent events should leave no one in any doubt that the
British Government is prepared to use the law against us as an instrument of
oppression. The only survival kit that will work is the one that is entirely
community based and integrated with a global Islamic movement that protects us
in the way France
or Russia once
claimed to be the “protectors” of Christian communities in the Middle
East. The shield of Islam is our only protection under all
circumstances. Survival within Islam is the only form of survival that has any
meaning. If we protect Islam, Islam will protect us. If we weaken our links
with Islam we shall be swallowed up. Maxim: Only Islam can protect Muslims.
- 14 - MOSQUES IN BRITAIN
The creation of a network of about 1,000 mosques in Britain
is one of the great achievements of the first generation of Muslim migrants to
this country. In financial terms (at 1990 values), these mosques represent an
investment of perhaps as much as £200 million. These mosques have to be
developed into major foci of Muslim community life. The part played by the
mosques in The Satanic Verses affair has shown that at times of crises Muslims
turn to the mosque for guidance. However, so far the full potential of these
mosques has not been realised. Among the first steps we should take is to put
the khateebs and imams of mosques on financial terms compatible with their
status and role in society. As a first step their salaries should be raised to
£20,000 per annum. The management of the mosques should also begin to attract
the attention and talents of Muslims born and educated in Britain.
The mosques should begin to develop in the role of problem-solving resource
centres. The ulama should cease to be mere employees. They should be offered
membership of restructured committee structures. A new partnership will have to
develop between the original founders and trustees, the ulama, and the younger
generation of Muslims. New committees should begin to emerge in all mosques to
chalk out a new and dynamic role for mosques in Britain.
Maxim: Mosques are the primary
institutions of Islam.
- 15 - ULAMA IN BRITAIN
The ulama will always remain one of our major resources and a pool for
leadership and knowledge. In a society where the bulk of available education is
likely to be secular, the role of ulama as teachers, guides and leaders will be
of paramount importance. The Satanic Verses affair has shown the leadership
potential of the ulama, but the ulama will have to develop a wider range of
capabilities over the whole range of social and political issues that confront
the Muslims in Britain.
This should include a better command of the English language and an
understanding of the social, political and administrative systems and
procedures of Government. Some of these roles can be undertaken with the help
of Muslims who are doctors, civil servants, solicitors, policemen, probation
officers, etc. Similarly, the ulama should begin to use their weekly wa’z
(speech preceding khutba on Fridays) to inform the community of major changes
that may be taking place, either in Britain or in the world of Islam as a
whole. Every mosque should become part of the Islamic movement in its widest
sense.
Maxim: Ulama must come forward
in leadership roles.
- 16 - ROLE OF TRUSTEES OF MOSQUES
The founders of mosques and their trustees have performed a great service to
the Muslims in Britain.
Without their commitment and sacrifice we would not have the network of mosques
that we have today. For their sacrifice and service the founders and trustees
of mosques have secured them an honourable place in our society, for which they
will be generously rewarded in the Hereafter, insha’Allah.
The founders and trustees of mosques must, however, realise that the role of
the mosques must evolve to keep pace with changes in the Muslim society.
Already more than half the Muslim population in Britain
consists of people born here. The trustees largely belong to a generation from
a different background. It is high time for trustees to start to bring in the
younger generation as partners in the management of the mosques. The first step
may be the creation or appointment of “management committees” comprising
members of the younger generation. The mosques ought to begin to change in
directions desired by the new generation, guided and advised by their elders.
Unless this transition be conscientiously undertaken and sensitively managed,
our mosques run the risk of becoming obsolete monuments to the religious
practices of first-generation migrants. Were this to take place, our children
and grandchildren would sell the mosques to the highest bidders in much the
same way as lapsed Christians have sold their churches to us. The disused churches
were fortunate to become mosques; the disused mosques of the future may be less
fortunate.
The founders and trustees of mosques labour under a greater obligation to
future generations than to the first generation of migrants. The mosques were
built to secure the future of our children, not to stand as monuments to our
past piety.
Maxim: Trustees of mosques must
seek partnership with the younger generation brought up inBritain.
- 17 - THE MUSLIM AGENDA
In this section an attempt has been made to identify key areas that will occupy
Muslim attention in the immediate future.
- 18 - 1. The Satanic Verses
This is a major conflict with implications for most aspects of our future in Britain;
it also encapsulates the whole range of issues that are likely to dominate
Islam’s relations with the west for a long time to come. The British Government
refuses to acknowledge the validity of the Muslim position. In this conflict
rational argument has come up against a blank wall of colonial and cultural presuppositions.
The only alternative is for Muslims to extend their agitation to a point where
the social, political and economic cost of keeping The Satanic Verses in
circulation becomes prohibitive. At some stage we may have to engage in a
campaign of civil disobedience1 in Britain.
The Satanic Verses is not an ordinary “book”, it amounts to a declaration of
war on Islam and Muslims. The circumstantial evidence, e.g., the size of the
advance paid to the author, and the media and literary hype that accompanied
its publication, leaves us in no doubt that The Satanic Verses is the result of
a conspiracy. This means, above all, that Muslims have to fight a prolonged
campaign to defeat the designs of the conspirators and their supporters.
The obvious solution to The Satanic Verses affair is for this book to be
unconditionally withdrawn by the author and his publishers. We realise that
withdrawal cannot mean the recall of all copies. However, withdrawal must mean
(a) an undertaking that existing stocks in shops and warehouses will be pulped,
(b) no further editions will be published in any shape or form, (c) the book
will be removed from public libraries, and (d) anyone who wants to return his
copy will receive a full refund. In addition, the author and publishers will
pay an agreed sum to relieve the suffering of those, mainly in India,
Kashmir, Pakistan
and Bangladesh,
who have been bereaved, maimed or injured in protests against The Satanic
Verses. Muslims in Britain
will continue to pursue the author and publishers of The Satanic Verses until
this conflict is satisfactorily resolved. We are a law-abiding community
seeking a peaceful settlement of a dangerous conflict. Such conflicts, unless
peacefully settled, often lead to violence.
The Satanic Verses is not
acceptable now and will not become acceptable at any time in the future.
1 See Alan Ryan’s article, “The Right to Disobey”, in The Times, April 4, 1990,
and Tony Benn’s article, “When Principle is above the Law”, in The Guardian,
April 4, 1990. Both Alan Ryan and Tony Benn would of course deny that their
arguments can be used by Muslims. In our view we can and we must.
- 19 - 2. Islam in Britain
Muslims in Britain
need to undertake a close examination of what, if any, legal and/or
constitutional position could be secured for Islam in Britain,
bearing in mind that a number of European States have accorded Islam the status
of an “official religion”. This will include the question of laws against
blasphemy to protect all religions. We must note that the existing laws against
blasphemy have failed to prevent grossly obscene and sacrilegious attacks on
the person of Jesus Christ, upon whom be peace, so much so that influential
opinion within the Church of England, whose creed alone is protected, now supports
the abolition of blasphemy as a criminal offence. The penetration of the
secular creed into Anglican thought is a matter of deep regret. The operation
of existing laws against blasphemy shows that their extension to protect Islam
as well is unlikely to prevent the kind of attacks on religion that the
“liberal” lobby claims is its right. The Muslim community may have to define
“no go” areas where the exercise of “freedom of speech” against Islam will not
be tolerated. It is only by taking a firm position now that Muslims in Britain
may in the long term succeed in defining a common cause within a secular
society. The one thing we must not do is to surrender to the demands of
rampant, immoral secularism.
- 20 - 3. Da’wah
Performing da’wah, or inviting non-Muslims to accept Islam, is a basic duty of
all Muslims. Muslims have come to live in the west in large numbers at a time
when the western civilisation is beginning to develop disorders of the mind,
body and soul as a direct consequence of unmitigated secularism. In this
situation the role of da’wah is clear. However, the method of da’wah is often
and unnecessarily contentious among Muslims. There are those who take the
passive route, and there are those who believe in working through revolutionary
change, beginning with Muslim societies and countries. In Britain,
in the short-term, the great impact is likely to be achieved through the
example of moral and material excellence set by Muslim individuals and families
living in a post-Christian, largely pagan, society. The collective effort of
the Muslim community in Britain
to lead a muttaqi life in a corrupt environment is bound to play a major role
in da’wah. Similarly, the taqwa of Muslim youth, the modesty of Muslim women,
the stability of Muslim family life, the absence of drinks-, drugs- and
sex-related crimes and the overall discipline of Muslims living in the west
will itself send powerful signals to non-Muslims. But this will only happen if
we succeed in arresting the “integration” and “assimilation” of Muslims
themselves into the corrupt bogland of western culture and supposed
“civilisation”. The emergence of a distinctive Muslim presence, individual and
collective, is an essential first step towards effective da’wah.
- 21 - 4. Existing Muslim or Islamic
Organisations
These organisations have played important roles in the life of the Muslim
community. They will continue to exist and develop. It is anticipated that most
will accept the framework offered in this manifesto. They may indeed already be
pursuing at least some of the goals of the community identified here. The role
of the established organisations and the new structures and institutions that
may be created will be complementary and cooperative. We cannot imagine a
situation in which it may not be possible to find areas of mutual cooperation
with existing organisations.
- 22 - 5. Education
A great deal of very useful work is already being done in this field by a
number of groups and organisations. However, a common syllabus for the teaching
of Islam to Muslim children in Britain
is an urgent need of all of those engaged in education. A Muslim Education
Commission (MEC) will be set up to examine all the relevant issues such as
voluntary-aided schools, single sex education, provision of Muslim teachers as
religious instructors, collective acts of worship in schools, Islamic dress,
and alterations to the National Curriculum where it can be shown that the
content of that curriculum is inimical to Islam. The report and recommendations
of the MEC would then form the basis of negotiations with the Secretary of
State for Education and Science and the LEAs in England,
Wales, Scotland
and Northern Ireland.
- 23 - 6. Muslim Personal Law
The vexed question of the application of Muslim Personal Law in such matters as
marriage, divorce and inheritance needs a Law Commission comprising Muslim
jurists and lawyers to examine the situation and make recommendations. So far
all approaches to the British Government on this issue have been vague, ill formulated,
largely emotional and incompetent. In the past British courts have recognised
Muslim marriage, divorce and inheritance issues decided according to Muslim
Personal Law outside Britain.
This issue may well revolve around the creation of a Muslim legal framework to
decide cases that may then be recognised as valid in British Law.
- 24 - 7. The Muslim Law Commission
The Muslim community needs a standing commission to keep the legislative
programmes of Government and opposition parties constantly under review.
Similarly, the Commission would monitor cases decided in law courts that may
have implications for the Muslim community. The Commission could also submit
written proposals to Government and opposition parties on major proposals in
their legislative programmes. The Commission may also initiate debate in the
Muslim Consultative Council and the General Assembly of Muslims in Britain
in order to create informed public opinion on major legal issues.
- 25 - 8. Financing Higher Education
The financing of students in higher education in Britain
is moving towards greater parental contributions and student loans. This is an
area in which mosques are equipped to play a significant role. Most mosque
trusts have surplus funds lying idle in the banks. Some of these funds can be
used to set up loan (gard-i hasana) schemes for Muslim students in higher
education. A major advantage of such schemes will be the goodwill for Islam
that this will create among young Muslims during the most formative years of
their lives. This experience will give them a further incentive to strengthen
the institution of the mosque and to maintain their attachment to it.
- 26 - 9. Muslim Weekend Colleges
At present, only small children receive supplementary education in mosques in
the evenings and at weekends. There is a need for more advanced classes for
teenagers, youths and adults. A curriculum of courses on such subjects as the
Seerah1 of the Prophet (upon whom be peace), Tafsir2, Qir’at3, Hifz4, Islamic
history, Islamic civilisation and culture, Islamic art, the Islamic movement
and Muslim political thought, etc., can be offered at a network of Muslim
Weekend Colleges throughout the country. Wherever possible such colleges should
operate within mosques. Most mosques have large unused space; carefully
designed “folding” partitions can be erected to create smaller classrooms.
1 Life. 2 Exegeses of the Qur’an. 3 Recitation of the Qur’an. 4 Memorisation of the Qur’an.
- 27 - 10. The Islamic University
Prestigious institutions are symbols of the maturity and identity of a
community. Muslims, though only a minority in Britain,
belong to a global civilisation and culture. Moreover, the intellectual
tradition of Islam is a major part of our inheritance. We have a different worldview
to offer. We adhere to a different philosophy of life, philosophy of knowledge
and philosophy of science.
After the collapse of communism, the intellectual encounter of the future is
liable to be between the west and Islam. The obvious platform from which to
conduct our debate and make our contribution is the Islamic University.
However, the Islamic University we need must not be a cosmetic and hypocritical
creation of the Saudi regime; just another western university under the banner
of Islam. We suggest that the intellectual foundations laid by the pioneering
work of The Muslim Institute in London
over the last two decades could provide a solid foundation on which an
International Islamic University (IIU) could be erected. So far as possible,
the proposed Islamic University should be locally supported and financed. A
planning committee could start work on this long-term project almost
immediately.
- 28 - 11. The Muslim Ummah Fund
Experience tells us that financial freedom, indeed strength, must be an
essential part of our strategy. Already we know of instances where Muslims in
public service have either been reprimanded, dismissed or had other pressures
put on them. Some Muslim organisations in receipt of grants from public funds
have had them stopped. All this for expressing their views in The Satanic
Verses affair. We must mobilise resources and raise funds within the Muslim
community on a large scale. Substantial funds will be needed for the
implementation of the programme outlined in this manifesto. For example, such
proposals as the establishment of the Muslim Education Commission, the Muslim
Law Commission, a Loan Fund for Students in Higher Education, Muslim
Weekend Colleges,
and eventually the Islamic University, are all capital intensive. Each of the
commissions will require full-time research staff backed by secretarial and
office facilities. Members serving on the various commissions will have to be
reimbursed their travelling and other expenses. Some may also have to be paid
professional fees.
We propose to launch The Muslim Ummah Fund (MUF) with an eventual target of
about £5 million a year.
- 29 - GLOSSARY
da’wah: inviting non-Muslims to Islam. fatwa: a religious opinion or, if given by the head of an Islamic
state, decree. halal: permitted. hifz: memorisation of the Qur’an. hijab: modesty of women’s dress in public required by Islam. In
particular, the wearing of a headscarf. imam: lit. leader. One who leads prayers. Also used for the leader of
an Islamic state. insha’Allah: God willing. jihad: struggle (often armed) in the way of Allah. khateeb: one who gives the khutba, usually the imam. khutba: formal sermon before or after a congregational prayer. mullah: lit. master. Often used pejoratively for ulama. muttaqi: adjective from taqwa. gard-i hasana: lit. “beautiful loan”. A loan which is returnable at
the convenience of the borrower or not at all. qir’at: recitation of the Qur’an. Seerah: Life of the Prophet, upon whom be peace. tafsir: exegeses of the Qur’an. taqwa: moral excellence acceptable to Allah. Also fear of Allah,
piety. ulama: persons learned in the sciences of Islam (pl. of alim). Ummah: world body of Muslims. wa’z: general speech or lecture given before or after a formal sermon
at a prayer meeting. Dr Kalim Siddiqui - Director of The Muslim Institute
Dr Pr
Muhammad al-Massari and B.A.Frémaux-Soormally – Trafalgar Square
I have met with our Mujaahid Dr Kalim
Siddiqui (RA) many times as well as with many other courageous members
of the Majlis al
Shura fi Britaniya (Muslim
Parliament of Great Britain) like Pr Muhammad Al-Massari (exiled from occupied
Arabia), Imâm Muhammad Al-‘Asi (Washington) and Imâm Musa (USA), Brother Ahmed
Huber (Switzerland), Dr Yakub Zaki (James Dickie from Scotland) at the Muslim
Parliament Conferences and have been promoting their works (as well as those of
our wonderful Brother Minister Louis Farrakhan’s video conferences with minor
edits because of our unfortunate doctrinal differences) for some two decades,
but never found a single Muslim or Muslimah who was interested in them either
in France, Belgium, Switzerland, England or Mauritius.Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui (not a relative of Dr
Kalim) who replaced him as leader of the now defunct “Muslim Parliament”, has
turned traitor and with other traitors bows down to the British establishment
and he was co-founder with his acolyte Dr Shaaz Mahboob of the bogus “British
Muslims for Secular Democracy” (BMSD), another government front used to control
genuine grassroots Muslim activism.One
of the trustees of the BMSD is woman journalist and media commentator YasminAlibhai-Brown from the
very secretive and dangerous Sect of the Ismailis (Sect of the Assassins) with
other (most probably) infiltrators or British spies.
Our very beautiful Imâm Musa in front of the United States Capitol building
Must read book by Don Heddesheimer, The First Holocaust.
by Zander C. Fuerza (ZCF) aka Zion Crime Factory
Author Don Heddesheimer’s book, The First Holocaust: Jewish Fundraising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During and After World War One,
is an important piece of the revisionist puzzle. Heddesheimer cogently
documents the slew of previous attempts by Jews to disseminate deceitful
and untrue atrocity propaganda before, during and after World War I. The First Holocaust
features an amazing collection of press clippings and propaganda
articles dating back to the late 19th century that make claims of the
suffering and imminent extermination of European Jewry. Among such
articles we find that Jews have, dozens of times before WWII, invoked
the cabalisitc “6,000,000″ number as the amount of Jews on the verge of
death and destruction during various periods of turmoil and conflict in
Europe and Russia. Undoubtedly, this book exposes the deliberate
fraudulence of these sinister Zionist campaigns and media blitzes — long
before Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933 — designed to elicit
public sympathy and financial support for Jewish political ambitions,
principally the establishment of the State of Israel.
The obsessive invocation of the cabalistic fable of “6,000,000 dead or dying Jews”
dating back at least four decades prior to the events of WWII directly
undermines and betrays the notion that 6,000,000 Jews perished in Europe
between 1939-1945, as Jews have claimed. It was a lie the first time, and it is a lie today!
Young White children are taught to hate their own kind over something that never even happened!
The Gentile populations of the West have, for decades, been inundated
and inoculated with an endless onslaught of holocaust-themed Hollywood
movies, television shows, “docudramas”, books and memoirs; in
conjunction with mandatory “holocaust education” in schools
across North America and Europe. The primary function of this insidious
global propaganda campaign is to — quite simply — brainwash non-Jews
into a state of abject fear and paralysis while we are ideologically,
economically and physically enslaved by the Jewish tribe. It is also
designed to delegitimize all criticism of Jews and the State of Israel
and to ensnare non-Jews into adopting a pro-Jewish, pro-Zionist
worldview. With their hateful holocaust lies, Zionist myth-makers are
teaching masses of young school children to hate Germans, and European
mankind in general. These kids, not knowing any better and unable to
think for themselves, blindly believe these tall tales and never
question what they’ve been told when they become adults. The
indoctrination of our little ones with Zionist ‘holocaust’ fiction is
permanently damaging the minds of young people. Force-feeding young
children, as well as teenagers, distortions and outright falsehoods
about World War II so that they sympathize with Jewish people and
treacherous Jewish causes — such as Zionism and Communism — is immoral,
destructive, harmful and criminal. It must be stopped!
A question that you might ask is: “what is the significance of the ‘Six Million’ figure and where did it originate?”
The mythical “Six Million” figure has intriguing origins indeed. Jews
have staunchly emphasized the 6,000,000 figure in atrocity propaganda from the years 1890 through 1945.
World War II ended in 1945, and since that time the cabalistic
6,000,000 figure has now reached sacrosanct status. This was achieved
through a sleazy and deceptive campaign of repetitive HoloHoax
swindlespeak in the news and entertainment media, centered in Jewish Hollywood. As the Jewish-Communist mass murderer, Vladimir Lenin, once said: “a lie told often enough becomes the truth.”
This campaign of Jewish deceit has steadily intensified over the years.
When Jews sense an increase in awareness of their treachery and global
crimes against humanity amongst the Gentile public (a natural reaction
of which is resentment and hostility), the louder they begin to wail
about their invented holocaust in the octopus of media organs they
control. That’s why they are always gauging the pulse of public opinion.
World leaders, Presidents, Prime Ministers, ceremonial Kings and
Queens, Popes, Priests and Holy Men of all faiths, genuflect in
groveling reverence of the mythical “6,000,000 Jews” who didn’t perish in “Nazi gas chambers”, as such chambers did not exist and were impossible. (See:VHO, IHR, CODOH, WSMOT, Zundelsite, Nazi Gassings Never Happened)
Research shows that the reason for this bizarre Jewish fixation on the
number 6,000,000 primarily stems from an ancient religious prophecy in
the Torah. According to some sources, the prophecy envisioned that
before the Jewish people could reclaim and reconquer Palestine to
establish a Jewish homeland called “Israel”, 6,000,000 Jews would first
have to perish in a fiery burnt offering (i.e. “Holocaust”), as a
sacrifice to their bloodthirsty tribal deity, YHWH. (See:Weintraub, Ben. The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism: Keystone of the New World Order. Washington, D.C.: Cosmo Pub., 1995.) Jewish author, Benjamen Blech, confirmed this reality in his book “The Secrets of Hebrew Words” (J Aronson Inc., 1991, p. 241), stating,
“You
shall return minus 6,000,000″; Jewish scripture relates a prophecy that
6,000,000 Jews must vanish before they can reclaim Palestine as their
ancient ancestral homeland.
“The Hebrew word for ‘ye shall return’(TaShuVU), seems
to have been spelled incorrectly. Grammatically it requires another
(vav). It ought to read (TaShUVU). Why is it lacking the letter (vav)
which stands for six?. [TaShuVU] without the vav is a prediction to the
Jewish people of ultimate return to their national homeland. TaShuVU in
numbers adds up to 708: tav=400, shin=300, vei=2, vey=6. When we write
the year, we ignore the millennia. In 1948 on the secular calendar, we
witnessed the miracle of Jewish return to Israel. On the Hebrew calendar
it was the year 5708. That was the year predicted by the incomplete
word (TaShuVu), you shall return. We did return, lacking 6 – an all
important 6 million of our people who perished in the holocaust. Yet the
fulfillment of the prediction of return in precisely that year implied
by the gematria of TaShuVU gives us firm hope that the words of the
prophets for Final Redemption will come true as well.”
[Quote 1] Jewish prophecies in the Torah require that 6
million Jews must “vanish” before the state of Israel can be formed.
“You shall return minus 6 million.” That’s why Tom Segev, an Israeli
historian, declared that the “6 million” is an attempt to transform the
Holocaust story into state religion. Those six million, according to
prophecy, had to disappear in “burning ovens”, which the judicial
version of the Holocaust now authenticates. As a matter of fact, Robert
B. Goldmann writes: “. . . without the Holocaust, there would be no
Jewish State.” A simple consequence: Given six million Jews gassed at
Auschwitz who ended up in the “burning ovens” (the Greek word holocaust
means burned offerings), therefore, the prophecies have now been
“fulfilled” and Israel can become a “legitimate state”. –Unknown
[Quote 2] Regarding the ‘six million’ number you
should know the following: In the Hebrew text of the Torah prophesies,
one can read “you shall return”. In the text the letter “V” or “VAU” is
absent, as Hebrew does not have any numbers; the letter V stands for the
number 6. Ben Weintraub, a religious scientist, learned from rabbis
that the meaning of the missing letter means the number is ’6 million’.
The prophesy then reads: You will return, but with 6 million less. See
Ben Weintraub: “The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism”, Cosmo Publishing,
Washington 1995, page 3. The missing 6 million must be so before the
Jews can return to the Promised Land. Jahweh sees this as a cleaning of
the souls of the sinful people. The Jews must, on the return to the
Promised Land, be clean — the cleaning shall be done in burning stokes. —
A Correspondent
Is it just coincidental that the flimsy and farcical story of
“6,000,000 Jews” being murdered in “gas chambers” and burned up in
“ovens” in concentration camps during WWII gave the Jews the impetus and
PR ammunition they needed to make their “gallant return” to the
“promised land” at the war’s end — occupying and ethnically cleansing much of Palestine through terrorism and force of arms
— establishing a racist/apartheid “Jewish state” called “Israel” in
1948? And this all just happens to fit the previously cited ancient
Torah prophecy to the letter? I hardly think so!
Today, the holocaust™ tall tale has taken the form of a bizarre
cult-like State-enforced and protected religious dogma of the West (i.e.
Holocaustianity), as it is illegal to question, dispute or deny in over a dozen European countries,
under punishment of heavy fines and imprisonment! This farfetched
Zionist-trumpeted conspiracy theory is being utilized by Jewish
hucksters and scam artists as a money-making enterprise — a larcenous
con of near-planetary proportions which Jewish professor Norman
Finkelstein dubbed “The Holocaust Industry”. (The Holocaust Industry: Reflection on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. London: VERSO, 2000.)
On top of that, this myth has been wielded by Jewish zealots as an
ideological sledgehammer to club Gentiles over the head with any time
non-Jews dare criticize or oppose the global banditry and menacing
influence of the self-professed “Chosen People”.
Below are reproductions of many press clippings and articles
featuring the cabalistic 6,000,000 number, dating back to the year 1900.
Note the ceaseless references to “6,000,000 Jews”, the continuous
begging for money and land (Palestine), and the term “holocaust” used
well before the events of the 1940s. It is also noteworthy that the
authors of the vast majority of these propaganda articles were the
richest of Wall Street’s Jewish bankers as well as leaders of Zionist
pressure groups — Schiffs and Warburgs among them. (More examples can be
found here, here and here; credit also goes to this blogger for unearthing many of these article clippings). 1900- American Zionist leader, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, let slip the Zionist agenda behind the Holocaust Hoax: to promote public sympathy for Zionism (Jewish takeover of Palestine).
The Zionist pronouncement that kick-started the hoax of the twentieth century.
1902- Under its entry on “anti-Semitism”, the tenth edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica references “Six Million Jews” of Rumania and Russia being “systematically degraded.” 1905- A Jewish preacher declares that if the (Jewish-led) Communist
uprising in Russia succeeds in its long-time goal of overthrowing the
Tsarist government, Zionism would be obsolete. “6,000,000 Jews” is
mentioned.
The New York Times reports: “From 1890 to 1902 he caused 6,000,000 Jewish families to be expelled from Russia.” 1906- A Jewish publicist addresses an audience in Germany where he claimed that the Russian
Government had a “solution of the Jewish Question” and that this
solution entailed the “murderous extermination” of “6,000,000 Jews.” Of
course, the Russians never had any such plans but the fictional story
was resurrected during WWII with the Germans being on the receiving end
of these slanderous accusations this time around.
As
a side note: 1906 was the year after the first Jewish-led Communist
uprising in Russia had failed. This lame sob story was nothing more than
a ploy to distract public attention from the fact that the
Communist-led upheaval that took place in Russia a year earlier was the
handiwork of his fellow Jews who perpetrated widespread atrocities
against Russian patriots (anti-Communists).
1908- Donmeh Jews organize a coup d’etat in the Ottoman Empire and seize power from the Sultan. 1910- In the American Jewish Committee’s annual report it is claimed that
since 1890 Russia has had a policy to “expel or exterminate” Six Million
Jews. (Source: American Jewish Yearbook pg. 15) 1911- Max Nordau, co-founder of the World Zionist Organization
together with Theodore Herzl, made an astonishing pronouncement at the
tenth Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland. He claimed that 6,000,000 Jews would be annihilated. This was twenty-two years before Hitler came to power and three years before World War I started.
Quoted in Ben Hecht’s book, Perfidy. Hecht, a Zionist Jew himself, would go on to make the very same claim in 1943.
1915-
Jewish leader Louis Marshall proclaims: “In
the world today there are about 13,000,000 Jews, of whom more than
6,000,000 are in the heart of the war zone: Jews whose lives are at
stake and who today are subjected to every manner of suffering and
sorrow…”
The crypto-Jewish “Young Turks” orchestrate a mass murder of 1.5 million Armenian Christians, as well as 250,000 Greek and Assyrian Christians.
1917- Jewish lobbyists convince the British government to support the
Zionist project of making Palestine the national homeland for the Jews.
British official James Arthur Balfour decrees the “Balfour Declaration.” The letter is addressed to Zionist big-wig Lord Rothschild.
Britain becomes a deadly pawn of Zionism.
This very same year radical Jewish Marxists
take control of Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution establishing the
first Zionist state, the “Soviet Union.” Czar Nicholas II, along with
his wife and children, are kidnapped by Jews, then shot and bayoneted. The “revolution” was led by the Jews’ Leon Trotsky,
Lazar Kaganovich, Lev Kamanev, Grigory Zinoviev, Jacob Sverdlov, Moisei
Uritsky, Alexander Parvus, Karl Radek, and the philosemitic part-Jew
Vladimir Lenin, who all received financing
from capitalist Jewish international bankers: Jacob Schiff, Max Warburg
and ultimately the Rothschild’s. The Communist Jews and their pawns
would go on a six decade long reign of terror.
Some 40 million Russian and Eastern European Gentiles would perish in
Gulags, death camps, mass executions and via man-made famines under
Jewish Communist ruler-ship.
Jewish
Communists plot genocide of Russians. They put out stories of Jewish
persecution at this same time to hide their blood-curdling atrocities in
Russia.
1919- Shortly after the end of World War I hostilities, Zionists claim a
“Holocaust” of “Six Million Jews” is imminent in Europe in a deceitful
campaign to raise money for Jewish charities and also to distract public
attention from the Jewish origins of Communism, the Bolshevik
atrocities in Russia and the Armenian Genocide.
The first reported “Holocaust” of “Six Million Jews.” Nothing more than Zionist propaganda.
Elder of Zion Nathan Straus published this article in the San Fransico Chronicle claiming 6,000,000 Jews were in peril.
More persecution propaganda in the same year. Again “6,000,000 Jews” as victims, of course.
1920-
A Jewish relief campaign advertisement states: “Today 6,000,000 Jews are facing the darkest days ever known in the history of the race.” 1921- Russian patriots gain ground on the Jewish Bolshevik
usurpers of their nation. In a vein attempt to hide their heavy
involvement in the brutal Bolshevist atrocities being committed in
Russia, Jews reel out the “six million” myth once again. 1922-
Zionist leader, Nahum Sokolow, boasts about Organized Jewry’s globalist ambitions when, at a Zionist conference in Carlsbad, California, he proclaimed: “The League of Nations is a Jewish idea, and Jerusalem some day will become the capital of the world’s peace.”
Six
Million again. Jews demand that Gentiles hand over their food to the
poor, innocent Jews while they murder millions, and ship millions more
off to Gulag slave camps in Communist Jew-controlled Russia.
1932-
Jews commit a deliberate genocide.
To put down nationalist resistance to a Communist takeover, Soviet
Dictator Josef Stalin orders the Jewish-dominated Soviet Secret Police
(NKVD) to orchestrate a man-made famine in the Ukraine. Stalin’s Jewish
deputies and secret police chiefs (Kaganovich, Beria, Yagoda, etc)
ruthlessly implement the murderous starvation policy. Between six and seven million Ukrainian men, women and children, are annihilated in this genuine Holocaust. It is now known as the “Holodomor.” 1933-
Adolf Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany in 1933. Jews immediately seek his complete destruction.
Hitler comes to power in Germany. Antithetical to Jewish banking
interests which thrives off of usury (the lending of money at interest
making debt-slaves out of countries), Hitler immediately begins printing his own state-controlled, labor-backed currency
and thus breaking the death-grip of the monolithic Jewish banking
establishment of Europe, led by the Rothschild’s and the Warburg’s.
Hitler also removed Jews from all positions in government, media,
education and banks, which they had been dominating up until that point.
Because of this World Jewry declares war on Germany in 1933. Jews
around the world launched a global economic boycott of German goods in
an effort to economically strangle Germany to death and topple Hitler’s
new government.
Jews don’t like it when Gentiles revolt against their tyranny and control. Their motto is: be our slave or be dead.
This act of treachery leads to widespread dislike of Jews in Germany
and foments tension between Jews and German Gentiles. For this act, and
for the Jews’ well-known support for Communism and substantial
involvement in the bloody Bolshevik Revolution, the Nazis declare Jews
“enemies of the state” eventually interning them in concentration camps
and labor camps during the Second World War. Almost the same thing
happened to Japanese-Americans after Pearl Harbor. Although, unlike the
Jews, Japanese people never waged an economic war on America, they were
interned in American concentration camps simply for their ethnicity. 1936- As early as 1936, Zionists who originally coined the phrase Final Solution of The Jewish Question, somehow knew exactly 6,000,000 Jews had “neither hope nor future.”
Appearing
before the Peel Commission, World Zionist Organization chairman, and
first Israeli president, Chaim Weizmann, declares that “6,000,000 Jews
are destined to be imprisoned,” (in Europe) “where they are unwanted.”
Jews continue to agitate for Palestine. The New York Times
reported that Zionist groups were desperately lobbying American
Christian leaders, Christian organizations, and the British government,
demanding assistance in the creation of a “Jewish nation in Palestine”
to save the Jews from “the European Holocaust.” These strikingly
prophetic statements were made years before the creation of ghettos or
concentration camps and over three years before the German invasion of
Poland.
Jewish
leaders meet to discuss their schemes, swindles and sinister
conspiracies. “Six Million Hebrews” is mentioned in the article title.
1939-
Poland, under British influence, refuses to concede to Hitler any of his
relatively modest territorial demands. Hitler sought to recover the
territory stripped away from Germany and given to Poland at the end of
WWI; specifically the formerly German city of Danzig.
Hitler also demanded an autobahn in the Danzig corridor connecting the
German mainland to East Prussia. Poland categorically refused all of
Hitler’s somewhat reasonable demands.
Hitler
wanted back the German city of Danzig and an autobahn through the
Danzig corridor connecting the German mainland to East Prussia. Poland,
under British/Jewish direction, refused to acquiesce to Hitler’s modest
demands.
In September Poland is invaded from the west by Germany and from the
east by the Soviet Union. Britain and France immediately declare war on
Germany, supposedly because of Hitler’s invasion of Poland. However,
Britain and France didnot declare war on the Soviet Union who also had
invaded Poland and then attacked Finland a few months later.
The reason the Allies only found fault with Germany for invading
Poland, and not the Soviets, was because the USSR was under Jewish rule,
and had been since 1917. The purpose of WWII all along was not to free
Poland but to destroy Germany, who had broken loose from the grip
of the Jews. The Allies, who originally claimed to be concerned for
Poland’s sovereignty, dumped Poland, along with the rest of Eastern
Europe, off to the Soviet-Communist butchers at the end of the war! This
Allied betrayal proves that the Allies never cared about Poland at all.
Poland was nothing more than a pawn used by the Allied warmongers to
sucker the Third Reich into a war.
The
Allies, who waged war on Germany in 1939 using as a justification the
excuse that Germany breached Polish sovereignty by invading, DUMPED
Poland off to Stalin and the Communist butchers who had murdered 22,000
Poles in the Katyn Forest in 1940!
Meanwhile Jews were whining about “Six Million” helpless victims in February, seven months before the war even started.
Over half a year before the war began Jews were already squawking about “6,000,000 helpless victims of persecution.”
Chaim Weizmann turns up again and proclaims: “The fate of six million people was in the balance”
A Jewish newspaper, The Jewish Criterion, predicts that “the coming world war would be the annihilation of six million Jews in East and Central Europe.”
1940- Jewish leader Nahum Goldmann predicts “Six Million” Jewish victims before Nazi concentration camps have even fully completed construction. 1941- An American Jew named Theodore Newman Kaufman devises a plan for the
extermination of all Germans through forced sterilization. He publishes
his evil aspiration to annihilate the German people in a book called “Germany Must Perish!” This Jewish “Final Solution” to Germans is praised by Jewish-owned publications in America.
1942- British Jew, Victor Gollancz, predicts 6,000,000 Jewish deaths.
1943- A Zionist organization, The American Jewish Committee, claims the Nazis had set in motion a plan to kill 6,000,000 Jews.
Zionist propaganda build up nearing the end of the war.
Ben Hecht,
a Hollywood screenwriter and Zionist Jew, floats out the “Six Million”
lie in Reader’s Digest Magazine. He would later go on to support the
Zionist terrorist group Irgun in Palestine “by writing propaganda and fund-raising.”
During the Nazi offensive on the eastern front, German soldiers discover the mass graves
of some of the 22,000 Polish military officers and intelligentsia who
were murdered and then buried in mass graves in the Katyn Forest by the
Soviets in 1940. The insidious Allies knew their “gallant Soviet ally”
was a mass murderer but kept quiet about it. When it could no longer be
kept hidden from the public they then tried to blame the atrocity on the
Germans! 1944- In September of 1944, eight months before the end of WWII, U.S. Communist (Jewish) Union leaders prematurely proclaim that nearly Six Million Jews have been killed, long before that could have been known or calculated.
In late 1944, half a year before the official end of the war, at
least three newspapers printed stories informing us of the mythical
deaths of “six million Jews.” All of these propaganda articles were
based on the lies of Ilya Ehrenburg, a Jewish propagandist in the USSR. The New York Timesreports that Jewish groups were urging the governments of Britain and America to launch gas attacks against the Nazis. 1945-
In January, still many months prior to the end of the war, before any
official body count for any group could have reasonably been calculated
or ascertained, Zionists proclaim exactly “Six Million Jews” had died. (more premature ’6,000,000 Jews have died’ pronouncements) Ilya Ehrenburg, a notorious Jewish Propagandist in the USSR who agitated for genocide against Germans and incited the mass rape
of German women by the Red Army, prematurely proclaimed that “the world
now knows that Germany has killed Six Million Jews” before anyone could
have known that was the number.
Jewish
Communist devil, Ilya Ehrenburg, prematurely announces 6,000,000 Jews
killed, thus exposing himself as a fraud and the holocaust as a
premeditated hoax.
Ehrenburg, along with another Communist Jew propagandist Vasily Grossman, are considered by many revisionists to be the brains behind the Holocaust Hoax. Together they penned “The Black Book,”
a work of pure fiction inundated with unconscionable anti-German hate
propaganda horror stories that are physically impossible, and have since
been thoroughly discredited.
Communist Jew demons, Ilya Ehrenburg and Vassily Grossman.
At a March 1945 Congressional Hearing, Joseph Thon, representing The National Organization of Polish Jews in America, stated to the committee: “The German people murdered, in cold blood, in excess of 6,000,000 European Jews
… I accuse the whole German people that in the years 1939 to 1945 they
slaughtered upward of 15,000,000 men, among which there were 6,000,000
Jews.”
Zionist
liar, Joseph Thon, let slip the “6,000,000 Jews have died” hoax a bit
too early. These Jews just can’t help themselves can they?
More newspaper clippings from 1945 telling us exactly 6,000,000 Jews
had been killed, before any official body count could have been
accurately ascertained.
In May of 1945 the New York Times reported that “more than 6,000,000 people” had been “liberated” from Nazi concentration camps.
The New York Times reports 6,000,000 had been liberated, not killed. OOPS!
1946- A year after the war Jews are already spouting the “six million” myth as fact.
Meanwhile, as the Jews whine about a phony Holocaust in Europe, Zionist terrorist groups wreak havoc in Palestine slaughtering Arab men, women and children, at will, like the massacre at Deir Yassin.
Inhuman
Jewish terror agents of the Irgun ruthlessly slaughtered Arab women and
babies, then mutilated their corpses in the Palestinian village of Deir
Yassin.
In 1946, Jewish Terror agents from the cutthroat Irgun terrorist network in Palestine, led by the mass murderer Menachem Begin (who would later become the Prime Minister of Israel), blow up the King David Hotel,
disguised as Arabs. 91 people are killed, 28 of the victims were
British officials. The British were the real target of the bombing as
the hotel was the headquarters for the British military command.
Begin
the beast; terrorist leader of the Irgun; mastermind of the King David
Hotel bombing in 1946 and other atrocities; Prime Minister of Israel. A
complete animal.
1947-1949
Over the course of two years Zionist Jews obliterate 419 Arab villages
and build Jewish settlements in their place. This process of ethnic
cleansing of Palestinians from their own homeland by Jews continues to
this very day.
The
Zionist colonization and ethnic cleansing of Palestine — a crime
against humanity that goes unpunished and is, in fact, supported by many
Western governments.
1963-
The Encyclopedia Britannica prints its 1963 edition, within which it
states that 2,000,000 people, mostly Jews, were exterminated by the
Nazis in Mauthausen, a concentration camp in Austria. This absurd figure
has been officially revised quite a lot. Now it is claimed that only
95,000 people died in Mauthausen, of which only 14,000 were Jews. An
exaggeration of 1,905,000! (more info)
This camp is no longer considered by official sources who support the
holocaust legend as an “extermination camp,” nor is it still claimed
that any camps on German soil were either. 1976-
The influential Zionist leader Nahum Goldmann, co-founder and long-time
head of the World Jewish Congress, publishes a book about Jews, The Jewish Paradox.
In the book Goldmann candidly admits on pages 122 and 123 that years
before the end of the second World War two influential co-conspiring
Jews conceived the idea of a post-war Nuremberg show-tribunal and
“German reparations” to be paid out to the Jews. Goldmann describes how
he, and his fellow conniving Zionists at the World Jewish Congress,
intended the reparations swindle to finance Jewish settlement in
Palestine after the war.
Goldmann admits the swindle.
1990-
The Allied Nuremberg Trial indictment charged the Nazis with murdering
4,000,000 people at Auschwitz. This figure was printed on the plaques
displayed to tourists visiting Auschwitz, and the figure was repeated as
“fact” by governments, historians, journalists, politicians, and all
authority figures, for 45 years. In 1990 it was all exposed as a big lie
when the Auschwitz State Museum officially revised the death toll from
4,000,000 down to 1.1 million, of which 960,000 are claimed to be Jews. (source)
Auschwitz death toll reduced to a million, yet sacred “Six Million” figure remains unchanged and is still repeated by Jews.
The
original plaques were removed and replaced with new ones sporting the
“new” fake figure of 1.5 million. That’s at least 2.5 million people
erased from the official death toll overnight. They can’t even make up
their mind about what the new figure should be. This should tell you
right away that they are just making it up as they go along.
The Nuremberg Trial indictment charged the Nazis with killing
1,500,000 people at Majdanek, a camp in Poland. This ridiculous figure was conjured by Saul Hayes, a Canadian journalist in the pay of a Canadian Zionist organization, the Canadian Jewish Congress. It is now claimed that only 79,000 people died in this camp, officially. An exaggeration of 1,421,000!
Despite substantial reductions in the official death toll’s of
Mauthausen, Auschwitz and Majdanek, the mythical and obviously false
“Six Million” figure is never revised and continues to be peddled by
Zionist Jews everywhere. That’s because it has religious significance to
Jews and fulfills their delusional ancient Torah prophecies. The
Holocaust™ is nothing more than a religion to inoculate the “Goyim”.
Also in 1990, another Holocaust myth was vanquished; that being the
preposterous lie that the Nazis used the skin of Jews to make
“lampshades” and their fat to make “human soap.” Jewish groups in Israel
have confessed that this widespread rumor was a myth.
Despite this admission, there are still Jews today going around claiming that this actually occurred.
Two Zionist Holocaust promoters, Deborah Lipstadt and Professor Peter Novick, both have stated in their books
that Simon Wiesenthal, the infamous “Nazi hunter” and pathological
liar, outright invented the “five million non-Jewish deaths” that
supposedly happened in the Holocaust as a marketing ploy to garner
interest of Non-Jews in the Holocaust religion, also known as
“Holocaustianity.”
The revisionists estimate that the combined death toll in all German
concentration camps was somewhere between 300,000 to 500,000. Of that
amount about half the victims were Jews. Unlike the comical and
discredited “6,000,000″, this figure is based on solid documentation,
including the reports released by the International Red Cross who
inspected the camps, the Auschwitz death registries released to the Soviet archives in 1990 (which recorded only 69,000 deaths in Auschwitz), and other evidence. The main cause of death was the typhus epidemic and starvation.
After decades of careful forensic investigation, scientific analysis,
and intense study, scholarly revisionists have allocated the “gas
chambers,” “steam chambers,” “electrocution conveyor belts,”
“suffocation rooms,” “pedal-driven-brain-bashing-devices,” “Jew bone
powder used for construction,” and other absurdities to the realm of
science fiction. (See: Vho.org, Codoh.com, holocaustdenialvideos.com, Winston Smith Ministry of Truth)
A
report from the International Red Cross Tracing Service that tallied a
total of just under 300,000 German concentration camp victims. Main
cause of death: Typhus.
1991-
In 1991, a leading Jewish Freemason let slip the agenda behind the
Holocaust religion. Ian J. Kagedan, an official for the Canadian branch
of B’nai B’rith (a secretive organization founded in New York City in 1843 by Jewish Freemasons), told us: “Memory of the Holocaust is central to the new world order. …Achieving our quest of a “new world order” depends on our learning the Holocaust’s lessons.”
Jewish Freemason admits Holocaust story a vehicle for Jewish World Domination.
Fund Raising Fliers-
Compendium of Jewish fund raising campaigns; 6,000,000 galore. Click to enlarge
New York Times “6,000,000″ References (1869-1945)-
34
appearances of the Kabbalistic 6,000,000 figure of Jews in the New York
Times from 1869 – 1945 (months before the end of WWII). Click to
enlarge.
Five early Jewish “holocausts” in the New York Times-
Five early Jew holohoaxes. Click to enlarge.
More pre-WWII 6,000,000 References- More early hoaxocausts-
This
1897 “Science of Religion” American magazine, claims nearly six million
Jews were killed in the Bar Kokhba revolt 132-136AD. What a laugh!
Click to enlarge.
1899: New York Times speaks of a “mighty holocaust of jews”. Click to enlarge.
