This is a unique opportunity to hear the renowned historian and author, Ilan Pappe speak about his book "The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine" where he lays out the past, present, and offers suggestions for the future.
Vancouver Marsh 29, 08.
*****
Ilan Pappe:
The present dismal reality unfolding in the Middle East has clear historical roots and a journey into the past may help to illuminate what lies behind the
destructive policies of Israel in both Palestine and Lebanon.
Zionism arrived in Palestine in the late 19th as a colonialist movement motivated by national impulses.
The colonisation of Palestine fitted well the interests and policies of the British Empire on the eve of the First World War.
With the backing of Britain, the colonisation project expanded, and became a solid presence on the land after the war and with the establishment of the
British mandate in Palestine (which lasted between 1918 and 1948).
While this consolidation took place, the indigenous society underwent, like other societies in the rest of the Arab world, a steady process of establishing a national identity.
But with one difference. While the rest of the Arab world was shaping its political identity through the
struggle against European colonialism,
in Palestine nationalism meant asserting your collective identity
against both an exploitative British colonialism and expansionist Zionism.
Thus, the conflict with Zionism was an additional burden. The pro-Zionist policy of the British mandate there naturally strained the relationship between Britain and the local Palestinian society.
This climaxed in a revolt in 1936 against both London and the expanding Zionist colonisation project.
At the end of November 1947, the UN offered to divide Palestine into two states almost equal in their territorial space. The Jews were only one third of the population by 1947 and most of them had arrived in Palestine only a few years earlier.
The categorical Palestinian refusal to go along with this deal, backed by the Arab League, allowed the Zionist leadership to plan carefully the next step.
Between February 1947 and March 1948,
a final plan for ethnic cleansing was prepared.
The Zionist leadership defined 80 percent of Palestine (Israel today without the West Bank) as the space for the future state.
This was an area in which one million Palestinians lived next to 600,000 Jews.
The idea was to uproot as many Palestinians as possible. From March 1948 until the end of that year the plan was implemented despite the attempt by some Arab states to oppose it, which failed.
Some 750,000 Palestinians were expelled, 531 villages were destroyed and 11 urban neighbourhoods demolished.
Half of Palestine's population was uprooted and half of its villages destroyed.
The state of Israel was established in over 80 percent of Palestine,
turning Palestinian villages into Jewish settlements and recreation parks, but allowing a small number of Palestinian to remain citizens in it.
The June 1967 war allowed Israel to take the remaining 20 percent of Palestine.
This seizure defeated in a way the ethnic ideology of the Zionist movement. Israel encompassed 100 percent of Palestine, but the state incorporated a large number of Palestinians, the people who Zionists made such an effort to expel in 1948.
The fact that Israel was let off easily in 1948, and not condemned for the ethnic cleansing it committed, encouraged it to
ethnically cleanse a further 300,000 Palestinians from the West Bank and the Gaza strip.
Norman Finkelstein’s address to the UCD Philosophy Society, University College Dublin, on the current state of the occupied territories. Tuesday 10 Feb 2015.
In his address, Dr Finklestein discusses the recent conflicts in the occupied territories which followed the kidnapping and killing of three Israeli youths and a Palestinian teen; Israel's anti-missile defence system, the Iron Dome; Isreal’s Operation Protective Edge; and possible ways to resolve the conflict.
Finkelstein, a political scientist, has written extensively on the political, social and historical state of Israel and the occupied territories. He famously and successfully dismantled and deconstructed 'From Time Immemorial' by Joan Peters which, at the time, was considered a foundational and invaluable text on the Palestine - Israel Conflict.
Finkelstein received his doctorate in 1988 from the Department of Politics at Princeton University. He currently teaches at Sakarya University’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies in Turkey. He is the author of ten books that have been translated into 50 foreign editions. The title of his latest book is Method and Madness: The hidden story of Israel’s assaults on Gaza.
“Mr Finkelstein's research is certainly thorough. His characterisations, too, can be brilliant, and he spares nobody...” The Economist (2012).
Pourquoi certaines personnes doutent-elles de l’existence de l’Holocauste ?
Comment peuvent-elles douter de l’existence des chambres à gaz?
Les preuves du génocide des juifs ne sont-elles pas indubitables ?
Je m’appelle Vincent Reynouard.
Depuis bientôt trente ans, je mène mes propres recherches sur l’histoire du IIIe Reich et de la Shoah. Cela m’a valu plusieurs condamnations et un séjour de neuf mois en prison en France.
Je propose, j’expose, je n’impose rien. Chacun doit être libre de se faire une opinion sur ce sujet.
• Que faites-vous des tas de cheveux, de prothèses, de valises visibles au musée d’Auschwitz?
• Que faites-vous des photos de chambres à gaz montrées dans les livres?
• Et les chambres à gaz que l’on peut voir à Auschwitz ?
• Et les photos de la résistance polonaise?
• Les charniers retrouvés à Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald etc. ne sont-ils pas les preuves d’un génocide?
• Pourquoi interner les juifs en camps de concentrations si ce n’était pas pour exterminer?
• Et l’extermination par le travail?
• Et les mauvais traitements infligée aux prisonniers?
• Et le témoignage de Simone Veil?
• Et pourquoi construire autant de fours crématoires si ce n’était pas pour brûler des cadavres en masse?
• Et toutes les victimes brûlées dans des fosses de crémation?
• Et les aveux du SS Gerstein?
• Que dites-vous du massacre de Babi Yar?
• Et tous ces rapports allemands qui dénombrent les victimes juives des Einstazgruppen?
• N’ignorez-vous pas que l’Aktion 1005 a effacé les preuves du génocide?
• Et de toutes façons, Hitler et Himmler n’avaient-il pas annoncé eux-même l’extermination des juifs dans leurs discours?
• Les plans d’Auschwitz ne mentionnent-ils pas des chambres à gaz?
• Et la chambre à gaz de Dachau?
• Et la chambre à gaz de Majdanek?
• Et toutes ses boîtes de Zyklon B retrouvées dans les camps?
• Et les témoins?
• Pourquoi envoyer les juifs à l’Est si ce n’était pour les exterminer?
• Pourquoi envoyer les médecins de l’euthanise à l’Est, si ce n’était pour équiper les camps de chambres à gaz?
• Viktor Brack n’a-t-il pas avoué l’utilisation de chambre à gaz dans le cadre de l’Aktion T4?
• L’étude très fouillée de Michael Tregenza à ce sujet ne vous suffit-elle pas?
• Que faites-vous de ces documents et témoignages mentionnant divers moyens de mise à mort?
• À quoi ces appareils étaient-ils destinés, si ce n’était à tuer?
• Pourquoi construire ces appareils à l’Est, près des ghettos, si ce n’était pour gazer les juifs?
• La décision d’exterminer les juifs n’a-t-elle pas été prise à la conférence de Wannsee?
• Qui prit au sérieux le livre de Kaufman, mis à part les nazis qui en firent un prétexte pour expulser de juifs?
• Que faites-vous des camps de Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor?
• Pourquoi envoyer le personnel de l’euthanasie dans ces camps, si ce n’était pour gazer les juifs?
• Les fosses retrouvées à Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor ne sont-elles pas la preuve d’une extermination?
• Les archéologues n’ont-ils pas retrouvé des restes de chambres à gaz dans ces camps?
• Les discours d’Hitler, les ordres de Göring et les journaux de
Goebbels n’apportent-ils pas la preuve qu’un génocide a eu lieu?
• Que faites-vous de tous ces articles et des communiqués de presse qui dès 1942, évoquent les atrocités nazis?
• Après cette déclaration commune, comment Laval pouvait-il ignorer l’extermination des juifs?
• Comment ignorer le génocide alors que dès 1943, des ONG en alertaient le monde?
• Que faites-vous des photos du camp de Majdanek, publiées dès 1944?
• Que faites-vous des clichés aériens des camps pris par les Alliés?
• Et les expertises soviétiques menées à Auschwitz dès 1945?
• Et pourquoi les Allemands n’ont-ils pas démentis ces accusations, s’ils n’étaient pas coupables?
• Que faites-vous des résultats obtenus par l’expert Markiewicz?
• Et les démonstrations de Richard Green?
• Les conditions pour la formations de bleu de Prusse dans les chambres à gaz étaient-elles vraiment réunies?
• Les quantités de Zyklon B n’étaient-elles pas largement suffisantes pour tuer sans laisser de trace?
• L’aération des chambres à gaz n’explique-t-elle pas l’absence de trace?
Que faites-vous des tas de cheveux, de prothèses, de valises visibles au musée d’Auschwitz?
Que faites-vous des photos de chambres à gaz montrées dans les livres?
Et les chambres à gaz que l’on peut voir à Auschwitz?
Au Musée Auschwitz, ainsi, le block 5 présente ce que les historiens
appellent les «preuves matérielles des crimes » : vous pouvez y voir un
tas de lunettes, des châles de prière, des prothèses, des valises, de la
vaisselle en émail, des habits et des affaires d’enfants, des
chaussures… En voyage pédagogique à Auschwitz, une collégienne lyonnaise
déclare :
J’ [ne] savais pas que les
chambres à gaz, ça avait fait tant de morts. En faite, i’ y a plein de
choses qu’on [ne] savait pas avant de venir et on [ne] s’attendait pas à
en voir autant et vraiment c’est choquant et… on a vu l’horreur en
personne aujourd’hui.1
Ce lycéen du Nord ajoute:
Ça faisait aussi un peu peur parce
que euh… on voyait qu’[il] y avait vraiment beaucoup beaucoup de monde.
[Il] y avait une grande allée remplie de chaussures. On se dit qu’[il] y
a eu vraiment un… une grosse boucherie, on pourrait appeler ça une
boucherie…2
Que faites-vous des preuves matérielles ?
À Auschwitz, une paire de chaussures est-elle la preuve de l’assassinat d’un Juif?
Cependant, ni l’un ni l’autre ne s’interroge : d’un côté, on nous dit
que les Allemands effacèrent minutieusement toutes les traces du
meurtre de masse, allant jusqu’à démonter les fours avant de dynamiter
les crématoires ; et de l’autre on nous dit qu’ils abandonnèrent ces
monceaux d’objets qui seraient des preuves. C’est totalement
contradictoire et cela devrait les amener à se poser cette question :
ces objets sont-ils des preuves incontestables qu’à Birkenau, les
déportés inaptes au travail auraient étaient gazés ? La réponse se
trouve dans l’imposant ouvrage en cinq tomes Auschwitz, 1940-1945 : central issues in the history of the camp,
publié par le Musée national Auschwitz-Birkenau : dans le deuxième
tome, consacré à la vie des prisonniers du camp, il est indiqué que:
Argent, vêtements, chaussures et
effets personnels de moindre valeur des Juifs admis au camp […] étaient
stocker dans les entrepôts du camp et traités de la même façon que ceux
des de la plupart des prisonniers non-juifs. 3
Les juifs internés au camp d’Auschwitz n’étaient autorisés qu’à en
conserver le minimum ; le reste de leur bagage était saisi puis
transporté par camion jusqu’au secteur appelé « Canada ». Voilà pourquoi
leurs affaires saisi et entreposées ne constituent pas une preuve d’un
quelconque assassinat. La guide du musée d’Auschwitz trompe donc les
visiteurs lorsqu’elle explique:
Quarante mille paires de
chaussures, c’est comme assassiner quarante mille personnes. Alors, ces
chaussures représentent cinq jours de ce génocide. Cinq jours…4
Les tas de cheveux visibles à Auschwitz
La tromperie la plus flagrante concerne les cheveux. dont sept tonnes
furent retrouvées à la libération du camp. Ils proviendraient de femmes
et de filles gazées:
Un peu plus loin, dans une pièce,
les lycéens découvrent una amas de cheveux : les cheveux des fillettes
et des femmes exécutées dans le camp. La gorge nouée, Lisa n’arrive plus
à bouger : « On leur a enlevé… ’fin… Les femmes, les cheveux, c’est le…
la chose… l’une des choses les plus importantes qu’on leur a enlevé…
leur identité. Et [il] y [en] a une quantité tellement énorme. » 5
Figure 1.1 Bernhardt
Walter/Ernst Hofmann, « Des femmes juives de Ruthénie subcarpathique
qui ont été selectionnées pour les travaux forcés à Auschwitz-Birkenau,
marchent vers leur baraquement après avoir été désinfectées et
tondues », photographie, mai 1944 (United States Holocaust Memorial
Museum, avec l’aimable autoristion de Yad Vashem). United States
Holocaust Memorial Museum, consulté le 8.VIII.2020. https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa8605
Toutefois, quand on sait que les femmes et les hommes admis au camp
étaient tondus, qu’environ 400 000 personnes entrèrent à Auschwitz6 et qu’une une chevelure pèse en moyenne 100 grammes7,
alors un rapide calcul montre que 40 tonnes de cheveux purent être
récupérés. En conséquence, cet amas capillaire n’est pas la preuve d’un
massacre systématique, mais seulement la preuve qu’en pleine guerre,
soumis depuis des mois au blocus britannique8,
les Allemands récupérait tout. Ils n’étaient pas la seule : en France,
depuis 1943, la loi interdisait de détruire les « déchets ou vieilles
matières9 »,
car elles étaient récupérées. Ce recyclage généralisé est si évident
que la même guide d’Auschwitz en parle : « Un kilo[gramme] de cheveux
coûtait entre 30 et 50 pfennig. C’était revendu a des sociétés qui les
transformaient en matelas, couvertures… 10 »
Certes, dans l’esprit de nos contemporains, faire des chaussons avec
cheveux peut choquer. Cependant à l’époque, c’était banal : en France,
ainsi, les cheveux étaient recyclés pour produire, entre autres, « des
pull-overs, des gants, pantoufles […] étoffes d’ammeublement, de
tentures, de tapis…11 »
Depuis mars 1942, ils étaient récupérés chez les coiffeurs des villes
de plus de 10 000 habitants, acheminés vers la filature de
Condé-sur-Noireau, dans le Calvados, où chaque mois, 200 tonnes de
cheveux arrivaient de la France entière12. En 1943, le mensuel Le Pont consacra un reportage photographique au recyclage des cheveux et à leur transformation en pantoufles13. Dans cette affaire, certains guides du musée d’Auschwitz profitent donc de l’ignorance des gens pour les tromper.
Figure 1.2 Henri
de Weindel, « À la manière de Vénus Aphrodite, vêtez-vous de vos
cheveux… ou des cheveux des autres », article et photographie, Le Petit Parisien, 23.V.1942, p. 1
La salle de douche du bâtiment BW 5
À Auschwitz, la tromperie est très facile. Ce professeur, par exemple, explique aux élèves:
« Dites-vous que vous aurez passé
ici plus de temps que la majorité des déportés qui sont arrivés ici. »
Car une fois passé la porte de la mort, seul un quart des déportés
entrés véritablement dans le camp. « Entrer dans le camp, pour un
déporté, c’[n’]est pas franchir le portail avec tous les autres
arrivants du convoi ; c’est être du bon côté du doigt. Ceux qui ne sont
pas entré dans le camp sont partis de ce côté ou derrière nous : on les a
conduits dans une salle de déshabillage, dans une douche, une douche où
l’eau ne coulait pas. »14
Je pourrais aisément prétendre “démontrer” ces propos à l’aide du plan d’époque reproduit en figure 1.3.
Les Juifs arrivaient sur la Judenrampe et ceux que l’on sélectionnait
pour la chambre à gaz étaient conduits vers l’un deux bâtiments B.W.5.
Ils entraient d’abord dans le vestiaire (salle représentée à gauche).
Une fois déshabillées, les victimes passaient dans cette salle de douche
(salle en bas, au milieu). Le gaz était produit dans cette pièce
appelée : « gaskammer », en français, « chambre à gaz » (salle en haut,
au milieu). Un système de tuyauterie amenait le gaz jusqu’au douches à
partir desquelles il se répandait dans le local de mort. Une fois les
victimes asphyxiées, leurs corps étaient entreposés dans la (salle
représentée à droite), qui était utilisée comme morgue temporaire. Puis
des camions les conduisaient vers l’un des quatre grands crématoires,
situés non loin.
Figure 1.3 Ce plan représente les installations BW 5b du camp d’Auschwitz-Birkenau. Référence :
« Alimentation en eau et drainage dans le bâtiment d’épouillage du camp
de prisionniers de guerre », plan, 9.V.1942, négatif n° 20995/477
(Musée national Auschwitz-Birkenau) tiré de Auschwitz : technique and operation de Pressac, p. 56.
Cette explication convaincrait tout le monde, car la mention
« gaskammer » serait vue comme une preuve définitive. Toutefois, elle
est entièrement fausse ; ce bâtiment servaient à l’hygiène : les
déportés entraient du côté sale (comme l’indique la mention « Unreine
Seite » sur le plan, salle de gauche) où ils se déshabillaient. Puis ils
recevaient une douche (salle en bas, au milieu), pendant que leurs
habits étaient traités dans la « chambre à gaz » de désinfection
(salleen haut, au milieu). Enfin, ils ressortaient côté propre (comme
l’indique la mention « Reine Seite » sur le plan, salle représentée à
droite) pour se rhabillaient. Les indications portées sur ce plan
étaient donc conformes à la destination réelle du bâtiment, qui n’était
d’ailleurs pas le seul bâtiment destiné à l’hygiène : le Sauna Central
du camp d’Auschwitz-Birkenau était lui aussi une vaste installation
prévue pour assurer l’hygiène des déportés.
Voilà pourquoi il est bon parfois de ; se méfier : dans une structure aussi complexe que Birkenau, la tromperie est facile.
Par définition, des camouflages sont conçus de façon à être
indétectables. Pour les découvrir, ils est bien souvent nécessaire
d’étudier le dossier, ce qui implique d’écouter attentivement les deux
parties. Écouter attentivement les deux parties : voilà ce que vous
n’avez probablement pas fait, sans quoi vous n’invoqueriez pas les
« faits établis » par les « photos ». En effet, il n’existe aucune photo
d’époque qui montrerait une “chambre à gaz homicide” allemande.
The last interview with Mullins. He explains how he had been attacked and the supposed stroke was likely an attack by his enemies. Even in his 80s and serious health problems he has more information about conspiracies than most people will ever know. Aside from more info on conspiracies we find out Mullins was a speed reader who read hundreds of books at the library of congress and has amassed a vast knowledge on these subjects.
FREEDOM LOVING MUSLIMS ALLIED WITH ADOLF HITLER AGAINST THE BANKERS AND THE COMMUNISTS, BUT WERE BETRAYED BY SAUDIS AND OTHERS!
MOST OF US WILL FORGET OR NOT EVEN HAVE KNOWN OF WILLIAM MILTON COOPER AND EUSTACE MULLINS PERSECUTION AND MURDER!
Here is an archive of Eustace Mullins' books. The above video is a talk by him. Perhaps
Mullins' most important book is "Secrets of the Federal Reserve". In
it, Mullins argued that there was a conspiracy among Paul Warburg,
Edward Mandell House, Woodrow Wilson, J.P. Morgan, Benjamin Strong, Otto
Kahn, the Rockefeller family, the Rothschild family, and other European
and American bankers which resulted in the founding of the U.S. Federal
Reserve System. He argued that the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 defies
Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 5 of the United States Constitution by
creating a "central bank of issue" for the United States. Mullins went
on to claim that World War I, the Agricultural Depression of 1920, the
Great Depression of 1929 were brought about by international banking
interests in order to profit from conflict and economic instability.
Mullins also cited Thomas Jefferson's staunch opposition to the
establishment of a central bank in the United States. In the 1983
edition of his book, he argued that Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and the House
of Morgan were fronts for the Rothschilds. In this edition, he also
outlined how financial interests connected to the J. Henry Schroder
Company and the Dulles brothers financed Adolf Hitler. He also alleged
that the Rothschilds were world monopolists. He furthermore claimed that
most of the the Federal Reserve was controlled via the City of London
due to the fact that controlling interest in the Fed was from de facto
or de jure subsidiaries of City of London Banks. In the last chapter
of the book, he noted various Congressional investigations, and
criticized the immense degree of power that these few banks who owned
majority shares in the Federal Reserve possessed. A central theme of
Mullins' book is that the Federal Reserve allows bankers to monetize
debt, creating it out of nothing by book entry, and thus they have
enormous leverage over everyone else. Near the end of the book, he said
of the Federal Reserve: “The Federal Reserve System is not Federal;
it has no reserves; and it is not a system, but rather, a criminal
syndicate. It is the product of criminal syndicalist activity of an
international consortium of dynastic families comprising what the author
terms "The World Order". The Federal Reserve system is a central bank
operating in the United States. Although the student will find no such
definition of a central bank in the textbooks of any university, the
author has defined a central bank as follows: It is the dominant
financial power of the country which harbors it. It is entirely
private-owned, although it seeks to give the appearance of a
governmental institution. It has the right to print and issue money, the
traditional prerogative of monarchs. It is set up to provide financing
for wars. It functions as a money monopoly having total power over all
the money and credit of the people." In "The World Order", Mullins
argued argued that the Federal Reserve and other central banks were
tools of a Rothschild World system, centered in the City of London,
which extended its power through organizations like the Royal Institute
of International Affairs, various foundations, corporate conglomerates,
intelligence agencies, etc. He proposed that Nations were not really
governing powers, but rather, that the world was parasitically
controlled by this interlock of banks, foundations, and corporations,
which acted as a unified force, tending towards World monopoly. He
furthermore proposed that this oligarchical apparatus was controlled by
corrupt, dynastic families that had accumulated their wealth through
trade in gold, slaves, and drugs. He claimed that as this consortium
furthered its monopolistic ambitions, it would seek the establishment of
a World Culture, eradicate nationalism, impoverish everyone except
themselves, and progressively turn the world into a police state. In
1987, Mullins wrote The Curse of Canaan: A Demonology of History, in
which he set forth the theory that behind the oligarchical system he
described in his other writings was a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy founded
in ancient Babylon, evidence of which he found in the Bible, Masonic
texts, and Talmudic and Kabbalistic literature. In the book, he asserted
that the French Revolution was a culmination of years of intrigue by
occult personages, and that it marked the beginning of a program of
world revolution that would later manifest in the Bolshevik Revolution
and the Soviet Communist regime. He proposed that the purpose of these
revolutions was to kill Gentiles, who he referred to as the "real
Semites", as opposed to the "cursed Cannanites". He claimed that for
thousands of years, Gentiles had been the victims of "anti-Semitic"
persecution. Personally, this is the text of his that I have the most
problems with, since he makes racial assumptions. I have written an
essay authenticating the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion that
far exceeds it in quality:
http://archive.org/details/WatersFlowingEastward_307 Of the books
provided, Mullins' books "Secrets of the Federal Reserve" and "The World
Order" are in my opinion his best, and his book "The Curse of Canaan"
is in my opinion his worst (the last chapter is particularly
embarrassing, and is an insult to his other works, though the book as a
whole still has some value). In 1988, Mullins wrote Murder by
Injection, where he argued that much of the United States was controlled
by the Rockefellers, and that the medical monopoly exercised a
pernicious influence on American life, intentionally making people sick
and deliberately introducing poisons, rather than healing people. In 1989, Mullins wrote The Rape of Justice, where he argued that the United States legal system was fundamentally corrupt.
Readers of all this might want to also read the following essay that I wrote: http://archive.org/details/SummaryOfRothschildPower
Addeddate
2011-02-09 02:43:55
Identifier
EustaceMullins
Identifier-ark
ark:/13960/t8pc3tb6f
Ocr
ABBYY FineReader 8.0
Ppi
300
The Contract Murder
Of Eustace Mullins By Eustace Mullins
6-16-6
June 13, 2006
For more than five years, I have been
battling to stay alive in the State in which I live. My adversary has not
been the mafia, but the Commonwealth of Virginia. The occasion was my publishing
the American-Christian Messenger, founded in 1972, in the summer of '72
issue, titled the Red State of Virginia.
I revealed for the first time that the
famed Byrd machine, which maintained iron control over the people of Virginia
for many years, was actually the Rothschild-Byrd Machine.
In December, 1893, Tom Martin, a railroad
lawyer representing Jacob Schiff of Kuhn Loeb and Company, the American
branch of the House of Rothschild, ran for the U.S. Senate from Virginia.
He was predicted to lose against the popular Fitzhugh Lee, but Kuhn Loeb
bought ten members of the Democratic Caucus of the Virginia Assembly for
the sum of one thousand dollars each. They then switched their votes from
Lee to Martin, who won the Senate seat.
Two young men from Martinsburg, VA are
launching their careers at that time. They were long time friends, Harry
Byrd and Lewis Lichtenstein Strauss. Strauss joined Kuhn, Loeb and Company
and with his financial backing, Byrd went into the Martin Organization,
which later became the Byrd Machine, with Rothschild backing. After many
years of total dictatorial rule in Virginia, Byrd finally died. Strauss
pushed his son to replace him, and the Byrd Machine continued with his
son Harry Jr. It was continuing now and was always known as the Byrd Machine,
but although to those in the know, it was always the Byrd-Rothschild Machine.
When Byrd Jr. decided to run as an Independent,
Strauss mailed flyers to every voter in the State of Virginia, notifying
them that he supported Byrd Jr. as an Independent.
Speaking of this strange alliance, over
WRNL, Richmond, VA . Feb. 10, 1949, Colonel Frances Pickens Miller said
"Virginia has not been functioning normally as a free society because
of the Political Clique that has controlled the Commonwealth during the
past half century."
Byrd referred to Byrd's lieutenant, a
man never elected to any Office, E.R. Combs, State Chairman of the Compensation
Board, who set the pay for every Byrd henchman who held every Office in
the State, which was modeled after the Communist Party of the Soviet Union,
which Byrd had used as a model in setting up his own totalitarian State
bureaucracy in Virginia. Miller then had to move to North Carolina after
making this speech. There has been no opposition to the Rothschild-Byrd
Machine since 1949, in Virginia.
This continues the absolutist tradition
in Virginia, which began as huge Estates, owned by men like King Carter
and the Byrd's. From its inception, it has been the very rich and masses
of peasants. Its Capitol, Richmond, VA is referred to as FIC, referring
to three groups which have always held power there. F is for Freemasons,
I is for the State of Israel and C for Communism. All three flags have
on occasions flown over the State Capitol in Richmond. There is no Virginia
flag, as Virginia is the last thing in the minds of the Virginia legislature,
as corrupt today as it was in 1893 when its bribed members voted Tom Martin
into the U.S. Senate.
When we think of the wonderful people
we have had in this State, Washington, Jefferson and so many others, we
wonder how we came to this sorry pass? The truth is, Virginians haven't
changed that much. We have been deleteriously influenced by changing mores,
and changing times. The people in my area, Staunton, VA, have not changed
that much, but their morals have been loosened that much.
The pressures around them have changed.
It is as deep sea diving, we have gone beyond our depths, and we are now
trying to change to adapt to the pressures of a lower depth. If indeed
we are in the lower depths, we must recognize our situation and adapt to
the lower depths.
The rise of the Byrd-Rothschild rule
in Virginia does not mean that we must ignore the changes of history. The
fact is that the Byrd-Rothschild group thrust Virginia onto the stage of
world history. Kuhn Loeb, which bought Virginia for the Rothschilds, also
bought Tom Martin. They long for Communist rule of the entire world.
Schiff financed the Rockefeller oil empire,
the Harriman railway empire, and many others. Primarily, he was responsible
for fostering the Rothschild money system on the entire world, by passing
the Federal Reserve System in the U.S., and creating the greatest financial
empire in the history of the world, which the Rothschilds passed in Congress,
by using their tool Woodrow Wilson and getting it through Congress with
the help of Virginian, Carter Glass, because Wilson was so despised by
Congress, he had no chance of getting the Bill passed, Glass came to the
rescue and became the pillar of the new money monopoly. He is remembered
today for his work in fastening the tentacles of the Wall Street Rothschild
octopus fatally into the American government.
So Richmond's Importance in the rise
of Communism is noted. Not only did Woodrow Wilson become the champion
of world terrorists, but he condemned the 20th century to be remembered
eternally as the century of terrorism, all the work of one man. I am still
hated today in Richmond today for my ground breaking expose of the Communist
empire and its use of the Federal Reserve System to create the Communist
world empire, which finally collapsed only because it was a fake system,
as its fake Federal Reserve origin. Wilson supported and defended the Communist
Dictatorship to his dying day, and is remembered still for his status as
a hero of the Soviet Union. He bailed out the collapsing Bolshevik government
by embezzling $100 million of the Special War Fund which Congress had voted
him to defend the U.S. in WW-1, and which saved Communism when he sent
it to the Soviet Union with his compliments. This gift is rarely mentioned
in histories of the time.
I mentioned this unknown chapter of history
in a lawsuit filed against the Commonwealth of Virginia January 30, 2006
in Federal Court, which they are now trying to dismiss with prejudice.
This case must be heard in the remembering of history as it actually happened.
I had filed this suit in trying to defend
myself against the furious vendetta which the Rothschild-Byrd organization
had launched against me, which had languished for five years. It was caused
by a series of strokes and heart attacks brought on by the stress in my
work.
The Rothschild-Byrd machine seized on
this opening as I was in a series of nursing homes trying to regain my
health, and during this period my Virginia Drivers License had expired
without my knowledge. The alert bureaucrats seized on this opening and
began to harass me daily to renew the license. As I had been driving for
72 years without incident in this State, I expected no problem with this
routine renewal, but the Rothschild-Byrd organization seized upon this
opening and denied my renewal.
Over the next 5 years, I took the test
82 times. Each time I was told that I failed the written test, which denied
me the driving test. I continued to drive to medial appointments and offices,
realizing that I was in extreme danger.
I then filed a $900 million damage suit
against Commonwealth of Virginia in the Federal District Court of the United
States in Harrisonburg, Virginia, charging violations of Federal laws against
age discrimination, but not mentioning the Rothschild-Byrd terrorist organization.
Having no response to my lawsuit from
the Commonwealth, I waited 20 days and filed the usual Motion for Default
Judgment This got immediate attention and they launched an all-out campaign
against me. On April 3, I went to the store to pick up medicine. When I
returned, I noticed a number of local police cars in my vicinity.
As I turned onto my street, I was surrounded
by many squad cars. I counted 25, which was very unusual, as rarely would
more than 2 cars answer the most serious call. The size of this terrorist
attack was to panic me into making a run for it, which would have been
fatal to me in this terrorist assault.
I stopped immediately and the Officers
began yelling orders to me, many of them conflicting with each other. The
Officers then wrote me a number of tickets, including the usual "Expired
Driving Permit". This was the notorious driving license scam.
Some years ago, someone had come up with
the idea that the State should hold all Titles to vehicles, mailing a Certificate
of Title to the 'owners'. This created a legal fiction that the State owned
the vehicles. Drivers were thus driving a State owned vehicle, mandating
drivers must have a license to drive a State vehicle, which was false.
The State reaped many millions with its
drivers license scam, and began issuing heavy fines for not having a State
license. Writing the tickets, the Officers warned me that I could not drive
a few feet to park in front of my home. I was near collapse from the shock
of this assault, having had a number of strokes and heart attacks at the
age of 83. I later found out that this was a police murder raid which the
attackers were certain I could not survive.
A few minutes later, I collapsed on the
steps to my front door and suffered a massive coronary occlusion which
shut down my heart and nervous system. I fell down a flight of concrete
steps, inflicting many abrasions and broken bones. A neighbor saw me fall
and rushed over to take me to the emergency room where I remained for many
hours. This was my first intimation of the murder plot against me. I was
never intended to survive this assault.
I left the State to recuperate from this
attack and remained away for some weeks. I had returned the tickets because
I had filed a lawsuit on drivers licensing in Federal Court. On January
30.
I returned home in late May. On Sunday
morning, June 3, I was awakened by armed Police, who began to shout at
me to produce any weapons I had. I replied that I had no weapons. They
then cuffed me for the first time and dragged me in my pajamas to a police
car and taken to jail. The charge was failing to appear in Court, a standard
charge for assaults on citizens.
A TV set produced a Magistrate who set
the date for my sentencing, July 28, 2006. I was then told I could go and
had to walk up a steep hill back to my home, stumbling on my flimsy slippers.
I realized this was the second police murder raid on me, in my home.
The demands that I tell police what weapons
I had was designed to force me to produce weapons and be shot down at once
as a crazed writer in a battle with police. I had known of many such cases.
An old friend, Bill Cooper, a prominent anti-Communist writer, had recently
been shot down under the same circumstances.
For 18 years after my fathers death,
I cared for my invalid mother and my handicapped sister in their home.
During this time, they were constantly harassed by police because of my
well known anti-Communist writings. After they passed away, the police
had only me to harass and they never let up on their surveillance of me.
At that time, I had not learned of the
longtime association of the Rothschild-Byrd machine and its Communist work,
which would have explained their antipathy to me. I and my relatives had
been assigned to the blacklist of the Richmond Taliban, fanatical Communist
zealots who are determined to attack anyone who criticized Communism, and
which inspired the two Staunton Police murder raids on my Staunton home.
These murder raids on an anti-Communist
were reminiscent of other terrorist acts in Recent history, the Waco holocaust,
in which an entire Christian congregation was burned alive in their Texas
church, the only time this has happened in the history of America, not
a single protest was heard from any minister, which of course would be
bad for business.
Then the Ruby Ridge massacre in Idaho,
in which Randy Weaver living in a mountain shanty, was charged with 'failure
to appear', then attacked in his home by a Swat Team of FBI assassins,
and the most famous assassin, Lon Horuichi of the FBI, then shot his wife
in the head as she was holding their baby in her arms. No one has ever
been charged with these murders.
I have grounds for a class action suit
in the police murder raids on my home, and also with conspiracy to murder
by a political organization, which would make a very interesting civil
rights case.
I cannot charge the Rothschild-Byrd party
with these crimes because it is composed of two units, the Virginia Democratic
Party, known as the Scalawags since they were organized by the occupation
troops in 1865, and the Virginia Republican Party, known as the Carpetbaggers,
formed on the same date. Since I as the Plaintiff cannot charge these criminal
groups under their correct names, it will be difficult to obtain indictments
against them. President Bush constantly warns us of the terror, but neglects
to tell us that they are government agents.
Afterthoughts added by an anonymous writer:
The grand climax of the murder plot against
Eustace Mullins will come next month, when he is sentenced to a long term
for his crime of failure to appear in Court. He will then become one of
those mysterious 'suicides' which routinely occur in remote Southern Jails
where a person is imprisoned on a minor traffic charge. The deed is carried
out by The resident hit man, who is always present in the infamous Southern
dungeons as a feature of the ongoing Occupation since 1865.
The State of Virginia is now permanently
branded as the FCI State
F for freemasonry,
I for Israel,
C for Communism.
Eustace Mullins
June 13, 2006
WORLD ORDER CHAPTER 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhFRGDyX48cBenjamin Freedman's 1961 Speech at the Willard Hotel (Complete)
Benjamin H. Freedman's excellent speech on how World War One (and Two) really started and why the U.S. was eventually drawn in.
Saved from Google Video.
Transcript and Additional Info:
http://mail.blockyourid.com/~gbpprorg...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVWSHxT19ww
Eustace Mullins :GERMAN-BRITISH ZIONIST ROLE IN THE CREATION OF APARTHEID ISRAEL!
7,486 views
•22 Nov 2012
1923 - National Socialist and Jewish Zionist Alliance - NAZISM
1928 - Rothschild reforms Judaism to set up a Jewish State in British Occupied Palestine
1933 - Judea declares war on Germany
1933 - Adolf Hitler signs the Haavarah Agreement to allow Jews to leave Germany with their Assets to settle in British Occupied Palestine
150,000 Jews in Hitler's Army funded by British and other bankers!
German Jewish Kapos put non-Zionist Jews in Concentration Camps
In forty years of dedicated investigative research, Eustace
Mullins has drawn considerable return fire. He was kept under daily
surveillance by agents of the FBI for thirty-two years; no charges were ever
placed against him. He is the only person ever fired from the staff of the
Library of Congress for political reasons. He is the only writer who has had a
book burned in Europe since 1945.
After serving thirty-eight months in the U. S. Army Air
Force during World War II, Eustace Mullins was educated at Washington
and Lee University, Ohio State University, University
of North Dakota, and New York University.
He later studied art at the Escuela des Bellas Artes, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico, and the Institute
of Contemporary Arts, Washington, D.C.
While studying in Washington,
he was asked to go to St. Elizabeth's Hospital to talk to the nation's most
famous political prisoner, Ezra Pound.
The outstanding literary figure of the twentieth century, Pound had seen three
of his pupils awarded the Nobel Prize, while it was denied to him because of
his pronouncements as a native American patriot. Not only did Eustace Mullins
become his most active protégé, he is the only person who keeps Ezra Pound's
name alive today, through the work of the Ezra
Pound Institute of Civilization, which was founded shortly after the poet's
death in Venice.
With the present work, Eustace Mullins hopes to end a
three-thousand-year blackout behind which the enemies of humanity have operated
with impunity in carrying out their Satanic program. It is very late in the
history of our civilization. This book is written solely with the goal of
renewing our ancient culture, and of bringing it to new heights.
Eustace Mullins, Curse of Canaan
2
Preface
After forty years of patient study of the crises which faces
humanity, I arrived at a very simple conclusion-all conspiracies are Satanic! In
retrospect, this conclusion should surprise no one. I admit that it came as
something of a surprise to me. I had never anticipated that my decades of work
would lead to such an all-encompassing and unchallengeable solution. This
answer had eluded me through the years, not because I was on the wrong track,
but because I had not yet consulted the ultimate source of knowledge-the Bible.
To trace the machinations of the materialist conspiracy, I had deliberately
limited myself to materialist sources-reference material on banking, politics,
economics, and the biographies of those who were most deeply involved in these
affairs.
When at last I did decide to look up some references in the
Bible, a task which was greatly simplified by a number of excellent
Concordances, such and Nelson's and Strong's, I was overwhelmed by its
immediacy, by its directness, and by the applicability of its words to present-day
happenings. As the months went by and I continued this research, I was not overwhelmed
by a sense of déjà vu, but by an overpowering conviction that very little had changed
in the last three thousand years. My first revelation was that "God has no
secrets from man." It is Satan who must confine his work to
stealthy conspiracies to deception, and to promises which will never be kept.
"And the
great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and
Satan, the deceiver of the whole world" (Rev. 12:9).
It is for this reason that politicians, of necessity, must
become followers of Satan in the rebellion against God. Politicians must
deceive the people in order to gain power over them, just as Satan must deceive
the whole world if he is to continue his rebellion against God. Satan takes you
to the top of the mountain and offers you all the kingdoms of the earth (Martin
Luther King proclaimed, "I have been to the top of the mountain," but
he never revealed what had taken place there); the politician offers you free
food, free lodging, free medical care --everything will become "free at
last!" The politician offers to defend you against your enemies, so that
he can deliver you to the ultimate enemy-- Satan.
God does not make offers to you in competition with Satan
and his politicians. What could God offer you when he has already given you
the whole world? What more could He do than to send His Only Begotten
Son to preserve this world for you when it was threatened by Satan? And why
would God wish to veil His love for you behind arcane mysteries, occult
conspiracies, and obscene practices?
Once my return to the Bible had given me the answers for
which I had been seeking so many years, I realized that I had arrived at the
culmination of this life's work. I had eagerly sought out the facts about each
of the many conspiracies, and I now was able to define their interlocking into
the one world "Conspiracy of Conspiracies." I had traced the names
and activities of the principal actors in the Satanic drama which this world has
become, a world which I described in 1968 in "My Life in Christ" as "Satan's Empire." This was an over-simplification, although I was
not aware of it at that time. I had written this book under great stress; my father had
died as the result of harassment by federal agents. Their goal was
to force me to give up this work.
Eustace Mullins, Curse of Canaan
3
Contents
1. The War Against Shem ...............................1
2. The Transgression of Cain ...........................35
5. The French Revolution............................ 107
6. The American Revolution......................... 129
7. The Civil War.......................................143
8. The State of Virginia...............................173
9. The World Wars ....................................195
10. The Menace of Communism ....................211
11. The Promise......................................... 227
(Perspective of a faithful Christic-Muslim)
B.A.
Frémaux-Soormally
Dedicated
to Eustace Mullins, his father and beloved family.
Eustace Mullins’ Curse of Canaan - I have never read any contemporary work so well
researched although I deplore the fact that Mullins ignored the fact that much
of the Holy Bible is unreliable and incomplete, and also ignored the countless texts
(if I am not mistaken) that had been rejected by the established churches, and
in particular by imperialist Rome.I
certainly also deplore the fact that he ignored the Islamic narrative of that
same Curse as contained infallibly (for Believing Muslims) in the Holy
Qur’ân and the Sunnah (other traditional texts like the Ahadiith, Sayings
attributed (rightly or wrongly) to Prophet Muhammad himself,peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him).However, it is a fact that the Ahadiith have
been very rigorously investigated, but unfortunately this does not make them
infallible in their entirety.As for the
Holy Qur’ân, there can be no doubt that it was inspired by one and only man, Muhammad, and written down in its entirety when he was alive, and
checked and re-checked many times again and again by him orally as the first
Muslims had committed them to memory, a practice that has been going on for
over 1400 years.That Holy Book was
preserved in its original Arabic language and never underwent the slightest
changes in its more than 1400 years of existence, an exploit in itself or a
miracle would rightly say the Believers.
Now, saying that Jesus Christ is “the only Begotten
Son of God” will make many smile (or
cringe), including myself, as this is only a matter of faith and of ‘pagan’
origin, but apart from that Eustace Mullins remains the very best that we had
in our Modern Age, sincere, honest, brave, jovial, incorruptible, and he passed
away having accomplished what no man has ever done during his lifetime.There may be others, but I (an amateur) do
not know much about them.
To his credit
To
have been the protégé of Ezra Pound.
To
have been the only person ever fired from the staff of the Library of Congress
for political reasons.
To have
been the only writer who has had a book burned in Europe
since 1945.
To
have survived relentless Jewish and F.B.I. persecution and harassment.
To
have reached the conclusion (like me), that “all conspiracies are Satanic!”
To
have remained a faithful Christian till the end.
To
have proved all along his sincerity, courage, honesty, incorruptibility, loyalty
to truth, perseverance and extreme patience.
To
have been really inspired to sayso prophetically: “God has no secrets from man” and
to have asked: “What could God offer you when he has already given
you the whole world?”
To
have written so beautifully such unique and factual books like “The
Federal Reserve”, “The Secrets of the Atom Bomb”, “The Curse of Canaan”, “The
Biological Jew”, and many others.
To
the fact that he was not awarded the abominable Jewish and Zionist Nobel
Prize Award and this makes him the best of the best!
Eustace Mullins speaking at the Global Sciences Congress, January 1990, Tampa Florida.
“Many of the black nobility still have homeopathic physicians and the
most famous one is the queen of England, who herself is treated
regularly by homeopathic physicians”
From 1945 through 1958 America’s iconoclastic poet–the flamboyant
Ezra Pound, one of the most influential individuals of his
generation–was held in a Washington, D.C. mental institution, accused of
treason. Pound had merely done what he had always done–spoken his
mind. Unfortunately for Pound, however, he had made the error of
criticizing the American government in a series of broadcasts from Italy
during World War II. For that he was made to pay the price. Was Pound a
traitor–or a prophet? Read his words and judge for yourself.
American students have been taught by scandalized educators that
famed American poet and philosopher Ezra Pound delivered “treasonous”
English-language radio broadcasts from Italy (directed to both Americans
and to the British) during World War II. However, as noted by Robert
H. Walker, an editor for the Greenwood Press: “Thousands of people have
heard about them, scores have been affected by them, yet but a handful
has ever heard or read them.” This ignorance of Pound’s most
controversial political rhetoric is ironic, inasmuch as: “No other
American–and only a few individuals throughout the world–has left such
a strong mark on so many aspects of the 20th century: from poetry to
economics, from theater to philosophy, from politics to pedagogy, from
Provencal to Chinese. If Pound was not always totally accepted, at least
he was unavoidably there.” One critic called Pound’s broadcasts a
“confused mixture of fascist apologetics, economic theory,
anti-Semitism, literary judgment and memory” Another described them as
“an unholy mixture of ambiguity, obscurity, inappropriate subject
matters [and] vituperation,” adding (grudgingly) there were “a few
pearls of unexpected wisdom.”
Despite all the furor over Pound’s broadcasts–which were heard
between January of 1941 through July of 1943–it was not until 1978
that a full-length 465-page compendium of transcriptions of the
broadcasts was assembled by Prof. Leonard Doob of Yale University in
association with aforementioned Greenwood Press. Published under the
title “Ezra Pound Speaking”–Radio Speeches of World War II, the volume
provides the reader a comprehensive look at Pound’s philosophy as it
was presented by the poet him self in what Robert Walker, who wrote the
foreword to the compendium, describes as “that flair for dramatic
hyperbole.”
What follows is an attempt to synthesize Pound’s extensive verbal
parries. Most of what is appears here has never been printed anywhere
except in the compendium of Pound’s wartime broadcasts. Thus, for the
first time ever–for a popular audience–here is what Pound really had to
say, not what his critics claim he said. When he was broadcasting from
Italy during wartime, Pound evidently pondered the possibility of one
day compiling transcriptions of his broadcasts (or at least
expected–quite correctly–that one day the transcripts would be compiled
by someone else). He hoped the broadcasts would show a consistent thread
once they were committed to print. Pound recognized relaying such a
massive amount of information about so many seemingly unrelated subjects
might be confusing listeners less widely read than he. However, the
poet also had very firm ideas about the need of his listeners to be able
to synthesize the broad range of material that appeared in his colorful
lectures.
Pound was sure his remarks on radio were not seditious, but were
strictly informational and dedicated to traditional principles of
Americanism–including the Constitution, in particular. In response to
media claims that he was a fascist propagandist, Pound had this to say:
“If anyone takes the trouble to record and examine the series of talks I
have made over this radio it will be found I have used three sorts of
material: historical facts; convictions of experienced men, based on
fact; and the fruits of my own experience. The facts . . . mostly
antedate the fascist era and cannot be considered as improvisations
trumped up to meet present requirements. Neither can the beliefs of
Washington, John Adams, Jefferson, Jackson, Van Buren, and Lincoln be
laughed off as mere fascist propaganda. And even my own observations
date largely before the opening of the present hostilities. “I defend
the particularly American, North American, United States heritage. If
anybody can find anything hostile to the Constitution of the U.S.A. in
these speeches, it would greatly interest me to know what. It may be
bizarre, eccentric, quaint, old-fashioned of me to refer to that
document, but I wish more Americans would at least read it. It is not
light and easy reading but it contains several points of interest,
whereby some of our present officials could, if they but would, profit
greatly.” Pound’s immediate concern was the war in Europe–”this war on
youth–on a generation” –which he described as the natural result of
the “age of the chief war pimps.” He hated the very idea that Americans
were being primed for war, and on the very day of Pearl Harbor he
denounced the idea that American boys should soon be marching off to
war: “I do not want my compatriots from the ages of 20 to 40 to go get
slaughtered to keep up the Sassoon and other British Jew rackets in
Singapore and in Shanghai. That is not my idea of American patriotism,”
he added. In Pound’s view, the American government alliance with British
finance capitalism and Soviet Bolshevism was contrary to America’s
tradition and heritage: “Why did you take up with those gangs?” he
rhetorically asked his listeners. “Two gangs. [The] Jews’ gang in
London, and [the] Jew murderous gang over in Moscow? Do you like Mr.
Litvinov? [Soviet ambassador to Britain Meyer Wallach, alias Litvinov,
born 1876.--Ed.] “Do the people from Delaware and Virginia and
Connecticut and Massachusetts . . . who live in painted, neat, white
houses . . . do these folks really approve [of] Mr. Litvinov and his
gang, and all he stands for?” There was no reason for U.S. intervention
abroad, he said: “The place to defend the American heritage is on the
American continent. And no man who had any part in helping [Franklin]
Delano Roosevelt get the United States into [the war] has enough sense
to win anything . . . The men who wintered at Valley Forge did not
suffer those months of intense cold and hunger in the hope that . . .
the union of the colonies would one day be able to stir up wars between
other countries in order to sell them munitions.”
What was the American tradition? According to Pound: “The
determination of our forbears to set up and maintain in the North
American continent a government better than any other. The determination
to govern ourselves internally, better than any other nation on earth.
The idea of Washington, Jefferson, Monroe, to keep out of foreign
shindies.” Of FDR’s interventionism, he declared: “To send boys from
Omaha to Singapore to die for British monopoly and brutality is not the
act of an American patriot.” However, Pound said: “Don’t shoot the
President. I dare say he deserves worse, but . . . [a]ssassination only
makes more mess.” Pound saw the American national tradition being buried
by the aggressive new internationalism.
According to Pound’s harsh judgment: “The American gangster did not
spend his time shooting women and children. He may have been misguided,
but in general he spent his time fighting superior forces at
considerable risk to himself . . . not in dropping booby traps for
unwary infants. I therefore object to the modus in which the American
troops obey their high commander. This modus is not in the spirit of
Washington or of Stephen Decatur.” Pound hated war and detected a
particular undercurrent in the previous wars of history. Wars, he said,
were destructive to nation-states, but profitable for the special
interests. Pound said international bankers–Jewish bankers, in
particular–were those who were the primary beneficiaries of the profits
of from war. He pulled no punches when he declared: Sometime the
Anglo-Saxon may awaken to the fact that . . . nations are shoved into
wars in order to destroy themselves, to break up their structure, to
destroy their social order, to destroy their populations. And no more
flaming and flagrant case appears in history than our own American Civil
War, said to be an occidental record for size of armies employed and
only surpassed by the more recent triumphs of [the Warburg banking
family:] the wars of 1914 and the present one.
Although World War II itself was much on Pound’s mind, the poet’s
primary concern, referenced repeatedly throughout his broadcasts, was
the issue of usury and the control of money and economy by private
special interests. “There is no freedom without economic freedom,” he
said. “Freedom that does not include freedom from debt is plain bunkum.
It is fetid and foul logomachy to call such servitude freedom . . .Yes,
freedom from all sorts of debt, including debt at usurious interest.”
Usury, he said, was a cause of war throughout history. In Pound’s view
understanding the issue of usury was central to understanding
history: “Until you know who has lent what to whom, you know nothing
whatever of politics, you know nothing whatever of history, you know
nothing of international wrangles. “The usury system does no nation . . .
any good whatsoever. It is an internal peril to him who hath, and it
can make no use of nations in the play of international diplomacy save
to breed strife between them and use the worst as flails against the
best. It is the usurer’s game to hurl the savage against the civilized
opponent. The game is not pretty, it is not a very safe game. It does no
one any credit.”
Pound thus traced the history of the current war: “This war did not
begin in 1939. It is not a unique result of the infamous Versailles
Treaty. It is impossible to understand it without knowing at least a few
precedent historic events, which mark the cycle of combat. No man can
understand it without knowing at least a few facts and their
chronological sequence. This war is part of the age-old struggle
between the usurer and the rest of mankind: between the usurer and
peasant, the usurer and producer, and finally between the usurer and the
merchant, between usurocracy and the mercantilist system . . . “The
present war dates at least from the founding of the Bank of England at
the end of the 17th century, 1694-8. Half a century later, the London
usurocracy shut down on the issue of paper money by the Pennsylvania
colony, A.D. 1750. This is not usually given prominence in the U.S.
school histories. The 13 colonies rebelled, quite successfully, 26 years
later, A.D. 1776. According to Pound, it was the money issue (above
all) that united the Allies during the second 20th-century war against
Germany: “Gold. Nothing else uniting the three governments, England,
Russia, United States of America. That is the interest–gold, usury,
debt, monopoly, class interest, and possibly gross indifference and
contempt for humanity.”
Although “gold” was central to the world’s struggle, Pound still felt
gold “is a coward. Gold is not the backbone of nations. It is their
ruin. A coward, at the first breath of danger gold flows away, gold
flows out of the country.” Pound perceived Germany under Hitler as a
nation that stood against the international money lenders and communist
Russia under Stalin as a system that stood against humanity itself.
He told his listeners: “Now if you know anything whatsoever of
modern Europe and Asia, you know Hitler stands for putting men over
machines. If you don’t know that, you know nothing. And beyond that you
either know or do not know that Stalin’s regime considers humanity as
nothing save raw material. Deliver so many carloads of human material at
the consumption point. That is the logical result of materialism. If
you assert that men are dirty, that humanity is merely material, that is
where you come out. And the old Georgian train robber [Josef
Stalin--ed.] is perfectly logical. If all things are merely material,
man is material–and the system of anti-man treats man as matter.” The
real enemy, said Pound, was international capitalism. All people
everywhere were victims: “They’re working day and night, picking your
pockets,” he said. “Every day and all day and all night picking your
pockets and picking the Russian working man’s pockets.” Capital,
however, he said, was “not international, it is not hyper-national. It
is sub-national. A quicksand under the nations, destroying all nations,
destroying all law and government, destroying the nations, one at a
time, Russian empire and Austria, 20 years past, France yesterday,
England today.”
According to Pound, Americans had no idea why they were being
expected to fight in Britain’s war with Germany: “Even Mr. Churchill
hasn’t had the grass to tell the American people why he wants them to
die, to save what. He is fighting for the gold standard and monopoly.
Namely the power to starve the whole of mankind, and make it pay through
the nose before it can eat the fruit of its own labor.” As far as the
English were concerned, in Pound’s broadcasts aimed at the British Isles
he warned his listeners that although Russian-style communist
totalitarianism was a threat to British freedom, it was not the biggest
threat Britain faced: You are threatened. You are threatened by the
Russian methods of administration. Those methods [are not] your sole
danger. It is, in fact, so far from being your sole danger that I have,
in over two years of talk over this radio, possibly never referred to it
before.
Usury has gnawed into England since the days of Elizabeth. First it
was mortgages, mortgages on earls’ estates; usury against the feudal
nobility. Then there were attacks on the common land, filchings of
village common pasture. Then there developed a usury system, an
international usury system, from Cromwell’s time, ever increasing.” In
the end, Pound suggested, it would be the big money interests who would
really win the war–not any particular nation-state–and the foundation
for future wars would be set in place: “The nomadic parasites will shift
out of London and into Manhattan. And this will be presented under a
camouflage of national slogans. It will be represented as an American
victory. It will not be an American victory. The moment is serious. The
moment is also confusing. It is confusing because there are two sets of
concurrent phenomena, namely, those connected with fighting this war,
and those which sow seeds for the next one.” Pound believed one of the
major problems of the day–which itself had contributed to war fever–was
the manipulation of the press, particularly in the United States: “I
naturally mistrust newspaper news from America,” he declared. “I grope
in the mass of lies, knowing most of the sources are wholly
untrustworthy.” According to Pound: “The United States has been
misinformed. The United States has been led down the garden path, and
may be down under the daisies. All through shutting out news.
- Michael Collins Piper
The Neo-Zionist order AKA The Illuminati:
(Note: The group being referred to here are not the Jewish People, but a group using Zionism as a shield.
The fascade is to make you blame the Jews, while these people switch masks again should Zionism become exposed.
This video is NOT anti-Jewish. Please do not Flag out of ignorance.)
What is this Neo-Zionist Order?
What is a central bank, and what does it have to do with the Federal reserve and our currency?
Why doesnt congress control the money?
What is the difference between a promisary note and gold and silver backed money?
What did the Nazis do with Sodium Flouride, and why is it in our water?
Why did America get involved in WW2?
New World Order ?
Author Eustace Mullins answers these questions and more
Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles ( online pdf 906 pages, good read go for it ) http://forum.conspiracycentral.net/index.php?showtopic=10055
Part 1 Eustace Mullins talks about the New World Order
-
Eustace Mullins (born 1923) is an American political writer, author,
biographer, and the last surviving protege of the 20th century
intellectual and writer, Ezra Pound. As of 2005, Eustace Mullins is a
member of the Southeast Bureau editorial staff of far-right Willis
Carto’s American Free Press. He is also a contributing editor to the
Barnes Review.
Contents
Biography
Eustace Clarence Mullins, Jr. was born in Roanoke, Virginia, the
third child of Eustace Clarence Mullins (1899-1961) and his wife Jane
Katherine Muse (1897-1971). His father was a salesman in a retail
clothing store.
Education
Eustace Mullins was educated at Washington and Lee University, New
York University, the University of North Dakota and the Institute of
Contemporary Arts (Washington, D.C.)
-
WWII
In December 1942, at Charlottesville, Virginia he enlisted in the
military as a Warrant Officer. He is also a veteran of the United States
Air Force, with thirty-eight months active service during World War II.
Ezra Pound
Mullins was a student of the poet and political activist Ezra Pound.
He states that he frequently visited Pound during his period of
incarceration in St. Elizabeth’s Hospital for the Mentally Ill in
Washington, D.C. between 1946 and 1959. Mullins claimed that Pound was,
in fact, being held as a political prisoner on the behest of President
Franklin D. Roosevelt. Mullins’ most notable work, Secrets of the
Federal Reserve, was commissioned by Pound during this period, and
written in consultation with George Stimpson, founder of the National
Press Club[1] Mullins claims that at the time he was writing his first
book, he was on the staff of the Library of Congress, but that shortly
after it came out in 1952, he was fired. This is repeated by Boller and
George (They Never Said It: A Book of Fake Quotes, Misquotes, and
Misleading Attributions, by Paul F. Boller, Jr. and John George,
published by Oxford University Press (1989), p. 15. The word
“discharged” is used, rather than fired.)
By 1995, Eustace was writing for Criminal Politics: “A good example
of these other paths is Criminal Politics, where Lawrence Patterson and
his cohorts, including Eustace Mullins and Fletcher Prouty, scour the
world for evidence of conspiracies within the world’s power structure.”
(Danky, Jim, and John Cherney. “An outpouring of right-wing publications
cover all social issues”. St. Louis Journalism Review 25.n179 (Sept
1995): 27(1). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale.) “Eustace Mullins, who was
a researcher at the Library of Congress in 1950 when McCarthy asked him
to look into who was financing the Communist Party, was the keynote
speaker at a dinner Sunday evening sponsored by the Sen. Joseph McCarthy
Educational Foundation. “I’ve come to believe in recent years that he
started to turn the tide against world communism,” said Mullins.” (The
Capital Times, Madison, WI, May 21, 2001, p. 3A. Full Text Newspapers.
Thomson Gale)[2]
Writings
In Secrets of the Federal Reserve (1952), Mullins highlighted a
purported conspiracy among Paul Warburg, Edward Mandell House, Woodrow
Wilson, J.P. Morgan, Charles Norris, Benjamin Strong, Otto Kahn, the
Rockefeller family, the Rothschild family, and other European and
American bankers which resulted in the founding of a privately owned, US
central bank. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustace_Mullins
Murder by injection
is one of the most important books ever written. It’s out of print and
very expensive to buy on Amazon. You can download it here for free.
There used to be a Eustace Mullins website but I think its down. Do
whatever you can to support conspiracy book authors and their next of
kin since they are the only people who will give you their work for
free.
I have more to say about this subject and I’ll get back to it when I
have time. I don’t appreciate White Nationalists calling him USELESS
Mullins. Ezra called him that in jest. That article in occidental upset me. People in the White Nationalist movement seem to think Mullins was more damaging than useful to the movement.
Most of Mullins sources have turned out to be 100% percent correct in
light of the Bohemian Grove membership lists that have come out. I
registered a domain for Eustace and I am one of his proteges who is
continuing where he left off. The domain is eustacemullins.us. An appropriate website for possibly one of America’s greatest patriots.
Legendary Historian And Freedom Fighter Eustace Mullins Dies He Will Be Missed Listen here to the shows Daryl Bradford Smith did with Eustace
http://iamthewitness.com/archive.php?dir=audio%2FEustace.Mullins%2F
> audio > Eustace.Mullins
File
Size
Last Modified
FolderUP 2010.01.09 · 02.56
TFC.2005.12.08.Thu.1of2.Mullins+Atkins.mp3 TFC.2005.12.08.Thu.1of2.Mullins+Atkins.mp3 4559.7 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2005.12.08.Thu.1of2.Mullins.Atkins.mp3 TFC.2005.12.08.Thu.1of2.Mullins.Atkins.mp3 4559.7 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2005.12.08.Thu.2of2.Mullins.mp3 TFC.2005.12.08.Thu.2of2.Mullins.mp3 4559.6 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2006.01.25.Wed.Mullins.1of2.mp3 TFC.2006.01.25.Wed.Mullins.1of2.mp3 4558.6 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2006.01.25.Wed.Mullins.2of2.mp3 TFC.2006.01.25.Wed.Mullins.2of2.mp3 4381.5 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2006.02.07.Tue.Mullins.mp3 TFC.2006.02.07.Tue.Mullins.mp3 4453 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2006.07.19.Wed.Mullins.mp3 TFC.2006.07.19.Wed.Mullins.mp3 6661.4 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2006.09.14.Thu.Mullins.mp3 TFC.2006.09.14.Thu.Mullins.mp3 4087.2 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2006.10.17.Tue.Mullins.mp3 TFC.2006.10.17.Tue.Mullins.mp3 6057.7 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2006.11.26.Sun.Mullins.mp3 TFC.2006.11.26.Sun.Mullins.mp3 7265.5 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
TFC.2006.12.16.Sat.Mullins.mp3 TFC.2006.12.16.Sat.Mullins.mp3 6383.2 KB 2009.09.20 · 17.15
Temps de lecture de cet article: 14 minutes
