The essays have been edited by Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., a former Marine Corps
officer and Distinguished McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University
of Minnesota Duluth, and by Mike Palecek, who has committed his life to
the search for truth and justice. If you care about either, then don't
miss this book.
And I suppose we didn't go to the Moon, either!
The Beatles, the Holocaust, and other mass illusions
Authored by Jim Fetzer
Cover design or artwork by Ole Dammegard
Edited by Mike Palecek
Unlike the government, none of us have any reason to lie. Some might say, "This may be the most dangerous book in the world!"
And they just might be right!
This book demonstrates--with scientific argument and empirical
proof--that
Man did not go to the Moon, that
Paul McCartney was replaced
after his death in 1966 and that
the official narrative of the
Holocaust cannot be sustained.
It also explains
how and why the
United States hung one of his doubles, not the real Saddam Hussein, and
that Osama bin Laden was not killed by U.S. Navy SEALs in Pakistan in
2011, but died from his medical conditions in 2001, where it was
politically expedient for him to die a second time.
Publication Date:
May 15 2015
ISBN/EAN13:
1512222267 / 9781512222265
Page Count:
368
Binding Type:
US Trade Paper
Trim Size:
6" x 9"
Language:
English
Color:
Black and White
Related Categories:
True Crime / Hoaxes & Deceptions
ORDER FROM
https://www.createspace.com/5501390
 |
|
|
Jim Fetzer & Ole Dammegard - Hour 1 - Mass Illusions: The Moon Landing, The Holocaust & The Beatles & Doubles
June 3, 2015
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps
officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota
Duluth. He has published widely on the theoretical foundations of
scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence,
cognitive science and evolution and mentality. Ole Dammegård is an
author, international speaker, investigator, former journalist, artist
who is behind the website Light On Conspiracies. Ole and Jim join us to
speak about their new book collaboration called, "And I suppose we
didn't go to the Moon, either?" It is a collection of essays on
government lies that is intended to challenge some of our most cherished
and deeply held beliefs. Our conversation begins with the first subject
of the book – the Apollo 11 Moon landing. Jim takes us through a few of
the vast number of anomalies in the 5,000+ photographs in existence,
and he talks about the problem with the Van Allen radiation belt, which
continues to be a giant obstacle for space travel today. Ole gives his
interpretation of why so many connections exist amongst various
conspiracies within the government, and we discuss the backlash that is
felt by researchers who decide to look into some of the most
preposterous events in history. Then, we delve into the holocaust,
anti-Semitism, hate speech, and the big media promotors of
disinformation, as well as the deterioration of news coverage that is
pushing the mainstream to alternative sources. In the members’ segment,
we start with the fascinating tale of the Beatles and their golden boy,
Paul McCartney. Jim relates how the British invasion of pop music in the
US sparked a revival of spirit that was clung to by the grief-stricken
youth who were reeling from the shocking assassination of JFK. We get
into the details of the extreme operation that was used to replace the
original Paul, who is said to have died in a car accident in 1966. Jim
points to the numerous signs that suggest the Beatles placed clues about
the death in their album artwork, lyrics, and even in the way they
referred to Paul. Then, we look into the assassination of Saddam
Hussein’s double and the real death of this beloved boogeyman. We also
touch on the fakery surrounding Osama Bin Laden’s death and the
disproportionately influential AIPAC lobby power that has been granted
as a result of the sham. At the end, Jim gives us a rundown of the
latest insane operation that has even the mainstream buzzing – Jade
Helm. We chew over the different components of this military maneuver of
which we can apply deductive reasoning, and we speculate on what could
be in store for us if indeed we are on the road to Marshall Law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant links
radiofetzer.blogspot.com
noliesradio.org
veteranstruthnetwork.com
jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
lightonconspiracies.com
openmindconference.nl
'Moon rock' given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin is fake
Capricorn One
Lunar Laser Ranging experiment
Paul McCartney and Wings
Our "Saddam" prisoner in Iraq - is NOT Saddam!
Posse Comitatus Act
Books & DVDs
And
I suppose we didn't go to the moon, either?: The Beatles, the
Holocaust, and other mass illusions (Save the World, Resist the Empire)
And I
suppose we didn't go to the moon, either?: The Beatles, the Holocaust,
and other mass illusions (Save the World, Resist the Empire)(on
CreateSpace)
Related programs
Ole Dammegard - Making Critical Thinking Illegal: Questioning the Holocaust
Ole Dammegard - Hour 1 - Templates of False Flag Operations: Paris & Copenhagen
Chip
Tatum & Ole Dammegard - Hour 1 - Pegasus Insider Speaks on CIA
Assassinations, Iran-Contra & Drug Trafficking Cover-ups
Ole Dammegard - Hour 1 & 2 - The Death Squad Network Behind the JFK Assassination
Ole Dammegard - Hour 1 - Coup d'etat in Slow Motion: The Assassination of Olof Palme
Ole Dammegard - Hour 1 - The Assassination of Olof Palme - Part 2
Ole Dammegard - Hour 1 - The Assassination of Olof Palme & The Sinking of Estonia - Part 3
Ole Dammegard - Hour 1 - The Assassination of Olof Palme - Part 4
Music
Capricorn One OST - Capricorn One
Posted on18 September 2012.
NOVANEWS
James H. Fetzer: Mossad Played a Crucial Role in 9/11 Attacks
(THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2012) - More than one
decade after the 9/11 attacks which completely diverted the path of the
U.S. foreign policy and led to the waging of two lethal, erosive wars on
Afghanistan and Iraq and killing of thousands of innocent civilians, an
influential, diligent group of researchers and authors have dared to
question the authenticity and veracity of the claims made by the U.S.
government that they were Islamist terrorists who crashed hijacked
planes into the World Trade Center towers and Pentagon and killed some
3,000 people.
One of these high-ranking, renowned researchers is Dr. James H.
Fetzer, a retired professor of philosophy at the University of Minnesota
Duluth. He has written on the philosophy of science and on the
theoretical foundations of computer science, artificial intelligence,
and cognitive science.
According to Dr. Fetzer, George W. Bush and his administration
officials were responsible for the atrocities which happened on
September 11, 2001. He firmly believes that Israel’s Mossad was involved
in the 9/11 attacks and that the U.S. government tries to withhold this
truth from the public; however, he has written tens of articles for
different magazines and news websites, providing evidence of the
involvement of Israel’s intelligence service in the attacks.
Dr. Fetzer has edited several books, such as “Murder in Dealey
Plaza: What we know now that we didn’t know then”, which are dedicated
to the study of the assassination of former U.S. President John F.
Kennedy. Among his seven authored scientific books are “Artificial
Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits” and “The Evolution of Intelligence:
Are Humans the Only Animals with Minds?”
Dr. James H. Fetzer took part in an exclusive interview with Iran
Review on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks and answered some
questions about the uncertainties about the horrendous incident which
took place 11 years ago in the heart of New York.
Q: Would you please talk about the difficulties and problems
the 9/11 Truth movement has faced during the past decade? Does the U.S.
government directly persecute or put pressure on independent researchers
and authors who cast doubt on the official accounts given of the 9/11
events? What about the mainstream media? Have they made efforts to
silence you and other researchers such as David Ray Griffin, Christopher
Bollyn, Webster Tarpley, etc. who believe that 9/11 attacks was a false
flag operation?
A: The most serious problems confronting the 9/11
Truth movement have arisen from conflicts internal to the movement
coming from various factions, which have adopted negative and even
hostile attitudes toward the others. One branch is the conservative,
public-relations oriented branch, such as the 9/11 movement in the UK
led by Ian Henshall, which doesn’t want to ruffle feathers by addressing
the discoveries that make a difference, such as the use of mini-nukes
to blow apart the Twin Towers, that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, that
all four of the crash sites were fabricated or faked, albeit in
different ways, and that the Mossad played a crucial role in 9/11. We
have all heard about WTC-7 and other hum-drum aspects of 9/11, but it
has not done what was originally hoped by arousing the public. More of
the same is not going to do it, either.
Then we have the “thermite sniffers”, led by Steven Jones and Kevin
Ryan, who insist that this obscure incendiary could have blown apart the
buildings, which, as T. Mark Hightower has shown, turned out to be
physically impossible, and the “plane huggers,” such as Rob Balsamo, the
head of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, who want to hang onto the myth that
these big Boeings actually crashed on 9/11, when all the evidence
contradicts them. Ironically, Pilots has done some of the most
important work on this subject, including establishing that Flight 93
was over Urbana, IL, after it had allegedly crashed in Shanksville; and
that Flight 175 was over Pittsburgh, PA, long after it had allegedly
entered the South Tower. With friends like these, 9/11 Truth doesn’t
have to have disinformation ops working against us to be fragmented,
even though there are plenty of them, too.
Q: Some authors and researchers have argued that there were
explosive materials which caused the Twin Towers to collapse after the
planes associated with Flight 11 and Flight 175 crashed into the North
Tower and South Tower. Is there compelling evidence confirming this?
Somewhere you argued that these flights were formally taken out of
service until September 28, 2005 and non-existent planes cannot crash
into a colossal building in the heart of Manhattan. Would you please
expand more on these two points?
A: Bureau of
Transportation Statistics records show that Flights 11 and 77 were not
even scheduled to fly that day, while FAA Registration data show that
the planes associated with Flights 93 and 175 were not de-registered or
formally taken out of service until 28 September 2005, which raises the
questions, How could planes that were not in the air have crashed on
9/11? and how could planes that crashed on 9/11 have still been in the
air four years later?
Although
it sounds like a stretch, the hits on both of the towers appear to have
involved the projection images of planes–though in the case of the
North Tower, it really does not look much like a plane at all–as I have
explained in many places, including “Planes/No Planes and Video Fakery”
and “Reason and Rationality in Public Debate: The Case of Rob Balsamo.”
Until you study the evidence,
“Were the 9/11 crash sites faked?” (Seattle, WA, 13 June 2012):
it is very difficult to believe. I resisted the very idea for a year
and a half until Morgan Reynolds convinced me that I had to study the
evidence. Now that I have, I can’t believe we were taken for such a
ride! If there were no “Big Boeing” plane crashes, after all, and these
were phantom flights, then the passengers were imaginary. And if the
passengers were imaginary, then there were no Islamic hijackers aboard
any of those planes. And if there were no Islamic hijackers aboard any
of those planes, the whole “War on Terror” has been justified by an
elaborate hoax.
Q: Do you have any information of the possible complicity of
Israel’s Mossad in carrying out the 9/11 attacks? We’ve heard of the
story of 5 dancing Israelis who had set up cameras directed at the Twin
Towers before the planes crashed into the buildings, and were seen
celebrating and congratulating each other after the towers collapsed.
What’s your take on that?
A: The evidence of Israeli involvement and Mossad
participation in 9/11 is abundant and compelling. Christopher Bollyn has
a book about it, which goes overboard about nanothermite, but otherwise
offers important evidence about this aspect of the case. Articles by
Alan Sabrosky whom I had invited to speak during The Vancouver Hearings
but medical problems intervened, elaborate on many aspects of Israeli
involvement. And the web site, “Israel did 9/11–all the proof in the
world” does an exceptional job of brining together an enormous body of
proof that even the transfer of the World Trade Center from the New York
Port Authority into the hands of Larry Silverstein was part and parcel
of the larger plan. An exceptional study, “9/11 and Zion: What was
Israel’s role?”, by Nicholas Kollerstrom, a historian of science from
the UK and an expert on the London 7/7 subway bombings, which recently
appeared in Veterans Today, is required reading on this issue.
Q: What’s your viewpoint regarding the possible involvement
of Osama bin Laden in the 9/11 attacks? The FBI website had blacklisted
him as the world’s most wanted terrorist, but did not attribute the 9/11
attacks to him due to a lack of sufficient evidence. We also know that
in the 1970s and 1980s, CIA and other Western intelligence agencies
along with the Saudi government armed, equipped and financed him to
fight the Soviet forces in Afghanistan. So, is it rational to claim that
bin Laden has revolted against his former allies and the ones who had
once backed him unconditionally?
A: Osama bin Laden was “our man in Afghanistan.”
When first asked about 9/11, he explained that he had nothing to do with
it, that it was contrary to the tenets of the Koran to murder innocent
women and children and that, while he had differences with the U.S.,
especially over stationing its forces in Saudi Arabia, the home of Mecca
and Medina, the most holy sites in Islam, that there is a “government
within the government” that brought 9/11 about and wanted to blame
Muslims, even though they had nothing to do with it. And, indeed, as
Elias Davidsson has documented, the U.S. has never been able to prove
that any of the alleged hijackers were aboard any of those planes, while
David Ray Griffin has noted that a half-dozen or more of those alleged
to have been aboard them were found alive and well after 9/11.
Interestingly, another expert who remarked that there is a “government
within the government” of the U.S. was former President William Clinton.
Q: In one of your articles, you cited the accounts of William
Rodriguez, the janitor of the North Tower and reports by a scientific
lab at the Columbia University which attested that huge explosions took
place at least 16 or 17 seconds before the planes crashed into the Twin
Towers of the World Trade Center. What does this fact indicate?
A: Willie’s reports have been confirmed by Craig
Furlong and Gordon Ross, “Seismic Proof: 9/11 was an inside job,” where
they compared very precise seismic data from a geological lab run by
Columbia University with FAA and military radar data for the alleged
impact times of the planes and found that they occurred 14 and 17
seconds prior to the alleged impacts. Since that would have been rather
difficult for Islamic terrorists to have arranged, it provides powerful
proof that 9/11 was indeed an “inside job.” The graph that summarizes
their study, which can be found on-line at Scholars for 9/11 and
911studies.org, also appears in “Seven Questions about 9/11,” which can
be found at Veterans Today along with photographs substantiating that no
Beoing 757 hit the Pentagon, substantiated in Vancouver, as I explain,
“9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings I.”
Q: At the Vancouver Hearings, you submitted the names of
George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld as the possible accomplices of the
9/11 atrocities. Would you please talk about the reasons you named them,
along with Philip Zelikow, Richard B. Cheney and Lt. Col. Steve
O’Brien, as those who should be held accountable with regards to the
9/11 events?
A: The key players in relation to 9/11 were the
neo-conservatives in the Department of Defense and the Israeli Mossad.
Philip Zelikow, Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, for example,
had as his area of academic specialization before entering government
the creation and maintenance of public myths, M-Y-T-H-S, which is what
he gave us in the 9/11 Commission Report. As Elias Davidsson has shown,
the government has never shown that the alleged hijackers were abroad
any of those planes. As David Ray Griffin and A.K. Dewdney have shown,
all of the alleged phone calls from those planes were faked. As Col.
George Nelson, USAF (ret.), has observed, although there were millions
of uniquely identifiable pieces from those four aircrafts, the
government has yet to produce even one! Neither the FBI nor the NTSB
even investigated those “crashes,” claiming that it wasn’t necessary
because “we saw what happened on television”. But it was all a fraud.
Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Cheney, George W. Bush and an obscure
Minnesota Air National Guard pilot named Lt. Col. Steve O’Brien, MNANG,
all played roles in managing these atrocities or in covering them up,
which I have detailed in “9/11 J’accuse: Zelikow, Cheney, Rumsfeld,
Bush, and O’Brien.” The others’ roles are relatively obvious, but Lt.
Col. O’Brien was piloting the C-130 that was circling the Pentagon, from
which the debris that later showed up on the lawn appears to have been
dropped. One especially conspicuous piece of fuselage has been tracked
back to a crash in Cali, Columbia, in 1995. I discussed all of this with
the BBC, but it misrepresented my position by switching photos that I
was talking about with others taken later. See “The BBC’s instrument of
9/11 misinformation.”
Q: Immediately after the 9/11 attacks, President Bush
declared the commencement of his War on Terror. As the first move, he
attacked and invaded Afghanistan, and two years later, he occupied Iraq.
We can think that Iraq was occupied because its vast oil reserves
should have been dominated by the U.S., but what was the reason for the
occupation of Afghanistan? Was this country of some geopolitical or
strategic importance to the United States?
A: Of course, the Taliban offered to surrender Osama
bin Laden if we could prove that he had been involved, which we
promised to do but of course ignored. The invasion of Afghanistan began
on 7 October 2001, less than one month after 9/11. An article that
appeared in The New York Times on 13 June 2010 discussed the vast
mineral wealth of that nation, including gold, iron, copper and
especially lithium, which is used in computers, triggers for nuclear
weapons, but especially in electric car batteries and a reported new
process to extract cheap energy from sea water. We appear to be there to
do for Afghanistan what the first Secretary of the Treasury under Bush,
Paul O’Neill, said the Bush administration was doing to the United
States: looting! When we are done looting, we will leave Afghanistan.
Q: U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said that the
9/11 attacks created “the kind of opportunities that World War II
offered, to refashion the world.” So, do you believe that the U.S.
government had been waiting for such an opportunity to find the pretext
to go to war with Afghanistan and Iraq and declare Iran, Iraq and North
Korea as the Axis of Evil? Can we think of the 9/11 attacks as a broader
plan to dominate the Middle East and its vast oil reserves?
A: Our presence there appears to have more to do
with the Israeli “master plan” to dominate and control the Middle East
than any longing for more oil. Gen. Wesley Clark, the former Supreme
Commander of NATO, has reported being informed immediately following
9/11 of a plan to destabilize and overthrow the governments of seven
nations in five years, including Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, but
working up to Syria and eventually Iran. This appears to be what is
driving the US presence there, where the Israeli lobby, AIPAC, which
ought to be registered as a “foreign agent,” dominates Congress and U.S.
foreign policy. Some wags have suggested this country ought to be
renamed “The United States of Israel,” which, I am sorry to say, is very
close to the mark, especially with regard to foreign policy.
The ADL (Anti-Defamation League) has made it their practice to
condemn anyone remotely critical of the actions of Israel as
“anti-Semitic,” including a recent article in which Gordon Duff, Alan
Sabrosky, Kevin Barrett and I were offered as examples of “anti-Semitic
9/11 conspiracy theorists.” But I agree with Michael Moore who, when
asked if he believes in conspiracy theories, replied, “Only those that
are true!” There is abundant and compelling evidence that 9/11 was
brought to us by the US neo-conservatives and the Israeli Mossad. When
asked who could have had the resources to pull off 9/11, intelligence
experts have been unanimous that only two agencies could have done it:
the CIA and the Mossad. Astonishingly, California, where I was born, has
just passed a law making any criticism of the actions of the government
of Israel “anti-Semitic,” which is completely absurd, as I explained
in, “Is 9/11 research ‘anti-Semitic’?” It is symptomatic of the
political power Israel exercises over the United States.
Q: You have just invited Susan Lindauer to speak at the
Vancouver Hearings. We know that she has been a U.S. intelligence asset
and helped with the facilitation of talks between the U.S. government
and Saddam Hussein. What have been the most revealing and important
parts of her testimonies regarding the 9/11 events?
A: What Susan reveals is inside information that
9/11 was an “inside job.” She served as the liaison between the CIA and
Saddam Hussein, who was so eager to avoid war with the U.S. that he
offered to purchase 1,000,000 cars per year for the next ten years. If
that was not enough, he said, make it the next twenty [years]! Imagine
where the U.S. would be economically if we had only taken up his
proposal? Instead, when Susan learned of plans to attack Iraq, she
protested vigorously to President Bush. For taking that step, for
speaking out about her concerns over the injustice of it all and the
violations of international law that would be involved, she was
harassed, intimidated, imprisoned and tortured. This is a stunning case
that reveals the depths of depravity to which the U.S. has sunk. I have
just published her astonishing, horrific story, “9/11: Confessions of a
former CIA Asset,” on Veterans Today.
Q: We are observing the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
As my final question, I would like to ask you to give us an overview of
the whole story that happened on that day. What realities have remained
obscured and hidden so far?
A: 9/11 was conceived as an elaborate psychological
operation to instill fear into the American people in order to
manipulate them into supporting the political agenda of the Bush/Cheney
administration, which included the invasion of several nations in the
Middle East and the creation of a new century of American domination of
the world for the next 100 years. The evidence supports the inference
that 9/11 was a “national security event” which was authorized at the
highest levels of the American government–the CIA, the NSA, the Pentagon
and The White House. It facilitated a reversal of US foreign policy and
extraordinary constraints on the Constitution of the United States,
which have dramatically increased the centralization of political power
in the executive branch and dominating the legislative and judicial
branches of government.
The creation of the Department of Homeland Security has been
especially ominous, where DHS has now requisitioned more than 1.5
billion rounds of .40 caliber hollow point ammo, which is not even
permissible in the conduct of warfare under The Geneva Conventions.
Combined with more than 300 FEMA camps around the country, which I have
discussed in “From America to Amerika: The End Game” (with Dennis
Cimino), even American should be alarmed at the parallels with the rise
of The Third Reich in Germany before WWII. As a former Marine Corps
officer, I am extremely apprehensive over the future of my country,
which has been transformed from the most admired and respected nation in
the world–along with our “gallant ally”‘ in the Middle East, Israel–to
the most despised and reviled. I never expected that the U.S. would
turn to “the dark side” in my lifetime, but it already has.
