Monday, 28 March 2016

RACIST ZIONIST FRANCE HAS ALWAYS FINANCED ISRAEL AND HATED PALESTINIANS, ARABS AND MUSLIMS.


 France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army
28 March 2016
Une sénatrice s'étonne d'une niche fiscale en faveur de Tsahal et reçoit des menaces de mort
 Nathalie Goulet, sénatrice UDI de l'Orne.


This is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”

h/t John Whitbeck

- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpuf

France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army

28 March 2016
This is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpuf

France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army

28 March 2016
This is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
h/t John Whitbeck
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpuf

France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army

28 March 2016
This is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
h/t John Whitbeck
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpuf

France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army

28 March 2016
This is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
h/t John Whitbeck
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpuf

France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army

28 March 2016
This is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
h/t John Whitbeck
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpuf

France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army

28 March 2016
This is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpuf
Politique – Publié le 26 mars à 00:00 – Mis à jour le 26 mars 2016 à 00:02

Une sénatrice s'étonne d'une niche fiscale en faveur de Tsahal et reçoit des menaces de mort

«
»

Une sénatrice s'étonne d'une niche fiscale en faveur de Tsahal et reçoit des menaces de mort

Nathalie Goulet, sénatrice UDI de l'Orne, a annoncé vendredi avoir reçu des menaces de mort via les réseaux sociaux après s'être étonnée d'une réduction d'impôts de 60%, dont peuvent bénéficier les contribuables français qui effectuent un don à l'armée israélienne.

Le 10 mars dernier, la sénatrice de l'Orne avait posé une question écrite au secrétaire d'Etat chargé du budget, Christian Eckert, pour attirer son attention sur l'existence d'une réduction d'impôts lorsque des dons sont envoyés à l'armée israélienne. Dans sa question écrite, Nathalie Goulet souligne notamment qu'il s'agit là "d'une niche fiscale payée par le contribuable français au profit d'une armée étrangère":

Voici dans son intégralité le texte de la question écrite n° 20545 de Mme Nathalie Goulet:
Mme Nathalie Goulet attire l’attention de M. le secrétaire d’État, auprès du ministre des finances et des comptes publics, chargé du budget sur la réglementation actuelle qui permet aux Français et Françaises qui font des dons à l’armée israélienne (Tsahal), de défiscaliser leurs dons et leur donne le droit à 60 % de réduction d’impôts, dans la limite de 20 % du revenu imposable. Il s’agit donc d’une niche fiscale payée par le contribuable français au profit d’une armée étrangère. Elle souhaiterait avoir l’explication de cette disposition exorbitante du droit commun.
Le ministre n'a pas encore répondu à la demande de la sénatrice, qui est également vice-présidente de la "Commission des affaires étrangères, de la défense et des forces armées du Sénat". Par contre, Nathalie Goulet a déclaré vendredi à l'AFP avoir reçu des menaces de mort anonymes sur les réseaux sociaux.

Questionnée vendredi par Ouest-France lors d'un déplacement dans l'Orne, l'élue UDI a refusé de commenter le sujet, déclarant: "Je n’en parlerai pas".

Rédaction web d'iTELE (avec AFP) - Photo : Nathalie Goulet (iTELE) 

THE GREAT DEBATE: CHURCHILL vs HITLER
 
 
(The "debate" is based upon actual quotes arranged mostly in chronological order)
 
Compiled by Mike King 
 * A skeptical reader might suspect that the quotes below were cherry-picked out of context and arranged for propaganda purposes. This is an understandable, though mistaken suspicion. We therefore invite you, after 'the debate', to also read 'The British Mad Dog' and 'The Bad War' . Both works (available at Amazon or here as pdfs) will provide a full and truthful explanation of Hitler, Churchill and World War II.
 
Prime Minister Churchill. We begin with you...
 
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill
We cannot tell whether Hitler will be the man who will once again let loose upon the world another war in which civilization will irretrievably succumb... It is on this mystery of the future that history will pronounce Hitler either a monster or a hero.

Nov., 1935
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler 
I appeal to reason in international affairs. I want to show that the idea of eternal enmity is wrong. We are not hereditary enemies. 
 
Feb., 1936
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill 
There can never be friendship between the British democracy and the Nazi Power. Which cheers its onward course by a barbarous paganism, which vaunts the spirit of aggression and conquest, which derives strength and perverted pleasure from persecution, and uses, as we have seen, with pitiless brutality the threat of murderous force.
Oct., 1938
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler
At no time and in no place have I ever acted contrary to British interests … I believe even today that there can only be real peace in Europe and throughout the world if Germany and England come to an understanding. 
Oct., 1939
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill 
I would say to the House as I said to those who have joined this government: I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat. We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering. 
 
May, 1940
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler
In this hour I feel it to be my duty before my own conscience to appeal once more to reason and common sense, in Great Britain as much as elsewhere. ... I can see no reason why this war must go on.

July, 1940
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill 
We shall go on to the end. We shall fight on the seas, we shall fight in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender...
June, 1940
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler
Time and time again I have offered friendship, and if necessary closest cooperation, to England. But love cannot be offered from one side only. It must be met with reciprocation by the other side.
Germany is not pursuing any interests in the West.
Sep., 1939
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill 
You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory. Victory at all costs. Victory in spite of all terrors. Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival.
May, 1940
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler
All of my peace overtures have been rejected and war was declared on us.... The German people has no hatred, no inimical feeling toward the English or French people.
May, 1940
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill 
There is one thing that will bring Hitler down, and that is an absolutely devastating exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland.
 
July, 1941
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler
Again and again I uttered these warnings against this specific type of aerial warfare, and I did so for over three and a half months. That these warnings failed to impress Mr. Churchill does not surprise me in the least. For what does this man care for the lives of others? What does he care for culture or for architecture?

May, 1941

http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill
 
And even if this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World (United States), with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.
June, 1940

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler 
 
(Roosevelt) is resolved to take over, as safely and securely as possible, the British Empire in the moment of its downfall. Since England is no longer in the position to pay cash for all the American deliveries.
December, 1941
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill
I have it in me to be a successful soldier. I can visualize great movements and combinations.
World War I
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler 
Churchill is the most bloodthirsty of amateur strategists that history has ever known.
1941
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill 
We never thought of peace, not even in that year when we were completely isolated and could have made peace without serious detriment to the British Empire. Why should we think of it now, when victory approaches for the three of us? 
1944
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler
It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. ... I have made too many offers for the limitation and control of armaments, which posterity will not be cowardly enough always to disregard, for responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be placed on me. Nor have I ever wished that, after the appalling First World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.
 
1945
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill 
I do not want to receive any suggestions how we can destroy militarily important targets in Dresden’s hinterland, I want to get suggestions how we can fry 600,000 refugees from Breslau in Dresden.
1945

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler
Centuries will go by, but from the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred of those ultimately responsible will always grow anew against the people whom we have to thank for all this: international Jewry and its henchmen (Churchill, FDR).

1945
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill 
In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler
The gift Mr. Churchill possesses is the gift to lie with a pious expression on his face and to distort the truth until finally glorious victories are made out of the most terrible defeats.
1941
http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.638769.1422117736!/image/3957911347.jpg
Churchill
I consider that it will be found much better by all Parties to leave the past to history, especially as I propose to write that history.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/k0GZIg8pvjM/hqdefault.jpg
Hitler 
...despite all setbacks, (this war) will one day go down in history as the most glorious and heroic manifestation of the struggle for existence of a nation.
1945
 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment