Friday, March 2, 2012
Debate challenge raised to $2,000!
Open to any UW teacher - prof, lecturer, TA
Dear University of Wisconsin system teacher,
It is the one year anniversary of the $1,000 9/11 Debate Challenge issued last March by me, Dr. Kevin Barrett, and the University of Wisconsin Sifting and Winnowing Club. Under the Challenge, any University of Wisconsin system teacher - professor, lecturer, or TA - could have earned a $1,000 honorarium by defending the 9/11 Commission Report in a ninety-minute debate with a former UW teacher who has been blacklisted from teaching in the UW system due to his 9/11-related research, publication and activism.
Since
no teacher in the entire Wisconsin university system is willing to
defend the 9/11 Commission Report for $1,000, we are now doubling the
honorarium to $2,000 - and making arrangements for the money to be
donated to 9/11-related charities. (This removes the "I don't want to
look greedy" excuse for ducking the debate, and underlines the fact that
accepting the challenge is a form of public service.)
Under the new arrangement, the $2000 honorarium will be donated to charities according to the outcome of the debate. If I win the debate, 1/3rd of the honorarium will be donated to the Feal Good Foundation for 9/11 first responders, and 2/3rds will be donated to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org). If the challenger wins the debate, two-thirds of the honorarium goes to the Feal Good Foundation, and one-third to AE911Truth.org. The winner of the debate will be determined by audience vote.
Please help the 9/11 first responders - and the 1,000-plus architects and engineers who are risking their careers by standing up for American values of free inquiry and constitutional governance. If you aren't up to it, please inform other UW system teachers, including TAs, about the 9/11 Debate Challenge. To accept the 9/11 debate challenge, contact me at kbarrett(at)merr(dot)com.
PS Three cowardly UW-Madison professors - Donald Downs, Ann Althouse, and Marshall Onellian - have insulted me in the media, but chickened out of my challenge to debate. (As has State Rep. Steve Nass.) Please contact them and urge them to debate Dr. Kevin Barrett on 9/11. Donald Downs: dadowns@wisc.edu (608) 263-2295 Ann Althouse: althouse@wisc.edu (608) 262-2444 Marshall Onellian: onellion@wisc.edu (608) 263-6829 Steve Nass Rep.Nass@legis.wisconsin.gov (608) 266-5715 Or (888) 529-0031
Dear University of Wisconsin system teacher,
It is the one year anniversary of the $1,000 9/11 Debate Challenge issued last March by me, Dr. Kevin Barrett, and the University of Wisconsin Sifting and Winnowing Club. Under the Challenge, any University of Wisconsin system teacher - professor, lecturer, or TA - could have earned a $1,000 honorarium by defending the 9/11 Commission Report in a ninety-minute debate with a former UW teacher who has been blacklisted from teaching in the UW system due to his 9/11-related research, publication and activism.
Since
no teacher in the entire Wisconsin university system is willing to
defend the 9/11 Commission Report for $1,000, we are now doubling the
honorarium to $2,000 - and making arrangements for the money to be
donated to 9/11-related charities. (This removes the "I don't want to
look greedy" excuse for ducking the debate, and underlines the fact that
accepting the challenge is a form of public service.)Under the new arrangement, the $2000 honorarium will be donated to charities according to the outcome of the debate. If I win the debate, 1/3rd of the honorarium will be donated to the Feal Good Foundation for 9/11 first responders, and 2/3rds will be donated to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org). If the challenger wins the debate, two-thirds of the honorarium goes to the Feal Good Foundation, and one-third to AE911Truth.org. The winner of the debate will be determined by audience vote.
Please help the 9/11 first responders - and the 1,000-plus architects and engineers who are risking their careers by standing up for American values of free inquiry and constitutional governance. If you aren't up to it, please inform other UW system teachers, including TAs, about the 9/11 Debate Challenge. To accept the 9/11 debate challenge, contact me at kbarrett(at)merr(dot)com.
PS Three cowardly UW-Madison professors - Donald Downs, Ann Althouse, and Marshall Onellian - have insulted me in the media, but chickened out of my challenge to debate. (As has State Rep. Steve Nass.) Please contact them and urge them to debate Dr. Kevin Barrett on 9/11. Donald Downs: dadowns@wisc.edu (608) 263-2295 Ann Althouse: althouse@wisc.edu (608) 262-2444 Marshall Onellian: onellion@wisc.edu (608) 263-6829 Steve Nass Rep.Nass@legis.wisconsin.gov (608) 266-5715 Or (888) 529-0031
Saturday, September 3, 2011
Why Won't Anyone from the University of Wisconsin Defend the 9/11 Commission Report?
Note: $1,000 cash still awaits the first qualified University of
Wisconsin teacher (professor, lecturer or TA) willing to defend the 9/11
Commission Report in a debate with Dr. Kevin Barrett, who has been
blacklisted from teaching in the UW system due to his research
indicating that 9/11 was a false-flag operation. Contact
kbarrett@merr.com by Wednesday, September 7th to claim the money
and arrange the debate!
Three cowardly UW-Madison professors - Donald Downs, Ann Althouse, and Marshall Onellian - have insulted Dr. Barrett in the media, but chickened out of his challenge to debate. Please contact them and urge them to debate Dr. Barrett. Donald Downs: dadowns@wisc.edu (608) 263-2295 Ann Althouse: althouse@wisc.edu (608) 262-2444 Marshall Onellian: onellion@wisc.edu
Thursday, September 8th, 7 pm, 180 Science Hall (across Park Street from Memorial Union):
World premiere of the new Architects and Engineers for 9/11
Truth film "9/11: Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out." (Watch the trailer.) After the film, we're hosting The Great 9/11 Debate, pitting blacklisted former UW instructor Dr. Kevin Barrett
against...whoever wants to make an easy $1,000 and has the guts to
defend the 9/11 Commission Report! Any U.W. system professor, lecturer
or instructor is eligible to earn a $1,000 honorarium by debating
Dr. Barrett; yet as of this writing there are no takers. Please ask
YOUR teachers here at the UW to support free speech and debate Dr.
Barrett, who was hounded from his teaching job for making historical
arguments that nobody at the U.W. is willing to oppose in a public
debate. (See the text of the full-page ad that appeared in the Isthmus last spring.) This event is sponsored by the UW-Madison Sifting and Winnowing Club.
Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist and Islamic Studies expert, is one of America's best-known critics of the War on Terror. Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. He is lead editor of the book 9/11 AND AMERICAN EMPIRE (Volume II) and author of the books TRUTH JIHAD: MY EPIC STRUGGLE AGAINST THE 9/11 BIG LIE (2007) and QUESTIONING THE WAR ON TERROR (2009). He ran for Congress (winning the primary) in 2008 and hosts two talk radio shows. His website is www.TruthJihad.com .
If you can't make this event, or love the film and want to see it twice, the film 9/11: Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out will also screen on Friday, September 9th, 7-9:30, at First United Methodist Church, 203 Wisconsin Ave. in Madison. Details here.
Three cowardly UW-Madison professors - Donald Downs, Ann Althouse, and Marshall Onellian - have insulted Dr. Barrett in the media, but chickened out of his challenge to debate. Please contact them and urge them to debate Dr. Barrett. Donald Downs: dadowns@wisc.edu (608) 263-2295 Ann Althouse: althouse@wisc.edu (608) 262-2444 Marshall Onellian: onellion@wisc.edu
(608) 263-6829
Thursday, September 8th, 7 pm, 180 Science Hall (across Park Street from Memorial Union):
World premiere of the new Architects and Engineers for 9/11
Truth film "9/11: Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out." (Watch the trailer.) After the film, we're hosting The Great 9/11 Debate, pitting blacklisted former UW instructor Dr. Kevin Barrett
against...whoever wants to make an easy $1,000 and has the guts to
defend the 9/11 Commission Report! Any U.W. system professor, lecturer
or instructor is eligible to earn a $1,000 honorarium by debating
Dr. Barrett; yet as of this writing there are no takers. Please ask
YOUR teachers here at the UW to support free speech and debate Dr.
Barrett, who was hounded from his teaching job for making historical
arguments that nobody at the U.W. is willing to oppose in a public
debate. (See the text of the full-page ad that appeared in the Isthmus last spring.) This event is sponsored by the UW-Madison Sifting and Winnowing Club.Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist and Islamic Studies expert, is one of America's best-known critics of the War on Terror. Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. He is lead editor of the book 9/11 AND AMERICAN EMPIRE (Volume II) and author of the books TRUTH JIHAD: MY EPIC STRUGGLE AGAINST THE 9/11 BIG LIE (2007) and QUESTIONING THE WAR ON TERROR (2009). He ran for Congress (winning the primary) in 2008 and hosts two talk radio shows. His website is www.TruthJihad.com .
If you can't make this event, or love the film and want to see it twice, the film 9/11: Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out will also screen on Friday, September 9th, 7-9:30, at First United Methodist Church, 203 Wisconsin Ave. in Madison. Details here.
The Ugly Truth
The Amerikan Way – A Study in Psychopathy
Christian Orthodox Girls
Sabba – The article is about America but it very much applies to Europe, Australia, New Zealand, in one word, the West.
This is what happens to whoever drinks from the poisonous chalice of judaism. And this is precisely what Muslims reject, detest and fight.
We often hear that the Muslims living in the West refuse to ‘assimilate’, but the question that is never asked is: assimilate to what exactly?
The Muslims living in the West would love nothing more than for the West to get back to its Christian roots, Christian ethics, Christian way of life, Christian Faith.
But do Europeans/Americans want to restore Christianity in their land? Do they want to live a Christian way of life? Or are they ones actually rejecting Christianity and being the most fiercely opposed to a Christian way of life?
CONTINUE READING
The Amerikan Way – A Study in Psychopathy
ZenGardner.com
Just look at everything Amerika stands for as a whole. Corruption, greed, violence, military aggression, social degradation, scientific insanity and on and on. It’s footprint on the world is nothing but horrific if you view it in the overall context.
Sure there are good people living there and those unwittingly caught up in the mass hysteria, but they’re participating nonetheless. That accountability won’t go away. Unless they stand up to it and fully withdraw their consent and work to reverse the madness they’re clearly part of the problem.
That’s not an easy spot to be in when the very fabric of the sociopolitical and economic support structure is an every day fact of psychopathic driven existence. It breeds acquiescence, apathy and hence continued participation. A pathetic state of affairs.
Looking honestly at this collective insanity is imperative if we’re to draw any kind of enlightening and empowering perspective.
Breaking Down the Nature of the Psychopathic Beast
Scientists researching the common characteristics of psychopathy now use a list of predominant qualities displayed by psychopaths that they’ve meticulously studied. The characteristics are quite telling and perhaps disturbing, as many can recognize these attributes in people around them.While they estimate only 2 to 4% of the population are psychopaths, Amerika ranking with a high percentile of those they have identified, they clearly understand that these types of non-empathic dehumanizing freaks gravitate towards positions of power.
See how these attributes ingrained in such ideas as manifest destiny and American supremacism match up to the collective American way of life and its effect on the world of today, following the brief introduction:
The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) is a diagnostic tool used to rate a person’s psychopathic or antisocial tendencies. People who are psychopathic prey ruthlessly on others using charm, deceit, violence or other methods that allow them to get with they want. The symptoms of psychopathy include: lack of a conscience or sense of guilt, lack of empathy, egocentricity, pathological lying, repeated violations of social norms, disregard for the law, shallow emotions, and a history of victimizing others.The twenty traits assessed by the PCL-R score are:
Originally designed to assess people accused or convicted of crimes, the PCL-R consists of a 20-item symptom rating scale that allows qualified examiners to compare a subject’s degree of psychopathy with that of a prototypical psychopath. It is accepted by many in the field as the best method for determining the presence and extent of psychopathy in a person.
- glib and superficial charm
- grandiose (exaggeratedly high) estimation of self
- need for stimulation
- pathological lying
- cunning and manipulativeness
- lack of remorse or guilt
- shallow affect (superficial emotional responsiveness)
- callousness and lack of empathy
- parasitic lifestyle
- poor behavioral controls
- sexual promiscuity
- early behavior problems
- lack of realistic long-term goals
- impulsivity
- irresponsibility
- failure to accept responsibility for own actions
- many short-term marital relationships
- juvenile delinquency
- revocation of conditional release
- criminal versatility
Does That Hit the mark?
I’ll let your own imagination extrapolate each of those qualities rather than break it down as I see it. It’s overall quite stunning that a collective entity could be so blatantly psychopathic and to such a degree.It’s something to be faced head on.
But really it’s nothing new. This is the definition of the behavior of empires and oligarchies throughout history. Humanity beats and flails its arms over and over when these qualities are recognized on so many humanity exploiting, oppressing and destroying levels but it’s generally been to no avail, according to written records and the whirled we’re witnessing before us.We protest and rant to whatever degree but the show goes on.
So what to do?
The Solution – Awakening
Only a mass awakening can shake the foundations of this kind of destructive insanity. These power structures are built on the fearful allegiance to those who make it possible. When we withdraw our support and participation in these types of foisted machinations they cannot continue.That may sound vague or simplistic to some but it’s extremely practical at the most basic level. If you’re employed in something supporting this paradigm, leave it.
If you’re giving attention and therefore energy to their charade, including the political, media and entertainment sideshow, stop it. If you’re still socializing on shallow levels of energy, or contributing to the fear and scarcity models by your sycophantic hand wringing and repeating of their fear programming, snap out of it.
Have some guts.
Take a stand for truth and love while you still can. Don’t wait for affirmation and some comforting collective movement. Be your own being. Leave your participation in what is obviously wrong and lend your energy to what you know is right.
It couldn’t be simpler. If you’re waiting for the right conditions you’re still firmly in their psychopathic pocket.
Get out now. The hour is late.
Much love, Zen
ZenGardner.com
*More on Psychopathy in a terrific film HERE.
And this exclamation mark! – hat tip Dane Wigington:
Why start the the film "9/11: Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out" mentioning the State fabricated term of "conspiracy theories"? This film does a great job in explaining HOW, but this is a matter for experts who speak and do nothing else to send the guilty ones to "Justice"!
ReplyDeleteOnce I find indisputable evidence of ONE LIE in the official account, I am not interested in the WHAT, WHERE, WHY or HOW of the matter because I have already thrown the case out! And, I found hundreds (thousands!) of LIES starting on DAY ONE! The experts SPEAK OUT, and that's all they can do, and it is not much because their case cannot be heard in any Court of Law as the Courts are not interested in the truth and in Justice, not at all! BAFS