Nathalie Goulet, sénatrice UDI de l'Orne.
This is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
h/t John Whitbeck
- See more at:
http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpuf
France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army
This
is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax
laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible
donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet
observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the
benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpufOr put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army
This
is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax
laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible
donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet
observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the
benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpufOr put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.h/t John Whitbeck
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army
This
is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax
laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible
donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet
observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the
benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpufOr put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.h/t John Whitbeck
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army
This
is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax
laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible
donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet
observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the
benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.h/t John Whitbeck
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army
This
is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax
laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible
donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet
observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the
benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Nathalie Goulet, a Senator for the UDI [centrist] party representing the Orne [a French department], announced on Friday that she had received death threats on social networks after she expressed astonishment regarding a 60% tax reduction available to French taxpayers who make a gift to the Israeli army.h/t John Whitbeck
On March 10, the Senator had posed a written question to the secretary of state [a junior minister] in charge of the budget, Christian Eckert, to draw his attention to the existence of tax reductions when gifts are made to the Israeli army. In her written question, Nathalie Goulet underlined that this represented “a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
Here is the full text of the written question no. 20545 of Mrs. Nahalie Goulet:
“Mrs. Nathalie Goulet draws the attention of the secretary of state in the Ministry of Finance in charge of the budget to the current regulation which permits French citizens who make gifts to the Israeli army (Tsahal) to deduct their gifts and give themselves a 60% tax reduction, within the limit of 20% of their taxable income. This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the benefit of a foreign army.”
The minister has not yet responded to the question of the Senator, who is also vice-president of the foreign affairs, defense and armed forces commission of the Senate. On the other hand, Nathalie Goulet declared Friday to Agence France-Presse that she had received anonymous death threats on social networks.
Questioned Friday by Ouest-France [a prominent regional newspaper] during a visit in the Orne, the Senator refused to comment on the subject, saying: “I won’t talk about it.”
France’s tax subsidy on ‘gifts’ to Israeli army
This
is astounding. A senior French politician has revealed that the tax
laws of France entitle a citizen to make a charitable, tax-deductible
donation to the Israeli army. As the French politician Nathalie Goulet
observes: “This represents a tax benefit by the French taxpayer for the
benefit of a foreign army.”
Or put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
- See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2016-03-28/frances-tax-subsidy-on-gifts-to-israeli-army/#sthash.hlddGEv4.dpufOr put more bluntly still, French citizens are being encouraged through the tax system to subsidise an illegal, belligerent occupation of the Palestinians by the Israeli army. It underscores the sheer hypocrisy of the French government as it claims to be trying to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through “peace-making” at the United Nations.
Maybe one should not be too surprised. After all, the United States and most European countries, including the UK and France, make donations to the Jewish National Fund tax-deductible, even though one of the JNF’s primary activities has been concealing war crimes committed by the Israeli army during the 1948 and 1967 wars: by planting and maintaining forests over more than 500 Palestinian communities that were destroyed by Israel after their inhabitants had been forcibly expelled.
The thickly planted pine forests not only provide year-round cover of the sites of destruction, but in the state’s early years ensured that any Palestinian refugee who managed to return to his or her village would find no place to rebuild their home.
Why are these facts not more widely known. Both because the media make no effort to expose these abuses of taxpayers’ money, and because the rare politician who speaks out, like Goulet, is quickly terrorised back into silence.
Below is an English translation, provided by John Whitbeck, of the original article, which can be found here.
Une sénatrice s'étonne d'une niche fiscale en faveur de Tsahal et reçoit des menaces de mort
«»
Nathalie Goulet, sénatrice UDI de l'Orne, a annoncé vendredi avoir reçu des menaces de mort via les réseaux sociaux après s'être étonnée d'une réduction d'impôts de 60%, dont peuvent bénéficier les contribuables français qui effectuent un don à l'armée israélienne.
Le 10 mars dernier, la sénatrice de l'Orne avait posé une question écrite au secrétaire d'Etat chargé du budget, Christian Eckert, pour attirer son attention sur l'existence d'une réduction d'impôts lorsque des dons sont envoyés à l'armée israélienne. Dans sa question écrite, Nathalie Goulet souligne notamment qu'il s'agit là "d'une niche fiscale payée par le contribuable français au profit d'une armée étrangère":Voici dans son intégralité le texte de la question écrite n° 20545 de Mme Nathalie Goulet:
Mme Nathalie Goulet attire l’attention de M. le secrétaire d’État, auprès du ministre des finances et des comptes publics, chargé du budget sur la réglementation actuelle qui permet aux Français et Françaises qui font des dons à l’armée israélienne (Tsahal), de défiscaliser leurs dons et leur donne le droit à 60 % de réduction d’impôts, dans la limite de 20 % du revenu imposable. Il s’agit donc d’une niche fiscale payée par le contribuable français au profit d’une armée étrangère. Elle souhaiterait avoir l’explication de cette disposition exorbitante du droit commun.Le ministre n'a pas encore répondu à la demande de la sénatrice, qui est également vice-présidente de la "Commission des affaires étrangères, de la défense et des forces armées du Sénat". Par contre, Nathalie Goulet a déclaré vendredi à l'AFP avoir reçu des menaces de mort anonymes sur les réseaux sociaux.
Questionnée vendredi par Ouest-France lors d'un déplacement dans l'Orne, l'élue UDI a refusé de commenter le sujet, déclarant: "Je n’en parlerai pas".
Rédaction web d'iTELE (avec AFP) - Photo : Nathalie Goulet (iTELE)
THE GREAT DEBATE: CHURCHILL vs HITLER
(The "debate" is based upon actual
quotes arranged mostly in chronological order)
* A
skeptical reader might suspect that
the quotes below were cherry-picked out of context
and arranged for propaganda purposes. This is an understandable, though
mistaken suspicion. We therefore invite you, after
'the debate', to also read 'The British Mad Dog' and 'The Bad War' . Both works (available at Amazon or here as pdfs) will provide a full and truthful explanation
of Hitler, Churchill and World War II.
Prime Minister Churchill. We begin with you...
Churchill
|
We
cannot tell whether Hitler
will be the man who will once again let loose upon
the world another war in which civilization will irretrievably
succumb...
It is on this mystery of the future that history
will pronounce Hitler either a monster
or a hero.
Nov., 1935
|
Hitler
|
I
appeal to reason in international affairs. I want
to show that the idea of eternal enmity is wrong. We are not
hereditary
enemies.
Feb., 1936
|
|
Churchill
|
There
can never be friendship between the British
democracy and the Nazi Power. Which cheers its onward course by a
barbarous paganism,
which vaunts the spirit of aggression and conquest,
which derives strength and perverted pleasure from persecution, and
uses,
as we have seen, with pitiless brutality the threat
of murderous force.
Oct.,
1938
|
|
Hitler
|
At
no time and in no place have I ever acted contrary to British interests … I believe even today that there can only be real peace in Europe and throughout the world if
Germany and England come to an understanding.
Oct., 1939
|
|
Churchill
|
I
would say
to the House as I said to those who have joined
this government: I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears
and sweat. We have before us an ordeal of the most
grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of
struggle
and of suffering.
May, 1940
|
|
Hitler
|
In
this hour I feel it to be my duty before
my own conscience to appeal once more to reason and common sense, in
Great
Britain as much as elsewhere. ... I can
see no reason why this war must go on.
July, 1940 |
|
Churchill
|
We
shall go on to the end. We shall fight on the seas, we shall
fight
in the air, we shall defend our island,
whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight
on the landing grounds, we shall fight in
the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall
never
surrender...
June, 1940
|
|
Hitler
|
Time
and time again I have offered friendship,
and if necessary closest cooperation, to England. But love cannot be
offered from one side only. It must be met
with reciprocation by the other side.
Germany is not pursuing any interests in the West.
Sep.,
1939
|
|
Churchill
|
You
ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one
word. It is victory. Victory at all costs. Victory in spite of all
terrors.
Victory, however long and hard the road
may be, for without victory there is no survival.
May, 1940
|
|
Hitler
|
All
of my peace
overtures have been rejected and war was
declared on us.... The German people has no hatred, no inimical feeling
toward the English or French people.
May, 1940
|
|
Churchill
|
There
is one thing
that will bring Hitler down, and that is an
absolutely devastating exterminating attack by
very
heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi
homeland.
July, 1941
|
|
Hitler
|
Again
and again I uttered these warnings against this specific
type of aerial warfare, and I did so for over three
and a half months. That these warnings failed to impress Mr. Churchill
does not surprise me in the least. For what does
this man care for the lives of others? What does he care for culture or
for
architecture?
May, 1941
|
|
Churchill
|
And
even if this Island or a large part
of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire
beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on
the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New
World (United States), with all its power and might, steps forth to the
rescue
and the liberation of the old.
June,
1940
|
|
Hitler
|
(Roosevelt)
is resolved to take over, as safely and securely
as possible, the British Empire in the moment of
its downfall. Since England is no longer in the position to pay cash for
all the American deliveries.
December,
1941
|
|
Churchill
|
I
have it in me to be a successful soldier. I can visualize great movements and combinations.
World War I
|
|
Hitler
|
Churchill is the most bloodthirsty of amateur strategists
that history has ever known.
1941
|
|
Churchill
|
We
never thought of peace, not even in that year when
we were completely isolated and could have made peace without serious
detriment
to the British Empire. Why should we think of it
now, when victory approaches for the three of us?
1944
|
|
Hitler
|
It
is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. ...
I have made too many offers for the limitation and
control of armaments, which posterity will not be cowardly
enough
always to disregard, for responsibility for the
outbreak of this war to be placed on me. Nor have I ever wished
that, after the appalling First World War, there
would ever be a second against either England or America.
1945
|
|
Churchill
|
I do not want to receive any suggestions how we can destroy militarily important targets in
Dresden’s hinterland, I want to get suggestions how we can fry 600,000 refugees from Breslau in Dresden.
1945
|
|
Hitler
|
Centuries
will go by, but from the ruins of our towns and
monuments the hatred of those ultimately responsible will always grow
anew
against the people whom we have to thank for all
this: international Jewry and its henchmen (Churchill, FDR).
1945
|
|
Churchill
|
In wartime, truth is so precious that she
should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.
|
|
Hitler
|
The
gift Mr. Churchill possesses is the gift to lie
with a pious expression on his face and to distort the truth until
finally
glorious victories are made out of the most
terrible defeats.
1941
|
|
Churchill
|
I consider that it will be found much better by all Parties to leave the past to history, especially as
I propose to write that history.
|
|
Hitler
|
...despite
all setbacks, (this war) will one day go down in
history as the most glorious and heroic manifestation of the struggle
for
existence of a nation.
1945
|
