These photographers may have never known the significance of
the pictures they took and that millions would be marveling at them in
the future. From thousands of images, I chose these to give us a rare
and fascinating look at how different (and similar) life used to be. Thanks for visiting Distractify and I hope you enjoy.
The oldest known selfie. (1839)
hyperallergic.comRobert
Cornelius took this photo outside the store his family owned. It became
famous for being the first self portrait or as its commonly now known, a
"selfie."
People posing next to the Statue of Liberty as it's unpacked. (1886)
This funny portrait of a woman was taken while she was mid-sneeze. (1900)
A "knocker-up" waking up clients - the early 20th century version of alarm clocks.
Nine kings gather to mourn the death of King Edward VII (1910).
This
may very well be the most kings ever photographed at once. Represented
are Norway, Bulgaria, Portugal, the German Empire, Greece, Belgium,
Spain, Great Britain, and Denmark.
Before automatic pinsetters were invented, "pin boys" worked to manually line them up. (1914).
Sarcastic photo taken by anti-prohibitionists to mock their opponents in 1919.
A police officer on a Harley and an old fashioned mobile holding cell. (1921)
An early example of "horsemanning", the 1920's version of "planking".
Two winners of a 1922 Beauty Pageant, when beauty standards were much different.
A baby bear drinks a bowl of honey in a cafe. (1950)
A man dresses up his dog in a suit, then puts a cat in his lap. (1950s)
An ice-cold whisky dispenser, sometimes found in offices. (1950s)
The winner of the 1950 "Miss Atomic Bomb" pageant.
Afghan women at a public library during the 1950s.
The
Afghanistan government was shifting towards democracy in the 1950s and
60s before the Taliban took over. Women could work, become educated,
dress casually and use many of the modern day services that men could.
A young Paul McCartney takes a mirror selfie. (1959)
[Colorized] Young women hosting a 1950s house party.
Fidel Castro lays a wreath at the Lincoln Memorial. (1959)
Fritz the bulldog, a TV celebrity, is groomed by a barber. (1961)
The "TV Glasses" that never quite caught on. (1963)
"The Kiss of Life". This iconic photo shows a utility worker
receiving mouth-to-mouth after being electrocuted. He survived. (1967).
A young Osama Bin Laden with his family in Sweden during the 1970s. He is second from the right in a green shirt.
Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham playing volleyball in 1971.
Although we did
everything differently back then, these photos also show that deep down,
raw human spirit never changes. Our compassion, ingenuity, curiosity,
and perseverance as a species will always stand the test of time. We're
a team of writers who love creating content for curious people like
you. Check Distractify out daily for more mind blowing photo lists like
this one!
Dedicated to my very dear and beloved wife Kate Bates (Kaamilah bint Qadar from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.), our children and grand children, loved ones, friends and foes.
Michael Cremo - The Hidden History Of The Human Race
Michael
Cremo is interviewed about his archeological discoveries and the cover
up of the scientific community.Cremo gives several examples of
archeological evidence that has been suppressed by the establishment in
the name of "scientific conformity". His books include 'The Hidden
History Of The Human Race' and 'Forbidden Archeology'. Richard Thompson
is credited by Michael Cremo as a valuable partner in his research.
From Daryl's Encyclopedia (updated 4 May 2013)
The Rashida (Rosetta) Stone
The Rashida (Rosetta) Stone
(part only) stolen in 1899 from the town of Rashid
(Egypt)
by the invading French armies, later stolen by the British invaders. In the
“Demotic” section Arabic script is clearly visible. Abu
Bakr Ahmad Ibn Wahshiyah(founder of
the science of Algebra) was the first scholar to decode hieroglyphs, one
thousand years before Jean Champollion according to Dr Okasha El Daly
Demotic
script on a replica of the rosetta stone on display in Magdeburg. Photo
by Chris 73. Creative Commons License. Source: Wikimedia Commons. Chapter One THE ARROGANCE OF A PSEUDO SCIENTIST BBC interviewer: "Is Evolution a
Theory?" Pr Dawkins: "No, it is a fact!"
Oxford University
Professor Richard Dawkins – UK
Oxford University
Professor and “Evolved Animal Humanist” Richard Dawkins – IMPERIALIST UK
Addressing University students, Oxford Zoologist
Professor Richard Dawkins [1941-….], an intolerant and fanatical Atheist, Evolutionist and Humanist
lecturer, stated once to a huge gathering of students (seemingly ready and
willing to be indoctrinated) that the cleverest ape-man that has ever lived was
Aristotle, a mercenary soldier in Alexander of Macedonia’s army, a man who never went to
a real school (the first modern schools and universities came with the Muslims)
and who spent twenty years learning “philosophy” while “walking with Plato”,
and Pr Dawkins was seen on British television (where freedom of speech is
absent) boasting that the “White European race” sprung from the Aristotelian
racial lineage. If Irish George Bernard Shaw
was alive today, he would have gladly given that arrogant Professor a piece of
his uniquely great human mind, but any striving and tolerant Muslim (by
definition, a Muslim is moderate and tolerant of everything except evil
practices), have the duty to pray to God Almighty to guide the deluded
Professor and show him the Light, although there is little hope that this may
ever happen. His ape-man religion has been proven many times to be the
fabrication of scientists lacking in honesty. The fact is that no indisputable
trace of humankind or of its civilisation seems to have yet been discovered
beyond ten (twenty) thousand years.Could we,
humans, old pyramid (ziggurat) builders, have come from another far away planet
or from another dimension or are we simply the recent product of an
interbreeding with some extraterrestrial beings (the extraterrestrial gods)? Or
are we simply the product of an almost impossible to fathom Creator?
A selected few, people of great knowledge, faith and wisdom, like Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Mark Hanson, a Greek Orthodox
Christian reverted to Islam, and one of the brightest world scholars in Islamic and
human matters, a man who has attained the highest level of faith and
spirituality, seems to have definite answers about God, Mankind, the world and
its origins. Such great souls are convinced the world was created by design and
that we were all created human, while others like the Nairobi-born Zoologist
Richard Dawkins maintain that all we see around us is just an accident of
multiple evolutionary processes with no design and no purpose at all, and that
we are only animals (rock and bacteria) that have evolved into humans in a
world “of savage competition, ruthless exploitation, and deceit”. Of course this is not science, but only the Professor’s
atheist religion!
WHERE THERE IS GOD (invented or real, or
what He represents), don’t we see more LOVE, hope, goodness, decency,
cleanliness, charity, morality, patience in adversity, compassion, forgiveness,
freedom, justice, mercy, and humankind as also SPIRITUAL and HUMAN?
And, WHERE THERE IS NO GOD, don’t we see
more HATE, inhumanity, evil, indecency, filth, greed and selfishness,
immorality, perversions, despair, suicide, cruelty, vengeance, slavery, racism,
injustice, covetousness, ruthlessness, ABOMINATIONS OF ALL KINDS, and Man as
only material and only an (evolved) animal, an INHUMAN and monstrous being
sprung from “thousands or millions of accidental genetic mutations”?
What did Karl Mordecai Marx himself,
“the last of the great Jewish prophets” turned atheist, really mean when he
wrote “religion is the opium of the people”. We witness rich and poor, black
and white, scientists and poets, Atheists and Believers, good and bad people
being addicted to religion, all kinds of religion, and not only the “vile
populace” of indoctrinated beings (human sheep). Only by going beyond faith, we
can manage to understand much of what is happening in a world that belongs to
the powerful, the mercilessly cruel, and the rich, and not to humankind
anymore, not even to GOD. Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Hanson argues that if one believes
in God, he or she is strengthened in that belief and God is then with him or
her, but if someone does not believe in God, he or she is strengthened in his
or her unbelief and abandoned by God. Professor Richard Dawkins drowns himself
in an ocean of unbelief and pseudo-scientific beliefs when it concerns God. His
opium is the religion of atheism and animalism (‘humanism’). Isn’t it a paradox
that Atheists should call themselves Humanists when they believe and claim they
are only (evolved) animals?
While the Greco-Roman Holy Christian Bible
recognises Satan as the ruler of the world, Dawkins gives us a clue as to who
now rule and should rule our world thanks to their “rebellious selfish genes”
as tale-told by himself in his famous pseudo-scientific
“thriller-manual-manifesto” (The Selfish Gene, 1976) in which he
zealously defends the hoax (deceit) of macro evolution, and propounds his “fundamental
law of gene selfishness”. Pr Dawkins is paid by our tax-money (with the
full blessings of Elisabeth II of "Battenberg Saxe-Coburg Gotha") to preach his fabricated
religion of selfishness to our youth. According to him, there is no Merciful,
Compassionate, Generous and Just God, no Creator, but, instead, eternal selfish
genes competing directly with their alleles for survival created man, and they
are “naturally selecting” the best genes for survival, meaning the White
European genes inherited from Aristotle, and he, Richard Dawkins, the disciple
of the Selfish Gene-God, is one of the worshippers and defenders of Animalism
and of western secular ‘democratic’ regimes.
Pr Dawkins would be one of those who
survived this savage competition, which gives his “naturally selected” race the
right to wipe out the 5-6 billion weaker “poorly-evolved animals” for his own
survival. Although billions of people in such a materialist world find it more
and more very hard today, due to western cultural and political oppression and
terrorism, to believe in a real Invisible (Unseen) God-Creator, why does the
Professor show such arrogance and scoff at others who are believers in God,
whether He exists or not? His delusion (sickness of the mind) prevents him from
seeing and admitting his own fanatical belief in the Selfish Gene-God, his
opium! Even Atheists have their prophets like Sigmund Freud, his nephew Edward
Bernays (who inspired Adolph Hitler, George W. Bush and other western fascist
and Zionist regimes), Charles Darwin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and their
likes. We are living in a society and a world where morality has been replaced
by force by all kinds of perversions of mind and body, where the New Age
religion with its Earth god aims at the breaking down of the family and the
prostitution of men, women and children, the abduction of our babies to be sold
into sex slavery (carried out by state-protected corporations to Israel and
other western and western-client countries), the worshipping of money and fame,
the poisoning of mind and body by drugs (including nicotine, alcohol and mainly
Jewish owned pharmaceutical so-called medicine), Zionist television,
pornography, and the complete control and dehumanisation of mankind. Those who
resist the western military regimes and their allies are ruthlessly murdered
along with their entire families by the Zionist New Secular (Talmudist) World
Order, the Tikkun
Olam Yehudim, their countries relentlessly bombed and devastated
(germ, chemical, electronic, wave, space…warfare), and their peoples
slaughtered mercilessly, jailed, tortured, mentally and physically shattered,
maimed for life and starved to death by the tens of millions.
Margaret Temple
(Maryam Noor) aged 65 - How I Found the Truth - SCOTLAND
But, millions other people do not go along with Pr Richard
Dawkins’ animal ideology and choose to believe in a God or in many gods.
Unfortunately, by their own fault, they do not have adequate armies to protect
their beliefs and nations from attacks and destruction by the Atheist, Secular,
‘Humanist’ and Zionist New World Order super military powers. Of apparently
intolerant Atheist parents, Mrs Margaret Temple of Scotland (above)
found God through Islam (for others it is through Christianity or Christ) at
the age of 65 in very mysterious circumstances, and took the Shahadah, the
Islamic Testimony that there is none worthy of worship (no other god) except
God and that Muhammad is His Messenger. When you sincerely and wholeheartedly
look for God, you will find Him, so goes the saying. This is evidence that
“God” (or a Godly inspired Arab, Muhammad) was right about the fitra (natural
inclination towards Islam) He says in the Holy Furqân (Criterion) or Holy
Qur’ân (Recitation) He had put at birth in every human being He had Himself
created, and thus disproving the selfish gene fabricated by our learned, but
misguided and unscientific Professor.
On Saturday 26th June 2004, the author was sent an Email
from one of his correspondents, Christian Cotten (chriscotten@wanadoo.fr) entitled “A
Story of Angels and of a Father” in its French translation: “UNE HISTOIRE
D'ANGES ET DE PÈRE” by Mr. Lloyd Glenn.
Is it a fabrication or a true story? It
is more likely a fabrication as some Sects are known for inventing such stories
to promote their sectarian religions.But,
does it really matter?Can Richard
Dawkins and others like him ever prove that this is simply a delusion?But, a similar event occurred in my own
personal life, and I have no evidence to prove that it is true, and have only
my salvaged autobiographical notes.In
this XXst Century, many famous “non believers” and researchers claim they have
had similar experiences, including that of visits, encounters, contacts from
outer space or from the other dimensions.Are our very young not fed trash on a daily basis by school (Harry Potter,
etc.), television, cinema, newspaper and magazine?
“Below is a
true story, but it was
“sanitized” for mainline Christian churches. It was originally written in 1994
by Mr. Lloyd Glenn, a Mormon, living in California,
about the true accident that happened to his son in 1993.”
The Birdies
“On July 22nd I was en route to Washington, DC
for a business trip. It was all so very ordinary, until we landed in Denver for a plane change.
As I collected my belongings from the overhead bin, an announcement was made
for Mr. Lloyd Glenn to see the United Customer Service Representative
immediately. I thought nothing of it until I reached the door to leave the
plane, and I heard a gentleman asking every male if they were Mr. Glenn. At
this point I knew something was wrong and my heart sunk. When I got off the plane
a solemn faced young man came toward me and said, "Mr. Glenn, there is an
emergency at your home. I do not know what the emergency is, or who is
involved, but I will take you to the phone so you can call the hospital." My heart was now pounding, but the will to be calm took over. Woodenly, I
followed this stranger to the distant telephone where I called the number he
gave me for the Mission
Hospital. My call was put
through to the trauma center where I learned that my three year old son had
been trapped underneath the automatic garage door for several minutes, and that
when my wife had found him he was dead. CPR had been performed by a neighbor,
who is a doctor, and the paramedics had continued the treatment as Brian was
transported to the hospital. By the time of my call, Brian was revived and they
believed he would live, but they did not know how much damage had been done to
his brain, nor to his heart. They explained that the door had completely closed on his little sternum right
over his heart. He had been severely crushed. After speaking with the medical
staff, my wife sounded worried but not hysterical, and I took comfort in her
calmness. The return flight seemed to last forever, but finally I arrived at the hospital
six hours after the garage door had come down. When I walked into the intensive
care unit, nothing could have prepared me to see my little son lying so still
on a great big bed with tubes and monitors everywhere. He was on a respirator.
I glanced at my wife who stood and tried to give me a reassuring smile. It all
seemed like a terrible dream. Doctor's filled me in with the details and gave a
guarded prognosis. Brian was going to live, and the preliminary tests indicated
that his heart was OK, two miracles in and of themselves. But only time would
tell if his brain received any damage. Throughout the seemingly endless hours, my wife was calm. She felt that Brian
would eventually be all right. I hung on to her words and faith like a
lifeline. All that night and the next day Brian remained unconscious. It seemed
like forever since I had left for my business trip the day before. Finally at two o'clock that afternoon, our son regained consciousness and sat
up uttering the most beautiful words I have ever heard spoken. He said,
"Daddy hold me" and he reached for me with his little arms. By the
next day he was pronounced as having no neurological or physical deficits, and
the story of his miraculous survival spread throughout the hospital. You cannot
imagine our gratitude and joy. As we took Brian home, we felt a unique
reverence for the life and love of our Heavenly Father that comes to those who
brush death so closely. In the days that followed there was a special spirit about our home. Our two
older children were much closer to their little brother. My wife and I were
much closer to each other, and all of us were very close as a whole family.
Life took on a less stressful pace. Perspective seemed to be more focused, and
balance much easier to gain and maintain. We felt deeply blessed. Our gratitude
was truly profound. The story is not over Almost a month later to the day of the accident, Brian awoke from his afternoon
nap and said, "Sit down mommy. I have something to tell you." At this
time in his life, Brian usually spoke in small phrases, so to say a large
sentence surprised my wife. She sat down with him on his bed, and he began his
sacred and remarkable story. "Do you remember when I got stuck under the garage door? Well, it was so
heavy and it hurt really bad. I called to you, but you couldn't hear me. I
started to cry, but then it hurt too bad. And then the 'birdies' came." "The birdies?" my wife asked puzzled. "Yes," he replied.
"The birdies made a whooshing sound and flew into the garage. They took
care of me." "They did?" "Yes," he said. "One of
the birdies came and got you. She came to tell you I got stuck under the
door." A sweet reverent feeling filled the room. The spirit was so strong
and yet lighter than air. My wife realized that a three year old had no concept
of death and spirits, so he was referring to the beings who came to him from
beyond as "birdies" because they were up in the air like birds that
fly. "What did the birdies look like?" she asked. Brian answered,
"They were so beautiful. They were dressed in white, all white. Some of
them had green and white. But some of them had on just white." "Did
they say anything?" "Yes," he answered. "They told me the
baby would be all right." "The baby?" my wife asked confused.
Brian answered. "The baby laying on the garage floor." He went on,
"You came out and opened the garage door and ran to the baby. You told the
baby to stay and not leave." My wife nearly collapsed upon hearing this,
for she had indeed gone and knelt beside Brian's body and seeing his crushed
chest whispered, "Don't leave us Brian, please stay if you can." As
she listened to Brian telling her the words she had spoken, she realized that
the spirit had left his body and was looking down from above on this little
lifeless form. "Then what happened?" she asked. "We went on a trip." He
said, "Far, far away." He grew agitated trying to say the things he
didn't seem to have the words for. My wife tried to calm and comfort him, and
let him know it would be okay. He struggled with wanting to tell something that
obviously was very important to him, but finding the words was difficult.
"We flew so fast up in the air. They're so pretty Mommy," he added.
"And there is lots and lots of birdies." My wife was stunned. Into her mind the sweet comforting spirit enveloped her more
soundly, but with an urgency she had never before known. Brian went on to tell
her that the "birdies" had told him that he had to come back and tell
everyone about the "birdies." He said they brought him back to the
house and that a big fire truck, and an ambulance were there. A man was
bringing the baby out on a white bed and he tried to tell the man that the baby
would be okay, but the man couldn't hear him. He said the birdies told him he
had to go with the ambulance, but they would be near him. He said they were so
pretty and so peaceful, and he didn't want to come back. Then the bright light came. He said that the light was so bright and so warm,
and he loved the bright light so much. Someone was in the bright light and put
their arms around him, and told him, "I love you but you have to go back.
You have to play baseball, and tell everyone about the birdies." Then the
person in the bright light kissed him and waved bye-bye. Then woosh, the big
sound came and they went into the clouds. The story went on for an hour. He
taught us that "birdies" were always with us, but we don't see them
because we look with our eyes and we don't hear them because we listen with our
ears. But they are always there, you can only see them in here (he put his hand
over his heart). They whisper the things to help us to do what is right because
they love us so much. Brian continued, stating, "I have a plan, Mommy. You have a plan. Daddy
has a plan. Everyone has a plan. We must all live our plan and keep our
promises. The birdies help us to do that cause they love us so much." In
the weeks that followed, he often came to us and told all, or part of it, again
and again. Always the story remained the same. The details were never changed
or out of order. A few times he added further bits of information and clarified
the message he had already delivered. It never ceased to amaze us how he could
tell such detail and speak beyond his ability when he talked about his birdies.
Everywhere he went, he told strangers about the "birdies." Surprisingly,
no one ever looked at him strangely when he did this. Rather, they always got a
softened look on their face and smiled. Needless to say, we have not been the same ever since that day, and I pray we
never will be."
END OF TRUE (OR MADE-UP) STORY
[PHOTO –
confidential and not provided because of this world of beasts and evil doers!]
A three year-old boy was nearly crushed to
death under an office partition glass panel weighing over 100kg, but was
‘miraculously’ saved from a certain death by a wall radiator. (Paris 1986) What is true, what is false?It is true
however that to billions of us God seems really a figment of our imagination,
but does denying the existence of God solve the problem of billions of human
beings who will never quench their thirst for the divine and the sacred? It is
an established fact that millions of people, without having to be indoctrinated
in any religion, thirst for God or for some kind of Ethereal Providence – just
like an addict for his opium, as would say Mr Karl Marx, the plagiarist
(Michael Tsarion). But, those who have lived real miracles know the truth; a truth that
intelligent people like Pr Richard Dawkins is unable to comprehend – the
possibility of another reality, another world. The “Heart”, not the mind, perceives
and understands certain truths. Pr Dawkins’ very existence is a miracle, but he
refuses to be grateful to the One Who (might have) created him. Does God or
angels exist or not? Many have known God, and seen angels, been with them,
talked to them, been assisted by them, and saved by their belief in God,
whether He exists or not, simply by their strong Faith in any deity whatsoever
or even in any absolutely fabricated Supreme Being. Hindus have been very well
known to turn humans into gods. Christians have turned at least one human into
God and another human into the mother of God. Hindus have millions of them, and
do still believe in them and practice rituals even to this day every single day
of their lives! Many lead quite a happy and peaceful life by being a Hindu or a
Vedantist. Even the ones who claim to have had near-death experiences and swear they have
seen God, a male, white, blond hair and blue eye Jesus Christ or the “Mother of
God”, a white, blond and blue-eyed female, “the Virgin Mary” when they died
have definitely seen and lived something wonderful and beyond description after
they were certified dead clinically. But, what they saw was at worst the fruit
of their own imagination and beliefs. As a historian it may be completely out
of question to believe in or rely upon such an unhistorical figure as Jesus
Christ, but as a scientist why not? Jesus Christ was an Arab (Middle Eastern
Palestinian or Phoenician) and cannot be as “Caucasian” as the White (rather
Pink!) European Christians or the Black Africans have been made to believe for
now two millennia. But, many people are sincere and have indeed experienced
life after death, and seen and heard incredible things before they returned to
their bodies. Although some stories are incredible to believe, like in Betty J.
Eadie’s book “EMBRACED
BY THE LIGHT” (Thorsons, UK, 1995) in which a woman saw the white
Jesus Christ as the God-Creator, as One and at the same time as two separate
Beings. One common thing to all these miraculous beings coming back from the
other side of life is the message of love they bring us, but neither Dawkins’
nor his “selfish genes” can explain this human reality. Whether he is a myth or
a real being, many lives have been saved from immorality and a life of crime
and sin by the Israelite Jesus Christ (of Bani Isra’il), and by the love Jewish
or Pauline Christians attribute to and bestow upon him. Is there not more to man than Pr Dawkins’ “selfish genes” that are devoid of
compassion, hope and a real sense of freedom and justice? There is definitely
more to life and truth than what we perceive, see, hear, think and are made to
believe. But, whatever the truth, it is beyond doubt that we, humans and human-beasts,
the kinds that are ruling our world (the reptilians, would say our great David
Icke) are all victims (or accomplices) of a an Elite that has taken over
through bloodshed and extreme savagery almost the entire world with their
headquarters in the United States of America, Britain, Europe, Eretz Israël and
their satellites – the real Axis of Evil. Former US Attorney Ramsey Clark
admitted that his country was “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world”.
US
Professor Noam Chomsky, Professor Howard Zinn, Professor Norman Finkelstein
(all three of Jewish ancestry?) and many
other academics and researchers confirm this point of view. Dr. KENT HOVIND challenged the world of
scientists believing in and teaching the “religion of macro-evolution”. A few
took up the challenge and failed, and the others ignored it. “I have a standing offer of $250,000 to anyone who can give any empirical
evidence (scientific proof) for evolution.* My $250,000 offer demonstrates that
the hypothesis of evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.[36]
[36] ^ a b Hovind, Kent. "Hovind's $250,000
Offer", Dr. Dino.com, 2005. Retrieved on 2006-10-18. “
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#_note-8 When Pr Richard Dawkins was asked by a BBC correspondent to provide any proof
for macro-evolution, he was unable to do so. When asked whether macro-evolution
was just a theory or a fact, he answered it was a fact. Coming from a man of
science of such a reputation, Pr Dawkins should be ashamed to utter such a big
lie. Whether Dr Hovind is right or wrong about his religious beliefs is not
relevant here. The truth is that evolutionists, including Pr Dawkins, have
never provided any scientific evidence to conclusively prove their claim of a
theory that on the contrary has been proven to be a hoax by many: Harun Yahya
(Adnan Oktar) in The Evolution Deceit, the Origin of life lecture
by Dr A.E. Wilder Smith, the work of “Jehovah Witnesses” on the subject, etc. “Kent Hovind had been charged with falsely declaring bankruptcy, making
threats against federal officials, filing false complaints, failing to get
necessary building permits, and various tax-related charges. He was convicted
of federal tax and related charges, for which he is currently serving a 10-year
sentence.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#_note-8 Dr Kent Hovind was jailed on 2 November 2006. Although very informative,
the wikipedia article is very prejudiced against Dr Hovind both on the science
side and the legal aspect. Arun Russo, filmmaker showed in his documentary Democracy
to Fascism that there is no law that can force US citizens to pay income
taxes on their wages. Jo Banister who used to work for the IRS (US
Inland Revenue Service), denounced the IRS as a fraudulent organisation. When
victims of the IRS asked in Court to be shown the law, the Judge says: I do not want the Law in my Court; I am the Law! Another
Freemason Judge said somwhere else: TRUTH IS NOT A DEFENCE!
1. EVOLUTION - FAITH OR FACT? - An Embarrassing Conundrum (VID 6 In A 7 Part Series)
NEW WORLD ORDER / WORLD WAR II / CONSPIRACY / ECONOMICS / NEWS
THE DARWINIAN FALLACY OF THE 'SUPER RAT'
http://www.tomatobubble.com/id788.html
THE
DARWINIAN FALLACY OF THE 'SUPER-RAT'
By Mike King
We have all heard of the "Super Rats" - those
"miracles of Evolution TM"
that have "mutated" into indestructible
creatures immune to even the deadliest of rat
poisons. With breathless enthusiasm the disciples of Darwin hail these
creatures
as smoking-gun evidence of "evolution on steroids".
How pathetic that the 'Super Rats' phenomenon is the best "evidence"
the Evolutionists can muster in support of Darwin's
simple first-cell-to amoeba-to-fish-to-amphibian-to-ape-to-man
delusion. Here is a typical example, from the
London Telegraph, of the type of twisted tommy-rot that passes for
"science",
and "journalism" these days:
New 'Super Rats' Evolve Resistance to Poison
Rats across Britain are evolving
a resistance to poison that makes them almost impossible to kill, scientists have warned.
"Genetic
mutations have produced a new breed of "super rat" with DNA
that protects the vermin from standard toxins,
according to Professor Robert Smith at the University of Huddersfield."
And this from PBS (Propaganda - Bullshit -Sophistry):
Pesticide Resistance
"The chemical arsenal we have developed in an attempt to rid our homes of
rodents and our crops of insects is losing its power. We have simply caused pest populations to evolve,
unintentionally applying artificial selection
in the form of pesticides. Individuals with a higher
tolerance for our poisons survive and breed, and
soon resistant individuals outnumber the ones we can control."
"Shhhh! Please don't rat me out as a fraud!"
And
on and
on the fallacy of "evolution" goes; promoted by the
press, taught in the schools, enforced by the state, never questioned
and never challenged. The most frustrating feature
of this big misconception is that is so simple to debunk. All
it takes is a bit of thought and some common sense, yet the lie rolls on and on.
Now you might say, "Wait a minute Mike. The Super Rat phenomenon is very
real. The rats without immunity die. Those rats lucky enough to have the immunity survive, and the offspring
of those survivors inherit the immunity. What's so hard to understand about that?"
Well, there is nothing hard to understand about that; and nobody disputes the
existence of Super Rats. But the phenomenon only demonstrates natural selection (or, in this case, artificially-induced
natural selection) --- not "evolution" TM. But the rat remains
a rat! Nothing changed. Nothing "evolved TM".
Nothing "mutated".
Not a single additional line of complex genetic
code was added to the overall rat gene pool that wasn't already there to
begin
with. The surviving rats were already genetically
immune to the poison. The dead ones were not. What type of insane
"scientist"
would make the galactic leap-of-faith from this
common-sense example of natural selection, all the way to the 'simple first cell - to amoeba - to fish
- to amphibian - to ape - to man' scenario?
The
bottom line remains: trans-species evolution TM- let alone trans-genus, trans-family, trans-order,
trans-class, trans-phylum, trans-kingdom - has never been observed; neither in the fossil record,
nor in the current natural world. Indeed, by definition, trans-species Evolution - TM
is not observable. "We can't observe trans-species Evolution because the changes are so subtle and they accrue over
100's of millions of years - but trust it, it happened."
That's
not science. That's wild conjecture. Darwin himself even admitted that
the fossil record does not support
his theory. And anyone who tries to use the 'Super
Rats' as a means to circumvent this Darwinian difficulty of
non-observability
is either a criminal, an insane person, or just
someone who hasn't really given the matter much thought.
Atheistic
Evolutionists have yet to observe / prove a single case of trans-species Evolution TM, yet, on the basis of 'Super-Rats',
we are expected to jump all the way up the biological classification ladder to trans-Kingdom Evolution TM-
which holds that both the lovely woman above and
the inanimate rose that she is smelling have the same great grandmother [x].
"Fish become ape? Darwin stupid!"
To
better dispel the Super Rat Fallacy, for the sake
of those who still don't see through the scam, let make an analogy to
biological
weapons. The technology for engineering
race-specific biological weapons does indeed exist. Let us all hope and
pray that
the weapons themselves do not exist in some secret
laboratory! But suppose that some evil clandestine group were to poison
the reservoirs and springs of Japan with a
biological weapon that was lethal to people with a certain gene specific
to Asiatics.
(that's the analogy to the rat poison).
What
would happen? Obviously, the Asiatic inhabitants of
Japan would die after drinking the poisoned water. But what about the
tiny minority of White expatriates, tourists,
teachers, missionaries et al, present in Japan at the time of the great
poisoning?
The biological weapon wouldn't kill them. The
"Whites of Japan" would survive, unchanged, and pass on their
genetic immunity to the bio-weapon on to their
offspring. (the analogy to the Super-Rat). One hundred years later,
Japan could be a thriving island nation of 10 million White people, all speaking English too!
Now, what type of deranged crackpot mad-scientist would then dare to hypothesize, no,
declare, that the Asiatics of Japan
"mutated" into White people? See my point? And yet, this is exactly
the type of madness that the great and the good of
Academia are shoving down our throats as they denounce doubters as
"uneducated"
and "anti-science". Dirty rats!
In
the bio-weapon analogy to 'Super Rats',
the predominately Asiatic group on the left
"mutates" into the totally White group on the right only because a dash
of certain "White genes" are already present among a
few of the population (such as the teacher standing on left).
That is NOT 'Evolution' TM.
*
Don't fall for Evolutionist Tricks!
READ: GOD VS DARWIN
(fka The God of Logic)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS EVOLUTION WITHIN THE SPECIES - FROM HUMANS TO LESBIANS, HOMOSEXUALS, BISEXUALS AND TRANSSEXUALS
Promised Land: LHBT-themed fairy tale for kids is all set to be published now!
"Once
upon a time in a land not so far away; There was a place where no one
cared if you were straight or gay." This LHBT-themed fairy tale for kids
has two boys falling in love after meeting in the forest and will be
published real soon.
"Once upon a time in a land not so far away; There was a place where no one cared if you were straight or gay."
This is the opening line of "Promised Land", a LGBT-themed fairy tale for kids, which will be published soon now that it has surpassed its crowdfunding goal.
New
Zealand-based creators of this illustrated fairy tale Adam Reynolds and
Chaz Harris are using Kickstarter, a funding platform for creative
projects, to get the book published.
The fairy tale created for
children between 5-10 years old is about two boys, Jack- a farm boy and
Leo, a Prince, who fall in love after meeting in the forest.
The
authors have asserted that even though there are several children's
books with LGBT characters already on bookshelves but Promised Lands
will be different. But how?
Source: Kickstarter
The realm of UtopiaIn
the book, the sexuality of the main characters is never questioned or
like in real world they are not asked to get treated. The characters in
the book just meet and fall in love.
The duo describes that they
wanted to create something that they could have used growing up. "I
wanted to tell the type of story that I never got to see or read myself
growing up," said Reynolds.
Parent-child interaction
As a kid how often have your parents discussed about heterosexual relationships leave alone homosexual?
The
"happily ever after" phrase is the conventional, perfect, non
questionable ending for every fairy tale and parents usually dodge any
'uncomfortable' questions about sex or relationships. But Reynolds and
Harris said, "Promised Land" makes it easy for parents to discuss
different kinds of relationships with their kids.
Successful crowdfund
The
target stated on the extensive campaign page on Kickstarter is
$NZ25,000 and till Tuesday evening they have successfully garnered
$NZ30,900.
Since they have met their goal, they will be releasing
the book on October 11th, which also happen to be the National Coming
Out Day.
SEVEN REASONS
WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
The following article of Mr A.Cressy Morrison, former President of the
New York Academy of Sciences first appeared in the Reader's Digest of January,
1948; then, on the recommendation of Professor C.A.Coulson. F.R.S., Professor
of Mathematics at Oxford
University (the same
university where Pr Richard Dawkins teaches), was republished in the Reader's
Digest of November, 1960. – It shows how science compels the scientists to
admit the essential need of a Supreme Creator. But Pr Richard Dawkins chose not
to admit this scientific reality. “We are still in the dawn of the scientific age and every increase of light
reveals more brightly the handiwork of an intelligent Creator. In the ninety
years since Darwin
we have made stupendous discoveries; with a spirit of scientific humility and
of faith grounded in knowledge we are approaching even nearer to an awareness
of God. For myself, I count seven reasons for my faith:-
FIRST By unwavering mathematical law we can prove that our universe was designed and
executed by a great engineering Intelligence. Suppose you put ten coins, marked from one to ten, into your pocket and give
them a good shuffle. Now try to take them out in sequence from one to ten,
putting back the coin each time and shaking them all again. Mathematically, we
know that your chance of first drawing number one is one in ten; of drawing one
and two in succession, one in hundred; of drawing one, two and three in
succession, one in a thousand, and so on; your chance of drawing them all, from
one to number ten in succession, would reach the unbelievable figure of one
chance in ten thousand million. By the same reasoning, so many exacting conditions are necessary for life on
earth that they could not possibly exist in proper relationship by chance. The
earth rotates on its axis at one thousand miles an hour; if it turned at one
hundred miles an hour, our days and nights would be ten times as long as now,
and the hot sun would then burn up our vegetation during each long day while in
the long night any surviving sprout would freeze. Again, the sun, source of our life, has a surface temperature of 12,000 degrees
Fahrenheit, and our earth is just far enough away so that this “eternal fire”
warms us just enough and not too much! If the sun gave off only one-half of its
present radiation, we would freeze, and if it gave half as much more, we would
roast. The slant of the earth, tilted at an angle of 23 degrees, gives us our seasons;
if it had not been so tilted, vapours from the ocean would move north and
south, piling up for us continents of ice. If our moon were, say, only fifty
thousand miles away instead of its actual distance, our tides would be so
enormous that twice a day all continents would be submerged; even the mountains
would soon be eroded away. If the crust of the earth had been only ten feet
thicker, there would be no oxygen without which animal life must die. Had the
ocean been a few feet deeper, carbon dioxide and oxygen would have been
absorbed and no vegetable life could exist. Or, if our atmosphere had been
thinner, some of the meteors, now burned in space by the million every day,
would be striking all parts of the earth, starting fire everywhere. Because of these, and host of other examples, there is not one chance in
millions that life on our planet is an accident.
SECOND The resourcefulness of life to accomplish its purpose is a manifestation of
all-pervading intelligence. What life itself is, no man has fathomed. It has neither weight nor dimensions,
but it does have force; a growing root will crack a rock. Life has conquered
water, land and air, mastering the elements, compelling them to dissolve and
reform their combinations. Life, the sculptor, shapes all living things; an artist, it designs every leaf
of every tree, and colours every flower. Life is a musician and has each bird
sing its love songs, the insects to call each other in the music of their
multitudinous sounds. Life is a sublime chemist, giving taste to fruits and
spices, and perfume to the rose, changing water and carbonic acid into sugar
and wood and, in so doing, releasing oxygen so that animals may have the breath
of life. Behold an almost invisible drop of protoplasm, transparent and jelly-like,
capable of motion, drawing energy from the sun. This single cell, this
transparent mist-like droplet, holds within itself the germ of life, and has
the power to distribute this life to every living thing, great and small. The
powers of this droplet are greater than our vegetation and animals and people,
for all life came from it. Nature did not create life; fire-blistered rocks and
a salt-less sea could not meet the necessary requirements. “Who, then, has put it there?”
THIRD Animal wisdom speaks irresistibly of a good Creator who infused instinct into
otherwise helpless little creatures. The young salmon spends years at sea, then comes back to his own river, and
travels up the very side of the river into which flows the tributary where he
was born. What brings him back so precisely? If you transfer him to another
tributary, he will know at once that he is off his course and he will fight his
way down and back to the main stream and then turn up against the current to
finish his destiny more accurately. Even more difficult to solve is the mystery of eels. These amazing
creatures
migrate at maturity from all ponds and rivers everywhere those from
Europe
across thousands of miles of ocean all bound for the same abysmal deeps
near Bermuda. There they breed and die. The little one, with
no apparent means of knowing anything except that they are in a
wilderness of
water, nevertheless find their way back not only to the very shore from
which
their parents came but thence to the rivers, lakes or little ponds so
that each
body of water is always populated with eels. No American eel has ever
been
caught in Europe, no European eel in American
waters. Nature has even delayed the maturity of the European eel by a
year or
more to make up for its longer journey. Where does the directing impulse
originate? A wasp overpowers a grasshopper, digs a hole in the earth, stings the
grasshopper in exactly the right place so that he does not die but becomes
unconscious and lives on as a form of preserved meat. Then the wasp will lay
her eggs handily so that her children when they hatch can nibble without
killing the insect on which they feed; to them dead meat would be fatal. The
mother then flies away and dies; she never sees her young. Surely the wasp must
have done all this right the first time and every time, or else there would be
no wasp. Such mysterious techniques cannot be explained by adaptation; they
were bestowed.
FOURTH Man has something more than animal
instinct the power of reason.
No other animal has ever left a record of its ability to count ten or even to
understand the meaning of ten. Where instinct is like a single note of a flute,
beautiful but limited, the human brain contains all the notes of all the
instruments in the orchestra. No need to belabour this fourth point; thanks to
the human reason we can contemplate the possibility that we are what we are
only because we have received a spark of universal intelligence.
FIFTH [Photo] Egyptian pyramid at Giza
and the Sphinx
Provision for all living is revealed in phenomena which we know today which Darwin did not know such
as the wonders of genes. So unspeakably tiny are these genes that, if all of
them responsible for all living people in the world could be put in one place,
there would be less than a thimbleful. Yet these ultra-microscopic genes and
their companions, the chromosomes, inhabit every living cell and are the
absolute keys to all human, animal and vegetable characteristics. A thimble is
a small place in which to put all the individual characteristics of two
thousand million human beings. However, the facts are beyond question. Well, then,
how do genes lock up all the normal heredity of a multitude of ancestors and
preserve the psychology of each in such an infinitely small place? Here
evolution really begins at the cell, the entity that holds and carries genes.
How a few million atoms, locked up as an ultra microscopic gene, can absolutely
rule all on earth is an example of profound cunning and provision that could
emanate only from a Creative Intelligence no other hypothesis will serve.
SIXTH [Photo] Aztec Pyramid
By the economy of nature, we are forced to realise that only infinite wisdom
could have foreseen and prepared with such astute husbandry. Many years ago a species of cactus was planted in Australia as a protective fence.
Having no insect enemies in Australia the cactus soon begun a prodigious
growth; the alarming abundance persisted until the plants covered an area as
long and wide as England, crowding inhabitants out of the towns and villages,
and destroying their farms. Seeking a defence, the entomologists scoured the
world; finally they turned up an insect, which exclusively feeds on cactus, and
would eat nothing else. It would breed freely too; and it had no enemies in Australia. So,
animal soon conquered vegetable and today the cactus pest has retreated, and
with it all but a small protective residue of the insects enough to hold the
cactus in check forever. Such checks and balances have been universally provided. Why have not
fast-breeding insects dominated the earth? Because they have no lungs such as
man possesses; they breathe through tubes. But, when insects grow large, their
tubes do not grow in ratio to the increasing size of the body. Hence, there has
never been an insect of great size; this limitation on growth has held them all
in check. If this physical check had not been provided, man could not exist. Imagine meeting
a hornet as big as a lion!
SEVENTH The fact that man conceives the idea of God is in itself a unique proof. The conception of god rises from a divine faculty of man, unshared with the
rest of our world the faculty we call imagination. By its power, man and man
alone can find the evidence of things unseen. The vista that power opens up is
unbounded; indeed, as man is perfected, imagination becomes a spiritual
reality. He may discern in all the evidence of design and purpose, the great
truth that heaven is everywhere and in everything, but nowhere so close as in
our hearts.
It is scientifically as well as imaginatively true; in the words of the
psalmist: “ The heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament sheweth His
handiwork.”
A. Cressy Morrison
Former President of the New
York Academy of Sciences
From “GOD OF ISLAM” by Sayyid Saeed Akhtar Rizvi, revised edition
published by World Organization for Islamic Services, 1978/1398, Tehran, IRAN.
A previous edition was distributed free 1971-1974 by the author who was then
the head of the UNIVERSAL SOCIETY OF ISLAM at both People’s & Trinity Colleges, Mauritius. The author was also Head
of Biology at the Trinity
College until 1974.
But, whether there is a God or
not, whether we are mere evolved animals or humans don’t we have to get out of
the mess our predecessors have put us into? But, the big question is how? Is it possible to get out the clutches of the military state system called
democracy? Democracy is evil mediacracy according to many US personalities, and
always ends up in dictatorship, according to Baptist Christian Evangelist Dr
Kent Hovind, as it has happened now in the USA, Canada, Australia, and in
Europe – all white supremacist regimes, according to Alex Jones, Aaron Russo
(Democracy to Fascism), David Icke (Democracy or Fascism), Pr Noam Chomsky (US
Fascism), and many others (including the author). Is it possible to get out of the mind controlled and centralised system of
government that has replaced all the gods? Fascism is racism. Military Zionism
is Nazism, racism and Fascism, all in one. Karl Marx predicted Jews would one
day take over the whole world and be the supreme masters. Is it possible to get back our liberties taken away by the state terrorist
religion? Atheist hegemony is evil. Is it possible to get rid of the fascist military and corporations that have
taken control of our civil life and liberties, that is scavenging our roads,
micro-chipping our citizens, curtailing our freedom to circulate, running our
governments, police, media, civil services and educational and health
institutions, with the complicity of (paid by) the United Nations and big
business corporations and the servile taxpayers themselves? We are not eternal
sheep that the Élite can take to the slaughterhouse without some of us standing
up and putting up a fierce fight or are we? Is it possible to fight the religion of immorality and savage capitalism
(pornography, prostitution, drugs, homosexuality, paedophilia, genetic
engineering, wars of conquest, genocide, global slavery, political kidnapping
and assassination, global immorality and planet pollution, engineered famines,
diseases and climatic catastrophes) imposed upon the masses by our controlled
political, social and cultural institutions? Finally, do we have the right to answer yes to these questions? We have reached a stage in the evolution of mankind where even thinking has
become a crime, where freedom of expression is curtailed more and more, and
even hating the criminal deeds of a particular group is a crime. (The first 800 page manuscript of this book was deliberately destroyed by Denis
Yates, an ex British soldier turned computer engineer (technician) and salesman
while he had the author’s computer in for repairs, but the Chemsford Trading
Standards concluded that he was too honourably known in Chelmsford that he
could not possibly have committed such an act. However, it was not a bad thing
after all because this new book looks a lot better thanks to new material from
the Internet and elsewhere.)
The beauty of the Internet, you just have to click on a button and the whole
world is displayed before your very eyes, both sound and picture, with all its
lies and truths. Let us give it a try at this very minute at 04.00 AM, Sunday
2nd September 2007, and see what Alex Jones is talking about!
Well, the first two articles are blood curdling: 1. “Marine tells of order to execute Haditha women and children” 2. “Porter: Kill More Iraqis or Pay $9 per Gallon”
Now, let us check my Email box! This is
the last one received.
Information Clearing House Newsletter
(Pr Michel Chossudovsky) Exposed: Pentagon's plan for
Iran attack 09/01/07
Cost of U.S. War and Occupation
of Iraq $447,884,620,921
This is what we call history in the making and it is frightening – global
plunder and genocide after genocide, endless lies and deception, and who is
behind them? Is this the kind of world we really want for our children? America and the entire West and
their Allies drumming for wars non stop on all Muslim countries who say no to
their hegemony.
Hanford:
[at dinner] ... So what are your world views, Driscoll? Paul Driscoll: ...I
don't have any, Mr. Hanford. Hanford: Of course you
do, man. We ALL do! Like all this nonsense about giving the Indians land. What
we need are twenty General Custers and a hundred thousand men! What we should
have done is swept across the prairie, destroying every redskin that stood
before us. After that, we should have planted the American flag deep, high and
proud! Abigail Sloan: I think
the country is tired of fighting, Mr. Hanford. I think we were bled dry by the
Indian Wars. I think anything we can accomplish peacefully, with treaties, we
should accomplish that way. Hanford: Now, I trust
this isn't the path you spoon-feed your students. Treaties, indeed! Peace,
indeed! Why, the virility of a nation is in direct proportion to its military
prowess. I LIVE for the day when this country SWEEPS AWAY... [notices Driscoll's disapproving look] Hanford: ... You some
kind of a pacifist, Driscoll? Paul Driscoll: No,
just some sick idiot who's seen too many boys die because of too many men who
fight their battles at dining room tables... and who probably wouldn't last
forty-five seconds in a REAL skirmish if they WERE thrust into it. Hanford: ... I
take offense at that remark, Mr. Driscoll! Paul Driscoll: And I
take offense at "armchair warriors," who don't know what a shrapnel,
or a bullet, or a saber wound feels like... who've never smelled death after
three days on an empty battlefield... who've never seen the look on a man's
face when he realizes he's lost a limb or two, and his blood is seeping out.
Mr. Hanford, you have a great affinity for "planting the flag deep."
But you don't have a nodding acquaintance of what it's like for families to
bury their sons in the same soil!
Paul Driscoll was played by Dana Andrews.Abigail Sloan was the school teacher and
guess who Hanford
was? THE BANKER! You do not mess up
with the Rothschild Banking Cartel!All US Presidents
who had tried were murdered.
17 December1992, Los Alamitos, California,
USA (pneumonia,
complicated by congestive heart failure)
Birth Name
Carver Dana Andrews
Height
5' 10" (1.78 m)
END OF CHAPTER ONE
Sunday 2nd September 2007
Updated 4th of May 2013 BAFS
Chapter Two will deal with David Icke : “THE
ILLUSION OF A MODERN PROPHET”.
Retrieved from "http://www.iamthewiki.com/index.php?title=The_Alien_Beginning_and_End_of_Humankind" This page was last modified 19:27, 2 September 2007.
http://freehovind.com/download
Last edited by Ghyslaine
ROC on Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
From my unpublished
book “THE ALIEN BEGINNING AND END OF HUMAN KIND” (more than 1200 pages, fully
illustrated).I never managed to publish
it because of lack of funds (I had other priorities), time, opportunity,
incentives (other more qualified authors had written better works than mine),
but more importantly because of the Jewish Zionist control of the first London
Publishing House I contacted back in 1999 or 2000 - “TA-HA Publishing” whose
owner admitted this sad truth to me on the telephone.For the same reasons, he admitted that he
could not publish Adnan Oktar’s (Harun Yahya’s) “The Holocaust Hoax”.My first attempt at writing “A Different
Perspective of World History” (over 800 pages with illustrations) was thwarted in
or around 1996 when one Denis Yates (an ex soldier) from Chelmsford deliberately deleted the entire book
(draft) when he had my computer in for repairs.He did this because he was outraged by what I had written in the book
about his beloved mass murdering Prime Minister John Major (who was then the
leader of the European Union) who I had accused of being behind the mass murders
of Muslims in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the Balkans!
The modern world is plagued with believing nations
in permanent disobedience to God’s Laws, Will, and Commandments and completely
heedless of His Guidance and dire Warnings.
Whether we retrace the decadence of some of them back to the ancient
history of the so-called Semitic people, Mayans, the Mesopotamians, Sumerians,
Babylonians, Phoenicians, Palestinians, Hittites, Druids, Magi, Wiccans,
Persians, Hindus, Chinese, Greeks, Romans of the Biblical Era, Arabs of the
Islamic Era, the Crusaders, the Inquisitors, Europeans of the Colonial,
Imperial and Slave Trade Era or the economically, intellectually and militarily
backward Ottomans, one well documented historical fact is indisputable: the
sustainable world was immediately overrun by wild predators in human form and clothing
and by civilisation destroyers as soon as Islam ceased to be the driving force
of modern civilisation.
Taking over from Muslims, White Christian Europeans
produced the greatest and more advanced civilisation of history. But, the White bloodthirsty, racist and over
greedy European barbaric hordes conquered the peaceful and highly civilised
Islamic Spain under the false banner of Christian civilisation to be followed
by the fall of Islamic Hindustan and the conquest of far away lands of Oceania
and the continent already known to some ancient Europeans (Vikings), Arabs
(Phoenicians), Muslims and Africans alike that they called the “Americas” (most
probably from the name of a Crypto Jewish merchant and financier close to the
de Medicis, Amerigo Vespucci. They had no
hesitation at all to savagely exterminate so many of these far away indigenous
populations in order to steal their wealth, natural resources as well as their
lands. (See also Paul Warburg’s and other financiers’ role in the modern wars
and revolutions!)
However, we would not bother if this was just past
history, but it is currently repeating itself and is ongoing and getting worse
to the point that even the Whites are now under constant attacks, not by
Muslims, but by their acolytes the Jews, the Ashkenazis, the Zionists, the
Illuminati, and the Freemasons that are running their government in the
shadows! When John Fitzgerald Kennedy
denounced those Secret and powerful Societies, he was assassinated by them!
At the Majlis al Shura fi Britaniya (Muslim
Parliament of Great Britain under Dr Kalim Siddiqui), Muslim experts and
analysts have proved that those same barbaric hordes allied with the murderous
Jews are now on a New Crusade to exterminate, this time, entire Muslim nations
who are seen now rising and posing a threat to Godless (Secular) Christian,
Jewish, Hindu, Chinese and Russian hegemony in the world. We have seen Algeria scorched, the Balkans
ethnically cleansed of their Muslim populations, Islam under permanent attack,
and Muslims being forcibly de-Islamised and de-Arabised worldwide. Like in
Turkey, the Western Secular Judeo-Christian colonial agenda was to secularise
(Atheise) all Muslim nations, replace Islam with Nationalism, Liberalism,
corporate democratism, Socialism, Communism, Feminism, Humanism (Atheism), Militarism,
Materialism, and other anti-Islamic isms where the all powerful “democratic”
Totalitarian State replaces God at the head of all public and private
institutions, and in particular in Banking, the Judiciary and Education.
God’s Laws (HUDDUD), both Christian and Islamic have
thus been replaced by man made laws that override all spirituality, morality
and inherited virtues and way of life.
As all attempts of political
struggle for the re-establishment of the Islamic State and way of life have
failed and proved catastrophic with millions of Muslim deaths and the gradual
destruction of what was left of Islamic and Christian civilisation, we are left
with two alternatives:
Abandon Islam and join the Forces of Evil!
Or resist by whatever means at our disposal
the imposition of a Satanic way of life on our Christian and Muslim children
and grand children, and the best weapon actually at our disposition is civil
disobedience and total political, cultural, and economic boycott and
independence (emancipation). But, it is
sad to see that most Christians and Muslims, due to both political and
religious corrupt leadership, have been made to adopt the slavish in between path:
That of collaboration with the Devil while
still claiming to be Christians or Muslims!
I
fail to see how both Christians and Muslims can get out of such a quagmire when
they work with Fascists and racists, study and promote their Eurocentric Social
Sciences where God is out of the curriculum, and where we never find a single
Muslim thinker ever mentioned. What is
the relevance of “Max Weber, Karl Mannheim, Karl Marx, Emile
Durkheim, Erich Fromm, Edward Shils, and Edward Carr” to Muslims? None whatsoever! Islam does not need philosophers when more
than 90% of Muslims worldwide are not even educated in Classical Arabic,
Islamic Sciences, Traditions, History and Eschatology due to the decadence of
the Ummah of Muhammad and European colonialism, neo-colonialism,
totalitarianism and fascism.
Who amongst the Muslims ever read or studied the works of Muhammad
Iqbal, Muhammad Hamidullah, Morteza Mohtahari, Ali Shariati or Dr Kalim
Siddiqui? While accepting being
brainwashed by the European School System, there is no way there can ever be a
Revival of the Ummah or of Christendom. Mauritius
is a very tiny country, but can be used to explain the evils of neo-colonialism
and European hegemony on the lives and way of life of the inhabitants where
they have been brainwashed to accept as norms of a modern society such evils as
gambling (including lottery), drugs (alcohol, cigarettes, etc.), lethal
vaccines, abortion, prostitution, pornography, GM ‘food’, poisonous additives
in drinks and food, cannibalism (some of our food may even contain additives of
human origins!), corporate drugs (medicine), corporate sports, corporate
television, corporate cinema, corporate media, incest (with all the
illegitimate children around and single mothers with many lovers, who knows who
we are getting married to?), and so on.
Muslims have been lured into using Western nonsensical terminology
like “democracy”, “independence”, “autonomy”, “sovereignty”, “freedom”,
“justice”, “equality”, “progress”, “modernity”, “patriotism”, etc., when these
have never existed even in their own countries.
However, there can never be any constructive dialogue between a super
military power and a completely unarmed and disarmed Muslim nation, first
because the super military power is always right and is not here to debate but
to impose its might and will over weaker people, including its own people at
home. We have seen the results of
Western political ‘reforms’ imposed on the conquered Muslims of Turkey:
Closure of the Sufi Tekkes
Closure of Zaviyes
Closure of religious schools
The imposition of secularism
The establishment of nationalist principles instead of Islam
The wearing of the brimmed hat
The banning of Islamic dress for women
The enforced use of the Latin alphabet in place of the Qur’anic
alphabet
The banning of the Azaan and Iqaama in Arabic and replaced with Turkish
instead
The prohibition of religious instruction in schools
The recognition of equal rights for women and in inheritance
The abolition of polygyny (“polygamy”)
The persecution and arrest of dissidents
The acceptance of homosexuality
The manufacture, trade and consumption of alcohol and cigarettes
The acceptance of prostitution and pornography
The imposition of casinos
So,
I say, to hell with Western patronising the Muslims or anybody! Governments lie. Religious leaders lie. Scientists lie. Jews are liars. Christians and Muslims lie. We must inform ourselves by reading and doing
our own research.
We have no evidence
that the human biological type(s) evolved from pre-human types. All we can be sure of is that humans appeared
all of a sudden on this planet as the best (created) living form (species)
compared to all other life forms, but also the worst when we consider the
madness of their political, religious and non religious leaders. The leading countries are very heavily armed
and are terrorising the entire planet including their own people at home. Having abandoned God’s Law, they have made up
their own laws and religions, and genocide, global plunder, pollution and endless
wars are their fundamental values.
Humans found God to guide them in order to lead a moral life
in peace and harmony with their neighbours, aimed at freedom and justice for
all. The victims of oppression found
solace in God’s Promise of a Day of Judgement after death because criminals get
very rarely punished for their crimes, and their victims are almost never
compensated for their losses. The weaker
hopes for better days and is forced to be patient without ever fully realising
that the oppressor is strong only because of his or her own weaknesses.
Watch out for the money Jews (the International Jewish
Mafia) as they are the ones who are currently engineering the end of the world
where only an Elite is expected to survive in already prepared bunkers or space
facilities. For those who still are not
informed about the danger that Jewish Supremacism represents in our world
today, they should read at least
The
International Jew by Henry Ford 1920-1922
The Jew by Hilaire Belloc
The Jews, Masters of the World by LEON DE PONCINS (The Secret
Forces of Revolution) 1932.
Just a
few facts from that last named book
On 28 June 1914, the Jew Gavrillo
Princip murdered Archduke François-Ferdinand in Sarajevo.
This was used as a pretext to start World War I, a Jewish War.
The Jew Kerensky took over from the
Tsar (like the Jew Kemal Mustapha will do later on in Turkey) and Sovietised the
Russians. The Soviets would then proceed
in mass slaughter of the Russian and Central Asian nations, both Christians and
Muslims.
The Jew provocateur (agitateur)
Parvus Helphand with the support of a half-Jew the Chanceller Bethmann-Hollweg
obtained from Ludendorf to send Lenin to Russia.
The immense majority of the
Bolsheviks were Jews for at least ten years.
They set up and put into practice a doctrine propounded by the Jewish
Prophets Karl Marx and Lasalle.
The slaughter of the Tsar and of his
entire family at Iekaterinbourg was organised and led by the Jews Yourovski et
Golostcheguine who were under the orders of the Jew Jacob Sverdloff, then Presdent
of the Tsik of Moscow.
Both Bela Kun and Tibor Szamuelly were
Jews as well as all the leaders of the Hungarian bloodthirsty Bolshevism.
The leaders of the German Spartakism
were all Jews: Liebknecht, Rosa Luxembourg, Kurt Eisner.
The American and Austrian Socialist
leaders were all Jews.
The Jew Léon Blum was the leader of
French Socialism
The Jewish International Bloodline
were behind the Versailles Treaty (Paul Warburg and
others)
the recent British Debacle
control American Destiny
are currently the absolute masters of Germany
financed the Russian Revolution and supported
the Five Year Economic Plan
own or control the banks
own or control the media
own or control the cables (telegraphs)
own or control the radio
are masters over public opinion
are the Invisible government behind the visible
government
control all the world gold
SOME
JEWISH ORGANISATIONS
ISRAËL.A race, a religion, a people
cemented by powerful organisations:
The Jewish Committee of America
The Jewish Board of Deputies of the
British Empire (set up on 16.2.1883) to collaborate with the government like
the Pharisees and Sadducees did with the illegal Roman occupiers of Palestine
The Universal Israelite Alliance (founded in Paris
in 1860)
The Universal Freemasonic Order of
the Bnai-Brith reserved exclusively for Jews and founded in New-York in 1843
with 75,000 members spread over 492 Lodges and 10 Grand Lodges in the US,
Germany, Romania, Austria, Hungary, Czecho-Slovakia, Egypt, Palestine, etc.
(1920 figures published by the Jewish Encyclopaedia) - with ties to the
Israelite Alliance and the other big Jewish organisations.
The Revolutionary Bund, the greatest
revolutionary group in Russia
(later to be absorbed into the Communist and Menshevik Parties) and the Priory
(Poale) of Zion played both major roles in Russia before the Great War and in Palestine.
The L.I.C.A. (LICRA) or the International
league against Anti Semitism (Paris)
All the leaders of the Polish Social
Democratic Party, the Revolutionary Socialist Party and the Socialist Party
were Jews.
About the Revolutionary Priory of Zion, the Jew Elie Eberlin said:
« The Priory of Zion has assigned
as its final goal the creation of a Socialist Jewish State in Palestine”
We have here all the proofs required
to see Jews as being the root causes of our human tragedy of modern times.Jews (representing then some 15 million
people) have turned the world upside down and threaten to destroy civilisation.And, if we do not stop them in time, it will
be too late.Whether God or Aliens
created humankind, the Jews are bent on destroying it for good and they have
already been largely successful!
BAFS
1998
MACRO-EVOLUTION BY DESIGN ???
MACRO Evolution BY DESIGN was an Islamic Theory Before Darwin was Even Born ???
Quran 29:20
Say: "Travel through the Earth and see how He began the Creation. Then,
Allah makes the latter Creation. Allah is capable of (doing)
everything". 24.45 . Allah has created every animal out of water .
Of them (is a category which) walks upon its belly, (another which)
walks upon two legs, and ( a third which) walks upon four . Allah
creates what He wills. Allah is Able to do everything (He wants). 21: 30 Have not those who disbelieve seen (known) that the heavens and
the Earth were of one connected entity, then We separated them (from
each other), and We made every living thing out of water? Will they not
then believe? 71.17. And Allah has caused you to grow out of the earth like plants. 32.7. (Allah is He) who has made everything He created better, and He began the creation of the human (being) out of clay. Please
read the article linked at the end of the video description for more
Quranic verses about our evolution in this 1400 years old book. A Message to Atheists: Evolution
theory and natural selection was the work of many scientists and
philosophers. However, Muslim scientists contributed a lot to it and
they didn't believe many myths from Greek philosophers like Aristotle
who believed in spontaneous generation of life for example.
I'm a
Muslim (helasmoh???) who strongly believes in evolution by design (BELIEVE???) NOT in blind
evolution and chance, natural selection and chance alone CANNOT make
such a wonderful tree of life. Life in this universe is guided same as
the universe itself is guided by ingenious laws that we just started to
understand. If you think blind evolution and chance can bring
sophisticated life answer the Quranic challenge in my other video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYO9Au... If
you still want to attribute evolution to the Greeks please send me a
link with advanced knowledge like Muslim scientists had not just the
vague ideas Greeks had about evolution, if you disagree ask John William
Draper to change the name of evolution his book :) A Message To Muslims: -Eve
from Adam's rib: Most of the ideas that contradict evolution among
Muslims are from the myths of other religions which were imported to
Islam and attributed falsely to the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon
him). Our father Adam (peace be upon him) was preferred or chosen over
other people of his time as Allah stated clearly in Quran 3:33-34,
just like Allah chose any prophet after him also Quran stated in these
verses that all were "offspring", Adam was included and Allah is never
short of words. -Creation of Adam in Heaven: There is no such thing
in the Quran, Adam was reworded to stay in Heaven with his wife AFTER he
won the contest against the angels (the naming of creatures) as Quran
stated clearly in 2:35 and 7:19. When Adam disobeyed Allah and ate from the tree him and his wife were sent back to Earth.
-Why
Adam disobeyed Allah? Because Allah didn't promise Adam to be immortal
in Heaven, Adam was growing older and Satan promised him that if he ate
from the immortality tree then he will not grow older. Quran: 20:120 and
7:20
-Creation of Adam from dust: We are all created from dust, just like our father Adam. Quran 18:37, Quran 30:20, Quran 35:11, Quran 40:67.
-Adam
was created suddenly: Just This verse is enough to refute such claim
and there are many others Quran 7:11: And We created you (humans, in
plural form), then fashioned you (made you in the image you are, also
addressing humans in plural form), then said to the angels: Prostrate to
Adam!
-How can Adam be our father if there were many humans?: The
children of the smart man that Allah chose were the most fit to survive
to our days (survival of the fittest), there are many other human
species which we found their fossils only and they didn't make it to our
time.
-How Adam children got married? If Adam and Eve were the only
humans then the only answer is that brothers married their sisters, do
you accept such answer? Of course there were other humans and Adam
children married them.
-Allah is NOT a wizard, He does NOT pull new
stars and new galaxies from a magic hat and certainly He doesn't do that
for new species. Allah created and planned this universe on scientific
laws; evolution is just one of them. Evolution means way more ingenious
creator than a wizard who had to come to Earth and pull species one
after another because he couldn't plan that from the beginning and you
know very well that Allah is the best planner, evolution was part of the
plan from the beginning of creation of this universe. Please read the article linked here, don't be brainwashed by the myths of other religions. Thank you. Click on the link below for more information about evolution in the Qur'an. http://answeringislamicskeptics.weebl... helasmoh ??? [WHY HIDE YOUR IDENTITY???]
WE ARE ALL GODS
THE 7 LAWS OF SUCCESS
Dr Deepak Chopra
Success can be defined as the
continued expansion of happiness and the progressive realisation of worthy
goals.Success is the ability to fulfil
our desires with effortless ease.Material wealth is only one component of success.Success is a journey not a destination.Material abundance makes the journey more
enjoyable.Success includes good health,
energy and enthusiasm for life, fulfilling relationship, creative freedom,
emotional and psychological stability, a sense of well being and peace of
mind.Yet, even with all that, we will
remain unfilled unless we nurture the seeds of divinity inside us.In reality we are divinity in disguise and
the gods and goddesses in embryo that are contained within us seek to be fully
materialised.True success is therefore
the experience of the miraculous.It is
the unfolding of the divinity within us.
Law is the process by which
the unmanifest becomes the manifest.It
is the process by which the observer becomes the observed.It is the process by which the seer becomes
the scenery. It is the process by which the dreamer manifests the dream.
All of creation, everything
that exists in the physical world is the result of the unmanifest transforming
itself into the manifest.Everything
that we behold comes from the unknown, our physical body, the physical
universe, anything and everything that we can perceive through our senses is
the expression of the unmanifest becoming manifest.
The physical universe is nothing
other than the self - curving back within itself to experience itself as
spirit, mind and physical matter.In
other words, all processes of creation are processes through which the self or
divinity expresses itself.Consciousness
in motion expresses itself as the object of the universe in the eternal downs
of life. The source of all creation is
divinity of (or?) the spirit.The
process of creation is divinity in motion or (of?) the mind.The object of creation is the physical
universe, which includes the physical body.
And threes three components
of reality, spirit, mind and body are observer, the process of observing and
the observed are essentially the same thing.They all come from the same place, the field of pure potentiality, which
is purely unmanifest.The physical laws
of the universe are actually this whole process of divinity in motion or
consciousness in motion.When we
understand these laws and apply them in our lives, anything we want can be
created because the same laws that nature uses to create a forest or a galaxy
or a human body can also bring about the fulfilment of all our other desires.
THE FIRST LAW OF SUCCESS
Pure potentiality = Pure
consciousness. It is the field of all possibilities and infinite creativity. Other attributes of consciousness are pure
knowledge, unboundedness, perfect balance, infinite silence, invincibility,
simplicity and bliss.This is our
essential nature.Our essential nature
is one of pure potentiality.When you
discover your essential nature and know who you really are, in that knowing
itself is the ability to fulfill any dream you have because you are the eternal
possibility, the immeasurable potential of all that was, is and will be.The field of pure potentiality is your own
self…
Dr Deepak Chopra
The rest of the law is
unfortunately more of the same hogwash.I
love Dr Deepak Chopra, like I love Pr Texe Marrs, but he feeds on the
gullibility of the Western disillusioned masses and the hippies who lost hope
and faith in their respective churches.
See David Icke’s new age
religion of infinite consciousness, infinite love and of self creation or the Zionist
United Nations Dictatorship (UNO) New Age religion that it is trying to impose
manu militari on the entire world.
“God is also a human
being”, says Minister Louis Farrakhan (2011) of the Black racist Sect known as
“Nation of Islam” and is the Shriners’ (Master Masons’) “Father of the Sons of
Islam”, that is, the Black “direct descendants of God” destined to “create a
new earth and a new heaven”.
“A Shriner belongs to the
ancient Arabic order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine.”
BAFS
Richard Dawkins has lost:meet the new new atheists
Secular humanism is recovering from its Dawkinsite phase – and beginning a more interesting conversation
The atheist spring that began just over a decade ago is over,
thank God. Richard Dawkins is now seen by many, even many non-believers,
as a joke figure, shaking his fist at sky fairies. He’s the Mary
Whitehouse of our day. So what was all that about, then? We can see it a bit more clearly
now. It was an outpouring of frustration at the fact that religion is
maddeningly complicated and stubbornly irritating, even in largely
secular Britain. This frustration had been building for decades: the
secular intellectual is likely to feel somewhat bothered by religion,
even if it is culturally weak. Oh, she finds it charming and interesting
to a large extent, and loves a cosy carol service, but religion really
ought to know its place. Instead it dares to accuse the secular world of
being somehow -deficient. The events of 9/11 were the main trigger for the explosion of this
latent irritation. There was a desire to see "Islamic terrorism" as the
symbolic synecdoche of all of religion. On one level this makes some
sense: does not all religion place faith above reason? Isn’t this
intrinsically dangerous? Don’t all religions jeopardise secular freedom,
whether through holy wars or faith schools? On another level it is
absurd: is the local vicar, struggling to build community and help
smelly drunks stay alive, really a force for evil — even if she has some
illiberal opinions? When such questions arise, a big bright
‘Complicated’ sign ought to flash in one’s brain. Instead, in the wake
of 9/11, many otherwise thoughtful people opted for simplicity over
complexity. They managed to convince themselves that religion is
basically bad, and that the brave intellectual should talk against it.
(This preference for seeming tough and clear over admitting difficult
complexity is really cowardice, and believers are prone to it too.) The success of five or six atheist authors, on both sides of the
Atlantic, seemed to herald a strong new movement. It seemed that
non-believers were tired of all the nuance surrounding religion, hungry
for a tidy narrative that put them neatly in the right. Atheism is still with us. But the movement that threatened to form
has petered out. Crucially, atheism’s younger advocates are reluctant to
compete for the role of Dawkins’s disciple. They are more likely to
bemoan the new atheist approach and call for large injections of nuance.
A good example is the pop-philosopher Julian Baggini. He is a stalwart
atheist who likes a bit of a scrap with believers, but he’s also able to
admit that religion has its virtues, that humanism needs to learn from
it. For example, he has observed that a sense of gratitude is
problematically lacking in secular culture, and suggested that humanists
should consider ritual practices such as fasting. This is also the
approach of the pop-philosopher king, Alain de Botton. His recent book Religion for Atheists rejects
the ‘boring’ question of religion’s truth or falsity, and calls for ‘a
selective reverence for religious rituals and concepts’. If you can take
his faux-earnest prose style, he has some interesting insights into
religion’s basis in community, practice, habit. And liberal punditry has softened. Polly Toynbee’s younger sisters,
so to speak, are wary of seeing all of religion as a misogynist plot.
When Zoe Williams attacks religious sexism or homophobia she resists the
temptation to widen the attack and imply that all believers are dunces
or traitors. Likewise Tanya Gold recently ridiculed the idea of religion
as a force for evil. ‘The idea of my late church-going mother-in-law
beating homosexuals or instituting a pogrom is obviously ridiculous,
although she did help with jumble sales and occasionally church
flowers.’
All
these writers admirably refuse to lapse into a comfortably sweeping
ideology that claims the moral high ground for unbelief. Life’s
complicated, they admit. Institutional religion might be dubious, but
plenty of its servants buck that trend with a flair that puts secular
culture to shame. To adapt a Katharine Hepburn line, the time to make up
your mind about religion is never. In these pages Douglas Murray recently recounted debating alongside
Richard Dawkins and being embarrassed by the crudity of his approach.
Murray is not one of life’s fence-sitters: it must have occurred to him
that atheism has polemical possibilities that would suit him rather
well. But he has the sense to turn down the role of the new Christopher
Hitchens. A polemical approach to religion has swung out of fashion. In
fact, admitting that religion is complicated has become a mark of
sophistication. Andrew Brown of the Guardian has played a role in
this shift: he’s a theologically literate agnostic who is scornful of
crude atheist crusading, and who sometimes ponders his own attraction to
religion. On a more academic level, the philosopher John Gray has had
an influence: he is sceptical of all relics of Enlightenment optimism,
including the atheist’s faith in reason. What, if anything, do these newer atheists have to say? In previous
generations, the atheist was keen to insist that non-believers can be
just as moral as believers. These days, this is more or less taken for
granted. What distinguishes the newer atheist is his admission that
non-believers can be just as immoral as believers. Rejecting religion is
no sure path to virtue; it is more likely to lead to complacent
self-regard, or ideological arrogance. It might sound odd to cite Alain de Botton as a critic of complacent
self-regard, but this is central to his stated purpose. Attending to the
religious roots of humanism can prod us out of seeing secular humanism
as natural, the default position, and incite us to ponder our need for
discipline, structure, community, and so on. At one point he commends
the Christian perspective, that we are ‘at heart desperate, fragile,
vulnerable, sinful creatures, a good deal less wise than we are
knowledgeable, always on the verge of anxiety, tortured by our
relationships, terrified of death — and most of all in need of God’. Is
this mere posturing at depth, for ultimately he does not affirm the idea
of our need of God in a sustained, serious way? Yes and no: it is also a
mark of the intelligent humanist’s desire to avoid simplistic
ideologising and attempt some honesty about the human condition. The key
novelty of the newer atheism, perhaps, is its attentiveness to human
frailty. The religious believer might say: we do not need humanism to tell us
this. Indeed not, but it might not hurt non-believers, inoculated
against all religious talk, to hear of it.
This article first appeared in the print edition of The Spectator magazine, dated 13 April 2013
Subscribe with our offer of the summer:
three months’ print and digital subscription to the Spectator —
including our apps for iPad, iPhone and Kindle Fire — for just £12. Click here to join us.
When I picked up “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins, I was
expecting to encounter new reasons put forward to form a positive case
for the Atheist worldview, but I have to say that I was disappointed.
What I read were rehashed, incoherent and outdated arguments that made
me realize that Richard Dawkins is not very well read in philosophy. In
light of this I thought it would be useful to provide a compilation of
arguments from existing material and respond to his main arguments in
the following way: 1. Respond to what Dawkins considers his central argument; 2. Respond to what Philosophers consider his best argument. Responding to what Dawkins considers his central argument On pages 157-158 of “The God Delusion,” Dawkins summarises what he maintains as “the central argument of my book”: 1. One of the greatest challenges to the human intellect has been to
explain how the complex, improbable appearance of design in the universe
arises. 2. The natural temptation is to attribute the appearance of design to actual design itself. 3. The temptation is a false one because the designer hypothesis
immediately raises the larger problem of who designed the designer. 4. The most ingenious and powerful explanation is Darwinism evolution by
natural selection and we don’t have an equivalent explanation for
physics. 5. We should not give up the hope of a better explanation arising in physics, something as powerful as Darwinism is for biology. God almost certainly does not exist. Preliminary Note Before I go into Dawkins’ main points, I would like to address his
conclusion “God almost certainly does not exist.” My main issue is – how
does he conclude that God doesn’t exist from the above statements? It
seems to me that his conclusion just jumps out of thin air, to infer
that God does not exist just shows how invalid his argument is. It seems
to me that the only delusion is Dawkins’ conviction that his arguments
undermine the existence of God. If we could conclude anything from Dawkins’ argument it would be that
we should not conclude that God exists based on the design of the
universe. However, even if that is true, it doesn’t mean that God
doesn’t exist; we can believe in God’s existence from many other
arguments, which include: • The argument from morality; • The miracle of the Qur’an; • The cosmological argument; • The argument from personal experience; • The argument from consciousness. If we were to accept all of Dawkins’ statements, it would not be
enough to reject the idea that God exists, and it certainly does not
provide a positive case for Atheism. However, many of his statements are
false. Let us take his statements and respond accordingly. Statement #1: One of the greatest challenges to the
human intellect has been to explain how the complex, improbable
appearance of design in the universe arises. I believe that it is only a challenge if you wish to take God out of
the picture. It is indeed a challenge if you presume atheism to be true.
However for someone who is reflective and thinks deeply about things, I
think the simplest and the best explanation – with the greatest
explanatory power – is that there is a supernatural designer. The next
point will address why God makes sense of the design in the universe. Statement #2: The natural temptation is to attribute the appearance of design to actual design itself. This is not only a natural temptation but a rational conclusion
brought to light based upon the fine-tuning of the initial conditions of
the universe. Let me start off by presenting the premises of this
argument: 1. The fine-tuning of the universe to permit life is due to physical necessity, chance, or design. 2. It is not due to physical necessity or chance. 3. Therefore, it is due to design. Explaining Premise One The existence of a universe that permits human life is due to
conditions that must have been fined-tuned to a degree that is beyond
comprehension. Take the following examples into consideration: • The Strength of Gravity & the Atomic Weak Force: Physicist P.
C. W. Davies concludes that a small change in the strength of gravity or
of the atomic weak force would have prevented a universe that permits
our existence. P. C. W. Davies argues that this small change is as small
as one part in 10100 . • Volume of the phase space of possible universes: Roger Penrose of
Oxford University explains that the creator would have to aim for a very
tiny volume of the “phase space of possible universes” to create a
universe that resembles our own. This is quite technical science, but we
should ask the question: how tiny is this volume? According to Penrose
the volume would be 1/10 to the power of X which is 10123.
The precision required to produce a universe that resembles our own is
much greater than the precision that would be required to hit one proton
if the universe were a dartboard! In light of the above, there are only three possible explanations for the presence of the above fine tuning of the universe: 1. Physical necessity; 2. Chance; 3. Design. Why it cannot be Physical Necessity This option is irrational. There is just no physical reason why these
constants and quantities should have the values they do. As P. C. W.
Davies explains: “Even if the laws of physics were unique, it doesn’t follow that the
physical universe itself is unique…the laws of physics must be augmented
by cosmic initial conditions…there is nothing in present ideas about
‘laws of initial conditions’ remotely to suggest that their consistency
with the laws of physics would imply uniqueness. Far from it…it seems,
then, that the physical universe does not have to be the way it is: it
could have been otherwise.” Additionally if anyone was to take the view that the fine-tuning of
the universe to permit human life is due to physical necessity, it would
imply that it would be impossible to have a universe not fit for life!
However physicists maintain that the universe in which we live didn’t
have to be the way that it is, and there could have been many other
universes that did not permit human life. Why it cannot be Chance Some people who do not understand the impossibility of the universe
coming into being by chance exclaim, “It could have happened by chance!”
However would they say chance explains how an elephant was sleeping in
their garage overnight? Or how a 747 ended up parked in their garden?
Even after their irrational perspective is highlighted, they still hold
on to the theory that the universe can exist due to chance. In response
to this I would argue that it is not just about chance but something the
theorists such as William Dembski call “specified probability.” Specified probability is a probability that also conforms to an
independent pattern. To illustrate this, imagine you have a monkey in a
room for twenty-four hours, typing a way on your laptop. In the morning
you enter the room and you see, “To be or not to be!” The monkey has
miraculously written out a part of a Shakespearian play! What you may
have expected is random words such as “house,” “car,” and “apple.”
However, in this case not only have you seen the improbability of typing
English words – but they also conform to the independent pattern of
English grammar! To accept this is just the result of blind chance would
be irrational and counter discourse, as anyone can claim anything from
this perspective. To put this in to context, British mathematicians have
calculated that if a monkey did type on a laptop at every possible
moment, it would take 28 Billion years (!!!) to produce “To be or not to
be”. In conclusion, accepting the chance hypothesis is tantamount to
rejecting the existence of our own universe! Since premises one and two are true, it follows that supernatural
design is the most reasonable explanation for the fine-tuning of the
universe to permit human life. Statement #3: The temptation is a false one because
the designer hypothesis immediately raises the larger problem of who
designed the designer. The above statement, which is a contention to the design argument is
flawed for two main reasons. Firstly, anyone with a basic understanding
of the philosophy of science will conclude that in the inference to the
best explanation, the best explanation does not require an explanation!
The following example illustrates this point. Imagine 500 years from
now, a group of archaeologists start digging in London’s Hyde Park only
to find parts of a car and a bus. They would be completely justified in
inferring that these finds were not the result of any biological process
but the products of an unknown civilization. However if some skeptics
were to argue that we cannot make such inferences because we do not know
anything about this civilization, how they lived and who created them,
would that make the archaeologists conclusions untrue? Of course not! Secondly, if we take this contention seriously it could undermine the
very foundations of science and philosophy themselves. If we require an
explanation for the basic assumptions of science, for example that the
external world exists, where do you think our level of scientific
progress would be? Additionally if we were to apply this type of
question to every attempt at explaining the explanation, we would end up
with an infinite regression of explanations. And an infinite regression
of explanations would defeat the whole purpose of science in the first
place – which is to provide an explanation! A Note on Rejecting the Supernatural Dawkins’ also rejects a supernatural designer because he thinks, as
an explanation, it lack explanatory power; in other words, no progress
is made with an explanation to the apparent fine-tuning. He raises this
objection because he feels that a supernatural designer is just as
complex as design. However Dawkins’ objection is problematic as he
assumes that a supernatural designer is as complex as the universe. But a
supernatural designer, in other words God, is one of the simplest
concepts understood by all. This opinion is expressed by many
Philosophers including the famous atheist turned theist Professor
Anthony Flew. Dawkins’ other assumption is that God is made of many parts; however,
God is immaterial, transcendent and one. Just because God can do
complex things does not make him complex, it seems to me that Dawkins
confuses ability with nature. In other words, just because God can do
complex things (such as creating the universe) it does not make His
nature complex.So it stands to reason that God is the simplest, and
therefore the best, explanation. Statement #4: The most ingenious and powerful
explanation is Darwinism evolution by natural selection and and we don’t
have an equivalent explanation for physics.This statement is irrelevant
due to the following reasons: 1. Evolution does not have its foot in the door; 2. Evolution is based upon incalculable probabilities; 3. Evolution is impossible because we have not spent enough time on Earth yet. Let me expand upon these points. 1. Evolution does not have its foot in the door With regards to the existence of God, evolution does not even have
its foot in the door; it’s billions years away. The fine-tuning
argument mentioned above refers to the initial conditions of the
universe and various constants that pre-date any evolutionary process.
Simply put, evolution has no say. 2. Evolution is based upon incalculable probabilities The odds against assembling the human genome spontaneously are
incalculable. The probability of assembling the genome is between 4-180 to 4-110,000 and 4-360 to 4-110,000.
These numbers give some feel for the unlikelihood of the species Homo
sapiens. And if anyone were to accept evolution by chance, they would
have to believe in a miracle as these numbers are so high! Therefore
evolution itself would prove the existence of God! 3. Evolution is impossible because we have not had enough time on Earth yet According to John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler, the odds of assembling a single gene are between and 4-180 to 4-360.
The implications of this are that there simply has not been enough time
since the formation of the earth to try a number of nucleotide base
combinations that can even remotely compare to these numbers! Statement #5: We should not give up the hope of a better explanation arising in physics, something as powerful as Darwinism is for biology. Dawkins basically says that since there is a naturalistic explanation
for the apparent design in species and we do not have a similar
explanation for physics, we should just wait. Does this not sound like
blind faith to you? The statement presumes scientism to be the only way
of establishing facts or sound conclusions. Why else would he want to
wait for a naturalistic explanation? Dawkins’ presumption that scientism
is the only way to establish facts is not true because:
scientism, which is the view that we should believe only what can be
proven scientifically, is self-defeating. Scientism claims that a
proposition is not true if it cannot be scientifically proven. However,
the above claim itself cannot be scientifically proven. Therefore,
according to this claim, the claim itself is not true, hence scientism
defeats itself.
scientism cannot prove necessary truths like mathematics and logic. For example, “if p implies q, and p, then q”
and “3 + 3 = 6″ are necessary truths and not merely empirical
generalisations. In fact, scientism requires these necessary truths, but
it cannot prove them, and any attempt to do so would be tantamount to
arguing in a circle.
scientism is limited in its scope as it cannot address political or
moral realities. Concerning morality, scientism can only provide
“well-being” as a yardstick for moral truths. However, rapists, liars,
and thieves could all have “well-being” due to their actions, therefore
the moral landscape, as defined by science, is occupied by good and bad
people, and from this perspective morality has no meaning.
It can be seen from the above that Dawkins’ central argument fails
and is an embarrassment to the scientific community, as atheist
Philosopher Michael Ruse explains, “unlike the new atheists, I take scholarship seriously. I have
written that The God Delusion made me ashamed to be an atheist and I
meant it. Trying to understand how God could need no cause, Christians
claim that God exists necessarily. I have taken the effort to try to
understand what that means. Dawkins and company are ignorant of such
claims and positively contemptuous of those who even try to understand
them, let alone believe them. Thus, like a first-year undergraduate, he
can happily go around asking loudly, “What caused God?” as though he had
made some momentous philosophical discovery.” Responding to what Philosophers consider his best argument According to Philosopher and lecturer at Yale University, Gregory E.
Granssle, Dawkins’ strongest argument can be found on page 55: “A universe with a creative superintendent would be a very different kind of universe from one without.” Dawkins’ argument can be summarised in the following way: 1. A universe created by God would be different than the one created by nature; 2. The universe we live in fits better to a universe created by nature; 3. Therefore the universe we live in is most likely to have been created by nature. I would argue that Dawkins’ argument couldn’t be any further away
from the truth; this is because the universe that we live in actually
makes more sense being created by God for the following reasons. 1. The universe is ordered and open to rational anaylsis If God did not exist, the universe would not display the order it
does, and it would not be finely-tuned to permit human life. Professor
Roger Penrose states, “There is a certain sense in which I would say the
universe has a purpose. It’s not there just somehow by chance…I don’t
think that’s a very fruitful or helpful way of looking at the universe.” Additionally, the very fact that we can observe and perform rational
analysis on the patterns we perceive in the universe makes more sense if
God did exist, because in a naturalistic universe things would be
expected to be more chaotic. This does not mean a universe without a God
could not be ordered; however it is more likely that God would create
an ordered universe, and since the universe we live in is ordered it
makes sense that God’s existence fits well with our universe 2. The universe contains conscious and aware beings A universe that contains consciousness and awareness makes sense with
the existence of God. A universe without a God would be very different
to the one we are living in.Explanation Human beings experience things all the time. This article you are
reading is an experience; even talking about your experience is an
experience. However the ultimate reality that we know from any
experience is the one who experiences it – in other words ourselves.
When we realise that there is a first-person, an “I”, “me” or “mine,” we
come to face a profound mystery. The Philosopher Roy Abraham Varghese
puts it nicely when he wrote, “To reverse Descartes, ‘I am, therefore I
think…’ Who is this ‘I’? ‘Where’ is it? How did it come to be? Your self
is not just something physical.” The self is not a physical thing; it is not contained in any cell or
biological structure. The most unchallenged and intuitive reality is
that we are all aware, but we cannot describe or explain what this
awareness is. One thing that we can be sure of is that the self cannot
be explained biologically or chemically. The main reason for this is
that science does not discover the self; it is actually the other way
round. For science to try and explain the truth of the self would be
tantamount to arguing in a circle! Even scientists recognise this; the
physicist Gerald Schroeder points out that there is no real difference
between a heap of sand and the brain of an Einstein. The advocates of a
physical explanation for the self end up in a muddle as they require
answers to even bigger questions, such as “How can certain bits of
matter suddenly create a new reality that has no resemblance to
matter?”So if the self cannot be explained physically then the next
question must be asked: “How did it come to be?” The history of the
universe indicates that consciousness spontaneously arose, and language
emerged without any evolutionary forerunner. So where did it come from?
Even the neo-atheists have failed to come to terms with the nature of
the self and its source, because no physical explanation is coherent
enough to be convincing. Even Richard Dawkins almost admits defeat
concerning the self and consciousness; he states, “We don’t know. We
don’t understand it.” The best explanation for the nature and source of the self is that it
came from a source that is thinking, aware and conscious. How else can
the self, which is an entity with a capacity to reflect and experience,
manifest itself? It cannot have come from unconscious matter incapable
to experience and ponder. Simply put, matter cannot produce concepts and
perceptions, therefore we can conclude that the self cannot have a
material basis but must have come from a living source that transcends
the material world; and this is best explained by God. No other answer
provides an adequate explanation for this phenomenon. 3. The universe contains objective morality We all believe that killing 6 million Jews during World War II was
morally wrong, however not only do we believe it was morally wrong we
believe it was objectively morally wrong. What I mean by objective is
that if the Nazis had successfully taken over Europe and brainwashed us
to believe that it was ok to commit genocide, it would still be
objectively morally wrong regardless of human experience. However since
our universe contains objective morality then it can only make sense
with God’s existence, because God is required as rational basis for
objective morality. Without God morality is subjective, because God is
the only conceptual anchor that transcends human subjectivity. So the
universe with objective morality makes no sense without God. In this
light the Muslim or theist may argue: 1. If God does not exist, then objective moral values do not exist; 2. The universe with objective moral values does exist; 3. Therefore, God exists.Explaining the key premise The question about objective good or bad, in other words objective
morality, has been discussed by various moral philosophers. Many have
concluded that there is no objective morality without God, for instance
the late J. L. Mackie in his book “Ethics” states that there are no
objective moral values. Humanist philosopher Paul Kurtz aptly puts it
as, “The central question about moral and ethical principles concerns
this ontological foundation. If they are neither derived from God nor
anchored in some transcendent ground, are they purely ephemeral?” Paul Kurtz is right; God is the only conceptual anchor that
transcends human subjectivity, so without God there is no rational basis
for objective morality. To explain this further let us discuss
alternative conceptual foundations for morality.In God’s absence, there
are only two alternative foundations: 1. Social pressure 2. Evolution Both social pressures and evolution provide no objective basis for
morality as they both claim that our morality is contingent on changes:
biological and social. Therefore morality cannot be binding and true
regardless of who believes in them. Therefore without God, there is no
objective basis for morality. God as a concept is not subjective,
therefore having God as the basis for morality makes them binding and
objective, because God transcends human subjectivity. The following
statement by Richard Taylor, an eminent ethicist, correctly concludes, “Contemporary writers in ethics, who blithely discourse upon moral
right and wrong and moral obligation without any reference to religion,
are really just weaving intellectual webs from thin air; which amounts
to saying that they discourse without meaning.” Since the universe contains objective morality, and Gods existence is
necessary as a conceptual foundation for objective morals, then the
universe we live in makes sense with the existence of God. A Quick Note on Religious “Evils” Before I conclude I would like to highlight that a response to
Dawkins’ other contentions with the concept of God and religious life.
Dawkins seems to attribute all the negative and evil things to religion.
However there is a strong argument that these things are not unique to
religion itself, but the common conceptual dominator is humanity. This
is summarised well by Keith Ward, the former Regius Professor of
Divinity at the University of Oxford, he writes, “It is very difficult to think of any organised human activity that
could not be corrupted…The lesson is that anti-religious corruptions and
religious corruptions are both possible. There is no magic system or
belief, not even belief in liberal democracy, which can be guaranteed to
prevent it.” To illustrate this let me use the outdated cliché of “religions are
the cause war and conflict” and show how war and conflict are not unique
to religions. In the relatively short history of secularism the
following massacres have committed in the name of non-religious
ideologies such a communism, nationalism and social-Darwinism: • 70,000,000 under chairman Mao • 20,000,000 under Stalin • 2,000,000 no longer exist because of Pol Pot • 700,000 innocent Iraqi’s in the current occupation • 500,000 Iraqi children in the 10 year sanctions So it can be clearly seen above that war and conflict are not
religious monopolies, rather they are human phenomena and not unique to
religion. As Professor Stephen L. Carter argues in “Civility”: “[T]he statement that wars have been fought in the name of God is a
non sequitur. As the theologian Walter Wink once pointed out, more
people have died in the twentieth century’s secular wars than in the
preceding fifty centuries of fighting combined…. No religious war in
history, not all the religious wars of history added together, did as
much damage as this century’s wars of nationalism and ideology.” Conclusion This article attempted to respond to Richard Dawkins’ best-seller
“The God Delusion” by responding to his central argument and the
argument that Philosophers consider to be his best. However,
intellectual gymnastics – no matter how truthful – seldom convinces
others, so I thought it would best to allow the expression of God – the
Qur’an – to have the final say. In the wonderful eloquence and sublime
style God says, “In the creation of the heavens and Earth, and the alternation of the
night and day, and the ships which sail the seas to people’s benefit,
and the water which God sends down from the sky – by which He brings the
Earth to life when it was dead and scatters about in it creatures of
every kind – and the varying direction of the winds, and the clouds
subservient between heaven and Earth, there are signs for people who use
their intellect.” Qur’an, 2:164 Bibliography The majority of this article has been compiled from: Contending with Christianity’s Critics: Answering New Atheists and Other Objectors. Edited by Paul Copan and William Lane Craig. There is a God: How The World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind. By Professor Anthony Flew. The anthropic cosmological principle. By John D. Barrow and Frank J. Tipler. The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. By William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland. God?: A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist. By William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
"Inherit the Wind"- How the Illuminati Brainwashed Christians
April 23, 2014
(left,
In the movie, Clarence Darrow, played by Spencer Tracy, interrogates William
Jennings Bryan, played by Frederic March.) The movie "Inherit
the Wind" (1960) based
on the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, helped make
Americans adopt the doctrine of evolution.
James Perloff shows how Hollywood
distorted the facts to advance the Illuminati agenda.
"We are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence
in these theories... Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are
empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism."
(Protocols 2:2-3) "Now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of
that Christian religion." (Protocol 17:2) by James Perloff (henrymakow.com)
Perhaps nothing advanced evolution so effectively as the play and movie Inherit
the Wind. It depicts the 1925 "Monkey Trial." The defendant was
John Scopes, a Dayton, Tennessee schoolteacher charged with violating the
Butler Act, a state law that forbade teaching that man descended from lower
forms.
Leading Scopes's defense was famed attorney Clarence Darrow. Assisting the
prosecution was former Democratic Presidential candidate William Jennings
Bryan. The most common impression about this trial is that Darrow humiliated
Bryan in cross-examination, scoring a powerful victory for Darwinism over
religious fundamentalism.
Public beliefs regarding the trial are based mostly on Inherit the Wind,
which portrayed a battle between enlightened evolutionists and imbecilic
Christians. My book Tornado in a Junkyard compares the screenplay (the
Oscar-nominated Spencer Tracy version) to the trial transcript and other
records. Here are highlights. (The complete comparison is posted on my blog.)
THE MOVIE opens with the grim town minister and other prudes marching to the
local high school. They arrest young Scopes, who is forthrightly teaching
biology using Darwin.
IN REALITY, Scopes was not a biology teacher. He taught math, but had briefly
substituted for a biology teacher during an illness. The ACLU recruited him to
challenge the Butler Act. Scopes never taught evolution. He wrote in his
autobiography, Center of the Storm: "Darrow had been afraid for me
to go on the stand. Darrow realized that I was not a science teacher and he was
afraid that if I were put on the stand I would be asked if I actually taught
biology."
"If the boys had got their review of evolution from me, I was unaware of
it. I didn't remember teaching it."
IN THE MOVIE, we see Scopes in jail, a persecuted martyr. Aroused by the town
preacher's sermon, a lynch mob gathers outside the jail, burning Scopes in
effigy. A rock sails through the window, injuring him.
IN REALITY, Scopes didn't spent one second in jail. Violating the Butler Act
was not an imprisonable offense. Furthermore, no bad blood existed between
Scopes and Dayton's people, who were delighted that the trial put Dayton on the
map.
IN
THE MOVIE, Clarence Darrow arrives, bravely taking the case singled-handedly.
The local Christians boo him; a mob outside his hotel threatens a lynching.
IN REALITY, Darrow, left, brought a team of lawyers, and here's what he himself
said of his Dayton experience: "Yet, I came here a perfect stranger and I
can say what I have said before that I have not found upon anybody's part - any
citizen here in this town or outside, the slightest discourtesy. I have been
better treated, kindlier and more hospitably than I fancied would have been the
case in the north."
IN THE MOVIE, William Jennings Bryan is an ignorant bigot opposed to science.
He says: "The people of this state have made it very clear that they do
not want this zoological hogwash slobbered around the schoolrooms!"
"The way of scientism is the way of darkness."
IN REALITY, Bryan was a member of the American Association for the Advancement
of Science. What he really said about science during the trial: "Give
science a fact and it is not only invincible, but of incalculable service to
man."
IN THE MOVIE, the judge disallows any testimony from eminent scientists whom
Darrow has brought. The judge declares "zoology" (which he can barely
pronounce) and other sciences "irrelevant to the case."
IN
REALITY, Darrow called as a witness zoologist Maynard Metcalf, who testified at
length. Bryan, left, quickly recognized that the atheistic Darrow was
orchestrating a parade of witnesses to promote Darwinism. (The trial was being
broadcast on radio nationwide, and reported in newspapers globally.) Bryan
asked Judge John Raulston: "Will we be entitled to cross-examine their
witnesses?" Raulston said they would.
This enraged Darrow, who knew Bryan would ask his witnesses embarrassing
questions like "Where are Darwin's missing links?" and "Are you
an atheist?" Darrow therefore had his remaining witnesses submit
affidavits. These totaled 60,000 words and occupy 54 pages of trial transcript;
excerpts were read in court. The decision to stay off the stand was not made by
a bigoted judge, but by Darrow himself, to elude cross-examination. Ironically,
most of the "evidence" Darrow's experts discussed - Piltdown Man,
"useless vestigial organs" - are long discredited.
THE "DEBATE"
But what of that famous "debate" where Darrow supposedly trounced
Bryan, symbolizing Darwinian triumph over the Bible?
It was not a debate. Darrow called Bryan as a witness. Thus only Darrow could
ask questions, completely controlling the exchange. He peppered Bryan with
anti-Bible questions he had spent years developing. On the preceding evening,
he rehearsed his inquisition with an associate; Bryan, on the other hand, had
to answer everything off-the-cuff.
Naturally, with these advantages, Darrow looked better than Bryan - but not
nearly as decisively as in Inherit the Wind, which grossly distorts the
event. For example, it has Bryan say that the Bible defines sex as
"original sin" (nothing resembling this was said.) And when the
movie's cross-examination finishes, Bryan cracks up mentally, wildly shouting
the names of the Bible's books (another complete fabrication).
Hollywood distortions aside, why did Bryan place himself in a position where
only Darrow could go on offense? The answer is simple. Darrow tricked Bryan
into believing that, after this, their roles would reverse: Bryan would be able
to question Darrow about Darwinism. This was important to Bryan, since he had
been denied cross-examination of Darrow's "experts."
But the next morning, Bryan sat stunned as Darrow changed Scopes's plea from
"not guilty" to "guilty," thus ending the trial.
Darrow's words to the judge: "We will ask the court to bring in the jury
and instruct the jury to find the defendant guilty."
Darrow had no intention of going on the stand and letting Bryan get revenge by
quizzing him on evolution. The trial had NEVER been about John Scopes's guilt
or innocence. Its sole purpose was to disseminate Darwinism and assail
Christianity.
But in Inherit the Wind, Darrow fights to the bitter end for his client.
The backwoods jury finds Scopes "guilty."
Gloom falls on the defendant and his noble attorney, as "bigotry and
ignorance" have won the day.
---
You know, Henry, I remember watching "Inherit the Wind" on TV
when I was a kid way back in the 1950's and 60's. Even then I knew and said to
myself, "This kind of movie is a real putdown to the Christian community
and Christian Faith." Only much later did I come to understand just
how sinister the agenda was: the Christ-hating, Christianity-despising Talmudic
Jews and "illuminati-elite" were [and continue to this very moment]
mock and cartoonize Christians and biblical faith oriented values. The idea of
Darwinism and luciferian/satanism is to make "the Animal Kingdom of
Mankind" divided between just three classes: the elite who rule and lend
money hither & yon; the masses whom they use as "employable &
useful to create wealth"; ... and "the useless eaters" who are
to be eliminated from the "ecological equation."
Yeah. A nice little cabal of Darwinists they are. In their mind
& mindset: they are "the gods who rule." we are only the animals
and cattle and pack-mules that they manage.
And the truth is: WITHOUT DIVINE INTERVENTION they will probably pull this off.
... but only over my dead body and over the dead bodies of those who love
freedom and decent human [and divine] values. I will NEVER yield to their
sinister and vile satanic agenda.
ANIMOLOGIST RICHARD DAWKINS, THE POPE OF ATHEISM AND OF QUANTUM PHYSICS LOSING IT AGAIN!!!
Richard Dawkins, what on earth happened to you?
Dawkins
in 2014 is a man so convinced that he possesses God-like powers of
omniscience that he can’t understand why everyone is angry at him for
pointing out the obvious
Another day, another tweet
from Richard Dawkins proving that if non-conscious material is given
enough time, it is capable of evolving into an obstreperous crackpot who
should have retired from public speech when he had the chance to bow
out before embarrassing himself.
“Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse,” huffs
Dawkins. Seeming to have anticipated, although not understood, the
feminist reaction this kind of sentiment generally evokes, he finishes
the tweet: “If you think that’s an endorsement of date rape, go away and
learn how to think.” You can almost imagine him tweeting this, his fingers jabbing away at
the keyboard as his glasses slide down a face contorted with
disappointment at how irrational everyone is being. This is Dawkins in
2014: a figure of mockery, a man so convinced that he possesses God-like
powers of omniscience that he can’t understand why everyone’s getting
angry at him for pointing out the obvious. Why won’t we all just learn
how to think, damn it! Then we could all live together in a peaceful
society where nobody wears “bin liners”, and women shut up about sexual harassment. Remember when Dawkins was widely respected? When his biggest detractor was late evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould? I don’t. Having grown up after Dawkins made the transition from lauded science communicator to old man who shouts at clouds, it’s hard for me to understand why anyone continues to listen to him about anything. Sure, he wrote some pop science books back in the day, but why do we
keep having him on TV and in the newspapers? If it’s a biologist you’re
after, or a science communicator, why not pick from the hundreds out
there who don’t tweet
five or six Islamophobic sentiments before getting off the toilet in
the morning? If you need an atheist, there are many philosophers,
scholars of religion, and public intellectuals available who don’t refuse to acknowledge the existence of theology. Dawkins has been arrogant for years, a man so convinced of his
intellectual superiority that he believes the one domain in which he
happens to be an expert, science, is the only legitimate way of
acquiring or assessing knowledge. All of his outbursts in recent years
follow from this belief: he understands the scientific method, a process
intended to mitigate the interference of human subjectivity in data
collection, as a universally applicable way of understanding not just
the physical world but literally everything else as well. Hence his
constant complaint that those appalled by his bigoted vituperations are simply offended by clarity;
feeble-minded obscurantists who cling to emotion, tradition or the
supernatural to shield themselves from the power of his truth bombs. You don’t have to be religious to find this level of hubris baffling. In his review of The God Delusion, Terry Eagleton remarks:
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the
subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what
it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.
Dawkins’ narrowmindedness, his unshakeable belief that the entire
history of human intellectual achievement was just a prelude to the
codification of scientific inquiry, leads him to dismiss the insights
offered not only by theology, but philosophy, history and art as well. To him, the humanities are expendable window-dressing, and the
consciousness and emotions of his fellow human beings are byproducts of
natural selection that frequently hobble his pursuit and dissemination
of cold, hard facts. His orientation toward the world is the product of a
classic category mistake, but because he’s nestled inside it so snugly
he perceives complex concepts outside of his understanding as
meaningless dribble.If he can’t see it, then it doesn’t exist, and
anyone trying to describe it to him is delusional and possibly
dangerous. All we can do at this point is hope his decline into hysterical
dogmatism culminates in a reverse deathbed conversion. But if there’s
one thing Dawkins has tried to impress upon us, it’s that miracles don’t
exist. So I’ll do him the courtesy of not holding my breath.
"Proof" of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon’s Journey into the Afterlife (38-min. video)
Near-death
experiences, or NDEs, are controversial. Thousands of people have had
them, but many in the scientific community have argued that they are
impossible. Dr. Eben Alexander was one of those people.
A highly trained neurosurgeon who had operated on thousands of brains
in the course of his career, Alexander knew that what people of faith
call the “soul” is really a product of brain chemistry. NDEs, he would
have been the first to explain, might feel real to the people having
them, but in truth they are simply fantasies produced by brains under
extreme stress.
Then came the day when Dr. Alexander’s own brain
was attacked by an extremely rare illness. The part of the brain that
controls thought and emotion—and in essence makes us human—shut down
completely. For seven days Alexander lay in a hospital bed in a deep
coma. Then, as his doctors weighed the possibility of stopping
treatment, Alexander’s eyes popped open. He had come back. Alexander’s recovery is by all accounts a medical miracle.
But the real miracle of his story lies elsewhere. While his body lay in
coma, Alexander journeyed beyond this world and encountered an angelic
being who guided him into the deepest realms of super-physical
existence. There he met, and spoke with, the Divine source of the
universe itself.
This story sounds like the wild and wonderful imaginings of a skilled
fantasy writer. But it is not fantasy. Before Alexander underwent his
journey, he could not reconcile his knowledge of neuroscience with any
belief in heaven, God, or the soul.
This story would be remarkable no matter who it happened to. That it
happened to Dr. Alexander makes it revolutionary. No scientist or person
of faith will be able to ignore it. Learning about it will change your
life.
N.B. It is sad that I did not manage to find out that Christopher Everard had any consideration whatsoever for the 1,8 billion Muslims or so of the planet and of the Islamic reality although he writes and tells many truths also about Muslim innocence in certain political and propaganda matters. BAFS
Mars
colonies, extraterrestrial bloodlines and conflicts, and the influence
of the Bilderberg Group, Illuminati, and Skull & Bones are all
explored with Alfred Webre. How Mars became a ‘dead planet,’ the
possible depopulation of Earth, and our planet’s true alien elite--from
Annunaki to Reptilian Grays--are demystified as we explore the
conspiracy to move the elite to a home on Mars. Is the multi-dimensional
universe on a changing paradigm away from the zero-sum game of warfare?
What did Nikola Tesla know about life on Mars? And what role does Dick
Cheney play in the manipulation of mankind? Explore the secrets of the
illuminati in space in this uncensored Buzzsaw interview, hosted by Sean
Stone. GUEST BIO: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd - Alfred's
book, Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact (2000), founded Exopolitics, the
science of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multiverse.
Using advanced quantum access technology, the U.S. Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) time traveled Alfred's book, Exopolitics: Politics, Government,
and Law in the Universe (2005), from 2005 back to 1971, when an
unwitting Alfred was examined by a group of approximately 50 CIA and
DARPA officials who knew Alfred would be a leading future
extraterrestrial and time-travel whistleblower, and would become the
developer of the Exopolitics and Dimensional Ecology models of the
Omniverse. ADD’L LINKS: https://www.youtube.com/user/Exopolit... https://twitter.com/alfredwebre http://www.amazon.com/Exopolitics-Pol... http://thelip.tv/ http://thelip.tv/show/buzzsaw/ Buzzsaw Full Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5al1... Buzzsaw Short Clips Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0mjg... https://www.facebook.com/EnterTheBuzz... https://www.facebook.com/thelip.tv EPISODE BREAKDOWN: 00:01 Welcome to Buzzsaw with Sean Stone. 00:20 Introducing Alfred Webre. 00:56 Active colonies on the red planet. 07:10 Explosions on the Mars surface, nuclear theories and Nikola Tesla communications to Mars. 13:46 Trips to Mars and the development of large-scale colonies courtesy of the Bilderberg group, and extraterrestrial conflicts. 17:10 The extraterrestrial lifeforms on Mars. 19:51 Why colonize Mars? The true alien elite on Earth. 22:49 The evolution of Homo-Sapiens, intervention of Annunaki, Reptilians and Grays. 25:38 How a career in politics led to immersion in multi-dimensional phenomenon. 28:07 The multi-dimensional universe and true Total Recall. 31:57 What do Mars colonies look like? 33:01 Depopulation of Earth and the timescale of Mars colonization. 36:35 Dick Cheney’s collapsing health and how Skull & Bones have controlled Nazis, Communism, Capitalism and beyond. 40:18 Cancelling out negative illuminati frequencies and ascending consciousness. 41:40 Where to find more information. 42:10 Thanks and goodbye.
Stone Age
Psychedelia is the latest book by British author CHRIS EVERARD.
308 pages
• index • full colour chapter • free DVD with ever book order
Message from the author:
“I
founded Enigma Books & Enigma Publications in 1996. I now run Enigma
Magazines too - and we are building a stable of brilliant authors who write
about subjects which have been suppressed and censored. We get about
880,000 people per week visiting our website. So, hey - thanks... We sell
our books exclusively - we used to use Amazon, but basically, we decided to
start our own bookstore because we prefer to not charge a single penny for
shipping. No matter where you live on planet Earth, you won’t be charged a
penny for mailing fees!”
Stone Age
Psychedelia is my new book. It is 308 pages long with a proper index,
full colour illustrations and I travelled thousands of miles doing research.
Stone Age
Psychedelia is the first book which charts the existence of Egyptian mummies in
the USA, and presents laboratory analysis of the mummy of King Ramses II -
which conclusively proves that hallucinogenic plants from south America &
the USA were ingested & traded in Egypt. Chris Everard's quest begins in
Iraq & Egypt, examining carvings which are more than 2,000 years old,
showing erectile serpents and humanoid figures with the heads of toads - these
strange humanoid-amphibians are depicted alongside Egyptian priests, taking
part in ceremonies...
The
ELONGATED SKULLS of the rulers of ancient Iraq & Egypt are investigated -
proving that the royal elite looked very very different to normal human beings.
This priesthood were using ancient herbs and saps and mushrooms to adjust their
brain chemistry and tap into images & visions of the SPIRITWORLD...
These
visionary, prophetic rulers inspired the corpus of Gnostic texts... This book
is the result of a seventeen year long quest - delving deep into the Creation
Myths of Egypt, and meetings with high level Magicians, Druids, Satanists,
Freemasons, Astronomers & Archaeologists. Chris Everard's investigation has
uncovered the deepest arcane secrets of FreeMasonry and taught him how to use
hallucinogenic plants to SEE and TELEPATHICALLY COMMUNICATE with the OGDOAD
Gods... Fully illustrated with full colour 16 page chapter, More than 300
PAGES, this is a monumental book.
Praise
for
Stone Age
Psychedelia
(These
are real reviews)
Almost
two decades in the writing, with full-time research covering three continents,
British author and film maker CHRIS EVERARD investigates the secret history of
the Royal-Political elite in the ancient world. STONE AGE PSYCHEDELIA presents
corroborated archaeological evidence, maps, diagrams, documents and photos...
"A
thorougly entertaining read which I couldn't put down. I ordered my copy of
this book and it arrived within 10 days - which is pretty good service these
days. An endless supply of amazing facts to astonish your friends with. Prepare
to be amazed!"
PG, Spain
"A
masterpiece full of information you will have a hard time acquiring
elsewhere".
JOHAN
I just
received STONE AGE PSYCHEDELIA last week, and I literally could not put it down
until I finished it today! Mr. Everard illustrates with clear and
colorful detail the varied uses of mind and consciousness altering substances
through out the ages. He reveals with wonderful insight and
attention to detail the occulted secret that the elite of planet Earth have
been (for thousands of years) secretly expanding their consciousness with the
use of plants, herbs and chemicals in a quest to gain direct experience into
higher realms of consciousness and communicate with "the gods"
CHAD,
Germany
"In
his brilliant and epic book, Stone Age Psychedelia, Chris Everard makes the
inarguable case that psychedelic plant-induced shamanic visions are 'real' and
that ancient religions, communication from the spiritworld and /or 'alien'
intelligences, all stem from and have the same 'root', a trance-induced, other
level of reality. This may be accessed via tribal drumming, dance movements and
ritual sex, whilst ingesting psychoactive substances. This is truly the 'Secret
of The Ages', which the Royal Elite and their pet magicians have conspired to
hide from us for untold millennia... This is a truly splendid book".
ROB,
England
"I
can assure U this book is far more entertaining than anything else people throw
out there… U should get the real buzz of Truth when U read this. It shines
through and through".
TOMO
“IF YOU
SEEK TRUTH, THIS IS IT...”
BRYAN
FIVE STAR
REVIEWS ALL THE WAY!
FREE
DELIVERY
We ship
worldwide every day.
“Stone
Age Psychedelia is a wonderful book. Full of fascinating facts &
insights”
Lionel
Fanthorpe, Presenter of Fortean Times on Channel 4 TV, regular contributor to
Fortean Times Magazine & special guest on George Noory’s Coast to Coast AM
Radio Show
Thank you for dropping by
my Website.
Christopher
Everard
Taught
himself French, Latin & Sumerian
My book Stone Age Psychedelia has been made into a TV series
called GODS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD.
My book tells the
previously untold story of ‘Spiritual Warfare’ being perpetrated against
ancient tribal people in the Amazon, Siberia, Europe and Asia. Their
methods of communicating with the God-head through the use of very ancient
hallucinogenic herbs is under attack - and their rituals and knowledge have
been hijacked by Occultists, Secret Societies & the Vatican who have used
these plants and the telepathic effects which they create in order to contact
the dark & demonic forces of the Universe... And some of those
occultists tried to stop me from making this film.
Ayahuasca,
Syrian Rue, Salvia Divinorum, Mandrake, Yohimbe Bark, Peyote, Cocaine, the
Pharaohs, Elongated Skulls, Magic, Ritual & the revealing of the identity
of the OGDOAD GODS.
1.•genetics
2.•nuclear
disasters
3.•alchemy
4.•egyptology
5.•astronomy
6.•robotics
7.•archaeology
8.•frankenstein
foods
9.•demonology
10.•cults
11.•scientology
12.•hallucinogens
13.•celebrity
cults
14.•new
world order
15.•astrology
16.•reflexology
17.•philosophy
18.•surrealist
art
19.•truth
movement
20.•cymatics
21.•voodoo
Feed Your Brain Magazine is
More than just a magazine - each monthly issue is an iBook in its own
right.
If I don’t get at least one DEATH THREAT a
day, then I consider that I am not doing deep enough investigations!
I investigate - that’s my job. I have been editing Feed Your Brain
Magazine since 2008 and love being in contact with all my readers. I have
interviewed Astronauts, Attorneys for the World Bank, Black Magicians,
Ministers in the Egyptian government, members of the Skull&Bones
Brotherhood, the KKK, high ranking Freemasons and many authors &
celebrities such as Pete Townsend, Brian Eno, David Icke, Alex Jones,
Anthony Hilder, Jordan Maxwell, Uri Geller, Michael Tellinger and many
others...
Our publication of the ‘VatiLeaks’ scandal forced the resignation of the
pope, destroyed Berlusconi’s career and the police raided the Mafia and seized
$300m of assets!
We investigate how the
European Parliament & ENEA Italian Energy Agency paid the Mafia to
dump Nuclear Waste in the Mediterranean Sea.
We publish evidence which
proves that ancient Egyptians visited Australia and exported Eucalyptus
Oil back to Egypt for the embalming of Kings & Queens.
200+ fully illustrated
pages of delicious in-depth investigations into the Mafia, Elvis, Church
of Satan, Fukushima, the Riches of the Royals, Merkabah, Britney, Madonna,
Kabbalah, the Order of the Dragon, British Intelligence Services,
Hollywood celebrities on LSD, Ancient Alien contact in Rhodesia, the
Vatican ‘VatiLeaks’ scandal, Chernobyl, Biblical Prophecies, the Book of
Revelations, Atomic Alchemy... All delivered right now, today.
Elvis, Howard Hughes,
Sammy Davis Jr. & the Satanic-Masonic underworld of Vegas.
Evil atomic alchemy, nuclear
investments of the royal family, Biblical predictions of Chernobyl.
LSD, Cary Grant, Larry
Hagman, Elvis, MDMA, Peyote, Aldous Huxley, Meeting entities on Acid &
Beverly Hills!
How rich are the Royals? A
staggeringly deep investigation into the Royal Riches!
500 new
readers every week!
British intelligence
services investigated by Chris Everard; MI5, MI6, SIS & MOSSAD.
Britney & Madonna’s
fascination with the Kabbalah. Nag Hammadi codex & the Merkabah.
Megaliths, pyramids, the
Ogdoad reptilian-amphibian gods of ancient Egypt, art in 23,000BC.
Sego Canyon rock art,
aliens teaching man how to write, cosmic codes of Hebrew & the
Annunaki.
How rich are the Royals? A
staggeringly deep investigation into the Royal Riches!
Fukushima Fallout; the
true tragedy revealed. Censored media reports leaked & published by
Chris Everard
EXTREMELY INFORMATIVE MATERIAL TO READ, WATCH AND ACT UPON!
The Suppressed History of Humankind...
Millions
of people have come to realise that the TEXT BOOKS they read when they
were at school fail to tell the WHOLE TRUTH about Humankind.
It
seems more and more obvious that a major LIE and a concealment of
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE has been perpetrated on Mankind. All over the
world, we are now - because of the digital communication revolution -
beginning to see that our human ancestors were GIANTS, they had GIANT
TOOLS, GIANT AXES and were buried in GIANT SARCOPHAGI...
Every
penny from our Enigma Channel subscribers is ploughed back into high
quality film production - we appreciate all our subscriber-viewers very
much. You can SUBSCRIBE by just clickinghere
The Human Giants & Nephilim
The Enigma Channel is investigating GIANTS for a new documentary TV series. According
to a report in "The World", 7 October 1895, a party of prospectors
found the mummified remains of a very tall man in a cave near San Diego,
California. Over his head were the remnants of a leather hood. An
expert from the Smithsonian Institution inspected the remains; the
mummified body was 2.5 m (8 ft 4 in) tall and the height of the man when
alive was estimated to be 2.7 m (9 ft). There are claims of
authenticity on some blogs and claims of fraud on others. Smithsonian
employees were meant to claim that this was made of GELATIN.
However,
why would the Smithsonian BUY an artefact if they thought that it was
fake? Our new documentary series investigates all kinds of evidence -
and some items which are definitely not hoaxes.
You can watch dozens of Documentaries which are banned and censored from YouTube - Start your subscription by clickinghere
The LOST
Pharaohs
This
week coming we broadcast the first proper report from Egypt about the
forgotten tomb of pharaoh Senebkay - who is, in himself, a forgotten
pharaoh!
The
Abydos Kingdom, which lay in the southern part of Middle Egypt between
the larger kingdoms of Thebes (Dynasties 16–17) and the Hyksos (Dynasty
15) in northern Egypt is a big surprise - and the oversized massive
solid rock sarcophagus has an unusual rough outer surface - normally for
a pharaoh we would see a smoothed and sometimes engraved exterior.
Unlike other royal family dynasties, the pharaohs of the Abydos Dynasty
were forgotten to history and their royal necropolis unknown until this
discovery of Senebkay’s tomb. Millions of tourists flock to the Osireion
and also the Abydos temple as each year goes by - and it is proof that
under the sands of Egypt, there are still many more treasures - and even
perhaps entire pyramids which have been 'lost'. Right now, you can
subscribe and watch documentaries about Egyptian discoveries not only on
land - but also in the sea, off the coast of Alexandria. We have our
own team of archaeologists and Egyptologists.
You can watch dozens of Documentaries which are banned and censored from YouTube - Start your subscription by clickinghere
The Lost Tribes of Giant APE MEN
Living
in deep caves on high snowy peaks in Tibet and Nepal, there is a
legendary giant hairy man... Of course, when we're kids, the BBC and
mainstream media laugh at this idea of a giant red ape in the
mountains... However, there is more than enough evidence which proves
that a 3metre [9 feet] tall ape did indeed wander the mountain tracks of
the Himalayas...
The
fossil record shows that "Gigantopithecus blacki" giant ape-man species
were the largest apes that ever lived, standing up to 3 metres (9.8
ft), and weighing up to 540 kilograms (1,200 lb). In 1935,
palaeontologist Ralph von Koenigswald came across an unusually large
molar while looking through fossil teeth in a Hong Kong drugstore, where
they were known as ‘dragon’s teeth’ and sold for medicinal purposes. He
realized that the tooth belonged to a new primate species, which he
named Gigantopithecus blacki. Many hundreds of teeth have since been
found, along with four jawbones. Gigantopithecus (‘giant ape’) is
regarded as the largest primate ever to have existed.
You can watch dozens of Documentaries which are banned and censored from YouTube - Start your subscription by clickinghere
The Demons Worshipped by the ILLUMINATI...
World
international FREEMASONRY is the EXECUTIVE HEAD of Judaism - the higher
one travels up the exam 'degrees' of masonry, the more and more Hebrew
words you have to learn… Some of those Hebrew words are the names of
DEMONS which are used as Passwords in Masonic lodges, where top
politicians, law-makers, judges and even Prime Ministers kneel
blind-folded and swear allegiance to JAH-BUL-ON - a word which has such
great occult significance that it may only be uttered as a whisper into
the ear of a fellow Freemason...
Your subscription allows us to investigate fascinating subjects which would otherwise be suppressed. Chris
Everard's films are even deleted from Torrents… If you want to know
what the mainstream media is hiding from you, then Subscribe right now…
SPIRITWORLD III Every
day, millions of dollars are paid to black magicians via auction
websites and blogs so that they can put curses on people… Every day, Ivy
League college brotherhoods meet and perform rituals with characters
dressed as the Pope & the Devil - many of these Ivy League students
go on to be employed at the tax payers' expense with top jobs in
government… Every day, more and more children are abducted and go
missing… Every day hundreds of tons of drugs are shifted across borders
by cults who have 'Death Squads' and their own Satanic/Voodoo temples…
Difficult to believe? SPIRITWORLD III investigates this subject which
no mainstream media outlet fears to tread…
Words
cannot say how incredibly grateful THE ENIGMA CHANNEL team are for the
support of our subscribers. Many aspects to the dreadful and terrible
events in Paris were caused by rampant anti-Muslim sentiments dressed up
in cartoons - and we received many emails and messages of support from
our subscribers worldwide. With the help of the KEV BAKER SHOW, we were
able to broadcast a podcast with our friends on the KTFRN network in
Denver, which received a record global audience. We are now editing new
reports which deeply investigate the state of anti-Muslim sentiments
which are threaded into the newswires, and identify the politicians
whose political careers are financed by the lobbyists hired by the Arms
Industry. In the coming weeks new documentaries highlighting the
destruction of many Muslim oil-rich nations will be aired.
We
are already BETA TESTING our new UPLOADER ACCOUNTS which allow viewers
to upload video clips and submit URLs of documentaries to our Search
Engine - already, this has expanded the range of TV shows and films
available, and we shall be issuing full Uploader Account status to our
viewers soon.
Chris Everard
exposes how Margaret Thatcher and her son supported a COUP against a
small oil-rich African nation - the IRON LADY wanted to take over and
control her own country - not to be missed!
PLEASE
SUBSCRIBE and help us fund more investigations and report on subjects
which are never covered on the Mainstream. To start your subscription,
which costs £19.99 for a whole year, then click here.
Most Britons are direct descendants of farmers who left modern day Iraq and Syria 10,000 years ago, a new study has shown.
After
studying the DNA of more than 2,000 men, researchers say they have
compelling evidence that four out of five white Europeans can trace
their roots to the Near East.
The discovery is shedding light on
one of the most important periods of human history - the time when our
ancient ancestors abandoned hunting and began to domesticate animals.
Hunters: Chewing harder food meant hunter-gatherers has longer and narrow mandibles
The invention of farming led to the first towns and paved the way for the dawn of civilisation.
The
Leicester University study looked at a common genetic mutation on the Y
chromosome, the DNA that is passed down from fathers to sons.
They found that 80 per cent of European men shared the same Y
chromosone mutation and after analysing how the mutation was distributed
across Europe, were able to retrace how Europe was colonised around
8,000BC.
Roots: Britons are descended from farmers who
migrated from the Persian Gulf 10,000 years ago according to a new study
(file picture)
Prof Mark Jobling, who led the study: 'This
was at the time of the Neolithic revolution when they developed a new
style of tools, symmetrical, beautiful tools. 'At this stage about
10,000 years ago there was evidence of the first settlements, people
stopped being nomadic hunter-gatherers and started building
communities. 'This also allowed people to specialise in certain areas of trade and make better tools because there was a surplus of food.'
European farming began around 9,000 BC in the Fertile Crescent - a
region extending from the eastern Mediterranean coast to the Persian
Gulf and which includes modern day Iraq, Syria, Israel and southeast
Turkey. The region was the cradle of civilisation and home to the Babylonia, Sumer and Assyrian empires.
Skills: Professor Mark Jobling says the settlers were more attractive to women because they could grow more food
The development of farming allowed people to settle down for the
first time - and to produce more food than they needed, leading to trade
and the freedom to develop new skills such as metal working, building
and writing. Some archaeologists have argued that some of these
early farmers travelled around the world - settling new lands and
bringing farming skills with them. But others have insisted that the skills were passed on by word of mouth, and not by mass migration. The
new study suggests the farmers routinely upped sticks and moved west
when their villages became too crowded, eventually reaching Britain and
Ireland. The waves of migrants brought their new skills with
them. Some settled down with local tribes and taught them how to farm,
the researchers believe. 'When the expansion happened these men
had a reproductive advantage because they were able to grow more food so
they were more attractive to women and had more offspring,' said Prof
Jobling. 'In total more than 80 per cent of European men have Y chromosomes which descend from incoming farmers. 'It
seems odd to think that the majority of men in Ireland have fore
fathers from the near East and that British people have forefathers from
the near East.' The findings are published in the science journal PLoS Biology. Dr
Patricia Balaresque, a co-author of the study, said: 'This means that
more than 80 per cent of European Y chromosomes descend from incoming
farmers.' In contrast, other studies have shown that DNA
passed down from mothers to daughters can be traced by to
hunter-gatherers in Europe, she said. 'To us, this suggests a
reproductive advantage for farming males over indigenous hunter-gatherer
males during the switch from hunting and gathering, to farming - maybe,
back then, it was just sexier to be a farmer,' she said. Europe
was first settled by modern humans around 40,000 years ago. But other
types of humans - including Neanderthals - were living in Europe
hundreds of thousands of years earlier.
"I'll
show them! I'll show them all!"
EVOLUTIONIST
MAD MAN SAYS HE FOUND "LUCA"
By Mike King
Propaganda Rag SawFit To Distort"
A
Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"
*****************************************
FREE SAMPLE DAYSubscribe to the Anti-New York Times and
stay on top of world events.
William F. Martin says that the Last Universal Common Ancestor can be traced back to deep
sea vents like this one off the Galápagos
NY Times: Meet Luca,
the Ancestor of All Living Things
By NICHOLAS WADE
REBUTTAL
BY
One of
the ironies of the crackpot theory of "Evolution" TM,
is that the deceitful
dogma itself is always "evolving." Since the
1860's inception of Darwinian doctrine, mad scientists have bickered
endlessly about how "Evolution" TM actually played out, never
questioning the basic foundational assumption that life spontaneously, with neither reason nor guidance, emerged
from non-life in the first place.
From Darwin's Origin of the Specious
Species to the present day, the case for "Evolution" TM must,
by necessity, rely upon the classic logical fallacies that are so evident to philosophers; yet completely invisible
to arrogant "theoretical scientists" emotionally attached to a dogma disguised as "science." This idiotic
article by renown "science journalist" and author Nicholas Wade is no different.
Haz
Mat suits and goggle on. Into the "Primordial Soup" (or is it "deep sea vents" now?) we "wade"
(corny pun intended).
"Shhhh, Mr. Wade. You must never tell anyone
about the Anti-New York Times."
Wade:
A surprisingly specific genetic portrait
of the ancestor of all living things has been
generated by scientists who say that the likeness sheds considerable
light on
the mystery of how life first emerged on Earth.
Rebuttal:
Notice how it is already assumed, without evidence, that "all living things" have a common ancestor. (fallacy
of assumed truth)
Wade:
This venerable ancestor
was a single-cell, bacterium-like organism. But it
has a grand name, or at least an acronym. It is known as Luca,
the Last Universal Common Ancestor, and is estimated to have lived some four billion years ago, when Earth
was a mere 560 million years old.
Rebuttal:
Mr. Wade, before you school us dumb plebes about Luca's birthplace, please prove to us that Luca even existed; and
then prove how Luca "evolved" into other species; which in turned "evolved" and "evolved"
millions of times into all current life forms. And by "proof," we mean observational evidence -- the very
definition of the Scientific Method.
Wade:
The new finding
sharpens the debate between those who believe life
began in some extreme environment, such as in deep sea vents or the
flanks
of volcanoes, and others who favor more normal
settings, such as the “warm little pond” proposed by Darwin.
Rebuttal: Whatever happened to the "Primordial
Soup" TM theory?
You
see, these erudite eggheads love to "debate" endlessly over how many
angels can dance on
the head of a pin, without ever demonstrating that
there were actually any angels dancing on the pin, at all!
"Luca!
We
have you surrounded. Come out of that sea vent with
your flagella up. And don't try any of that binary fission business"
They found little Luca in the deep sea,
not the Primordial Soup as had once been theorized.
Wade:
The nature of the earliest ancestor of all living
things has long been uncertain because the three great domains of life
(bacteria, plants, animals) seemed to have no common point of origin.
Rebuttal: Mr. Wade,
has it ever occurred to you and your sci-fi cult that the reason why the various domains "seem to have no common
point of origin" is because maybe, just maybe, they do not have a "common point of origin?"
Wade:
Specialists have recently come to believe that the bacteria and
archaea were the two earliest domains, with the
eukaryotes emerging later. That opened the way for a group of
evolutionary
biologists, ... to try to discern the nature of the
organism from which the domains emerged.
Translation: The high-priests of "Evolution" TM have just concocted a new theory to explain away the gaping holes in the previous theories.
Wade:
Their starting point was the known protein-coding genes of bacteria
and archaea. Some six million such genes have
accumulated over the last 20 years in DNA databanks as scientists with
the new
decoding machines have deposited gene sequences
from thousands of microbes.
Rebuttal: "DNA decoding machines" were used to sniff out little Luca --- (palm
to face, deep sigh, shaking head)
Wade: Genes
that
do the same thing in a human and a mouse are
generally related by common descent from an ancestral gene in the first
mammal.
Rebuttal: The
belief in the "common
descent" between a human and a mouse is based on
the fallacious prior assumption that we all came from Luca. It can just
as easily be argued that DNA similarities between Mickey Mouse and Mickey Mantle are due
to both of them having been designed by the same Creative Force which Tesla, Edison, Einstein (puke)
all believed
to exist. Hence, genetic similarities between the
two Mickeys can be explained as cross-associations / basic templates of
the same life-transmitting Creative Force which
animates the universe.
Will
the wonders of modern
"science" ever cease?! The new Super Duper Decoding
Machine not only links Mickey Mantle to the rodent family; it
traced the birth of Luca to a deep sea vent!
Wade: By
comparing their sequence of DNA letters, genes
can be arranged in evolutionary family trees, a
property that enabled Dr. Martin and his colleagues to assign the six
million
genes to a much smaller number of gene families.
Rebuttal:
One can arrange and categorize the various "families" of automobiles (trucks, sports cars, SUV's, luxury cars,
go-carts etc) into a "tree" with many branches. Would their common component similarities therefore "prove"
that Ferraris blindly "evolved" from school-buses?
Wade:
Genes are adapted to an organism’s environment.
Rebuttal:
Wrong again, Mr, Wade! The gene pool is not "adaptable." What happens sometimes
is that environmental changeswill favor one existing genetic
trait over another. Hence, those specimens
without the trait are at a disadvantage while those
with it will prosper and produce offspring. This might explain why one
group of finches has a beak like this while another
group of finches has a beak like that. But it damn sure cannot explain
how Marylyn Monroe and a putrid maggot have the
same 1 millionth grandmother!
Wade: So Dr. Martin hoped that by pinpointing the genes likely to
have been present in Luca, he would also get a glimpse of where and how Luca lived.
Rebuttal: "Likely to have been present in Luca" ---
that's called conjecture, not science.
Wade:“I
was flabbergasted at the result, I couldn’t believe it,” he said.
Rebuttal: We can't either.
Wade:
The 355 genes pointed quite precisely to an
organism that lived in the conditions found in deep sea vents, the
gassy, metal-laden,
intensely hot plumes caused by seawater interacting
with magma erupting through the ocean floor.
Rebuttal: Cheese and crackers! We can't even find lost civilizations
from a few thousand years ago and this academic ass-clown found little Luca in a deep sea vent?
Wade: Deep sea vents are surrounded by exotic life-forms and, with their extreme chemistry,
have long seemed places where life might have originated.
Rebuttal: "Seemed" -- "might have." Save the speculative words for Star
Trek or Jurassic Park, not the Science Section of a newspaper that so many people actually place trust in.
1- Mr. Spock of Star Trek says: "Evolution
is not logical."
2- Some evolutionists now believe that T-Rex "evolved" into a bird.
Wade: The 355 genes
ascribable to Luca include some that metabolize hydrogen as a source of
energy as well as a gene for an enzyme called
reverse gyrase, found only in microbes that live at extremely high
temperatures...
Rebuttal: So,
some of the genes "ascribed to" (speculative) this ancestral organism called Luca (never proved to
have existed), are found in microbes that live at high temperature. Therefore, Mickey Mantle and Mickey Mouse, Marilyn
and the maggot do all have a common ancestor after all. Brilliant! (palm
to face, deep sigh, shaking head)
Wade: The
finding has “significantly advanced our understanding of what Luca did for a living,”James O.
McInerney of the University of Manchester wrote in a commentary, and provides “a very intriguing insight
into life four billion years ago.”
Rebuttal:
How does one even begin to respond to this madness?
Wade:
Dr. Martin... argues that Luca is very close to the
origin of life itself. The organism is missing so
many genes necessary for life that it must still have been relying on
chemical
components from its environment. Hence it was only “half alive,” he writes.
Rebuttal:
In other words, the "Luca-was-born-in-a-sea-vent"
theory has so many holes that it requires another band-aid theory to keep it viable --- the "half alive"
theory.
"It's half alive!
It's half alive!"
Wade: The
fact that Luca depended on hydrogen and metals favors a deep sea vent
environment
for the origin of life, Dr. Martin concludes,
rather than the land environment posited in a leading rival theory
proposed
by the chemist John Sutherland of the University of Cambridge in England.
Rebuttal: Wade, with his "Luca-was-born-in-a-sea-vent" theory, is seeking to dethrone Sutherland and his "Luca-was-born-on-land" theory
as the crackpot theorist of the year. This heated
competition among psychos has always been a comical feature of
"theoretical
science."
Wade: Luca and the origin of life are “events separated by a vast distance
of evolutionary innovation,” said Jack Szostak of Massachusetts General Hospital, who has studied
how the first cell membranes might have evolved.
Rebuttal:
This crackpot believes in cellular life before Luca --- which means that there was another great great great grandma
Luca long before "sea vent" Luca was born.
Wade:
Dr. Sutherland too gave little credence to the argument
that Luca might lie in some gray transition zone
between nonlife and life just because it depended on its environment for
some essential components. “It’s like saying I’m half alive because I depend on my local supermarket.”
Rebuttal:
The lunatic Sutherland is dismissing the lunatic Martin. Just another day at the
asylum of modern academia. Let the "academic debate" begin!
Wade:
Dr. Sutherland and others have no quarrel
with Luca’s being traced back to deep sea vents. But that does not
mean life originated there, they say. Life could
have originated anywhere and later been confined to a deep sea
environment
because of some catastrophic event like the Late
Heavy Bombardment, which occurred 4 billion to 3.8 billion years ago.
Rebuttal: The Late Heavy Bombardment? What the
heck was that?
Wade: This was a rain of meteorites that crashed into Earth with such force that the
oceans were boiled off into an incandescent mist.
Rebuttal: Mr. Wade, can you cite for us the observational evidence for this "rain
of meteorites" and the "boiling off" of the oceans?
Wade:
Life is so complex it seems to need many millions of years to evolve.
Rebuttal:
Circular logic! It goes like this:
"Life
takes 'million of years' to 'evolve' --- We cannot
observe this because it played out over 'millions of years.' "
Once
upon a time, the meteors rained, the oceans
boiled, and out popped little Luca -- with his
millions of complex DNA codes, cell wall, cell membrane, cell plasma and
flagella
already intact.
Wade:
Dr. Sutherland, working from basic principles of
chemistry, has found that ultraviolet light from the sun is an
essential
energy source to get the right reactions underway,
and therefore that land-based pools, not the ocean, are the most
likely
environment in which life began.
Translation:
Sutherland: "Luca
came from a land pool, you idiot!"
Martin:
"Nonsense, fool! Luca came from a deep sea vent!"
Sutherland: "Land pool!"
Martin: "Sea vent!"
Sutherland:
"Your momma wears combat boots!"
Martin: "Your momma so ugly, the strip club paid her to keep her
clothes on!"
Your momma's so ugly, when she goes into a strip club, they pay her to keep her clothes on. - See
more at: http://www.laughfactory.com/jokes/yo-momma-jokes/3#sthash.tCNuzrBV.dpuf
Your
momma's so ugly, when she goes into a strip club,
they pay her to keep her clothes on. - See more
at:
http://www.laughfactory.com/jokes/yo-momma-jokes/3#sthash.tCNuzrBV.dpuf
Wade:"We didn’t set
out with a preferred scenario; we deduced the scenario from the chemistry,” Sutherland said, chiding Dr. Martin
for not having done any chemical simulations to support the deep sea vent scenario.
Rebuttal: You tell him, Dr. Sutherland! The absence
of chemical simulations means that Dr. Martin's theory has no merit.
Say, Dr.
Sutherland, can you tell us about your "chemical simulations" that prove that life came from non-life,
formed in a land pool and then evolved and evolved and evolved? Just sayin'.
Wade:
Dr. Martin’s portrait of Luca “is all very interesting, but it has nothing to do with the actual origin of
life,” Dr. Sutherland said.
Rebuttal:
So, Dr.
Sutherland is saying that Dr. Martin is an even
nuttier mad scientist than he is? --- OK. We'll accept that.
Caption reads: "There goes Williams
again ... trying to win support for his Little Bang theory."
Scientific endeavors not grounded on sound philosophical principles
lead to insanity.
.
Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the
Science
Section of New York Times
today that a half alive organism nick-named Luca,
as in Last Universal Common Ancestor, has been
traced to deep sea vents.
Boobus
Americanus
2: Amazing how a simple single cell in the ocean formed like that and gave birth to us all.
Sugar the Cat: "No Boobusss. What'ss amazing iss that you accept thingss without quesstioning. Read my book "God vss
Darwin" and you'll see that Luca exissted only in the warped imagination
of Darwin and his sci-fi cult.
Editor: That's your book too now?
THE DARWINIAN MYTH OF THE 'SIMPLE
CELL'
By Mike King
Once upon a time, the Evolutionists theorize, a “simple single-cell life form”
spontaneously emerged out of a protein-rich “primordial soup” which, they theorize, had also existed.
Another group of crackpots argue that "Luca"(Last Universal Common Ancestor) grew
out
of the ocean floor, and still others now insist --
with comical certainty - that the point of origin was a sea-vent.
Through
the process of binary fission, they theorize, single bacterial cells divided and regrouped into multi-cellular organisms.
Over billions of years, the family tree
theoretically branched out to include all living things --from blades of grass, to birds, to maggots, to Marilyn
Monroe. It’s amazing what a “simple” cell can theoretically do! We emphasize the word "theory"
because not one of these amazing events has ever been actually observed, and nor can any
be duplicated by experimentation.
Charles Darwin
had proposed that the very first cell, the "universal
common ancestor" of all life forms, could have
formed "in some warm little pond." One of Darwin's supporters
and colleagues, the German biologist (and admitted forger) Ernst Haeckel,
examined a mixture of mud removed from the sea-bed and claimed
that it was a non-living substance that turned into
a living one. This so-called "mud that came to life," is
an indication of just how basic and how simple that
living cells were thought to be by the founding fools and falsifiers of
"The Theory of Evolution"TM(bow
your head in solemn reverence as you say that).
Shhh! Please don't tell anyone that Haeckel and I are frauds."
By invoking the "simplicity" of that original simple cell, Evolution ™
is made to sound somewhat plausible to
those who are easily-impressed by the diploma-decorated dick-heads of
egghead
academia. The misrepresentation of the original
simple cell slowly “evolving” into more complex cells, and then
into actual full-blown creatures over time, is the
only way that the Evolutionists can even begin to sell their
junk-science.
So, let’s attack the theory at its very root, "the
simple cell."
To make life easier for the Evolutionists, let us grant them a generous head-start by not even asking how the Universe
organized itself into a precision so mathematically perfect
as to make a Rolex watch seem like a piece of inaccurate
junk; or where the “Primordial Soup” came from; or
the Sun; or the amino acids and protein building blocks, or
how the Earth and its chemical components all got
here in the perfect proportions necessary to sustain life. Let’s focus
only on the "simple" and "spontaneous" cell.
The word cell comes from Latin, cella, meaning "small room,"
(jail cell, cellar etc) which is essentially what the cell is. The cell is the basic structural and functional unit
of all living organisms. Cells are the smallest form of life that can replicate independently. Prokaryotic cells
are said to be the earliest and “simplest” forms of
bacterial life on Earth, as they have a self-sustaining process
built into them. A prokaryotic cell has three
regions, each with its own components. On the outside, flagella
and pili project from the cell's surface. These structures are made of proteins that facilitate movement
and actual communication between cells.
Did you know that cells, like ants, actually communicate with each other
by sending and receiving signals? That's how "good
bacteria cells" know how to kill "bad bacteria cells. Where
did that "intelligence" come from?
Enclosing the cell itself is the cell envelope – which consists of a cell wall covering a plasma membrane and a further covering layer called a capsule. The envelope gives rigidity to the cell and also serves as a protective filter and barrier against exterior forces,
and prevents the cell from expanding and bursting from environmental pressures.
Finally, inside the cell is the cytoplasm
region that contains the complex, and we do mean, complex,and voluminous, and we do mean, voluminous, coded genome(DNA). Prokaryotes also carry extra-chromosomal DNA elements called plasmids, which encode
antibiotic resistance genes.
The
"randomly formed" original "simple single cell" comes with its own genome -- living computer chips packed
with voluminous complex DNA coding which transmits during cell reproduction.
So
you see, dear reader, this bacterial “simple cell”
which accidentally, randomly, and “unintelligently”
popped up out of the sand ot the soup is not so "simple"
after all. It's actually a multi-functional,
multi-component, integrated, well-oiled and living machine that cellular
biologists can spend an entire lifetime studying. If it were possible to shrink yourself to the size of an atom,
enter the walls of the “simple single
cell,” and gaze about this microscopic world-within-a-world
like some awestruck tourist; you would marvel at
the suddenly visible nanotechnology enveloping you. Only this bit of
orchestrated
technology actually lives, mends itself, protects itself, feeds itself, and, get this, reproduces itself!
Sorry Chuckie D., but integrated
complexity and living nanotechnologydoes
not spring up without intelligence behind it. Even the atoms,
the tiniest particles of matter within the "simple"
cell, demonstrate an ordered integrated complexity of their
own. Every atom is composed of a nucleus
made of protons and neutrons. The nucleus is surrounded by a cloud of electrons.
The electrons are bound to the atom by the electromagnetic force, and the
protons and neutrons in the nucleus are bound to each other by the nuclear force -- all in the perfect mathematical
proportion needed for stability. Nothing "simple" about nuclear physics, eh Chuckie?
Neither
atoms nor cells are "simple!" Darwin's parent-less "simple" cell, which popped-up out of the
non-observable "primordial soup," is actually more complex than an nuclear submarine or a space ship.
All "simple" life is complex and integrated;
and cannot come from non-life. Intelligence cannot
come from non-intelligence. Consciousness cannot come from non-consciousness.There is not a single
bacteria cell on Planet Earth that doesn't have a "mother." And yet, the entire Theory of Evolution
™ rests on the dogmatic
belief that the first "simple" cell (and no other cell since) was somehow "immaculately conceived."
Think about it.
So
then, if life forms can
only come from other life forms; how did life
originate? The only plausible explanation is that life, like time and
like space,
is an eternal phenomenon with no beginning and no
end -- an idea way above our intellectual pay-grades to fully grasp,
yet completely logical nonetheless. The universal
creative life force is the parent of all. He is not an old man with
a long white beard and tunic, of course, but we may
nonetheless logically refer to this awe-inspiring,
eternal, intelligent creative life-force as "God."
The
"simple cell" Darwinists
and the Big Bangers need to go back to the drawing
board and "check their math," as well as their logic. They
won't though, because Godlessness and conceited
arrogance walk hand-in-hand.
The mathematical "fingerprints" of an intelligent creative force are everywhere
- snowflakes, spider webs, insect wings.
READ "GOD vs DARWIN" AND LEARN MORE ABOUT
THE HOAX OF EVOLUTION.
OW
AVAILABLE IN PDF, KINDLE OR PAPERBACK!
GOD vs. DARWIN
The Logical Supremacy of Intelligent Design Creationism Over Evolution
COMPLEX INTEGRATION: THE FATAL FLAW OF "EVOLUTION"
By Mike King
The
great and the good of the “intelligentsia” assure us that all “educated” people accept Charles
Darwin’s Evolution as a indisputable fact of science that is "not open for debate." Now those
superstitious "straw-men" bible-thumpers portrayed in the propaganda film Inherit the Wind
may have a hard time accepting it; but even the
slightest doubt can never be tolerated within the elite confines of the
academic
cool-kids club. Woodrow Wilson Warmonger of World War I fame, a former pointy-headed Princeton professor
himself, put it this way:
“Of course, like every other man of intelligence and education I do believe
in organic evolution. It surprises me that at this late date such questions should be raised.”
And
yet, neither Darwin, nor Wilson, nor the Communist ACLU Attorney Clarence Darrow (played by Spencer Tracy),
nor any other “scientist” (bow your head in solemn reverence when you say that word) has
ever adequately
addressed the gaping holes of Darwin’s Dogma. The
best rebuttal the "smart people" can muster consists of
scorn, ridicule, charges of "stupidity" and even
government force -- but never any true scientific or philosophical
substance. Many of these holes are blown wide-open
in the book: “God vs Darwin: The Logical Supremacy of Intelligent
Design Creationism”(by yours truly).
But for this particular piece, let us focus on what is perhaps
the single biggest flaw of all regarding
trans-species “Evolution” – which should not be confused with minor
variations / adaptations of existing characteristics already present in a gene pool (Darwin’s finches,
peppered moths, stickleback fish, "super rats" etc.) We refer to this gaping hole as the “complex
integration” of multiple parts that is found in all living organisms (even “simple” single-cell
bacteria).
1.Woodrow Wilson. The deceitful tool who embroiled America into World War I claimed that all "men of intelligence
and education" believe in Darwinian Evolution.
2.Charles Darwin. His "Origin of the Species" is loaded with logical
fallacies and rhetorical tricks -- which are masterfully exposed in 'God vs Darwin.' (here)
Darwin
and his deluded devotees maintain that tiny
“imperceptible” and "innumerable" blind and random mutations,
favored by environmental circumstances, added up
over very long periods of time to the point that an evolved species (such
as we humans) became unrecognizable from our direct lineal “ancestors” (single-cell oceanic bacteria).
Apart from the obvious fact that none of these
transitions from millions of years ago were observable, how do the
Evolutionists
explain away the “complex integration” of
our body parts? One part of any given creature could
not have blindly “evolved” without so many other
parts coming into existence at the exact same moment in time.
And each of those parts neeeded other parts to be
in place and so on. How can hundreds or even thousands of complex parts
-- functioning in sync with one another in a
scientific symphony in which each component can only function if all the
others
are in place -- have “blindly” appeared, without intelligent guidance, one piece-of-the-puzzle at a time,
over “millions of years?”
To better illustrate
this problem, let’s have a closer look at the integration of the digestive system.
To start the digestive process, we need an oral
cavity -- that is, a mouth to put the food in. The mouth needs teeth, both upper & lower sets,
deeply anchored into our gums, which are attached to a jaw-bone, which is attached to a
skull which is etc., etc., etc.,
Without all of this in place at the same time, the first step of the
digestive
process comes to a halt. But our gums and 32
perfectly-matching teeth alone, which come if different shapes and sizes
for
certain functions, won’t ensure survival. We still
need saliva to begin the breaking down of the food,
as well as the preservation of our teeth and the gums which hold them. And we also need mucous producing cells
in the mouth to help form the saliva mix.
Remove any of those elements (oral cavity, teeth (upper & lower), gums, jaw-bone, salivary glands,
mucous) and humans (and many other animals) never make it out of the box. Each of the elements is part
of an integrated system in which one element cannot function, and serves no purpose, without all of the others already
in place. Then of course there is the tongue – a complex multi-faceted organ in its own right,
which is vital for chewing and swallowing food. In the back of the mouth, the
tongueis anchored into the hyoid bone – which itself is anchored by various muscles
and ligaments. Once swallowed, the pre-digested food passes through the pharynx(part
of the throat) -- which is lined by more essential membranes and muscles – and moves down to the
esophagus(food pipe).
Let’s review the pre-digestion process: oral cavity, teeth (upper & lower), gums,
jaw bone, skull, saliva, mucous, tongue, hyoid bone, muscles,
ligaments,
pharynx, membranes, muscles, and esophagus. That’s
15 systems in all, each of them also highly complex, and each of
them integrated with the other systems. Remove just one, and there can be no digestive system and hence, no species.
Therefore, the elements of this grand orchestra had to have come into play at the same time – which implies,
no, proves deliberate design. But we’re just getting started.
1.
Just
the individual contents of the mouth alone form a
complex integrated system in which each part is useless without all
others
in place. 2. Complex Integration: Remove just component, and the whole structure becomes non-viable.
3. For that reason alone (although there are many other flaws) Darwin's ridiculous
paper gets an "F."
Moving right along, gravity and contraction (more muscles) push
the mix into the stomach where digestive enzymes really begin to break down the food. To
block these powerful enzymes from literally “eating” the stomach itself, membranes called gastric mucosa
produce a protective coating of mucous which lines the stomach. How genius is that? On to the duodenum -- the first section of the small
intestine which leads to the large intestine. Along the journey there are more enzymes
produced by the pancreas. Then it is down to the colon, (there is an ascending colon,
a descending colon and a sigmoid colon) rectum, anal canal and out the anus -- where
Darwin's stinky work-of-fiction truly belongs. Assisting the expulsion of bodily waste is the diaphragm --a sheet of internal skeletal
muscle made up of no fewer than a dozen different
parts. Though it is mainly part of the respiratory system, the
diaphragm
also generates the pressure needed for waste disposal.
Key contributions to the process are also rendered by theliver, the gall bladder, the spleen, the cecum, and many more muscles and many more glands to numerous to name. And holding those muscles in place are a complex system of more ligaments fastened to morebones
which are fastened to other bones
etc. etc. etc. As for the liquids that we ingest,
that speaks to a whole other complex integrated system of complex
integrated
systems involving kidneys, renal arteries, renal
veins,urinary tracts, collecting
ducts, bladder, pelvis etc. Of course, all of this digestion is pointless without blood-flow to carry the food's nutrients throughout the
body – which means that even more complex systems had to have been be put in place at the same time: blood, veins, arteries, capillaries. But the nutrient-carrying blood can’t flow through the vascular system without a pump and an oxidation
system already in place, right? You need a set of heart & lungswhich are the basis of the cardio-pulmonary system
-- an incredibly complex integrated structure made up of countless essential components such as the --
(well, you get the point -- we can go on forever with this --)
So, let’s take it from the
top, boys and girls. All of the following complex elements must come into place at the same time in order for digestion to work:
oral cavity, teeth, gums, jaw-bone, skull, saliva,
mucous, tongue, hyoid bone, muscles, ligaments, pharynx, membranes, more
muscles, and esophagus, more muscles, stomach, digestive enzymes, gastric mucosa, duodenum,
small intestine, large intestine, more enzymes, pancreas,ascending colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum, anal canal, anus, diaphragm,
liver, gall bladder, spleen, cecum, more muscles, more glands, more ligaments,
more bones, kidneys, renal arteries, renal veins, urinary tracts, collecting ducts, bladder, pelvis, blood,veins,
arteries, many millions of capillaries (10 billion capillaries in human body), cardio-pulmonary system, a bunch
of other integrated items and systems too numerous to list here and a partridge in a pear tree!
Each necessary component
"blindly" evolved and integrated with all the others by itself --- one at a time, without design?
Ha ha ha. --- "Intelligent and educated," my foot!
This mind-boggling complexity, -- which cannot be reduced by even a single element lest the
species cease to exist -- becomes even more integrated and more
complicated when studied on a molecular
level --- the complex "4-digit" DNA “computer
coding” behind it all. The mere suggestion of these integrated
systems blindly “evolving,” one component at a
time, independent of one another, in an “imperceptible”
manner over millions of years is absurd on its
face. As a matter of fact, St. Charles Darwin himself, in
a pathetically futile effort to explain away the “problem” that integrated parts posed for his theory, admitted
that his idea sounded “absurd in the highest degree.”
From
his Origin of the Species:
“To
suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting
the focus to different distances, for admitting
different amounts of light, and for the correction
of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural
selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the
highest degree.”
After objecting to his own theory
(so that he can control the debate),Darwin proceeds, in the very next paragraph, to lamely explain away
the "absurdity" of attributing the integrated complexity of the eye to random evolution. But his "solution"
to the problem amounts to nothing but a diversionary debating trick.
“When
it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round,
the common sense of mankind declared
the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox
populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in
science."
Darwin is using an old lawyer's trick here. He
states the objection, then casually explains it away by using
a bizarre and totally irrelevant analogy to
astronomy. He also adds a theatrical touch of Latin mumbo-jumbo to
impress the
easily-impressed. We're not talking about the sun
and the earth and "Vox populi," Chuckie! The subject here is your
admittedly "absurd"-sounding claim that the integrated complexity of organisms and body parts came about
blindly, randomly, and one element at a time without any intelligence involved. Explain it for us!
Plato
warned us to be on guard against the type of empty diversionary
rhetoric that Darwin used to explain away the
massive holes in his goofy theory of self-creating
life coming blindly from non-life, and then putting its own integrated
parts together.
Darwin continues:
"Reason
tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye
to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful
to its possessor, as is certainly the case; iffurther,
the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if
such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions
of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be
formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not beconsidered as subversive of the theory.”
More slick sophistry, silly semantics and weasel words --
An "if", followed by another "if," then a "can be," then an "if further,"
then a "should be," and a "could be," then a "though," and finally a "should not be."
If elephants could fly -- If I could live forever -- If dogs could
speak. If,
maybe, perhaps, and, though, coulda, woulda,
shoulda, mighta, but, but but, if, if, if... This then is what the
academic cool-kids
club refers to as "science?" This non-observable
and wild speculation about "numerous gradations" of the
eye's integrated components amounts to pure
rhetorical manipulation -- not true science. Read it again closely.
Darwin totally
dodges the question and explains NOTHING to solve the mystery of complex integration -- a mind-boggling phenomena
that is observable in all living creatures and even "simple" single-cell organisms.
As it is with the many essential integrated systems of an
automobile -- each one absolutely necessary for the car as a whole to function -- (engine,
transmission, wheels, axle,
spark plugs, gas tank, battery, hoses, belts,
ignition, alternator, steering wheel, gear shift, accelerator,
carburetor, braking
system, drive shaft, oil, coolant / anti-freeze,
transmission fluid, containers for fluid, radiator, chassis, pistons,
nuts,
bolts, welded parts, etc.) -- only the
existence of an eternal, designing force without origin, permeating and
communicating
through every living cell of existence, possessed
of freakish intelligence and power, and far beyond our lowly human "pay
grade" to ever fully comprehend, can adequately
explain the complex integration of multiple systems that neither Darwin
nor his sci-fi cult of diploma-decorated dick-heads
have ever been able to, and never will be.
Can you?
1.
The 20th Century discovery of DNA codes which
program our physical traits makes Darwin's problem of explaining away
integrated
complexity a million times even more complex. 2. Imagine
car parts blindly "evolving" one at a time and "randomly" integrating themselves during a billion-year
tornado. That is essentially what "educated" evolutionists, without a shred of observable precedent,
believe to have happened in the living world. 3.
You may be a whiz at mathematics and rhetoric,
professor. But you're as bloody frickin' stupid as you are insane!
Jake Heppner
1187938
![[Colorized] Young women hosting a 1950s house party.](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uAjHb4EwEV-xbONdrTI8bphPoH8Q0_E5Is7D78Q5BAuq43Utom8rwcHs4ovAiOvxjBnhcxZiDnkKKsW837WYfpCbHnNZ9Pl_fpG4qd7uyTNpd9Z3j_kFACXYYb_Mteq96xWM1FiEBMGlm4I63ib93T9JBF6kriCqPAOTZy4Ltgp23g=s0-d)
THE MOVIE opens with the grim town minister and other prudes marching to the
local high school. They arrest young Scopes, who is forthrightly teaching
biology using Darwin.
IN
THE MOVIE, Clarence Darrow arrives, bravely taking the case singled-handedly.
The local Christians boo him; a mob outside his hotel threatens a lynching.
IN
REALITY, Darrow called as a witness zoologist Maynard Metcalf, who testified at
length. Bryan, left, quickly recognized that the atheistic Darrow was
orchestrating a parade of witnesses to promote Darwinism. (The trial was being
broadcast on radio nationwide, and reported in newspapers globally.) Bryan
asked Judge John Raulston: "Will we be entitled to cross-examine their
witnesses?" Raulston said they would.
