White Warrior Woman: A State of Mind

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2011-11-04 16:18

by Carolyn Yeager, July 2007

copyright Carolyn Yeager 2007

We hear, read and speak much about the male warrior, and rightly so, as every people who seek to be independent and free has need of them. We know there have been female warriors too, sprinkled here and there throughout history. We call to mind the famous Amazon women of Greece; the warrior queen Vishpala of the iron leg, mentioned in the Rigveda; the helmeted Gordafarid of the Iranian Shahnameh (pictured); the Shield Maidens and Valkyries of Norse mythology.

These women warriors, and others whose names come down to us from our illustrious past,

are invariably brave and aggressive. While such extra-ordinary behavior is not the norm for women, even in Aryan societies, and does not represent our traditional role as its come

to be preferred, it nevertheless sets a standard of courage

and sacrifice that we women of today can emulate.

For us, being a White Warrior Woman is a state of mind.

The women of present-day India love the story of Vishpala because it inspires them to overcome obstacles in their own lives. The women of Iran likewise repeat the story of Gordafarid to remind themselves of their own inner strengths. We, the racial descendents of white Europeans, have many brave heroines to look to for inspiration, from Jeanne d’Arc (pictured)

to the incredible American Revolutionary War “soldier”, Deborah Sampson.

Our history is clear – in early Aryan civilizations women were treated with respect, and their place in society, though different, was essentially equal to that of men. But under the invasive foreign influence of priests and other self-appointed religious authorities, women, in time, lost many of their rights and privileges. The Talmudic tradition, as well as orthodox Islamic clergy, relegated women to a dependent role under the rule of father or husband. Following the same tradition, the Jew Paul (Saul) turned Christianity toward a non-Aryan form of patriarchy which was ripe for abuse, a position not found in the teachings of Christ.

I believe strongly that women have an essential role to play in securing the victory of our people. We must realize, clearly and cogently, that we are participants in a battle – a struggle – for not only the survival and well-being of ourselves, our families, our tribe and our nation, but for the ultimate triumph of our race. In this battle we must be impeccable in our warrior state of mind - a state of mind that knows it must, first, possess knowledge, and then strength of mind, great heart, and true instincts.

This is a large order, and is the reason why not many modern women are racial warriors. The most common behavior white women exhibit today is not recognizing their enemy. Too many praise the enemy and the “outsider” and demean their own. They don’t understand that while other cultures may have some agreeable qualities – they may not be totally bad or wrong - they're not our culture. They haven’t developed from our racial history and kin to be suitable for our temperament, and thus insert a jarring note into our national harmony. Many women have additionally fallen into the trap of believing that to be dominant or to be victorious is to be unjust and heartless. Of course, this is taught in our schools.

A good example of this was brought to my attention by an American Indian, David A. Yeagley, in an article What's up with White Women? He tells of a student who spoke up in one of his college classes, praising his American Indian culture and saying of her own white American culture, "I don't see anything about my culture to be proud of. It's all nothing. My race is just nothing."

It turns out that this young woman was "not proud of how America came about," meaning the defeat and consequent suffering/dislocation of the American Indian population. In her youth and inexperience, she was playing up to her college professor, no doubt believing he would approve of her disavowal of her own culture and her favoring of his. She was also expressing white guilt.

This young woman obviously did not have the state of mind of a warrior. In fact, she’s an example of the behavior shown by a defeated race, and she is respected by none. On the way out of class, Yeagley reports that a white male remarked to all within hearing distance that he wouldn't want her “on his team.” Yeagley later reflected to himself that he wouldn't either, because a woman who won't be true to her own people won't be true to someone else's, either. He recalled a Cheyenne saying: “A nation is never conquered until the hearts of its women are on the ground.”

In 1941, in the village of Pontcharra in France, with all the men away fighting the war, the women of the village donned their best dresses to celebrate Bastille Day, and as it turned out, that was the day they gave themselves to the German conquerors. We might ask of our young college student: Who had conquered her people? Or perhaps we should ask: who, or what, had conquered her?

Yeagley, speaking as a Comanche, said he was proud it took the most powerful nation on earth to defeat him because a warrior is measured by the strength of his enemies. It did not make him proud to hear this student praise his culture over her own; it made him feel less worthy. “If her people are nothing,” he asked, “what does that say about mine?” It made him not want her on his team, either.

Another aspect of this story is that the other students in the class made no comment to her disparaging words. They listened in silence, not wanting to offend their instructor or open themselves to criticism by disagreeing with their fellow student. They failed to speak up.

One of the obligations of White Warrior Women is to speak up. We must tell the story of the white race, and tell it proudly, without fear of being called a racist or other labels intended to silence us. Racism is no more than another word for patriotism – a righteous cause for which millions have died. The greatest crime in all nations, as judged by patriots and neutral parties alike, is to help an enemy destroy it.

Category

Early Articles, For and About Women

Listen to
Carolyn on
The White Network every Monday, Thursday and Saturday

Radio Archives

The Heretics' Hour

Saturday Afternoon

The International Jew Study Hour

The Revisionist Report

Other Podcasts

Newsletters

The Heretics’ Hour

The White Network is the new home of “The Heretics’ Hour” with Carolyn Yeager
“The Heretics’ Hour” is a two-hour program currently broadcasting every Monday at 9 p.m. Eastern time (6 p.m. Pacific). Carolyn deals with controversial subject matter: World War II real history, Holocaust revisionism, race and free speech issues, the attack on White culture, Jews and the power they wield in white societies.
“The Heretics’ Hour” premiered as a one-hour show on March 1, 2010 on the Voice of Reason Network. The archives of those two years plus of programs can be found there and here. From now on, “The Heretics Hour” programs will be archived at The White Network, as well as at carolynyeager.net.
About Carolyn Yeager

Carolyn Yeager is a revisionist writer and Internet radio personality who is best known for her investigative articles on Holocaust frauds such as Elie Wiesel, Denis Avey and Irene Zisblatt. She also carried out a major project in partnership with Wilhelm Mann, translating chapters of Hermann Giesler’s Ein Anderer Hitler (Another Hitler) from German to English … the first such translations ever done. These translations, along with supporting articles and commentary, were published in thirteen issues of The Barnes Review (TBR) history magazine from November 2008 to June 2011. Other articles have been published in TBR, at the Inconvenient History Revisionist Blog, in the Saxon Messenger magazine, and on Carolyn’s website .
Carolyn is the author of Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour-What the Tour Guides Don’t Tell You at Auschwitz-Birkenau, published by TBR in March 2010. Information on purchasing the book is here. Carolyn also runs the popular website Elie Wiesel Cons The World that examines the false testimony of the world’s most famous Holocaust survivor.
The Heretics’ Hour with Carolyn Yeager made its inaugural broadcast on Voice of Reason Network on March 1, 2010 and ran weekly until May 14, 2012. It went from a one-hour to a two-hour program in Sept. 2011. All the original programs are archived at carolynyeager.net. Carolyn had for a time a daily program, The Revisionist Report, which ran from May 7 until August 25, 2011 on Republic Broadcasting Network. She has also been a guest on several other radio programs which are archived here.
Email: carolyn at carolynyeager dot net
Intro and outro music is from Les Preludes by Franz Liszt.
The current break music for The Heretics’ Hour is “Heldengedenken” (Remembering Heroes) by Frank Rennicke. It’s on Youtube here.

Program Archives

Jewish Crypsis – Crypto-Jews – Part 1

Published on September 3, 2013 by Tanstaafl in Age of Treason Radio

Examining crypto-jews – also known as secret jews, hidden jews, New Christians, conversos, marranos, and anusim.
Crypsis, Wikipedia:

In ecology, crypsis is the ability of an organism to avoid observation or detection by other organisms.

Crypto-jews are an open secret. Here are two examples in recent news.
‘Hidden Jews of Poland’ visit Israel, by Rabbi Levi Brackman, 1 Sep 2013, Ynetnews:

Sixteen young Polish Jews, many of whom have only recently discovered their Jewish roots, arrived in Israel last month for a special seminar organized by Shavei Israel, an organization that aims to strengthen the connection between descendants of Jews and the State of Israel and the Jewish people.

“There is a growing thirst among young Poles with Jewish roots to learn more about their Jewish religious and cultural heritage,” said Shavei Israel Chairman Michael Freund.
“This awakening would have been unthinkable just 25 or 30 years ago, but since the downfall of Communism, an increasing number of Poles have sought to reclaim and affirm their Jewish identity. We owe it to them to assist them in any way that we can.”
Freund added that “with the start of the new Jewish year just a few weeks away, it is fitting that these young Poles have come to Israel to rekindle their bond with the Jewish people. They represent the future of Polish Jewry, which despite decades of suffering and persecution is now beginning to thrive.
“There can be no sweeter revenge for what was done to us seven decades ago in Poland than to reconnect as many of these young Polish Jews as possible with Israel and the Jewish people.”

Today, there are approximately 4,000 Jews registered as living in Poland, but experts suggest there may be tens of thousands of other Jews in Poland who to this day are either hiding their identities or are simply unaware of their family heritage.
In recent years, a growing number of such people, popularly known as the “hidden Jews of Poland,” have begun to return to Judaism and to the Jewish people.

Peekaboo, Another Jew, at Age of Treason, May 2013.
Quoting Venezuela’s ‘anti-Semitic’ leader admits Jewish ancestry:

In an interesting twist, [Nicolás] Maduro, the political successor of the late president Hugo Chávez, told the press last week that he himself was descended from Sephardic Jewish ancestors.
“My grandparents were Jewish, from a [Sephardic] Moorish background, and converted to Catholicism in Venezuela… The mother of [Minister of Communication and Information] Ernesto Villegas also comes from a similar background,” Maduro said last week

The readers’ comments at AoT are informative. Of particular note are the comments of the erstwhile crypto-jew onwatch/Stuart, whose great concern that Whites should not exclude jews helps demonstrate why they must be excluded.
The main focus in this installment is on the large number of crypto-jews who trace their origins to The Inquisition in Spain, more than 500 years ago. The figure most associated with that inquisition is Tomás de Torquemada, Wikipedia:

Tomás de Torquemada, O.P. (1420 – September 16, 1498) was a 15th-century Spanish Dominican friar and the first Grand Inquisitor in Spain’s movement to restore Christianity among its populace in the late 15th century. As well as being Grand Inquisitor, Torquemada was also the confessor to Isabella I of Castile. He is notorious for his zealous campaign against the crypto-Jews and crypto-Muslims of Spain. He was one of the chief supporters of the Alhambra Decree, which expelled the Jews from Spain in 1492.

He was the nephew of a celebrated theologian and cardinal, Juan de Torquemada,[2] who was the grandson of a converso

Alhambra Decree, at Wikipedia, provides an idea just how well-off the jews had been with the muslims:

Beginning in the 8th century, Muslims had conquered and settled most of the Iberian Peninsula. Jews, who had lived in these regions since Roman times, were considered “People of the Book” and given special status and often thrived under Muslim rule.[3] The tolerance of the Muslim Moorish rulers of al-Andalus attracted Jewish immigration, and Jewish enclaves in Muslim Iberian cities flourished as places of learning and commerce.

One example of special treatment that the jewish persecution narrative serves to justify:

As of November 2012, Sephardic Jews have been given the right to automatic Spanish nationality without the requirement of residence in Spain. Prior to November 2012, Sephardic Jews already had the right to obtain Spanish citizenship after a reduced residency period of two years (versus ten years for foreigners).

So you think you’re a Crypto-Jew?, by Amy Klein, 18 May 2009, Jewish Telegraphic Agency:

Technically, a converso refers to a person who underwent a conversion himself/herself, but the term has been used to refer to their descendants as well. A Crypto-Jew, or secret Jew, is someone who practices his/her Judaism secretly while openly professing another religion. “Anusim” is a Hebrew term for people who were forced to convert against their will, while “meshumadim” refer to willing converts. The term “marrano” is more complex, and there are many different histories for the term. The one that makes the most sense to me is a combination of two Hebrew words: “mumar”(convert) and “anús” (compelled one). Marrano means swine and was meant as a pejorative term used by Jews who did not convert to describe Jews who did.

That last sentence conflicts with the usual etymology of marrano offered in mainstream/non-jew sources like Wikipedia.
Anusim:

[Marrano] is the insulting term Spanish antisemites gave to the anusim.

Marrano:

Originally the term was used by common people. The insult was mostly racist, as people viewed – in a superstitious and prejudiced way – the descendants of forced New Christians as a racial group identifiable by their bad denture, which allegedly proved their sinful soul.

Marrano acquired connotations of “filthy-dirty” (sucio) and “unscrupulous” (sin escrúpulos) during the heyday of the Spanish Inquisition, when the term was used to impugn the character of recalcitrant crypto-Jews.

The podcast will be broadcast and available for download on Tuesday at 9PM ET.

Podcast: Download

Tags: anusim, crypto-jews, hidden jews, Jewish crypsis, marranos, secret jews

Holo Frauds & Quacks

Why the BBC and Labour Government Cynically Backed the Denis Avey Holocaust Hoax, and why they won't let it go

Published by admin on Mon, 2011-10-10 22:41

By Carolyn Yeager, April 2011
copyright Carolyn Yeager 2011

The latest media/government/holo industry campaign has turned into a can of worms, but there is too much is at stake to retract it.

Does the public enjoy being fed fairy tales that serve the interests of the power elite? The answer must be yes, especially when it's the kind that plays well with those who long for the "glory of Britain" in a time when Britain is becoming increasingly non-British. In order to soften the blow that via WWII the British not only lost their Empire but are losing their national sovereignty and also their racial distinctiveness, the alien government and media conspire to convince the people that doing so is a good and noble act … in Britain's "best tradition."

The Hoaxers: Denis Avey, the prize liar, is flanked by BBC producer Patrick Howse (left) and BBC World Service reporter Rob Broomby (right), at Number Ten Downing St. in London.

The two media men in the picture above admit they spent years hoping to verify the unlikely tale of Denis Avey, told by him to the BBC 60 years after the fact. They held on to it because for all mainstream government-connected media, new tales about the holocaust are worth their weight in gold.

Here was a living human being in his late 80's with a bold story, but no proof he was telling the truth. Avey apparently did not know the name of the Jewish prisoner he "traded places with" in the early telling of his tale. If he had, the BBC would have known where to look for the man. Rob Broomby wrote in the March 16, 2010 BBC official newspaper Ariel (page 5), titled "How a BBC investigation found genuine 'Hero of the Holocaust" that it was only when someone sent them a copy of a video interview made by a certain Ernie Lobet before his death in 2001, in which he recalled a British soldier he knew only as 'Ginger' who had smuggled cigarettes and chocolate from England to him inside Auschwitz, that they made the connection to Avey.

Here we have a problem because cigarettes, and maybe even chocolate at times, could be purchased in all the camps. In the Monowitz camp, working conditions were quite tolerable, and the Red Cross delivered packages to Jewish inmates right up to the point when Allied bombers began destroying all transports within Germany. If Lobethal knew where his sister lived (as he said he told Avey), he could himself have asked the Red Cross to look her up and ask her to send him packages. Although, it may have been a difficult request to fulfill since the BBC, with all its resources, could not find Lobethal's sister Susana in the 2000's until they went on a house-to-house search for her in person. Yet we're to believe it was easy for Avey's mother to contact her during the war.

Despite holes in the story, it is accepted

Avey and Susana Lobethal Timms both claim to have met "briefly" in 1945 when Denis returned from the war, according to Broomby. But Avey also says he was suffering from tuberculosis (highly contagious), exhaustion and post-traumatic stress and had to be hospitalized immediately and took two years to recover. I don't believe that these two ever met before the BBC got them together in October 2009. It's more likely that Howse and Broomby had met with Susana and she agreed to go along with the story, or simply agreed to the story. The explanation Avey and Timms give for not knowing each other-that "they lost touch" after 1945-is not persuasive. Susana would surely have made the effort to notify Avey that Ernst was alive, and then was moving to America, if all this were really true. If it were true, Ernst would want to thank the man who "saved his life" if his sister knew who the man was.

Avey claims he was known as 'Ginger' because of his red hair. He first said he traded places with a Jewish prisoner he had gotten to know in their common workplace (Lobethal), but later changed it to a "Dutch Jew named Hans" who died shortly afterward. Was it because Lobethal, in his testimony on the video, had said not a word about trading places in the barracks for a night? If he were involved in such a dramatic event, it would certainly not have slipped his mind. But Lobethal only told of being given cigarettes.

This, however, didn't deter Howse and Broomby from connecting dots that didn't exist. Lobethal's actual Shoah testimony is that a British PoW he knew as Ginger gave him 10 packs of cigarettes, and he used two packs to trade for heavy socks to wear with his boots. Avey's story is that Ernst got his shoes resoled. Broomby wrote in the Ariel promo linked to above that Lobethal said he traded cigarettes for "favours" which "enabled him to get his shoes resoled," and that "saved his life" But when I watched the video testimony, that's not what he said. In any case, this brings up the question that if conditions were as bad inside the Monowitz camp as Avey says, who is doing skilled labor like resoling shoes for prisoners whom Avey says were only waiting to die? In his testimony for the Shoah Foundation, Lobethal did not describe conditions in his camp and barracks the way that Avey does.

Avey was set up to be the next Schindler

Between 2003 and the time Lobethal's testimony was discovered, Avey was saying he had "broken into Auschwitz" and spent a couple of nights in the Jewish barracks to see what it was like. I don't know of him saying that he provided a special Jewish prisoner-friend with cigarettes. I think he said he used cigarettes to bribe his way into the Jewish barracks. I am skeptical that the Shoah Foundation video of Lobethal's testimony came to the BBC's attention after and not before they began their search for Susana Timms. Broomby avoids giving a clear timeline. It's possible that once they saw the Lobethal video, the two media men linked together the red-haired PoW Avey with Lobethal's 'Ginger'. It explains why they persevered in their search for Susana-she was the vital link (witness) necessary to tie the two men together.

Avey had already committed himself to the "breaking into Auschwitz" story; now he and the BBC added the "cigarettes-life-saving story" to that, even though Lobethal had said nothing about the former. The video of that part of Lobethal's testimony has been disabled from the original BBC article where it had appeared and I have not been able to find it on the Internet.

The BBC kept mentioning Oskar Schindler in connection with Denis Avey, for example here and here, hoping to build another huge holo-icon, only this time British, and also use the comparison to publicize the motion picture that is planned

The role of the Holocaust Education Trust

The strong backing of this powerful organization, with its sinister influence on British politics, is key to the whole Avey phenomenon. In his acknowledgements in the book, Avey thanks Lord Janner, Karen Pollack and the team at the Holocaust Education Trust (HET) for their ongoing help and support. "Their work is beyond value." He then thanks Gordon and Sarah Brown. Following this, a page is given over to The Holocaust Educational Trust to advertise its achievements and aim of making the Holocaust a permanent part of Britain's "collective memory."

On Jan. 25, 2010, when Avey first met with Gordon Brown at 10 Downing Street, the Jewish Lord Janner was also in attendance. Janner proclaimed: "Denis Avey is a hero. He risked tremendous personal danger at Auschwitz to learn exactly what went on in that terrible place, and at the Holocaust Educational Trust we work to ensure that his efforts were not in vain - and that all young people learn about, remember and pass on to others the lessons of the horrors of the Holocaust."

The HET was set up by Labour politicians and is aligned with them. It works to ensure their reelection. Grenville Janner is a member of Labour, was an MP for a time, and was President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the main representative body of British Jewry, from 1978 to 1984. He has been a key international figure in efforts to seek compensation and restitution for Holocaust victims. Along with chairing the Holocaust Educational Trust, he is vice president of the World Jewish Congress. He was instrumental in arranging the 1997 London Nazi Looted Gold conference.

Janner received (bought?) a life peerage as Lord Janner of Braunstone in 1997 and since sits on the Labour benches in the British House of Lords. The president of HET is Steven Rubin. One of the things they do to intimidate British politicians is to place a "Book of Commitment" every Holocaust Memorial Day in the Houses of Parliament and "invite" members to sign it. By doing so, they "honour the memory of those who perished in the Holocaust and pay tribute to the bravery of those who risked their lives to help the persecuted" -in other words, the signees publicly affirm their belief in the Jewish Holocaust. HET takes pictures of the more prominent MPs signing the book, such as Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg … each looking properly somber and obedient. (You can see these pictures on the 5^th page) Do you think any MP would dare to not sign the "Book of Commitment?"

On July 2, 2010, after the General Election, the HET hosted the MP's of all political parties, plus students and Holocaust survivors, at a special reception to mark the 10,000th participant in the 'Lessons from Auschwitz' government-funded trips for high school students. The event was held in the Houses of Parliament.

HET chairman Lord Janner, Education Secretary Michael Gove, Lessons from Auschwitz student ambassadors Jack Boyce and Nadia Caney

John Bercow MP, Speaker of the House of Commons and HET chief executive Karen Pollock at the July 2010 reception.

Karen Pollock, as HET's chief executive, writes regular essays published in the Guardian. Her Sunday May 17, 2009 opinion piece was devoted to the idea that if Yad Vashem in Israel honors "Righteous Gentiles" of many nationalities, these governments should also create an honor for them in their individual nations. There can't be too many holocaust awards-hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of them is the desire of the Jewish organizations. The world will actually revolve around the "Holocaust" as the pivotal point in history; nothing will be more important.

Pollock began her essay with: "Finally the government is honoring British heroes who risked their lives to help Jews during the Holocaust" and ended it by reminding us, "As the European and local elections approach, we are again subjected to poisonous propaganda from the far right, who seek to extend an exclusive claim over "Britishness" and who purport to represent our country's heritage. But the hatred and division they peddle is the very antithesis of what Britain stands for."

This kind of propaganda is meant to shame Britishers into going along with the Jewish holocaust agenda. The very powerful Jews of Britian force holocaustianity down the throats of all British politicians, who don't seems to mind the taste of it, however.

Here is Karen Pollock again (right), under all the make-up, at an HET fundraiser in 2010 that featured Denis Avey as speaker and raised almost half a million pounds, with Hannah Loftus (left).

The all-important elections

After Prime Minister Gordon Brown's visit to Auschwitz on April 28, 2009 and prior to the June elections, the Telegraph newspaper reported that "Ministers are working on plans for a new award to honour British people who helped the Jews of Europe during the Holocaust. The medal or other award would recognize acts of courage for those who saved Jews or other persecuted groups during the darkest days of the Second World War." "Other persecuted groups" is added as a sop to the politicians, but in fact all those eventually chosen as 'Heroes of the Holocaust' aided Jews. Of course, the HET plays a major role in the selection.

Following this media publicity, the 2009 local elections and European Parliament elections were held on June 4 in England. In 2010, the 'Heroes of the Holocaust' awards ceremony took place at Downing Street on March 9. The publicity for the event highlighted Denis Avey's swap story. On April 6, campaigning began for the British General Election. On May 6, the General Election was held.

Does this not make it clear that some obeisance and slavish offerings to Holocaustianity must always precede the elections in order to get on the good side of the powerful Jews? But now that Labour is out of power, will the Conservatives carry on in the same way?

Efforts to defend against the criticism are appearing

A recent article in the New York Post uses the word "hoax" to report on the growing disbelief in Avey's bizarrely concocted story. The main objection most have is to the 'swap', which is necessary for the title of the book, The Man Who Broke Into Auschwitz, and is not something that can be dropped from the story.

The New York Post reports that the U.S. publisher Perseus did not return their call about whether they would conduct an investigation into the accuracy of the book's claims. According to a reviewer of the book on Amazon UK, Hoddard & Staughton, the UK publisher, posted a rebuttal on their website on April 11 to Guy Walters' April 9 Daily Mail critical review, but it was subsequently taken down. Now, however, an April 26, 2011 article by Reuters' Mike Collett-White, tells of the publisher's "point-by-point rebuttal of the Daily Mail article by Guy Walters," but not where to find it. Hodderd & Staughton has since said it was "proud to publish" Avey's book, and that "We have never doubted Mr. Avey's testimony." Well, they are not experts either, are they? This is equal to Boston University President Robert Brown writing to me on Sept. 27, 2010 that he "has no doubt Wiesel is a survivor of the Holocaust" and further that Wiesel is "a man of integrity and would not stoop to fabrication." Naturally he must say that, but he does not really have any direct knowledge whatsoever to base it on.

Hoddard & Staughton also said it responded with a "detailed explanation" to a fax from the World Jewish Congress asking to have the book verified. That explanation has not been made public either.

Rob Broomby issued a new statement: "I am certainly not distancing myself from the book at all. I stand by everything in the book." Good luck to him. Avey told Broomby that while the Walters' article is "deeply unpleasant … I stand by my account. It is a fact." A fact? Real facts are being ignored, while the issue is presented as being about taking an Englishman at his word.

On April 26 (yesterday as I write this), the BBC is carrying a Derbyshire story that Denis Avey is "searching for information about the Dutchman named Hans" with whom he exchanged clothing in the camp in Poland! The short notice says he is trying to find out what happened to "the other people involved in his story." This is really bizarre, a transparent and desperate tactic dreamed up by his co-author Rob Broomby and his publishers, perhaps. Will some cooperative soul crop up saying, Oh yes, I remember good old Hans writing to me about this escapade before I never heard from him again? Or maybe another "survivor" will suddenly appear and recall something about it. It does point out what Avey and the BBC should have been doing much earlier. But, of course, they didn't expect to be faced with this problem. Solutions are devised as problems arise.

The principals of the hoax are circling the wagons around them. The message is clear: they will do their utmost to survive the attacks that are coming. They have the media on their side, which is a giant advantage. And already the detractors are toning down their words. Piotr Setkiewicz, head of research at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, told Collet-White, "Perhaps 80 or 90 percent of what Mr. Avey says is true, but the problem is that deniers have this wonderful habit of fixing on every single thing which is obviously not true." It's certain that 80 percent of what Avey says is NOT true; one would have to go carefully through the book, but I'd be surprised if 40 percent is true. Additionally, Sekiewicz uses that odd language that calls someone who "fixes on what is not true" a denier! It has to follow that someone who does not pay attention to what is obviously not true is a believer.

Plenty of precedent for the Avey hoax phenomenon

Revisionist Report Podcast

RBN June 22nd, 2011

Published by admin on Sun, 2011-10-09 23:19

00:00

Click here to download the audio file.

The History of Political Correctness. See www.observations.net/marxism.html

Category

Revisionist Report Podcast

Pages

1 comment:

BAFS4 September 2013 at 02:51
JIM CONDIT JR. "The facts I cite are IN THE PUBLIC RECORD in general --- they are in the MAINSTREAM SOURCES -- but they are either given little or no commentary -- or ABSURD commentary, once you look closely.
Yeager NEVER ONCE gave a reason why a source was illegitimate."

YEAGER: "The truth of the matter is that I spent most of the time alloted to me doing just what he says I didn't do, both on the Deanna Spingola show "debate" between Jim and me (unavailable) and on the Charles Guiliani show wherein I pointed out why Jim's sources were faulty. It is not my fault that Condit simply ignores what I say to him and does not respond to it."

MUHAMMAD ALI BEN MARCUS

Wednesday, 4 September 2013