Friday, 1 June 2012


 I warned Mr Al Fayed in the Summer of 1997 that THEY would kill his son in Paris like they did Jean Seaberg!

Lundi 20 janvier 2014

  L'ex-femme d'un sniper du Special Air Service (SAS) affirme que l'unité spéciale est à l'origine de la mort de Lady Di, en 1997. Elle aurait subi des pressions et reçu de l'argent pour se taire.

L'ex-épouse d'un sniper du Special Air Service (SAS), une unité militaire d'élite en Grande-Bretagne, vient de faire des déclarations pour le moins sensationnelles au journal «The Daily Mail». La femme, qui n'est pas nommée, assure avoir reçu une enveloppe contenant 500 livres (745 francs) de la part d'un officier du SAS en échange de son silence sur «l'affaire Diana». Selon elle, son ex-mari, qui aurait participé à l'assassinat, lui a révélé que le SAS en était à l'origine, au cours de leur mariage.

Menaces de mort

La femme qui témoigne dit avoir peur pour sa vie à la suite de plusieurs menaces proférées par un officier du SAS, notamment depuis son divorce en 2010. Parlant pour la première fois ouvertement de l'affaire le 18 janvier, la quadragénaire a révélé que des détectives de Scotland Yard ayant participé au complot feraient l'objet d'une investigation de la part de l'Unité de mauvaise conduite sévère de la police métropolitaine (Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit). Ils seraient notamment accusés d'avoir intercepté un e-mail dénonçant le meurtre de Diana envoyé par la mère de l'ex-femme du sniper. «Je n'avais jamais reçu 500 livres auparavant en échange de mon silence, raconte-t-elle au «Daily Mail». Mais je ne pouvais pas me taire à propos d'une affaire aussi sérieuse. Le paiement était très suspicieux et je me suis sentie très mal à l'aise.»
Mission organisée

Elle revient sur les détails de l'accident: «Mon ex-mari m'a expliqué qu'une fois que le SAS avait réussi à faire chuter la voiture, un soldat est rapidement allé voir la carcasse pour voir à quel point la princesse était touchée. Apparemment, il a ensuite fait signe à un collègue pour l'informer que la mission avait été un succès.» Et de conclure: «Je suis convaincue que cette opération est le grand secret du SAS.»

Please, BUY and watch British film Producer Christopher Everard's documentary on DVD "LADY DIE 1 & 2). 

"Personally, following my own two year investigation, I am convinced that Diana Princess of Wales was murdered and equally confident that the evidence to prove it is in the files of the British Secret Intelligence Service and the CIA" - Noel Botham
"Anyone who looks at the facts of Diana's death, even stripped down to their bare essentials, cannot emerge without at least the suspicion that she was murdered.  More than eighty percent of British people believe that she was" - Noel Botham

* “This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous. My husband is planning an accident in my car, brake failure and serious head injury, in order to make the path clear for Charles to marry.”

Princess Diana, November 1995.

* “Prince Philip wants to see me dead.”

Princess Diana, November 1995 [Operation Paget Report, page 108].

* “I am a threat in their eyes. They only use me when they need me for official functions and then they drop me again in the darkness… they are not going to kill me by poisoning me or in a big plane where others will get hurt. They will either do it when I am on a small plane, in a car when I am driving or in a helicopter.”

Princess Diana, speaking to friend Roberto Devorik, August 1996.

* “Dear Simone, as you know, the brakes of my car have been tampered with. If something does happen to me it will be MI5 or MI6 who will have done it. Lots of love, Diana.”

Princess Diana, in a note to friend Simone Simmons, 1995.

* “Diana told me personally, during a holiday in the South of France, that the person who is spearheading these threats is Prince Philip … She told me it would happen either in a helicopter or a car.”

Mohamed Al Fayed, October, 2003.

  Klaus Werner 
From "LADY DI"by Christopher Everard

[Someone who was well  loved (see) gets a public (covert) execution (see), like Kennedy. Arizona Wilder* mentions how she (Wilder) was impregnated yet still menstruated.  CCTV tapes unavailable, just like the ones outside the Murray building and the Pentagon (911).  Just one of the numerous red flags.  ]

See: Celebrity idols Energy robbing

Sanpaku eye
Jon King
John Morgan
Keith Allen

Operation Paget (Diana assassination)
[film] Unlawful Killing
[vid] Princess Diana Evidence of Assassination: Jon King on Edge Media TV 

Boston Brakes, Camilla car accident (20:00), Land mines (32) 200 Million land mines deployed around the world, 200 million stockpiled, 3 weeks after Diana died Clinton did a U turn on banning land mines, CCTV (35) turned inwards, 3 vehicles disappeared without trace (40), Anderson in tunnel (47), Professor Dominique Lecompte (50), Boston Brakes assassination (1:00:00), seat belt jammed (1:00:44), media primed (1:00:20), Tomlinson got at, Henri Paul MI6 agent, patsy (1:12:00), embalmed illegally, Keith Moss gave order who was Consul general at British embassy (1:20:00), Burrell ordered to burn her personal belongings, crucial forensic evidence (1:23:00), Charles had team of embalmers with him when he went to France incase French didn't get there first (1:24:00), engagement ring (1:25:00), DA Ministry of Defence notice to pull newspaper story around his book (1:34:00)

[2011 May] Al-Fayed funded Diana movie alleges Prince Phillip is a 'Fred West-style psychopath' and labels Royal Family 'gangsters in tiaras'
 Interview with princess Diana's confidant Christine Fitzgerald
[2011 May] The director of a controversial Diana documentary says: There was a sinister conspiracy but it began AFTER the crash
[2011 May] Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see  

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

[2009 Feb] Diana: Can You See The Real Me?: The Greatest Spiritual Energy Extraction Scam of the 20th Century By Matthew Delooze  

Marilyn was another Serpent Cult symbolic Goddess. Same Scam, different time and different location

[2009] James Hewitt Not Charles Prince Harry's Bio-Father by IAN HALPERIN
[2008] Unresolved Issues of the Diana and Dodi Inquest by John Morgan
[1999] Princess Diana Was Pregnant by JIM KEITH
A report from Andrew Hennessey on his observation of the tape he listened to produced by David Icke, The Arizona Wilder Video:
What Did Princess Diana, John Denver And Sonny Bono Have In Common? Were They Killed By The Vatican-Led New World Order! By Greg Szymanski
MI6 and the Princess of Wales by Richard John Charles Tomlinson
MI6 & The Lying Game: Rosa Monckton and the Oxbridge spooks...
Diana Murder: Coverup Turns Deadly
James Andanson worked for MI6 British Intelligence as an informant
Diana crash witness: I saw a dozen 'shady figures' in tunnel
[2006] Jeweler Was Told To Lie In Princess Diana Case
[2006] Diana: The 18 missing witnesses in £4m inquiry
[2006] Death-crash Paul "drank Diet Coke."
Author backs Diana conspiracy
Family of Diana Crash Driver Speak of Their Legal Battle

[2012] Diana Inquest: Who Killed Princess Diana? by John Morgan

[2011] Diana Inquest: Part 4: The British Cover-Up by John Morgan
[2009] PRINCESS DIANA: THE EVIDENCE by Jon King & John Beveridge
[2009] Diana Inquest: The Untold Story by John Morgan
[2009] Cover-Up of a Royal Murder: Hundreds of Errors in the Paget Report By John Morgan
[2001] Hidden Evidence by John King and John Beveridge
    Book review by Stephen Reid
The Murder of Princess Diana by Noel Botham

Princess Diana’s Death and Memorial: The Occult Meaning
"There was a conspiracy against Princess Diana" says Australian tourist who shot video outside the Ritz Hotel on 30/31 August 1997

See: Car accidents  Revelation of the Method

Arizona Wilder* says that the princess Diana death was a ritual public sacrifice to usher in the Age of Horus [Egyptian magical tradition - rebirth of the dead god Osiris]. Because the magicians like to mirror dates, the dark goddess Hecates number is 13, which was why the 31st august was chosen. It was a mirror of a Isis, Osiris, Horus ritual because 3 people died and the unborn baby Diana was carrying was the very special 3 months old. Apparently Baron Rothschild had to be in the tunnel at the 13th pillar where the accident happened to take the soul of Diana - and indeed an ambulance did arrive on the scene a minute after the crash. The driver henri paul was Mind Controlled and trained for the crash. Bits of Diana were then eaten by the hierarchy. Arizona Wylder has said that some Spencers were there at these Rituals, but that Diana would not attend - and that symptoms of Bolemia and Anorexia were mind control techniques used on her. A report from Andrew Hennessey on his observation of the tape he listened to produced by David Icke, The Arizona Wilder Video: 

Most of the British Royal family are illegitimate, including Queen Victoria, Prince consort Albert, King Edward VII and his son Winston Churchill. Winston Churchill was first cousin with Adolf Hitler’s father and uncle to Anthony Blunt, King Edward VIII and King George VI. Adolf Hitler’s grandfather ran the Rothschild Bank, the Bank of England, and was the first Jewish MP in British Parliament.

Prince Albert was also the son of a stable boy. Close to bankruptcy, the British Royal family were saved by another stable boy, John Brown, who went on to marry Queen Victoria after Albert ‘died’.
    The British Royal family are a subset of the Rothschild family and the Rothschilds control all the wars and finances of the British monarchy. The British Royal family declare war as soon as the Rothschilds have completed their preparations. This makes for huge profits.

    Many royals died of syphilis and many others died from the treatment of syphilis. When a British royal didn’t like his wife, he simply ordered her murder – on their coronation night. This was repeated again 166 years later with the murder of Princess Diana as covered up by Lord Stevens.   HOW TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD  A Right Royal Con by Greg Hallett.

Now, when Princess Diana died, in 1997, I was one of the first Black people to suspect that Princess Diana had been murdered, and I will tell you why this thing happened, sir.  Because, about a year or 8 months before Diana died, there died a king in Lesotho, King Moshoeshoe II.  King Moshoeshoe II’s death was detail-for-detail identical to Princess Diana’s death.  

    Consider this please, all of you who might find my words incredible:  Princess Diana died in a tunnel, but the king of Lesotho died in a ravine.  He had gone far away to investigate a problem in his cattle ranch.  It was found that he was overdue, and when the people went to search for him, they heard from various boys who were looking after the cattle in the Basotho-land mountains, that the boys had heard what sounded like a rifle shot, and when the men went to look where the rifle shot had sounded, they found the king’s car off the road and deep in the ravine.  They went down their and they found that the king of Lesotho was in his car.  He was strapped in a safety belt, but he had a terrible injury at the back of his head.  And they found that the king’s driver was dead at the steering wheel.  But, the two men who were the king’s bodyguards, who were riding in the king’s vehicle in the seat directly behind the king, had escaped without a scratch.  One of the men entered the car and pulled out the dying king.  The king apologized to them for messing-up their hands with his blood, which was a tradition, that a dying king must thank the people who are trying to get him out of where he is.  And he must apologize to them for putting them into trouble, because anyone who handles the sacred blood of the king is in spiritual trouble of some kind after that.  

    Then, when the king’s car was brought out of the ravine, it was found that there was a hole, like a bullet hole, in one of the tires of the car.  And that car’s tire was mysteriously removed, afterwards, when the king’s car was stored not in a safe place, but in a yard outside where anybody could get at it.  And, when an autopsy was conducted on the body of the driver of the king’s car, it was found that the man had been so drunk as to not have been able to drive the car at all.  And third, the man who had driven the king’s car and who died at the wheel had not been the man who usually drives the king’s car.  

    Now, sir, do you see this mystery now?  The death of the Lesotho king matched that of Princess Diana, which was to follow it.  In many other amazing details than I have detailed now, and so the nation of Lesotho was reduced to a retch after the king’s death, when rioting took place as a result of a general election which provisional party members prospected and controlled.  [Interview] CREDO MUTWA On Alien Abduction & Reptilians

A police spokesman said at the time: “He took his own life by dousing himself and the car with petrol and then setting light to it.” But Andanson’s credit card records show he went into a Géant hypermarket just a few miles away from where he was found dead. He bought more than 100 litres of diesel and spent almost 600 francs.  [2007] James Andanson worked for MI6 British Intelligence as an informant

"One such 'unnamed' source - a former SAS sergeant - reveals that the 'accident' in which Diana died bore all the tell-tail signs of a known special forces assassination technique known as the 'Boston brakes'. Agreed, on first hearing, this sounds a bit James Bond - contrived. But bear with it. Because then you go on to read the testimony of former SAS officer and world famous explorer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes, who confirms that the 'Boston brakes' is indeed a commonly employed assassination technique used by hired 'hit squads', and that it involves the use of a device which remotely controls the target-vehicle's steering and brakes. Fiennes goes on to say that this method has been used at least once in England, and in this regard describes in some detail the assassination of one Major Michael Marman, who was killed in a 'car crash' near Stonehenge in 1986. There's no doubt that the operation that killed Major Marman, as described by Fiennes, as well as by former Equerry to the Queen, Air Marshall Sir Peter Horsley, was chillingly identical to the series of events that killed Diana. Once again I have to say that the way the authors are able to continually corroborate their evidence in this way, throughout the book, is very impressive. " [Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence] Book review by Stephen Reid

But what is even more sensational is the suggestion that Diana had herself become part of the above-mentioned “counter-monarchy problem”. Following her ostracism from the Royal Family, the source claims, Diana was courted by supporters of the little-known Merovingian royal bloodline from which she herself descended, and which is today largely represented by Britain's forgotten Royal House of Stuart. As the authors discover, and despite media propaganda to the contrary, the Stuarts are still alive, well and politically active. And what's more, they still bear legitimate designs on the British Throne. 

    Anyway, the evidence strongly suggests that, in her not-so-private war with the Windsors, Diana became secretly involved in a “succession fight ... a fight over the structure of the future of the Monarchy”. It really is difficult to convey the full range of complexities here, given the space limitations. What I would say, though, is this: those still ignorant of the Stuarts' claim to the Throne; their ongoing struggle to be heard; and perhaps more to the point, Diana's own Stuart heritage, should read this book. At the very least it will cast the Princess in a new political light, one that reveals her as - potentially - a massive threat to the continued succession of the Windsors. And therefore as a prime target for 'removal'. [Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence] Book review by Stephen Reid

"Personally, following my own two year investigation, I am convinced that Diana Princess of Wales was murdered and equally confident that the evidence to prove it is in the files of the British Secret Intelligence Service and the CIA" - Noel Botham

"Anyone who looks at the facts of Diana's death, even stripped down to their bare essentials, cannot emerge without at least the suspicion that she was murdered.  More than eighty percent of British people believe that she was" - Noel Botham

This third scenario suggested that Milosevic could be assassinated by causing his personal limousine to crash. Dr Fishwick proposed to arrange the crash in a tunnel, because the proximity of concrete close to the road would ensure that the crash would be sufficiently violent to cause death or serious injury, and would also reduce the possibility that there might be independent, casual witnesses. Dr Fishwick suggested that one way to cause the crash might be to disorientate the chauffeur using a strobe flash gun, a device which is occasionally deployed by special forces to, for example, disorientate helicopter pilots or terrorists, and about which MI6 officers are briefed about during their training. In short, this scenario bore remarkable similarities to the circumstances and witness accounts of the crash that killed the Princess of Wales, Dodi Al Fayed, and Henri Paul. MI6 and the Princess of Wales by Richard John Charles Tomlinson



Having been heavily mind controlled, Arizona Wilder cannot be regarded as a reliable witness!  Nor can Credo Mutwa be trusted!  

At that time, even David Icke could not be trusted because he was "possessed" or under some kind of drugs that made him claim he was THE SON OF GOD, THE MESSIAH, JESUS!  David, like Pine Russell aka Jordan Maxwell, was being manipulated according to his own sayings!

When questioned about this claim recently, David Icke was utterly dishonest in not admitting squarely that he did indeed make that claim and was wrong.  (BAFS)


Peter Mandelson parties with his super-rich chums again ... and the security guards DEFINITELY don't want you to see him

By Abul Taher

 It was a lavish party packed with oligarchs and mining magnates. Just the sort of occasion where you might expect to see Peter Mandelson.

But it seems someone was determined the world would not be allowed to see the Labour peer enjoying the lavish 40th birthday celebrations of his close friend billionaire Nat Rothschild.

Burly security guards used strong-arm tactics in a bid to prevent the former Business Secretary from being photographed as he joined other guests in Montenegro for the £1million event. 

Celebrating: Nat Rothschild, left, Peter Munk and Milo Djukanovic, right, enjoy the celebrations - but the Mail on Sunday's attempts to take pictures of Lord Mandelson were stopped by bouncers
Celebrating: Nat Rothschild, left, Peter Munk and Milo Djukanovic, right, enjoy the celebrations - but the Mail on Sunday's attempts to take pictures of Lord Mandelson were stopped by bouncers

They snatched a mobile phone and deleted photos from the device and a camera memory card before ordering a Mail on Sunday reporter to ‘Take a walk’.

The three-day celebration for 300 guests in Porto Montenegro – ‘the St Tropez of the Adriatic’ – started on Thursday evening with a reception at a beachside restaurant, followed by the main event on Friday night, an open-air disco beside an infinity pool.

Lord Mandelson arrived at the party wearing a dark-blue open-necked shirt and white chinos and was immediately surrounded by security staff who ushered him towards a launch.

When the Mail on Sunday reporter tried to take a picture on his mobile, the bouncers swooped.

One 6ft guard with a strong East European accent said ‘Let me see your phone’, as he snatched it away.

He then deleted the only picture of Lord Mandelson the device contained. Handing the phone back, he told the reporter: ‘No pictures here please.’ Another heavily built security guard said: ‘Take a walk now. Just take a walk. I don’t want to see you here ever again.’

An MoS photographer was also forced to delete all the photographs he stored on a camera memory card and told to leave immediately.

Elusive: Mandelson pictured in London, but not at the lavish party for his friend, Nat Rothschild
Birthday boy: Nat Rothschild has pulled out all the stops for his big day
Elusive: Mandelson pictured in London, left, but not at the lavish party for his friend, Nat Rothschild, right

Guests at the party – who were entertained until 4am by DJs flown in from the UK – drank Bellini champagne cocktails and enjoyed dinner at tables set out on each side of the vast pool.

The menu included a ham, figs and olive starter and barbecued Adriatic fish, followed by fruit panna cotta with wild berries – all teamed with £100 bottles of Bordeaux wine.

Lord Mandelson is believed to have stayed at the Aman Hotel on a private island at nearby Sveti Stefan. The hotel charges up to £2,600 per suite.

Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska arrived at the festivities on his £70 million yacht the Queen K, in an echo of the most infamous meeting between Mandelson and investment banker Nat Rothschild.

Three years ago, Lord Mandelson attended a party hosted by Mr Rothschild on Mr Deripaska’s yacht on the Greek island of Corfu. During the trip he allegedly ‘dripped pure poison’ about then Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

The source of the leak was believed to have been the then shadow chancellor George Osborne. The Chancellor was not invited to this weekend’s celebrations, according to sources close to the Rothschilds.
Hideaway: Sveti Stefan in Montenegro hosted part of the lavish three-day party, and in which Peter Mandelson stayed
Hideaway: Sveti Stefan in Montenegro hosted part of the lavish three-day party, and in which Peter Mandelson stayed

Other dignitaries who were invited included Peter Munk, 84, the Canadian billionaire who owns the largest gold mining company in the world; Tony Hayward, the former disgraced boss of BP who quit after the oil spill crisis in the Gulf of Mexico last year and is now one of Mr Rothschild’s business partners; and Milo Djukanovic, former prime minister of Montenegro.

Among other guests were historian Niall Ferguson and his pregnant wife Ayan Hirsi Ali, Russian model Sasha Volkova, Jimmy Choo shoe boss Tamara Mellon and British fashion author and socialite Plum Sykes.

The Sawiri family, Egyptian tycoons, were also there, apparently to check out the competition: they are building a £1billion marina and hotel development on the other side of the Bay of Kotor.

One royal guest was said to be King Kgosi Leruo Molotlegi. The leader of the Royal Bafokeng Nation - a semi-autonomous tribal region in South Africa which is rich in platinum - is a contact from Mr Rothschild's mineral business interests.

After dinner, a beaming Lord Mandelson watched as Mr Munk delivered a speech in honour of Mr Rothschild, lavishly praising his business achievements.

Mr Munk's massive yacht, the Golden Eagle, was one of two dozen moored in the marina. The largest, the Queen K, belongs to Mr Deripaska, a Russian aluminium oligarch.

Glamour: Jimmy Choo boss Tamara Mellon
Sasha Volkova is joining in the celebrations for Nat Rothschild's birthday
Glamour: Jimmy Choo boss Tamara Mellon, left, and model Sasha Volkova added a touch of glamour
The festivites included a party on the jetty beside Oleg Deripaska's yacht, the Queen K
The festivites included a party on the jetty beside Oleg Deripaska's yacht, the Queen K

The billionaire banker Nat Rothschild pulled out all the stops for the lavish party. About five tons of food and drink as well as top musicians and entertainers have been brought into Montenegro for the extravagant three-day bash.

The investment bank chief flew high-profile revellers by private jet to a £520m marina he part-owns.

Long-legged young British women in short skirts and high heels emerged from sleek black Audis and Mercedes, bringing a touch of Chelsea to the Balkan resort.

One Porto Montenegro resident told the Sunday Telegraph: 'This place has become like a bar on Sloane Square overnight.

'A month or two ago we'd nicknamed it Porto Moscow, there were so many Russians around. But it's a completely different atmosphere with all the British here.'

A fleet of articulated lorries travelled from the UK to the south-eastern European country carrying equipment and furniture including 100 palm trees which will be used to create a calm and relaxed atmosphere.

It is thoughts nearly £100,000 has been spent on some of the wines from the Rothschilds' top Bordeaux estates as well as other alcoholic beverages.

Former BP boss Tony Hayward who is now in business with Rothschild
Chelsea football club owner Roman Abramovich is one of the guest attending the glitzy do
Wealthy: Former BP boss Tony Hayward, left, and Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich attended the party

Rothschild and other billionaire investors have backed plans to establish an Adriatic St Tropez at Porto Montenegro, which is why he was probably so keen to host his party there.

The three-day no-expenses spared bash was an unofficial launch party for the development, built on the remains of a dilapidated Communist-era naval base.
The waterfront has had to be cleared of the rusting hulks of old warships. But they have salvaged one submarine, with plans to turn it into an exotic cocktail bar.
Plans are also in place for an international school and golf course to cater for super-rich residents, while a nearby commercial shipyard is to be turned into a maintenance yard for superyachts.

For hours before the start of the party the whole venue had been a building site swarmed over by mostly British construction workers.

Dress code for last night was 'disco chic' and the celebration was dubbed 'Nat's disco soiree' which took place around 65-metre infinity pool.

The birthday celebrations continued the next day with a 'hangover lunch' in the sunshine around the infinity pool.

Many of the high-profile guests are so discreet in their private lives security has been given cards to identify who's who.

The party is set to continue throughout the weekend.

Read more: 

“Rothschild is the lord and master of the money markets of the world, and of course, virtually lord and master of everything else.”Benjamin Disraeli, British Prime Minister
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” Lord Acton

Princess Diana Was Pregnant
Princess Diana Was Pregnant (9/6/1999) Recent French findings have not put to rest the suspicion that a conspiracy was responsible for the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, millionaire Dodi Fayed, and driver, Henri Paul, in Paris on August 31, 1997. The case for conspiracy is familiar enough to those who delve into the hidden side of world politics.

Diana had crossed the reigning House of Windsor, and had taken on the color of an enemy to the throne of Great Britain. Born of the competing Stuart Royal line, she had been a thorn in the side of the British Monarchy virtually from the beginning of her marriage to Prince Charles. She was far more popular than the aloof Charles, and a perception of unfair treatment by the Royal Family only added to already-numerous calls for the abolition of the Monarchy.

It is fair to think that Diana may have been seen by the House of Windsor as becoming dangerously powerful, and as a threat to their future. She was also viewed as a threat to other elements of the British establishment, including the arms industry, whose lucrative business in death was challenged by her calls for an international ban on land mines.
Diana had already been targeted with surveillance and wiretaps by Britain's domestic intelligence agency, MI5, and through the leaking of her private conversations to the press.

At least two persons close to Diana and Dodi Fayed have told the press that the couple were planning on marrying. They had been dating for nine months, and Dodi's purchase of a quarter million dollar diamond ring for her provided additional confirmation.

A marriage to Dodi Fayed would have been seen by the British establishment as an alliance with the Muslim world, and there was the real possibility that Diana would convert to the Islamic faith. Equally important, Dodi's father was billionaire Muhammad Fayed, related to the Saudi Royal Family. He is alleged to have compromised many British politicians through the use of his bribes and other incentives.

Of central importance to the belief that Diana may have been murdered are unconfirmed reports that she was pregnant by Dodi Fayed at the time of her death. Certainly, the birth of a child with Egyptian blood, half-brother to Diana's sons, would have been seen as a devastating event to the rulers of Britain. So far, however, no conclusive proof has been offered that she was pregnant. I have now obtained the closest thing to proof that will probably ever be revealed.

Confirmation of Diana's pregnancy comes from a unique source: through the network of the Middle Eastern religious group called the Sufis. The Sufis are a meditative, mystical offshoot of the Islamic faith, and several members of this group are friends of the author.

In 1998, one of my Sufi contacts, who chooses to remain anonymous, travelled to London to participate in Dhikr, a remembrance of Allah. This ritual was attended by both Sufis and orthodox Muslims. My contact reports that while participating in this ceremony, he met Dodi Fayed's personal physician, a man who is a Muslim, but is not a Sufi. In private conversation, the physician told him that Diana and Dodi Fayed had planned on getting married, and that he had personally examined her and determined that she was pregnant.

If this is the case, why has this physician not come forward and told the press? One can only speculate. Perhaps this information is being kept secret as part of a larger indictment when Muhammad Fayed finally weighs in with proof of a conspiracy.

*** Jim Keith is one of America's best known conspiracy writers, having penned over ten published books. His works include Okbomb, a revealing account of the Oklahoma City bombing, and the acclaimed Casebook On The Men In Black.

Death of Diana: Jim Keith Was Not Alone

Death of Diana: Jim Keith Was Not Alone (Sep. 23, 1999) 48 hours after Nitro News published Jim Keith's shock article on Princess Diana's supposed pregnancy, he passed away at age 50 from a blood clot, and our servers crashed.

It was only yesterday that we managed to fix the technical glitch. A afterwards, we accessed the famed author's Nitro Mail account, which we had set up for him.

We discovered that Keith had received a wealth of eye-opening information about the Diana case, just hours before his untimely death.

According to his sources, Jim was not alone in his belief that the Princess of Wales was pregnant. Members of the German media uncovered evidence in late 1997 to support the stunning claim, although the story was never published outside the country.

But perhaps Diana herself provided the answer when she once wore the number "492" on her baseball hat during a secret visit to a London hospital. This number is the top line of the kabbalistic magic square for Saturn. The mysterious square is used in Islamic tradition as a sigil to aid women after childbirth.
And in Britain, two mentors of Prince Charles, Michael Bentine and Laurens van der Post, died within days of each other. Both had backgrounds with British intelligence.

According to documentation, Dodi was aware of the dangers of leaving the Ritz well after midnight. In fact, he spoke to his father over the phone about serious security concerns.

Ex-MI6 spy Richard Tomlinson, in exclusive comments to Nitro News, admits that the Ritz was riddled with British intelligence officers that night - a fact that may have made Diana uncomfortable.

The Princess of Wales was a close friend of Lucia Flecha de Lima, the wife of the then ambassador from Brazil to the United States.

Keith's sources suggest that Diana and Dodi may have been headed to that embassy to escape trouble from MI6.

Since ex-spy Tomlinson exposed MI6's presence in the Diana case, he has been on the run: "MI6 have been harassing me relentlessly for the past two years," he told Editor Charles MacLaurin. "They have illegally banned me from entering France, even though I have a UK passport, and they have also used their influence in Australia to stop me getting a visa there."

There's no doubt that a pregnant Diana by Dodi would have been a huge embarrassment to the British Establishment. But was it a large enough embarrassment to murder them both?

If Jim Keith had lived to write another chapter in this tragic case, his answer may well have been yes.

Mass Control - Jim Keith's Final Book

Here stands the New Man.

His conception of reality is a dance of electronic images fired into his forebrain, a gossamer construction of his masters, designed so that he will not perceive the actual. His happiness is delivered to him through a tube or an electronic connection. His God lurks behind an electronic curtain - when the curtain is pulled away we find the CIA sorcerer, the media manipulator.

The late Jim Keith, famed Nitro News columnist and America's most beloved conspiracy writer, has written his final and greatest chapter. There has never been a book which so carefully and thoroughly exposes the secret plans to dominate world consciousness, and to put the reins of control in the hands of a few.

In the pages of this remarkable book, we see exposed for the first time a century of corruption, and the strange pieces of the puzzle finally put into place. Completed shortly before his untimely death, this book is a triumphant completion of Keith's life goal - to make sense of the terrifying, hidden history of world control.

Jim Keith
1949 - 1999

by Jon King & John Beveridge
‘ The Book The British Government Tried To Ban! ’

‘Princess Diana: The Evidence’ tells how the authors were forewarned of an imminent prime-target assassination just a week before Diana’s crash in Paris, and how they subsequently discovered that:

*French paparazzo and MI6 agent James Andanson, owner of a white Fiat Uno identical to the one involved in the crash, was planning to publish compromising photographs of the crash scene in a book when he was found dead in his burnt-out car 400 miles from where he should have been.

* Princess Diana was unable to wear her seatbelt because it was “jammed in the retracted position”, according to the official UK investigation.

* The Mercedes in which Diana died, the "only available car" on the night, was stolen at gunpoint prior to the crash; its EMS – the onboard computer-chip that controls the steering and brakes – was stolen and replaced.

* The 'Boston brakes' is a known method of assassination by ‘road traffic accident' developed by the CIA and adopted by the world’s intelligence services; it involves taking over the target vehicle’s steering and brakes by remotely controlling its on-board EMS.

* Other examples of assassination by ‘road traffic accident’ have occurred over the years, and are cited in the book.

* A parallel plot to assassinate Camilla Parker Bowles was foiled in June 1997, just weeks before Diana's 'accident', when Prince Charles's mistress survived her own near-fatal 'road traffic accident'.

* The CIA and NSA possess files revealing their complicity in the operation that killed Diana; these files also reveal that the British establishment was concerned that Diana might have been pregnant with Dodi Fayed's child.

* Diana was illegally embalmed in order to cover up her possible pregnancy and the order to embalm her was given by a very senior British diplomat named in the book.

Moreover, the authors discover...

* That all CCTV cameras lining the route from the Ritz Hotel to the crash tunnel were somehow inexplicably "turned inwards" on the night Diana died; thus no video footage of the journey or the crash exists.

* That it took nearly 2 hours to get Diana to a hospital 3.25 miles from the crash scene, and that the ambulance "stopped for a further ten minutes" outside the hospital gates, having driven past at least one fully equipped hospital en route.

* That the crash tunnel was swept clean, disinfected and reopened within hours of the crash, destroying crucial forensic evidence.

* That chauffeur Henri Paul, officially blamed for Diana's death, was a part-time intelligence agent who met with his intelligence handlers hours before the crash.

* That the blood sample on which the official verdict was based was never DNA-identified, that the blood tested was stored in a phial labelled “unknown male”, and that carbon-monoxide tests concluded that the blood could not have belonged to Henri Paul.

* That two senior MI6 officers plus the Queen's Private Secretary were allegedly present in the British Embassy in Paris on the night of the crash, and that these officials ordered staff manning the communications room to leave.

* That French paparazzo, part-time MI6 agent and white Fiat Uno owner, James Andanson, who told friends he took compromising photographs in the crash tunnel and that he intended to publish them in a book, was found ‘burnt to death’ with a bullet hole in his head just weeks before his photographic archive was stolen at gunpoint by three armed raiders. The photographs would never be seen again.

* That Diana's butler, Paul Burrell, was ordered by one of Diana's closest friends to burn the princess's blood-stained clothes immediately they arrived back in London, destroying crucial forensic evidence.


“Don’t meddle in things that you know nothing about because you know accidents can happen.”

Former British Armed Forces Minister and personal friend of Prince Charles, Nicholas Soames MP, from an alleged telephone conversation with Diana on her return from Angola, 1997, just weeks before her death.

* “This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous. My husband is planning an accident in my car, brake failure and serious head injury, in order to make the path clear for Charles to marry.”

Princess Diana, November 1995.

* “Prince Philip wants to see me dead.”

Princess Diana, November 1995 [Operation Paget Report, page 108].

* “I am a threat in their eyes. They only use me when they need me for official functions and then they drop me again in the darkness… they are not going to kill me by poisoning me or in a big plane where others will get hurt. They will either do it when I am on a small plane, in a car when I am driving or in a helicopter.”

Princess Diana, speaking to friend Roberto Devorik, August 1996.

* “Dear Simone, as you know, the brakes of my car have been tampered with. If something does happen to me it will be MI5 or MI6 who will have done it. Lots of love, Diana.”

Princess Diana, in a note to friend Simone Simmons, 1995.

* “Diana told me personally, during a holiday in the South of France, that the person who is spearheading these threats is Prince Philip … She told me it would happen either in a helicopter or a car.”

Mohamed Al Fayed, October, 2003.

* Princess Diana/Jorg Haider Deaths Correlations...

Diana Inquest: Who Killed Princess Diana?
a book by John Morgan
2012 March

Product Description

This explosive, evidence-based book is the most shocking, revealing, yet factual work written on the 1997 Paris car crash that took the lives of Princess Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed. Diana Inquest: Who Killed Princess Diana? includes evidence showing the assassination of Princess Diana was carried out by the British intelligence agency, MI6, on orders from senior members of the British royal family. Sensational new revelations include documentary and witness evidence which demonstrates that the top three MI6 officers in Paris were replaced by more senior officers in the days immediately prior to the Paris crash.
Analysis of testimony from MI6 officers reveals they lied repeatedly during their inquest cross-examinations.
There is strong evidence of MI6 involvement in two failed assassination plots against high-profile world leaders in the 18 month period leading up to the successful Diana assassination
This book also exposes Rosa Monckton – wife of former newspaper editor, Dominic Lawson – as an MI6 agent who spied on Princess Diana.
Who Killed Princess Diana? covers the role of the Queen and senior royals in the deaths. It reveals evidence of a special rescheduled meeting of the royal Way Ahead Group – chaired by the Queen – being held just 39 days before Princess Diana was assassinated. Analysis of the inquest testimony of the private secretaries of the Queen and Prince Philip shows they both lied about the nature and content of Way Ahead Group meetings.
This volume – the fifth in the Diana Inquest series – also includes evidence showing that British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, had prior knowledge of the assassination of Princess Diana.
The book reveals how the inquest judge, Lord Justice Scott Baker, deliberately prevented his jury from being able to piece together the evidence that could have allowed them to understand the roles played by MI6 and the royal family in the deaths of Diana and Dodi
The Diana Inquest series of books is based on forensic analysis of the testimony heard during the 2007-08 inquest, and also on evidence from the British police investigation that was withheld from the inquest jury. A leading UK QC, Michael Mansfield, who served throughout the six months of the London inquest, has stated “I have no doubt that the volumes written by [John Morgan] will come to be regarded as the ‘Magnum Opus’ on the crash ... that resulted in the unlawful killing of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed and the cover-up that followed.” Dodi’s father, Mohamed Al Fayed has said: “I believe that John Morgan has done more to expose the facts of this case than the police in France and Britain.”

About the Author

John Morgan, who is based in Brisbane, Australia, is an investigative writer with a diploma in journalism. Since 2005 he has carried out extensive full-time research into the events surrounding the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed. After studying the Paget report when it was published in December 2006, he was shocked by the content of it. He realised that the £4 million report which took three years to produce was littered with inaccuracies and poorly drawn conclusions -- John viewed it as a huge injustice to the memory of Princess Diana. The 2007 book, Cover-up of a Royal Murder, was the result of his subsequent investigation into the Paget report. John went on to closely follow and analyse the proceedings and transcripts of the London inquest into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed. The Diana Inquest series of books is the result of his thorough research and investigation into that process. John Morgan can be contacted at 

David Icke Newsletter Preview


Thank goodness for Wembley
The David Icke Newsletter Goes Out On Sunday with a major background article about the London rituals this summer and how the pieces fit

'Oh to be in England, now that April's here', wrote the poet Robert Browning, but in these ritual-soaked months of 2012 it would be more appropriate to say 'Oh not to be in London now that June is here' … and July, and August. It is a summer of mass rituals orchestrated by the bloodline families of the global Control System to fundamentally manipulate the energy field of London and, by its knock-on effect, the rest of Britain and the wider world ...
... I have been emphasising for a long time, as I did two weeks ago in the newsletter about the Olympic flame, that what we focus on - give our attention to - we energetically connect with. Once that happens, if we are dealing with a manipulative force, our energy can be vampired through that connection. Information or energetic perception programs can also come the other way and infiltrate the psyche. I suggest that both are happening in London this summer as one of the key locations on the Earth energy (information) grid is being subjected to two enormous mass rituals ...
... How outrageous it all is for this focus and finance to be showered on one woman and one family. Members of Parliament, judges, the military, Intelligence personnel, police officers and even Christian clergy all swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen when they take office - not to the people of the country. It's her parliament, her military, her MI5 and MI6, her police, her Church.

The Queen stands on the blood red carpet to address her parliament, her clergy and her judges surrounded by her military and her silly men in silly clothes of red, black and gold. We don't even have a national anthem in Britain - we have an anthem to the Queen. The Monarch is purely symbolic? Oh please. She is the symbol of state power and she has literal power behind the scenes. Woe betide anyone who crosses her. Are you expected to bow or curtsy to a member of the official government? No, but they are to her. So where does the real power lie? ...

... I do everything by intuition and my intuition at the end of last year said hire the Wembley Arena in north London for October 2012 and so we did so despite the financial risks. It is becoming ever clearer why that was done, coming as it does after the summer that is literally ablaze with mass rituals designed to vampire the peoples' energy, draw power to the Illuminati global centre in London and encode the energy grid with their Satanic vibration (information).

I hope that as many people as possible will gather at Wembley all day on October 27th and add their heart and energy to the Great Gathering of Consciousness that will dismantle this energetic web that is being constructed before our eyes. We will definitely have 5,500 seats, but if the interest is there before the end of July it could be 7,500 or even 11,000. It all depends on ticket sales before the end of July when we have to make those decisions.
The Illuminati families think they have the power, but their power is only our power that they steal from us. The truth is that we have the power to end this nonsense - and we need to use it very soon.

The Queen's Diamond Jubilee 'beacon' (prime Illuminati symbol) near Buckingham Palace. It was lit by the Queen using a crystal diamond to activate the mechanism and it completed the ritual sequence of more than 4,000 beacons that were illuminated across Britain and the world.

Join The Great Gathering of Consciousness
The Biggest Event of its Kind Ever Staged Anywhere in the World - David Icke at the Wembley Arena, London, in 2012
A mighty statement that the world is awakening and we are not taking it anymore.


This is only a fractional part of a very long document about the parasitic murdering reptiles know as the Royal Family of England and what princess Diana discovered about them.  Some people may find this totally unbelievable and shocking!

There have also been questions about whether Diana is even buried on the island. In the Summer of 1998, the Star magazine in the United States quoted an unnamed “senior source” at Buckingham Palace as saying she was secretly cremated and according to a report in the Los Angeles Times some people in the village of Great Brington also don’t believe she is buried on the island. I know these reports are true from my own sources.

One resident quoted by the LA Times said that the night her coffin was taken to Althorp for burial, the village had been ‘invaded’ by the army, police and special forces units, and all the villagers were hustled into their homes. She said that the crematorium at the church was working late into the night. Betty Andrews, the former cook and housekeeper at Althorp, is quoted by Star magazine as saying:
“There’s a strange feeling amongst the villagers that we may not be hearing the complete picture”.
While researching this book I was introduced to Christine Fitzgerald, a brilliant and gifted healer, who was a close friend and confidant of Diana for nine years. Because of Christine’s understanding of the esoteric, Diana was able to talk to her about matters she would not dare to share with anyone else for fear of being dubbed crazy. It is clear that Diana knew about the true nature of the royal family’s genetic history and the reptilian control. Her nicknames for the Windsors were “the lizards” and “the reptiles” and she used to say in all seriousness: “They’re not human”. There is a very good reason for Diana using this description of the Windsors.

As her deprogramming continued, Arizona Wilder remembered clearly a ritual she attended at Clarence House, the Queen Mother’s home near to Buckingham Palace, in which Diana was shown who the Windsors really are. It took place in the first seven days of July 1981, just before Diana and Charles were married on the 29th.

This period is the last seven days of the cycle of the Oak Tree, according to esoteric law, and the ritual was called The Awakening of the Bride. This is a ritual for all females of the 13 bloodlines who are going to be in publicly high positions and marry reptilians to produce the new generation of rulers. Arizona says that the Queen Mother, the Queen, Prince Philip, Lady Fermoy, Diana’s father Earl Spencer, Prince Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles were all present when Diana was brought into the room.

She was wearing a white gown and a drug had been administered by Lady Fermoy. Diana was told that she should consider her union with Prince Charles as only a means to produce heirs and nothing else. Camilla Parker-Bowles was his consort, not her. Arizona says that Prince Philip and the Queen Mother then shape-shifted into reptiles to show Diana who they really were. ‘Diana was terrified, but quiet’, she said. Diana was told that if she ever revealed the truth about them, she would be killed. (Remember the guy I mentioned who had a call from Diana in the March before she died asking for his advice on how to reveal information about the royals that would ‘shake the world’?)

The Queen Mother told Diana at the ritual that “all ears” would be listening to everything she said and “all eyes” would forever be watching her. This is the classic ‘nowhere to run’ bind imposed on all mind controlled slaves. Does anyone believe, therefore, that they would allow Diana into the clutches of Mohamed Al Fayed if he was not under their control? The ritual also involved the use of a golden penis (Osiris symbolism) which was used on Diana to signify the ‘opening of the womb’. Arizona says it was of reptilian shape and size and had needle-like protrusions designed to superficially puncture the walls of the vagina and cause bleeding.

Diana was told that after this ritual, she would never be “honoured” again by attending their rituals and she was not to ask questions about them. Now do people understand why Diana suffered from bulimia and serious emotional problems from the time she married Charles?

Diana told Christine Fitzgerald that the Queen Mother was the power behind the Windsors, along with Prince Philip. But Philip was subordinate in the hierarchy to the Queen Mother, Diana said. The Queen Mother is connected to a long list of Brotherhood groups and societies and she is the head of the Inner Temple, the elite and highly secret society for the upper levels of the legal profession on the ‘former’ Knights Templar land at Temple Bar in London.

It was the Queen Mother and her close friend, Diana’s grandmother, Ruth Lady Fermoy, who manipulated Diana into the marriage with Prince Charles. This is why Diana was given quarters at the Queen Mother’s home, Clarence House, in the weeks before the wedding and she left from there to marry Charles at St Paul’s Cathedral.
“Diana used to tell me that the Queen Mother was evil”, Christine Fitzgerald said, “She actually used that word, evil. She said she hated the Queen Mother and the Queen Mother hated her.”
Most people in Britain will be astonished to read this because the Queen Mother’s propaganda has turned her into the nation’s favourite grandmother. “Oh yes, the Queen Mum, such a lovely, gentle, kind old lady.” But this woman is not what she is claimed to be. I can’t emphasize that enough.

During her time at Clarence House before the wedding, Diana says herself that she was being given drugs like the anti-depressant, Valium, to treat her bulimia. And what else were they giving her? “They drugged her”, Christine said “I’m sure of it, they had her doped from the start.” Christine had many conversations with Diana and she opened her heart about her nightmare life with the Windsors.

But Christine’s contacts through her work have given her access to other sources with inside knowledge of the British Royal Family, too. This was the first time Christine Fitzgerald had talked publicly about her experiences with Diana and what she knows of the reptilian agenda.

She told me:

“The Queen Mother... now that’s a serious piece of wizardry. The Queen Mother is a lot older than people think. To be honest, the Royal Family hasn’t died for a long time, they have just metamorphosised. It’s sort of cloning, but in a different way. They take pieces of flesh and rebuild the body from one little bit. Because it’s lizard, because it’s cold-blooded, it’s much easier for them to do Frankenstein shit than it is for us. The different bodies are just different electrical vibrations and they have got that secret, they’ve got the secret of the micro-currents, it’s so micro, so specific, these radio waves that actually create the bodies. These are the energies I work with when I’m healing.

They know the vibration of life and because they are cold-blooded, they are reptiles, they have no wish to make the Earth the perfect harmony it could be, or to heal the Earth from the damage that’s been done. The Earth’s been attacked for zeons by different extraterrestrials. It’s been like a football for so long. This place was a bus stop for many different aliens. All these aliens, they could cope with everything, including the noxious gases.

They’re landing all the time and coming up from the bowels of the Earth. They looked like reptiles originally, but they look like us when they get out now through the electrical vibration, that life key I talked about. They can manifest how they want to. All the real knowledge has been taken out and shredded and put back in another way. The Queen Mother is “Chief Toad” of this part of Europe and they have people like her in each continent. Most people, the hangers on, don’t know, you know, about the reptiles. They are just in awe of these people because they are so powerful.

“Bal moral is a very, very nasty place. That’s somewhere they want to dig underground. They will find reptile fossils, it goes back that far. Don’t think of people like the Queen Mother and Queen Victoria, as different people. Think of them as the same person which after a while has had to replace their coat. When the flesh dies, that energy, while it’s dying, will be immediately up someone else’s jacksy (backside). It’s very vampire, worse than vampire.

They are not going to come to you with hooked teeth and suck you’re blood. Fear is their food, they can actually take fear and manifest it into a tangible thing. The key is the vibrational current. At that vibrational current, they can manifest anything from anything. Its like a holographic image. We are all minerals and water vibrating. This is all an illusion we are living in. That’s the secret. You know when the monarchy’s fallen, it’s not the end of it. They will manifest in another form. The reptiles have never been defeated and this is the closest they have come to it.

The reason they are so threatened today is because the Earth is in such trouble and the mental power of people is returning. This is their most frightening time, but this is not going to kill them. There are long centuries before it’s over yet. The difference this time is that it’ll be more difficult for them and they are going to have to settle for less and the Earth people are going to get more.

But even though these reptilian ones are fuckers, they are sad, pathetic beasts really, while humanity is galloping towards light. They’re just pathetic lumps of nastiness who aren’t going to win. I can’t talk about this everywhere because they would just go ‘Christine, get a white coat, put it on backwards, get out’. But I want an end to the bullshit.”
I was astonished to hear someone else talking about these subjects, which I knew from my own research to be true. She was not aware when she told me this of my own research into reptilians. Christine Fitzgerald, thanks to her insider contacts and her knowledge of metaphysics, had been able to grasp the biggest secret: that reptiles on another dimension are controlling the world by working through physical bodies which look human.

And also that the Windsors are one of these reptilian bloodlines. Christine also knew about the reptile Satanic rituals, the sexual rites and the widespread sacrifice of children. She said it is the pure essence of the pre-pubescent the reptiles want.
“If you looked at where all the castles are built and where there are a lot of street children in the Third World, they’re galloping it at the moment. They’re pulling the kids in en masse now.”
She said the reptiles want the children’s life essence because they can’t continue to manifest without that pure energy.
“The contaminated essence of us adults is not worth anything to them”, she said. “All the rituals, the knives, and sodomy, its that easy for these people to snatch a piece of your soul.”
Christine also spoke about the sex rituals and orgies involving the Windsors. The very word orgy comes from the Greek, orgia, meaning ‘secret worship’ and relates to the sexual rites of the ancient mystery religions. Christine said:
“There used to be an elect circle who took part in ritual orgies at Buckingham Palace. This was told to me by one of the participants. They were all couples. The lights used to go out at a certain time and they all swapped round and did their things. You know about the butler ringing the bell at six o’clock in the morning so that everyone goes back to their bed?

These people are nasty pieces of work, sweetheart, these people are nasty. Nothing you can think of can ever be as nasty as they really are. Diana used to say that if the world knew what they were really like, they wouldn’t want them, but I knew that. My chin was on the couch now, hearing about all these orgies at the palace. Just the laugh that these serious people who are going on like butter wouldn’t melt up their jacksy and they are carrying on like that.

But the sex thing is a big part of their rituals because it’s kundalini energy, see, which is the core, our generator. The orgies stopped because one of the couples died and they had an odd number and they didn’t want to bring in anyone else. So even that was ritual. Everything about them is ritual... all that heraldry, all that pomp and ceremony. Negative energy gets drawn to negative energy.”
Many of the Queen’s Ladies in Waiting have told Christine Fitzgerald about Prince Philip and his affairs.
“The royal family has got lots of black babies all over the world”, she says.
The recovered mind-slave Brice Taylor tells in her book, Thanks For The Memories, how she was forced to have sex with Philip and Charles. It is not without reason that the former British Intelligence officer, Peter Wright, said in his controversial book, Spycatcher, that “The palace had enjoyed several centuries of scandal burying.”

Christine said that another controversial book, The Royals, by the American author Kitty Kelly was true, but “She’s left out a lot of stuff, she’s been quite kind”. She’s not kidding as you will soon appreciate. Christine told me about other members of the royal clan including Prince Philip’s uncle, Lord Mountbatten, another Satanist. She said:
“Lord Mountbatten was a big shit, too. It was him who fucked up Charles and got him on the nasty road.”
So this is the family which hooked an unsuspecting 19-year-old and used her, in Diana’s words, as a “brood mare” to produce Windsor heirs with Spencer genes. But it was more than that. Much more.

Only a few weeks before this book went to press, and months after Christine gave me her information in England, I was contacted by a friend in the United States who was deprogramming a very high level mind controlled slave from Project Monarch. He believes her to be the highest ranked woman in the Satanic hierarchy in the United States and she was one of only three Mother Goddesses in the world. This is Arizona Wilder, formerly Jennifer Greene.

At the time my friend and Arizona had no idea what Christine Fitzgerald had said. Arizona had been programmed and trained since childhood to become a Mother Goddess who conducted Satanic rituals at the highest levels of the Brotherhood all over the world. She described to my friend the inside of many secret and underground facilities that he has personally seen. What she described was accurate every time. He also checked her story with other contacts and the truth of her memories was continually confirmed.

What she told my friend, and later told me on audio and video tape, supports the information supplied by other slaves and by Christine Fitzgerald about the Windsors and their true nature. Arizona said that she officiated at Satanic rituals at Glamis Castle in Tayside, Scotland, the childhood home of the Queen Mother, who still owns the property, and also at Balmoral, the Queen’s Scottish residence. The Brotherhood obsession with Scotland, she said, was because there are many entrances there into the inner-Earth where the physical reptilians live.

Glamis Castle is built on the site of an 11th century royal hunting lodge and the present building dates from around 1687. It is mentioned in the ‘Shakespeare’ story of Macbeth. Arizona said that the Queen, Prince Philip, Prince Charles and Princess Anne are present at the rituals and so is Charles’ girlfriend, Camilla Parker-Bowles. Doesn’t it all now start to make sense?

She said that during the sacrificial rituals the Queen wears a cloak of gold fabric inlaid with rubies and black onyx. The Queen and Charles have their own ritual goblets, inlaid with precious stones signifying their Illuminati-Brotherhood rank. The Mother Goddess says that the Queen makes cruel remarks about lesser initiates, but is afraid of the man code-named ‘Pindar’ (the Marquis de Libeaux) who is higher than her in the Satanic hierarchy.

This also supports a claim made to me by another recovered slave who said she had seen the Queen physically beaten by someone above her in Satanic rank. Pindar, apparently, bears a resemblance to Prince Charles and Arizona says that Pindar is Charles’ real father. She said that the sacrificial victims used in the rituals at Glamis Castle are mostly under five years of age and the ceremonies are guarded by members of Scotland’s Black Watch. She also confirmed that Lord Mountbatten was a paedophile and that the Windsors are reptilians in human form. Her interview with me was taped, as were the ones with Christine Fitzgerald, and copies are now at various addresses.

The video interview with Arizona is available and details are at the back of the book. I stress that this Mother Goddess had no idea what Christine Fitzgerald had told me and yet their statements match again and again. Arizona says that Diana definitely knew that the Windsors were shape-shifting reptilians and Diana’s comments to Christine Fitzgerald support this.

Apparently, reptilians have been seen to shape-shift during sleep. Here is a summary of just some of what Arizona said about the royal family:
  • The Queen Mother: She’s cold, cold, cold, a nasty person. None of her cohorts even trusted her. They have named an altar (mind control programme) after her. They call it the Black Queen. I have seen her sacrifice people. I remember her pushing a knife into someone s rectum the night that two boys were sacrificed. One was 13 and the other 18. You need to forget that the Queen Mother appears to be a frail old woman. When she shape-shifts into a reptilian she becomes very tall and strong. Some of them are so strong they can rip out a heart and they all grow by several feet when they shape-shift.” (Exactly what the lady who saw Edward Heath said, among many others.)
  • The Queen: “I have seen her sacrifice people and eat their flesh and drink their blood. One time she got so excited with blood lust that she didn’t cut the victim’s throat from left to right in the normal ritual, she just went crazy, stabbing and ripping at the flesh after she’d shape-shifted into a reptilian. When she shape-shifts she has a long reptile face, almost like a beak, and she’s an off-white colour. The Queen Mother looks basically the same, but there are differences. (This description fits many depictions of the gods and ‘bird gods’ of ancient Egypt and elsewhere.) She also has like bumps on her head and her eyes are very frightening. She’s very aggressive.”
  • Prince Charles: “I’ve seen him shap-shift into a reptilian and do all the things the Queen does. I have seen him sacrifice children. There is a lot of rivalry between them for who gets to eat what part of the body and who gets to absorb the victim’s last breath and steal their soul. I have also seen Andrew participate and I have seen Prince Philip and Charles’ sister (Anne) at the rituals, but they didn’t participate when I was there. When Andrew shape-shifts, he looks more like one of the lizards. The royals are some of the worst, OK, as far as enjoying the killing, enjoying the sacrifice, and eating the flesh, they’re some of the worst of all of them. They don’t care who sees them at the rituals, they are what they are, they show it outright. They don’t care if you see it. Who are you going to tell, who is going to believe you? They feel that it is their birth-right and they love it. They love it.”
Given the evidence I have presented in this chapter about the background to Diana’s murder, I was not surprised to hear this Mother Goddess recall the following about Mohamed Al Fayed:
“I saw Mohammed Al Fayed at a ritual at the Mothers of Darkness castle in Belgium in the 1980s. The Queen and the Queen Mother were also there. The Queen Mother was talking to him and he was looking around as if he didn’t believe this sort of thing went on. It was on December 24th at the ritual of the old king and the new king. They didn’t let him in to see the worst of it. It was kind of like, ‘let’s introduce him into this’.

But he would have seen a baby being born and introduced as the new king and the sacrifice of an old man. The Queen Mother was there, the Queen, Pindar, Rothschilds, a lot of people I don’t know and a guy named Tony Blair. He was being groomed because my understanding of it was that people are picked out and groomed for certain positions.

And to be considered for those positions you have to accept the reality and the necessity and the sovereignty of the Illuminati, and that the reptilians run the show. Tony Blair’s attitude was like ‘I belong here’. Dodi Fayed’s father seemed bothered by it, but not Tony Blair. I remember seeing him talking to the royals about something. I have seen Blair, Al Fayed and the Royal Family at rituals at Balmoral as well.”
Once you know this astonishing background, the why, who and how of Diana’s murder become crystal clear. They were all in it together and still are. Diana’s murder had been planned for a long time, probably from birth, and it was in the 1980s, around the time Al Fayed was at the Mother of Darkness castle with the royal family and Tony Blair, that the flaming torch symbol was placed on top of the Pont de L’Alma tunnel.

Arizona said that Diana was a product of the multiple personality disorder programme, which she said would have started before she was five. She said Diana was also three months pregnant when she died. Diana would probably not have known this, she said, because the techniques the Brotherhood use often mean that the women continue to menstruate for some months before they are officially confirmed to be pregnant.

Arizona said that when she, herself, was artificially impregnated in a mind controlled state with Pindar’s sperm, she menstruated for three months before she was told by a doctor that she was more than three months pregnant. It could have been Pindar’s child and not Dodi Fayed’s, Arizona suggested.
“That is a really powerful sacrifice” she said, “to sacrifice a pregnant woman”.
If Diana was, as appears highly likely, a product of the mind control programme, those who plotted her murder could have ensured all that they required to play out their ritual to perfection.

She would have accepted the invitation from Al Fayed at the right time, fallen for Dodi Fayed, agreed to go to Paris for the night and so on. She could also have been, like Arizona, impregnated artificially and have no recollection of it. Arizona says that she knows that Diana was impregnated with Pindar’s sperm in this way to conceive her son William, the blond-haired, blue-eyed baby born on the summer solstice. And she is in no doubt that Diana was a ‘multiple’.

As she said:
“The things that she did with her eyes, like the eye rolling, is very, very common in multiples. Sometimes she’d be very shy and then suddenly she’s blossoming and she’s really social. These are the different altars (programmes) coming out, someone’s shy, someone’s not shy, someone’s angry, someone’s not angry. Then there was the weight gain and the weight loss.

The bulimia and the cutting herself are all signs of a multiple. Some are told that if you feel bad about yourself or you remember something, cut yourself. To me it was real obvious with Diana. Someone with this stuff just doesn’t announce to the world that something’s wrong, They spend their lives trying to hide it. ‘I was out grocery shopping’, or ‘I was out clothes shopping’, ‘I was taking a walk’, whatever, but you weren’t.”
The recovered mind-slave Brice Taylor confirms that Diana was a ‘multiple’ in her book, Thanks For The Memories, and she says that William and Harry are also. I think Dodi was another, thus making it child’s play to make he and Diana ‘fall in love’. The symbolism of Osiris, Isis and Horus, in the Pont de UAlma tunnel that night was also confirmed by Arizona. “Diana was Isis, Dodi Fayed was Osiris, and the child was Horus.

I don’t think it symbolised the birth of a child so much as the birth of an age the Age of Horus which begins by the year 2,000. This means the New World Order, the Age of Horus, the terrible child.” She said that the foetus would have been divided among certain high ranking leaders of the Brotherhood/ Illuminati and consumed in ritual.

She said that from her long experience of the rituals, she was sure that parts of Diana’s body would have been consumed also. Again I ask, is her body even on the island at Althorp Park? It makes you wonder what Tony Blair and the Royals were doing when they came together at Balmoral immediately after Diana’s death.

Another part of the ritual was that Diana was blond-haired and blue-eyed. Cathy O’Brien is the same, so is Arizona although she had dyed her hair to break that spell when I met her. She said that even when the Elite sacrifice cats they are blond-haired and blue-eyed. There is something about that genetic structure which is fundamental to them and this is the blood they need to survive in this dimension. At least most of the Monarch slaves have blond hair and blue eyes. “There were no blue eyes on this planet until the extraterrestrials came”, Arizona said.

Diana told Christine Fitzgerald in 1989 that they were going to kill her:
“It sounded outlandish at the time”, Christine said, “because she had the boys and they were little and I thought, no, they need her to bring the boys up.”
But there were to be many indications that Diana was indeed in danger from the Windsors and the Brotherhood in general. In the late 1980s with her marriage nothing more than a public show, Diana was having a relationship with her personal detective, Barry Mannakee, but he died in a motorcycle ‘accident’ in 1988.

By 1990, with the Gulf War threatening, Diana was having a relationship with Captain James Hewitt. One day, about this time, she went rushing into Christine’s healing centre in London in a terrible state. Christine remembers:
“She was crying hysterically and I said ‘What’s the matter?’ You know it was dog’s died stuff, bottom lip out, full sob. She came galloping through the door. I gave her rescue remedy, clutched her, hugged her, calmed her down, and said now tell me what’s going on. ‘I can’t believe it, I can’t believe it, they killed him, they killed him’ she sobbed. I said: ‘Who did they kill?’

She told me about her affair with the detective (Barry Mannakee) and how he was decapitated on a motorbike and how she thought it was a terrible accident. But now she knows the Royal Family killed him because Prince Charles’ senior detective had just told her that if she didn’t cool it with Hewitt, the same would happen to him. He told her she should not think that she was indispensable, either.”
Officially, Barry Mannakee died in a ‘road crash’. How dangerous the roads seem to be if the royals don’t like you. Christine said that Diana was very much in love with Mannakee and she had visited his grave regularly. Diana had, apparently, been unaware of his death at the time until she was being driven with Prince Charles to the airport to fly to the Cannes Film Festival. He waited until she was about to get out of the car in front of waiting photographers and he said:
“Oh, by the way, I got word from the Protection Unit yesterday that poor Barry Mannakee was killed. Some sort of motorcycle accident. Terrible shame, isn’t it?”
Diana burst into tears, but Charles said sarcastically: “Let’s go darling, your press awaits you.”61 I would emphasize again that the confirmation that Mannakee was murdered, and the personal threat to Diana, came from Prince Charles’ senior detective, according to the Princess. Would he be making statements and threats to her like that without the approval of Prince Charles? Of course not. In 1998 in the Independent Television documentary, Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, James Hewitt said that he too had been warned to stop seeing Diana or the consequences would not be pleasant.

He said:
“The telephone calls were anonymous, but left me in no doubt that they knew what the situation was. They were threatening. They said it was not conducive to my health to continue the relationship.”
He said that other warnings came from Diana’s personal police protection officers, the Royal Household, and a member of the Royal Family, whom he would not name:
“The (member of the Royal Family) said your relationship is known about. It is not supported, we cannot be responsible for your safety and security, and suggest that you curtail it forthwith.”
James Hewitt was further quoted in the London Times about these threats and his comments supported completely the story Diana had told Christine Fitzgerald. Hewitt said that his clearest warning came when he was told that he would suffer the same fate as Barry Mannakee.62

Does anyone still believe that the Windsors and their networks were not involved in the murder of Princess Diana? Or that they had prior knowledge and played an active role in the decision to assassinate the mother of William and Harry?

According to reports in the United States, Susan Barrantes, the mother of Sarah ‘Fergie’ Ferguson, had been telling friends that she thought Diana had been murdered in the weeks before she was decapitated in a mysterious car crash in Argentina on September 19th 1998.63 Confidential mail for Diana was delivered to Christine Fitzgerald and this included packages from a former member of the elite SAS who was concerned for Diana’s safety.

He was warning her of what was going on behind her back.” Half of M16 were on Diana’s side too you know”, Christine said. One day a client, who had involvement with the security agencies, saw some of these packages being delivered. Christine described what followed:
“She said I’m really worried for you, you don’t know what you’re getting involved in here. Diana’s basically mad, she’ll drop you in it, she will hang you out to dry, you’ll end up dead, your kids will end up dead, your cats, your business will be ruined. I couldn’t believe how she was carrying on. She was so full of hate. Diana came in the next day and I gave her the mail. I said not everyone who bows to you has your best interests at heart. I told her what happened and she went purple with rage. When she died, everybody came in and said ‘They bumped her off didn’t they?’ But that client was the only one who was outraged at the suggestion. I was checked out by M16, my phones were tapped, my house was burgled, the royal family kept a big check on me while I was dealing with Diana.”
Christine and her contacts have no doubt about what happened in Paris:
“She was bumped off, she was left to die at the roadside. Those responsible were above the elite of the army”, she said.

“It was not the ‘secret squirrels’ (British Intelligence)”, she understands, “it was above that”.

She said that “Mohamed Al Fayed ‘in his tortured little sense’ wants to be part of the reptilian power because ‘he likes all that’.”
Christine believes that Diana’s romance with Dodi was engineered. She said:
“Diana fell in love quite easily and he’s a master of the smile. She was unfortunate in her love affairs because she rescued others in her own distress. So the men she went for were all emotional cripples because she was a healer, too. Most people who went with Diana used her and I think Dodi did also. He would have used her for his ego, the contacts, and his dad. The Royal Family killed her for her light energy, especially when she was pregnant. I don’t believe she was as badly injured as they say. If they checked her body they would see that the scar the surgeons made starts at her pubis and goes right up to her throat.

They’ve even taken her thymus gland, the way we make interstellar communication. I know from the best sources that she was pregnant and they took the baby. Pieces of that foetus will have been delivered everywhere. They can make babies from the cells. Parts of her body will have been used in their rituals as well. Diana was always having Kensington Palace swept for bugs, but they had Dodi bugged and they knew exactly what was going on. This was not the first time she thought she was pregnant and this nearly happened before, but she wasn’t pregnant. That was with Hewitt.”
Christine Fitzgerald shared the most intimate details of Diana’s life and knew her in ways, and at levels, that very few others did. The incredible revelations of the Windsors’ treatment of Diana over so many years, the threats made to her by Prince Charles’ personal detective, the ritual sacrifices and the confirmation that they were responsible for the murder of Barry Mannakee, cannot be allowed to pass by.

There must be a campaign to press the Windsors to face these matters and for Al Fayed, Trevor Rees-Jones, Earl Spencer, and the others I have named, to answer the questions that have to be addressed. Power must be stripped from the Windsors, their royal dynasty dismantled, and their crimes against humanity publicly exposed. More than that, however, those in the political, security, and medical professions, who are also involved, must be equally exposed.

The Royal Family, Earl Spencer, and the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, have all dismissed claims that Diana was murdered and called for such suggestions to cease ‘for the sake of the boys’. The questions must not be allowed to be ignored or another Brotherhood assassination will have been achieved while those responsible go free. Earl Spencer went to the extent of issuing a statement on behalf of the Spencer family in February 1998 in which he asked:
“Is there any good in all this speculation? I ask that because there is clearly a lot of harm in it. All we, her family, ask is that Diana’s memory be respected, and that sensational speculation be left out of the public arena, where it undermines our aims to come to terms with her loss”.
When you see the evidence presented in this chapter while people like Earl Spencer and Tony Blair say there is no evidence of a conspiracy, what does that make you think? If Diana had been your sister would you not be determined to find out what happened? If you were Prime Minister when such a famous and much loved Princess had been killed, would you not insist that the truth be established? So why don’t they?

Diana’s relationship with her brother was less than harmonious to say the least. When you know the background, Earl Spencer’s famous speech at her funeral can be seen as a diatribe of hypocrisy So was his bitter condemnation of the media, in a statement after her death outside his home in Cape Town, a statement which, like Al Fayed’s, fueled the belief that the paparazzi were to blame for the crash.

Christine Fitzgerald said of him:
“Charles Spencer is a sh it, major sh it. He’s quite a spiteful little shit, too. When Diana was going through the trauma and really needed a new home, he said to her: ‘You’re not bringing your shit down to me and mine.’ He wouldn’t even give her one of the houses. He’s not a powerful man at all. He knows he’s sniffing around something dangerous and powerful and so he’s attracted to it. Satanism goes on on the Spencer estate. Diana knew about it.”
Diana had a profound affect on millions of people as we saw after her death and they did not know the half of what she had to suffer after the Windsors sank their fangs. In many ways Diana was a mirror of Marilyn Monroe, used by the establishment and then cast aside and murdered. Marilyn had affairs with President Kennedy and, it seems, his brother, Bobby, and when she became dangerous and surplus to requirements she was killed because of what she knew.

In another of those remarkable examples of synchronicity there are many ‘coincidences’ that connect her life and Diana’s. They were both born on the first of the month and died at the age of 36 in August. They both married on the 29th of the month to men twelve years older. Marilyn called herself the Queen of Diamonds and Diana the Queen of Hearts. And both were the subject of the Elton John song, Candle In The Wind, which he sang at Diana’s funeral. Since Christine Fitzgerald first spoke to me the threat to destroy her business has been implemented.

Suddenly the phone stopped ringing and when I met her again she was seeing as many clients in a week as she had been in a day. This is unexplainable when you consider she is one of Britain’s most gifted and effective healers working in the centre of London. Unexplainable, that is, unless you know the story. But she told me she is determined the truth shall be known, whatever the authorities seek to do to her:
“I don’t want a war, I just want an end to the bullshit”, as she puts it.
Looking back on Diana’s life and their conversations together, she says:
“Poor cow, she was in a house where no-one gave a damn and it’s a terrible state of affairs. She was all alone in a nest of vipers. I used to just patch her up. She just found me and just came to me. I made her wait for a fortnight until I checked it out. They used to say that I was giving her anger therapy. I didn’t. I used to just listen to her, take it all in, and think Jesus Christ! But I didn’t think they would kill her. I can’t believe that this information is so close to home and yet they are still managing to keep it at bay. My room is the truth room and its a real place of safety and I don’t judge anyone on their shit, and that’s why I haven’t spoken about any of this in the past. She was as screwed up as anyone, you know, and if you are going to tell the truth, you have to tell the whole truth. She wasn’t crazy, she was mentally and physically abused, I feel, from a little girl. Her father was a nasty piece of work and her stepmother (Raine), too.

“The Royal Family were very afraid. She would have taken the public away from them, she would have taken the world from them gradually. They recognized her worth and fed off her in a psychic vampire way for a long time. All she wanted was to get married and have children you know, bless her little heart. She wanted to live out what she had never had. The world would have come to rights with Diana because, as fucked up as she was, she was a light being and wherever she went she manifested love. It was amazing. The sad thing was that she didn’t know she was doing that and she needed proof of her worth and she was looking in the wrong quarters for that. But when she tried to break away, we went out and did normal things. She did kung fu with my husband for five years. She wanted to be normal, to link arms and walk down the street. She knew where her heart lay. She really and truly did amazing things.”
Diana said she could not believe how cold the Windsors were and the public had a graphic example of this in the days after her death. They stayed out of sight at Balmoral in Scotland while the people mourned Diana in their tens of millions with an unprecedented explosion of grief. Only pressure from the public through the media forced the Queen, kicking and screaming, to make a cold, emotionless and pathetic ‘tribute’ to Diana on television the night before the funeral.

Cold is a word constantly used about the Queen, Philip, and Charles, and that’s the mental and emotional profile of the Brotherhood and its networks.

Bill Cooper said that the initiates that he met in his work for US Naval Intelligence had “No conscience, no morals, no regrets, no feelings, no emotion”. This is precisely the same character profile as the Windsors and, according to all the people I have met who have encountered them, the character profile of the reptilians of the lower fourth dimension. There is a reason for that, of course.

The people have been hoodwinked for thousands of years. Hoodwinked about their history, hoodwinked about who they really are and the true nature of life. Hoodwinked about the true background and Agenda of those they have allowed to rule them. How apt, therefore, that this word should also derive from Freemasonry. Dr. Albert MacKey, the 33rd degree Freemason and foremost Freemason historian of the 19th century, defined the term ‘hoodwinked’ in his Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry as: A symbol of secrecy, silence and darkness, in which the mysteries of our art should be preserved from the unhallowed gaze of the profane.

The human race has indeed been hoodwinked.
1 The Top 13 llluminati Bloodlines, p 89.
2 Ibid, p 90.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid, p 91-2.
7 Ibid, p 89.
8 Ibid.
9 Secret And Suppressed, p 66.
10 Ibid.
11 Ibid, p 68.
12 The Top 13 llluminati Bloodlines, p 94.
13 Secret And Suppressed, p 80.
14 The Top 13 llluminati Bloodlines, p 99.
15 Ibid, p 102.
16 Secret And Suppressed, pp 19, 65, 85.
17 Ibid, p 66.
18 Ibid.
19 Ibid, p 65
20 Ibid,p69.
21 Andrew Morton, Diana, Her True Story (Michael O’Mara Books, London, 1992, republished as
Diana: Her True Story In Her Own Words, 1997).
22 Ibid.
23 Ibid.
24 The London Daily Mail, Thursday, August 27th 1998.
25 Ibid.
26 Diana: Her True Story
27 Ibid.
28 Ibid.
29 Private Eye magazine, No 956, Friday, August 7th 1998, p 5.
30 Tom Bower, Fayed, The Unauthodsed Biography (Macmillan, London, 1998).
31 Ibid, p 22.
32 The London Daily Mail, Friday, June 26th 1998.
33 Simon Reagan, Who Killed Diana? (a Scallywag publication, Amsterdam, 1998), p 57.
34 Ibid, p 62.
35 The News Of The World, Sunday, January 18th 1998, pp 18, 19.
36 Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam, Who Killed Diana?, p 17.
37 Dispatches, Channel Four, June 1998.
38 Ibid.
39 Ibid.
40 Fayed, The Unauthorised Biography, p 425.
41 Ibid, p 420.
42 Ibid, p 421.
43 Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam, Who Killed Diana?, p 64.
44 Ibid, pp 73, 74.
45 Jim Marrs, Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy (Carrol and Graf Publishers, New York, 1989), p 382.
46 Dispatches.
47 Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, Imi, 1998.
48 “Diana, the Unsolved Mystery”, News Of The World News Special, January 18th 1998.
49 The information about David Sands death comes from the Tony Collins book, Open Verdict, an account of 25 mysterious deaths in the defence industry (Sphere Books, London, 1990).
50 Sir Peter Horsley, Sounds From Another Room (Leo Cooper, England, 1997). The story is also told by Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam in Who Killed Diana?, pp 126-133.
51 Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam, Who Killed Diana? (Vision Paperbacks, London, 1999), pp 175-177.
52 The News Of The World, News Special, January 18th 1998.
53 Daily Mirror, Monday, March 2nd 1998, p 2.
54 London Daily Mail, August 29th 1998, pp 1, 2.
55 Dispatches.
56 Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam, Who Killed Diana?, p 145.
57 Quoted in Blasphemous Rumours, p 212.
58 The Phoenician Origin Of Britons, p 64.
59 “Fayed’s rooftop flame of love for Dodi and Diana”, London Daily Express, Friday, July 24th 1998, p 3.
60 The Women’s Encyclopaedia Of Myths And Secrets, p 543.
61 Kitty Kelly, The Royals (Warner Books, New York, 1997), p 347
62 The Times, Wednesday, June 3rd 1998.
63 “Fergie’s Mom Was Murdered”, The Globe, October 6th 1988.
Views: 1707

by Dee Finney
from GreatDreams Website

Do you know the Lizard King? Is Pindar real?
According to David Icke, the hierarchy goes like this :
  • Reptilian ’Royalty’: Winged reptilians, with the highest caste being the Albino type (similar to Pindar).
  • Reptoids: Wingless reptilians. They are the ones described as having larger scales on their backs and three fingers with an opposing thumb.
  • Greys: Described as being either drone-like slaves of the reptilians or an extraterrestrial life-form allied to them.
  • Humans: We’re at the bottom, but why doesn’t that surprise me ?
The Reptilians are described as being between 5 and 12 feet tall. There are several types.

Also from Icke’s research:
"Pindar attends the major Satanic ceremonies in Europe and then flies to California for the rituals there".
Later in the book (Biggest Secret), Icke says that,
"Pindar, the ’Marquis de Libeaux’ travels in a white limousine (A ’code-white’ is a code understood by judges, police, the military etc. and it means: look the other way or do not prosecute this person)."
On page 453 of the same book, Icke states that,
" ... the Queen makes cruel remarks about lesser initiates, but is afraid of the man code-named ’Pindar’ (the Marquis de Libeaux) who is higher than her in Satanic rank. Pindar, apparently, bears a resemblance to Prince Charles. Arizona Wilder says that Pindar is Charles’ real father."
Finally, Icke summises, along with Arizona Wilder, the possibility that Princess Diana was pregnant at the time of her murder and that the child could have been Pindar’s rather than that of Dodi Fayed, and the child was sacrificed in a ritual ceremony. Diana was sacrificed because she would not cooperate with the organization.

Icke insists that only one ’strain’ of the reptilian race is antagonistic towards us. To consider all reptilians ’evil’ is like considering all humans the same way. Patently false.

Going Dutch

The Dutch government resigned this week under pressure brought on by accusations that in 1995, over 7000 Bosnia Muslims were executed by Serbs while under the protection of Dutch troops. This was the worst mass murder in Europe since WWII.
Queen Beatrix, the Bilderburger leader, witnessed the mass sacrifice as part of a ritual ceremony. An interim government will run the small nation until the May 15, 2002 election.

Who knows about this 12 foot albino lizard??? I have heard them call him the "Marquis de Libeaux". Marquis actually means king. In French it simply means the Marquis of Libeaux.
Marquis being a noble, Libeaux being the name of some region.

Top Illuminati Family Names

These are the top of the Illuminati organization. These are the people that really run this world. The most powerful is Marquis de Libeaux then followed by the Rothschild’s {Bauer}, Bruce, Cavendish {Kennedy}, de Medici, Hanover, Hapsburg, Krupps, Plantagenet, Rockefeller, Romanov, Sinclair/St. Clair, Warburg {del Banco}, and Windsor families.
These are the families that run the NWO and all the stooges that work for them. They all worship Satan and they all take part in human sacrifice and ritual child abuse. If you do your own research you will see that these families have "bred themselves since ancient times and they are obsessed with keeping their bloodlines "pure". These are the sickest people on this planet and their hold is going to be broken as the world "wakes-up" to their murderous deception around the world. Remember the truth will set you free!

The original "Mother Goddess" after whom a slew of deities including Queen Semiramis, Isis, Diana and others were fashioned was Ninkharsag.

The commander of the Anunnaki was Enlil, half-brother of Enki.
The book of Genesis and Exodus and were based on The Levites (initiates of the Egyptian mysteries); based on Sumerian stories and accounts. Between 11,000 and 4000 BC catastrophes were visited upon the earth, destroying the advanced civilizations of the Golden Age. The Anunnaki are said to have arrived 450,000 years ago. Their leader was the winged albino-white Draco.

The owner of this seal can be identified from the cuneiform inscription which translates:
’Seal of Mushezib-Ninurta, governor, son of Ninurta-eresh,
ditto, son of Samanuha-shar-ilani, ditto.’
Samanuha-shar-ilani was ruler of Shadikanni
(Arban in eastern Syria), in 883 BC, and an Assyrian vassal -
subject to the firm control of Assyria, and enjoying the wealth and security that such political domination provided.
During this period, seal designs were often cut on hard stones using cutting-wheels and drills. The image is similar to two wall relief's from the throne room of King Ashurbanipal II (reigned 883-859 BC) at Nimrud.
The king, shown in mirror image, is protected by guardian genii sprinkling holy water from a bucket using what may be a fir cone or sponge.
A stylized tree stands in the centre, symbolizing nature and the land of Assyria.
Above is a god in the winged disc.

Length: 4.9 cm
Diameter: 1.7 cm

Found by H.C. Rawlinson and acquired by The British Museum around 1852
D. Collon, First impressions: cylinder seals in the Ancient Near East (London, The British Museum Press, 1987), pp. 76-7, fig. 341
A.H. Layard, Discoveries in the ruins of Nineveh and Babylon (London, J. Murray, 1853), p. 603


  • From what star constellation are the reptilians said to originate?

  • What is the difference between reptilian full-bloods and reptilian hybrids?
    Full-bloods are reptilians using a human form to hide their true nature; hybrids are reptile-human crossbreed bloodlines who are possessed by the reptilians from the forth dimension
  • Where did the white race and the reptile-aryan crossbreeds emerge from after the flood?
    The Caucasus Mountains
  • What were the Aryans who left the Caucasus to rule India called?
    The Khattiyo
    Since Sir William Jones presented his analysis of Sanskrit in 1786, Western scholars knew that Sanskrit - like Hittite - was an Indo-European language. So L.A. Waddell (Laurence Austine Waddell) was intrigued that this Indo-European-speaking people in Northern India appeared to be pointing to Anatolia as their homeland.
    What drew his attention there even more were certain provocative correspondences. For instance, the ruling class who first invaded Northern India called themselves “Khattiyo”. Why this is interesting is that the reason we call the people in Anatolia “Hittites” is because they called themselves Khatti.
    Since English does not possess certain sounds, the term is transliterated in several different ways - such as the Jewish celebration of Hannukah, which is sometimes spelled Channukah. Likewise, the people who called themselves “Khatti” are variously referred to as “Catti” or “Hatti”.
    And it is from this that the English-speaking nations derived the exonym “Hittite”.

    Waddell was fascinated that an Indo-European-speaking people in Anatolia called themselves “Khatti” and that the Northern Indians who appeared to be describing Anatolia as their “homeland” called themselves “Khattiyo”

    from "Were the Phoenicians Related to the Hittites?"

  • Where did the Jewish race originate from?
    The Caucasus Mountains
  • What do lions symbolize to the Aryans?
    The Sun


Posted by Adam
Princess Diana

TRAGIC Princess Diana feared Britain’s Prince Philip would kill her — according to a shocking new report.

Author Ian Halperin alleges Diana — who died 13-years-ago yesterday (August 31) –  told one of her closest friends six days before she died that she was terrified Philip would kill her because she refused a proposition he made to have sex with her one night in 1997.

The friend said Philip warned Di that if she didn’t sleep with him he would make her fear rebellion for the rest of her life.

“And he most certainly did,” said the longtime Diana friend. “He must have been loaded that night when he propositioned Diana but the dirty bastard was able to scare her to death.

“To this day I wonder if Prince Philip arranged the tragic car crash so he could off Diana and never have to fear her talking about what happened.

“One thing I know for sure is that Diana would have never lied about something like this.”

Princess Diana

Picture 1 of 3
Tags: , ,
See also:

Share This Post


rumor_title.gif (8684 bytes)

The Uncensored National Rumor

Diana Was The Target

From Conspiracy Tales,
A Monthly Newsletter By Brian Redman
Editor of Conspiracy Nation

Introduction by Rayelan Allan, Publisher, Rumor Mill News
In the article I wrote for Paranoia Magazine, "Diana, Was Not the Target", I said,
"If the original plan had been followed, only Dodi would have died. Princess Diana would have lived. But the accident and its aftermath would have filled her with such horror, she never again would make any trouble for the Palace and her "handlers".
The original plan was not followed. Somewhere between the MI6 document that made its way to the President, via the CIA and FBI Division 5; someone else, with another agenda, entered the picture. The story that has been released to the public states that Diana died from loss of blood due to a torn heart. The truth is so abhorrent and unspeakable, that even those who know it can not bring themselves to think about it, let alone speak it."
The rest of the article can be found on the Paranoia Magazine Webpage at this link:
Diana Was NOT the Target
Over the many months that have passed since the article was published I have had some second thoughts. The premise of the article is that Diana was NOT the target, Dodi was. The operative that gave me the information has supplied reliable information in the past and the story WAS definitely believable.
I was able to write Oswald LeWinter because he was still in prison in Austria and ask him to confirm or deny the premise. He did NOT deny it!
I checked out my information with one other source who was able to confirm many of the things that went into the article. Because I had confirmed it with three separate men who had sources within the intelligence communities, I went ahead and published it. But I still had a nagging feeling that something was NOT correct.
About a week ago, in a conversation with another researcher, I was able to pinpoint the nagging feeling! I realized that more than likely the story I was given was a COVER story that was created just in case the truth was discovered, the Mastermind of the operation would be able to save face with his family!
In other words, DIANA WAS THE TARGET!
Who had enough to lose that he took the time to create a cover story, within a cover-up? Who would do this? Who believed the truth about the murder would finally come out, and who was clever enough to engineer a cover-story that would let him off the hook, at the SAME time he was engineering the murder? Who stood to lose EVERYTHING if the people closest to him knew or even suspected that HE was the one who ordered the murder of Diana?
As I thought about this I realized that there is ONLY one person who would go to this trouble, Prince Phillip!
He must have realized that those within his family who were not PART of the murder plot would have the ability to find out WHO ordered the murder of Diana! Prince William is one who seems determined to discover who killed his mother as evidenced by this recent story.
Like Mohammed Al Fayed, I have always believed that Prince Phillip was the one behind the murder of Dodi. I NOW realize that he probably ALWAYS intended to kill BOTH Diana and Dodi. But he KNEW he would need to be able to "wash his hands" of any involvement in Diana's Death, therefore he decided to create a cover-story. Who was this cover-story created for? It was created for Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry. It was created in case they discovered that their father/grandfather was behind the murder of Diana!
It is my belief NOW that Diana was always the target, but to save face in case the murder plot was unearthed, a cover-story was created that would allow Prince Phillip to save face with his son and his Grandsons.
He could tell them, "Look, I didn't want her to die! I only wanted to kill that "son of a bedouin camel trader!" Yes, I told the doctor to perform an abortion. I couldn't have the mother of the future King of England pregnant with a bastard "raghead"! I didn't know the abortion would kill her!"
His grandsons would hate him, but they would NOT hate him for ordering the murder of their mother. They would hate him for letting her die during a botched abortion in the ambulance!
Just as I was about to write an article on this revelation, my monthly copy of "Conspiracy Tales" arrived in the mail. It seems that my friend Brian Redman had been on the same wave length that I was on. He too had realized that DIANA WAS THE TARGET, and a cover-story within a cover-up had been created to throw select people off track!
While I DON'T agree with everything Brian says in the following article, I do agree with his statement, "... there was a cover-up within the cover-up."
Here is the latest from Brian Redman, the Editor of Conspiracy Nation, the oldest Conspiracy webpage on the Internet!

August 25, 2001
One Step Beyond...
"Diana Was Not The Target" is the title of a groundbreaking article by Rayelan Allan. [1]
I was privileged to be associated with Rayelan during the days and months following the assassination of Diana, Princess of Wales, as we both dug into the event, trying to find the true story. Her blockbuster report, "Who Controls Diana, Controls The World," premiered on my web site, "Conspiracy Nation." [2]. Author Robert Anton Wilson so connected Rayelan's premiere report with my web site, that he mistakenly attributes authorship to "Conspiracy Nation" in his book, Everything Is Under Control. [3] Rayelan followed up on her premier report in her book, Diana, Queen of Heaven, which book I was honored to write the foreword to. As mentioned, Rayelan's article, "Diana Was Not The Target," broke further ground in the quest to get at what really happened, in Paris, on August 31, 1997. This issue of Conspiracy Tales goes "one step beyond" Rayelan Allan's latest sleuthing, and demonstrates a cover-up within the cover-up.
Part of the detective work in solving crimes is to show that there was (1) Motive, (2) Means, and (3) Opportunity.
Diana was not shy about speaking her mind on subjects such as the British Royal Family, land mines, and (so-called) AIDS. Her divorce from Prince Charles was acrimonious and there was a bitter, ongoing, "family feud." Diana was a defector from the British monarchy. She had been ushered into the halls of power, via her marriage to the Prince of Wales; but she had sufficient conscience to finally rebel against the allure of power. [4]. Diana's relationship with Dodi Fayed further increased her political savvy. [4]. The popular princess went so far as to publicly refer to the British House of Windsor as "lizards" and "reptiles." "They're not human," she said. [5] Diana grew to believe that the British monarchy, with all its hidden power, were her enemies. [6]. In Great Britain, all members of MI5, MI6 (British intelligence agencies), members of Parliament, and military officers swear an oath of loyalty to the monarchy, not to the United Kingdom. [5] [6]. In the U.K., the monarchy is the state. By revealing royal family secrets, Diana may have been committing "treason."
Diana, nominated for a Nobel Prize, had become a "loose cannon" in the eyes of the Windsors. [6]. Her voice was heard internationally. And a new snag emerged: her romance with Dodi Fayed, an Egyptian and a Muslim. (According to the president of the American-Arab-Muslim Council, it was more than a romance; he claims that Dodi and Diana, before their deaths, had been secretly married, in Egypt. [7].) The Dodi/Diana romance was viewed by the state of Israel as a threat to its interests (national security). Any birth of an Anglo-Arab child to the internationally famous couple would promote world interest in Arab culture. [6]. There is speculation that Diana may have even secretly converted to Islam. [6] There was the dangerous (to Israel) potential that a Dodi/Diana union would be a powerful symbol to help unite the Arabs. (Ironically, Ariel Sharon is now also uniting the Arabs, though inadvertantly.) Suppose Dodi Fayed influenced Diana to denounce the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians? Her voice would have been heard.
Ex-British intelligence agent Richard Tomlinson says that MI6 (British intelligence, similar to the CIA) had assassination mechanics already worked out whereby to murder "a Serb leader"; he says the plan "eerily mirrors" the "car accident" deaths of Dodi and Diana. [8].
The American CIA, the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), and other U.S. intelligence agencies had been spying on Diana for several years. [9]. The CIA routinely "bugged" her phone calls. [8]. The NSA admits it has 39 NSA-originated and NSA-controlled documents -- 124 pages altogether -- of top-secret information on Diana. [9] These U.S. spy agencies, as a matter of procedure, forwarded the results of their spying to their British counterparts. [9]. It was not just the demonized "paparazzi" who were intensely interested in what Diana was up to.
Reportedly, Diana's true killers belonged to an international conglomerate of intelligence services, known as Defense Intelligence Services (a.k.a. "Group 26"), based in Bristol, England. [10]. When independent journalist Sherman Skolnick began delving into this connection, he was warned off the story by one of the alleged members of Group 26, Gunther Russbacher. (This editor listened to a tape-recording of Russbacher's polite warning to Skolnick; apparently unknown to Russbacher: Skolnick had taped the phone call.) Dodi's actual murderer may have been what the Globe "tabloid" described as "a shadowy figure from the French underworld" with ties to British intelligence. [11]. He may have been the one who, immediately after the car crash, "reached into the car, as if he was checking to see if Dodi was alive," and broke Dodi's neck. [1].
Diana climbed into an ambulance after the car crash and the ambulance drove off, presumably rushing the princess to a hospital. As the Mercedes was Dodi's death car (though not via the car crash), the ambulance was Diana's deathmobile. Details to follow later, in this issue of Conspiracy Tales.
The Mercedes carrying Dodi and Diana to their joint fate left the Paris Ritz shortly after midnight on August 31, 1997. Also in the car were the driver, Henri Paul, and a bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones. Contrary to reports, Henri Paul was not drunk when he drove the car away from the Ritz. Ritz Hotel surveillance videos do not show Mr. Paul as being obviously intoxicated. Two days prior to the car crash, Henri Paul took an extensive medical exam necessary for his airplane pilot's license: the results of the medical showed no alcohol-related problems. [6]. The bodyguard, Rees-Jones, who survived the crash, insists that Mr. Paul was not drunk. [6]. Somewhere between the Ritz and the Pont l'Alma crash, Mr. Paul was poisoned -- intoxicated (toxic means poison). [6]. An abnormally high level of carbon monoxide was subsequently found in Henri Paul's blood, during his autopsy. [6] Mr. Paul was not driving erratically when he drove away from the Ritz. [6].
All 17 close-circuit cameras on the route from the Ritz to the Pont l'Alma tunnel were not functioning. [5]. This system of video surveillance had never before malfunctioned all at the same time. [5]. Simultaneous to the camera system failure, all police communications frequencies in central Paris went down. [5]
As the Mercedes neared the area of the tunnel, an unknown motorcyclist blocked an off ramp, thereby forcing the car to enter the tunnel. [8] In the Pont l'Alma tunnel, a flash of light (NOT "paparazzi" camera flashbulbs) from an extremely powerful "anti-personnel device" momentarily blinded Henri Paul. [6]. The car, stolen earlier that year, had been tampered with [6] A momentarily blinded Mr. Paul, poisoned, lost control of the vehicle and it crashed into a pillar. Contrary to erroneous press reports which had the car going much faster upon impact, the Mercedes was going less than 60 mph. [6].
Diana Was Not The Target
Diana was still very much alive after the car crash. [11] She was also 3-months pregnant. [5] [6] [7]. (Likely, the father was Dodi Fayed.) Stunned, she exited the car and walked around [1]. An ambulance arrived and she was assisted into it. It took over one hour for the ambulance to get Princess Diana to a nearby hospital. [5]. Why the delay?
The ambulance carrying Diana parked itself on a side street. There, an abortion was performed. The 3-month foetus was taken from Diana's womb. [1]. According to Rayelan Allan, Diana died inadvertantly, due to blood loss and damage to internal organs. [1] "Diana was not the target," she says. Her death was, according to Allan, not part of the plan.
Ms. Allan deserves more recognition for her efforts at getting to the bottom of the Diana/Dodi mystery. Her scenario is almost correct, except that Diana WAS the target. Is it really believable that after witnessing the demise of her lover and then undergoing a forced abortion, that the outspoken Diana would have kept quiet about it? She was politically savvy. She furthermore had a powerful ally in Mohammed Fayed, Dodi's multi-millionaire father. Diana had to be eliminated permanently; it WAS part of the plan. But there was a cover-up within the cover-up: Diana's pregnancy had to be hidden from autopsy doctors. It was not a botched abortion which killed her; it was purposeful "botching" which ensured that the princess would be delivered to the hospital on the verge of death. That ambulance was Diana's deathmobile.
"Paparazzi" Scapegoats
The world immediately sensed that there was something fishy about Diana's sudden death. Its grief and fury was supplied with a "patsy" for the death in the form of photographers who were near the scene of the car crash. A new word came into common usage: "Paparazzi." They were depicted as low-life scum who'd harassed the princess to her death.
But many of these "paparazzi" were actually mainstream journalists. [12]. They were also key witnesses, present at the crash scene during its immediate aftermath. They took a lot of photographs which are crucial evidence. Unfortunately, swift action by French police resulted in the confiscation of most of these "paparazzi" photographs. [6] (Some of the pictures, however, had already been wired to a press agency in North London. [8].)
The "paparazzi" were detained by the authorities and held incommunicado for days. They were warned that publishing any of the confiscated photos could be a felony, "obstructing investigation." [6]. When these normally communicative journalists were finally released from custody, they had by then all "clammed up." They weren't saying much. Meanwhile, within 12 hours of some key photos having been wired to the North London press agency, that agency was burglarized and the photos stolen. [8].
What do the "paparazzi" know? Why aren't they talking? Maybe they're afraid of "car accidents." Some "paparazzi" witnesses complain of being "stalked" and of having their homes and offices burglarized. [11]. Another, James Andanson, was found dead in a burned up car. "His mysterious death has never been explained." [11]
The LeWinter Affair
Oswald LeWinter was recruited into the CIA during the Vietnam War. He grew disgusted with the Agency and eventually turned renegade. [6] (By "renegade" is meant, sort of like Diana herself: "a loose cannon.")
John McNamara, Mohamed Al-Fayed's chief of security, says that in April 1998 his boss was contacted by high-power attorney Keith Fleer. Fleer arranged for McNamara and Al-Fayed to meet Oswald LeWinter in Austria. LeWinter claimed he had secret CIA files on Diana and Dodi; he'd sell them for $20 million. [8].LeWinter claimed that Mercedes driver Henri Paul had been poisoned and that the car had been tampered with; LeWinter produced documents supporting his claims. [6] But on April 22nd, LeWinter was pounced on by FBI agents. (FBI nabs him in Austria?) [5]. They said he was -- get this -- selling phony documents. LeWinter was arrested and charged with fraud. (FBI goes to Austria to nab someone selling phony documents?)
The LeWinter documents were not phony. LeWinter was offered a deal by the authorities: "Play ball with us; say that, 'Yes, the documents are fake,' and you'll get a simple fraud charge. Otherwise, you'll face charges of high treason (for stealing and disseminating classified information) in the United States." [1]
One of the supposedly fraudulent documents was published: first, in a Vienna newspaper; later in the London Mirror. Here is what it said:
Foreign Intelligence Information Report
Directorate of Intelligence
1. Relationship initiated between Diana POW and Dodi aF according to reliable intel sources in November 1996. Intimacy begins shortly after they meet. (Report filed)
2. Reliable source reports Palace seriously disturbed by liaison. PM considers any al Fayed relationship politically disastrous. Edinburgh sees serious threat to dynasty should relationship endure. Quote reported: "Such an affair is racially and morally repugnant and no son of a bedouin camel trader is fit for the mother of a future king." Edinburgh. (Report filed)
3. Request from highest circles to DEA attache UK for 6 on Dodi re: Cocaine. See file forwarded to UK embassy DC. (Copy filed)
4. U.S. liaison to MI6 requested by David Spedding for assistance in providing permanent solution to Dodi problem. Blessing of Palace secured (Twiz filed)
5. WHuse [White House] denies Spedding request. Harrison authorized only to arrange meeting for MI-6 representative with K-Team Geneva. (Twiz on file)
6. Meeting in Geneva reportedly successful (Report filed)
7. Al Fayed Mercedes limo stolen and returned with electronics missing. Reliable intel source confirms K-team involved. Source reports car rebuilt to respond to external radio controls. (Report filed) [1]
Diana Was The Target
Eliminating only Dodi Fayed would not solve the Diana problem, nor would eliminating both Dodi and the unborn child. Diana had to be silenced. Diana was the target.
Many reputable professionals agree: it was not an accident that Diana died; she was murdered. [6] [11] Governments kill thousands of people each day, in the name of "national security." What difference would 3-and-a-half more bodies make to them? "The State is the coldest of all cold monsters." [Nietzche]
Diana divorced Prince Charles on August 28, 1996. Almost exactly to the day, one year later, Diana was killed. Both Diana and the actress Marilyn Monroe were born on the first of the month. Both died, at age 36, in August. (The "loose cannon" Monroe's murderers restrained her and inserted a specially doctored Nembutal suppository into her anus; see Double-Cross by Sam and Chuck Giancana. ISBN: 0-446-36412-6.) Monroe, the Queen of Diamonds, and Diana, the Queen of Hearts, were the subjects of the Elton John song, "Candle in the Wind," which Mr. John sang at Diana's funeral.
Below are sources for the Diana story:
[1] Allan, Rayelan. "Diana Was Not The Target." Paranoia magazine. #24, Fall 2000. See also
[2] Conspiracy Nation
[3] Wilson, Robert Anton. Everything Is Under Control. ISBN: 0-06-273417-2
[4] Allan, Rayelan. Diana, Queen of Heaven ISBN: 0-9670060-0-7
[5] Icke, David. The Biggest Secret. ISBN: 0-9526147-6-6
[6] Hounam, Peter & McAdam, Derek. Who Killed Diana? ISBN: 1-883319-87-0
[7] Redman, Brian. "Princesses In Peril." Conspiracy Nation, Vol. 11 Num. 14. (Should be at Conspiracy Nation web site, URL listed in #2, above.)
[8] Jones, Barbara. "Princess Must Die." Star. March 9, 1999.
[9] Smith, Bob. "CIA Kept Top-Secret Files on Di." Star. Dec. 22, 1998.
[10] Allan, Rayelan. "October Surprise and the Murder of Princess Diana." Conspiracy Nation, Vol. 11 Num. 82. See web site URL in #2, above.
[11] "Crash Investigation." Globe. June 26, 2001.
[12] Redman, Brian. Conspiracy Nation, Vol. 10 Num. 96. See web site URL in #2, above.
This issue by Brian Redman.
Address any correspondence to
Conspriacy Tales
314 S. Prairie (#101),
Champaign, IL 61820
Thanks to Rayelan Allan of Rumor Mill News for her very leading edge stories.
Visit Rumor Mill News at
Thanks to Sherman Skolnick for his guidance.
Visit his web site for the latest insider news at



Camilla Parker Bowles Tried to Kill Herself!!!!!!!

Posted by Adam
Camilla Parker BowlesPRINCE Charles‘ frumpy wife Camilla Parker Bowles tried to KILL HERSELF, it has been claimed.
The British royal — referred to as the Duchess of Cornwall — apparently had some sort of meltdown that left her in seclusion and nursing a badly broken leg, according to American tabloid Globe.
Bowles’ crisis was allegedly triggered when she learned Queen Elizabeth will formally bypass Charles and make William the heir to the throne later this year.
Camilla was sleeping with Charles — whom she wed in 2005 — while he was still married to the late Princess Diana, William’s mom.
Reports earlier this month claimed William is set to announce his engagement to longtime love Kate Middleton.
Tags: ,
See also:

Christopher Everard

Yep, there can be absolutely no doubt that the world has 'awoken' to the corruption of the Royals and the political-banking elite... We have also awoken to the sick perverted antics of the Vatican, which Saint Malachy describes as 'Babylon'... Saint Malachy was a 12th century Irish monk, who, while on a visit to Rome had a vision of all the popes who would ever reign...

The Malachy Prophecies have been accurate right up until the 20th century - one amazing prophecy was called "Religio depopulata" ("Religion destroyed"). This prophecy is connected with Pope Benedict XV (1914-1922). Religion & religious life did indeed come under attack, with the engineering of the first world war and also the rise of the Romanov Royal Family and their evil spectre of stage-managed Communism...

The 20th Century did indeed see Gypsies, homosexuals and many Hebrew families being slaughtered - it was the century which marked the end of the reign of influence of the Holy Roman Empire… It's traditional political influence died back to eastern Europe, France and South America… The 20th century was the century where the Jesuits (Los Allumbrados - the Illuminati) began their involvement with South American child-trafficking and drug-running… The Royal-Bavarian-British strongholds became supremely wealthy after securing the Opium of VietNam and then Afghanistan.

People are also having SECOND AWAKENINGS - realising that the fear-mongers and freeze-dried emergency food rationing red-neck doomsday radio show hosts have been lining their pockets with the unnecessary promotion of fear… People have also awoken to the misguided and inaccurate 'revelations' of New Age Gurus and misinformants like Arizona Wilder… As for the nonsense peddled out recently about the Moon being an artificial spaceship built by aliens - many people have abandoned the 'Conspiracy Theorists' and have sensibly done their own research which is the safest bet nowadays...

Now that the Royal-Political & Banking families have stolen the oil reserves of Iraq and Libya, it is important that people forget the red herring nonsense spread by Arizona Wilder and keep focussed on how the Illuminati families really operate - one of their primary incomes is generated from the sale of GOLD - which has been promoted ad nauseum by Alex Jones… If you want to deepen your own understanding of the Vatican and Royal-Political Elite, Royal witches, Pedo-Priests, Freemasons and Satanists throughout history - then check out a new digital book entitled EMPIRE OF EVIL which I have been writing during my travels across the world this summer. I've tried to make my new iBook an entertaining and startling exposure of the creeps and weird people which control the world's economy and TV & Radio mainstream media… After all, learning solemn facts about infant massacres and cults becomes 'one dimensional' and uninspiring unless we interject some of the ironic laughs which we often have when tuning through the LIES of the mainstream media!

You can read sample pages and learn more about the highest secrets of these strange people by clicking onto my person web page - and I really thank everyone for their support - as I need to step up writing more books to pay the bills! Here's my website

Hasnat Khan: The statement in full

This is the full statement of Diana’s former lover Hasnat Khan to the inquest into her death.

Hasnat-Khan Hasnat Khan

The surgeon made a statement to police using his full name - Hasnat Ahmad Khan - on September 24 2004.

The inquest was told that reference to a Dr Jarman in the statement may actually be a codename for the journalist Martin Bashir. In his statement, read out in court , Mr Khan said:

“I have a Bachelor in medicine, a Bachelor in surgery and I am a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons. I specialise in heart and lung surgery and I am currently based at Harefield Hospital.

“Prior to  this, I worked at the London Chest Hospital and before that, in 2000, I was at St Bart’s. Prior to that I was studying for my PhD at Imperial College. Between 1995 and 1996 I was working at the Royal Brompton Hospital in London.

“It was in August or September of 1995 that I met Diana, Princess of Wales.
“Diana and I met through Oonagh Toffolo, whose husband was recovering from heart surgery at the Royal Brompton. At the time, I was working for Professor Yacoub, the heart surgeon, and Mr Toffolo was one of his patients, so I was involved in his medical treatment and care. I first met Diana when I had occasion to speak to Mrs Toffolo, whose husband was required to stay in hospital for some time.

“Diana would visit him on a regular basis. From what she had seen during her visits, Diana became very interested in the workings of the hospital.

“Out of general interest, she wanted to visit the patients on the ward. As Diana’s interest increased, she decided she wanted to watch a heart operation. In fact, she watched two such operations, although you only ever hear of one in the press.
“I was always extremely busy at work during the week, but at the weekends I had more time to spend doing my rounds on the wards. Diana and her girlfriends would often pop in and, when I had finished my rounds, they would join me for a chat. They were all very friendly people.

“I found Diana very down to earth and she made everyone feel at ease. I did notice that she was also very flirtatious with everyone. Over a period of time, we became good friends.

“We were chatting one day and I mentioned that I needed to go to my uncle’s house in Stratford-upon-Avon to pick up some books. I did not think for one minute that she would say yes, but I asked her if she would like to come with me. I was very surprised when she said she would.
“We drove there together and Diana met my aunt and uncle. We had dinner in a restaurant and then drove back to London.

“I think this took place around mid-September 1995.

“After this, our friendship turned into a relationship.
“Diana and I had a very good relationship with no personal problems. The only problem we did have was with the media and the only place we could have any real privacy was at Kensington Palace as they could not get to us there.

“I was living in Neville Street in Kensington at the time and the media followed me everywhere, even to my place of work at Harefield Hospital.

“Diana was very protective towards me and wanted to shield me from the attention.

“The media found out about us around November 1995, very soon after our relationship started. I think they had already guessed we were seeing each other, but then someone working at the hospital leaked it out. This happened when, as a joke, the Princess arranged for a big pot of flowers to be sent to me at the Royal Brompton.
“There was a card with the flowers, but no name on it, although I knew who had sent them. A lot of people obviously saw me carrying these flowers through the hospital. Someone found out which florist they had been sent from and rang them up to find out who had ordered the flowers.

“Initially the florist would not tell them, however the person ringing told the florist they were inquiring on my behalf, and if I did not find out who had sent them, I would be returning the flowers. Eventually the florist said that they had been ordered from Kensington Palace. After this, the press went everywhere trying to get information on me.
“They visited old girlfriends, my medical school and retired professors who I had known.

“During our relationship, I stayed with Diana many times at Kensington Palace and she also stayed with me at my place. We had a normal sexual relationship and I have no reason to think that Diana was ever unfaithful to me.

“Diana introduced me to Princes William and Harry. Diana just wanted her sons to know what was happening in her life.

“Diana and I were very good friends and we never took what the other said that seriously. Although we did talk about marriage, we did not make a point of sitting down and discussing the specifics. It was something we would chat about generally if it came up in conversation. Neither of us ever proposed.

“My main concern about us getting married was that my life would be hell because of who she was. I knew I would not be able to live a normal life and if we ever had children together, I would not be able to take them anywhere or do normal things with them. Anyone could approach me, in the pub, on the train, anywhere.
“Diana was not in the same position as me. She did not have a job like mine where she had to consider patients and staff.

“The hospital I was working in at the time had started getting a bit upset by the disruption caused by Diana’s visits. It was becoming a security issue.

“Diana was also not used to doing everyday things that the rest of us take for granted. For example, we once went to the pub together and Diana asked if she could order the drinks because she had never done so before. She really enjoyed the experience and chatted away happily to the barman.

“On another occasion we had to queue to get into Ronnie Scott’s jazz club. She later said she loved queuing as you get to meet so many people.

“On one occasion Diana wanted to fly to Spain to meet me when I was over there. I told her that she would not be able to just walk into the airport as everybody would be looking at her.

“She said she would wear a wig to disguise herself. I told her that was a ridiculous suggestion as she wouldn’t look anything like her passport photo with a wig on.

“A lot of people have said to me that even a married man would leave his wife if he had the chance of being with Diana, but I did not want that sort of lifestyle.

“I told her that the only way I could see us having a vaguely normal life together would be if we went to Pakistan, as the press don’t bother you there.

“I know Diana considered this an option for a while and she even went to Pakistan to speak to Jemima Khan about life there. However, after a while, she no longer talked about Pakistan, and although she did not actually say so, I got the impression that she no longer considered living there a possibility.

“Diana considered other countries that may have been suitable. She would think of somewhere and just get up and go there without saying anything to me.

“She would return from these trips and say something or other was not right, like security would be a problem. I know she thought about South Africa and Australia. Her brother was living in South Africa at the time. Diana visited, and although she loved Cape Town, she said the fences were going up and security would be a problem.

“I did not want to have to look over my shoulder all the time.

“I had had experiences of working in Australia, but after thinking about it, Diana said it would be too far away from her sons.

“I know that around the end of 1996 or the beginning of 1997, Diana asked Paul Burrell to talk to a priest about the feasibility of us getting married in secret.

“I knew nothing about this until afterwards, when both Paul and Diana told me. I do not know the name of the priest that Paul approached.

“When I found out, I said to Diana, ’Do you honestly think you can just bring a priest here and get married?’
“I thought it was a ridiculous idea.

“I think in her head she wanted to get married, but practically she had not thought about the implications.
“We had an argument about it once and I told her she could not just jump into something like that. She just said that everything would be all right. That was her answer to everything, ’It will turn out all right’.

“If we had married, as far as I am concerned, Diana would not have had to convert to the Muslim faith.
“Being a Muslim, you have to believe in Christ and Moses. As far as her religion was concerned, she could go to a church or a mosque. I would never tell someone what religion they should be.

“My only concern would have been if we then had a child. I could imagine it being very difficult deciding what religion to bring the child up in.

“Diana used to read about Islam and she would tell me what she had learned. However, she never said that she would convert to the Muslim faith and I never asked her to.

“I do not know the Royal Family so I do not know if it would have been a problem for them had Diana remarried.

“We never discussed having children, either married or unmarried, but Diana did mention that she would love to have a girl. During our relationship Diana was taking the contraceptive pill that was prescribed by a male gynaecologist who used to visit her at Kensington Palace. I never met this gynaecologist, but, as far as I am aware, the pill was prescribed to Diana because of our relationship and for no other reason.

“I would describe Diana as an excellent time and appointment keeper, excellent with her boys and a kind person. I know she had personal problems, but I think that is understandable as she had been through so much.

“Emotionally she felt she was still young. She wanted a husband to be there for her, to have a normal relationship with him.

“I would say that Diana was concerned about her safety, but was not paranoid about it.

“One day, in 1995, I had finished work and bumped into Diana outside the hospital. She had been visiting Mr Toffolo and was in her black Audi. She offered me a lift, but I declined because I only lived a stone’s throw away.

“I next saw her in a car just a couple of months later, maybe around December. It was a different one to the Audi. I think it was a BMW. I asked her what had happened to the Audi as it was such a lovely car. She told me that the brakes had been tampered with so she decided to change the car.
“Diana was convinced that Barry Mannakee, who had been one of her protection officers, was murdered in a motorbike accident. She was very upset by the way in which Charles chose to tell her about his death.
“They were on an official visit together and he decided to tell her at a moment when it was impossible for her to show her emotions. I asked her if she had had an affair with Barry Mannakee and she said that he had looked after her very well.
“Diana felt that it was not normal for a motorbike to have a head-on collision with a truck. I told her that these things do happen. She also said that if car brakes failed so often, then no one would buy cars.
“Diana said that following the Panorama interview, she had been told that there was an eavesdropping centre somewhere in the UK. We never discussed this further.
“She never wrote to me about any fears she had.
“I remember, in the winter of 1996, reading that Camilla Parker Bowles had had an accident and I mentioned this to Diana. She said that this was the second accident that Camilla had had, but that the first accident had not been reported in the press.
“She went on to say that, as a result, Charles had arranged security for Camilla. Diana then said that one of them had to go, Camilla or her. This was a one-off conversation we had and never discussed the matter again.
“I would be very naive to think that MI5 or MI6 did not have an interest in me because of my relationship with the Princess of Wales. I really did not think that I was ever under any threat from the authorities, although I am sure that had I stepped over the line, it may well have been a different matter. By this I mean that if I had ever harmed her or the boys, I would have been dealt with through the criminal justice system.
“During my relationship with Diana, I did receive a lot of anonymous threats through the post.
“I have received envelopes containing cut-out pictures of me together with a noose around my neck. This went on and on and it was very stressful.
“I did not tell anyone and I did not do anything about it, although I did mention it once to Diana. I did not want her to worry about it as I knew she tried so hard to protect me. I destroyed all of this mail.
“When I was seeing Diana, I didn’t have a mobile phone, so I would often ring her from a public phone box rather than from my own landline. Then I asked myself what good that was as her lines were probably being bugged anyway.
“I remember one particular day when I rang Diana to arrange to meet up, she told me that ”Dr Jarman“ was coming to see her, but that she would not be long with him.
“She said he was her mole and used the name ’Dr Jarman’ instead of his real name. I never asked too many questions and Diana was careful not to tell me too much as she wanted to protect me.
“On the odd occasion when she did try to tell me things, I used to stop her because it was none of my business, it did not interfere with my life and I did not want to be put in a position where I knew too much.
“In the last year of her life, Diana was just like any other normal person.
“The only worries she had were about her boys, as any mother would.
“I would say that Diana had been emotionally hurt in the past, but I never saw in her anything to suggest that she was mentally unstable. She had been traumatised by her mother leaving and became very close to her father afterwards.
“Diana did not have a good relationship with her mother. She did not approve of her daughter seeing me, a Pakistani and a Muslim. Diana stopped talking to her mother because of this.
“She had originally been good friends with Sarah Ferguson, but they had fallen out by the time she died.
“I think she had got over Charles’ affair with Camilla Parker Bowles and also Tiggy Legge-Bourke’s closeness with Princes William and Harry, which she had initially found difficult to accept.
“Although we never discussed her relationship with Prince Charles, I do believe she had got over their separation.
“As far as other members of the Royal Family are concerned, Diana was always very complimentary about the Queen. Although she did not like the Duke of Edinburgh, she never expressed any fear of him.
“I know that Mohamed Al Fayed had asked Diana many times to go on holiday with him and his family. He used to send her presents.
“On one occasion he sent her two computers for the Princes.
“When Diana went to St Tropez with Mr Al Fayed, everything was fine between us. I said goodbye to her the day she went as I had stayed with her the previous night at Kensington Palace. The boys were going with her too. I left Kensington Palace once she had gone.
“After a few days, I felt something was wrong. Her mobile kept going on to answerphone.
“When I did eventually speak to her, unbeknown to me, she had returned from her holiday with Mohamed Al Fayed, had been at home for either one or two nights and had then gone off to Paris.
“When you know someone very well, you know when something is not right and that is how I felt when I spoke to her.
“I told her I thought something was wrong because of the way she had been acting, but she just said that because of the geography of where she was, she was having problems getting a reception on her phone. I said we would talk when she got home.
“I next spoke to Diana when she had got back from her trip, but she was on her way with her boys to see her sister, Jane. We arranged to meet up in Battersea Park when she got home again.
“When we did meet up in Battersea Park, she was not her normal self and she kept looking at her mobile phone. I told her that I thought she had met somebody else and it must be someone from Mohamed Al Fayed’s contingent. I had no idea who it could be. As far as I knew, it could have been a bodyguard or anyone, but I just knew that she had changed since she had been away with Mr Al Fayed, so I guessed it must have been someone in his party.
“I knew that Mr Al Fayed had children, but at that stage I did not know of his eldest son, Dodi. I was surprised when she denied to me that there was anyone else.
“At the end of our meeting in Battersea Park we arranged to see each other again, the following day, at Kensington Palace. I can’t remember the exact date, but we met in Battersea Park within a couple of days of her returning from Paris. It was at this second meeting that Diana told me that it was all over between us.
“She denied there was anyone else involved. I told her that I strongly suspected there was someone else and I remember saying to her at the time ’You are dead’, meaning her reputation was dead.
“I said this because I was sure that it was someone from Mohamed Al Fayed’s group and that was how I felt about anyone involved with him.
“I did not know him personally, but I had read in the press about his business involvements and Diana had given me a general impression of him in the past.
“It was only when I heard the news on the radio that I learned about Dodi. I think she wanted to be with someone who was happy to be seen with her in public and she could do that with Dodi.
“Diana went away with her friend Rosa after this holiday with Mr Al Fayed and then went away again on Mr Al Fayed’s boat with, as I later found out, Dodi.
“I think that Diana finally realised that Al Fayed could give her all the things I could not. He had money and could provide the necessary security for her. You never see Al Fayed without six or seven bodyguards around him.
“Mohamed Al Fayed can stand up to anything. I cannot talk for his son as I didn’t know anything about him.
“I tried to ring Diana the night she died, but could not get through to her. I later found out that she had changed her number. I think she must have done this while she had been away. I had not rung her for a while because when I saw her with Dodi in the papers, I realised then who it was she had got involved with during her holiday.
“I never wrote Diana’s mobile number down. I just used to remember it. I cannot recall that number now though.
“I genuinely thought it was downhill now for Diana and I thought I would just sit on the sidelines and watch. By this, I mean I felt her relationship would be heading downwards as I had heard so much bad publicity about Dodi.
“I suppose it is possible that Diana was trying to make me jealous, but I do not believe that was the entire reason she was doing it.
“I think that when she had gone away on the boat she had felt protected and thought she would wait and see what happened with Dodi.
“These are just my thoughts. It is impossible to tell whether we would have got together again, but depending on what would have happened between her and Dodi, it could have been a possibility in the long run.
“I would be very surprised if Diana had made up her mind in two, three or four weeks of seeing Dodi to get married to him.
“Diana was a very good mother and was devoted to her boys. She would not have done anything to jeopardise them, and this would include bringing bad publicity on either herself or them.
“I think she would have thought things through very carefully before deciding to get married to Dodi.
“I would also be extremely surprised if she was pregnant when she died as she had been seeing Dodi for only a short time. We were together for two years and she was always very particular about taking her contraceptive pills.
“Had she been pregnant, she would definitely have told somebody.
“I think she would have kept the baby, had that been the case. I never had the opportunity to discuss Dodi with her.
“After our meeting in Kensington Palace, when she told me our relationship was over, I never had the chance to speak to her again.
“During our relationship, Diana used to talk to my family quite a lot and would visit my aunt and uncle in Stratford-upon-Avon when my grandmother was staying with them. She used to do this even without me.
“To my knowledge, Diana didn’t speak to any of my relatives during her first holiday when she was away with Mohamed Al Fayed and his family, but she may have spoken to them on her return.
“I think that when the news of Diana and Dodi came out in the press, she did ring a few people in my family to explain that she was not doing anything wrong. I think these were just wishy-washy phone calls in an attempt to make my family think she wasn’t a bad person for going away with Dodi.
“My uncle, Jawad Khan, has told me that he received a call from Diana whilst she was away. She told him that she was just friends with Dodi and that they were just enjoying a holiday together. As far as I am aware, she did not ring any of my relatives to ask them to mediate between us in an attempt to patch up our relationship. They would have told me if they had received such a call.
“In any case, I believe that had Diana wanted to patch things up between us, she would have rung me direct.
“Paul Burrell told me that Diana had said to him, during her second trip on the boat, ’I wonder what Hasnat will be thinking’. I think Diana was maybe wondering whether I would be affected emotionally.
“I have no views regarding a conspiracy and I think Diana could have married whomever she wanted.
“Personally, I think it was a tragic accident, but I am very surprised that she was not wearing a seat-belt at the time. She was always very particular about putting her seat-belt on.
“The other thing I find strange is that Paul Burrell said she didn’t have her mobile phone or purse with her at the time of the crash and this is very much out of character.
“I think that if Diana were alive today, we would have remained very good friends, whatever she did and whomever she was with. It is a huge loss when someone very close to you dies.
“I do not know what Diana was like in other relationships but she protected me very well, not just from the media but also from a lot of information. Perhaps she protected me because she thought we had a future together.”

Friday, December 19, 2014

Cynthia McKinney on truth-in-politics; John Morgan names Princess Diana's MI6 assassin

Friday 12/19 - Listen live - 8 to 10 pm Eastern on Revolution Radio:  - click on the "Studio B" button. To be rebroadcast Sunday 11 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. Eastern on  and then archived at the usual spot.
First hour: Cynthia McKinney was elected to Congress in 1992 and served six terms before running as the Green Party's 2008 presidential candidate. (Don't blame me - I voted for her!)

From Cynthia McKinney's biography: "On the first anniversary of the release of the 9/11 Commission Report, McKinney presided at a Congressional Briefing where dozens of experts and family members of 9/11 victims gave nine hours of testimony critiquing the Report's errors, omissions, and recommendations. Further testimony on 9/11 was heard at the Congressional Black Caucus' annual legislative weekend in September 2005, where McKinney also organized a brain trust panel dealing with political attacks on black musicians, including the MK-ULTRA and COINTELPRO programs conducted by the FBI from the 1950s to the 1970s." Her courageous grilling of Donald Rumsfeld on the 9/11 inside job is the stuff of legend.

Second hour: John Morgan says:

A bombshell new book published this week names the MI6 officer who headed the operation team that carried out the assassination of Princess Diana in Paris in late-August 1997. 

 The book entitled How They Murdered Princess Diana: The Shocking Truth is the most complete evidence-based account yet published on the car crash in the Alma Tunnel that took the lives of Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed. 

 Written by Australian author John Morgan – who has been researching the deaths for the past nine years – this book exposes Sherard Cowper-Coles, former British ambassador to Saudi Arabia, as the head of the assassination operation that orchestrated the car crash. Also revealed is substantial detail on how the murder was carried out – the naming of MI6 agents employed on the job and particulars about their respective roles. 

 The book reveals that Princess Diana was effectively murdered by deliberate mistreatment in her ambulance by people who were supposed to be saving her life. The author shows that this was a back-up plan which was automatically triggered after it became clear that Diana had survived the crash. 

Morgan has spent years studying and assessing the huge amount of evidence pertaining to the Paris crash – including over 8,000 pages of inquest transcripts and official police investigative reports. He also analysed and published over 500 documents that were secretly supplied to him in 2010. The explosive material – which included the official post-mortem reports for both Diana and Dodi – came from within the Scotland Yard Paget investigation, but all 500 plus documents had been fraudulently withheld from the inquest jury in London. 

 How They Murdered Princess Diana covers the entire story of what occurred, including the massive post-crash cover-up conducted by British authorities. The book exposes the official 2007-8 inquest into the deaths as one of the most corrupt court investigations in England’s judicial history. This is the first time the complete story has been addressed in such chilling detail – a true account using the witnesses own words that will at times leave the reader shocked, aghast and breathless. 

 A leading UK QC, Michael Mansfield, who served throughout the six months of the London inquest has stated: “I have no doubt that the volumes written by John Morgan will come to be regarded as the ‘Magnum Opus’ on the crash ... that resulted in the unlawful killing of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed and the cover-up that followed.” 

 Speaking from his home in Brisbane Morgan – who features in a London play titled Truth Lies Diana starting in Charing Cross Theatre in January 2015 – says that the time is approaching when the parties who carried out the assassination must be brought to justice. He said that “the Paris crash was one of the most highly-coordinated inter-governmental operations ever carried out – and the ensuing cover-up over many years has been just as coordinated and just as sinister”. Morgan continued: “Many in the public now know that an assassination occurred on that night in Paris and are hopeful that there will be some justice and the perpetrators will be called to account, sooner rather than later”.

WHO KILLED DIANA? - Best Video On This Subject

Brendon O'Connell

Up in smoke: How Fayed burned Harrods' 'cursed' Royal seals

War of words: Mohamed Al Fayed claims he had the prestigious royal warrants removed and burnt

War of words: Mohamed Al Fayed claims he had the prestigious royal warrants removed and burnt
He has waged a high-profile war of words on the Royal Family for years.
Now former Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed has revealed how he ordered the royal warrants in his store to be burned.
The flamboyant Egyptian tycoon described the prestigious seals as a 'curse' on his store.
He said he had them taken down and destroyed in 2000 after the Duke of Edinburgh withdrew his 44-year-old seal, angered by Mr Fayed's accusations of a plot to murder his son Dodi and Diana, Princess of Wales.
Prince Philip said at the time he decided not to renew the warrant as he no longer patronised the Knightsbridge store.
But in a letter to a newspaper yesterday, Mr Fayed said that he wished to clarify what had happened, having been outraged by an implication that the royals had had the warrants removed.
He wrote: 'This is not so. I ordered their removal. Later, I had them burned. They were a curse and business tripled following their removal.'
Harrods held warrants from the Queen, Duke of Edinburgh, the Queen Mother and the Prince of Wales, receiving its first in 1913.
Up in flames: The store's seals were destroyed by order of Fayed
Up in flames: The store's seals were destroyed by order of Fayed

The seals are given to people or companies which supply goods or services to the royals for five years or more.
Mr Fayed had accused Prince Philip in court of masterminding the deaths of Dodi and Diana in the Paris car crash in 1997. He also suggested Prince Charles was involved in the alleged death plot or cover-up. He claimed the killing took place to prevent the princess marrying a Muslim.
Years later, during the 2008 Diana inquest, he described the royals as 'that Dracula family'.
Mr Fayed, 77, sold Harrods to the Qatari royal family for £1.5billion in May and is due to step down as honorary chairman in November.
In his letter he said also urged the new owners to remove two memorials in the store to his son and the Princess of Wales. One consists of photographs of the pair as a backdrop to a pyramid-shaped display holding a wine glass still smudged with lipstick from the Princess's last dinner as well as a ring Dodi Fayed bought for her the day before they died.
The second, a statue of the couple, called Innocent Victims, was 'the only memorial to the Princess in this country', Mr Fayed wrote, 'if one discounts the misconceived municipal waterworks in Hyde Park that every year causes casualties among the children who slip over when paddling in it'.
He wrote '[It] should remind the world of what was lost when two young people, on the brink of happiness together, were killed.'
He said he doubted any members of the Royal Family 'would dare to show their faces' again in Harrods.
It was claimed recently that the Qataris had been considering removing the memorials. 

Remove the memorials: Mohamed Al Fayed says he has written to Harrods' new owners telling them to remove memorials to Diana, Princess of Wales, and Dodi Fayed, pictured here
Remove the memorials: Mohamed Al Fayed says he has written to Harrods' new owners telling them to remove memorials to Diana, Princess of Wales, and Dodi Fayed, pictured here

1 comment:

    "The book entitled How They Murdered Princess Diana: The Shocking Truth is the most complete evidence-based account yet published on the car crash in the Alma Tunnel that took the lives of Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed."
    I would love to read that book. A long time ago I watched the DVD documentary LADY DI (2 volumes) by Christopher Everard and they were excellent. The document on the same subject by David Ike (who is also known for his lies) was excellent (or good) as well.
    But, as usual, Muslims tend to have better answers to such assassinations as we know already in advance much about them because we are on the receiving end. For example, I did not have to watch a single footage about 9/11 (not a single second of anyone of them) to know that 19 Muslims did not do it! When I saw "the plane" enter into a concrete and steel building with Zero resistance, I did not have to watch any further. My elementary Physics was enough to immediately understand that the footage was fake!
    As for Dodi Fayed, I came to London in April in 1997 and it was there that I heard for the first time that an Arab Muslim was 'going out' with Princess Diana. I immediately stopped what I was doing and wrote a letter to Mr Al Fayed of Harrod's starting: DEAR MR FAYED, YOUR SON IS DEAD! And I went on to explain who and where he will be murdered. It was a wild guess, but I told Mr Fayed to remember Jean Seaberg who was murdered by the CIA in Paris. I never knew if he ever received my letter as he never replied to it. Yet, later I informed him about the letter on his own website and I still received no reply. In a letter to the Prime Minister of Mauritius "J'accuse", I mentioned this letter to Mr Fayed.
    I even travelled to Paris and walked from the Ritz Hotel to the Hospital where Diana was apparently terminated, eviscerated and embalmed which was totally forbidden by law. I asked to see the Doctor who carried out the embalming and I was not alowed to see him. This is the hospital where was son was born in 1982. The obstetrician was Pr Darbois.
    In brief, I knew already that Mr Fayed was going to be assassinated for obvious reasons. A Muslim? An Arab? A Princess bearing the child of a "filthy Arab", a Muslim? Even marrying an English Princess? No, never!
    Kevin, I congratulate you for your great Jihaad. I wished more people (and Muslims) were like you.