THE AXIS OF EVIL:USA, UK, EU & ISRAEL

911 False Flag - American Traitors & Mossad - Where are the Oath Keepers? - Ken O'Keefe

Published on 20 Dec 2014

This is the updated version (as of December 2014) of my 911 production originally broadcast on The Peoples Voice in January 2014. It has additional footage and commentary, improved graphics and is a direct response to David Cameron's ridiculous speech at the UN General Assembly in 2014.

Vic Sadot

14 hrs · Berkeley, CA, United States ·

PLEASE SHARE THIS POST: "We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo!" Why? Listen to the song! Lyrics provided. (5:30) Published 11-05-15 at Truth Troubadour YouTube Channel by Vic Sadot. http://youtu.be/0fhCw3hKBa0 The song was written by Vic Sadot Singer-Songwriter after reading the various views of 22 writers in the 2015 book of the same title this song is named for, We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo, edited by Dr. Kevin J Barrett. Kevin Barrett has a PhD in Arabist-Islamology studies, and has advanced degrees in English, French, and African Literature. He was fired from the University of Wisconsin for questioning 9/11, and he has been an activist, author, and host of radio shows ever since. Hear him on ‪#‎TruthJihad‬ radio and ‪#‎FalseFlagWeekly‬ live-stream on No Lies Radio. This is an artist’s response to the events and what has been written so far about them. Kevin Barrett contributed heavily to two of the six verses.

We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fhCw3hKBa0

This song was inspired by the book edited by Kevin Barrett by the same title. In fact, Kevin contributed ideas for two of these verses, making him a co-write...

youtube.com

Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Great! Congratulations! Unique and remarkable! Erratum: Nous ne sommes pas Charlie Hebdo Et, nous ne le serons jamais!

THANK YOU ET MERCI!

Basheer

CHARLIE HEBDO, HYPER CACHER - Affaire Merah : une coentreprise Mossad DCRI - Laurent Guyénot

Published on 26 Apr 2015

Vocalisation de l'article : http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr...

Notes :

[1] http://fr.euronews.com/2015/01/13/les...
[2] http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/201...
[3] Michael Ledeen, « What Machiavelli (A Secret Jew ?) Learned from Moses », Jewish World Review, 7 juin 1999, www.jewishworldreview.com/0699/machiavelli1.asp
[4] http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2012/...
[5] http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr...
[6] http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-fran...
[7] http://www.leprogres.fr/rhone/2012/03...
[8] http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/video/2...
[9] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qjQz...
[10] http://radiorcj.info/2012/03/20/7376/...
[11] Rowan Scarborough, « U.S. troops would enforce peace under Army study », The Washington Times, 10 septembre 2001.
[12] http://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/10/wor...
[13] Ces exemples et d’autres sont rapportés par Gordon Thomas dans son Histoire secrète du Mossad, de 1951 à nos jours, Nouveau Monde Editions, 2006.
[14] http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8rw...
[15] http://www.alterinfo.net/Les-fausses-...
[16] http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x99k.... Voir d’autres exemples encore sur http://cristos.over-blog.com/pages/Le...
[17] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rugVN...
[18] Christophe Barbier, dans « C dans l’air » (France 5), le 12 mars 2012.
[19] O. Recassens, D. Hassoux et C. Labbé, L’Espion du Président, Robert Laffont, 2012. Voir aussi http://www.franceinter.fr/emission-da...
[20] http://arthurzbygniew.blogspot.fr/201...
[21] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LSkZ...
[22] http://www.metrofrance.com/info/moham...
[23] http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/monde/...
[24] On serait alors dans le scénario du « complot piraté », hypothèse que j’ai développée depuis pour le 11-Septembre : http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr...
[25] Gordon Thomas, Histoire secrète du Mossad, de 1951 à nos jours, Nouveau Monde Editions, 2006, p. 410-41.
[26] http://www.wat.tv/video/proches-moham...
[27] http://www.ledauphine.com/faits-diver...
[28] http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-fran...
[29] http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/pol...
[30] http://www.jeanmarcmorandini.com/arti...
[31] http://www.numerama.com/magazine/2218...
[32] http://videos.tf1.fr/jt-20h/claude-gu...
[33] http://www.20minutes.fr/societe/90669...
[34] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LSkZ7...
[35] http://videos.tf1.fr/jt-we/les-detail...
[36] http://videos.tf1.fr/jt-we/les-detail...
[37] http://news.sky.com/home/video/16194180 : vidéo supprimée.
[38] http://www.europe1.fr/France/Merah-a-...
[39] http://lci.tf1.fr/france/faits-divers...
[40] http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2012/...
[41] http://www.sudouest.fr/2012/03/29/aff...
[42] http://www.france24.com/fr/20120323-c...
[43] http://oumma.com/11936/tuerie-de-toul...

Category
- News & Politics

Freaked out French President François Hollande attacks Dr Kevin Barrett over 'We Are Not Charlie Hebdo'

French President attacks me, wants to ban my “conspiracy theories”

Posted by Kevin Barrett on March 20, 2015

France freaks out over "We Are Not Charlie Hebdo"

Alain Soral : Judaïsme, talmudisme et sionisme

Published on 1 Oct 2013

Muhammad: A Prophet for Our Time

Published on 6 Jun 2013

Karen Armstrong talked about her book Muhammad: A Prophet for Our Time, published by Harper Collins in the Eminent Lives series. She described Muhammad, the prophet and founder of Islam, as a respectful man who ...

Who was Muhammad? By Non Muslims
Unfortunately there is a piece of human garbage who recorded idiotic vocals in the background!

Thurs 03/19/2015 False Flag Weekly News

Streamed live on 19 Mar 2015

CLICK THE LINK BELOW TO SEE TODAY’S NEWS STORIES AND THEIR SOURCE LINKS:
http://noliesradio.org/archives/96694

Enjoy this week’s False Flag Weekly News – before it gets banned! (Watch it above, or click here to see links to the stories we covered.)

The first country to ban us will probably be France, where Prime Minister François Hollande recently attacked me by name, while also calling for removing “conspiracy theories” (i.e., truthful reporting) from the internet:

The President of France orders you not to buy this book

“[Anti-Semitism] maintains conspiracy theories that spread without limits. Conspiracy theories that have, in the past, led to the worst…[The] answer is to realize that conspiracy theories are disseminated through the Internet and social networks. Moreover, we must remember that it is words that have in the past prepared extermination. We need to act at the European level, and even internationally, so that a legal framework can be defined, and so that Internet platforms that manage social networks are held to account and that sanctions be imposed for failure to enforce.” (source)

Hollande’s suggestion that “conspiracy theories” will be banned “at the European level, and even internationally” means that if he’s right, you may not be able to watch False Flag Weekly News much longer.

Actually, for all I know, we may already be banned in France. According to RINF.com:

“Earlier this week, the Interior Minister of France — with no court review or adversarial process — ordered five websites to not only be blocked in France, but that anyone who visits any of the sites get redirected to a scary looking government website, saying:

You are being redirected to this official website since your computer was about to connect with a page that provokes terrorist acts or condones terrorism publicly.”

Along with his statement calling for outlawing “conspiracy theories” Hollande issued a diatribe attacking me personally, alongside four other “leading conspiracist intellectuals.”
Why are the French authorities so angry with me?

They are freaking out about the new book I am about to publish, We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11.

The book has intellectual respectability and thus crossover potential and the ability to reach and influence people who matter. And it includes more than enough information for any reasonable reader to conclude that the Charlie Hebdo affair, like most of the other spectacular “Islamic terror attacks,” was a false flag operation.
In former times, books banned in the USA, like Ulysses and Naked Lunch, were printed in France and smuggled across the Atlantic. Will We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo have to be printed in North America and smuggled into France? Or will Hollande get his way and convince the US to revoke whatever is left of the First Amendment and ban it here too?

Hollande’s moves are just the latest in a series of trial balloons aimed at outlawing “conspiracy theories.” The initial impetus came from Obama’s former Information Czar Cass Sunstein, who argued that some day it may be necessary to ban “conspiracy theories,” but in the meantime governments should just “cognitively infiltrate” conspiracy movements and “disable the purveyors of conspiracy theories.”

Today, Western governments are already working overtime to “disable” truth-tellers. Check out Snowden’s leaked document exposing the war on alternative media:

Snowden: ‘Training Guide’ for GCHQ, NSA Agents Infiltrating and Disrupting Alternative Media Online

Another trial balloon came from UK PM David Cameron, who said that people like me are “nonviolent extremists” comparable to ISIS who need to be eradicated using all means at the government’s disposal.

Thanks, David, I love you too!
Ironically, it seems the Charlie Hebdo PR campaign, which was supposedly about defending free speech, has triggered the biggest crackdown on free speech in French history…a crackdown that is threatening to go global.

So if you actually do support free speech, please go to http://wearenotcharliehebdo.blogspot.com and purchase an advance copy of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11. As David Ray Griffin says, it’s a “breakthrough” book. Buy it while you can – and deliver a symbolic middle finger to François Hollande and the other state terrorists who “hate our freedoms.”

Kevin Barrett

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.

WE ARE NOT CHARLIE HEBDO - FREE THINKERS QUESTION THE FRENCH 9/11 - DR KEVIN J. BARRETT

We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

"A breakthrough in the study of State Crimes Against Democracy (SCADS). Never before have truth-seekers countered with such a comprehensive response to a likely false-flag operation so soon after it happened." -David Ray Griffin

"A necessary set of challenging responses to the Islamophobic manipulation of the Charlie Hebdo incident, suggesting the urgent relevance of dissent and suspicion in response to official versions of controversial events."- Richard Falk

Available soon from Sifting and Winnowing Books! Pre-order at the list price of $19.95 and avoid paying postage: Send $19.95 to S&W, POB 221, Lone Rock, WI 53556. The book will ship in early April.

Only one version of the Charlie Hebdo affair made the mainstream media: "Muslim extremists kill cartoonists and Jews." An officially-orchestrated response - "je suis Charlie" - followed.

But is there another side to the story?

Disturbing facts quickly emerged. Politicians, big media, the security industry, and arms manufacturers all rushed to cash in. And freedom of speech in France – the supposed target of the terrorists – was rolled back by the French government. Even as millions marched for Charlie, millions more sensed that something was very, very wrong.

In We Are Not Charlie Hebdo, twenty leading public intellectuals refuse the invitation to identify with "Je Suis Charlie." Jews, Muslims, Christians, Protestants, Catholics, atheists, people of the left and right, progressives and traditionalists, people from many different countries and ethnicities – all have united to say "we are NOT Charlie Hebdo." Most suspect the whole affair was a false flag operation or psy-op. (Evidence for that interpretation is presented in the book.) Others merely dissent from the official, mythic false consensus.

If you question what governments tell you…if you doubt the mainstream media version of events…if you are NOT Charlie Hebdo…then this book is for you.

Contributors

Zafar Bangash, editor, Crescent Magazine
Kevin Barrett, Press TV commentator and Veterans Today editor
Barry Chamish, author and investigative journalist
John Cobb, theology professor
Oe Dammegard, author
Laurent Guyénot, author
Anthony Hall, professor of Globalization Studies
Barbara Honegger, author and journalism professor
Shaykh Imran Hosein, Islamic scholar and geopolitical analyst
Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Thaddeus Kozinski, humanities professor
Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor, Tikkun
Cynthia McKinney, six-term congresswoman and Green Party presidential candidate
John Andrew Morrow, professor of Islamic Studies
Ashahed Muhammad, editor, The Final Call
Paul Craig Roberts, former editor of the Wall Street Journal and presidential advisor
Alain Soral, philosopher-activist
Yvonne Ridley, journalist
Ibrahim Soudy, structural engineer
Webster Tarpley, historian
Andre Vltchek, journalist and filmmaker

We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Deep State fraud triggers phony outpouring

4 Votes

Barrett says victims of the Paris shooting were not killed by Muslim extremists but by agents of the Deep State. (Image, Press TV)

By Barrie Zwicker and Graeme MacQueen (Special to Truth and Shadows)
Despite his being an international outlaw, Kevin Barrett of Wisconsin has been able to turn out a prodigious number of truth-oriented radio programs, articles and published books, including his latest, the anthology We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo! Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11.
Oh, right, that’s why he’s an international outlaw. His status was confirmed, at least north of the Canada-U.S. border, by Canada’s hard right Harper government. At the end of May the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) turned Barrett back at the border in a hostile manner, preventing him from fulfilling a Toronto speaking engagement.
Barrett might not have had much more luck entering France or Israel, considering that

many of the 22 contributors to We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo! provide evidence that those massacred in Paris did NOT die at the hands of jihadist Muslims but under orders from the Deep State, in a false flag operation with heavy Israeli involvement.
One can only hope that Barrett’s mistreatment at the hands of the politicized CBSA will spur sales of this important book.
Why is the book important? In part, because it’s a successful experiment—a rapidly-produced substantial response to a lethal state propaganda action.
Vincent Salandria, one of the first critics of the official narrative of the JFK assassination, wrote:

A successful political assassination is carried out to produce policy changes. Those policy changes generally take effect quickly. Consequently, it behooves a democratic citizenry to come promptly to their own reasoned conclusions about the killing of their head of state. Citizens cannot leave to their government, which under republican principals is their mere servant, to shape their thinking on such a vital issue. (1998)

Once a lethal event is staged—whether the event is the killing of a head of state, as in the case Salandria addressed, or a political massacre, as in the Charlie Hebdo case—the planned policy, legal and other actions and changes will rapidly be initiated: civil society’s critical response must also be rapid. Kevin Barrett rose to the occasion.
The obstacles are formidable. When elements of the state have facilitated or carried out the crime, the state will obscure the facts. It will drag its feet, produce distortions, red herrings, bombast, unbelievable coincidences and outright lies. It will do all in its considerable power to control the messaging while impeding citizens in their efforts to get at the facts. In this, the state has a distinct advantage.
After each lethal event a new truth community emerges. By definition, truth communities are chary about going beyond the evidence. Honouring evidence is at the heart of truth movements. By the same token, the state’s lies cannot always be clearly proven. Nevertheless, we must be courageously frank when we find official narratives unconvincing. We must proceed with what Bertrand Russell called “critical receptiveness.”
And this is the spirit of Barrett’s anthology. He offers readers a broad mix of thinkers with an array of approaches. Some authors concentrate on questioning the official account of the killings. Others leave this entirely to one side and concentrate on explaining how, regardless of what did or did not happen, the repressive response of the state must be rejected. Different authors, different emphases. But every contributor rejects “I am Charlie.”
The contributors provide a wide range of ideological positions as well as a range of views on religion. How unusual and refreshing for Muslims to be given a full voice. And to be able to read, in the same volume, an array of non-believers. (Vitchek: “I am an atheist, but I am not Charlie Hebdo!”) They all stir the pot as it must be stirred.
Do we, the reviewers, agree with everything in this book? Certainly not. Pro-humanist lefties that we are, we’re impatient with the heterosexist comments scattered through the volume, as well as with the claim, expressed by Barrett and one or two of the contributors, that secularism is a blight. Barrett writes:

Today, all of the features of pre-1960s American society would be decried by the radical secularists who have seized power in the West as symptoms of massive and systematic discrimination in favor of religious believers against non-believers.

We think it most dubious that pre-1960s American society is a worthy benchmark. And Barrett, uncharacteristically, has not made his claim well. More importantly, we don’t agree at all that “radical secularists” have seized power in the West; we would say it is militaristic market-fundamentalist capitalists, who see religious groupings as pawns while insincerely trotting out defenses of liberal freedoms when it suits them, that have seized power.
Barrett asks: “Will we have a pluralistic religious world or an irreligious McWorld of ruthlessly-enforced and globally-uniform ‘totalitarian tolerance?’ That is the real question underlying the debate about human rights and religion.”
But is that the real question? We don’t think so. We think that undermining a viciously immoral empire can be accomplished only by people of clear moral vision, but we have seen that some of these people will be conventionally religious and some not. Religion historically has not proven itself a reliable protector of life, or of the vulnerable, or of freedom, or of the creative spirit. That Pope Francis is proving such a departure from most of his predecessors highlights this opinion.
We don’t for a moment suggest, however, that we disagree with most of Barrett’s contributions. On the contrary, we find them informed, thoughtful and original.
Under Barrett’s guidance, the defence of Muslims and of Islam is a major theme of this book, and we believe this is as it should be. Several contributors explicitly or implicitly pose the question about the Hebdo killings: “Who benefitted?” The answer is that it could not be Muslims. Quite the reverse. Once again Muslims are the generalized scapegoats. Israel, however, was an immediate beneficiary—which, as several contributors note, was also the case with 9/11.
Specific or circumstantial linkages with Israel include, as John Andrew Morrow writes, that Charlie Hebdo “deliberately set out to offend the sensibilities of Christian and Muslim believers. Tellingly, however, the paper never provoked Jews.” Why?
Charlie Hebdo in fact was extra-sensitive about possibly offending Jews. Back in 2009 Charlie Hebdo cartoonist Maurice Sinet, known to the world as Siné, faced charges of “inciting racial hatred” for a column he wrote following the engagement of Jean Sarkozy to Jessica Sebaoun-Darty, heiress of a major consumer electronics company. Commenting on rumours that Jean intended to convert from Catholicism to Judaism (Jessica’s religion) for social success, Siné quipped, “He’ll go a long way in life, that little lad.” Charlie Hebdo‘s editor, Philippe Val, said Sinet’s piece was offensive and asked Siné to apologize. Siné refused, saying, “I’d rather cut my balls off.” He was fired, which arguably saved his life. Plus he won the lawsuit.
Barbara Honegger writes that leading up to the Paris shootings “the lower house of the French Parliament voted to recommend the recognition of Palestine as a state, to which Israeli prime minister Netanyahu warned that France was making a grave mistake; and France had voted in favor of International Criminal Court (ICC) membership for Palestine at the United Nations. France was also spearheading an effort at the U.N. to pass a Security Council resolution to restart and conclude the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, and the French foreign minister had stated publicly that if it failed, France would officially recognize Palestine as a state. With France taking multiple official measures openly sympathetic to Muslim Palestinians, real Islamic zealots would never have chosen such a time to murder innocent French civilians.”
Other and broader strands in the book include:

The abuse and manipulation of language in the service of hatred and mass murder. “Terrorist, like other terms of abuse directed mainly at Muslims, is a weaponized term designed to legitimize ethnically-specific mass murder. Obviously one cannot fight a war against an abstract noun; the term war on terror makes no sense except as part of a homicidal conditioning program. The bizarre notion of a ‘war on terror’ is a euphemism for ‘mass murdering Muslims’ who are the main recipients of the terrorist label,” Barrett writes in the opening piece.
The psychological dimension of false flag ops. “The people who script false flag events like to hit our subconscious to get us going emotionally. So here we have a Jewish synagogue, and the street name is Crystal Street. It could be a coincidence,” says Danish investigative journalist Ole Dammegard. “They’re going for the emotional impact, following the problem-reaction-solution template. And the emotion this time is for us to feel sorry for the Jewish population and blame someone else, take the pressure off the state of Israel so they can continue doing what they’re doing.”
The timing of false flag ops repeatedly shows that they cannot be pure happenstance. Besides Barbara Honegger’s points about France being sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, Webster Tarpley pointed out that President Hollande had also called for the lifting of sanctions against Russia and was preparing to sign a compromise agreement on Ukraine in Astana on January 15th. On January 7th, just eight days before this potential détente the Charlie Hebdo massacre derailed everything. The Astana meeting was called off.
Additionally, Tarpley notes, Hollande in a radio interview two days before the massacre, “demanded an end to the economic sanctions imposed on Ukraine Russia. Second, he rejected the idea that France should militarily occupy Libya, a reckless adventure. Thirdly, he undercut both German Chancellor Merkel and Greek Prime Minister Samaras by assuming a very relaxed posture in regard to the January 25th Greek elections, in sharp contrast to the hysterical scare propaganda being heard around the EU about the apocalyptic dangers of a Syriza victory.
“On the Russia sanctions,” Tarpley continues, “Hollande stated categorically: ‘I think the sanctions must stop now. They must be lifted if there is progress. If there is no progress the sanctions will remain…Mr. Putin does not want to annex eastern Ukraine. He has told me that…What he wants is to remain influential. What he wants is for Ukraine not to fall into the NATO camp.’
“It was pure heresy,” concludes Tarpley, “one of the biggest breaks with the Anglo-Saxon lockstep since the death of de Gaulle.”
The rampant hypocrisy of the Western world, the American Empire and perhaps Zionism most of all. “The hypocrisy and double standards have become stupendous,” writes Tony Hall. “They are marked in the disparity between hate speech laws designed to silence criticism of Israel and Zionism on the one hand and officialdom’s encouragement and embrace of expressions of Islamophobia on the other.”
Freedom of speech is not absolute anywhere, and its defense is frequently entangled with the hypocrisies. As Lawrence Davidson writes: “On January 10th, French Prime Minister Manuel Valls declared war against ‘radical Islam’ because its practitioners had attacked ‘our values, which are universal.’ That last claim is an example of French hubris getting in the way of reality. For better or worse, French values are definitely not universal. They are just another version of culturally determined practices which, in terms of speech, set the limits of what the powers-that-be find permissible. These limits may be broader than the ones promoted by Islamists but, as we have seen, they are not open-ended.”
This book could sport an internal awards system. We propose two categories. First is Paragraph Most Likely to be Remembered as a Tour de Force.

Our candidate is this by Thaddeus J. Kozinski: “When a narrative emerges whose explanation for a massively violent event and the meaning of the concomitant crisis becomes official, unquestionable, and authoritative; when it includes, and without empirical evidence or investigative inquiry, the assignation of innocence and exceptionalism to the victims, and utter depravity and terrifying power to the designated criminals; when dissent from this narrative is socially forbidden, even to the extent of legal harassment and prosecution; when it spawns behavior in contradiction with itself, such as the committing of acts of terror in the name of eradicating terrorism, or restricting and punishing free speech in the name of expanding and protecting it; when the narrative is immediately supported, echoed, and policed by the vast majority of the ruling classes, including both the mainstream and “alternative” (gate-keeping) left and right; when it successfully unites and synthesizes otherwise opposed factions of the [population]—liberals with neoconservatives, libertarians with statists, humanists with Nietzscheans, theists with atheists; when rational scrutiny and frank discussion of obvious explanatory holes in the narrative are forbidden; and when the ritualistic, annual remembrance of an event and recitation of its hallowed story, particularly the harrowing portrayal of the demonic villains to which it assigns all blame for both the increasing domestic strife among citizens and the perpetual Manichean war against the newest “enemy,” instills and evokes primordial fear and religious awe in the [population]; when the narrative of an event or series of connected events possesses all of these attributes, or even just a few of them, we know we are dealing with no chance and ordinary phenomenon.”
Wow!
The Single Chapter to Read if You Don’t Read Any Others Award, for these reviewers, goes to former U.S. Congresswoman and courageous Truth and human rights activist Cynthia McKinney.
McKinney offers a very helpful theoretical framework. She envisions the world’s diverse campaigns against Deep State deception as parts of a unitary “global truth movement,” a “complex adaptive system” essential at this moment in history.
“Unmasking the Deep State,” she adds, “is the best way to thwart its accelerating merger with the Public State—a circumstance that could render the political process and the operation of the Public State irrelevant.”
McKinney also earns a Special Mention for Best Metaphor. After referring to the multi-pronged and successful campaign to unseat her after she served six Congressional terms with distinction she writes:
“Most of the current crop of Congresspersons know from my example that the Deep State is riddled with landmines of self-protection. Best to say nothing, do nothing, and know nothing—for any motion at all could set off a deadly device.”
This speaks volumes to the suppression and manipulation of legislators in the “free Western democracies.”

We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Deep State fraud triggers phony outpouring

4 Votes

Barrett says victims of the Paris shooting were not killed by Muslim extremists but by agents of the Deep State. (Image, Press TV)

A successful political assassination is carried out to produce policy changes. Those policy changes generally take effect quickly. Consequently, it behooves a democratic citizenry to come promptly to their own reasoned conclusions about the killing of their head of state. Citizens cannot leave to their government, which under republican principals is their mere servant, to shape their thinking on such a vital issue. (1998)

Today, all of the features of pre-1960s American society would be decried by the radical secularists who have seized power in the West as symptoms of massive and systematic discrimination in favor of religious believers against non-believers.

The abuse and manipulation of language in the service of hatred and mass murder. “Terrorist, like other terms of abuse directed mainly at Muslims, is a weaponized term designed to legitimize ethnically-specific mass murder. Obviously one cannot fight a war against an abstract noun; the term war on terror makes no sense except as part of a homicidal conditioning program. The bizarre notion of a ‘war on terror’ is a euphemism for ‘mass murdering Muslims’ who are the main recipients of the terrorist label,” Barrett writes in the opening piece.
The psychological dimension of false flag ops. “The people who script false flag events like to hit our subconscious to get us going emotionally. So here we have a Jewish synagogue, and the street name is Crystal Street. It could be a coincidence,” says Danish investigative journalist Ole Dammegard. “They’re going for the emotional impact, following the problem-reaction-solution template. And the emotion this time is for us to feel sorry for the Jewish population and blame someone else, take the pressure off the state of Israel so they can continue doing what they’re doing.”
The timing of false flag ops repeatedly shows that they cannot be pure happenstance. Besides Barbara Honegger’s points about France being sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, Webster Tarpley pointed out that President Hollande had also called for the lifting of sanctions against Russia and was preparing to sign a compromise agreement on Ukraine in Astana on January 15th. On January 7th, just eight days before this potential détente the Charlie Hebdo massacre derailed everything. The Astana meeting was called off.
Additionally, Tarpley notes, Hollande in a radio interview two days before the massacre, “demanded an end to the economic sanctions imposed on Ukraine Russia. Second, he rejected the idea that France should militarily occupy Libya, a reckless adventure. Thirdly, he undercut both German Chancellor Merkel and Greek Prime Minister Samaras by assuming a very relaxed posture in regard to the January 25th Greek elections, in sharp contrast to the hysterical scare propaganda being heard around the EU about the apocalyptic dangers of a Syriza victory.
“On the Russia sanctions,” Tarpley continues, “Hollande stated categorically: ‘I think the sanctions must stop now. They must be lifted if there is progress. If there is no progress the sanctions will remain…Mr. Putin does not want to annex eastern Ukraine. He has told me that…What he wants is to remain influential. What he wants is for Ukraine not to fall into the NATO camp.’
“It was pure heresy,” concludes Tarpley, “one of the biggest breaks with the Anglo-Saxon lockstep since the death of de Gaulle.”
The rampant hypocrisy of the Western world, the American Empire and perhaps Zionism most of all. “The hypocrisy and double standards have become stupendous,” writes Tony Hall. “They are marked in the disparity between hate speech laws designed to silence criticism of Israel and Zionism on the one hand and officialdom’s encouragement and embrace of expressions of Islamophobia on the other.”
Freedom of speech is not absolute anywhere, and its defense is frequently entangled with the hypocrisies. As Lawrence Davidson writes: “On January 10th, French Prime Minister Manuel Valls declared war against ‘radical Islam’ because its practitioners had attacked ‘our values, which are universal.’ That last claim is an example of French hubris getting in the way of reality. For better or worse, French values are definitely not universal. They are just another version of culturally determined practices which, in terms of speech, set the limits of what the powers-that-be find permissible. These limits may be broader than the ones promoted by Islamists but, as we have seen, they are not open-ended.”
This book could sport an internal awards system. We propose two categories. First is Paragraph Most Likely to be Remembered as a Tour de Force.

Alain Soral et Dieudonné à la journée "Je ne suis pas Charlie" (27 juin 2015)

Published on 7 Jul 2015

Le 27 juin 2015, Alain Soral et Dieudonné ont donné une conférence commune au théâtre de la Main d’Or à Paris, dans le cadre de la journée « Je ne suis pas Charlie ». ERTV et Quenel+ étaient sur place !

Source : http://www.dailymotion.com/ERTV
Plus d'infos : http://www.sharp-infoclash.com

http://www.phdnm.org/

Video avec soustitres anglais / Video with english subtitles

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApS5wEpxGqE

Lourdement condamné et désormais sans travail...

AIDEZ VINCENT REYNOUARD

Heavily condemned and now without work ...
HELP VINCENT REYNOUARD

Vincent Reynouard est le desperado du révisionnisme. Il a l'intention de se battre et de délivrer son message jusqu'au bout, c'est-à-dire jusqu'à son dernier jour de liberté ou jusqu'à son départ forcé en exil.
VOUS POUVEZ L'AIDER en lui donnant sur le compte suivant :

Titulaire : Siegfried VERBEKE

---------------------------
Pour un virement international :
IBAN : BE35 2200 0505 3837
BIC (BANK IDENTIFIER CODE) :
GEBABEBB

----------------------------
Envoi direct d'argent :
Vous pouvez également envoyer de l'argent sous enveloppe à l'adresse suivante :
Siegfried Verbeke
Italiëlei, 203B
B-2000 ANTWERPEN (Belgique)

Ou alors l'envoyer à Vincent Reynouard par Western Union.
Pour savoir comment faire cliquez ici.

Vincent Reynouard is the "desperado" of the revisionist fight. He intends to fight and to deliver its message to the end, that is to say, until his last day of freedom or until his forced departure into exile.
YOU CAN HELP giving it directly to this account:
Holder: Siegfried VERBEKE
----------------------

For an international money transfer :

IBAN INTERNATIONAL BANK ACCOUNT NUMBERIBAN : BE35 2200 0505 3837
BIC (BANK IDENTIFIER CODE) :
GEBABEBB
-------------------------
You can also send money in an envelope to the following address:
Siegfried Verbeke
Italiëlei, 203B
B-2000 ANTWERPEN (Belgium)

Or, you can send money to Reynouard on line with Western Union: click here.

Bienvenue à vous, visiteur.
Sur cette page d'accueil, une petite série de vidéos
qui nous présentent
et qui répondent aux premières objections
qu'on nous oppose généralement...

Accès direct
à notre catalogue

cliquez ici

6 mois de prison ferme requis contre V. Reynouard pour cette BD...

La bande-dessinée
poursuivie par Charlie-Hebdo et
qui résume l'argumentation révisionniste
(cliquez sur l'image pour la télécharger gratuitement au format pdf)

J'ai fait un rêve

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgjeBEm39L8
L'Histoire (officielle) est écrite par les vainqueurs...

Pas sérieux, les "négationnistes" ?

Avoir raison contre tous ? C'est possible...

débloquer la vidéo

Peut-on être objectif quand on se revendique national-socialiste ?

Réponse à l'historien Georges Bensoussan

Pourquoi ils nous censurent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzekk6yaMDE

Il n'est pas question de persécuter qui que ce soit...
Non à la haine

Notre catalogue complet en ligne : plus de 120 titres (brochures, livres, vidéos) à partir de 0,5 €

Cliquez ici pour le consulter

Notre chaîne Youtube

Cliquez ici

Cliquez ici pour un aperçu du dernier numéro.
Pour acheter le numéro 90-91 : cliquez ici
Pour vous abonner (6 mois ou un an) : cliquez ici

Découvrez la BD que Vincent Reynouard a réalisée pendant son séjour en prison...

Pour nous soutenir dans notre combat

Pour nous soutenir, rien de plus facile : des timbres poste (français) ou un petit billet glissé dans un petite carte sous enveloppe, le tout à l'adresse suivante : Siegfried Verbeke - Italiëlei, 203B - B-2000 ANTWERPEN (Belgique. Envoi anonyme si vous le souhaitez, donc sans aucune trace. A l'heure de la guérilla, adoptons les méthodes de guérilla...

Pour tout contact ou pour donner afin de soutenir la cause :

- e-mail : contact@phdnm.org
- adresse postale : Siegfried Verbeke - Italiëlei, 203B - B-2000 ANTWERPEN (Belgique)

Jim Condit Jr. - The Zionist Take-Over of the Catholic Church

Published on 23 Dec 2014

Jim Condit Jr with Eric Hufschmid in September 2006, on how the Rothschilds took over the Roman Catholic Church between 1958 and 1965, after they already took over the worldwide financial operations of the Vatican in 1823. The Jesuit Order was founded by Los Alumbrados (with 80% Marrano Jews), financed by Dutch and Spanish Jews. The Knights Templar were agents of the Guilhemids, descendants of Prince Rabbi Makhir, King of the Jews in exile in the 8th century, and uncle of Charlemagne.

Jim Condit on the Crypto-Jewish popes Paul VI and John Paul II; the sudden death of Pope John Paul I; Pope Pius X and Zionist leader Theodor Herzl; The ADL of B'nai B'rith vs Mel Gibson; The Jewish Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, Vatican II (Second Vatican Council 1962-1965), Malachi Martin and his Crypto-Jewish master Cardinal Augustin Bea; The Converso Jew Gregory Baum who reformed the Catholic Education in the 1960s and 1970s; The Pharisees and the Crucifixion of Christ; Father Denis Fahey's Rulers of Russia; Douglas Reed; Leonard Bernstein and the death of the Cardinal of Cincinnati; Gary Giuffre; Michael Rose; The Crypto-Jewish Catholic Church busy recruiting Sodomites; and very much more.

THE CONCLUSION OF MY LIFE-LONG RESEARCH
I totally agree with Jim Condit Jr. as I have witnessed first hand the Zionist takeover of the Catholic Churches in Mauritius, France and Britain. This was the main reason why I left the Secular, Sodomite, Paedophile, Socialist, Communist, Zionist Catholic Church as soon as I saw the damages done by Council Vatican II and the appointment of Jew Lustiger as Archbishop of Paris.

I saw the Vatican colluding with Talmudist Jews regarding the Dead Sea Scrolls, Palestine, and other world matters. The Jesuits behind everything is a Protestant Zionist shit!

The reason why Jews have been able to take over all the top jobs, businesses, banks, industries, media, and the Vatican is BECAUSE OF THE ZIONIST PROTESTANTS WHO WANTED TO DESTROY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH!

Now, we understand why Tony Blair embraced Judeo-Zionist Catholicism, why Prince Charles attacked Muslims, why France defended Charlie Hebdo, why Britain has now declared war on Islam and Muslims, and why the entire Judeo-Zionist West has declared an all out TALMUDADE against Muslims mass murdering them wholesale, together with their Christian neighbours, destroying their lands and civilisation, enslaving and de-Islamizing the Survivors of the greatest Holocaust in World History!

BAFS

DR KEVIN BARRETT

Thursday, March 26, 2015

I'm Not Anti-Semitic (the poem)

(In memory of Helen Thomas. -KB)

One day I read an email
And received distressing news:
Of anti-Semitism
I had been falsely accused

But I'm not anti-Semitic,
I like the Jews just fine
In Troy New York or Timbuktu:
Any place but Palestine

The anti-Defamation league
Put the kibosh on me
They said that I believed in a
"Jewish conspiracy"

I'm not anti-Semitic,
I like the Jews just fine
In Northfield, Minnesota:
Any place but Palestine

It's true that Jewish thugs conspired
To steal the Holy Land
But now it seems that saying so
Is grounds for being banned

I'm not anti-Semitic,
I like the Jews just fine
In heaven, hell or Hollywood:
Any place but Palestine

They've drowned the holy land in blood
So please do not be peeved
When I say, with Helen Thomas,
That it's time for them to leave

I'm not anti-Semitic,
I like the Jews just fine
Next door or north of outer space:
Any place but Palestine

Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Excellent News!
Jews have now recovered their homeland again with American help: UKRAINE!
Basheer

Friday, 20 March 2015

Freaked out French President François Hollande attacks Dr Kevin Barrett over 'We Are Not Charlie Hebdo'

THE AXIS OF EVIL:USA, UK, EU & ISRAEL

911 False Flag - American Traitors & Mossad - Where are the Oath Keepers? - Ken O'Keefe

Comments

CHARLIE HEBDO, HYPER CACHER - Affaire Merah : une coentreprise Mossad DCRI - Laurent Guyénot

Category

Freaked out French President François Hollande attacks Dr Kevin Barrett over 'We Are Not Charlie Hebdo'

French President attacks me, wants to ban my “conspiracy theories”

Alain Soral : Judaïsme, talmudisme et sionisme

Kevin Barrett

We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

"A breakthrough in the study of State Crimes Against Democracy (SCADS). Never before have truth-seekers countered with such a comprehensive response to a likely false-flag operation so soon after it happened." -David Ray Griffin

Alain Soral et Dieudonné à la journée "Je ne suis pas Charlie" (27 juin 2015)

http://www.phdnm.org/

Lourdement condamné et désormais sans travail...

AIDEZ VINCENT REYNOUARD

Heavily condemned and now without work ...HELP VINCENT REYNOUARD

Bienvenue à vous, visiteur. Sur cette page d'accueil, une petite série de vidéos qui nous présentent et qui répondent aux premières objections qu'on nous oppose généralement...

6 mois de prison ferme requis contre V. Reynouard pour cette BD...

La bande-dessinée poursuivie par Charlie-Hebdo etqui résume l'argumentation révisionniste(cliquez sur l'image pour la télécharger gratuitement au format pdf)

J'ai fait un rêve

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgjeBEm39L8 L'Histoire (officielle) est écrite par les vainqueurs...

Pas sérieux, les "négationnistes" ?

Avoir raison contre tous ? C'est possible...

Peut-on être objectif quand on se revendique national-socialiste ?

Réponse à l'historien Georges Bensoussan

Pourquoi ils nous censurent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jzekk6yaMDE

Il n'est pas question de persécuter qui que ce soit...Non à la haine

Notre catalogue complet en ligne : plus de 120 titres (brochures, livres, vidéos) à partir de 0,5 €

Découvrez la BD que Vincent Reynouard a réalisée pendant son séjour en prison...

Pour nous soutenir dans notre combat

Pour tout contact ou pour donner afin de soutenir la cause :

truthjihad.com blog

Thursday, March 26, 2015

I'm Not Anti-Semitic (the poem)

About Me

THE FRENCH CONNECTION

Heavily condemned and now without work ...
HELP VINCENT REYNOUARD

Bienvenue à vous, visiteur.
Sur cette page d'accueil, une petite série de vidéos
qui nous présentent
et qui répondent aux premières objections
qu'on nous oppose généralement...

La bande-dessinée
poursuivie par Charlie-Hebdo et
qui résume l'argumentation révisionniste
(cliquez sur l'image pour la télécharger gratuitement au format pdf)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgjeBEm39L8
L'Histoire (officielle) est écrite par les vainqueurs...

Il n'est pas question de persécuter qui que ce soit...
Non à la haine