Recently
I asked, “If bin Laden didn’t do 9/11, then who did”? In responding to
the question, I highlighted the importance of several Zionist Jews in
the planning and the implementation of the 9/11 false flag. I placed
particular emphasis on the role of the Orientalist scholar, Bernard
Lewis, as well as on Michael Chertoff. On the day of September 11, 2001,
Chertoff was in charge of the criminal division of the US Dept. of
Justice including the FBI. Lewis was instrumental in inventing and
elaborating the bin Laden-based fantasy that prevails to this day as a
prominent part of a fabricated narrative of 9/11 still being deployed to
subjugate the public.
Chertoff
was in charge of destroying as much evidence as possible concerning
what really happened on 9/11. As he worked hard to hide and destroy
various proofs of what had really happened, Chertoff simultaneously
directed the concoction of much fake evidence. Prominent among
counterfeited material was the FBI release on 28 Sept. 2001, of a
compilation of the facial photographs of 19 Arab men. These individuals
were named and pictured by the FBI as the supposed hijackers widely
equated in the media with suicide bombers.
Many
of the Arab men in the photographs later turned up very much alive and
well in various places. In fact genuine scholars have repeatedly exposed
as a fraud the whole hijacking story, both its various parts as well as
in its totality. One of those who exposed in stages the fabricated
story of the pretend hijackers is Claremont Graduate University
Professor, David Ray Griffin. Between 2004 and 2017, Prof. Griffin
developed his position in the course of researching and writing 11 books
highly critical of various aspects of the official narrative. These
include The New Pearl Harbour Revisited (2012) and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2004). See
https://americanswhotellthetruth.org/portraits/david-ray-griffin/
Other contributors to this subject of the falsified accounts of the hijackers include Jay Kolar in the peer-reviewed, The Hidden History of 9/11 edited by Paul Zarembka, (2008). In Hijacking America’s Mind: Counterfeiting Evidence (2013),
Elias Davidsson has meticulously chronicled the many disparities
between the myth of the hijackers and what the existing evidence shows
and does not show.
In
summing up these and other accounts, Craig McKee explains that there is
“not a shred of evidence that any 9/11 ‘hijackers’ boarded any planes.”
https://truthandshadows.com/2015/03/19/hijackers-did-not-board-planes/
Pulling
out the concocted story of the Arab hijackers from the 9/11 fable,
essentially collapses the underlying illusion on which the whole 9/11
fable depends. If no hijackers boarded and seized control of passenger
jets, what was going on with the kamikaze airliner televised live in
Manhattan hitting the South Tower? Were military drones made to stand in
for passenger jets in the scripted drama authored and directed by the
real culprits?
As
for pilling on physical impossibilities on top of fictional narratives,
how are we to explain the televised clip of what was said to be an
aluminum passenger jet cutting through multiple massive columns of
high-grade steel without even slowing down the projectile?
One
would have expected that the impact of the aluminum-steel collision to
have shattered the jet, but especially its wings, into millions of
confetti-like bits. Instead we see the plane absorbed in tact into the
building much like a hot knife cutting smoothly into soft butter.
On
the day of 9/11 Donald Trump drew was interviewed. The future US
President drew on his inside knowledge of the Twin Towers’ steel
construction, explaining his theory the South Tower’s steel exterior
could not have been breached by an airplane no matter how sturdy. He
speculated that the bizarre crash filmed from many different angles
probably involved the detonation of bombs.
The fact that the concocted hijackers saga, complete with jihadists
wielding box cutters and passengers making cell phones that could not
have happened, reminds me of how jurist Reiner Fuellmich frames the
discussion of the manufactured COVID panic. The Covidians’ psychological
manipulations depended on their producing mountains of counterfeit
evidence of fast-mounting COVID cases produced by a purposely faulty PCR
test. The concocted hijacker stories, like the production of the
fictional “COVID cases,” created a fake foundation on which to build a
host of illusions meant to scare the public into taking gene-altering
jabs as well as submitting to mounting authoritarian control.
What
do I mean when I attribute much of the responsibility for the 9/11
debacle to those many components of organized Jewry that advance the
cause of Zionism? Zionism is a form of Jewish nationalism that coalesced
over several decades resulting in the establishment in 1947-48 of the
country of Israel. After the Jewish state was established, Zionism
continued in the quest to continue the military elimination and
displacement of Israel’s enemies, many of them Arab Muslims. Zionist
objectives also include the constant push to increase the size of
Israel’s Jewish population as well as to expand the extent of its
geographic, economic and political reach.
Zionism
is a truly a global movement whose proponents, some of whom are avid
Christian Zionists, picture Israel as the national home of international
Jewry. Some go further, picturing Jerusalem as the future site of the
world’s primary centre of learning, science and governance hosting the
Third Temple with a restored Sanhedrin of Jewish sages.
Backed
by the Israeli government, Zionist agencies in many countries are known
for spying. This Israeli and Zionist preoccupation with spying is
rampant in the United Sates. One of the goals of the covert incursions
is to silence criticism of Israel for its often ruthless treatment of
Arabs in or around the Jewish state. Much of this ruthlessness is aimed
at Palestinians, but especially at those incarcerated in the open-air
prison of Gaza as well as at those that persist in clinging to their
rightful lands illegally seized from them in 1967 on the West Bank of
the Jordan River.
With
the backing of key members of the Rothschild banking clan, the Zionist
agenda gathered momentum throughout the twentieth century as as a
leading project embraced by the complex of interests driving the rise of
the Anglo-Empire. A key to enhancing the Jewish and Zionist influence
within the Anglo-American Empire was the establishment of the US Federal
Reserve in 1913.
The
1913 Enactment stripped away much of the USA’s sovereign authority over
financial affairs. Paul Warburg was the main architect of the 1913
Enactment. Warburg did much of the hands-on engineering to make the new
US Federal Reserve an extension of the European system of privatized
central banking. This banking weave runs throughout the
Rothschild-Warburg complex of finance and family lineages. The picture
above includes Wall Street Banker, J.P. Morgan. In 1913 he was the
covert New York representative of the Rothschild/Bank of England complex
integral to the secret operations of the City of London.
September
11, 2023, marks the 22nd anniversary of 9/11. Twenty-two years before
9/11 the family of Benjamin Netanyahu stepped forward in 1979 to host
the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. This conference
helped lay the groundwork for what would become the US-led Global War on Terror. George H.W. Bush, a former CIA Director and future US President, contributed to the proceedings.
The
exploitation of “terrorism” as both a political tool and as a term of
political propaganda forms an integral part of Israel’s history. As with
the Lavon Affair in 1954 and the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in
1967, the founders of Israel regularly engaged in well-organized
terrorism to advance their agendas. One of the best known examples is
the blowing up by the Jewish militia, Irgun, of the King of the David
Hotel in Jerusalem in 1946. The aim was to expel the British government
from its Mandatory Rule over Palestine in order to clear the way for
Israel’s establishment.
Like
Menachem Begin, Benjamin Netanyahu comes from an extreme branch of
Revisionist Zionism aimed at creating an enlarged Israel hostile to any
integration of the land’s native Arabs. Now in 2023 Netanyahu has
alienated many Israeli citizens by embracing the outer extremes of
religious Zionism. This extremism extends to the Jewish supremacism
celebrated in the teachings in the 1980s of Rabbi Meir Kahane. Rabbi
Kahane’s legacy has been adopted by Netanyahu’s current National
Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir.
Itamar Ben-Gvir Electioneering with Benjamin Netanyahu
The
strategy of the Netanyahu family in convening the Jerusalem Conferences
in 1979 was to alter the image of Israel’s enemies by depicting them as
enemies of the entire “West,” but especially of the US superpower. This
goal was achieved in September of 2001 when the likes of Benjamin
Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, Paul Wolfowitz, Robert Kagan, Bernard Lewis and
Dick Cheney led the widespread misrepresentation of what really happened
on 9/11. By acting decisively on this misrepresentation as if it was
true, the influence of Zionism would surge especially where it counts
the most, namely in the United States.
After
9/11, Zionist muscle flexing became even more dominant in shaping the
orientation of the US government to both its own citizens as well as to
the rest of the world. Some, like E. Michael Jones, go as far as
indicating the USA has become pretty much a Jewish entity. This pattern
was reflected when Netanyahu, who grew up in the United States, received
29 standing ovations when he spoke in the American Congress. This
display of raptured hero worship was telling. Jewish power has become
especially dominate across many compartments in upper echelons of US
power.
Pretty
much all major US initiatives, but especially those involving major
decisions about banking and military intervention, are essentially
subject to the veto of the large complex of organizations that make up
the Israel Lobby. A pioneering study of the power of this lobby over US
foreign policy was published in 2007 by Prof. John Mearsheimer and Prof.
Stephen a Walt.
Many other neoconservatives, some of whom absorbed the philosophy of “noble lies and perpetual war”
taught by Prof. Leo Strauss, pulled together in the lead up and
aftermath of 9/11. This muscular coalition of Israel-First
neoconservatives became primary beneficiaries of the coup that elevated
Zionist rule to unparalleled influence over the economic, legal, and
political culture of the United States.
Prominent
among those that took part in the coup were Paul Wolfowitz, Richard
Perle, William Kristol, Donald Kagan, Elliot Abrams, James Woolsey,
Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, Norman Podhoretz, Dov Zakheim, Frank
Gaffney, and “Scooter” Libby. Two mirrored reports, one directed at the
Israeli government and the other directed at the US government,
helped articulate the coup’s objectives. Some of the objectives of 9/11,
including the drafting of the massive Patriot Act, were pre-prepared
and then unpacked immediately, even as the dust from the pulverized
towers was still lingering on the ground.
In
1996 Richard Perle chaired a committee that gave advice to Netanyahu as
he took over the Office of the Israeli Prime Minister. In A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,
a get-tough approach was outlined. The removal from office of Iraq’s
Saddam Hussein was proposed as was the alleged need for a showdown with
the Russia-backed Assad government in Syria. The twinned partner of the Clean Break report was the Rebuilding America’s Defences report. In 2000 this US report presented ideas emanating the Project for the New American Century (PNAC).
The
PNAC document explained how the USA could greatly expand its capacities
to better engage in simultaneous campaigns of conquest and military
policing throughout the world. This report culminated in a long process
of transforming the Armed Forces of what was then world’s dominant
superpower, into an instrument devoted primarily to waging wars for
Israel. The shopping list of armaments and new military technologies
included a provision expressing much contemporary resonance. This
proposal was to engage in “advanced forms of biological warfare that can
‘target’ specific genotypes. [This innovation] may transform biological
warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."
PNAC’s
preoccupation with the mounting of biological warfare anticipated the
current role of the Pentagon in the ongoing genesis of the worldwide
depopulation campaign presently underway. In the wake of the 9/11 false
flag, the report, Rebuilding America’s Defenses,
was essentially implemented along with much more besides. Far from
leading to a New American Century, the PNAC document led to decades of
internal decline, rot, and bankruptcy as the United States devoted the
flower of its capacities to fighting the futile 9/11 Wars that were not
in its interests.
Just
days after 9/11, a new Zionists organization, the Foundation for the
Defence of Democracies (FDD), was founded with major support from Edgar
and Charles Bronfman as well as other Jewish donors. The FDD’s aim was
to spin 9/11 in order to spread and intensify Islamophobia. The aim of
this campaign of defaming Muslims was to harness public opinion to
support, for instance, the Zio-American invasions of Muslim majority
countries including Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, and Yemen.
In this fashion Israel’s enemies were made to become “the West’s”
primary enemy meant to replace the Communist enemy in the Cold War.
Al-Qaeda
was a CIA-instigated component of the mujahideen, theUS-backed
mercenary force initially recruited, equipped and trained by the United
States to fight the USSR-backed regime in Afghanistan during the 1980s.
The US government still backs and funds al-Qaeda for its activities in
several West Asian countries including Syria. Nevertheless the US
government as well as the Zionist web site, Wikipedia, continues to describe al-Qaeda as the primary culprit of 9/11. See The De Facto US/Al Qaeda Alliance
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/10/29/the-de-facto-usal-qaeda-alliance/
PNAC’s report of 2000 culminated in the observation that
the
process of transformation [of the military], even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor.
https://resistir.info/livros/rebuilding_americas_defenses.pdf
In
September of 2001 the catastrophic and catalyzing event— like a new
Pearl Harbour— happened. Many of the Zionist neocons that had pointed to
the need for a surprise “attack” on America, apparently saw their
wishes come true. Did Islamic jihadists acting independently just happen
to oblige the neocons by delivering to them just what they wanted,
namely something like a new Pearle Harbor?
Or
did those in and around PNAC participate in the planning and then in
helping to arrange the implementation of 9/11 false flag. This
misrepresentation persists to this day in the coverup integral to the
infested swamp of delusion miring whole populations in plagues of psy op
lunacies.
There
are many chroniclers of the Israeli, Jewish, and Zionist aspects of the
continuing 9/11 operation, an operation resulting in the imposition of
emergency measures that continue to this day. The Wikispooks
item linked to below, offers a succinct and yet quite comprehensive
survey that represents a necessary corrective to the onerous weight of
the disinformation offered by Wikipedia on all 9/11-related topics. See https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it
Among
the pioneering investigators who fleshed out many links between Israel,
Zionism, Jews and 9/11 are Michael Piper Collins, Christopher Bollyn,
and Victor Thorn. Bollyn has acknowledge his debt to Andreas von Bülow, a
former German parliamentarian and Defence Minister— an important and
thoughtful intelligence agency insider— who in 2003 wrote a book
attributing the events of 9/11 to covert collusion between Israel and
the United States.
Other
high-ranking officials who came to similar conclusions include Michael
Meacher, a former British cabinet minister, Francesco Cossiga, a former
President of Italy, Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of
the US Treasury, Lt. Col. Robert L. Bowman, former head of the US Star
Wars Program, and Hamid Gul, former head of Pakistan’s Inter-Service
Intelligence Agency (ISI).
Among
the investigators that have seriously addressed the connections linking
Israel-First partisans to 9/11 are Dr. Allan Sabrosky, David Icke, Dr.
Kevin Barrett, J. Michael Springman, Jonathan Azaziah, Barrie Zwicker,
Louis Farrakhan, Kees van der Pijl, Christopher Ketcham, Ryan Dawson,
Ken O’Keefe, Craig McKee, James Fetzer, and the especially very prolific
Laurent Guyénot. This list is far from complete.
http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=5367.msg20823#msg20823
In
the my prior essay on this topic I introduced Bernard Lewis as the
probable source of the bin Laden fantasy. The bin Laden story is part of
the larger fantasy that 9/11 was the outcome of the independent actions
of a cohesive group of Islamic jihadists that acted independently in
order to realize a shared religious vision of Islamic conquest.
By
now it should be clear that this picture of what happened doesn’t even
come close to approximating what we can derive from the evidence. Much
of the evidence is very straightforward. It survives in videos depicting
what was seen and heard on the day of 9/11. Taken together, much of the
abundant existing evidence makes it clear that 9/11 was an enormous and
extremely complex spectacle that must have required much wealth, much
detailed planning, much insider access, much organization, and much
advanced logistical knowhow. The scale of operation 9/11 was obviously
far beyond anything that could have been achieved by a rag tag
collection of jihadists said to be acting independently.
The
scale of the 9/11 event was modest compared to the inflated level of
coordination necessary to create and maintain the cover up. Over the
years I have come to marvel at the sheer audacity of the cover story.
This authentically murderous event was executed with the intent of
elevating the imagery of Islamic terrorism to ridiculous heights.
By
now the whole performance should have been exposed for the utter fraud
that it is. The over-the-top portrayal through faked cell phone calls,
depicted accounts of Muslim hijackers often equated with suicide
bombers. The whole dark ritual of blasting into impressionable minds
masses of crude representations picturing crazed an Muslim killers, can
be seen in retrospect as a disgusting caricature. Through the lens of
what we can currently see happening in 2023, we can now look back on the
events of Sept. 11, 2001 as more of a lethal farce than a display of
revolutionary chutzpah.
Who
were the dramatists who wrote the false flag plot of 9/11? As I tried
to figure out who had the means and the gall to take on such a task, my
attention was drawn to Bernard Lewis. I first learned of Lewis from the
late Edward Said, the outspoken Professor of Comparative Literature at
Columbia University. In 1978 Prof. Said published the book Orientalism,
a major classic of academic literature. In the book and in the intense
academic controversies it energized, Bernard Lewis became the much
publicized-personification of what Prof. Said meant by invoking the
imperial ethos of Orientalism.
Going back to Napoleon’s imperial foray into Egypt, Orientalism
highlighted the study of the predominately Muslim populations
inhabiting the Near East and the Maghreb south of the Mediterranean Sea.
Said developed the thesis that the history of the social sciences, of
which Orientalism forms a representative part, was deeply bound up with
project of advancing the imperial enterprise integral to the rise of
European empires.
The
study of Orientalism was called upon to infuse the imperial powers with
the intellectual means of dominating Muslim peoples largely by
exploiting schisms of divide-and-conquer. As both an American and as a
Christian Palestinian, Prof. Said asserted that he was well placed to
look at imperialism for both the delivering and receiving sides.
Clearly
Said regarded Lewis as a nemesis. Born in Great Britain in 1916, Lewis
came of age studying in some of the core academies of British imperial
Orientalism. He assimilated much of the content as well as the
methodology of Orientalist studies. He then then applied what he had
learned in the very institutions that been integral to influencing the
British colonization that had helped shape the Maghreb, Egypt, West Asia
and Eurasia.
In
1974 at the the age of 58, Lewis moved across the Atlantic to an
academic post at Princeton where his teaching responsibilities were cut
to a minimum in order to leave him lots of time to engage in other
activities. Once Lewis moved from the older to the newer branch of the
Anglo-American Empire, he applied his knowledge to the big transition in
US foreign policy initiated in 1979 when Jimmy Carter began his
one-term presidency.
In
1979 the US government let loose the mujahideen, the mercenary Muslim
fighting force it created and equipped to overthrow the Soviet-backed
regime governing Afghanistan. The US government was also a party in the
decision to help facilitate the entry of Ayahtollah Ruhollah Khomeini
into the government of Iran. This development predictably made Iran the
primary theocratic site of an Islamic Revolution that rippled throughout
the Muslim world.
With
his legacy of Orientalist activity in the academy and in government
intelligence agencies, Lewis was perfectly placed to play a leading part
in the transition that culminated the transformation of the British
Empire into the Anglo-American Empire. Especially by sponsoring the
mujahideen, in which Osama bin Laden played a significant role, the
wheels began turning towards the demise of the Soviet Empire.
With
the end of the Cold War the conditions became ripe for the
transformation of Lewis’ notion of the “clash of civilizations” into a
War on Terror. The Princeton professor worked hard by writing many books
while he engaged in much behind-the-scenes activity as the Communist
foe was replaced by a heavy fixation on making Islamic jihadists the
main enemy to be conquered.
After
9/11 Lewis went to a work basically serving as a full-time adviser to
the White House. In helping to lead the US response to 9/11, Prof. Lewis
was often praised as being the prophetic figure who had predicted the
rise of Islamic terror that was said to have become so intense that it
made jet planes penetrate right through a steel-frame skyscraper on
9/11.
Frankly
I picture Lewis more as a driving force in the genesis of the very
events he was so often congratulated for anticipating. As I picture it,
Lewis was mentoring some of the key figures along the journey from the
final stages of the Cold War to a long stretch of the Global War on
Terror. Prof. Lewis lived to witness the 9/11 Wars until 2018 when he
died at age 102.
I
picture especially Lewis’ influence on Samuel Huntington. Huntington
developed Lewis’s pet paradigm of the “clash of civilizations” into
articles, a major book and a prominent place in US strategic thinking. I
also picture Lewis’ influence on Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter’s
National Security Advise from 1977-1981.
Brzezinski
often took credit for starting the end of the Cold War by playing an
instrumental role in setting the Muslim proxy army against the
Soviet-backed government of Afghanistan. Lewis was much more qualified
than Brzezinski to direct this operation from the shadows. Avoiding the
limelight, Lewis probably advised Brzezinski on techniques for turning
Muslims against Muslims in Afghanistan.
After
9/11 Lewis spent a great deal of time at the White House with
Vice-President Dick Cheney, the chief hands-on War Lord of the US
response to the so-called “terror attack.”
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Samuel Huntington, and Dick Cheney, All Mentored by Bernard Lewis
Interspersed
amidst his intimate exchanges with Cheney, Lewis took part in a number
of meetings with President Bush, the National Security Council, and many
high-ranking military officials. Cheney said of Lewis on his 90th
birthday, "You simply cannot find a greater authority on Middle Eastern
history, classical Islamic civilization, the Ottoman Empire ... than
this man."
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/24633
The antagonisms between Bernard Lewis and Edward Said that began with the latter’s publication of Orientalism
in 1978 have become the stuff of legend in the academy even until this
day. The two scholars were captured in 1986 going head-to-head at the
Middle East Studies Association’s 20th anniversary panel discussion.
Said
presented a stunning commentary on the bias in the media coverage of
the Middle East. Then as now, Muslims were subject to being stereotyped
for their “fundamentalism” as expressed in “congenital terrorism”
outside the boundaries of “civilized” behaviour. Prof. Said noted the
lockstep uniformity of media bias and US policy in the Middle East. He
condemned the overlap of the “Orientalist Lobby” with the “Zionist
Lobby.”
As
I interpret this exchange, it seems evident that Said was well aware of
Lewis’ oversized influence inside the US government even in those days.
Prof. Said died in 2013 at age 67 after a long and painful struggle
with leukemia. If he had been able to survive and thrive as the War on
Terror unfolded, history might have turned out differently. The
Palestinian scholar would probably have become the most eloquent public
voice condemning the predatory orgy of invasion of Muslim-majority
counties as well as the invasions on the rights and freedoms of all
citizens.
The following clip is of Charlie Rose’s interview of Bernard Lewis just days after the 9/11 debacle.
Click Lick on video here.
https://charlierose.com/videos/737
Early
on in the interview Prof. Lewis helped build up the mystique
surrounding Osama bin Laden, the CIA asset that supposedly turned
against the United States. Bin Laden was said by Lewis to have had a
“significant following” in the Islamic world. Prof. Lewis pointed to
what he claimed was the wide appreciation of bin Laden’s poetry in the
Arab-speaking world. Did Prof. Lewis himself compose some of the poetry
and prose attributed to Osama bin Laden in his project of calling
attention to the supposed “mastermind of 9/11”?
In
the context of these times, Bernard Lewis comments to Charlie Rose
appear almost quaint and naive when he encouraged the US government and
its allies to teach Arabs how to make progress in the world by adopting
democracy and the ethos individual freedoms. The myth of the US as a
bastion of democracy and individual liberties no longer flies as easily
as it once did. This tired old cliché is simply not credible given the
attacks we the people of the West are facing from our own enemy
governments, media, and law enforcement agencies.
It
didn’t take long for Lewis to move beyond his assessment of bin Laden
and to add his own voice to those of many other neocons who very soon
after 9/11 began expressing the view that Saddam Hussein should removed
in order to remake Iraq. The lie that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass
destruction was a sub-fraud derived from the Big Fraud of 9/11.
Nevertheless the US-led invasion of Iraq was mounted in 2003.
Bernard
Lewis married outright fiction with some true and half-true elements to
author the plot handed over to the public as an explanation for the
events of 9/11. Lewis was far from alone in deploying this technique.
The lies and crimes of 9/11 were exploited to advance a wide array of
negotiated outcomes including filling the pockets of war profiteers.
The
master plot, however, was to demonize the image of Muslims in oder to
create the psychological conditions that would help the US government to
better serve the agendas of Israel. One of the most prominent of these
agendas was for the Jewish state to achieve hegemony in its own region.
Many
examples could be given of how this marriage of fiction and fact was
given dramatic expression to help embed the 9/11 myths as the basis for
popular understanding of a key episode in history. Among the most
ambitious of projects in this regard, was Lawrence Wright’s The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006).
The image of the official narrative of 9/11 was no doubt buttressed
when the volume was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 2007. Were Zionist
interests involved in the judging? It would be surprising if that was
not the case.
Lawrence
Wright narrates the volume by pretending to be an eye witness to the
events he describes. It is made to seem as if he is watching over the
shoulders of his main characters throughout many stages of their lives.
Wright describes details like smells and sounds and facial expressions.
While this technique helps bring fiction to life, it interferes with the
telling of history by adding details usually not connected to
verifiable literary sources.
The Looming Tower is written like a novel. In fact it pretty much is
a novel with a few verifiable facts thrown in here and there. The goal
of the text is to give the appearance of historical substance to the
currents of thought and belief said to have motivated the supposed
perpetrators of 9/11.
At
the basis of the novel’s plot is Sayyid Qubt, an authentic Muslim
critic of Western society. Qubt based many of his assessments in what he
saw during the times he spent at a teachers’ college in Greely Colorado
in 1949-50. When he returned back to Egypt in the 1950s and early 60s,
Qubt developed a written interpretation of Islam that made him a
sometime enemy of the government of Abdul Nasser. Qubt was jailed and
then released. At one point he was even offered the job of Egypt’s
Minister of Education. He declined the offer and was subsequently
apprehended and hanged.
Wright’s
text becomes much more problematic when he paints a largely fabricated
picture of the extension of Qubt’s analysis into a largely invented and
sometimes embellished history of al-Qaeda. The author presents al-Qaeda
as an independent polity often well beyond the reach and monitoring of
CIA handlers.
Wright’s
account of al-Qaeda is intertwined with accounts of the life of medical
doctor, Ayman al-Zawahiri. Al-Zawahiri was pictured as being close to
Osama bin Laden, part of a big and very rich Saudi family. I did not see
anywhere in Wright’s text a reference to the close ties linking the
Bush and bin Laden families through the Carlyle enterprise in military
commerce.
Wright
also tells the story of the conflicts preventing constructive
collaboration between FBI’s John O’Neill and the CIA’s Michael Michael
Scheuer, both known to be bin Laden watchers. This aspect of The Looming Tower
helps support the thesis of the official story’s defenders. They parrot
the explanation of the 9/11 debacle as a result of the failures of the
intelligence agencies to share information with one another. The picture
of the 9/11 debacle as the result of mistakes and errors was widely
embraced, including by the 9/11 Commission.
The
text finishes with page after page of a list of names of individuals
who were said to have been interviewed. Some of these names are to be
found in a “Notes’ section that is often confusing and unpersuasive and
does not offer definitive proof for the extravagant claims and
generalizations the author frequently makes. In the final analysis, the
text is based on collections of hear say and on the imagination of an
ambitious journalist. Wright was well rewarded for telling a colourful
story that pointed attention away from the real culprits.
The
technique of writing about the events of 9/11 in the literary style of a
novel was embraced by Prof. Phillip Zelikow. Zelikow was proud that his
9/11 Commission Report, a text that he mostly authored himself, was the first government document ever to be nominated for a National Book Award.
Phillip
Zelikow is Zionist Jew who was a Bush White House insider and the
Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission that submitted its report on
2004. Zelikow was appointed after President George W. Bush’s original
appointee, Henry Kissinger, aroused much resistance including from the
families of the 9/11 victims. Zelikow was subject to many
conflicts-of-interests. He should not have been appointed by the White
House to sanitize the roles of other White House insiders including
prominently, President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney.
Much
of the report was based on evidence obtained illegally though torture.
Much of this torture was directed at a figure known as Khalid Sheik
Mohammed. KSM seems to be a name assigned to different people through
the course of changing events. Like the report of the National Institute
of Standards and Technology, the report of the 9/11 Commission
basically worked backwards starting with the conclusion and then
inventing or modifying evidence to prove the conclusion. The conclusion,
of course, was that bin Laden and al-Qaeda did 9/11.
One
of Zelikow’s academic specialties was in the creation of “public
myths.” Clearly his method as the main author and manipulator of the
Commission’s proceedings, was to confirm media accounts that Islamic
jihadists did 9/11. The other side of this strategy was to completely
avoid any reference to the fact that the first five 9/11 suspects were
Israeli citizens including at least two Mossad agents. These so-called
“dancing Israelis” were accompanied by several dozen Israeli spies taken
into custody.
https://www.unz.com/article/what-did-israel-know-in-advance-of-the-911-attacks/
Video published at
https://www.corbettreport.com/911-suspects-philip-zelikow/
In August of 2022 President Joe Biden took a bow for a drone strike said to have killed Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul Afghanistan.
https://muslimskeptic.com/2022/08/12/the-many-deaths-of-ayman-al-zawahiri/
In 2011 Osama bin Laden claimed in a hotly contested account, to have killed Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad Pakistan.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/05/tyler-durden/obama-lied-about-bin-ladens-death/
Hence
it can be said that three US Presidents, George W. Bush, Barak Obama,
and Joe Biden have ordered the killing of those whose actions are said
to have caused the Global War on Terror. At different times Osama bin
Laden and then Khalid Sheik Mohammed and then Ayram al-Zawahiri were
labelled as “masterminds” of the 9/11 attacks. I propose that a Bernard
Lewis is a likely suspect in creating the fantasy driving the 9/11 Wars
and the state of emergency that persists to this day.
Part One
