02.16.13
by

Sixty-Six Million Christians (AND MUSLIMS) Murdered By Jewish Bolsheviks

The Mass Murder of Russian Christians and the Destruction of their Churches, by Lasha Darkmoon


STALIN’S JEWS (See here)

The other day I received a polite email from one of my many critics. He was less than satisfied with a controversial statement I had made in one of my articles. He had detected what appeared to be a serious discrepancy in what I had written about the Bolshevik Jews who had engineered the Russian Revolution (1917) and had managed to kill, in the process, some 66 million Russian Christians.

Here is what my critic had to say:

Email from Mark. E. Moore,
February 12, 2013
RE: The Building of Synagogues under Stalin

Dear Lasha:

In your online article, “Satan’s Secret Agents: the Frankfurt School and their Evil Agenda (posted 02/13/13), you wrote:

“In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist Jews, the emptying of churches was accomplished by the simply expedient of burning the churches down—thousands of them—and building synagogues instead.” (Boldness added.)

However, the source cited (see here) for your statement contradicts your statement itself:

“For a few years, Soviet Jews were allowed to use Yiddish in Jewish schools and to publish Yiddish and Hebrew newspapers. However, synagogues were closed down. In fact, while Yiddish and Hebrew were tolerated, or at least encouraged, the official policy was to use these languages as instruments to effect the total assimilation of the Jews. Thus, while the Soviet government officially condemned anti-Semitism, it aimed at eradicating the Jewish faith.

“There was also renewed persecution of the Jews. Apart from having their synagogues closed and their Rabbis arrested, they were discriminated against in education as well as in military, political, and educational careers.”

(Boldness added)

Please explain the discrepancy and cite other sources for your statement that Stalin built synagogues in the stead of Christian churches.

Very truly yours,

Mark E. Moore

*          *          *

This was a valid criticism, impeccably expressed, but I resented something in the tone of the writer which seemed to suggest that he was trying to make excuses for these Jewish revolutionaries led by Lenin who was himself partly Jewish: that he was trying to diminish their role in these atrocities, and, so to speak, let the Jews off the hook for having committed mass murder on an unprecedented scale.

This is what I wrote in response to him. My apologies if the language here is a bit emotional at times. Mass murder, I guess, is an emotional subject. So bear with me.


“The unprecedented catastrophe of the Russian revolution required an explanation… For very many this lay in the coming to power of the Jews, and their hatred for the Russian people. For after the revolution of February, 1917, the Jews acquired full rights with the rest of the population, and the barriers set up by the Pale of Settlement were destroyed. Jews poured from the western regions into the major cities of European Russia and soon acquired prominent executive positions in all major sectors of government and the economy…. The mainly Jewish nature of the Bolshevik leadership—and of the world revolution in general—cannot be doubted….

“The Jews were especially dominant in the most feared and bloodthirsty part of the Bolshevik State apparatus, the Cheka, which, writes Brendon, “consisted of 250,000 officers (including 100,000 border guards). In the first 6 years of Bolshevik rule it had executed at least 200,000. Moreover, the Cheka was empowered to act as ‘policeman, gaoler, investigator, prosecutor, judge and executioner’. It also employed barbaric forms of torture….

“So complete was the Jewish domination of Russia as a result of the revolution that it is a misnomer to speak about the ‘Russian revolution’; it should more accurately be called the ‘Russian-Jewish revolution’.”

(Scroll down to “Bolshevism and the Jews”, here)

Email from Lasha Darkmoon,
February 16, 2013

Dear Mark,

Thank you for pointing out the defective link in my article. How it got in there I have no idea. Sometimes these things happen when one is writing and publishing in haste. I have deleted the defective link and substituted the following paragraph in its place: “See here, here, here, here and here for more details on the systematic destruction of Christian churches and the persecution of Russian Christians under the Jewish leaders of the Russian Revolution. See also extended endnote” 

The extended endnote (duplicated below) will be of particular interest to you, though it may not satisfy you if you are a committed Zionist and wish to find excuses for the well-documented crimes of the Bolshevik Jews after the 1917 Russian Revolution.

I am well aware that Jews were among those killed in Stalin’s purges and that some synagogues may have been closed down, but that occurred at a much later date and it does not in any way exculpate the Jews for their strikingly prominent role in the Bolshevik Revolution—and it certainly does not make the Jews the victims of the Revolution, no matter how hard they strive for victim status. They are the war criminals here. Period.

The authority you quote, and to which I mistakenly provided a link, appears to be a Zionist source. I do not trust Zionist sources as a matter of principle. They are known to lie and exaggerate and indulge in elaborate fantasies. Weren’t they the ones who got us into the Iraq War on false pretenses, relating to non-existent weapons of mass destruction? And aren’t they trying to pull the same fast one on us right now in regard to Iran?

Even after the Stalinist purges, organized Jewry remained entrenched in power in the Soviet Union. Jews continued to occupy all the most important posts in the Soviet government. And Stalin who was head honcho, though not a Jew nominally, was the ultimate Shabbat goy, a Jew in all but name or what some might wish to call a “spiritual Jew”. He married into a Jewish family, had Jewish mistresses and friends, and at every point in his career was surrounded by Jewish commissars. Lenin, who was partly Jewish, had always been his role model and chief ideological influence.


Stalin with his Jewish-brother-in-law, Lazar Kagaonvich.
(Hard to tell them apart)


Stalin’s Jewish brother-in-law moreover, Lazar Kaganovich, remained Stalin’s constant advisor, confidante and close friend. And Kaganovich was the greatest mass murderer of them all, reportedly claiming responsibility for the death of 20 million people. Funnily enough, Kaganovich was to outlive all the other Bolshevik killers, dying only in 1991—whereas Stalin met his Maker in March 1953 after one of his closest buddies, probably Comrade Beria, slipped some rat poison into his wine.

On a former occasion, when in debate with Israel Shamir, I had this to say about Lazar Kaganovich and the other omnipotent Soviet Jews who helped to make life a living hell for millions of Russian Christians. These mass murderers, purportedly running a revolution in support of the working classes—“the dictatorship of the proletariat”—managed to kill tens of millions of innocent peasants in the process. To improve the world these miserable sonofabitches needed to wade through seas of blood. And later on some Jew in Hollywood would quip, “You can’t make an omelette without breaking eggs!”

Kaganovich and his evil crew of natural born killers certainly knew how to break heads as easily as you and I know how to break eggs. “The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of a million is a statistic,” Stalin is said to have joked on one occasion.

Here is what I wrote roughly a year ago in an article:


“One Jew alone, the infamous Lazar Kaganovich, personally claimed responsibility for killing twenty million [people]. It was he who stood atop the rubble of a Christian church and proclaimed, “Mother Russia has been cast down! We have torn away her skirts!”

“Apart from Kaganovich, there were other Jews who contributed to the massacre of Christians under the cruelest circumstances: Ilya Ehrenburg, Natalfy Frenkel, Mathias Berman, Genrikh Yagoda (lingerie pervert), and, last but not least, Lavrenti Beria—though Beria may or may not have been Jewish. Mainstream historians assert that he was not. But they would, wouldn’t they?—given that Beria was not only a mass murderer of peasants, but also a bloodthirsty sex maniac and pedophile who buried children in his basement—probably alive. (See here and here, pp. 516-519).

“At no other time in the history of the world has a country been so saturated with Jewish influence as it was between 1917 and 1953 in the Soviet Union: the time of the great gulags and the merciless slaughter of the peasants.”

Incidentally, I will be dealing with this topic in more detail in a separate article soon.

You quote me as writing the following in my article on the Frankfurt School, objecting to the four words in bold font: “In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist Jews, the emptying of churches was accomplished by the simply expedient of burning the churches down—thousands of them—and building synagogues instead.” You will be pleased to hear that I have decided to delete these four words in bold font, since I have been unable to locate my original source for this statement or to find any reliable documentary evidence of synagogue substitution for demolished churches.

However, these four words in bold font, “and building synagogues instead”, are not really necessary. In principle, I see no reason why these Jewish revolutionaries, who actually went out of their way to demolish Christian churches, should raise any objections to the erection of synagogues if their fellow Jews should request such new synagogues. Suffice to say that we have more than enough evidence that Orthodox Christian churches were demolished in huge numbers, which is all that really needs to be said.

See “Endnote” HERE (but also duplicated below) for more details on the destruction of Orthodox Christian churches and the systematic torture and mass murder of Russian Christians by the Bolshevik Jews.

Sincere best wishes,

Lasha Darkmoon


Note that quote carefully: “Kaganovich also ordered the shocking demolition in downtown Moscow of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in 1931. It was replaced by a giant swimming pool.”

*          *          *

Endnote


American historian Edwin Schoonmaker writes:

“Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write: “According to such information that the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands of the Greek Catholic Churches… In Moscow and other large cities one can see Christian churches in the process of destruction… the Government needs the location for a large building,” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12) Apostate Jews, leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the people” had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia.” (“Democracy and World Dominion,” 1939, p.211). 


Wikipedia tells us that the Communist state after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution  was “committed to the destruction of religion”, and destroyed churches, mosques and temples — no mention of synagogues being destroyed —  and that it “ridiculed, harassed and executed [Christian] religious leaders, flood[ing] the schools and media with atheistic propaganda.”

Since the Russian Revolution was essentially a Jewish revolution, with an overwhelmingly high percentage of its leaders being Jewish, one can understand why synagogues were NOT destroyed. The animosity of the Jewish leadership was directed almost exclusively toward the Christian clergy and their churches. Monks, nuns and priests were put to death in large numbers, often after being cruelly tortured in the process, their eyes gouged out and in some instances being boiled alive.

(For graphic details of the systematic torture of Christians under the Bolsheviks, see here and section 7, “Fiendish tortures devised by the Jewish cheka”, here).

According to the Atlantic, September 1991, p.14, “In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka staff in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews. (See footnote 21, here)

For more on the specifically Jewish character of the Russian Revolution, see here and here.

Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the “historic sin of the Jews.” She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, “The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition.”

In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:

“The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged. Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.” (Cited here)



THE RAT TORTURE
 
A red-hot poker, when pushed through the bars of the cage, would force the maddened rat to escape by gnawing its way into the stomach of the human prisoner. This is one of the tortures the Bolshevik Jews are reported to have introduced from China. They certainly had Chinese torturers working for them, just as today the American government has relied heavily on the expertise of Israeli torturers at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere.

Further corroboration for the horrendous crimes committed by the Jewish Bolsheviks will be found in part 2 of this 2-part article by Lasha Darkmoon. 

The most detailed and impassioned account of Jewish atrocities committed against Christians is probably  Eustace Mullin’s cult classic article, The Secret Holocaust: The real holocaust was a Christian Holocaust by Jews of sixty-six millions, mostly Christians.

Personal feedback: darkmoon@darkmoon.me
Comments invitedHERE:


35 thoughts on “Sixty-Six Million Christians Murdered By Jewish Bolsheviks”

  1. I’ll never understand how todays media, in America and Europe, plays the holocaust card at every turn to elicit sympathy for Jews, eradicated in World War two. One only has to look back 30 years-or-so, from the 1940’s, to see the atrocities committed by Jews, themselves, on a much, much, greater scale.
    This would seem to lend credence to the so-called fabrication, that Jews, are in fact running the media in America and Europe.
    Sickening. I’ve always wondered why Jews throughout history have been persecuted by many. Could it be that the Jew’s were always mistreated for no good reason? That they were/are never in the wrong, It’s all because people don’t understand their religion? I find this excuse utterly and totally ridiculous. Most, non brainwashed, people know there’s way more to their story and most of the true story portrays Jews in a bad light. A light they light themselves.
    Like
    Reply
    • How about all North America’s and members of EU slaves to the same entities?? Isn’t their enough evidence that every president and minister has to first show his immense suckup to Israel to take the blessings before he/she allowed to position?
      Like
      Reply
    • Bold assertion; possibly to avoid embracing millenia of persecution of Jews, including in Russia (ever sel Fidler on the Roof?). Why focus now on anything that happened a long time ago. Don”’t be like the Arabs who hold on to historical resentments (e.g. the Crusades) for centuries
      Its a time for forgiveness for all and move from a war economy
      to a peace economy; we don’t really have to look to place blame on anyone (when we may be subconsciously trying to compensate for a sense of personal failure. While this may seem cathartic, it doesn’t strengthen one’s self-esteem.
      Like
      Reply
  2. Pingback: Multicultural Genocide of White Protestant America | Economic & Multicultural Terrorism
  3. Jews are simply rats in human bodies. One of the reasons why there will be chaos in the world eventually is because there are rats ruuning media, governments and economies.
    Like
    Reply
  4. Jews and Muslims have roots in middle east. In human history, all religions which were born in the middle east had same agenda. Its global dominance and occupation. Thats why Islam and Judaism has same hatred. Because they know there will be only one winner in the end. Islam uses spread and mass immigration as their concept. Jewish concept is complex and it lies in many areas. They dont have lot of crowd so they control money, politics, media, arms trade and scientific research to reach the final dirty agenda.
    Like
    Reply
    • ITS WORSE THAN YOU THINK:
      THE JEWISH RABBI WHO CREATED ISLAM
      JEWISHENCYCLOPEDIA
      The unedited full-text of the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
      SCHWARZ, JOSEPH:
      Palestinian geographer; born at Flosz, Bavaria, Oct. 22, 1804; died at Jerusalem
      Feb. 5, 1865. When he was seventeen years old he graduated as teacher
      from the Königliches Schullehrerseminar of Colberg, after which he joined his brother Israel at the University of Würzburg, where for five years he devoted himself to the history and geography of the Holy Land, and published a map of Palestine (1829; republished at Vienna, 1831, and Triest, 1832). It was his ardent desire, however, to study in Palestine itself the physical history and geography of the Holy Land, where his knowledge of Talmudic sources and early Jewish writers would be of more service. Accordingly he decided to settle in Jerusalem, whither he went in 1833. Schwarz then began a series of journeys and explorations in various parts of Palestine, to which he devoted about fifteen years.
      The results of his investigations and researches into the history, geography, geology, fauna, and flora of that country have placed him in the front rank of Palestinian explorers and geographers. HE IS THE GREATEST JEWISH AUTHORITY ON PALESTINIAN MATTERS SINCE ESTORI FARHI (1282-1357), the author of “Kaftor wa-Feraḥ.”
      (Be sure to Google this article:
      HISTORY OF PALESTINE
      614-1096 C.E.
      From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.
      By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850
      Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, aka Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, Abu Bakr, the first Caliph, was in fact: [A JEWISH RABBI] Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl (A 6 YEAR OLD CHILD), for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally:
      The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous; this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.
      ARABIAN JEWS CREATED ISLAM TO DESTROY THE PERSIAN & ROMAN (BYZANTIUM) EMPIRES.
      MOSSAD CONTROL ALL EXTREMIST MUSLIM GROUPS, LI*KE HAMAS & ISIS.
      Like
      Reply
    • Christianity has roots in the middle east. JESUS was born in ME “Palestine”. Christianity was born in ME Saint Paul preaching was born in ME “Syria” … do you want to tell me Christianity “having the very same roots” has the same agenda ?
      Like
      Reply
    • So what you are saying is, Islam spreads with the use of intellect regardless of what method that is, “mass emigration” or others but not the sward like its been always the propagated. while the Jewish manipulative concept remain to be the failure since world Jew’s are no more than 35 million Chameera in which Christians who spread their lord message by the sword, gun, nuclear, ISIS, deceptions etc… are simply Jewish slaves, hands and tools to maintain that manipulation???
      What you’re saying have some point of legitimacy, but hatred???? Don’t you think the conclusion is a little out of date and much of a contradictory to what you said earlier??
      I mean you can’t put the word migration to spread Islam which requires intellect conversation, then add hatred in it!! Hatred intellectuals will simply not be heard, don’t you think?
      Buddhism was spread by the sword, ask Genghis Khan if you like on hows and whys?

      This is a Must Must Must read!! trust me!! Its another way of seeing things from different prospective!! !!
      https://www.quora.com/Are-Hinduism-and-Buddhism-the-only-major-religions-in-the-world-which-were-spread-largely-without-bloodshed
      Like
      Reply
    • @ Showlaq Khalil:
      Wrong Showlaq, Genghis Khan was NEVER a Buddhism, and his quest of conquer with blood & swords was for HIS OWN ambitious, NOT for Buddhism. Not to spread & speculate wrong information, you have to very careful what you post, or else you are one of the culprit.
      I have to agree Islam was spread & propagated via migration/trade, & Christianity via trade/politics/economic activities.
      Like
      Reply
  5. Reblogged this on News for the Blind and commented:
    Yet they still scream about their hollow cause that never happened!
    Like
    Reply
  6. (MUSLIMS IN SOVIET UNION]
    Reading this article brings to mind question to be asked in the nearest future about USSR revolution. In regards to whereabouts 63millions of Muslims Ummah who are missing at that period of time.
    From 1928 to 1935, more than 25,000 Islamic personalities were arrested, more than 10,000 Mosque closed &torn down, more than 14,000 religious primary schools & more than 500 Madrasas closed.
    I do not make the 63 millions of head but with calculations & statistics.
    – In 1917 there were 40 millions Muslims in Soviet Russia.
    – On 10th December 1955 former Soviet Premier Khrushchev said in Srinagar that there are now 15 millions Muslims in Soviet Union. If his figure is correct we are to ask the grave question as to where are the other 25 millions Muslims?
    in period of 38 years at the 1•5 per cent annum [which comes to 23 millions on a 40 millions population, bringing the total to 63 millions] Have they been physically exterminated or what happened?
    Debo Salaudeen Jnr
    Like
    Reply
  7. NON JEWS ARE ANIMALS:
    GENTILES IN HALACHA
    Foreword — Daat Emet
    For a long time we have been considering the necessity of informing our readers about Halacha’s real attitude towards non-Jews. Many untrue things are publicized on this issue and the facts should be made clear. But recently, we were presented with a diligently written article on the subject, authored by a scholar from the Merkaz HaRav yeshiva — so our job was done by others (though we have already discussed some aspects of this issue in the weekly portions of Balak and Matot). Since there is almost no disagreement between us and the author of the article on this issue, we have chosen to bring the article “Jews Are Called ‘Men'” by R’ David Bar-Chayim (in Hebrew) so that the reader will be able to study and understand the attitude of the Halacha towards non-Jews.
    In this article R’ Bar-Chayim discusses the attitude towards “Gentiles” in the Torah and in the Halacha and comes to an unambiguous conclusion:
    “The Torah of Israel makes a clear distinction between a Jew, who is defined as ‘man,’ and a Gentile.”
    That is to say, any notion of equality between human beings is irrelevant to the Halacha. R’ Bar-Chayim’s work is comprehensive, written with intellectual honesty, and deals with almost all the aspects of Halachic treatment of non-Jews. It also refutes the statements of those rabbis who speak out of wishful thinking and, influenced by concepts of modern society, claim that Judaism does not discriminate against people on religious grounds. R’ Bar-Chayim shows that all these people base their constructs NOT on the Torah but solely on the inclinations of their own hearts. He also shows that there are even rabbis who intentionally distort the Halachic attitude to Gentiles, misleading both themselves and the general public.
    For the English readers’ convenience we will briefly mention the topics dealt with in R’ Bar-Chayim’s article:
    Laws in regard to murder, which clearly state that there is Halachic difference between murder of a Jew and of a Gentile (the latter is considered a far less severe crime).
    A ban on desecrating the Sabbath to save the life of a Gentile.
    A Jew’s exemption from liability if his property (e. g. ox) causes damage to a Gentile’s property. But if a Gentile’s property causes damage to a Jew’s property, the Gentile is liable.
    The question of whether robbery of a Gentile is forbidden by the Torah’s law or only by a Rabbinic decree.
    A ban on returning a lost item to a Gentile if the reason for returning it is one’s sympathy towards the Gentile and compassion for him.
    The sum which a Gentile overpays in a business transaction due to his own error is forfeit; whether a Jew is permitted to intentionally deceive a Gentile is also discussed.
    One who kidnaps a Jew is liable to death, but one who kidnaps a Gentile is exempt.
    A Jew who hurts or injures a Gentile is not liable for compensation of damage, but a Gentile who hurts a Jew is liable to death.
    One who overcharges a Gentile ought not return him the sum that the Gentile overpaid.
    A Gentile — or even a convert to Judaism — may not be appointed king or public official of any sort (e. g. a cabinet minister).
    One who defames a female proselyte (claiming that she was not virgin at the time of her marriage) is liable to neither lashes nor fine.
    The prohibition to hate applies only to Jews; one may hate a Gentile.
    One may take revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment “love your neighbour” applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles.
    One who sees Gentile graveyards should curse: “Your mother shall be greatly ashamed…”
    Gentiles are likened to animals.
    If an ox damaged a Gentile maidservant, it should be considered as though the ox damaged a she-ass.
    The dead body of a Gentile does not bear ritual impurity, nor does a Gentile who touches the dead body of a Jew become impure — he is considered like an animal who touched a dead body.
    One is forbidden to pour anointing oil on a Jew, but there is no ban on pouring that oil on a Gentile because Gentiles are likened to animals.
    An animal slaughtered by a Gentile is forbidden, even if the ritual slaughter performed was technically correct, because Gentiles are deemed like animals. (Daat Emet does not agree that this is the Halachic reason for invalidating a Gentile’s ritual slaughter — but this is not the place to delve into the subject).
    Their members are like those of asses” — Gentiles are likened to animals.
    Between the Jews and the Gentiles — In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought
    R’ Bar-Chayim’s arguments and conclusions are clear, Halachically accurate, and supported by almost all the existent major Halachic works. It would be superfluous to say that R’ Bar-Chayim fully embraces this racist Halachic outlook as the word of the Living G-d, as he himself pointed out in the “Conclusion” of his article:
    “It is clear to every Jew who accepts the Torah as G-d’s word from Sinai, obligatory and valid for all generations, that it is impossible to introduce ‘compromises’ or ‘renovations’ into it.”
    On the other hand, we want to make it clear that Daat Emet — as well as any reasonable people who do not embrace Halachic laws as the word of the Living G-d — are repulsed by such evil, racist discrimination.
    In the Hebrew text we have abridged the second part of R’ Bar-Chayim’s article,
    “Between Jews and Gentiles — In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought,” because, in our view, the Halacha is the law which obligates every religious Jew while concepts of the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and Jewish thought are not binding on anyone, as our rabbis have already written:
    “And so the Aggadic constructs of the disciples of disciples, such as Rav Tanchuma and Rabbi Oshaya and their like — most are incorrect, and therefore we do not rely on the words of Aggadah” (Sefer HaEshkol, Laws of a Torah Scroll, p. 60a); we have expanded on this issue in the portion of Vayeshev.
    Like
    Reply
  8. Hi Folks,
    I HAVE BEEN SUSPENDED BY GOOGLE & YOU TUBE, FOR EXPOSING TALMUDIC JUDAISM:
    THE CHILD-RAPE ASSEMBLY LINE
    In Ritual Bathhouses of the Jewish Orthodoxy, Children Are Systematically Abused
    By Christopher Ketcham Nov 12 2013
    Rabbi Nuchem Rosenberg, the lone whistleblower among the Satmar, a powerful Hasidic sect, who recently was the victim of a bleach attack in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.
    Rabbi Nuchem Rosenberg—who is 63 with a long, graying beard—recently sat down with me to explain what he described as a “child-rape assembly line” among sects of fundamentalist Jews. He cleared his throat. “I’m going to be graphic,” he said.
    A member of Brooklyn’s Satmar Hasidim fundamentalist branch of Orthodox Judaism, Nuchem designs and repairs mikvahs in compliance with Torah Law. The mikvah is a ritual Jewish bathhouse used for purification. Devout Jews are required to cleanse themselves in the mikvah on a variety of occasions: Women must visit following menstruation, and men have to make an appearance before the High Holidays, such as Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. Many of the devout also purify themselves before and after the act of sex and before the Sabbath.
    On a visit to Jerusalem in 2005, Rabbi Rosenberg entered into a mikvah in one of the holiest neighborhoods in the city, Mea She’arim. “I opened a door that entered into a schvitz,” he told me. “Vapors everywhere, I can barely see. My eyes adjust, and I see an old man, my age, long white beard, a holy-looking man, sitting in the vapors. On his lap, facing away from him, is a boy, maybe seven years old. And the old man is having anal sex with this boy.”
    Rabbi Rosenberg paused, gathered himself, and went on: “This boy was speared on the man like an animal, like a pig, and the boy was saying nothing. But on his face—fear. The old man [looked at me] without any fear, as if this was common practice. He didn’t stop. I was so angry, I confronted him. He removed the boy from his penis, and I took the boy aside. I told this man, ‘It’s a sin before God, a mishkovzucher. What are you doing to this boy’s soul? You’re destroying this boy!’ He had a sponge on a stick to clean his back, and he hit me across the face with it. ‘How dare you interrupt me!’ he said. I had heard of these things for a long time, but now I had seen.”
    The child sex abuse crisis in ultra-Orthodox Judaism, like that in the Catholic Church, has produced its share of shocking headlines in recent years. In New York, and in the prominent Orthodox communities of Israel and London, allegations of child molestation and rape have been rampant. The alleged abusers are schoolteachers, rabbis, fathers, uncles—figures of male authority. The victims, like those of Catholic priests, are mostly boys. Rabbi Rosenberg believes around half of young males in Brooklyn’s Hasidic community—the largest in the United States and one of the largest in the world—have been victims of sexual assault perpetrated by their elders. Ben Hirsch, director of Survivors for Justice, a Brooklyn organization that advocates for Orthodox sex abuse victims, thinks the real number is higher. “From anecdotal evidence, we’re looking at over 50 percent. It has almost become a rite of passage.”
    Ultra-Orthodox Jews who speak out about these abuses are ruined and condemned to exile by their own community. Dr. Amy Neustein, a non-fundamentalist Orthodox Jewish sociologist and editor of Tempest in the Temple: Jewish Communities and Child Sex Scandals, told me the story of a series of Hasidic mothers in Brooklyn she got to know who complained that their children were being preyed on by their husbands.
    In these cases, the accused men “very quickly and effectively engage the rabbis, the Orthodox politicians, and powerful Orthodox rabbis who donate handsomely to political clubs.” The goal, she told me, is “to excise the mother from the child’s life.” Rabbinical courts cast the mothers aside, and the effects are permanent. The mother is “amputated.” One woman befriended by Dr. Neustein, a music student at a college outside New York, lost contact with all six of her children, including an infant she was breastfeeding at the time of their separation.
    “THE ORTHODOX JEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD”!
    The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.
    The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud,” Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:
    “THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH…”
    SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”
    This “divine truth” which “a whole people venerate” of which “not a single letter of it is missing” and today “is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history” is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:
    SANHEDRIN, 55b: “A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).”
    (footnotes) “(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.”
    SANHEDRIN, 69b “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.
    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.
    (footnotes) “(5). Lit., `says’. (6) Lit., `here’, that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”
    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”
    (footnotes) “(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”
    ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. “R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it…From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.
    SOTAH, 26b. “R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)…As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?”
    Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! The Talmud states: “When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … . If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go.” Footnote: “Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place.” Further footnote: “Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, there fore, be suspected.”
    HOW PEDOPHILIA CAME TO HOLLYWOOD
    BY BILLY WILDER
    Screenwriter and director, Billy Wilder, has had an enormous impact on the public, as substantiated by his numerous Oscars and other film awards. Responsible for famous films like Hold Back the Dawn, Five Graves to Cairo, Double Indemnity, The Lost Weekend, Sunset Boulevard, Stalag 17, Sabrina and The Apartment, Wilder’s cinema successes were granted him as he was just another pawn who was utilized with satanic acumen to help abolish society’s established code of ethics. His own authorized biographer who worked closely with him, Maurice Zolotow, wrote:
    “Of course, I did not know what I was getting into when I had started this. It became, as all such journeys have become, a journey to find out the secret springs of this most devious and perverse of Hollywood’s personalities.”
    Wilder loved to transport the viewer into the depravity of his own heart and did this by tricking the censors who sought to enforce the old Hollywood Production Code of Hollywood’s “Golden Age.” Wilder recalls, “We had to operate cunningly to outwit the censors and this made us write more subtly.” What subtleties did he scatter throughout his films? Perversion. In his movie, The Major and the Minor, Wilder admits that the motif was child sexuality, stating:
    “Ray Milland falls in love with Ginger as a twelve year old child. We had here the first American movie about pedophilia. The Major is sexually aroused by her. He can’t help himself. I was worried that audiences would be shocked by this story, but it seems that they were not.”
    This goes to show that if a story is entertaining and “cute,” it can bypass the normal reaction to such filth and translate into apathetic disregard on the slippery slope of corruption. Where did this movie minister of perversion receive his material? Wilder was given his creative material by another supernatural force. In addition to stating that he is “demonically possessed and slightly crazed,” Zolotow reports of Wilder:
    “He could not stop his creative machinery from functioning. He was enslaved by his art…One sometimes felt as if one were moved by powerful invisible forces. I forgot to tell you that Wilder never starts a new screenplay without typing two words on the first page: Cum Deo (‘With God’). He has a pantheistic feeling about the universe.”
    Demon possession leads many from the truths of God to the pantheistic lies of the New Age movement because Satan uses those who will serve him most faithfully in preparing humanity to embrace him as the god of this world. Wilder’s responses upon completion of his show make it readily apparent which god he aligned himself with. Scientologist screenwriter of the Sound of Music, Ernest Lehman, recalls:
    “He looked at the heavens and screeched F— you!” It was…a victory cry, as if he were calling out to God and saying, ‘I completed this picture despite everything you did to make me surrender.'”
    Dr. Lycurgus Starkey rightly announced on the NBC network: “His movies have overturned all the sexual mores, glorified promiscuity, glamorized prostitution and elevated adultery to a virtue.” Dr. Starkey was prophetically right in predicting the social effect and outcome of Wilder’s films that we currently face in our day. The atheist author of communism, Karl Marx, explains the reasons why this is so:
    “The ideas of the ruling class are, in every age, the ruling ideas: i.e., the class which is the dominant material force in society is at the same time its dominant intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production.”
    The gross immorality in Hollywood that makes its way on the screen and thus influences the masses reflects the lives of those who operate within it. An intimate friend of the late Steve McQueen related:
    “He’d kill for a part in a movie…he’d suck anyone’s [expletive]…he’d get f—– or f— anyone who’d get him a part in a show…then he’d wish-he’d pray- that person would have a heart attack or a stroke and die, and then there would be no way for anyone to know how McQueen had got the part.”
    This disgusting ambition is what keeps the infamous casting couch warm and desirous hopeful actors willing. Hollywood insider, Phyllis Diller, clarifies this fact:
    “The casting couch is the name of the game in Hollywood. I know there are stars, especially women, who have made a career from sexual favors.”
    Would you invite a person whom you knew to be ethically bankrupt and an absolute moral degenerate into your home to influentially instruct your wife, your husband, and your children or loved ones? These are the very ones that America invites into their home every night via the television to submissively share their lives with.
    Biblically condemned spiritual conundrums regularly occur in Hollywood. Faye Dunaway said that the ghost of Joan Crawford is haunting her. Actress Jean Seberg believed that her “devils” kept her from ever being free. She stated:
    “The devils will stop that sort of stuff in a second. They ride right here. (Touching her collar bone with her fingers) Sitting here and here. There’s one on each side…these are both unfriendly influences. They tell me to run my car into other cars, or drive off a cliff.”
    A friend later reflected on her life and pin pointed the cause as the “acting classes at Columbia Studios…[which] had the power to influence Jean’s devils.” Like countless others in the Hollywood movie star system, this lead to psychiatric hospitals and suicide. Actor Sal Mineo was in regular contact with psychics and spoke of the “vibrations” of James Dean’s spirit that haunted him, stating, “I’ve got to get him off my back because I don’t want to join him down there.” Mineo was murdered under mysterious circumstances. Is fame worth the extorted fees that Satan demands of his servants of the silver screen?
    As Alan Alda declared:
    “There’s plenty of money to be had…But you also lose your soul.”
    WILDER WAS THE PERVERT WHO MADE ALL THE PROPAGANDA FILMS ON THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS, ABOUT HUMAN SOAP etc.
    Like
    Reply
  9. 1919 US Congress had a hearing on the Bolshevik revolution that occured in Russia and it concluded that in fact Bolshevism is Jewish and had infiltrated Mexico.
    Like
    Reply
  11. They infiltrate, and destroy countrys from inside, and now they use the refugees to create chaos in Europe, It will be the anhialation of the white people here in Europe!!
    Like
    Reply
    • It’s the Vatican’s Jesuits that are responsible for ALL of these atrocities. They are using these Jews to accomplish their designs so that people will blame all Jews for the Jesuit’s crimes and finish the “Jewish problem” for the Vatican.
      Like
      Reply
  13. Pingback: https://mysteryworshipers.wordpress.com/ | weltgericht
  14. To wage war, you need to indoctrinate weakminded stupid people from childhood, and the only way to achieve that is to poison their food wich will limit their ability to reason for themselves. One that believes in the afterlife will fight more fiercely. And the reason why groups spend so much time indoctrinating people is because who controlls the ants (us) controlls the money. I’m a Christian myself but lets face it… hardly anyone is… and I doubt even the Vatican actualy listens to God or Jezus as they CLEARLY stated not to take a life and to love your neighbours as your own. Greedy people do what they are good at, wich is steal from people by lying to them and letting them hear what they want to hear (that you are a good person and that you will go to heaven, as long as you live how they want you to live). But a Real Christian knows it is not words, but deeds that will get you in heaven. Islam is an example of an altered religion full with contradictions… they say you will have tons of virgins in paradise.. and yet the quoran sais woman are 99% evil and 1% develish.. meaning that either paradise is actualy HELL itself, or virgins are all male…. think about it…
    Like
    Reply
  16. Pingback: THE ETERNAL ENEMY OF MANKIND | Smoloko
  17. Ah , come on. Both mohammedis, cretianity and judaism are abrahamic. The fact that 60 mil ‘christians’ were killed really is a misnomer. The term christian was applied to all Whites by jews! ergo it was a race war.
    Like
    Reply
  18. Pingback: Blood Passover | Justice4Poland
  19. Pingback: ANTI-NWO PRIMER | Smoloko
  20. The curious thing is that, after the war, Stalin realized to get rid from Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee, accused of bourgeois nationalism and set up the infamous “Doctors’ Plot”, where many professionals were imprisoned under the charges of treason.
    Like
    Reply
  21. Pingback: Las raíces judías del bolchevismo. + Jews and the bolshevik Revolution by Þorsteinn Scheving Thorsteinsson (from Island). – ricardodepereablog
  22. You may well find that any discrepancy here is the silent war between the AshkeNAZI Jews and their Sephardic ‘cousins’ the real Jews; since this was the subject of later atrocities also during WWII and part of a continuing war of annihilation against the original Jewish culture. Not all Jews are the same and not all of them are Khazarian adoptees of faith.
    Like
    Reply
  23. Allahuakbar
    murderer go to hell
    Like
    Reply
  24. 66 million (if that figure is exact!) include millions of Russian, Ottoman and Central Asian Muslims. Solzhenitsyn should have mentioned them as well in his book. Was it Gulag Archipelago?.
    Like
    Reply

Leave a Reply 

Christianity and the Middle East

The Scofield Bible—The Book That Made Zionists of America’s Evangelical Christians

By Maidhc Ó Cathail

“For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgement.”
         —The New Scofield Study Bible*

cathail
(www.anchorbibleconcepts.com)Since it was first published in 1909, the Scofield Reference Bible has made uncompromising Zionists out of tens of millions of Americans. When John Hagee, the founder of Christians United for Israel (CUFI), said that “50 million evangelical bible-believing Christians unite with five million American Jews standing together on behalf of Israel,” it was the Scofield Bible that he was talking about.
Although the Scofield Reference Bible contains the text of the King James Authorized Version, it is not the traditional Protestant bible but Cyrus I. Scofield’s annotated commentary that is problematic. More than any other factor, it is Scofield’s notes that have induced generations of American evangelicals to believe that God demands their uncritical support for the modern State of Israel.

Blessing Israel, Cursing Its Critics

Central to Christian Zionist belief is Scofield’s commentary (italicized below) on Genesis 12:3: “‘I will bless them that bless thee.’ In fulfillment closely related to the next clause, ‘And curse him that curseth thee.’ Wonderfully fulfilled in the history of the dispersion. It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew—well with those who have protected him. The future will still more remarkably prove this principle.”
Drawing on Scofield’s rather tendentious interpretation, Hagee claims, “The man or nation that lifts a voice or hand against Israel invites the wrath of God.”
But as Stephen Sizer points out in his definitive critique, Christian Zionism: Road-map to Armageddon? (available from AET’s Middle East Books and More): “The promise, when referring to Abraham’s descendants, speaks of God blessing them, not of entire nations ‘blessing’ the Hebrew nation, still less the contemporary and secular State of Israel.”
Notwithstanding this more orthodox reading, The New Scofield Study Bible, published by Oxford University Press in 1984, intensified Scofield’s interpretation by adding, “For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgement.”
“Sustained by a dubious exegesis of selective biblical texts,” Sizer concludes, “Christian Zionism’s particular reading of history and contemporary events...sets Israel and the Jewish people apart from other peoples in the Middle East...it justifies the endemic racism intrinsic to Zionism, exacerbates tensions between Jews and Palestinians and undermines attempts to find a peaceful resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, all because ‘the Bible tells them so.’”

The Incredible Scofield

In his 2008 book, The Rise of Israel: A History of a Revolutionary State, Jonathan R. Adelman describes the crucial support Israel receives from Christian fundamentalists as “totally fortuitous.” That assertion is belied, however, by the incredible career of the man who wrote “the Bible of Fundamentalism.”
Two years after Scofield’s reported conversion to Christianity in 1879, the Atchison Patriot was less than impressed. Describing the former Atchison resident as the “late lawyer, politician and shyster generally,” the article went on to recount a few of Scofield’s “many malicious acts.” These included a series of forgeries in St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to six months in jail.
Being a “born again” preacher did not preclude Scofield from becoming a member of an exclusive New York men’s club in 1901, either. In his devastating biography, The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield suggests, “The admission of Scofield to the Lotus Club, which could not have been sought by Scofield, strengthens the suspicion that has cropped up before, that someone was directing the career of C.I. Scofield.”
That someone, Canfield suspects, was associated with one of the club’s committee members, the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. As Canfield intimates, Scofield’s theology was “most helpful in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s pet projects—the Zionist Movement.”
Others have been even more explicit about the nature of Scofield’s service to the Zionist agenda. In “Unjust War Theory: Christian Zionism and the Road to Jerusalem,” Prof. David W. Lutz writes, “Untermeyer used Scofield, a Kansas City lawyer with no formal training in theology, to inject Zionist ideas into American Protestantism. Untermeyer and other wealthy and influential Zionists whom he introduced to Scofield promoted and funded the latter’s career, including travel in Europe.”
On one of these European trips, Oxford University Press publisher Henry Frowde “expressed immediate interest” in Scofield’s project. According to a biography of Frowde, although the OUP publisher was “[n]ot demonstrative in his religious views, all his Christian life he was associated with brethren known as ‘Exclusive.’” The “Exclusive Brethren” refers to the group of Christian evangelicals that, in an 1848 split in the Plymouth Brethren, followed John Nelson Darby, the Anglo-Irish missionary generally considered to have been the most influential figure in the development of Christian Zionism, and a major influence on Scofield.

Scofield’s Legacy

Had the Scofield Bible never been published, American presidents influenced by Christian Zionism such as Truman, Johnson, Reagan and George W. Bush might have been less sympathetic to Israeli demands, and consequently more attentive to U.S. interests. Moreover, the American people could have been spared the pseudo-Christian rants of John Hagee, Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, not to mention the lucrative End Times Rapture “prophecy” peddled by Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye.
But it is the people of the Middle East who have been most affected by an expansionist Israel emboldened by the unswerving allegiance of Christian Zionists led to believe that Scofield’s words are God’s will. Not least among the many victims of the Scofield Bible are 5 million Palestinian refugees whose right to return is fervently opposed by America’s Zionized Christians. Thanks to their indoctrination by Scofield’s unholy book, they believe that Palestine belongs not to the Palestinians—many of whom are fellow Christians—but exclusively to “God’s chosen people.” ❑
Maidhc Ó Cathail writes extensively on U.S. foreign policy and the Middle East. He is also the creator and editor of The Passionate Attachment blog, which focuses primarily on the U.S.-Israeli relationship.

 
Picture of Book Cover ©1989 Samuel C. Gipp. Reproduced by permission
Question #39
Retail prices shown in US Dollars
English ($6.95)   Quantity





AddThis Sharing Buttons
16Share to PrintShare to More5
    QUESTION: Isn't the New Scofield Bible a King James Bible'?
    ANSWER: Not only is the New Scofield Bible NOT a King James Bible, it is not even a "Scofield" Bible.
    EXPLANATION: The first and most weighty reason why the New Scofield Bible is not a Scofield Bible at all is shamefully simple. Dr. C.I. Scofield did not edit it. Dr. Scofield died in 1921! Barring a very "selective" resurrection, it is impossible for a man who died in 1921 to edit a book in 1967.
The publisher's justification for a new "edition" is that Dr. Scofield, whose reference Bible was first published in 1909 added material and published another edition in 1917. But it is an author's preogative to alter his own works, but that certainly does not give others, more than 45 years after his death, a blank check to make alterations and then sign his name to it!
If we altered the ending of "Macbeth" we would be less than honest to claim that the change met Shakespeare's approval.
Secondly, the editors exercised great liberty in changing attributes of Dr. Scofield's reference work that Dr. Scofield himself felt important enough to include in his work. In the introduction to their doubly dishonest 1967 publication they admit such changes.
New Scofield: "Among the changes and improvements in this edition are: important word changes in the text to help the reader; a modified system of self-pronunciation; revision of many of the introductions to the books of the Bible, including designation of the author, theme, and date; more subheadings; clarification of some footnotes, deletion of others, and the addition of many new notes;: more marginal references; an entirely new chronology; a new index; a concordance especially prepared for this edition; new maps; and more legible type. Some of these features are explained below."
By their own words, they admit to altering Dr. Scofield's text (the King James Bible), introduction of books of the Bible, notes, marginal references, chronology and many other features.
Did Dr. Scofield give his approval to these changes? Not unless one of the nine committee members had the witch of Endor conjure him up as she had Samuel!
In fact, the publisher even admits that the changes made were arbitrary choices of the revision committee.
"Each position taken represents the thinking or conviction of the committee as a group."
What are the results of such shenanigans? One example will suffice. Let us examine the footnote found in Acts 8:12 of the New Scofield Bible concerning baptism.
"Baptism has, since the apostolic age, been practiced by every major group in the Christian church and, in Protestant communions, is recognized as one of two sacraments - the other being the Lord's Supper. Since early in the Church's history three different modes of baptism have been used: aspersion (sprinkling); affusion (pouring); and immersion (dipping)."
Here we see that the nine revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) believe that there is a difference between the true Christian church and Protestant "communion". Might I ask? When one group is defined as "Protestant" what is the other group called?
Secondly, the nine apostate revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) claim, without scriptural proof that Christians baptize by pouring and sprinkling as well as immersion.
Remember, the footnote is found in a S-C-O-F-I-E-L-D of 1967. A book which claims on its title page that a dead man (Dr. Scofield) is one of its editors.
What does the footnote for Acts 8:12 in the REAL Scofield Bible of 1917 which had a living Dr. Scofield as its editor say?
Nothing. There IS no such footnote!
That's right! The New "Scofield" bible has a "Scofield" note added after the death of "Scofield" the editor which the REAL Dr. Scofield never approved of and never had in a text anytime in his life time!
I ask you, is this honest?
Proof that the New Scofield Bible isn't a King James Bible is found on almost every page where the margin notes the twin Bible reading as "KJV". The text of the New Scofield Bible is NOT a King James Bible and it is NOT a Scofield Bible.
It might be noted that in recent years the size and shape of the New Scofield Bible has been changed to more resemble the Scofield Reference Bible. Many Christians who desire a true Scofield Reference Bible have purchased a New Scofield Bible by mistake.
The "Bible" business is lucrative. Isn't it?