Canada: Hypocrite Nation Ruled by Zionist Deception & anti-Free Speech Laws
Deconstructing the Zionist media’s hypocrisy surrounding Charlie Hebdo and the notion of “Freedom of Speech”
By
Arthur Topham
January 19th, 2015
“The National Post, perhaps
Canada’s foremost advocate and practitioner of censorship, is the least
qualified to condemn the alleged revenge massacre of 11 Charlie Hebdo
workers, yet devoted several consecutive front pages and
endless verbiage to the incident – far greater coverage than that
allotted to the brutal massacre of 3000 innocent Palestinians several
months earlier in Gaza, although the massacre was the more reprehensible
for having been committed by a racist, occupier government already
condemned by the United Nations for its barbarism.”
~ Ian V. Macdonald, letter to the National Post, Jan. 10, 2015
The latest Zionist false flag event in Paris, France on January 7th,
2015 that wiped out the staff of the pro-zionist, anti-Muslim,
anti-Christian
Charlie Hebdo hate propaganda rag, immediately
unleashed a massively orchestrated outcry of cacophonous proportions
from the Beast’s Big Brother Zionist msm media calling for greater
protection of people’s right to “Freedom of Speech”.
Apart from the aftermath of 9/11, never has this writer witnessed
such a unified show of chimerical bigotry and deception, all of it
wrapped in the gilded glitter of falsely misplaced emotional rhetoric,
blatant lies and contrived television imagery specifically designed and
pre-packaged to elicit a world-wide response from an unconscious
audience of somnambulant innocents still too blurry-eyed and bewitched
to recognize the reality of the Rothschild New World Order and its
modus operandi.
Reacting with predictable clockwork precision to their own fabricated
murderous crime; one bearing all the standard hallmarks of yet another
Israeli Mossad covert operation designed to appear as a deliberate
“terrorist act” by a fanatical group of “radical” Muslims, the
Canada-wide Zionist-controlled media immediately cranked up its
Islamophobic sirens to a deafening roar with broadcasts blaring forth
from talking heads accompanied by what W. H. Auden once aptly styled,
“the hum of the printing presses, turning forests into lies” with their
broadsheets whirling like buzz saws 24/7, flashing out nonstop,
monotonous anti-Islam hate messages to Canadians across the country.
This relentless verbal/visual assault by the Talmudic inspired
Israeli/Rothschild media upon the abused psyche of Western civilization –
ongoing since their hugely successful 9/11 coup of September 11th, 2001
– has now reached the stage where every facet of their global crime
syndicate is being utilized to increase hatred and fear of Islam to a
climactic point of no return, thus providing their needed justification
for whatever pre-emptive mode of violent attack the Zionist Jew killing
machine might wish to adopt in the near future.
No better example exists of this hypocritical, bigoted vilification
of Islam by the Zionist-controlled media than that found in their
premier flag ship hate generator the
National Post, Tel Aviv’s
direct propaganda line for funnelling into the unwary, dumbed down minds
of Canadians, Israel’s racist, supremacist, apartheid mindset; one that
constitutes the foundational basis of its twisted, psychopathic
political ideology known as Zionism.
Completely disregarding Canada’s horrific record of outright
censorship, harassment, fines, jailings and ongoing suppression of its
own citizens’ fundamental right to freedom of speech, the Zionist media
now has the unmitigated chutzpah to sermonize to Canadians about how
important it is to protect “FREE SPEECH” for the likes of
Charlie Hebdo and co. all the while overlooking the stinking mess of free speech violations in Canada’s own backyard.
Canada’s Disgraceful “Free Speech” Record
The
National Post, of all Canada’s zio-rags, is a veteran of
the infamous and controversial Section 13 “hate speech” legislation wars
that suddenly gained prominence across the nation around 2007 when the
Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC) filing a Section 13 “hate speech”
complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) against
Rogers Media Inc. (
Macleans Magazine), based upon the reproduction of perceived anti-Islam writings by one of their pro-Zionist Jewish writers Mark Steyn.
Coinciding with Steyn’s case was also that of Ezra Levant, then owner of the
Western Standard, an
Alberta based tabloid that callously published the infamous
Jyllands-Posten cartoons of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (SAWW) back in
February of 2006. As a result of Levant’s insolent disregard for Islam’s
holy Prophet both the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada and the
Edmonton Council of Muslim Communities filed complaints against Levant
and his magazine with the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship
Commission that resulted in a hearing in January of 2008.
Marc Lemire, one of Canada’s most distinguished Section 13 victims
and staunch resister to this nasty piece of Zionist/Bolshevik-motivated
legislation, gives us a compete, well documented history of the rise and
fall of Section 13 which can be found on his website,
FreedomSite Blog.
As well, for those interested in delving into the specifics surrounding
this specious piece of draconian “hate speech” legislation that
initially slithered its way into Canadian jurisprudence via the untiring
efforts of Canada’s Jewish lobby organizations (predominantly the
former Canadian Jewish Congress and B’nai Brith Canada) beginning as far
back as the 1950′s, I suggest reading the following article,
Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws.
In Part 3 of Lemire’s history, under sub-heading “Section 13: The Shit hits the fan”, he writes:
“Keep
in mind that the primary intent of Section 13 was to quietly keep it
behind closed doors and censor individuals in a manner which “would not be attended by great publicity”.
While this was true with most Section 13 cases, it certainly was not
true with Mark Steyn and Macleans Magazine. The proverbial ‘hate speech
earthquake’ hit the media, once it was revealed that one of Canada’s
most respected magazines and the “one-man global content provider” Mark
Steyn were under investigation for hate speech. Editorials against
censorship went viral from coast to coast in Canada and spread across
the globe via the Internet.”
The war to silence Canadians and stymie any public speech that the
Jewish lobby felt might negatively impact them or Israel in any way
(either on or off the internet), gained its foothold back in 1977 when
the federal government first implemented the so-called
Canadian Human Rights Act
and created its attendant enforcement agencies, the Canadian Human
Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Both
the commission and the tribunal were quasi-judicial, i.e. “crazy”
judicial in that they basically set their own rules and guidelines and
consistently changed the “legal” goal posts depending upon whatever case
they were dealing with, in order to ensure a conviction. If fact, of
the hundreds of Canadians dragged before these Stalinist style “Show
Trial” tribunals, EVERYONE was found guilty for the simple reason that
all it took was for someone to register a complain against them and
that, in itself, sealed their fate. When I describe Section 13 as a
“Bolshevik” type law I do so with the full knowledge that under the
former Soviet system, Lenin, in one of the regime’s very first acts upon
gaining absolute power, was to make “anti-Semitism” a crime punishable
by death. Death, that is, without so much as a trial even. All it would
take, (just as with the Section 13 “complaints”) was for someone to
accuse another of said crime and the Cheka (soviet secret police) had
the excuse to execute the victim.
In the case of Canada and its Section 13 “hate crime” laws, which
invariably include the same accusation of “anti-Semitism”, the
punishment wasn’t quite as severe or immediate but metaphorically
speaking, in term of survival, the victims stood no greater chance of
gaining their freedom once accused. Many, if not most of the victims,
were unable to afford to hire counsel and even if they were able to the
fact that
Truth was not considered a viable defence
against whatever they had written or spoken, it was virtually impossible
to argue against the charge. As such the defendants were at the mercy
of the tribunals and the commission’s commissars were able to maintain a
100% conviction rate right up until 2007
when, Allah be praised!, the Canadian Islamic Congress and other Muslim
organizations finally decided to file similar Section 13 complaints
against the two self-chosen writers mentioned above who were, by their
Judaic birthmarks, both members of the same conniving covenant that
initially bore responsibility for creating these very censorship laws in
the first place. Not only that, they were the only two Jews in Canada
ever to be charged with “hate speech” under Section 13 and, surprise!
surprise! the only two individuals ever to escape the snares and traps
that CHRC and the CHRT had used on hundreds of non-Jewish Canadians for
decades prior to then.
It has always been this writer’s contention, based upon my last eight
years of personal experience in dealing with these Orwellian censors,
that had the Canadian Islamic Congress not filed a complaint against
Mark Steyn and
Macleans Magazine and had Ezra Levant also not
been charged by a Muslim complainant over his publication of the
infamous Prophet Muhammad (SAWW) cartoons, this Zionist-inspired
legislation known as Section 13 that clung like a barnacle to the dark
underside of Canada’s legal system for the past thirty years without the
Zionist media challenging it, would, in all likelihood, have continued
on unabated and still not have been repealed. It was only the final
realization by the Jewish lobby that Section 13 was, in fact, a
double-edged sword capable of being used against their own kind as well
that spurred the Zionist media on to make a major issue out of an
Orwellian, Zionist-driven law that had for decades been used against
non-Jews with hardly a murmur of protest. Now that the perpetrators
themselves were being held to account for the same crimes the whole
dynamic changed and the war to rid the nation of Section 13 began in
earnest.
It was around the same period (2007) when Steyn and Levant received their just deserts that I and my website
RadicalPress.com were also
caught up
in the legally sticky Section 13 “hate speech” web and I suddenly found
myself forcefully initiated into that elite, Zionist-created group of
alleged “hate-mongers”,”anti-Semites”, “racists” and “neo-Nazis” who had
come before me throughout the late 70′s, 80′s and 90′s. In my own case
it was the secret, Jews-only Masonic society, B’nai Brith Canada who had
filed a Section 13 complaint against me with the Canadian Human Rights
Commission; one premised on the “
contention that Arthur Topham of Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada and his internet publication known as Radicalpress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”
Please note the “citizens of Israel” portion. It was the first time in
Canadian jurisprudence that the Jews, via their back-room manipulation
of the CHRC, had arbitrarily introduced this novel addition to the
Section 13 complaint; one which now included
people of a foreign nation! [
There
are reasons why they attempted this but a thorough analysis of that
particular subterfuge is beyond the scope of this article. A.T.]
While the Zionist news media, throughout its campaign to hasten the
demise of Section 13, magnified its two pet Jewish “free speech”
advocates to heroic proportions, the remaining hundreds of victims, once
they had been tried and convicted, inevitably sank back into Zion’s
media pit of silence and anonymity their identities liquidated and their
unjust sufferings lost forever. Their names though
are
important, more important to the struggle for real freedom of speech
than the media’s manufactured heroes, Steyn and Levant, for the nameless
ones were the truly courageous Canadian heroes, those resisters whose
who, on their own and motivated by their strong convictions, had stood
up to Canada’s Marxist/Bolshevik commissars with little or no money and
next to nil support from the general public while the Zio-media used all
of its ill-gained media power to malign, vilify and crucify them in the
public eye, just as they always do to anyone who stands in the way of
their hate-filled agenda. And so here I present the names of some of
victims that I was able to find. God forgive me for the ones I’ve left
off (if readers can provide me with additional names I’ll add them to my
website as they emerge).
The list began with John Ross Taylor back in the late 70′s and
carried on with Terry Long, Randy Johnston, William James Harcus,
Wolfgang Droege, Kevin Lew, Derek J. Peterson, Tony McAleer, Charles
Scott, Ernst Zundel, John Micka, Fred Kyburz, Eldon Warman, Alexan
Kulbashian, James Scott Richardson, Tomasz Winnicki, Craig Harrison,
Peter Kouba, Glen Bahr, Terry Tremaine, Alex Di Civita, Liz Lampman,
Lubomyr Prytulak, Bobby Wilkinson, Jessica Beaumont, Melissa Guille,
Ciaran Paul Donnelly, Jason Ouwendyk, Heather Fleming, Ronald Fleming,
Jim Keegstra, Malcolm Ross, Doug Collins, Marc Lemire, Arthur Topham,
David Ahenakew, Bill Whatcott,
Mark Merek,
Dean Clifford….
It must also be mentioned here that those pictured below, as well as
Bill Whatcott, were all assisted in great measure by Canada’s foremost
defender of true freedom of speech, the late Douglas Christie, who acted
in varying capacities for all of the accused, including myself, right
up to the point of his tragic passing in March of 2013.
In previous writings I’ve delved further into the creation of
Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws and in every case of ongoing persecution
and prosecution it was always the Jewish lobby groups in Canada who
were clambering and crying for the use and retention of these
anti-democratic, unconstitutional “laws” that for some strange reason,
in practically 99% of all cases, involved non-Jewish individuals who
were being critical of the ideology of political Zionism or the illegal,
terrorist actions of the state of Israel toward the Palestinian people
or else exposing the mendacious Jewish Rothschild central banking cartel
that controls much of the world’s monetary system or the Jewish media
cartel that controls the vast proportion of the Western world’s media
and source of information. Those who were publishing critical articles
were doing so because they firmly believed that their country, its
government, jurisprudence, culture and social mores were under direct
attack by the foreign influences of these Zionist organizations plus
the choke hold
that the state of Israel was gaining over Canada’s federal leaders and
their parties. In other words their criticisms in many cases were based
upon their personal belief and knowledge that Canada was under attack
from foreign agents and that it was
their constitutional right and duty to express their views on this vital matter of national security.
Charlie Hebdo and the ongoing Lies of the Jews
Juxtaposed against this background gestalt of brutal, repressive
anti-Free Speech legislation (easily traced back to and premised upon
the foundational lie of the 20th Century by World Jewry that “6 Million
Jews” had been “holocausted” by gas and ovens in the work camps of
National Socialist Germany during the latter half of WWII, a deception
now proven to have been a fabricated event of mythical and universal
proportions perpetrated upon humanity), Canada’s anti-Free Speech laws
tended, in practically every case,
to always benefit only one small minority
– the nation’s Jewish community – who amount to less that 2% of the
country’s population. Thus all the present hoopla emanating from the
Jewish-controlled media about “Freedom of Speech”, “free expression” and
the West’s longstanding “liberal” tradition of justifiable satire for
the likes of Islamophobic and Christianophobic writers, artists and
publishers like
Charlie Hebdo, the repulsively loathsome Jew ‘comedian’
Sarah
Silverman, et al, resonates with even greater magnitude the same hollow
sounds of bigotry and deception here in Canada today.
When the news began to break via Twitter on June 26th, 2013 that the
Canada’s Senate had finally given third and final reading to Bill C-304,
an Act to repeal the censorship provision – Section 13 – contained in
the
Canadian Human Rights Act this didn’t automatically signal
the end of ALL of Canada’s repressive “Free Speech” legislation. Far
from it. All the repeal accomplished was to removed the provisions
within the
Act that formerly gave non-Jews the same legal right
to point a fierce and accusing finger at those of “Jewish ethnicity” who
were out to destroy Canada’s socio-cultural and democratic way of life
and demand that they also be held accountable for their traitorous
actions against the nation in this regard. The demise, therefore, of
Section 13, as far as the Zionist media was concerned, was the end of
their coverage on the issue of “Freedom of Speech”. Their job was done
and their own media was now far less restricted in its ability to carry
on with their Islamophobic agenda of vilifying Muslims everywhere. As
for the even more threatening, draconian legislation still contained
within Canada’s
Criminal Code under Section 318 to 320, “Hate
Propaganda”, those heinous laws are still very much alive and currently
being used to the max to take down my website RadicalPress.com and
myself and thus set a new precedent that will undoubtedly be used to
coerce any other Canadian citizen who might think they still have the
right of “Freedom of Speech” to self-censor their opinions and beliefs
and whatever historic research they may have uncovered that might
support their viewpoint.
When you are immersed in the thick of a battle, be it to retain your
constitutional right to freedom of expression or your fundamental right
to stay alive physically, you quickly learn who the enemy is and what
type of tactics they employ to overpower you. After eight long years of
being in the trenches of what metaphorically (and some say
realistically) might appropriately be called World War III and
witnessing the stratagems used by the Zionist forces, it becomes clear
how their
modus operandi works. In actual physical warfare the
Zionist forces, be they Israel attacking Gaza with their superior
military firepower or the USA attacking Iraq with its superior
firepower, they always resort to what they coined their “Shock and Awe”
bombing power on their perceived enemy. This same strategy though is
also, first and foremost, used pre-emptively when it comes to their
disinformation “bombing campaign”campaigns that always precede any
actual on the ground operations. In esoteric terms it exhibits the old
adage, “As above, so below”.
At this stage of writing, the
Charlie Hebdo narrative, for
those whose minds haven’t already succumbed to the current “Shock and
Awe” propaganda ordinance emanating forth from Zion’s big media guns,
more than sufficient evidence now exists to prove that we’ve being
subjected once again to another Israeli Mossad false flag operation; one
deliberately orchestrated in order to provide the necessary media grist
to carry out their latest “Free Speech” disinfo blitzkrieg designed to
fool the traumatized masses into believing their lie that the massacre
was carried out by “Muslim Jihadists” incensed over the magazine’s
ongoing slander and mockery of Islam’s Holy Prophet Muhammad (SAWW).
Nothing could be further from the truth.
As many writers have already revealed, including the American writer Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: “
The Charlie Hebdo Story Simply Doesn’t Wash“.
There’s just too many similarities to all the previous false flag
events, including the greatest of all thus far in the 21st Century –
9/11– all of which were carried out with precisely the same global
mind-control objective – the obfuscation, via dissimulation and outright
LIES projected through Zion’s global media cartel, of the true motives
and actions of the state of Israel, first by transforming, then
transposing
their wilful and ongoing acts of terrorism
against the Muslim people of the Middle East into a completely opposite,
inverted and deceptive narrative; one that portrays Israel (again and
again) as the woefully misunderstood victim of the former
“Nazi-insprired Holocaust of 6 Million Jews” plus interminable Islamic
ill-will, anti-Semitic chicanery and racist hatred, all of which is
presently being focalized in the
Charlie Hebdo incident in
order to then justify their ultimate purpose in pulling off this latest
cabalistic caper; one intended to be a “shock and awe” strike against
the very foundations of freedom itself, that is, the fundamental,
God-given right and necessity for every single human being on the face
of this planet to be allowed to speak their mind and criticize whomever
they feel may be attempting to stand in the way of this core human
characteristic and all it entails in terms of keeping the principles of
truth, honesty and moral rectitude alive.
By their past fruits we are able to recognize the Zionist’s present
plot to disenfranchise the West of its basic human right to free
expression via their entrenched “Hate Speech” laws which they themselves
were instrumental in setting in place over the decades following WWII
and have steadfastly refused to abolish in Canada and France and Germany
and Australia and numerous other EU nations. It also explains the
Zionist media’s refusal to deal with Section 318 to 320 during the many
years that Section 13 was a hot topic across the Zionist news wires. The
big question remains though, why are they waxing so eloquent about
“Freedom of Speech” for the likes of
Charlie Hebdo yet refusing
to face the reality of these current, draconian “Hate Propaganda”laws;
ones that fly in the face of the very principles and liberties that they
are now espousing with such zealous vigour and haughtiness?
Dieudonne, Moi, Satire and Big Brother double standards
The most inescapable act of hypocrisy regarding the Zionist media’s
trumpeting of “Freedom of Speech” is France’s disingenuous and
despicable treatment of that nation’s famed comedian
Dieudonne M’Bala M’Bala,
without a doubt one of the finest and incisive minds, popular comedians
and satirists alive today. The French officials’ two-faced approach of
promoting
Charlie Hebdo and the concept of “Freedom of Speech”
and the right to satire anything satireable while at the same time going
on a “Hate Speech” rampage around the country arresting anyone who so
much as made a contrary peep about the manifestly obvious suspicious
murders or didn’t append their “Je suis” to the proper name, not only
showed the world what a bunch of hypocritical and dangerous clowns they
were but also reinforced the fact that France’s government is totally
under the control of seditious Zionist Jew forces.
Just recently, in a radio interview with
Kevin Barrett
where we were discussing the whole Dieudonne debacle, it was pointed
out that what is happening to Dieudonne in France and myself here in
Canada over the past eight years of ongoing harassment, arrests, libel
suit threats and so on is indicative of a world-wide conspiracy to stop
the flow of truthful information concerning the miserable machinations
of World Jewry’s Zionist juggernaut whether it issues forth from
writings on a blogsite or from out of the mouths of satirical comedians
such as Dieudonne.
While it’s just fine for
Charlie Hebdo to “satirize”
whomever they like (but please don’t criticize Zionism or Israel) when I
penned a satire on a hate-filled screed against the German people
originally written by a Jewish writer, Theodore n. Kaufman, back in 1941
in his now infamous book,
Germany Must Perish! and called it
Israel Must Perish! the
immediate reaction from the Jew lobby in Canada was to file a Sec.
319(2) “Hate Propaganda” complaint against me and my website alleging
that I was calling for the genocide of the whole Jewish population! Did
the satire aspect of the article elude their intellectual acumen or were
they just grasping at straws in order to somehow get me arrested? Only
time will tell.
Here in Canada it’s B’nai Brith International, one of Rothschild’s
19th century secret masonic brainchilds, who man Big Brother’s “hate
speech” ghetto towers, sweeping the Cyberian landscape 24/7 with their
search lights in an ongoing effort to spot a Truth Revealer lurking
somewhere in the digital underbrush that they can then literally hunt
down by simply filing a Section 319(2) “hate speech” complaint against
them with whatever local “Hate Crime Team” may be available depending
upon the province the patriot resides in.
In France they likely hide behind a different mask but regardless of
the name their purpose is to spy on a nation’s citizens and rat out
anyone who they think may be a danger to Zion’s ongoing subterfuge and
then use that nation’s “Hate Speech” laws to prosecute the alleged
“anti-Semitic” victim.
The notion of satire has to be the biggest joke of all when viewed
within the context of the current feigned fuss over free expression and
the
Charlie Hebdo false flag. For the Zionist Jew media the right
to be able to publish endless lies, hatred, pornography, Islamophobia,
Christianophobia – all of which mock everything that humanity has held
sacred for millennia – is foremost and nothing illustrates this fact
more than the government/media’s full-scale promotion of the latest
edition of
Charlie Hebdo that came out within practically a week
following the demise of its former staff. Touting this deliberate act of
further promoting a magazine whose contents supposedly were responsible
for the deaths of around a dozen or more people as “Freedom of Speech”
has to be one of the more provocative examples of Jewish chutzpah ever
witnessed, yet, thanks to such sinister machinations this jaded,
derelict crime syndicate comprised of interminable moral reprobates and
serial killers were then able to utilize their widespread media sorcery
to cast their evil spell over millions of French citizens
thus manipulating them into believing their absurd lies while at the
same time dashing about the country arresting others who were
theoretically exercising these same, supposed “freedoms”.
As a Christian I’ve observed the artistic, literary and mimetic
actions of the Jews when it comes to “satirizing” non-Jewish religions,
their churches, their leaders or their saints and I’ve seen with my own
eyes too many examples of what they consider to be “free expression” and
“satire” disguised as “modern art” or “satire” yet, upon closer
examination reveal themselves to be nothing more than lurid, depraved
exhibitions of pornographic, scatological/sexual perversion and
deviancy, reprehensible to the eye and an affront to one’s spiritual and
moral sense of propriety. And when I witness such moral obscenity
associated with their “artistic” creations I can only conclude and agree
with those who state that the ideology of political Zionism is, at its
root, immoral, atheistic and demonic in nature and cannot be connected
to anything truly spiritual or holy in the traditional sense of those
terms.
That said it behooves me to further add that, given all of the
revulsion, disrespect, contempt and derision that much of what Zion
vainly attempts to portray as “art” and “satire” entails, what is even
more insulting, outrageous and unjust, is the fact that, after
appointing themselves the arbiters of all things permissible, including
the right to insult and denigrate anyone that they so wish to (for
whatever purposes), they then turn around and create, promulgate and
rigidly uphold so-called “Hate Speech” laws that exist only to prohibit,
by the force of the state,
anyone else from
exercising these same identical freedoms which they sell to the gullible
public as universal rights and freedoms! Put in layman’s language
there can never be such a thing as a level playing field when it comes
to “Freedom of Speech” if, as in Orwell’s
Animal Farm, some people are more free to say what they want than others.
Allow me to present some examples. As a Christian I’ll use two ‘cartoons’ from
Charlie Hebdo
that relate to spreading Christianophobia or anti-Christian, anti-God
hate propaganda rather than adding to the already existing plethora of
specious, Zionist hate-motivated Islamophobic “art”. To wit:
The Babylonian Talmud, the “bible” of the
Rabbinical cult we associate with “Judaism”, consists of massive tomes
of Jewish “Law” purported (by the priesthood) to have been handed down
orally to Moses by the Jewish “g-d” Jehovah in the self-chosen people’s
hoary past. Then, with the addition of greater masses of written
commentary on said law, finally set in print around the 5th century A.D.
The Talmud considered to be the ultimate authority and reference when
it comes to any and all questions dealing with the religious life of an
orthodox Jew supersedes the Torah in all aspects of authority.
Hidden for centuries from the prying eyes of non-Jews the Talmud was
eventually translated into English in the early part of the 20th
Century. Not long afterward an American author and researcher, Elizabeth
Dilling, began a comprehensive study of the Talmud after returning from
a visit to the Soviet Union in 1931 where she had gone to observe what
the Zio-Communists were then touting as their great “humanitarian
experiment”. Being able to go behind the scenes Dilling was, “shocked at
the forced labor, the squalid living quarters, and deplorable living
conditions, and the atmosphere of fear created by the Soviet
dictatorship.” But even more so was she shocked by the “virulent
anti-Christianity of the atheist Communist regime.”
Had Dilling been able, at the time, to penetrate further into the
vast reaches of the Soviet wastelands she would have witnessed what,
thanks to the heroic efforts of Russia’s Nobel Prize winning author and
dissident Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, he described as the greatest mass
genocide of Gentile Russian Christians ever undertaken in the history of
the world. According to Solzhenitsyn somewhere in the neighbourhood of
sixty-six million souls vanished into that frozen nightmare of terror
and fear now known as the Gulag Archipelago.
Dillings book,
THE JEWISH RELIGION: Its Influence Today is a wealth of factual information on the hidden side of Pharisiac Judaism. Chapter 3 in particular, “
The Talmud and Bible Believers”
examines in detail how the Rabbinical priesthood views the likes of
Jesus Christ and Mother Mary; both of whom are treated with the utmost
contempt and disrespect. When one realizes just how vile and hateful the
passages are describing Jesus and his Mother it’s not too difficult to
connect the dots when it comes to understanding why this book, which is
posted on my website
RadicalPress.com
in digital format (and numerous other websites around the world), was
one of the principal documents submitted by the “complainants” in my
present case as “proof” that I am
willfully
promoting hatred against “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic
group”. Still, as the old saying goes, “The proof is in the pudding” and
in the case of the Gulag Archipelago that pudding is stuffed to
overflowing with the bloated and starved carcasses of countless millions
of innocent people.
As such it beggars the mind to think that BC’s Attorney General, the
Honourable Suzanne Anton, would have attached her name to such a sleazy
and ill-conceived accusation; one that eventually led the thought police
to proceed with their stalking and final arrest and jailing that then
allowed them to illegally enter my home and steal all of my computers
and electronic files and subsequently subject me to years of ongoing
litigation in order to prove my innocence. This “law” we call Section
319(2) is a purely Bolshevik-inspired piece of Zionist double-talk and
deception that allows the state to accuse me (or any other Canadian) of
willfully promoting hatred against “people of the Jewish religion or
ethnic group” for simply re-posting historical facts gleaned from the
annals of the former Zionist Jew dominated Soviet dictatorship.
Upon reading what the Talmud has to say about Jesus Christ and Mother
Mary it won’t take a whole lot of extrapolating to see why the
Talmud-driven Zionist media commissars are still going out of their way
to defend the likes of images such as these. Just like the
New York Times, Charlie Hebdo’s
messages appear to be exactly what the Zionist media cartel deems
content “fit to print”. I will leave it to viewers to decide whether
they see these ‘cartoons’ as satire, humour or otherwise. They certainly
aren’t the ones though that the Zionist media has been flashing about
since the
Charlie Hebdo incident.
One of the
National Post’s well known Jewish writers, Andrew Coyne, in the comment section of its January 15, 2015 edition, penned an article entitled, “
Humour busts taboos”
(currently changed online to read: “Coyne: Everything can be laughed
about, because everything can be discussed”) wherein he labours to
intellectually justify the “humour” associated with
Charlie Hebdo
and Jewish ‘comedians’ such as Sarah Silverman (Coyne finds her humour
“indefensibly funny”) who get their jollies out of telling
anti-Christian jokes such as the example below:
British Internet writer and contributor to Veteran’s Today, Lasha Darkmoon, also has a few pertinent things to say about Silverman in her recent and popular article, “The Paris Massacre: they had it coming” where she writes, “The Jewish comedienne Sarah Silverman, the nice young lady who likes
humping dogs and
licking their anuses in various video skits—see
here—and
who gets many a cheap laugh by insulting Christianity in America, would
have been a great hit with these satirical French journalists. They
would have
loved her for saying,
“I hope the Jews DID kill Christ! I’d fucking do it again—in a second!”.
Coyne on the other hand, quoting François Cavanna, founder of
Charlie Hebdo,
who once stated, “Nothing is sacred” goes on to say, “I have been
turning over those words in my mind ever since I saw them, shortly after
the massacre. Can he really have meant it? Nothing is sacred? Why? Why
was he so insistent, so absolute? …But I think it is more than that. I
think it stems from an understanding that “offensive” humour is not an
aberration, a warped version of the real thing, but rather that
offensiveness of one kind or another is an intrinsic part of humour.
Virtually all humour is offensive to someone; most humour is hurtful to
some sensibility; much humour is rooted in pain and fear and the ugly
reality of things.”
In his analysis of why people laugh, he tells us, “Nobody really
knows why people laugh. They just do.” … “What one can say, however, is
that it [
laughter] emerges from some fundamentally healthy part of us.”
So I ask myself, why didn’t I laugh when I looked at the
Charlie Hebdo
image of God the Father being bum-phucked by my Lord Jesus Christ who,
in turn, is having his own derriere desecrated by what is supposed to be
a symbolic image of the Holy Spirit? The standard interpretation for
Jews like Coyne would be that it’s apparently just a pun (satire) on the
Catholic church’s opposition to gay marriage. No problem. Get over it
guys. It’s all just “a joke”. Remember, “Nothing is sacred” and the
laughter produced by such “satire” obviously “emerges from some
fundamentally healthy part of us.”
But if you don’t find it funny at all and rather offensive then
according to Coyne’s reasoning “…that’s also the moral answer. The first
thing to ask about a joke is not, is it offensive, but: is it funny? If
it is, if we laugh at it in spite of ourselves,
chances are it is
because there is something else to it than mere insult or grotesquerie:
some larger truth, some point we resist acknowledging, because to do so
would make us uncomfortable.” [Note: all emphasis throughout this article is by the author. A.T.]
Really now Andrew? Oi vey! I should truly like to know just what it
is, what “larger truth” is hidden there that we, who don’t laugh at
supposed ‘cartoons’ such as this, “resist acknowledging” because it
would “make us uncomfortable”? How about the “larger truth” that the
atheistic Zionist mindset could care less about what Christians or
Muslims hold to be sacred? Is this not their standard operating
procedure today just as it was after the overthrow of Czar Nicholas of
Russia in 1917 when the Jew-led Bolsheviks systematically went about
raping and murdering and torturing the Christian priests and nuns and
destroying their houses of worship on a scale that, were it fully
disclosed to the masses today on the Zionist media, would turn the
stomachs of whole nations to the point where their present belief in
your endless lies would suddenly cease to exist?
Commenting on Sarah Silverman’s career Coyne says, “If her routine
were only about shock value, I don’t imagine she would have lasted as
long as she has. Rather, she has thought long and hard about what makes
us anxious — what we’re least willing to talk about.”
So, according to the atheistic Zionist mind-set of Jewish writers
like Coyne, if someone has expended a lot of mental energy trying to
figure out how to make Christians “anxious” about homos marrying homos
by forcing them to talk about it through portraying their Saviour
screwing God the Father up the ass, then this is a good thing. A funny
thing. A laughter producing mechanism that gets the desired result “by
turning our anxieties and discomforts in on themselves, forcing us to
confront them rather than bury them.” Sigmund, I’m certain, would have
been proud of Andrew Coyne’s deeply analytical diagnosis of Sarah
Silverman’s perverted, sick mind.
Then of course, as Coyne goes on to say, “There’s a world of meaning
in this. When an “offensive” comic says nothing is unsayable, they mean
that we do not have to be afraid of words. They are not our master: we
are theirs. Everything can be laughed about, because everything can be
discussed.”
Now this is all fine and dandy for Andrew Coyne and his Jewish comedians and the
National Post
and its readership who subscribe to this type of psycho-babble
purporting to be wisdom but, like all babble that arises in the Zionist
media, it only caters to the self-chosen mindset, be it ethnic Jews or
culturally and socially indoctrinated “mentally-cloned” chabez goy
“Jews” who, because of their own life experiences growing up in a
culture saturated with endless Zionist propaganda, have come to think
and react and behave just like their Zionist counterparts.
But of course for all of Coyne’s sophisticated rhetoric and
sophistry, specifically designed to make an ugly pile of dog shit look
like a fruit cake, his arguments in favour of justifying what is nothing
more than pure pornography, an “art” and an industry which the the Jews
have developed to the point of perfection and now reap countless
millions from its exploitation via their mass media, don’t impress me
one iota.
But, and believe me when I say this is a BIG BUT (no pun or typo
intended), there are the rest of us great unwashed goyim who amount to
not millions but billions, who for numerous reasons don’t think at all
like the Zionists would have us think. We have our own codes of moral
conduct and our own spiritual views and perspectives on what we believe
to be the holy and sacred side of life here on planet Earth. And yes, we
also value justice and freedom of speech just like the Zionists purport
to value it. Nonetheless, there is a vast and fundamental separation
between the Zionist version of freedom of speech and that of the
non-Zionist; a difference based upon the elemental fact that
non-Zionists believe in freedom of speech
for EVERYONE,
not just for the Zionist Jews and their fawning sycophants who, for
whatever reason, feel that Zion’s version of TRUTH and FREEDOM is
somehow the only version permissible for the whole of humanity. Therein
lies the rub and therein lies the one single factor that historically
has made the “Jewish Question” one of continuing paramount importance
for all of mankind and, as far back as a century ago, prompted the late
Henry Ford, Sr. to describe this amazing occurrence with the Jews as
“The world’s Foremost Problem”.
Given a level playing field in all the critical sectors of a nation
that comprise government, banking, economics, industry, education,
social and religious institutions and most important of all, openness
and diversity within the most crucial area – its
media/news/entertainment/communication systems – the majority of
citizens in any democratic nation would have the wherewithal to
manage their country for the good of all rather than be held hostage to a
tiny deviant minority that now rules over us with greater and greater
disregard for the essential values that
do make life both
sacred and worthwhile. This is a lesson that the Zionists and their
obeisant sycophants are still in denial about. For the majority it’s but
a matter of ignorance due to their brainwashing and were they to be
told the whole truth would likely change their ways but for those in
power who manage the levers of deception it’s not so much a matter of
denial but one of cold, calculated, wilful, heartless premeditated
criminal intent to perpetrate and perpetuate their execrable program to
enslave the vast majority of humanity via the ongoing misuse of their
media cartel and other control mechanisms.
Some final thoughts on Canada’s PM Stephen Harper and “Freedom of Speech”
Saving the worst for last and not wishing to subject readers to more
obnoxious imagery I will forgo posting a photo of Canada’s No. 1 Zionist
lackey and current Prime Minister of Canada, the Dishonourable Stephen
Harper.
Before commenting on his recent reaction to the
Charlie Hebdo
affair I want to reiterate a fact that needs to be born in mind with
respect to my legal proceedings now before the court. On April 27th,
2011, about one week prior to the last federal election, being fully
conscious of the imminent threat that Harper posed to my country should
his Conservative party gain a majority vote and be given the opportunity
to exercise h/is-rael’s agenda via their controlled puppet, I penned an
article titled,
Hating Harper
and posted it to my website. There you will find an image of the
traitor who is now attempting to tell Canadians what a wonderful, free
and democratic nation they live in; one that, were it not for those
insanely envious ‘Mooslim’ terrorist Jihadists who hate our way of life,
would have us all living just happy as a clam. When I wrote the article
I knew full well what Canada would be facing should Stephen Harper and
his Con-servative Party gain a majority of votes necessary to rule the
country for next four years.
The very next day, Canada’s former No. 1 serial complainant in the
vast majority of the now repealed Sec. 13 “Human Rights” cases (please
note that I am under a court order NOT to publish his name anywhere on
the net), filed a Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” complaint with the
BC Hate Crime Team
under the supervision of Det. Cst. Terry Wilson pictured below along
with his partner in crime Cst. Normandie Levas. That was the first step
taken in a long drawn-out clandestine process that eventually culminated
in my arrest and incarceration on May 16th, 2012.
The BC Hate Crime Team’s website tells us that it “has two full-time police officers
trained to recognize the specialized and multi-jurisdictional nature of hate propaganda offences.”
It was one of those “trained” police officers, Cst. Levas, who filed a
report with BC Attorney General, Hon. Suzanne Anton, outlining her
reasons why she felt I had committed the unforgivable crime of
“willfully promoting hatred against people of the Jewish religion or
ethnic group” by, (
quoting Det. Cst. Wilson’s words to me while I was in jail),
“calling for the total genocide of the Jewish population”. Based on
this “trained” police officer’s “evidence” the Attorney General then
gave their consent to have me formally charged. Later on, during the
preliminary inquiry
when I cross examined Cst. Levas in court about her “training” and what
it was that qualified her to make such presumptive and false
accusations about me, she revealed to the court that prior to joining
the “Hate Crime Team” she had worked as a . . . dental assistant!
Returning to the
Charlie Hebdo hoax and that other hoax, the Zionist
National Post, I
want to make further reference to an article that appeared on the front
page of the January 9, 2015 edition titled, “THIS IS WAR ON US ALL,
HARPER SAYS: PM says terror law to be tabled soon.” (My apologies to
readers but I’ve been unable to find a link to the article online)
Before the blood had dried on the two young Muslim brothers
alleged to have carried out the shootings at the office of
Charlie Hebdo then
subsequently murdered by the French security forces in order to ensure
that they would never have the opportunity to tell their side of the
story, Canada’s Zionist-controlled puppet, Prime Minister Stephen
Harper, was already blabbering on in the media about how the “jihadists
are at war with anyone who values openness and tolerance” and further
stating that his government was already busy formulating new proposed
legislation that would introduce “new arrest powers aimed at thwarting
terrorist threats” in an upcoming bill destined to be tabled at the end
of January when Parliament resumes.
He then went on to say, “They have declared war and are already
executing it on a massive scale on a whole range of countries with which
they are in contact, and they have declared war on any country, like
ourselves(sic),
that values freedom, openness and tolerance. We may not like this and wish it would go away,
but it is not going to go away.”
Yes, Stephen Harper, you can be damn sure that these false flag
events such as we’ve just witnessed in Paris, France won’t “go away” so
long as the wars which your government has plunged Canada into at the
behest of Israel are slated to carry on and the necessity to manufacture
greater and greater levels of fear remain a prerequisite to gaining
approval for your heinous acts of genocide against defenceless people
like the Palestinians of Gaza and the West Bank, the Afghans and those
still surviving in other Middle East nations where the Zionist forces
are constantly committing their war crimes.
Making these hypocritically absurd pronouncements given the fact that
there was still no definite proof as to who had committed the murders
merely shows the insidiousness and transparent bigotry of those in power
who, because they are puppets dangling on Zionist strings, will mouth
their aggressive lies and threats to the world regardless of whatever
the people may think to the contrary. This process of accusing either an
individual or a nation of crimes yet unproven applies not only to the
Islamic community as a whole but to my own “Freedom of Speech” case here
at home in Canada and now before the Supreme court of British Columbia.
The fact that I have yet to be tried for the alleged “crime” of
“willfully promoting hatred against people of the Jewish religion or
ethnic group” certainly didn’t deter the Zionist media in Canada from
making all sorts of false and defamatory accusations and slanderous
remarks against my person when the Indictment was first handed down
November 5, 2012. The same Zionist big mouth, Ezra Levant, was only too
happy to
interview my former counsel, Douglas Christie
on his SunNews show “The Source” where he then proceeded to accuse me
of all sorts of falsehoods just like Harper does when it comes to
discussing issues to do with Islam and Israel’s false flag events all of
which are designed to further enhance just such vitriolic rhetoric.
Within the short span of about six minutes good ol’ free speech
advocate Ezra Levant managed to slander, defame and libel me as many
times as possible, punctuating every comment or question to lawyer Doug
Christie with at least one or more
ad hominem slur, in order
to show the world just how grand and liberal the Zionist mainstream
media truly is when it comes to freedom of expression.
Yes, said Ezra, that Topham is an “anti-Semite.” He’s “offensive” and
an “anti-Zionist [which is] code for anti-Semitic.” His website is
“gross” and his comments “repulsive” and everything that he does is
“motivated by a form of malice.” And on top of that Levant also shared
freely his opinion that I was a “nobody” and an “anti-Semitic idiot and a
right wing wacko” ending his “freedom of speech” soliloquy by
emphatically pronouncing to all of Canada that when it came right down
to it
“I HATE ARTHUR TOPHAM!”
When I finished watched the interview I said to myself, oi vey! with
“free speech” friends like this who needs enemies? Here he is, one of
Canada’s most vocal advocates for “freedom of speech” on the Internet
and he’s sitting there abusing me left, right and center telling the
world blatant lies about me and making me out to be some sort of crazed
Jew-hating anti-Semite! That folks is how “Freedom of Speech” works for
those holding the mechanisms of mind-control in their nefarious little
hands.
Getting back to Harper and his disingenuous statements to the media
he goes on to say, “At the same time, we also encourage people to go
about their lives and to
exercise our rights and freedoms and our openness as a society as loudly and as clear as we can because
that is the best way of defeating what is ultimately a movement of
hatred and intolerance.” “No shit Batman” as a friend of mine used to
say when confronted with such transparent posturing. That is precisely
what I and many other Canadians have been doing for decades. And were we
able to “exercise our rights and freedoms” without the Jewish lobbyists
using their “Hate Propaganda” laws to attack and imprison us? No. Just
more hypocritical smoke and mirrors and sententious sophistry that’s
all.
Commenting on the Paris demonstrations that followed in the wake of
the shootings Harper, monotonously mouthing the Zionist agenda rather
than taking into consideration ALL Canadians, displayed his now
usual chutzpah by stating, “Today, I know all Canadians…stand together
with [
Israel? A.T.] the people of France…our great friends and
allies” culminating his bigoted remarks with his final fatuous remark
that, “When a trio of [
alleged. A.T.] hooded men struck at some of
our most cherished democratic principles – freedom of expression, freedom of the press – they assaulted democracy everywhere.”
Talk is obviously cheap and meaningless when a nation’s leader can
make such blatantly deceptive statements to the press and the so-called
“independent” media stands by unquestioningly allowing it to go on.
Conclusion
So what are we to make of this latest false flag event that occurred
in Paris, France? Will the world fall for it like most people fell for
the 9/11 false flag and continue on supporting those who are the
perpetrators of the majority of mankind’s problems? How long will the
pretense last before the mask of Zion finally falls from the face of
evil, revealing forever the primary source of mankind’s collective woes
and allowing for the final liberation of the millions of people still
suffering from the ignorance that’s ultimately a result of having lived
their lives in a trauma-induced trance of fear and insecurity; products
of deliberate mind-control by a globally elite force of psychopaths who
truly believe that they were given the right by their G_d to wield
unlimited power and control over the majority of humanity? How long
before the majority of Jews themselves will be healed of this
devastating ghetto consciousness that’s plagued the world for over two
millennia?
For most people today the realization that they are going about their
lives unaware of the fact that there’s a war going on around them
designed to eventually enslave them is beyond belief. They simply remain
transfixed by Big Brother’s media, struggle on a daily basis to pay
their credit card debts and keep food on the table and a roof over their
heads all the while faithfully watching the sitcoms and television news
and sports and a myriad number of channels all designed with the intent
of diverting their attention away from the psycho/spiritual battles
that are going on behind the scenes both in Cyberspace (the Internet)
where the final battle is now well underway as well as in the courtrooms
of the nation where the Zionist forces are surreptitiously at work both
enacting new legislation and protecting old legislation like Section
318 to 320 of Canada’s
Criminal Code, laws overtly and covertly
designed to criminalize the Truth Revealers who are on to their scams
and are doing their utmost with scant resources to strike the chimes of
truth and freedom and connect the dots so that the majority of those
still asleep might one day awaken.
Make no mistake about it. The Zionists KNOW their days are numbered
and that time is fast running out for them to pull off their global
coup. The fact that they know though is not something that will
automatically tempt them to change their evil ways. That’s not how
psychopaths operate. The stronger the resistance to their plotting and
scheming the more they dig their heels in and resort to greater and
greater subterfuges to prevent the tide of truth from rising. They
understand better than anyone the power of their media and the power of
their purse and they will not stop using either of these devices to
achieve the end they’ve worked for so long and with such single-minded,
albeit, malicious intent.
It may be pointless at this juncture in the battle to remind people
that this war has been going on since Lucifer first broke rank with the
heavenly hosts and decided that he would rather be God and do his own
thing instead of remaining a willing and loving participant in the grand
scheme of Creation. God of course, having endowed all of his Creation,
from the heavenly realms down to us mundane time-space mortal creatures
of flesh and blood with free will wasn’t about to interfere with his
design and so left his somewhat recalcitrant and sentient family to work
it out on their own.
The debate over who the Zionists really are and why they’re motivated
to act as they do would fill a thousand Alexandrian libraries. The
origins of such primal urges to control others cannot help but lead
serious thinkers to an eventual realization that such questions
ultimately cannot be answered without delving into speculative
philosophical, occult and spiritual realms that go far beyond the scope
of this article.
The Internet at this early juncture in its nascent beginnings is
already expanding at quantum speeds. The information age is gaining
ground with every millisecond, exploding our preconceived notions of
time and space and taking us on a transcendental journey that at this
point in time is akin in terms of progress to our little toe projecting
out upon the threshold of a dream that undoubtedly will continue to
unfold throughout the remainder of the present Aquarian cycle, leading
us onward and inward to greater and greater understanding, peace,
harmony, and love.
Together humanity now faces the supreme trial of all ages past. We
stand as a vast human species with one foot embedded in yesterday and
the other foot jutting forth into a future that all too often appears
shrouded in grey, chemtrail-like clouds of self doubt brought forth
daily through the interminable Big Brother’s flak of fear and loathing
which constitute the hallmarks of the Zionist Information Media now
permanently acting in collusion with its counterparts in every other
phase of global involvement who are intent on breaking the will of the
people to the point where they eventually give up and bow their heads to
accept their chains of slavery and subservience to the satanic power
that now rules the world by default.
Bob Dylan, one of the leading American Jewish poets, songwriters and
musicians of the 1960′s prophetically expressed best our current
existential dilemma when, in 1964 he wrote his immortal song, “The Times
They Are A-Changing”. I publish it here for readers to consider.
The glorious sun of Truth and Justice is now rising upon an otherwise
outwardly bleak, forlorn, terror-stricken Cyberian landscape according
to divine plan, casting great shadows across the wreckage of thousands
of years of endless war and strife and suffering. It’s radiant rays of
life-giving hope are bursting forth with new and brighter intensity than
ever before, defying with the full intensity of its love-driven will
and determination all of the Evil and Darkness emanating forth from the
present Zio-Talmudic tyranny now so frantic with fear and desperately
attempting to pull off its age-long plan for absolute control of planet
Earth.
In the end Truth and Love and Peace WILL prevail.*
—–
* Keep dreaming Baby!
FFWN: Remembering David Crowley
TODAY’S NEWS STORIES AND THEIR SOURCE LINKS
In Memoriam: David Crowley and family
1) Director of film, “Gray State”, suicided
with his family
2) “CIA kills people, makes it look like
suicide” – Guantanamo guard
3) Minnesota bill would ban NSA activities
– let’s pass “the David Crowley Bill” in his
memory
Charlie Hebdo fallout
5) Analyzing a fake BBC news site
6) Was BBC hoax a Zionist psy-op?
7) French rein in speech supporting acts of terror
8) Charlie used by authorities as excuse for power grab
More Charlie Hebdo fallout: The Israeli
connection
9) Long-time CNN figure leaves over ‘anti-Israel’ tweets
10) “I am Charlie” translates to “I am Israel” in Hebrew
11) France’s First “False Flag”: The Dreyfus Affair
12) Netanyahu’s “Lessons from Charlie”
13) Bibi carried away planning another false flag (satire)
14) Killings deepen riff as Turks assail Netanyahu for “crimes against humanity”
15) EU turning against Israel for its illegal acts
16) Austraiia’s last UN vote against Palestinian statehood
Charlie-driven islamophobia runs amok
17) Iran’s Supreme Leader to Western youth: “Think for yourself!”
18) Muslim to be made French citizen for assistance at “kosher” deli
19) Anti-Islam ads on San Francisco buses . . .
Zionist War on Iran
20) Israel helps ISIS, murders Iranian general in Syria
21) Senate’s give to ISIS: Sanctions on Iran
22) US forced to admit it framed Iran by planting nuclear bomb plans
23) Argentine Special Prosecutor in 1994 “false flag”
24) Judge slams prosecutor for attacking Fernandez for plot with Iran
Sandy Hook False Flag
25) Town to vote on demolishing Adam Lanza home
26) CT State Police gave false affidavits
27) Sandy Hook commission: Ban guns more than 10 rounds at a time
World Economy on the Brink of Collapse?
28) Swiss bank runs as financial system implodes
29) Will Collapse in Oil Price Cause a Stock Market Crash?
30) Plunging oil prices could kill electric and hybrid cars
31) Richest 1% is about to own more than everyone else put together: Oxfam
American Police State
32) Cops shoot 9 times, kill black man with hands up
33) Ferguson juror suing Ferguson prosecutor
34) The Digital Arms Race: NSA Preps America for Future
Battle
35) CIA using drug money to overthrow President of Ecuador
Odds & Ends
36) Ocean life faces mass extinction
37) LEGO Hitler: Teen Depicts Holocaust In Toys for School Project
Posted by
Kevin Barrett
at
8:37 PM
Israel, the psychopathic nation
Is Zionism a collective personality disorder?
Can a nation be a psychopath?
According to one expert on political psychopathy, Andrzej Lobaczewski,
the answer is yes. Whole nations, even international political
movements, can exhibit behavior that parallels that of psychopathic
individuals.
Lobaczewski, a Polish psychiatrist, diagnosed psychopathic symptoms among the Communist-era leadership. He argued that individuals with personality disorders, especially psychopathy, tend to gravitate to positions of power, which can set off a contagion in which the entire regime takes on psychopathic characteristics.
In a brand-new article, translated and published here for the
first time, Laurent Guyénot argues that Israel (and the international
Zionist movement surrounding and empowering it) is a textbook case
of political psychopathy. Naturally the Zio-psychopaths, who always have
to be 100% right and cannot accept the slightest bit of criticism, will
not respond well to this article. Their reaction will offer yet another
item of evidence that Dr. Guyénot’s thesis is correct.
Laurent Guyénot is
an Engineer (National School of Advanced Technology, 1982) and
medievalist (PhD in Medieval Studies at Paris IV-Sorbonne, 2009). He has
authored numerous books; the latest is JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State. My recent interview with him on the Charlie Hebdo affair is archived here.
-KB
ISRAEL, THE PSYCHOPATHIC NATION
by Laurent Guyenot
“Judeophobia is a psychosis. As a psychosis, it is hereditary and as a
disease transmitted for two thousand years, it is incurable.” (Leo
Pinsker,
Auto-Emancipation, 1882)
Jewishness is a notoriously ambivalent notion. On the one hand,
Judaism is a religion; on the other, Jews are a people, an ethnic group
or race. It all depends on the circumstances. But in both cases,
Jewishness may legitimately be subjected to psychological analysis. If
Judaism is a religion, we may turn to Freud, who addressed the
relationship between religion and neurosis in three books:
Totem and Taboo,
Civilization and Its Discontents and
The Future of an Illusion,
in which he calls “religion” (referring mainly to Catholicism) a
“universal obsessional neurosis of humanity.” If, conversely, the Jews
are a people, then we can base our analysis on common sense, which
admits that every people has a national character forged by history – or
a collective memory, which is to say, its own representation of its
history. Concerning the character of the Jewish nation, there is no
shortage of opinions from Jewish intellectuals.
The
hypothesis presented in this paper can be summarized as follows: The
Jewish nation, as a state, but also as an organized world community,
acts collectively towards other nations and other human communities in
the way a psychopath acts towards his fellow men. I will first describe
psychopathy as a cognitive and behavioral structure and show how the
ideology and methods of the chosen people are related to it. It goes
without saying that I do not intend to imply that “the Jews” are
psychopaths, but instead that they are the first victims of a mental
straitjacket imposed by their elites, who through veritable intellectual
terrorism, make of them, to the extent that they comply, the
instruments of the collective psychopathy of Israel.
What is a psychopath?
Psychopathy is a syndrome of traits classified among the personality
disorders. Canadian psychologist Robert Hare (1) in the wake of Hervey
Cleckley’s
The Mask of Sanity (1941), has defined its
diagnostic criteria on the basis of a cognitive model that is now widely
adopted, though some behaviorally-oriented psychiatrists prefer the
term sociopathy. In an effort to get everyone to agree, the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual on Mental Disorders, the American psychiatric bible, suggested antisocial personality disorder; but the term psychopathy is still in use.
The
most striking traits of the psychopath are lack of empathy and
conscience. Other traits are common to narcissism: psychopaths have a
grand vision of their own importance. In their minds, everything is owed
to them because they are exceptional. They are never wrong, and
failures are always the fault of others. They often show megalomania,
but some learn to hide their arrogance under false modesty. If the
psychopath pretends to rise to the universal level, it is because he
confuses it with his personal interests, and the truth with his own
opinions. However, the psychopath is distinguished from the simple
narcissist by his appetite for power, which makes him much more
destructive. Moreover, his capacity for harm is not inhibited by any
scruples or remorse: he is incapable of feeling guilt. Although he
imagines himself a hero, and in some cases looks like a hero, the
psychopath is, on the human spectrum, the polar opposite of the hero who
sacrifices himself for his community; he will not hesitate to sacrifice
the people around him, and when he knows he is lost, he consoles
himself by causing as many people as possible to fall.
Basically,
the psychopath perceives others as objects. He has a mechanical view of
people and human relationships (and, in some way, of himself as well).
Although devoid of conscience, he often has a keen perception of the
law, which he, as a mechanic of the social engine, overestimates. He has
not internalized moral law and in this sense is not socialized, but he
has mastered the rules of the game and cheats without qualms if he can.
For the same reason, the psychopath almost always develops an immoderate
taste for money; he idealizes it as the epitome of power, the very
essence of the social; he thinks that people can be bought and sold like
things, and life often proves him right.
The diagnostic criteria for psychopathy also include pathological
lying, deception (cunning) and manipulative behavior. The psychopath
feels only very superficial emotions and has no real feelings for
anyone; but he has developed a great ability to deceive. He can be
charming to the point of being charismatic. He typically shows
highly-developed verbal intelligence and lies with disconcerting aplomb.
He is unable to empathize, but learns to simulate it, sometimes with a
tendency to histrionics (Latin histrio, “theater actor”). The
psychoanalyst Helène Deutsche makes this trait the mark of “as-if
personalities” endowed with purely mimetic “pseudo-emotions,” devoid of
inner experience, “a little like an actor with good technique, but not
animated by any actual life.” (2) But the psychopath is more than that:
he is a manipulator. It is through his extraordinary ability to feign,
trick, trap, and capture that the psychopath draws his power. Although
he himself is immunized against guilt, he becomes a master in the art of
using guilt to dominate others.
In
any situation, the psychopath projects a persona, which can vary
according to circumstances. The opinions he wears in public are all
disguises that he tailors to his own advantage. However, lying is so
deeply embedded in his nature that the question of his “sincerity” is
almost irrelevant: the psychopath can beat a lie detector. The truth has
no value in his eyes, or merges with the version of events that suits
him. The psychopath is unable to put himself in the place of others, and
thus to view himself critically. Confident in any circumstance of being
right and innocent (and superior), he considers the resentment of his
victims as irrational and pointless.
Although those close to the psychopath – at least those who learn the
hard way his true nature – can judge him raving mad, the psychopath is
not “sick” because he does not “suffer.” He is innocent of neurosis, and
never requests psychiatric care (except as a strategic calculation). He
is not psychotic, and cannot be regarded as maladapted to social life.
On the contrary, he is, in a certain sense, over-adjusted. That is why
the real mystery, from a Darwinian point of view, is not the existence
of psychopaths, but their low proportion in the population.
Jewishness and selective empathy
The most optimistic low-end estimate of the proportion of psychopaths
in the Western population is 1%. This 1% should not be confused with
the famous 1% who own half the world’s wealth; but a study of senior
executives of large companies, published under the title
Snakes in Suits,
shows that psychopathic traits are widespread among them (3). This is
not surprising; modern society values psychopathic traits and favors the
upward mobility of psychopaths.
The fact that Jews today are disproportionately represented among the
elite (they form half of billionaires in the United States, while
representing only 2.4% of the population) (4) does not allow us to
conclude that psychopathy is more prevalent among the chosen people. In a
way, quite the opposite is the case: Jews demonstrate among themselves
an extraordinary capacity for empathy, or at least familiarity that
breeds exceptional solidarity to the point of self-sacrifice. But the
selective nature of this empathy suggests that it is addressed less to
the humanity of others than to their Jewishness. In
Nomads. Essay on the Jewish Soul
(1929) we learn what transpires when two Jews meet. “We have never met
before, but I instantly know him. One look, one phrase, and I know where
he grew up, how he grew up, where he got his drive and his sense of
humor. He is New York. He is Jewish. He looks like my uncle Louis, his
voice is my uncle Sam. I feel we’ve been together at countless weddings,
bar mitzvahs, and funerals. I know his genetic structure. I’m certain
that within the last five hundred years—perhaps even more recently—we
shared the same ancestor.” (5)
This is a comment from Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor, about his
meeting with Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Council of the Federal
Reserve, two very influential Americans, about whom we would like to
believe that such familiarity does not affect their judgment of the
nation’s interest. Kadmi Isaac Cohen described Judaism as “the
spiritualized deification of the race […]. Thus the divinity in Judaism
is contained in the exaltation of the entity represented by the race.”
(6) It is as if the Jews felt united by a collective or ethnic soul,
which occupies more or less of their individual soul according to
individuals and circumstances.
IDF slogan: “1 shot 2 kills”
This is indeed how many Jews recall their Jewishness. “Being Jewish
to me,” says Alain Finkielkraut, “is to feel involved, concerned,
sometimes compromised by what other Jews do. It’s a feeling of
belonging, affiliation; and in this affiliation, there is, for example,
the tortured link to Israel.” (7) Every Jew experiences himself as part
and parcel of the chosen people; everything he is doing reflects on the
community. When a Jew is a victim, all Jewish people are victimized. (By
contrast, if he is a torturer, his Jewishness is repressed because it
would implicate the whole people in his guilt.) Jewishness is in some
sense a latent sentiment capable of being activated by the slightest
alarm. “The feeling of Jewishness remains in me something dark, abyssal,
and above all, unstable. Both powerful and labile. Nothing is as
important to me as my Jewishness which, however, in many respects, has
so little importance in my life,” writes Jacques Derrida. (8)
Jewish ethnocentrism
In contrast to the empathy it shows for itself, the Jewish community
as a whole, to the extent it submits to its representative elites, tends
to behave towards the mass of Gentiles in a psychopathic rather than
empathic manner. This is why a goy observer, Werner Sombart, despite his
reputation as a Semitophile, highlights features of Jewish collective
psychology that are similar to psychopathic tendencies including a
temperament that is “coldly utilitarian” and “calculating,” alongside a
propensity to mimicry, combined with a mechanical conception of human
relations. (9) The founder of sociology Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), very
critical of his Jewish community, noticed among Jewish intellectuals a
pragmatic and self-interested notion of truth, which can be compared
with that of the psychopath: “The Jew . . . seeks to learn not in order
to replace his collective prejudices by reflective thought, but merely
to be better armed for the struggle. . . . [H]e superimposes this
intellectual life upon his habitual routine with no effect of the former
upon the latter”. (10) Many Jewish historians, for example, seem to
value History less as a pursuit of truth than as a means of power.
The
hypothesis of a form of “collective psychopathy” with narcissistic
tendencies makes it possible to deconstruct the universalism in which
Judaism is draped. At the first level, Jewish universalism is a fable
intended to obfuscate reality and confuse the goy. But it is not only
this, as it also appears in the literature internal to the Jewish
community, where it amounts to an expression of limitless ethnic
narcissism. The Jewish people are “the seed that is germinating the
humanity of the future” (Jacob Kaplan, Chief Rabbi of France); “the
living ladder that meets the sky” (Emmanuel Levinas); “Israel equals
humanity” (Levinas) (11); “The Jew is closer to humanity than any
other,” so that “the enemy of the Jews is the enemy of humanity” and
therefore killing Jews is “murdering all mankind” (Elie Wiesel) (12).
Worse, “Hitting a Jew is hitting God Himself,” according to Cardinal
Aron Jean-Marie Lustiger (13), taken almost verbatim from the Talmud
(Sanhedrin 58b: “Hitting a Jew is like slapping the face of God himself
“). This is why the strange notion of “crimes against humanity” was
created specifically in 1945 at the Nuremburg Trials to describe the
massacre of Jews, while the term “genocide” was coined for the same
purpose by Raphael Lemkin in 1944. These terms having since been
generalized to other victims of history, the copyrighted term Holocaust
was coined — hard to beat.
This equation between Jewishness and humanity, which is the height of
ethnocentrism, is the real meaning of Judaism’s claim to embody
humanism. Though Israelis are “the most separatist people in the world”
according to Nahum Goldman (former president of the World Jewish
Organization and founder of the World Jewish Congress), he adds: “The
Israelis have the great weakness of thinking that the whole world
revolves around them .” (14) So there is not necessarily a contradiction
in their minds between universalist discourse and the practice of
tribalism. If the Jew is the essence of humanity, what is good for the
Jews is good for humanity, on principle. And although fundamentally
racist, Jewishness cannot see itself as such: “Judaic ethics […] by
definition deny racism. A Jew cannot be racist.” (Elie Wiesel) (15).
This does not prevent the same Elie Wiesel from stating that “Jewish
history describes an ongoing conflict between us and the others. Since
Abraham, we are on one side and the whole world is on the other.” (16)
It has often been
said that Jews have an ethnocentric conception of universal history,
which has no meaning in their eyes except in relation to the Jewish
people. Josef Kastein acknowledges this in his book
History and Destiny of the Jews
(1936): “Because it accepted the idea of the chosen people and
salvation, the Jewish world was Judeocentric, and Jews could interpret
everything that happened according to a single point of view, with
themselves as the center.” (17) Joshua Jehouda illustrates this
perfectly in
Antisemitism, Mirror of the World: “He who plumbs
the depths of universal history, to gain an overall vision, finds that
from ancient times until today two opposing currents are fighting over
history, penetrating and shaping it constantly: the messianic current
and the anti-Semitic current […] Because messianism and anti-Semitism
are the two opposite poles of the journey of humanity.” (18)
In
his megalomania, the psychopath is convinced that when he uses others,
it is for their own good. Similarly, according to rabbinical logic, it
is to enlighten humanity that the Jewish community must preserve itself,
prosper, and eventually dominate humanity: “Judaism considers only the
salvation of the house of Israel, which alone will permit the salvation
of the seventy nations of the universe” (Rabi,
Anatomy of French Judaism,
1962) (19). This is where the double ethno-religious nature of Judaism
helps streamline the paradox that the Jews should remain a separate
people in order to spread their universal religion. Such Jewish
intellectuals as Felix Adler (1851-1933) have defended the paradoxical
idea that the Jewish people must remain ethnically united to accomplish
their mission: To spread the universalism that will dissolve ethnicity
from the rest of humanity. Only when the mission is completed will the
Jewish people disappear. In this way has the most ethnically oriented
community manages to impersonate the champions of universalism. (20)
Thus when Martin Buber called for a state for the Jews, it was so they
could serve humanity. For it is only by fulfilling his messianic dream
of a national home, he said, that the Jewish religion can lead humanity
towards the messianic age. (21) This argument, developed by Reform
Judaism, is intended primarily for goyim but also for “soft” Jews, in
order to convince them that their commitment in favor of the group is a
service to humanity.
The Innocent Victim
The
psychopath is unable to see the other person’s point of view, and
criticism strikes him as irrational aggression. This is the reaction of
the Jewish elites to criticism: To them it can be nothing other than the
expression of visceral anti-Semitism, an atavistic goyish disease.
“Judeophobia is a psychosis,” wrote Leo Pinsker, a founding father of
Zionism, “a hereditary demonic madness,” “a congenital perversion of
human mentality,” “passed down for two thousand years,” “incurable.”
(22)
The psychopath does not know the feeling of guilt; he constantly
plays innocent. Those who get in his way, or even cast a shadow over his
path, are solely responsible for their own destruction. Their
accusations are baseless fabrications, their anger an irrational hatred.
“One thing that Judaism has which other spiritualities lack is
innocence,” explains André Neher, one of the leaders of “the Jewish
school of thought of Paris” (with Emmanuel Levinas and Leon Ashkenazi).
“We are innocent, and we feel even more deeply that we are innocent when
we are accused. […] It is this innocence that we must be aware of at
present, and that we must never deny, never, in any circumstance.” (23)
And it works: “You will understand nothing of anti-Semitism,” wrote
Jean-Paul Sartre, “if you fail to remember that the Jew, that object of
so much hatred, is perfectly innocent, nay harmless.” (
Anti-Semite and Jew,
1946). The Jewish question is thus reduced to the question of
anti-Semitism, which, thanks to the mythology of the Holocaust, is
elevated to the status of metaphysical Evil. “The hatred of the Jews is
the enigma of enigmas …” (André Glucksmann,
Hate Speech, 2004)
(24). It is a necessary enigma, without which the Jewish people could
dissolve. Towards the end of his life, the Jewish writer Ilya Ehrenburg
repeated that he would consider himself a Jew “as long as there was a
single anti-Semite left on earth.” (25) Persecution is the central theme
of the Passover holiday, Hanukkah, Purim and Yom Kippur, and Jewish
history as taught to Jewish children, according to Michael Walzer, is
one long tale of exile and persecution – Holocaust history read
backwards. (26) According to historian Zygmunt Bauman, Israel uses the
Holocaust “as the certificate of its political legitimacy, as a
safe-conduct pass for its past and future policies, and, above all, as
advance payment for the injustices it might itself commit.” (27)
Israel, Psychopath State
The State of Israel is now in the international scene what the
psychopath is in a human community. With regard to the Palestinians,
“Israeli Jews’ consciousness is characterized by a sense of
victimization, a siege mentality, blind patriotism, belligerence,
self-righteousness, dehumanization of the Palestinians, and
insensitivity to their suffering,” in the words of journalist Akiva
Eldar (“Operation Cast Lead against Gaza in 2008-2009″). (28) As noted
by the Deputy Director of Military Intelligence Yehoshafat Harkabi:
“Dazzled by its self-righteousness, Israel cannot see the case of the
other side. Self-righteousness encourages nations no less than
individuals to absolve themselves of every failing and shake off the
guilt of every mishap. When everyone is guilty except them, the very
possibility of self-criticism and self-improvement vanishes…” (29) The
Israeli journalist Gideon Levy wrote in Haaretz in 2010 that “Only
psychiatrists can explain Israel’s behavior.” However, the diagnosis he
offers, including “paranoia, schizophrenia and megalomania,” (30) is in
my opinion insufficient. It must take into account Israel’s
extraordinary manipulative capacity on the world stage via corruption
and propaganda, that is to say, the Bank and the Press.
Israel’s
relationship to the United States is that of a typical psychopath to an
influential and impressionable man he has decided to use to accomplish
his misdeeds. The golden rule of manipulation formulated by Colonel
Mandell House (who was the intermediary between the Zionist network and
President Woodrow Wilson) applies generally to Israel’s manipulation of
the United States: “With the President […] it was invariably my
intention to always to make him believe that ideas he derived from me
were his own.” (31) Indeed, Israel has managed to lead America into a
Middle East policy that only serves Israeli interests, by pretending to
the American people that it serves their interests. The psychopath tries
to interfere in all the human relationships of his prey, so as to
prevent any alliance that could allow him to be unmasked. Isolate and
divide-and-rule are the essence of this strategy. This is exactly what
Israel and its neoconservative moles have done, by trying to split the
United States from its historic allies in the Middle East, with the aim
of one day remaining the only ally of the United States in the area; the
demonization of all heads of state in the Arab world is part of this
strategy.
The power of the Zionist manipulation of the United States, based on
quasi-total control of the mainstream media alongside large-scale
psychological operations such as September 11th, is truly bewildering.
But it becomes understandable in light of the cognitive mechanisms of
psychopathy. It even becomes predictable to some extent, if we keep in
mind that the psychopath has no ability to question, no limits to his
appetite for power, and no remorse about leading humanity into ruin to
save his skin. Nothing better illustrates the psychopathic nature of
Zionism than the apocalyptic nuclear blackmail Israel perpetually
exercises over the West under the name “the Samson Option.” In 1974
Golda Meir summed it up as “Israel’s willingness in a doomsday situation
to take the region down with it” (32) in the event of looming defeat.
And remember: there is no limit to the psychopath’s thirst for power,
because he does not seeks power for the comfort it can bring him, but
instead loves power for the sake of power.
Conclusion
By drawing a parallel between psychopathy as a personality disorder
and the attitude of Israel, I do not mean, of course, the Jews in
general. They are the first to be manipulated by their elites, and they
are part of this collective psychopathy only to the extent of their
submission to those elites. Jewishness, do not forget, is whatever idea
the Jews make of it; and the idea the Jews make of it is, almost
entirely, the one imposed on them by their elites.
What
is at issue is the prevailing ideology of Israel, and (more discreetly)
of the organized Jewish community. Dominant discourse is always shaped
by the elite. Sometimes a strong current of popular thought emerges to
challenge the dominant way of thinking, but nothing of this kind is yet
observable in the Jewish community; it is overwhelmingly docile to its
elite, which currently dominates the media and the entertainment
industry and therefore enjoys considerable mind-control powers. Their
ruse is to maintain in the Jews an absolute conviction of the immaculate
innocence of their people, and simultaneously to inculcate a paranoid
fear of anti-Semitism, this “disease transmitted for two thousand years,
incurable.” (Leon Pinsker) (33)
In
The Corporation: the Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power
(Free Press, 2005), Joel Bakan noted that those “legal persons” that
are large companies behave like psychopaths, insensitive to the
suffering of those they crush in their pursuit of profit: “Corporate
behavior is very similar to that of a psychopath.” That company culture,
which involves every employee to one degree or another, is driven by
its ruling elite. The Enron case has shown the world the tremendous
damage that can be done by a company run by people of high intelligence
and perverse ideology. (34) My analysis here of the Jewish community is
based on exactly the same reasoning. Like it or not, the character of a
nation is as much determined by its legitimate leaders than the reverse.
Until proven otherwise Benjamin Netanyahu is as much Israel as Vladimir
Putin is Russia.
Ledeen is indeed a “terrorism expert” – he is said to be an Operation Gladio wet work operative
And since Israel has New York as its second capital, we must also
count among its elites the neoconservatives (“neo” here means “crypto”
and “conservative” means “Likudnik”), whose leaders define themselves as
disciples of Leo Strauss, therefore implicitly as super-Machiavellian.
(In his Thoughts on Machiavelli, in fact, Strauss claims he is the only
one who understands what Machiavelli never dared to write). This
hyper-Machiavellianism of the neoconservatives, to which they admit when
speaking amongst themselves, must be taken very seriously. In an
article in the Jewish World Review of June 7, 1999, the neoconservative
Michael Ledeen defends the thesis that Machiavelli was a “secret Jew”
since “If you listen to his political philosophy you will hear Jewish
music.” (35) According to Strauss, Machiavelli is the super-patriot who
understands that only the nation has an eternal soul, and that,
therefore, the best leader is one who has no fear of losing his soul,
since he has none. In practice, the art of the Machiavellian prince is
to terrorize while diverting popular resentment toward his enemies. I
believe that the admission of Ledeen sheds light on the psychopathic
nature of Israel. From the Judeo-Machiavellian (i.e. neoconservative)
point of view, the current leaders of Israel from Tel Aviv to New York –
from Benjamin Netanyahu to Larry Silverstein – are super-patriots.
This article is in no way anti-Semitic; it is a severe criticism of
“Jewishness” as a system of thought, a representation of the world and
the self. We are critiquing an idea by exposing its dangerous
irrationality, nothing more. Even if it is as old as the world, an idea
still deserves critique. Since the first victims of a toxic idea are the
men and women it inhabits, they are likewise the first we would help
liberate. This article is basically a fraternal message to all Jews:
Jews of all countries, disunite! Break away from your elites and their
pathological ideology! Rejoin humanity!
Likewise,
not all elites deserve to be put in the same bag. Many are the Zionist
leaders who have had the courage to confront the monster they created,
and to try to undo the damage. Moshe Sharett, Foreign Minister from 1948
to 1956 and Prime Minister from 1954 to 1955, advocated a moderate
Zionism respectful of international rules, in contrast to the methods of
Ben Gurion, Pinhas Levon, Moshe Dayan and Shimon Peres, the clan
determined “to set the Middle East on fire,” “to frighten the West into
supporting Israel’s aims,” by raising “terrorism to the level of a
sacred principle” according to Sharett (36). The Zionist leader Nahum
Goldman, quoted above, was in favor of a genuine dialogue with the Arabs
and was deeply disillusioned by the attitude of Ben Gurion, whom he
described as “organically incapable of compromise” and blinded by
self-righteousness. After 1967 he became an outspoken critic of illegal
occupation of Palestinian territories. During the government of Begin,
he advised President Carter to “break the back” of the Zionist lobby
that he had long headed, which he believed had become a “negative
factor” afflicting American foreign policy. (37)
Why
have men like Sharett and Goldman never managed to overcome the
psychopathic ideological power machine of Zionism? Could it be because
it – like Jewishness itself – is rooted deeply in the Bible? In the
final analysis does not the Zionist manipulation go back to the creation
by those ancient priests, the Levites, of a tribal god by the name of
Yahweh, who usurped the title of the Creator of the Universe and Father
of Humanity? Ultimately, is not Zionism the logical outcome of Yahwism?
This is a question that I will reserve for another article.
1) Robert Hare,
Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us, The Guilford Press, 1993.
2) Helene Deutsche, Les «comme si» et autres textes, 1933-1970
(1992), Seuil, 2007, p. 55, cited in Roland Gori, La Fabrique des
Imposteurs, Le Lien qui Libère, 2013, p. 232.
3) Paul Babiak et Robert Hare,
Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work, HarperCollins, 2007. Theme expressed in documentary film I am Fishead (2011) :
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXFmo6WipNk
4) Benjamin Ginsberg,
The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, University of Chicago Press, 1993 ; J.J. Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, Basic Books, 1997.
5) Robert Reich,
Locked in the Cabinet, Scribner, 1997,
cited in Kevin MacDonald, Culture of Critique: Toward an Evolutionary
Theory of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and
Political Movements, Praeger 1998, kindle edition 2013, e. 9222-27.
6) Cited in André Pichot,
Aux origines des théories raciales, de la Bible à Darwin, Flammarion, 2008, p. 418-419.
7)
www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Alain-Soral-commentaires-de-l-actualite-et-conseils-de-lecture-25711.html, à 15:12.
8) Cité dans Hervé Ryssen,
Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 183.
9) Werner Sombart,
Les Juifs et la vie économique (1902), KontreKulture, 2012, p. 482 et 158.
10) Cited in Kevin MacDonald,
Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, Praeger, 1998, édition kindle 2013, e. 5403-10.
11) Cited in Hervé Ryssen,
La Guerre eschatologique, Éditions Baskerville, 2013, p. 23-24 et Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 184-189.
12) Cited in Roger Garaudy,
Le Procès du sionisme, 1998, p. 17 et dans Hervé Ryssen, Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 184-189.
13) Jean-Marie Lustiger,
La Promesse, Parole et Silence, 2002.
14) Nahum Goldman,
The Jewish Paradox, Fred Jordan Book, 1978, p. 8 et 56-57.
15) Cited in Hervé Ryssen,
Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 191.
16) Hervé Ryssen,
La Guerre eschatologique, Éditions Baskerville, 2013, p. 25.
17) Josef Kastein,
History and destiny of the Jews, Garden City publishing, 1936, cited in Douglas Reed, La Controverse de Sion (1956), Kontre Kulture, 2012, p. 163.
18) Josué Jehouda,
L’Antisémitisme, miroir du monde, Éditions Synthesis, 1958, p.185, cited in Léon de Poncins, Les Juifs et le Concile Vatican II, Kontre Kulture, 2014, p. 173.
19) Cited in Martin Peltier,
L’Antichristianisme juif. L’enseignement de la haine, Diffusion Internationale Édition, 2014, p. 250-252.
20) Kevin MacDonald,
Culture of Critique, Praeger, 1998, Kindle edition 2013, e. 9983-10008 ; see also
Separation and Its Discontents, Praeger, 1998, Kindle edition 2013, ch. 7.
21) Cited in Kevin MacDonald,
Separation and Its Discontents, Praeger 1998, Kindle edition 2013, e. 5485-91.
22) Léon Pinsker,
Autoémancipation, Lettre d’un juif russe à ses frères (1882), Éditions Mille et Une Nuits, 2006, p. 17 et 21.
23) Cited in Hervé Ryssen,
Les Espérances planétariennes, Éditions Baskerville, 2005, p. 319.
24) Cited in Hervé Ryssen,
Psychanalyse du judaïsme, Éditions Baskerville, 2006, p. 205.
25) Kevin MacDonald,
Culture of Critique, Kindle 2013, e. 3176-78.
26) Michael Walzer, “Toward a New Realization of Jewishness,”
Congress Monthly n° 61, 1994, p.4, cited in MacDonald, Separation and
Its Discontents, Kindle 2013, e. 4675-86.
27) Kevin MacDonald,
Separation and Its Discontents, Kindle 2013, e. 4674-86.
28) Cited in Max Blumenthal,
Goliath: Life and Loathing in Greater Israel, Nation Books, 2013, p. 16.
29) Alan Hart,
Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Volume 2: David Becomes Goliath, p. 42-49.
30) Gideon Levy, “Only psychiatrists can explain Israel’s behavior,”
Haaretz, January 10, 2010,
www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/only-psychiatrists-can-explain-israel-s-behavior-1.261115
31) Arthur Howden Smith,
The Real Colonel House (1918), Bibliographical Center for Research, 2010, citd in Aline de Diéguez,
Aux Sources du chaos mondial actuel, on line at: http://aline.dedieguez.pagesperso-orange.fr/mariali/chaos/house.html.
32) Alan Hart,
Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, vol. 2: David Becomes Goliath, Clarity Press, 2009, p. 194.
33) Léon Pinsker,
Auto-émancipation, 1882, cited in Jean Daniel, La Prison juive, Odile Jacob, 2005, p. 133.
34) See the documentary
The Smartest Guy in the Room (2005), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxzLX_C9Z74
35) Michael Ledeen, “What Machiavelli (A Secret Jew?) Learned from
Moses,” Jewish World Review, 7 juin 1999,
www.jewishworldreview.com/0699/machiavelli1.asp
36) Livia Rokach,
Israel’s Sacred Terrorism: A Study Based on Moshe Sharett’s Personal Diary and Other Documents, Association of Arab-American University Graduates, 1986, p. 42-49.
37) Alan Hart,
Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Volume 2: David Becomes Goliath, p. 42-49.
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.
Dr.
Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast
outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York
Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other
leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and
universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for
Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author,
and talk radio host.
