Showing posts with label ANGLO-INDIA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ANGLO-INDIA. Show all posts

Wednesday, 28 August 2019

BHARAT ISRAEL - MUSLIMS, CHRISTIANS, LOW CASTES, CHANT PRAISE LORD RAAM OR DIE!

"It's like they are trying to erase us — erase all of my people," says Jaibuna, the widow of Pehlu Khan. The 55-year-old Muslim man was beaten to death in 2017 by Hindu men who objected to his transporting cows.
Furkan Latif Khan/NPR 
 
 World

'This Is It. I'm Going To Die': India's Minorities Are Targeted In Lynchings

Last year, a long-distance truck driver, Mohammad Hashim, was hauling a load of refrigerators out of New Delhi when a dozen strangers on motorbikes forced him off the road.
They pulled him out of his truck and demanded he open the back. They wanted to see if Hashim was transporting cows or beef — which is illegal in many Indian states, because cows are sacred in Hinduism, the majority religion in India.
"But I'm just the driver, and I'm not allowed to open the back of the truck. It was locked," Hashim, 45, recalls. "So they pulled on my beard and tried to force me to chant 'Jai Shri Ram.'"

Long-distance truck driver Mohammad Hashim, 45, survived an attack by a Hindu mob last year. A dozen men on motorbikes forced him off the road and beat him. He suffered a broken leg and fractured vertebrae.
Furkan Latif Khan/NPR 
 
That slogan — which means "Praise Lord Ram," a Hindu god — has long been known as a prayer. Now it's an incitement to mob violence against India's minorities.
Hashim, a Muslim, refused to chant in praise of a Hindu god. So the men started beating him.
"I thought, 'This is it. I'm going to die,'" he recalls. "Then I went unconscious."
A surge in lynchings
Since the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party won power in India five years ago, lynchings of the country's minorities have surged. In February, Human Rights Watch reported at least 44 such murders between May 2015 and December 2018. Hundreds more people have been injured in religiously motivated attacks.
Most of the victims are Muslims, members of the country's largest religious minority. They comprise about 15% of India's 1.3 billion people. Other victims include lower-caste Hindus and Christians.

Most of the attackers are devout Hindu men, known as "cow vigilantes," who take it upon themselves to enforce beef bans. Some of them claim ties to the BJP. Last year, a BJP minister met with a group of men convicted of a lynching and draped them in flower garlands.

After Prime Minister Narendra Modi won a second term in a landslide victory in May, a new parliament was sworn in, dominated by his BJP. As opposition lawmakers, particularly one Muslim politician, recited the oath of office, some BJP lawmakers taunted them with chants of "Jai Shri Ram."
Last month, a BJP state minister was filmed heckling a Muslim lawmaker and trying to force him to chant "Jai Shri Ram" outside the Jharkhand state assembly.
In an April report, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom condemned what it called the Indian government's "allowance and encouragement of mob violence against religious minorities." In June, after a lynching in Jharkhand, the U.S. commission called on the Indian government to "take concrete actions that will prevent this kind of violence and intimidation."

Mohamed Irshad, 27, was with his brother and his father, Pehlu Khan, when they were attacked by a Hindu mob in 2017. "My brother and I barely survived — and all of India saw what happened to our father," he says. The attackers posted a video of their assault on social media in which Khan, his white tunic splattered with blood, pleads for his life, calling his attackers "brother."
Furkan Latif Khan/NPR 
 
Article 15 of India's constitution prohibits discrimination based on religion. Human rights groups are lobbying for the creation of a specific hate crimes law, but none exists in India yet.
"It's like they are trying to erase us"
One of India's most infamous recent lynching cases was that of Pehlu Khan, 55, a Muslim dairy farmer from Haryana state.
In April 2017, Khan and his two sons were driving home from a cattle fair in neighboring Rajasthan, with two cows and two calves in the back of their truck, when strangers on motorcycles surrounded them.
"I showed them receipts for the cows we'd bought, but they tore them up — and started beating us with hockey sticks," says Khan's son Mohamed Irshad, 27. "I suffered internal bleeding. My brother and I barely survived — and all of India saw what happened to our father."
That's because the attackers themselves recorded a video of their assault and posted it on social media. In a two-minute clip, the men praise Hindu gods as they punch and kick Khan. His white tunic splattered with blood, the father of eight pleads for his life, calling his attackers "brother."
That graphic video is how Khan's widow Jaibuna, who goes by one name, learned of her husband's death. She was waiting for him to return home from the cattle fair when a neighbor ran up and showed her the clip on his cell phone.
"People were saying, 'Don't show her, this is her family!'" recalls Jaibuna, who is in her mid-40s but doesn't know her exact age. "Everyone was panicking, and I couldn't take it. I fainted."
Before he died, Khan was able to describe his attackers to police. Six men were arrested. Charges against them were dropped, then reinstated, and the case remained in limbo for two years — until last week, when a court acquitted all of them, citing lack of evidence.
Instead, Khan was charged posthumously with cow smuggling. Police say he didn't have a permit to transport cows across state lines. Khan's two sons, who were with him that day, await trial — and if convicted, face the possibility of up to five years in prison.
"It's like they are trying to erase us — erase all of my people," Jaibuna says in the muddy courtyard of their family farm.
The family has sold off their cattle, to avoid further attacks. They're frightened. A sole buffalo remains on their farm, along with some chickens.
Former BJP lawmaker Gyan Dev Ahuja, who represented the Rajasthan district where Khan was murdered, has said he has "no regret over his death." He called Khan a "sinner."
A lack of public outcry
Videos of religiously motivated attacks in India like the one that killed Khan continue to go viral. There's a new clip on social media practically every week.
But prosecutions — of the attackers, at least — are rare. So is public outrage.
"How does a majority stay silent and witness something, unless you believe that what's happening is the right thing?" asks author Rana Ayyub, who went undercover to write a book about the BJP's role in anti-Muslim riots in Modi's home state of Gujarat, where Modi served as chief minister before becoming prime minister.
The lack of public outcry over the surge in lynchings shows that India's Hindu majority tacitly supports not murder, Ayyub says, but some discrimination against Muslims.
Some Indian analysts say the situation in India is comparable to the post-Civil War period in the United States, when many white people looked on as black people were lynched.
"The similarities with the American lynchings of the late 19th century are striking," says Prabhir Vishnu Poruthiyil, a business professor at the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay who has studied corporate India's lack of response to hate crimes.
"Most of the upper-middle class that populate[s] the corporate classes, they're also upper-caste Hindus," Poruthiyil explains. "Even if they don't agree with the lynching itself, they might be OK with the idea of stopping cow slaughter. It's a slippery slope."
As a child in Mumbai, Ayyub survived Hindu-Muslim riots in 1992 and 1993, which killed several hundred people. But she says what's happening now feels worse, because it's not a "spur of the moment" outpouring of anger. There are very specific targets.
"Now lynchings are organized on social media," Ayyub says. "People send messages to each other, saying, 'Hey, this household has beef in their fridge, let's go attack them."
She says India's Muslims increasingly perceive such attacks as being against them, rather than in defense of cows and Hindu customs. The repercussions could be dangerous, Ayyub warns. She's worried that Muslims are being alienated as Hindu nationalists revise mainstream Indian norms along Hindu lines.
Relatives of Mohammad Hashim, a lynching survivor, gather at the family's home in Haryana, India.
Lauren Frayer/NPR
"When you try to stifle a community, when you try to put them down, when you try to make them secondary citizens, their anger will burst on the streets," Ayyub says. "That's how you radicalize people."
Offering help
There is a small, fledgling movement of Indians — Muslims and Hindus — working to fight hate crimes and help victims.
In donated office space in New Delhi, four cellphones are lined up on a desk. When one line is busy, the next one rings. This is the headquarters of a new hate crimes helpline, created by United Against Hate, a network of volunteers. Organizers say they've received 15,000 phone calls since launching in July.
Callers "are very upset. They are very worried and say, 'We are in a difficult position,'" says dispatcher Jagisha Arora. "One person called me and said, 'I'm at police station right now. Police are refusing to lodge a complaint. They are threatening us.'"
Arora, 26, logs details from each call in an Excel spreadsheet and connects callers to free legal aid in 100 different Indian cities.
But from time to time, she also gets a different type of call — from people who are angry that this helpline even exists.
"Some people call to complain, like, 'Why are you spreading this?' They accuse me and say Muslims are bad," she says, shaking her head.
Fears persist
Hashim, the truck driver, survived his lynching on the highway outside New Delhi. After the attack, he was bedridden for six months with a broken leg and fractured vertebrae.
He can't read or write, so his supervisor at the trucking company — a Hindu — helped him file a police report. Nothing has come of it.
Now it's time for Hashim to get back on the road. He needs to provide for his five children.
"My children say, 'Don't worry about us, Daddy. We can stay poor. We'll eat less. We want you to be safe,'" Hashim says.
They're scared that next time, their father might not come home.
NPR producers Furkan Latif Khan and Sushmita Pathak contributed to this report.

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

12 MILLION INDIAN HOUSEHOLDS DEFECATE IN THE OPEN

"Only 46.9 percent of India's 24.66 million households have toilets, 49.8 percent defecate in the open, and 3.2 percent use public toilets, according to 2011 census figures."
 HINDUSTANIS WERE ALWAYS A VERY CLEAN PEOPLE.  WHAT HAPPENED TO ANGLO BHARAT (BOLLYWOOD INDIA)?

India faces stinking reality on Toilet Day

Nobody liked the smell of truth, more so since it concerned the tetchy aspect of toilets in India.
India's Federal Minister of Rural Development Jairam Ramesh was accused last year of hurting Hindu religious sentiments by the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party for saying the country needed "more toilets than temples".
Cleanliness may be next to godliness, but India - with 1.2 billion people - is far from achieving it. As World Toilet Day is marked on November 19, India's sanitation and toilet statistics continue to raise a stink.

Less than one-in-three households in Indian villages have toilets. Urban areas have more toilets but nevertheless suffer from poor sanitation and disposal mechanisms.

The lack of public toilets for the urban poor and in rural areas leads to alarming rates of water-borne disease and affects women and children most, campaigners say.

India also carries the shame of having manual labourers, mostly marginalised people who belong to a community formerly called "untouchables" or Dalits, to clean human excreta from open lavatories, even today in the 21st century.


While a 1961 census by the government said there were more than 3.5 million "faeces scavengers", recent reports have said the number is down to 64,000. This is contested by NGOs saying these workers still suffer the ignominy of cleaning human excreta, suffer illnesses and social ostracisation.

A few years ago, "Shit of the Other" - a show by Delhi-based artist Inder Salim - displayed human faeces in a bottle. Some contended it was not scatological but a telling artistic statement of the state of the poor and disadvantaged, who are compelled to defecate in public in Indian cities.

"Toilets are not just confined to sanitation in India," Salim says. "They contain layers of oppressed people, Dalits, our inability to deal with this basic human need."

Mahatma Gandhi, India's "Father of the Nation", had in the early part of the 20th century branded the practice of engaging manual scavangers to clean latrines as a social evil. Gandhi preferred to clean his own toilet to set an example - something that shocked many.

Gandhi's call to make sanitation a hygienic issue 65-years ago seems to have gone down the drain.
Consider these facts:

- Only 46.9 percent of India's 24.66 million households have toilets, 49.8 percent defecate in the open, and 3.2 percent use public toilets, according to 2011 census figures.

- The economic impact of inadequate sanitation is about 2.4 trillion rupees ($38.4 million), or 6.4 percent of India’s gross domestic product, according to the Water and Sanitation Programme.

- The states of Jharkhand and Odisha rated lowest with 78 percent of  households lacking toilet facilities.
- More people in India have mobile phones than toilets.

Right to dignity
"We need to view services – such as the availability of functional toilets – as a part of the right to live a life of dignity and equality," says Subhadra Menon, director of Health Communication at the Public Health Foundation of India.

But she adds: "Having said that, the provision of toilets to 1.2 billion people is far more complex than making mobile phones available, so in a sense, it isn't right to compare apples and oranges.

"But yes, the kind of social and other marketing that can be utilised to influence choices and behaviours is not being done optimally in the case of the use of toilets."

Sulabh International is an NGO promoting sanitation across the country. Its founder, Bindeshwar Pathak, bemoans that "India lacks a culture of sanitation."

The royal rajas - erstwhile rulers - might have had slaves to evacuate their "thunder boxes", but much of India has had a late start to "toilet training", Pathak says.

"Even the rural rich in the 1950s did not have toilet facilities in their mansions. Women went to the open for their ablutions as did the men."

While he says India has made progress from a no-toilet scenario to providing nearly half of its population with latrines, "implementation of rural sanitation must be made priority and speeded up", says Pathak.

Sulabh is seeking ways to accelerate the installation of toilet facilities. These programmes include training youth in both rural and urban areas on health and sanitation; pressing the government for fund allocation, and encouraging alternative livelihoods for caste groups that manually scavenge toilets.

'No toilets, no marriage'
It's easier for modern Indian women in the metros to walk into a shopping mall and find a loo. But it is not so for their underprivileged sisters who are poor or live in villages with no toilet facilities.

Women and girls often defecate in public, harming their health and also inviting molestation and unwanted attention from men in both rural and urban areas.

Police in the state of Bihar have admitted violence against women could be contained if more public toilets were provided.

As Salim points out, "You can find public urinals for men, but women suffer most as Indian cities and villages do not make space for women's basic needs. Gender gets the worse off in this shitty business."

Ramesh, who has campaigned zealously for the need for toilets, last year invoked a "no toilet, no bride" campaign. He exhorted women to not marry men whose family homes did not come equipped with toilets.
Some instances have occurred where brides have left the home of the groom after finding the household did not have a proper toilet. It has forced some men to pose in photos beside toilets in their home before seeking a bride in their villages.

A "right to pee" campaign was also launched in April 2012 by a group of non-profit organisations in Mumbai. They fought for the use of free toilets for women who were until then charged a fee to use toilets, while men could use them for free.

India's Supreme Court ruled in 2011 that every government school must provide toilets, especially for girls. Inability to do so would mean closing the schools down.

"Once political support – across party lines – builds up for an issue, chances are it gets addressed satisfactorily," says Menon. "Therefore, it is more about how all our politicians and elected representatives can take up the issue of toilets being provided.

"The critical issue is this – each and every day, young, adolescent girls and young adult women [and men actually] need to expose themselves to multiple vulnerabilities," Menon says. "This makes even more serious the ignominy that these girls and women face – including not having a clean and functional toilet that they can use with a guarantee of privacy."


ADDENDUM

Adalberto Erazo Jr.
Wednesday 20 November 2013 at 2:16 AM
 
Narendra Modi got his enlightenment 22 years late: Jairam Ramesh on 'toilets before temples' remark
 
I spoke of toilets out of conviction, Modi out of compulsion: Ramesh
 
 

Narendra Modi got his enlightenment 22 years late: Jairam Ramesh on 'toilets before temples' remark

Narendra Modi got his enlightenment 22 years late: Jairam Ramesh on 'toilets before temples' remark
 
New Delhi Jairam Ramesh has launched an acidic attack on Narendra Modi for his "more toilets than temples" comment, saying it is borne out of his "blind desire for the Prime Minister's position."

Mr Modi had said yesterday, "My identity is of a Hindutvawadi, but I say build toilets before you build temples," ruing the fact that many Indians still do not have access to basic sanitation. (Make toilets before temples: Narendra Modi tells students in Delhi)

The union minister told NDTV today, "He's got enlightenment finally, but 22 years too late. Had he had the same realization earlier India would have been spared the trauma of the Babri Masjid tragedy and subsequent events.. - the Bombay blasts, Godhra and its consequences. The communalization that took place on account of this temple movement, which was masterminded by Modi amongst others."

And he added sarcastically, "But I am glad that Modi, 22 years later, is a changed man."


Mr Ramesh's ire is grounded in the fact that when he made a similar comment last year, he was subjected to not just sharp criticism from the BJP, but also gross acts vandalism by alleged members of BJP-affiliated outfits like the Bajrang Dal. 

"BJP workers and supporters came and urinated in front my house. Where was Modi then? Where was he when I was being attacked by Rajiv Pratap Rudy, Prakash  Javdekar and others?" he said today.

A year ago, almost to the day, Mr Ramesh, then Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation., had said, "I think toilets are more important than temples. No matter how many temples we go to, we are not going to get salvation. We need to give priority to toilets and cleanliness."

BJP leader Rajiv Pratap Rudy slammed him saying, "It would be good for Mr Ramesh that out of his exuberance he stops making such comments which will destroy the fine fabric of religion and faith."
 
 

I spoke of toilets out of conviction, Modi out of compulsion: Ramesh

68129
New Delhi: Union Minister Jairam Ramesh, who was criticised by the BJP over a similar comment on toilets as Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi, has questioned the BJP's 'double standards'. Speaking to CNN-IBN on Modi's comment that toilets should be built before temples in India, Ramesh said, "I still believe we need more toilets than temples. I wish Modi had discovered this 20 years ago, then we would not have had the Babri Masjid episode."

"When I spoke, Rajiv Pratap Rudy said I should respect the fine line between faith and religion. Then he went on to say that the BJP maintains that one should not get into the debate of whether a temple or toilet is more important. Prakash Javadekar also attacked me. Activists of the RSS and VHP came to my house and left bottles of urine. I wonder where they are now when Mr Modi has suddenly discovered the value of toilets," Ramesh added.

ALSO SEE Where are the BJP critics who slammed Ramesh for toilet remark: Cong

Jairam Ramesh said that Modi was making whatever statements due to his ambition of becoming the Prime Minister. "I spoke out of conviction, Modi speaks out of compulsion," Jairam Ramesh said.
Speaking at a function organised in New Delhi for the youth, Modi said he dared to say so even though his image as a Hindutva leader did not allow him. "I am known to be a Hindutva leader. My image does not permit me to say so, but I dare to say. My real thought is 'Pehle shauchalaya, phir devalaya' (toilets first, temples later)," he said.

ALSO SEE Toilets first, temples later, says Modi

However, a similar comment by union minister Jairam Ramesh a few months ago had invited flak from Hindu outfits. Ramesh said that toilets are more important that the temples in our country also commenting on poor hygiene levels in the latter.
BJP spokesperson Rajiv Pratap Rudy had then said, "Making of toilets and having faith in a religious place of worship are two different things. India is a multicultural country where we should have unblemished faith in a temple, a mosque, a gurudwara or a church. You cannot juxtapose the two."

ALSO SEE BJP lashes out at Jairam Ramesh for comparing toilets with temples

But the BJP has welcomed Modi's comments now. "All Modi was saying was that sanitation is another name of God in a way. So we should focus more on the sanitation part and temples people will build any way. Jairam lacked conviction and his motive was a suspect when he made such a statement," BJP leader Balbir Punj said.
The Congress has said that it exposes the party's double standards. "I am only saying that the BJP is showing double standards. When Jairam Ramesh said the same thing, the BJP critics criticised him. Where are the critics today? Why are they not saying anything to Modi. Actually Modi has no faith in Hinduism," Congress MP Rajeev Shukla said.

Congress General Secretary Digvijaya Singh said, "I would like to know what VHP, RSS, and the party that chose him as their PM nominee thinks of it. Modi talks of a spiritual experience. I would like to ask him if he has experienced the spirituality involved in cleaning a toilet."

Following is the full transcript of Jairam Ramesh's interview: 
 
CNN-IBN: Narendra Modi has made this remark that toilets are more important than temples. But when you had made a similar statement you were attacked by sanghis and various people. How do you respond to this comment? 
 
Jairam Ramesh: On October 5, at Sewagram in fact, where Gandhiji had his ashram in the mid 30s, I made this comment. And I still believe in it that this country needs more toilets than temples, or mosques or gurudwaras or churches. And that's what I had said. I had used temples as a short form for any place of worship. And I'd said that what we need, with 60 pc of women still defecating in the open and the link established between open defacation and malnutrition, what we need are more toilets and less places of worship. When I said this Mr Rajiv Pratap Rudy attacked me for destroying the fine fabric between faith and religion. His exact words, I have it here, 'for destroying the fine fabric of faith and religion'. I don't know what he means by it. Then he went on to say that the BJP maintains that one should not get into the debate of whether a temple or toilet is more important. Prakash Javadekar then attacked me publicly. Activists of the RSS and VHP came to my house, they left bottles of urine outside my house. I went to Agra a couple of days later and black flags were shown, my effigies were burnt. I wonder where they are now? Now that Mr Narendra Modi has suddenly discovered the value of toilets.
I wish Mr Narendra Modi discovered this 20 years ago. We wouldn't have had the Babri Masjid episode, communal riots across the country, particularly in Mumbai.

CNN-IBN: But do you think this signifies a shift in his position?
 
Jairam Ramesh: I can't speak for Mr Modi. All I can say that in his blind pursuit of the Prime Ministerial post, he seems to be willing to make whatever statements that are necessary to appeal to whatever section of the society he wants to appeal to. All I wish is that this enlightenment had dawned on him before he became one of the orchestrators of Mr Advani's rath yatra, which caused untold misery on the people of India and brought about a bitter and almost lasting communal divide in our politics.

CNN-IBN: Mr Balbir Punj has said that when you spoke you lacked conviction. He somehow believes that Mr Modi has some conviction, which is why BJP is probably going to defend his statement?
 
Jairam Ramesh: I don't give Mr Punj much credence but let me say that I spoke out of conviction, Mr Modi is speaking out of compulsion.