The criminals were protected by French Law and Police - and thanks to the Communist-Atheist thieves Joachim & Véronique Garnier, and my own treacherous Common-Law wife Sylviane Paulette Garnier who, with the complicity of my own Legal Advisor Guy Sibony, Notary Piales, and others, forced me to sell my thriving 4 million Francs business, the 3-star Windsor Hotel in Paris X that our own unique son inherited from Gérard Frémaux, his legal father, and move to Mauritius! Sylviane stole much of our son's inheritance and gave it to her fatherless son Joachim!
ALAIN SORAL's "COMBAT" (FIGHT, KAMPF, JIHAAD...) started in 2007, mine started in 1968 (when I spent one night in a UK prison and deported to Paris?) and got worse in 1983, then again in 1988, and now again in 2022. French Pr. Roger Garaudy's fight started as soon as he embraced Islam.
Affaire de la "quenelle de Colmar" : Alain Soral définitivement condamné à 150 jours de prison ou 22500 euros d’amende
Soutenez la résistance authentique aux côtés d’Alain Soral et d’E&R !
- Publié le : mercredi 21 septembre 2022
- Mots-clés : France; Justice & Droit; Persécutions !; Suisse
- Commentaires : 33
- Nombre de vues : 18 603
- Source : E&R122 votes
La rentrée est là, l’hiver approche et la France sous contrôle atlanto-sioniste retient son souffle dans cette période qui sent, non pas le gaz, mais la fin d’un temps. Celui de la gouvernance globale ou celui des nations ? L’avenir nous le dira. Pour l’instant l’heure est au combat et pour E&R il dure depuis 2007, sans relâche, afin de produire un réseau digne de faire vivre la France que nous aimons, envers et contre tout.
ALERTE DONATEURS :
SOUTENEZ ALAIN SORAL ET E&R
En cette période dangereuse dont le potentiel révolutionnaire s’avère plus fort que jamais, vous pouvez appuyer la résistance authentique aux côtés d’Alain Soral en faisant un don ou en adhérant :
E&R : plus qu’un site,
un réseau unique dans le paysage métapolitique français
Ce réseau structuré est le cœur de nos succès passés et à venir, la clef permettant à Égalité & Réconciliation de tenir contre vents et marées.
En nous soutenant, vous permettez notamment à la Coordination nationale de l’association d’activer et de déployer en permanence ses militants au sein de nos sections régionales, que ce soit en milieu rural ou citadin.
Ce dynamisme collectif permet de mettre en relation nos adhérents – aux niveaux local et national – pour leur permettre d’obtenir des résultats concrets, notre plus belle réalisation étant sans nul doute la ferme E&R, lieu d’entraide paradisiaque qui accueille des camarades toute l’année.
C’est également ce lieu phare d’E&R qui héberge chaque été notre événement le plus important : le Festival de la Réconciliation.
D’autres projets ruraux sont actuellement en cours de développement par l’association.
Votre soutien permet à nos équipes juridiques
de défendre les intérêts d’Alain Soral et d’E&R
Face aux nombreux procès en cours, en France comme en Suisse, sans notre organisation hiérarchisée et structurée de manière efficace, Alain Soral serait aujourd’hui en prison, voire pire.
Nous aurions également disparu d’Internet après avoir été sous le feu des Sleeping Giants et subi des dizaines de fermetures de comptes, qu’ils soient bancaires, de réseaux sociaux ou de solutions de paiement. La liste est non exhaustive et nous savons que ce n’est pas fini.
Depuis quinze ans,
nos militants donnent vie au site egaliteetereconciliation.fr
Grâce notamment à la Rédaction de combat de Pierre de Brague, aux équipes vidéo d’ERTV et à notre radio ERFM, sont délivrées quotidiennement et à des millions de visiteurs des informations de qualité couplées à une grille de lecture sans concession ni équivalent, basée sur les travaux et les analyses d’Alain Soral pour permettre de comprendre le processus politique, historique et philosophique que nous traversons.
Si un espoir peut venir de l’Est pour que notre pays se redresse durablement, nul doute que le travail d’Égalité & Réconciliation est loin d’être terminé. L’essentiel sera donc de tenir plus longtemps que nos adversaires.
De la part d’Alain Soral et de tous ses militants, merci pour votre soutien !
À ne pas manquer, sur E&R :
-
E&R | 29 août |88 MédiasPolitique E&R et LFI bientôt ciblés par des assassinats ?
Le média russe Rybar accuse notre gouvernement de préparer des missions homicides
C’est ce qu’écrit le média russe indépendant Rybar dans un message traduit par Donbass Insider sur Telegram (voir ci-dessous). Si des attentats n’ont pas eu lieu ou encore eu lieu contre des responsables de LFI ou d’E&R, considérés par le pouvoir profond français comme une opposition sérieuse, par rapport à la droite et à la gauche classiques, des surveillances téléphoniques et des moyens plus (...)
-
E&R | 24 février |27 CommunautésJustice & Droit Affaire Shoah où t’es ? : Alain Soral débouté par la CEDH
Alain Soral a été débouté, de manière « définitive », ce jeudi 24 février 2022 par la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (CEDH) qu’il avait saisie après sa condamnation dans le cadre de l’affaire Shoah où t’es ?. Le dessin Shoah où t’es ? est un pastiche d’une couverture de Charlie Hebdo moquant Stromae, les massacres au Rwanda et les victimes des attentats de Bruxelles (22 mars 2016). Pour le simple (...)
-
E&R | 9 février |51 CommunautésCulture Spotify supprime le compte d’ERFM
Sur "signalement" de Tristan Mendès France
Maintenant que @spotify fait l'actualité avec le sulfureux Joe Rogan, c'est le moment de rappeler que Dieudonné et Alain Soral (ERFM) sont présents sur @spotifyfrance. Deux individus condamnés pour antisémitisme. Peut-être une réaction @spotifyfrance ? pic.twitter.com/WoNHczGnAd — Tristan Mendès France (@tristanmf) February 5, 2022 En France, la première cancel culture n’est pas (...)
-
E&R | 18 janvier |59 CommunautésJustice & Droit Affaire de la "quenelle de Colmar" : Alain Soral définitivement condamné à 150 jours de prison ou 22500 euros d’amende
En rejetant ce mardi 18 janvier 2022 le pourvoi en cassation d’Alain Soral dans le cadre de l’affaire dite de la « quenelle de Colmar », la Cour de cassation a confirmé la décision rendue le 6 janvier 2021 par la Cour d’appel de Colmar, à savoir la condamnation du président d’E&R à 150 jours de prison ou 22500 euros d’amende pour une photo de quenelle ! Pour avoir diffusé en mai 2019 sur (...)
|
|
Cet article a été vu 18603 fois Popularité : 1 Commentaires : 33 |
33 Commentaires
AVERTISSEMENT !
Eu égard au climat délétère actuel, nous ne validerons plus aucun
commentaire ne respectant pas de manière stricte la charte E&R :
- Aucun message à caractère raciste ou contrevenant à la loi
- Aucun appel à la violence ou à la haine, ni d'insultes
- Commentaire rédigé en bon français et sans fautes d'orthographe
Quoi qu'il advienne, les modérateurs n'auront en aucune manière à justifier leurs décisions.
Tous les commentaires appartiennent à leurs auteurs respectifs et
ne sauraient engager la responsabilité de l'association Egalité &
Réconciliation ou ses représentants.
Suivre les commentaires sur cet article
RSS 2.0Alain Soral et E&R
E&R en vidéos
Revues
International
Bonnes adresses
of Israeli Politics
By Roger Garaudy
Contents
Introduction
Part I: Theological Myths
- The Myth of the "Promise": Promised
Land or Conquered Land?
a. In Contemporary Christian Exegesis
b. In the Prophetic Jewish Exegesis
- The Myth of the
"Chosen People"
- The Myth of Joshua:
Ethnic Purification
Part II: The Myths of the 20th
Century
- The Myth of Zionist
Antifascism
- The Myth of the
Justice of Nuremberg
- The Myth of the
Holocaust
- The Myth of "A Land
Without a People for a People Without a Land"
Part III: The Political Use of the
Myth
- The Israeli-Zionist Lobby in the
United States
- The Israeli-Zionist
Lobby in France
- The Myth of the
Israeli Miracle: The External Financing of Israel
Conclusion
PDF
- the whole book
Addendum:
Right to Reply -
A Pamphlet in Response to
Attacks
A Reply to the Media Lynching of Abbe Pierre and Roger
Garaudy
- Introductory words
- Machination of a
Lynching
- The Scorned "Right
to Reply"
- The Witch
Hunt
- Struggle Against All
Fundamentalisms
- The Magic Word that
Kills
- As for the lies
instituted at Nuremberg
- Then what do I
deny?
- One Goal: Gag Abbe
Pierre and Garaudy
- Zionism against
Israel
- A Very Powerful
Lobby in the United States
- A Very Powerful
Lobby in France
- The Nuremberg
Taboo: An Inverted Dreyfus Affair
- A "Litany of
Hate"
- A Tribal Reading of
the Bible
- A Prophetic
Reading: Abbe Pierre
- Abrogate the
Totalitarian Gayssot Law
- In Whose
Interest?
- But the Truth
Bursts Against Darkness
Annex
- Letter from Abbe Pierre to Roger
Garaudy, 15 April, 1996
- Letter from Pastor Roger
Parmentier to Roger Garaudy, 11 May, 1996
- The Cry of a
Deportee
by Gaston Pernot, Doctor of Law, Commander of the Legion of Honor, Paris
("Le Figaro," Friday, May 3, 1996)
- Indignation of an
Israeli Writer
by Ari Shavit/Haaretz/New York Times Syndication
(Translated from Hebrew in "Liberation" of May 21, 1996.)
Introduction
THIS BOOK IS THE HISTORY OF A HERESY
Through a literal and selective reading of a Revealed Word, it makes
religion into a political tool and in so doing, hallows it.
This heresy is a fatal disease at this end of the century, that I
already defined in "Integrismes."
I fought Islamic fundamentalism in "The Greatness and decadence of
Islam" at the risk of displeasing those who did not like me to
say it.
I fought Christian fundamentalism in "Towards a war of
religion" at the risk of displeasing those who don't like me to
say: "The Christ of Paul is not Jesus."
I am fighting today Jewish fundamentalism in "The founding
myths of the israeli policy," at the risk of attracting the
thunder of those Israeli-Zionists who did not like Rabbi Hirsch's
reminder:
"Zionism wants to define the Jewish people as a national entity ... which is a heresy."
SOURCE: "Washington Post," October 3, 1978.
What is the Zionism that I denounced (and not the Jewish people)
in my book?
It has often defined itself: it is a political doctrine.
"Since 1896, Zionism refers to the political movement founded by Theodore Herzl."
SOURCE: Encyclopedia of Zionism and Israel. "Herzl Press." New York, 1971, volume 2, p. 1262.
This is a nationalist doctrine which was not born out of Judaism
but out of the European nationalism of the 19th century. Herzl, the
founder of political Zionism, did not claim to belong to a religion:
"I do not obey a religious impulse."
SOURCE: Th. Herzl: "Diaries. Ed. Victor Gollancz, 1958. "I am an agnostic." (p. 54)
He was not interested in the "Holy Land" in particular: for his
nationalist objectives, he would have equally accepted Uganda or
Tripoli, Cyprus or Argentina, Mozambique or the Congo.
SOURCE: Herzl, Diaries (passim).
But in the face of the opposition of his Jewish friends, he realized
the importance of the "Mighty Legend" (June 9, 1895), Diaries I, p.
56) as "a rallying cry of irresistible power."
SOURCE: Herzl, p. 45.
This is a mobilizing slogan that this eminently realistic politician
could not ignore. Transposing this "mighty Legend" of the "Return"
into historical reality, he declared: "Palestine is our unforgettable
historical homeland ... The name alone will be a powerful rallying
cry for our people."
SOURCE: "L´État Juif," p. 209."The Jewish Question is for me neither a social question nor a religious question ... it is a national question."
This is a colonial doctrine. Here too, the lucid Theodore Herzl does
not hide his objectives. The first step is to set up a "Charter
Company" under the protection of England, or any other power, as a
stepping stone toward the formation of "the Jewish State." That is
why he called on the master of this type of operation, the colonial
trafficker, Cecil Rhodes, who used his Charter Company to carve out
of South Africa a subsidiary bearing his name: Rhodesia.
Theodore Herzl wrote him on January 11, 1902:
"Please send me a letter stating that you have examined my program and that you approve it. You may be wondering why I am calling on you, Mr. Rhodes. It is because my program is a political program."
SOURCE: Herzl, "Tagebuch," Vol. III, p. 105.
The Zionist doctrine adopted at the August 1897 Basle Congress had
three dimensions: political, nationalist, colonial. Due to his
Machiavellian genius, Theodore Herzl could justifiably say:
"I founded the Jewish State."
SOURCE: "Diaries," p. 224.
Half a century later, his disciples applied exactly the same
policies, used the same methods and followed the same political line
to create the State of Israel (after W.W. II).
But this political, nationalist, colonialist enterprise was never a
fulfilment of Jewish faith and spirituality. At the same time as the
Congress of Basle, which could not be held in Munich (as predicted by
Herzl) because of opposition from the German Jewish community,
another conference was held in Montreal (1892), where Rabbi Isaac
Meyer Wise, the most representative Jewish personality in America,
initiated a motion against the political and tribal Zionist
interpretation of the Bible and for a spiritual and universalist
interpretation of the Prophets.
"We totally disapprove of the initiative aiming at the creation of a Jewish State. Attempts of this type highlight an erroneous conception of the mission of Israel ... that the Jewish Prophets were the first to proclaim ... It aims at a Messianic time when men recognize belonging to one great community for the establishment of the Kingdom of God on earth."SOURCE: Confèrence Centrale des Rabbins Americains. Yearbook VII, 1897, p. xii.
This opposition to political Zionism, inspired by the attachment to
the spirituality of the Jewish faith, did not cease from expressing
itself. Following W.W.II, using the U.N. and at the same time taking
advantage of rivalries among nations and, especially, of the
unconditional support of the United States, Israeli Zionism managed
to impose itself as a dominant force. Thanks to its lobby, it
succeeded in reversing an admirable prophetic tradition. But it did
not manage to stifle the criticism of great spiritual men.
Martin Buber, one of the great Jewish voices of this century, during
his entire lifetime and until his death in Israel, did not stop
denouncing the degeneracy and even the inversion of religious Zionism
into political Zionism.
Martin Buber declared in New York:
"The feeling I had 60 years ago when I entered the Zionist movement is essentially the same feeling I have today ... I hoped that this nationalism would not follow the path of others a beginning with a great hope and degenerating later to become a sacred
egoism, daring, even like Mussolini, to proclaim itself sacroegoismo, as though collective egoism could be more sacred than individual egoism. When we returned to Palestine, the decisive question was: Do you want to come here as a friend, a brother, a member of the community of people of the Middle East or as the representatives of colonialism and of imperialism?
"The contradiction between the end and the means to reach it
divided the Zionists: some wanted to receive political privileges from the
Great Powers, others, especially the youth, wanted to be allowed to work in
Palestine with their neighbors, on behalf of their life together, and for
the future.
"All was not always perfect in our relations with the Arabs, but there was, in general, good neighborliness between Jewish villagers and Arab villagers.
"This organic phase of establishment in Palestine lasted until the time of Hitler.
"It was Hitler who pushed the masses of Jews to come to Palestine, and not an elite who came to carry on their lives and prepare for the future. Thus, a selective organic development was replaced by a mass immigration requiring a political force for its security ... The majority of Jews preferred to learn from Hitler rather than from us ... Hitler showed that history does not follow the path of the mind, but that of power, and that when a people is quite strong, it can kill with impunity ... This is the situation that we had to combat ... To "Ihud" we proposed ... that Jews and Arabs not only coexist but cooperate ... This would make possible an economic development of the Middle East, thanks to which the Middle East could bring a great essential contribution to the future of humanity."SOURCE: "Jewish Newsletter," June 2, 1958.
Addressing the 12th Zionist Congress in Kaarlsbad, September 15,
1921, Buber said:
"We speak of the mind of Israel and we believe that we are not like other nations ... But the mind of Israel is nothing more than the synthesis of our national identity, nothing more than a justification of our collective egoism ... transformed into an idol. We have refused to accept any prince other than the Lord of the Universe. While we are like all other nations and we drink with them from the same cup that intoxicates them. The nation is not the supreme value ... Jews are more than a nation: they are the members of a community of faith.
"Jewish religion was uprooted, and this is the essence of the disease whose symptom was the birth of Jewish nationalism around the middle of the 19th century. This new form of desire for land is the cornerstone of what modern Jewish nationalism has borrowed from modern nationalism of the West.
"What does the idea of 'chosen' have to do with all that? Being 'chosen' does not indicate a feeling of superiority, but a sense of destiny. This feeling does not originate from a comparison with others, but from a vocation and responsibility to accomplish the task of which the prophets keep reminding us: if you brag about being chosen, instead of living in obedience to God, you commit a felony."
Evoking this "nationalist crisis" of political Zionism, which is a
perversion of the spirituality of Judaism, he concludes:
"We hoped to save Jewish nationalism from the mistake of making an idol out of people. We have failed."SOURCE: Martin Buber, "Israel and the World." Ed. Schocken. New York, 1948, p. 263.
Professor Judas Magnes, president of Hebrew University since 1926,
considered that the "Biltmore Program" of 1942, requiring the
creation of a Jewish State in Palestine:
"Will lead to a war against the Arabs."SOURCE: Norman Bentwich. "For Zion Sake." Biography of Judas Magnes. Philadelphia: "Jewish Publication Society of America," 1954, p. 352.
In his opening address in 1946 at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
where he had been president for 20 years, he said:
"The new Jewish voice speaks with the voice of guns ... This is the new Torah of the land of Israel. The world has been shackled by the madness of physical force. May Heaven guard us from shackling Judaism and the people of Israel to this madness. It is pagan Judaism that has conquered a great part of the powerful diaspora. During the time of romantic Zionism, we thought that Zion must be redeemed with honesty. All the Jews of America bear the responsibility of this mistake, this mutation ... even those who are not in agreement with the actions of the pagan leadership but stand idly by. The anesthesia of the moral sense leads to its atrophy."SOURCE: Ibid, p. 131.
In fact, since the Biltmore Declaration, the Zionist leaders had the
most powerful protector: the United States. The World Zionist
Organization had swept aside the opposition of those Jews faithful to
the spiritual traditions of the prophets of Israel, and demanded the
creation, not anymore of a "national Jewish home in Palestine,"
according to the terms (if not the spirit) of the Balfour Declaration
of the preceding war (W.W. I), but the creation of a Jewish State in
Palestine.
Already in 1938, Albert Einstein condemned this Declaration:
"In my opinion, it would be more reasonable to reach an agreement with the Arabs based on sharing life peacefully together, rather than to create a Jewish State with borders, an army and a project of temporal power, no matter how modest it is. I fear the internal damage that Judaism will sustain due to the development, in our ranks, of a narrow nationalism. We are not anymore the Jews of the Maccabees period. To become again a nation in the political sense of the world will be equivalent to turning away from the spiritualization of our community that we owe to the generosity of our prophets."SOURCE: Rabbi Moshe Menuhim, "The decadence of Judaism in our time", 1969, p. 324.
The reminders did not miss, following every Israeli violation of
international law.
To mention only two examples of what was said loudly, expressing what
many Jews think privately but, under the intellectual inquisition of
the Israeli-Zionist lobby, do not have the power to express publicly:
In 1960, during the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem, the "American
Council for Judaism" declared:
"The American Council for Judaism addressed a letter yesterday, Monday, to Mr. Christian Herter, denying the government of Israel the right to speak in the name of all Jews. The Council declares that Judaism is a matter of religion, not nationality."SOURCE: "Le Monde," June 21, 1960.
During the bloody invasion of Lebanon by the Israelis, Professor
Benjamin Cohen of Tel-Aviv University wrote to P. Vidal-Naquet on
June 8, 1982:
"I am writing to you while listening to a transistor that has just announced that 'we' are in the process of 'realizing our objectives' in Lebanon: to insure 'peace' for the residents of Galilee. These lies worthy of Goebbels make me mad. It is clear that this savage war, more barbaric than any of those preceding it, has nothing to do with the attempt in London or the security of Galilee ... Jews, sons of Abraham ... Jews, victims themselves of so much cruelty, how can they become so cruel? ... The greatest success of Zionism is the 'dejudaisation' of the Jews.
"Dear friends, do whatever is in your power to prevent Begin and Sharon from reaching their twin objectives: the final liquidation (a fashionable expression here these days) of the Palestinians as a people, and the Israelis as human beings."SOURCE: Letter, published in "Le Monde," June 19, 1982, p. 9.
"Professor Leibowitz calls Israeli politics in Lebanon Judeo-Nazi."
SOURCE: "Yediot Aharonoth," July 2, 1982, p. 6.
This is what is at stake in the struggle between the Jewish prophetic
faith and nationalist Zionism, based, like any other nationalism, on
the refusal to recognize the other, and on making oneself sacred.
Any nationalism has the need to hallow its pretensions. Following the
fractionization of Christianity, each of the nation-states claimed
that it had received the sacred heritage and the investiture of
God.
France is the "eldest daughter of the Church" through which it
carries on the work of God (Gesta Dei per Francos). Germany is "above
all" because God is with her (Got mit uns). Eva Person declared that
"the mission of Argentina is to bring God to the world," and in 1972,
the prime minister of South Africa, Vorster, celebrated the savage
racism of "Apartheid" saying, "Let us not forget that we are the
people of God, invested with a mission." ... Zionist nationalism
shares in this exhilaration of all nationalisms. Even the most lucid
let themselves be tempted by this exhilaration.
Even a man like Professor André Neher succumbs to this
temptation. In his beautiful book, "L'essence du
prophétisme" (Ed. Calmann-Lévy, 1972, p. 311),
after recalling so well the universal meaning of the alliance of God
and man, he ends up writing that Israel is "the sign, par
excellance,
of divine history in the world. Israel is the axis of the world, it
is its nerve, its center, its heart."
This comment recalls the unfortunate "Aryan Myth" whose ideology was
the foundation of panGermanism and Hitlerism. This path is the
opposite of the teaching of the Prophets and the admirable "I and
Thou" of Martin Buber.
Exclusiveness bans dialogue: one cannot "dialogue" with Hitler or
Begin, because their racial superiority or their exclusive alliance
with the Divine leaves them nothing to expect from the other.
We are aware that in our time, the only alternative to dialogue is
war, and, as we keep repeating, dialogue requires that from the
start, everyone is aware of what is lacking in his faith and that he
needs the other to fill this void. This is the condition of any
desire for fullness (which is the spirit of any living faith).
Our anthology of Zionist crimes is part of a body of efforts made by
those Jews who have tried to defend a prophetic Judaism against a
tribal Zionism. What nourishes antisemitism is not the criticism of
the policy of aggression, deception and blood of Israeli-Zionism. It
is the unconditional support of its policy, which by literal
interpretation of the great traditions of Judaism, selects only
whatever justifies this policy, elevates it above international law
by making sacred the myths of yesterday and today.
latest updates
- Video : Muslim Bro Saves His Fellow Hindu Pilgrims From Drowning During Visarjan
- Video : Labour Leader Calls Out Hinduphobia…And Hinduphobes lose their Wigs
- Video : US Man charged with hate crimes for attacking, robbing Hindu women
- Video : Before Gandhi Garba There Was Sword Garba
- The Hindoo Colonials Part 2 : A Model Minorty’s Self Delusion Of Grandeur
- Video : Hindoo A-Holery Has Landed Announcing There Is NO Hinduphobia
- Video : Swamiji Sarvapriyananda Speaks Out Against Hinduphobic Coolie Gungadin Indians In The US
- Direct Action Day in Leicester
- Video : Hindus Turn Up In Numbers To Protest Against Far Right Islamists
- Video : The BullS**t Broad’Caste’ing Corporation Better Known as the BBC Exposed
- Video : Hinduphobic Media Perform Indian Vanishing Rope Trick After Attacks On Hindus
- Video : Hindu Girl Burnt To Death By Stalker For Refusing Marriage
- What is Abrahamic Supremacy ? Part 2 : The Neo Puritans of The Left And Right
- Video : Shivaji Statue Installed in Kashmir – The Symbol of The Greatest Indigenous ‘Heathen Pagan’ Resistance In The World
- Video : Another Kashmiri Hindu Killed By Islamists – Full Story
HHR Letter To Keir Starmer : Leader of the Labour Party
Dear Sir Starmer,
Hindu Human Rights Group (HHR) was set up to highlight persecution, oppression, and discrimination against Hindus worldwide. HHR was formed in the UK, and it is sadly in this country that we find Hinduphobia now going mainstream.
It is commendable indeed that you have condemned the antisemitism which has saturated the Labour Party in recent years, something which resulted in the party’s condemnation by the EHRC (ironically a body which a Labour government had created). Nevertheless, just as Labour has managed to make antisemitism mainstream and acceptable, it has done the same with Hinduphobia.
As with almost all immigrant communities, Hindus and others flocked to the Labour Party as their natural home. The blatant and vile racism evident in the Conservative Party meant they needed little persuading: Peter Griffiths election in Smethwick in 1964 using racist language; Enoch Powell’s 1968 ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech and opposition to Labour’s legislation to outlaw racial discrimination; the Monday Club supporting repatriation, colonialism, apartheid and Rhodesia; Federation of Conservative Students handing out ‘Hang Mandela’ posters; Margaret Thatcher speaking of white people being swamped in their own country; John Carlisle as lobbyist for apartheid South Africa; Alan Clarke praising Nazism and saying Ugandan Asians (like the family of Priti Patel) should not come here as they were the wrong colour; Nicholas Budgen using the race card in a manner that echoed Powell. The examples are legion.
It is therefore sad, disturbing and somewhat disheartening that Labour would employ tactics reminiscent of what was once seen in the hard right of the Conservative Party, and even to the right of that. The present electoral contest in Batley has brought this to the fore. When you have the Daily Mail, a newspaper that once supported the British Union of Fascists, condemning the Labour Party for using anti-Hindu and anti-Indian rhetoric, then this is something very serious. In that same article, your own Stockport MP Navendu Mishra lashed out after the party distributing that leaflet.
Unfortunately, this is the long culmination in sinister trends that have been afoot in the Labour Party in which Hindus are seen as a malevolent, metaphysical threat. Labour MPs have long pioneered the ‘self-determination’ of Kashmir. In reality this means supporting the extermination and expulsion of the indigenous Hindu population who were forced out by Pakistan-armed Islamic extremists in 1990, en masse. To this day many continue to languish in refugee camps. Yet this is always censored by those same MPs and the like who claim to support human rights. Indeed in September 2019, violent mobs who back the extermination of Hindus in Kashmir attacked the Indian High Commission in London. British Labour MP Liam Byrne in fact heading the mob.
Yet no mention of the indigenous Hindus exterminated from their only homeland. They have been erased from history and Labour has no intention of acknowledging that they existed. No dialogue from Labour, no interest. What can one say about a political party which pioneered the fight against racism and other forms of hate, that is now complicit in fanning the flames of communal hatred now in Britain? Why is it that Labour denies the genocide that has taken place in Kashmir against Hindus; and indeed in Pakistan and elsewhere? Why is Labour deaf to any dialogue with Hindus on the matter?
The second area in which Labour pioneered Hinduphobia is less well known nationally. This is on the issue of caste. Former Labour MP Rob Marris pioneered what on the surface looked like a noble cause to combat caste discrimination. However one did not have to look far to see something else was lurking. In meetings with organisations such as Castewatch it rapidly descended into fanatical speeches about Hindu supremacy in the UK, Hindus wanting to legalise burning of widows, and other strange phenomena which would not be out of place in the pages of Der Sturmer, the racist mouthpiece of Nazi Julius Streicher during the Third Reich. Again not just lack of dialogue but complete hostility from this former Labour MP, the same sort which one would normally have expected from Alan Clarke, Nicholas Budgen or even Enoch Powell. But not from Labour. In fact these anti-caste events went beyond even the Monday Club with their emphasis on Aryan race theory. It is doubtful if even the Monday Club would rant on about the Aryan race. Indeed it would be hard pressed to see if its sinister reincarnation in the Traditional Britain Group of Gregory Lauder-Frost would take things to this level.
https://www.hinduhumanrights.info/hinduphobia-the-labour-partys-other-problem/
The sad fact is that Labour has become almost a mirror image of the TGB run by Lauder-Frost.
https://www.hinduhumanrights.info/is-corbyns-labour-party-the-new-far-right/
Let us not forget that just as the Right has its own long contamination of antisemitism, racism and identity politics, so does the Left. Eugenics was once an intrinsic part of socialism and ideas of progress. Marx revealed his antisemitism in the ‘Jewish Question’, his racism by disparaging racist references to blacks, and his belief that India was incapable of progress without the superior whites ruling it.
https://www.hinduhumanrights.info/labours-aryan-brotherhood/
This will no doubt come as a shock to you. The Labour Party is one that prides itself on combatting racism. But racism evolves and mutates. These are not the days when shaven-headed Nazi tattooed maniacs like Nicky Crane prowl the streets to attack and kill, or where a teenage Joe Pearce sells the National Front’s Bulldog to school children. That racism lies at the heart of the identity politics which Labour now peddles, seeing some communities as inferior, just as some races were once seen as inferior. At least we can say that Nicky Crane eventually disowned his racist views when he came out as gay, shortly before dying from AIDS. Joe Pearce also saw the light after being jailed once too often for stoking racial hatred. But with the Labour Party the constant, unrelenting attack on Hindus and stoking Hinduphobia continues unabated. What is the result of all this?
Inflammatory leaflets in Batley. Labour MPs’ supporting mob violence in the streets in a manner which Enoch Powell never did with the dockers and Smithfield meat packers. Meetings by Labour MPs backing the extermination of Hindus in Kashmir. Yet all the while Labour is deaf to Hindus, who are doubly done over like people of colour and yet blamed as having the very white privilege which Labour’s middle-class, red brick university-educated, latte-sipping, disconnected elite have. This has not just resulted in the mass alienation of Hindu voters from a party they once called home and indeed to which they owed so much. It also shows the disconnect which labour has with the white working-class majority, which formed the core of its voting base, and at one time through the trade unions the major feed for its MPs. For this reason James Callaghan felt he could not quash strikers in the Winter of Discontent, thereby allowing Thatcher to win. Callaghan had come up through the very trade union movement which he now had to face down. Such a situation would be rare now as the disconnected elite come up through a process of brainwashing in which Hinduphobia is an essential component.
That the Labour Party has chosen the sectarian and identitarian politics of Hinduphobia is a sad epitaph to a party which under Clement Attlee not only gave this country its national health service, but which under Harold Wilson faced off white minority rule in Rhodesia, and subsequently opposed apartheid in South Africa. Roy Jenkins passed progressive legislation to build a ‘civilised society’. It was the same Labour Party which of course gave independence to India, much to the chagrin of Churchill and the Conservatives. Yet this is now the same party whose mainstream attitude mirrors that of Churchill when he notoriously said:
“I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.”
Churchill blamed India’s backwardness and especially its social degradation and poverty on Hinduism. Hindus were unfit to rule and education would hopefully extinguish Hinduism from India because it was the main impediment to progress. In 1943 he admitted:
“the only quality of the Hindus is that there’s a lot of them and that is a vice.
Two years later, in 1945, Churchill told his private secretary John Colville that “the Hindus are a foul race,” and that he wished Air Chief Marshall Arthur “Bomber” Harris could “send some of his surplus bombers to destroy them.” In other words, he wanted the Hindus exterminated. Leo Amery, Secretary of State for India, privately noted, “I didn’t see much difference between his outlook and Hitler’s.”
Just as now there is precious difference between the Bulldog rag once sold by Joe Pearce in the National Front and some of the gutter comments and literature emanating from the Labour Party. Or very little difference in the obscene racist comments by Churchill and present-day parts of the Labour Party.
The question is will Labour wake up and disown its intolerant and bigoted elements? Do Hindus have a place in a political party that is so encased in its own self-destructive intolerant Hinduphobia?
I look forward to hearing from you.
Thank You
Ranbir Singh
HHR Chairman
Hinduphobia was first used in the British Media.Read more.. @
York Newspaper. (20 March 1883). Hinduphobia.
Ursula Haverbeck : le verdict est définitif, la peine est exécutoire
START
Ursula Haverbeck a été condamnée à un an de prison pour discours de haine. La décision est maintenant définitive. La femme de 93 ans devrait bientôt commencer à purger sa peine.
Le jugement du tribunal régional de Berlin à l’encontre Ursula Haverbeck, négationniste de l’Holocauste, âgée de 93 ans, pour incitation à la haine est définitif.
La Cour d’appel a rejeté l’appel le 28 juillet dernier.
Cela a été annoncé par une porte-parole du tribunal vendredi lorsqu’elle a été interrogée par SPIEGEL.
En 2016, Ursula Haverbeck avait affirmé dans une conférence publique et en 2018 dans une interview publiée sur Internet que l’Holocauste n’existait pas.
En avril 2022, elle a été condamnée à un an de prison pour sédition.
La révision de la défense n’a pas abouti.
Malgré son grand âge, la Chambre a exclu une peine avec sursis parce que Haverbeck n’avait montré aucun signe de repentance.
La peine de deux ans et demi de prison que Ursula Haverbeck a déjà purgée n’a pas eu l’effet dissuasif escompté, raison pour laquelle le président du tribunal régional de Berlin a déclaré dans le prononcé du verdict qu’il n’y avait « pas d’alternative » à l’emprisonnement puisque, « rien ne peut vous arrêter. »
Selon le procureur, Ursula Haverbeck devrait recevoir une citation à comparaître pour commencer à purger sa peine à l’automne.
Reste à savoir si son avocat tentera de justifier l’incapacité pour éviter la prison à sa cliente. Son avocat Wolfram Nahrath n’a pas pu être joint vendredi après-midi pour commenter ce jugement.
END
Ursula Haverbeck: The verdict is final - the charge to begin the sentence is expected to be in the fall - The Limited Times (newsrnd.com)
[Pour se perpétuer, le mensonge a besoin de sa livre de chair. Mais attention : une livre de chair, ni plus ni moins, à découper d’un seul tenant, au gramme près… les exécuteurs judiciaires ont la main qui tremble et leur grosse tête molle fuit de partout en se vidant…]
28 comments
![['Pascale Publications']](https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?url=https%3A%2F%2F2vbqh.img.a.d.sendibm1.com%2Fim%2F1745975%2Fb46de65478e8c82354e7fbe152f5a3aa20b61b78d03f2bf57c7e3087ad737864.jpg%3Fe%3DLcCjHP1gAKGQhDdNR4wyScj21i6mUtLO0PwH_hYXltlkStA7TLS-dCuYtpImDiuccEH-bQNZgONi4E-hYXKKb6pcV-3-IoLEhhx_A6ksDaWeJdMdG4Cz4EvSyAlBNxWEJ-FRY2U7FW00UvHf1KkYjuIuVmEfrqoIOiyJfHUyMBUABJpBMV4lhn0N2uR30XKgUPngogXQ2Q0t0pa6o3yw_dnuTZl1b4i1lDh1WQ&t=1665657207&ymreqid=4e5a11ed-336a-6c41-1c94-180001014000&sig=eQoDr35zzFQV1kwHxSE73w--~D)
OCTOBER 12, 2022
The Guardian (London): Arthur Sulzberger Jr. on How The New York Times Turned Around
Against the odds, a unique American institution has thrived.
From the opening:
"Where does the New York Times reside in the subconscious of newshounds across America? Paul Rudnick (cough cough) wrote this answer for a New York City mother played by Bette Midler (cough cough) in Coastal Elites on HBO this year:
'I love the Times. I feel like it’s my child, or my parent. Do you know what the Times means to a liberal Jewish woman like me? On the census, when it asks for religion, I don’t put Jewish. I put the New York Times. Which I have delivered. The real Times. The newsprint Times. I know I’m old-fashioned, but reading the Times online is like having sex with a robot. I mean, it’s cleaner and it’s faster but you can tell the difference. OK, I’ll just say it. The New York Times online is the New York Times for the gentiles.'" (emphasis and coughing fits ours)
See that? The Slimes is the Jewish "religion" (a sanitized Talmud, if you will) from which the usual suspects receive their ideological (what's good for the Jews) marching orders. Indeed, many a truth is said in jest. Thanks for that, Mr. Kaiser, Mr. Rudnick & Ms. Midler.
* Editor's Note: A glance at the approving online comments which readers send in as responses to various Slimes articles reveals at least 50% Jewish-sounding surnames -- most from NY, NJ, FL & PA.
|
|
|
When Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. completed the handover of his role as Publisher of "the paper of record" to his son, Arthur G. Sulzberger in 2018 -- it marked the 5th generation of leadership of this wretched institution that has been in the blood-soaked hands of the same demonic dynasty for 126 years now. The Jewish reign over the minds of America's "coastal elite" class really started when the grand patriarch and "German" immigrant, Adolph Ochs, purchased the influential journal on-the-cheap from cash-strapped Gentile owners who never recovered from the New York bankers-induced Panic of 1893. (cough cough). It was Ochs who added the Times' well-known self-serving motto "All the News That's Fit to Print" to the masthead.
Upon his death in 1935, the controlling title of "Publisher" of The Slimes passed to his son-in-law, Arthur Hayes Sulzberger -- until 1961. With the brief 1961-1963 exception of Sulzberger's brother-in-law, Orville Dreyfus, the mighty Slimes has been ruled by a line of Sulzberger sons right up until the present day. Though the company is owned by private shareholders now, that wretched family has always maintained majority control of its pro-Globalist, anti-White, anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Western-culture, pro-Fed and pro-war-war-war propaganda.
|
|
After Dreyfus's brief reign was cut short by a fatal heart attack in May of 1963, Arthur's son, Arthur Ochs "Punch" Sulzberger took over the Manhattan Mendacity Factory and ran it for 29 years -- handing it over to his son, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr, in 1992 -- who, as previously stated, passed the publisher title on to his boy Arthur G in 2018 -- with the Chairman of NYT Company title to follow at this year's end.
It's really remarkable, isn't it? Presidents and Prime Ministers come and go, but discounting the Dreyfus stint, only four (just recently five) men have steered the lead attack vessel of the West's Judenpresse Armada since 1896 -- and always port side (left). The sheer number of minds that this rotten clan of blood-thirsty demons has stupefied and the number of souls they have polluted lies well into the 100s of millions. As a multi-generational Jewish crime family, the Sulzbergers rank second (albeit a distant second) only to The Rothschilds -- whose ultra-patriarch, Meyer Amschel Rothschild, first made his mark about 250 years ago and whose direct male descendants still wield enormous power to this day. It is interesting to note how these elite Jewish crime families -- who are the hidden force behind feminism / career womenism -- only keep their boys in charge of their own clans.
|
|
|
The erudite writer Gore Vidal may have been a libtarded sodomite who was wrong about many things; but he did have an anti-establishment streak (or pretended to have one) about him. His reference to the Slimes as “the Typhoid Mary of American journalism” was as spot-on as it was witty. One need only glance at the morning headlines of “the paper of record,” and then take note of how the superficial infomercials known as “the Nightly News” will so often pick up on whatever front page fairy-tale that Sulzberger's seditious scribblers spun that very same morning.
Like some journalistic plague, the virus of lies, half-truths and cherry-picked data then infects the unguarded minds of the whole country, and indeed, the world. Such is the indisputable power and undeserved “prestige” of this dreadful “Orwellian” institution. For as long as this Satanic weapon of disinformation exists, "youse guys" can count on the "almost daily" The Anti-New York Times to wage eternal Holy War against it. If the Slimes is the disease of deception, let the ANYT be your antidote of truth.
****
BELOW: Sulzberger's Jewish "Pulitzer Prize Winners" are frequently invited onto TV News programs to further spread their journalistic typhoid by peddling domestic Marxism and selling the endless wars which they -- years later -- will often turn against.
|
|
|
|
|
|
