ASHKE-NAZI-BRITISH IMPERIALISM
2.69K subscribers
Support us: https://www.subscribestar.com/the-gre...
To donate by Mail:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. Box 804, Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
Book: The Bad War, by M S King
http://tomatobubble.com/books_m_s_kin...
Video: Hellstorm
https://www.hellstormdocumentary.com/
Bengal Golodomor 1943
- THE HINDU MILITARY ACCOMPLICES
RURAL PEOPLE OF MAHARASHTRA, INDIA. THIS VIDEO TAKEN IN 1943.
In 1943 the Film Advisory Board (FAB), the body that had been created to oversee the production of wartime documentaries in India, was dissolved and Information Films of India (IFI) was created in its place. Under this new organisation the Government of India assumed full responsibility for propaganda films. In addition, the government implemented the Defence of India Rule 44A, effective from September 1943, which required that every cinema in India show at least 2,000 feet of government ‘approved’ film at each performance. To ensure that the IFI’s films reached as wide an audience as possible they were issued in separate English, Hindustani, Bengali, Tamil and Telugu versions (‘Note for Cut Motion’). This closer governmental control of film production was a response to two main threats: the unrest in the sub-continent caused by the nationalist Quit India movement, and the growing seriousness of the war in south-east Asia (Garga, 2007, 97). The Second World War deployed a large amount of Indian resources and manpower.
By 1943, India was third only to Britain and Canada in producing goods for war supply (Jackson, 2006, 358). The number of soldiers serving in the Indian Army grew from 205,058 men in October 1939 to 2,251,050 in July 1945, the majority of whom came from rural areas (Brown, 1994, 319; Garga, 2007, 109).
The war effort had its effect on the Indian economy, bringing with it both inflation and food shortages (Brown, 1994, 325). Among the Empire countries India provided the most serious opposition to Britain’s War aims. The outbreak of war witnessed the leading Indian political party, the Indian National Congress, resign from the government rather than supporting the war cause, and in 1942 the party launched the ‘Quit India’ movement, demanding full independence for India.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnBsjWNibL8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVtFiqENR78
Bengal famine of 1943 | Wikipedia audio article
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zr6shIzvEG0
Bengal Famine 1943 | Real Story Explained | 4 Million People Killed | Winston Churchill | Hindi
FORMER JEW Benjamin H. Freedman speech 1961
Benjamin H. Freedman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxZKtX-PEvY
Michael Hoffman & Texe Marrs Part 1 Judaism Discovered
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ENIivsnflg
Michael Hoffman & Texe Marrs Part 2 Dark Secrets Of The Talmud
Hoffman Michael. Overcoming Holo-Speak.
[REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE???]
THE RUSSIAN/CENTRAL ASIAN AND GERMAN DOUBLE HOLOCAUSTS WERE ALL ORCHESTRATED BY WARMONGERING JUDAICS, COMMUNISTS, SOCIALISTS, WESTERN ZIONIST CHRISTIANS AND ATHEISTS!
TO THOSE WHO CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH AND THEY ARE VERY FEW
"YISRAEL – GOD CONTENDED, FOUGHT, WRESTLED, AND LOST! And, that defeated God blessed him! WOW!"
IT WAS WRITTEN, SO SOME SAID, IN GENESIS 32
Male and female slave owner, cattle, donkeys, sheep and goats herder
YACOV was looking for favours as a SERVANT in the eyes of his Lord and
brother ESAU. But, he was told ESAU was instead coming to attack him and
his tribe from the Land of Seir in Edom with 400 men – to kill him, his
women and children! (Esau lived in another land and had never met his
brother Yakov’s wives or children!) So, he cried out to God to save him
from the hand of his brother Esau.
But, not trusting his God
would save him, he decided to cowardly stay behind and send a colossal
bribe to his brother: “two hundred female goats and twenty male goats,
two hundred ewes and twenty rams, 15 thirty female camels with their
young, forty cows and ten bulls, and twenty female donkeys and ten male
donkeys.”
That night YAKOV got up and took his two wives, his
two female servants and his eleven sons and crossed the ford of the
Jabbok. 23 After he had sent them across the stream, he sent over all
his possessions. He was alone when he started wrestling, fighting,
contending with a man who prevented him from crossing the river. And he
won the fight. That man was GOD! Because he defeated God, God told him
that from now on his name would be ‘ISRA EL or ISRA’IL in Arabic,
meaning POWERFUL AGAINST GOD! EL was an Arab God that Israel was
worshipping as well as the Palestinian God ADONIS or ADONAÏ!
When YAKOV finally met with Esau, he bowed to the ground seven times as
he approached his brother who ran to him and embraced him, threw his
arms around his neck, and kissed him. And they both wept. But, Esau kept
the bribe although he did not want it!
Later, YACOV or JACOB
or ISRAEL would steal ESAU’s first-born birth right from a dying and
stupid Isaac, allegedly! WOW! THIEVING ISRAEL!
The belief in
One God, Life after Death, Judgement Day, and Paradise were all concepts
held by the Egyptians long before the HIBIRUS (Hebrews) appeared on the
scene as bandits from Mesopotamia inhabited also by North Arabians.
These concepts were held by Persians as well as "Indo-Aryans" (and most
probably by others) before everything got mixed up, messed up and
corrupted later by everybody, and more specifically by the racist tribe
of YAKOV or ‘ISRA EL or YISRAEL – GOD CONTENDED, FOUGHT, WRESTLED, AND
LOST! And, that defeated God blessed him! WOW!
Through the
Hitleress Saraï or Matriarch Sarah, the HIBIRUS had already stolen the
birthright, according to their own Holy Book, of ABRAM’S or AVRAM’s or
ABRAHAM’s first-born son ISHMAEL, and the cowardly Patriarch, cowing
down to his over-aged wife Sarah, allowed this to happen! (It is obvious
that all these accounts are fables, myths, legends and outright lies,
including the Order the Human Sacrificing God gave to Abraham to
holocaust his ONLY SON (who was at the time Ishmael, not Isaac!) And,
the stupid father complied, proving that his religion was indeed one
offering human sacrifices and holocausts to his bloodthirsty God
(Moloch, maybe!)! Who will believe such shit from any God?
Christians and Muslims later foolishly adopted the concepts of
LIFE AFTER DEATH,
THE JUDGEMENT DAY,
PARADISE, and
HELL, not understanding that Arabs and others were masters of poetry
and very often used METAPHORS to convey ideas and messages. Taken as
metaphors, all this makes sense as they force Believers to enjoin the
GOOD and forbid EVIL during their earthly lives! At least, this is the
way I UNDERSTAND IT!
I even go further and say that even GOD IS A
METAPHOR, which does not mean that HE DOES NOT EXIST or that I deny
there is a SUPREME INTELLIGENCE who is behind the CREATION of everything
we see and do not see!
This short exposé proves one thing beyond any doubt: ISRAEL WAS JUST A TRIBE LIVING IN THE MIDDLE EAST!
BAFS
Monday 21st of October 2019
P.S. Feel free to correct any mistake I have made! I am writing while looking after my two grandchildren!
The extremely few (outside the Secret Services) who read chunks of what
I write are scared when they see my 1727 Oxford Bible containing 81
books authorised by “their Majesties” of England.
😂🤪😭😇😍
 |
THE JEWISH WAR ON GERMAN ZEPPELINS
By Mike King
|
A Zeppelin airship takes its name from German
Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin -- a German General and inventor whose company -- Luftschiffbau Zeppelin (LZ)--led the development of the rigid flying machines in the
late 1800's / early 1900's. After the great success of Zeppelin's design, the word "zeppelin" became used
to refer to all rigid airships.
Zeppelins were first
flown commercially in 1910 by Deutsche Luftschiffahrts-AG (DELAG) --
essentially
the world's first airline service. By the outbreak
of World War I in 1914, DELAG had made more than 1,500 flights. During
the war, the German military made use of Zeppelins
for bombing and scouting.
1.
Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin (1838-1917)
// 2.
1900: The first flight of the 420-feet-long"LZ 1" (shown above a
large boat)
// 3. By 1910, DELAG was flying the
Zeppelins (now over 700-feet long) commercially.
The defeat of Germany in 1918 (engineered
by Jewish Marxists at home and Jewish Globalists & Zionists from the outside) slowed down DELAG's business substantially.
In 1919, DELAG's airships were surrendered under the terms of the vicious Treaty of Versailles
which had
been imposed upon a disarmed Germany. The treaty
also prohibited the Germans from building more airships. An exception
was
made to allow for the construction of a single
airship for the US Navy -- a transaction which spared DELAG from total
extinction
and bought the company some more time.
In
1926 the restrictions
on airship construction were lifted at a time when
some of the oppressive monetary reparations of the Versailles Treaty
were
restructured. Work was then started on the
construction of the airship, Graf Zeppelin (775 feet) -- named after the
Count. The company was revived and, during the 1930s, the airships Graf Zeppelin and the larger Hindenburg
(803-feet) operated regular transatlantic flights from Germany to North America and Brazil.
To enhance revenue, the zeppelins carried transatlantic mail from the United States to Europe.
Special postage stamps were minted and sold for this purpose -- but the practice was suddenly discontinued (by the U.S.)
and the unsold zeppelin stamps were destroyed by the Post Office (a most unusual act which enraged many stamp collectors
(here)) Although neither Hitler nor FDR were in power in 1930, could the sudden discontinuation and strange
destruction of the stamps have been the result of a general hatred of Germans held by some people (cough cough) already
embedded within the federal bureaucracy? Probably.
1.
In 1919, the Allies ruined Germany at Versailles
--- not only seizing land, money, colonies, people
and resources from innocent Germany, but also banning its amazing
airships.
// 2 & 3. DELAG managed to hang on until the
ban was lifted in 1926. In 1930, the U.S. Postal Service issued special
air-mail
stamps for letters shipped to Europe aboard the
Graf Zeppelin -- but suddenly discontinued the service and destroyed the
remaining
stamps which could still have been sold to
collectors.
The
spire of the Empire State Building was originally designed to serve as
a mooring mast
for the jaw-dropping 750-foot-long marvels of
German engineering. But it was found that high winds associated with
such high-altitude
moorings made the Manhattan mooring idea too
impractical. The airships did pass over Jew York during the 1930's.
After 1933,
the zeppelins came with Hitler's Swastika flag on
the tail as street-level onlookers gave the "Sieg Heil" salute.
"Oy vey!"-- the "usual suspects" -- who had
already, in 1933, "declared war" upon Germany --
must surely have shrieked.
The legendary Hindenburg
disaster of 1937, which occurred right here in New
Jersey, along with, shall we say, "geo-political" issues (cough
cough) eventually brought about the demise of Zeppelins -- structures which had been the great pride of Germany -- both
before and during the righteous reign of The Great One (that's Hitler for all you newbies * normies).
The
preceding account is pretty much
standard knowledge. But there is a little bit more
to the story that (((they))) don't want you to know about.
1.
Swastikas flying over New
York drove (((them))) crazy!
// 2. 1937: The
horrible explosion and crash was broadcast live via radio, and then
shown on
pre-TV news reels (generally seen by movie-goers
before the show starts)
// 3. Hard to imagine -- given what was to come
in
a few years -- that Americans saluted the
flag-draped coffins of the fallen Germans.
*
1.
The Hindenburg was a massive
structure and engineering marvel, but passenger
space was limited. // 2 & 3. The dining room offered spectacular
views,
slow moving views.
Begun in 1932 and finally launched in 1936, the Hindenburg Airship -- named after
Paul von Hindenburg -- measured an
astounding 803 feet -- but its beautiful interior could only
accommodate
about 100 people, a number which includes the
well-to-do passengers and crew. General Hindenburg, we should note, was
the
respected World War I general and later president
of Germany who -- in order to break the contentious multi-party gridlock
that was crippling Germany -- named Hitler as
Chancellor in 1933.
1. Hindenburg had died in 1934, at age 87 -- but the zeppelin bearing his name immortalized him.
The Jews and Communists HATED Hindenburg
for enabling Hitler's rise in 1933.
// 2. A 1933 KPD (German
Communist Party) poster blares: "An End to This
System," and depicts an ominous Red threat aimed at Hitler and
Hindenburg
(in pointy military helmet).
*
Prior zeppelins had always been designed to stay float using helium -- a gas which
is not flammable. At the time, however,
helium was only available in industrial quantities from plants in the
United
States. Despite a U.S. ban on the export of helium
under the Helium Control Act of 1927, the Germans designed the
Hindenburg
to use helium in the belief that the US government
would license its export. But that assumption was made before
FDR and his Jewish-Marxist gang took over America in 1933.
Some important
background context....
1.
Jewish pressure to destroy Germany began years before the actual second world war started.
// 2. 1933.
Daily Express (London): "Judea Declares War on Germany."
// 3. 1933 / NY Daily News
When the designers learned that FDR's administration would not allow helium to be shipped to "Nazi" Germany,
the Hindenberg was re-engineered to use hydrogen for its lift instead -- a gas which is flammable. The man responsible
for denying helium to Germany was Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes (cough cough) -- a
fanatical German-hater and FDR Marxist. Though
the German engineering geniuses were still
able to construct a very safe airship -- because
hydrogen was flammable -- there now existed an opportunity for an
"accident"
with a plausible "explanation" for it.
On May 6, 1937, at the very
moment that the Hindenburg was docking before an awed crowd at
Lakehurst,
NJ, the grand airship burst into flames and
crashed, killing 35 of the 97 passengers & crew. "Static
electricity"
was blamed, yet the Hindenburg had previously
endured direct lightning hits! The true cause of the explosion
remains unknown to this day. But the unusual amount
of news reel cameras present that day, the helium embargo, the timing
of the mysterious ignition just as the ship was
mooring, the hyping of the idiotic "static electricity" theory,
and the anti-German hysteria being whipped up by
the press all combine to suggest that the Hindenburg disaster was
actually
an act of sabotage. Theories ranged from an
on-board fanatic-bomber to an incendiary rifle-bullet fired from the
nearby
woods. The incident shattered confidence in
Germany's zeppelins and marked the end of the airship era. How conveeenient.
1.
A suspicious blast -- at the exact moment of
mooring with the cameras filming -- destroys
Germany's Airship industry.
// 2. It was FDR's Jewish Secretary of the
Interior, Harold Ickes, who would not permit helium
exports to Germany.
// 3. FDR with the mighty Ickes.
The Controversial Zeppelin Stamps That Enraged 1930s Collectors
The U.S. Post Office ended up destroying most of them.
On May 21, 1930, the world’s biggest airship, the Graf Zeppelin,
floated over the Cape Verde Islands and slowed down over an unusual
target: the Porto Praia post office. When the ship had maneuvered to
just the right spot, its crew threw something out of the gondola,
attached to a small parachute. As frightened crowds gathered below to watch, the mysterious object fluttered down from the sky and landed right on the building’s roof. It was a big sack of mail.
Over the next few weeks, the Graf Zeppelin
would complete its first Pan-American tour, flying to Rio de Janeiro,
Ohio, and New Jersey, and then back over the Atlantic to Spain and its
home country, Germany. Although much glitz and glamour accompanied the
airship’s comings and goings, its journey was funded by something more
mundane: those sacks of mail, via the stamps affixed to the letters
inside.
At 775 feet from nose to tail—about as long as the Golden Gate Bridge is tall—the Graf was the largest flying machine the world had ever seen. Its operating costs were proportionate, clocking at about $4 per mile
(or $54 per mile in today’s money). Although passengers paid steep
ticket prices, especially on early flights, the ship could only hold
about 20 of them at a time, limiting that revenue stream. And despite
the fanfare that greeted its every move, attempts to charge admission to
view it on the ground didn’t go over well with the public, who were generally hurting from the Great Depression, and who wanted their close-ups for free.
Instead, the Graf’s parent
company, German Zeppelin Airship Works, decided to recoup costs by
commissioning special stamps from the countries on the tour route. Only
letters with these stamps on them would be accepted onto the airship,
which would then deliver them to their destinations. This was the only
commercial transatlantic air mail option available at the time, and was
days faster than sending a letter by boat. Brazil, Bolivia, Germany, and
Spain all made the Zeppelin stamps, and 93 percent of the proceeds from
each stamp was funneled back into German Zeppelin Airship Works.
After some debate, the U.S. Post Office decided to get in on the game as well, designing and printing a run of Graf Zeppelin stamps in a matter of weeks. They called this
a gesture of goodwill toward Germany, and pledged to also contribute 93
percent of the revenue to the Airship Works. Secretly, though, they
expected that an enthusiastic population of American collectors would snap up most of the stamps, keeping them out of circulation, and ensuring that the Post Office held onto most of the money.
So on April 19, 1930, the USPO issued three stamps, each with a different design and for a particular amount. The first, a 65-cent stamp, was green, and showed the Graf
cruising eastward above the sea. This stamp would get a postcard over
the ocean once, from the U.S. or Brazil to Spain or Germany. The second,
a $1.30 stamp, was brown, and featured the zeppelin heading west over a
cropped map of the world labeled with the tour’s three main cities
(although New York, here, stands in for New Jersey). That one would get a
letter across the sea.
The last stamp, in a bright sky blue, cost $2.60, and displayed the Graf
high in the clouds, superimposed over a small globe. This one was more
fun than practical—it would get your letter round-trip, over to Europe
and then back again. (One young boy from Ontario sent himself a letter
this way, and made the papers.) The stamps’ release was trumpeted in newspapers from New York City to Santa Cruz.
The joke, though, was on the post office.
The economic hardship that led so many Depression-era Americans to be
buoyed by the sight of a massive airship also made it difficult
for any of them to pay $4.55—50 times the cost of a loaf of bread—for a
set of three collectible stamps. The U.S. printed 1,000,000 of each
color, but only sold about 227,000 zeppelin stamps total, most of which actually did end up on mail delivered by the Graf.
The Post Office eventually destroyed the
remainder of the stamps, making collectors, who quickly accused them of
creating artificial scarcity, even angrier. But that’s what happens when
you try to cross the world’s biggest zeppelin.
Stamp of Approval
is an occasional column that explores the designs and backstories of
the world’s strangest stamps. Have a stamp you want investigated? Stick
it in an email to cara@atlasobscura.com.
Piper Michael Collins - Auschwitz The Final Count
Authors : Piper Michael Collins
Title : Auschwitz The Final Count
Year : 2012
Link download : Piper_Michael_Collins_-_Auschwitz_The_Final_Count.zip
A thought-provoking new anthology edited by English historian Vivian Bird casts stark new light on what really happened at Auschwitz during World War II. As the evidence shows, the official "facts" just don't add up. In the summer of 1997 I was invited to speak at a California college seminar about my book, Final Judgment, which contends that Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, played a front-line role in the JFK assassination conspiracy alongside the CIA. Almost instantaneously I was hit by a media barrage orchestrated by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, a lobby for Israel. The ADL told the press I was "a Holocaust denier" and, for that reason alone, I should not be allowed to discuss my book (which, incidentally, never once mentions the Holocaust). Evidently the ADL was determined to shift the focus away from what my book really does address, so they determined the best way to discredit me was to smear me as "a Holocaust denier" (which I am not). The ADL's tactic succeeded, setting off a firestorm of opposition-a "holocaust," so to speak-and the seminar was canceled, illustrating one point most clearly:
The Holocaust has become a powerful propaganda tool for the state of Israel. And what is important to remember is this: What did-or did not-happen at the Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland is, in fact, integral to the foundation of the basic story of the Holocaust. Auschwitz is central to the Holocaust legend. If it can be proved that the official stories we have been told about Auschwitz are not true, the entire fabric of the Holocaust ultimately has to unravel.
What, then, did happen at Auschwitz? On April 18, 1945, in the immediate aftermath of World War II, The New York Times reported that 4 million people died at Auschwitz. This "fact" was reported over and over again during the next half-century, without being questioned.
However, on January 26, 1995, commemorating the 50th anniversary of the Auschwitz liberation, both The Washington Post and The New York Times itself reported that the Polish authorities had determined that, at most, 1.5 million people (of all races and religions)-not "4 million"-died at Auschwitz of all causes, including natural causes. Yet this was not the first time this drastically reduced figure appeared in the major media.
Almost five years previously, on July 17, 1990, The Washington Times reprinted a brief article from The London Daily Telegraph. That article stated: Poland has cut its estimate of the number of people killed by the Nazis in the Auschwitz death camp from 4 million to just over 1 million . . . The new study could rekindle the controversy over the scale of Hitler's "final solution" . . . Franciszek Piper, director of the historical committee of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, said yesterday that, according to recent research, at least 1.3 million people were deported to the camp, of whom about 223,000 survived. The 1.1 million victims included 960,000 Jews, between 70,000 and 75,000 Poles, nearly all of the 23,000 Gypsies sent to the camp and 15,000 Soviet prisoners of war.
Shmuel Krakowsky, head of research at Israel's Yad Vashem memorial for Jewish victims of the Holocaust, said the new Polish figures were correct: "The 4 million figure was let slip by Capt. Rudolf Hoess, the death camp's Nazi commander. Some have bought it, but it was exaggerated." . . . Plaques commemorating the deaths of 4 million victims were removed from the Auschwitz museum earlier this month. This detail of history was intriguing, since, after all, history books had said for a generation that of the 6 million Jews who died during the Holocaust, 4 million died at Auschwitz alone. Thus, if the new facts were correct, the actual overall number of Jewish Holocaust victims had to be considerably less than the much-talked-about figure of 6 million. Put simply: subtract the former 4 million Jews dead at Auschwitz from the popular 6 million, and that leaves 2 million Jews dead. Simple math-and a controversial conclusion indeed.
More recently, Walter Reich, former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, jumped into the debate over Auschwitz. On September 8, 1998, The Washington Post published an article by Reich in which he addressed Jewish outrage over a group of elderly Polish nuns who wanted to place crosses in memory of Christians who died at Auschwitz. Reich was responding to what he described as a "well-meaning" August 31, 1998 editorial in The Post about the affair. Reich commented that the editorial "illustrates how old fictions about Auschwitz have been accepted as facts-fictions that have been used repeatedly to distort the camp's history." Evidently, the Post had forgotten its own report on the Auschwitz numbers that it had published three years previously and chose, instead, to repeat "old fictions . . . accepted as facts." What, then, were those "old fictions . . . accepted as facts"? Here's what Reich had to say: The Post identified Auschwitz-Birkenau as the death camp "where 3 million Jews and millions of others were murdered by the Nazis." Recent scholarship by a Polish historian has put the number of deaths there conservatively at about 1.1 million, with other estimates ranging to about 1.5 million. Approximately 90 percent of the dead were Jews. The Post's numbers may have been derived in part from the inflated estimate-originally of Soviet origin and endorsed by Polish authorities after the war-of about 4 million dead. This number, and other numbers of similar magnitude, were repeated so often that they came to be accepted by many as true, even though historians in Poland and elsewhere have revised this number down considerably. Honest people find no problem with Reich's call (in the essay) for "only words of accurate history" in reportage about Auschwitz. Today, a major first step toward "only words of accurate history" is the release of a new anthology on Auschwitz, assembled by English writer Vivian Bird.
Auschwitz: The Final Count examines the "new" reports in the mainstream media (outlined above) and provides essential additional facts that must be considered in order for the full story of Auschwitz to finally be told. Bird's 109-page book is a compendium (supplemented with commentary by Bird) of four complete, previously published works relating to Auschwitz and the Holocaust. ...
JEWS AND
Winston Churchill Starved 3 Million Indians to Death in the Man-Made Bengal Famine of 1943
Burning the dead
Churchill’s Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India during World War II is a book by the science journalist Madhusree Mukerjee. It tells of British policy in India in the Second World War and how it relates to the Bengal Famine of 1943.
Mukerjee reminds the reader that before the British conquest India was a rich land. Certainly the conquerors drawn to Bengal in the 18th century were of the opinion they were adding a magnificently wealthy possession to their empire. Under colonial rule, however, Bengal soon became a synonym for poverty and a frequent setting of famine.
During the Second World War the colony was made to contribute heavily to the British war effort. India’s industries, manpower, and foodstuffs were made to serve requirements of the war the empire had involved itself in.
This was merely the latest escalation in a long-lasting exploitation of the colony. The British deemed their unwanted presence in India a service and therefore extracted “payment” for it in the form of the Home Charge. As the British obstructed the expansion of manufacturing in India lest it provide competition for their domestic industry, the export of agricultural produce presented the only way of realizing this transfer.
Unsurprisingly, there was strong resistance to colonial rule that could only be overcome by large-scale repression. As part of the August 1942 crackdown against the Quit India Movement alone, more than 90,000 people were locked up and up to 10,000 were killed.
Short on manpower the British at times resorted to attacking crowds with aircraft. In particularly rebellious districts authorities burned down homes and destroyed rice supplies. British India was not unlike an occupied land.
The book exposes the manifold causes of the Bengal Famine. To begin with mortality rate in Bengal under British rule was atrocious even in a normal year with some of that attributable to malnutrition.
The Cyclone storm and subsequent floods disrupted life and ruined crops. The loss of Burma severed links with an important source of rice imports to India. These two factors which were outside British control, were probably enough for a disaster on their own, but subsequent British policies made the crisis far worse than it needed to be.
Anticipating the possibility the Japanese could advance further, the British carried out a scorched earth policy in coastal Bengal, seizing rice stocks, motor vehicles, bicycles and boats. Seizure of boats was particularly disruptive as they normally represented the primary means of transporting rice crops to the markets.
The loss of Burmese rice imports to India was not made up by imports from elsewhere, nor was India’s obligation to supply British Indian troops abroad lessened. Instead, India was made to cover the loss of Burmese rice imports to Ceylon, Arabia and South Africa even though these territories were already better provisioned with food than India.
Albeit in the years before WWII India had become a net importer of food, importing at least one million tons of cereal per year — a figure that was not actually sufficient to cover its needs, but represented what it could afford to import after paying the Home Charge — the British now undertook to export food from India.
Anticipating food shortages that were certain to follow colonial administration moved to protect the strata of society most useful to the British Empire — administrators, soldiers and industrial workers. It set out to buy up huge quantities of grain and store it for their use. It would pay for these stocks in the same way it acquired supplies for the war effort — by printing money.
The price of already precious grain skyrocketed and the Bengal peasant was priced out of the market. Between the purchases of the Bengal administration, the Government of India, the army and the industries which were recipients of government largesse, grain was sucked out from rural areas. Departments of government and industries crucial for the war effort secured huge stocks of grain — part of which would end up rotting as millions starved.
What made the looting of the countryside to this extent possible was that the transfer of purchasing power away from the peasant and to the government and to those the government made business with, that money printing enabled.
In the course of the war the money supply increased by between six and seven times so that the British worried they were “within sight of collective refusal to accept further paper currency”. This confounded the problem of food scarcity since some cultivators understandably held onto their grain rather than release it to the market, as it was seen a better store of value than the rapidly depreciating currency.
The reason government purchases were so devastating for Bengal peasants were that most families owned tracts of land too small to sustain their families on their own.
Even in a normal year such families were not in position to store enough of their harvest to sustain them until the next one. They were not sellers of crops, they sold their labor to the big landowners and bought food.
Except now buying food meant competing with a government that could print money at will.
Albeit crop failure and the loss of Burmese imports was enough to create a serious food deficit for India, there was actually no food problem for the British Empire taken as a whole. In fact London claimed that Bengal could not be fed — not for a lack of food, but for a lack of ships — supposedly shipping was so scarce that grain, which was available, could not be taken to India without disrupting the British war effort.
Prioritizing its war over the bare lives of three million of its subjects would have been bad enough, but Mukarjee shows that shipping was nowhere as scarce as London claimed, albeit it was certainly being mismanaged. For example there was shipping and food enough to build up a stockpile in the Eastern Mediterranean for the purpose of Allied invasion of the Balkans that would never come about. Also there were always ships aplenty to build up an enormous and ever-growing stockpile of food in the British Isles that the London government was actually building up for post-war use.
In reality the biggest obstacle to secure food for famine-stricken India was not a lack of means, but the lack of will to allocate the resources necessary. Such readjustments would have clashed with the interest and the intent of the British Empire under Winston Churchill to exploit its colony for its purposes to the greatest extent possible.
To their credit, not every Brit was of a mind with the London government personified in Winston Churchill.
Many officials, including high-ranking ones like the Secretary of State for India, Leopold Amery and the Viceroy of India, Field Marshal Wavell repeatedly called for a decisive effort to relieve the famine. Governments of Australia, New Zeeland and Canada offered grain for India if United Kingdom, which had taken control of their shipping, would transport it there.
British soldiers on the scene defied orders not to help famine refugees often handing over food from their own rations.
In addition to showing how the British Empire helped cause the Bengal Famine of 1943 and then denied it famine relief Churchill’s Secret War also provides the context for these two stories.
SATAN HIMSELF
Mukarjee recounts a fair bit of the dynamic between colonial metropolis and the colony centering on exploitation and resistance, explains the consequences of British wartime policies for the political future of the colony — partition and independence — and paints a picture of famine and repression as seen from the ground by offering vivid first hand accounts by people who were affected.
It is a book rich in content, but probably the one thing to take from it is the way in which the famine was made worse and its victims selected by government abuse of paper currency.
British reaction to food shortages in Bengal was to protect the cities and industries at the expense of the peasants. Like the Soviet Union which had faced a food crisis of its own a decade earlier the British Empire figured it was up to it to decide who would live and who would die.
Only where the Soviet method of robbing the countryside of grain in 1932-33 was requisition, the British method of choice in India was money creation. It was a more elegant method, but no less deadly, and more difficult to effectively resist.
If the famine in 1932-33 in the Soviet Union was a requisition famine, the Bengal Famine of 1943 was a printing press famine.
JUDAIC GOLODOMOR
HOLODOMOR, DEATH FAMINE BY THE JUDAIC BOLSHEVIKS
Holodomor: Stalin's Secret Genocide
52,654 views
•16 Jan 2017
154 subscribers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr5WkhEiqcY
Holodomor: Stalin's Secret Genocide / Голодомор: прихований геноцид Сталіна (2016)
An estimated ten million Ukrainians died in the early 1930s in a genocide known as Holodomor. Find out more about the incident that inspired the film Bitter Harvest.
2016
Written and directed by: Andrea Chalupa
Narrated by: Andy Holowaty
Music:
*"March for the Young Nakhimovets" by Loktev Choir
* "Ne Khody Ulane" by the Lemon Bucket Orchestra
* "Oj Polia Vy Polia" by the Lemon Bucket Orchestra
Produced by:
Holodomor National Awareness Tour
Ukrainian Canadian Research and Documenation Center
Holodomor Research and Education Consortium
Ukrainian Canadian Congress
Canada Ukraine Foundation
Original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYG7f... (Holodomor National Awareness Tour)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxNMDCMM3dI
Harvest of Despair The 1933 Ukrainian Holodomor Famine Genocide Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KExl0iTlEWw
Harvest of Despair -- The 1933 Ukrainian Holodomor Famine Genocide [Full Documentary]
2.93K subscribers
Douglas Reed writes: “The Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprised 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People’s Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919 were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly ‘Socialist’ or other non-Communist parties… were 55 Jews and 6 others.”
Richard Pipes admits: “Jews undeniably played in the Bolshevik Party and the early Soviet apparatus a role disproportionate to their share of the population. The number of Jews active in Communism in Russia and abroad was striking: in Hungary, for example, they furnished 95 percent of the leading figures in Bela Kun’s dictatorship. They also were disproportionately represented among Communists in Germany and Austria during the revolutionary upheavals there in 1918-23, and in the apparatus of the Communist International.”
According to Donald Rayfield, in 1922, the Jews “reached their maximum representation in the party (not that they formed a coherent group) when, at 15 per cent, they were second only to ethnic Russians with 65 per cent.”
The London Times correspondent in Russia, Robert Wilton, reported: ”Taken according to numbers of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that rule Bolshevik Russia they are nine in ten; if anything the proportion of Jews is still greater.”
On June 9, 1919 Captain Montgomery Shuyler of the American Expeditionary Forces telegrammed from Vladivostok on the makeup of the presiding Soviet government: “… (T)here were 384 ‘commissars’ including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians, and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number, 264 had come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial Government.”
The Jews were especially dominant in the most feared and blood-thirsty part of the Bolshevik State apparatus, the Cheka, which, writes Brendon, “consisted of 250,000 officers (including 100,000 border guards), a remarkable adjunct to a State which was supposed to be withering away. In the first 6 years of Bolshevik rule it had executed at least 200,000. Moreover, the Cheka was empowered to act as ‘policeman, gaoler, investigator, prosecutor, judge and executioner’. It also employed barbaric forms of torture.”
So complete was the Jewish domination of Russia as a result of the revolution that it is a misnomer to speak about the “Russian” revolution; it should more accurately be called the Russian-Jewish revolution
Source: http://www.orthodoxchristianbooks.com...
NO ERRAND-BOY TO STALIN: THE POWER AND SIGNIFICANCE OF LAZAR KAGANOVICH
We sometimes hear the exculpation that Jewish Communists were not all that important in the scheme of things . . . Nothing could be further from the truth.
Rees identifies Lazar Kaganovich as the most prominent Jew in Soviet public life (p. 246), and as a person who was indispensable to Stalin in the 1930’s. (p. 247). Rees also says that Kaganovich, “contributed more than any other individual to shaping the [Stalin] regime in its formative years.” (p. 271). Between 1930 and 1935, Kaganovich was—according to Rees—“a figure of enormous power” who, moreover, appeared to be a possible successor to Stalin. (p. 273).
——The following [except for the titles in CAPS, and explanatory comments in brackets] are direct quotes——
KAGANOVICH RESPONSIBLE FOR THE UKRAINIAN FAMINE-GENOCIDE (HOLODOMOR)
Kaganovich, as general secretary of the Ukrainian Communist Party, was a forthright exponent of forcible grain seizure. He now defended a policy of exploiting the peasants, a policy which, when advocated by [fellow Jews] Zinoviev and Trotsky, he had denounced only in November 1926. (p. 83).
He [Kaganovich] was the principal author of the Urals-Siberian method of grain procurement of 1929-30 that acted as a prelude to forcible collectivization. He facilitated the mass deportation of the kulaks and played a key role in expulsion of Kuban peasants in 1932. In the years of famine he was the most vocal supporter of Stalin’s draconian law of 7 August 1932… (p. 272).
[Note that Kaganovich was at the height of his power as Stalin’s deputy, in 1930-1935. (p. 123). This covered the years of the HOLODOMOR].
Source: https://justice4poland.com/2017/03/23...
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus shared a memory.
It's
excellent to have regular fun and it is extremely healthy, but we must
leave serious matters to the HONEST experts and the BRAVE FIGHTERS!
I am not a Facebooker or a Youtuber or one of those likomaniacs, likoholics, and whatnot, with no toilet (bathroom) at home, and I am horrified how much time and of their lives some Earthlings (the lowest of the low) spend on Faecesbook!
Decadent Muslims sold out to the Ottomans, then to decadent Christendom and now to SATAN.
Both Christians and Muslims sold out Palestine to Satan and all they do now is LAMENT like the bogus Israelites who call themselves "JEWS"!.
I just checked in to see if I had received a reply to a private message I sent to a recently encountered person!
BAFS
I am not a Facebooker or a Youtuber or one of those likomaniacs, likoholics, and whatnot, with no toilet (bathroom) at home, and I am horrified how much time and of their lives some Earthlings (the lowest of the low) spend on Faecesbook!
Decadent Muslims sold out to the Ottomans, then to decadent Christendom and now to SATAN.
Both Christians and Muslims sold out Palestine to Satan and all they do now is LAMENT like the bogus Israelites who call themselves "JEWS"!.
I just checked in to see if I had received a reply to a private message I sent to a recently encountered person!
BAFS
4 Years Ago
See Your Memorieschevron-right
It's excellent to have regular fun and it is extremely healthy, but we must leave serious matters to the HONEST experts and the BRAVE FIGHTERS!
I am not a Facebooker or a Youtuber or one of those likomaniacs, likoholics, narcissists, and whatnot, with no toilet (bathroom) at home, and I am horrified how much time and of their lives some Earthlings (the lowest of the low) spend on Faecesbook!
Decadent Muslims sold out to the Ottomans, then to decadent Christendom and now to SATAN.
Both Christians and Muslims sold out Palestine to Satan and all they do now is LAMENT like the bogus Israelites who call themselves "JEWS"!.
I just checked in to see if I had received a reply to a private message I sent to a recently encountered person!
BAFS
Kate Bates
At the height of the 1932-33 Ukrainian famine under Joseph Stalin, starving people roamed the countryside, desperate for something, anything to eat. In the village of Stavyshche, a young peasant boy watched as the wanderers dug into empty gardens with their bare hands. Many were so emaciated, he recalled, that their bodies began to swell and stink from the extreme lack of nutrients.
"You could see them walking about, just walking and walking, and one would drop, and then another, and so on it went," he said many years later, in a case history collected in the late 1980s by a Congressional commission. In the cemetery outside the village hospital, overwhelmed doctors carried the bodies on stretchers and tossed them into an enormous pit.
The Holodomor's Death Toll
The Ukrainian famine—known as the Holodomor, a combination of the Ukrainian words for “starvation” and “to inflict death”—by one estimate claimed the lives of 3.9 million people, about 13 percent of the population. And, unlike other famines in history caused by blight or drought, this was caused when a dictator wanted both to replace Ukraine’s small farms with state-run collectives and punish independence-minded Ukrainians who posed a threat to his totalitarian authority.
“The Ukrainian famine was a clear case of a man-made famine,” explains Alex de Waal, executive director of the World Peace Foundation at Tufts University and author of the 2018 book, Mass Starvation: The History and Future of Famine. He describes it as “a hybrid…of a famine caused by calamitous social-economic policies and one aimed at a particular population for repression or punishment.”
In those days, Ukraine—a Texas-sized nation along the Black Sea to the west of Russia—was a part of the Soviet Union, then ruled by Stalin. In 1929, as part of his plan to rapidly create a totally communist economy, Stalin had imposed collectivization, which replaced individually owned and operated farms with big state-run collectives. Ukraine’s small, mostly subsistence farmers resisted giving up their land and livelihoods.
Grain confiscated from a family derided as "kulaks" in the village of Udachoye in Ukraine.
Sovfoto/UIG/Getty Images
Resistant Farmers Labeled as 'Kulaks'
In response, the Soviet regime derided the resisters as kulaks—well-to-do peasants, who in Soviet ideology were considered enemies of the state. Soviet officials drove these peasants off their farms by force and Stalin’s secret police further made plans to deport 50,000 Ukrainian farm families to Siberia, historian Anne Applebaum writes in her 2017 book, Red Famine: Stalin's War on Ukraine.
“Stalin appears to have been motivated by the goal of transforming the Ukrainian nation into his idea of a modern, proletarian, socialist nation, even if this entailed the physical destruction of broad sections of its population,” says Trevor Erlacher, an historian and author specializing in modern Ukraine and an academic advisor at the University of Pittsburgh’s Center for Russian, East European, & Eurasian Studies.
Collectivization in Ukraine didn’t go very well. By the fall of 1932—around the time that Stalin’s wife, Nadezhda Sergeevna Alliluyeva, who reportedly objected to his collectivization policy, committed suicide—it became apparent that Ukraine’s grain harvest was going to be miss Soviet planners’ target by 60 percent. There still might have been enough food for Ukrainian peasants to get by, but, as Applebaum writes, Stalin then ordered what little they had be confiscated as punishment for not meeting quotas.
“The famine of 1932-33 stemmed from later decisions made by the Stalinist government, after it became clear that the 1929 plan had not gone as well as hoped for, causing a food crisis and hunger,” explains Stephen Norris, a professor of Russian history at Miami University in Ohio. Norris says a December 1932 document called, “On the Procurement of Grain in Ukraine, the North Caucasus, and the Western Oblast,” directed party cadres to extract more grain from regions that had not met their quotas. It further called for the arrest of collective farm chiefs who resisted and of party members who did not fulfill the new quotas.
An armed man guards emergency supply grain during the Ukrainian famine of early 1930s.
Sovfoto/UIG/Getty Images
Decrees Targeted Ukrainian 'Saboteurs'
Meanwhile, Stalin, according to Applebaum, already had arrested tens of thousands of Ukrainian teachers and intellectuals and removed Ukrainian-language books from schools and libraries. She writes that the Soviet leader used the grain shortfall as an excuse for even more intense anti-Ukrainian repression. As Norris notes, the 1932 decree “targeted Ukrainian ‘saboteurs,’ ordered local officials to stop using the Ukrainian language in their correspondence, and cracked down on Ukrainian cultural policies that had been developed in the 1920s.”
When Stalin’s crop collectors went out into the countryside, according to a 1988 U.S. Congressional commission report, they used long wooden poles with metal points to poke the dirt floors of peasants’ homes and probe the ground around them, in case they’d buried stores of grain to avoid detection. Peasants accused of being food hoarders typically were sent off to prison, though sometimes the collectors didn’t wait to inflict punishment. Two boys who were caught hiding fish and frogs they’d caught, for example, were taken to the village soviet, where they were beaten, and then dragged into a field with their hands tied and mouths and noses gagged, where they were left to suffocate.
As the famine worsened, many tried to flee in search of places with more food. Some died by the roadside, while others were thwarted by the secret police and the regime’s system of internal passports. Ukrainian peasants resorted to desperate methods in an effort to stay alive, according to the Congressional commission’s report. They killed and ate pets and consumed flowers, leaves, tree bark and roots. One woman who found some dried beans was so hungry that she ate them on the spot without cooking them, and reportedly died when they expanded in her stomach.
“The policies adopted by Stalin and his deputies in response to the famine after it had begun to grip the Ukrainian countryside constitute the most significant evidence that the famine was intentional,” Erlacher says. “Local citizens and officials pleaded for relief from the state. Waves of refugees fled the villages in search of food in the cities and beyond the borders of the Ukrainian Soviet Republic.” The regime’s response, he says, was to take measures that worsened their plight.
By the summer of 1933, some of the collective farms had only a third of their households left, and prisons and labor camps were jammed to capacity. With hardly anyone left to raise crops, Stalin’s regime resettled Russian peasants from other parts of the Soviet Union in Ukraine to cope with the labor shortage. Faced with the prospect of an even wider food catastrophe, Stalin’s regime in the fall of 1933 started easing off collections.
A string of carts with bread confiscated from peasants, circa 1932.
Sovfoto/UIG/Getty Images
Russian Government Denies Famine Was 'Genocide'
The Russian government that replaced the Soviet Union has acknowledged that famine took place in Ukraine, but denied it was genocide. Genocide is defined in Article 2 of the U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.” In April 2008, Russia's lower house of Parliament passed a resolution stating that “There is no historical proof that the famine was organized along ethnic lines.” Nevertheless, at least 16 countries have recognized the Holodomor, and most recently, the U.S. Senate, in a 2018 resolution, affirmed the findings of the 1988 commission that Stalin had committed genocide.
Ultimately, although Stalin’s policies resulted in the deaths of millions, it failed to crush Ukrainian aspirations for autonomy, and in the long run, they may actually have backfired. “Famine often achieves a socio-economic or military purpose, such as transferring land possession or clearing an area of population, since most flee rather than die,” famine historian de Waal says. “But politically and ideologically it is more often counterproductive for its perpetrators. As in the case of Ukraine it generated so much hatred and resentment that it solidified Ukrainian nationalism.”
Eventually, when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Ukraine finally became an independent nation—and the Holodomor remains a painful part of Ukrainians’ common identity.
No comments:
Post a Comment