Raul Hilberg's Stunning Admission (censored from PBS)
46,002 views
•11 Mar 2015
4.34K subscribers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2q51wqEE1fM&list=PLbWVp9IQtQE3aHS0et8ea4aiubFCkpzqm
THIS IS A SEGMENT FROM A LARGER STORY! Go to http://takimag.com/article/fear_of_a_... to read the entire thing.
Do you know how giddy I was to write that? I was giddy because I know I”€™m the first person in the history of the world to string those words together as a sentence. When I was a teenager, my friends and I used to see if we could come up with a legible sentence that no human before us had ever uttered. To this day, I still recall winning that competition by saying, “€œLook out, here comes Edward James Olmos on a unicycle, and he’s brought the woodpeckers.”€
As much as that line still makes me laugh, it was pure fiction. But the Hilberg sentence is real. Yes, Raul Hilberg, the father of Holocaust history, chose a 1988 PBS documentary in which Maya Angelou uses tai chi to overcome rape and evil to make a declaration so startling that PBS edited it out of the broadcast. And, in fact, he may have implicated himself as a perjurer.
How do I even start eating this overstuffed monte cristo of craziness?
“€œI”€™m asking my question rhetorically, because I know the answer. It’s the “€˜fear of the gray area.”€™”€
Did I say simple? I meant insane.
For some reason (and I don€™t know why) Hilberg decided to begin his talk with a startling anecdote. And PBS censored that anecdote (and I totally know why). Some years ago, I found the original audiotape of Hilberg’s speech. The full PBS special is online; you can see it here.
Hilberg makes his appearance at the 50:52 mark; his speech begins at 53:36.
This is the opening part of Hilberg’s speech. On the audio clip, I”€™ve let it run so that it bleeds over into where PBS chose to begin the remarks.
For those of you too lazy to click on the clip, here’s a transcript of the censored portion:
(laughter from the audience).
And after a while I chanced to talk to the deputy chief of that office, and I said to him this: I”€™ve been troubled by one question. And I”€™m afraid that I went into print with something that isn”€™t entirely accurate. And that is the role of Adolf Hitler himself in the annihilation of the Jewish people in Europe. Now, I know that you are only concerned here with live individuals, and that you do not investigate the dead.
But still … what do you think?
“€œAch,”€ he said, “€œwe”€™ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn”€™t have the evidence.”€
And he laughed.
This is not insignificant. Here’s Hilberg, in 1988, speaking of a conversation he had with German war crimes prosecutors in 1976. In-between “€™76 and “€™88, Hilberg testified against Canadian Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, who was on trial under Canada’s “€œfalse news”€ law. Let’s be clear”€” Hilberg was helping the Canadian government put Zundel in prison simply for publishing a pamphlet. And on the stand, Hilberg steadfastly maintained that there was at least one, maybe two, direct orders from Hitler to initiate the “€œFinal Solution.”€
We know from Hilberg’s censored PBS comments that as early as 1976 he was very aware of the lack of any direct evidence implicating Hitler, yet on the stand in Toronto in 1985, he didn”€™t mention what he told the West German prosecutors in “€™76 “€”his fear that he “€œwent into print with something that isn”€™t entirely accurate”€ regarding Hitler’s role. Hilberg was asked by Zundel’s attorney a multitude of questions directly pertaining to the accuracy of Hilberg’s book, and the claims he made in it regarding Hitler’s involvement in the Holocaust. Under oath, he defended his “€œnot entirely accurate”€ material as being completely accurate.
Hilberg perjured himself.
But there is, I would argue, a bigger story here. The story isn”€™t “€œWhy would Hilberg perjure himself?”€ (the damn fool shouldn”€™t have taken part in that show trial to begin with), but rather, “€œWhy would PBS edit out the most fascinating remark in the speech?”€ That’s what interests me. In a boring-as-toast special featuring overweight people doing tai chi, PBS chose to leave out the one thing that might have sparked a genuinely interesting debate.
I”€™m asking my question rhetorically, because I know the answer.
It’s the “€œfear of the gray area.”€ Hilberg’s comment was an admission that, even by the late “€™80s, there were still large gaps in our knowledge of the Holocaust. Too many”€”way too many”€”mainstream historians and media figures believe that the existence of these “€œgray areas”€ must be covered up, lest the gaps and uncertainties open the door to “€œdenial.”€
Yes, broadcasting Hilberg’s opening remarks might have driven a few people to Holocaust denial (or, dare I say, legitimate revisionism), but suppressing those key few minutes not only robbed viewers of some tantalizing food for thought, but it also turned Hilberg’s speech into a crashing bore.
Maybe it was just an attempt to make Maya Angelou’s tai chi look appealing in comparison.
Obersalzberg Now & Then: the Mountain Retreat of Adolf Hitler
David Duke The Zionist Matrix of Power Full Movie
ROTHSCHILD ISRAEL AND HOLOHOAX MANUFACTURED IN UK AND USA
"Tales of the Holohoax" and Denmark's anti-Muslim cartoons
Satire demonized and criminalized in Britain
by Michael Hoffman
Monday, February 08, 2010
Simon Sheppard (left) and Stephen Whittle now serving prison sentences in Britain
Meanwhile, revisionist expression concerning Talmudic Judaism or the alleged execution gas chambers of Auschwitz is another matter entirely. In the latter case, the "racist" pejorative is gleefully pinned on revisionists by the media and the courts, thereby acting as a solvent for weakening any claims to apply the western heritage of freedom of the press to revisionist writers or satirists.
Hence, Simon Sheppard, who received a lengthy prison sentence in part for distributing in England this writer's satirical comic book Tales of the Holohoax is described by all British media, from the snooty BBC to the proletarian "Sun" newspaper, as a "racist."
The unjust assignment of this pejorative is the impregnable wall that has been erected to isolate Mr. Sheppard's case from that of the anti-Muslim Danish cartoonists, and causes him to forfeit the civil liberties protections of Europe's supposed guardians of freedom against Islamic fundamentalism. The possibility that Europe might need to be guarded against the racist tyranny of fundamentalist Orthodox Judaism is policed out of consideration.
What precisely is there that is "racist" about the Tales of the Holohoax cartoons? The media do not scruple to attempt an analysis because they are under no pressure or obligation to do so. Satire is only a noble weapon when it is used against "demon Islam," while Judaism and Holocaustianity are sacred dogmas in Europe. Satirizing these sacred cows is a "disgusting hate crime."
Westergaard is portrayed as a defiant saint, while Mr. Sheppard and his partner in "criminal" satire, Stephen Whittle (they are known collectively as the "Heretical Two"), are less than zero in the eyes of the Western gatekeepers of morality and history - "race hate criminals" - in the purple prose of the BBC. The fact that these two have been stigmatized as "racist" is sufficient to render the stigma a reality, even when the facts bear witness to the contrary.
The "revisionist community," with some notable exceptions (Lady Michelle Renouf, Dr. Robert Faurisson, Willis Carto, Herman Otten) is reluctant to mention Tales of the Holohoax in connection with the plight of the "Heretical Two." The publication itself and the heretics who circulated it would now be a cause célébre if the current "revisionist community" had any of the public relations instincts of Ernst Zundel.
In the 2009 Christmas list of imprisoned revisionists and their jailhouse mailing addresses circulated around the Internet and published in certain revisionist newsletters, under the names Sheppard and Whittle the reason given for their incarceration was an oddly generic one: "sought asylum in the U.S." But the reason they were asylum seekers was noticeably absent. By this omission, reference to Tales of the Holohoax and its author were sent down the memory hole -- by revisionists themselves.
I have seen no sustained analogy concerning this writer or Mr. Sheppard, and Mr.Westergaard. And since it has been decided that Tales of the Holohoax shouldn't be mentioned or discussed, no parallels are drawn between this writer's satirical gas chamber cartoons and the anti-Muslim ones in Denmark. A magnificent opportunity is thereby lost.
Culpability for this loss also rests with the Muslim and Arab media who have failed to compare the two sets of cartoons and the fate of the distributors.
No European has gone to jail for satirizing Islam or its prophet. On the contrary, the defiance of the Danish cartoonists is celebrated, rewarded and protected, while Sheppard rots in a British prison for distributing a satire that pokes fun at Talmudic tall tales recycled for modern consumption during and after World War II.
Thursday, January 08, 2015
Cartoon Blasphemy of Holocaustianity Damned by the West
[FOR ART SPEIGELMAN QUOTE AND SOURCE SEE BELOW]
Hot air windbags throughout the West are today proclaiming their defiant support for “blasphemy” of religion of the kind the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists specialized in with regard to Islam.
Ross Douthat of the New York Times writes: “...both liberalism and liberty require that it (blasphemy) be welcomed and defended.” (“The Blasphemy We Need,” January 7, 2014).
We don’t know if Douthat’s sincere or not. Here is our e-mail to him:
Dear Mr Douthat: Very nice rhetoric. Question: is your pledge selective or absolute? If selective, it means nothing. It only signifies the right to blaspheme against that which you oppose.
Here is a test of your professed ideals: will you "welcome and defend" the satirical comic book Tales of the Holohoax? http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres9/TalesV2.pdf
The cartoons in this comic book blaspheme the execution gas chambers of Auschwitz and associated mythomania.
-- Michael Hoffman (end quote from our e-mail to Times’ columnist Douthat).
We also take this opportunity to challenge revisionists around the world, as well as Muslim media, to ask, what are you doing to publicize the disparity between the publicity and support accorded to anti-Islamic cartoons, and the damnation and denunciation leveled at the Tales of the Holohoax comic book, for which two men in Britain, Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle, have been imprisoned?Here is a golden opportunity to show up the hypocrisy of kosher-conservatives in America, and people like German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Israeli mass murderer Binyamin Netanyahu, who support the arrest and imprisonment of anyone who dares to blaspheme Holocaustianity — the civic religion of the otherwise agnostic West — while proclaiming the right of freedom of expression for those who blaspheme Islam.
All it takes is getting Tales of the Holohoax and the demonization of its author and jailing of its distributors, into the international discussion and to the attention of reporters and columnists, and have it “go viral.”
If we can break through the media curtain we will unmask the inquisitors and religious fanatics who denounce Muslims for transgressions against liberty for which they themselves are guilty.
Racist pair lose jail term appeals
The Sun (UK) January 29, 2010
Published material found later included images of murdered Jews alongside cartoons and articles ridiculing ethnic groups. At the appeal, Sheppard's counsel, Adrian Davies, challenged the convictions on the grounds of jurisdiction, the meaning of "publication" and whether the material on the internet was "written material" within the meaning of the Act. He said the articles complained of were posted on a website in California where there was no doubt that they were "entirely lawful and enjoyed the highest degree of constitutional protection under the laws of the United States." There was no evidence that anyone in England and Wales, except for the police officer, who the Crown did not rely on as a member of the public under the Act, had ever read any of them. "Despite this, Mr Sheppard has been sentenced to a longer term of imprisonment than Abu Hamza," he told Lord Justice Scott Baker, Mr Justice Penry-Davey and Mr Justice Cranston. Giving their ruling, Lord Justice Scott Baker said the trial judge was right to hold that he had jurisdiction to try the pair because a substantial measure of the activities constituting the crime took place in England. He said the judge had also correctly addressed the issue of publication - the material in the case was available to the public despite the fact that the evidence went no further than establishing that one police constable downloaded it. And the words "written material" in the Act were sufficiently wide to include articles in electronic form. On the question of sentence, he noted that the judge had said he had rarely seen or read material that was so abusive and insulting in its content towards racial groups in this country. (End quote)
For further research:
The Massacre of Charlie Hebdo in Paris
Satirical gas chamber comic book by Michael Hoffman
WHILE ENGLISH PEDOPHILES CAN GO FREE!
PIZZAGATE UK POLICE CHIEF CONDONES PEDOPHILIA NATIONAL POLICE CHIEFS COUNCIL
Published on 28 Feb 2017
2017 #PIZZAGATE UK POLICE CHIEF CONDONES PEDOPHILIA NATIONAL POLICE CHIEFS COUNCIL!!!!
SUBSCRIBE to our channel to keep updated! LIKE and SHARE video!
SUBSCRIBE to our channel to keep updated! LIKE and SHARE video!
POSTED BY VICKIE JACOBS ON FACEBOOK
WHAT?
Visit the post for more.
theuglytruth.wordpress.com
* The "criminal invaders" are RECRUITED MERCENARY CRIMINALS, and they have nothing to do with Muslim "savages" or Islam!
The "Judaics" promised to genocide the White European biological types, but the WHITES ignore that millions of Whites are Muslims and the racists and ignoramuses among them do not stop vilifying Muslims and Islam! (BAFS)
TUESDAY / DECEMBER 26, 2017
A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
* The "criminal invaders" are RECRUITED MERCENARY CRIMINALS, and they have nothing to do with Muslim "savages" or Islam!
The "Judaics" promised to genocide the White European biological types, but the WHITES ignore that millions of Whites are Muslims and the racists and ignoramuses among them do not stop vilifying Muslims and Islam! (BAFS)
DECEMBER RE-ENROLLMENT PERIOD
Pepe the "alt-right" frog reads the ANYT
TUESDAY / DECEMBER 26, 2017
| |||||
 | |||||
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
___________________________________________________________________
DECEMBER, 2017 1 FED RESERVE NOTE
___________________________________________________________________
"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"
NY Times: For One Far-Right Politician, Forgetting Germany’s Past Just Got Harder
A political art group built a replica of the Berlin Holocaust Memorial in Bornhagen, Germany. Next door is the home of Björn Höcke, a far-right politician who called the memorial “a monument of shame.”
REBUTTAL BY
Nothing that happens in the occupied Germany of Marxist Mamma Merkel shocks us anymore, particularly when it comes to the legal persecution of "Holocaust Deniers" ™ -- some of them in their 80's and 90's! But as this sad story reveals, even that class of Holocaust-believing / Holocaust-acknowledging thought-criminals which we might refer to "Holocaust Forgetters" or "Holocaust Mitigators" are subject to persecution and social ostracism as well.
These are the folks who do not actually "deny" the Holohoax, but simply argue that, after 3/4 of a century, the time has come for Germans to move on from self-flagellation. Though it is still legal to express such a sensible view, the state-enabled social abuse which such expressed sentiments can trigger can make the punishment for "Holocaust Forgetting" (™ pending) very painful nonetheless.
1. Ursula Haverbeck, 89, sits in prison for denying the Holohoax.
2. Horst Mahler, 82 next month, also sits in prison for denying the Holohoax.
3. Meanwhile, the Frumpy Frau floods Germany and Europe with criminal invaders* who are given free housing and welfare benefits.
From the article:
"No one in the village saw it coming, least of all Björn Höcke, a quiet and well-liked local father of four who also happens to be Germany’s most notorious far-right politician.
Last January, at a rally in Dresden, Mr. Höcke questioned the guiding precept of modern Germany — the country’s culpability in World War II and the Holocaust — calling on Germans to make a “180 degree” turn in the way they viewed their history.
Germans were “the only people in the world to plant a monument of shame in the heart of their capital,” he said, referring to the Holocaust memorial in Berlin.
And then, one recent Wednesday morning, Mr. Höcke woke up in his rural home to find the Holocaust memorial outside his bedroom window: 24 rectangular concrete slabs, one section of the original monument, rebuilt to scale on the property immediately neighboring his.
The only difference: The slabs had been rotated 180 degrees." (to mock Höcke's words and to face his home."
Wow. Just wow.
1 & 2: A MASSIVE (5 acres, 2,711 concrete slabs) eyesore to remember the Holohoax sits in the heart of Berlin.
3. Björn Höcke -- while not "denying" the Holohoax -- dared to express his misgivings about the Berlin monstrosity. Now, his whole village neighborhood is being legally terrorized by extremely well-funded Communists who have erected a smaller replica of that eyesore just outside his window, as the state "looks the other way."
It turns out that a Communist "artist collective" known as the Center for Political Beauty purchased the neighboring property solely for the purpose of shaming Mr. Höcke. The replica of the Berlin memorial, put up overnight on November 22 of this year, not only harasses the Höcke family (including children), but has put an unwanted spotlight on Bornhagen, a scenic village of 309 inhabitants. Local hotels are already seeing cancelled and diminished bookings.
Philipp Ruch, co-founder of the group which erected the memorial and, on paper, the Höcke family's new "neighbor," had this to say:
“We wanted to remind Mr. Höcke that he can turn German history however much he likes, it doesn’t change. “He broke the mother of all taboos, he challenged the founding narrative of modern Germany and he got away with it. We learn from our past so it does not happen again. That is who we are. That is our strength,”
For months, the artistic terrorists scouted out the quiet village. They registered a business and then rented the property next to Mr. Höcke’s home. The building of the Holocaust memorial was shielded from the view of neighbors by a large tent, said to be hiding a surprise for an engagement party.
1. The Höcke home -- Imagine your family waking up one morning, looking out the window, and seeing a pile of protest stones facing your home, and alerting every Communist in the world as to where you live. 2. The quiet village of Bornhagen is now a battlefield in a cultural-political war. 3. The extremely well-funded (Soros? CIA?) Communist "German" Philipp Ruch (face covered in Holohoax "ashes") leads "The Center for Political Beauty," whose mission statement describes itself as "an assault team that establishes moral beauty, political poetry and human greatness while aiming to preserve humanitarianism."
* The "criminal invaders" are RECRUITED MERCENARY CRIMINALS, and they have nothing to do with Muslim "savages" or Islam!
The "Judaics" promised to genocide the White European biological types, but the WHITES ignore that millions of Whites are Muslims and the racists and ignoramuses among them do not stop vilifying Muslims and Islam!
No comments:
Post a Comment