MY FATHER TOO MUST HAVE LOVED HITLER HIS DOG, AND I STILL DO!
Adolf Hitler The greatest story Never told Full 6 hours Documentary
God’s
people have succumbed to the Godless religion - Homo homini lupus est
- A
man is a wolf to another man, not the animal itself as it is
not as evil as the humans who show utter cruelty and inhumanity, and worse
predatory tendencies than any other living forms, be they viruses or wolves! ISLAM
and all true people of God, not hypocrites, on the contrary acknowledges the
entire of humanity as one Brotherhood – Homo homini frater est – A man is a
brother to another man including the women, obviously!
Published on 3 May 2014
All Muslims united under Muhammad constitutes ONE
SINGLE NATION called the UMMAH OF MUHAMMAD.
All humans submitting to the ONE AND ONLY GOD OR GODLY VALUES ARE
MUSLIMS, no matter whether they call themselves Jews, Christians, Hindus or
even Atheists or if any such God exists or not!
Universal Brotherhood and Sisterhood have and should have no barriers!
AFTER being heavily indoctrinated in Western
European Imperial, Colonial and Christian philosophies and ideologies, I
discovered after I left their Citadels of Slavery in 1964, at the age of 18,
the one Eastern European one that seemed to have scared the shit out of the
Western Imperialists, Colonialists and so-called Christians – Godless Soviet
Socialism and Communism. Oy vey, that
was a discovery! When I returned home I
discovered the Jewish fraud called FREUD that the West had been worshipping for
quite some time. I learned much later
through my own research and with the advent of
the Internet of that other fraudster called Albert Einstein, and pervert
named Michael King alias Martin Luther King or Mohundas Karamchand Gandhi his
English handlers eulogized as Mahatma, and of thousands others! And ever since I never stopped discovering
and revealing tons of fraudsters, including the likes of Helena Petrovna
Blavatsky and Allister Crowley, and their Holy writings some of which are referred
to as Bible Versions, Gospels, Holy Books of Philosophy and Psychology, etc.
It is a fact however that they do contain a lot of
good advice for individuals and event fragments of humankind, but all of them
lack in two main things: UNIVERSAL TRUTH and UNIVERSALITY, mainly because of
European racism and white supremacism where the non-Europeans and the
“non-Whites” were totally inferior and insignificant people. However, when many
of them became decadent or woke up to other realities they still kept part of
the racism and colour supremacism, but adopted this time ancient philosophies
like “Hinduism, Taoism or Buddhism” making sure they never fall into the grip
of the most dangerous philosophy in all human history and adopted by more than
1,5 billion of humanity – ISLAM!
Yes, every crappy philosophy is and will always be
far better than Islam and their hatred for Islam is visceral and so inherent in
their nature and every day way of life and thinking that until and unless they
destroy all traces of it, including the Arabic language, and exterminate all
its active adherents called Muslims, they will never be satisfied. It does not amuse me to see them quote ad
nauseam the names of all their philosopher Gods and never even mention the name
Muhammad, and when they do it is only to vilify him and his religion!
One glaring example is Carl Gustav Jung, a
WHITE Swiss German (26 July 1875 – 6 June 1961), an adept of the non-science
known as PSYCHIATRY (a Jewish mind control monopoly), and the non-science known
as PSYCHOANALYSIS claiming that they alone can analyse the psyche and nobody
else can or will be allowed to, and for that you need a Freemasonic degree from
their universities! He is even credited
to have FOUNDED the other crap called ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY and his work is
famous for having influenced not only Jewish psychiatry, but also WESTERN “anthropology,
archaeology, literature, philosophy and religious studies.”
What benefit to ME AS A FREE-THINKING human being
was GOD JUNG’S RELIGION – none at all! As
a young student, after I finished reading my very first book on “PHILOSOPHY”, I
asked myself what the hell did I just read!
It was crap from beginning to the end, and endless play on words and racist
human concepts! I understood then that
my mind was too puny to understand Western PHILOSOPHY or CRAPOLOGY!
Those same geniuses practiced slavery, segregation,
invaded other people’s lands, mass murdered entire nations and groups of people,
stole all their resources, enslaved the survivors to this very day trapping
them into an artificial Satanic way of life, and made their lives hell, and
WHAT DID THEY WRITE ABOUT THE PSYCHE OF THEIR OWN LEADERS OR GOVERNMENTS WORTH
REMEMBERING? There must be many, but I have not encountered anyone of them! After I
read Carl Jung’s “Hitler on the Couch” (• Omnibook Magazine, 1942 •), I promised I would never read
any book on “PHILOSOPHY” or “PSYCHIATRY” again.
It was full of lies, dogmatic prejudices, partisan politics, and lies even
about the Roman occupation of Palestine. Jung was just repeating the crap he
learned in fabricated history and religious mythology! SHAME ON HIM!
But, I am still curious to read his “MUHAMMAD ON
THE COUCH”, if there is such a one!
THE WAR ON ISLAM AND MUSLIMS IS PLANNED AND MEANT TO
LAST FOR EVER AND AS LONG AS MUSLIMS WILL NOT WAKE UP AND PUT THEIR DAMN
RELIGION INTO PRACTICE, AND JUST FORGET ABOUT GOD, AND OF ANY HEAVENLY PARADISE
AND HELL WHEN THESE ARE RIGHT HERE ON EARTH, AND WHICH THEY AND MOST OF US REFUSE
TO SEE!
BAFS
5th February 2017
You receive this email because you are subscribed to receive news article updates from....
You receive this email because you are subscribed to receive news article updates from....
|
||
|
·
Leon Degrelle - The Epic Story of the Waffen SS (Best Quality)
Published on 20 Mar 2014
Léon
Joseph Marie Ignace Degrelle (15 June 1906 -- 31 March 1994) was a
Walloon Belgian politician, who founded Rexism and later joined the
Waffen SS (becoming a leader of its Walloon contingent) which were
front-line troops in the fight against the Soviet Union and communism.
Leon Degrelle's Open Letter to Pope John Paul II: http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres...
Promotions: 12 February 1942; Gefreiter (Heer) 28 February 1942; Oberfeldwebel (Heer) 1 May 1942; Leutnant d. R. (Heer) 1 June 1943; SS-Obersturmführer d. R. der Waffen-SS 1 January 1944; SS-Hauptsturmführer d. R. der Waffen-SS 20 April 1944; SS-Sturmbannführer d. R. der Waffen-SS 1 January 1945; SS-Obersturmbannführer d. R. der Waffen-SS 20 April 1945; SS-Standartenführer d. R. der Waffen-SS Degrelle was promoted directly to SS-Brigadeführer and Generalmajor der Waffen-SS d. R. by Heinrich Himmler on 02 May 1945; an entry to this effect appears in his Soldbuch, however this promotion cannot be considered official as Himmler had been stripped of all SS and Party posts by Führer order on 28 April 1945.
Decorations & awards:
Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves 22 August 1944 Mentioned in the Wehrmachtbericht 27 August 1944 Eichenlaub zum Ritterkreuz des Eisernen Kreuzes as SS-Sturmbannführer d. R. and Kdr. 5.SS-Freiwilligen-Panzer-Brigade "Wallonien" / Kampfgruppe Wagner / Armee-Abteilung Narwa / Heeresgruppe Nord, Northeastern Front 20 February 1944 Ritterkreuz des Eisernen Kreuzes as SS-Hauptsturmfuhrer d. R., and Führer SS-Sturmbrigade "Wallonien" / 8.Armee / Heeresgruppe Süd, Eastern Front 9 October 1944 Deutsches Kreuz in Gold as SS-Sturmbannführer d. R. and Kdr. 5.SS-Freiwilligen-Sturmbrigade "Wallonien" / 5.SS-Panzer-Division "Wiking" / III.(germanische) SS-Panzer-Korps / Armee-Abteilung Grasser / Heeresgruppe Nord, Northeastern Front 25 May 1942; 1939 Eisernes Kreuz I. Klasse 3 March 1942; 1939 Eisernes Kreuz II. Klasse 14 September 1944; Nahkampfspange III.Stufe (Gold) 19 March 1944; Nahkampfspange II.Stufe (Silber) 30 November 1943; Nahkampfspange I.Stufe (Bronze) (other documents indicate 23 December 1943 and 20 February 1944) 25 August 1942; Infanterie-Sturmabzeichen in Silber 19 March 1944; Verwundetenabzeichen, 1939 in Gold 20 February 1944; Verwundetenabzeichen, 1939 in Silber (another document indicates 23 December 1943) 15 August 1942; Medaille "Winterschlacht im Osten 1941/42" (Ostmedaille)
My
French Kosher butcher in Paris (1975-1988) was Jewish and his name was … ADOLPHE!
After
the Jewish Israel War of 1938-1945 that took the lives of some 60 million Earth
two legged humans, the Jews and their Friends and Acolytes started to destroy
anything, every single item, and there were millions of them, that reminded us
of Herr Adolf (Adolphe) Hitler. Any street
shop, auction or online trader would find themselves in immense trouble if they
are caught selling or promoting any of those artifacts.
The
world has been terrorised into submission to Judaic Supremacy for over 70 years
and THIS HAS TO STOP! The entire
Christian and Muslim world have been forced to submit to those Devils
reluctantly or not. The others simply found their interests in following the rulers no matter how evil they are.
BAFS
Achtung! The White Resister: TRUTH MIXED WITH RACIST PROPAGANDA!
5th Century Coin Now “Hate”
In
another example of political correctness gone mad, an eBay auction of a
5th Century Thracian coin with a swastika has been halted on the
grounds that it was “hateful or discriminatory.”
By Mike King
 |
 |
Ever since Russia's non-invasion and peaceful reunion with the
overwhelmingly Russian peninsula of Crimea, several leading luminaries of the West's PRC (Predatory
Ruling Class) have launched "Putin is like Hitler" accusations. From the big mouth
of the Hildebeast:
"Now
if this sounds familiar, it's what Hitler did back in the '30s."
From the gaping posterior of that useless royal eater, Prince Charles:
America's British poodle, David Cameron, yapped:
"We run the risk of repeating the mistakes made in Munich in '38 (appeasing Hitler). We cannot know what will happen next."
Putin = Hitler ...Putin = Hitler... Putin = Hitler
America's northern
poodle, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper (ex):
"We haven't seen this kind of behavior since the Second World War."
On Russia hosting the 2014 Winter
Olympics, the faggy-ass Senator Lindsey Graham whined:"We haven't seen this kind of behavior since the Second World War."
"If you could go back in time, would you have allowed Adolf Hitler to host the Olympics in Germany?
To have the propaganda coup of inviting the world into Nazi Germany and putting on a false front?"
The ever-warmongering and certifiably insane Senator John
McCain:
"If
Putin is allowed
to go into a sovereign nation on behalf of
Russian-speaking people, this is the same thing that Hitler did prior
to World
War II. "
Putin = Hitler ...Putin = Hitler... Putin = Hitler
The diabolical global manipulator Zbigniew
Brzezinski:
"(Putin is ) a partially comical imitation of Mussolini and
a more menacing reminder of Hitler."
The bow-tied egghead sophist George Will:"This is more than merely the fascist mind; its ethnic-cum-racial component makes it Hitlerian. Hence Putin is “unpredictable” only to those unfamiliar with the 1930s."
Putin = Hitler ...Putin = Hitler... Putin = Hitler
And
there are plenty
more 'Putin is Hitler' sound-bytes too numerous to
list. Ironically, there are indeed many parallels between Putin and
Hitler,
but not for the reasons expressed by this gang of
bloodthirsty predators.
For example:
For example:
Putin came from a humble background and has known hardship. So did Hitler.
Adolf & Vlad got nothing handed to them.
Putin inherited a ransacked, poverty-stricken, demoralized and dying nation (in 2000). So did Hitler (in 1933).
Pre-Hitler Germans and pre-Putin Russians --- left starving
and desperate by the International bankers (cough cough).
Putin stripped the Globalist Jewish Oligarchs of their power and privilege. So did Hitler.
Some things never change!
Putin has defied the New
World Order and condemned the sovereignty-killing model of what he terms, "the uni-polar world".
So did Hitler, who openly referred to it as "the world conspiracy."
Putin turned the economy around in dramatic fashion. So did Hitler.
Putin turned the economy around in dramatic fashion. So did Hitler.
Amazing recoveries forgotten by history.
Both men understood that the greatness of a people is to be found in its morals and families.
Putin is admired by the overwhelming majority of his people (90%). So was Hitler (99%).
Rock stars!
Hitler with the sons of composer Richard Wagner. Putin with classical tenors Placido Domingo and Jose Carreras.
Putin has been unjustly vilified by relentless western propaganda. So was Hitler.
The Piranha Press always attacks good men.
Putin is being relentlessly baited by western-backed puppet governments
(Georgia, Ukraine, Baltic States). So was Hitler (Czechoslovakia, Poland).
Marshall Smigly of Poland and Poroshenko
of Ukraine -- troublemakers emboldened by the UK & US.
Putin peacefully liberated ethnic Russians (Crimea) from the oppression of foreign governments. So did
Hitler (Sudetenland).
The people of the Sudetenland and Crimea were overjoyed when they returned to their respective motherlands.
Men of reason and culture --- not warmongers!
About
the only difference between Putin and Hitler is that Putin has
not been able to consolidate power and cleanse
Russia's elite class of the traitors in their midst. Let's hope he can
"purge"
them soon and really become like Hitler.
Artwork Favored by Adolf Hitler Now Exploding in Popularity
Adolf Hitler’s favorite artists and artwork, promoted throughout National Socialist Germany and shunned by the jews for decades, are now on fire, with art collectors in America and Europe paying more than $150,000.
“The major auction houses won’t touch these artists due to their
acceptance by and collaboration with the Nazis,” said Maryland
auctioneer Bill Panagopulos. But, he added, “ there’s a market here.”
Marius Martens, a Dutch art dealer, said art from Karl Walther or
sculptor Georg Kolbe, whom Hitler liked and whose work he displayed in
Third Reich buildings, has finally caught the eye of collectors because
the World War II period is now popular.
“This is only the beginning,” Martens said, adding that he has
received death threats for selling the artwork. Panagopulos said he is
already planning a sale of the works.
The popularity of Hitler’s favorite artists sprang to life in just
the last 12 months. “Last year, the market was awakened by the sale of a
painting by Karl Walther for 23,000 euro. It was an extremely scarce
piece as it once hung in the New Chancellery of Adolf Hitler.” he said.
“It seems now that this was not a one-off occasion. Recently works of
other artists popular in the Third Reich have been sold for
considerable prices,” he added.
“Almost 70 years after World War II, more and more people see this
art from a purely historical perspective. Although the art works
originate from an extremely tragic period, they should not be hidden or
destroyed. This is an opinion shared by several museums, seeing the
rising number of exhibitions of this art and the number of visitors,”
said Martens.
He added that as the World War II generation dies off, their period
becomes history. “The driver is time. Just like no well-thinking human
being bought a portrait of Napoleon in 1820, short after he destroyed
Europe,” said Martins. “In the coming 10 years everybody who lived in
the war will die: this means that living-past will change into history.”
Panagopulos said, however, that the growing popularity among
collectors of art from Hitler’s favorites does not mean that Third Reich
art is hot — yet.
- Dr. Goebbels' Estate Sues Publisher for Printing Quotes from the Propaganda Ministers' Diaries
- A “Beautiful Journey”: Rare Pictures of Hitler Meeting Britain's Duke of Windsor Up for Auction
Stay Connected With Us
Jung and the Nazis
by Mark Medweth
It is difficult to deny that Carl Jung's theories are largely overlooked in comparison
to Freudian and other schools of thought. There are numerous possible reasons for such an
occurrence but the most intriguing of all are accusations of anti-Semitism and
National-Socialist support in the 1930's. Having been accused of such, and facing the
associated stigma of scandalous behavior and beliefs may very well be the reason behind
Jung's unpopularity. His relationship with Sigmund Freud, his written work on Jewry, his
fascination with the Nazi movement, and the allegation of Nazi sympathy in general, seem
damaging to say the least. An examination of Jung and his work during the period leading
up to and through World War Two sheds greater light on such long-standing accusations and
goes a long way toward dispelling these claims.
Nazi Sympathizer
Like many others, Jung initially welcomed the focus of unity that swept across the
German land as the National-Socialist "revolution" took hold (Stern, 1976).
Though as time went on and Jung grew increasingly cautious in his views, accusations of
being a "Nazi sympathizer" emerged; accusations which, in some respects, seems
justified as we will see.
In 1928, Carl Gustav Jung became a member of the International General Medical Society
for Psychotherapy (Gallard, 1994). This society, which began two years earlier, was
founded on the desire to develop a psychotherapeutic science with a spiritual, rather than
widely popular material, emphasis. In the same year that Jung joined the society, so too
did Matthias Heinrich Goring, the cousin of the now infamous Marshall, Herman Goring. Jung
was elected vice president in 1930 and was asked to assume the presidency in 1933 due to
the deteriorating political climate. It was believed that Jung, being a Swiss National and
thus neutral, would be in a better political position to handle the role (Gallard, 1994).
Later that year, there was a reorganization of Zentralblatt fur Psychotherapie, the
society's publication journal. The decision was made that two separate but aligned
editions of the journal would be published: an international edition edited by Jung, and a
German edition under the control of Goring for the purpose of ensuring that all material
conformed to Nazi ideology (Sherry, 1986). It was soon after recommended by Goring that
every practicing psychotherapist adopt Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf as a basic reference.
This written appeal was slated for publication in the German edition of the journal but
somehow ended up in the international journal above Carl Jung's signature (Gallard, 1994;
Sherry, 1986). Though the society's headquarters were located in Switzerland and he was
certainly far removed from this "Nazi deception," it was a commonly held belief
that Jung accepted the presidency of a Nazified German organization; thus he must be a
sympathizer.
His decision to accept such a position was heavily criticized by many. Perhaps the fact
that Jung fantasized of national glory, was purportedly not immune to the lure of power,
and felt neglected and misunderstood, played a role in his acceptance of the presidency
for a society in which some members were almost certainly familiar with Mein Kampf and
Nazi ideology (Stern, 1976). Jung, however, offered the excuse that he simply followed the
wishes of his German (and Jewish) colleagues; his true aim was to save psychotherapy which
could easily disappear, as he had put it, with a single stroke of the pen by higher
authorities (Gallard, 1994). He did initially doubt his decision from a moral standpoint
but the desire to preserve the interests of science made the risky effort worthwhile
(Gallard, 1994). In the end, Jung's professional reputation was certainly affected by
these events, though he seemed to have a blind spot to these ramifications. However, this
blind spot, some have suggested, also allowed Jung to see and clarify elements which went
previously undetected, out of which his fascination with events in Germany grew.
Jung's Fascination
Part of Jung's fascination with the Nazi movement was due to his belief that his
archetype theory was best able to explain the "rumblings" of pre-World War Two
Germany. He saw the Nazi movement as an enormous eruption of the collective unconscious he
had previously postulated as far back as 1918 (Stern, 1976). Jung believed the archetype
"Wotan," which represented the German state of mind in the 1930's, was the
return of the collective repressed, and constituted a great event in light of the belief
that the Germans were experiencing a reintegration of archaic elements into their psyche
(elements that had been, over past centuries, suppressed by various cultural movements).
By 1936, Jung's excitement waned as he recognized (and clearly stated) the demonic
aspect of Hitler and the Nazi movement (Gallard, 1994). However, according to his
theories, there is an inherent duality of the archetype, leading Jung to the expectation
that the evil side would turn into its opposite, allowing these forces to humanize. Thus,
Jung believed a new and positive cultural form would emerge and remained hopeful (Gallard,
1994). Such hopefulness was frowned upon by those opposed to the Nazis but, as we will
later see, his medical profession may have accounted for his unpopular views. Despite
these events there were other damaging accusations. His relationship with Freud, it has
been suggested, represented a darker side to Jung's Jewish attitudes.
Jung and Freud
The anti-Semitism charges in the 1930's were dismissed as having been started by a
vengeful Sigmund Freud in order to discredit Jung's work (Sherry, 1986). These
accusations, however, were continually repeated by Freudians and stuck with Jung wherever
he went. It is true that a superficial glance of Jung's attitude concerning Freudian
psychology seems frighteningly similar to Nazi phraseology. Jung referred to the Freudian
school of thought as subversive, depreciatory, undermining, obscene, and smutty-minded,
while the Nazis described Jews as alien, subversive, lascivious, and parasitic (Stern,
1976). His statements may have sounded anti-Semitic but Stern (1976) proposes they were
more correctly attributable to the resentment that periodically overcame him; he may have
overshot his initial target, which was undoubtedly Sigmund Freud (Stern, 1976). These
anti-Semitic accusations by Freudians, Jung warned, were a confirmation that
psychoanalysis was a Jewish psychology (Sherry, 1986). It seemed that no one, without
facing charges of anti-Semitism, could criticize Freud's work. Did Jung's resentment of
Freud arise because he was anti-Semitic? It is more likely that this tension between the
two grew out of their necessary separation as coworkers and colleagues.
It is true that Jung had a conflictual relationship with a prominent Jew - Sigmund
Freud. It was Freud, however, who first emphasized cultural and religious differences
between the two (Gallard, 1994). What originally brought Freud and Jung together was their
common belief that the unconscious was a reality. In the end, however, the separation of
the two collaborators was necessary because of different fundamental views that could not
be reconciled: Freud concentrated on the physical and biological background of the
unconscious, while Jung conceptualized the psyche in terms of polarities (Franz, 1975).
Jung believed that both the biological as well as the spiritual aspects belonged to the
very nature of the unconscious. In later years, Jung explained the separation as a
typological difference in temperament (Franz, 1975). Freud's work corresponded to an
extroverted approach to science while Jung's methods were more of an introverted concern.
It is clear that differences between the two were at a fundamental, structural level
rather than racially or religiously based. In a 1929 text, Jung contrasted their two
theories and no mention was ever made of Freud's religious origins (Gallard, 1994). In
1939, Jung spoke about Freud after the eminent thinkers death and again made no mention of
religious or racial differences, though the time in history would have been an opportune
moment to do so, considering the rise of the Nazi movement and the general feeling of
dislike toward the Jews in Germany. In Jung's own words, "I am absolutely not an
opponent of the Jews, even though I am an opponent of Freud's. I criticize him because of
his materialistic and intellectualistic - last but not least - irreligious attitude and
not because he is Jewish" (Jung, 1934b, as cited in Gallard, 1994, p. 218).
To this day, the two schools of thought are opposed to each other. This opposition
probably resides in the typological differences alluded to by Jung. The Freudian outlook
is much closer to the extroverted orientation of our Natural Sciences while Jung's
approach is of a more subjective nature (Franz, 1975). Whether one is satisfied that he
was an opponent of Freud because of professional and not religious differences, Jung was
also accused of writing, throughout the 1930's, what some consider to be anti-Semitic
statements about Jews in general.
Jung and Jewish Psychology
In the very first issue of the Zentralblatt fur Psychotherapie, with Jung as
editor, he wrote that the universal aspect of the psyche should not be allowed to hide the
particular characteristics that are evident from belonging to any given cultural or
religious group. In fact, Jung touched on this topic - differences between Jewish and
Germanic psychology - on many occasions which highlights his "concern to give voice
to those viewpoints which report on the 'imponderable differences' between men, and by
exposing them, to reach a synthesis" (Gallard, 1994, p. 209). Such may be the case,
but Jung's emphasis on religious and cultural differences of the psyche was a serious
breach of ethics in consideration of the time in history (Gallard, 1994). To accentuate
such differences between Jewish psychology and other schools of thought fed into Nazi
propaganda.
Furthermore, Jung continually failed to explain exactly what he meant by his oftentimes
paradoxical writing, thus leaving him open to criticism. In light of this, the accusations
of ant-Semitism seem hardly surprising. As an example of paradoxical writing, Jung, at one
point, likened Jewish psychology to Chinese psychology. At that time in history however,
the Chinese culture was not well known; they were a remote people, not valued by others,
and were of an entirely different cultural realm (Gallard, 1994). It is not surprising
that such an idea could be taken as a further attack on Jews. Yet unknown to most, Jung
had spent years immersing himself in Far Eastern culture and found somewhat of an
authentication of his ideas. His great respect for the Chinese culture implies that he was
complimenting Jewish psychology. In fact, at one point, he stated that Jews were more
vastly conscious than the barbaric Germanic people and had a higher degree of civilization
and adaptability (McGuire, & Hull, 1977).
In relation to such differences that Jung so eagerly emphasized, it was his belief that
the cultural specificities were the universal heritage of humankind which can be found in
all people (Gallard, 1994). However, an effort must first be made to recognize these
particulars which usually show themselves as differences. This notion would explain why
Jung was so intent on highlighting differences between Jewish and Germanic psychology: he
simply wished to initiate discussion on, what many considered, sensitive matters (Sherry,
1986). Though some would later suggest that through addressing Jewish psychological
differences, he was really unconsciously addressing Freud, it is clear that he failed to
understand the possibility of misinterpretation and the dangerous misuse of what he wrote.
If Jung could be accused of anything, it would be his poor timing in light of the events
unfolding around him in pre-war Europe.
Having considered these accusations - of being a Nazi sympathizer and anti-Semite - it
is worth considering often overlooked public statements expressed by Jung as the war
approached.
Jung's Own Words
As early as 1918, Jung knew something unfavorable was arising within Germany. His words
of the "blond beast stirring in its subterranean prison...threatening us with an
outbreak that will have devastating consequences" (Jung, 1947, as cited in Welsh,
Hannah, & Briner, 1947) serve as an early warning of what was to come. Just ten years
later, he wrote on how each person is unconsciously worse when acting within a crowd
rather than individually. Jung warned the world that the larger an organization becomes,
the more the people are prone to immorality and blind ignorance (Jung, 1947, as cited in
Welsh, Hannah, & Briner, 1947).
In 1933, in a lecture given in Cologne, Germany (at the same period in history when
others accused him of Nazi-sympathy), Jung leveled a full blown warning about people as a
collective suffocating the individual, leaving those in the crowd anonymous,
irresponsible, and dangerous. Jung implied that Hitler (and Nazism) was the inevitable
cause of such collectivenes. Four years later, in 1937, Jung spoke at Yale University in
the United States, relaying his belief that the movement seen in Germany was explained by
a fear of neighboring countries supposedly possessed by devilish leaders. In stating that
no one can recognize their own unconscious underpinnings, the possibility that Germany was
projecting their own condition upon their International neighbors was evident (Jung, 1947,
as cited in Welsh, Hannah, & Briner, 1947). This fear leads to the nationalistic duty
to have the biggest guns and the strongest army.
In 1940, most of these words were published in German but were quickly suppressed. As a
result of Jung's views about Germany and particularly Adolf Hitler, he ended up on the
Nazi "blacklist" (Jung, 1947, as cited in Welsh, Hannah, & Briner, 1947).
When France was later invaded, the Gestapo destroyed Jung's French translations as well.
In no uncertain terms, Jung's writings and lectures served as a warning for the conflict
to come. As well, Jung's own words opposed the accusations of Nazi sympathy and
anti-Semitism. It would seem then, in light of the above, that the answer to the question
of Nazi sympathy and anti-Semitism is fairly clear.
Conlusions
Was Jung a Nazi sympathizer and ant-Semite? The answer is most likely no. Jay Sherry
(1986) suggests that Jung's bitterness toward Freud as well as his fascination with his
archetype theory coming to life caused him to miss, on a feeling level, what was unfolding
in a historical sense. Jung clearly showed the importance he placed on mythical symbols
and transformations, and his choice to describe events psychically (in mythological terms)
rather than from a psychiatric or sociological standpoint may have obscured his view of
his predicament (Gallard, 1994). As well, his initial enthusiasm about the Nazi movement
was likely a result of the polarity of his theory. If each archetype contains the seeds of
good as well as evil, it is difficult at the start to judge whether a positive or negative
resolution will take place. His medical background may have counseled him to a "wait
and see" attitude in light of this polarity (Jung, 1947, as cited in Welsh, Hannah,
& Briner, 1947). Jung stated that, "a doctor needs a certain optimism in order to
save everything that can possibly be saved, even when things look very black. One simply
cannot afford to let oneself be too much impressed by the apparent or real hopelessness of
a situation, even though this should entail exposing oneself to a certain danger"
(Jung, 1947, as cited in Welsh, Hannah, & Briner, 1947). This attitude leaves no room
for initial negative judgments, but leads one to proceed cautiously and optimistically.
This would account for the numerous accusations that Jung possessed an initial
give-them-a-chance attitude toward Hitler and the Nazi movement (Sherry, 1986).
One should also keep in mind that, from Jung's standpoint, pre-National-Socialist
Germany was one of the most differentiated cultural countries in the world, and
represented the intellectual background to which the Swiss were tied through language and
friendship (Jung, 1947, as cited in Welsh, Hannah, & Briner, 1947). Jung admits that,
as Hitler seized power, he consoled himself in the fact that Germany was indeed a
civilized European nation with a strong sense of discipline and morality. Thus, to Jung
(as well as countless others), the ultimate outcome seemed confusing and uncertain (Jung,
1947, as cited in Welsh, Hannah, & Briner, 1957).
Finally, Marie Louise von Franz (1975) knew Jung up to his death and never perceived
the slightest trace, conscious or unconscious, of National-Socialist or anti-Semitic
support. To the contrary, she states that Jung frequently spoke against Hitler and the
Nazis in distinctly unambiguous terms. The fact that some of his most devoted pupils -
Erich Neumann, Gerhard Adler, James Kirsch, and Aniela Jaffe - were Jewish and that racism
was quite contrary to Jung's well known aspirations of universality suggests the
accusations are somewhat misguided (Stern, 1976). As a result of these insights, it is
best to infer that Jung's misplaced optimism and the mistake of talking too much proves
the truism that "a great scientist is not necessarily a good politician" (Franz,
1975, p. 63).
©1996, Mark Medweth
'Jung and the Nazis' was originally published in the online journal
Psybernetika at Simon Fraser University. SFU deleted the entire journal.
Never leave anything of value on a university site.
References
Franz, M. L. von. (1975). C. G. Jung: His myth in our time. New York: G. P.
Putnam's Sons.
Gallard, M. (1994). Jung's attitude during the second World War in the light of the
historical and professional context. Journal of analytical psychology, 39,
203-232.
McGuire, W., and Hull, R. F. C. (1977). C. G. Jung speaking. New Jersey:
Princeton University Press.
Sherry, J. (1986). Jung, the Jews, and Hitler. Spring: an annual of archetypal
psychology and Jungian thought. Texas: Spring Publications.
Stern, P. J. (1976). C. G. Jung: The haunted prophet. New York: George
Braziller.
Welsh E., Hannah, B., and Briner, M. (Trans.) (1947). Essays on contemporary
events. London: Kegan Paul.
|| Personality & Consciousness || Contact || TE Forum || Carl Jung ||
Adolf Hitler: England Does Not Want Peace - 8th November 1939 (VIDEO)
Adolf
Hitler speaks about war
with England and how his peace offers
were
refused by Churchill, and he thus,
will have to reply to Churchill in
the
language he understands, that of all out
war.
Hess Brought Hitler's Peace Offer to Britain in 1941
It was one of the most perplexing
episodes of the Second World War which,
more than 70 years on, remains shrouded
in mystery.
Adolf Hitler - England Does Not Want Peace, 8th November 1939.
Amazing Adolf Hitler Speech ~ Our enemies today face the entire German Volk!
N.B.
ReplyDeleteMuslims are not united worldwide under Muhammad, but under the Devil, Sects, and tribal and cultural Gods!
BAFS