FREEMASONIC LODGES SHOULD BE BANNED!
Antonius, my Friend and Brother in Humanity, Truth will always triumph even if Authority (TYRANNY) acknowledges it or not!
BREAKING: Terrorist troll Joshua Goldberg behind professor’s suspension!
Write, fax, or phone: Mike Mahon President & Vice-Chancellor A762 University Hall, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1K 3M4. Phone: (403) 329 -2201. Fax: (403) 329-2097.
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
Published on 5 Oct 2016
Prof. Tony Hall suspended without pay at University of Lethbridge (10/5/16)
"The betrayal of the university was clearly seen in the letter the President wrote. Mc Mahon is telling the Canadian people that academic freedom is dead! When the Judaics and the Freemasons send out an order we have to comply or die!
Let us see what the Friends of Pr Hall will do to defend this matter."
BAFS
A Florida man named Joshua Goldberg – who has already been arrested for conspiring to commit false-flag “Islamic terror” – may soon be charged with yet another crime: The creation of a horrific “kill all Jews” image that is currently under investigation by Canadian police.
Joshua
Goldberg, arrested for trying to incite false flag “Islamic terror,”
may be re-arrested for hate speech…alongside his accomplices at B’nai
Brith?
The photoshopped image, manufactured by Goldberg, purports to depict political cartoonist Ben Garrison choking an Orthodox Jewish man. Accompanying the image, in small print, is an unhinged “kill all Jews now” rant. In an article published here on September 16th, I speculated that rabid Zionists, rather than rabid Jew-haters, had manufactured the image. It turns out I was right.
The short answer is “yes.”
“Unfortunately that Photoshopped image of me assaulting that Orthodox Jew man continues to circulate and be posted everywhere. Ironically, it was created by a 20 year-old Jewish kid named Joshua Goldberg. He was arrested by the FBI about a year ago for sending bomb making instructions to what he thought was a Muslim terrorist–instead it was an FBI undercover agent. Goldberg is now pleading mental illness, but for years he was allowed to stir up trouble from his parent’s basement in Florida. For some reason he enjoyed targeting me and he’s the one who created that image as well as many other hate screeds.”
Ben Garrison had his life ruined by trolls like Goldberg, who vandalized Garrison’s cartoons to make it appear that Garrison was a rabid Jew-hater. Now Goldberg’s hate speech has damaged another man’s career and reputation: that of Professor Anthony Hall, Globalization Studies, University of Lethbridge.
Mainstream media outlets including CBC and the Lethbridge Herald accepted B’nai Brith’s false narrative that Professor Hall was responsible for Goldberg’s planted image. The scandal exploded into an all-out media assault on Professor Hall; but as the origin of Goldberg’s hate image came under suspicion, the B’nai Brith and the media shifted its attack to focus on Hall’s “anti-Zionist propaganda.”
B’nai Brith’s ongoing witch-hunt targeting Anthony Hall broke into local media last June, focusing on his role at False Flag Weekly News
Following
the Goldberg “kill all Jews” false flag attack on Hall, the Lethbridge
Herald trumpeted Hall’s “anti-Zionist propaganda” and “conspiracy
theories”
Dr. Mike Mahon
President, University of Lethbridge
Dear Dr. Mahon,
I’m writing in response to the ongoing orchestrated attack on Professor Anthony Hall. The smear campaign against Professor Hall is an attack on the entire academy. Its purpose is to terrorize academicians into remaining silent on controversial issues. If successful, the media lynching of Professor Hall would grossly undermine academic freedom, especially the institution of tenure.
The lynchpin (no pun intended) of the anti-Hall campaign is a horrific image that was planted on Professor Hall’s Facebook page – unbeknownst to Professor Hall, who had absolutely nothing to do with that image. The grossly offensive image, which features a Jewish man being strangled alongside ultra-inflammatory text calling for the killing of “all Jews,” was in fact created by an allegedly self-employed propagandist named Joshua Goldberg, who was later arrested for his efforts to create incidents of so-called “Islamic terrorism.” Obviously Joshua Goldberg created his horrific “kill all Jews” image not because he himself is anti-Jewish, but rather as a way to manufacture false evidence of “anti-Semitism” that could later be used against people like Professor Hall. Goldberg appears to have created this awful image precisely to fit the definition of hate speech. It is a weaponized image. The weapon was used against Anthony Hall in precisely in the way its creator intended.
When planted evidence is used against a victim, it is the criminals who manufactured and planted the evidence, not the victim, who are at fault. Joshua Goldberg, B’nai Brith, and the individual or entity who planted this hate speech on Professor Hall’s Facebook page all ought to be investigated for their respective roles in this orchestrated smear campaign against Professor Hall.
The institution of tenure exists for one reason and one reason only: To ensure that even the most controversial avenues of research and interpretation are fully protected in our academy. Professor Hall is using his tenure properly. Are you? Is anyone else at the University of Lethbridge? If not, why not? How can you, or any other professor, justify holding tenure if you are not, in fact, making every possible effort to challenge the most sacrosanct public myths, and to pursue the most controversial avenues of research and interpretation?
Sincerely,
Dr. Kevin Barrett
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus to Antonius J Hall
DEAR READERS
Throughout the decades I have written many personal letters to authority. All were in vain. This was how I learned that authority meant tyranny and was not at the service of the people who wrongly think they put them there.
The first two letters that I remember of were addressed to Leonid Brezhnev (USSR) and François Mitterand (FRANCE) regarding my son Olyeg. Later, I addressed one to the alleged Queen of Great Britain and one to John Major (GREAT BRITAIN). And, then one to Aneerood Jugnauth (MAURITIUS), but this time not about myself. And many others to Members of Parliament and other leading authorities, and even one to a Lord, a personal friend of mine (so I thought!) of the House of Lords.
In all those instances, I understood that there was only ONE AUTHORITY everywhere, and that every single one of them acted in the same manner, all against the people, against Freedom, Truth and Justice, and always in favour of the Chosen Ones, including the House "Negroes". Whether out of fear or by design, they constitute the Evil forces that own, run and control everything!
I understood that I was always dealing with Satan (the symbolic one) directly. So, I stopped writing to them to ask for anything personal, but TELLING them a piece of my mind regarding certain issues I was interested in or that were affecting us all, including myself.
When I was at the Sorbonne, Old and New, I never saw any academic freedom even there. I was even marked ZERO (over twenty) for the very first time in my life by my teacher Mr Najab ("Expression Écrite et Orale" - Written and Oral Expression) on a work in French I submitted on "Parapsychology" because, Mr Najab told me, the English Institute (Sorbonne Nouvelle) cannot accept my personal experience, and he advised to remove almost half of my material, and re-write my work.
So, regarding the case of my good friend Pr Antonius Hall, my teacher and Brother in humanity and religion (I understand that we both share the same fundamental values like Freedom, Truth, Justice, and a moral way of life) achieved only with personal and collective efforts, I have no request to the University of Lethbridge as I am convinced that IF there is any honest and courageous authority there, the Professor will receive justice at their hands despite all the pressures. However, had there been no implicit or explicit complicity of the University, this matter would have ended within twenty four hours in favour of Pr Hall.
B'nai B'rith (ADL) is a supremacist, racist, Zionist, terrorist, and non religious Judaic Freemasonic Lodge accountable to none just like Israel, that stolen land of Palestine.
Suffice to say that Pr Hall has committed no provable crime and is unjustly targeted by the most powerful Defaming Lobby that controls the affairs of the State in the entire "Western" European world like a rabid dog and that constitutes the most powerful Judaic Lobby in the world.
It is my experience that the entire colonised world has suffered from the imperialists and colonialists that have imposed upon them a Western controlled Academia that allows no freedom at all except being a mouthpiece of the State and the Corporations that own and rule the country and its institutions. Think, but do not tell anybody unless we say so. No free debate; no free press; no questioning without our permission; no discussion about any issue unless we allow it; and no research unless we give you the green light. We are the Freemasons, the Judaic ("Jewish") Supremacists, the Carnegie, Rockefeller, Rhodes, Rothschild and Fulbright Masters of the World, the Knights of Malta, of Eulogia, etc. M.K. Gandhi rightly called our public schools Citadels of Slavery! But, today even private schools are fast becoming citadels of slavery too.
Tenure is like knighthood and it is only by Royal or Freemasonic permission that professors are protected by this institution. The ADL (All Defamation League) of B'nai B'rith Lodge is allowed to function freely to make sure that all professionals toe the line. Whether Pr Hall is famous or internationally acclaimed is not the issue here nor is the weapon of mass deception called anti-Semitism when it is proven that most of those claiming to be Semites are not, even by their own people. For example, Arthur Koestler. He was murdered together with his wife for having said so in his book "The Thirteenth Tribe". To prove that the Judaics own and control even the Police is easy when we see that the Police decided that both murders were suicide. Nor is the other weapon of mass deception the Judaics and others call HATE SPEECH the issue here!
This thing called “hate speech” is simply speech that a certain group hates. It is the opposite of what it is purported to be. The accusers hate the people who pursue the truth. The truth seekers who dare to question and investigate do so out of their deep desire for peace.
It is not up to Professor Anthony Hall to prove that he is innocent, but to the accusers, including ISRAEL, to prove that he is guilty of any crime!
ACADEMIA IS DEAD! Only the Citadels of slavery remain! Lethbridge can break that monopoly, but only if they are really honest enough to want to, and have the courage to do so!
BAFS
1st of October 2016
Throughout the decades I have written many personal letters to authority. All were in vain. This was how I learned that authority meant tyranny and was not at the service of the people who wrongly think they put them there.
The first two letters that I remember of were addressed to Leonid Brezhnev (USSR) and François Mitterand (FRANCE) regarding my son Olyeg. Later, I addressed one to the alleged Queen of Great Britain and one to John Major (GREAT BRITAIN). And, then one to Aneerood Jugnauth (MAURITIUS), but this time not about myself. And many others to Members of Parliament and other leading authorities, and even one to a Lord, a personal friend of mine (so I thought!) of the House of Lords.
In all those instances, I understood that there was only ONE AUTHORITY everywhere, and that every single one of them acted in the same manner, all against the people, against Freedom, Truth and Justice, and always in favour of the Chosen Ones, including the House "Negroes". Whether out of fear or by design, they constitute the Evil forces that own, run and control everything!
I understood that I was always dealing with Satan (the symbolic one) directly. So, I stopped writing to them to ask for anything personal, but TELLING them a piece of my mind regarding certain issues I was interested in or that were affecting us all, including myself.
When I was at the Sorbonne, Old and New, I never saw any academic freedom even there. I was even marked ZERO (over twenty) for the very first time in my life by my teacher Mr Najab ("Expression Écrite et Orale" - Written and Oral Expression) on a work in French I submitted on "Parapsychology" because, Mr Najab told me, the English Institute (Sorbonne Nouvelle) cannot accept my personal experience, and he advised to remove almost half of my material, and re-write my work.
So, regarding the case of my good friend Pr Antonius Hall, my teacher and Brother in humanity and religion (I understand that we both share the same fundamental values like Freedom, Truth, Justice, and a moral way of life) achieved only with personal and collective efforts, I have no request to the University of Lethbridge as I am convinced that IF there is any honest and courageous authority there, the Professor will receive justice at their hands despite all the pressures. However, had there been no implicit or explicit complicity of the University, this matter would have ended within twenty four hours in favour of Pr Hall.
B'nai B'rith (ADL) is a supremacist, racist, Zionist, terrorist, and non religious Judaic Freemasonic Lodge accountable to none just like Israel, that stolen land of Palestine.
Suffice to say that Pr Hall has committed no provable crime and is unjustly targeted by the most powerful Defaming Lobby that controls the affairs of the State in the entire "Western" European world like a rabid dog and that constitutes the most powerful Judaic Lobby in the world.
It is my experience that the entire colonised world has suffered from the imperialists and colonialists that have imposed upon them a Western controlled Academia that allows no freedom at all except being a mouthpiece of the State and the Corporations that own and rule the country and its institutions. Think, but do not tell anybody unless we say so. No free debate; no free press; no questioning without our permission; no discussion about any issue unless we allow it; and no research unless we give you the green light. We are the Freemasons, the Judaic ("Jewish") Supremacists, the Carnegie, Rockefeller, Rhodes, Rothschild and Fulbright Masters of the World, the Knights of Malta, of Eulogia, etc. M.K. Gandhi rightly called our public schools Citadels of Slavery! But, today even private schools are fast becoming citadels of slavery too.
Tenure is like knighthood and it is only by Royal or Freemasonic permission that professors are protected by this institution. The ADL (All Defamation League) of B'nai B'rith Lodge is allowed to function freely to make sure that all professionals toe the line. Whether Pr Hall is famous or internationally acclaimed is not the issue here nor is the weapon of mass deception called anti-Semitism when it is proven that most of those claiming to be Semites are not, even by their own people. For example, Arthur Koestler. He was murdered together with his wife for having said so in his book "The Thirteenth Tribe". To prove that the Judaics own and control even the Police is easy when we see that the Police decided that both murders were suicide. Nor is the other weapon of mass deception the Judaics and others call HATE SPEECH the issue here!
This thing called “hate speech” is simply speech that a certain group hates. It is the opposite of what it is purported to be. The accusers hate the people who pursue the truth. The truth seekers who dare to question and investigate do so out of their deep desire for peace.
It is not up to Professor Anthony Hall to prove that he is innocent, but to the accusers, including ISRAEL, to prove that he is guilty of any crime!
ACADEMIA IS DEAD! Only the Citadels of slavery remain! Lethbridge can break that monopoly, but only if they are really honest enough to want to, and have the courage to do so!
BAFS
1st of October 2016
Comments
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus * . (Explicit complicity is found in a Message from President Mike Mahon himself! See below.)
Message from President Mike Mahon in response to commentary related to Dr. Anthony Hall
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Share13
Recently there has been significant public commentary and media coverage regarding the online activities and some of the personal views held by Dr. Anthony Hall. The University has received numerous inquiries and expressions of concern regarding Dr. Hall’s activities, views and teachings in the classroom. As we are able, we have attempted to respond to those inquiries.
The University recognizes the serious nature of these concerns and can confirm that we are actively engaged with this issue. As an employer however, the University is bound by privacy obligations and cannot provide specific commentary or details on any human resource action undertaken with regards to any employee of the University.
We can say unequivocally that Dr. Hall does not speak on behalf of the University or its faculty, staff and students. The University of Lethbridge is an inclusive and welcoming place of research, learning, creative activity and engagement for all members of the community. As a community we condemn any communication that promotes hatred, discrimination or violence to any individual or group.
Michael J. (Mike) Mahon, Ph.D.
President and Vice-Chancellor
University of Lethbridge
Message from President Mike Mahon in response to commentary related to Dr. Anthony Hall
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Share13
Recently there has been significant public commentary and media coverage regarding the online activities and some of the personal views held by Dr. Anthony Hall. The University has received numerous inquiries and expressions of concern regarding Dr. Hall’s activities, views and teachings in the classroom. As we are able, we have attempted to respond to those inquiries.
The University recognizes the serious nature of these concerns and can confirm that we are actively engaged with this issue. As an employer however, the University is bound by privacy obligations and cannot provide specific commentary or details on any human resource action undertaken with regards to any employee of the University.
We can say unequivocally that Dr. Hall does not speak on behalf of the University or its faculty, staff and students. The University of Lethbridge is an inclusive and welcoming place of research, learning, creative activity and engagement for all members of the community. As a community we condemn any communication that promotes hatred, discrimination or violence to any individual or group.
Michael J. (Mike) Mahon, Ph.D.
President and Vice-Chancellor
University of Lethbridge
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Text
emailed to President Michael J. Mahon. ("Your explicit complicity in Pr
Antonius Hall's victimisation by the B'nai B'rith as per your own
message")
Like · Reply · October 1 at 1:03am · Edited
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus I do not understand how Israeli agents can use this page to spew their venom on Pr Hall non-stop! Have they hacked his page?
Why Anthony supports open debate on the Holocaust
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus We
do not need to debate PROVABLE HISTORICAL FACTS that clearly show that
we do not have an iota of evidence to prove that Six Million Jews have
been holocausted when it is clearly documented that after Judea declared
war on Germany, millions of Jews move
out of Europe and mainly to the United States where they have been
running the country ever since. The Foreign Zionist Council proved how
powerful powerful they were by even MURDERING the US President JFK and
got away with that heinous crime because they owned/controlled all the
US governing apparatus! BAFS
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus The
professor knows better about the definition of that term debate and its
common usage. I may be wrong, but I do not see how or why!
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus In
my view there can be no debate at all, but only research, findings, and
conclusions! And we must be free to talk and write about it, but we are
not.
"Holocaust" (Six million Jews holocausted) is not History, but IMPOSED DOGMA, MYTH, A LIE, DECEPTION, MATHEMATICALLY, PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, ... !
Provable historical facts are not debatable! They are either true or false! So-called Survivors' have been proven over and over again to have lied and to lie!
Statement (not argument): Six Million Jews were gassed.
Counter statement (not argument): There is no evidence of a single Jew having been gassed nor of a single homicidal gas chamber. The truth stands by itself and does not require agreement or disagreement unless proven false.
There is indeed one false statement here. Which one? This is a matter of research, but not for a debate and a vote on the issue. There can be no research on the issue when laws have been passed to make all research a crime when it proves there was no evidence, therefore no Holocaust of Six Million nor even of one single Jew!
Even some Jews refused the term Holocaust and chose to call it Shoah! When I read here that "All history is open for interpretation", I wonder if the author of that comment understands what is meant by the term HISTORY! In French it can also mean FAIRY TALE! If we cannot prove it happened, it cannot be part of History.
"Holocaust" (Six million Jews holocausted) is not History, but IMPOSED DOGMA, MYTH, A LIE, DECEPTION, MATHEMATICALLY, PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, ... !
Provable historical facts are not debatable! They are either true or false! So-called Survivors' have been proven over and over again to have lied and to lie!
Statement (not argument): Six Million Jews were gassed.
Counter statement (not argument): There is no evidence of a single Jew having been gassed nor of a single homicidal gas chamber. The truth stands by itself and does not require agreement or disagreement unless proven false.
There is indeed one false statement here. Which one? This is a matter of research, but not for a debate and a vote on the issue. There can be no research on the issue when laws have been passed to make all research a crime when it proves there was no evidence, therefore no Holocaust of Six Million nor even of one single Jew!
Even some Jews refused the term Holocaust and chose to call it Shoah! When I read here that "All history is open for interpretation", I wonder if the author of that comment understands what is meant by the term HISTORY! In French it can also mean FAIRY TALE! If we cannot prove it happened, it cannot be part of History.
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus We
cannot talk about the "Holocaust" for at least four decades in the
absence of evidence. To anybody who says or keeps claiming it happened,
but cannot provide any kind of hard evidence, I will say: JUST SHUT UP
and I will ignore them because it is an unnecessary distraction and a
waste of time.
Write a reply...
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus All DEBATES I have seen to this day were one side coming with provable facts and the other with the Holocaust Dogma that nobody is allowed to question or debate and TONS OF LIES!
Friday, 09/23/2016 False Flag Weekly News
Streamed
live 8 hours ago
PLEASE SUPPORT WITH YOUR DONATIONS
http://noliesradio.org/donate
CLICK THE LINK BELOW TO SEE TODAY’S NEWS STORIES AND THEIR SOURCE LINKS and for More Info:
http://noliesradio.org/archives/120266
SPECIAL GUEST TODAY: Allen Roland
http://noliesradio.org/donate
CLICK THE LINK BELOW TO SEE TODAY’S NEWS STORIES AND THEIR SOURCE LINKS and for More Info:
http://noliesradio.org/archives/120266
SPECIAL GUEST TODAY: Allen Roland
QUESTIONING AN OFFICIAL STORY IS NOT HATE SPEECH, IT IS FREE SPEECH.
The False Flag Weekly News anchored by Dr. Kevin Barrett and Prof. Tony Hall looks behind the headlines and main stream media stories to get at what’s really going on in the world. From violations of international law to initiating WWIII, you don’t want to miss what they and their guests have to say about the stories behind the stories.
PLEASE SHARE THIS VITAL NEWS SHOW ON YOUR FACEBOOK, TWITTER, EMAIL. You can also use the EMBED link to put this show on your blog or website. SEE GOOGLE SHARE LINK ABOVE
"The views expressed in False Flag Weekly News are the sole responsibility of the speaker(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NoLiesRadio.org. NoLiesRadio.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements expressed therein."
False Flag Weekly News is web-streamed LIVE every Friday 8am Pacific * 11am Eastern * 15:00 GMT
Please address the issues presented in the news show when making comments. Personal attacks, threats, veiled threats, bigoted remarks or foul language will get you banned.
· Category
· Licence
- Standard YouTube Licence
Addendum
10-100 million Native Americans reduced to only 300,000 who
survived!
100-150 million Muslims worldwide murdered because of
European imperialism, colonialism, slave trade, democracy, Socialism, Marxism,
Communism, Zionism, Fascism, Liberalism, Enlightenment, Christianism or
Jesusims, Zionist United Nations Organization, Zionist USA, Canada, Australia,
United Kingdom of Great Israel Kingdom of B'rit'ain, etc.
100 (?) million Africans were murdered by Europeans!
Millions of Asians were murdered by Europeans
SABBATAI JEWISH FREEMASONIC LODGE ADL of B'NAI B'RITH VICIOUSLY TARGETING PR ANTONIUS J. HALL
New From Antonius. Very Important That the News Get Out.
In recent days I discovered that the Canadian branch of the
Israeli-US-based Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is reporting
that I am “well known for using academic credentials to deny the
Holocaust.” On August...
ahtribune.com
Antonius J Hall I
am sorry to learn of this struggle. You seem to have recovered and I
give thanks for the insights and mentorship you have provided along the
way. I'll be very interested by what you might want to offer after
reading the article. Its only been posted for about 10 minutes.
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Thanks,
Anthony! I will definitely read it although my time is very limited.
Too much on my hand with BABY CARING! (The photo was taken today at the
same market where I was assaulted three times by a "Police" officer,
pushing the same pram on my way to collect my baby and four year old
granddaughter. I promise that I will give you my feedback. Regards and
God bless you! With Christic love. Basheer
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Baby is sleeping and I am traveling back home now. I will read the article.
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Antonius J Hall
Borrowing a term from Pr James Henry Fetzer, I would conclude that the
whole Jewish or Judaic Freemasonic Lodge known as the B'nai B'rith claim
is vitiated in its entirety given the fact that I can prove beyond the
shadow of a doubt
1. That the picture shown on facebook is a collage and a photoshopped image
2. That the text cannot be imputed to Pr Antonius Hall because it is simply and beyond the shadow of a doubt just a compilation or summary of all the false antisemitic claims made against innocent victims of Judaic hegemony and supremacy by the Judaics themselves when they target any individual they want to character assassinate or incite violence, persecute, ostracise, and other such measure that would eventually silence that individual, including murder. The ADL B'nai B'rith and other Judaic organisations around the world, and in particular, in the West have been found guilty of this countless of times or for using this kind of staged incident to carry out their own agenda.
3. Anti-Semitism is bogus and is a fabrication of the false Semites themselves, mostly Ashkenazi Talmudists!
It is not necessary and futile to comment on any part of it although it must be said again that we have not found any evidence, including many Jews themselves, about any Six Million Jews having been exterminated by the Germans nor have we found any evidence of a single homicidal gas chamber. Hundreds of researchers have come to the same conclusion, including David Cole and French Pr Roger Dommergue Polaco de Menasce, himself a Jew! Read also "A letter from Jewish French Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce to Stevens Spielberg" by Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce
https://archive.org/.../ALetterFromJewishFrenchDr...
Who ever accused Pr Dommergue of "Holocaust Denial"? Holocaust denial and Anti-Semitism are just Freemasonic and Judaic weapons to silence dissent regarding Judaic criminality around the world, including in occupied Palestine, occupied France, occupied Australia, occupied Canada, occupied Germany, occupied USA, etc.
To be this is blatantly by design in order as Pr Hall rightly observed not to win converts but to allow the designer to justify political actions. And the DESIGNER betrayed itself by trying to make it a criminal Police case clearly aiming at making Pr Hall lose his position at the University of Lethbridge!
For the purpose of this short commentary, the rest of the article is irrelevant to me although it contains damning truths (I already know of for the most part) about the designers of such deceptions.
If so-called good people would unite and join Pr Hall's battle, much of this kind of demonization can and will be avoided, and the culprits even prosecuted, but sadly they won't.
Regards
Basheer
1. That the picture shown on facebook is a collage and a photoshopped image
2. That the text cannot be imputed to Pr Antonius Hall because it is simply and beyond the shadow of a doubt just a compilation or summary of all the false antisemitic claims made against innocent victims of Judaic hegemony and supremacy by the Judaics themselves when they target any individual they want to character assassinate or incite violence, persecute, ostracise, and other such measure that would eventually silence that individual, including murder. The ADL B'nai B'rith and other Judaic organisations around the world, and in particular, in the West have been found guilty of this countless of times or for using this kind of staged incident to carry out their own agenda.
3. Anti-Semitism is bogus and is a fabrication of the false Semites themselves, mostly Ashkenazi Talmudists!
It is not necessary and futile to comment on any part of it although it must be said again that we have not found any evidence, including many Jews themselves, about any Six Million Jews having been exterminated by the Germans nor have we found any evidence of a single homicidal gas chamber. Hundreds of researchers have come to the same conclusion, including David Cole and French Pr Roger Dommergue Polaco de Menasce, himself a Jew! Read also "A letter from Jewish French Dr. Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce to Stevens Spielberg" by Roger Dommergue Polacco de Menasce
https://archive.org/.../ALetterFromJewishFrenchDr...
Who ever accused Pr Dommergue of "Holocaust Denial"? Holocaust denial and Anti-Semitism are just Freemasonic and Judaic weapons to silence dissent regarding Judaic criminality around the world, including in occupied Palestine, occupied France, occupied Australia, occupied Canada, occupied Germany, occupied USA, etc.
To be this is blatantly by design in order as Pr Hall rightly observed not to win converts but to allow the designer to justify political actions. And the DESIGNER betrayed itself by trying to make it a criminal Police case clearly aiming at making Pr Hall lose his position at the University of Lethbridge!
For the purpose of this short commentary, the rest of the article is irrelevant to me although it contains damning truths (I already know of for the most part) about the designers of such deceptions.
If so-called good people would unite and join Pr Hall's battle, much of this kind of demonization can and will be avoided, and the culprits even prosecuted, but sadly they won't.
Regards
Basheer
Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Once
I accused B'rit'ish Zionist PM Toni Blair of being a Freemasonic Knight
of Malta. At the end of his last term, what did he do? He went to his
Grand Master the Pope and converted to Roman Catholicism! The Vatican
had its finances managed by the Rothschilds
and since the Zionists had installed a Zionist Pope (John Paul II) at
the Vatican after murdering the previous Pope, Roman Catholicism has
converted to Zionism since Vatican II. The USA, Australia, Canada,
France and Britain are no more Christian, but Zionist and Freemasonic.
BAFS
SABBATAI JEWISH FREEMASONIC LODGE ADL of B'NAI B'RITH TARGETING PR ANTONIUS J. HALL
JEWIPEDIA:
Sabbatai Zevi (שַׁבְּתַי צְבִי, other spellings include Sabbatai Ẓevi, Shabbetai Ẓevi, Shabbeṯāy Ṣeḇī, Sabbatai Sevi, Shabsai Tzvi, and Sabetay Sevi in Turkish) (August 1, 1626 – c. September 17, 1676[1]) was a Sephardic Rabbi[2] and kabbalist who claimed to be the long-awaited Jewish Messiah. He was the founder of the Sabbatean movement.
N.B. HE WAS NOT FORCED BY THE SULTAN OR BY ANYBODY TO CONVERT TO ISLAM!
September 21 ,2016
Israeli-Canadian Thought Police Take Aim…. At Me
By Prof. Tony Hall, Editor-In-Chief of American Herald Tribune
168 Shares
- 164
-
“Antisemitism in all forms is rampant on social media, but this is the clearest, most obvious kind of antisemitism one could possibly create,” said Michael Mostyn, B’nai Brith CEO. “The classification of this as antisemitic cannot be challenged, and the fact that this promotes violence towards Jews is beyond dispute. Regardless, Facebook has deemed it acceptable despite its ‘community standards’ containing clear provisions against hate speech. The Jewish community deserves no less protection or respect than any other when it comes to hate speech and threats of violence.”
“Every year, upon publication of our Annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents, a contingent of detractors accuses us of saying the sky is falling, and that antisemitism does not exist in Canada,” said Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. “Content like this is proof positive that not only antisemitism of a genocidal nature exists in Canada, but the systems that are supposed to protect us from racist hate speech don’t consider hatred of Jews to be problematic.”
B’nai Brith has reported the post to Lethbridge Police Services.
In the eyes of the B’nai Brith, is a “holocaust denier” anyone who disagrees with any element, large or small, of its favored historical interpretation? Is the B’nai Brith naturally hostile to anyone that retains independent, evidence-based perspectives on some of the most fraught issues of historical interpretation in contemporary times?
What is behind the creation of the original post that set the controversy in motion? Who created it and why? Is this whole episode an engineered crisis? Is one of its purposes to fend off the criticisms of those that accuse the B’nai Brith and related Zionist agencies of claiming “the sky is falling” with their Orwellian system of Annual Audits of Antisemitic Incidents. Please see below the map published to present cartographic interpretations by the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.
In its material the B’nai Brith describe the post as a “depiction of a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew accompanied by a lengthy, violent anti-Semitic screed beside the photograph.” Here is the post, which I first saw sometime early in September as part of a smear piece published about me at “Aussie Dave’s” Israellycool.
The B’nai Brith in Action
My initial research into the item’s content is leading me to the
opinion that the image probably emerges from some sort of staged
situation, one that seems to include the application of photo shop
techniques. The most basic questions that must now be pressed concern
the source of the atrocious text. From whence does it originate?
Certainly I did not write it. Glen Davidson did not write it. Who did
write it and why? Not once yet have I seen this deeper question posed by
those who are exploiting the vile item to dramatize a real or concocted
dispute with Facebook.Quite possibly by design, the miniscule, densely compressed text is very difficult to read especially on small digital devices. Could this attribute be because the text was conceived not as a means of winning adherents but rather as a justification for political actions like the B’nai Brith’s current hate speech campaign highlighting my academic position at the University of Lethbridge?
I first saw the item among a number of screen shots all dedicated to “Aussie Dave’s” nomination of me as “Anti-Zionist-Not-Anti-Semite of the Day.”
I can trace one thread of this matter’s origins to a recorded telephone call I listened to a year ago. Its source was Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. In August of 2015 Ms. Hohmann telephoned the manager of a community venue in downtown Edmonton Alberta. Ms. Hohmann aim on behalf of her employer was to shut down a book promotion event. At the time Dr. Barrett along with his wife, two sons a dog and me were touring Alberta to call attention to an edited text entitled We Are Not Charlie Hebdo. Dr. Barrett edited the volume to which I had contributed an article.
The venue’s manager, Richard Awid, taped Ms. Hohmann’s intervention and subsequently played it back for me. Here is how I described this part of the episode in an article entitled “B’nai Brith Moves to Quash Free Speech in Canada,”
Mr. Awid was somewhat dumbfounded that a small event at his community hall, “one of 100 such venues in Edmonton,” would elicit such an intense response from a very powerful organization in Toronto. He played back to me on his answering machine a recorded message he received at about 9 am on August 12 from Amanda Hohmann. Ms. Hohmann explained that she had received “a few complaints” about “Mr.” Kevin Barrett on the B’nai Brith’s “anti-hate hotline.” (1-416-633-6224; 1-800-892-2624)
Ms. Hohmann asserted that
“Mr. Barrett is a known anti-semite conspiracy theorist, a Holocaust Denier, and 9/11 Denier and all sorts of other things.”Ms. Hohmann made no effort whatsoever to give background proof of her allegations or to identify the sources of the supposed “complaints.” Nevertheless she proposed to Mr. Awid that he should “cancel the event and let Mr. Barrett know he is not welcome in Edmonton.”
Are the protagonists in these ugly witch hunts ever held accountable for the excesses? Are there any constraints on the increasingly severe incursions of the Zionist thought police? What remedies are or are not available for the likes of Dr. Barrett who is a Muslim man. Along with the rest of the omma, Dr. Barrett and his family are regularly subjected to heavy does of “hate speech” and sometimes worse?
When Richard Awid, a Muslim himself, did not adhere to Ms. Hohmann’s instructions, the B’nai Brith was able to send in a representative of the “hate speech” unit of the Edmonton police. The officer monitored the first part of the event and then left after informing Dr. Barrett that our presentation deemed was not to be hate speech by the police force he represented. I recall wondering at the time, does that bizarre episode foreshadow an era when all university classes will be policed by officials answerable to agencies like the B’nai Brith? Is that where this is leading?
The B’nai Brith has been front and center in Canada’s increasingly notorious record of aggressively policing citizens for supposed thought crimes and speech crimes. The B’nai Brith’s assault on free speech in Canada includes among its objects for criminalization Doug Collins, Malcolm Ross, Jim Keegstra, Ernst Zundel, Terry Tremaine, David Ahenakew and, most recently, Arthur Topham.
My reading of an Internet copy of the text, one that became integral to the proceedings of the Topham trial, caused me to reflect on how one-sided the whole discourse on genocide is becoming. The suffering of one group is highlighted and elevated above all others while the suffering and assaults imposed on other groups is often downplayed, ignored or even denigrated. I had no idea before the B’nai Brith-instigated prosecution of Arthur Topham that there was such a detailed plan to annihilate the entire German people.
I only recently have become fully aware of the extent of the murder, rape and pillage of several millions of Germans after 1945 in American prisoner war camps and in orgies of Soviet-instigated ethnic cleansing in Eastern Europe. Where are the museums to promote public education about these crimes against humanity? Where is the museum to commemorate the horrendous intergenerational genocide of perhaps a hundred million Indigenous peoples in the Holocaust of the Americas since 1492? Will future You Tubers make videos to ask elderly members of today’s generation what they did or didn’t do about the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians now underway in order to clear the way for Greater Israel?
Thought Police Wreaking Havoc on Campus
The B’nai Brith is becoming especially aggressive in campaigns to
have individuals fired from their work for expounding historical
interpretations it does not like. The B’nai Brith boasted menacingly on
September 15 of having destroyed the career of Nikolas Balakas, a
long-serving lab technician at York University’s Department of Astronomy
and Physics. The announcement that Canada’s most ruthless thought
police agency had succeeded in its campaign to get York University to
fire its employee was written by Aidan Fishman. Mr. Fishman is Campus
Advocacy Coordinator of B’nai Brith Canada.After counting coup on Mr. Balaras’s dismissal, Mr. Fishman concludes with the following plea that the University of Lethbridge should follow York University’s example. The B’nai Brith official wrote,
“Unfortunately not every administration is prepared to act with such decisiveness [as that of York University], as the ongoing saga surrounding Professor Anthony Hall at Lethbridge University shows. I hope that the administration in Lethbridge can use the excellent example set by York University on this matter, and take appropriate steps to ensure that their students are not similarly subjected to hatred and antisemitism on campus.”Who is the real author of this “ongoing saga?” Where is the proof as of today that University of Lethbridge students are being subjected “to hatred and anti-Semitism on campus.” I have not once seen this kind of language appear in 26 years of teaching evaluations. Where is there any accountability for floating this kind of vicious agenda of smear? The intrusion into this matter of a B’nai Brith official described as Campus Advocacy Coordinator is, as far as I know, setting precedents at my school. What is the nature of the “advocacy” Mr. Fishman is “coordinating”?
The effort of B’nai Brith’s “campus coordinator” and possibly others of his group to inject themselves into the internal governance of the University of Lethbridge brings to mind a similar controversy brewing at Oberlin College. Oberlin College is a renowned Liberal Arts school in Ohio whose origins long predate the American Civil War. There Dr. Joy Karega has been suspended with pay from her teaching position as a result of a controversy also involving Facebook posts. I have written a lengthy open latter on the matter to Oberlin President, Dr. Marvin Krislov. The text, which has been mirrored on other web sites, was first published at American Herald Tribune.
I hereby invite Aiden Fishman to join this initiative and thereby embark on a constructive course rather than the trajectory of negativity implicit in his present preoccupation with hate talk and advocacy for division. Of course Mr. Fishman is far from alone in the type of “advocacy” in which he is engaged. There is a barrage of interventions currently underway from organizations like the AMCHA Initiative, the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Campus Outreach, Hillel, the American Jewish Congress, David Horowitz’s FrontPage and Daniel Pipes’ Campus Watch to mention only a few. As currently on full public display at Oberlin College, these well-funded and deeply staffed interventions invariably wreak havoc on the principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse on campus?
I suggested the following title for the event.
Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories:
A Rational or Irrational Phrase in Academic Discourse?
In my research research into the Joy
Karega/Oberlin debacle I became aware of the concerted campaign in 2014
to destroy the career of Prof. William I. Robinson. Dr. Robinson is
Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Santa Barbara.
Like Dr. Joy Karega, Dr. Steven Salaita, Dr. Hatem Bazian, Dr. Rabab
Abdulhadi, Dr. Richard Falk, me and many others, Dr. Robinson includes
in the curriculum some focus on the plight of Palestinian people. Caption: Prof. Richard Falk, Former UN Rapporteur and Princeton University Professor of International Law, Speaks on the Issue of Academic Freedom at the University of California at Santa Barbara
The sociologist refused to back down from incorporating in his teaching critical perspectives on the harsh treatment of Palestinians especially in Gaza and the so-called Occupied Territories. Amidst proliferating Jewish settlements and the constant repressions of the Israeli police state, many Palestinians continue to eke out marginal existences on the heavily militarized lands set aside for them by the United Nations in Resolution 181. Resolution 181, an international instrument calling for partition of Palestine and UN trusteeship over Jerusalem, constitutes the primary law at the roots of the Israeli entity in its present form.
The persecution to which I was subjected involved a litany of harassment, slander, defamation of character and all kinds of threats against the university by outside forces if I was not dismissed, as well as hate mail and death threats from unknown sources. More insidiously, it involved a shameful collaboration between a number of university officials and outside forces from the Israel lobby as the university administration stood by silently, making a mockery of academic freedom.Will the same toolbox of wrecking instruments deployed at the University of California be shipped in from the United States and unpacked at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta Canada? Will the administration of my own school continue to uphold the University of Lethbridge’s good reputation as an institution of higher education where the vital principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse are expressed and defended?
The disciplinary procedure initiated against me by UCSB officials involved a host of irregularities, violations of the university's own procedures, breaches of confidentiality, denial of due process, conflicts of interest, failure of disclosure, improper political surveillance, abuses of power and position, unwarranted interference in curriculum and teaching and so on. As I would discover during the course of the ordeal, individuals inside the university and in positions of authority had linked up with agents of the lobby outside the university in setting out to prosecute me.
On several occasions I have publicly lauded the U of L for creating an environment of academic freedom. I made this observation, for instance, at the University of Lethbridge’s book event when in 2011 my volume, Earth into Property, was launched. In this 900+ page peer-reviewed academic text published by McGill-Queen’s University Press, I incorporate analysis that the B’nai Brith flippantly trivializes as “9/11 conspiracy theories.”
Deeply corrupt agencies like the B’nai Brith have a lot to lose when the basic facts about what really happened on 9/11--who did what to whom—become the common knowledge of the general public. That day may be approaching far faster than those hiding behind the tired old memes about “conspiracy theories” anticipate.
How much longer can the evidence of 9/11 be concealed behind the ruthless kind of ad hominem attacks that have become the well known-specialty of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith in all its many constituent parts? How much longer will the public tolerate the hate propaganda and professional assaults that are obliterating the fundamental integrity of so many of our most important institutions?
What other lies and deceptions are being fed to the public on a regular basis? What is the level of public confidence these days in the trustworthiness of society’s key institutions including government, media, police and agencies of higher education? Who can say public confidence in these entities is high?
What is the appropriate role for universities in addressing issues of officialdom’s fraud and malfeasance especially in situations that have large implications for public policy? If even tenured university faculty can be intimidated into shying away from the professional responsibility to distinguish truth from falsehood, but especially in situations that threaten power’s imperatives, who will perform this vital function? Politicians? Talking heads on TV? Who will speak truth to the unaccountable power that the B’nai Brith in its current reckless demeanor so abundantly epitomizes?
Ritual Defamation in the Social Media Circus
To return to the Facebook post that lies at the root of this
controversy, I have already publicly condemned the contents of the
offending item in the September 16 edition of False Flag Weekly News. I currently co-host this regular broadcast along with one of its founding partners, Dr. Kevin Barrett.I noticed a reference to my public condemnation of the item in question in the comments section of the B’nai Brith’s own web post of August 29. A commenter going by the name of Andrew Blair observes,
It is important to realize that Professor Hall publicly condemns that image and text. Go to False Flag Weekly, at minute 36, to see and hear his denunciation.When I put on my “fairness” glasses and look at that image I see Tony Hall in the headlock, and the arms locking his head are the image and the text. Does anyone else see that, or are my “fairness” glasses defective?“Andrew Blair’s” question certainly resonates with me. The B’nai Brith’s description of the image in its news announcements refers to “a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.” Is the Orthodox Jew not a White man too? What is there to say that the aggressor in this image is not Cherokee or Mohawk or Palestinian for that matter?
What are the politics of the B’nai Brith’s choice of words in its racialized approach to its public announcement highlighting this inflammatory image? What effect is being sought? Did the image emerge from a real or staged situation? If it was the former, what was the event? Where did it happen? Who took the photograph? Have the investigators in the B’nai Brith-police-hate-crime-complex explored such matters.
Is the B’nai Brith’s emphasis on “police investigations” itself a staged tactic of sorts? Is it meant to dramatize the main story line aimed ultimately at seizing control of strategic instruments of Internet comminication. The subplot, which is certainly intended to harm me personally and professionally, is that crazed and genocidal anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists-- even “holocaust deniers”--- are running around loose with full Internet access even in Lethbridge Alberta?
My own best best assessment is that the offending social media item seems likely to have been produced by photo shop juxtapositions of different images. The “White man’s” head and the “Orthodox Jew’s” crushed glasses both look like inserts. The white wing of the victim’s crushed and displaced glasses seems to have been drawn in. There are signs of graphic tinkering in the relationship between the huge muscular arm in the forefront and the squeezed face of the suffering victim.
The reversal of Talmudic-style contempt for the Other (the Goy) cries out the pictured message of Jewish victimhood. The provocative power of the image is reinforced by the B’nai Brith’s very racialized description. In my recent research I have discovered that this image and others images very much like—images that often feature the same racist “White man”--- show up in on many Internet posts, even one I found translated into German.
The text in the offending item is perhaps the most appalling excerpt of gutter prose I have ever seen. Its contents are so reprehensible that they demand careful consideration. Like an illegal drug planted by corrupt police on a targeted individual, the reprehensible social media item has been metaphorically put on my digital front door step and then advertised by the B’nai Brith to advance its own political agenda. I am left with little alternative but to respond as decently and as conscientiously to a crime in progress.
The author, it is claimed by the item’s creator, is Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” Garrison. This Garrison person has many nicknames. He is made to exclaim,
“There was never a Holocaust, but there should have been and, rest assured, there WILL be, as you serpentine kikes richly deserve one. I will not rest until every single filthy. Parasitic kike is rounded up and slaughtered like the vermin they are. The White man has had more than enough of International Jewry and we are fully prepared to smite the parasite for the millionth time. The greedy, hook nosed kikes know that there days are numbered and, unlike in the past, they now have nowhere to run. This time, there will be no kikes left alive to spead around the planet like cockroaches. We will get them ALL into the oven and their putrid memory will finally be erased from the planet once and for all. Like all parasites the Jew will continue to reproduce until every last one has been wiped out. This is why it is crucial that all kikes are ruthlessly and mercilesslt butchered for the good of us all. KILL ALL JEWS NOW! EVERY LAST ONE!” Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” GarrisonWhat kind of demented mind would come up with such a macabre celebration of envisaged mass murder? What would be the motivation to pen such a blatant incitement to hate and slaughter of a specific people?
My research into the offending item’s origins quickly led me to the many Internet profiles and posts of Ben Garrison. Ben Garrison is apparently a real person who lives in Montana. It turns out that this Ben Garrison, the sole named individual in the miniature text of the offending Facebook post, is also the aggressor in the photo shopped image. Adorned with dark glasses and a cowboy hat, Garrison is pictured as (in the words of B’nai Brith) as “the White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.”
Ben Garrison
The real life Ben Garrison is often described as a libertarian
political satirist. He is a prolific cartoonist whose cartoon and
personal images lie at the center of an increasingly contentious media
circus. Significantly Facebook figures centrally in the many-faceted
narrative of Ben Garrison. Perhaps his Facebook connection is a major
reason why B’nai Brith and related agencies chose Garrison’s Internet
personae as poster boy for its hate speech campaign of fund raising and
ritual defamation.Holocaust Studies experts at Tel-Aviv University are among the most outspoken proponents of the view that Ben Garrison is indeed the kind of bigoted psychopath who would in real life utter provocations to the genocide of Jews. These Israeli academicians would probably argue it is entirely in character for Ben Garrison to have actually have declared with sincerity, “Kill All Jews.” The hypothesis that Ben Garrison’s racist screed should be taken at face value is implicit in the wording and headlines of the posts by B’nai Brith, Daniel Leons-Marder’s Everyday Antisemitism and the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.
The smear campaign’s architects and engineers are attempting a controlled demolition of my reputation in their quest to harness Facebook more fully to their own agendas. These architects and engineers count among their allies the creators and authors at Encyclopedia dramatica, Of Ben Garrison the encyclopedia’s drama experts report, “Scholars from Tel-Aviv University's Center for Holocaust Studies have ominously described him [Ben Garrison] as the most racist man in the universe, and the biggest existential threat to the Jews since Hitler.”
This characterization runs counter to the dominant view that Garrison is “the Internet’s most trolled cartoonist.” According to a Breitbart article entitled “Ben Garrison: How the Internet Made a Fake White Supremacist”,
Montana-based artist Ben Garrison isn’t a violent Neo-Nazi, or even a white nationalist. He’s a polite, accomplished cartoonist, with no history of overt or covert racism. His true political leanings are libertarian, anti-elitist, and anti-globalist. Garrison is, in fact, the victim of one the most extraordinary and longest-running smear campaigns on the internet.
For a mixture of amusement and spite, in a trolling spree that has lasted over six years, thousands of online pranksters and real neo-Nazis have been remixing his cartoons into racist caricatures. Most Ben Garrison cartoons attack the government, corporations, and political movements.
However, almost immediately after one is published, it is remixed into a new version that attacks Jews, African-Americans, or other minorities. These are rapidly disseminated in troll communities and sometimes become more widely-shared than the originals.
Given the nature of their dubious employment in what Norman Finkelstein has labeled the “Holocaust Industry,” I find it difficult to believe that these individuals as well as their bosses, underlings and associates were not aware of the controversy swirling around Ben Garrison. After all, I was able to discovered the basic outlines of the Garrison controversy in a few google searches after viewing the posts featuring Mostyn’s, Hohmann’s and Leons-Marder’s comments. Is this group merely incompetent? Are its members part of a concerted agenda to change the public policies of many agencies, including those of the Canadian government, Facebook and the University of Lethbridge, through calculated misrepresentations, frauds and incitements?
In an Internet post entitled “Ben Garrison on Trolls” the Montana cartoonist is said to speak for himself. Interestingly, Garrison’s observations begin with his reference to the very same Facebook reference to “community standards” that supposedly initiated the B’nai Brith’s slander of me.
“This page wasn’t removed. We reviewed the page you reported for harassment. Since it did not violate our community standards, we did not remove it. Thanks for your report.”In my view the largest weight of available evidence points to the conclusion that Ben Garrison did not write the “Kill All Jews” commentary. If Ben Garrison did not write the planted text, then who did?
This is the message [writes Ben Garrison] I received after reporting a hate page on Facebook. Near the top of the hate page was a statement that encouraged the extermination of all Jews. Along with that statement was a photo of my face and the name Ben Garrison. Trolls had stolen my artwork and photos from my blog, my cartoon site as well as my fine art site and had concocted an entire page devoted to spewing libelous hate. The troll entity called the page ‘Ben Garrison Cartoons—the Official Site.’ The trolls had stamped the name ‘Ben Garrison’ onto as many hateful images as possible throughout the page. How does one stop such blatant libel? Where do these trolls come from? Is it even possible to track them down? Why do they do such terrible things? Why me?
As I found out, it’s not just me. Many others have suffered the same outrageous indignity. It appears that trolls are no longer content merely talk to each other on sordid sites such as ‘4chan’ or ‘Stormfront.’ They want to go mainstream. Therefore, social media are a natural target for them. Do they really believe the vitriolic memes they are shoveling, or are they merely playing an elaborate prank? It doesn’t matter. Their memes of hate must not go mainstream. Facebook must wake up and block the hate before it gets established. Hate speech is not free speech. Hate speech is blind, one-dimensional blackness. It is not reasoned debate. It loudly shouts for the murder of human beings and Facebook is providing them a megaphone for that purpose.
Could the B’nai Brith’s highlighted social media item have been produced by a Zionist group, agency or individual? Why might partisans of Israel do such a thing? Could it be to provide the ammunition for smear campaigns directed against individuals and groups that criticize Israel? Could it be to create incidents to justify appeals for money such as those accompanying the B’nai Brith’s slanderous posts aimed at damaging the reputation of the University of Lethbridge and my tenured academic role in it as a 26-year member of the Arts and Science Faculty?
Worse, much worse, can be envisaged. Could it be that the production and planting of the of the Ben Garrison post as well as others like it might be deployed to provide “evidence” in thought crime and speech crime litigation, the ultimate specialty and raison d’etre of the B’nai Brith? It is easy to imagine how such an outlandish and extravagant expression of hostility as that said to come from Garrison could be rendered useful to Crown prosecutors serving the Zionist masters.
Regardless of its source, there is no doubt that the Ben Garrison post could conceivably be exploited as a tailor made item to assist Crown prosecutors serving the agenda of B’nai Brith and related agencies. Such an item could definitely be deployed in a litigious assault on designated targets in order to establish webs of connection linking alleged hate speech with genocidal intent as well as the semantic nuke in the Zionist arsenal of weaponized words.
The conspiracy to advance the public perception that the engineered phrase, “holocaust denial,” has any internal and external coherence as an outlawed category of forbidden thought and speech runs absolutely contrary to the intellectual viability of the academy as well as the health of society more generally. The basic premise of the world’s most fraught term creates a false dichotomy that is coming to epitomize the decline of evidence-based rationality beneath the ascent of a new kind of orthodoxy combining both religious and secular elements.
Those that want to entrench and enforce an outlawed realm of forbidden thought and articulation brandish the weaponized term like an ideological sniper on steroids. They have no interest in providing definitions of where orthodoxy ends and where denial begins. As I am discovering by raising even a simple call for “open debate” on the main platform of Zionism’s unaccountable power, there are harsh new authoritarian forces that need to be called to account if we are even to slow down the police state incursions in our post-911 world.
The new configurations of authority are extending to important agencies like the Royal Canadian Legion, Jasper National Park, and the Alberta Society of Fiddlers. Those overseeing these important institutions are made to feel empowered to impose arbitrary sanctions and punishments against an individual who dared to question enshrined orthodoxy.
The message is made clear that the vibrance of art and culture, the wellbeing of veterans as well as the need to protect some of Alberta’s most majestic Alpine environments have become secondary commitments. The treatment in Jasper National Park of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free and democratic society. Our right and need to express independent thought, the starting point of collective self-determination, has has been sacrificed in order to enforce supine obedience to the sanctification of an historical interpretation that must not be held subjected to sceptical scrutiny and reconsideration.
How many are now being held, including some Canadians, in dark European dungeons for questioning any aspect of the unrelenting vilification of Germany as home of the most the most evil society of monsters ever to walk the face of the earth? Will we ever be able to liberate ourselves from the spell that is causing us to become so blind and unresponsive to the holocausts we ourselves are imposing on the natural world and also on the besieged worldwide community of our Muslim brothers and sisters?
What are the chances that the nuclear holocaust currently being promoted by our governors can be held back when those most intent on making war not peace are so firmly in charge? Is there a connection between the decline of the anti-war movement and the rise of the militarized police state currently deploying false flag-induced fears to constrain our ability to think, speak and act in conformity with the imperatives of survival? What we most require at this moment is simple affirmations of life’s beauty and integrity. Instead we are delivered coercive dictates demanding we deny what we our reason and research tells us to be true.
How did we the academics, but especially we the historians, allow it to happen that a whole category of the European past has been declared off bounds to unfettered discussion and critical investigative scholarship? By allowing this development to proceed, a very sweeping and consequential precedent is being set.
How did we the citizens allow the principle to develop that government can declare that whole subject areas of research and publication to have been so perfectly interpreted, so correctly dealt with in every detail, that no revision and modification of existing conclusions can be allowed. What is the role of the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith in enforcing the ruthless bulldozing aside of the most basic foundations of freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and adherence to rigorous standards of scientific inquiry.
The B’nai Brith and Ben Garrison, the poster boy for the Zionist organization’s hate speech campaign, are exactly on the same page when it comes to Facebook. Both Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith seek to constrain free speech on the Internet more tightly. Is this convergence of agendas a coincidence or are more calculated deceptions at play here? To publicize his desire that Facebook be more proactive in censoring the Internet, Garrison produced the following cartoon.
Facebook and Israel; Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith
My FFWN co-host, Dr. Kevin Barrett, has evaluated the evidence surrounding the Garrison post and concluded it was “very
likely produced by B’nai Brith itself, or other Zionist extremists of
like mind, as a PR operation. No wonder they are “monitoring” the police
to make sure they behave themselves.”Presenting his own version of the B’nai Brith’s highlighted image, Dr. Barrett continues
Dr. Barrett observes that“the manufactured incident smearing Tony Hall may be part of a coordinated program, orchestrated from Tel Aviv, to try to stop the rise of the ever-increasing virtual army of pro-Palestine social media users.”
The absurd rant with its lurid references to “greedy hook-nosed kikes” and so on does not pass the smell test. Whoever created this image obviously did not do so with the intention of convincing the public to take action against Jews and/or Zionists. On the contrary, it appears to have been designed for the opposite purpose: To convince the public that crazed, foul-mouthed, murderous anti-Semites are a clear and present danger.
Virtually every time a swastika is spray painted on a synagogue, the culprit turns out to be a “self-hating” Jewish Zionist trying to conjure up the specter of an “anti-Semitic threat.” Would an investigation of the provenance of this image find something similar?
As highlighted in Telesur, the government of Israel and Facebook have been represented at the highest level in a series of meetings aimed at conspiring to hold back the growing flood of social media posts subjecting Israel’s maltreatment of the Palestinians to sceptical public scrutiny.
This recent development well demonstrates the specious nature of B’nai Brith’s characterization of Facebook as some kind of rogue agency unwilling to act immediately to pre-empt an existential threat emanating from Lethbridge. More likely the B’nai Brith’s alarmist posts in late August of 2016 were, in part at least, a ploy to divert attention from the reality that social media, but especially Facebook, is more and more being harnessed to Zionist goals and agendas.
Was the B’nai Brith’s deployment of the racist side of Ben Garrison’s dual public personae calculated to serve the double purpose of both smearing me and my school as well as leading interested parties to a surprising “libertarian” voice for the suppression of Internet freedom? What should be done about Internet trolls such as those at the B’nai Brith that have shown themselves to be unrelenting in planting lies and innuendo with the aim of silencing criticism of Israel?
WRITER
Prof. Tony Hall
In recent days I discovered that the Canadian branch of the
Israeli-US-based Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is reporting
that I am “well known for using academic credentials to deny the
Holocaust.” On August 29, Daniel Leons-Marder mirrored the Canadian
B’nai Brith report under the title, Facebook Allows “Kill All Jews” Post on Wall of Canadian Professor.
In an item Leons-Marder claims has been shared 11,000 times, he
asserted “B’nai Brith Canada reported the image, which was ruled
acceptable [by Facebook] within two hours, when it was alerted to it
having been posted on the Facebook page of Canadian Academic Professor
Anthony Hall, who is a holocaust denier.”
The B’nai Brith’s Aug. 29 announcement starts with a bald statement
that “Police have launched an investigation into an antisemitic Facebook
post that was exposed by B’nai Brith Canada last Friday.” The earlier
August 26 statement emphasized the role of Facebook, introducing me in
the controversy as being “well known for using [my] academic credentials
to deny the Holocaust and promote 9/11 conspiracy theories.”
Under the headline, “Killing Jews Is Now an Acceptable Message, Facebook Says,” the B’nai Brith announced,
“Antisemitism in all forms is rampant on social media, but this is the clearest, most obvious kind of antisemitism one could possibly create,” said Michael Mostyn, B’nai Brith CEO. “The classification of this as antisemitic cannot be challenged, and the fact that this promotes violence towards Jews is beyond dispute. Regardless, Facebook has deemed it acceptable despite its ‘community standards’ containing clear provisions against hate speech. The Jewish community deserves no less protection or respect than any other when it comes to hate speech and threats of violence.
“Every year, upon publication of our Annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents, a contingent of detractors accuses us of saying the sky is falling, and that antisemitism does not exist in Canada,” said Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. “Content like this is proof positive that not only antisemitism of a genocidal nature exists in Canada, but the systems that are supposed to protect us from racist hate speech don’t consider hatred of Jews to be problematic.
B’nai Brith has reported the post to Lethbridge Police Services.”
The Canadian B’nai Brith’s post, together with those of others that have mirrored B’nai Brith’s announcement, constitute the first time I have seen myself described in print as a ‘holocaust denier.” What is the definition used by the thought police to decide who is or is not a “holocaust denier? Are there many holocausts or only one? Who owns the term, “holocaust?” If there are exclusive rights, how were they obtained?
In the eyes of the B’nai Brith, is a “holocaust denier” anyone who disagrees with any element, large or small, of its favored historical interpretation? Is the B’nai Brith naturally hostile to anyone that retains independent, evidence-based perspectives on some of the most fraught issues of historical interpretation in contemporary times?
What is behind the creation of the original post that set the controversy in motion? Who created it and why? Is this whole episode an engineered crisis? Is one of its purposes to fend off the criticisms of those that accuse the B’nai Brith and related Zionist agencies of claiming “the sky is falling” with their Orwellian system of Annual Audits of Antisemitic Incidents. Please see below the map published to present cartographic interpretations by the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.
As shall be explained below, the B’nai Brith has failed to perform due diligence in its handling of this matter. Its officers did not even attempt back up their provocative characterizations of me with even a shred of genuine evidence. The organization opted instead to exploit for its own political agenda the shock value inherent in the vile contents of an item allegedly posted, apparently very briefly, on my FB page. The item is said to have been posted by Glen Davidson. I did not ever see it on my FB page. I did not invite nor did I even have any knowledge of it until recently.
In its material the B’nai Brith describe the post as a “depiction of a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew accompanied by a lengthy, violent anti-Semitic screed beside the photograph.” Here is the post, which I first saw sometime early in September as part of a smear piece published about me at “Aussie Dave’s” Israellycool.
To reiterate and to be absolutely clear, I did not post this social media item myself. I did not create it or solicit it. I do not approve of its contents. In fact I of course strongly condemn the message conveyed in both the image and the text. Due diligence demands, however, that I look further into this matter.
Quite possibly by design, the miniscule, densely compressed text is very difficult to read especially on small digital devices. Could this attribute be because the text was conceived not as a means of winning adherents but rather as a justification for political actions like the B’nai Brith’s current hate speech campaign highlighting my academic position at the University of Lethbridge?
I first saw the item among a number of screen shots all dedicated to “Aussie Dave’s” nomination of me as “Anti-Zionist-Not-Anti-Semite of the Day.”
I remember being particular interested in the part of the post that mentioned Ryan Bellerose, a Metis man and convert to Judaism who has recently been hired as the B’nai Brith’s new Western Canadian representative. Most of my attention zeroed in on Aussie Dave’s suggestion to his readers that they communications to the president of my University, Dr. Mike Mahon. I also took note of a screen shot of an item on U of L letterhead where Dr. Mahon responds to “JP.” Who is “JP”?
I can trace one thread of this matter’s origins to a recorded
telephone call I listened to a year ago. Its source was Amanda Hohmann,
National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. In August of
2015 Ms. Hohmann telephoned the manager of a community venue in
downtown Edmonton Alberta. Ms. Hohmann aim on behalf of her employer was
to shut down a book promotion event. At the time Dr. Barrett along with
his wife, two sons a dog and me were touring Alberta to call attention
to an edited text entitled We Are Not Charlie Hebdo. Dr. Barrett edited the volume to which I had contributed an article.
The venue’s manager, Richard Awid, taped Ms. Hohmann’s intervention and subsequently played it back for me. Here is how I described this part of the episode in in an article entitled “B’nai Brith Moves to Quash Free Speech in Canada,”
Mr. Awid was somewhat dumbfounded that a small event at his community hall, “one of 100 such venues in Edmonton,” would elicit such an intense response from a very powerful organization in Toronto. He played back to me on his answering machine a recorded message he received at about 9 am on August 12 from Amanda Hohmann. Ms. Hohmann explained that she had received “a few complaints” about “Mr.” Kevin Barrett on the B’nai Brith’s “anti-hate hotline.” (1-416-633-6224; 1-800-892-2624)
Ms. Hohmann asserted that
“Mr. Barrett is a known anti-semite conspiracy theorist, a Holocaust Denier, and 9/11 Denier and all sorts of other things.”
Ms. Hohmann made no effort whatsoever to give background proof of her allegations or to identify the sources of the supposed “complaints.” Nevertheless she proposed to Mr. Awid that he should “cancel the event and let Mr. Barrett know he is not welcome in Edmonton.”
In this telephone call the B’nai Brith’s “human rights” director tried to defame a colleague offering absolutely no proof whatsoever to provide evidentiary backing for her directive from Toronto that Dr. Barrett should not be welcome in Alberta’s capital. I believe the Western world currently supports many Amanda Hohmanns paid very well to target and slander regularly individuals like Dr. Kevin Barrett.
Are the protagonists in these ugly witch hunts ever held accountable for the excesses? Are there any constraints on the increasingly severe incursions of the Zionist thought police? What remedies are or are not available for the likes of Dr. Barrett who is a Muslim man. Along with the rest of the omma, Dr. Barrett and his family are regularly subjected to heavy does of “hate speech” and sometimes worse?
When Richard Awid, a Muslim himself, did not adhere to Ms. Hohmann’s instructions, the B’nai Brith was able to send in a representative of the “hate speech” unit of the Edmonton police. The officer monitored the first part of the event and then left after informing Dr. Barrett that our presentation was not to be deemed hate speech by the police force he represented. I recall wondering at the time, does that bizarre episode foreshadow an era when all university classes will be policed by officials answerable to agencies like the B’nai Brith? Is that where this is leading?
The B’nai Brith has been front and center in Canada’s increasingly notorious record of aggressively policing citizens for supposed thought crimes and speech crimes. The B’nai Brith’s assault on free speech in Canada includes among its objects for criminalization Doug Collins, Malcolm Ross, Jim Keegstra, Ernst Zundel, Terry Tremaine, David Ahenakew and, most recently, Arthur Topham.
My reading of an Internet copy of the text, one that became integral
to the proceedings of the Topham trial, caused me to reflect on how
one-sided the whole discourse on genocide is becoming. The suffering of
one group is highlighted and elevated above all others while the
suffering and assaults imposed on other groups is often downplayed,
ignored or even denigrated. I had no idea before the B’nai
Brith-instigated prosecution of Arthur Topham that there was such a
detailed plan to annihilate the entire German people.
I only recently have become fully aware of the extent of the murder, rape and pillage of several millions of Germans after 1945 in American prisoner war camps and in orgies of Soviet-instigated ethnic cleansing in Eastern Europe. Where are the museums to promote public education about these crimes against humanity? Where is the museum to commemorate the horrendous intergenerational genocide of perhaps a hundred million Indigenous peoples in the Holocaust of the Americas since 1492? Will future You Tubers make videos to ask elderly members of today’s generation what they did or didn’t do about the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians now underway in order to clear the way for Greater Israel?
After counting coup on Mr. Balaras’s dismissal, Mr. Fishman concludes with the following plea that the University of Lethbridge should follow York University’s example. The B’nai Brith official wrote,
“Unfortunately not every administration is prepared to act with such decisiveness [as that of York University], as the ongoing saga surrounding Professor Anthony Hall at Lethbridge University shows. I hope that the administration in Lethbridge can use the excellent example set by York University on this matter, and take appropriate steps to ensure that their students are not similarly subjected to hatred and antisemitism on campus.”
Who is the real author of this “ongoing saga?” Where is the proof as of today that University of Lethbridge students are being subjected “to hatred and anti-Semitism on campus.” I have not once seen this kind of language appear in 26 years of teaching evaluations. Where is there any accountability for floating this kind of vicious agenda of smear? The intrusion into this matter of a B’nai Brith official described as Campus Advocacy Coordinator is, as far as I know, setting precedents at my school. What is the nature of the “advocacy” Mr. Fishman is “coordinating”?
The effort of B’nai Brith’s “campus coordinator” and possibly others of his group to inject themselves into the internal governance of the University of Lethbridge brings to mind a similar controversy brewing at Oberlin College. Oberlin College is a renowned Liberal Arts school in Ohio whose origins long predate the American Civil War. There Dr. Joy Karega has been suspended with pay from her teaching position as a result of a controversy also involving Facebook posts. I have written a lengthy open latter on the matter to Oberlin President, Dr. Marvin Krislov. The text, which has been mirrored on other web sites, was first published at the American Herald Tribune.
In my effort to reach out to President Krislov, Dr. Karega and the other students and faculty involved in what has definitely become a fiasco for the Oberlin community, I proposed in my open letter that we all work together to mount a joint academic conference. I proposed that my own Liberal Education program at the University of Lethbridge ally itself with the embattled Liberal Arts College in Ohio to organize an event aimed at bringing thoughtful academic commentary to address a mounting crisis in higher education in North America.
I hereby invite Aiden Fishman to join this initiative and thereby embark on a constructive course rather than the trajectory of negativity implicit in his present preoccupation with hate talk and advocacy for division. Of course Mr. Fishman is far from alone in the type of “advocacy” in which he is engaged. There is a barrage of interventions currently underway from organizations like the AMCHA Initiative, the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Campus Outreach, Hillel, the American Jewish Congress, David Horowitz’s FrontPage and Daniel Pipes’ Campus Watch to mention only a few. As currently on full public display at Oberlin College, these well-funded and deeply staffed interventions invariably wreak havoc on the principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse on campus?
I suggested the following title for the event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmJFqmMvOYM
Caption: Prof. Richard Falk, Former UN Rapporteur and Princeton University Professor of International Law, Speaks on the Issue of Academic Freedom at the University of California at Santa Barbara
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IesTlj0F98c
The sociologist refused to back down from incorporating in his teaching critical perspectives on the harsh treatment of Palestinians especially in Gaza and the so-called Occupied Territories. Amidst proliferating Jewish settlements and the constant repressions of the Israeli police state, many Palestinians continue to eke out marginal existences on the heavily militarized lands set aside for them by the United Nations in Resolution 181. Resolution 181, an international instrument calling for partition of Palestine and UN trusteeship over Jerusalem, constitutes the primary law at the roots of the Israeli entity in its present form.
Prof. Robinson has written of his ordeal in August of 2014 on Truthout. In an article entitled “Repression Escalates on US Campuses,” the sociologist explains,
On several occasions I have publicly lauded the U of L for creating an environment of academic freedom. I made this observation, for instance, at the University of Lethbridge’s book event when in 2011 my volume, Earth into Property, was launched. In this 900+ page peer-reviewed academic text published by McGill-Queen’s University Press, I incorporate analysis that the B’nai Brith flippantly trivializes as “9/11 conspiracy theories.”
Deeply corrupt agencies like the B’nai Brith have a lot to lose when the basic facts about what really happened on 9/11–who did what to whom—become the common knowledge of the general public. That day may be approaching far faster than those hiding behind the tired old memes about “conspiracy theories” anticipate.
How much longer can the evidence of 9/11 be concealed behind the ruthless kind of ad hominem attacks that have become the well known-specialty of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith in all its many constituent parts? How much longer will the public tolerate the hate propaganda and professional assaults that are obliterating the fundamental integrity of so many of our most important institutions?
What other lies and deceptions are being fed to the public on a regular basis? What is the level of public confidence these days in the trustworthiness of society’s key institutions including government, media, police and agencies of higher education? Who can say public confidence in these entities is high?
What is the appropriate role for universities in addressing issues of officialdom’s fraud and malfeasance especially in situations that have large implications for public policy? If even tenured university faculty can be intimidated into shying away from the professional responsibility to distinguish truth from falsehood, but especially in situations that threaten power’s imperatives, who will perform this vital function? Politicians? Talking heads on TV? Who will speak truth to the unaccountable power that the B’nai Brith in its current reckless demeanor so abundantly epitomizes?
What are the politics of the B’nai Brith’s choice of words in its racialized approach to its public announcement highlighting this inflammatory image? What effect is being sought? Did the image emerge from a real or staged situation? If it was the former, what was the event? Where did it happen? Who took the photograph? Have the investigators in the B’nai Brith-police-hate-crime-complex explored such matters.
Is the B’nai Brith’s emphasis on “police investigations” itself a staged tactic of sorts? Is it meant to dramatize the main story line aimed ultimately at seizing control of strategic instruments of Internet communication. The subplot, which is certainly intended to harm me personally and professionally, is that crazed and genocidal anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists– even “holocaust deniers”— are running around loose with full Internet access even in Lethbridge Alberta?
My own best best assessment is that the offending social media item seems likely to have been produced by photo shop juxtapositions of different images. The “White man’s” head and the “Orthodox Jew’s” crushed glasses both look like inserts. The white wing of the victim’s crushed and displaced glasses seems to have been drawn in. There are signs of graphic tinkering in the relationship between the huge muscular arm in the forefront and the squeezed face of the suffering victim.
The reversal of Talmudic-style contempt for the Other (the Goy) cries out the pictured message of Jewish victimhood. The provocative power of the image is reinforced by the B’nai Brith’s very racialized description. In my recent research I have discovered that this image and others images very much like—images that often feature the same racist “White man”— show up in on many Internet posts, even one I found translated into German.
Where the picture provides the main message, the text provides the “evidence” of the antisemitism that the B’nai Brith and its allied agencies are simultaneously engaged in inventing, cultivating, spotlighting and publicly combating. What justification would there be for the existence of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith without the métier of antisemitism? The primary essence of the B’nai B’rith entities is to advance the agendas of the Israeli entity in the Diaspora, in other words in Canada, USA, Britain, France. Australia, and many other countries.
The text in the offending item is perhaps the most appalling excerpt of gutter prose I have ever seen. Its contents are so reprehensible that they demand careful consideration. Like an illegal drug planted by corrupt police on a targeted individual, the reprehensible social media item has been metaphorically put on my digital front door step and then advertised by the B’nai Brith to advance its own political agenda. I am left with little alternative but to respond as decently and as conscientiously to a crime in progress.
The author, it is claimed by the item’s creator, is Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” Garrison. This Garrison person has many nicknames. He is made to exclaim,
My research into the offending item’s origins quickly led me to the many Internet profiles and posts of Ben Garrison. Ben Garrison is apparently a real person who lives in Montana. It turns out that this Ben Garrison, the sole named individual in the miniature text of the offending Facebook post, is also the aggressor in the photo shopped image. Adorned with dark glasses and a cowboy hat, Garrison is pictured as (in the words of B’nai Brith) as “the White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.”
Holocaust Studies experts at Tel-Aviv University are among the most outspoken proponents of the view that Ben Garrison is indeed the kind of bigoted psychopath who would in real life utter provocations to the genocide of Jews. These Israeli academicians would probably argue it is entirely in character for Ben Garrison to have actually have declared with sincerity, “Kill All Jews.” The hypothesis that Ben Garrison’s racist screed should be taken at face value is implicit in the wording and headlines of the posts by B’nai Brith, Daniel Leons-Marder’s Everyday Antisemitism and the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.
The smear campaign’s architects and engineers are attempting a controlled demolition of my reputation in their quest to harness Facebook more fully to their own agendas. These architects and engineers count among their allies the creators and authors at Encyclopedia dramatica. Of Ben Garrison the encyclopedia’s drama experts report, “Scholars from Tel-Aviv University’s Center for Holocaust Studies have ominously described him [Ben Garrison] as the most racist man in the universe, and the biggest existential threat to the Jews since Hitler.”
This characterization runs counter to the dominant view that Garrison is “the Internet’s most trolled cartoonist.” According to a Breitbart article entitled “Ben Garrison: How the Internet Made a Fake White Supremacist”
Given the nature of their dubious employment in what Norman Finkelstein has labeled the “Holocaust Industry,” I find it difficult to believe that these individuals as well as their bosses, underlings and associates were not aware of the controversy swirling around Ben Garrison. After all, I was able to discovered the basic outlines of the Garrison controversy in a few google searches after viewing the posts featuring Mostyn’s, Hohmann’s and Leons-Marder’s comments. Is this group merely incompetent? Are are its members part of a concerted agenda to change the public policies of many agencies, including those of the Canadian government, Facebook and the University of Lethbridge, through calculated misrepresentations, frauds and incitements?
In an Internet post entitled “Ben Garrison on Trolls” the Montana cartoonist is said to speak for himself. Interestingly, Garrison’s observations begin with his reference to the very same Facebook reference to “community standards” that supposedly initiated the B’nai Brith’s slander of me.
“This page wasn’t removed. We reviewed the page you reported for harassment. Since it did not violate our community standards, we did not remove it. Thanks for your report.”
Could the B’nai Brith’s highlighted social media item have been produced by a Zionist group, agency or individual? Why might partisans of Israel do such a thing? Could it be to provide the ammunition for smear campaigns directed against individuals and groups that criticize Israel? Could it be to create incidents to justify appeals for money such as those accompanying the B’nai Brith’s slanderous posts aimed at damaging the reputation of the University of Lethbridge and my tenured academic role in it as a 26-year member of the Arts and Science Faculty?
Worse, much worse, can be envisaged. Could it be that the production and planting of the of the Ben Garrison post as well as others like it might be deployed to provide “evidence” in thought crime and speech crime litigation, the ultimate specialty and raison d’etre of the B’nai Brith? It is easy to imagine how such an outlandish and extravagant expression of hostility as that said to come from Garrison could be rendered useful to Crown prosecutors serving the Zionist masters.
Regardless of its source, there is no doubt that the Ben Garrison post could conceivably be exploited as a tailor made item to assist Crown prosecutors serving the agenda of B’nai Brith and related agencies. Such an item could definitely be deployed in a litigious assault on designated targets in order to establish webs of connection linking alleged hate speech with genocidal intent as well as the semantic nuke in the Zionist arsenal of weaponized words.
The conspiracy to advance the public perception that the engineered phrase, “holocaust denial,” has any internal and external coherence as an outlawed category of forbidden thought and speech runs absolutely contrary to the intellectual viability of the academy as well as the health of society more generally. The basic premise of the world’s most fraught term creates a false dichotomy that is coming to epitomize the decline of evidence-based rationality beneath the ascent of a new kind of orthodoxy combining both religious and secular elements.
Those that want to entrench and enforce an outlawed realm of forbidden thought and articulation brandish the weaponized term like an ideological sniper on steroids. They have no interest in providing definitions of where orthodoxy ends and where denial begins. As I am discovering by raising even a simple call for “open debate” on the main platform of Zionism’s unaccountable power, there are harsh new authoritarian forces that need to be called to account if we are even to slow down the police state incursions in our post-911 world.
The new configurations of authority are extending to important agencies like the Royal Canadian Legion, Jasper National Park, and the Alberta Society of Fiddlers. Those overseeing these important institutions are made to feel empowered to impose arbitrary sanctions and punishments against an individual who dared to question enshrined orthodoxy.
The message is made clear that the vibrance of art and culture, the wellbeing of veterans as well as the need to protect some of Alberta’s most majestic Alpine environments have become secondary commitments. The treatment in Jasper National Park of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free and democratic society. Our right and need to express independent thought, the starting point of collective self-determination, has has been sacrificed in order to enforce supine obedience to the sanctification of an historical interpretation that must not be held subjected to sceptical scrutiny and reconsideration.
How many are now being held, including some Canadians, in dark European dungeons for questioning any aspect of the unrelenting vilification of Germany as home of the most the most evil society of monsters ever to walk the face of the earth? Will we ever be able to liberate ourselves from the spell that is causing us to become so blind and unresponsive to the holocausts we ourselves are imposing on the natural world and also on the besieged worldwide community of our Muslim brothers and sisters?
What are the chances that the nuclear holocaust currently being promoted by our governors can be held back when those most intent on making war not peace are so firmly in charge? Is there a connection between the decline of the anti-war movement and the rise of the militarized police state currently deploying false flag-induced fears to constrain our ability to think, speak and act in conformity with the imperatives of survival? What we most require at this moment is simple affirmations of life’s beauty and integrity. Instead we are delivered coercive dictates demanding we deny what we our reason and research tells us to be true.
How did we the academics, but especially we the historians, allow it to happen that a whole category of the European past has been declared off bounds to unfettered discussion and critical investigative scholarship? By allowing this development to proceed, a very sweeping and consequential precedent is being set.
How did we the citizens allow the principle to develop that government can declare that whole subject areas of research and publication to have been so perfectly interpreted, so correctly dealt with in every detail, that no revision and modification of existing conclusions can be allowed. What is the role of the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith in enforcing the ruthless bulldozing aside of the most basic foundations of freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and adherence to rigorous standards of scientific inquiry.
The B’nai Brith and Ben Garrison, the poster boy for the Zionist organization’s hate speech campaign, are exactly on the same page when it comes to Facebook. Both Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith seek to constrain free speech on the Internet more tightly. Is this convergence of agendas a coincidence or are more calculated deceptions at play here? To publicize his desire that Facebook be more proactive in censoring the Internet, Garrison produced the following cartoon:
Presenting his own version of the B’nai Brith’s highlighted image, Dr. Barrett continues,
This recent development well demonstrates the specious nature of B’nai Brith’s characterization of Facebook as some kind of rogue agency unwilling to act immediately to pre-empt an existential threat emanating from Lethbridge. More likely the B’nai Brith’s alarmist posts in late August of 2016 were, in part at least, a ploy to divert attention from the reality that social media, but especially Facebook, is more and more being harnessed to Zionist goals and agendas.
Was the B’nai Brith’s deployment of the racist side of Ben Garrison’s dual public personae calculated to serve the double purpose of both smearing me and my school as well as leading interested parties to a surprising “libertarian” voice for the suppression of Internet freedom? What should be done about Internet trolls such as those at the B’nai Brith that have shown themselves to be unrelenting in planting lies and innuendo with the aim of silencing criticism of Israel?
—-
Israeli-Canadian Thought Police Take Aim…. At Me By Prof. Tony Hall
September 21, 2016 by 2 Comments
Israeli-Canadian Thought Police Take Aim…. At Me
By Prof. Tony Hall
Editor-In-Chief
American Herald Tribune
By Prof. Tony Hall
Editor-In-Chief
American Herald Tribune
Originally published here:
Under the headline, “Killing Jews Is Now an Acceptable Message, Facebook Says,” the B’nai Brith announced,
“Antisemitism in all forms is rampant on social media, but this is the clearest, most obvious kind of antisemitism one could possibly create,” said Michael Mostyn, B’nai Brith CEO. “The classification of this as antisemitic cannot be challenged, and the fact that this promotes violence towards Jews is beyond dispute. Regardless, Facebook has deemed it acceptable despite its ‘community standards’ containing clear provisions against hate speech. The Jewish community deserves no less protection or respect than any other when it comes to hate speech and threats of violence.
“Every year, upon publication of our Annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents, a contingent of detractors accuses us of saying the sky is falling, and that antisemitism does not exist in Canada,” said Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. “Content like this is proof positive that not only antisemitism of a genocidal nature exists in Canada, but the systems that are supposed to protect us from racist hate speech don’t consider hatred of Jews to be problematic.
B’nai Brith has reported the post to Lethbridge Police Services.”
The Canadian B’nai Brith’s post, together with those of others that have mirrored B’nai Brith’s announcement, constitute the first time I have seen myself described in print as a ‘holocaust denier.” What is the definition used by the thought police to decide who is or is not a “holocaust denier? Are there many holocausts or only one? Who owns the term, “holocaust?” If there are exclusive rights, how were they obtained?
In the eyes of the B’nai Brith, is a “holocaust denier” anyone who disagrees with any element, large or small, of its favored historical interpretation? Is the B’nai Brith naturally hostile to anyone that retains independent, evidence-based perspectives on some of the most fraught issues of historical interpretation in contemporary times?
What is behind the creation of the original post that set the controversy in motion? Who created it and why? Is this whole episode an engineered crisis? Is one of its purposes to fend off the criticisms of those that accuse the B’nai Brith and related Zionist agencies of claiming “the sky is falling” with their Orwellian system of Annual Audits of Antisemitic Incidents. Please see below the map published to present cartographic interpretations by the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.
As shall be explained below, the B’nai Brith has failed to perform due diligence in its handling of this matter. Its officers did not even attempt back up their provocative characterizations of me with even a shred of genuine evidence. The organization opted instead to exploit for its own political agenda the shock value inherent in the vile contents of an item allegedly posted, apparently very briefly, on my FB page. The item is said to have been posted by Glen Davidson. I did not ever see it on my FB page. I did not invite nor did I even have any knowledge of it until recently.
In its material the B’nai Brith describe the post as a “depiction of a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew accompanied by a lengthy, violent anti-Semitic screed beside the photograph.” Here is the post, which I first saw sometime early in September as part of a smear piece published about me at “Aussie Dave’s” Israellycool.
To reiterate and to be absolutely clear, I did not post this social media item myself. I did not create it or solicit it. I do not approve of its contents. In fact I of course strongly condemn the message conveyed in both the image and the text. Due diligence demands, however, that I look further into this matter.
The B’nai Brith in Action
My initial research into the item’s content is leading me to the
opinion that the image probably emerges from some sort of staged
situation, one that seems to include the application of photo shop
techniques. The most basic questions that must now be pressed concern
the source of the atrocious text. From whence does it originate?
Certainly I did not write it. Glen Davidson did not write it. Who did
write it and why? Not once yet have I seen this deeper question posed by
those who are exploiting the vile item to dramatize a real or concocted
dispute with Facebook.Quite possibly by design, the miniscule, densely compressed text is very difficult to read especially on small digital devices. Could this attribute be because the text was conceived not as a means of winning adherents but rather as a justification for political actions like the B’nai Brith’s current hate speech campaign highlighting my academic position at the University of Lethbridge?
I first saw the item among a number of screen shots all dedicated to “Aussie Dave’s” nomination of me as “Anti-Zionist-Not-Anti-Semite of the Day.”
I remember being particular interested in the part of the post that mentioned Ryan Bellerose, a Metis man and convert to Judaism who has recently been hired as the B’nai Brith’s new Western Canadian representative. Most of my attention zeroed in on Aussie Dave’s suggestion to his readers that they communications to the president of my University, Dr. Mike Mahon. I also took note of a screen shot of an item on U of L letterhead where Dr. Mahon responds to “JP.” Who is “JP”?
The venue’s manager, Richard Awid, taped Ms. Hohmann’s intervention and subsequently played it back for me. Here is how I described this part of the episode in in an article entitled “B’nai Brith Moves to Quash Free Speech in Canada,”
Mr. Awid was somewhat dumbfounded that a small event at his community hall, “one of 100 such venues in Edmonton,” would elicit such an intense response from a very powerful organization in Toronto. He played back to me on his answering machine a recorded message he received at about 9 am on August 12 from Amanda Hohmann. Ms. Hohmann explained that she had received “a few complaints” about “Mr.” Kevin Barrett on the B’nai Brith’s “anti-hate hotline.” (1-416-633-6224; 1-800-892-2624)
Ms. Hohmann asserted that
“Mr. Barrett is a known anti-semite conspiracy theorist, a Holocaust Denier, and 9/11 Denier and all sorts of other things.”
Ms. Hohmann made no effort whatsoever to give background proof of her allegations or to identify the sources of the supposed “complaints.” Nevertheless she proposed to Mr. Awid that he should “cancel the event and let Mr. Barrett know he is not welcome in Edmonton.”
In this telephone call the B’nai Brith’s “human rights” director tried to defame a colleague offering absolutely no proof whatsoever to provide evidentiary backing for her directive from Toronto that Dr. Barrett should not be welcome in Alberta’s capital. I believe the Western world currently supports many Amanda Hohmanns paid very well to target and slander regularly individuals like Dr. Kevin Barrett.
Are the protagonists in these ugly witch hunts ever held accountable for the excesses? Are there any constraints on the increasingly severe incursions of the Zionist thought police? What remedies are or are not available for the likes of Dr. Barrett who is a Muslim man. Along with the rest of the omma, Dr. Barrett and his family are regularly subjected to heavy does of “hate speech” and sometimes worse?
When Richard Awid, a Muslim himself, did not adhere to Ms. Hohmann’s instructions, the B’nai Brith was able to send in a representative of the “hate speech” unit of the Edmonton police. The officer monitored the first part of the event and then left after informing Dr. Barrett that our presentation was not to be deemed hate speech by the police force he represented. I recall wondering at the time, does that bizarre episode foreshadow an era when all university classes will be policed by officials answerable to agencies like the B’nai Brith? Is that where this is leading?
The B’nai Brith has been front and center in Canada’s increasingly notorious record of aggressively policing citizens for supposed thought crimes and speech crimes. The B’nai Brith’s assault on free speech in Canada includes among its objects for criminalization Doug Collins, Malcolm Ross, Jim Keegstra, Ernst Zundel, Terry Tremaine, David Ahenakew and, most recently, Arthur Topham.
The case against Arthur Topham and his Radical Press
is still ongoing. By following at a distance the tawdry prosecution of
the self-employed reporter, publisher, editor and carpenter in Quesnel
British Columbia, I was made aware of a very significant text published
in 1941. Theodore Kaufman’s Germany Must Perish!
outlines an extremely ruthless strategy of genocidal destruction of a
whole people. Has this classic description of genocidal intent and
methodology been ever given prominence in a school curriculum in Canada?
I only recently have become fully aware of the extent of the murder, rape and pillage of several millions of Germans after 1945 in American prisoner war camps and in orgies of Soviet-instigated ethnic cleansing in Eastern Europe. Where are the museums to promote public education about these crimes against humanity? Where is the museum to commemorate the horrendous intergenerational genocide of perhaps a hundred million Indigenous peoples in the Holocaust of the Americas since 1492? Will future You Tubers make videos to ask elderly members of today’s generation what they did or didn’t do about the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians now underway in order to clear the way for Greater Israel?
Thought Police Wreaking Havoc on Campus
The B’nai Brith is becoming especially aggressive in campaigns to
have individuals fired from their work for expounding historical
interpretations it does not like. The B’nai Brith boasted menacingly on
September 15 of having destroyed the career of Nikolas Balakas, a
long-serving lab technician at York University’s Department of Astronomy
and Physics. The announcement that Canada’s most ruthless thought
police agency had succeeded in its campaign to get York University to fire its employee was written by Aidan Fishman. Mr. Fishman is Campus Advocacy Coordinator of B’nai Brith Canada.After counting coup on Mr. Balaras’s dismissal, Mr. Fishman concludes with the following plea that the University of Lethbridge should follow York University’s example. The B’nai Brith official wrote,
“Unfortunately not every administration is prepared to act with such decisiveness [as that of York University], as the ongoing saga surrounding Professor Anthony Hall at Lethbridge University shows. I hope that the administration in Lethbridge can use the excellent example set by York University on this matter, and take appropriate steps to ensure that their students are not similarly subjected to hatred and antisemitism on campus.”
Who is the real author of this “ongoing saga?” Where is the proof as of today that University of Lethbridge students are being subjected “to hatred and anti-Semitism on campus.” I have not once seen this kind of language appear in 26 years of teaching evaluations. Where is there any accountability for floating this kind of vicious agenda of smear? The intrusion into this matter of a B’nai Brith official described as Campus Advocacy Coordinator is, as far as I know, setting precedents at my school. What is the nature of the “advocacy” Mr. Fishman is “coordinating”?
The effort of B’nai Brith’s “campus coordinator” and possibly others of his group to inject themselves into the internal governance of the University of Lethbridge brings to mind a similar controversy brewing at Oberlin College. Oberlin College is a renowned Liberal Arts school in Ohio whose origins long predate the American Civil War. There Dr. Joy Karega has been suspended with pay from her teaching position as a result of a controversy also involving Facebook posts. I have written a lengthy open latter on the matter to Oberlin President, Dr. Marvin Krislov. The text, which has been mirrored on other web sites, was first published at the American Herald Tribune.
In my effort to reach out to President Krislov, Dr. Karega and the other students and faculty involved in what has definitely become a fiasco for the Oberlin community, I proposed in my open letter that we all work together to mount a joint academic conference. I proposed that my own Liberal Education program at the University of Lethbridge ally itself with the embattled Liberal Arts College in Ohio to organize an event aimed at bringing thoughtful academic commentary to address a mounting crisis in higher education in North America.
I hereby invite Aiden Fishman to join this initiative and thereby embark on a constructive course rather than the trajectory of negativity implicit in his present preoccupation with hate talk and advocacy for division. Of course Mr. Fishman is far from alone in the type of “advocacy” in which he is engaged. There is a barrage of interventions currently underway from organizations like the AMCHA Initiative, the Simon Wiesenthal Center for Campus Outreach, Hillel, the American Jewish Congress, David Horowitz’s FrontPage and Daniel Pipes’ Campus Watch to mention only a few. As currently on full public display at Oberlin College, these well-funded and deeply staffed interventions invariably wreak havoc on the principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse on campus?
I suggested the following title for the event.
Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories:
A Rational or Irrational Phrase in Academic Discourse?
In my research research into the Joy Karega/Oberlin debacle I became
aware of the concerted campaign in 2014 to destroy the career of Prof.
William I. Robinson. Dr. Robinson is Professor of Sociology at the
University of California at Santa Barbara. Like Dr. Joy Karega, Dr.
Steven Salaita, Dr. Hatem Bazian, Dr. Rabab Abdulhadi, Dr. Richard Falk,
me and many others, Dr. Robinson includes in the curriculum some focus
on the plight of Palestinian people.A Rational or Irrational Phrase in Academic Discourse?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmJFqmMvOYM
Caption: Prof. Richard Falk, Former UN Rapporteur and Princeton University Professor of International Law, Speaks on the Issue of Academic Freedom at the University of California at Santa Barbara
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IesTlj0F98c
The sociologist refused to back down from incorporating in his teaching critical perspectives on the harsh treatment of Palestinians especially in Gaza and the so-called Occupied Territories. Amidst proliferating Jewish settlements and the constant repressions of the Israeli police state, many Palestinians continue to eke out marginal existences on the heavily militarized lands set aside for them by the United Nations in Resolution 181. Resolution 181, an international instrument calling for partition of Palestine and UN trusteeship over Jerusalem, constitutes the primary law at the roots of the Israeli entity in its present form.
Prof. Robinson has written of his ordeal in August of 2014 on Truthout. In an article entitled “Repression Escalates on US Campuses,” the sociologist explains,
“The persecution to which I was subjected involved a litany of harassment, slander, defamation of character and all kinds of threats against the university by outside forces if I was not dismissed, as well as hate mail and death threats from unknown sources. More insidiously, it involved a shameful collaboration between a number of university officials and outside forces from the Israel lobby as the university administration stood by silently, making a mockery of academic freedom.Will the same toolbox of wrecking instruments deployed at the University of California be shipped in from the United States and unpacked at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta Canada? Will the administration of my own school continue to uphold the University of Lethbridge’s good reputation as an institution of higher education where the vital principles of academic freedom and civil academic discourse are expressed and defended?
The disciplinary procedure initiated against me by UCSB officials involved a host of irregularities, violations of the university’s own procedures, breaches of confidentiality, denial of due process, conflicts of interest, failure of disclosure, improper political surveillance, abuses of power and position, unwarranted interference in curriculum and teaching and so on. As I would discover during the course of the ordeal, individuals inside the university and in positions of authority had linked up with agents of the lobby outside the university in setting out to prosecute me.”
On several occasions I have publicly lauded the U of L for creating an environment of academic freedom. I made this observation, for instance, at the University of Lethbridge’s book event when in 2011 my volume, Earth into Property, was launched. In this 900+ page peer-reviewed academic text published by McGill-Queen’s University Press, I incorporate analysis that the B’nai Brith flippantly trivializes as “9/11 conspiracy theories.”
Deeply corrupt agencies like the B’nai Brith have a lot to lose when the basic facts about what really happened on 9/11–who did what to whom—become the common knowledge of the general public. That day may be approaching far faster than those hiding behind the tired old memes about “conspiracy theories” anticipate.
How much longer can the evidence of 9/11 be concealed behind the ruthless kind of ad hominem attacks that have become the well known-specialty of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith in all its many constituent parts? How much longer will the public tolerate the hate propaganda and professional assaults that are obliterating the fundamental integrity of so many of our most important institutions?
What other lies and deceptions are being fed to the public on a regular basis? What is the level of public confidence these days in the trustworthiness of society’s key institutions including government, media, police and agencies of higher education? Who can say public confidence in these entities is high?
What is the appropriate role for universities in addressing issues of officialdom’s fraud and malfeasance especially in situations that have large implications for public policy? If even tenured university faculty can be intimidated into shying away from the professional responsibility to distinguish truth from falsehood, but especially in situations that threaten power’s imperatives, who will perform this vital function? Politicians? Talking heads on TV? Who will speak truth to the unaccountable power that the B’nai Brith in its current reckless demeanor so abundantly epitomizes?
Ritual Defamation in the Social Media Circus
To return to the Facebook post that lies at
the root of this controversy, I have already publicly condemned the
contents of the offending item in the September 16 edition of False Flag Weekly News. I currently co-host this regular broadcast along with one of its founding partners, Dr. Kevin Barrett.
I noticed a reference to my public condemnation of the item in
question in the comments section of the B’nai Brith’s own web post of
August 29. A commenter going by the name of Andrew Blair observes,It is important to realize that Professor Hall publicly condemns that image and text. Go to False Flag Weekly, http://noliesradio.org/archives/119976, at minute 36, to see and hear his denunciation. When I put on my “fairness” glasses and look at that image I see Tony Hall in the headlock, and the arms locking his head are the image and the text. Does anyone else see that, or are my “fairness” glasses defective?“Andrew Blair’s” question certainly resonates with me. The B’nai Brith’s description of the image in its news announcements refers to “a White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.” Is the Orthodox Jew not a White man too? What is there to say that the aggressor in this image is not Cherokee or Mohawk or Palestinian for that matter?
What are the politics of the B’nai Brith’s choice of words in its racialized approach to its public announcement highlighting this inflammatory image? What effect is being sought? Did the image emerge from a real or staged situation? If it was the former, what was the event? Where did it happen? Who took the photograph? Have the investigators in the B’nai Brith-police-hate-crime-complex explored such matters.
Is the B’nai Brith’s emphasis on “police investigations” itself a staged tactic of sorts? Is it meant to dramatize the main story line aimed ultimately at seizing control of strategic instruments of Internet communication. The subplot, which is certainly intended to harm me personally and professionally, is that crazed and genocidal anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists– even “holocaust deniers”— are running around loose with full Internet access even in Lethbridge Alberta?
My own best best assessment is that the offending social media item seems likely to have been produced by photo shop juxtapositions of different images. The “White man’s” head and the “Orthodox Jew’s” crushed glasses both look like inserts. The white wing of the victim’s crushed and displaced glasses seems to have been drawn in. There are signs of graphic tinkering in the relationship between the huge muscular arm in the forefront and the squeezed face of the suffering victim.
The reversal of Talmudic-style contempt for the Other (the Goy) cries out the pictured message of Jewish victimhood. The provocative power of the image is reinforced by the B’nai Brith’s very racialized description. In my recent research I have discovered that this image and others images very much like—images that often feature the same racist “White man”— show up in on many Internet posts, even one I found translated into German.
Where the picture provides the main message, the text provides the “evidence” of the antisemitism that the B’nai Brith and its allied agencies are simultaneously engaged in inventing, cultivating, spotlighting and publicly combating. What justification would there be for the existence of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith without the métier of antisemitism? The primary essence of the B’nai B’rith entities is to advance the agendas of the Israeli entity in the Diaspora, in other words in Canada, USA, Britain, France. Australia, and many other countries.
The text in the offending item is perhaps the most appalling excerpt of gutter prose I have ever seen. Its contents are so reprehensible that they demand careful consideration. Like an illegal drug planted by corrupt police on a targeted individual, the reprehensible social media item has been metaphorically put on my digital front door step and then advertised by the B’nai Brith to advance its own political agenda. I am left with little alternative but to respond as decently and as conscientiously to a crime in progress.
The author, it is claimed by the item’s creator, is Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” Garrison. This Garrison person has many nicknames. He is made to exclaim,
“There was never a Holocaust, but there should have been and, rest assured, there WILL be, as you serpentine kikes richly deserve one. I will not rest until every single filthy. Parasitic kike is rounded up and slaughtered like the vermin they are. The White man has had more than enough of International Jewry and we are fully prepared to smite the parasite for the millionth time. The greedy, hook nosed kikes know that there days are numbered and, unlike in the past, they now have nowhere to run. This time, there will be no kikes left alive to spead around the planet like cockroaches. We will get them ALL into the oven and their putrid memory will finally be erased from the planet once and for all. Like all parasites the Jew will continue to reproduce until every last one has been wiped out. This is why it is crucial that all kikes are ruthlessly and mercilessly butchered for the good of us all. KILL ALL JEWS NOW! EVERY LAST ONE!” Ben “Tel Aviv Terror” GarrisonWhat kind of demented mind would come up with such a macabre celebration of envisaged mass murder? What would be the motivation to pen such a blatant incitement to hate and slaughter of a specific people?
My research into the offending item’s origins quickly led me to the many Internet profiles and posts of Ben Garrison. Ben Garrison is apparently a real person who lives in Montana. It turns out that this Ben Garrison, the sole named individual in the miniature text of the offending Facebook post, is also the aggressor in the photo shopped image. Adorned with dark glasses and a cowboy hat, Garrison is pictured as (in the words of B’nai Brith) as “the White man assaulting an Orthodox Jew.”
Ben Garrison
The real life Ben Garrison is often described as a libertarian
political satirist. He is a prolific cartoonist whose cartoon and
personal images lie at the center of an increasingly contentious media
circus. Significantly Facebook figures centrally in the many-faceted
narrative of Ben Garrison. Perhaps his Facebook connection is a major
reason why B’nai Brith and related agencies chose Garrison’s Internet
personae as poster boy for its hate speech campaign of fund raising and
ritual defamation.Holocaust Studies experts at Tel-Aviv University are among the most outspoken proponents of the view that Ben Garrison is indeed the kind of bigoted psychopath who would in real life utter provocations to the genocide of Jews. These Israeli academicians would probably argue it is entirely in character for Ben Garrison to have actually have declared with sincerity, “Kill All Jews.” The hypothesis that Ben Garrison’s racist screed should be taken at face value is implicit in the wording and headlines of the posts by B’nai Brith, Daniel Leons-Marder’s Everyday Antisemitism and the Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism.
The smear campaign’s architects and engineers are attempting a controlled demolition of my reputation in their quest to harness Facebook more fully to their own agendas. These architects and engineers count among their allies the creators and authors at Encyclopedia dramatica. Of Ben Garrison the encyclopedia’s drama experts report, “Scholars from Tel-Aviv University’s Center for Holocaust Studies have ominously described him [Ben Garrison] as the most racist man in the universe, and the biggest existential threat to the Jews since Hitler.”
This characterization runs counter to the dominant view that Garrison is “the Internet’s most trolled cartoonist.” According to a Breitbart article entitled “Ben Garrison: How the Internet Made a Fake White Supremacist”
Montana-based artist Ben Garrison isn’t a violent Neo-Nazi, or even a white nationalist. He’s a polite, accomplished cartoonist, with no history of overt or covert racism. His true political leanings are libertarian, anti-elitist, and anti-globalist. Garrison is, in fact, the victim of one the most extraordinary and longest-running smear campaigns on the internet.If Breitbart has it right and Tel-Aviv’s Center for Holocaust Studies has it wrong, then the real Ben Garrison could not have written the disgusting text that goes along with the offensive image of the cartoonist putting his victim in a headlock. If Ben Garrison is not to be understood as the kind of person who could have come up with the wording replicated and publicized by Amanda Hohmann, Daniel Leons-Marder, and B’nai Brith’s CEO, Michael Mostyn, then these individuals are involved in a telling case of false flag deception.
For a mixture of amusement and spite, in a trolling spree that has lasted over six years, thousands of online pranksters and real neo-Nazis have been remixing his cartoons into racist caricatures. Most Ben Garrison cartoons attack the government, corporations, and political movements.
However, almost immediately after one is published, it is remixed into a new version that attacks Jews, African-Americans, or other minorities. These are rapidly disseminated in troll communities and sometimes become more widely-shared than the originals.
Given the nature of their dubious employment in what Norman Finkelstein has labeled the “Holocaust Industry,” I find it difficult to believe that these individuals as well as their bosses, underlings and associates were not aware of the controversy swirling around Ben Garrison. After all, I was able to discovered the basic outlines of the Garrison controversy in a few google searches after viewing the posts featuring Mostyn’s, Hohmann’s and Leons-Marder’s comments. Is this group merely incompetent? Are are its members part of a concerted agenda to change the public policies of many agencies, including those of the Canadian government, Facebook and the University of Lethbridge, through calculated misrepresentations, frauds and incitements?
In an Internet post entitled “Ben Garrison on Trolls” the Montana cartoonist is said to speak for himself. Interestingly, Garrison’s observations begin with his reference to the very same Facebook reference to “community standards” that supposedly initiated the B’nai Brith’s slander of me.
“This page wasn’t removed. We reviewed the page you reported for harassment. Since it did not violate our community standards, we did not remove it. Thanks for your report.”
This is the message [writes Ben Garrison] I received after reporting a hate page on Facebook. Near the top of the hate page was a statement that encouraged the extermination of all Jews. Along with that statement was a photo of my face and the name Ben Garrison. Trolls had stolen my artwork and photos from my blog, my cartoon site as well as my fine art site and had concocted an entire page devoted to spewing libelous hate. The troll entity called the page ‘Ben Garrison Cartoons—the Official Site.’ The trolls had stamped the name ‘Ben Garrison’ onto as many hateful images as possible throughout the page. How does one stop such blatant libel? Where do these trolls come from? Is it even possible to track them down? Why do they do such terrible things? Why me?In my view the largest weight of available evidence points to the conclusion that Ben Garrison did not write the “Kill All Jews” commentary. If Ben Garrison did not write the planted text, then who did?
As I found out, it’s not just me. Many others have suffered the same outrageous indignity. It appears that trolls are no longer content merely talk to each other on sordid sites such as ‘4chan’ or ‘Stormfront.’ They want to go mainstream. Therefore, social media are a natural target for them. Do they really believe the vitriolic memes they are shoveling, or are they merely playing an elaborate prank? It doesn’t matter. Their memes of hate must not go mainstream. Facebook must wake up and block the hate before it gets established. Hate speech is not free speech. Hate speech is blind, one-dimensional blackness. It is not reasoned debate. It loudly shouts for the murder of human beings and Facebook is providing them a megaphone for that purpose.
Could the B’nai Brith’s highlighted social media item have been produced by a Zionist group, agency or individual? Why might partisans of Israel do such a thing? Could it be to provide the ammunition for smear campaigns directed against individuals and groups that criticize Israel? Could it be to create incidents to justify appeals for money such as those accompanying the B’nai Brith’s slanderous posts aimed at damaging the reputation of the University of Lethbridge and my tenured academic role in it as a 26-year member of the Arts and Science Faculty?
Worse, much worse, can be envisaged. Could it be that the production and planting of the of the Ben Garrison post as well as others like it might be deployed to provide “evidence” in thought crime and speech crime litigation, the ultimate specialty and raison d’etre of the B’nai Brith? It is easy to imagine how such an outlandish and extravagant expression of hostility as that said to come from Garrison could be rendered useful to Crown prosecutors serving the Zionist masters.
Regardless of its source, there is no doubt that the Ben Garrison post could conceivably be exploited as a tailor made item to assist Crown prosecutors serving the agenda of B’nai Brith and related agencies. Such an item could definitely be deployed in a litigious assault on designated targets in order to establish webs of connection linking alleged hate speech with genocidal intent as well as the semantic nuke in the Zionist arsenal of weaponized words.
The conspiracy to advance the public perception that the engineered phrase, “holocaust denial,” has any internal and external coherence as an outlawed category of forbidden thought and speech runs absolutely contrary to the intellectual viability of the academy as well as the health of society more generally. The basic premise of the world’s most fraught term creates a false dichotomy that is coming to epitomize the decline of evidence-based rationality beneath the ascent of a new kind of orthodoxy combining both religious and secular elements.
Those that want to entrench and enforce an outlawed realm of forbidden thought and articulation brandish the weaponized term like an ideological sniper on steroids. They have no interest in providing definitions of where orthodoxy ends and where denial begins. As I am discovering by raising even a simple call for “open debate” on the main platform of Zionism’s unaccountable power, there are harsh new authoritarian forces that need to be called to account if we are even to slow down the police state incursions in our post-911 world.
The new configurations of authority are extending to important agencies like the Royal Canadian Legion, Jasper National Park, and the Alberta Society of Fiddlers. Those overseeing these important institutions are made to feel empowered to impose arbitrary sanctions and punishments against an individual who dared to question enshrined orthodoxy.
The message is made clear that the vibrance of art and culture, the wellbeing of veterans as well as the need to protect some of Alberta’s most majestic Alpine environments have become secondary commitments. The treatment in Jasper National Park of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free and democratic society. Our right and need to express independent thought, the starting point of collective self-determination, has has been sacrificed in order to enforce supine obedience to the sanctification of an historical interpretation that must not be held subjected to sceptical scrutiny and reconsideration.
How many are now being held, including some Canadians, in dark European dungeons for questioning any aspect of the unrelenting vilification of Germany as home of the most the most evil society of monsters ever to walk the face of the earth? Will we ever be able to liberate ourselves from the spell that is causing us to become so blind and unresponsive to the holocausts we ourselves are imposing on the natural world and also on the besieged worldwide community of our Muslim brothers and sisters?
What are the chances that the nuclear holocaust currently being promoted by our governors can be held back when those most intent on making war not peace are so firmly in charge? Is there a connection between the decline of the anti-war movement and the rise of the militarized police state currently deploying false flag-induced fears to constrain our ability to think, speak and act in conformity with the imperatives of survival? What we most require at this moment is simple affirmations of life’s beauty and integrity. Instead we are delivered coercive dictates demanding we deny what we our reason and research tells us to be true.
How did we the academics, but especially we the historians, allow it to happen that a whole category of the European past has been declared off bounds to unfettered discussion and critical investigative scholarship? By allowing this development to proceed, a very sweeping and consequential precedent is being set.
How did we the citizens allow the principle to develop that government can declare that whole subject areas of research and publication to have been so perfectly interpreted, so correctly dealt with in every detail, that no revision and modification of existing conclusions can be allowed. What is the role of the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith in enforcing the ruthless bulldozing aside of the most basic foundations of freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and adherence to rigorous standards of scientific inquiry.
The B’nai Brith and Ben Garrison, the poster boy for the Zionist organization’s hate speech campaign, are exactly on the same page when it comes to Facebook. Both Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith seek to constrain free speech on the Internet more tightly. Is this convergence of agendas a coincidence or are more calculated deceptions at play here? To publicize his desire that Facebook be more proactive in censoring the Internet, Garrison produced the following cartoon:
Facebook and Israel; Ben Garrison and the B’nai Brith
My FFWN co-host, Dr. Kevin Barrett, has evaluated the evidence surrounding the Garrison post and concluded it was “very
likely produced by B’nai Brith itself, or other Zionist extremists of
like mind, as a PR operation. No wonder they are “monitoring” the police
to make sure they behave themselves.”Presenting his own version of the B’nai Brith’s highlighted image, Dr. Barrett continues,
The absurd rant with its lurid references to “greedy hook-nosed kikes” and so on does not pass the smell test. Whoever created this image obviously did not do so with the intention of convincing the public to take action against Jews and/or Zionists. On the contrary, it appears to have been designed for the opposite purpose: To convince the public that crazed, foul-mouthed, murderous anti-Semites are a clear and present danger.As highlighted in Telesur, the government of Israel and Facebook have been represented at the highest level in a series of meetings aimed at conspiring to hold back the growing flood of social media posts subjecting Israel’s maltreatment of the Palestinians to sceptical public scrutiny.
Virtually every time a swastika is spray painted on a synagogue, the culprit turns out to be a “self-hating” Jewish Zionist trying to conjure up the specter of an “anti-Semitic threat.” Would an investigation of the provenance of this image find something similar?
Dr. Barrett observes that “the manufactured incident smearing Tony Hall may be part of a coordinated program, orchestrated from Tel Aviv, to try to stop the rise of the ever-increasing virtual army of pro-Palestine social media users.”
This recent development well demonstrates the specious nature of B’nai Brith’s characterization of Facebook as some kind of rogue agency unwilling to act immediately to pre-empt an existential threat emanating from Lethbridge. More likely the B’nai Brith’s alarmist posts in late August of 2016 were, in part at least, a ploy to divert attention from the reality that social media, but especially Facebook, is more and more being harnessed to Zionist goals and agendas.
Was the B’nai Brith’s deployment of the racist side of Ben Garrison’s dual public personae calculated to serve the double purpose of both smearing me and my school as well as leading interested parties to a surprising “libertarian” voice for the suppression of Internet freedom? What should be done about Internet trolls such as those at the B’nai Brith that have shown themselves to be unrelenting in planting lies and innuendo with the aim of silencing criticism of Israel?
—-
Comments
L'autre panafricanisme !
Mais celui-là existe, malheureusement.
Mais celui-là existe, malheureusement.
See translation
For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast – and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of TruthJihad.com to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air – become a subscriber today! Or if you prefer, PAYPAL a one time donation, or a regular payment, to truthjihad(at)gmail[dot]
POSTED ON FACEBOOK BY VICKIE JACOBS
DR HENRY MAKOW
I'm not sure what Abe Foxman would say about God's genocidal tendencies. In any case, the Baal worshipers are
The great prophets of the Old Testament were also antisemites who also would be hauled up in front of human rights tribunals. Jeremiah said Jews "will not speak the truth; they have taught their tongue to speak lies..." (Jeremiah 9:5). Isaiah says the lord will smite "the daughters of Zion [who] are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes..." (Isaiah 3:16)
Jesus joined the noble ranks of antisemites when he told the Pharisees, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44)
The Roman historian Tacitus condemned them for
subverting religion, country and family and said they were "enemies of all
races but their own." George Bernard Shaw said, "The Jews had better
stop being Jews and start being human beings."
The Hungarian musician Franz Liszt said, "They sell ...the crowbars and the projectiles that destroy the foundations of faith and morals."
The great German poet, Goethe said, "This crafty race has one great principle; as long as order prevails, there is nothing to be gained."
Voltaire, the French philosopher, said, "The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous - cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity."
Jews are not taught about the supremacist agenda of their cabalist leaders. Instead, they are told they are "hated for no reason" or because people need an innocent scapegoat to blame for their suffering. Anti Semitism is an "irrational sickness in the mind of the Gentile." Increasingly in the satanist New World Order, the sane are labeled sick.
MEASURES OF THEIR SUCCESS
The political, economic and cultural conquest of the world by cabalist Jews and their allies is the true history of the last 500 years or more. (The Illuminati bankers are behind imperialism.) Yet their control of culture is such that people are totally unaware that any conquest has even taken place. "Anti Semite" is a curse that instills paralysis.
If you're not an anti Semite, in the sense of opposing the satanic agenda of organized Jewry, you are an opportunist or dupe, or worse.
People are unaware that all wars were contrived by the Masonic Jewish bankers to increase their power and wealth, destroy their rivals and advance their scheme of world-government.
People are unaware that their "leaders" are puppets and the mass media are prostitutes. They are unaware that the Illuminati have sponsored feminism, homosexuality, promiscuity and pornography,and now transgenderism, to shred the social fabric (marriage and family) and undermine resistance. They are unaware that 9-11 etc were false flags used to rob us of our civil rights and they continue to stage fake terror to confiscate our weapons.
An ethnic Jew, the son of holocaust survivors who lost their parents, I recognize there are just causes for anti Semitism past and present. I represent those ordinary Jews who have been duped like the goyim. We refuse to be human shields, human sacrifices and scapegoats for organized Jewry's demented, satanic, no-longer-hidden agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLEpNthvCic
481,420 Views
Ouedraogo Souleymane Basic-SoulFollow
51 Comments
Franc-maçonnerie
: cérémonie d'intronisation de Ali Bongo et Sassou Nguesso en tant que
grands maitres des loges du Gabon et du Congo
Promesse solennelle : " J...
See more
Promesse solennelle : " J...
See more
Protected: Rafiq on the U. of Lethbridge witch hunt, plus Libertrarian pro-9/11-truth biker Randy Vanadisson _ on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad Radio
Coming Up Sunday, October 2nd —
Monday, Wednesday, and Sunday at 8am Pacific * 11am Eastern * 16:00 GMT
EXCLUSIVE BROADCAST:
Rafiq on the U. of Lethbridge witch hunt, plus Libertrarian pro-9/11-truth biker Randy Vanadisson
First hour: Rafiq, author of the new article “Canadian professor libelously targeted as “anti-semite” in coordinated attack.” Breaking news: The insane “kill all Jews” image that was planted, without his knowledge, on Professor Hall’s Facebook page “was
created by a 20 year-old Jewish kid named Joshua Goldberg. He was
arrested by the FBI about a year ago for sending bomb making
instructions to what he thought was a Muslim terrorist–instead it was an
FBI undercover agent.” In other words, this weaponized image
was created by a Jewish-Zionist false flag provocateur and instigator
of phony “Islamic terrorism,” presumably to be used precisely the way it
was deployed against Tony Hall. Goldberg and his B’nai Brith cronies
should all go to prison for this. And everyone at the University of
Lethbridge who did not immediately stand up for Tony Hall needs to
resign permanently not just from that university, but from the whole
global community of scholars.
Second hour: Randy Vanadisson is a member of Libertarians Motorcycle Club – and a supporter of 9/11 truth who recently organized a Richard Gage talk at a biker rally. Randy has a BA in anthropology and MA in sociology from the University of Toledo – focus in social psychology.
This show was broadcast on October 2, 2016.
Monday, Wednesday, and Sunday at 8am Pacific * 11am Eastern * 16:00 GMT
EXCLUSIVE BROADCAST:
Rafiq on the U. of Lethbridge witch hunt, plus Libertrarian pro-9/11-truth biker Randy Vanadisson
Second hour: Randy Vanadisson is a member of Libertarians Motorcycle Club – and a supporter of 9/11 truth who recently organized a Richard Gage talk at a biker rally. Randy has a BA in anthropology and MA in sociology from the University of Toledo – focus in social psychology.
This show was broadcast on October 2, 2016.
For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast – and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of TruthJihad.com to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air – become a subscriber today! Or if you prefer, PAYPAL a one time donation, or a regular payment, to truthjihad(at)gmail[dot]
POSTED ON FACEBOOK BY VICKIE JACOBS
God Was the First Anti
Semite
September
30, 2016
It's time
to call anti Semitism by its real name , anti Satanism
Most Jews
and Non-Jews don't realize that the goal of Judaism and
organized Jewry is to overturn God, i.e. the natural and spiritual order.
This is
clear from their "revolutionary" role throughout modern history and in
current events. They're causing mayhem to demoralize humanity and force
it to accept their tyranny.*
Using Freemasonry and the mass
media, they have given the goyim a bogus
leadership class. To succeed in the West, you must sell your soul.
This satanic possession is proceeding on
many fronts and is only going to get worse.
*"Our
[Jewish] State...[finds it] necessary to maintain the terror which tends to
produce blind submission... for the sake of victory, we must keep to the
programme of violence and make-believe." [i.e. war, false flags,
bogeymen]...we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our
super-government. Protocols of Zion 1-24
(Disclaimer-
I continue to repeat myself because we need constant reminders. We are dealing
with cognitive dissonance. Society's sensory organs tell us that what is
happening is not happening and bad is in fact good. We cannot see the
spiritual and physical enslavement that is taking place in front of our eyes.)
Updated
excerpt of a key statement
By Henry
Makow Ph.D.
The first
anti Semite was God
himself.
When
Moses told him the Jews were worshiping a golden calf, "The LORD said to
Moses, "I have seen this people, and behold, they are an obstinate people.
"Now then let Me alone, that My anger may burn against them and that I may
destroy them..." (Exodus 32: 9-10)
I'm not sure what Abe Foxman would say about God's genocidal tendencies. In any case, the Baal worshipers are
now in
charge. God would face a Human Rights Tribunal for his rash statements. I
In the
meantime, they have evicted Him from His own Creation, and banished the word "God"
from polite society.
The great prophets of the Old Testament were also antisemites who also would be hauled up in front of human rights tribunals. Jeremiah said Jews "will not speak the truth; they have taught their tongue to speak lies..." (Jeremiah 9:5). Isaiah says the lord will smite "the daughters of Zion [who] are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes..." (Isaiah 3:16)
Jesus joined the noble ranks of antisemites when he told the Pharisees, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44)
Ye
serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Mathew 23-33)
O
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which
are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even
as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! (Mathew 23:37)
The NWO
is their revenge against God and Jesus.
SATAN'S
LITTLE HELPERS?
Throughout
history, Jews were criticized by a Who's Who of Western civilization who might
face "hate crime" charges today.
The Hungarian musician Franz Liszt said, "They sell ...the crowbars and the projectiles that destroy the foundations of faith and morals."
The great German poet, Goethe said, "This crafty race has one great principle; as long as order prevails, there is nothing to be gained."
Voltaire, the French philosopher, said, "The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous - cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity."
Jews are not taught about the supremacist agenda of their cabalist leaders. Instead, they are told they are "hated for no reason" or because people need an innocent scapegoat to blame for their suffering. Anti Semitism is an "irrational sickness in the mind of the Gentile." Increasingly in the satanist New World Order, the sane are labeled sick.
It's
about time Jews realize that Judaism is not on the side of the angels, but it's
not too late to get out.
It's time Christians realize that they have been had by the world's greatest tricksters. The Jews are not "the chosen people." Most don't even believe in God. Their leaders believe in Satan. They are megalomaniacs that destroy nations, kill millions and threaten the future of humanity.
It's time for all of us to realize that being able to criticize Jews is a litmus test of our freedom. Anti Semitism was banned and severely punished in Soviet Russia. Is that the kind of society we want? It's time to stop cringing at the charge of "anti Semite" and accept it as a compliment, a sign of courage and rectitude. It's time to call anti Semitism by its real name , Anti-Satanism.
It's time Christians realize that they have been had by the world's greatest tricksters. The Jews are not "the chosen people." Most don't even believe in God. Their leaders believe in Satan. They are megalomaniacs that destroy nations, kill millions and threaten the future of humanity.
It's time for all of us to realize that being able to criticize Jews is a litmus test of our freedom. Anti Semitism was banned and severely punished in Soviet Russia. Is that the kind of society we want? It's time to stop cringing at the charge of "anti Semite" and accept it as a compliment, a sign of courage and rectitude. It's time to call anti Semitism by its real name , Anti-Satanism.
MEASURES OF THEIR SUCCESS
The political, economic and cultural conquest of the world by cabalist Jews and their allies is the true history of the last 500 years or more. (The Illuminati bankers are behind imperialism.) Yet their control of culture is such that people are totally unaware that any conquest has even taken place. "Anti Semite" is a curse that instills paralysis.
If you're not an anti Semite, in the sense of opposing the satanic agenda of organized Jewry, you are an opportunist or dupe, or worse.
People are unaware that all wars were contrived by the Masonic Jewish bankers to increase their power and wealth, destroy their rivals and advance their scheme of world-government.
People are unaware that their "leaders" are puppets and the mass media are prostitutes. They are unaware that the Illuminati have sponsored feminism, homosexuality, promiscuity and pornography,and now transgenderism, to shred the social fabric (marriage and family) and undermine resistance. They are unaware that 9-11 etc were false flags used to rob us of our civil rights and they continue to stage fake terror to confiscate our weapons.
An ethnic Jew, the son of holocaust survivors who lost their parents, I recognize there are just causes for anti Semitism past and present. I represent those ordinary Jews who have been duped like the goyim. We refuse to be human shields, human sacrifices and scapegoats for organized Jewry's demented, satanic, no-longer-hidden agenda.
-
Related-
Makow - The Devil and the Jews
Zionist
admits "anti Semitism is a trick we use" (to
portray self defense as bigotry)
Makow - Feckless Goyim Downplay Protocols of Zion
Makow -The Riddle of Anti Semitism
Newman - Is Lucifer the God of Judaism?
Gilad Atzmon - Did the Jews Just Lose Europe?
First Comment by Michael:
Makow - Feckless Goyim Downplay Protocols of Zion
Makow -The Riddle of Anti Semitism
Newman - Is Lucifer the God of Judaism?
Gilad Atzmon - Did the Jews Just Lose Europe?
First Comment by Michael:
"God
was the First Anti-Semite" Wow!, what a fine article summing up so much.
And the cartoon is perfect. Modern Jewry has supplanted God with themselves.
How full of it can one group be? I recall the article you posted from the
fellow whose family knew Richard Wurmbrand. He shared the conversation
Richard had with his Masonic brother, testifying that Jesus was indeed the
Messiah, and his brother countered with, "No. We, the Jewish people are
the Messiah." Christian leaders certainly need to wrap their myopic
eyesight around articles like this. Knowing your enemy and how he works in and
through certain people is important and as part of the Gospel message as
anything in the New Testament. "My people are destroyed for lack of
knowledge." Ignorance is not really bliss, it's disastrous.
Glen
writes:
I may not
be able to speak as a Jew, but I am more than able to speak as a recovering
"duped" Goyium. I spent my entire early life in the churches of the
Christian Zionist. The modern day state of Israel was the golden calf that was
placed upon their alter and was to be worshiped unquestionably. Forever being
told "they" were Gods chosen people, believe me when I say it took
some doing to learn the truth and then to accept that truth.
With the
help of the good old "net" I ran across web pages by people such as
Jackie Patru and Elizabeth Dilling. For the first time I learned about
the Jewish Talmud and the sick, perverted teachings therein. I also learned it
is their book of choice when it came dealing with the rest of the world.
I have a
family who still watch T.V. evangelist John Hagee and hang on every word he
says. Try as I might I can't get them to give true Christians such as Chuck
Baldwin a second look. It is sad to say they will worship the followers of
Satan and the modern day state of Israel as it leads them through the gates of
hell straight to the battle of Armageddon. The profit Jeremiah nailed it
way back when, when he stated " Hear now this, O foolish people, and
without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear
not" ( Jeremiah 5:21)
I will
close with a short video all my Christian-Zionist friends
need to watch, but I'm sure they will have eyes and not see, ears and not hear.
Sid
Green, who is Jewish writes:
Thanks for writing that article; you are the only one of us who seems to
be calling out the truth at the moment.
- See
more at:
http://henrymakow.com/2016/09/the-first-anti-semite.html#sthash.pXbhi1E6.dpuf
Adolf Hitler vs The Jew World Order NEW DOCUMENTARY
Adolf Hitler vs The Jew World Order NEW DOCUMENTARY
Friday, 10/14/2016 False Flag Weekly News
Streamed live on 14 Oct 2016
PLEASE SUPPORT WITH YOUR DONATIONS
http://noliesradio.org/donate
CLICK THE LINK BELOW TO SEE TODAY’S NEWS STORIES AND THEIR SOURCE LINKS and for More Info:
http://noliesradio.org/archives/121005
QUESTIONING OFFICIAL STORIES IS NOT HATE SPEECH, IT IS FREE SPEECH.
The False Flag Weekly News anchored by Dr. Kevin Barrett and Prof. Tony Hall looks behind the headlines and main stream media stories to get at what’s really going on in the world. From violations of international law to initiating WWIII, you don’t want to miss what they and their guests have to say about the stories behind the stories.
PLEASE SHARE THIS VITAL NEWS SHOW ON YOUR FACEBOOK, TWITTER, EMAIL. You can also use the EMBED link to put this show on your blog or website. SEE GOOGLE SHARE LINK ABOVE
"The views expressed in False Flag Weekly News are the sole responsibility of the speaker(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NoLiesRadio.org. NoLiesRadio.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements expressed therein."
False Flag Weekly News is web-streamed LIVE every Friday 8am Pacific * 11am Eastern * 15:00 GMT
Please address the issues presented in the news show when making comments. Personal attacks, threats, veiled threats, bigoted remarks or foul language will get you banned.
http://noliesradio.org/donate
CLICK THE LINK BELOW TO SEE TODAY’S NEWS STORIES AND THEIR SOURCE LINKS and for More Info:
http://noliesradio.org/archives/121005
QUESTIONING OFFICIAL STORIES IS NOT HATE SPEECH, IT IS FREE SPEECH.
The False Flag Weekly News anchored by Dr. Kevin Barrett and Prof. Tony Hall looks behind the headlines and main stream media stories to get at what’s really going on in the world. From violations of international law to initiating WWIII, you don’t want to miss what they and their guests have to say about the stories behind the stories.
PLEASE SHARE THIS VITAL NEWS SHOW ON YOUR FACEBOOK, TWITTER, EMAIL. You can also use the EMBED link to put this show on your blog or website. SEE GOOGLE SHARE LINK ABOVE
"The views expressed in False Flag Weekly News are the sole responsibility of the speaker(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NoLiesRadio.org. NoLiesRadio.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements expressed therein."
False Flag Weekly News is web-streamed LIVE every Friday 8am Pacific * 11am Eastern * 15:00 GMT
Please address the issues presented in the news show when making comments. Personal attacks, threats, veiled threats, bigoted remarks or foul language will get you banned.
-
Category
Prof. Anthony Hall vindicated – B’nai Brith and its U. of Lethbridge punks bitch-slapped by national faculty association
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today EditorWill slandered professor Anthony Hall soon return to the University that has so mistreated him?
The witch-hunt against University of Lethbridge professor Anthony Hall may have just ended not with a bang but with a whimper. And it is the Israel lobby group B’nai Brith Canada, and its flunkies at the University of Lethbridge, who are whimpering.The Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) just issued a stinging reprimand for University of Lethbridge president Mike Mahon, a glorified gym teacher who unilaterally suspended Professor Hall without pay because he disagrees with Hall’s political views. See:Here is CAUT’s statement:
CAUT is using extremely strong language. The statement accuses Mike Mahon of violating “all principles of due process and natural rights” and “denying…legal rights” i.e. violating the law.CAUT is not only threatening all-out legal action, but also “imposing censure” on the University of Lethbridge. This is a formal process that amounts to a complete boycott of the University of Lethbridge by the entire Canadian academic community – a sort of scholarly BDS action. Professors would refuse to work there, students would refuse to study there, and all Canadian academicians would essentially consider that the “University of Lethbridge” no longer existed.How could the University of Lethbridge resolve the situation? I spoke to Professor Hall this morning. He was optimistic about the long-term prospects of his academic freedom struggle, and grateful to CAUT for doing the right thing. But he also hastened to point out that Mike Mahon and others at the University had created an extremely hostile work environment for him, and that the University of Lethbridge needs to do much more than merely allowing him to return to teaching in the horrendous environment they have created for him.By suspending Professor Hall without pay, without any form of due process, the University essentially endorsed the outrageous, libelous lies concocted by the B’nai Brith and its suspected confederates. The biggest lie, the one that launched the entire witch hunt, was a Zionist-fabricated “kill all Jews” image that was mysteriously planted on Professor Hall’s Facebook page without his knowledge. B’nai Brith and Facebook conspired to create a media scandal about the image, and despite Hall’s complete innocence, media outlets including the Lethbridge Herald and CBC labored to fabricate a spurious link between the horrific, genocidal image and Professor Hall in their coverage of the incident. Rather than reporting the truth – that Professor Hall was the innocent victim of a smear campaign – they absurdly implied that Professor Hall himself wanted to “kill all Jews” !The genocidal image was created by a Florida-based Jewish Zionist false flag terrorist named Joshua Goldberg (who has been arrested for plotting fake “Islamic terrorism”) and then planted on Professor Hall’s Facebook page by persons unknown. Though the planted image was credited to “Glen Davidson,” an Alberta resident, Davidson now says he was not the source of the image, and does not know how it came to be surreptitiously planted, under his name, on Professor Hall’s Facebook page. See:We now know that this image was produced by Florida-based Jewish Zionist false flag terrorist Joshua Goldberg, planted on Professor Tony Hall’s Facebook page by an unknown hacker, and then used by B’nai Brith to launch a witch hunt against Professor Anthony Hall, who was completely innocent of any connection whatsoever to the image.This is B’nai Brith’s tweet slandering Professor Hall. B’nai Brith’s own confederates appear to have manufactured and planted the image on Professor Hall’s Facebook page, then spammed Canada with press releases blaming Professor Hall, who had no idea the image was there!Why would B’nai Brith and its accomplices target Professor Hall for this kind of slander operation? Presumably they disapprove of Hall’s research and public statements on various controversial issues, especially his work on false flag terrorism. (Hall has interpreted such events as 9/11 and the Ottawa capitol shooting as apparent false flag public relations stunts designed to further the Zionist war on Islam and Muslims.)The University of Lethbridge, by implicitly endorsing B’nai Brith’s libelous big lie, has managed to tarnish Professor Hall’s reputation on campus to the point that many students and colleagues have accepted the false notion that Hall is a “genocidal anti-Semite.” Hall has suffered hostile treatment on and off campus as a result of the University’s going along with the B’nai Brith’s witch hunt.At a very minimum, the University needs to:*Fire president Mike Mahon and Board Chairman Kurt E. Schlachter;*Apologize in the strongest possible terms;*Vow to support Professor Hall’s academic freedom to study, write, and speak about any and all issues;*And make it absolutely clear that Professor Hall has done nothing wrong, but has in fact been doing exactly what all tenured professors are implicitly required to do by virtue of their tenure: Investigate the most controversial issues and pursue the truth wherever it leads, no matter how much powerful interest groups may be displeased.
That day is indeed approaching quickly…because people are waking to the fact that foriegn vermin within our own governments are directly responsible for the murders on Sept. 11, foreign vermin in our governments are directly responsible for the murders in London in the subway and the Goddamn cherry on the proverbial cake – The good ole “HOLOCAUST”, has proven to be complete and utter bullshit. Not JUST bullshit, but a manufactured lie which is only a part of a much larger murderous plan. These people are just never going to learn to behave, they must be stopped.
I’ll bet you dollars to donuts that Facebook can tell you the colour of the poster’s underwear in addition to his or her identity…
So why are you not allowed to learn the identity of the person maligning you?